Maybe I'm missing something. Why does the lack of open source drivers mean old phones can't run new OS versions? I can't root my Galaxy S3, download a Cyanogenmod Nougat build, and flash it on there?
Impressive! You can tell how good a driver I am without even knowing anything about me. But I can predict the future; I knew you would say something snarky and condescending.
There's not much guidance and wisdom that can be imparted to a baby. And hopefully as the children grow up, the parents grow in wisdom and maturity as well. If you wait until you're in your 40s to have kids, A) it could be much harder to conceive and B) you'll be in your 60s or 70s when they're teenagers. Maybe that would be fine but it sounds tiring to me. I think mid 20s to mid 30s is the perfect time to start having kids.
The point is, he pretended well enough that people were willing to vote for him. He said he went to church, he said things like "God bless America", and so on. If he had regularly said things like "I don't believe in God", the election probably would have gone very differently.
Well it's also possible normal encryption would not look random if it's done badly. I'm assuming it's a good algorithm with a key escrow system or something similar. Certainly service providers could not reliably detect the difference between strong and backdoored encryption using just DPI, unless everyone in the world is using the same back door scheme, and it works as you describe.
Slack? That has Windows, Mac, Linux, Android, iOS, and web clients. And it's very nice, and has a free tier. The main thing the free tier doesn't include (from my perspective anyway) is group audio and video calls - two party only.
If the media have been unfriendly to Trump then they must be really really stupid, because they gave him billions of dollars worth of free coverage during the campaign.
It's not like explosives where you can track large purchases of certain chemicals, unbreakable encryption uses the same computers, same development tools, and same bits that fly across the internet for everything else - virtually indistinguishable from "legitimate, ordinary traffic."
Only if you use steganography. My understanding is encrypted traffic is easily distinguished from clear text.
I don't think DPI would be sufficient. Strong and backdoored encryption would both look like random bits. You couldn't tell which is which without decrypting everything in real time, which is impossible. Maybe a backbone provider could decrypt ROT13 in real time but not much more than that.
I wouldn't rely on book encryption. I've seen enough TV to know the police will always have a brilliant investigator who will find a clue that tells him or her what book to use.
You have to pick a book that is personally significant to you right, not just a random one from the library?
True, but "I hate Muslims"? "Kill Muslims"? Some of the search terms seem pretty clear cut. And no, someone looking to understand the mindset of people who hate Muslims is probably not going to google "I hate Muslims". More likely something like "why do people hate Muslims".
You really think the tiny, tiny number of people who purposely enter random search terms are going to have any effect on the trends of the billions of searches on Google every day? And so what if people search for song lyrics? What effect will that have on any correlations this guy or anyone else is studying?
Slashdot Mirror
Maybe I'm missing something. Why does the lack of open source drivers mean old phones can't run new OS versions? I can't root my Galaxy S3, download a Cyanogenmod Nougat build, and flash it on there?
Impressive! You can tell how good a driver I am without even knowing anything about me. But I can predict the future; I knew you would say something snarky and condescending.
You must drive around different humans than I do, because they surprise me now and then.
There's not much guidance and wisdom that can be imparted to a baby. And hopefully as the children grow up, the parents grow in wisdom and maturity as well. If you wait until you're in your 40s to have kids, A) it could be much harder to conceive and B) you'll be in your 60s or 70s when they're teenagers. Maybe that would be fine but it sounds tiring to me. I think mid 20s to mid 30s is the perfect time to start having kids.
I have no idea. Does it?
Since apparently the system is based on the assumption that the animal is going to stay on the ground, that doesn't sound that hard to believe.
How do you know the risk any better with imperfect human drivers?
Choice is exactly what they don't want you to have.
Or as Major John Sheppard said, "Is he supposed to be naked like that?"
The point is, he pretended well enough that people were willing to vote for him. He said he went to church, he said things like "God bless America", and so on. If he had regularly said things like "I don't believe in God", the election probably would have gone very differently.
MapQuest is on page one for me, Bing maps on page two. I didn't see openstreetmap on the first three pages.
Well it's also possible normal encryption would not look random if it's done badly. I'm assuming it's a good algorithm with a key escrow system or something similar. Certainly service providers could not reliably detect the difference between strong and backdoored encryption using just DPI, unless everyone in the world is using the same back door scheme, and it works as you describe.
Many major news networks gave him a lot of coverage, not just Fox. CNN in particular covered him extensively.
You know how ads work right? That isn't the TV network attacking Trump, someone bought the air time.
Slack? That has Windows, Mac, Linux, Android, iOS, and web clients. And it's very nice, and has a free tier. The main thing the free tier doesn't include (from my perspective anyway) is group audio and video calls - two party only.
If the media have been unfriendly to Trump then they must be really really stupid, because they gave him billions of dollars worth of free coverage during the campaign.
It's not like explosives where you can track large purchases of certain chemicals, unbreakable encryption uses the same computers, same development tools, and same bits that fly across the internet for everything else - virtually indistinguishable from "legitimate, ordinary traffic."
Only if you use steganography. My understanding is encrypted traffic is easily distinguished from clear text.
I don't think DPI would be sufficient. Strong and backdoored encryption would both look like random bits. You couldn't tell which is which without decrypting everything in real time, which is impossible. Maybe a backbone provider could decrypt ROT13 in real time but not much more than that.
I wouldn't rely on book encryption. I've seen enough TV to know the police will always have a brilliant investigator who will find a clue that tells him or her what book to use.
You have to pick a book that is personally significant to you right, not just a random one from the library?
Maybe you have a different idea of what lower class means. I don't think those people are flying.
There's a Borderlands game like that, and I guess the same game studio has made other choose your own adventure type games.
By extension, locals with limited exposure to another race will judge that race based on the limited sample they are exposed to
Judge that race as what? As inferior. That's racism.
Try Wyoming, it's hard to find anything but country radio.
True, but "I hate Muslims"? "Kill Muslims"? Some of the search terms seem pretty clear cut. And no, someone looking to understand the mindset of people who hate Muslims is probably not going to google "I hate Muslims". More likely something like "why do people hate Muslims".
You really think the tiny, tiny number of people who purposely enter random search terms are going to have any effect on the trends of the billions of searches on Google every day? And so what if people search for song lyrics? What effect will that have on any correlations this guy or anyone else is studying?