He was also complaining about designs that did not handle resizing of text very vell. And very common "webdesigners" tries to lock the users to one font-size and the layout breaks horrible if one tries to resize the text. So yes, the layout I linked to is an exception to that rule.
Even a layout that uses the whole width can break when the text is resized.
So for me a design that doesn't break in diffrent font-sizes is more important than one that uses the whole width.
I design the icons in.png then convert them to.ico with png2ico
works both on *nix and windows. You can also add several different image sizes in the icon file you make with this program.
Though you have to download a nightly build of either firefox or mozilla suite which has support for XTF then you can try xforms with an extension.
A bit of a hassel, but after seeing the xforms examples I have to say it looks pretty neat;)
More about xhtml and media types:
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-media-types/ Explains why msn really should have gone for html 4.01 strict. Since IE doesn't support the right mime type.
We already know that AOL has worked to integrate the IE engine into Netscape, has reworked the winamp core into a new AMP player using XUL for the interface, and implemented an AIM client in XUL. That appears to me to be a very consistent plan to integrate all their products / acquisitions into a new internet suite, based on Mozilla XUL.
there is still some of us that prefere winamp3.
I still use it, mostly because of the playlist manager. just too bad they stopped working on it too soon, would been perfect had they removed some of the few bugs.
but still even with those bugs i think its way better than the version 2
just let us hope they will continue the work on the wasabiplayer. www.wasabidev.org
one of their goals is to get it on linux aswell.
a reason winamp3 had buildt names like 499a, 499b
as the version 500 was supposed to work on linux.
I have built *tons* of web pages for both IE and Mozilla. They render exactly the same in Opera, IE, KHTML, and Mozilla, they conform to the XHTML 1.1 spec, they are lightweight, and they look pretty good.
do you server your pages as application/xhtml?
something you should when conforming to the xhtml1.1 specs. last time i checked msie couldn't handle that pretty well.(granted the same goes for khtml)
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-media-types/
yup, and they even got the wrong order of the psuedo-classes
a:link a:visited a:active a:hover
should be
a:link a:visited a:hover a:active
and they aslo use properitary css, speaking of the scrollbar "css". propitary css which is not properly marked with vendorname Vendor-specific extensions
and to qoute w3.org:
Vendor/organization specific extensions should be avoided
if its inline i would rather use a span-tag than a div-tag.
you could also use a strong or em tag, which would give a semantical meaning aswell, rather than just a visible look.
yeah, but you should really think of the enviromnental consequences of that battle,
granted it looks cool, but what about Endor? and its habitants? the Endor Holocaust
no, if you look at the left there is only written 6 days, the calender is probably just showing working days,
you also tell by the other "red-letter days" as 8th of mars and 1th of may, they are also lacking from the calendar
Slashdot Mirror
Especially check out the video with Laura Didio that is linked from that site. She does not sound very neutural to me. http://wm.microsoft.com/ms/windowsserversystem/fac ts/videos/yankee_group_laura_didio.wmv
He was also complaining about designs that did not handle resizing of text very vell. And very common "webdesigners" tries to lock the users to one font-size and the layout breaks horrible if one tries to resize the text. So yes, the layout I linked to is an exception to that rule. Even a layout that uses the whole width can break when the text is resized.
So for me a design that doesn't break in diffrent font-sizes is more important than one that uses the whole width.
There are exception like Patrick Griffith's "Elastic Lawn" http://www.csszengarden.com/?cssfile=/063/063.css& page=0.
Scales rather nicely when you adjust the font-size.
This reeks of a FUD post...
No, it's a troll. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slashdot_trolling_phe nomena#Minor_trolls
Look at the bottom at the minor troll list.
Found some on this page http://www.mwbrooks.com/dvorak/national.html, as I was looking for a norwegian layout. There is a swedish layout there aswell.
The link to the norwegian dvorak layout is a bit wrong on the mwbrooks page the correct is http://www.stenling.no/dvorak/
So you say we can make HawaIII this way?
I design the icons in .png then convert them to .ico with png2ico
works both on *nix and windows. You can also add several different image sizes in the icon file you make with this program.
Mozilla has support for xforms: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/xforms/
Though you have to download a nightly build of either firefox or mozilla suite which has support for XTF then you can try xforms with an extension. ;)
A bit of a hassel, but after seeing the xforms examples I have to say it looks pretty neat
some links explaining black smokers.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_smokers
http://www.oceansonline.com/hydrothe.htm
http://www.ocean.udel.edu/kiosk/bsmoker.html
D'oh. I completely posted the wrong link the second paragraph.
It was supposed to be to this site: http://www.hixie.ch/advocacy/xhtml
But then they have to use the mime type application/xhtml+xml which IE supricingly doesn't support ;)
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-media-types/
More about xhtml and media types: http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-media-types/
Explains why msn really should have gone for html 4.01 strict. Since IE doesn't support the right mime type.
We already know that AOL has worked to integrate the IE engine into Netscape, has reworked the winamp core into a new AMP player using XUL for the interface, and implemented an AIM client in XUL. That appears to me to be a very consistent plan to integrate all their products / acquisitions into a new internet suite, based on Mozilla XUL.
No, the AMP is using wxWindows, not xul.
from Henrik Gemal's blog
there is still some of us that prefere winamp3. I still use it, mostly because of the playlist manager. just too bad they stopped working on it too soon, would been perfect had they removed some of the few bugs. but still even with those bugs i think its way better than the version 2
just let us hope they will continue the work on the wasabiplayer. www.wasabidev.org one of their goals is to get it on linux aswell. a reason winamp3 had buildt names like 499a, 499b as the version 500 was supposed to work on linux.
for the mozilla suit, there is a link to "Other Systems & Languages" on the mozilla suit page. where you can find the last builds,
you have to take in count the extra whitespace, so its 7 with that.
are you talking about the hp dashboard? i remember that one, was a really neat tool.
I have built *tons* of web pages for both IE and Mozilla. They render exactly the same in Opera, IE, KHTML, and Mozilla, they conform to the XHTML 1.1 spec, they are lightweight, and they look pretty good.
do you server your pages as application/xhtml? something you should when conforming to the xhtml1.1 specs. last time i checked msie couldn't handle that pretty well.(granted the same goes for khtml) http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-media-types/
just note that Tierra's version of KQ2 is a bit different than Sierra's. so you can see it as another game.
After a quick look at the standards, one can tell that the browsers are not required to support blink
quote w3c.org:n g-props
Text blinks (alternates between visible and invisible). Conforming user agents are not required to support this value. http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/text.html#lining-striki
looks like its being maintained like this in css3 http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-css3-text-20030514/#t ext-blink
yup, and they even got the wrong order of the psuedo-classes
and they aslo use properitary css, speaking of the scrollbar "css". propitary css which is not properly marked with vendorname Vendor-specific extensions
and to qoute w3.org: Vendor/organization specific extensions should be avoided
if its inline i would rather use a span-tag than a div-tag. you could also use a strong or em tag, which would give a semantical meaning aswell, rather than just a visible look.
First they came to RFID the homeless,
and I didn't speak up,
because I wasn't homeless.
Then they came to RFID the foreigners,
and I didn't speak up,
because I was a foreigner.
Then they came to RFID the poor,
and I didn't speak up,
because I wasn't poor.
Then they came for me,
and by that time there was no one
left to speak up for me.
the original by martin niemoller
yeah, but you should really think of the enviromnental consequences of that battle, granted it looks cool, but what about Endor? and its habitants?
the Endor Holocaust
maybe you can use this card ATI Radeon 9500 ASC,
the article also meantion the Nvidas GeForce 4900 MX-ASCII
no, if you look at the left there is only written 6 days, the calender is probably just showing working days,
you also tell by the other "red-letter days" as 8th of mars and 1th of may, they are also lacking from the calendar