Yes, relative speed between the objects also effects time,
true
I'm not saying gravity is the only effect going on, but know that Lorentz Space-Time is a/simplification/,...
False, Lorentz space time is the _solution_ to Einstein's field equation when there is zero stress-energy and therefore no gravity. When there is no gravity, you end up with Special Relativity. If you didn't, then GR would be suspect of being incorrect.
What is important to note is that just as a complete lack of motion would negate the need to define time
A complete lack of change would remove the need for time. And if you consider all change to be "motion", then that would be true. So in some classical sense, yes.
a complete lack of gravity would negate the need- as far as the universe is concerned, to define space.
False. Without gravity you have Lorentz space time. Quantum Mechanics works without any gravity at all!
Gravity's distortion of space is what defines it. What does this have to do with anything? Without a definition of space, there is no way to define motion- motion isnt occuring. This means that suddenly Lorentz Space-Time doesnt work either.
False. Gravity's distortion of space does not define space, it defines the distortion of space. There is plenty of motion that has nothing to do with gravity. You could have photons traveling through empty space - motion without gravity.
Maybe the reason there's so many posts about this that need your "correction" is that, well, they are right?
I have read Wheeler's book, Dirac's book, and even Pauli's fucking book on general fucking relativity. How many fucking GR books have you read. God damnit I am sick of all you stupid slashdot, fucking, idiots. You people think that because you know how to turn a fucking computer on that you understand the mysteries of the universe.
I'm never posting on this website again. You fucktards can can keep you ignorance and moderate it up until you all fucking choke on it.
if you could do this, then you would be world famous - therefore I am pretty sure that you can't
if you have a pair of entanged electrons and you collapse one, then a random eigenstate will pop out. Same with the other. No information is passed, because it was random.
I think that what you are saying is that you want to set up one of the particles as a quantum register after transmitting the other. And that you want the other particle to be a quantum register too? How can you do that?
As for you last paragraph, I don't understand what you are saying, but perhaps you are not taking Special Relativity into account for something, as c is the limit for nonrandom stuff.
Jesus Christ people, I am not attacking the GameCube.
I am refuting the argument that the PS2's future is one with few good games.
My claim is that, the PS2 has been and is #1, and therefore good games will come at least through the next development cycle.
The only negative statement that I have made against the GC is that it is improbable for it to surpass the PS2 in one year. I find that to be a reasonable statement.
If you looked at the console shipping figures of 1992 (a year after the release of the SNES in North America), you'd be saying that the 16-bit console wars are "over," with Sega being the clear winner.
The tide did change, but developers did not jump ships in mass. The Genesis was still a worthwhile console to own with plenty of great games being made - all the way up to the end.
The SNES had superior graphics and sound that were impossible not to notice. The gap in preformance (though noticablem, especially loading speed) is not as great here.
But more importantly the SNES was only released in 1991! So this little factiod is completely inapplicable. The Game Cube was released in 2001, it is no longer brand new.
GameCube numbers may be down in North America and Japan, but they are growing quickly. More quickly than Sony's numbers. They may catch up to Sony this year.
I am afraid that is simply not probable. The gamecube would have to sell much more than its entire userbase in one single year. The market is too saturated for that.
The best thing that nintendo could do to reach any growth approaching that would be to focus on the connectivity with the GBA, which is by far the most popular device.
Hell, if you took gravity out of the equation instants would run together and all things which define time would go away- gravity causes time.
In the case of no gravity, you get Lorentz Space-Time. Time is fine.
And what we are looking for is the speed at which gravitational information is exchanged.
Consider 2 masses, very far apart. There is gravity between them. If one moves, how long until the other one feels it (the gravitational 'pull' changing). This is what is meant.
Moderators note: I hate Slashdot during science articles. This is like the 4th comment that I have corrected, and by far the worst. If you don't understand something, don't moderate it just because it sounds interesting.
Uh Oh, looks like you need to rewrite special relativity now that all of the energy formula's come out wrong.
And while you are at it, you will have to rewrite General Relativity (after Special Relativity of course), The Klein Gordon Equation, The Dirac Equation, then rederive the existence of the positron.
As for E&M, we can no longer use the Coulomb potential, and we must now use the Yukawa potential. Opps, experiment doesn't match theory. You must rewrite all of Electricity and Magnetism.
Oh boy, we are back at Newtonian mechanics in the pre-industrial era. How much fun it will be to rederive everything from scratch.
(1) E^2 = (c*P)^2 + (c^2*m)^2 (2) E = m*c^2/sqrt(1-(v/c)^2)
Light has energy Light has momentum Light has NO mass
If light had mass, then light would have infinite energy, see eq 2. = m*c^2/sqrt(1-(c/c)^2) = m*c^2/sqrt(1-1) = m*c^2/sqrt(0) = m*c^2/0 = Inf, if m != 0
As long as we are quoting Japanese shipping figures.
System Dec 16 - Dec 22 Total Sales in 2002 GBA 325,400 3,146,900 PS2 154,000 3,511,200 GC 76,900 1,129,300 XB 16,200 312,400 PSone 5,700 219,000
This generation of console wars is over as far as first place is concerned. The number one system is always going to attract developers and have plenty of good games.
If all the good developers just diffused to their favorite environment, then why have there been so many good PC games running on DOS and Windows - especially in DOS and especially in all versions of Windows up until about DX5-6.
Don't let your purchasing choices and ties colour your perception.
By default you have to turn on the texture smoothing and cd speedup. They are less compatible - for example certain games stream music or movies off the disc just as fast as they are read and faster disc speeds will fudge this up.
The one (big) thing that bleem does do that the PS2 doesn't is increasing the resolution for polygonal games. Of course this causes many more incompatibilities and that is why bleem must be custom programed for individual games and the PS2 enhancement works more in general.
The texture smoothing works wonders for games that dither colors like FF9 and Vagrant Story. But as for your assertion that these games would compete with their PS2 counterparts, I can only hope that you are sleep deprived.
Personally, I'm of the opinion that homo sapiens did evolve--and then, just about the time of the neolithic revolution, God made one example from dust, whose offspring have wandered throughout the world, mating the animals that just happen to be completely indentical to themselves.
If you could only hear your self from where I sit.
searches corresponding sets "C" {C}+{C++}+{C#}+{C,C++}+{C,C#}+{C++,C#}+{C,C++,C#} "C not C++" {C}+ +{C#}+ +{C,C#} "C not C#" {C}+{C++}+ +{C,C++} "C not C++ not C#" {C} "C++" {C++}+ +{C,C++}+ +{C++,C#}+{C,C++,C#} "C#" {C#}+ +{C,C#}+{C++,C#}+{C,C++,C#} "C++ and C#" {C++,C#}+{C,C++,C#}
You are correct. This matrix is singular (this linear system cannot be solved). The search cannot seperate {C++,C#} and {C,C++,C#} jobs.
Though you could find the extrema by solving with {C++,C#} held at zero and {C,C++,C#} help at zero seperately. I assume that the true solution lies between those values. Though I do not care enough to prove it.
Ah.. You have to get a license, BUT if you have an out of state relative own the said vehicle, you can easily avoid getting Maryland plates/state inspection/exhaust inspection.
At least, that's what I have been doing, and I haven't been in trouble so far.
The characters were some how oversized and this made Dhalsim an undefeatable character, as he could strike from across the screen.
The controls were impossible. Forget throwing fireballs more than 1/5 attempts. Forget spinning piledrivers, ever.
Damage didn't register until seconds after landing blows. You could jump in with Chun-Li, kick someone to death, and then get hit by them before they fell dead.
The combos were totally fucked up. Since when can Chun-Li and E. Honda kill someone with one combo.
I actually returned this game to K-mart
But surprisingly SSF2 was an excellent port on the PC. The graphics and control were good. The music was wonderfully recomposed for to play off the CD tracks.
SNES and Genisis, and 3DO ports were all good. The turbographics16 port was a bit shitty, but what can you really expect from that system.
The original intent of the knife was to kill as well, so we should ignore any and all other uses anyone can come up with and make knives illegal on that basis alone
That analogy is soo true. Didn't you see the Simpsons episode where homer uses his gun to turn off the lights, turn off the tv, open his beer,...
Slashdot Mirror
Yes, relative speed between the objects also effects time,
/simplification/, ...
true
I'm not saying gravity is the only effect going on, but know that Lorentz Space-Time is a
False, Lorentz space time is the _solution_ to Einstein's field equation when there is zero stress-energy and therefore no gravity. When there is no gravity, you end up with Special Relativity. If you didn't, then GR would be suspect of being incorrect.
What is important to note is that just as a complete lack of motion would negate the need to define time
A complete lack of change would remove the need for time. And if you consider all change to be "motion", then that would be true. So in some classical sense, yes.
a complete lack of gravity would negate the need- as far as the universe is concerned, to define space.
False. Without gravity you have Lorentz space time. Quantum Mechanics works without any gravity at all!
Gravity's distortion of space is what defines it. What does this have to do with anything? Without a definition of space, there is no way to define motion- motion isnt occuring. This means that suddenly Lorentz Space-Time doesnt work either.
False. Gravity's distortion of space does not define space, it defines the distortion of space. There is plenty of motion that has nothing to do with gravity. You could have photons traveling through empty space - motion without gravity.
Maybe the reason there's so many posts about this that need your "correction" is that, well, they are right?
I have read Wheeler's book, Dirac's book, and even Pauli's fucking book on general fucking relativity. How many fucking GR books have you read. God damnit I am sick of all you stupid slashdot, fucking, idiots. You people think that because you know how to turn a fucking computer on that you understand the mysteries of the universe.
I'm never posting on this website again. You fucktards can can keep you ignorance and moderate it up until you all fucking choke on it.
in short, no
if you could do this, then you would be world famous - therefore I am pretty sure that you can't
if you have a pair of entanged electrons and you collapse one, then a random eigenstate will pop out. Same with the other. No information is passed, because it was random.
I think that what you are saying is that you want to set up one of the particles as a quantum register after transmitting the other. And that you want the other particle to be a quantum register too? How can you do that?
As for you last paragraph, I don't understand what you are saying, but perhaps you are not taking Special Relativity into account for something, as c is the limit for nonrandom stuff.
Jesus Christ people, I am not attacking the GameCube.
I am refuting the argument that the PS2's future is one with few good games.
My claim is that, the PS2 has been and is #1, and therefore good games will come at least through the next development cycle.
The only negative statement that I have made against the GC is that it is improbable for it to surpass the PS2 in one year. I find that to be a reasonable statement.
If you looked at the console shipping figures of 1992 (a year after the release of the SNES in North America), you'd be saying that the 16-bit console wars are "over," with Sega being the clear winner.
The tide did change, but developers did not jump ships in mass. The Genesis was still a worthwhile console to own with plenty of great games being made - all the way up to the end.
The SNES had superior graphics and sound that were impossible not to notice. The gap in preformance (though noticablem, especially loading speed) is not as great here.
But more importantly the SNES was only released in 1991! So this little factiod is completely inapplicable. The Game Cube was released in 2001, it is no longer brand new.
GameCube numbers may be down in North America and Japan, but they are growing quickly. More quickly than Sony's numbers. They may catch up to Sony this year.
I am afraid that is simply not probable. The gamecube would have to sell much more than its entire userbase in one single year. The market is too saturated for that.
The best thing that nintendo could do to reach any growth approaching that would be to focus on the connectivity with the GBA, which is by far the most popular device.
Hell, if you took gravity out of the equation instants would run together and all things which define time would go away- gravity causes time.
In the case of no gravity, you get Lorentz Space-Time. Time is fine.
And what we are looking for is the speed at which gravitational information is exchanged.
Consider 2 masses, very far apart. There is gravity between them. If one moves, how long until the other one feels it (the gravitational 'pull' changing). This is what is meant.
Moderators note: I hate Slashdot during science articles. This is like the 4th comment that I have corrected, and by far the worst. If you don't understand something, don't moderate it just because it sounds interesting.
Yes, but you cannot send any _information_ faster than the speed of light.
You have no control over how the wavefunction will collapse.
Wow maybe what you say is true.
:)
Uh Oh, looks like you need to rewrite special relativity now that all of the energy formula's come out wrong.
And while you are at it, you will have to rewrite General Relativity (after Special Relativity of course), The Klein Gordon Equation, The Dirac Equation, then rederive the existence of the positron.
As for E&M, we can no longer use the Coulomb potential, and we must now use the Yukawa potential. Opps, experiment doesn't match theory. You must rewrite all of Electricity and Magnetism.
Oh boy, we are back at Newtonian mechanics in the pre-industrial era. How much fun it will be to rederive everything from scratch.
I hope you take this kindly
(1) E^2 = (c*P)^2 + (c^2*m)^2
(2) E = m*c^2/sqrt(1-(v/c)^2)
Light has energy
Light has momentum
Light has NO mass
If light had mass, then light would have infinite energy, see eq 2.
= m*c^2/sqrt(1-(c/c)^2)
= m*c^2/sqrt(1-1)
= m*c^2/sqrt(0)
= m*c^2/0
= Inf, if m != 0
"The PS2 is nearing the end of its life."
As long as we are quoting Japanese shipping figures.
System Dec 16 - Dec 22 Total Sales in 2002
GBA 325,400 3,146,900
PS2 154,000 3,511,200
GC 76,900 1,129,300
XB 16,200 312,400
PSone 5,700 219,000
This generation of console wars is over as far as first place is concerned. The number one system is always going to attract developers and have plenty of good games.
If all the good developers just diffused to their favorite environment, then why have there been so many good PC games running on DOS and Windows - especially in DOS and especially in all versions of Windows up until about DX5-6.
Don't let your purchasing choices and ties colour your perception.
By default you have to turn on the texture smoothing and cd speedup. They are less compatible - for example certain games stream music or movies off the disc just as fast as they are read and faster disc speeds will fudge this up.
The one (big) thing that bleem does do that the PS2 doesn't is increasing the resolution for polygonal games. Of course this causes many more incompatibilities and that is why bleem must be custom programed for individual games and the PS2 enhancement works more in general.
The texture smoothing works wonders for games that dither colors like FF9 and Vagrant Story. But as for your assertion that these games would compete with their PS2 counterparts, I can only hope that you are sleep deprived.
Personally, I'm of the opinion that homo sapiens did evolve--and then, just about the time of the neolithic revolution, God made one example from dust, whose offspring have wandered throughout the world, mating the animals that just happen to be completely indentical to themselves.
If you could only hear your self from where I sit.
I'll answer the question, but first you must prove to me that you exist.
everyone laughs and thinks that the duckbilled platypus is funny looking. fine, mod me as a troll
But the duckbilled platypus has a spur on its rear legs that is used for defense and that thing fucking hurts
I'm just warning you all
I was speaking about the insects my friend
Insects have an open circulatory system.
fuckers don't look so funny when they dig that poisonous spur into you
don't pick them up
the exoskeleton is a problem
but most important is their open circulatory system is not capable of delivering oxygen and removing toxins from a large body
OTOH squids have some amazingly diverse evolved traits, little would surprise me
peh
just take 1/2 the log, pretty boy
all true geeks had a log log duplex or such
Hmm, let's see
searches corresponding sets
"C" {C}+{C++}+{C#}+{C,C++}+{C,C#}+{C++,C#}+{C,C++,C#}
"C not C++" {C}+ +{C#}+ +{C,C#}
"C not C#" {C}+{C++}+ +{C,C++}
"C not C++ not C#" {C}
"C++" {C++}+ +{C,C++}+ +{C++,C#}+{C,C++,C#}
"C#" {C#}+ +{C,C#}+{C++,C#}+{C,C++,C#}
"C++ and C#" {C++,C#}+{C,C++,C#}
You are correct. This matrix is singular (this linear system cannot be solved). The search cannot seperate {C++,C#} and {C,C++,C#} jobs.
Though you could find the extrema by solving with {C++,C#} held at zero and {C,C++,C#} help at zero seperately. I assume that the true solution lies between those values. Though I do not care enough to prove it.
However, as for Java and JavaScript
searches corresponding sets
"Java" {J}+{JS}+{J,JS}
"JavaScript" {JS}+{J,JS}
"JavaScript not Java" {JS}
This is trivially solved.
{J}+{J,JS} = "Java" - "JavaScript not Java"
{JS}+{J,JS}= "JavaScript"
California has 35 million residents. Oregon has like 3.5 million.
Manufacurers will probably make a hood orniment GPS in the shape of a beaver.
Ah.. You have to get a license, BUT if you have an out of state relative own the said vehicle, you can easily avoid getting Maryland plates/state inspection/exhaust inspection.
At least, that's what I have been doing, and I haven't been in trouble so far.
All theoretical chemistry is really physics;
and all theoretical chemists know it. -- Richard P. Feynman
Argh, that game was shite.
The characters were some how oversized and this made Dhalsim an undefeatable character, as he could strike from across the screen.
The controls were impossible. Forget throwing fireballs more than 1/5 attempts. Forget spinning piledrivers, ever.
Damage didn't register until seconds after landing blows. You could jump in with Chun-Li, kick someone to death, and then get hit by them before they fell dead.
The combos were totally fucked up. Since when can Chun-Li and E. Honda kill someone with one combo.
I actually returned this game to K-mart
But surprisingly SSF2 was an excellent port on the PC. The graphics and control were good. The music was wonderfully recomposed for to play off the CD tracks.
SNES and Genisis, and 3DO ports were all good. The turbographics16 port was a bit shitty, but what can you really expect from that system.
score!
The original intent of the knife was to kill as well, so we should ignore any and all other uses anyone can come up with and make knives illegal on that basis alone
...
That analogy is soo true. Didn't you see the Simpsons episode where homer uses his gun to turn off the lights, turn off the tv, open his beer,