Do you need dedup with dynamic block sizes? Or is fixed block size enough? Comparing data domain (or similar products) with ZFS's dedup (or most other primary storage "dedup" filesystems) is comparing apples and oranges.
What I have done for a while is have a swap partition that I disable normally, but have a wrapper script that swapon it and then hibernate. Eventually I don't care about it enough to use it.
First of all, to that security company. Good job really publicizing a vulnerability without checking with unpaid developers of a complete open source project.
Actually, they notified us about it a couple weeks ago, and gave us enough time to fix it before announcing the vulnerability.
HTTP is just one of the possible transports for SOAP, so saying SOAP reinvented HTTP would be like... I think I will spare you from a bad analogy this time.
tickets are only closed by inactivity if it's pending, which means we requested information from the ticket submitter. Which ticket is this, and did you get back to us with the information?
Also, quite a few projects have pulled the source to previous releases (a violation of the GPL that these projects were released under; gaim is one of them). Their management of projects and overall administration leaves MUCH to be desired.
We haven't pulled the source to previous releases, we just moved them to elsewhere. All previous releases are tagged in our monotone repository, you can follow the instruction here to get it:
This was how it was initially done, except it caused various problems since manually resizing a GtkPaned (if I remember correctly) causes weird behavior when you change the request size of the child (which is how automatic resize is implemented).
If someone can come up with a clean patch that can make both work at the same time, we will gladly accept it. Of course, whiners are whiners, not coders.
> And if Ubuntu was really concerned about security they would ship > it by default with a web browser already set up under a separate > username with strict selinux policies.
It is non-trivial to setup, but I use firefox under a different username today. It doesn't solve the problem of cookie stealing though.
Slashdot Mirror
This looks really impressive compare to other alternatives that I've tried.
Do you need dedup with dynamic block sizes? Or is fixed block size enough? Comparing data domain (or similar products) with ZFS's dedup (or most other primary storage "dedup" filesystems) is comparing apples and oranges.
What I have done for a while is have a swap partition that I disable normally, but have a wrapper script that swapon it and then hibernate. Eventually I don't care about it enough to use it.
I was going to comment on that, but I RTFA and it's correct there :-)
["cultural revolution" that spawned the current Chinese Communist Party government] gets rated informative?
Nah, time for everyone to just switch to IE.
That is not limited to firefox, almost every graphical browser is "vulnerable" to this
"On the netbook, Chrome was slightly ahead of IE8."
Well, consider that we have no full time developers and makes about $3000 a year from GSoC... comparing to firefox would be a bit unfair, no?
First of all, to that security company. Good job really publicizing a vulnerability without checking with unpaid developers of a complete open source project.
Actually, they notified us about it a couple weeks ago, and gave us enough time to fix it before announcing the vulnerability.
I am not sure about that, I was reading that Tencent was paying people around 1K/month
HTTP is just one of the possible transports for SOAP, so saying SOAP reinvented HTTP would be like... I think I will spare you from a bad analogy this time.
tickets are only closed by inactivity if it's pending, which means we requested information from the ticket submitter. Which ticket is this, and did you get back to us with the information?
More like due to crappy protocol.
comparing nightly to stable version?
You mean reduces usb initialization _to_ said time, right?
there's fscache which will probably be merged soon. RHEL5 already ships with it, so it's probably stable enough. It only works with NFS though.
just talked to someone in China (Xian), and he told me he couldn't get to it...
how would you request permission?
And my car's plate ends in 666. I personally don't mind it though
Also, quite a few projects have pulled the source to previous releases (a violation of the GPL that these projects were released under; gaim is one of them). Their management of projects and overall administration leaves MUCH to be desired.
We haven't pulled the source to previous releases, we just moved them to elsewhere. All previous releases are tagged in our monotone repository, you can follow the instruction here to get it:http://developer.pidgin.im/wiki/UsingPidginMonotone
This was how it was initially done, except it caused various problems since manually resizing a GtkPaned (if I remember correctly) causes weird behavior when you change the request size of the child (which is how automatic resize is implemented).
If someone can come up with a clean patch that can make both work at the same time, we will gladly accept it. Of course, whiners are whiners, not coders.
> And if Ubuntu was really concerned about security they would ship
> it by default with a web browser already set up under a separate
> username with strict selinux policies.
It is non-trivial to setup, but I use firefox under a different
username today. It doesn't solve the problem of cookie stealing
though.
Originally out of a developer's own pocket. Later some nice people offered pro-bono support.