Slashdot Mirror


Sony Reveals More PS4 and Dual Shock 4 Details

Yesterday, Sony gave a presentation explaining a bit about the new PS4 hardware, the development environment (Windows 7 based IDE), and the changes to the Dual Shock controller. From the article: "The system is also set up to run graphics and computational code synchronously, without suspending one to run the other. Norden says that Sony has worked to carefully balance the two processors to provide maximum graphics power of 1.843 teraFLOPS at an 800Mhz clock speed while still leaving enough room for computational tasks. The GPU will also be able to run arbitrary code, allowing developers to run hundreds or thousands of parallelized tasks with full access to the system's 8GB of unified memory. ... The DualShock 4 controller that's standard on the PS4 eliminates one feature that was seldom used on the PS3 —the analog face buttons..." The trackpad will support two touch points, the rumble motors can be controlled more finely, and the analog sticks were tweaked for "reduced dead zone and better feeling tension that grips your thumbs."

242 comments

  1. Too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Too bad it's made by sony though.

    1. Re:Too bad by noh8rz10 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I for one welcome my new time wasting overlord. Why the hell not, sounds like fun! I'm not going to hold my nose because of a 4 year old Linux thing, or a 15 year old cd root kit thing. What I care is, how awesome will bioshock infinite 2 or assassin's creed V look? The only thing missing fromm the summary is a ship date. Will it be out the door in time for Christmas?

    2. Re:Too bad by tepples · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm not going to hold my nose because of a 4 year old Linux thing

      I disagree. If the management responsible for Sony's behavior in the George Hotz and Lik Sang cases has neither left nor repented, I don't see how I can forgive Sony.

    3. Re:Too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      how awesome will bioshock infinite 2 or assassin's creed V look?

      Exactly as awesome as the PC version, minus 20%. For what it's worth, AMD just released the 7790, a $150 graphics card with very, VERY similar numbers, and the PS4 hasn't even shipped yet.

      You can avoid Sony and still have the best graphics. Just go PC.

    4. Re:Too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "et al." is probably the phrase you were looking for. It's an abbreviation for "et alii" which is Latin for "and others" - see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Et_al#et_alii

    5. Re:Too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad? It's indisputably a good thing that the PS4 is being made by Sony. People who want lots of DRM and possibly some more bait & switching will adore the PS4, and Sony delivers all of that in a single package. The PS4 every imbecile's dream!

    6. Re:Too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bait-and-switch behavior should mean the end of the company. I'm not risking them doing it again.

    7. Re:Too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MMMMM delicious hyperbole.

      The simple truth is that very few people cared about Linux on the PS3. So sure, dozens of you are holding grudges. Please, do carry on. And please do keep whining about it ad infinitum. I find it almost as entertaining as the games themselves.

    8. Re:Too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the Sony corporation IS a video game! My daughter installed their fun "Find the XCP rootkit" from a music CD on my computer when she was a teenager working at a record store. Another great Sony title was "Update your console without deleting Linux". That one was even harder than the XCP game. Then they had the even harder "keep your private information that's in a web-facing unencrypted database out of the hands of fraudsters" game.

      I can't wait to see the games for this new PS (BTW, what does PS stand for? Please, Sony? Piece of Shit? Patently Stupid? I'm guessing the latter; anyone who buy anything, let alone computer gear, from a company with a track record like Sony is, IMO, particularly stupid.

    9. Re:Too bad by Wookact · · Score: 1

      Bioshock looks awesome on my PC, no new console needed.

    10. Re:Too bad by Microlith · · Score: 1

      a 4 year old Linux thing

      Barely 3 years since it was retroactively and unilaterally removed from existing systems.

      a 15 year old cd root kit thing

      The rootkit thing happened in 2006, not 1998.

      What I care is, how awesome will bioshock infinite 2 or assassin's creed V look?

      Ah yes! More sequels! Fuck originality, I want to know what Madden 45 looks like!

    11. Re:Too bad by iplayfast · · Score: 1

      I agree. I'm still boycotting Sony, they are bullies in corporate shirts.

    12. Re:Too bad by hawkinspeter · · Score: 1

      I choose not to forget how Sony stole from me. Companies that have such a disdain for their customers need to go out of business - there's plenty of other companies willing to produce consoles that don't treat their customers like shit.

      I hope the Ouya console leads a new generation of cheap Android consoles that puts Sony out of business once and for all.

      --
      You're a temporary arrangement of matter sliding towards oblivion in a cold, uncaring universe
    13. Re:Too bad by Tharkkun · · Score: 1

      how awesome will bioshock infinite 2 or assassin's creed V look?

      Exactly as awesome as the PC version, minus 20%. For what it's worth, AMD just released the 7790, a $150 graphics card with very, VERY similar numbers, and the PS4 hasn't even shipped yet.

      You can avoid Sony and still have the best graphics. Just go PC.

      I'm sorry but if you have a PC from 2006 throwing a new video card in won't make it perform to the level of a PS4. So realistically it's cheaper to buy a PS4 than a new PC + upgraded video card.

    14. Re:Too bad by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      What I care is, how awesome will bioshock infinite 2 or assassin's creed V look?

      The answer is, as always, "not as good as it will on the PC."

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    15. Re:Too bad by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Get a PC. Sadly it will likely have on par or better graphical fidelity by the time PS4 is released, and playing FPS like bioshock on a controller is a task for teens who just don't know better.
      Or don't remember the whole "PC vs consoles in the same game, bad PC gamers being gods destroying console players with their terrible control scheme".

    16. Re:Too bad by hairyfeet · · Score: 0

      What I want to know is how they and MSFT expect to get all this performance....out of an AMD Jaguar. Now this is coming from somebody who has been selling AMD exclusively for five years, I don't own Intel anything and am typing this on a Thuban X6, but its...a Jaguar.

      For those that don't know Jaguar is the replacement for Bobcat which is a NETBOOK chip designed to compete with the Atom. Now as somebody who owns a Bobcat netbook I can tell you that thanks to being out of order and having a hell of a lot nicer IGP it'll stomp the Atom nicely but an Athlon would curbstomp it HARD, much less a Phenom or FX. So why oh why would you put a netbook chip into your console? And from what I've been reading the Jag looks to be another FX style "half core" which means its only a quad with kinda sorta hyperthreading...why? Why would you want to put a gimped chip in your system when there are so many better choices? Hell Liano would bitchslap the Jag.

      Maybe its true they are planning to compete on price, maybe they want to get it out the door ASAP because they are scared of Valve which I have to admit I understand, from the sound of the Valve plan they are gonna try something completely different, with a low/mid/high specs and dozens of companies making their own flavors so they'll be able to hit pretty much any price point...who knows. I just don't get the Jag. I mean if this was an HTPC, or built into a TV? Yeah it'd make a great media player, I just don't see how they are gonna do all the physics heavy 1080p gaming folks are gonna expect with a Jag. I have a feeling a year after launch the devs are gonna be slamming into the limits of the Jag. Again nothing against AMD but this would be like looking at Intel's entire line up and saying "Yes for our heavy processing system we'll use the Atom"..WTF?

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    17. Re:Too bad by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      Hah. I'm not. Only in Slashdot can people get obsessed by some silly Linux thing. PS3's main function is a game console and for that purpose it has always worked more than fine. However if PS3 or PS4 wouldn't perform properly as a gaming machine, then I would completely understand not supporting Sony.

    18. Re:Too bad by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Barely 3 years since it was retroactively and unilaterally removed from existing systems.

      Excuse me? I had a YDL on install on my PS3 and it wasn't retroactive or Unilateral. you had to agree to do it, and in fact if you upgrade an OtherOS equipped PS3 to modern firmware it will warn you what will happen and asks you to confirm twice, not just once as it would normally.

      Your choice, you can keep OtherOS and lose PSN or vice versa.

    19. Re:Too bad by iplayfast · · Score: 1

      Some silly Linux thing eh? Let's translate it into cars, as we are on slashdot.

      You can no longer use brand X gas in your car you must use brand Y. You're okay with that, right?
      But you can no longer use wheels on your car and you have a problem with that.

      You forget that some of us paid close to $1000 when it first came out, with the understanding that it could play games, do it's sony thing, play blueray disks, and run Linux.

      So I deserve some of that original money back. I don't like being held up for about $200 worth of functionality. You might be okay with that, but then again plenty of people don't mind being smacked in the face once in a while. I for one, DO NOT ACCEPT the Sony overlords.

    20. Re:Too bad by indeterminator · · Score: 1

      Too bad it's made by sony though.

      Too bad any potential alternatives will mean giving more money to Microsoft. And it's hard to beat the evil of MS tax.

  2. No link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's with the only link being to the wikipedia page for the Dual Shock controller?

  3. Why is TFA a Wikipedia article? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on.

  4. Yawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get back to me the system is sub $200.

    1. Re:Yawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no way they could have that price point with decent hardware. I think your statement should be read as "I'll get back to this when it's $200" - see ya in 5 years.

  5. Any Word On compatability? by Wing_Zero · · Score: 2

    So are they going to ditch the PS3 support with this one? i still have my PS2 sitting in my living room for that reason.

    1. Re:Any Word On compatability? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Acquisition of GaiKai and skinny on the street says it will be offered down the line by some sort of cloudy streamy service.

    2. Re:Any Word On compatability? by Somebody+Is+Using+My · · Score: 5, Informative

      The Playstation 4 will not be backwards compatible with Playstation 3 games.

      Playstation 2 games will be supported via emulation, /if/ you buy and download them from the Playstation store (so no, you can't just pop in a PS2 disc and expect it to work; you need to buy the game again).

      In other words, for full backwards compatibility you need all three devices.

    3. Re:Any Word On compatability? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They will be doing streaming PS3 games. I don't like kotaku but this was the first article I found: http://www.kotaku.com.au/2013/02/the-ps4-will-stream-ps1-ps2-and-ps3-games/

    4. Re:Any Word On compatability? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Yup.
      That is the reason I am likely not getting one.
      That and the fact that the PS3 still works fine. Heck, I am still backlogged with PS2 games to play.

    5. Re:Any Word On compatability? by ZombieBraintrust · · Score: 2

      They are ditching PS3 support. Mainly so they can move to a PC architecture.

    6. Re:Any Word On compatability? by tepples · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Acquisition of GaiKai and skinny on the street says it will be offered down the line by some sort of cloudy streamy service.

      Which means if your home Internet is satellite, microwave, capped DSL, capped cable, or capped fiber, good luck.

    7. Re:Any Word On compatability? by Vanderhoth · · Score: 1

      Also means you'll have to go repurchase all the stuff you own, if they make it available at all.

    8. Re:Any Word On compatability? by DdJ · · Score: 1

      Three devices? What's the state of original PlayStation games? There's a (small) subset of those that don't run properly on the PS2. Will they run on the PS4?

      (I have a ton of PSX and PS2 games. Today, I keep both an original PlayStation and a PS2 hooked up in our guest room, next to the SNES, Genesis, and GameCube. I do not have a PS3 or any PS3 games, so the question of how original PlayStation games play on the PS3 isn't of interest to me.)

    9. Re:Any Word On compatability? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sounds about right, considering the vast majority of home consoles have not supported another console's games.

      backward compatibility is a feature a lot of people say they want, but few people actually use. i'm happy the ps4 won't play ps3 games - that would have driven up the price tremendously, and my ps3 still works just fine.

      and if you don't already have a ps3 but want to play ps3 games, guess what? the ps3 is really cheap now.

    10. Re:Any Word On compatability? by butalearner · · Score: 4, Funny

      In other words, for full backwards compatibility you need all three devices.

      My 60 GB first generation PS3 begs to differ! Just a month ago I was looking through my games and I realized I never played Growlanser 3 (which came in the set with 2, which I played through twice), so I've been going through that one. As a bonus, it takes some of the load off my aging furnace.

    11. Re:Any Word On compatability? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Traditionally Gaikai was a subscription based service especially when I was beta testing it.
      I imagine that you don't get to actually buy your cloud games, but for another $10 a month (in addition to your PS+ for $20) you can rent them out.

    12. Re:Any Word On compatability? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It'd be no different than what it was on the PS3 at best.
      But the PS3 used the last bios of the PS2.
      And the last bios of the PS2 had compatibility issues with some PS2 games.
      The purpose of the 9000x series slimline PS2's was to remove a bios bug that allowed homebrew.
      It also broke compatibility with some games (I believe Virtua Fighter was one).

    13. Re:Any Word On compatability? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea and backward compatible PS3s aren't even expensive refurbished. Sub $200.

    14. Re:Any Word On compatability? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assume it'll be no better than the PS3 which is good but not perfect. Wip3out is the only game I have which doesn't play on the PS3.

    15. Re:Any Word On compatability? by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      To be fair, the original PS3s had PS2 hardware built in. As the revisions went on, they started chopping the physical PS2 parts out.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    16. Re:Any Word On compatability? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ePSXe and PCSX2 work great for PlayStation and PS2 emulation. At maximum settings and with the right shaders, they make some games almost look modern.

  6. Article link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please post the article link other nobody can RTFA.

  7. The article? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "From the article" - what article?

  8. Analog face buttons? by KatchooNJ · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I guess you can call them seldom used... I never even knew the PS3 had controllers with those buttons. My PS3 controllers never had them.

    --
    "Never give up, for that is just the time and place when the tide will change." -Harriet Beecher Stowe ^_^
    1. Re:Analog face buttons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Games like Metal Gear Solid, you could vary the force on them, it was decent but under used.

    2. Re:Analog face buttons? by Fallingcow · · Score: 1

      WTF controllers did you buy?

      DualShock 2 & 3 had them. They let games tell whether you smashed the button & released it quickly, or gently pressed it and gently eased up.

      Only games I can recall using them on either system were entries in the Metal Gear Solid series. Control scheme for MGS2, for instance, will have to be modified if it's re-released on the PS4.

    3. Re:Analog face buttons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting that you own the only PS3 in the world without a controller with analog face buttons.

    4. Re:Analog face buttons? by Tmann72 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yeah, you do. It's the four face buttons with the X, O, Triangle, and Square. They had analogue capability in that they could detect how soft or hard you pressed them. This was used more in the ps2 days, but has fallen out of use since it rarely made things better.

    5. Re:Analog face buttons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The PS2 had analog face buttons too. But very few games used them at all, and practically no game made practical use of them

    6. Re:Analog face buttons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All PS2 and PS3 controls have them. However they are rarely used (the only games I know are MGS2 and Wipeout Fusion).

    7. Re:Analog face buttons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assumed they were referring to the L3/R3 buttons (the analog sticks), but the linked Wikipedia article mentions those buttons being on the DS4 as well.

    8. Re:Analog face buttons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The D-pad and L1/L2/R1/R2 as well...

    9. Re:Analog face buttons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, I don't think they did that, I think they only measured preasure (the conductive pad under the buttons has a rounded shape, the harder the button is pressed, the bigger the contact surface becomes.

    10. Re:Analog face buttons? by Nerdfest · · Score: 1

      I think they'd be better off adjusting the shape a bit to make the sticks more comfortable. They only seem to be comfortable for me if I stick my elbows out ... they're way too low. They should just bite the bullet and move a bit closer to the XBox controller shape.

    11. Re:Analog face buttons? by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Racing games did though.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    12. Re:Analog face buttons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're correct, but so is GP. the dual shock 3 can do the things in GP's post because of the pressure sensitivity you mentioned.

    13. Re:Analog face buttons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gran Turismo 3 used them extensively... Moved to a PC in 2004ish, do they not still do this on PS?

    14. Re:Analog face buttons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes it was great for feathering the gas in Gran Tourism games. I also believe some FPSs used this as a pre trigger pull so you could load the trigger and then pull the trigger.

    15. Re:Analog face buttons? by KatchooNJ · · Score: 1

      Interesting. I guess I never realized that the PS3 controllers had this capability because I never played anything that apparently used this and also because there was no indication on the controller that they had analog button functions. I remember the old conrollers had that button that actually said, "ANALOG" on it, so there was no mistaking there.

      --
      "Never give up, for that is just the time and place when the tide will change." -Harriet Beecher Stowe ^_^
    16. Re:Analog face buttons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the Gran Tourismo games were the only ones I've ever played that used this functionality.

    17. Re:Analog face buttons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And by detecting pressure you can infer what he wrote (gently pressed, quickly released, etc.). Imagine a time-domain graph of the pressure. Imagine the derivative. Are you that dense?

    18. Re:Analog face buttons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about you stick to your Xbox controller? Some of us actually prefer the dual shock! *GASP*

    19. Re:Analog face buttons? by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1

      Interesting. I guess I never realized that the PS3 controllers had this capability because I never played anything that apparently used this and also because there was no indication on the controller that they had analog button functions. I remember the old conrollers had that button that actually said, "ANALOG" on it, so there was no mistaking there.

      That Analog button actually refers to the analog sticks rather than analog face buttons.

      When the PS1 came out, its controllers didn't have analog sticks. They were added a few years into the console's lifetime with the introduction of the Dual Analog controllers (which was replaced the next year by the more well known DualShock controllers). Unfortunately, this means that older games don't support analog sticks, so you could press the Analog button to turn them off. Newer PS1 games supported both analog sticks and the D-pad; the Analog button would switch control schemes.

      The DualShock 2 (shipped with the PS2) added analog face buttons as well. All PS2 games had the Analog function always turned on; it was included only for PS1 game support.

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    20. Re:Analog face buttons? by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Actually pressure sensitive buttons were on the DualShock 2 for the PS2...

    21. Re:Analog face buttons? by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      I think EVERY single button is analog on a DualShock 2 except start and select, including the D-Pad.

    22. Re:Analog face buttons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used them for Gran Turismo. Gas and brake respectfully.

  9. Yay!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All that massive power so we can play CoD 27, Crysis 20, wth ultra photorrealistic graphics, 200-people multiplayer, but the same old tired gameplay.

    Amazing!!

  10. The missing article... by boarder8925 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I think this is the article in question.

  11. Anyone ever use by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    the analog face buttons? I gave up pretty quick on them after using them to play Mad Maestro on the PS2. Didn't even realize they were still in the PS3. I do wish Sony would stop adding pointless features to their game pads. It's not so much that the features bug me as I'd rather they spend time/money somewhere else. Plus it'd be nice if the gamepads weren't $60 bucks. On the plus side the PS4's gamepad looks cheap to produce.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Anyone ever use by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      the analog face buttons? I gave up pretty quick on them after using them to play Mad Maestro on the PS2. Didn't even realize they were still in the PS3. I do wish Sony would stop adding pointless features to their game pads. It's not so much that the features bug me as I'd rather they spend time/money somewhere else. Plus it'd be nice if the gamepads weren't $60 bucks. On the plus side the PS4's gamepad looks cheap to produce.

      I think the useless touchpad will drive up the price.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    2. Re:Anyone ever use by 0racle · · Score: 1

      stop adding pointless features to their game pads

      I like Gran Turismo with speeds between stop and full throttle.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    3. Re:Anyone ever use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll get right on buying a shock wireless controller for Ps3.

      Right on it...

      Shock...

    4. Re:Anyone ever use by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      For PS3, I don't recall any games that used them. For PS2, there was this little, unknown game no one has heard of called Metal Gear Solid 3 that used them.
      A soft or hard press made the difference between choking an enemy and slitting their throat. Or between a slicing action and a stabbing action while in melee combat. It was rather nice once you got used to it, but from what I can tell, Metal Gear Solid 4 switched away from that system.

    5. Re:Anyone ever use by White+Flame · · Score: 1

      I mapped steering to the left analog stick, and accelerate/brake to the right analog stick. Worked a whole lot better than squeezing the buttons, not knowing how hard was maximum pressure. (I think it was GT, was a while ago since I've always used real force-feedback wheels since...)

    6. Re:Anyone ever use by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Can't you just map the throttle/brakes to whichever joystick isn't being used for steering?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    7. Re:Anyone ever use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Analog buttons (R2 aside) have always made The Problem far, far worse for me.

    8. Re:Anyone ever use by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      The Xbox 360 controller also has analog face buttons. And no, I don't know of any games that actually use them.

      I guess the controller makers figure "better more data than less, even if the data is practically useless." Or something.

  12. As long as they don't mention Linux support. by BluPhenix316 · · Score: 1

    I don't think, we will be duped again.

  13. Re:Caution about moderation abuse... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The reason people impersonate you is because everyone thinks you're a moron. The hosts file is not intended to be used as you suggest. But it's pretty damn funny, though.

  14. What's the point of buying a Sony PC? by tepples · · Score: 2

    If PlayStation 4 is moving to a PC architecture, then what's the point of buying a PlayStation 4 over a home theater PC running a less-closed operating system such as Windows 8 or GNU/Linux?

    1. Re:What's the point of buying a Sony PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      PCs don't get to run Sony exclusive titles. People like them, a lot. It's the same for the other consoles, it's about the games, not the transistor configurations. The new xbox will also return to x86 architecture. Going to moan about that too?

    2. Re:What's the point of buying a Sony PC? by gstoddart · · Score: 2

      If PlayStation 4 is moving to a PC architecture, then what's the point of buying a PlayStation 4 over a home theater PC running a less-closed operating system such as Windows 8 or GNU/Linux?

      So you can play the games for the Playstation?

      The internals might be PC architecture, but Sony is going to make damned sure there's lots preventing you from running these games on a PC.

      Sony is doing this to cut costs, not make something which is 'open' in any meaningful way. Because let's face it, Sony doesn't do that sort of thing.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    3. Re:What's the point of buying a Sony PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What... All 2 titles that they have? No, this move is another nail in Sony's coffin. They are and have been slowly alienating themselves from their customer bass by ignoring what people actually want.

    4. Re:What's the point of buying a Sony PC? by ZombieBraintrust · · Score: 1

      Price, exclusive games, and difficulty. I was looking to purchase a Gaming PC a few weeks ago and every site I came across told me not to build one instead of buying one from a vendor. The consensus is that companies like Alienware gouge on price and include components with high numbers instead of good components. The prices were also higher than console prices. Most of those machines also ran Windows 8 (yuck) You can hardly go into a best buy and purchase good gaming pc either.

    5. Re:What's the point of buying a Sony PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      who can blame them, after a few days that customer bass starts to stink.

    6. Re:What's the point of buying a Sony PC? by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      If PlayStation 4 is moving to a PC architecture, then what's the point of buying a PlayStation 4 over a home theater PC running a less-closed operating system such as Windows 8 or GNU/Linux?

      Maybe because you want to play PS4 games? Apple moved to a PC architecture and people still purchase their products instead of a home theater PC or Windows 8 or GNU/Linux. Probably because they want to run OS X.

      By the way, exactly how is running Windows 8 any less closed than running a Playstation?

    7. Re:What's the point of buying a Sony PC? by Tharkkun · · Score: 1

      If PlayStation 4 is moving to a PC architecture, then what's the point of buying a PlayStation 4 over a home theater PC running a less-closed operating system such as Windows 8 or GNU/Linux?

      Maybe because you want to play PS4 games? Apple moved to a PC architecture and people still purchase their products instead of a home theater PC or Windows 8 or GNU/Linux. Probably because they want to run OS X.

      By the way, exactly how is running Windows 8 any less closed than running a Playstation?

      It's less about running OSX and more about tinkering. It's just like using these DVR solutions. I would rather pay $6.50 a month for a DVR box from comcast then fiddle around with a conversion card and software on my PC. The same goes for consoles. People want to be able to sit down and have it just work. Zero configuration. Plug and play!

    8. Re:What's the point of buying a Sony PC? by Tarlus · · Score: 1

      ...what's the point of buying a PlayStation 4 over a home theater PC running a less-closed operating system such as Windows 8 or GNU/Linux?

      Exactly the same point that exists in buying a PlayStation 3 over a HTPC. People want different tools for different jobs.

      --
      /* No Comment */
    9. Re:What's the point of buying a Sony PC? by feandil · · Score: 1

      the internals are not "PC architecture", the internals are using PC CPU and GPU, but the cache and bus are not the same. once engines are optimised for the hardward specificities on a PS4 they won't run the same way on PC.
      I predict vastly superior performance for the PS4 compared to a PC of the same price because of the dedicated hardware.
      that doesn't mean there won't be cross-platform games, on the contrary it will be easier than before, but to havbe the same quality on PC will required many more dollars of hardware

    10. Re:What's the point of buying a Sony PC? by Nyder · · Score: 0

      PCs don't get to run Sony exclusive titles. People like them, a lot. It's the same for the other consoles, it's about the games, not the transistor configurations. The new xbox will also return to x86 architecture. Going to moan about that too?

      Odd, as a PC Gamer, I could care less about the exclusive games to the consoles. Since almost all games that are put out on consoles have crappy PC ports, I'm pretty sure exclusives games, if they were to come to PC's are going to be crappy ass ports.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    11. Re:What's the point of buying a Sony PC? by khchung · · Score: 1

      How about the lack of cheaters/aimbots/etc in multiplayer? And the certainty that everyone have the same hardware, so the play is fair?

      With the PS3 or PS4, I can be reasonably certain that I will be playing against honest players 99.9% of the time, and no one has the advantage of a better/faster machine. That would be enough of an incentive for me to choose PS4 over PC for any multiplayer games.

      Yes, I realize it is still possible to have cheating devices outside the box, but it would be much more of a hassle that most players won't bother.

      --
      Oliver.
    12. Re:What's the point of buying a Sony PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except most Sony exclusives are pure shit that no PC gamer would want to play.

    13. Re:What's the point of buying a Sony PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah. Even with the large GDDR5 memory, it will bottleneck in other areas that don't affect gaming PCs, like CPU and GPU. Consoles will never overtake a gaming PC.

    14. Re:What's the point of buying a Sony PC? by tepples · · Score: 1

      How should Street Fighter IV or another fighting game have been made for the PC without being what you'd call a crappy port?

  15. If you want Linux, get Ouya by tepples · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Fortunately, for people who want a Linux box and a game console in one package, Ouya comes out this June. I have no need for Sony.

    1. Re:If you want Linux, get Ouya by Mike+Frett · · Score: 1

      Exactly, I'm done with the 'Big Boy's', and my bro is done with Xbox. Ouya and Indie all the way for me!. They can shove their $70 games and $600 Consoles up their rectums.

    2. Re:If you want Linux, get Ouya by Narishma · · Score: 1

      Ouya is Android, not Linux.

      --
      Mada mada dane.
    3. Re:If you want Linux, get Ouya by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you fucking stupid? I'm a god damn windows fan boy and I hate linux on the desktop, and I still know better than that.

    4. Re:If you want Linux, get Ouya by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux is not an OS, it's a kernel. Android DOES run Linux. Therefor, Android IS Linux, but with a different userspace than is used on GNU/Linux (no I'm not an RMS fanboy, I'm just using it here to make it distinct from Android userspace on a Linux kernel.)

    5. Re:If you want Linux, get Ouya by Nyder · · Score: 1

      Fortunately, for people who want a Linux box and a game console in one package, Ouya comes out this June. I have no need for Sony.

      You mean the "Steam" Box (Valve) will be a Linux box & game console in one Package.

      Ouya runs Android, not Linux.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    6. Re:If you want Linux, get Ouya by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you serious? Ouya?

      It will be half-baked HTML5 games, a few low-level ones and Android games. (that will, yet again, be half-baked because the thing won't sell outside of the geeky markets since they already have a smartphone or tablet, and even then GEEKY market types have those as well most likely and broke them open for hacking and other purposes)

      It doesn't even shine next to Wii with the quality of games, never mind the technical side of games.

      And this is coming from a person who is betting their money ON HTML5 in the near future when uptake explodes after the final few large areas get finalized and pushed out.
      The main areas being hardware control, file management, and the ability to embed binary data in some way in to one file.
      Despite what a lot of sites will say, portability is a good thing with flash files and the artificial DRM of HTML5 files being separate will not stop anyone and will only serve to annoy.
      So for the moment I will just stick with embedding data in base91 for now. Last time I tried embedding binary, the NULs were stripped.

  16. Re:Caution about moderation abuse... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What? You don't have a 14MB hosts file with ~1million entries in it? Next you'll probably tell me that your computer doesn't start thrashing and take 5 minutes for a DNS lookup!

  17. Nuh uh by fyngyrz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    No hardware compatibility, no emulation == no buy.

    And I agree with you: I *am* going to hold my nose because of that linux thing. That was uncalled for. "Here! Have this console with this feature! Got it? Ok, yeah, that feature? We're taking that out."

    I just can't see giving Sony any more money; as they chose to make it so that only used, older units will play the titles in my game library, then so be it: Used, older units is what I will buy when the ones I have go nipples north. I've already dedicated more shelves (and system inputs) to game machines than most people bother to; no more.

    There's a silver lining to this, too... the used game market for the previous and earlier generation machines is inexpensive and rich with titles. Couldn't find and play all the good ones if I played one a day for the rest of my life. There are a few titles that have basically infinite re-playability, too, because they're about interacting with other people. So.... pfbbbt.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    1. Re:Nuh uh by Hatta · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No hardware compatibility, no emulation == no buy.

      Why not? Don't you already have a PS3 you can play your PS3 games on? It's a brand new console. Backwards compatibility didn't help the Atari 7800, and it didn't help the Sega Genesis much either. Why spend so much effort engineering in backwards compatibility when you can just play your old console?

      When DVDs came out, I didn't bitch that they weren't backwards compatible with what I already had. I kept my VCR and watched my tapes on that when I wanted to, and watched DVDs when I wanted to do that. What's so hard about that?

      Promising backwards compatibility and then removing it is a shitty thing to do to your customers. Being up front about the lack of a feature that's barely useful is doing things right for a change.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    2. Re:Nuh uh by tuffy · · Score: 1

      Backwards compatibility did help the PS2, along with Nintendo's long line of portables. But the PS3 architecture is unsustainable, so there was never any chance those games would be supported by the PS4. The best one can hope for is that they'll be recompiled for the new architecture and put up on Sony's download shop someday in the future.

      --

      Ita erat quando hic adveni.

    3. Re:Nuh uh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because not everyone has the cash to splash out wholesale on a new console.

      Some people sell their old consoles in for a bit of cash to go towards the new one.

    4. Re:Nuh uh by jxander · · Score: 1

      Atari? VHS? Is it too much to ask for technology to march forward a bit?

      This isn't the 80s anymore. We have the technology, we can rebu- no wait ... we can emulate! I'm not a SW monkey, so maybe someone else can answer this : how hard is it to take an existing game and transpose it into emulator language? Or, for some outside the box thinking... what's stopping Sony from just finding some guy on the internet who wrote a Playstation emulator, and paying him a couple grand for the rights to use it? Say 50k. That's probably less than some Sony VP get paid for taking his morning dump, and the whole thing becomes a non-issue. Done and done.

      The real problem is logistics. I have a limited number of ports on my television, and a limited amount of usable shelf space. If I'm required to have 2 or 3 systems per "tech tree," plus my HTPC, plus a cable box, I am going to run out of real estate in a big hurry. Not to mention the act of training my wife and kids: "To watch a DVD you want *that* playstation, it's on HDMI 3 ... no dear, Pretty Princess Pony plays on *that* system, it's connected to component 2... no no, that's the HTPC remote."

      --
      This signature is false.
    5. Re:Nuh uh by iroll · · Score: 1

      If the PS4 isn't powerful enough to emulate a PS3 in software, then what makes it powerful enough to warrant obsoleting the PS3? Pretty much every previous generation has had this capability (ignoring engineered incompatibility, like cartridges).

      --
      Repetition does not transform a lie into the truth. - FDR
    6. Re:Nuh uh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It helped first iterations of PS3 and PS2.

      Another thing to consider: I already have PS3 and XBox360, but where am I supposed to stick one or two consoles more? Space under my TV is not stretchable, so those'll have to go.

      My PS2 and PS1 collection still gets some use without taking extra space near TV thanks to PCSX and PCSX2 teams. I rather doubt it there'll be PS3 emulator in close future.

    7. Re:Nuh uh by n30na · · Score: 1

      Previous generations usually achieved this by having the chips for the old console in them, in one form or another, when playing just one generation back at least.

    8. Re:Nuh uh by vux984 · · Score: 0

      Don't you already have a PS3 you can play your PS3 games on?

      No. I don't have a PS3. So right there that argument flies out the window.

      But even if I did have a PS3 I would want backwards compatibility. Less clutter in my living room for one thing, the ability to sell the PS3 to help fund the PS4 would be nice, or the ability to give it away. My parents have my old Wii now that we have a Wii-U. I can still play the Wii games at home, and now the kids can play them with grandma too.

      When DVDs came out, I didn't bitch that they weren't backwards compatible with what I already had.

      Yes they were. CD's play just fine in them.

      Promising backwards compatibility and then removing it is a shitty thing to do to your customers

      Not half as shitty as promising a feature, delivering the feature, and then removing it from the devices people already had as a condition of continuing to use it to play multiplayer games. That's not 'shitty' that's criminal.

      Being up front about the lack of a feature that's barely useful is doing things right for a change.

      Being up front is a good change. And the substantial architectural changes between PS3 and PS4 with respect to CPU probably makes back-comp a pain in the ass to implement, so I get why they aren't doing it. I don't really care though, they set down that course of action when they gambled on the Cell in the first place. I thought it was a bad idea then, and it continues to have lasting repercussions of suck today.

      Then again I've only bought Nintendo consoles since the PS1. I get enough of the so-called mature console style games on my PC, and now have one attached to my TV, with an xbox controller, and tons of games picked up on steam and gog and elsewhere for a fraction of the price, better mod options, and a host of other stuff.

      I didn't have a PS3 and don't miss it. I'm not likely to buy a PS4 either. But I bought a Wii-U even though launch game support was weak because Nintendo delivers a different gaming experience, and quite frankly we're happy with it. It does a lot of stuff my PC box can't do well. The new tablet controler is pretty sweet, and my kids love to be able to play skylanders and other games even when the TV is tied up with something else. Its a feature I didn't give much value to when I bought it, but its amazing how much it gets used.

      The backwards compatibility with Wii is a nice bonus too, and is much more than a "barely useful feature", particularly given the weak Wii-U launch title line up.

    9. Re:Nuh uh by Tharkkun · · Score: 1

      A lot of my PS1 games still didn't work properly on my PS2. I had to bust out my PS1 to play them so it wasn't all it's cracked up to be.

    10. Re:Nuh uh by Grench · · Score: 1

      When DVDs came out, I didn't bitch that they weren't backwards compatible with what I already had.

      Yes they were. CD's play just fine in them.

      Yes, DVD players will play CDs.

      But most people who switched up to a DVD player wanted to watch films, rather than listen to music. Let me know when you manage to get your DVD player to play VHS or Betamax tapes.

      --
      He's Jesus, for Christ's sake.
    11. Re:Nuh uh by spire3661 · · Score: 2

      DO you know how the PS3 got PS2 emulation? By slapping a full set of PS2 hardware inside the PS3. The Xbox back compat list is spotty at best. I have had a full back compat PS3 since launch, and a full library of PS2 titles. The PS2 games i played the most I ended up geting the HD remasters of. Its a total non-issue. What you should be stoked for is the fact that the next consoles are pretty PCs and that development across PC and consoles is going to be very smooth and easy.

      --
      Good-bye
    12. Re:Nuh uh by hairyfeet · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Besides lets be honest folks...its an HTPC. Both MSFT and Sony have gone with low power HTPC chips from AMD...so why not just build an HTPC and have control of the system?

      Hell you can buy a nice AMD Hexacore for $300 that will curbstomp the chip in the Sony and MSFT consoles, just slap whatever GPU you prefer (If you want to save money the HD4850s are dirt cheap and play most games at 1080P and med/high settings, spend a little more you can get the HD7770 and double the memory and boost the performance by 50%) and whatever OS suits your fancy, I prefer Win 7 but on an HTPC Windows 8 actually works nice as those big ass tiles are easy to hit with a remote and since Valve has ported Steam Linux is always an option, and unlike the consoles its YOURS, want multiple OSes? RUN IT. Want to buy games from a dozen different vendors? DO IT. Nobody has control over the hardware but YOU.

      I could understand the consoles in the past because it was hard to hook a PC to a TV for the average Joes and the consoles used exotic chips that gave them advantages in some areas...but its an AMD Jaguar folks, a bog standard X86 netbook chip, all they did was bolt 2 jaguar quads together and there ya go. I built a system just like the one linked for my oldest and it just blows through games like they were nothing WHILE playing his tunes AND having his chat running AND his browser loaded in the background, it never bogs down. And hooking a PC to a TV is as simple as an HDMI cable now, my mom could do it, it will detect the TV and do all the setup and Bob's your uncle. And if you want the little case? They make VCR looking cases you can use if that is what melts your butter but I've built several HTPCs and when folks see how nice the new cases look they usually just skip the HTPC case.

      So I don't get it this time, like Jim Sterling said about the current consoles they are just crappy PCs with all the hassles like long updates and online passes but none of the upsides like cheaper prices and better MP...so why? Its not like you can't plug a wireless controller into a PC, Valve has big picture mode now which makes driving with a wireless thumbstick or remote easy peasy, the games are cheaper, MP lasts longer, hell you can still fire up Counterstrike Classic and be blasting away with dozens of folks inside of 4 minutes, and the best reason it leaves YOU in control of your system, so why? Why get worse prices and all the BS from Sony and MSFT along with gimped hardware? The sad part is when MSFT and Sony move to the Xbox 5 and PS5 they'll abandon the systems but thanks to DMCA they'll make sure nobody can just put out a simple unlock so all that bog standard X86 hardware will be dumpster bait...why put up with that?

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    13. Re:Nuh uh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=68q1C7Vj9n4

      So far it doesn't look fake, though I did notice it was running at 480i resolution.

      (theoretically, it shouldn't be as hard as you think to emulate a ps3, due to cell's ASM tables have been known since 2007, and many of them can be one to one mapped to an equivalent Intel call. Altivec maps pretty well to AVR instructions in recent intel procs as well. The 7 other cores in the ps3 as well are very simple stream processors with a very small amount of cache, which lends itself to being emulated by AMD APUs, or in the hyperthreading logical cores in intel land. The GPU itself shouldn't be too hard if you can figure out the mapping structure for the 7000 seres GPU that is in it and do a one to one map with a recent GPU.

      The hard part is keeping the BIOS from freaking out, and getting your account banned off PSN is probably going to happen. For single player though you shouldn't have issue though.

    14. Re:Nuh uh by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      So silly, the predecessor of the DVD was the SVCD. NOT the VHS.

      Order of precidence:

      VHS/BetaMax->Laserdisc->VCD->SVCD->DVD->Bluray/HDDVD

      How crude of you to completely ignore the massive number of titles that came out on VCD and SVCD in asia!

      And yes, My DVD player plays VCD and SVCD discs just fine, thank you.

    15. Re:Nuh uh by xhrit · · Score: 1

      Why not?

      Convenience. You do not need a different machine to run each different piece of software you own. Backwards compatibility is basically what made Microsoft Windows so popular.

    16. Re:Nuh uh by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      There was also models of PS3 which had the PS2 "Emotion Engine" CPU emulated in the software, but included the PS2 GPU as an ASIC.

    17. Re:Nuh uh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No hardware compatibility, no emulation == no buy.

      Why not? Don't you already have a PS3 you can play your PS3 games on? It's a brand new console. Backwards compatibility didn't help the Atari 7800, and it didn't help the Sega Genesis much either. Why spend so much effort engineering in backwards compatibility when you can just play your old console?

      When DVDs came out, I didn't bitch that they weren't backwards compatible with what I already had. I kept my VCR and watched my tapes on that when I wanted to, and watched DVDs when I wanted to do that. What's so hard about that?

      Promising backwards compatibility and then removing it is a shitty thing to do to your customers. Being up front about the lack of a feature that's barely useful is doing things right for a change.

      If I had a single argument against this, it would be cost.

      Converting to DVD from VHS did not ever cost me upwards of $60 per movie. I also did not spend hundreds of dollars on either format for the player itself.

      Perhaps this is where a lot of gamers are slightly peeved with backwards compatibility. And we're not talking about PS2 support here.

    18. Re:Nuh uh by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Yes i know, it was a hack. For any meaningful PS2 emulation to occur, they had to put at least some PS2 hardware in the PS3. Do you want them to to put PS3 hardware in the PS4 to make back compat work?

      --
      Good-bye
    19. Re:Nuh uh by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Don't you already have a PS3 you can play your PS3 games on?

      No. I don't have a PS3. So right there that argument flies out the window.

      What do you play your PS3 games on then? And why would that method stop working because a PS4 was connected to your TV?

    20. Re:Nuh uh by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      DId your Laserdisc play VHS/Betamax tapes?

      Did your VCD play Laserdiscs?

    21. Re:Nuh uh by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      A lot? Gee the only ones I know of that don't work are a few Japanese PS1 games in Japanese PS2s, and the PS1 X-files game which does not work properly in either a PS2 or PS3 (the game obvious breaks the TRC that works on a release PS1 but fails in the "perfect tech-doc PS1's in the PS2 and the emulated version of same PS3)

    22. Re:Nuh uh by neildiamond · · Score: 1

      Actually, most of the used games for PS3 are still cheaper new on steam.

    23. Re:Nuh uh by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      Considering the physical incompatibility of both the signal encoding methodologies and the physical form factors, no.

      But, my dvd player does play vhs tapes. It's a combo deck unit.

      Laserdisc was a short lived product that was quickly orphaned. It was never popular enough to be worthwhile for backward compat. To be a marketable feature. VCD and SVCD however were *insanely* popular in asia, and have a physically identically sized form factor disc, made with similar tech. It is trivial to include VCD and SVCD capability in a bluray/dvd player.

      Really, you were asking rhetorical questions, but the rhetoric behind the question is invalid; the assertion being that back compat is not a valid marketing tactic. The fact that essentially *every* dvd player is also a vcd and svcd player, and that are even vhs players as well, and that the features in question were driving forces for adoption in certain markets, invalidates the rhetoric.

      But thanks for playing anyway.

    24. Re:Nuh uh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      part of me agrees with you, but with the advent of digital distribution backwards compatibility has become a lot more important.

      What if every new iphone or ipad that came out was unable to play the stuff you bought on the previous iteration?
      I bet you'd have a problem with that, but since this is a console you see it differently for some reason.

    25. Re:Nuh uh by feandil · · Score: 2

      like most people you underestimate the advantage of using unified memory. there's no data transfer on the bus when you want to send data calculated from the cpu onto the gpu, the graphics perf are going to be vastly superior to an "equivalent" PC when we devs tune our engine to make the most of it.

    26. Re:Nuh uh by ZombieBraintrust · · Score: 1

      To be fair there were alot of combo DVD/VHS players made when DVD came out.

    27. Re:Nuh uh by Boltronics · · Score: 1

      I agree with you on the importance of backwards compatibility, but MS hasn't particularly cared about it in a long time.

      For example, want to play old Windows games like C&C RA or Dark Reign over LAN? IPX hasn't been supported in Windows since Vista - but GNU/Linux still has it, so these games can only run perfectly over LAN (without unofficial game hacks) on a modern OS under Wine.

      --
      It's GNU/Linux dammit!
    28. Re:Nuh uh by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      I do the same thing- buy old used consoles and games. I don't need the newest "shiny" graphics; just give me good game play. I still whip out the old Air Combat on my original Playstation once is a while. Horrible graphics, bad controls, fun as hell.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    29. Re:Nuh uh by hairyfeet · · Score: 2

      Yeah yeah, wasn't that the same tune you guys sang for the last THREE console revs? And it took PCs maybe a year before games looked better on PC?

      And who gives a rat's ass about unified memory when the PC has 8GB and the GPU another GB of its own? Unless they are gonna replace hard drives with SSDs and use exotic memory like SRAM (which from the specs again its just an HTPC with some buzzword bingo covering the fact its just an HTPC) you are STILL limited by how fast the hard drive or Blu Ray can spin, and with even low end machines coming with 8GB of DDR 3 nowadays frankly memory ain't shit, if anything in a year the PCs will be having to drag down their graphics because of the consoles.

      Again look up the specs on Bobcat which is all Jaguar is, its just not a powerful chip, you can dance around and throw bullshit all day long but that ain't gonna make a Pinto into a Porsche Hoss. The Bobcat/Jaguar was made to compete with ATOM, Not even the Celeron, the fricking Atom, and all the buzzwords in the world ain't gonna change that fact.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    30. Re:Nuh uh by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      I'm with you. I was really pissed when my 8-tracks didn't work in my laserdisc player.
      Unless you're changing media formats (cartridge -> optical), the only reason not to have backwards compatibility is cost.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    31. Re:Nuh uh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep on trolling. Don't you have a Nintendo forum to hang out on?

    32. Re:Nuh uh by Xeranar · · Score: 1

      They were protecting their proprietary control system. I don't necessarily beliebe that wiping a PS3 and installing over it is an issue like they did but in a world where consoles are sold at a small loss (realistic losses at launch are $50-100) and is recouped through sold games pirated property is an issue. This whole debate feels so much like the pot one. People claim this high-minded appeal when in reality it's just a play to get high or in this case to pirate games.

      If you want near absolute control buy a PC. Consoles are closed for a reason and this marginal community is no threat to them.

      That being said, I'm ready for the PS4. The small screen in the controllers should be interesting and just about big enough to use for menu and item swapping. It could pan out well for RPGs or Madden with play selection on the controller.

    33. Re:Nuh uh by xhrit · · Score: 1

      You can still install a 3rd party IPX driver though. Compared to everything else, Windows is the most backwards OS ever made.

    34. Re:Nuh uh by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      Promising backwards compatibility and then removing it is a shitty thing to do to your customers. Being up front about the lack of a feature that's barely useful is doing things right for a change.

      Just because *you* think it's barely useful, doesn't mean many others do.

      By the way, you left out cases where backwards compatibility IS there. Bluray players play DVDs (and I think virtually all play CDs too). Super VHS players/recorders play(ed) VHS tapes.

      I *have* re-bought a few of the PS3 "collection" games. I think all of them I've got so far were $20 or under for 3 games (heck, I got the GOW one for $9.99 for 5 games). I would have far preferred paying the same amount of money, maybe even slightly more, for the backwards compatibility instead. Yes, I know about the original backward compatible ones, but I got into it when they got cheaper, used less power, etc. If it were an optional "pay $100 for a software download of PS2 compatibility", that'd be great.

    35. Re:Nuh uh by vux984 · · Score: 1

      What do you play your PS3 games on then?

      I don't have any PS3 games. But one of the considerations I would take into account when buying a PS4 was whether the PS3 library would be playable, because if so, that's quite a value proposition only over being able to play the comparative handful of launch titles targeting the PS4.

      The same line of reasoning helped me to justify a Wii at launch. In addition to the (relatively thin wii launch library there was a whole back catalog of gamecube games I'd never played.

    36. Re:Nuh uh by vux984 · · Score: 1

      But most people who switched up to a DVD player wanted to watch films, rather than listen to music.

      Most people who switched up to DVD wanted to do both. And the new device would supplant the VCR, and replace their CD player. Their stack of components in their home theatre wasn't going to get bigger due to the DVD player, because the CD player could be removed thanks to backwards compatibility. Some people care about that, wives in particular. :)

      Others have mentioned VCD and SVCD and even combo players, but that's almost beside the point. (Although the combo players in particular do show you just how important backcompat is to some people.)

    37. Re:Nuh uh by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Nope. There's no argument about whether or not backward compatibility is a valid marketing tactic (it clearly is). The argument is whether something can succeed without it. The DVD replacing VHS tapes - we can ignore those Asian markets which went via VCD if that makes you feel better - the *vast* bulk of DVD players sold in America were sold to someone "upgrading" (quotes due to no record capability in the early days so a VHS is objectively better in at least one criteria) from VHS not VCD - is pretty good evidence it is possible. If you must include Asian markets then the VCD itself is evidence that backwards compatibility isn't essential.

      The CD is also evidence.

      Backwards compatibility is always better for the user. Unless it raises the price (or size or whatever metric might also be cared about) of course in which case different people will value it differently. That doesn't mean it's required.

  18. Then why PS exclusives over PC exclusives? by tepples · · Score: 2

    PCs don't get to run Sony exclusive titles. People like them, a lot.

    Nor do PlayStations run PC-exclusive titles. People like them, a lot. There are a lot of games that Valve greenlighted that Sony probably wouldn't for whatever reason.

    1. Re:Then why PS exclusives over PC exclusives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Utterly missing the point, a classic myopic PC zealot. The world isn't one or the other, it's what people prefer. You like PCs, 100 million xbox 360 and PS3s have been purchased. You think they should be on PCs only? Sheesh. What a fucking twat you must be. Some of us have all three, but don't carrying on shitheads. Whaaa whhaaa, someone didn't chose the same as me, whaaa wwaaaaaa.

  19. PC/PS4 multiplatform releases by tepples · · Score: 1

    The internals might be PC architecture, but Sony is going to make damned sure there's lots preventing you from running these games on a PC.

    Please elaborate on these "lots". How is Sony going to prevent licensed developers from taking their own games, which are already ported to very PC-like hardware, and making PC ports available through Steam on the PC? And what is Sony going to do to attract PS4 ports of games originally developed for the PC?

    1. Re:PC/PS4 multiplatform releases by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      There's nothing at all to prevent the publishers from taking their games and doing whatever they like unless they signed a contract with Sony to the contrary.

      But I'm betting that there will be just enough stuff in there that is proprietary to make it just incompatible enough as to be entirely unusable.

      I meant you won't be able to take a PS4 title, pop it into your PC and run it. Just because the CPU architecture is x86 doesn't mean Sony hasn't gone to great pains to ensure they don't quite work the same.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:PC/PS4 multiplatform releases by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The internals might be PC architecture, but Sony is going to make damned sure there's lots preventing you from running these games on a PC.

      Please elaborate on these "lots". How is Sony going to prevent licensed developers from taking their own games, which are already ported to very PC-like hardware, and making PC ports available through Steam on the PC? And what is Sony going to do to attract PS4 ports of games originally developed for the PC?

      Both Macs and Windows use PC architecture computers, and yet, I cannot run most Mac software on my Windows PC and vice versa. I can run Linux on both, but I can't run software designed for either on Linux. Software compatability is a lot more involved than the underlying hardware.

  20. DNAS error -103 by tepples · · Score: 4, Informative

    There are a few titles that have basically infinite re-playability, too, because they're about interacting with other people.

    If by "interacting with other people" you mean "online play", Sony is known for closing these titles' matchmaking servers with DNAS error -103 ("This software title is not in service") to make you buy the sequel. If by "interacting with other people" you mean something else, please elaborate.

    1. Re:DNAS error -103 by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Informative

      If by "interacting with other people" you mean "online play", Sony is known for closing these titles' matchmaking servers with DNAS error -103 ("This software title is not in service") to make you buy the sequel. If by "interacting with other people" you mean something else, please elaborate.

      Yeah, I'm a bit concerned on this front, but for a different reason.

      I bought my PS3 a few years back because then it was a reasonable price for:

      1. 3D Bluray player

      2. It streamed Netflix 3. Now, it also streams Amazon Prime

      4. Oh...apparently it plays games too.

      I use it a great deal for watching HD YouTube these days, and streaming NF and AP.

      I've bought like 3 games, I tried Red Dead Redemption and love the game, but can never get the hang of it.

      I used to could play game quite well as a kid, but I can't seem to get the real memory and muscle memory to get down all the freakin' controls on the dual shock. Two joy sticks (that also are press-able buttons) and the other plethora of buttons, and then on top...this new (to me) 3rd person view.

      I do ok till a gunfight hits, and next thing I know, I'm staring at the sky or the ground and blood stains are filling the screen.

      I guess I need to find 2-3 weekends in a row, with nothing else to do but sit down and learn the damned controller.

      The games look cool, I would thing that the Batman Arkham Asylum would be fun, but shit, I don't think I stand a chance to play that one till I can somehow develop the muscle memory for the controllers.

      Anyway, I digress, but I bought the PS3 mostly as a nice BR player and streaming machine.

      I hope those functionalities aren't dropped anytime soon after the PS4 comes out.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:DNAS error -103 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet you're not using your "Dead Eye" to slow time down and "mark" targets which he will then blow away like a quick draw cowboy. The game doesn't explain it well. I didn't realize you could "mark" multiple targets until near the end of the game. BTW, the ending sucks. Really bad.

    3. Re:DNAS error -103 by CastrTroy · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Oh, I haven't played PlayStation in so long I forgot about the joysticks as pressable buttons issue. I can't believe that anybody really thought that was a good control mechanism. As if 4 thumb plus 4 shoulder buttons plus start and select wasn't enough already, they had to make the joysticks into buttons.

      I'm pretty sure that Netflix will develop support for the PS4, although it may or may not be there on release day. As far as blu-ray player goes, you might be better off getting a dedicated blu-ray player as I've known a lot of people with dead drives on their PS3, possibly from playing so many movies. And the same problem happened with DVDs on the PS2.

      As nice as it is to have a single box under your TV that does everything, I can defintely see the pluses of having a dedicated blu-ray player, some kind of Android TV box for Netflix and streaming videos from your file server, and then a console for serious gaming. But I don't think I'd buy a console on release date. It would probably cost close to the price of the TV.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    4. Re:DNAS error -103 by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Hello it's 2013, 2006 want's it's PS2 issue back.

      Yes, Sony does shut down older PS2 game servers which is the ONLY way to see that DNAS error since DNAS is a PS2 thing....if they're not all that popular and after a few years. SCEA can't help it if you were so busy playing same-screen SNES multiplayer on an SDTV to not get your PS2 till after a few servers got shut down.

      There ARE PS2 games with online mutliplayer still functional.

    5. Re:DNAS error -103 by tepples · · Score: 1

      Does Sony shut down servers of PS3 games that are no longer popular among the majority?

    6. Re:DNAS error -103 by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      'm pretty sure that Netflix will develop support for the PS4, although it may or may not be there on release day. As far as blu-ray player goes, you might be better off getting a dedicated blu-ray player as I've known a lot of people with dead drives on their PS3, possibly from playing so many movies. And the same problem happened with DVDs on the PS2.

      Well, I'm hoping that when the PS4 comes out..that Sony doesn't turn of the network and make my PS3 console useless for streaming, etc....

      The PS3 was a pretty good deal when I bought it for BR and streaming, of course now, I'd get something else....I doubt I'll buy a PS4. Then again, if I find maybe 2 weekends in a row or take time off work and hang at home, I might dedicate some hours to try to master these controllers and play the games.

      I watch people play them and they sure do look like fun. Much more like being in a movie.....that the old Nintendo days, and the Fairchild system I had way before that. More more involving....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    7. Re:DNAS error -103 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'm pretty sure that Netflix will develop support for the PS4, although it may or may not be there on release day. As far as blu-ray player goes, you might be better off getting a dedicated blu-ray player as I've known a lot of people with dead drives on their PS3, possibly from playing so many movies. And the same problem happened with DVDs on the PS2.

      Well, I'm hoping that when the PS4 comes out..that Sony doesn't turn of the network and make my PS3 console useless for streaming, etc....

      That's the thing. You don't know, you can only hope Sony agrees that you should have some functionality. They have no qualms removing features and prohibiting you from forming a class action. They can just turn it off and there's nothing you can do about it. Well, other than spend seven figures doing battle with the finest corporate lawyers dirty money can buy.

      In the post-ubiquitous entertainment gadget world, there are two people. Those who have never had the rug pulled out from under them and those who have. And, for that second camp, they have gained the wisdom to never buy in to a locked platform.

    8. Re:DNAS error -103 by Applekid · · Score: 1

      Hello it's 2013, 2006 want's it's PS2 issue back.

      Hello, 1998 calling, it wants it overused condescending unfunny phrase back.

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    9. Re:DNAS error -103 by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      If by "interacting with other people" you mean "online play",

      I was thinking about titles like Mechassault, where the heart of the game is playing with multiple people as mechs... people employ infinitely variables strategies, and so the gameplay likewise varies. Used to be able to do that online, too, but now it's all at-home play. Even though the online play is gone, the game retains a great deal of its playability because it's not just you against a very limited opponent (the computer.)

      On XBox live, my experience has mostly been with racing games, and various kinds of lag, cars that flash on and off the track or freeze in place, pretty much soured me on it. I prefer multiplayer at home, because it tends to be a lot more reliable, and there's pizza, friends, music, etc. We hold a regular gaming night every Thursday at my house; it's been going on for almost ten years now. Total blast.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    10. Re:DNAS error -103 by apoc06 · · Score: 2

      Part of the reason PSN is free is because the servers are run by the publishers, not Sony. I believe that Sony may host a game server if the developer or publisher pays for it, but the Sony PSN servers mainly handle infrastructure, friends lists, updates, etc.

      Sony doesn't dictate when a game's servers should go dark. If a game is no longer supported, blame the publisher.

    11. Re:DNAS error -103 by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      I used to could play game quite well as a kid, but I can't seem to get the real memory and muscle memory to get down all the freakin' controls on the dual shock. Two joy sticks (that also are press-able buttons) and the other plethora of buttons, and then on top...this new (to me) 3rd person view.

      I haven't yet played Red Dead Redemption, but I checked gamefaqs.com, and it uses the familiar "one joystick controls movement and one controls the camera" scheme. (Though it seems to me like the other games I play have which stick does which reversed from this.. I could be misremembering.)

      ANYWAY, I actually agree with you on a lot of controls being confusing for some games (esp the !@#$ Quicktime Events in games like God of War.. I play just rarely enough that I have to refamiliarize myself with the square/triangle/circle/x buttons)â¦

      But I'm always amazed at how "move with one stick and control the camera with the other" seems to work so well, even though it seems very unrelated to what we do in real life. Even if you're walking in one direction and looking in another, you don't likely change *walking* direction without also looking that way briefly.. But somehow it works in game controls without disorienting people (like 3D can, since we don't have the physical consequences along with the visual ones).

    12. Re:DNAS error -103 by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      But I'm always amazed at how "move with one stick and control the camera with the other" seems to work so well, even though it seems very unrelated to what we do in real life. Even if you're walking in one direction and looking in another, you don't likely change *walking* direction without also looking that way briefly.. But somehow it works in game controls without disorienting people (like 3D can, since we don't have the physical consequences along with the visual ones).

      Yeah, that camera thing, 3rd person view I'm calling it...is what confuses me.

      I've only played first person shooters in the past (Doom, Descent, etc).

      As soon as action hits...that camera is what does me in....I'm looking all over the place in a panic...ahaha.

      I'll figure it out, but sure isn't easy for me to learn so far in the few times I've had time to play it. In some ways, it sucks to get old.

      :)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  21. ... the first time... by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    I'm mildly interested in PS4.

    />rant/
                    I'm more interested in why this shows up in my feed twice. Like you think I didn't hear you the first time, you have to repeat yourself?
                    Or is /. pimping pageviews for gain, or just not paying attention in the subQ? What, repeating yourself is going to improve the story?
                    Go ahead, tell me me it's my feed reader. Happening on three different readers on both Windows and Android. The problem is not on my end.
                    We can sit through the lame griefers, but mirroring posts is within the power to control. Do.

    /rant/

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  22. LOL. Does anyone even care any more? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Consoles are totally dead, as far as I am concerned.

  23. Decreased? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    reduced dead zone

    I have a PC driver for my ps3 controller where you can alter quite a few different settings on it, analog stick dead zone is one of them.
    I often find myself turning that towards the higher end, too low and it causes more frustration than it's worth.

  24. GPU already years out of date by InsaneLampshade · · Score: 3, Interesting

    1.8 teraflops, 800MHz clock speed... so they're aiming for a GPU with roughly the same power of something nVidia released in 2010?

    Not to mention only 8GB RAM shared between GPU & CPU, I'm sure that'll last us for years to come!

    1. Re:GPU already years out of date by Voyager529 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      1.8 teraflops, 800MHz clock speed... so they're aiming for a GPU with roughly the same power of something nVidia released in 2010?

      Not to mention only 8GB RAM shared between GPU & CPU, I'm sure that'll last us for years to come!

      Two pieces of fairness here...

      1.) the PS3 had 256MBytes of RAM on its release.
      2.) like every other console, it can get away with having lower specs than a general purpose PC - it doesn't have to run an operating system in the same sense that a desktop does; in broad terms it's closer to ESXi and its requirements than Win7/OSX/Ubuntu in its, so far more of that RAM can go to the game itself.

      Bonus: Even if we postulate that the OS takes a gig of RAM itself, 7GB is roughly 1/3 of a single layer Blu-Ray disc. I know that HD textures can eat up graphics RAM pretty quickly, but is it really limiting to have 1/3 of a game in RAM at a time? Let's face it, console game creation has always involved working within some incredibly tight limits...even Crysis 3 doesn't require that amount of RAM to play. If 7GB of RAM and streaming the rest from an internal hard disk is a constraint, then I'd be forced to assume that the people writing games cut their teeth on ActiveX controls...

    2. Re:GPU already years out of date by InsaneLampshade · · Score: 2

      Skyrim can easily reach 4GB RAM on PC with the better textures they released for the PC version. That came out in what 2011? I'm sure over the course of the next few years we'll be at a point where higher quality textures in games push RAM usage well beyond 8GB.

    3. Re:GPU already years out of date by n30na · · Score: 1

      As someone who has 16gb of RAM in their pc, I'll say that games rarely use more than 1gb, and only see them use 2gb on very rare occasions. Some of this is likely due to things being held back by the current console generation, but I definitely think that it won't be the kind of limiting factor is has been for developers this generation. Sure, we'll hit it eventually, we always do, but to be honest I don't see it being a big deal.
      As for gpu power.. I agree that it's a little skimpy, but it's because they have to save money somewhere, and to be honest I think that the "average" console player is starting to not care about graphics as much, as things get closer to the "good enough" range for most people. Not to mention that console games tend to run a bit closer to the metal, coupled with being specifically targeted/optimized for the platform generally gets a solid amount more performance compared to how similar hardware on a pc. Obviously PCs will still have better graphics at the mid-high end, but that's just how this always is :)

    4. Re:GPU already years out of date by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Skyrim barely uses 1gig of VRAM in the vanilla PC version.... what are you smoking? Texture resolution in Skyrim PC and Skyrim consols are THE SAME! With the modded texture packs available off the internet, THEN you have Skyrim utilizing more than 2gigs of VRAM...

      PS3 and Xbox 360 were the first consoles to utilize multi-thread CPUs... developers have grown more akin to this model and I'm glad to see PS4 still use a multi-core chip, but one that's faster and has more RAM.

      This will allow for true 1080p gameplay, something the PS3 and 360 barely pull off.

    5. Re:GPU already years out of date by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When PS3 and 360 first came out, there did perform head to head with equivalent PCs at a much lower price... but that changed no more than a year later, when nvidia released GTX2xx gpus and AMD released HD3xxx GPUs. Nowadays, a $400 entry level PC can handle current gen games at higher settings than with PS3/360.

    6. Re:GPU already years out of date by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But did nVidia have eight CPU cores with caches and north bridge on the same die, while limiting the power consumption and thermals into a SFF compatible fold? Nopiti nope, I don't tikiti think so.

    7. Re:GPU already years out of date by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1.8 teraflops, 800MHz clock speed... so they're aiming for a GPU with roughly the same power of something nVidia released in 2010?

      No, it uses AMD hardware that's slower than the (then ATI branded) graphics cards of 2008.

    8. Re:GPU already years out of date by edxwelch · · Score: 1

      No, if you consider cost and power consumption, it's actually ahead of it's time.
      1.8 teraflops is about same performance as a HD7850, which costs $180 and draws 150W. Considering total cost of the PS4 is going to be $300, the GPU can only cost a small fraction of that. Also, TDB needs to be below 100W to fit in small console case.

    9. Re:GPU already years out of date by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correction. The PS3 had 512MBytes of RAM at release. 256MBytes of XDR DRAM for system memory and 256MBytes of GDDR VRAM for the GPU.

    10. Re:GPU already years out of date by Nyder · · Score: 1

      1.8 teraflops, 800MHz clock speed... so they're aiming for a GPU with roughly the same power of something nVidia released in 2010?

      Not to mention only 8GB RAM shared between GPU & CPU, I'm sure that'll last us for years to come!

      Two pieces of fairness here...

      1.) the PS3 had 256MBytes of RAM on its release.
      2.) like every other console, it can get away with having lower specs than a general purpose PC - it doesn't have to run an operating system in the same sense that a desktop does; in broad terms it's closer to ESXi and its requirements than Win7/OSX/Ubuntu in its, so far more of that RAM can go to the game itself.

      Bonus: Even if we postulate that the OS takes a gig of RAM itself, 7GB is roughly 1/3 of a single layer Blu-Ray disc. I know that HD textures can eat up graphics RAM pretty quickly, but is it really limiting to have 1/3 of a game in RAM at a time? Let's face it, console game creation has always involved working within some incredibly tight limits...even Crysis 3 doesn't require that amount of RAM to play. If 7GB of RAM and streaming the rest from an internal hard disk is a constraint, then I'd be forced to assume that the people writing games cut their teeth on ActiveX controls...

      Yes, and devs have been bitching about the low amout of ram in the Xbox 360 & PS4. Now they have nothing to bitch about. You on the other hand, don't appear to know shit and is bitching up a storm. You a dev? No? Then quit assuming.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    11. Re:GPU already years out of date by Nyder · · Score: 1

      1.8 teraflops, 800MHz clock speed... so they're aiming for a GPU with roughly the same power of something nVidia released in 2010?

      Not to mention only 8GB RAM shared between GPU & CPU, I'm sure that'll last us for years to come!

      Two pieces of fairness here...

      1.) the PS3 had 256MBytes of RAM on its release.
      2.) like every other console, it can get away with having lower specs than a general purpose PC - it doesn't have to run an operating system in the same sense that a desktop does; in broad terms it's closer to ESXi and its requirements than Win7/OSX/Ubuntu in its, so far more of that RAM can go to the game itself.

      Bonus: Even if we postulate that the OS takes a gig of RAM itself, 7GB is roughly 1/3 of a single layer Blu-Ray disc. I know that HD textures can eat up graphics RAM pretty quickly, but is it really limiting to have 1/3 of a game in RAM at a time? Let's face it, console game creation has always involved working within some incredibly tight limits...even Crysis 3 doesn't require that amount of RAM to play. If 7GB of RAM and streaming the rest from an internal hard disk is a constraint, then I'd be forced to assume that the people writing games cut their teeth on ActiveX controls...

      Yes, and devs have been bitching about the low amout of ram in the Xbox 360 & PS4. Now they have nothing to bitch about. You on the other hand, don't appear to know shit and is bitching up a storm. You a dev? No? Then quit assuming.

      damn it, that should be PS3, not PS4.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    12. Re:GPU already years out of date by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and if I don't care about cost or power consumption? Then it's still years out of date before its even been released.

    13. Re:GPU already years out of date by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Skyrim console and PC textures are the same? Umm wtf have *you* been smoking good sir?

      http://www.bethblog.com/2013/02/06/skyrim-hd-texture-pack-update-on-steam/

  25. Social features by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why does this crap has to be integrated into everything? TV, phones, tablets and now game consoles.

    Can somebody tell me when this "social media" hype is over? it's like having a really long migraine attack, and everytime I see or read something about Facebook, Google+ etc. it makes me throw up a little in my mouth.

    1. Re:Social features by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess as soon as humans stop being social creatures, you'll get your wish. In the meantime, thanks for whining about it to this social community! We appreciate irony.

  26. does it run Linux by iplayfast · · Score: 1

    You know like the PS3 used to?

    1. Re:does it run Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if it does, it will be removed again later...

    2. Re:does it run Linux by Narishma · · Score: 2

      No, it runs BSD instead.

      --
      Mada mada dane.
  27. Poised to be a cash cow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PS4... requires always on internet connection, monthly subscription fee, and still charge $60 for new games, and will, eventually, require reactivation (via small fee) to play used games...

    Seems like SOny is catching up to MS.

  28. PlayStation 1 is emulated by tepples · · Score: 1

    what's stopping Sony from just finding some guy on the internet who wrote a Playstation emulator, and paying him a couple grand for the rights to use it?

    PlayStation 1 is already well emulated, on the PSP no less. Let me know when PlayStation 2 or 3 is emulated in a way compatible with over 75% of games. The Xbox emulator on the Xbox 360 never got much above 50%.

    1. Re:PlayStation 1 is emulated by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      PCSX2 emulates a lot of games properly on PC.
      It's compatibility list currently stands at 78.25% of games:
      http://pcsx2.net/compatibility-list.html

  29. Used by tepples · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't have a PS3.

    Then why do you have PS3 games that you would use with backward compatibility? Or would you be buying used games?

    1. Re:Used by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He doesn't know. He also thinks that a DVD player being able to play CDs is some sort of valid argument against the parent post's point.

      He's one of these obtuse little nerds that quote out of context to support invalid arguments. Doubtful that he's been laid in a while unless it was gay sex.

    2. Re:Used by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Then why do you have PS3 games that you would use with backward compatibility?

      Because if I were to consider buying a PS4, then being able to play the large PS3 library would be a compelling factor, precisely because I never had a PS3.

      When I bought a Wii, the ability to pick up the top rated Gamecube titles (at very reasonable prices due to being used / last gen / etc) was a real bonus, and really propped up the thin Wii launch library.

    3. Re:Used by vux984 · · Score: 1

      He doesn't know.

      See above.

      He also thinks that a DVD player being able to play CDs is some sort of valid argument against the parent post's point.

      The parents post comparing a VCR to a DVD player while claiming no backwards compatibility was silly.

      Yes, I -get- the point the parent attempted to make with respect to DVD vs VHS in terms of video formats. But to actually rant about DVD backwards compatibility when one of the selling features of the things were that you could in fact play all your audio CDs in them (aka backwards compatibility) completely undermines his argument.

      Especially since any halfwit can see why DVD players couldn't play VHS tapes.

      Doubtful that he's been laid in a while unless it was gay sex.

      Lol, well gay sex was apparently at least on one of our minds today.

    4. Re:Used by tepples · · Score: 1

      When I bought a Wii, the ability to pick up the top rated Gamecube titles (at very reasonable prices due to being used / last gen / etc) was a real bonus

      I thought console makers wanted people to buy new games from the new generation, not used games from the previous generation, so that the console maker can get its pound of flesh from each disc.

    5. Re:Used by halltk1983 · · Score: 1

      The reason that the DVD player couldn't play VHS was mismatched hardware. The only way to do it would be to include a VHS in the DVD player, which some companies did, and they were more expensive. The reason that the PS4 won't play PS3 games is mismatched hardware... Unless they include the old hardware, and the associated cost, like some DVD player manufacturers did.

      --
      Watch for Penguins, they eat Apples and throw rocks at Windows.
    6. Re:Used by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Yes, I got that, if you see my earlier post (above the one you replied to). I was only pointing out why back compat was valuable and why it would be nice. I wasn't arguing that it was actually reasonable for the PS4 to be backwards compatible with the PS3.

    7. Re:Used by vux984 · · Score: 1

      I thought console makers wanted people to buy new games from the new generation

      I'm sure they do. But anything that helps motivate me to buy the new console is going to increase the odds I buy some of those new games.

  30. Just works by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    no driver updates. No tweaking settings. Better overall performance at a lower price because you don't have to test/optimize for every graphics card.

    Two things I noticed. 1) it's built on Directx. You'd think they'd worry about building their tech off Microsoft. 2) GDDR5. Not really a big deal. My $90 GT240 has 256 of GDDR5. The only reason you can't buy one with GDDR5 now is the cards perform a bit too well, and nvidia didn't want them biting into the $150 dollar range. :P

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  31. Re:Nuh uh (Why not?) by Filter · · Score: 2

    Why not? Because I don't have to, because a new ps4 is not a necessity. Since there is no backwards compatibility I have no compelling reason to choose this Sony product over any other game console. It will be easy for me to follow my conscience and choose to purchase from a company with higher standards of conduct. I don't trust Sony, trust is earned, they have proved themselves untrustworthy. Sometimes it's hard to make a consumer decision but this couldn't be simpler.

    --

    "better ways of doing things eventually just replace the inferior things" - Linus Torvalds 09-08-07

  32. No analog buttons but PS2 game support? by HalAtWork · · Score: 2

    The DualShock 4 controller that's standard on the PS4 eliminates one feature that was seldom used on the PS3 —the analog face buttons..."

    So how will PS2 games like Metal Gear Solid 2 be playable? Canceling a shot by easing off the fire button is crucial.

    1. Re:No analog buttons but PS2 game support? by ProppaT · · Score: 1

      They're not talking about the triggers, they're talking about the 4 face buttons...

      --
      Wise men say, "Forgiveness is divine, but never pay full price for late pizza."
    2. Re:No analog buttons but PS2 game support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The PS3 hasn't support PS2 games for years, why would the PS4?

    3. Re:No analog buttons but PS2 game support? by Fallingcow · · Score: 1

      Yes, exactly. Ever played MGS2?

    4. Re:No analog buttons but PS2 game support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To make the customer happy.

  33. Wine by tepples · · Score: 1
    tepples opens Wine Notepad and begins to write a comment

    I can run Linux on both, but I can't run software designed for either on Linux.

    I have no problem running Modplug Tracker and FamiTracker, software designed for Windows, on a laptop running Xubuntu 12.04 LTS. In fact, I'm typing this very comment into a Win32 program running inside Linux. Sure, PlayStation 4 will incorporate measures to make binary compatibility more difficult. However:

    Software compatability is a lot more involved than the underlying hardware.

    I know it's more complicated than just a recompile. That's why I said "very PC-like hardware" and "PC ports". If there's about as much difference between PS4 OS and Windows or Linux as there is between Linux and Windows, it's just that much easier for a developer to port a PS4 game to a PC operating system. So why make a game exclusive to PlayStation 4 when you can reach paying PC customers too?

    tepples copies the comment and pastes it into Firefox

  34. Sony takes away personal computing features by tepples · · Score: 1

    Maybe because you want to play PS4 games?

    If a video game is released for PS4 and PC, people who want to play it on a PC can buy the PC version. Or what sort of anticompetitive contracts do you think Sony Computer Entertainment will use to discourage PS4/PC multiplatform releases?

    Apple moved to a PC architecture and people still purchase their products instead of a home theater PC

    Mac mini is a home theater PC. It runs XBMC (the home theater part) and it allows the user to write and install software, including game mods that use a game's mod API (the personal computer part). Sony Computer Entertainment, on the other hand, has a track record of taking away personal computing features from its devices.

    By the way, exactly how is running Windows 8 any less closed than running a Playstation?

    True, Windows 8 and PlayStation 3 Game OS are both proprietary software. But Windows 8 desktop software can be self-signed, whereas software for a PlayStation family device must be signed by Sony Computer Entertainment.

  35. Netflix vs. YouTube by tepples · · Score: 1

    You think they should be on PCs only?

    The problem is that the console makers appear to have been fairly successful in promoting disregard among the public for games developed by student, hobbyist, and startup developers. If the consoles' official app stores are like the Netflix of video games, then what's the YouTube or Vimeo?

  36. And it didn't even make a difference for security by Myria · · Score: 2

    "Here! Have this console with this feature! Got it? Ok, yeah, that feature? We're taking that out."

    Sony claimed that removing Linux from the older systems was for security, but the PS3 ended up getting hacked to hell anyway. Sony really should have lost that lawsuit over removing a feature from the old models.

    With consoles, the best versions are generally the first or second versions, because over time, the company releases systems with fewer and fewer features.

    --
    "Screw Sun, cross-platform will never work. Let's move on and steal the Java language." - Visual J++ Product Manager
  37. DVD players with VCD back-compat by tepples · · Score: 1

    When DVDs came out, I didn't bitch that they weren't backwards compatible with what I already had.

    My first DVD player could play music CDs, MP3 CDs, and VCDs. My second DVD player could play music CDs, MP3 CDs, and CDs with MPEG-4 ASP video and MP3 audio in an AVI container.

  38. Android is Linux, but not GNU/Linux by tepples · · Score: 2

    Ouya is Android

    Agreed.

    not Linux.

    Android is not GNU/Linux, but it does use the Linux kernel, and some people have reported success running a userspace based on GNU in a chroot alongside Android.

    1. Re:Android is Linux, but not GNU/Linux by afidel · · Score: 1

      There are easier ways to install Linux on Android.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  39. Console makers ban copylefted software by tepples · · Score: 1

    So you claim the PCSX2 has in fact surpassed 75% compatibility. But one problem with using PCSX2 is that it's distributed under the GNU General Public License, and console makers ban copylefted software in general. Your compatibility link is not responding, so I can't go check whether contributors to PCSX2 are required to sign a copyright assignment agreement that would allow for licensing the emulator to Sony Computer Entertainment under more console-friendly terms.

    1. Re:Console makers ban copylefted software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That doesn't say anything about Sony.

      When the fact that the GPL was being violated was brought to Atari's attention, they were kind at first until it was discovered that Nintendo doesn't allow open source software to be used with the Wii SDK

      First, the GPL was being violated, second it was Nintendo that didn't allow open source software to be used with the Wii SDK. Sony could just use PCSX2 without any permission so long as they provided a link to the source code upon request.

  40. VCDs work by tepples · · Score: 1

    VCDs work in a lot of DVD players. Expecting VHS to work is like expecting a PS2 to play N64 Game Paks.

  41. Re:Caution about moderation abuse... apk by tepples · · Score: 1

    Then perhaps you should upgrade to the PlayStation 4's built-in web browser, which uses an optimized data structure for hosts file lookups. With several GB of RAM, what's 14 MB for a DNS firewall config?

    </sarcasm>

  42. Still no pictures? by White+Flame · · Score: 1

    I'm curious why they haven't revealed what it looks like yet.

    1. Re:Still no pictures? by ZombieBraintrust · · Score: 1

      They announced that it was a box.

  43. Re:Caution about moderation abuse... apk by jones_supa · · Score: 1

    A corrupt slashdot luser has infiltrated the moderation system to downmod all my posts while impersonating me.

    Then create an account to prevent this from happening.

  44. Re:And it didn't even make a difference for securi by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

    Sony really should have lost that lawsuit over removing a feature from the old models.

    No, they shouldn't because the actual choice is the users. You can keep Linux, but then because you're not running a recent firmware they don't "trust" your PS3 so you lose PSN access. That's it. You have a choice, Linux on the PS3 (which wasn't all that special anyway) or PSN. The update that removes Linux capability warns you in no uncertain terms what it does, and requests confirmation, twice, before it does it.

    because over time, the company releases systems with fewer and fewer features.

    Yes, cost reduction...since if people aren't willing to buy your console at 299 one way to get it down in price is to remove the discret S-video jacks, and then perhaps the serial port for the link cable no one has, and then perhaps remove the parallel port which only game cheating devices (some of which could be used to play "backups") connected.

    With the PS3, the biggest complaint about it at launch was the price. And now the biggest complaint about the new models is the lack of backwards compatibility/SACD/built in card reader/4 USB ports. All of which went bye bye to get the cost down.

  45. Killer App! by freeze128 · · Score: 1

    What the new playstation absolutely needs is 100% configurable buttons on the controller! It can easily be justified as an accessibility option.

    The need for this can often be seen when playing an older PS2 game where some idiot assigned the square button as "Back" when all the other games in the world use the circle button.
    This should be the FIRST thing they implement.

  46. Removing by ZombieBraintrust · · Score: 1

    Sony never removed backwards compatiblity from any customers machine. I had purchased a 60 gig machine and it had backwards compatiblity up untill it was stolen from me out of the back of a truck. What they did was stop including the PS2 "emotion engine" graphics chip inside new PS3s as a cost cutting move. They announced this publically. People understood what they were buying. I think you are confusing things with Linux.

    1. Re:Removing by apoc06 · · Score: 1

      Good point. Since they are still producing PS3s and therefore still fabbing Cell processors, some marketing genius should get them to offer a version of PS4 that includes a Cell. At a slightly higher price, of course. Then announce in advance that they will only produce a few thousand models.

      Early adopters would eat that up.

  47. Re:And it didn't even make a difference for securi by Doctor_Jest · · Score: 1

    You have a choice, Linux on the PS3 (which wasn't all that special anyway) or PSN

    That wasn't a choice when I bought it. Why should it be a choice later on after I've sunk money into the damn thing? As for newer models not having the feature, that's fine... no one is forcing them to include it, but since I bought it with that feature, they took a big fat dump on my PS3 to make it continue being a PS3. It doesn't matter if YOU thought it wasn't really special. You don't get to dismiss a valid point because you think the choice is obvious (you chose PSN, I am guessing.)

    I didn't want to make that choice. But I am making this choice. No PS4. They can shove it up their tailpipe. I won't buy one.

    --
    It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man.
  48. Built-in headset by khchung · · Score: 1

    With all the comments, I am surprised no one commented on the built-in headset.

    Even supporting Bluetooth headsets, there are too few people using them in PS3 multiplayer games.

    Even though I got a BT headset linked with my PS3, I rather bothered to hook it up every time I play. It really is quite a hassle to go through the menus, and often my headset would have lost all its charge when I do so.

    With headset coming with each box and connecting directly to the controller, you can expect nearly all players to have it on (or can plug it in quickly).

    Plus, you can have 3+ players each with their own headsets on the same system, it will hopefully encourage more multiplayer games to support more than 2 players on each console (Borderlands 2, I am looking at you).

    That, in my hope, will encourage more "get together to play" style gaming that used to be pervasive with consoles in the past. Instead of the current "everyone get home to their own console to play together" situation.

    --
    Oliver.
  49. Re:And it didn't even make a difference for securi by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    The first several versions of the Xbox 360 overheated and eventually died, usually just beyond the warranty period.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  50. Post-3.21 disc games by tepples · · Score: 1

    Linux on the PS3 (which wasn't all that special anyway) or PSN.

    I thought post-3.21 disc games didn't work on a pre-3.21 PS3, even if you didn't use PSN.

    then perhaps the serial port for the link cable no one has

    If you're referring to the link cable on the original PlayStation, I am a counterexample to a literal interpretation of your "no one". I have used it to play Command & Conquer: Red Alert: Retaliation with a neighbor.

  51. Just works by tepples · · Score: 1

    If you want near absolute control buy a PC.

    What should someone do who wants both absolute control and the ability to play a game without buying a separate copy of each game each member of the household? What should someone do who wants both absolute control and the assurance that the game one bought will just work?

    That being said, I'm ready for the PS4. The small screen in the controllers should be interesting and just about big enough to use for menu and item swapping.

    That's what they said about the screen in the Dreamcast VMU, but that feature by itself wasn't enough to save the Dreamcast.

  52. And no mods by tepples · · Score: 1

    no driver updates. No tweaking settings. Better overall performance at a lower price because you don't have to test/optimize for every graphics card.

    And no good-faith game modding community. And no games developed by hobbyists or startups, so you get a string of safe bets from major studios like Call of Sameness 9 and Super Mario 13.

  53. Perhaps the question should be: what job? by tepples · · Score: 1

    People want different tools for different jobs.

    Even if a PlayStation family console is the best tool for the job of playing major-label games, what's the best tool for the job of playing indie games?

    1. Re:Perhaps the question should be: what job? by Tarlus · · Score: 1

      PC would be the best for indie games, I would imagine.

      --
      /* No Comment */
  54. What kind of cheats? by tepples · · Score: 1

    How about the lack of cheaters/aimbots/etc in multiplayer?

    If a game is susceptible to aimbotting, a player using a PC could kick your tail any day because a mouse is more precise than an analog stick. As for other cheating, are you talking about, say, mods to give away all players' positions such as radar extenders or fog-of-war eliminators? I'm asking because I'm trying to find a mitigation for cheating in online games with strangers that doesn't take away a device owner's ability to run good-faith game mods created by someone else who lives in the same city.

    With the PS3 or PS4, I can be reasonably certain that I will be playing against honest players 99.9% of the time

    The same is true of same-screen multiplayer on console games and on controller-optimized PC games (which are starting to show up now that Steam has Big Picture), and the same is true of LAN games or friends-only online games. You only have to worry about cheaters if you choose to play online with strangers.

    1. Re:What kind of cheats? by khchung · · Score: 1

      How about the lack of cheaters/aimbots/etc in multiplayer?

      If a game is susceptible to aimbotting, a player using a PC could kick your tail any day because a mouse is more precise than an analog stick. As for other cheating, are you talking about, say, mods to give away all players' positions such as radar extenders or fog-of-war eliminators? I'm asking because I'm trying to find a mitigation for cheating in online games with strangers that doesn't take away a device owner's ability to run good-faith game mods created by someone else who lives in the same city.

      With the PS3 or PS4, I can be reasonably certain that I will be playing against honest players 99.9% of the time

      The same is true of same-screen multiplayer on console games and on controller-optimized PC games (which are starting to show up now that Steam has Big Picture), and the same is true of LAN games or friends-only online games. You only have to worry about cheaters if you choose to play online with strangers.

      You totally missed the point. Playing online with strangers is EXACTLY how I play multiplayer online games, and it is feasible and enjoyable _only_ because I do with with a PS3 against other PS3 players, instead of using a PC.

      I tried to play online Starcraft and Warcraft for while before, and quickly got turned off but the numerous accounts of cheats posted in the forums. The message I got was clearly that, as you move up the ladder, you will be facing lots of cheaters.

      OTOH, with the PS3 multiplayer games, there was almost no mention of cheaters in the forums. I have played for years with strangers online and never had a case where I encounter any player cheating.

      --
      Oliver.
  55. Unified memory in PCs by tepples · · Score: 2

    PCs with Intel IGPs have unified memory. What unified memory means is that the CPU and GPU are fighting over access to the memory bus.

  56. Why people choose consoles by tepples · · Score: 1
    A few months ago, you posted a build of an entry-level HTPC based on an AMD E350 for under $400. Someone else replied that your build doesn't have "a nice case, quiet fans, a modern graphics card, a wireless controller, a Blu-Ray player, and Windows".

    so why not just build an HTPC and have control of the system?

    I asked exactly this question earlier in the discussion, and others replied with their own reasons for choosing a console. One is that games for a console just work, with no need for antivirus or driver updates. Another is that someone playing online with a pickup group of strangers is far less likely to run into someone with a noticeable unfair advantage, such as a cheater or someone with a much more expensive CPU and GPU. A third is that some major publishers will want to keep their games console-exclusive because mass copyright infringement isn't quite as prevalent on consoles as it is on PCs. A fourth is that PC games typically require much larger installs than even PS3 games. Wii and Xbox 360 games don't require installs at all. A fifth is the always-online trend of PC games like Assassin's Creed 2 and the latest SimCity. Some people drag out a console specifically to pass the time during an Internet outage.

    And hooking a PC to a TV is as simple as an HDMI cable now

    Provided your TV has HDMI in. The big screen HDTV at my aunt's house is a CRT projection HDTV made before LCD and plasma were popular, and it has only composite and component in.

    And if you want the little case? They make VCR looking cases you can use if that is what melts your butter but I've built several HTPCs and when folks see how nice the new cases look they usually just skip the HTPC case.

    What if I want to buy all this, but I don't live anywhere near your shop? Not everybody has the time to learn how to research parts and build a computer from parts. A lot of people just want to take the box out of the cardboard, plug it into the wall and the TV's HDMI, put in a disc, and go.

    Valve has big picture mode now which makes driving with a wireless thumbstick or remote easy peasy

    Provided developers are willing to rework their games to be controller-friendly, or to port console games to the PC at all.

    the games are cheaper

    Two to four times cheaper? Console games are far more likely to support multiplayer with one copy of the game.

    1. Re:Why people choose consoles by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      First of all YOU get to choose what case you want, if you want an ultra slim case? get a shuttle, its YOUR choice, not one size fits all. I chose that system because as someone who actually BUILDS HTPCs I've found that most folks? Honestly like the new black cases, they usually come with silver or red accents and look quite spiffy. You can of course turn it on your side if that is what melts your butter, or there are several companies that make HTPC cases that look like everything from a VCR to a Mac Mini, again YOUR choice so if you don't like my taste in cases? Cases start at around $22 at geeks, personally I like this one as it looks really nice sitting straight or on its side, kinda like an Xbox.

      Second...driver updates? Seriously? does ANYBODY do that anymore? this is like Linux users saying "Windows has daily BSODs!" because they haven't actually used a Windows machine since Win98. I'll tell you the same thing I tell my customers, if it ain't broke? DON'T FIX IT. Unless you are using some weird exotic hardware its really pointless, i haven't seen a non GPU update that gave so much as a single FPS in performance and Steam will now tell you "Hi, you have a graphics card update, would you like me to apply it?" and that is that, hell it doesn't even need a reboot anymore so you can just surf for a minute or two while it installs, so that is a non argument.

      as for those "other reasons" it all basically boils down to used games which guess what? MSFT and Sony are killing with the new consoles! Aren't they just doubleplus smart? I know I've built 3 HTPCs in the past 2 months for folks that heard about the killing of used games and said "Well screw that". As for price? Actually...yes they ARE that cheap, in fact I know of which I speak because both of my boys game so I usually buy games 3 at a time. In fact the only problem we've had, if you want to call it a problem, is that during the sales they have 4 packs discounted so heavily (probably for exactly the reason you bring up) that its cheaper for me to buy the 4 pack when we only need 3, but I just give the fourth to one of the boys and let them gift it to one of their online friends, no biggie. During the Xmas sale I spent MAYBE $150 and we ended up with so many AAA titles that I honestly haven't even played a third of what we bought yet, oh the curse of having so many cheap AAA titles...its soooo hard LOL. And the MP is beyond simple, its just "Hey you wanna play?" and there ya go. I'm taking the weekend off thanks to getting a dose of strep and I just got done handing out a pile of loot in Borderlands to the boys, took less than 3 minutes for all 3 of us to be in game. I seem to have a knack for finding rare loot and they suck at it so I've maxxed my bank out and just pass out the good stuff i don't need to the boys. If you haven't tried it? Its really fun. I'm hoping BL2 will be on a Steam sale soon so I can pick up 3 copies so we can jump into together like we did with BL1.

      Finally as for BPM and needing devs...why? You want the easiest way to drive around without a controller? BAM! You're welcome. If you have a wife or GF they will love the hell out of you for getting it, the keyboard is instantly familiar to those that do a lot of cell texting so they can just fly on it. After getting one one of my customers is getting ready to have me build him ANOTHER HTPC for his den because his wife put her little hands on that controller and that was it, she is tweeting and FB updating and just flies on the thing, she loves the hell out of it. Notice the trackball under your thumb, that plus the left and right triggers under your first and second finger mans that this and a wireless controller and its just the same as a console only better. After al

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    2. Re:Why people choose consoles by tepples · · Score: 1

      I chose that system because as someone who actually BUILDS HTPCs

      That's part of the problem. Someone considering HTPC gaming first has to find a PC builder willing to build an HTPC. Not all PC builders are in that line of work.

      as for those "other reasons" it all basically boils down to used games

      Not necessarily. There's also the fact that developers know in advance exactly how many pixels per second a GPU can push with a particular shader program, exactly what texture compression formats are supported, etc, so that the game doesn't fail to run and doesn't become a slide show on unexpected hardware. In addition, the developers know exactly what controller will be connected, so they don't have to require a keyboard and mouse just to select the "Configure Gamepad" option if the user happens to plug in a standard USB HID gamepad (as opposed to an Xbox 360 Controller).

      both of my boys game so I usually buy games 3 at a time.

      Thank you for pointing out some Steam sales where 3- or 4-packs cost less than one copy of a console game. That helps if you live in the city, but not if you live where typical broadband is satellite or microwave with a 10 GB/mo cap.

      Finally as for BPM

      What's BPM, other than "beats per minute" in a rhythm game? I searched for bpm gaming on Google and found mostly "business process management", but I'm not sure how that relates.

      and needing devs...why?

      Because there are certain game genres that are traditionally underrepresented on PC. Good luck finding any major PC fighting game that isn't Street Fighter IV.

      You want the easiest way to drive around without a controller? BAM! [handheld wireless keyboard with trackball] You're welcome. If you have a wife or GF they will love the hell out of you for getting it, the keyboard is instantly familiar to those that do a lot of cell texting

      I thought "cell texting" was done on a flat sheet of glass nowadays.

      After getting one one of my customers is getting ready to have me build him ANOTHER HTPC

      That works fine for customers who live near you. Where do you ship? Or how should people find an HTPC builder near them? Effectively everyone lives near a seller of ready-made game consoles.

      But the nicest thing about HTPCs is YOU decide

      The problem there is analysis paralysis: when presented with too many choices, people are likely to punt. How, before buying a copy of a particular game, should one know whether it'll work on a Bobcat-based computer or whether it requires an AMD 6-core monster? The consoles' discrete "generation" concept helps users determine system requirements as a snap judgment.

      only want casual gaming ala the Wii? Pick up a Bobcat HTPC and its cheap like a Wii and plays casuals great, hell I've played GTA:VC and GTA:SA as well as Torchlight II on one and they work nicely for those.

      Is there anything like Mario Party or Smash Bros. or Just Dance for the PC?

      I agree with you: I want HTPC gaming to succeed. But I don't see where you addressed online play against cheaters, online play against people with much more powerful PCs than you, games that aren't ported to PC at all because of piracy, always-online requirements, or pre-HDMI monitors.

    3. Re:Why people choose consoles by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Find us? Really? There is at LEAST 1 PC shop i n every podunk town, usually 2 or 3 and I have YET to find one that won't do what we call a "Tiger build" aka throw together a Tiger kit. Just go to the website, pick the kit you want, and say "I want THAT kit with THIS card,how much" and there ya go. I charge $75 a build but I do ALL the work, I install all the patches and SPs, install all the programs, by the time I'm done its "flip switch and go". Some places charge more, some less, 10 minutes on the phone will find the one near you that will fit your bill. Also remember Tiger has their house brand Systemmax that is basically the same thing, they just sell pre-built Tiger kits.

      As for finding a mom&pop shop? Yellow pages,ask around, some of us don't advertise since we have more work now than we want (those are usually the best guys, but ask around and you can find 'em) or hell just drive down the street. Like I said 10 minutes on the phone will tell you all you need to know, there are a few shops that only sell their own builds, i'd avoid them as I found those guys tend to be what I call "craigslist pickers" that buy junked systems off of CL and refurb, if I'm selling a refurb you KNOW its a refurb and the price is lower because of it. Do I sell online? Nope, got burnt by eBay. Frankly going DIY with online PC sales would require me to raise prices because of the insurance and shipping and I try to keep prices low, but its not like I'm a rare bird here, there are a billion guys that do kit builds out there, we really aren't hard to find in any town.

      As for "too much choice"? Once you pick a shop ASK US and we are HAPPY to help, there is NOTHING I love more than someone who says "What do you think?" because I have spent damned near 25 years doing this and can steer them away from rookie mistakes. My biggest question is "What do you want it to do?" and you answer me that and I can point you in the right direction. Hell I've done the same for a good 10 plus guys here so if you want just shoot me an email saying what you want it to do and a rough budget and I can point you in the right direction. Like I said been doing it for years so I know what they can and can't do, its really not hard.

      And as far as Smash bros, not into casual but if you are just go to the casual in Steam or type "Game like Smash bros for PC" and I'm sure there are a dozen. Its like tower defense or FPS, most genres will have dozens of imitators, many of them quite good, and for every format out there. I know that if you want the "fake guitar" style games which ironically I've been playing bass since I was 14 yet I suuuuccckkk at those things? Frets Of Fire supports loading your own songs and USB controllers and from what I understand there is a simple adapter that lets you use Guitar Hero controllers. I know that for more console like games my youngest just bought an adapter that lets him use his PS2 and Gamecube controllers, cost like $8, really not a big deal.

      As for whether you need a Bobcat or a Hexacore that is beyond simple...do you REALLY like casual phone style games? Then Bobcat. Do you REALLY like your big sprawling first and third person games? Thuban. Again not a hard choice, one is more like an oversized cellphone, the other is a monster. If you aren't playing the monster games and will spend more time watching movies or chatting or playing FB games? Bobcat. I used to have the Athlon in between but frankly the price on the Hexacores has dropped so much in many cases it just doesn't make sense, you are saving MAYBE $40 and getting half the performance with an Athlon triple...why bother? The hexa turns off 3 cores when they are not needed so you get the lower power of the triple when you aren't using the cores and the extra boost when you are, easy choice.

      Frankly you could drop me in a town I had never been to and inside of 30 minutes I could find you a kit builder, all it takes is a phone and asking a couple of questions. Do you do kit builds, if so what do you charge? Can you help me choose the parts? I

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    4. Re:Why people choose consoles by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Oh and one thing I forgot to address was your question on cheating? Punkbusters. Pretty much all the games that aren't cooked up in a garage uses it and it works quite well, if you try to cheat your ass will get the banhammer but quick. Honestly I haven't seen any obvious cheating in years, oh sure you'll get some that use behavior that many consider lame, just watch the Call Of Duty Circus to see some of the lame things like the "sniper spin" but that isn't actual cheating, that is just dumb game mechanics. I prefer to use masher revolvers in BL because while you can find guns with higher damage because of the way they designed critical hits if you are good at headshots the masher can be a monster.

      Anyway as I said if you actually want one I'll be happy to point you in the right direction. Frankly if you are older than 12 and can follow picture directions YOU can build a Tiger kit, they literally come with pictures that hold your hand through every step of the way. If you want casual only? Bobcat. want more of the HT in the HTPC than gaming? The Liano and those of its kind with built in midrange GPUs can be useful for this while saving money, and if you want a monster, one that will last you for years with plenty of upgrade room down the line? get a hexacore, not only are the chips cheap but you can go up to an octocore later if you wish and most of the boards support 16GB-32GB of RAM, more than you will ever need for gaming.

      To give you an idea how long you can go I've been gaming for 3+ years on the same $50 HD4850 card, I'll be changing it for an HD7770 when the 8 series comes out as they'll be around $70 then, my board can hold 16GB but since its DDR 2 I'll probably just stick with the 8GB its got now (not that I've found a game that can use its 8GB and need more yet) and maybe pick up an AM3+ board in a year or two to max out the OS at 16GB.

      I'll admit I made a few boo boos when i built this one, I went with Win 7 Home because I was able to get it for $40, I should have spent the extra and got Pro but to be fair I didn't see any point in having more than 8GB of RAM and other than just to say you have it? Not really any point now, its just so cheap you might as well get the big sticks anyway. And I should have went with a DDR 3 board two years ago when i went from quad to hexa but again to be fair I was able to get a damn nice gamer board with Crossfire capability and lots of nifty extras for just $45 by sticking with DDR 2 and I already had the 8GB of RAM so I just didn't see a point in adding a good $100+ to the cost just to add more memory down the line. Hell I can still pick up 4GB DDR 2 sticks when I happen to trip over them and can put the max RAM the OS will take with the board I have now so its not really affecting me, its just something I would have done differently if I had to do it over because i could have gotten RAM even cheaper.

      But frankly this Thuban just curbstomps any game I throw at it, in fact I'll often be playing a game WHILE burning a DVD or transcoding a video and since I keep the OS and the game files on separate drives it never slows down. Rather than go through all the bullshit of migration I'm just gonna add a cheap 32GB or 64GB SSD as a caching drive in a few months but even without it honestly I have more power than i know what to do with so I can easily see this PC still gaming in 2020 when Win 7 goes EOL. Considering that I paid less than $550 for a PC with 3TB of space, 8GB of RAM, dual burners including Lightscribe on the top one (I just love Lightscribe, it makes my DVDs and CDs just nicer to hand out), an HD4850, Win 7 Home and 10 USB ports? I really can't complain, everyone that sees it says "Man that is a VERY nice computer you have there" and it just runs like a champ, its just nice to have everything at my fingertips..ya know?

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  57. Installation Information by tepples · · Score: 1

    it was Nintendo that didn't allow open source software to be used with the Wii SDK. Sony could just use PCSX2 without any permission so long as they provided a link to the source code upon request.

    PCSX2 is GPLv3. (source). This means Sony would have to ship each copy with Installation Information, or instructions to install one's own modifications on the hardware that shipped with PCSX2. Anybody could use this Installation Information to install homebrew on the platform.

  58. Choosing a kit by tepples · · Score: 1

    Just go to the website, pick the kit you want, and say "I want THAT kit with THIS card,how much" and there ya go.

    How are end users supposed to know what kit they want? It's not like consoles, where you can say "PlayStation 4" and be done with it.

    ask around

    You can tell how much I know that I don't know from the following question: Who's "around"? If I don't know, the general public is even less likely to know. I ask this explicitly because I have a disability that makes me literal-minded, and I want my walkthrough about how to buy a gaming HTPC to be as clear as possible.

    some of us don't advertise since we have more work now than we want

    No advertising on the part of local HTPC builders leaves Microsoft, Nintendo, and Sony with all of end users' mindshare.

    Once you pick a shop ASK US and we are HAPPY to help

    I asked a couple years ago in one shop and was told that the only computers they could build in cases smaller than a huge tower were computers with an Atom processor, and an Atom is about as powerful as a Pentium 4. If it varies from shop to shop, that's another advantage of consoles because wherever you go that advertises "PlayStation 4", you can get a PlayStation 4.

    My biggest question is "What do you want it to do?" and you answer me that and I can point you in the right direction.

    I told a sales associate in another shop what I wanted, namely to watch movies and play video games on a TV, and he told me PlayStation 3 was a better fit for that use case than a PC running Steam.

    do you REALLY like casual phone style games? Then Bobcat. Do you REALLY like your big sprawling first and third person games? Thuban.

    The manufacturers have done a far poorer job of promoting those brand names than the console makers have done of promoting their brand names.

    Do you do kit builds, if so what do you charge? Can you help me choose the parts? Its really not hard questions

    So the procedure becomes as follows: 1. find a kit, and 2. find a PC builder that will build it. This raises the question that the prospective buyer of a PC to replace a console must somehow answer: "Which kit do I want that will let me play the next five years of Steam games in this genre on at least minimum settings?". Any proponent of HTPC gaming and local PC builders should cite a recommended kit and video card for low, medium, and high price. And if the low-price kit is still more expensive than a console, the practical advantage of openness has to be made explicit.

    Thank you for your patience with me. I'm just trying to get toward a walkthrough that will make HTPC buying as easy as buying a console.

    But at least with Steam you can be off for up to a month and the games still run

    Unless the listing for the game on Steam shows that a particular game has third-party DRM in addition to standard Steam DRM.

    1. Re:Choosing a kit by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      If you have the Internet Hoss you are a good 90% of the way there. As I said there are plenty of old tech guys like me that are happy to steer folks in the right direction, hell advice is free. And you don't have to DIY, just grab a pre-built Systemmax and there ya go. And frankly the only reason i know the chip names is I like reading about chip tech, its just easier to say Bobcat than E300-E1300 or Thuban instead of 10xx T 6 core series.

      But let us say for the sake of argument you were my customer and wanted an HTPC that would look snazzy and game. For a case I'd have you pick one from a couple of choices so you can choose something you thought looked purty. Now if you just wanted the casual stuff, more HT than game? Then here ya go, a dual core Bobcat (FYI Bobcat is similar to Atom but with slightly more powerful CPU and a MUCH more powerful GPU, perfect for media boxes and casual gaming) and it even comes with the cute case and the RAM. Of course if you were an actual customer I'd know the price instead of having to make rough guesses, but either one of these would game nicely and I would tell you if you ONLY wanted to game the Athlon would probably make you VERY happy,my youngest is gaming on that chip as we speak, or if you want to be able to game AND transcode video or burn DVDs? Then the X6 naturally has more punch. With prices that low you can sell the case you don't need on Craigslist and save yourself even more money, I would usually give $20-$25 off the build if it came with a case they didn't want as I can always use nice cases.

      And then it'd simply be a matter of picking a graphics card and slapping on the OS, neither one is hard. If you want cheap with good performance the HD4850 is dirt cheap and will do most games at med-high to high, if you don't mind spending a little more up front to save on your electric bill the HD7770 cards use 40% less power under load and the 77xx cards has the new "deep idle" where it will shut down the majority of the card when you are saying chatting or surfing which lowers the power to something like 16w, which for a gaming card is just crazy low.

      But honestly any teenager that can read can build one of these, like I said they comes with pictures and a step by step how-to with the board and the case. Total build time if you aren't in a rush? About an hour and a half, two and a half if you've never done one and triple check everything. I've whipped off four in a day and i'm not speedy. Once you slap the parts in you just fire her up and stick in the OS disc, after that its all "clicky clicky" simple. Then install steam and get to gaming Hoss, if you got the parts at 4PM there is no reason why you couldn't be firing up a game before 8PM and again that is with you taking your time, you use something like Ninite to install the third party software and you can be gaming by 6:30 PM. And notice they not only have browser, AVs, and runtimes like Flash but the have Steam as well so you can just check the boxes to everything you want and it'll do all the work, couldn't be simpler.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  59. It's not I folks: It's Jeremiah Cornelius... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    THIS is why he's doing it & proof of it, here -> http://interviews.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3585927&cid=43295193 when others pointed out Jeremiah Cornelius forgot to submit one of the "first post spams" (masquerading as myself, by posting as AC & using some old posts of mine or other b.s. he put up), & JC mistakenly submitted one of the impersonations of myself as his registered 'luser' name here on /. forums.

    Pretty pitiful actually, but like every up to no good idiot does? He screwed up & submitted it under his registered 'luser' name here, instead of his ac submittals he's been doing.

    * Jeremiah Cornelius: DO YOURSELF, and the rest of us, A GIANT FAVOR MAN: Seek professional psychiatric help!

    (Since Jeremiah Cornelius obviously can't get over the fact he made a spelling error on what it is HE ALLEGEDLY DID FOR A LIVING? That's not MY fault... it's HIS!)

    APK

    P.S.=> I seriously must have dusted JC (in his mind @ least) for his BAD spelling error & it "got his goat"...

    I.E.-> Catching what he claimed to do as a job, for YEARS he left "PENETRATION" (correct) spelled as "PENTRATION" (incorrect) on his resume on LinkedIn & I pointed it out as he & his friends trolled me as usual (webmistressrachel, gmhowell, & crew (probably ALL JC no doubt using alterate emails or TOR to do it as a possible - I've caught "them & theirs" doing it before, ala Barbara, not Barbie = TomHudson (same person))).

    So THAT is what has gotten his goat in a technical debate & his "geek angst" could only come up with *trying* to "impersonate me" in every news thread on /. for the month of March 2013 so far!

    (Just to attempt to 'discredit me' as a spammer here obviously)

    Doing so, by posting that "$10,000 challenge" &/or reposts of my old posts on hosts file value to end users into EVERY SINGLE NEWS ARTICLE POSTED on /. ...

    It's all I can think of that *might* cause such a mentally troubled 'reaction' like the Jeremiah Cornelius is doing & there's NO QUESTION he's the one doing this spamming of nearly every posted article masquerading as myself...!

    ... apk

  60. Oh, really? Why does it work... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The reason people impersonate you is because everyone thinks you're a moron. "The hosts file is not intended to be used as you suggest. But it's pretty damn funny, though." - by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 28, @10:42AM (#43302885)

    Just as I state to end-user's benefit in better speed, security, reliability, + anonymity to an extent online, here (per my subject-line above):

    ---

    APK Hosts File Engine 5.0++ 64-bit:

    http://www.start64.com/index.php?option=com_content&id=5851:apk-hosts-file-engine-64bit-version&Itemid=74

    ---

    Hmmm?

    * You're welcome to disprove the 16 points there validly on computing based grounds...

    (Good luck - You'll NEED it (& that won't help either: It can't be done, & 100's of trolls like yourself have tried + failed consistently in over years here...)).

    APK

    P.S.=> By the way - Here's roughly a 100 /.'ers that disagree & 40++ posts of mine on hosts that've been up-modded too, disproving your b.s. quoted above, easily:

    ---

    * THE HOSTS FILE GROUP 40++ THUSFAR (from +5 -> +1 RATINGS, usually "informative" or "interesting" etc./et al):

    APPLYING HOSTS TO DIFF. PLATFORM W/ TCP-IP STACK BASED ON BSD: 2008 -> http://mobile.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1944892&cid=34831038
    HOSTS MOD UP:2009 -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1490078&cid=30555632
    HOSTS MOD UP:2009 -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1461288&threshold=-1&commentsort=0&mode=thread&cid=30272074
    HOSTS MOD UP:2009 -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1255487&cid=28197285
    HOSTS MOD UP:2009 -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1206409&cid=27661983
    0.0.0.0 in HOSTS:2009 -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1197039&cid=27556999
    0.0.0.0 IN HOSTS:2009 -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1143349&cid=27012231
    0.0.0.0 in HOSTS:2009 -> http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1198841&cid=27580299
    0.0.0.0 in HOSTS:2009 -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1139705&cid=26977225
    HOSTS MOD UP:2009 -> http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1319261&cid=28872833 (still says INSIGHTFUL)
    APK 20++ POINTS ON HOSTS MOD UP:2010 -> http://news.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1913212&cid=34576182
    HOSTS MOD UP:2010 -> http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1869638&cid=34237268
    HOSTS MOD UP:2010 -> http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1907266&cid=34529608
    HOSTS MOD UP:2010 -> http://apple.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1725068