Slashdot Mirror


Slashdot Asks: How Will You Replace Google Reader?

Despite a hue and cry from disappointed users, Google has not made any moves to reverse its decision to close down Google Reader on the first of July, just a few weeks away. Despite the name — and the functions it started out with in 2001 — Reader has become more than a simple interface to RSS feeds; Wikipedia gives a concise explanation of how it evolved from just a few features to a full-blown platform of its own, incorporating social-sharing features of the kind that have become expected in many online apps. Those features have morphed over the years along with Google's larger social strategies, along the way upsetting some readers who'd grown used to certain features. If you're a Google Reader user, will you be replacing it with another aggregator?

335 comments

  1. Sod google reader by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm going to miss igoogle :(

    --

    Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    1. Re:Sod google reader by Digicrat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm going to miss igoogle :(

      +1. iGoogle is/was a great homepage.

      I've got a list of alternatives to iGoogle somewhere (there are 3-4 that look decent), but I've yet to spend the time to actually look at any of them.

    2. Re:Sod google reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Check out http://www.ighome.com

      It doesn't look quite as nice as iGoogle, but it's close enough.

    3. Re:Sod google reader by Dishevel · · Score: 1

      iGoogle is my portal to /.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    4. Re:Sod google reader by DrXym · · Score: 5, Informative

      Exactly. iGoogle is a really useful homepage. Google have nothing to replace it (Google+ is not a replacement). So I'll just jump over to Yahoo. I'll probably do a large chunk of my searches through Yahoo too.

    5. Re:Sod google reader by godless+dave · · Score: 1

      Me, too.

      --
      "If it's real, then it gets more interesting the closer you examine it. If it's not real, just the opposite is true." -
    6. Re:Sod google reader by babblefrog · · Score: 1

      I'm using Protopage as my iGoogle replacement, and I have setup tt-rss as my Reader replacement. Neither one is an exact drop-in replacement, but they are close enough.

    7. Re:Sod google reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I went from MyYahoo to iGoogle years ago. It's sad to think I might return. Getting you to use a their web site as a home page used to be the gold mine all companies strive for. I don't understand why Google would give this up. Especially without presenting a Google alternative well before the expiration.

    8. Re:Sod google reader by RoboRay · · Score: 1

      Hmm... that's disappointing. I was going to check out www.ighome.com as an alternative to the dying iGoogle, but it seems that nobody ever told the people who run ighome that periods in email address are valid. Firstname.lastname@domain.net is not a valid address as far as they are concerned. Oh, well. Their loss.

    9. Re:Sod google reader by craigminah · · Score: 1

      I think MyYahoo is good as is PageFlakes.

    10. Re:Sod google reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been using Bing Reader (BReader) for awhile now, absolutely love it! Everything that Google Reader should have been !
      iBing isn't too shabby either!

    11. Re:Sod google reader by LordThyGod · · Score: 2

      I've been using Bing Reader (BReader) for awhile now, absolutely love it! Everything that Google Reader should have been ! iBing isn't too shabby either!

      Good to see MS is supporting RSS now.

    12. Re:Sod google reader by bdraschk · · Score: 1

      My mother will miss iGoogle much more than i will. I set it up as her home page in Firefox and now she's used to having an overview of mail and calendar entries on startup. I'm not sure how she'll like going to mail and calendar in different tabs :-(

    13. Re:Sod google reader by markzip · · Score: 1

      +A bunch I might be able to cobble together a replacement for iGoogle (thanks for the suggestions below, hivemind), but what am I going to do for my parents? Or clients? "It looks different! Why did you change it? How come it doesn't work like it did before?"

    14. Re:Sod google reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      igHome accepts firstname.lastname@domain.net as a valid email address. I know because my email address is like that, and it worked fine.

    15. Re:Sod google reader by Brucelet · · Score: 1

      Wow, I hadn't realized igoogle was still up. They announced it's closure much earlier than reader and yet it's going to live three months longer.

    16. Re:Sod google reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't load, in Opera with Javascript turned off. I'd turn it on but first the page has to load.

    17. Re: Sod google reader by Nostromo21 · · Score: 1

      gReader on droid - there is no substitute. Been using it since day 1 of owning my 1st droid. Someone pls don't tell me it's going to stop working come July....? *cringe*

    18. Re: Sod google reader by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      Someone pls don't tell me it's going to stop working come July....? *cringe*

      When the Google Reader shutdown was announced, gReader said that they'd figure out a way to make gReader continue to work without Google. I haven't read anything since then, though.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
  2. feed2imap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For now I'm using feed2imap with my GMail account, works good but it sucks for RSS channels with images (eg. Soup.io stream)

    1. Re:feed2imap by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Does it convert the images to embedded images or keep them linked externally? Theoretically wouldn't be too hard to add as a feature.

    2. Re:feed2imap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does it convert the images to embedded images or keep them linked externally? Theoretically wouldn't be too hard to add as a feature.

      I have like no idea I think it keeps them externally linked

  3. Seems legit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    www.commafeed.com

    1. Re:Seems legit by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      +1 for Commafeed. It's not Google Reader but is the least shit of all the alternatives. Simple, clean interface, moderately fast and no stupid Facebook buttons to spy on you.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:Seems legit by Brucelet · · Score: 1

      I've been looking at commafeed and old reader and liking them both. Neither has a mobile app though which is one thing I'll miss from google reader.

    3. Re:Seems legit by Sancho · · Score: 1

      Newsblur has a mobile app for Android and iPhone. I'd rather just a good mobile site, but it's better than nothing.

    4. Re:Seems legit by jamessnell · · Score: 1

      +1: Perfect!

    5. Re:Seems legit by Ocker3 · · Score: 1

      Thank you, oh so much. this is the best I've seen so far!

  4. With NSA Reader! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The NSA already reads all the feeds I subscribe to so I don't have to!

    1. Re:With NSA Reader! by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

      In all seriousness: are any of the alternatives safer than the rest? Do any offer going above and beyond the https fig leaf?

    2. Re:With NSA Reader! by SwedishCoward · · Score: 1

      Are all the Soviet Russia jokes on NSA from now on?

  5. I've been trying feedly by Chrisq · · Score: 5, Informative

    Feedly is OK, but not as good as reader. In particular I miss being able to use it to combine multiple feeds into a bundle - which then has its own RSS feed that can be displayed on web pages. Also an embeddable view for igHome would be good

    1. Re:I've been trying feedly by Anathem · · Score: 1

      Seconded. I'm probably going to use Feedly.

    2. Re:I've been trying feedly by Threni · · Score: 1

      Using Feedly as a backend to gReader (Android app). So I'm not expecting any changes - it should "Just Work(tm)"

    3. Re:I've been trying feedly by onosson · · Score: 5, Informative

      I've been using Feedly since about 1-2 days after the announcement of Reader's cancellation, and although it took a while to get used to it I've found it to be a pretty solid replacement. The iOS app works well for me, and I appreciate that there are a few alternative views available for scrolling through your feed. I hope that it continues to work well once the Reader "tap" is shut off for good - Feedly has said the transition will be "seamless", I have my fingers crossed.

      --
      ? syntax error
    4. Re:I've been trying feedly by kevinsalazar · · Score: 2

      You can already do that in Feedly, just put all the related content you want bundled together in the folder and just read the folder instead of the specific feed.

    5. Re:I've been trying feedly by Geeky · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The thing that put me off feedly was the requirement for a browser extension. Why on earth would you need a browser extension for what ought to be a simple website?

      --
      Sigs are so 1990s. No way would I be seen dead with one.
    6. Re:I've been trying feedly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I went with myyahoo early on. As the feeds seemed to be delivered in the way I wanted they also had a good selection of built in AP news. Basically 1-2 screens with everything on it and I could choose what I wanted to look at. I could not stand having it 'ping' me every time something changed it was driving me nuts. Now I look at 1-2 times a day.

      The downside is it misses sites that tend to spam a lot of items out everyday. As it only shows last X items.

    7. Re:I've been trying feedly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, Feedly is working well for me. I use it to look at feeds, and potentially mail interesting stories or share them to Facebook, etc. At one point I used some of the advanced Google features - like taking my "starred items" and exporting them as its own feed to be digested on a web site. That was really cool and let me curate content in Reader to then be re-published somewhere else. I don't know how else to accomplish this now.

    8. Re:I've been trying feedly by Taeolas · · Score: 5, Informative

      I switched to Feedly as well a few days after the announcement, and I've had no real issues with it. It works for my needs, both on the desktop and on the phone.

      I've also noticed that since I'm not using GReader any more, I've stopped using G+ as well. Feedly's G+ link sharing seems a bit buggy, so I don't share there, and I don't feel the need or desire to check in on G+ any more one way or another. (Granted I barely share on Facebook either).

      My only real beef is email sharing feels a bit cludgy compared to Reader, but even with Reader it wasn't as nice as it used to be.

    9. Re:I've been trying feedly by dc29A · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Android client on Feedly always uses their built-in shitty browser. No thanks. I need their client to allow me to pick a default browser (FF + Adblock). Until that happens, no Feedly for you!

    10. Re:I've been trying feedly by Captain+Hook · · Score: 2

      Same here, that put me right off it.

      I've gone with Netvibes, more as a replacement for iGoogle rather than Reader. It doesn't have the multiple device sync'ing that reader did but it does make a nice homepage and I've just got used to having to ignore the RSS items which I've already on PC or Mobile when viewing from the other device.

      --
      These comments are my personal opinions and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the other voices in my head.
    11. Re:I've been trying feedly by Anastomosis · · Score: 1

      Seconded for Netvibes. Been using it since I heard about the iGoogle shutdown, and haven't gone back. I really like it.

    12. Re: I've been trying feedly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a Feedly app for iOS and Android.

    13. Re:I've been trying feedly by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Why on earth would you need a website for what ought to be a simple RSS reader?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    14. Re:I've been trying feedly by slim · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why on earth would you need a website for what ought to be a simple RSS reader?

      It feels neater architecturally. If 1000 people use a desktop RSS reader set to poll every 5 minutes, the feed gets 1000 hits every 5 minutes. If they all use a service like Reader (and it's sensibly written) then the feed gets one hit every 5 minutes.

      It has the convenience of giving you all your items, with your unread flags up-to-date, wherever you're reading (home, work, mobile, ...).

      It empowers the provider to generate good "people who liked this also liked..." recommendations -- whether you find that useful, scary or both.

    15. Re:I've been trying feedly by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 1

      I agree, in particular because I recently switched back to Opera. I use feedly on my iPhone and iPad, but I don't really use those much at work. I still like browsing articles while waiting for compiles to finish, though, so it's a bit lame to not have a reader that works in my browser. :/

    16. Re:I've been trying feedly by Anubis+IV · · Score: 5, Informative

      I used Feedly for about a month after the Google Reader announcement, but the inability to export your feeds (as .opml or otherwise) was a deal-breaker for me. Their prescribed manner for exporting is to log into your Google account and grab it from there, which won't be an option for much longer, and last I had checked, they had not promised that they'd add the ability, despite increasingly vocal requests from the community.

      So, rather than getting permanently locked into using Feedly, I went searching and ended up at The Old Reader, which seems to do a decent job. It doesn't have as much attention to detail, but it's clean, responsive, works well, and most importantly allows me to export my feeds. I wish it supported the ability to set per-folder and per-feed viewing options, rather than changing those options globally, and it'd be nice if it grabbed updates a bit more frequently, since I've noticed it can lag behind Google Reader by a few hours, but overall it's a better replacement for me than Feedly.

      The runner-up for me as Comma Feed, which also seems to be decent, but it had some quirks that made it annoying to use (e.g. if you wanted to mark more than one article as unread, you had to click the keep unread buttons for them from bottom-to-top, since interacting with an article down lower on the list would mark everything higher on the list as read). It was also noticeably slower to load articles when you clicked on a folder.

    17. Re:I've been trying feedly by Mr_Silver · · Score: 0

      Why on earth would you need a website for what ought to be a simple RSS reader?

      Off the top of my head, for locked down corporate computers and the ability to read and sync (the read/unread status of posts) across lots of different desktop, laptop, tablet and mobile devices.

      --
      Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    18. Re:I've been trying feedly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Started to have a look at Netvibes, other slashdotters may like to know that you can export your feeds to xml using google takeout and then just import them

    19. Re:I've been trying feedly by Anubis+IV · · Score: 0

      Providing a uniform (i.e. works the same way) and synchronized (e.g. unread items) experience across multiple devices and platforms is a pretty compelling reason. Few RSS clients can provide those, particularly the latter. Of those that can, many try to be different (e.g. Flipboard), which may work for some people, but simply isn't useful to most of us who have been using RSS for years. As for the remaining, all of the ones I've tried feel like they were made by people who had no attention to detail or interest in making the user experience a pleasant one. If you want a solid, cross-platform, well-designed client that doesn't feel like it was designed either by geeks for geeks or by designers for people who don't know about RSS, you'll be hard-pressed to find one, or at least I was.

      If you can suggest one that meets that standard and works on both PC and mobile devices, however, I'd definitely be VERY interested.

    20. Re:I've been trying feedly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed, that's why I'm not using it. I'm using http://theoldreader.com/ instead.

    21. Re:I've been trying feedly by blahbooboo · · Score: 1

      Thanks so much. I actually like Comma Feed more than The Old Reader!

    22. Re:I've been trying feedly by St.+Arbirix · · Score: 1

      Because there is no website. See here.

      When I first started using Feedly it was just a shiny veneer over Google Reader and it kind of still is. Notice that without the extension there's no login on their site. They've assumed your feed information from Google Reader into their extension, but they haven't yet produced a version that they can host. They probably didn't have hardware that could handle their user base offline before Google announced Reader is shutting down. The way the extension currently works, you could probably host feedly.com from a laptop.

      --
      Direct away from face when opening.
    23. Re:I've been trying feedly by sub7 · · Score: 1

      i'm also enjoying ye old reader... not bad.

      --
      rm -rf /bin/laden
    24. Re:I've been trying feedly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been pondering this for a while now since I converted by Bloglines account over to Google Reader I never looked back.

      One thing that I feel Google is missing with it's push for using social media to get our news is that not everything I want could be considered social. By this I mean developer feeds or those feeds that provide discounts like Deals2Buy. I don't expect nor do I want these to show up in any social circle like G+. What if I want to casually browse a 'list' without wondering if upvoted items are going to force it off my feed.

      Another thing that I liked about Google Reader was that that website and Android app were synced. If I read up to a certain point on the web, the app would know this and only show me what I'd missed. I don't think Feedly has this type of integration... or does it? I haven't checked in a while.

      As an aside, I have wondered by Feedly required it's own separate Android authentication log in instead of re-using Android's builtin Account sync.

    25. Re:I've been trying feedly by LordThyGod · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why on earth would you need a website for what ought to be a simple RSS reader?

      Its an NSA requirement.

    26. Re:I've been trying feedly by aradiaseven · · Score: 1

      I hope that it continues to work well once the Reader "tap" is shut off for good - Feedly has said the transition will be "seamless", I have my fingers crossed.

      I'm surprised people have been giving Feedly such an easy time over that claim, which to me seems deeply suspect.

    27. Re:I've been trying feedly by onosson · · Score: 1

      I'm suspicious too, but hopeful at least. In the meantime, I've downloaded my reader subscription list ... if Feedly doesn't pan out after July 1, then I will start to look at other options. Personally, I'll be able to live without my feeds for some time, but for me they are largely in the "recreational" side of things, and I can always resort/revert to bookmarking the essentials for the time being.

      --
      ? syntax error
    28. Re:I've been trying feedly by Myopic · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Agreed. I switched to Feedly a few hours after Google told me they didn't want me to get news from them anymore. I think it's pretty good. The thing I miss from GR is using 'n' and 'p' to read the next and previous news stories. Feedly's documentation swears that it supports keyboard shortcuts, but it doesn't work for me on any of my machines. The layout is usually pretty nice. I'd like more features, but the basic implementation is a satisfactory replacement for Reader.

    29. Re:I've been trying feedly by Moofie · · Score: 1

      What are you going to do? Not pay for the free service?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    30. Re:I've been trying feedly by Omestes · · Score: 1

      I just wish I could mark articles as "unread" within a feed, without having to back out to a list and do a dodgy swipe (on Android, where I do most of my RSS browsing these days). Also there is still no way to easily subscribe to feed on Firefox, for some strange reason. Easy on Chrome, PiTA on Firefox.

      Other than that it is perfectly adequate. Nothing more, nothing less.

      Commafeed looks good, but won't play well on my phone or tablets, so... Web interfaces are great, but generally can be stupid on mobile devices. I'd rather have a dedicated app.

      iGoogle is still going to be the killer. I'm going to miss having all my feeds, my mail, my weather, and /. waiting for me when I open my browser. There really isn't a replacement for it, as far as I can see. There are pages that try to duplicate it, but generally falls short by either being too much, too slow, or two kludgy and wonky.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    31. Re: I've been trying feedly by santiago · · Score: 1

      Use j to go forward and k to go backwards. The shortcuts work on many sites, including Feedly, Google Reader, Gmail, Google+, and even Facebook.

    32. Re: I've been trying feedly by santiago · · Score: 1

      Use j to go forward and k to go backwards. The shortcuts work on many sites, including Google Reader, Feedly, Gmail, Google+, and even Facebook.

    33. Re:I've been trying feedly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for suggesting Theoldreader. It is perfect for my needs. I spent about two days searching for a reader and got so tired of the same old "It's so elegant and simple!" misrepresentations. Theoldereader really is simple, maybe not elegant, but it really works too.

    34. Re:I've been trying feedly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how do you get an atom/rss feed of that like you can in Reader?

    35. Re: I've been trying feedly by elcano · · Score: 1

      Feedly as a backend server might be as good as was the Google Reader backend. I never used Google Reader via a browser. I always use a dedicated offline reader clients in each device - with read/unread status synced via Google Reader API. Clients like NewsRob or Press sync periodically while I'm on WiFi and I can read later, saving data from my 'unlimited' plan. I tried the Feedly client just after Google announcement, but it does not meet my need. It is focused in eye-candy, does not preload, so it is pulling data as I use it...in general, it is more a competitor to Flipboard than to a hard core rss offline reader.

    36. Re:I've been trying feedly by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      Using Feedly as a backend to gReader (Android app).

      How did you set that up? I don't see an option for that.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    37. Re:I've been trying feedly by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      Why on earth would you need a website for what ought to be a simple RSS reader?

      I don't really care about the website bit, but I love having my phone synched to the desktop client. If I read an article on my phone, it no longer shows up in Reader and vice versa.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    38. Re:I've been trying feedly by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      Are there android apps for The Old Reader or Comma Feed?

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    39. Re:I've been trying feedly by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      The Old Reader does not, though I believe they're working on an iOS app and have said they'll do an Android one afterwards (I could be wrong about that). No clue about Comma Feed.

    40. Re:I've been trying feedly by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      The Old Reader does not, though I believe they're working on an iOS app and have said they'll do an Android one afterwards (I could be wrong about that).

      Ahh. One of *those*, eh. I'm going to give Tiny Tiny RSS a try.

      Thanks for the info!

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    41. Re:I've been trying feedly by wessman · · Score: 1

      "combine multiple feeds into a bundle - which then has its own RSS feed that can be displayed on web pages."

      This is the the most important feature to me. Any of these alternatives do this?

      Also important to me is the speed at which Google Reader does keyword searches across all my subscribed feeds.

    42. Re:I've been trying feedly by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      Is that the self-hosted one? If so, I gave it a shot, but it was abysmally slow on my shared webhost. If you have a dedicated box or a VPS, you may have more luck.

    43. Re:I've been trying feedly by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's the self-hosted one. I'm importing all of my feeds right now. Hoping it doesn't suck.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    44. Re:I've been trying feedly by JimFive · · Score: 1

      I actually like the integrated browser that allows me to swipe to the next feedly story after looking at the website. What I don't like is how slow/laggy the interface is trying to get into the first story.
      --
      JimFive

      --
      Please stop using the word theory when you mean hypothesis.
    45. Re:I've been trying feedly by Threni · · Score: 1

      I haven't, yet. But it's how I'm going to be replacing Reader.

      http://techcrunch.com/2013/06/03/reeder-greader-other-popular-feed-reading-apps-partner-with-feedly-ahead-of-google-reader-shutdown/

      But, like I said, it's a back-end change, so I'm not expecting to have to do anything.

    46. Re:I've been trying feedly by cout · · Score: 1

      A lot of features that should have worked in feedly didn't work for me. One I can think of off the top of my head was the configuration option for changing the font. It had no effect on my machine (running latest firefox stable under linux).

    47. Re:I've been trying feedly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The thing I miss from GR is using 'n' and 'p' to read the next and previous news stories.

      'N' and 'P' have been replaced by 'J' and 'K' respectively

    48. Re:I've been trying feedly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'j' goes to the next and 'k' goes to the previous article

    49. Re:I've been trying feedly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tried it but I couldn't find a decent Bookmark importer. Tried several and none seem to work.

  6. If Life Wasn't So Busy, My Own by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Informative

    How Will You Replace Google Reader?

    (Disclaimer: I'm going to use the term 'bandwidth' universally instead of the more correct 'latency' or 'throughput' so normal people can hopefully understand this post) The biggest problem I have with every alternative I have tried is that they are built with the most annoying design flaws. They are so painful to me that I am certain these flaws will be look back upon as the geocities of our modern day web development.

    When I fire up an alternative, the responsiveness that was in Google Reader just isn't there. And it always seems like the alternatives require you to hit "refresh" on their interface and then what happens? It apparently makes a call out to every single RSS feed to get updates. On the surface this may seem like standard HTTP way of thinking about things. But it makes for a shit user experience. I have thousands of RSS feeds. Thousands. And if I hit refresh in this paradigm, my browser makes 1,000+ HTTP GET requests. It's not a lot of data but if even one of those requests is slow, it's usually blocking on ceding control back to me.

    So let's iterate improvements on here that will get us back to Google Reader style responsiveness, shall we? Well, one of the simplest improvements I can see is to do these requests asynchronously with nonblocking web workers. You can attach each of them to the div or construct that each feed is displayed in and only have them work when that feed is visible (for instance if I am collapsing/expanding folders of feeds). You can grey out the feed until the request comes back but if another request returns first, it is parsed and inserted and activated to my vision. That way if cnn.com comes back faster than NASA's Photograph of the Day, I can read while waiting for my images.

    But the core problem is that I'm on my home computer on a residential cable modem and, let's face it, Cox sucks. So what I think Google was doing was sacrificing their bandwidth to actually "reverse" the request from client to server. And, in doing so, they could package up all your updates and ship them out in one request (probably compressed). So, this is how I would approach that. Instead of doing a heart beat HTTP GET to check for RSS updates, I'd build a WebSocket and instead of requesting information, the client (browser) would be listening for information. The event/listener paradigm here would save both the user and the RSS host a lot of bandwidth but it would cost the host of the feed reader service some of that bandwidth (although much less). So basically the client JavaScript would load the page just like normal but instead of continually sending HTTP GET requests, a WebSocket would merely inform the server which feeds are active and listen for updates coming in from the server.

    On the downside, this greatly complicates the server side. You need to have one be-all end-all "cache" or storage of all incoming feeds that any user is subscribed to. And for each of these feeds, you need to have a list of the users subscribed to it. And now your server will need to maintain the HTTP GET requests to cnn.com and NASA in order to get updates. When it gets an update, there's two ways you could handle it (user queues are complicated so I won't suggest that) but the most basic way is to send it right out to everyone on that subscription list who has an active WebSocket session established with their account. If a new WebSocket session is established, they simply get the last N stories from their subscriptions (Google included pagination backwards binned by time). To alleviate even more bandwidth from you, you could store it on the client side with HTML5 Web Storage and then the first thing the Web Socket does is find the last date on the last stored element and send that across to t

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:If Life Wasn't So Busy, My Own by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      (Disclaimer: I'm going to use the term 'fuckwit' universally instead of the more correct 'douchebag' or 'twat-waffle' so normal people can hopefully understand you're a troll).

      cm ftw

    2. Re:If Life Wasn't So Busy, My Own by Aguazul2 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, after trying some of the alternatives, I was also planning to write my own -- although it's getting a bit late now. Google should have given us maybe a year or two of notice. I was going to do the polling on my webserver, send items as E-mail and then knock something up to view them using luakit.

    3. Re:If Life Wasn't So Busy, My Own by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Webworkers means each frontend server must subscribe to feed updates relating to particular users. This means you're likely to have a bunch of bandwidth usage inside your data center. It's a lot more feasible to implement fast polling by recording for each subscription (user cross feed) the time of last content change. Then most of the time when the client polls, you look up the relevant timestamps and find that there's no new data. On occasion you find that there is new data in one or two feeds, and you send the data in those feeds that is after whatever the client submitted as the last timestamp on file.

      Using a document store like Google's Megastore (http://research.google.com/pubs/pub36971.html) or MongoDB, you can maintain a single document of per-user update timestamps, which means you make a single request to your storage engine for most polls. This should be pretty fast and quite scalable on the polling end. Updating those timestamp documents will be more resource-intensive.

    4. Re:If Life Wasn't So Busy, My Own by Hevel-Varik · · Score: 1

      This ^ is why I read Slashdot.

    5. Re:If Life Wasn't So Busy, My Own by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Entitled hand-wringing?

      "I'd write my own, but ain't nobody got time for dat. Instead, I'm just gonna write a giant-ass comment on every Slashdot story, and cap it all off by complaining about how little time I have."

      Hint: there's a reason why eldavojohn's time is limited. It probably has a lot to do with giant, whiny posts on Slashdot.

    6. Re:If Life Wasn't So Busy, My Own by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I here I thought I was the only one that noticed that.

      cm ftw

    7. Re:If Life Wasn't So Busy, My Own by Hevel-Varik · · Score: 1

      a detailed implementation approach along with design criticism and solutions linking to technologies I'd never heard of. Though, I can see there's some sort of history here...

    8. Re:If Life Wasn't So Busy, My Own by Andtalath · · Score: 1

      Google ran all feeds once and then built their own database from it.

      If one person had cached the latest XKCD, everyone had.

      Presumably, of course.

    9. Re:If Life Wasn't So Busy, My Own by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think _thousands_ of feeds is exactly a normal use case.

      How can you even care about a thousand things / people?

    10. Re:If Life Wasn't So Busy, My Own by justthinkit · · Score: 1

      I'm genuinely interested, and have 12 feeds. Not uncommonly I will subscribe to a site's feeds, get caught up, then usually unsubscribe most or all the feeds. For example, /. has a feed, I subbed for a while but there was no need -- can go to home page and click "Early" to get caught up on earlier articles. Care to list some of your top feeds?

      --
      I come here for the love
  7. Why do I need an aggregator? by MichaelJ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    An application on my desktop, or "app" on a tablet or smartphone, is all the aggregation I need in order to read the RSS feeds to which I'm subscribed. The only functionality that Google Reader ever provided that I needed was syncing unread/read information across those applications. Of course, under the covers the applications were letting Google do all the heavy lifting, even the RSS feed checking. Going forward, though, all I need is an RSS reader application that's multiplatform with read/unread syncing.

    --

    Michael J.
    Root, God, what is difference?
    1. Re:Why do I need an aggregator? by Geeky · · Score: 2

      OK. So what does that? Genuinely curious, not found an option I like yet.

      --
      Sigs are so 1990s. No way would I be seen dead with one.
    2. Re:Why do I need an aggregator? by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 2

      This, except I don't care about synching. Thunderbird does everything I need.

    3. Re:Why do I need an aggregator? by Aguazul2 · · Score: 2

      Disadvantage with a local reader (not backed by an online aggregator): If you are offline for a few days, you miss all that news. Maybe that's okay by you.

    4. Re:Why do I need an aggregator? by gl4ss · · Score: 0

      OK. So what does that? Genuinely curious, not found an option I like yet.

      well, there's another solution.

      pick 3 newssites that post the usual stuff. like, if you come to slashdot.com every so often you will come across the big tech stories, apple announcements and such.

      It's not like there's any point in having 40 blogs that post all the same shit bombing your reading inbox.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    5. Re:Why do I need an aggregator? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      You're almost there. You need one that's multiplatform with read/unread syncing...maybe web based? Like Google Reader? Which is an aggregator!

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    6. Re:Why do I need an aggregator? by hab136 · · Score: 1

      Using it with 40 different blogs that all post the same shit is silly. Don't do that. RSS is supposed to be used with irregularly and infrequently updated content.

      For example, I use RSS to keep up with web comics. Now I don't have to remember that Comic A updates on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays, and Comic B updates every 3rd Thursday, and Comic C was on hiatus for a summer but started up again. I just go to my "comics" folder on Google Reader and see what's new.

      I also use RSS to keep up with a few low-volume blogs, that update whenever the author feels like it, but general 2-3 times a month.

      There's no good replacement for RSS.

    7. Re:Why do I need an aggregator? by fearlezz · · Score: 2

      I switched to thunderbird as well. My favorite feature: no single company can cut my access to this reader.

      --
      .sig: No such file or directory
    8. Re:Why do I need an aggregator? by meiao · · Score: 1

      I used not only for syncing.
      It was my memory, which I could tag and easily search.
      Also keeping all those posts on the cloud so it won't bloat my small HD (which are not cheap in the third world).

    9. Re:Why do I need an aggregator? by JanneM · · Score: 1

      Depends on the number of entries in the feed file. For infrequently updated places the XML feed can go back months.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
  8. Replaced iGoogle with... by Kinwolf · · Score: 1

    Netvibes. It was the closest I found to iGoogle in layout and functionnalities. Been using it for a year and liking it.

  9. liferea by ssam · · Score: 1

    liferea does everything I need. prefer a local application, as it means I can read through the feeds on the train.

    1. Re:liferea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      liferea does everything I need. prefer a local application, as it means I can read through the feeds on the train.

      ditto. I usually update my feeds a couple of times per day, liferea does the job fine.

  10. rss2email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  11. Newsblur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    In the very worst case, you can stand up your own server, as we have access to the source: https://github.com/samuelclay/NewsBlur

    1. Re:newsblur by c0d3g33k · · Score: 1

      Don't forget it's fully open-source so you can run your own server if you desire (or contribute fixes if so inclined).

    2. Re:Newsblur by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Nice, been looking at services like this that are open source and give me the option to host it myself later, this is what I'd like to do for my web-based RSS reader and email.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    3. Re:Newsblur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the very worst case, you can stand up your own server, as we have access to the source: https://github.com/samuelclay/NewsBlur

      Well, I know this article is a couple years old, but it says you need two different database engines and an S3 account to make it work. If I'm standing up my own server with my own data backends, why would I want to pay for a third data backend?

  12. Yoleo Reader works for me by pls2917 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've been using http://yoleoreader.com/ for the last few days and it works well for me. It even pulled the existing feeds directly from Google since I signed on with Google Account.

    1. Re:Yoleo Reader works for me by guidryp · · Score: 2

      I lasted about 5 minutes with Yoleo and gave up. I don't like the layout and it doesn't seem to be configurable and it failed to import many of my reader feeds.

      If nothing web based turns up that is half decent I will go with "newsfox" add on for firefox which does a half decent job. But I would prefer a web based client like reader.

    2. Re:Yoleo Reader works for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Hey all, this is Jamie Gilgen, the developer of Yoleo. The importer is very busy right now because of this post, it might take a little bit to import :)

    3. Re:Yoleo Reader works for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must have been using Yoleo during a really busy time. The importer works is back up and humming and we're working on a few different layout and theming options.

    4. Re:Yoleo Reader works for me by jamiebikies · · Score: 1

      Okay, threw some more hardware at the importer, bring it on :)

    5. Re:Yoleo Reader works for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey all, this is Jamie Gilgen, the developer of Yoleo. The importer is very busy right now because of this post, it might take a little bit to import :)

      Any plans to allow layout customization? I'm used to opening feed entries inline. There's not much screen realestate left for articles on this old 4:3 monitor when there's a column swallowed up for feeds a column swallowed up for headlines.

    6. Re:Yoleo Reader works for me by Mr_Silver · · Score: 1

      The font is pretty hard to read, it would be nice if you used a different one.

      It's annoying that I cannot hide subscriptions in the left hand column. Especially when they have no new stories.

      Clicking on a thread causes an eternal spinning "Loading".

      At that point I'm afraid I gave up. It's a good start though.

      --
      Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    7. Re:Yoleo Reader works for me by jamiebikies · · Score: 1

      Absolutely, I'm working on that now. A sort of "headline mode" :)

    8. Re:Yoleo Reader works for me by jamiebikies · · Score: 2

      I have a change that's just waiting to deploy that'll make the font easier to read. This slashdot post is making my servers pretty busy, working on it as we speak :) Yoleo is in beta so these are pretty standard growing pains, I think.

  13. TheOldReader is promising by Octorian · · Score: 2

    I'm really seriously considering going with http://theoldreader.com/ as they're the only ones who are even attempting to make a mobile website. However, their mobile site's layout is quite cumbersome to use and desperately needs fixing.

    Everyone else seems overly obsessed with being "app first, screw the rest," where said apps don't run on my phone platform of choice. But if any 3rd party apps I actually can run will support other sites in time, I may give them a shot too.

    1. Re:TheOldReader is promising by wile_e8 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think The Old Reader is the best replacement for Google Reader because it seems to be the only RSS reader I've found that is actually trying to do what Google Reader did. The others I've tried (specifically Feedly and Netvibes) seem to have different goals but can be adapted to behave similarly (but not the same) to Google Reader. I actually went with Netvibes for about the first month after the GR announcement because TOR was pretty lacking in the feature department and extremely slow due to the crush of new users. However, TOR had been rapidly updating the feature set, and I switched back over after they fixed up the mobile site and expanded their keyboard shortcuts among other tinngs (they've been great at adding features requested on the user feedback site).

      When picking out a replacement to GR, I thought the most important thing was having the same goals as GR did in order provide the same functionality, and TOR has that in spades. I've never figured out why Feedly gets so much love in the GR replacement posts on tech sites. Need to install a browser extension? Yuck. The app wants to look like a magazine? Yuck. If you want to a pretty app to read articles like a magazine on your tablet, Feedly is nice, but it's not a replacement for Google Reader. The Old Reader is, especially now that the mobile site works as well as the Google Reader app ever did.

    2. Re:TheOldReader is promising by CalicoPaisley · · Score: 1

      TheOldReader has replaced GReader for me completely and seamlessly. I can't stand Feedly because I don't have a smartphone and the web interface is crap. But I'm no longer even angry about GReader going because TheOldReader has picked up the torch, and very well I might add.

    3. Re:TheOldReader is promising by ottothecow · · Score: 2
      Newsblur is similar.

      I couldn't stand what feedly and netvibes were trying to do. I imported my feeds into both The Old Reader and newsblur and newsblur is what stuck. The two things I didn't like about the old reader was that they were having trouble keeping stuff up to date and that they didn't wrap the content to a smaller, more readable width like Reader used to do. Otherwise I liked that they were even simpler than newsblur.

      --
      Bottles.
    4. Re:TheOldReader is promising by ZzzzSleep · · Score: 1

      I've also moved over to The Old Reader. It does almost everything that Google reader, and even has the sharing like reader used to have, before Google decided that everyone should use Google+ to share instead...

    5. Re:TheOldReader is promising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm going with OldReader for now, but am really not impressed by it's responsiveness. Not having used it before the influx it IS hard to tell how much is design and how much is capacity crunch, especially seeing as things are getting better over time, but the point is that ultimately there is just a lot of waiting that there wasn't in Google. Honestly I'm going to be using Google until zero hour and complaining for the foreseeable future once it does go down.

    6. Re:TheOldReader is promising by kav2k · · Score: 1

      I will also vote for The Old Reader.

      I'm also contributing to the development of its notifier extension for Chrome, shaping it to be a more useful tool, in the spirit of "I have to live with that, may as well improve it".

    7. Re:TheOldReader is promising by fuzzywig · · Score: 1

      Same here, The Old Reader (we're going to have to come up with a different acronym than TOR) is the closest to what I used to use Google reader for. I switched over last week, and apart from my muscle memory typing the wrong address, it's going fine. I do notice the formatting of posts is more basic, but at least that's always readable.

    8. Re:TheOldReader is promising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check out newsblur

  14. Self-hosted TinyTinyRSS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'll go for a self-hosted tinytinyRSS: http://tt-rss.org/

    Never cared much for all the social features, I like keeping up with websites and being absolutely sure I haven't missed anything.

    I'm not sure why I sign into google anymore. No need for reader. Youtube favs I suppose.

    1. Re:Self-hosted TinyTinyRSS by zenderbender · · Score: 2

      I also switched to Tiny Tiny RSS and purchased the app for my phone in order to support the developer. I don't miss Google Reader at all.

    2. Re:Self-hosted TinyTinyRSS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I also switched to Tiny Tiny RSS and purchased the app for my phone in order to support the developer. I don't miss Google Reader at all.

      I tried TT and it couldn't fetch half my feeds ("initialization error") and got the dates wrong by as much as 4 days on some of the feeds it managed to fetch. I started looking through the support forum to see what I needed to do to fix it and saw the abusive nature of Fox's (the main/only developer) posts and decided that I would not have any luck getting these issues fixed and gave up on it. I'm on The Old Reader for now.

    3. Re:Self-hosted TinyTinyRSS by PAPPP · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I went to tt-rss as well and am more than happy with it. The web interface is nice, it's self hosted (more important in light of recent news), it's easy to set up (even in unsupported shared-hosting configurations), and the Android app is decent. The web interfaces is also very easily customizable, even for someone who doesn't like doing web fronted work.
      Fox can be a little gruff, but considering the volume of stupid questions suddenly coming in to a one-man project with the death of google reader, I can't say I blame him.

    4. Re:Self-hosted TinyTinyRSS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    5. Re:Self-hosted TinyTinyRSS by anyGould · · Score: 1

      I also switched to Tiny Tiny RSS and purchased the app for my phone in order to support the developer. I don't miss Google Reader at all.

      I tried TT and it couldn't fetch half my feeds ("initialization error") and got the dates wrong by as much as 4 days on some of the feeds it managed to fetch. I started looking through the support forum to see what I needed to do to fix it and saw the abusive nature of Fox's (the main/only developer) posts and decided that I would not have any luck getting these issues fixed and gave up on it. I'm on The Old Reader for now.

      I get the initialization error a lot, but the feeds still show up. (Apparently they just like to be grumpy about all the mal-formed RSS feeds).

      The big selling feature for me was that it's self-hosted, so I never have to worry about migrating again.

  15. IFTTT by hawks5999 · · Score: 1

    You can set up recipes on ifttt.com to send new feed items to different platforms. I tried sending to gmail and setting up tags and filters to keep feeds organized and out of my inbox. This worked ok. Ultimately I ended up making an unpublished Facebook page and sending feed items to it as link posts. This is working out pretty well.

  16. Happy with NewsBlur by alvin67 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I have been very happy with NewsBlur as my Reader replacement. I am now 100% switched over. I use it to read nearly 1500 feeds and performance is great. They have clients for iOS and Android and FeedMe is a decent third party Windows Phone client. For the amount of time I spend each week in feeds, I am happy to pay $20 per year for a premium NewsBlur account.

    1. Re:Happy with NewsBlur by alvin67 · · Score: 2

      Forgot to mention that NewsBlur is open source, so you could host your own. Also, it has a nice API.

    2. Re:Happy with NewsBlur by ottothecow · · Score: 2
      Yup, newsblur has been working great for me (well, except for the rush of server crushing users that came to every alternative service when google first announced their plans). I don't read enough feeds to need a premium account. If I did...I would probably just host the software myself.

      I was also trying theoldreader and one other place I can't remember the name of. theoldreader was good but they were having growing pains with all the new users (feeds weren't updating well) and so newsblur was the site I kept coming back to.

      --
      Bottles.
    3. Re:Happy with NewsBlur by Lord+Satri · · Score: 2

      +1 .. NewsBlur works greatly for me too. And it's open source so at least I'm not worried about perenity.

    4. Re:Happy with NewsBlur by airlie · · Score: 2

      I really really like NewsBlur, but they only keep unread data for 2 weeks worth of articles. That ruins it for me.

    5. Re:Happy with NewsBlur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NewsBlur age out and remove unread entries after 2 weeks. I got a refund because of this.

    6. Re:Happy with NewsBlur by gullevek · · Score: 1

      I also ended up using NewsBlur and was also very happy to shell out some money for it. With the latest design it even doesn't look that horrible anymore. Plus it works almost like Google Reader and doesn't need some stupid browser plugin like Feedly.

      --
      "Freiheit ist immer auch die Freiheit des Andersdenkenden" - Rosa Luxemburg, 1871 - 1919
  17. Tried feedly, gone over to newsblur by nicolai.mollerup · · Score: 2

    Newsblur is clean, fast and easy to use.

  18. Local network Tiny Tiny RSS by intermodal · · Score: 1

    I'm not happy about having to do it, but I've been playing with my own Tiny Tiny RSS server installed on my file server. It runs well, but it's not Google Reader.

    --
    In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    1. Re:Local network Tiny Tiny RSS by steveg · · Score: 1

      Same here. I didn't install the "Official" Android app, I used an alternate one.

      It seems to be working fine, but I hope NewsRob really does switch over to a new backend so I can go back to using it.

      --
      Ignorance killed the cat. Curiosity was framed.
    2. Re:Local network Tiny Tiny RSS by intermodal · · Score: 1

      I'm using an unofficial android client as well. I had to hack the backend a little on my server to get the locally cached images to work, not sure if that's the reason my android won't properly cache the article images. Internet can be a bit flaky out where I live, so I prefer to remain able to view my feeds when it's not functioning.

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    3. Re:Local network Tiny Tiny RSS by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      Which client do you use?

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    4. Re:Local network Tiny Tiny RSS by steveg · · Score: 1

      It's the one by Nils Braden, ttrss-reader-fork.

      --
      Ignorance killed the cat. Curiosity was framed.
    5. Re:Local network Tiny Tiny RSS by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the tip. I've seen others mention it, so I'll give it a try. I already have tt-rss set up, and I like it a lot!

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
  19. inoreader.com by chargen · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've been trying inoreader and have found it to be easy to use and fairly feature-rich.

    Some highlights
    - Easy import of all your Google reader feeds
    - Lacking an android app, but one is planned and there is a mobile version of the site
    - Fast
    - Free

    1. Re:inoreader.com by arnwald · · Score: 1

      Thanks, looks really great, if I had karma, I would vote you up.

      --
      My other sig is Funny.
    2. Re:inoreader.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm also going to switch over to InoReader after Google Reader finally shuts down.

      It fits my particular use scenario which is: always on a PC+browser when there's idle time between compiles or queries.

      Transfer of all my RSS feeds from GReader to Ino was quick and painless compared to others I tried.

      Interface is pretty close to GReader (hope Ino reader doesn't jazz it up)

    3. Re:inoreader.com by ubersoldat2k7 · · Score: 1

      Yep, I've trying inoreader for a few days and it fits very well with the way I used Google Reader. Their mobile site is what I wanted, although a little slow.

      I think that after... 6 years? I'll be switching from Google Reader. No need to have my Gmail account on any more.

  20. Isn't it open source? by apcullen · · Score: 1

    Can't somebody who's interested just pick up the development?

    1. Re:Isn't it open source? by hobarrera · · Score: 2

      No, it wasn't open source, sorry!
      Someone could create a clone. I'm curious as to why that hasn't happened. Probably no interested developers.

    2. Re:Isn't it open source? by steveg · · Score: 2

      Feedly has created a clone, at least for the backend, which is all I care about. Their front end is pretty awful, but I'm hoping some good front ends come along or some of the old ones that used GR as a backend switch over.

      --
      Ignorance killed the cat. Curiosity was framed.
  21. I switched to feedly by CokeJunky · · Score: 2

    The switchover was simple - log in with my goolge account and authorize it. The layout is clean, and the app form on my phone is prompt and beautiful. Thanks google for making me switch... Feedly kicks google readers butt. Feedly may not be the beat alternative, but it was the only one I tried after reading a few reviews of the options. I didn't feel the need to look any further.

    --
    More Caffeine. NOW
  22. Switched, but not happy. by Remus+Shepherd · · Score: 2

    I've completely switched over to NetVibes, but I'm not happy about it. The Netvibes web page is slow to load and has buggy UI on every browser I've tried, especially on mobile platforms. But it does what I want it to do, which is give me my RSS feeds synched on several different devices, and it allows me to permanently save some articles.

    TheOldReader probably has better UI -- because it's simpler -- but I don't believe it has the 'save' functionality that I need. Feedly is just god awful for what I need. Bloglines is NetVibes -- literally, it's a front-end for the same service. I don't know of any others that have what I want, but if I find one I'm ready to switch again in a heartbeat.

    --
    Genocide Man -- Life is funny. Death is funnier. Mass murder can be hilarious.
    1. Re:Switched, but not happy. by Bazman · · Score: 1

      Similar experience with netvibes - it normally starts up blank on my Android phone, I just have to hit refresh. Once in a while it'll tell me I have a negative number of things unread. It has trouble keeping a consistent count of unread items between the title, the menu, and its own 'refresh' button. Oh, and the 'Load More' button appears off the end of my screen sometimes. These are mostly minor annoyances I can live with.

      Google Reader never did anything wrong, though.

  23. newsblur by AshPattern · · Score: 1

    I've been really happy with http://newsblur.com/ . It has pretty much every feature of reader I cared about, with a better interface and a very dedicated individual working hard behind the scenes.

  24. the old reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The old reader: https://theoldreader.com/ it's just like google reader

    1. Re:the old reader by blahbooboo · · Score: 1

      The old reader: https://theoldreader.com/ it's just like google reader

      Agreed! no stupid swiping back and forth or browser plugins like with Feedly...

    2. Re:the old reader by Grygus · · Score: 1

      I've been on Feedly since the announced shutdown of Google Reader, but just switched to The Old Reader because it's simple, fast, and clean. Thanks to the people who recommended it here.

  25. Opera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Opera's internal RSS reader was and still is the best reader out there.

    I just hope the new Webkit fork version of Opera doesn't kill it.

  26. Netvibes & ComicRocket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've found Netvibes worked well for my news feeds (switch from widget to reader view and its very similar to google reader layout). My webcomics moved over to ComicRocket which has a lot of features like keeping track of where in the archives you are when getting caught up on a series. Tried it with Outlook and Opera's RSS readers and just didn't care much for them.

  27. Re:A low tech solution by slim · · Score: 2

    This isn't sufficient.

    Some of my feeds update several times a day, and yes, it would be OK to just check back regularly.

    Other feeds update irregularly, sometimes with weeks or months between updates. I still want to see those updates, and I want to see them reasonably promptly. It's dumb not to automate the checking of those sites, and RSS is the rational way to achieve it.

  28. Google's loss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Really bummed that Google Reader is closing. But if Google is no longer interested in my news reading habits then it's their loss. And I'll no longer be logged-in to Google all day. So it's really their loss. But a huge gain for my privacy.

    At work using Windows RSS Owl is looking like my best choice. Akregator for Linux. Not yet sure what I'll use on Mac.

    1. Re:Google's loss by Aguazul2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And I'll no longer be logged-in to Google all day. So it's really their loss

      Mod parent up -- this is a good point. The only reason I'm logged into Google is for Reader. I only know of stuff happening on Google Plus because it pops up in the corner of the screen. Now Google Plus will also completely disappear from my life.

    2. Re:Google's loss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google is no longer interested in my news reading habits

      Yeah, this is totally baffling to me. Somewhere at Google HQ some guys sat down and said "Here we have a complete listing of every interest held by a large group of well-informed highly educated people. They check this webpage obsessively for news on specific topics. As an advertising company, how can we monetize this?" And they came up with nothing and decided to shut down the service.

  29. Reeder or Feedly by jsdcnet · · Score: 1

    I've been using Reeder on my Mac + iPad, and it's pretty good. Feedly is also pretty good. Not sure which I'll end up with long-term, guess we'll see how I feel once Reader is finally dead and buried.

    --
    no longer working for cnet
  30. The Old Reader by conejo+especial · · Score: 2

    The Old Reader. It's web-based and you can use Google or Facebook login, or a completely separate one if you like. Since the Google Reader shut-down was announced they've made a lot of changes including adding keyboard shortcuts mostly the same as Google Reader.

    YMMV of course, but I find it a suitable replacement personally.

  31. I don't need to by gweihir · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    No technology Google ever created had a realistic long-term perspective. Hence I stayed away from it in the first place. They are not after creating infrastructure, they are after profits. "Don't be evil" has long been superseded by "be profitable".

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    1. Re:I don't need to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google is profitable. The new slogan is "don't care".

    2. Re:I don't need to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are a for-profit company, not a charity. I don't think that either of those are mutually exclusive. If there official slogan was "be cool" instead of "don't be evil", you might have a point.

    3. Re:I don't need to by interkin3tic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Simply stunning.

      Google: "Here, let me do this free awesome thing for you. I'll be taking notes of course, but you know that."
      Gweihir: "How LONG are you going to do it for me?!?"
      Google: "Uh, probably a few years at least. And you can use someone else's service if you want when we stop, we'll make it really easy to do so. Like, one button push."
      Gweihir: "So, not forever?"
      Google: "Well, no, but it's not like we're charging you for..."
      Gweihir: "EVIL!!! OMG, YOU'RE JUST LOOKING FOR A PROFIT!!! FUCK YOU!!!"

      Yeah, you definitely dodged a bullet there.

    4. Re:I don't need to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      search? ;) ad words?

    5. Re:I don't need to by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Some reading comprehension would help you to be less stunned.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  32. Re:I can't replace something I never use. by camperdave · · Score: 0

    It may have some fans, but the majority of the people on the web do not even know what Google Reader is.

    Agreed. I'd never heard of it until this Slashdot article.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  33. Re:Google Reader? by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

    Ditto.

    --
    I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
  34. OwnCloud News by Trevelyan · · Score: 2

    I have an instance of OwnCloud setup at home. I use it mostly for syncing contact and calendar data. I'm even subscribed to my girlfriends calendar and vice versa. The WebDav part I only really use as a quick way to get files from one device to another, and by device I mean smartphone, tablets as well as proper computers.

    When Google announced the closure of Reader, OwnCloud started work on a news reader app too. I've been running it since the beta and I'm very happy.

    1. Re:OwnCloud News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I run OwnCloud too, I must get round to installing the News Reader

    2. Re:OwnCloud News by rewarp · · Score: 1

      Same setup here. Couldn't be easier on ownCloud on a Debian 7 server. I have been using it for about a month and am happy with it.

      --
      In adding a sig, for no other reason, than for aesthetics.
    3. Re:OwnCloud News by benob · · Score: 1

      After looking at a lot of alternatives, I settled on OwnCloud News Reader. The android app is still being polished but the browser interface is great.

  35. NewsBlur by gmuslera · · Score: 1

    Had to be something that i could access also from my N9, be native app or light enough html. tt-rss is good, easy to put almost anywhere. But had also support for newsblur, that is open source if i ever have to host it myself, and have some social feedback and discovery that has proved useful (better than whats hot in google reader). The only missing piece of the puzzle still is search, that is in the pipeline.

  36. Roll your own with Yahoo Pipes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://jonwestfall.com/2013/03/rolling-a-google-reader-replacement-with-yahoo-pipes-readability-ifttt/

  37. rss2email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Set up a separate email account, read your RSS feeds with the mail reader of your choice: http://www.allthingsrss.com/rss2email/

  38. rsslounge^Wselfoss by gwolf · · Score: 2

    Several months before Google's announcement, I was fed up with some details regarding Google Reader (namely, going always through *their* servers according to *their* conditions). Given I am a systems adminstrator and have the ability (and little extra bandwidth) to self-host that service for myself, I installed a rssLounge instance.

    I now learn rssLounge has been renamed to selfoss. I have yet to check this new version — but leaving minor glitches aside, rssLounge has me quite happy.

    1. Re:rsslounge^Wselfoss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      selfoss works quite nicely, it's my replacement for google reader. too bad the development of gregarius (http://sourceforge.net/projects/gregarius/ ) has been stopped in 2008 - it was a great piece of software.

    2. Re:rsslounge^Wselfoss by zequav · · Score: 1

      Same here. In fact I prefer selfoss to Google Reader, so I must thank google for removing it. The transition was so nice that I plan to do the same as soon as there are self hosted alternatives to contacts and calendar that sync with android (which will be as soon as the OwnCloud android app supports caldav and carddav; right now it's quite useless for me with file syncing support only).

  39. TinytinyRSS! by Twiggeh · · Score: 5, Informative

    I switched to TinytinyRSS, and since its hosted on my friends server (will probably set up my own once my ESXi host gets more RAM) i dont have to worry about it suddenly dying on my. Migration was easy too since i could just export my list and import it in TTRSS.

    1. Re:TinytinyRSS! by 3.1415926535 · · Score: 2

      I second this. I set it up on my home cable modem connection and it works great. It would be even more responsive if I put it on my dirt-cheap VPS account server, I just haven't bothered since the cable modem works fine. They keep changing the Android app and adding annoying animations, but it still works *much* better than Feedly and doesn't require giving some third-party access to all of my browsing history.

    2. Re:TinytinyRSS! by Arashi256 · · Score: 1

      Yup, I'm running tt-rss off my own home server now with the Android app. It's obviously a little slower than Reader as I don't have a data centre in my loft, but it works well enough. I just imported my Reader subscriptions and job done. Plus the NSA can't read it! :D

    3. Re:TinytinyRSS! by Linnerd · · Score: 1

      I decided that I was not going to be burned by another provider turning sour on me so all the solutions that permanently required some third party support were out to start with.

      Switched to TinyTiny RSS, hosting it myself, imported all the feeds i had, reading on any machine I please, at work, on my N900 phone (you just can't get "Apps" for that - and what a goodness, too ;-), with all the stuff kept in sync, works perfectly.

      Can only recommend it.

    4. Re:TinytinyRSS! by american_coot · · Score: 1

      Another tt-rss evangelist here. It works remarkably well and was relatively easy to set up. I think they'll soon have ready-made VMs available for even easier setup/deployment to EC3. By the way, feedly fans or those considering using it should beware that there is no search capability within subscribed feeds, meaning you can't just search for a post you read a while back. The only search ability is to search for new feeds to subscribe to. With tt-rss you have search, and it also does a good job of handling tags, providing a tag cloud etc.

    5. Re:TinytinyRSS! by babblefrog · · Score: 1

      There are multiple android apps for tt-rss, if you don't like one, you might try another one. I'm using the one by Nils Braden.

    6. Re:TinytinyRSS! by m_vand · · Score: 1

      Try this alternative mobile interface:

      https://github.com/mboinet/ttrss-mobile

    7. Re:TinytinyRSS! by Goldenhawk · · Score: 1

      I tried TinyTinyRSS, honestly tried hard. But since my websites all run on shared hosting, I couldn't get it to run, despite the various sites that post hacks for making it work. It's just seriously designed for dedicated hosting. Shame, because it would otherwise do exactly what I wanted.

      --
      --Brandon / Split Infinity Music

    8. Re:TinytinyRSS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm another happy TT-RSS user. In fact I wish I'd known about it years ago as I'm now freed from having to shackle my web browser to a google login at all times.

      Be prepared for whithering scorn and insults from the lead dev if you ask stupid questions on the tt-rss forums though.

    9. Re:TinytinyRSS! by steveg · · Score: 1

      That's the one I'm using as well. It supports offline use and seems like it has a fairly clean interface. The "official" client does support offline use, but one of the few messages I've read in the TT-RSS feed is that the author doesn't much care if it works since he thinks you're an idiot for wanting to use it while offline. Or words to that effect. Certainly left *me* with a good impression.

      This one seems quite usable, but I'm still hoping NewsRob migrates to a new backend, since I still like it a lot better. But this will get me through.

      --
      Ignorance killed the cat. Curiosity was framed.
    10. Re:TinytinyRSS! by JanneM · · Score: 1

      Third this. Pushed me to finally set up my own small server at home. Set up was easy and it works quite well.

      I use the official android client so far, and it's not bad. Still, I keep hoping NewsRob will come to support tt-rss as a backend at some point. That's the one thing I miss most from Google Reader.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    11. Re:TinytinyRSS! by JanneM · · Score: 1

      I like it so far, but tags and filters are mystifying.There's no documentation about them that I can find, so I really have no idea how they're supposed to be used, and I don't really have time for experimentation. I think they could potentially be very useful for marking important-seeming items in the UI or things like that?

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
  40. Netvibes and here's why by stevegee58 · · Score: 4, Informative

    When I received the first warning about Reader going away I started looking for alternatives. For me, having it be web-based was most important since I wanted to used it at home and work. The "at work" thing is a problem since I can't just install anything I want on my work PC.
    It seems like the RSS reader market is flooded with apps so it was difficult to find web-based services. I had grown used to the Reader look and feel so I settled on NetVibes as being the closest fit.
    My main criticism is NetVibes is not as fast as Reader but otherwise the format and whatnot is perfectly usable.

    1. Re:Netvibes and here's why by RyoShin · · Score: 1

      I switched to NetVibes, too, and so far I like it. What I especially like is having distinct "pages" that can have distinct feed categories, making it easy for me to set up a "work" page (/., Ars, Hack a Day, etc.), a "home" page, and an, uh, "other" page. At work I just keep the work page open, and if that runs out and I'm bored I can switch to "home" to read some webcomics or gaming feeds.

      I have a few complaints, the primary one being that you can't sort ASC which I liked to do so I can easily read the oldest news first, but nothing that would turn me away from it. (I also really like their grid layout, useful for things like checking deals on NewEgg and just seeing a quick thumbnail to know if the product may interest me or not.)

      To other readers, if you visit their site, you'll see a lot about "company" this and "metrics" that. Don't be fooled--while they have a subscription model for data analysis or something, the free version is perfectly fine for just RSS feeds. (They have a few extra widgets outside of feeds, but nothing I find useful.)

      I had heard a lot about Feedly, but having to install an extension for an online RSS reader rubs me the wrong way.

  41. Netvibes by breid7718 · · Score: 1

    When they made the announcement, I tried Netvibes again and really got into it. It's got the option of reading the feeds in a Google Reader-esque interface or in more of a widget format. Moreover, you can customize whether to see it as images or listing by the feed category. That's really nice for sticking news headlines in a long list and putting image based feeds in a widget look to see what you actually want to consume. The mobile site is nice enough to eliminate the need for something app-specific and offers offline syncing options as well. It also let me import everything over while maintaining my categories.

  42. Got this via Netvibes... by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

    Which works quite well. I also tried Feedly, but that comes with a weird Firefox add-on that causes high power consumption on battery...

  43. Hive by hraefn · · Score: 1

    I have been trying http://hivereader.com/ part time, while I use Feedly full-time. Hive shows a lot of promise.

  44. I replaced it ages ago by hobarrera · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I replaced it ages ago, with a simple python script croned every 15 minutes. It picks up new entries to my feeds, and emails them to me. Sieve filters those emails into a different mailbox, so I've a special mailbox which is basically entries for my rss feeds.

    I don't know why I've never made a web interface for that, it might become pretty popular. :P

    1. Re:I replaced it ages ago by hobarrera · · Score: 3, Informative

      After getting some feedback on this usage of mine, and algo after seeing some other comments here, here are some hightlights:
        + IMAP takes care of the sincronization across devices.
        + There's a client for every device out there: the email client.
        + Achieving, deleting, marking as read/unread, flagging, all supported through IMAP as well.

      Maybe rather than a web-based interface, this needs an email based interface (sort of like mailing lists).

    2. Re:I replaced it ages ago by Bazman · · Score: 1

      Any chance you can bung said script on github?

    3. Re:I replaced it ages ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you share your script ?

    4. Re:I replaced it ages ago by hobarrera · · Score: 1

      Oh, btw, I'm not the author of it either!
      It's a modified version of and old release of this one: http://www.allthingsrss.com/rss2email/

      I think the modifications I did were encoding related and to fix wrapping of very long lines. (I sent some of those changes back to the author at the time).
      If I ever get around to double checking those changes are decently implemented, I'll share those as well.

    5. Re:I replaced it ages ago by akorvemaker · · Score: 1

      There are a few hosted solutions like that as well. I'm using Blogtrottr now. Seems good and reliable. Feed My Inbox ran well for a few years, but shut down at the beginning of the year.

      Email works great. We already have mature clients for reading them. And it doesn't become a separate inbox/site/client I need to check.

  45. I replace it how I replace everything... by ducomputergeek · · Score: 1

    with a small perl script.

    --
    "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
  46. Re:Google Reader? by Aguazul2 · · Score: 2

    You must have a lot of spare time. I just want to zip through the news looking for anything that interests me. That is when an RSS reader really helps. I don't have time to load up 10 websites 5 times a day, re-reading the same headlines many times over. Going back to that would be like going back to writing with quill and parchment instead of using a keyboard and screen.

  47. Mighty difficult by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's rather difficult to replace something I never used.

  48. Re:Google Reader? by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

    Clicking on 4 bookmarks in the morning is not a great hardship. I might click on them again at lunch. I'm certain that it doesn't materially impact my spare time.

    --
    I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
  49. tt-rss by a9db0 · · Score: 1, Informative

    I use tt-rss. It runs on my web server so i't always on, has mobile interfaces, runs in any browser. Try it.

    http://tt-rss.org/

    --
    -- "Never underestimate the power of human stupidity." - R.A.H.
    1. Re:tt-rss by syntap · · Score: 1

      +1, I installed tt-rss on my Web server too shortly after the announcement. I didn't care out the Google Reader interface itself, just the aggregation so all my Android devices are synchronized.

      Still isn't perfect yet, but usable.

    2. Re:tt-rss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Same here. It would be the "slashdotter solution", since it has a lot of strength in its plugin capabilities, is GPL v2, fully stylable, has an API, etc. If you have your own server available (or a shell account somewhere), I can't see any reason to not use this solution. I left Google Reader after several years upon the close-down decision earlier this year, and I have not missed it a bit.

      For those that have previously tried TT-RSS and didn't like it, it can be said that it has evolved significantly in my eyes during this year. Development is very much alive.

      Source is managed through Github.

      It does run under Windows according to reports, but not without a fight, and it is not supported.

  50. Best Windows RSS Reader by taxman_10m · · Score: 1

    Sharpreader
    sharpreader.net

    It's old and hasn't been updated in forever, but it's clean, simple, and fast. Faster than any other reader I've tried (such as RSS Owl or Liferea).

  51. Newsbeuter by mutende · · Score: 1

    On the desktop I've switched to Newsbeuter, and I'll probably skip reading feeds on my phone.

    --
    Unselfish actions pay back better
  52. not really Googlereader like, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right now I'm using a small program I wrote [1], which is more than enough for my personal use.

    Launch it and it will output a list of new articles (title+link) sorted by source. Pipe the output to sendmail and you get some kind of rss2email digest mode.

    [1] https://github.com/tgirod/feedme

  53. Repeat question, already asked 3 months ago by Walking+The+Walk · · Score: 0
    This question was already on slashdot, back in March. It was titled "What's the Best RSS Reader Not Named Google Reader?" I mean really, does Slashdot's search suck so bad that the editor's couldn't find that previous question? If so, then Let Me Google That For You. First three results:
    1. This page
    2. Google Reader Being Retired
    3. What's the Best RSS Reader Not Named Google Reader?
    --
    A recursive sig
    Can impart wisdom and truth
    Call proc signature()
    1. Re:Repeat question, already asked 3 months ago by steveg · · Score: 1

      And it's been three months, so people have had time to investigate and figure out wht they're going to do.

      So it's probably *more* pertinent now than it was then.

      --
      Ignorance killed the cat. Curiosity was framed.
  54. For a fairly drop-in relacement, tt-rss by ckthorp · · Score: 1

    I switched to tt-rss and couldn't be happier. It works almost exactly like Google Reader and even includes plugins to allow you to use the same navigation keys. It can import OPML for your feeds list and has a plugin to import your starred posts. The only downside is not being able to play flash video (youtube, et al) in the reader pane.

    1. Re:For a fairly drop-in relacement, tt-rss by ckthorp · · Score: 1

      Nevermind on the downside... Just found that there is a plugin to fix that.

  55. Don't care.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Never used it.

  56. Wrote my own by uberjack · · Score: 2

    I used Google Reader more than any other Google service. Which is why when they announced discontinuation, I decided to roll my own replica.

    1. Re:Wrote my own by javabsp · · Score: 1

      This looks really impressive compare to other alternatives that I've tried.

    2. Re:Wrote my own by uberjack · · Score: 1

      Thanks! I'm trying to replicate as much as I can by July. I also have an Android client for it semi-working: angrroid

  57. Feedly by Mistah+Blue · · Score: 1

    I've moved to feedly.

  58. Re:A low tech solution by slim · · Score: 2

    I follow over 60 sites. If I could manually check each one in 5 seconds, it would take me 5 minutes - not counting the actual reading. With a "freaking 24/7/365 watchbot", that's down to, essentially, zero.

    Now, of course, it would be even quicker to go cold turkey and drop all those blogs. I don't want to do that; why should I?

  59. Tiny Tiny RSS (tt-rss) and the Android app. by Domini · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I tried both Feedly and NewsBlur, and both did a lot of things I did not want or need. They were pretty, but when it came down it it I was losing control of my important feeds.

    I had to upgrade my ancient Linux server (it was overdue) before I could install it (although I think they might have relaxed some of the requirements now)

    I am very happy with it now. It is lean and light, clean and works flawlessly for me.
    The android app is written by the developer and rivals that of Google Reader. (clean and simple) Although it is paid... but I don't mind paying for it for all I got.

    I can recommend it to everyone who feels a bit of reticence and want and alternative.

    1. Re:Tiny Tiny RSS (tt-rss) and the Android app. by Col.+Klink+(retired) · · Score: 2

      I'm actually happier now with Tiny Tiny RSS than I was with Google Reader. I have a lot more control and how often feeds are read, there are more options to customize the interface, and I can add feeds from my local network as well.

      https://code.google.com/p/ttrss-reader-fork/ is a free (and improved) fork of the Tiny Tiny RSS Reader Android app.

      --

      -- Don't Tase me, bro!

    2. Re:Tiny Tiny RSS (tt-rss) and the Android app. by Domini · · Score: 1

      Yup, I am as well. But even if the user is not technical, I think they will prefer some of the better sharing features it has.

      I've tinkered with it a little... mostly with plug-ins and re-sharing options. And it amazed me every time the amount of useful options/controls/features/plugins it has (which all work pretty flawlessly)

      Yup, color me impressed.

      Also, thanks for the android app link... although I do not use iOS, it would be nice to know I can get a nice dedicated app for it as well... last I checked I could not find one... which is the only fault I can find.

  60. Re:Google Reader? by slim · · Score: 1

    That's great if you're only interested in 4 sites. What if you're interested in 60?

  61. Re:I can't replace something I never use. by mrclisdue · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yes, I agree wholeheartedly. Why should we be subjected to articles about stuff you know nothing about?

    Indeed, the articles should only relate to areas of your expertise, like realtime midget scat porn, and arithmetic for 'tards.

    Looking forward to your daily updates.

    cheers,

  62. Thank you! by sirwired · · Score: 1

    This is what I've been looking for! I was trying Feedly, but their interface isn't nearly as responsive or well-organized.

  63. GR shuts down when? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Switched over to feedly now but thought I'd go back to GR to save a list of feeds. I get a dialog reminding me that GR will close in July, but I can't close the dialog. Whatever I try, that dialog stays there. So, for me, GR is pretty much closed already.

    1. Re: GR shuts down when? by garryknight · · Score: 1

      Apologies for multiple posts. Phone + Starbucks WiFi = grief.

      --
      Garry Knight
  64. Feedly FTW by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

    Already have replaced Google Reader with Feedly... MUCH better than Reader ever was..

    --
    THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
    1. Re:Feedly FTW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, +1 for Feedly.

      Way better than any Yet_Another_Reader started last week.

      Now I just need to find a replacement for gmail to be Google-free!

  65. GR shuts down when? by garryknight · · Score: 1

    Switched over to feedly now but thought I'd go back to GR to save a list of feeds. I get a dialog reminding me that GR will close in July, but I can't close the dialog. Whatever I try, that dialog stays there. So, for me, GR is pretty much closed already.

    --
    Garry Knight
  66. TTRSS and Raspberry Pi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am self hosting using Tiny Tiny RSS and a rasberry pi. I have found it to work quite well as a news aggregation appliance.
    The performance is a little sluggist compared from google reader, but I figure in a year or two, something with more cpu horsepower will come along and I can upgrade.

    Another option to consider to hosting TTRSS on something like heroku.

  67. With Twitter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find it more efficient than having 200 feeds downloading from separate sources.

  68. in a terminal by flok · · Score: 1

    I just run a couple of rsstail-instances in a couple of multitail windows. Works for me.

    --

    www.vanheusden.com - home of Multitail, HTTPing, CoffeeSaint, EntropyBroker, rsstail, bsod, listener, nagcon, nagi
  69. The Old Reader by blahbooboo · · Score: 2

    The Old Reader is almost as good as Google Reader for my use. I just want a simple web browser based list of my article subscriptions.

    I tried Feedly, and other "replacements" but they were just too annoying with their stupid swiping and web browser plugins.

  70. RSS to Email application by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://blogtrottr.com/

    This has been working very well for me since Google first announced the upcoming demise of Google Reader. RSS -> GMail, then GMail via phone, desktop, IMAP, etc. Plus now I can leave an entry marked unread for as long as I want, easily archive the contents offline, delete entries, and forward them as emails without having to fill in a CAPTCHA.

  71. Wrote My Own by billstclair · · Score: 2

    In a few days of spare time, I added an RSS Aggregator to my blogging engine. Only tracks a single list of feeds per blog, and only works in Lisplog, which is currently not easy for non-wizards to get bootstrapped, but it serves my purposes.

      https://billstclair.com/blog/aggregator/
      https://lisplog.org/aggregator/

  72. Why not Email? by devent · · Score: 2

    I never understood this desire to put everything as a web service.
    Why is RSS not just an Email mailer that can send news to my Email address?
    IMAP is perfect for it, and POP3 is also capable. Plus you have encryption (IMAPS), user management, and you don't need Yet Another App.

    There is for example rss2email that can receive RSS feeds and send them as Email. Here is come better documentation: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Rss2email

    --
    http://www.mueller-public.de - My site http://www.anr-institute.com/ - Advanced Natural Research Institute
    1. Re:Why not Email? by devent · · Score: 1

      As a followup here is a short tutorial how to setup rss2email on your computer:
      as root: yum install rss2email
      as user: r2e new devent@localhost
      Edit the file /home/devent/.rss2email/config.py

      # The email address messages are from by default:
      # change to the user
      DEFAULT_FROM = "devent@localhost"
      # ...
      # 1: Use SMTP_SERVER to send mail.
      # 0: Call /usr/sbin/sendmail to send mail.
      # change to 0
      SMTP_SEND = 0

      After it's setup you can add new RSS feeds (it's a good idea to quote the URL):
      as user: r2e add "https://www.archlinux.org/feeds/packages/"

      First run will get the feeds and send them to your local account:
      as user: r2e run
      To periodically get the feeds and send them add a cronjob:
      as user: crontab -e
      enter: "*/30 * * * * /usr/bin/r2e run" without quotes

      And you are good to go. Add new feeds as desired.

      --
      http://www.mueller-public.de - My site http://www.anr-institute.com/ - Advanced Natural Research Institute
    2. Re:Why not Email? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't understand why a service that gives notification of items appearing on web sites is a web service and not e-mail?

    3. Re:Why not Email? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tiny Tiny RSS (http://www.tt-rss.org) makes it possible to send an email digest of news headline by email. The plugin architecture of ttrss should make it relatively easy to extend this to include the whole article...

    4. Re:Why not Email? by exceptionaldriver · · Score: 1

      Brilliant, thanks for this post. will add new feeds to my site. Dan. http://www.exceptionaldriver.co.uk/

  73. I won't replace it... by sconeu · · Score: 1

    Since I never used it (or even heard about it until it was cancelled).

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  74. tint tiny rss by gmiller123456 · · Score: 1

    I went with Tiny Tiny RSS. despite its name, the native interface is actually quite bloated. But fortunatley someone has written a fairly minimalist plugin UI which performs quite well on mobile devices.

    I'm not sure if it's just me, or if all of the "social" features of many of the other RSS are actually useful to others. But all I really wanted is a simple thing that tracks which articles are new vs. what I've read. Pretty much every reader I came across was bloated with a lot of features and decorations that slowed it down. I belive I've got a good enough solution with Tiny Tiny RSS. It requires you to host the app on your own website, so it's not going to work for everyone, nor be exactly easy to set up.

  75. Re:i never used it, much like the rest of google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but if i had, id replace it with an open source alternative. the problem would then be, without google, id have the crushing burden of choosing any of 23 well developed multiplatform alternatives that respect my privacy and freedom... http://alternativeto.net/software/google-reader/?license=opensource&tag=rss-aggregator

    23 you say? I get "No Results" when clicking on that link. I've looked for open source alternatives, and the only ones I found were TT-RSS and Newblur. TT-RSS doesn't fetch half my feeds and it gets the dates wrong, sometimes by as much as 4 days, on the ones it does. The sole developer is a dick swearing at his users telling them there's nothing wrong with his software, it's the feed or the user. Newsblur, according to the only online article about installing it, requires two different database engines and an S3 account to install.

  76. Re:A low tech solution by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 2

    unless you like to read a wide variety of things i have in my desktop email/rss reader over 70 feed many of those are from aggregators/webspiders that scower the web looking for more content on a specific subject giving me a feed, rss for people who enjoy reading or need to stay up to date on things is great.

    oh and its pretty good for torrents too.

    --
    ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
  77. I use NSA Reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    Booz employee here. I use NSA reader to read your emails. Of course, most of your emails are boring so I have to run a filter to only include the good stuff -- drugs, gay sex, nude pics of your girlfriend (and/or mother in one case), etc. Our image analysis algorithms are pretty good, so I can exclude goatses and fat chicks.

  78. Re:i never used it, much like the rest of google by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 1

    I never used it either. I don't say that to brag about ignorance (?!) but just to put this into context:

    Every single description of Google Reader that I've read (keeping in mind that I've never tried it ; I realize this is a recipe for talking out of one's ass) make it sound utterly trivial, a product that any programmer could clone in an hour. It merges RSS feeds? Seriously? People are bent out of shape by that?!

    Of course not. I know it can't merely be an RSS merger/splitter/etc which also happens to have a web page view of the resulting feed(s), but that's how everyone describes it. And when you read that it's hard to get motivated and curious to go see what it really is. ;-)

    Hey wait, maybe I am bragging about ignorance. Nooo!! I'm bitching about the fact that no person has ever explained why anyone would give a damn about Google Reader and ever mentioned a single interesting or nontrivial aspect of it. Ever. Even here on Slashdot, nobody really says anything substantial about it. Google Marketing Fail. No wonder they're turning it off; they never turned it on, in the business sense.

    --
    "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
  79. Feedly... So far. by Narot23 · · Score: 1

    Feedly has been good for my uses thus far. Multi-platform, web support, and it can be "toned down" enough for lightweight / rapid reading. Google Currents offers some cool layout options (for Android), but really lacks in terms of feed support and managing subscriptions. I'm by no means a power user with RSS, but find my bare requirements (self-managed lists/groups, mark read after viewing, iOS/Android/Browser support, images disabled in headline view) best served by Feedly.

  80. Re:Google Reader? by kbg · · Score: 1

    If your websites are in the hundreds, then yes I am incapable of loading hundreds of websites manually by hand every single day.

  81. I've been using The Old Reader by boldsoon · · Score: 1

    I've been using The Old Reader. It's not that bad, it's way better than when I tried it a few months ago. Good at home, good at work and hope it will improve at mobile. I will probably stop using google chat because of this change, and will only receive my e-mails via mobile client/Outlook. Just hope Google don't delete all my feeds for Google Alerts.

  82. Emacs + Gnus + Gwene by yosephi · · Score: 2

    There is a steep learning curve, but having mail and news in one place is nice. This video gives a preview of how it works.

    1. Re:Emacs + Gnus + Gwene by Sq · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'll second http://gwene.org/

      It will turn any RSS to newsgroup, and you can read those with any NNTP newsreader (for which I already have setup .newsrc syncing between accounts).

  83. ownCloud News by Phil+Urich · · Score: 2

    Still rough in some respects, but entirely usable right now, and there's even an Android app. Hell, the dev behind the current quasi-official Android app (there's also a more-official one planned, and of course there's an open---albeit not yet stable---API) has even made it work on Android 2.1 devices, so my rooted Nook Touch works. Reading RSS on an e-ink screen? As the kids wouldn't say anymore, hells to the yes.

    Okay, so I'm using EC2 for the server at the moment, thus relying on a third party again. But since it's ownCloud, I can back up and reimport my entire setup on any webserver I control anywhere, so if Amazon self-destructs or such I'm not left searching for another full solution stack. Never again. Plus, well, I'm a KDE user, and integration in Akregator is coming down the line in theory. So I'll be able to have discrete desktop and mobile apps for a web service that I can put up wherever I have hosting. That's not a solution for everyone per se (although if any of my friends want to use it I'll obviously give them accounts) but it's a pretty perfect replacement for my own needs.

    --
    I remember sigs. Oh, a simpler time!
  84. NewsBlur by Zamphatta · · Score: 1

    I've been using NewsBlur for the past 2-3 weeks. I like it, & I totally recommend it to my fellow Google Reader exiles. It's not perfect, but it's close enough for me.... 'til something better shows up. I'm still surprised Google shut down Reader. They really didn't "get it" did they? They could've used that to make a tidy profit on the side, if not a big profit right down the pipe. They could've used it to combine with their social stuff, and made a sort of twitter/news hybrid. I really think that could've been huge, so I think they missed the boat on this. Good news tho... now the feed reader "market" can get competitive & inventive again.

  85. Re:Google Reader? by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

    I'm not, but if I was I wouldn't expect Google to bail me out.

    --
    I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
  86. I'm using Feedly by urbster1 · · Score: 0

    Feedly has been amazing to those of us migrating from Google Reader: http://feedly.com/

  87. Re:I can't replace something I never use. by Gonoff · · Score: 1

    It may have some fans, but the majority of the people on the web do not even know what Google Reader is.

    Agreed. I'd never heard of it until this Slashdot article.

    Please list everything you do not know about. If you cannot list that, how the **** do you expect anyone else to know the extent of your uninformedness?

    --
    I'll see your Constitution and raise you a Queen.
  88. Feedly by brisk0 · · Score: 1

    I've been using Feedly increasingly since a few days after the announcement. At first it was a simply awful replacement, but the devs seem eager to implement the full gambit of Reader's abilities, and since then all of the features I used from Reader have been implemented (although some perhaps sub-optimally). My only real complaint is how ridiculously long it takes to load compared to Reader. I also haven't given the add-on a serious try (I've mostly browsed from Android phone).

  89. With An RSS Reader by reallocate · · Score: 1

    I don't need to read feeds from multiple devices. That means I don't need to synchronize. And, that mean I don't need Google Reader, or Feedly, or the hassle of Tiny Tiny RSS, or whatever.

    What I need is a local RSS reader, a client. I already have that, and I had it before Google invented Reader.

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    1. Re:With An RSS Reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then I guess the question wasn't for you, was it?

  90. Taptu is quite good...but not perfect by CCarrot · · Score: 1

    Taptu is cross platform, and it seems to work quite well, at least for my needs.

    You can roll multiple feeds into streams (e.g., combine local news channel and newspaper feeds into one called 'Local news', or take multiple tech forum feeds and roll them into one 'Tech News' stream). Read/unread syncing is pretty reliable, and you can log in using your current Google Reader account to load your feeds directly. Once they're in Taptu, it doesn't matter if they disappear from Google Reader...I think. Guess we'll see in a couple of weeks!

    Whoops...one thing I just discovered: there doesn't seem to be any way to directly add an RSS feed that's not curated by their 'Stream Store', at least from the browser interface. That's a bit maddening...oh well, it'll work, for now.

    --
    "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
  91. you idiots, aggregators just lets big brother in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    install sage and be a man and pull down your own fucking rss feeds

  92. I've switched to RSSOwl by BrunBoot13 · · Score: 0

    ... and so far it's working great for me (RSSOwl). I also tried The Old Reader, and quite liked it except for its inability to mix all feeds into one continuous timeline.

    --
    I understand that English is a living language, but I object to changes arising merely from repeated errors.
  93. Feedly is my choice by ZDroid · · Score: 0

    Oh, that Google. I didn't use Reader too much, but it was great service. I switched to Feedly, because of UI/UX, and it also has Android app, so...

  94. I went on my own. by motang · · Score: 1

    I have my own now. I got myself a domain, and I am running Tiny Tiny RSS (tt-rss).

  95. One thing I won't be doing. by Seumas · · Score: 1

    I'll tell you what I won't be doing.

    I won't be replacing my RSS feed with full article content and images and videos that are static -- staying until I read them -- with high signal to noise ratio . . . with fucking twitter and facebook, which is what every fucking idiotic dumbshit pundit I have seen commenting about RSS the last few months has said everyone is doing, while RSS "is dying".

  96. I already replaced it months ago by neminem · · Score: 1

    With theoldreader, it does everything greader does (by design: that was its goal, hence the name.) I'm perfectly happy with it as a replacement.

  97. Digg Reader by Mr_Silver · · Score: 2

    I've tried most of them and, to be honest, they are all pretty rubbish. I don't want any fancy new bells and whistles - but what Google Reader had today (minus the sharing bit) would be just fine.

    Unfortunately none of the alternatives I looked at could manage that. From non-working sites, to ghastly user interface design, to one which requires a browser plug-in just to work (seriously wtf?).

    On that basis, I'm really hoping that Digg Reader (whenever it arrives) doesn't suck. If it does, then I don't think there are any viable alternatives.

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
  98. Wrote My Own by echusarcana · · Score: 1

    Really wasn't that hard to replace iGoogle + GReader.

  99. Re:A low tech solution by omnichad · · Score: 1

    This puts more of the burden on yourself - the reason we have computers is to automate the mundane and tedious.

  100. go-read by srussell · · Score: 1
  101. Enmingle.com by neillm78 · · Score: 1

    I use enmingle.com, a social site for file sharing and news aggregation (among other things).

  102. Live Bookmarks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I prefer them to any rss reader. No idea why anybody wouldn't either. If I want google news I can get it in my firefox favorites tool bar.

  103. Re:Google Reader? by Grygus · · Score: 1

    Neither did anyone else; Google had a technical solution to a problem that some people had, people liked it, now it is going away. There are other people with similar solutions, and we're each trying to figure out which one fits our needs best.

    My use of a reader solves a slightly different problem; I personally do not follow all that many sites but many of the ones I do follow update irregularly, so it is easier for me to simply be notified when they do update than to uselessly visit a page that has nothing new. Even the ones that update regularly but not daily lend themselves to a feed reader for me; I don't need a scheduled stop on M-W-F for Site A and M-F for Site B, and just Mondays for Site C; they all just pop into the reader whenever they update, and I don't particularly care when that is. A reader also makes sure I don't miss anything, because it keeps track of what I've already read.

    Meanwhile, bookmarks work just fine and none of this impacts you at all; what's the problem?

  104. Re:Google Reader? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not incapable, but why should I? I could also walk everyplace, but I drive a car. Similarly, visiting a page to see whether it is updated is highly inefficient. Much better to have the site let me know when there is new content. If you track a lot of content, maintaining that many bookmarks becomes unwieldy. There are a few reasons to use subscription-based methods to browse the web. Perhaps you should actually look into things before rushing to judgment. It just may be possible that everyone besides you is not an idiot.

  105. No, I think I'm going to continue to store all my data locally like I have for two decades.

  106. Kolab by rdnetto · · Score: 1

    I don't need a web interface, so KDE Kolab and Kontact/Thunderbird. It's a full PIM suite, so it also provides centralised storage for a bunch of other things as well.

    --
    Most human behaviour can be explained in terms of identity.
  107. Newsblur by datalife · · Score: 1

    I can absolutly recommend NewsBlur!!

    http://www.newsblur.com/

    It's better than GoogleReader and is OpenSource. You've 3 options:
    - use the free account (up to 64 sites)
    - pay 24$/year for unlimited sites + extra features (fair price if you ask me)
    - geek option: set it up yourself (you have all features in that way) -> https://github.com/samuelclay/NewsBlur.git

    Plus, it comes with free iOS and Android-Apps.

    I've set it up myself last week and said goodbye to google reader.

    --
    There are only 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand binary and those who don't.
  108. selfoss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been using selfoss. URL: http://selfoss.aditu.de/
    Set it up on my own server with a cron job to poll my feeds every X minutes. It stores the fetched results in either a SQLite file or another database backend.

  109. Re:I can't replace something I never use. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally I just wait until the story comes out on Slashdot. After all, this place is still "news for nerds / stuff that matters" right?

  110. Reader2000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.reader2000.com

  111. Re:i never used it, much like the rest of google by steveg · · Score: 1

    Well, for one thing it has an API and a very large percentage of the RSS readers out there (on phones especially) use Google Reader as a backend.

    I've never actually *used* Google Reader. I created an account, and I've set up some feeds on the Google Reader site. I then pointed my NewsRob app on my Android phone to Google Reader, and I *do* use the heck out of that.

    Reportedly Feedly has replicated Google's API, and some of the apps that used GR as a backend are supposedly being modified to use Feedly as a backend. No official word whether NewsRob will do so, but they're "in talks."

    --
    Ignorance killed the cat. Curiosity was framed.
  112. /. is my news aggregator by OhHellWithIt · · Score: 1

    Seriously. I tried Google Reader, and I kept forgetting to look at it.

    --
    "Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." -- George Orwell
  113. Tiny Tiny Rss by Andtalath · · Score: 2

    Not perfect, but it's pretty close and I store everything on my own server.

  114. Bamboo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bamboo reader has become my reader of choice

  115. newsbeuter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use newsbeuter and sync all my read/unread threads automatically by linking the cache.db to my Dropbox folder.
    When deeply interested in a topic, i simply press o which opens a new tab in my opened browser. Oh, and i
    can export all relevant feeds into a .txt file for easy reading on my ebook reader.

  116. Removing my Google-Fix by chromeronin799 · · Score: 1

    Mail, contacts and calendar - options are going to me.com - not really a fan of more tie in, but at least supports push mail to my phone and tablet, or a zimbra mailserver appliance as a VM. Online filestorage: Dropbox and Mega are filling that role nicely, I might ass an owncloud server on a VM. Online Office suite: you know, a crappy old PC with enough RAM running ubuntu, VMware Server, a desktop VM, and the above VMs, and VNC or X11 tunnelled over SSH works well enough for me. I can get VNC or SSH/X11 clients on just about anything. Could also run an Open SSL VPN appliance. Software cost for the above: free Might have to buy a DNS name, as DynDNS is getting less friendly, Ive already lost my old [host].homelinux.org domain from them 8(

  117. Pushed me over the edge by JanneM · · Score: 1

    This pushed me to finally set up a small server at home. Had been meaning to for a long time, just to learn about it, but never did. Now I have a small server with Tiny Tiny RSS running on it. Not too difficult to set up, and works really well. The Android app is not NewsRob quality but it's good enough to use on a daily basis.

    --
    Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
  118. Session time out problem in Tiny Tiny RSS by kbahey · · Score: 1

    I have been using Tiny Tiny RSS since March, ever since Google announced they are discontinuing Reader.

    It works well, and close enough to Reader. Imported my RSS without issues.

    Once issue I am facing is that the session times out a couple of times per day.

    This is despite having the following settings in config.php:

    define('SESSION_COOKIE_LIFETIME', 86400*365); // Default lifetime of a session (e.g. login) cookie. In seconds, // 0 means cookie will be deleted when browser closes.

        define('SESSION_EXPIRE_TIME', 86400*365); // Hard expiration limit for sessions. Should be // greater or equal to SESSION_COOKIE_LIFETIME

    Any idea why this happens?

  119. Brief by doru · · Score: 1

    I've been using Brief (add-on for Firefox) for about two months, and I'm quite satisfied. Getting used to the bookmark integration took some time, but it's not so bad. It can import feeds exported from Google Reader. More details here.

  120. Feedly by NyaR · · Score: 1

    Feedly has replaced Google Reader, I like it more. I get a lot of reading done while taking a shit now.

  121. Re:I can't replace something I never use. by camperdave · · Score: 1

    Simple. I'm an average user. If average users don't know something, then logically, I don't either.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  122. readraven by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not sure if it's ok to self-promote here, but we've been hacking on a replacement for about 9 weeks now:
    https://www.readraven.com

    It's still a very young project in that we're still working through our UI bugs, but our full intention is to be a long term project designed around a few key values:
    - longevity
    - privacy
    - simplicity
    - beauty

    For more about what we stand for, check out our values:
    https://www.readraven.com/values

    The long term plan is to charge money for the service because that is the most transparent way for us to build for forever. We think selling user information to advertisers is not only a bad business model, but also creates an adversarial relationship with users.

    As I said, we're still really young, but our backend is working well, and we hope to iterate rapidly. Check us out, if you like.

    Alex Chiang
    https://www.readraven.com
    http://chizang.net/alex/blog

  123. What about Podcasts? by mangueirita · · Score: 1

    I for once used google reader to listen to my podcasts. It kept them all in the same place whenever I switched machines.

    Recently I found PODFY (http://www.podfy.com/) that works on a PC, phone or tablet and never looked back.

  124. Feed on Feeds by TheRealDevTrash · · Score: 1

    Seriously! It's awesome

    --
    I used to be /dev/trash but Slashdot no longer allows slashes for usernames.
  125. Combo of gmail and ifttt works well by prlj13 · · Score: 1

    I've been using ifttt and gmail since just after they announced retiring Google reader. It works pretty good so far: http://prlj13-whatimupto.blogspot.ca/2013/06/rss-replacing-google-reader-with-ifttt.html

  126. press on android by mimecine · · Score: 1

    I can't stand all these browsy, graphical rss readers, and press ( paid ) has a great interface for *reading* news. They have promised a new backend before the demise of reader... don't know if there is a ios client.

  127. Gmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After trying options (Feedly, TT-RSS, NewsBlur, others), none were satisfying.

    So I wrote some PHP scripts that pull in RSS/Atom, parse them, and inject them via IMAP into a Gmail account. The keyboard shortcuts aren't quite as nice Reader (but Reader's weren't perfect).

    When Google kills Gmail, I'll just export via IMAP, and import to some other IMAP server/email reader.

  128. Feedindicator: Lightweight Ubuntu RSS indicator by aikawa · · Score: 1

    Not a cloud service, but this can help Ubuntu users:

    http://code.google.com/p/feedindicator

    Lightweight: no UI apart from the status bar icon, which develops into a menu that shows recent items (optionally in sub-menus). Click on an item to open it in your browser.

  129. Found a replacement by timkofu196 · · Score: 1

    I have been using The Old Reader https://theoldreader.com/ for a little over a week now and it's great.

  130. Opera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm switching back to Opera. Has always had a (better) feeds reader. It's just fastest I know for reading/skimming.
    Opera will be using Chromium from now on (Thought 14 is not available for Linux yet). So no reason to not use Opera anymore. I switched in the past, because of the lack of support for Opera by the mayor websites.

  131. inoreader.com by Dorian_am · · Score: 1

    My favorite in this time - inoreader.com ;) I don't like Feedly, because it not allow export my feeds.

  132. RSS on Mac OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Vienna is great for Mac users.

  133. Re:I can't replace something I never use. by Gonoff · · Score: 1

    We still need that list.

    --
    I'll see your Constitution and raise you a Queen.
  134. RE: How Will You Replace Google Reader? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have all my feeds sent to my email account using http://blogtrottr.com/... I can just read them along with other email messages.

  135. Use the Super Dimensional Fortress! by bitterblackale · · Score: 2

    MetaARPA members of SDF have access to tt-rss, and SDF is worth supporting: http://sdf.org/?join#meta

  136. Old Reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been using The Old Reader and I really like it. It doesn't have an app yet but the web interface is nice.

    http://theoldreader.com

  137. RSS Owl by lissnup · · Score: 1

    I switched to RSSowl.org desktop app. It was meant as the first of however many tests until I settled on a replacement for Google Reader, but it works fine so I am sticking with it.

  138. Thunderbird by gshegosh · · Score: 1

    It always seemed a bit cumbersome to me, but when Google announced end of life for their Reader, I've moved to Thunderbird with my feeds and it works well enough. But, I might be a special case - I no longer work on more computers than my laptop, so I have no need for a web-based reader.

  139. I don't get it by joh · · Score: 1

    People recommend all kinds of webappy RSS-readers instead of Google Reader. But the actual point of Google Reader was not that it was a web app. The point was that it was a backend and API for reading and syncing your news with hundreds of clients on all platforms that used Google Reader as a way to sync your stuff.

    NONE of all the other services, apps, websites, browser extensions that are trying to do the same actually do the same. With Google Reader as a de-facto standard for that there was real competition between applications that all worked with the same backend. What we have now is full fragmentation into dozens or hundreds of incompatible services.

    What we not have (and won't get) is the one thing that would be able to replace Google Reader: An open standard that could be supported by all kinds of clients and servers which then would work seamlessly which each other.

    That so few people understand this is baffling. Sometimes I think that the Internet is turning from a network based on open standards into a set of proprietary and incompatible services is just natural: People want this and even many geeks don't understand the difference.

    Me? I suppose I will use the opportunity to kick that habit. I have been reading dozens of feeds daily for many years and I don't think I really got anything out of it but wasted time. The world is crazy anyway, I won't change it and getting angry every day isn't actually worth it.

  140. BazQux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    BazQux is not free, but cheap. It's UI is cleaner than Reader, and above all : it displays comments from blogs.
    The more I use it, the more I like being able to read comments.

  141. I won't by Askmum · · Score: 1

    Never used it, won't ever miss it.

  142. Google what ? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
    It must be Earth-shattering news. This "Google Reader" thing must be so totally unavoidably vital to everything in the universe that I can't understand how I could possibly have missed hearing about it for ... well, ever. The only thing that possibly could interrupt my plans to commit seppuku over it's demise is that it doesn't as far as I know, do anything of any importance.

    So what the hell is one of these things, what do I need it for, and should I kill others in my grief over it's passing?

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  143. Curata Reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Recently launched http://reader.curata.com "the cleanest, easiest and simplest reader"