Slashdot Mirror


Nanocoating Waterproofs Any Gadget

An anonymous reader writes "Water has always been the bane of electronics, however American company Liquipel just announced that they have developed a way to completely waterproof any device against the elements. Using a revolutionary process, Liquipel applies a hydrophobic nanocoating to phones, computers, and other devices that completely waterproofs them and protects them against accidental exposure to liquids."

314 comments

  1. Announcing Waterproof 3D HDTVs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    What? Your TV is only 3D HDTV? It's not WATER PROOF?! Why not? Are you poor? Why haven't you bought one? How else do you plan to entertain under water?

    1. Re:Announcing Waterproof 3D HDTVs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I read this to my girlfriend because I thought it was funny. Her response? "It would be kind of cool to watch TV underwater. I want one in the shower. Do you know how boring it is to shave your legs?"

    2. Re:Announcing Waterproof 3D HDTVs! by TheLink · · Score: 5, Funny

      Maybe if you helped her shave her legs it would be more interesting. At least the first few times ;).

      --
    3. Re:Announcing Waterproof 3D HDTVs! by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Funny

      Maybe if you helped her shave her legs it would be more interesting.

      Then she can do his back.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    4. Re:Announcing Waterproof 3D HDTVs! by Belial6 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes, in the "There Was Blood EVERYWHERE!!!" kind of way.

    5. Re:Announcing Waterproof 3D HDTVs! by narcc · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's the most interesting response I've seen from Siri yet...

    6. Re:Announcing Waterproof 3D HDTVs! by logjon · · Score: 4, Funny

      He'll purr like a walrus.

      --
      The stories and info posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
      Only fools would take it as fact.
    7. Re:Announcing Waterproof 3D HDTVs! by dragonhunter21 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      That's the best kind of story!

      --
      Sent from my CR-48
    8. Re:Announcing Waterproof 3D HDTVs! by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Ahh, waxing... The personal grooming choice that assures no guy will think of a citizen from the largest South American country when he encounters the word "Brazilian".

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    9. Re:Announcing Waterproof 3D HDTVs! by Kagetsuki · · Score: 5, Informative

      My Android phone is waterproof (IS11CA) and I actually use it to watch video/listen to audio in the shower/bath pretty much every day. They do actaully sell TVs for use in shower by the way.

    10. Re:Announcing Waterproof 3D HDTVs! by Amouth · · Score: 4, Funny

      and put, on his three wolf moon shirt

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    11. Re:Announcing Waterproof 3D HDTVs! by Megahard · · Score: 1

      One of the "hot" items at CES is the wireless TV that you can carry and put anywhere. Some were saying the hot tub would be a good place.

      --
      I eat only the real part of complex carbohydrates.
    12. Re:Announcing Waterproof 3D HDTVs! by petman · · Score: 2

      Since my wife doesn't have hairy legs and never needs to shave her legs, I'm curious - do women need to shave their legs in the shower?

    13. Re:Announcing Waterproof 3D HDTVs! by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Let me guess, she doesn't poop either.

    14. Re:Announcing Waterproof 3D HDTVs! by guttentag · · Score: 1
      Actually, Samsung would be very interested. I bought one of their LED TVs recently, and as I was throwing out the box this morning I noticed a 5"x7" cloth in a plastic pouch, labelled:

      This product is high glossy, Please be careful of surface scratch while installation. Make sure to brush off the dirt on the provided cloth before cleaning the cabinet. For cleaning the front cabinet, make sure you use only the provided cloth on which to spray water 4 to 6 times before wiping it out softly in one direction. After cleaning, wipe cabinet to remove any moisture

      So it sounds to me like they're making a big deal about my TV not being waterproof. They're even telling me I can't spray water on the screen directly, I must spray water on their magic cloth no more than 6 times, and even then promptly wipe away what little moisture that puts on the frame around the screen. Then there's a diagram showing me that I must wipe the frame of the TV in a counterclockwise motion. Apparently the screen itself cannot be cleaned with even a damp cloth... So this must be a real issue.

    15. Re:Announcing Waterproof 3D HDTVs! by couchslug · · Score: 2

      "Then she can do his back."

      Or he hers...

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    16. Re:Announcing Waterproof 3D HDTVs! by zazzel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I wonder how people can actually do this kind of thing. I always feel relieved when I'm in the quiet sanctity of my bathroom, and the only thing I hear is water flowing and bubbles bursting. I still prefer actual books, too. They just work, and when I drop them, all I lose is a cheap paperback.

      There's way too much noise (aka "entertainment") in the world anyways.

    17. Re:Announcing Waterproof 3D HDTVs! by 1u3hr · · Score: 4, Funny

      Since my wife doesn't have hairy legs and never needs to shave her legs, I'm curious - do women need to shave their legs in the shower?

      The non-inflatable ones do, yes.

    18. Re:Announcing Waterproof 3D HDTVs! by HopefulIntern · · Score: 2

      Samsung always include those cloths in their TVs and monitors. I thought they were meant for cleaning the "glossy" surface of the TV itself, not the screen. The cloth being included as a non-abrasive alternative to a conventional cloth or paper towel.

    19. Re:Announcing Waterproof 3D HDTVs! by Dunbal · · Score: 4, Funny
      Please note that entertaining underwater when more than two (2) fish are present constitutes a public performance and you will be persecuted under appropriate copyright laws unless you pay the $2 million public performance fee.

      Love,

      MPAA

      PS: Yes, I said persecuted not prosecuted.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    20. Re:Announcing Waterproof 3D HDTVs! by Dunbal · · Score: 3, Informative

      You should learn about laser. It's expensive and it hurts like hell, but you only have to go for a few months and then you're done forever.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    21. Re:Announcing Waterproof 3D HDTVs! by petman · · Score: 1

      Ok, whatever. My question was, do they need to do it in the shower? If it's so boring, why not do it in the bed room or living room in front of the TV?

    22. Re:Announcing Waterproof 3D HDTVs! by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Oh hell no. Waxing is easy, trivial if you get someone to do it for you. An epilator is fucking nasty. Pull out each of your hairs, one by one? No thank you.

      I'm still pondering laser hair removal. Sadly I think I'm going too grey for it to be effective these days.

    23. Re:Announcing Waterproof 3D HDTVs! by CrashandDie · · Score: 1

      When's the last time you shaved in the living room? Fancy getting tiny hairs _all_ over the place?

    24. Re:Announcing Waterproof 3D HDTVs! by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

      k, whatever. My question was, do they need to do it in the shower? If it's so boring, why not do it in the bed room or living room in front of the TV?

      You have running water in front of your TV?

    25. Re:Announcing Waterproof 3D HDTVs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Thanks for making me shoot Tuscan Whole Milk out of my nose.

    26. Re:Announcing Waterproof 3D HDTVs! by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      My understanding is that wet shaving with a blade gives smoother results than dry shaving with an electric shaver but it's going to make a mess of foam and hair so you want to do it somewhere you can rinse down easilly such as the shower.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    27. Re:Announcing Waterproof 3D HDTVs! by pepeperes · · Score: 2

      You have running water in front of your TV?

      I live under a bridge, you... !!

      --
      ... from the forgotten corner in europe
    28. Re:Announcing Waterproof 3D HDTVs! by delinear · · Score: 1

      Natural selection will soon resolve that.

    29. Re:Announcing Waterproof 3D HDTVs! by wrook · · Score: 1

      It might sound strange, but why not try it and find out? I've shaved my legs before. It's fairly common in some sports for guys to do it. It will take you less than 5 minutes to understand why you need running water.

    30. Re:Announcing Waterproof 3D HDTVs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why isn't there a +1 Troll modifier when you need it?

    31. Re:Announcing Waterproof 3D HDTVs! by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 2

      There's way too much noise (aka "entertainment") in the world anyways.

      You forgot to shoo everyone off your lawn... :-)

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    32. Re:Announcing Waterproof 3D HDTVs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When your 4k 3D HDTV is not water proof, you get to deal the with customers who have an interestingly spongy mix of dried liquids over the circuit boards and forward facing parts of their sets. My hands feel sticky for just thinking about it.

    33. Re:Announcing Waterproof 3D HDTVs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read this to my girlfriend

      If you're trying to make comments/jokes/whatever on this site, don't give away that it's a complete fantasy so quickly - no one here has a girlfriend, we all live in our parents' basements.

    34. Re:Announcing Waterproof 3D HDTVs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and the only thing I hear is water flowing and bubbles bursting.

      Many people frown on doing that in the bath tub.

    35. Re:Announcing Waterproof 3D HDTVs! by smooth+wombat · · Score: 2

      Laser hair removal is not permanent. It may make the hair be gone for an extended period of time, but it is not permanent.

      If you want permanent hair removal, you have to go with electrolysis. It is time consuming, can be expensive for each trip and is not the most comfortable thing to go through, but it is permanent.

      I should know. Been doing it for years. Pretty soon, I won't have to shave my neck area at all. What has been done is now perfectly smooth. No issues with irritation when wearing a tie.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    36. Re:Announcing Waterproof 3D HDTVs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do any girls poop? I've spent a week with a girl in close quarters and somehow she never pooped. I've always been amazed at that. Either that or severe constipation.

    37. Re:Announcing Waterproof 3D HDTVs! by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      A waterproof book in the bath is a lot nicer than a paper book when either is soaking wet.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    38. Re:Announcing Waterproof 3D HDTVs! by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
      It wont work. The soap and detergents are molecules that are hydrophilic on one end and oleophilic in the other. They are likely to bond with the hydrophobic nano coating and strip them off. When they say "waterproof" they dont mean soap/detergent proof. Definitely wont work in showers.

      BTW don't berate me if I got that nugget of info wrong. I got it by reading "The Case of the Drowning Duck by Erle Stanely Gardener, a Perry Mason mystery. Not from any Chemistry text book.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    39. Re:Announcing Waterproof 3D HDTVs! by cylcyl · · Score: 4, Funny

      using lasers to saw off her legs seems like an extreme solution...

    40. Re:Announcing Waterproof 3D HDTVs! by Pope · · Score: 1

      Fine, he'll just shampoo them out of his shower!

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    41. Re:Announcing Waterproof 3D HDTVs! by Pope · · Score: 1

      Violators will be prostituted?

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    42. Re:Announcing Waterproof 3D HDTVs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tried that once... I have really thick, wiry hairs, so the first blade will dig in and pull on a hair, pulling up the skin like a tent, then the next blade will cut through the skin. (For this reason, I can't shave my face against the grain, but I was a teenager and hadn't figured that out yet.) It was pretty painful while I was doing it, but I figured it must hurt everyone who shaved, so I just sucked it up and continued. When I was done, there were little points of blood where each of the hairs had been. I'm not sure if I excised the follicles entirely or just damaged them irreparably, but regardless, the hair that I shaved that day never grew back again.

    43. Re:Announcing Waterproof 3D HDTVs! by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      I avoid the irritation of wearing a tie by not wearing a tie. Happens to be cheap and fast as well, which I like.

    44. Re:Announcing Waterproof 3D HDTVs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      water resistant not water proof. hot water gives off steam and loosens the molecular bonds of the water. i had a 100m water resistant watch once, and 3 inches of hot tub water was enough to fry it out. this coating is again water resistance not waterproof. I've seen Japanese devices with plastic layers for water resistance, but they all assume you didn't have it powered on until after it was dry. i also once had a phone that literally corroded just from bath steam, this is what this coating protects against is steam and possibly immersion in cold water. also devices that get hot can melt plastic. this is mostly marketing hype i doubt a thin layer of plastic is going to save batteries. this coating is targeted at developing countries where solar power or windmills drive satellites and tvs etc

      even plastic bags designed to be water resistant can fail on a spill into a bathtub.

    45. Re:Announcing Waterproof 3D HDTVs! by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

      True, but when you're going on interviews or going out with the parents on special occasions, a tie is a requirement. Also, some collars on the shirts I wear rub on my neck so not having that bit of stubble to be irritated is a good thing. That and when wearing turtlenecks like Steve Jobs (though I'm not an Apple fanboy. I just look good in dark-colored turtlenecks).

      That said, as difficult as it is for me to find clothes to wear, I may end up wearing togas and loinclothes.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    46. Re:Announcing Waterproof 3D HDTVs! by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      and put, on his three wolf moon shirt

      I know it's a joke, but you wouldn't believe how good I look in my three wolf moon shirt. And the ladies just go wild!

      Even my neutered male cat, 11 years old, growls and puts his tail straight up whenever I've got that shirt on. Put a little dab of civet behind the ears (Hai Karate will do if you can't get your hands on pure civet) and women literally throw themselves in front of you, like a bi-polar sufferer in front of a subway train.

      Caution: if you get your hands on one of those three wolf moon shirts, be careful how you use it. With great power comes great responsibility.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    47. Re:Announcing Waterproof 3D HDTVs! by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Tell her we'd rather you put a webcam in there.

    48. Re:Announcing Waterproof 3D HDTVs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somebody please show zazzel the location of the 'mute' button.

    49. Re:Announcing Waterproof 3D HDTVs! by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      +1

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    50. Re:Announcing Waterproof 3D HDTVs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you have to go with electrolysis. It is time consuming... Been doing it for years. Pretty soon, I won't have to shave my neck area at all.

      That's a long time!! And for just part of your neck!

    51. Re:Announcing Waterproof 3D HDTVs! by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      My kitchen and living room are the same space. BTW, which corner of Europe exactly.

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
    52. Re:Announcing Waterproof 3D HDTVs! by pepeperes · · Score: 1

      Very near from Europe's most western cape :)

      --
      ... from the forgotten corner in europe
    53. Re:Announcing Waterproof 3D HDTVs! by pepeperes · · Score: 1

      Ok, not really, seems i was mistaken. Near Finisterre.

      --
      ... from the forgotten corner in europe
  2. what about space age polymers? by cultiv8 · · Score: 1

    they're such hydrophobes.

    --
    sysadmins and parents of newborns get the same amount of sleep.
    1. Re:what about space age polymers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Car Wax. The new hydrophobic nanocoating.

  3. speak for yourselves.... by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Interesting

    At one point we’ve all done it – spilt a drink over a laptop, gotten our tablets soaked in the rain, or even dropped our phone in the toilet.

    I've never done any of those things with my expensive tools/toys. It baffles me how badly people treat expensive and hard to replace tools. It's not limited to technology either; a friend of mine has a collection of rusted saws, screwdrivers and other tools because he's too lazy to bring them in out of the rain after a big home improvement project. Pathetic.

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    1. Re:speak for yourselves.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yea- now if they made a break-proof coating! I'm sold. I've dropped my laptop numerous times in a water-free nevironment only the break the DC jack on the laptop every time. It has been years.... but...... three or four times.

    2. Re:speak for yourselves.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We of the /. community are duly impressed with your complete and utter perfection.

      CAPTCHA: excelled.

    3. Re:speak for yourselves.... by sandytaru · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I am a destroyer of keyboards. So I've learned simply to not buy expensive keyboards. Everything else, yeah, I try to treat gently, from my beloved Honda which is about to tick over 200K miles, to my late grandfather's violin 110 year old violin. Even my $80 mouse gets more care and attention and caution than my keyboard, though.

      My dilemma is this: If I get an expensive heavy duty mechanical keyboard, I will somehow managed to drop a gallon of paint on it no matter how careful I am. So I just use $20 el cheapo Microsoft Curve keyboards, which invariably wear out after a year because I hammer it so bad.

      --
      Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    4. Re:speak for yourselves.... by Ryanrule · · Score: 3, Funny

      I can see dropping a phone in the toilet. Of course you must then recognize that every phone you see has been used while someone wiped their arse.

    5. Re:speak for yourselves.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Speak for yourself. My wife managed to drop her LG phone in the toilet. She got it out quickly (a mano) and I suggested the rice treatment for 24 h, and it still works fine. And she still sucks a mean dick. It was a close call, though. I'm all in favor of this technology...

    6. Re:speak for yourselves.... by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

      They're called "accidents" Mr. Douchbag

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    7. Re:speak for yourselves.... by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 2

      or even dropped our phone in the toilet.

      Gotta talk while pissin.' Yes, I've seen that happen. Yank it out, pull the battery and sim, clean them with alcohol if handy, wait in anxiety while they dry.

      You wouldn't catch me leaving my TEK 2246 out in the rain, but my former boss who owned a construction company, left his portable corded Skilsaw rotary with a carbide rebar-cutting blade out in the rain. Man, that was one pissed-off corner-cutter.

    8. Re:speak for yourselves.... by hldn · · Score: 1

      i recently spilt some water on my keyboard and the left ctrl key died. i took it apart and examined it closely, but i couldnt see where the problem was. i ended up having to use software (ctrl2cap) to switch the function of it with the capslock key. of course, now i have no capslock key :/

      anyway, shit happens. it'll happen to you too one day.

      --
      http://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    9. Re:speak for yourselves.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      There's a solution to that already, It's called a macbook.

    10. Re:speak for yourselves.... by LongearedBat · · Score: 2

      I thought phone screens are too small for porn.

    11. Re:speak for yourselves.... by msuarezalvarez · · Score: 1

      Hmm, so you are the guy that uses the capslock key for something?!

    12. Re:speak for yourselves.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Accidents happen. Accidentally washing your phone or watch in the washing machine. Dropping your phone overboard while on a boat, or you yourself falling overboard, etc. Getting drenched in the rain when caught out. If you live and do anything at all it happens.

      With that said, I seriously doubt this "waterproofs" your device. I'm sure at trivial depths (maybe as little as 5 feet) the particles aren't going to stop shit from entering your electronics. I know for sure it wouldn't work in soapy water (like the washing machine) because I'm guessing the nanoparticles rely on the surface tension of water to work.

    13. Re:speak for yourselves.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "of course, now i have no capslock key :/"

      so its WIN-WIN ?

    14. Re:speak for yourselves.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      There's a better solution to that already. It's called being careful with your expensive shit.

    15. Re:speak for yourselves.... by Omnifarious · · Score: 1

      Remind me to never be your friend. How do you live with your own mistakes, or don't you ever make any?

    16. Re:speak for yourselves.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And yet, somehow they don't happen to everybody.

    17. Re:speak for yourselves.... by Shoten · · Score: 2

      I've had a douchebag in the seat next to me on a plane make a spastic grab for his drink while reaching over me...and my laptop. Not all exposure to water is defined by the owner of the damaged item being the one who is pathetic, and none of the times my electronics got wet had to do with my negligence. I've also been caught in a scirrocco in Italy while walking back home, knocked off the side of a dock by a person turning with an oar tucked stupidly under their armpit...the ways in which water and other liquids can get to our electronics are many. Let's face it; water covers most of the planet, and even falls from the sky on regular occasions...it ain't exactly hard to get exposed to.

      --

      For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
    18. Re:speak for yourselves.... by omglolbah · · Score: 1

      * One of our customers expects all text on drawings to be in all caps for clarity.
      * Variables have to be typed in all caps for historical reasons.. (all variables are that way already and the codebase is much too big to refactor efficiently.. mostly because there are no automatic tools available and the code is stored in binary files linked to an ancient database)

      Just two usage cases for the caps lock ;)

    19. Re:speak for yourselves.... by mug+funky · · Score: 3, Funny

      who needs a solution that creates more problems?

      (hyperbole aside... seriously, buying new software and learning a new platform just to get that cool magnetic DC plug that Apple will sue anyone else who uses it over?)

    20. Re:speak for yourselves.... by dissy · · Score: 2

      Oblg.: http://www.crazywebsite.com/Website-Clipart-Pictures-Videos/Funny-People/Girl-Laptop-Bathroom-1LG.jpg

      Perhaps she is chatting on IRC, the Internet Relay Crap
      Or maybe paying for an ebay order with PeePal
      That's one heck of a core dump

      Just imagine the poor guy who has fore play with her. The packet route goes from bathroom floor - laptop - desk - her lap - his face - him realizing what he really actually ate - back to bathroom floor.
      Isn't the round-trip of life beautiful?

    21. Re:speak for yourselves.... by drumlight · · Score: 1

      I'm Canadian and use it for postal codes. They don't look right in lower case, I can't coordinate my fingers quite well enough and the Post Office gets confused by L!C@H7

    22. Re:speak for yourselves.... by EvanED · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I've killed two separate MS Natural 4000s, one about 30 minutes after getting it. It's very rare that I'll spill, but man, it seems like just a little splash has a high probability of rendering it useless.

      Personally though, the extra comfort of a comfortable-to-use keyboard is worth an occasional fairly-expensive (at least for a grad student) replacement. I never understand people who spend like $1500 for an awesome gaming rig or something and then get a cheapass keyboard, which is one of the couple components you actually use. But I might just be overly sensitive or something; I do pay a lot of attention to arm ergonomics as fallout from wrist problems many years back.

    23. Re:speak for yourselves.... by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 2

      Yes, they do.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    24. Re:speak for yourselves.... by Max+Littlemore · · Score: 1

      * Variables have to be typed in all caps for historical reasons..

      Whenever I use all caps for variables (or constants) I tend to have underscores in them and rarely use digits. WHAT IS WRONG WITH A FREAKING SHIFT LOCK!?!?!

      Whew. Sorry, but whoever thought a caps lock was an improvement over shift lock was an idiot.

      --
      I don't therefore I'm not.
    25. Re:speak for yourselves.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Saws and screwdrivers are technology.

    26. Re:speak for yourselves.... by X0563511 · · Score: 0

      ... to my late grandfather's violin 110 year old violin.

      Wow! His violin has a violin? How old is this property-owning property?

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    27. Re:speak for yourselves.... by EdIII · · Score: 2

      You just squint your eyes. When there is a will there is a way.......

      It may have gone too far when you are standing up on a chair, leg over on the dresser, holding your phone up desperately trying to get signal in a hotel room in the middle of nowhere to look at Internet porn.

      Cirque Du Soleil had nothing on me that day.......

    28. Re:speak for yourselves.... by EdIII · · Score: 1

      The really terrible thing is having an executive hand you a dead phone, asking for you to fix it, only to answer that first obvious question with, "I dropped in the toilet".

    29. Re:speak for yourselves.... by Glonoinha · · Score: 5, Funny

      Get back to us when you kill an IBM Model M keyboard. It's like the Tonka Truck of keyboards. You hit someone with a Model M, they're going down.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    30. Re:speak for yourselves.... by vux984 · · Score: 1

      I can see dropping a phone in the toilet. Of course you must then recognize that every phone you see has been used while someone wiped their arse.

      Not necessesarily...

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QLw6FemRavs&feature=related

      Maybe the execution there is a bit over the top, but its real enough all the same. Many people have lost their phone like that, from the front pockets of hood and jackets. Or off of belt clips and holsters... you undo the belt and gravity takes over from there... the belt just provides a nice rail for it to slide along rigth at the toilet... at least for people who wear the holder on the non-buckle side...

    31. Re:speak for yourselves.... by EvanED · · Score: 4, Funny

      You hit someone with a Model M, they're going down.

      Unfortunately that'll be me hitting you after I have to listen to you type for a couple hours. :-)

      (I'm well aware of the model M's reputation, but I don't find the better "button feel" to be anywhere near worth the noise, let alone the lack of a split keyboard or the Natural 4000's reverse tilt which I really really wish was more common. That alone makes typing far more comfortable; I don't understand why it's basically the only keyboard out there with that feature.)

    32. Re:speak for yourselves.... by Kompressor · · Score: 3, Funny

      Dare I make a "Yo dawg" comment?

      --
      kmem russian roulette: Aquillar> dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/kmem bs=1 count=1 seek=$RANDOM
    33. Re:speak for yourselves.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Thank you for saying this. I was trying to come up with a succint, witty response to this asshat, and then I ran across your response. Thanks for putting my thoughts into words.

    34. Re:speak for yourselves.... by flonker · · Score: 2

      I have killed an IBM Model M keyboard. One of the original PS/2 models. A friend of mine got drunk, passed out, and somehow managed to knock it on the floor, and then dropped a 50 pound 23" CRT on top of it. A couple of keys popped off and broke.

    35. Re:speak for yourselves.... by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

      Because it's so expensive you'll never use it near water anyway?

    36. Re:speak for yourselves.... by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      A couple of keys broke? The keycaps are easily replaceable on Model Ms, as long as you didn't break the molded plastic tube under them. Broken keycaps don't equal a "killed" keyboard any more than a flat tire equals a "wrecked car".

    37. Re:speak for yourselves.... by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      I accidentally brought my cheap Samsung phone in a hot tub with me for several minutes before I realized I still had it in my pocket. After fully disassembling it and baking it an environmental chamber for a couple hours at ~100F, it worked just fine and I'm still using it.

    38. Re:speak for yourselves.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could buy it for the hardware and install windows on it.

    39. Re:speak for yourselves.... by petman · · Score: 2, Informative

      Speak for yourself. I don't wipe my arse.

    40. Re:speak for yourselves.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The nice thing about other people damaging your equipment is you can make them pay for it.

    41. Re:speak for yourselves.... by Maritz · · Score: 1

      Spoken like someone who would be over the hills and far away should one need to be administered... ;)

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    42. Re:speak for yourselves.... by Pax681 · · Score: 1

      You just squint your eyes. When there is a will there is a way........

      well as we say here in Scotland it's more like "where there's a willie, there's a way" :P

    43. Re:speak for yourselves.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know exactly what you're saying. I'll also hazard a guess that you're at least 30+ years of age. You see, it's generally only the older generation that has a "look after things" kind of attitude. Very few "kids" of today have that. Blame the modern world where nothing is built to last (or at least so we're lead to believe) and everything should breakdown/wear excessively and generally need to be entirely replaced every year or so.

    44. Re:speak for yourselves.... by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 2

      Or a Toshiba Toughbook CF30. It's a bit more expensive, but it doubles as a bullet shield (only small calibers, non armour piercing and it will probably not be a usefull computer afterwards). Dropping it from a dozen meters (40 feet or so) doesn't really damage it and a car driving over it is no problem if the toughbook is flat on the ground. It seems to object to a tank driving over it though.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    45. Re:speak for yourselves.... by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Shift lock is for old people. I can type entire sentences with a baby finger on the shift key.

      No conscious effort, easier than hitting a separate toggle key (CAPS LOCK or SHIFT LOCK) and almost certainly learned during my main Angband playing days.

      As you suggest though, infinitely more useful for programming - and 'finger on shift' operation is even more convenient as you just lift for digits.

    46. Re:speak for yourselves.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He thought he made a mistake once, but he was wrong.

    47. Re:speak for yourselves.... by delinear · · Score: 5, Funny

      The only real way to kill a Model M is to throw it into the fires of Mount Doom, where it was forged.

    48. Re:speak for yourselves.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I accidentally brought my cheap Samsung phone in a hot tub with me for several minutes before I realized I still had it in my pocket. After fully disassembling it and baking it an environmental chamber for a couple hours at ~100F, it worked just fine and I'm still using it.

      pockets? in a hot tub? i think you're doing it wrong. Unless you're getting them confused with hot pockets.

    49. Re:speak for yourselves.... by delinear · · Score: 1

      That's fine if you can spare the equipment for the time it takes to get it repaired/replaced. If it's his work laptop he might need it a little more urgently, in which case prevention is still better than cure (obviously depending on the cost of the prevention).

    50. Re:speak for yourselves.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also have never once done anything like that to any of my gadgets. Partly because I'm not a clutz. Partly because I actually have to pay for my gear, so I treat it appropriately. I'm also always amazed how poorly people treat their stuff.

    51. Re:speak for yourselves.... by Tom · · Score: 1

      That.

      It's probably a matter of POV. I'm also baffled at people who put stickers on their notebooks or otherwise feel the urge to "personalize" their stuff by, essentially, damaging it. Heck, one of the things I love about the Apple notebooks is that they don't have two dozens "Intel inside", "NVidia! Yeah!", "Designed for Windows FuckME", "Free Virus Inside!", "Buy 2, get 1 for the prize of 1" and so on stickers.

      When I gave my iPhone (1st generation) to my girlfriend after buying the iPhone 4 (that means it was almost 3 years old) it had one small scratch on the back. And I never had a sleeve or cover for it. How hard is it to not put your phone into the same pocket as your keys or spare change?

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    52. Re:speak for yourselves.... by rrossman2 · · Score: 1

      nor have I.. yet I have many friends who have, some multiple times. My one friend who worked at AT&T said it got to the point when someone brought a phone in and said it got wet, you'd automatically ask if it was dropped into the toilet before you touched it. (Previously his thought was a more innocent "default" of they spilled a drink on it or it was out in the rain.. he never understood how *so many* people can drop their phones into toilets.

      I also know a few people who managed to drop their phones into a full (or nearly full) pitcher of beer

    53. Re:speak for yourselves.... by dkf · · Score: 1

      Get back to us when you kill an IBM Model M keyboard. It's like the Tonka Truck of keyboards. You hit someone with a Model M, they're going down.

      It's a great melee weapon for use against zombies. I believe you can type on it too.

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    54. Re:speak for yourselves.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's difficult to break keyboards by sucking. Unless you have an industrial grade cleaning device at your disposal.

    55. Re:speak for yourselves.... by eth1 · · Score: 1

      It's very rare that I'll spill, but man, it seems like just a little splash has a high probability of rendering it useless.

      At my last job, we used a dishwasher to clean keyboards coming back from lease returns (man, were they nasty). Out of hundreds or thousands that came through there over several years, I don't think any of them ever died because of that. What are you splashing on them, sulphuric acid? :P

    56. Re:speak for yourselves.... by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      I once somehow got chocolate into my camera case (sigh) and found out the hard way when I removed the camera again afterward and found it had dried chocolate on it. Of course, it did no harm, but its a pain to clean off properly.

      Meanwhile my daughter has a "drop-proof + waterproof + coldproof" camera from Olympus that is wonderful precisely because even though she's extremely careful of it, we can worry a bit less if something untoward happens. As an aside, she's never used it underwater or in the cold because she values her devices too.

      Parenting note: I taught my child how to handle DVDs (at the time) and electronics properly at about 3 yrs old. "This is how you do that" is much more productive than "don't touch that" in the long run. Now she's the one who sighs when her friends grab devices and discs improperly.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    57. Re:speak for yourselves.... by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      A bag of rice is very handy too ... absorbs liquid quickly.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    58. Re:speak for yourselves.... by IMightB · · Score: 1

      You're forgetting the fact that many ./ers have never left their mothers basement.

    59. Re:speak for yourselves.... by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      * golf clap *

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    60. Re:speak for yourselves.... by EvanED · · Score: 1

      I suspect being actually plugged in and powered makes the difference, though I don't discount the possibility of unusually poor build quality (in that respect) from MS. But it seems like just a teaspoon or two of water is enough to cause significant problems.

    61. Re:speak for yourselves.... by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

      Or a Toshiba Toughbook CF30. It's a bit more expensive, but it doubles as a bullet shield (only small calibers, non armour piercing and it will probably not be a usefull computer afterwards). Dropping it from a dozen meters (40 feet or so) doesn't really damage it and a car driving over it is no problem if the toughbook is flat on the ground. It seems to object to a tank driving over it though.

      40 feet? Come on, even if the case were perfectly sturdy with perfectly soft insides (two things that are impossible) you can't stop a hard drive from that speed (and the CF30 doesnt come with an SSD) without serious damage. The most rugged of the Toughbook line is only certified for a 6 foot drop.

    62. Re:speak for yourselves.... by sandytaru · · Score: 1

      Too bad I can't make an edit to my edit.

      --
      Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    63. Re:speak for yourselves.... by wootcat · · Score: 1

      Probably most happen this way.

      --
      I'm really a low 5-digit Slashdotter, but this ID is where I am now.
    64. Re:speak for yourselves.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Panasonic makes Toughbooks, not Toshiba.

    65. Re:speak for yourselves.... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      My swimsuit had a pocket. I was in a hotel, not my own backyard, so I couldn't exactly go au naturel.

    66. Re:speak for yourselves.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You spend $20 on a $2 keyboard? I throw away about 5 keyboards a week, even after giving them away to anyone who wants them. Of course, the source of the keyboards is big companies doing PC refreshes. Seriously you can buy a pretty good processor for $20 (although I admit you can't type on it).

    67. Re:speak for yourselves.... by DaveGod · · Score: 1

      Those extremely cheap Microsoft 600 keyboards are quite decent for home use. More to the point, they're a known quantity and I'm used to it. From experience, more expensive keyboards certainly do not equate to better quality, never mind the lottery as to whether the key operation conforms to personal preference.

      I actually bought my first because it was so absurdly cheap I decided to pick it up as a spare. When my then-keyboard broke I tried several random replacements but just kept going back to the "spare".

    68. Re:speak for yourselves.... by AmbushBug · · Score: 1

      So the M stands for Mordor? I always wondered want it stood for... good to know, thanks!

    69. Re:speak for yourselves.... by kesuki · · Score: 1

      the only technological solution is to have a magnetic breakaway cord like the original xbox controllers.

    70. Re:speak for yourselves.... by kesuki · · Score: 1

      The only real way to kill a Model M is to throw it into the fires of Mount Dhoom, where it was forged.

      There fixed that for you.

    71. Re:speak for yourselves.... by kesuki · · Score: 1

      "he never understood how *so many* people can drop their phones into toilets."

      it is because they secretly feel like they have a shitty job and want a break from all the pointlessness. it's not even at a conscious level for most of them.

    72. Re:speak for yourselves.... by morethanapapercert · · Score: 1
      Pardon me for asking; but what the hell was an open can of paint doing in the same room as your keyboard (and presumably computer, monitor etc)???

      When I painted my home office, I couldn't get all the furniture out ( no room elsewhere for the items) but I made damn sure my computer was shut down, draped in old sheets and put in another room, away from foot traffic.The furniture got draped with cheap vapour barrier grade plastic sheeting.

      That's not being anal either; like removing the outlet and light switch covers, that's just doing house painting properly.

      For what it's worth; I'm hard on keyboards as well. In my case it's because I learned to type first on a manual and then later an IBM Selectric, so my fingers are well trained to press a key more firmly and far more deeply than modern keyboards require. I'd break down and buy one of the Model M based designs if I could find a vendor that also a) Used double shot keycaps, b) has greater stagger between rows than the 1-5 mm I usually see c) the keys are mounted on a slight curve, not a straight plate d) has media and common shortcut keys e) (optional) backlit letters. I have given serious thought to building my own keyboard from scratch, since it seems no one makes keyboards with all 5 features.

      --
      I need a wheelchair van for my son. Help me get the word out. https://www.gofundme.com/wheelchair-van-for-jj
    73. Re:speak for yourselves.... by EvanED · · Score: 1

      I perhaps should have not been quite so forceful with your statement. If you have gone out and tried out some different keyboards and made a conscious choice, that's fine. It's people who just order some $10 keyboard or something because it's cheap that I don't get. (Or people who go "yeah I'd like to get that $50 keyboard but it's too expensive. But yes I need SLI and the extreme edition processor!")

    74. Re:speak for yourselves.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I totally read your post like one of those "Most Interesting Man In The World" commercials.

      He can infinitely recite Pi, and never misses a beat.
      When he is out on the town, he is able to obey every law. Even the contradictory ones.
      He thought he made a mistake once, but he was wrong.
      He is... the most perfect man in the world.

    75. Re:speak for yourselves.... by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because 2 year old video cards and crappy screens work better than the comparable model Dell that costs a third less.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    76. Re:speak for yourselves.... by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Hell, you can run Panasonic Toughbooks over with an 18 wheeler and it will still work...or drop it in molten metal ( a story I heard, never verified...).

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    77. Re:speak for yourselves.... by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      If you take out the thousands of screws, you will find that the typing surface is made up of three layers of plastic. Take apart the layers, and proceed to wipe them with a cloth to dry them, then put back together (in the same order!), 90% of the time, it will return to working shape, but alignment is very important.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    78. Re:speak for yourselves.... by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Yup, teach um young that stuff. My kids even used my computers successfully at that age, and since the older does so well with the computers, I gave him my old laptop when I got a new one.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    79. Re:speak for yourselves.... by EvanED · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately I got a bit unlucky there. I did actually take apart my keyboard like that the first time it happened, but the traces actually have visible water damage (see the brown bits). I tried that at the time, and again now, and it didn't help.

      When I went to try that with the second keyboard, while I was separating the layers I kind of tore one of the layers through a trace. Oops.

      I have occasionally wanted to go and see if I could figure the right place at MS to contact to see if I could buy a couple of those plastic things though... I think i'll give that another shot now.

    80. Re:speak for yourselves.... by laird · · Score: 1

      "who needs a solution that creates more problems?"

      What are you talking about? The article describes a process that is applied to electronics to make it waterproof. I saw it demoed, and it appears to work - an iPhone that was not only completely submerged but full of water remained powered on and received a phone call. Which, at CES, was impressive - plenty of cell phones that weren't under water failed to receive phone calls there. :-) Seriously, though, once the device is treated, it feels and acts exactly like it did before treatment. So WTF are you talking about? Do you have some deep understanding of their treatment process and some hidden problems that we don't know about? Do share...

    81. Re:speak for yourselves.... by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Heck, one of the things I love about the Apple notebooks is that they don't have two dozens "Intel inside", "NVidia! Yeah!", "Designed for Windows FuckME", "Free Virus Inside!", "Buy 2, get 1 for the prize of 1" and so on stickers.

      But then Apple makes up for it with the gigantic tacky glowing Apple logo on the back of the screen. At least I can peel the stickers off of my laptops.

    82. Re:speak for yourselves.... by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      What does nightwish have to do with it.

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
    83. Re:speak for yourselves.... by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      If it's liquid sealed mercury may be safe (for the laptop)...

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    84. Re:speak for yourselves.... by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      read the parent post before you trowel the butthurt on.

    85. Re:speak for yourselves.... by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      from the Dells i've used, your statement might well be correct.

  4. I call slashvertizing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The link is from a questionably "objective" source that has no real info on how (or if) it works. But by all means mail them your gadgets! They were nominated for an award you've never heard of!

    1. Re:I call slashvertizing by swalve · · Score: 3, Informative

      I have to agree. If only because it seems impossible. How much of a gap can it bridge? Won't a coating break the buttons' electrical contacts? How does it protect the battery?

    2. Re:I call slashvertizing by Gnaget · · Score: 1

      Agreed. After a perusal of their site, I wouldn't be an early adopter of this. They specifically tell you in their demonstration video not to try it at home, so it sounds like a modern version of the Emperor's new clothes.

    3. Re:I call slashvertizing by cheater512 · · Score: 2

      The interesting part is they took the battery cover off underwater.

      Now usually on most phones I've seen, the battery connects via bare copper. How can it still actually function, without allowing water to short circuit it?
      Ditto for headphone jack. Either it covers the connection or it lets water in.

    4. Re:I call slashvertizing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Pure water is actually a reasonable insulator. You can generally immerse electronics in pure water, then dry it off and it will work, if it stopped working at all. I'll bet all their amazing immersion demos are being done with deionised water

      Water with ions in it, such as from salt or contamination, is conductive and will corrode. I'd like to see them dunk a "waterproofed" phone into seawater.

    5. Re:I call slashvertizing by artor3 · · Score: 1

      My guess is that the video used distilled water, which is highly resistive. Water only conducts if it contains impurities.

      For the actual product, I would expect them to apply the coating with the battery already in, and you simply can't take it out without needing to reapply the coating.

    6. Re:I call slashvertizing by socialleech · · Score: 1

      Imagine the liquid cooling possibilities of computers that couldn't be injured by submerging them!

      Didn't I see someone comment about dolphins flying water filled spaceships a couple days ago here? We should let them know we've solved one problem!

    7. Re:I call slashvertizing by adolf · · Score: 1

      Imagine the liquid cooling possibilities of computers that couldn't be injured by submerging them!

      Already works: Just find a suitable container, fill it with mineral oil, and submerge the electronics in it.

    8. Re:I call slashvertizing by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      I thought that too. I would suspect that it is thin enough that it doesn't prevent the flow of electrons between the copper contacts, but pushes the water away enough to prevent the electrons from flowing across them. Amazing yes, but it doesn't seem impossible.

    9. Re:I call slashvertizing by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      Or the copper contacts have small plastic lips/edges on the battery/phone contacts, so they're watertight enough when the battery is seated (held in with the battery tension).

    10. Re:I call slashvertizing by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Does this coating prevent conduction, or is it merely a method to avoid the corrosion water causes? That's the real problem - shorts are bad, yes - but that's usually not what kills a gadget.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    11. Re:I call slashvertizing by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      ... can be tricky, because mineral oil and air do not have the same dielectric constant.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    12. Re:I call slashvertizing by adolf · · Score: 1

      Neither do air and dust. Or the air in July and the air in January.

      *shrug*

    13. Re:I call slashvertizing by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Yep, that'd have to be some highly pure water to do that. Obviously it won't work with seawater, but it also probably won't work with most tap water.

    14. Re:I call slashvertizing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Already works: Just find a suitable container, fill it with mineral oil, and submerge the electronics in it.

      Mineral oil will destroy any rubber parts in the computer. Most computers contain at least a few capacitors with rubber seals. Certain types of coatings and glues will also breakdown. Non sealed hard disk drives (ie all consumer models) should never be submerged and there is little reason to put the power supply in the same tank as the motherboard.

      I find submerged PCs fascinating, but I've never seen it done properly.

      I've checked out these waterproof coatings too. They're ok. Just a spray on plastic. Nothing you can rely on, but it would be nice to have just in case. Though I wouldn't pay extra for it.

    15. Re:I call slashvertizing by adolf · · Score: 1

      Mineral oil will destroy any rubber parts in the computer. Most computers contain at least a few capacitors with rubber seals.

      In practice, this doesn't seem to be a problem.

    16. Re:I call slashvertizing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you solely look at a scammy web site that holds itself not liable for any damage it may not appear to be much.

      In the real world it's a huge problem.
      http://www.bit-tech.net/modding/case-mod/2010/09/15/the-mineral-oil-pc-by-andrew-mollman/5

    17. Re:I call slashvertizing by adolf · · Score: 1

      And I'm instead supposed to believe a guy who refers to the bung in the end of a capacitor as being "PVC insulation"?

      Sorry.

    18. Re:I call slashvertizing by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      True yes, but the difference between air and dust, and air at different human-habitable temperatures and humidities.... is much less than the difference between air and oil?

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    19. Re:I call slashvertizing by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      They reply to that concern in their youtube videos and use sealed bottled water in all their later videos on purpose to prove the point.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    20. Re:I call slashvertizing by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Mineral oil would work too, and looks reasonably like water.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    21. Re:I call slashvertizing by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      I especially liked in the how its done video that they use a "unique process only found on the surface of the sun to bind the molecules to your device" Sounds very fishy.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    22. Re:I call slashvertizing by laird · · Score: 1

      They don't operate by making the case waterproof. The showed a demo (I saw it live) and the iPhone 4 was full of water while operating. They're coating everything inside the iPhone, making the microphone, speakers, components, etc., waterproof. Keep in mind that the iPhone's battery is permanently installed, so if the insulate the battery and al of the wires, it should be fine even if covered in water. They did say that you needed to let the phone dry off before charging it again, as the contacts in the charging cable would short.

  5. Meh. by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 2

    Old News. I've been playing acoustic and electric guitar with Elixir strings for almost a decade, with customer satisfaction. Any nerd considering learning guitar should also, as they are resistant to Chee-toe residue.

    Gripe: can you guys find a way to coat the upper B and E strings?

    1. Re:Meh. by Max+Littlemore · · Score: 1

      I've found them to start off great, but they deteriorate after a while and feel kinda yuck. I think bang for buck standard phosphor bronze is about as good.

      --
      I don't therefore I'm not.
    2. Re:Meh. by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 1

      But now you can waterproof the rest of your guitar so you can play electric guitar in the shower! [NSFW]

      --
      Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
  6. What I want to know is... by rsilvergun · · Score: 5, Insightful

    why is my $15 Walgreens watch waterproof to a depth of 20 meters, but if I sneeze on my $400 Android / iPhone it's ruined and I voided the warranty?

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:What I want to know is... by QuasiSteve · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think you'd have to do a little more than sneeze on it - but I am well aware of stories in the past where e.g. sporters who sweated a little (much) got told by the service center that the humidity indicators in their iPod (or similar) indicated the device got wet and thus the warranty was void.

      But just to address your specific example - your $15 Walgreens watch probably has little to no openings and whatever interface controls are there are very easy to make waterproof. Compare to the many slots and compartments on a typical smartphone which often are required to be easily user-accessible. You wouldn't want to have to unscrew the back of your smartphone every time you'd just want to recharge it (if it ran for 2 years on a few button cells like your watch, then that wouldn't be much of an issue).

      But, more importantly, your $15 Walgreens watch is $15. If they actually got a claim from somebody with valid proof that they only dove to 19.95m and not over 20.00m, sending out a new $15 Walgreens watch is a heck of a lot cheaper than going over that paperwork and trying to tell you that you must be mistaken.
      For $400+ devices, on the other hand, it's a lot cheaper to open it up, point at the humidity tags, and say "sucks to be you".

    2. Re:What I want to know is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Because only a fool would buy replace a crappy cheap watch with another just like it...

    3. Re:What I want to know is... by ScentCone · · Score: 4, Insightful

      why is my $15 Walgreens watch waterproof to a depth of 20 meters, but if I sneeze on my $400 Android / iPhone it's ruined and I voided the warranty?

      A couple of thoughts, here.

      1) How do the microphone, micro SD slot, speakers, and charging/data port on your watch work after you've taken it down to 20 meters?

      2) Has it ever occured to you that the makers and retailers of your $15 watch are simply banking (literally) on the fact that essentially nobody will every submit that cheap watch to 20 meters of water? And if someone does do so, and the watch inevitably fails, what percentage of that already tiny percentage are going to actually bother to pursue warranty service/replacement on something that costs less than a decent pizza? They could simply replace that costs-them-$3 watch every time all three people in that group take a shower, and they'll still make more money than they would have by not saying "Waterproof to 20 meters!" on the packaging and not having to service such claims.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    4. Re:What I want to know is... by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      why is my $15 Walgreens watch waterproof to a depth of 20 meters, but if I sneeze on my $400 Android / iPhone it's ruined and I voided the warranty?

      Your $15 Walgreens watch has rubber seals on the backplate and around any buttons/knobs.
      Your $400 Android / iPhone doesn't. If it did, the phone would be a lot bulkier.

      Looking at their list of "approved devices", I'm wondering how the nanocoating interacts with user removable batteries.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    5. Re:What I want to know is... by gstrickler · · Score: 1

      Because no tech wants to touch it after you've sneezed on it.

      --
      make imaginary.friends COUNT=100 VISIBLE=false
    6. Re:What I want to know is... by Greyfox · · Score: 1

      Actually if you live in someplace moist, like Mississippi, you've probably already voided the warranty with the local ambient humidity.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    7. Re:What I want to know is... by thePig · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In that case, the best and cheapest option is to nano-coat the humidity tag.
      No problems with replacement then ...

      --
      rajmohan_h@yahoo.com
    8. Re:What I want to know is... by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      It has been shown that the humidity detectors can indicate the device got wet just from being used in normal operating environments.

    9. Re:What I want to know is... by EvanED · · Score: 1

      I think you'd have to do a little more than sneeze on it - but I am well aware of stories in the past where e.g. sporters who sweated a little (much) got told by the service center that the humidity indicators in their iPod (or similar) indicated the device got wet and thus the warranty was void.

      Heck, there was a story on here a while back about how just bringing in your phone from the cold was enough to trip the humidity sensor from small amounts of condensation. Personally, I think that it's BS that's legal, but whatever, it is.

    10. Re:What I want to know is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >

      Looking at their list of "approved devices", I'm wondering how the nanocoating interacts with user removable batteries.

      From the site you linked.

      HTC Evo 4G
      HTC Evo Shift 4G

      Both of these phones have user removable batteries. I actually have both sitting in front of me currently.

    11. Re:What I want to know is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Conformal coating can make almost anything with no moving parts IP68+.

      Waterproof microphones/speakers exist, the micro SD slot could easily be hidden under a sealed cover plate, and the charging port could be protected by a "cork" type stopper. Conformal coating for any PCB without moving parts.

      I do this shit for lulz. The manufacturers could easily do it given financial incentive.

    12. Re:What I want to know is... by Kagetsuki · · Score: 1

      There are waterproof Android phones. I own an IS11CA, which is called the "Casio G'z One Commando" overseas. My carrier (KDDI AU) also has an insurance plan that covers basically everything. I haven't had to use the insurance yet but, but I can vouch for the phone being prety tough as my father managed to drop it down a flight of stone stairs approximately 5 seconds after I first showed it to him.

    13. Re:What I want to know is... by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

      "Compare to the many slots and compartments on a typical smartphone which often are required to be easily user-accessible."

      Like on that hugely popular whatchamacallit... iPhone? :p

      It's not like waterproof gadgets aren't available... see Moto Defy and Defy+... it's just that they're crippled in all other respects.

    14. Re:What I want to know is... by FreakyGreenLeaky · · Score: 1

      'coz your snot is icky, ok? sars, plague, God knows what's in your snot. then it dries, and has to be peeled off, etc. no, no. you can keep your snot-encrusted ipad.

    15. Re:What I want to know is... by Cederic · · Score: 2

      The manufacturers could easily do it given financial incentive.

      They could do it given market demand. As it is, the market wants cheaper and/or more fashionable, and "Indestructible" isn't sexy enough to show off your metrosexual design tastes.

    16. Re:What I want to know is... by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      You should have bought a Motorola Defy. It's not waterproof as such, but water resistant. There is a defy + (faster and with an IP67 rating) but I cant find the specs now. This worries me for I have ordered one this week, and not yet recieved it.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    17. Re:What I want to know is... by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      If the phone is really waterproof the default procedure for investigating a phone could start with a low-temperature washing cycle in a dishwasher. If I were a repair tech I'd really prefer that.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    18. Re:What I want to know is... by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      Water resistance tagging is regulated in the USA. Its possible some manufacturers would lie, but it does actually require testing and approval to use those markings.

      cf. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_Resistant_mark

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    19. Re:What I want to know is... by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      Point of note: with inductive charging and bluetooth, there's no need for our phones to have external electrical contacts at all anymore.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    20. Re:What I want to know is... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Thanks - glad I reloaded the comment before making the same point myself. :)

      The only reason I need a microSD card on my phone is because the manufacturers put too little storage in them for what I want. Some people also like to change SIM cards, but for my use cases (and I think 99% of users) having screw-down panel with an O-ring, behind which I could install a SIM card (it's Verizon around here, but still) and a microSD card would be fine.

      Bluetooth is plenty sufficient for getting the images off. Ideally I'd have a unit that both did inductive charging and at the same location opportunistically paired with my phone and synchronized the photos to my computer.

      Somebody who did need to change SIM cards frequently might want to get a different phone, or the door could be optionally latched with something that did not provide a good seal but was easy to open with a finger. Maybe even the same door without a screw.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    21. Re:What I want to know is... by FranktehReaver · · Score: 1

      HEY! HEY! HEY!....... Little Caesar's Pizza is good and its only 5 bucks... or 5.55 now... Whatever I think it taste good!...

    22. Re:What I want to know is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pah, my sun dial can go down further than that.

    23. Re:What I want to know is... by sarysa · · Score: 1

      Can't speak for iPhone and its non-removable battery, but I had a little "happening" while hiking that ended up with my Galaxy S (Android) phone submerged for several minutes. Didn't remove the battery until nearly 8 hours later, and 24 hours later I thought for sure it was dead. But I just needed to be more patient -- nearly a year later I tried it on a lark and it was fine. (the downside being I now had two identical phones on the same carrier and a hole in my pocket, hehe)

      That said, I doubt your Android phone will be that delicate.

      On the subject of TFA, I wouldn't mind a phone I could take with me diving at shallower depths (or better yet, boring deco stops)...but due to the limits of capacative touchscreens, I'd need something with physical buttons...

      --
      Charisma is the measure of someone's ability to lie with a straight face.
    24. Re:What I want to know is... by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      Its worth pointing out that you can buy dual-sim phones for the people who need such devices. Also, SIMs can easily be inserted under a small lid with gasket to be changed from the outside without fully breaking the phone's seal.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  7. Nanocoatings Are Going Mainstream by againsttheodds · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It is no doubt that nanocoatings are going mainstream what with the latest solar paint that can harness the sun http://www.infobarrel.com/Solar_Nanopaint_-_Paint_With_Quantum_Dot_Solar_Cells and coatings for jets and other aircraft to provide excellent aerodynamic properties. Then you have nanocoatings for engines and http://againsttheodds.hubpages.com/hub/Nanodiamond-Lubricants-And-Lubrication-Particles and countless other applications on the horizon. It is an exciting time and there is still plenty of room at the bottom.

    1. Re:Nanocoatings Are Going Mainstream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Comments like this are why I read Slashdot.

    2. Re:Nanocoatings Are Going Mainstream by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

      Really? Mainstream you say? So that means that I can go and get a can of that shit right next to the Krylon at home depot? I refuse to call all the wonderful and yet somehow never actually mass produced or implemented scientific advances "mainstream". By the time any of these have a hope in hell of getting to the shelves, say in 10 years or so, we'll already have moved well beyond them.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    3. Re:Nanocoatings Are Going Mainstream by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      are going mainstream

      (emphasis mine)
      Going is future tense, as in it will happen.
      Besides that: it is difficult to manufacture these nanopaints on a large scale. Once that's fixed (however difficult it may be) they are probably going mainstream.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    4. Re:Nanocoatings Are Going Mainstream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is an exciting time and there is still plenty of room at the bottom.

      Room at the bottom is rarely a problem, even during boring times.

  8. Hydrophobic nanocoatings... by Captain+Sarcastic · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... are just the thing for rabid technophiles!

    --
    Strike while the irony is hot! -- The Freethinker
    1. Re:Hydrophobic nanocoatings... by swalve · · Score: 1

      A work of art. Well done, madam.

    2. Re:Hydrophobic nanocoatings... by SmurfButcher+Bob · · Score: 1

      THIS nanocoating is made from pure Santorum extract, so some technophiles will need to consider their choice of orientation.

      --

      help me i've cloned myself and can't remember which one I am

  9. Pretty cool, I must admit by Joshua+Fan · · Score: 1

    I was convinced when they took off the back cover of the HTC Thunderbolt and resubmerged it. It would be nice if phones started being shipped with this preapplied. Didn't DuPont already make hydrophobic coating for pants?

  10. Waterproof? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Water resistant, yes.
     
    Water proof, no. Try dropping your treated item in 10+ feet of water and get back to me if it's insides don't need drying out. Then I'll be impressed.

  11. Retro stuff by kurt555gs · · Score: 1

    I went straight to Ziebart!

    --
    * Carthago Delenda Est *
    1. Re:Retro stuff by whovian · · Score: 3, Funny

      I went straight to Ziebart!

      No, its "Zie Bart, Zie"

      --
      To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
  12. Legit! by ryanw · · Score: 1

    My friend knows these guys and had his iPhone done. I didn't believe it, but it's legit.

    1. Re:Legit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to admit I wasn't initially sure, but if some random guy on the internet claims to have a friend who knows the people making these otherwise unfounded claims and he says they're legit, then count me in!

    2. Re:Legit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And now that everyone's doing it, I'm in too!

  13. Skin Moisture by yanom · · Score: 2

    I'm curious how this will react with the moisture in our skin as we tap away on said gadgets.

    --
    "That's either incredibly asinine or the most brilliant troll I've ever read. Not sure which." -Anonymous Coward
    1. Re:Skin Moisture by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

      Well... the moisture will have even less chance of getting inside the gadget and wreaking havoc. 1 cellphone death less per 10 years, hooray!

  14. Caution: by Brian+Feldman · · Score: 0

    Side-effects may include instant death.

    --
    Brian Fundakowski Feldman
  15. Am I the only one? by Tarpan+Horses · · Score: 1

    That thinks this is actually kinda awesome? Sure it's completely geekish and totally limited in the potential buyers. But I can't help look at this and think that it is very neat. It's not nearly effective enough for me to do go through with it, but it is still a very slick approach to a neat step in the right direction. I think if I could walk in and get it done without losing my device during shipping + paying the shipping costs of sending it from Canada I would give it a lot more thought. The price doesn't even seem all that bad.

    --
    - Tarpan
  16. shower tv by FirephoxRising · · Score: 2

    my wife likes to use her ipod touch and kindle in the bath, I'm just waiting for the inevitable accident. waterproof gadgets would rock!

    1. Re:shower tv by artor3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      At least for the kindle, waterproof gadgets have already been invented.

      It's called a zip-loc bag, and it is great for unwinding in the tub.

    2. Re:shower tv by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, the ipod touch/iphone works really well in a plastic bag as well. The touch sensor seems to have no problem being behind the extra plastic, which is nice in heavy rain.

    3. Re:shower tv by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      My DX is -JUST- big enough to not fit in one. Sadface.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    4. Re:shower tv by TubeSteak · · Score: 2

      It's called a zip-loc bag

      I put my phone in a zip-loc bag and it took on water.
      If you intend to mix electronics and water, it's cheaper to spend the 20~50 bucks and buy a real dry bag.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    5. Re:shower tv by modecx · · Score: 5, Informative

      Funny you mention it, I recently saw a plastic-baggie type product designed especially for this purpose: allows full submersion of electronics, and works with capacitive touch screens despite being made of a fairly thick plastic. LokSak

      While I suppose the standard zip-loc would work for the purpose, but this looked much more confidence inspiring.

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    6. Re:shower tv by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like to call this "showertexting".

    7. Re:shower tv by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      You just need a bigger bag. Resealable plastic bags are available in all kinds of sizes, from 1" square to some really huge sizes.

    8. Re:shower tv by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second this, zip-loc bags are rarely, truly waterproof. I lived on a boat for two years and would always double bag my electronics when using the dinghy to transfer from shore. In two years myself, and crew, lost: 3 cameras, 5 mobile phones, 2 mp3 players and 3 laptops!!!!!

    9. Re:shower tv by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I used this while running when if rains. I need my audiobooks and RunKeeper. :)

    10. Re:shower tv by SalaSSin · · Score: 2

      You mean shexting?

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice - Grey's Law
    11. Re:shower tv by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 1

      used that when going swimming once. it learked a bit.

      better solution: ziplock, wrap around, with rubber band, then another ziplock similarly wrapped with rubber band. survived swimming in the ocean for an hour, with no problems (outer ziplock leaks a bit, but none of that gets into the inner bag).

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    12. Re:shower tv by Stenchwarrior · · Score: 1

      That's right. Thanks to drug dealers (and consumers) there's a need for every size "baggie" that can be produced.

      --
      Loading...
    13. Re:shower tv by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 1

      Not to mention people who sell drugs in the rain while reading from their iPads.

      --
      Who did what now?
    14. Re:shower tv by Golddess · · Score: 1

      Not all zip-loc bags are created equal. In my personal experience at least, "sandwich" bags tend to be really flimsy, while quart and gallon sized bags are quite a bit sturdier. I'll use quart-sized bags as ice packs, and as long as I didn't puncture the bag when dropping in the ice, I've never seen a leak.

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    15. Re:shower tv by jeffmeden · · Score: 2

      Yes, a bag you can buy for about three and a half cents will surely work as well as one that is purpose built! The big thing is the temperature of the water; seal something up on a nice warm summer day and take it rafting with you, then drop it in the river... And watch as the inside gets just as wet as the outside. Moisture management is only effective if you take watertight sealing, plus humidity/condensation into account at the same time.

    16. Re:shower tv by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got my wife the iLoc (look on ebay) - it's basically just a heavy duty ziplock. The touchscreen works fine on the ipad. I also got one for my Nook; it confuses the hell out of the IR touchscreen, so I can't read in the bath with it. Should be ok on a non-touch kindle.

    17. Re:shower tv by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Boy Scouts led to some of the bigger ones. It is pretty nice to pack in ziplock bags to go camping, and they sell very nice 3 gallon bags that work well.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    18. Re:shower tv by modecx · · Score: 1

      Good point, because that's not something I personally have to deal with too often; the average relative (diurnal) humidity in my area rarely exceeds 50...even near a lake!

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
  17. I'm not an electrician, but... by flibbidyfloo · · Score: 2

    How could you coat the interior of a microSD card slot that's covered with a loose-fitting cover and make it waterproof? If the nano-coating doesn't conduct electricity then any card you insert won't make contact with the contacts. If it does conduct, then it's useless as a waterproofing seal over electronics. The same would seem to hold true for any earphone plug or charging port, right?

    1. Re:I'm not an electrician, but... by JakartaDean · · Score: 4, Informative

      How could you coat the interior of a microSD card slot that's covered with a loose-fitting cover and make it waterproof? If the nano-coating doesn't conduct electricity then any card you insert won't make contact with the contacts. If it does conduct, then it's useless as a waterproofing seal over electronics. The same would seem to hold true for any earphone plug or charging port, right?

      I don't know how it works for sure, but I imagine its just surface tension. The coating doesn't physically close the slot, it coats the outside of the slot with a film that repels water. Water doesn't go into very small places at routine pressure -- the raindrop-size drops you encounter all the time are its least-energy state, the "natural" curvature of water drops. The coating keeps water far enough away so this curvature radius doesn't contact the inside of the slot.

      --
      The subject who is truly loyal to the Chief Magistrate will neither advise nor submit to arbitrary measures (Junius)
    2. Re:I'm not an electrician, but... by Solandri · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not only conductivity, but how does the coating hold up under the friction of plugging in the charger every day? If you peek at the metal contacts of a USB cable with a flashlight, I'll bet they have spots worn into them from being plugged in. I doubt any coating could survive that, and the parts which suffer the most wear are also the parts that need waterproofing the most.

    3. Re:I'm not an electrician, but... by ai4px · · Score: 1

      Where can you find a flashlight with a USB cable?

    4. Re:I'm not an electrician, but... by RedBear · · Score: 1

      You've been somehow modded +5, Informative while being entirely incorrect.

      These "nanocoating" waterproofing products, and Liquipel specifically, absolutely do not keep any liquids from penetrating into the device. The very idea that a coating could keep water out of speaker grills and docking/USB ports or even a micro SIM slot is patently ridiculous anyway. We're not talking about Gore-Tex or something where the holes are only a few thousand times the size of a water molecule. That's the scale where your pressure argument might start to make sense.

      You have to realize the reason they are touting these treatments as "nanocoatings" is because they (allegedly) coat every internal nook and cranny inside the device with a permanent layer of highly water-repellent stuff that is only a few molecules thick.

      Oh yes, you can be assured that your iPad will be full of water as soon as you jump in the pool, but the point of the coating (allegedly) is that the water molecules can never actually come into contact with anything inside the device. So nothing shorts out, the device keeps working normally, and you just let the water drain out when you leave the pool/beach/shower/whatever. Supposedly. The demo videos on their website are fairly impressive though. They even imply that treated devices will survive going through the laundry. But you can clearly see that the devices get filled with water when submerged, and have to be drained when taken out of the water. The job of the coating is simply to keep the liquid from damaging anything, not to keep liquids out.

      As to how they manage to really coat everything perfectly enough at the molecular level to make it reliable, I'm sure that's a big part of their proprietary process. I'm guessing it has to be done while the device is at least partially disassembled. There is a competitor to Liquipel that has been advertising a service to waterproof an iPod Shuffle, for a cost of something like $175. I doubt that the process would be that expensive if it didn't involve the labor cost of disassembling and reassembling the Shuffle.

      This article about Liquipel is of course just astroturfing, but if these coatings in general are really as durable as implied it will completely change the way we treat personal electronics around liquids. Someday it may confuse your children when you absent-mindedly admonish them to stop playing with their supersoakers around you while you read a book in the backyard on your seventh-generation iPad. Your iPad by that point may be far more resistant to water than you are. Spill coffee on your laptop again? Go rinse it off (with soapy water) in the sink, while it's still running!

      Something to think about.

    5. Re:I'm not an electrician, but... by RedBear · · Score: 1

      Hate to reply to myself, but I'd like to point out to everyone who seems flabbergasted by this concept that it isn't really a new idea, the idea of allowing water into a device but protecting the internal surfaces, contacts and circuit boards from actually coming in contact with the water molecules.

      Case in point, Boeshield T9. Invented by engineers at Boeing for coating internal areas of airplanes where it is difficult to get physical access. It's basically a wax suspended in a solvent solution. You spray it on something, for instance a circuit board, the solvent evaporates and leaves the wax which acts as an electrical insulator and water repellent, to prevent corrosion damage. Works pretty well, too.

      How well? A work acquaintance of mine tells a story about a welding machine he treated by immersing it in a barrel of T9. It somehow went overboard from his fishing boat. You know, in the ocean. Saltwater. The electronics would have normally been irreparable from corrosion the moment it entered the water. He's a diver, so a couple weeks later he goes down (it's in about thirty feet of water) and brings it back up. Cleans it out and plugs it in. It works, and he still uses it today.

      So yeah, not a new idea, making something waterproof even when it's full of water. But T9 is just wax, so not physically very durable, and I think immersing things like LCD panels in T9 in liquid form probably wouldn't work out well. So really the only exciting thing about these coatings is that they are supposedly quite durable and are compatible with the whole device, including the delicate parts like the LCD panels.

    6. Re:I'm not an electrician, but... by flibbidyfloo · · Score: 1

      Your explanation matches what I assumed to be happening. While I know you were mainly replying to JDean, my question still stands. How does the coating repel water from electrical contacts without preventing the connection from being made? If it allows electrons through then water inside would still short out the circuits. If it doesn't let electrons through then it prevents you from connecting it to anything external. Maybe their expensive process involves them masking off the exposed contacts so they are't coated. But then I'd think the contacts would be prone to corrosion from water.

    7. Re:I'm not an electrician, but... by RedBear · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's a good question actually. I wondered the same thing about the Boeshield T9 product, but I've been assured by several people that it doesn't interfere with physical contacts.

      Maybe these coatings provide just enough electrical isolation to keep voltage from shorting through liquids between physically separated components while still allowing current to flow between metal contacts that are physically touching. That would be my best guess. But I really don't know for sure.

    8. Re:I'm not an electrician, but... by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      What the hell is he doing with a welding machine on a fishing boat?

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
    9. Re:I'm not an electrician, but... by gottabeme · · Score: 1
      --
      "Those who consume the bulk of goods are those who make them. We must never forget this secret of our prosperity."
  18. Why did I listen by Intoblivion · · Score: 1

    When they told me hydrophillic was the next big thing!? Well, these things are cyclical I suppose...

    1. Re:Why did I listen by Captain+Sarcastic · · Score: 1

      ...Well, these things are cyclical I suppose...

      Well, this was cyclic, but then it wasn't for a while....

      --
      Strike while the irony is hot! -- The Freethinker
  19. Recoating after battery swap? by nefus · · Score: 2

    Yea but do you have to recoat your phone after taking the back off and reseating or replacing the battery? I have to reseat my cell phone all the time because it gets so dang laggy, I'd hate to have to recoat my phone with this stuff every time.

    1. Re:Recoating after battery swap? by ryanw · · Score: 1

      Maybe coat all your batteries independently and the device without the battery in .... that would solve that I would imagine. Good question.

  20. Crap it still works after dropping it in the loo by elmetatron · · Score: 1

    I guess this will eliminate employees "upgrading" their company crackberries by dropping them in the toilet.

    --
    Just another idiot with mod points.
  21. How It's Made by dead_user · · Score: 1

    Why did that video feel so much like "How It's Made" on Discovery?

  22. Waterproof? How about salt-water or soda-proof? by Omnifarious · · Score: 2

    There are many more liquids in the world than water. How does this coating stand up to something as corrosive as salt water or Coke?

    1. Re:Waterproof? How about salt-water or soda-proof? by Kagetsuki · · Score: 1
    2. Re:Waterproof? How about salt-water or soda-proof? by Guppy · · Score: 2

      There are many more liquids in the world than water. How does this coating stand up to something as corrosive as salt water or Coke?

      Presumably well, hydrophobic coatings are apparently quite good at reducing corrosion. I'd be more interested to know how it stands up to something capable of wetting hydrophobic surfaces, like alcohol. Or with some fat content, like whole milk or soup.

    3. Re:Waterproof? How about salt-water or soda-proof? by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

      But Coke dissolves it faster.

  23. So Basically... by Volntyr · · Score: 1

    The only two differences between this product and NeverWet are 1. This product is available now (sort of) while we have to wait a few months for the latter and 2. You have to send in your gadget to Liquipel HQ? Sorry, I would rather wait for the stuff to come out to the market than to trust sending my electronics somewhere to be coated.

  24. not revolutionary by ridgecritter · · Score: 4, Informative

    What I've read in the media of this process suggests that it's parylene. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parylene

    If so, it's not revolutionary, but a good application of an old coating technology. When I get my iPhone 5, I'll probably send it to these guys for coating.

    1. Re:not revolutionary by az1324 · · Score: 1

      Yep probably CVD Parylene treatment like Golden Shellback aka ZAGG HzO.

    2. Re:not revolutionary by Guppy · · Score: 2

      What I've read in the media of this process suggests that it's parylene. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parylene [wikipedia.org]

      Doesn't parylene turn yellowish under UV exposure though? Except for the fluropolymer version (which I suppose it could be).

    3. Re:not revolutionary by Richard+Kirk · · Score: 4, Informative

      I have done Paralyne coating back in the 1980's. It is a vapour deposited plastic. If you are putting down Paralyne 'C' (the chlorinated version - there was no fluorinated version back then as far as I knew) then it could give a tough plastic coating that could be 100 nm deep. This forms a thin coating over all surfaces including under electronic components on boards. I have even seen it creep between stacks of microscope slides that aren't quite flat. This coating was transparent. If you put down a thinker coating you could get interference colours, and if you kept going it would look milky - particularly with Paralyne 'N' (the unchlorinated version)..

      Paralyne was a standard 'tropicalization' process for electronics to be used in harsh environments. You tended to 'tropicalize' circuit boards with masking over the board edge connectors. As Paralyne was good at penetrating, you probably could not coat anything with a 2-way switch, or plugs. But things like earphones and displays would probably be fine.

      Yellowing? I never saw it go yellow. It would have to go amazingly yellow because the coat is so thin.

    4. Re:not revolutionary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does this work with the connections? If you coat your iPhone 5 with this, won't the iPod connector (aka the USB port) no longer work, being covered in plastic now. However, if you don't coat the connector with the stuff, how do you stop the accidental spill shorting across the pins on the port and killing the device?

  25. New or old it sounds interesting- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And I can think of many uses besides cheap stuff like cell phones and laptops
    .
    I have a decent chunk of change invested in digital cameras and very often do get caught out in rainy weather.
    If this stuff will work on a DSLR I have a few I'll be sending in.
    Hopefully they'll do some testing soon and verify that Nikon DSLRs can be done.

  26. Re:Crap it still works after dropping it in the lo by ryanw · · Score: 1

    I guess this will eliminate employees "upgrading" their company crackberries by dropping them in the toilet.

    Yah, that could make for a problem buying used phones on ebay.... you'd never know why someone is selling a "perfectly good and working phone" for a discount.

  27. Hydrophobic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We need oleophobic coating to eliminate the fingerprint smudges on the glass of a smartphone.

  28. Forget electronics... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Forget phones and TVs, I want a set of dishes and cookware coated in this stuff!

  29. Love the disclaimer at the end... by jelle · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure if I should believe the video, it looks like an infomercial, and the disclaimer flashed at the end doesn't instill confidence that it really exists and works...

    --
    --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
  30. Oh Gawd, not this rubbish again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Prior to studying Computer Science in University, I went to college and studied Electronics Engineering. I worked for an industrial electronic design and manufacturing company for 3 years between one and the other. Most products went into the oilfield. Scada, wellhead controllers, remote sensing equipment, etc. When manufacturing circuit boards 50 at a time, they would put them into a commercial *DISHWASHER* to get all the water soluble solder flux off and wash the board clean. Because chips follow the original Texas Instruments Mach32 procurement process (as outlined by the US Air Force in the 1960's and 1970's), they are hermetically sealed, must past gross leak, and fine leak tests, thermal shock, high altitude testing, centrifuge tests, and other tests, water won't 'leak' into the chips and wreck them. When power is applied, damage can happen. When there is no current, electronics are inert. To keep things 'dry' under power, silicone spray can keep the rest of the electronics from creating short circuits (due to conduction through water, etc.). This was also important in highly corrosive environments (hello petrochemical plant). They also used Hall-effect keyboards and switches to eliminate any chance of an electric arc in hazardous environments (when a seal fails in a methane/ethane/propane plant and you need to press a button to shut off a pump to stop the leak, and pressing the switch blows up the plant you have failed). As stated previously, you can enjoy this new 'wonder technology', or you can get a can of silicone spray. Have fun!

    1. Re:Oh Gawd, not this rubbish again! by Sockatume · · Score: 2

      When there is no current, electronics are inert.

      Galvanic corrosion can occur whenever two dissimilar metals meet and are provided with an electrolyte, so you might want to be careful about that. I wouldn't get anything with a copper heat sink wet, for example.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  31. Re:Crap it still works after dropping it in the lo by jelle · · Score: 1

    Maybe the company should keep some old original crackberries and maybe a couple of RAZRs on hand as replacements for 'broken' ones... That will fix the problem faster than anything...

    --
    --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
  32. Boats... by Coldeagle · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It would be interesting to see what would happen if the coating was applied to a boat. Would the boat be fouling proof? Also, would it go even faster because it's coated in a hydrophobic substance? Hmmmm...The geek in me wants to get a toy boat, test its performance, then have them coat it then test it again and see if the performance improves by a measurable amount.

    1. Re:Boats... by xepel · · Score: 1

      I think the idea behind coating electronics is that you can coat them both inside *and* outside. When you are applying such a thin layer of (what is apparently) plastic, you have to worry about friction wearing off the coating on the outside. When it's also applied to the inside electronics, which are not exposed to wear and tear, those parts can stay waterproof over a long time, keeping the device safe.

      A boat is different, however. Instead of applying this waterproofing to inside, non-worn parts, you'd be applying it to the outside of the hull. Those are the parts which would receive the most friction, and would likely cause the coating to wear off very quickly. Unless you plan on coating your boat before every ride, I have doubts that this would be terribly (long-term) useful.

    2. Re:Boats... by subreality · · Score: 1

      The skin-drag effect is only a minor source of inefficiency in most boats. The viscosity drag dominates at low speed and displacement waves are the big one at high speed. The former you fight with a good hull shape. The latter requires increasing the length of the boat.

      On the other hand, planing hulls might benefit a little. I'm not sure how big the effect would be.

      As for fouling, Teflon would be a better defense, but barnacles will find a way to stick to anything.

  33. Another waterproofing company...HZO by illiteratewithdrawal · · Score: 2

    Also with a booth at CES is HZO. It looks like they use a similar technology that allows electronic devices to last a few hours underwater rather than 30 minutes as with Liquipel. For most cases, 30 minutes would be plenty in the case of an accidental drop or splash. Also, Liquipel is available direct to the consumer rather than only offered at the manufacturing level. Would be nice to see a comparison with how technically the two technologies differ.

    1. Re:Another waterproofing company...HZO by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

      So do you just drop your phone in a bucket of this stuff and let it dry for an hour? Or how exactly do you coat the phone yourself with the "direct to the consumer" variant?

    2. Re:Another waterproofing company...HZO by illiteratewithdrawal · · Score: 1

      I don't claim to understand how it works, but they show a simplified demonstration of the process on their website. (link also available in the summary)
      The Liquipel version costs "only" $59.

  34. someone's going to try it for cybernetics.. by Destoo · · Score: 1

    Someone's going to try it and end up at the hospital.

    "Waterproofing and Bioproofing are different. (your body rusts things that water don't"
    Best material? Glue from a glue gun, according to Lepht Anonym.
    And PCBs are a no-no, but that might change too with the appropriate coating.

    Full talk at: www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_JpPMIriAI

    I think Lepht is still in "repairing Lepht" mode, so she probably won't be trying this new nanocoating. But it could definitely help hedge cybermancers who practice in their kitchen.

    --
    Nouvelles de jeux et technologies en français. TC
  35. Mine gadget is wrapped in tinfoil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you insensitive clod!

  36. Zagg... by hitmark · · Score: 1

    Zagg seems to be marketing something similar these days.
    http://hzo.me/

    --
    comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
  37. Yeah, right. Read their site. by Animats · · Score: 2

    Their site reads:

    If my electronic is accidentally exposed to water after being Liquipelled what do I do?

    Do not panic! Please follow the aftercare instructions such as drying the device as much as possible, powering down the unit (if it is not an emergency and you do not need to make a call), removing the battery and battery cover if possible and not restarting until it has dried. Please note not to charge your device for 24 hours until it has dried out.

    Most electronics will survive water contact if dried out. After all, one of the last steps in PC board manufacture is a pass through a dishwasher-like device. This "nanocoating" starts to sound like a placebo.

    It's lame that phones have connector holes in them at all. With inductive charging, Bluetooth headphones, and WiFi or cellular for everything else, why should there be connectors at all. I'm surprised that Steve Jobs didn't eliminate holes years ago on uglyness grounds.

    There are at least three phones on the market designed to survive immersion in water. It's not rocket science.

    1. Re:Yeah, right. Read their site. by HopefulIntern · · Score: 1

      It's lame that phones have connector holes in them at all. With inductive charging, Bluetooth headphones, and WiFi or cellular for everything else, why should there be connectors at all. I'm surprised that Steve Jobs didn't eliminate holes years ago on uglyness grounds.

      An excellent point! I could understand if some phones retained the conventional jacks for wires, but you would think by now at least some companies would go the all-cable-less route.

    2. Re:Yeah, right. Read their site. by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      The simcard.
      Do you really believe cellular providers will be forward thinking enough to allow phones without a simcard?

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    3. Re:Yeah, right. Read their site. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd still need, at the very least, holes for the speaker and mic. I doubt most people would want a phone that was always silent and you couldn't talk on without a bluetooth headset (and even if they did, you're just moving the hole - if you drop your headset in water your phone is still out of commission until you get it replaced). It's a nice idea aesthetically but wouldn't solve the immediate water issue.

    4. Re:Yeah, right. Read their site. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have a valid point and I guess that's probably how phones will end up in the future, but for ease of compatability I certainly love my ports. I was really happy when phones finally started coming with 3.5mm headphone jacks and standardizd usb charging ports...let alone the other ports like sd etc.

    5. Re:Yeah, right. Read their site. by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Actually, it sounds a lot like this thing called "paint".

  38. Now if only ... by quax · · Score: 1

    ... their video didn't sound and look like a cheap infomercial straight out of the eighties.

  39. My Phone Drinks Too Much by wooferhound · · Score: 1

    I think It's cool because you could take your phone to the bar and not worry about anybody spilling a Bud Light on it.

    --
    We are Dead Stars looking back Up at the Sky
    1. Re:My Phone Drinks Too Much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never was worried about Bud Light.
      Seems not to work as well with Jack & 1664, though.
      Should I switch bars?

    2. Re:My Phone Drinks Too Much by HopefulIntern · · Score: 5, Funny

      I would be equally worried about spilling any Bud Light into my mouth...

  40. Waterproof? Potting ! by stooo · · Score: 1

    Simply pot it. Now that's efficient.

    --
    aaaaaaa
  41. So does Humiseal... by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    Conformal coating is nothing new. That someone thought to apply it to the touch surfaces of a device is not surprising.

  42. Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Been selling car/boat/airplane (you name it) waxes and coating products for the past 10 years. There is nothing revolutionary about this ... I've been coating (and "waterproofing") all sort of things for ages with the standard products.

    It's a different thing to make a solid surface hydrophobic than to actually waterproof all the seams to prevent water/moisture getting in a product.

  43. language by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    waterproof or water-resistant? There is a significant difference.

  44. Correction: by arisvega · · Score: 1

    Saline water has always been the bane of electronics: pure, de-ionized water is an insulator.

    --
    The three laws of thermodynamics:(1) You can't win. (2) You can't break even. (3) You can't even quit.
  45. Waterproof ? Just HOW Waterproof ?? by vikingpower · · Score: 1

    "Waterproof" or not always depends on the pressure you apply, or not. "Up to 50 bar", for example ( see on the back of watches ). I mean: even a Dutch submarine will let water leak inside, if brought to a depth of 30000 feet. Although it is perfectly waterproof at 900 feet....

    --
    Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
  46. So Much Hyperbole! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Completely water proofs", huh? How well does it work when submerged at 1 atmosphere? What about 10 atmospheres?

    This coating might make things mildly water resistant. But definitely not water proof.

  47. Bullshit. How's it gonna work on *moving parts*? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine it: Coat a phone with that stuff. Now press a button. A physical one.
    Either the coating will make the button immobile, so you can’t press it anymore.
    Or the coating will break, creating a way for water to get in.
    And how will the power connector still work with an isolating (or short-circuiting) layer?

    Either they are really fuckin' stupid... or really fuckin' evil.
    And "Ooh sorry, I'm just being stupid. *drool*" is the easiest fuckin' excuse in the book of social manipulation. So I'm not falling for that. (Still works great though, since there are always enough idiots around, parroting "Never account to evilness what you can account to stupidity.". Then again, most people are really fuckin' stupid. But hey, they can also be both! ;)

    I call fraud and snake oil.

  48. I want some... by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    Where can I buy, how long before it hits the commercial market?

    1. Re:I want some... by raygundan · · Score: 1

      I think now. When I hit their website yesterday, they had "buy now" buttons, turnaround estimates, and it appeared you could check out although I did not go all the way through the process to be 100% sure. I'm going to hold off until my next phone-- the only problem with the scheme is the loss of your phone for a week or so while they coat it. But when I'm ready to replace this phone, I'll send the new one off for coating before it's activated.

  49. Corrosion-X by Frederic54 · · Score: 1

    never heard of it? http://www.corrosionx.com/corrosionx.html

    It's used in RC world for years now. I also read that some guys sprayed a TV and put it in a water tank, it worked for 8 or 9hours!

    --
    "Science will win because it works." - Stephen Hawking
  50. My Watch Joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My watch is waterproof to 70 meters. I never understood why my watch needed to be waterproof at 70 meters. If I'm underwater at 70 meters I already know what time it is....it's TIME FOR SOME DAMN AIR!!!

  51. Liquid proofing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wish my Android was semen proof....I found out the hard way. The warranty was difficult to prove.

  52. Might as well spray your phone with rainx by n2hightech · · Score: 1

    This place is practicing Puffery (Legal Lying) when they say their coating "Water Proofs" Your phone. From their own website warranty page "WE NEVER SUGGEST OR RECOMMEND THAT YOUR DEVICE MAY COME IN CONTACT WITH WATER OR ANY OTHER TYPE OF LIQUID. We do not warrant that the coating of your device will work perfectly or that it will work under all conditions." So .. Send us your phone Let us put a coating on it that might destroy it. If it does we will gladly coat your next phone. (We will not pay for any damage we do to your phone). If it gets wet and craps out We will gladly recoat your next phone (We will not pay for any damage water does to your phone). Any coating that can protect your phone from water will render any external electrical contacts useless. If the coating stops water it will stop electrical conduction. If it were electrically conductive it would short out your phone. If the coating scrapes off, Then your phone is not protected. Save your money- Put your phone in a zip lock bag when you go to the beach.

  53. Parylene? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds a lot like Parylene, (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parylene) although the masking might be a challenge for some devices. I wonder badly this coating effects the quality of the microphone and speaker...

  54. Available Today on Waterfi.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A consumer ready waterproofing service is already available for your electronics on www.waterfi.com today. Every product comes with a one year warranty and a convenient return policy so you there is no risk of it not working. Our product has been available to consumers for a while, so you can check out product reviews to hear how well they work directly from our customers rather than from us. Check it out!

  55. How many pockets do *you* have? by danaris · · Score: 1

    How hard is it to not put your phone into the same pocket as your keys or spare change?

    Well, in general, I agree with your post, but for this, I have to say: if I didn't put my phone in the pocket with my keys or the pocket with my spare change, it would have to go into one of the pockets I sit on.

    I don't think that's really all that good for it, either.

    However, I have an Otterbox Defender case for mine, since I have known for years that I tend to be hard on my devices, not through conscious uncaring, but through clumsiness and carelessness.

    Dan Aris

    --
    Fun. Free. Online. RPG. BattleMaster.
  56. At least now I know I'm not a freak by The+Other+White+Meat · · Score: 1

    A few years ago I bought a waterproof cordless phone, then use a VOIP gateway to connect it as an extension on my office PBX. Why, you ask? Because my clients have this uncanny ability to call me when I am in the shower. Doesn't matter when, or what day, if I am in the shower, they call. I tried the cell phone in a ziplock bag, but the waterproof phone works even better. I am not sure that waterproofing my cellphone would be an improvement. Sure it would work, but what about soap scum?

    --

    --- Generation X: The first generation to have SIG lines inferior to their parents... ---
  57. couchdouche got pwned like a biatch by APK & r by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  58. I love laser hair removal by Trillian_1138 · · Score: 1

    I'm a trans woman, coupled with an Eastern European Jewish ancestry, so I kind of lost the body hair lottery. But I'm a huge fan of laser hair removal. The way I've come to describe it? Expensive, painful, and awesome. If you have a medium skin tone and dark body hair, it works exceptionally well.

  59. Waterproofing Electronics by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

    What a great product. We had some freezing rain, and at the curb, water and snow banks were covering a hidden pothole. My son, holding his nice new all-in-one cellphone (I wont mention brand name), stepped into the puddle, to discover it was a foot deep. He fell over onto his hand which was holding the all in one and.....
    Water got in, road salt got in, and in 5 seconds, no more functional phone.

    So a coating to protect a device against rain, or accidental exposure to water is a good good option.

    --
    Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
  60. Okay, so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    does the Liquipel process nano-coat everything— including the internal components like chips and circuitry— or only the external exposed surfaces? Could the coating affect disassembly or repair processes? How about fasteners (like small screws)? Could the Liquipel affect them?

  61. haha yeah right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is so obviously a hoax but omg great idea if it was actually possible and THAT practical.

  62. Sounds good, but I haven't had any desire to test by tchall · · Score: 1

    My Droid Razr is SUPPOSED to be protected by a similar coating... My "testing" so far has been unintended splashes once in a while.

    There's no reason the same treatment that makes some Docker pants stain and waterproof wouldn't work on other materials...

    Sounds like a good idea to me!