I havent played 5. I originally had III. Loved it. I like the research system where you set percentages to each tech you'd like to concurrently research. IV went to a queue system, which is ok. However SEIV had other improvements over III, and is more compatible. I just generally love the game. I havent played tactical much since Im playing multiplayer, and the game is not RT
I personally disagree with the AC opinion, but that is a matter of taste. soylent has about 1000 users joined in the first day, have some good posters. We will see how it fares after the novelty ends. Still the articles are more interesting so far, and there are some decent comments.
Generally good points, except I do not know why you bring up heartlessness...as I had not.
Let us suppose that Enterprise A makes doodads. Enterprise B makes humbugs. Enterprise A needs B's humbugs for its doodads, and Enterprise B needs A's capital. Enterprise A contracts with Enterprise B. As part of that contract Enterprise A agrees to not buy humbugs from any other 3rd enterprise unless members of the 3rd enterprise agree to pay contribute a fee to Enterprise B to recover lost income.,
The above contract seems lawful.
.
Let us suppose two other Enterprises. Enterprise A owns machinery and patents concerning the production of engines. Enterprise B is co-operative of skilled labor. Enterprise A needs B's labor, and B needs A's capital. Enterprise A contracts with Enterprise B, and as part of that contract Enterprise A agrees to not contract for labor with any other enterprise unless members of the third enterprise agree to contribute dues to Enterprise B.
For that matter, there are the fiddly things that 1% of users care about, and then there are the things that really turn people off. My list of easy fixes that would really improve relations are:
1. Add green bars above comments.
2. Make fonts more similar to current fonts, and make the text darker.
How about Big Rig and cab drivers.
Or just helicopter drop them some money.
Not an authorized Soylenter
hear hear!!!
Bullshit. If there is good data that is contrary to the general consensus, you better believe that scientists will claw for it....
Over 10,000 scientists were invited to participate. That a whole lot of 'friends and coworkers'
I havent played 5.
I originally had III. Loved it. I like the research system where you set percentages to each tech you'd like to concurrently research. IV went to a queue system, which is ok. However SEIV had other improvements over III, and is more compatible. I just generally love the game.
I havent played tactical much since Im playing multiplayer, and the game is not RT
space empires IV
A Soylent Troll is better than a /.-ing Human.
Damn. I should have come back with that!
Ok, was it a question for *nerds*
I personally disagree with the AC opinion, but that is a matter of taste.
soylent has about 1000 users joined in the first day, have some good posters. We will see how it fares after the novelty ends. Still the articles are more interesting so far, and there are some decent comments.
Thank you.
Is this news for nerds?
You won't get this kind of shit article on http://soylentnews.org/
soylentnews? Tell me more.
Can I encrypt it in my own body? If not what is the point. I leave cells everywhere.
nice
ha!
good god.
Yes. But a god troll is better than a bad human.
The above contract seems lawful.
.
Let us suppose two other Enterprises. Enterprise A owns machinery and patents concerning the production of engines. Enterprise B is co-operative of skilled labor. Enterprise A needs B's labor, and B needs A's capital. Enterprise A contracts with Enterprise B, and as part of that contract Enterprise A agrees to not contract for labor with any other enterprise unless members of the third enterprise agree to contribute dues to Enterprise B.
This is the same lawful contract. Isn't it?
Nice troll, but if you inspect my entire posting record you will clearly see how sparsely I comment here, often not commenting for months at a time.
However, let us suppose that we were engineered/enhanced by an advanced alien race whom is no longer present.
How would science go about testing the alternative hypothesis that we were not the natural product of evolutionary processes on earth??
So few comments today.
For that matter, there are the fiddly things that 1% of users care about, and then there are the things that really turn people off. My list of easy fixes that would really improve relations are: 1. Add green bars above comments. 2. Make fonts more similar to current fonts, and make the text darker.