Once you're in orbit, you're halfway to anywhere. The moon, Venus and asteroids are all easier targets than Mars. Some of the moons of Jupiter may well be easier targets too. Mars is hard because it's big, with a thin atmosphere, so you need heavy equipment to land and take off. For Venus you just stay in orbit. For smaller moons with no atmospheres you need a lot less mass in fuel and heat shielding to land and take off again. You can use that space for more life support and radiation shielding.
Drinking is absolutely a skill. The first time I ran a 400 m race I barely finished because I started as if I was 100 m. Drinking requires the same pacing because it's easy to drink too much too fast, before you feel it.
That's not quite true. Canada has a lower overall population density than the US, but the urban density is about 40% higher than the US (Europe is 270% higher than the US).
The stupid in the summary burns. The stupid in the article is a glaring bright bonfire. Especially the part where they say "cutting through the technical jargon, here's all you need to know...."
I don't think that's true. There are people who really do like ads. I used to have roommates who eagerly awaited the daily delivery of fliers, then spent the evening reading them all.
I don't understand it, but these people do exist. However, they're not the ones running ad blockers. Those are the people who hate ads with a passion. If I were an advertiser I would thank ad block for offering a free way for me to avoid pissing them off.
That's one particular gene that is associated with Alzheimer's. There is no "Alzheimer's" gene, despite what the summary says. Even if there were, it doesn't mean you can't do anything to delay it. You could make an argument that the disease called death starts having an effect at the age of zero, but you should still buckle up and not smoke.
So is New York City. But step over whatever kind of border, geographical, political or demographic, and there's lots of open space. There's even lots of land that isn't used for anything.
Yahoo's "hope" seems pretty optimistic all right. I'd think they'd be more interested in the finding the vulnerability bit anyway. Run it on your code before you make it live and fix the bugs yourself if you have to.
They probably decided they needed to explain why a major tech company was sponsoring develop of automated cracking tools though.
Artificial intelligence (AI) is intelligence exhibited by machines. In computer science, an ideal "intelligent" machine is a flexible rational agent that perceives its environment and takes actions that maximize its chance of success at some goal.[1] Colloquially, the term "artificial intelligence" is applied when a machine mimics "cognitive" functions that humans associate with other human minds, such as "learning" and "problem solving".[2] As machines become increasingly capable, facilities once thought to require intelligence are removed from the definition. For example, optical character recognition is no longer perceived as an exemplar of "artificial intelligence" having become a routine technology.[3] Capabilities still classified as AI include advanced Chess and Go systems and self-driving cars.
So a program that runs through a list of vulnerabilities checking for each one wouldn't really qualify as AI, but one that used a more sophisticated approach might.
The trends Pinker talks about have been statistically consistent over at least the last thousand years, and not just in war. Do you think the number of murders has gone down because of MAD? The number of third world genocides? Incidence of terrorism?
Read "The Better Angels of our Nature" by Stephen Pinker.
The answer to your question is that lots of things have changed since 1939 (or 1039 for that matter) and while the exact details of the mechanics may not be precisely clear, the incidence of interstate and civil war, genocide, other killings by governments, terrorism and murder have all decreased dramatically.
Factors that appear to make it unlikely for states to go to war with each other are one or both being democracies, a strong reliance on international trade, and membership in international organizations. While China isn't really a democracy, the US is (mostly) and both rely very heavily on international trade and are members of a great number of international organizations.
Satellite imagery can't tell you everything. In this case you might see a building that you suspect might be some kind of military installation, but you're not sure. Pokemon Go usage would probably be a half decent datapoint, but could be confounded by things like civilian employers who don't like their employees goofing off. Realistically, the US probably just monitors which places have government or military cell phones frequenting them.
Better! The artist's experiment with a new medium has revealed that it is ephemeral, as are all things in life. While you might think you are working digital marble, like the sculptors of the ancients, the cyber medium is more akin to shifting sand.
You're assuming there's secret sauce. It sounds like the do a search for whatever their TV show is, and draw a pretty graph of the number of seeders and leechers. There can optionally be a "a verification section that confirms that the peer download file matches the target file."
Sounds like a pretty standard waste of the patent office's time.
Dude, all that stuff happened in the fifties. And sixties. Okay, and seventies too. Israel hasn't been actually invaded by a coalition of their neighbours, bent on annihilation, in, like, decades!
A cynical person, or one older than 40, might say that their strategy is working.
It's not strange. It's right in the name. Terrorism isn't about killing people, it's about scaring them to achieve a political end. Terrorists choose targets to generate maximum fear, which usually means doing something intensely violent on a small scale.
Slashdot Mirror
Once you're in orbit, you're halfway to anywhere. The moon, Venus and asteroids are all easier targets than Mars. Some of the moons of Jupiter may well be easier targets too. Mars is hard because it's big, with a thin atmosphere, so you need heavy equipment to land and take off. For Venus you just stay in orbit. For smaller moons with no atmospheres you need a lot less mass in fuel and heat shielding to land and take off again. You can use that space for more life support and radiation shielding.
Exactly. Notice how the general public doesn't use terminals anymore?
Drinking is absolutely a skill. The first time I ran a 400 m race I barely finished because I started as if I was 100 m. Drinking requires the same pacing because it's easy to drink too much too fast, before you feel it.
That's not quite true. Canada has a lower overall population density than the US, but the urban density is about 40% higher than the US (Europe is 270% higher than the US).
The stupid in the summary burns. The stupid in the article is a glaring bright bonfire. Especially the part where they say "cutting through the technical jargon, here's all you need to know...."
That's a pretty intense rate of deflation. At that rate we'll all be walking around with antimatter keychains next year.
If only the solar sail spacecraft had some means of propulsion that could help it slow down at it's destination.
The technology to send a probe to Proxima Centauri within a couple of decades more or less exists now. It only requires the will to do it.
I don't think that's true. There are people who really do like ads. I used to have roommates who eagerly awaited the daily delivery of fliers, then spent the evening reading them all.
I don't understand it, but these people do exist. However, they're not the ones running ad blockers. Those are the people who hate ads with a passion. If I were an advertiser I would thank ad block for offering a free way for me to avoid pissing them off.
If you're "the world over" and you're not the USA (i.e. Canada), the USA snooping on your data is "another government."
That's one particular gene that is associated with Alzheimer's. There is no "Alzheimer's" gene, despite what the summary says. Even if there were, it doesn't mean you can't do anything to delay it. You could make an argument that the disease called death starts having an effect at the age of zero, but you should still buckle up and not smoke.
So is New York City. But step over whatever kind of border, geographical, political or demographic, and there's lots of open space. There's even lots of land that isn't used for anything.
Laser tag + augmented reality + first person shooter. You think old farts get annoyed by Pokemon, just wait.
Slashdot. It used to be the home of tech geeks. Now it's at least half luddites. Sad.
Yahoo's "hope" seems pretty optimistic all right. I'd think they'd be more interested in the finding the vulnerability bit anyway. Run it on your code before you make it live and fix the bugs yourself if you have to.
They probably decided they needed to explain why a major tech company was sponsoring develop of automated cracking tools though.
Your definition isn't the one commonly in use. Most people would say "human-level AI" or at least "hard AI" to talk about what you describe.
From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...:
So a program that runs through a list of vulnerabilities checking for each one wouldn't really qualify as AI, but one that used a more sophisticated approach might.
What does a hand made concept car cost?
Tequila would be better. Whale is salty.
The trends Pinker talks about have been statistically consistent over at least the last thousand years, and not just in war. Do you think the number of murders has gone down because of MAD? The number of third world genocides? Incidence of terrorism?
Read "The Better Angels of our Nature" by Stephen Pinker.
The answer to your question is that lots of things have changed since 1939 (or 1039 for that matter) and while the exact details of the mechanics may not be precisely clear, the incidence of interstate and civil war, genocide, other killings by governments, terrorism and murder have all decreased dramatically.
Factors that appear to make it unlikely for states to go to war with each other are one or both being democracies, a strong reliance on international trade, and membership in international organizations. While China isn't really a democracy, the US is (mostly) and both rely very heavily on international trade and are members of a great number of international organizations.
Satellite imagery can't tell you everything. In this case you might see a building that you suspect might be some kind of military installation, but you're not sure. Pokemon Go usage would probably be a half decent datapoint, but could be confounded by things like civilian employers who don't like their employees goofing off. Realistically, the US probably just monitors which places have government or military cell phones frequenting them.
Better! The artist's experiment with a new medium has revealed that it is ephemeral, as are all things in life. While you might think you are working digital marble, like the sculptors of the ancients, the cyber medium is more akin to shifting sand.
I threw up in my mouth a little writing that.
You're assuming there's secret sauce. It sounds like the do a search for whatever their TV show is, and draw a pretty graph of the number of seeders and leechers. There can optionally be a "a verification section that confirms that the peer download file matches the target file."
Sounds like a pretty standard waste of the patent office's time.
Dude, all that stuff happened in the fifties. And sixties. Okay, and seventies too. Israel hasn't been actually invaded by a coalition of their neighbours, bent on annihilation, in, like, decades!
A cynical person, or one older than 40, might say that their strategy is working.
It's not strange. It's right in the name. Terrorism isn't about killing people, it's about scaring them to achieve a political end. Terrorists choose targets to generate maximum fear, which usually means doing something intensely violent on a small scale.