Slashdot Mirror


User: IAR80

IAR80's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
296
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 296

  1. Re:Its about time. on Ion Engine Propels Probe to Moon · · Score: 1

    Ion drives were also user in the European Artemis spacecraft which is geostationary. Too bad the Arian e launcher had a problem reducing a lot the "life expectancy" of the satelite who had to use most of its fuel to reach the geostationary slot. http://www.spaceandtech.com/digest/flash2001/flash 2001-056.shtml

  2. Re:Safe to the environment also the best part on European Moon Mission Ready for Launch · · Score: 1

    At least if the launch fails they will have a nuclear test.

  3. Re:Ion drive is cool, but... on European Moon Mission Ready for Launch · · Score: 1

    The ion drive is very good for long distance journeys. There is a limited amount of speed you can achive with classical propelents. The speed you can accelarate with ion drive is far greater. Best example Deep Space One.

  4. Re:Safe to the environment also the best part on European Moon Mission Ready for Launch · · Score: 1

    The problem will not be contamination of space, the prblem will be if the Ariane goes kaboom again on the launchpad. Then you risk plutonium contamination allthough the quantites will be minimal. At leat comapred with Chernobal. :)

  5. Re:I did not have relations with that server on Samba 3.0.0 Released · · Score: 2, Funny

    Your linux server is in denial. ;)

  6. Re:International Law on IBM Responds To SCO: Business As Usual · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Another bonanza for lawyers.

  7. ownership on Novell Claims Ownership of UNIX System V · · Score: 2, Funny

    Unix claimed ownership of the Novel 5.0

  8. Re:NFS on Distributed Filesystems for Linux? · · Score: 2, Insightful

    NFS still needs some cleaning up.

  9. Re:Politics that hard way on DOS Attack Via US Postal Service · · Score: 1

    Where I live the office is still returning it, but unfortunatelly not to many spamers arround.

  10. Re:anthrax on DOS Attack Via US Postal Service · · Score: 1

    Unfortunatelly some postal workers were infected and some even died + caused wide spread panic. Also some postal offices were out of service and doing cleanup for months. I guess it was a DOS on the society as a whole and on postal service in particular even though the target was different.

  11. Re:Politics that hard way on DOS Attack Via US Postal Service · · Score: 1

    You can allways put in the envelope without a stamp and him as expeditor.

  12. Re:Ping of death? on DOS Attack Via US Postal Service · · Score: 2, Funny

    yep. And I guess the Unabomber was the physical incarnation of the "mail bomb".

  13. anthrax on DOS Attack Via US Postal Service · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wasn't the last DOS attack through postal service using anthrax?

  14. bigotism on Top Physicist Advocates Scientific Self-Censorship · · Score: 1

    I thought true scientific achievements come out only due to lack of censorship even if we are talking about self censorship. There is no good science or bad science, it is only science. Extreme cases of censorship of science we saw in the midlle ages with the inquisition when some clerics decided what is good science and what is bad science. We all know what that lead to. I know we are talking here about self censorship, but isn't that another form of inqusition? Or more acuratelly said a form of self iquisition. Look for example at the Openheimer case. Indeed it was tragic that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were destroyed killing tens of thousends of inocent people, but more were killed than in the both cases toghether with thw Tokyo classical raid. Also we lived throughout the cold war with the fear of nuclear holochaust, which thank god never happend, but nuclear power did happened. Therefore self censorship will only bring a new form of dark ages.

  15. Re:60% throughput is normal on 802.11n: High Throughput, Not Just Fast Wireless · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Depends verry nuch on the environment. You'll get 60% in the countryside while 20% in crouded spectrum metropolitan area might be a good asumption.

  16. Re:good idea on 802.11n: High Throughput, Not Just Fast Wireless · · Score: 1

    Yep. Plus using CDMA (DSSS or FHSS) you never know how much throughput you'll get at a given time even taking in account the overhead. So that Mbps thing is useless.

  17. Re:Antenna on Intel Demonstrates 220Mbps Variant of UWB · · Score: 1

    The gain deppends on the frequency. Low gain for low frequencies and high gain for high frequencies. Also high bandwidth with BPSK modulation might work better than low bandwidth 256QAM modulation.

  18. Re:Technology on Intel Demonstrates 220Mbps Variant of UWB · · Score: 1

    I'll give you 5$ for it. :) Still you can build a firewall out of it so all is not lost.

  19. Re:Let's not! on Researching The Open Source Way · · Score: 1

    I know what you mean m8. I used to work in government funded environment but due to lack of funds I am right know in the corporate world and sudenly Dilbert.com transformed into reality.

  20. Re:Let's not! on Researching The Open Source Way · · Score: 1, Funny

    I would rather live live in a society where most source is open and programers are paid from governmental research funds and when they are thrown out of a project they will have to work in a corporte environment and code in visual basic untill they get back on track.

  21. Re:Alliance? on EA and NVIDIA in Alliance · · Score: 1

    No! This is the coalition.

  22. creepy on EA and NVIDIA in Alliance · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I allways found that kind of alliances creepy. This kind of thing never promotes value. The end of all this will be that all EA games will work verry bad with ATI boards and non EA games will be less competitive on Nvidia. Finally the end user will end up screwed.

  23. Re:Pronunciation on End of The Von Neumann Computing Age? · · Score: 1

    Thrust me, Neumann it is deinitelly not a hungarian name.

  24. 802.11 on Intel Pushes 802.16a Wireless MAN Standard · · Score: 2, Informative

    Even old 802.11 standard can reach 50km. There is no limitation of distance in the actual protocol. With high gain antenna, line of sight and enough power you can shoot much more. Actually there was a trial in Sweden using metorolagical baloons and they did more than 200km with 802.11b. The main concern is LOS blocking due to curvature of the Earth. If you want to shoot 60km and have one antenna at ground level, you need to have the other one at least 200m high. And this will aplly to 802.16 too.

  25. Re:The next time Rob Malda lets one, it's gonna bl on Newly Discovered Fault Under L.A. · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Does this mean that will take 2k years to wipe out LA? How unfortunate.