Slashdot Mirror


User: edxwelch

edxwelch's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
1,673
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 1,673

  1. Re:"near-native performance"? on Emscripten and New Javascript Engine Bring Unreal Engine To Firefox · · Score: 2

    That's simple not true. There are parts of a graphic engine that are quite slow, even in c (like fustrum culling). If you implement those algorithms in a language that is twice as slow you will have problems

  2. "near-native performance"? on Emscripten and New Javascript Engine Bring Unreal Engine To Firefox · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It says that it's twice as slow as native c code. This must be a new definition of the word "near".

  3. Re:GPU already years out of date on Sony Reveals More PS4 and Dual Shock 4 Details · · Score: 1

    No, if you consider cost and power consumption, it's actually ahead of it's time.
    1.8 teraflops is about same performance as a HD7850, which costs $180 and draws 150W. Considering total cost of the PS4 is going to be $300, the GPU can only cost a small fraction of that. Also, TDB needs to be below 100W to fit in small console case.

  4. Re:Wait! on Apple Yanks "Sweatshop Themed" Game From App Store · · Score: 1

    Those rules are a little vague though:
    "We will reject Apps for any content or behavior that we believe is over the line. What line, you ask? Well, as a Supreme Court Justice once said, "I'll know it when I see it". And we think that you will also know it when you cross it."
    in other words, Apple can reject anything for whatever reason they feel like

  5. GT3 on Next-Gen Intel Chip Brings Big Gains For Floating-Point Apps · · Score: 3, Interesting

    AMD has lost the CPU race a long time ago, but still beats Intel with integrated graphics. Now, It looks like Haswell could win that battle too.
    The article shows GT2 to be 15% - 50% faster than the old HD4000. That's still a bit slower than Trinity, but GT3 has double the execution units than GT2, potentially blowing anything away that AMD could offer.

  6. Sony never really considered Nvidia seriously on Nvidia Walked Away From PS4 Hardware Negotiations · · Score: 1

    I'd say Sony already decided to use AMD before talking to Nvidia. The Nvidia meeting was only a way to make AMD reduce their asking price.
    Nvidia do not sell APUs, so they had no chance really. Combining the GPU and CPU on same silicon reduces the price, the power consumption and also both CPU and GPU share the same memory, giving better performance (http://vr-zone.com/articles/amd-afds-seattle-trinity-follow-on-kaveri-to-have-true-shared-memory/16258.html)

  7. Re:Mythbusting time! on Intel Announces Clover Trail+ Atom Platform For Smartphones and Tablets · · Score: 1

    Fact 6: Neon code has to be re-written :(

  8. Isn't Tegra4 for tablets? on Nvidia Tegra 4 Benchmark Results · · Score: 2

    I thought the mobile version was the slower Tegra4i. Why are they comparing it with the iPhone5 then and not iPad4?

  9. Re:malware on iOS Developer Site At Core of Facebook, Apple Watering Hole Attack · · Score: 1

    It used to be a great site for App Store marketing tips, but since has gone downhill some what

  10. Re:No really, it's jQuery that's broken on WebKit As Broken As Older IE Versions? · · Score: 1

    I sort of agree. Every framework you use has dozens of functions, each of those functions needs memory assigned in the browser, even if they aren't used. If websites were only using jQuery that wouldn't be such a problem, but most websites are using dozens of frameworks, sometimes multiple versions of the same framework.

  11. All versions of iOS drain battery on iOS 6.1 Leads To Battery Life Drain, Overheating For iPhone Users · · Score: 2

    I remember hearing battery problems for practically every iOS version from 5.0 onwards.
    http://osxdaily.com/2011/10/16/ios-5-battery-life-fix-tips/
    http://arstechnica.com/apple/2012/12/ios-6-0-2-suspected-of-draining-batteries/
    What gives?

  12. I don't know anything about Mac development build, but on Windows assert() is automatically removed in the release build (that's how assert is ment to work). So, looks more like a broken release build setup, than some one forgetting something.

  13. The solution: "Let's not eat meat every day" WTF? on Will Renewable Energy Ever Meet All Our Energy Needs? · · Score: 1

    At the end of the article it mentions one of the solutions to the energy crisis is to stop eating meat.
    Sorry, but I don't quite get the connection. What does eating meat got to do with solar power?

  14. Re:well, good. on Intel Gets Go-Ahead For $4 Billion Chip Plant In Ireland · · Score: 1

    > It comes at a cost - the Irish government is famous for encouraging huge foreign businesses to come in and set up to bring in thousands of jobs at a time at the expense of encouraging any sort of local entrepreneur.

    That's right, a local Irish company building state-of-the art 14nm CPU fab facilities would have just sprung into existance, if it weren't for the Irish government favouring Intel.

  15. Re:Just remove Java and get it over with on Java Zero-Day Vulnerability Rolled Into Exploit Packs · · Score: 2

    Sorry, to correct my previous post.
    Java does indeed overwrite system settings, however both Chrome and Firefox ignore the system setting and the plugin remains disabled.

  16. Re:Just remove Java and get it over with on Java Zero-Day Vulnerability Rolled Into Exploit Packs · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, you are right. Updating java re-enables the plugin (very bad :( ). However, Firefox seems to know that the plugin has security hole and disables it.

  17. Re:Just remove Java and get it over with on Java Zero-Day Vulnerability Rolled Into Exploit Packs · · Score: 2, Informative

    Please, stop the FUD already. All the security holes have been accessed via the java browser plugin, so just disabling the plugin is enough. .. and while you at it, disable the .NET browser plugin. Just as many security holes have been found in that component as java.
    There is no need to uninstall JRE (If you have Java installed on your system, then you probably need it for something)

  18. This is re-badge, not real 8000 series on AMD Unveils Preliminary Radeon HD 8000M Series Mobile GPU Details · · Score: 1

    These cards are based on the same Southern Islands core as the 7000 series. So, why is AMD calling these 8000 series? Because AMD has run out of money, causing the real 8000 series (Sea Islands) to be delayed: http://www.techspot.com/news/50975-amd-radeon-hd-8000-series-could-be-delayed-until-q2-2013.html

  19. Any big game studios using it? on Blender 2.65 Released · · Score: 1

    Blender used to be somewhat lacking, but it kept getting better and better - until now it seems to be able to do everything that Max or Maya can do.
    I wonder if there are any big game studios using it?

  20. Re:The actual picture on Chinese Moon Probe Flies By Asteroid Toutatis · · Score: 1

    What? Only one picture? That's it?

  21. Re:If an asteroid were to strike Earth within an h on Earth Avoids Collisions With Pair of Asteroids · · Score: 1

    and that's ignoring the fact that society would break down. People would start killing each other for the remaining food resources, just to stay alive.

  22. Re:The sky is falling... ? on Frame Latency Spikes Plague Radeon Graphics Cards · · Score: 1

    > The 7850 demonstrated here is an anomaly for AMD. None of their other cards do this.

    Just shows that you haven't RTFA. The article compairs 7950 versus 660 Ti.

  23. Re:Why would they stop developing weaponry? on North Korea Launches Long-Range Rocket · · Score: 1
  24. Re:Can TMSC really do it? on TSMC and Global Foundries Plan Risky Process Jump As Intel Unveils 22nm SoC · · Score: 1

    2 years. Yes, that's the time from which TMSC first publicly said they would use it (last year), until when they deliver (2014 according to article).

  25. Can TMSC really do it? on TSMC and Global Foundries Plan Risky Process Jump As Intel Unveils 22nm SoC · · Score: 2

    It took Intel 10 years to take FinFET from concept to production, yet TMSC are claiming they can do it in only 2 years. Is that even feasible? Even if it is, doesn't Intel have patents on the tech?