Well, look at many of the "worms" spreading around these days. They spread as.exe mail attachments, which you need to start yourself to take effect. Neither windows nor linux will protect against idiots.
Yup, we go the oposite directions of various not-so-good regimes which tries(tried) to produce perfect citizens. Genetic variation is good according to darwinism, as there is a greater chance of survival of the fittest.
What's the problem ? People still run macos 9 and windows 98. It works for them. Why use the latest (and often unstable all the time) ? Making sure people can their job is far more important than running the latest foo 4.9.177
It is important that trees like this are not meant to show what derives from what, in terms of code. Unix has clearly inspired Minix, as Tanenbaum has said many times, so one might draw links. There is no code sharing though. Linus wrote Linux on Minix, and because he wanted a free Minix, first versions were to some degree inspired by minix. So again a link can certanly be drawn. No code sharing even here, as stated by Tanenbaum and Linus though.
As I see it, they just won't export the gcc internal structure. So fork gcc, or contribute patches to them that does what one wants. See also http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/
Uhm, it kills the process if it raises a floating point exception in a signal handler !? Hardly seems like the correct way to address the issue.
Re:This happened some days ago now
on
POV-Ray 3.6 Released
·
· Score: 4, Informative
Download page says "Note: this is the version 3.5 source code. The version 3.6 source code will be made available within a few weeks."
And their ftp server tell us: "With the POV-Ray 3.6 release on 9 June 2004, source is not immediately available. It will be released shortly. If you want source code, you could look in our old versions dirs."
I have seen the sketch, and I agree, it's funny as hell. This however, did not make me laugh. As for bots posting to *BSD stories !? Grow up goddamnit.
Seriously. I use it, never had a problem with it. Not that hard to configure if you know how to read. In fact it's really amazingly much better than the alternatives. bind seems to support more features than most of them. ddns is important to me, works nicely used with dhcpd, I don't see how I would achieve that using other dns servers.
Well, I would ideally use *one* player to play videos. I don't see why i should monkey around with one player for mpg files, one for.rm files, one for.mov files, one... Having other apps for playing audio, ripping is another matter.
>With a source code control system, you know that so and so added on >such and such a date. You can then go to that person and ask them where >they got it from if there's ever any question. While ofcourse a source control system will help alot, it won't always reveal the whole truth about where the code comes from. For the 2.6 kernel you can view the changes here. On thing you might notice is alot of changes from e.g. akpm(Andrew Morton). But he didn't write that all code. Alot of the changes commited by akpm is patches contributed by other people again. This goes for most kernel programmers commiting changes to the vanilla tree. So in this case, the question is, does akpm keep track of all the patches he ever gets ?(often they do include an attribution in the changelog, but it can still be a weak spot.)
Try pkg-config --list-all pkg-config provides you with compiler/linker/preprocessor flags for compiling a program that uses various libraries. Now, if only all libraries provided a.pc file..
Slashdot Mirror
how much development there is on it I don't know, but
slrn is very nice newsreader.
Well, look at many of the "worms" spreading around these days. .exe mail attachments, which you need to start yourself
They spread as
to take effect.
Neither windows nor linux will protect against idiots.
Just about any game I've run using winex starts fullscreen, and
the games usually allows one to set the resolution.
Yup, we go the oposite directions of various not-so-good regimes which tries(tried) to produce perfect citizens. Genetic variation is good
according to darwinism, as there is a greater chance of survival
of the fittest.
Reminds me, I made this,
which is some very simple code for the uninitated to genetic algorithms.
What's the problem ? People still run macos 9 and windows 98. It works for them. Why use the latest (and often unstable all the time) ? Making sure
people can their job is far more important than running the latest foo 4.9.177
It is important that trees like this are not meant to show what
derives from what, in terms of code. Unix has clearly inspired
Minix, as Tanenbaum has said many times, so one might draw links.
There is no code sharing though.
Linus wrote Linux on Minix, and because he wanted a free Minix,
first versions were to some degree inspired by minix. So again
a link can certanly be drawn. No code sharing even here, as stated by
Tanenbaum and Linus though.
Humm. Did they remember kvikkalkul ?
Maybe http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2004-05/msg00679.html ?
"GCC can dump its internal representation in a C-like syntax using the
new -fdump-tree-... switches."
As I see it, they just won't export the gcc internal structure.
So fork gcc, or contribute patches to them that does what one wants.
See also http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/
Uhm, it kills the process if it raises a floating point exception
in a signal handler !? Hardly seems like the correct way to address the issue.
Download page says "Note: this is the version 3.5 source code.
The version 3.6 source code will be made available within a few weeks."
And their ftp server tell us:
"With the POV-Ray 3.6 release on 9 June 2004, source is not
immediately available. It will be released shortly. If you
want source code, you could look in our old versions dirs."
So, be patient.
Seems like povray is used for many cool things.
e.g. rendering mars. Also done here
I have seen the sketch, and I agree, it's funny as hell.
This however, did not make me laugh.
As for bots posting to *BSD stories !? Grow up goddamnit.
One of the main things is dust. The solar cells on the rovers eventually
get coated with fine dust.
This is funny because of ... ??
using common name conventions , that method ought to be called
getName()
Seriously. I use it, never had a problem with it. Not that hard to
configure if you know how to read.
In fact it's really amazingly much better than the alternatives. bind
seems to support more features than most of them.
ddns is important to me, works nicely used with dhcpd, I don't see
how I would achieve that using other dns servers.
Well, I would ideally use *one* player to play videos. I don't see why i should .rm files, one for .mov files, one ...
monkey around with one player for mpg files, one for
Having other apps for playing audio, ripping is another matter.
>And WHO needs MS mediaplayers anyhow...
Have any pointers to alternatives ?
Some people seems to disagree with you on the easiness of Python.
Learn to read, and count ?
It says 4.10
10 comes after 9, atleast in base 10 math.
>With a source code control system, you know that so and so added on
>such and such a date. You can then go to that person and ask them where
>they got it from if there's ever any question.
While ofcourse a source control system will help alot, it won't always reveal the whole truth about
where the code comes from. For the 2.6 kernel you can view the changes here.
On thing you might notice is alot of changes from e.g. akpm(Andrew Morton). But he didn't write that all code.
Alot of the changes commited by akpm is patches contributed by other people again. This goes for most kernel
programmers commiting changes to the vanilla tree. So in this case, the question is,
does akpm keep track of all the patches he ever gets ?(often they do include an attribution in the changelog, but it can still be a weak spot.)
Try a motorcycle ?
Or perhaps a Skycar
Try pkg-config --list-all .pc file..
pkg-config provides you with compiler/linker/preprocessor flags for
compiling a program that uses various libraries.
Now, if only all libraries provided a