at my univ. they don't give you DNS until you register you MAC to you student ID. and they can call your phone/email you if you have shit leaking out of your computer.
the IT here is pretty newb but it seems like a good idea.
and then there's people like me that squat on IP's that noone knows about and runs their own DNS
The special ink goes on the face side of the card.
The casino doesn't care about knowing the dealer's card before you do... that doesn't present any useful statistical information.
The ink makes optical recognition more efficient by looking at a big 4 across the whole card, rather than a tiny-ass 4 in the corner of the card and artwork inside.
This is a frivilous order like SO many others. Would a lawyer please respond to this post and explain the method or suing the operator of this bot. Something needs to be done about bots initiating legal matters with humans. It's bad enough cameras can mail you tickets for going through red lights.
I work for the DoD and I can tell you that this push is serious. We use significat bandwith to run encrypted channels between sites, and the navy is pushing to do away with subnetting in general. The head of this initiative is NMCI, who will be responsible for all military IT in the upcoming years. With a centralized IT division, I personally think the IPV6 switch will be quick and well-funded.
Why not reduce the number of commercial search results to attract customers to the search page... until advertisers pay to inject THEIR commercial "search results" with little competition?
You do not want a company with a significant monopoly in operating systems giving out results to internet search queries, can anyone think of why this is a bad idea?
Hey AC, consdider the number or offenders vs. the number that are caught. Then multiply this ratio by the legitamate fine and you will get a (much!) higher number than "imprisonment for not more than 1 year or a fine of not more than $10,000.00, or both"
The sweetest part of this diagram: http://www.newscientist.com/misc/popup_ns.jsp?id=n s99993893F1 is that there's no other planes in the diagram. And this plane is steering itself away from an imaginary line... something to think about
http://www.etplanet.com/windows/longhorn/
Could it get any more integrated than having a search bar on the taskbar?
This searchbar will search files on your computer, phonebooks... and "the internet" (read: MSN search)
Yes, and client-side validated forms. Wow, I registered the "*@comcast.net" email address. I didn't work as I expected, but I have it registered it to me nonetheless.
I'm tired of people coming up with combinations of 2 html tags and patenting them, like the previous thread where someone owned a patent on:
A structured document browser includes a constant user interface for displaying and viewing sections of a document that is [sic] organized according to a pre-defined structure. The structured document browser displays documents that have been marked with embedded codes that specify the structure of the document. The tags are mapped to correspond to a set of icons. When the icon is selected while browsing a document, the browser will display the section of the structure corresponding to the icon selected, while preserving the constant user interface.
wow, <A href="$A" target="$B"><img src="$C">, that's original
What I want to see is a backwards-compatible solution to signing e-mail like the following:
Every message you send (default behavior) gets MIME-attached with an encoded message digest and public key.
You physically type in a password for each e-mail you send (default config).
The recipient can add you to their "contacts" and collect your public key.
When a "trusted" or even "known" contact (valid public key and checksum) sends you mail it is hilighted or regarded not-spam or...
This is something that is easily-implementable, backwards-compatible (you don't *need* to read the MIME attachemnt to check for validity) and trustworthy.
Negative side effects are that if manual password entry is disabled, viruses can use your mail. (A counter measure would be to have the e-mail specify if the password was cached or manually entered)
Please let me know if this has been implemented in a mail program yet.
Slashdot Mirror
or so you can sell your "services" to the highest marketing bidder? sike!
Bullshit
Does this effect virtual OS's?
the IT here is pretty newb but it seems like a good idea.
and then there's people like me that squat on IP's that noone knows about and runs their own DNS
-
He is redistributing a derivative work in this case.
- This derivative work is licensed broader than the orignial work (GPL).
- To apply the GPL, one must have exclusive copyright privileges to a work (or be granted all the priv's but some other means)
- a contradiction
This contradiction is what confuses me.That is the ugliest fucking car I've ever seen.
The special ink goes on the face side of the card.
The casino doesn't care about knowing the dealer's card before you do... that doesn't present any useful statistical information.
The ink makes optical recognition more efficient by looking at a big 4 across the whole card, rather than a tiny-ass 4 in the corner of the card and artwork inside.
That's not bad
This is a frivilous order like SO many others. Would a lawyer please respond to this post and explain the method or suing the operator of this bot. Something needs to be done about bots initiating legal matters with humans. It's bad enough cameras can mail you tickets for going through red lights.
I work for the DoD and I can tell you that this push is serious. We use significat bandwith to run encrypted channels between sites, and the navy is pushing to do away with subnetting in general. The head of this initiative is NMCI, who will be responsible for all military IT in the upcoming years. With a centralized IT division, I personally think the IPV6 switch will be quick and well-funded.
And this year's voting turnout is: 500%
oh wait a minute...
Why not reduce the number of commercial search results to attract customers to the search page... until advertisers pay to inject THEIR commercial "search results" with little competition?
You do not want a company with a significant monopoly in operating systems giving out results to internet search queries, can anyone think of why this is a bad idea?
Correction: Everything on the internet *is* true, I believe you are misquoting your sources. :-)
Hey AC, consdider the number or offenders vs. the number that are caught. Then multiply this ratio by the legitamate fine and you will get a (much!) higher number than "imprisonment for not more than 1 year or a fine of not more than $10,000.00, or both"
The sweetest part of this diagram: http://www.newscientist.com/misc/popup_ns.jsp?id=n s99993893F1 is that there's no other planes in the diagram. And this plane is steering itself away from an imaginary line... something to think about
http://www.etplanet.com/windows/longhorn/ Could it get any more integrated than having a search bar on the taskbar? This searchbar will search files on your computer, phonebooks... and "the internet" (read: MSN search)
Going to 64 bit would be great, since they are currently at 128 bit.
magnetism has not yet been directly related to radiation poisioning
Yes, and client-side validated forms. Wow, I registered the "*@comcast.net" email address. I didn't work as I expected, but I have it registered it to me nonetheless.
wow, <A href="$A" target="$B"><img src="$C">, that's original
p.s. is there a stopwatch program that interfaces with X to see how much time a day yo put in on the computer?
This is something that is easily-implementable, backwards-compatible (you don't *need* to read the MIME attachemnt to check for validity) and trustworthy.
Negative side effects are that if manual password entry is disabled, viruses can use your mail. (A counter measure would be to have the e-mail specify if the password was cached or manually entered)
Please let me know if this has been implemented in a mail program yet.
and I can freely distribute these addresses, because when I get spam (not free pr0n) sent to freeporn.com@phor.net, I can just block them.
in your AIM profile, you can also link to %n@phor.net which is their screenname. Then you can trace them easily.