Electric charging stations are not the size of gas stations. They are the size of a parking meter.
More like the size of a parking lot, no? (Assuming we're talking about long-distance travelers with mostly depleted batteries, not commuters or those running errands who can top off at the grocery store while they shop)
The surface area issue only comes into play with alternating current - it's called the Skin Effect. The higher the frequency, the thinner the area that the current travels on. According to the linked Wikipedia article, the skin effect at 60Hz (North American household power) is 8.5mm deep. I would take this to mean that the entirety of a 17mm think wire would carry current, but an 18mm thick wire would have a small part at the core that wasn't carrying current. The way to get around this is by using Litz wire. Click the link for more fun facts!
Suggesting that the more force you exert on our hypothetical negatively-massed object, the slower it accelerates. Alternately, merely breathing on it should have the affect of sending it flying away from you at something approaching the speed of light.
Or, one could interpret the "-F" term to mean that we have to exert "negative force" on our object in order to accelerate it. Which would suggest that the object responds in the opposite direction to the force applied - pushing on it causes it to accelerate towards the direction that the push came from, and pulling on it causes it to accelerate away from the direction of the pull. Assume that the old Newtonian saw RE equal and opposite reactions applies to our exotic matter, and that we don't lose anything to deforming or heating it. We now have an immovable mass.
It's hard to be "turbulent" when there is only one molecule in flight, in a vacuum. I believe that the idea here is that although the molecule can only pass through one of the slits in the grating, it behaves as if it passed through all of the slits simultaneously and interfered with itself on the way through, thereby affecting the probability of where it strikes the detector.
The virtual graphics adapter may not be all that powerful, but it looks like people have been having success with VMware and doing a hardware passthrough for the video card.
I'd bet that in a couple of years this becomes a standardized feature of other VM systems as well.
when you say "firmware" you are leading me to believe they are not IOS supported devices.. and if that is so then they are from the linksys side and not what i consider actual "cisco" hardware.
Yes, they're definitely of Linksys origin - pre-Cisco buyout by quite some time. They're significantly more reliable than the standard Linksys home router, but I suspect the fact that I always made sure to supply them with a nice clean 60 Hz sine wave at 120V had a lot to do with it.
while i like/liked linksys and i like cisco - and i'm fine with the buyout.. some of their decisions have muddied the waters and made it a little more difficult to find the right solution.
I agree - Cisco putting their name on Linksys hardware in the consumer sector is easy to see past, but knowing whether you're looking at something that descended from Linksys or IOS heritage is difficult at the bottom end of the business line.
I generally don't deploy these for my clients any more, as I'm working with businesses that are willing to invest a bit in more feature-full hardware than I was before. I've had good luck recently with Fortigate, and their focus on security is, IMHO, worth the slight premium for the hardware and the yearly support contracts.
That's likely because the RV series came out of their Linksys purchase - I've deployed Linksys RV042 routers in the past; they were reasonably priced and didn't give me any maintenance issues.
They were rather lackluster from a configuration and firmware perspective - they were capable of basic VPNs and had 2 WAN ports, but that's about all for features over a home class router.
Slashdot Mirror
They really, REALLY want you to convert to server core and pick up powershell.
That's the only logical explanation...
Chevys and what an unholy mess their electrical systems are?
Not enough can be said on this topic.
Signed,
A Chevy Colorado Owner
I doubt there is a single person who knows about every aspect of IEEE 802.11.
There is. His name is Matthew S. Gast. Read this book and you'll have a solid foundation, too.
And then put it on rails?
:-D
Electric charging stations are not the size of gas stations. They are the size of a parking meter.
More like the size of a parking lot, no? (Assuming we're talking about long-distance travelers with mostly depleted batteries, not commuters or those running errands who can top off at the grocery store while they shop)
The surface area issue only comes into play with alternating current - it's called the Skin Effect. The higher the frequency, the thinner the area that the current travels on. According to the linked Wikipedia article, the skin effect at 60Hz (North American household power) is 8.5mm deep. I would take this to mean that the entirety of a 17mm think wire would carry current, but an 18mm thick wire would have a small part at the core that wasn't carrying current. The way to get around this is by using Litz wire. Click the link for more fun facts!
F=(-m)(-a)
F=(-m)(-a)
F=-1*(-m)(a)
-1*F=(-m)(a)
-F=(-m)(a)
Suggesting that the more force you exert on our hypothetical negatively-massed object, the slower it accelerates. Alternately, merely breathing on it should have the affect of sending it flying away from you at something approaching the speed of light.
Or, one could interpret the "-F" term to mean that we have to exert "negative force" on our object in order to accelerate it. Which would suggest that the object responds in the opposite direction to the force applied - pushing on it causes it to accelerate towards the direction that the push came from, and pulling on it causes it to accelerate away from the direction of the pull. Assume that the old Newtonian saw RE equal and opposite reactions applies to our exotic matter, and that we don't lose anything to deforming or heating it. We now have an immovable mass.
This has indeed been fun. Absurd, but fun!
So then how does that work In Soviet Russia?
ISR, anonymous makes slashdot out of illusionary cowards?
I really hope it's entitled "Schrödinger's Time Lord".
It's hard to be "turbulent" when there is only one molecule in flight, in a vacuum. I believe that the idea here is that although the molecule can only pass through one of the slits in the grating, it behaves as if it passed through all of the slits simultaneously and interfered with itself on the way through, thereby affecting the probability of where it strikes the detector.
IANA physicist, tho.
Newfies can eat 2-3 in one gulp
You should see what a Newfie can do with a bottle of Screech...
Yeah, but when it floods down in Texas, all of the telephone lines are down... How's the word gonna get out??
Dare I make a "Yo dawg" comment?
a "meta" viewpoint that reads it as both serious and satire simultaneously.
Schrödinger's viewpoint? Don't open the box, or you'll collapse the waveform!
Here's another one for you, in case you missed it: Triceratops didn't exist.
Seems to be the same gaffe that they made with the Apatosaurus.
The virtual graphics adapter may not be all that powerful, but it looks like people have been having success with VMware and doing a hardware passthrough for the video card.
I'd bet that in a couple of years this becomes a standardized feature of other VM systems as well.
Kill 'em all and let root sort 'em out!
when you say "firmware" you are leading me to believe they are not IOS supported devices.. and if that is so then they are from the linksys side and not what i consider actual "cisco" hardware.
Yes, they're definitely of Linksys origin - pre-Cisco buyout by quite some time. They're significantly more reliable than the standard Linksys home router, but I suspect the fact that I always made sure to supply them with a nice clean 60 Hz sine wave at 120V had a lot to do with it.
while i like/liked linksys and i like cisco - and i'm fine with the buyout.. some of their decisions have muddied the waters and made it a little more difficult to find the right solution.
I agree - Cisco putting their name on Linksys hardware in the consumer sector is easy to see past, but knowing whether you're looking at something that descended from Linksys or IOS heritage is difficult at the bottom end of the business line.
I generally don't deploy these for my clients any more, as I'm working with businesses that are willing to invest a bit in more feature-full hardware than I was before. I've had good luck recently with Fortigate, and their focus on security is, IMHO, worth the slight premium for the hardware and the yearly support contracts.
A guy can dream, right?
That's likely because the RV series came out of their Linksys purchase - I've deployed Linksys RV042 routers in the past; they were reasonably priced and didn't give me any maintenance issues.
They were rather lackluster from a configuration and firmware perspective - they were capable of basic VPNs and had 2 WAN ports, but that's about all for features over a home class router.
Real business is done over spark gap transmitter.
That, or carrier pigeon.
Thanks. Now I have "Never Gonna Give You Up" as sung by a Dalek stuck in my head.
That's irrational.
He sneezed?
1/2Tau * r^2.
Done. Next?