we did not have 300+ million recording devices attached to every telephone. some aspects of the Cold War were like the Forever War (I'm referring to the sci-fi novel), though it morphed into something else.
no, we did not have populace on "internet" in 1980s, nor did we have automated systems for listening to all comm for key words. we did not have a "forever war" in place.
my advice was similar, go to the shady part of town at night dressed as batwoman. enough interesting things will then ensue you'll forget all about your hijacked account
you think "1984" was to be interpreted literally? We have instead government tapping all internet and phone systems, data mining social media, warring against people who never attacked us in the name of "peace", able to legally "disappear" people who are considered threats without warrant nor oversight, a privileged powerful and wealthy few with government in their pockets engineering the media, social and economic systems for their benefit......we're there
so important scientific principles cannot be taught in grade school? nonsense, the scientific method ( not the only one science uses) itself can be expressed non-mathematically.
too fast, too mercifull. toss him into a sarrlac and have footage in the belly of him screaming and getting disfigured during a few minutes of slow digestion
no, not functionally like mainframes at all. they are like a network clustered bunch of x86 pc's with shared storage. that's all. Each blade is going to be bottlenecked by its few SAN links, each is ever only going to be able to give a VM at most its full CPU core count and nothing more (can't run a single vm across multiple blades for performance improvement), if a blade fails without warning then HA will take a while to spin up and continue on another blade
nonsense, mainframe have been networked for decades. they can do "cloud computing". they've never gone away, they run all modern languages, dbms, and can even run Linux. now they even have expansion chassis that can take x86 blades for softwares that can't run on Z.
no, you have some misconceptions. there is no such need and no cost savings and to move away from mainframes. You assume a mainfrme must be running COBOL.
Mainframes run modern software. They run it extremely cost effectively for the throughput they have, moreso than any other platform. The run it with extreme reliability and uptime. They run modern DBMS, they run enterprise java and all other modern languages, they can and do run Linux and Linux business apps. they can run x86 software on X blades.
eh, gcc doesn't even follow C99, it's a half-assed C89 with all kinds of weird extension. its middle layer is intentionally left opaque and undocumented by Stallman's minions, totally against the open source spirit
they won't be selling commodity x86 server crap, you mean. they'll be selling their mainframes, supercomputers, i-series (the successor to AS/400 that can run system i, Linux and Windows), and system P (linux and AIX)
er, I know from sad experience once a company starts dealing with multiple clusters of those in disparate locations, it isn't simple anymore and it isn't solid
but I have seen magazine capacity mentioned as part of the propaganda against such rifles.
the scariest looking gun to me is a different sort. At the gun store I frequented 20+ years ago was a bolt action.50 BMG with bipod and 5.5-22x50 scope. now that is seriously scary shit, wish I had bought it since at time I was single and had plenty of disposable income. think the price was $7500.
and not to mention they were flinging bombs and bullets out of a car while being chased, lobbed a pressure-cooker shrapnel bomb at SWAT team, had explosives strapped to body, shot an officer sitting in his car multiple times....this couple weren't usual armed robbery suspects on the lam trying to hide
the only reason they became accepted into the enterprise is because that is what consumers were familiar with, But now that model is going to rot from the ground up, at least three other major players have good inroads to eat Microsoft's lunch. Windows 8 marks the beginning of the fall of Microsoft.
why would gun owners want to compromise after seeing a situation that totally justifies a an armed citizen owning semi-auto rifle with magazine capacity over 10?
as aside, certain cops need to spend more time on the range focusing on the basics.
Slashdot Mirror
you missed where the ubiquitous cameras were to keep the majority in line, for the squealing we also have analogous system in place.
we did not have 300+ million recording devices attached to every telephone. some aspects of the Cold War were like the Forever War (I'm referring to the sci-fi novel), though it morphed into something else.
no, we did not have populace on "internet" in 1980s, nor did we have automated systems for listening to all comm for key words. we did not have a "forever war" in place.
my advice was similar, go to the shady part of town at night dressed as batwoman. enough interesting things will then ensue you'll forget all about your hijacked account
don't forget spending it on our chief exports, death and maiming and tools for same.
you think "1984" was to be interpreted literally? We have instead government tapping all internet and phone systems, data mining social media, warring against people who never attacked us in the name of "peace", able to legally "disappear" people who are considered threats without warrant nor oversight, a privileged powerful and wealthy few with government in their pockets engineering the media, social and economic systems for their benefit......we're there
so important scientific principles cannot be taught in grade school? nonsense, the scientific method ( not the only one science uses) itself can be expressed non-mathematically.
too fast, too mercifull. toss him into a sarrlac and have footage in the belly of him screaming and getting disfigured during a few minutes of slow digestion
no, not functionally like mainframes at all. they are like a network clustered bunch of x86 pc's with shared storage. that's all. Each blade is going to be bottlenecked by its few SAN links, each is ever only going to be able to give a VM at most its full CPU core count and nothing more (can't run a single vm across multiple blades for performance improvement), if a blade fails without warning then HA will take a while to spin up and continue on another blade
nonsense, mainframe have been networked for decades. they can do "cloud computing". they've never gone away, they run all modern languages, dbms, and can even run Linux. now they even have expansion chassis that can take x86 blades for softwares that can't run on Z.
no, you have some misconceptions. there is no such need and no cost savings and to move away from mainframes. You assume a mainfrme must be running COBOL.
Mainframes run modern software. They run it extremely cost effectively for the throughput they have, moreso than any other platform. The run it with extreme reliability and uptime. They run modern DBMS, they run enterprise java and all other modern languages, they can and do run Linux and Linux business apps. they can run x86 software on X blades.
I think a bunch of grandmas will still have theirs, "from my always-cold, shaky, liver-warted arthritic hands!"
that's very funny, with myself and my friends and relatives getting household computers in 19878 - 1982
yeah, it almost works
the most important of the world's business has always been done by mainframes, most of your money is information in a network of mainframes.
no, you were in the middle times. the IBM PC came first in homes and mom & pop, the Lotus 123 was the killer-app that brought it into business.
eh, gcc doesn't even follow C99, it's a half-assed C89 with all kinds of weird extension. its middle layer is intentionally left opaque and undocumented by Stallman's minions, totally against the open source spirit
they won't be selling commodity x86 server crap, you mean. they'll be selling their mainframes, supercomputers, i-series (the successor to AS/400 that can run system i, Linux and Windows), and system P (linux and AIX)
er, I know from sad experience once a company starts dealing with multiple clusters of those in disparate locations, it isn't simple anymore and it isn't solid
but I have seen magazine capacity mentioned as part of the propaganda against such rifles.
the scariest looking gun to me is a different sort. At the gun store I frequented 20+ years ago was a bolt action .50 BMG with bipod and 5.5-22x50 scope. now that is seriously scary shit, wish I had bought it since at time I was single and had plenty of disposable income. think the price was $7500.
and not to mention they were flinging bombs and bullets out of a car while being chased, lobbed a pressure-cooker shrapnel bomb at SWAT team, had explosives strapped to body, shot an officer sitting in his car multiple times ....this couple weren't usual armed robbery suspects on the lam trying to hide
the only reason they became accepted into the enterprise is because that is what consumers were familiar with, But now that model is going to rot from the ground up, at least three other major players have good inroads to eat Microsoft's lunch. Windows 8 marks the beginning of the fall of Microsoft.
you are the one who understands nothing, we're not talking about private DNS in an internet attached network.
why would gun owners want to compromise after seeing a situation that totally justifies a an armed citizen owning semi-auto rifle with magazine capacity over 10?
as aside, certain cops need to spend more time on the range focusing on the basics.
the fork has been done, and it is useful. what 'fallacy" are you imaging in your ignorance?