Slashdot Mirror


Newly Discovered Fault Under L.A.

Randolpho writes "Whether you like the city or not, you can't say Los Angeles doesn't have a fault. It does, and it's one of earth-shattering proportions. Geologists have confirmed that LA was built right over a faultline, which they're calling the Puente Hills Blind Thrust System; it runs from northern Orange County through Los Angeles on up to Beverly Hills, and has a habbit of ripping earthquakes as large as 7.5 on the Richter Scale every 10 thousand years or so. And the last one was about 8 thousand years ago."

231 comments

  1. So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How does that affect those of us living in the San Fernando Valley?

    (Besides a little extra shaking when the Chatsworth folks film porn?)

  2. La has a Fault? by BuckaBooBob · · Score: 5, Funny

    naa! Can't be :).. I guess Insurance Companies earthquake Periums will go way up in about 1800 years or so.

    --
    Who needs WiFi when we can have Packet Over Sheep! http://datacomm.org/PoS-InternetDraft.txt
    1. Re:La has a Fault? by bombkit · · Score: 0

      10 thousand years or so. And the last one was about 8 thousand years ago
      That dosen't necessarily mean in exactly 1800 years, at 12 midnight, LA is going to be smitten off the earth. It's a rough figure for an approximate date. Who knows.. there could be an earthquake tommorow, or it could be 4000 years off.

    2. Re:La has a Fault? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they'll just use the $100 trillion collected from file-sharing students to pay for the damages. And have money left over for two more quakes.

    3. Re:La has a Fault? by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      Good job! You have correctly identified the reason that this joke is funny!

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    4. Re:La has a Fault? by bombkit · · Score: 0

      Actually, I don't even think that would cover it.
      Math from the story: An earthquake 1/15th the scale of what the predicted one would be cost 44 Billion US dollars.

      That means if this earthquake where to happen tommorow, it could cost us 660 Billion dollars to clean up.
      As I understand it, in the previous story, they actually ment 97 billion dollars. Not trillion. Bazzar miscalculation.

    5. Re:La has a Fault? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he was elaborating on the point he made by replying instaid of posting a new thread, like most idiots..

    6. Re:La has a Fault? by Cuthalion · · Score: 1

      Cost of damages and strenght of earthquake aren't linearly related I'm pretty sure.

      --
      Trees can't go dancing
      So do them a big favor
      Pretend dancing stinks!
    7. Re:La has a Fault? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can see it now, running on the 24 hour traffic reports on KFI:

      "...and in traffic we have the 405 backed up through the Sepulveda Pass, a giant pavement split in the number 2 lane on the 60 freeway in Diamond Bar due to a newly discovered fault line in which that particular lane was built over, its just eaten a semi truck and two low-riders, other than that most southland freeways are clear..."

  3. 2000 years left? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The way the economy is going I might even be able to pay off my debts and move somewhere else by then!

  4. I sure picked a fine time to move to LA by anonymous+loser · · Score: 4, Funny

    I just got here, and now you're telling me I'm due for a huge earthquake?

    Well, I suppose on the bright side, if it's true I might be able to afford buying that house after all.

    1. Re:I sure picked a fine time to move to LA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you've just moved to California- welcome to California, now leave.

      I've lived here for two whole years and I don't take kindly to east coast people enroaching on my native land. :-)

    2. Re:I sure picked a fine time to move to LA by Michael+Ross · · Score: 0

      Even better, if you do buy a single home now, in the right location, it might get converted into two separate open-air units, free of charge.

      But don't buy a fish tank just yet. A buddy of mine living in Northridge at the time of the big quake, woke up in time to see his huge fish tank slowly gyrate out into the middle of his room, and then explode.

    3. Re:I sure picked a fine time to move to LA by NonSequor · · Score: 1

      There is never a fine time to move to LA.

      --
      My only political goal is to see to it that no political party achieves its goals.
  5. so this means we're overdue? by pphrdza · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    But seriously, is anyone going to tell us how soon to expect the next big one, or are we just supposed to extrapolate for ourselves?

    1. Re:so this means we're overdue? by k-0s · · Score: 1

      This is Slashdot, you extrapolate for yourself. Haven't you learned anything yet, lol.

  6. I live near LA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    And all I can say is Scum City couldn't care less...how could you when you're too busy shooting wi' your homies and pimpin' the ho's

    1. Re:I live near LA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, those silly negroes. Indeed.

    2. Re:I live near LA by JDWTopGuy · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah? Well it's all their fault!

      --
      Ron Paul 2012
  7. Name already taken? by worst_name_ever · · Score: 4, Funny
    LA was built right over a faultline, which they're calling the Puente Hills Blind Thrust System

    And to think, all this time I thought that was how Hollywood executives mate...

    --

    In Soviet Rush, today's Tom Sawyer gets high on you.
    1. Re:Name already taken? by Jru+Hym · · Score: 1

      I thought it was a Bachman Turner Overdrive cover band.

      --
      This lobster was alive when it hit the frothy, boiling water.
  8. yo fault by Easy2RememberNick · · Score: 1

    Nice to know, but not a whole lot that can be done about it other than move somewhere else. I suppose you can build better and safer structures but when a big enough quake occurs nothing will help. I'd be more worried about offshore, undersea quakes.

  9. New fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    So in a way, you could say this is a continental segmentation fault?

    8-)

  10. wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    And to think that I thought all that rumbling was just the automatic gunfire from the local crips and bloods who maintain our number #1 status quo worldwide...
    You learn something new everyday!

  11. Add this to the list of many other faults in LA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like smog, crime, and wannabe actors & actresses.

  12. God damn it! by Ciel · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...so you mean to say that we may have 2,000 years left to wait?

    Argh!

    The wheels of justice turn slowly indeed...

    1. Re:God damn it! by monadicIO · · Score: 1

      Even worse....what if the quakes deFAULT on their arrival???

      --

      The law of excluded middle : Either I'm foo or I'm foobar

    2. Re:God damn it! by isorox · · Score: 1

      so you mean to say that we may have 2,000 years left to wait?

      It would have been here this morning, but it's stuck in traffic on the 415...

    3. Re:God damn it! by drewpt · · Score: 1

      That would be the 405.. ;)

      Or was it the 10, 110, 5, 134, 105, 210, 170, 118, 605, 91, 710, 60, 55, 30, 241, 15, 215?

    4. Re:God damn it! by Michael+Ross · · Score: 0

      That long of a delay could only be the 405, "Satan's Parking Lot".

    5. Re:God damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey dickhead, you forgot the 73 and the 57...

      go anteaters!!!

      (go where?)

    6. Re:God damn it! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Mom's going to flush it all soon
      Mom's coming 'round to put it back the way it ought to be...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:God damn it! by isorox · · Score: 1

      hey, I live 6,000 miles away, it's a little hard to read from here, I had to squint as it was!

    8. Re:God damn it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and the 2 and the 101, toughguy

  13. What to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm not American, but as I understand your legal system, the correct thing to do is sue the scientists, right?

    1. Re:What to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope...
      Bush is going to dig, to kill those motherf*cking sons-of-a-earth-bitches. :)

      I am an Anonymous Coward because I'm scared of the government.

    2. Re:What to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We can't sue them they work for the Government and are thus protected.

      My request is for acurrate 15 minute earth quake predictions. Just enough Time to grab a skate board and and surf the earth swells

    3. Re:What to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Close. But to be proper, you should not only sue the scientists, but also add in the institutions where they work (because they have endowment$), the publications that reported the results (for irresponsibily lowering your property values through hysteria), and any one large industry that is unpopular enough that no one will mind when you claim billions from them. (But remember, tobacco, guns, and college students running pirate-2-pirate software have already been taken.)

    4. Re:What to do? by rushiferu · · Score: 1

      "I'm not American, but as I understand your legal system, the correct thing to do is sue the scientists, right?"

      See! Our legal system isn't complicated after all!

  14. When You Re-post This Story in 2000 Years by n3rd · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm sure you'll be hearing cries of "dupe, dupe!".

    1. Re:When You Re-post This Story in 2000 Years by k-0s · · Score: 2

      Or something witty like in Californian Los Angeles the faultlines find You!

  15. What about me? by gsharaf · · Score: 1

    I live in LA city, and there hasn't been an EAWRHTTOIHEOIUOIQWOHE HELP HE

  16. Horror storys! by Neophytus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We are always told every few months the earth is overdue a major earthquake, eruption, ice collapse, comet or other worldwide catastrophy. If it happens it will happen, but for now I'm happy where I am away from any of them.

    1. Re:Horror storys! by big_groo · · Score: 4, Funny
      We are always told every few months the earth is overdue a major earthquake, eruption, ice collapse, comet or other worldwide catastrophy. If it happens it will happen, but for now I'm happy where I am away from any of them.

      And you exactly are ... where?

    2. Re:Horror storys! by KurdtX · · Score: 1
      We are always told every few months the earth is overdue a major earthquake, eruption, ice collapse, comet or other worldwide catastrophy. If it happens it will happen, but for now I'm happy where I am away from any of them.

      And you exactly are ... where?
      In his mother's basement. Of course, to be safe from a nuclear blast, he'd still have to clasp his hands behind his head.

      (apologies to those who didn't grow up in the US during cold-war hysteria and don't get it)
      --

      Kurdt
      I'm not anti-social. Just pro-technology.
    3. Re:Horror storys! by dacarr · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, I am sure some Televangelist can convince God to move the PHBT fault to your neck of the woods. =^_^=

      --
      This sig no verb.
    4. Re:Horror storys! by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      Parent must be...First Post from the ISS!!

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
  17. Thank god. . . by astrobabe · · Score: 1

    So what you're telling me is that the next earthquake has a possiblity of knocking out all of the Valley girls. . .hmmm I'm all for this fault ;)

    1. Re:Thank god. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okey, in order for all the Valley girls to be knocked out the earth quake would have to extend to the east coast too..... because a lot of those valley girls live here too.

    2. Re:Thank god. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you kidding?

      You're actually in favor of something that would reduce the number of available women? Esp. cute, dumb ones?

      If you don't want your girls, send them this way.

    3. Re:Thank god. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      San Fernando Valley? Most of Los Angeles County?
      Can you say "Se habla espanol"!!!!!!

  18. News for Nerds? by (startx) · · Score: 1

    Come on, I thought nerds would at least get something like this before Leno!?! But no, it was in his monoloug last night.

    1. Re:News for Nerds? by Randolpho · · Score: 1

      Hey, I posted it the moment I found it. What more do you want out of me, blood? ;)

      --
      "Times have not become more violent. They have just become more televised."
      -Marilyn Manson
  19. All right, I'll do it..... by monadicIO · · Score: 1

    ....and mention the obvious jokes that'll refer
    to "seg faults"

    --

    The law of excluded middle : Either I'm foo or I'm foobar

    1. Re:All right, I'll do it..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...um. ok. but, you forgot the jokes. come on. lets here it...?!?

  20. Orange Country and Beverly Hills?!? by Quaoar · · Score: 1

    Oh no! I hope no tennis courts or olympic-sized swimming pools get damaged when the next big one hits!

    --
    I'll form my OWN solar system! With blackjack! And hookers!
  21. Tell Hollywood by Wild+Stallion · · Score: 1

    "it runs from northern Orange County through Los Angeles on up to Beverly Hills, and has a habbit of ripping earthquakes as large as 7.5 on the Richter Scale every 10 thousand years or so. And the last one was about 8 thousand years ago." Sounds to me like the making of the next really bad disaster movie.

    1. Re:Tell Hollywood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's been done. Bad B movies rock.
      http://us.imdb.com/Title?0116225
      (Escape from LA)

  22. What about you? by TWX_the_Linux_Zealot · · Score: 1

    "I live in LA city..."

    HA! we know you're not from LA! you would have referred to it as "LA", "Orange County", "San Jose", or any number of cities around the vicinity that no one in hell who isn't from LA could begin to locate geographically...

    --

    IBM had PL/1, with syntax worse than JOSS,
    And everywhere the language went, it was a total loss...
    1. Re:What about you? by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      Ha! We know you're not from LA! Or California either! San Jose is ~500 miles from Los Angeles.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    2. Re:What about you? by TWX_the_Linux_Zealot · · Score: 1

      "Ha! We know you're not from LA! Or California either! San Jose is ~500 miles from Los Angeles."

      Damn straight! I'm glad to not be from California, too!

      --

      IBM had PL/1, with syntax worse than JOSS,
      And everywhere the language went, it was a total loss...
    3. Re:What about you? by drewpt · · Score: 1

      San Jose is more like 350 miles from LA.

  23. Hollywood by huhmz · · Score: 4, Funny

    I can see a Jerry Bruckheimer production coming

    1. Re:Hollywood by Lord+Prox · · Score: 1

      I can see a Jerry Bruckheimer production coming
      A John Woo film.
      Apocolypse in LA.
      Starring Bruce willis mabey? Only this time as a coal miner, yeah thats it. And... ummm... J-Lo as the geologist/recovering p0rn addict assigned to the team. Mini Me could be the stow away orphan that gets into trouble/comic relief and Michael Ironside as the mission director/govt goon/bad guy that hasen't told them the whole story until they are on there way...Sarah machelle Geller as the intellegent tech that is in over her head and needs constant rescuing... annnnnd falls in love with Ben affleck! Yeah thats it. And they are the only 2 to survive.

      I'm going to make a bundle on this one.
      (c) 2003 By Lord Prox.

  24. Technical errors? by antdude · · Score: 1

    I live in Puente Hills area and I don't think it matters WHERE you live in Southern CA, it will still be bad when a major quake hits.

    My friend, who is interested in earthquakes as a hobby, told me that this story has technical errors. Does anyone else agree?

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    1. Re:Technical errors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree you have a friend who is interested in earthquakes as a hobby, for what it is worth ;-)

    2. Re:Technical errors? by dacarr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You know, I do concur - the path described is similar to the Whittier narrows fault, which runs through Chino Hills and Yorba Linda on its way to LA. Perhaps they're seeing offshoots of WN?

      --
      This sig no verb.
  25. Otisville? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OTISVILLE???

  26. Yeah by Jesus+IS+the+Devil · · Score: 1

    Time to move to Afghanistan. :rolleyes:

    --

    eTrade SUCKS
  27. You know you've spent too much time online... by GQuon · · Score: 5, Funny

    ..when you read
    Geologists have confirmed that LA was built right over a faultline

    as

    Googlists have confirmed that LA was built right over a faultline

    and thinking

    "What? People can make scientific discoveries by searching the internet?"

    I have to go lie down now.

    --
    Irene KHAAAAAAN!
    1. Re:You know you've spent too much time online... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think that's bad...
      I thought this was another stephen king troll.

      Whether you like the city or not, you can't say Los Angeles...

  28. Dimwit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You didn't have to point out the bad fucking pun with capitalisation.

    1. Re:Dimwit. by monadicIO · · Score: 2, Funny
      You didn't have to point out the bad fucking pun with capitalisation.

      Normally, I would let this pass. In this CASE, I think you're being to SENSITIVE. Doesn't your rant CAPITALISE on my capitalisation too? Aren't we all at FAULT?

      --

      The law of excluded middle : Either I'm foo or I'm foobar

  29. Volcano... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe NOW people will listen to what Anne Heche has to say...
    Maybe not...

  30. Re:YOU SIR, ARE GAY. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go for it!

  31. Feh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LA is a shithole anyway.

  32. Student homes and workshops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it had run under San Fransisco, student homes and workshops could be destroyed. Not to mention the student homes and workshops.

  33. I've heard this for a while... by DarkBlackFox · · Score: 1
    I've always heard stories about California falling off into the ocean at some point. Could LA be at fault for this catastrophe?



    *wanders back to his east coast cave*

  34. Who is to blame? by paranoos · · Score: 5, Funny

    I blame Los Angeles. It's their own fault, after all.

    1. Re:Who is to blame? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worst. Pun. Ever.

  35. i want to blame the china men by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's probably the fault of the chinese.

    1. Re:i want to blame the china men by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's probably the fault of the chinese.

      The Chinaman peed on my rug.

  36. LA, hmm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just like Sodom and Gomorrah...

  37. Puente Hills has a mall that was shown in BTTF... by antdude · · Score: 4, Interesting

    FYI. The Twin Pines Mall (name replaced Puente Hills Mall), in the first movie of Back to the Future Trilogy, is located in this area.

    You can see photographs and information here and here.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  38. A habbit? by fistynuts · · Score: 1

    Is that like a hobbit?

    --
    "You heard the man, Tubbs.. get undressed."
    1. Re:A habbit? by one9nine · · Score: 1

      Or a very tiny bunny perhaps.

  39. How do they know this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know little about geology, and I dare not read the article, so maybe someone can tell me how exactly they know the magnitude of this fault's quakes, and when the last one was.

    I assume they're basing these guesses on an analysis of the sedimentary rock in the area, but it seems that they're getting a lot of info from just looking at layers in the sand. Can anyone give a layman's summary?

    1. Re:How do they know this? by WhiteBandit · · Score: 1

      Disclaimer: I haven't read the article yet

      But generally, geologists can find out the possible magnitude earthquake a fault can produce by looking at the total surface area of the fault, which is length x depth of the fault. The San Andreas can produce something in the area of a magnitude 8 while the area off the coast of Seattle can produce upwards of a 9.2 (which releases about 30 times more energy than an 8.0) since it is in a subduction zone and the surface area of the fault is much greater than that of the San Andreas. I don't know the exact forumla that they use to calculate this though, sorry.

      In regards to determining when a fault last ruptured, you dig a trench across the fault and look at the layers of sediment across it. The layers near the surface will most likely be even, but as you go farther down, you'll notice layers are offset from each other. To determine a date, you look at the most recent offset layer and use carbon dating (providing you can find some decent material) and this will give you an approximate date.

    2. Re:How do they know this? by pyr0 · · Score: 1

      I am a geologist (although I am not an earthquake seismologist, I do dabble in structural geology), and I can't say I've heard anything about determining the possible magnitude of a quake through total surface area of the fault (at least it was never talked about in any class I've ever had...if you can cite a reference to back that up, I'd like to read it). Typically, such large fault systems are not a single plane of movement, but many many en echelon or conjugate fractures that can jump from one location to another with depth and lateral distance. As such, I would think it is damn near impossible to figure out the total surface area. What can be done is to observe the intensity of deformation of rocks near and on the fault plane of interest. It is possible to estimate how big of an earthquake is needed to produce the deformation observed.

      Another thing to note about the Seattle seismic zone is that the "fault" is actually a subducting slab of oceanic crust, and earthquake epicenters tend to be *very* deep compared to most in California. A 7.0 quake 40 miles down or so is going to do far less damage at the surface than a 7.0 quake much closer to the surface.

    3. Re:How do they know this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is in fact a relationship between the surface area of a fault that slips and the stress drop that occurs during an earthquake (and therefore the moment magnitude expected):

      Moment = (stressdrop/2)*(surface area)^(3/2)

      (for a derivation see Physics of the Earth by F. D. Stacey p. 174-176, or any other geophysics textbook).

    4. Re:How do they know this? by WhiteBandit · · Score: 1

      Aye, however I believe (I will admit, I could be wrong!) that equation finds the moment magnitude of a fault that has actually ruptured/already had an earthquake, and you can use this to find the MW of an earthqauke.

      I am digging through my notes at the moment but also did some random searching on the web. Haven't found anything definitive at the moment, but here is some linkage:

      Regarding the Seattle Fault Zone and calculating surface area to find possible magnitude
      Canadian Geological Survey FAQ site Scroll down and read:

      Is there a maximum magnitude for an earthquake?
      Though theoretically there is no mathematical limit with the magnitude calculation, physically there is a limit. The magnitude is connected to the surface area of the blocks of rock which rub and in doing so give rise to seismic waves. Since the tectonic plates have finite dimensions, the magnitude must therefore also reach a maximum. It is believed that the greatest earthquakes can reach magnitude 9.5, which corresponds to the magnitude of the Chilean earthquake described above.


      Most things I am finding via google, deal with calculating the actual Mw of an earthquake based on the surface area of a fault rupture. Perhaps I could be wrong though?

    5. Re:How do they know this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An equivalent way to express the relationship is:

      Moment = (shear modulus)(area)(slip)

      This relationship can be used to estimate the moment that can be expected during an earthquake on a given fault. The shear modulus for geologic materials is known. For the fault in question, the amount of slip you can expect can be estimated based on the paleoseismologic record of previous events. The surface area that ruptures can be estimated based on the length of the fault (or the length of the segment that is expected to break), the amount of expected slip, and the dip of the fault.

  40. Sounds like a Jazz Fusion band... by Zenjive · · Score: 1

    Puente Hills Blind Thrust System ...tonight only at the Hep-Cat Club!

    --


    A vacuum is a hell of a lot better than some of the stuff that nature replaces it with. - Tennessee Williams
  41. Enter Joke Here by Kaz+Riprock · · Score: 1


    Enter ["Blind Thrust"] comment here.

    I mean...really...who thought that up?

    --
    Mordor...a magical, mythical land where women are more rare than dragons--but where every man would rather find a dragon
    1. Re:Enter Joke Here by Loki_1929 · · Score: 1

      "Enter ["Blind Thrust"] comment here.
      I mean...really...who thought that up?"


      People like us.

      "Slashdot
      News for nerds, stuff that matters."


      --
      -- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
  42. From the article by Vinnie_333 · · Score: 3, Funny
    "Earthquakes don't kill people, buildings do." Of course, by that logic:

    Sharks don't kill people, looking like a seal does.

    Explosions don't kill people, debris does.

    Knives don't kill people, a thrusting motion does.

    --

    "We shall party like the Greeks of old! You know the ones I mean." - HedonismBot
    1. Re:From the article by threephaseboy · · Score: 1
      # Knives don't kill people, a thrusting motion does.

      Ohh yeah....
      --
      .
    2. Re:From the article by spoonist · · Score: 2, Funny

      And you mustn't forget the physics classic:

      It's not the fall that kills you, it's the rapid deceleration.

    3. Re:From the article by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Sharks don't kill people, looking like a seal does.

      That's why I always swim safe.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  43. CNN had this story a few days ago... by antdude · · Score: 1

    Link: A recently mapped, still-active fault line that snakes beneath downtown Los Angeles is capable of generating major earthquakes, but only about once every 2,000 years, according to a new study.

    "If you had to design the worst place to put a fault in Los Angeles, Puente Hills is it," Dolan said.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  44. It's a good start... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...hopefully someday the whole US will sink to the bottom of the ocean.

  45. monopoly? by SHEENmaster · · Score: 1

    The RIAA is assessed for property repairs totaling $97 Trillion, or is it Billion?

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
  46. Re:YOU SIR, ARE GAY. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Please refrain from using the term "gay" to imply "stupid." Unless he really is gay. In which case...is he hot?

    Wait a second. This is Slashdot. Oops.

  47. A better more technical article by Tycho · · Score: 3, Informative

    CNN has an article on this new fault that is slightly less confusing. You can find it here.

    --
    Impersonating Tycho from Penny Arcade since before there was a PA.
    1. Re:A better more technical article by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "http://www.nsa.gov/programs/kids/index.html"

      I think its a great site, with some nice puzzles. And they let you download the source.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  48. Don't mod up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Simply using the stupid dupe joke. Deosn't even make very much sen

  49. Learn to swim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    learn to swim suckas! Muahahaah.

  50. Re:YOU SIR, ARE GAY. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What are you going to do when you get out into the 'real world' and your boss is a geek? Are you going to give him a nose bleed? No. You're going to suck it up, and act like his jokes are funny. Think of it as job training.

    Sorry, the morons like he's describing (90% of Slashdot readers) don't make it into management positions.

  51. Learn to swim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll see you drowning in the Arizona Bay.

    -Tool

  52. The fault is above ground... by acroyear · · Score: 4, Funny

    You know, by the description here, it sounds like its running exactly under I-405, the Santa Monica freeway, which is already one of the biggest faults LA's ever had...

    --
    "But remember, most lynch mobs aren't this nice." (H.Simpson)
    -- Joe
    1. Re:The fault is above ground... by Safety+Cap · · Score: 1

      That would be the Newport-Inglewood fault. It is not large in terms of length or width (the San Andreas fault is much longer and wider). It also will not displace as far as the SA fault could if it (SA) released in a single event.

      --
      Yeah, right.
    2. Re:The fault is above ground... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that something just went over your head.

    3. Re:The fault is above ground... by DannyO152 · · Score: 1

      Maybe more like the 10 or 101. I remember hearing, after the Northridge quake in '94, that a fault runs under Wilshire near the Miracle Mile / La Brea tar pits area. This is a new (kinda parallel) one? Los Angeles calling (and I, I live near the fautline.)

    4. Re:The fault is above ground... by Quikah · · Score: 1

      The 405 is the San Diego freeway. The 10 is the Santa Monica freeway.

      --
      Q.
  53. The Solution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...to LA's massive pollution problem has just been discovered. Now, we just wait for a little shake and BAM! Clean air over the newly shaped West Coast.

  54. Sue's To Blame! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Didn't you see the opening credits?

    With respects to Richard O'Brian. Let's do the Time Warp Agaaaaaaaain! Of course, that 'Jump to the left' might just kickstart the fault. No more Saturday night Rocky's in LA, I guess... Shame...

  55. Old news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jesus, has no one seen the old Superman films? I'm moving to Luthorland when this happens.

  56. Re:YOU SIR, ARE GAY. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get me a job where you're working, because I have several jobs worth of evidence to the contrary.

  57. Superman can save us. by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

    In one of the superman movies Lex Luthor bought most of Arizona and was gonna disturb the Californian fault lines (nukes i think) and drop the west coast into the pacific. Then all his cheap Arizonan land would turn into pricey waterfront property.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    1. Re:Superman can save us. by 3waygeek · · Score: 1

      IIRC, back in the late 80s, some wackos claimed that Nostradamus predicted that just such a quake was imminent.

      After that story broke, a bunch of fat people from Arizona made a trip out to LA and held a massive jump-in on Venice Beach, the theory being that all that bouncing blubber would trigger the Nostradamus quake, causing their Arizona desert property to become much more valuable.

      I was living in greater LA at the time, and remember the story from one of the local TV newscasts. I found it quite surprising that it made the news -- strange behavior on Venice Beach isn't exactly newsworthy.

  58. Re:Puente Hills has a mall that was shown in BTTF. by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 1

    Yeah, interestingly enough I was wondering about exactly that the other day... I am planning a road trip through California (all the way from Florida), and noticed that there is a city named "Lone Pine" in California... All I could think of was the "Lone Pine Mall" and old man Peabody screaming "My pines!" from Back to the Future.

    So, you've answered a burning question of mine that I never knew who to ask. Thanks!

  59. Re:Hey! by CyberDruid · · Score: 1

    Asian american...

    --

    Opinions stated are mine and do not reflect those of the Illuminati

  60. And in other news... by Czernobog · · Score: 1

    California outlaws the Shake and the Swing, following intense lobbying by Donald Rumsfeld and his "dancing-is-sinful" raving chums.

    --
    /. Where the truth
    1. Re:And in other news... by gearheadsmp · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you're mistaken for Herr Ashcroft? Donald Rumsfeld seems to uppity to not like dancing.

  61. I'm a googlist! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    Googlefight:

    Puente Hills Blind Thrust System
    (132 results)

    versus

    San Andreas Fault
    ( 51 100 results)


    Googlism nr.1:

    california earthquakes is an interesting
    california earthquakes is available from the northern california earthquake data center run by ucb and usgs
    california earthquakes is available from the northern california earthquake data center
    california earthquakes is from ellsworth
    california earthquakes is the subject of ongoing research
    california earthquakes is a clickable map showing historic earthquakes going back as far as 1812
    california earthquakes is discussed
    california earthquakes is presented
    california earthquakes is used to produce three
    california earthquakes is being investigated by maryann phipps of degenkolb engineers
    california earthquakes is available
    california earthquakes is what is called the san andreas fault line
    california earthquakes is the highway
    california earthquakes is high enough


    Googlism nr.2:

    los angeles earthquakes is the fragility of an american culture based on the automobile

    So clearly, we googlists can't take the credit for this one. But we were close to un-earthing the problem (-: before those darn geologists beat us to it:

    Googlism nr.3:

    danger to los angeles is not just the great san andreas fault
  62. Youth Brigade had it right... by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 2


    And we'll sink with Californiaaa, when it falls into the seaaaaaaaaa...

    1. Re:Youth Brigade had it right... by JoeMac · · Score: 1

      Tool wasn't far off the mark either...

      Some say a comet will fall from the sky. Followed by meteor showers and tidal waves. Followed by faultlines that cannot sit still. Followed by millions of dumbfounded dipshits. Some say the end is near. Some say we'll see armageddon soon. I certainly hope we will cuz I sure could use a vacation from this Silly shit, stupid shit... One great big festering neon distraction, I've a suggestion to keep you all occupied. Learn to swim.

  63. A silly article by Safety+Cap · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The only thing of note is that this puts to rest the thought that blind thrust faults cannot exist (which is kind of stupid, if you think about it).

    The article names one of the thousands of faults in the LA basin, and probably one or the 10 or so that could cause serious damage.

    The Newport-Inglewood fault is also another one that you don't hear about (for you Los Angelinos, it runs right under the 405 and up through Westwood - go Bruins!), but it has as much potential to cause damage as any other.

    What is interesting is that they were able to accurately measure the folded sandstone (anyone know what units? It's too deep to be QAL) clearly enough at depth.

    The rate of earthquakes on the west coast is high - you'll see a 2 on the Richter every few days, but you won't notice it.

    Seeing as how the San Andreas last popped near Ft. Tejon in the mid 1800s, that is the one that would scare me: it moved about 30' back then. With the #$(#@ government allowing developers to build on top of the fault zone, some poor schlubs are going to find the remains of their living room 30 feet away from the remains of the rest of their home. Or rubble.

    Just make sure your earthquake kit is up-to-date and don't sweat it. It could be worse: it could be Seattle (an earthquate caused by Juan de Fuca plate movement could cause a Tsunami AND erupt that little ol' volcano they have just outside the city). Do'o.

    --
    Yeah, right.
    1. Re:A silly article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      some poor schlubs are going to find the remains of their living room 30 feet away from the remains of the rest of their home.

      So after the quake, who owns the land in between?

    2. Re:A silly article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      >The only thing of note is that this puts to rest the thought that blind thrust faults cannot exist

      I don't think the existence of blind thrusts has ever been a question. Structural geologists have been quite aware of that type of structure for some time. Indeed, the question isn't even if blind thrusts are a seismic problem -- the Northridge earthquake in 1994 was on a blind thrust. The problem with blind thrusts is that there is no easy way to tell where they are, principally because (by definition) they don't "daylight" i.e. reach the surface. The cool thing about this study is that paleosiesmologists have documented a previoiusly-unknonwn blind thrust fault in an urban area (a major seismic hazard) using well data and geophysics. Not only that, but they mananged to place constraints on it's prior movement history and its recurrence interval. A nice piece of important work.

    3. Re:A silly article by Iguanaphobic · · Score: 3, Informative

      It could be worse: it could be Seattle (an earthquate caused by Juan de Fuca plate movement could cause a Tsunami AND erupt that little ol' volcano they have just outside the city).

      Not to mention the potential strength of the next "Big One" in the Seattle/Vancouver area. 8 Million people, suddenly swimming...

      The Cascadia Megathrust Event is due.

      --
      Fascism should more properly be called corporatism, since it is the merger of state and corporate power.
    4. Re:A silly article by blair1q · · Score: 1

      > A nice piece of important work

      Which, of course, everyone in LA will ignore until one or more of the local faults cooks off and levels an apartment building.

      Then the entire city will go nuts and Phoenix will have another building boom.

      Which means I can't just invest in real estate now, because it won't be worth anything until the day the quake happens. And then, I won't be able to find any for cheap.

      If Californians weren't so stupid, I could be spending the next year getting rich.

    5. Re:A silly article by Velox_SwiftFox · · Score: 1

      I was thinking, "LA has so many already, seems like a lot of concern over this fault threatening to rip it a new one."

    6. Re:A silly article by JebusIsLord · · Score: 1

      Good point... my guess is that he is now the proud owner of two unconnected properties.

      --
      Jeremy
    7. Re:A silly article by SunPin · · Score: 1

      That's what risk is about... if you think they will run to Phoenix and the surrounding area (a pretty likely scenario) then you take that risk... it's real estate--you'd have to be a complete idiot to screw it up and not profit. Some of the dumbest people I know make serious money in real estate. Certainly the Slashdot crowd has the wherewithal to do just as well or better.

      --
      Laws are for people with no friends.
    8. Re:A silly article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's real estate--you'd have to be a complete idiot to screw it up and not profit. Some of the dumbest people I know make serious money in real estate. Certainly the Slashdot crowd has the wherewithal to do just as well or better.

      A serious question -- this is something I've thought of doing for a while. Anyone know of a good, reputable guide (i.e., NOT like Carleton Sheets) to getting started in real estate?

    9. Re:A silly article by BuckaBooBob · · Score: 1

      So if they reassesed that piece of land after.. Would you owe more or less in land tax?

      --
      Who needs WiFi when we can have Packet Over Sheep! http://datacomm.org/PoS-InternetDraft.txt
    10. Re:A silly article by edhall · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, LA takes as many seismic precautions than any other metropolis in the world (probably equalled only by Tokyo). Evidence of this is that the only apartment building to actually collapse in the Northridge 'quake had serious code problems. Scores more were rendered uninhabitable, but among apartment buildings only the Northridge Meadows complex pancaked; it was later discovered that it had been built without some of the required reinforcing between floors. Most of the rest of the country has no such requirements, and under the building codes in, say, St. Louis, you would have had dozens of Northridge Meadows.

      The problem with the Puente Hills fault is that it goes right under downtown. Although the buildings there are designed to withstand a large earthquake on more distant faults, they weren't designed for a Northridge-style event right under them. (Northridge was 6.8 Richter, more or less the size of event expected on the Puente Hills fault.)

      I lived around a mile from the Northridge epicenter, in West Van Nuys. Real Estate values in our neighborhood went down briefly, and didn't start climbing until a year and a half later. But the market hardly colapsed. (It helped that the houses in our area were well-built, with only those with second-story add-ons suffering much, if any, structural damage.) Nobody I know moved to Phoenix. When we sold our house four years later, we got what we expected for it, around 20% more than its valuation shortly before the Northridge quake occured.

      -Ed
    11. Re:A silly article by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, we'll just get Superman to fly around the planet, reverse time, and go after the other cruise missile.

    12. Re:A silly article by BigT · · Score: 1

      Always more. Taxes will never go down for any reason. It's the first rule of government.

      --
      Is it weird in here, or is it just me?
  64. So by gearheadsmp · · Score: 1

    who wants to start a fundraiser for Hillary Rosen and Jack Valenti to move to houses that reside on this fault line? After all, it's their fault.

  65. geologistz r teh r0x0r (nt) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (nt)

  66. learn to swim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i have a suggestion to keep you all occupied.
    learn to swim

  67. Rumble Tumble City by I-R-Baboon · · Score: 1

    A city in California dangerously close to a fault line....and this is news because?

    *waits for that luxurious waterfront property to show up in Arizona*

    --
    -1 Overrated (Too many big words for me to comprehend)
  68. This is silly by mbone · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is silly - if not FUD for grant money.

    The LA basin is about 1 to 30 kilometers of rubble on top of a very active basement of solid rock which is riddled with active faults like a piece of dropped china is riddled with cracks. All of the rubble (alluvium) makes it hard to see active faults as they are buried deep.

    Basically every big earthquake that LA has experienced (with the exception of the large one the San Andreas fault in the 1840's) has been on a previously unknown fault.

    So, earthquakes happen, but our ability to tell exactly where they will be is near nil.

    1. Re:This is silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you Mr. Expert. I can't wait to hear your opinion on a subject you actually know something about.

    2. Re:This is silly by toxic666 · · Score: 1

      Yes and no.

      Earthquakes don't happen very often and, for a selected location, can only be predicted statistically. For instance, the mean magnitude 5 recurrence interval is x years, magnitude 6 is y years and magnitude 7 is z years. Unfortunately, accurate records are not long enough in CA to make accurate frequency predictions.

      Thus, geologists have to look at core and petroleum industry seismic profiling data to look for faults and radiometric age data along displacements. These serve as estimates for the dates and magnitudes of earthquakes before the historic seismic record.

      The point of the studies is not to predict the time a specific fault will fail, but to generate an overall picture of how often earthquakes occur in a region to make clarify its seismic risk.

  69. Someone has a bad habbit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    of spelling habit incorrectly.

  70. Shocking by MourningBlade · · Score: 2, Funny

    I found out about this story on news.google.com

    Slashdot's report was the highest ranked one - above National Geographic, and the Los Angeles Daily.

    In the "honorable mention" category were CNN and NBC.

    If only I could see the faces of the editors for those news agencies when they saw that...

  71. Book on LA and Earthquakes by wdavies · · Score: 2, Informative

    Mike Davis's book, Ecology of Fear: Los Angeles and the Imagination of Disaster,is a pretty good liberal read about LA and its various geological and meteorological issues. You might also check out his City of Quartz as well if you really hate the place :-)

    Amazon associate link $11.20


    Amazon, no associate link
    $11.20

    (Barnes and Noble, no affiliate link)
    $12.60

    Winton

  72. Re:YOU SIR, ARE GAY. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please refrain from using the term "asshole" to imply "moron." Unless the object being described really is... an... asshole. then.., um... yeah.

  73. not just LA - faults everywhere! Hide! by iggymanz · · Score: 1

    other areas far from the west coast in the U.S. have been rated for being in danger of a severe quake....even parts of my home state of Illinois , about every 500 years or so

  74. Did you know? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Russia, the fault runs through YOU!

  75. How? by swtaarrs · · Score: 1

    I don't doubt that the fault line exists, but how exactly can they tell what earthquakes happened thousands of years ago?

    1. Re:How? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In most paleosiesmologic studies, a trench is excavated across a fault. In the walls of the trench is preserved the record of sedimentation across the fault. By studying this stratigraphy, including offset units, the geometry of specific kinds of deposits, etc., the number of past earthquake events can be reconstructed. By dating specific deposits (with 14C, optically-stimulated luminescence, cosmogenic nuclides, etc.), numerical constraints on the timing of past earthquake events can also be obtained.

      This study is a little different. Instead of a trench, drillholes were made into the fault-related sediment. But otherwise, the methodology is similar.

  76. ObSimpsons Quote by Rob.Mathers · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Let's goLet's go burn down the observatory so this will never happen again."
    - Moe, after the comet that was going to destroy Springfeild burns up in the atmosphere

    --

    My other sig is funny!
  77. Bwa ha ha ha! by fireboy1919 · · Score: 1

    Now my ruthless plan to buy the land around Los Angeles, and blow up the fault line so that Los Angeles has a massive earthquake and falls into the ocean can finally succeed!

    Then all the rich saps living in Los Angeles will have nowhere to go except another city...MY city - Lutherville. It won't be long before I own their sorry butts! And no one can stop me!

    --
    Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
  78. Tool was right by path_man · · Score: 1

    go check out the lyrics for Aenema at http://www.purelyrics.com/index.php? lyrics=utorsdph -- and 7 years early!

    --
    The surest sign of intelligent life in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us. -- Calvin & Hobbes
  79. No, ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... this is NOT about a new Quake sequel!

  80. Life imitates "art" by Fjord · · Score: 2, Interesting


    Like or hate hollywood megamovies, Volcano was based on the premis of an undiscovered fault line having a molten eruption. Very good insight on what actually could happen given this (but still a movie). Plus it has Tommy Lee Jones.

    --
    -no broken link
    1. Re:Life imitates "art" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And just what is a "molten eruption"? I'll tell you: movie fantasy. Not going to happen in LA. Iceland maybe, but not LA.

    2. Re:Life imitates "art" by Fjord · · Score: 1

      er, that's what happens on a fault line. Ever heard of the ring of fire? It's not what you get after you eat taco bell. If there is a fault line through LA, then a volcano couldd spring up there (one could anyway, if there is a hot spot like hawaii). The lava follows the path of least resistance and push us through the cracks in the earth.

      Now the likelihood of it happening is small, because relatively speaking, LA is just a dot on that line.

      Still would suck for a lot of people, though.

      --
      -no broken link
    3. Re:Life imitates "art" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Granted, faults (if they are in the right setting and are deep enough) can be conduits for magma. But, there is no shallow magmatic source beneath Los Angeles.

    4. Re:Life imitates "art" by angst_ridden_hipster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah. Good insight.

      Uh-huh.

      They confuse a tar pit with volcanic activity.

      They represent a fallen glass and steel building as a good deflector for flowing lava.

      And they didn't even get the geography of LA right.

      Whoever did the science research and fact-checking for that film had an undergraduate degree in medieval poetry or something, but certainly not geology.

      Might as well watch Star Trek to learn about quantum theory.

      --
      Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachtani?
      www.fogbound.net
  81. Well... by meme_police · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...since we seem to have significant earthquakes every decade here in SoCal I'm not too concerned about a 7.5 in the next 2 millenia.

    --

    The meme police, They live inside of my head

  82. Just a thought on preventing earthquakes(!) by 0x00000dcc · · Score: 1
    Forest fires are avoided each year by making small, controlled fires such that when it's fire season the damage is not so bad because the fire actually runs out of steam. Forgive me if this sounds stupid - I'm no geologist - but could the same thing be done for earthquakes - stick some dynamite or nukes in strategic areas and make some small controlled earthquakes so the tension built up for plate movement wil not be as bad when it moves on its own? Maybe this sounds too Dr Evil-ish ...

    --

    -- (Score:i, Imaginary)

    1. Re:Just a thought on preventing earthquakes(!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interestingly enough, there have been proposals to do something like this. The idea is to pump water into a fault. The water alters the differential stress experienced along the fault (as well as serving as a "lubricant") and allows the fault to move. That way, large amounts of stress do not build up and the seismic hazard is reduced. There are cases of earthquakes being triggered (inadvertently) in oil fields where water is being pumped into the ground to increase hydrostatic pressure (and assist in pumping of oil out of the ground).

      Why isn't this done to make faults "safer"? 1) It's quite expensive, 2) not everyone agrees on how faults behave*, and 3) there is the unquantified danger of triggering large earthquakes.

      *Strong faults: Between earthquakes, faults are "locked" due to inherent "strength" arising from friction, etc. This brittle strength must be exceeded for an earthquake to occur.

      Weak faults: Earthquakes are triggered by changes in the orientation of local stress field. You expect less of a stress drop during an earthquake if this is the case.

    2. Re:Just a thought on preventing earthquakes(!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just pump water into ground. If done at the right places it causes lots of little earthquakes thereby avoiding the big ones. Miscalculate and you could trigger something really massive.

  83. re: Jerry Bruckheimer by wattersa · · Score: 1

    Yeah, hopefully he'll do better than the original movie about an apocalyptic earthquake hitting los angeles. And better than

  84. Rebuiding Los Angeles by Other1 · · Score: 1, Funny

    Has Halliburton been assigned this contract yet?

    1. Re:Rebuiding Los Angeles by Loki_1929 · · Score: 2, Funny

      " Has Halliburton been assigned this contract yet?"

      Na, I hear some Iraqi contractor got it.

      --
      -- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
  85. Guns don't kill people... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Loss of blood/body tissue because of exit wounds made by subsonic bullets kill people.

  86. Rats... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...We mised by 2,000 years.

    Kiss all those stupid actors & actressess goodbye.

    I won't be happy until Martin Sheen covers himself with a CASE of duct tape.

  87. USGS recent earthquake maps by wattersa · · Score: 2, Informative

    These are maps showing magnitude, fault, date, and so on. You can also view "shakemaps" and other cool stuff.

    NEIC real-time list

    Los Angeles area seismicity map

    U.S. seismicity map

    World seismicity map

  88. Whittier fault? by sakusha · · Score: 2, Informative

    I heard exactly this same sort of story when I was living in downtown LA and the Whittier Quake happened (6.1 on the Richter scale IIRC). I wonder when that was, hmm.. must've been around 85 or 86? They said the Whittier Fault had the same potential to liquify the downtown subsoil. When it hit, I was in an unreinforced brick building just a couple of miles from the epicenter, I couldn't believe how much the ceiling beams shook, I thought the building was about to collapse. But anyway, I wonder just what is the big picture, there are a other newly discovered faults like the Whittier fault right through the downtown area, that's probably how that area originally became the flatter LA basin area, due to the repeated liquefaction of soil during quakes and subsequent resettling.

  89. Sweet! by nukey56 · · Score: 1

    So what you're saying is that we've got 2000 years until the next "big one". Time to invest in some porcelain!

  90. Slashdot is on the cutting edge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ya know, I seeing articles on slashdot after Leno does a joke about it (the new fault line) the night before.

  91. L.A. rumble by FrostedWheat · · Score: 1

    Hail to the King baby!

    Ahhh, that was always my fav. level in Duke3D! Now if only I could get the game to build properly ...

  92. You are WRONG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Explosions kill plenty of people with debris having nothing to do with it. It's the force of the shock wave that causes damage to the body... sheesh

  93. Dangit no mod points by harborpirate · · Score: 1

    Could somebody mod the parent post up as +1 interesting? I seem to be fresh out.

    And also "dangit I was gonna post that!"

    Note that the parent post forgot to mention the fictional fault line and volcano were in Los Angeles, leaving out crucial irony.

    And realism in the movie? Um, lets just forget about that.

    So to hell with the parent, mod me up!

    --
    // harborpirate
    // Slashbots off the starboard bow!
    1. Re:Dangit no mod points by Fjord · · Score: 1

      yeah, I kinda thought a lot of people knew it was about a volcano springing up in LA, but that was my bad. I know it's a movie, but it's not so much the things that happen science-wise, but the panic, loss of life, and property damage that I was thinking of. And now it's all possible! :)

      RE: the reality, I did parenthesise that it's a movie. And I'd mod you up but I already posted. :P

      --
      -no broken link
  94. For some reason by Rooked_One · · Score: 1

    I see the price of boats in that area going up soon.

  95. Re:YOU SIR, ARE GAY. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fully agree.

  96. Built right or wrongly by SmackCrackandPot · · Score: 2, Funny

    >Geologists have confirmed that LA was built right over a faultline,

    Looking on the bright side, that's better than having LA built wrongly over a faultline,

  97. Let's see by tetro · · Score: 1

    Okay, major earthquakes every 10,000 years and the last one was 8,000 years ago. I'll bet $100 that all the local news channels will make a big deal out of this with some sensationalist headline and drag it out over a week, then drag it out that we have 2,000 years till the next one, and talk more crap after that. P.S. I don't have $100, so there's no bet. Hehe

    --
    .smell my feet.
  98. PHBTS! Puente Hills Blind Thrust System by danpbrowning · · Score: 1

    So when Los Angeles gets shaken to pieces, will it make a "PHBTS" sound? (Phbts! Insert flatulence joke here).

    --
    Daniel
  99. Re:Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Asian american...

    You may wish to unwash your brain and unjerk your knee. Nobody said he was Amercian.

  100. Re:YOU SIR, ARE GAY. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, the morons like he's describing (90% of Slashdot readers) don't make it into management positions.

    First of all, keep telling yourself that you're in the 'cool' 10%. Second, I posted this, because every boss I have ever had has had a different perspective than mine. Most of the time I have to pretend to be able to relate to his/her perspective just to save face and reduce office tension.

  101. Is this a dupe or did it just make main page? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am just wondering, cause I am POSSITIVE I read this a few days ago on /. possibly in the "Science" section or the front page....

  102. Re:YOU SIR, ARE GAY. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You really must realize that most of us here on /. have no idea that people we know, and talk to every day are gay. Most are under the impression that they don't know any gays, so it's perfectly okay to make gay jokes.

    This is one reason that gays will find it much harder to become a pseudo-respected minority like blacks and mexicans. You could correct this by having, "I'M GAY" tatooed on your foreheads. Rainbow bumper stickers just aren't enough.

    Wow. Was that off-topic enough for you?

  103. Arizona Bay by jonathonc · · Score: 2, Funny

    In other news today the Big One hit LA creating a new resort called 'Arizona Bay'. Nobody was missed.

    1. Re:Arizona Bay by ChadN · · Score: 2, Funny

      TOOL LYRICS
      "Aenima" - abbreviated

      I've a suggestion to keep you all occupied...

      Learn to swim.
      Learn to swim.
      Learn to swim.
      Learn to swim.

      --
      "It's overkill, of course. But you can never have too much overkill." - Anonymous Slashdot Coward
  104. Re:Puente Hills has a mall that was shown in BTTF. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Lone Pine Mall"

    For anyone that missed the joke, Marty hits one of the pines when he goes back and "Twin Pines Mall" becomes "Lone Pine Mall" when he returns home at the end of the movie. I never noticed this when I was a kid.

  105. Hardly Silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Say you are a school district...say Los Angeles Unified School District for example. And say some bank comes to you and says "Hi! We'd like you to buy our building. It's 25 stories high and right next to the Harbor Freeway - you can put all your district office workers in one place."

    Seeing as how you're the same district that spent $250 million, and counting, building a brand new high school smack dab on top of a super fund site, you bite. But then you find out that the building, all 25 stories, is tilting. And gee, to add insult to injury, there's a fault running right by it. And even worse, the fault is estimated at being able to generate a 7.6 magnitude quake but when the building went up, the code called for it to withstand only a Magnitude 5.

    Ok, so maybe you're not the district but a sysadmin who is being offered a job to work in said building. Wouldn't you want to know about the fault? Wouldn't you maybe be a bit more motivated to negotiate a tele-commuting arrangement so you're not in said building when LA starts rocking?

  106. Geologists have it easy... by maunleon · · Score: 3, Funny

    How many other professions allow you to make a prediction with 2000+ years as error margin?

    I predict that within 2000 years, pigs will fly. Give me a grant. I promise to pay back all the money if I'm proven wrong.

    1. Re:Geologists have it easy... by laughing_badger · · Score: 1

      Cosmologists. 2000 million years one way or the other is a bullseye at dating the age of the universe.

      --
      Help children born unable to swallow - www.tofs.org.uk
  107. Redmond? by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 1

    >>it could be Seattle (an earthquate caused by Juan de Fuca plate movement could cause a Tsunami AND erupt that little ol' volcano they have just outside the city). Do'o.

    Would this take out Redmond too? Oh baby!

    --
    Huh?
    1. Re:Redmond? by pyrote · · Score: 2, Funny

      From: God (god237@godshouse.god)
      to: Everyone
      Subject: Redmond

      Crap. They figured out the plan.

      --
      THE WORLD IS GOING TO END!!!! eventually.
    2. Re:Redmond? by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 1

      LMFAO!

      You just earned yourself a fan.

      --
      Huh?
  108. rumble rumble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    how long you think before someone registers PuenteHillsBlindThrustSystem.com and puts up an index embedded audio snippet that makes some rumble sounds and then says, "heh. just kidding."

  109. Re:YOU SIR, ARE GAY. by Surye · · Score: 1

    Heh, This coming from someone who obviously reads /. comments often enough to deduct this point. Interesting....

  110. A Fault in LA? by miracle69 · · Score: 1

    Fill it with Silicone!

    --
    Linux - Because Mommy taught me to Share.
  111. Learn to swim... by techstar25 · · Score: 1

    To quote the song Ænema by TOOL:
    "Cuz I'm praying for rain
    And I'm praying for tidal waves
    I wanna see the ground give way.
    The only way to fix it is to flush it all away...Learn to swim, I'll see you down in Arizona bay.."

  112. Ah yes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Time to tear down all those nasty buildings to make LA sa safer place.

  113. lord earth forgive me for my sins by jago25_98 · · Score: 1

    holy crap! the earth could swallow me whole, taking me at any minute! i gotta get out of here

    , fiddle-sticks; I live in Dorset. where was i? ah yes, Mrs Smith is coming round to collet the teapot this Afternoon

  114. Habbit ??? by dimension6 · · Score: 1

    It sounds as though somebody's been reading/watching the Lord of the Rings a bit too much ...

  115. 8,000 years ago? by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

    Okay, can someone build me a cryogenic suspension system, so I can freeze myself? That way when they have the technology to revive me in 2000 years, I can actually panic properly.

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  116. I'm glad it's not... by No.+24601 · · Score: 1

    the LAPD making these accusations, 'cause i'd be damned to believe it's OJs fault this time.

  117. As Bill Hicks said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GOODBYE YOU LIZARD SCUM!!!

  118. Earthquakes don't have habits. by popmaker · · Score: 2, Informative

    Why do I always hear "This earthquake (or another) strikes every 1000 years". Earthquakes are not that predictable. So, no, the eathquake will not be there in 2000 years, it could be thera ANYTIME. No one in history has ever predicted an earthquake with a sufficient notice. I wonder when they will let go of the old geologists fantasy of "earthquake prediction".

  119. reply? by gthug · · Score: 0

    reply to deez nutz negros. /. can eat a cock.

  120. Duh LA, San Fran, Portland and Seattle by Arbogast_II · · Score: 1

    are all built in locations where Planet Earth will without a doubt wreck the city. Residents have no reason to move there if they arent ready for the possability the whole city may need to be rebuilt. No brainer!!!

    --


    HenryJamesFeltus.com
  121. Huh? by Ogerman · · Score: 1

    "and has a habbit of ripping earthquakes.."

    habbit? Is that like a hobbit with a habit?

    1. Re:Huh? by GiMP · · Score: 1

      It is the love-child of a coney (rabbit) and a hobbit.. although considering how much hobbits enjoy eatting rabbit, I'd doubt that such a thing would occur.

  122. Re:You have no frame of reference here Donny by CyberDruid · · Score: 1

    "The chinaman peed on my rug" is a quote from The Big Lebowski and so is my answer. And so is the subject of this post. Get a haircut.

    --

    Opinions stated are mine and do not reflect those of the Illuminati

  123. San Francisco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How will this impact San Francisco?

    1. Re:San Francisco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it won't