Slashdot Mirror


Latest Chernobyl Motorcycle Photos

wrx writes "Elena has taken another motorcycle ride through the Chernobyl area, and has updated her site with a whole lot of new photos and text. The pictures now show several surrounding towns, the radiation level of the magic wood, and many more details inside buildings. After the dust had settled from the original slashdot story, Elena wrote 'who are those slashdot people? they swept over like Mongol-Tartars.'"

951 comments

  1. Watch the hit counter spin by azuroff · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm counting around 100 or so hits every few seconds...

    We'll show her who "those slashdot people" are.

    1. Re:Watch the hit counter spin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      So am I...

      I'm guessing about 80 of those 100 hits is people like us refreshing to check how many have hit.

    2. Re:Watch the hit counter spin by magn · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Maybe if everyone stopped reload it to see the hit counter it wouldn't spin so fast :)

    3. Re:Watch the hit counter spin by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

      How appropriate. We "nuke" her website.

    4. Re:Watch the hit counter spin by Falc0n · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yup... Just in case Angelfire decides her bandwidth is too much, here is a mirror: http://www.fcdnet.org/chernobyl/

    5. Re:Watch the hit counter spin by carcosa30 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Those aren't hits, they're roentgens.

      My hair feels funny...

      Once again, mad props to crazy Russian girl. Her recklessness is unimaginable.

      --
      Intolerance for ambiguity is the mark of the authoritarian personality.
    6. Re:Watch the hit counter spin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't do it. I LUV HUR!

    7. Re:Watch the hit counter spin by ack154 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Might want to work on the mirror you have there... it's not so much a mirror, but a single page that points right back to the Angelfire site...

    8. Re:Watch the hit counter spin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      It is currently at 31,906.

    9. Re:Watch the hit counter spin by ShallowThroat · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ahead is atomic plant.
      Huge is bandwidth bill.
      Sad am I.

      --
      The "Insert Quote Here" line is almost as predictable as inserting an actual quote.
    10. Re:Watch the hit counter spin by frostyboy · · Score: 5, Informative

      Heh, looks like you made the same mistake that I almost did. The link on that first page just goes right back to angelfire. The -k option in wget is most useful for these situations

      True mirror at: http://netfiles.uiuc.edui/benoc/mirrors/www.angelf ire.com/extreme4/kiddofspeed/



      Visit the oldest running human webcam on the internet:
      http://www.mitwebcam.com
      --
      Who is General Failure? And why is he reading my disk????
    11. Re:Watch the hit counter spin by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Funny

      Bribing the guards 6000 rupels
      Tank of petrol 190 rupels
      Nice digital camera 2500 rupels

      having glow in the dark hair - priceless

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    12. Re:Watch the hit counter spin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      It is so funny to see how quickly it increases! Damn... we are the "slashdot people" ;)

    13. Re:Watch the hit counter spin by Pathwalker · · Score: 5, Informative

      If you want to grab it via bittorrent, and contribute bandwidth back to other people who are downloading, I've got a torrent of a mirror set up here.

      Bittorrent is probably overkill for a 5 meg site, but who cares; it helps spread the bandwidth load around...

    14. Re:Watch the hit counter spin by shadowbearer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Mod parent up.

      I would hope, however, that the admins at Angelfire would have waived the bandwidth limitations for this particular user. If they have any human decency that is... what she has to say, and what she's doing, should be viewable by everyone, regardless of b/w limitations or not. I'd mirror it myself (have a complete local copy) but I'm out of webspace...

      Some things are just too damned important...

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    15. Re:Watch the hit counter spin by rustycage · · Score: 1, Troll

      I just watched it break 50k a minute ago.

      --
      No Sig For You
    16. Re:Watch the hit counter spin by Bombcar · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Note that if you look at some of the Images, it seems pretty obvious that she's in the process of registering and moving her site to another location

    17. Re:Watch the hit counter spin by Bombcar · · Score: 0

      I just love being right.......

      Note the Admin contact. :)

    18. Re:Watch the hit counter spin by shfted! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I made that same mistake on the original story, and got flamed royally for it. My karma went from Excellent to Neutral in a day, and a moderation or two since sent me negative. ;)

      --
      He who laughs last is stuck in a time dilation bubble.
    19. Re:Watch the hit counter spin by double-oh+three · · Score: 1

      When I first looked maybe 2 hours ago it was at 50,000ish, now it's at 78,000+. Either there are 5 people that are trying to wear out their F5 keys, or it's not that bad of an approximation of the massive hyperlinkage of a slashdotting.

      --
      "For years, I struggled with reality... but I'm happy to say I finally won out over it." -- Elwood P. Dowd
    20. Re:Watch the hit counter spin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some things are just too damned important...

      Let's have a little perspective, huh? She didn't cure cancer, she took some photographs of the apea around Chernobyl.

    21. Re:Watch the hit counter spin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I accidentally moderated this as "underrated" by hitting an arrow key while still in the moderation box. I apologize duly. Please moderate the Anonymous post above this one down, then moderate this down as well. Unfortunately, the moderation system won't allow me to fix this error myself. Aargh!

    22. Re:Watch the hit counter spin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nevermind, posting anonymously seems to have undone all my moderations. :-)

    23. Re:Watch the hit counter spin by omarin · · Score: 1


      Not to be a pain in the ass, but I believe the correct (English-language) name and spelling of their money is "Roubles", not "rupels"...

    24. Re:Watch the hit counter spin by dgmartin98 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Now it's at 92819 (~9:12 am GMT)

      --
      FPGA, Wireless, ASIC, Verilog, VHDL, HW, 10yr exp, Team Lead, Ottawa (More? Email above. slashdotusername=dgmartin98 )
    25. Re:Watch the hit counter spin by JoeBaldwin · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Let's have a little perspective, huh? She didn't cure cancer, she took some photographs of the apea around Chernobyl.


      Yes, but at great personal cost to her health. Nobody else would go there; she says so herself. These are *one of a kind*.

      Fuck just waiving bandwidth restrictions, I'd give her a medal.
    26. Re:Watch the hit counter spin by andrewuoft · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How tasteless.. and offensive.

      The blame for Chernobyl lies squarely on the Soviet empire; a cruel and heartless regime that destroyed the lives of millions of people.

      Anyone with a USSR flag, or a picture of Stalin or thinks Communism is cool can receive one free ass whipping from me.

      Andrew
      Ukrainian-Canadian

    27. Re:Watch the hit counter spin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I thought the real negligent people were those who decided to disable some of the safety systems and deliberately overheat the reactor to see what would happen.

    28. Re:Watch the hit counter spin by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

      Was that actually the way it went down? I don't remember reading that.

      --

      +++ATH0
    29. Re:Watch the hit counter spin by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Anyone that didnt say "holy shit" and gained a new perspecitive on life is either a moron that is incapable of comprehending what they are looking at or a sick individual.

      sorry, but those photos gave me the intense creeps for the past 2 hours and has reminded me that things are not bad at all here in the USA.... at least my child's school is not equipped with children's gas masks.

      I feel that every american shoudl be required to view that entire website, and high school classes need to take a week to discuss what happened there.

      I remember when it happened, and it's unbelieveable how this one person's website has brough back all those fears I had as a kid then returned and compounded with the realization that ... "It really was as bad as I feared it was."

      Makes Our three mile island look like a simple fart.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    30. Re:Watch the hit counter spin by boaworm · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm on my way to the US in three weeks, first visit ever for me. I am dying to find out what is really so great "over there". I mean... even your animals love for America is such that they try to get back from Europe :-)

      (From article)

      Zoologists also brought two American Bisons, but idea to breed them didn't work out and bison male run away. I don't know, if he run from radiation or from his bride, but last time bison has been seen in Belorusia, he heading west and may be he just decided to return to America.

      --
      Probable impossibilities are to be preferred to improbable possibilities.
      Aristotele
    31. Re:Watch the hit counter spin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Score: -1, Tasteless

    32. Re:Watch the hit counter spin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Elana your site is fascinating!!!
      Take another ride!.

      GB

    33. Re:Watch the hit counter spin by Squarepusher · · Score: 1

      I was always under the impression that the radiation one is exposed to builds up. That is, if I'm exposed to X amount of radiation today and my limit is Y then tomorrow I can only be exposed to Y - X or less, otherwise I'll suffer. Does that make sense? I'm just curious about that part, wouldn't she have to stop her rides in the near future lest she come down with a nasty case of radiation poisoning?

      Anyway, I agree that this is a very touching pictorial and I am very glad to have had the opportunity to see this. If it weren't for the fact that she obviously has to have some sort of pass in order to enter the dead zone I would be very interested in travelling there myself.

      I find it difficult to put to words the emotion that rises from gazing upon this post-apocolyptic scene. For truely that is an accurate description of the dead zone.

      When visiting I imagine that one could experience several things all at once. One could feel what it could have been like if the cold war had ended in the mutually assured destruction that was promised were the damn to break. Also, a sense of what things were like before civilization gripped the planet. Before there was noise pollution we had silence broken only by the sounds of nature. (Anyone who's read Timeline by Michael Crichton may harken back to comments written on the difference in ambient sounds.)

      It seems beautiful and terrible by turns. It makes me want to cry, yet I yearn to experience this most rare place myself.

      --
      Every hour wounds. The last one kills.
    34. Re:Watch the hit counter spin by magarity · · Score: 1

      but at great personal cost to her health. Nobody else would go there

      A trained physicist with a radiation detector is not the average kid looking for thrills. Read the text accompaning the pictures. It's clear she knows exactly where it is OK to go for how long. Also where just walking over would kill her. No wonder no one else goes there; they wouldn't know where to stay safe. Also note that there are guards living there full time to warn off foolhardy visitors and guided tours for the weathly adventurous from time to time.

    35. Re:Watch the hit counter spin by lrucker · · Score: 1
      Elena says she has unlimited bandwidth:

      My provider do not charge for kilobites, I just buying internet card and it is unlimited internet.

    36. Re:Watch the hit counter spin by mi · · Score: 2, Insightful
      to crazy Russian girl

      Kyiv is the capital of Ukraine ...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    37. Re:Watch the hit counter spin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...at least my child's school is not equipped with children's gas masks.

      You forgot to put "yet" at the end of that sentence. If the self-fulfilling prophecy of the fear mongers in control comes true, we'll have our own Chernobyls in the U.S. Personally, I wouldn't put it outside of the realm of possibility that the Bush dynasty would love to nuke at least one place in the U.S. Against, better judgment, the Davis-Besse nuclear facility is going to be re-opened becaue the energy company that owns it has deep pockets and they were losing money on that plant while it was shut. It just so happens that this nuke facility is located 90 miles west of Cuyahoga County in Ohio. And it just so happens that that county is the biggest representation of Democrats in the state of Ohio. So... would the rest of the state really care if those "commie" Amuhrica haters were killed off in a nuclear incident? Probably not. And that would be a big coup for the Bushites. You know they'd be behind it 100% too. Fuckers.

    38. Re:Watch the hit counter spin by tigris · · Score: 1


      A Timeline.
      Apparently they were trying to see if their electrical generators would supply enough power to the emergency cooling system during spindown if they lost electrical power and had to switch to diesels. More here
      Amazing.

    39. Re:Watch the hit counter spin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Feature billing on Coast To Coast AM tonight:
      http;//www.coasttocoastam.com/

      If somebody knows her email address, Art Bell would like to get in touch with her.

      {^_^} Joanne, jdow@earthlink.net

    40. Re:Watch the hit counter spin by msim · · Score: 1

      whoa, it's now nudging 230,000 hits, 24hours ago it was 160,000!

      --

      Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know when your gonna get food poisoning.
    41. Re:Watch the hit counter spin by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      not painful at all :)
      It was just a quickie anyway, the punchline was more important than the accuracy

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    42. Re:Watch the hit counter spin by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

      I'm glad those articles weren't the knee-jerk "NUKE-YOU-LAR BAD" type of Luddite FUD you normally see associated with the Chyornobyl incident. It seems a lot of people like to try and use it as an example of how nuclear energy is too dangerous for public use.

      --

      +++ATH0
    43. Re:Watch the hit counter spin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'm on my way to the US in three weeks, first visit ever for me. I am dying to find out what is really so great "over there". I mean... even your animals love for America is such that they try to get back from Europe :-)"

      It's not bad.... I hope you're not disappointed. There are a lot of things to be fixed, but I think we do the best we can. I'm not sure why the buffalo was trying to get back though, they were almost completely wiped out!

    44. Re:Watch the hit counter spin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In 1995 when I went to Russia.
      One ameriacan dollar equaled 4800 rubels.

  2. Soaking up the gamma by NatlLabGeek · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I can't even imagine the dose she's soaking up. I look at the reading she's showing in pictures and she's taken up my YEARLY dose in HOURS. Is it really exciting enough to give away years of your life for a helluva ride?

    Then again, I chase storms.

    Go with God, girl.

    1. Re:Soaking up the gamma by b0r0din · · Score: 5, Funny

      Some people smoke. Others drive their motorcycle through the worst nuclear incident of all time. In my opinion, the second one sounds much cooler. For some reason Snow Crash comes to mind.

    2. Re:Soaking up the gamma by gumbi+west · · Score: 5, Informative
      Not so sure. You probably get about 300 mR/year and you may get way more. For example, if you smoke you get an additional 1000 mR/year (1 R/year) in addition to all the other things in the tobaco.

      Also, 300 mR is only enough to increase your risk of cancer by 0.01 %, i.e. it's not going to take any time off your life (unless you happen to be the one in 10,000 who gets cancer as a result of that additional exposure, and even then, your chances of dieing are only 1 in 2).

    3. Re:Soaking up the gamma by orthogonal · · Score: 1

      I can't even imagine the dose she's soaking up. I look at the reading she's showing in pictures and she's taken up my YEARLY dose in HOURS

      Elena's one HOT babe.

      She kinda reminds me of Rudolf the Red-Nosed Reindeer: "And if you ever saw [her], you would even say [she] glows."

      Seriously, she's a brave woman and a good photographer, and her original photo essay was haunting and poignant. I'm looking forward to this addition to it.

    4. Re:Soaking up the gamma by gumbi+west · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Wait a second! she is showing readings of less than 1 mR/hour. Power plant workers can work in 1 mR/hour for the entire year and not exceed NRC's strict 2 R/year limit. In otherwords, this is nothing. Parent poster doesn't know what he is talking about.

    5. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Ironpoint · · Score: 2, Informative


      I don't think radiation works that way. Once you leave the area, the radiation doesn't follow you (if you didn't roll around in the material). Its not a chemical like mercury. You don't soak it up until you meet some magical tumor line. If you don't develop tissue damage while irradiated you won't mysteriously develop it later just because you were irradiated.

    6. Re:Soaking up the gamma by chornobyl · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The worst nuclear incident of all time? Hiroshima?

    7. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 5, Interesting

      At least she's documenting her journeys. IMHO, the most interesting thing about her picture is not the radiation, but that the whole place is preserved from the Soviet era. Sort of like a depopulated Pompeii, without all the digging.

    8. Re:Soaking up the gamma by gumbi+west · · Score: 5, Insightful
      The highest reading she shows or talks about is 3 mR/hr. This is only 30 times higher than the levels in Grand Centeral Station, and is many times less than a number of natural locations.

      Sorry, I'm not trying to karma whore, but my day job relates to getting people not to be affraid of radiation, so seing this post have such high mod points is really getting to me.

    9. Re:Soaking up the gamma by fm6 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I'm not sure a motorcycle ride is worth even a 1 in 10K chance of getting cancer. But then, I'm not a biker.

      But to continue the relative risk theme: visiting a meltdown dead zone is not they only way to expose yourself to radiation. There's living in a house made of brick. (Not very much, I admit, but some.) There's living in a poorly ventilated house that's over a Uranium deposit. And of course, there's sunbathing or visiting a tanning salon, which Elena's pastime look positively healthy!

    10. Re:Soaking up the gamma by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, plenty of people ride motorcycles around Hiroshima and Nagasaki, I'm sure.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    11. Re:Soaking up the gamma by ModernGeek · · Score: 1

      Isn't there a pill of some sort of pill you can take to keep radiation from entering your body for a certain amount of time? I think I saw it on some NBC post 9/11 special. Anyhow, does anyone know of a site giving the history of chenobyl? I am wondering what happend that day, and what it was like. Was it a fire that spread into an explosion? Was it a chemical reaction that dumped somthing into the water? I think it's a shame since it keeps us from using nuclear energy, which can be clean and efficiant.

      --
      Sig: I stole this sig.
    12. Re:Soaking up the gamma by gumbi+west · · Score: 4, Informative

      Living in a home made of brick (as I do) will increase your dose by about 30 mR/year. On the other hand, living in a poorly ventilated house over a soil rich in Uranium can increase your dose by about 1000 mR/year. This is all in the United States NRC's (not online) NuReg 1401.

    13. Re:Soaking up the gamma by ModernGeek · · Score: 1

      Yeah, potasium iodide, they are saying it keeps radiation out of your system for X amount of dollars, like this: http://www.nukepills.com/

      --
      Sig: I stole this sig.
    14. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Aglassis · · Score: 5, Informative

      You said: " Wait a second! she is showing readings of less than 1 mR/hour. Power plant workers can work in 1 mR/hour for the entire year and not exceed NRC's strict 2 R/year limit. In otherwords, this is nothing. Parent poster doesn't know what he is talking about."

      The NRC limit (see 10 C.F.R.) is 3 rem per quarter, and 5 rem per year. A rem is a weighted roetgen (R). The weighting factors are used because while a roetgen measures the energy deposited, a rem measures the physical damage (exposure versus dose). An example of a weighting factor is a gamma will have a factor of 1, while a fast neutron may have a factor of 20. So a 1 mR/hr exposure rate will give you 1 mrem/hr for gammas, and 20 mrem/hr for fast neutrons.

      --
      Suddenly, the hairy finger of a familiar monkey tapped me on the shoulder. It was time.--G. T.
    15. Re:Soaking up the gamma by anagama · · Score: 4, Insightful


      As a motorcycle rider, I can tell you that the increase in safety margins she enjoys riding on empty roads is probably 1000 times greater than the increased health risk the radiation poses. That's not all that clear. Look at it this way - "cell phone chatting back seat kid swatting speeding paying no attention to anyone else cause I have the biggest SUV in town" type drivers are a much greater risk than elevated radiation levels. On a bike, she's definitely safer in the Dead Zone than in a poplulated zone.

      On a side note, women who ride motorcycles (as driver not passenger) are undeniably the most alluring of all. I'm in love!

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    16. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Forgotten · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually it is all about cumulative damage, so in a sense you are soaking something up. DNA can be repaired, but the more damage there is, the more likely something really catastrophic will happen. A very high flash dose virtually guarantees enough cells have scrambled machinery that you will die, but the same sort of thing can happen with a small dose over time.

      It comes down to how fast and how completely the exposed tissue is replaced or repaired. In this case she's not spending all her time in the hot zone - her visits are sporadic, unlike say the old guy with the horse-drawn cart (who lives there all the time). So she's probably ok, because she has time to heal in between exposures.

      Also, there is a way you can take it out with you - by inhaling radioactive particulate (fallout). This is part of the reason smoking is dangerous - all organic matter has a small percentage of radioactive isotopes, and small particles get lodged in the lungs where they just keep on giving. It's also the only real danger in handling stuff like depleted uranium rounds, if there's an opportunity for them to produce dust. Radiation that can't penetrate the skin can hurt you from within your body. She's specifically staying in the centre of the asphalt and away from the irradiated dirt and dust that's washed off to the side of the road, so again she should be ok.

    17. Re:Soaking up the gamma by PhraudulentOne · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, did you notice her license plate said KIA? :0

      --
      You create your own reality - Leave mine to me.
    18. Re:Soaking up the gamma by zx75 · · Score: 1

      No, that display is in roentgens... that is less than 1000 mR/hour.

      --
      This is not a sig.
    19. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Artifakt · · Score: 4, Informative

      Most of that increase is from Radon, which is an inert gas that is produced by the breakdown of Thorium or Uranium. It's much heavier than mormal air and so tends to linger in basements, and as a gas, of course it goes right into a person's lungs.

      Then there's Granite. Some granites produce 500 to 800 mr/year or so exposure. 'The' UN building in NY, NY is sheathed with a moderately hot granite cladding, resulting in, if I recall correctly, employee exposures of 200-250 mR/year at full time, and some buildings are much worse.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    20. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Aglassis · · Score: 5, Informative

      You said: " Yeah, potasium iodide, they are saying it keeps radiation out of your system for X amount of dollars, like this: http://www.nukepills.com/"

      Potasium iodide doesn't 'get the radiation out of your system'. Please understand that radiation is the transmittal of energy through EM-wave or various particles (betas, alphas, neutrons). Radiation may pass through your body (perhaps doing harm) but it won't stay. Contamination is some radioactive substance that emits radiation governed by its half-life. If you drive by the a site that has alot of contamination you will get some radiation dose. As long as you don't ingest any of the contamination you will not get a dose when you leave.

      The purpose of potassium iodide is to minimize the dose to your thyroid. One characteristic radionuclide from nuclear reactors and nuclear weapons is radioactive iodine (typically I-129 and I-131). Your thyroid can absorb a certain amount of iodine before it become saturated. If you use iodine pills, your thyroid will absorb a non-radioactive nuclide. This means that when you ingest radioactive iodine following a casuality, little of it will be absorbed into the thyroid, reducing the dose to the thyroid. Please note though, that the thyroid isn't the only organ that can kill you if it gets exposed to a significant amount of radiation. Its just the only one that there is an effective preventive measure for. If you are in the area of radioactive fallout, it will increase your chances of survival slightly, but it won't make you a radiation-resistant superman.

      --
      Suddenly, the hairy finger of a familiar monkey tapped me on the shoulder. It was time.--G. T.
    21. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      One of the units at Chernobyl had gotten a license to operate, even though they hadn't run all of the required tests. One of the tests they hadn't run was to verify that the spin down of the turbine after a turbine trip could power the unit until the standby generators could be activated. The unit was coming up to a planned shutdown, so they decided (or were told) to run the test and get it out of the way.

      However, rather than simply tripping the turbine and reactor, which would only give them one shot to get the test right, they decided to keep the reactor running at low power level and simply trip the turbine. That would let them repeat the test as many times as they needed to in order to make sure they passed it.

      Sure enough, the operators flubbed the test on the first run through, but they also allowed the reactor to sink to an extremely low power level. So low, in fact, that they got into an unstable operating range that they didn't know about. So, when they goosed the reactor to repeat the test, they got a runaway instead.

      The resulting pressure excursion and/or steam explosion blew the head off of the reactor and the roof off the building. The reactor, like all Soviet reactors, had no containment structure. This allowed air to enter, which allowed the graphite blocks that served as a moderator to catch fire, creating a radioactive smoke plume blowing downwind. The rest of the world (ie., us) found out about the accident when Swedish scientists reported a radioactive cloud passing overhead.

      The graphite in the reactor all burned away eventually, in spite of many days worth of truly heroic (and fatal) efforts to put it out. The fuel all coalesced into a magma and the proceeded to sink down through the building structure where it (fortunately) dispersed into the different basements and sub-structures until it had been dispersed and cooled enough that it stopped. It's all still there and will be continue to be deadly dangerous for thousands of years to come.

      So much for safe, clean, and efficient nuclear power.

      All this is from memory, so please forgive any errors, which are entirely mine.

    22. Re:Soaking up the gamma by actiondan · · Score: 0, Troll

      i>The worst nuclear incident of all time? Hiroshima?

      Shhh! We don't talk about the two times that nuclear weapons were deployed in anger. We'd just spedn all our time worrying about the fact that the country that used them has a lot more of them nowerdays.

      Dan.

    23. Re:Soaking up the gamma by fm6 · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, the wildlife that's beginning to swarm in the Dead Zone is as dangerous to a biker as any cell-distracted SUVer. As Elena herself acknowledges. Wonder if she knows about deer warning devices?

    24. Re:Soaking up the gamma by actiondan · · Score: 2, Funny

      my day job relates to getting people not to be affraid of radiation

      Intriguing...

      Is it something to do with learning to love the bomb? ;)

      Dan.

    25. Re:Soaking up the gamma by haggar · · Score: 1

      Can you tell us what exactly is your job?

      --
      Sigged!
    26. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
      your chances of dieing are only 1 in 2
      Dieing? What colour???
    27. Re:Soaking up the gamma by shadowbearer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ditto here.

      Man, riding thru the Chernobyl fallout areas...

      But, hey, I have to say this; riding on icy roads on a bike... now that's friccin courage, skill, and an insane kind of chutzpah I can *really* admire :) Holy fucking shit! Lady, I salute you... you have more balls than 90% of the male population... and you're a helluva lot better looking *grin*

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    28. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup. I've a mind to eat some yellow snow now!

    29. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Sanksa+Wott · · Score: 1

      She mentions at one point that on the "day of disaster people gothered on the roof of this builing and have been looking at a beautiful shining above Atomic Plant. This was the shinning of radiation."

      I have never heard of radiation producing visible evidence (immediately, that is), but then again, there was a lot of it. What is this "shinning" all about?

    30. Re:Soaking up the gamma by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      Go with God, girl.

      You know, I'm not religious whatsoever; and I take a heckuva lot of risks (vertical face rock climbing without gear being one) but that exactly sums up my feelings.

      That is one damned courageous woman. She's smart enough to know the risks she's taking, too.

      May Murphy smile on you, kiddo...

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    31. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I understand the joke you were trying to make, but it doesn't exactly make sense - dyeing is what you do with fabrics. Dieing actually has to do with metalwork: "To cut, form, or stamp with or as if with a die". Clearly the poster was referring to the chances of joining a metal shop.

      Or possibly it's a gambling reference - which might be more apt for riding around Chernobyl...

    32. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Davak · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up.

      Davak

    33. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Kaboom13 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nuke-powered monorail salesman?

    34. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1 in 2? I like those odds!

    35. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How long will it take to clean the atmosphere of the pollutants from the fossil fuels we've been burning?

    36. Re:Soaking up the gamma by mini+me · · Score: 2, Funny

      Is there a chance the reactor can bend?

    37. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MOOOD The parent uuup!

    38. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As soon as I finish to fuck your mom in the armpit ?

    39. Re:Soaking up the gamma by wiggles · · Score: 1

      Yeah, yeah... Just don't piss her off. She might turn into Lou Ferigno in green paint and start breaking shit.

    40. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will that be more or less time than it took to bury all the coal workers, and people that died from emphysema and other aggravated respiratory ailments?

      Chernobyl is pretty much the worst-case scenario, and even at that nuclear power has still killed fewer people than alternatives in use.

      Solar will kill people, too, if it ever actually got implemented on an industrial scale. High energy densities are dangerous. Selenium is toxic.

    41. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Actually, the movie that this photo exhibit would probably remind her of would undoubtably be Andrei Tarkovsky's "Stalker".

    42. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Informative
      > She mentions at one point that on the "day of disaster people gothered on the roof of this builing and have been looking at a beautiful shining above Atomic Plant. This was the shinning of radiation."
      >
      >I have never heard of radiation producing visible evidence (immediately, that is), but then again, there was a lot of it. What is this "shinning" all about?

      Chernobyl was a graphite fire - the fire is probably what is being described.

      There is a visible phenomenon - Cerenkov radiation - a beautiful blue glow produced when fast moving particles strike water (speed of light in a transparent medium is a function of refractive index -- if particles have to "slow down", that energy has to go somewhere - it gets shot out in a cone of radiation).

      If you're seeing Cerenkov radiation at the bottom of a reactor pool, it's beautiful. If you're seeing it because the neutron flux through your eyeballs is enough that your vitreous humor is glowing blue, it's probably less than beautiful, given that if you know what you're seeing, you realize that your lifespan is probably best measured in hours/weeks, rather than years.

      Given that the only probable reports of seeing Cerenkov radiation from within the eyeball have been criticality incidents at very close range (1946, Tickling the dragon's tail"> and 1999 Japan, Tokaimura), I'm skeptical that the people on top of the building were seeing Cerenkov radiation from within their eyeballs.

      Chernobyl wasn't just a graphite fire, however, it was also a steam explosion. It's plausible (I don't have the numbers) that the neutron flux being spewed from the building was high enough to make condensing steam in the nearby air glow blue.

      From the account provided, there's insufficient data to sway me one way or the other -- were witnesses seeing light from the burning graphite and related fire, or were they seeing Cerenkov light released when you dump a massive neutron flux into a tower of condensing steam. The simpler hypothesis is that it was merely light from the intense fire.

      If I had to choose, I'd go with fire, but a single picture from the rooftop, or an eyewitness reporting blue in the fire would be enough to convince me that the shining was the blue light of Cerenkov radiation brought on by the dumping of insane numbers of neutrons into condensing droplets of water as the steam condensed.

      Aside to Elena: Thank you again for documenting this.

    43. Re:Soaking up the gamma by MCZapf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't know what the shining at Chernobyl was, but maybe it was something like the Cerenkov Radiation "blue glow".

    44. Re:Soaking up the gamma by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Should take about a week for /. readers across Eastern Europe to scour the place for souvenirs.

      The only thing left for the archaeologists will be the Soviet-era cement.

    45. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Chernobyl is the Hiroshima that keeps on giving. Hiroshima's been rebuilt. People live there; it's safe. Chernobyl is still hot...

    46. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Mr.+Troll · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not on your life my Hindu friend

      --
      Kiss my shiny metal ass
    47. Re:Soaking up the gamma by BrainInAJar · · Score: 1

      you need a researcher's ID (what she calls the 'passport') to get in, so that's not likely to happen

    48. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hmm, and who can we thank for that?, wasnt that the great US of A?

      gotta love that so called free country

    49. Re:Soaking up the gamma by BrainInAJar · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Anyhow, does anyone know of a site giving the history of chenobyl? I am wondering what happend that day, and what it was like. Was it a fire that spread into an explosion? Was it a chemical reaction that dumped somthing into the water? I think it's a shame since it keeps us from using nuclear energy, which can be clean and efficiant" A total rundown of the events of the Chernobyl4 nuclear meltdown.

    50. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably the smoke refracting the 6000K+ (yes, Kelvin--it can be used as a relative measure of luminosity--the sun is about 5800K) white-hot glow from the reaction that was taking place below.

      The smoke pillar would look like a spectacular firework mishap, probably flickering in the same manner.

    51. Re:Soaking up the gamma by einTier · · Score: 4, Informative
      I once got to watch a small nuclear reactor fire up, and got to watch the Cerenkov radiation at the bottom of the reactor pool.

      That picture does not do it justice. While I was somewhat disappointed that the whole nuclear reaction was fairly anticlimatic -- no rumbling, no vibration, no nothing discernable except the blue light -- that blue light at the bottom of the pool was probably the most beautiful thing I have ever seen. There's just no way to describe the color. It's so vivid and so intense.

      --
      -------------------------------------------------- $665.95 -- retail price of the beast.
    52. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're pretty close to what I remember - the situation was made much worse by the accumulation of fission poisons from the prolonged period of operation - that's what caused the sag in the power output. The control rods were tipped with fissionable uranium (for higher efficiency under normal operating conditions) and in addition to all the other fuck-ups, they withdrew the rods too far when they "goosed" it. Hence, when they ran the rods in to shut it down, the over-all reactivity momemtarily increased before the boron segments entered the core, helping to produce the power spike that blew it up.

    53. Re:Soaking up the gamma by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Of course, you can skip the nukepills and simply use Iodized Salt for table salt. In America, that is what nearly 100% use. Of course, it came into active use to protect us from those pesky soviets, but nobody thinks about that. Now, it may be of use from a dirty bomb.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    54. Re:Soaking up the gamma by blair1q · · Score: 1

      >>Should take about a week for /. readers across
      >>Eastern Europe to scour the place for souvenirs.
      >>
      >>The only thing left for the archaeologists will
      >>be the Soviet-era cement.
      >
      >you need a researcher's ID (what she calls
      >the 'passport') to get in, so that's not likely
      >to happen

      Badges? We don' need no steenkin' Badges!

      And even if we do, how hard could they be to counterfeit?

      Without ID, I give it two weeks. With fake ID, they could probably load the reactor cap on a truck and hump it out.

    55. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very few houses in Europe or Russia are made with wood frames like they are in the US and Canada. Most are traditional brick, concrete brick, solid concrete, or somesuch.

    56. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      suck my dick Davak

    57. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean Interplay lied??!!!

    58. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder how much it is increased by living next to Rocky Flats?

    59. Re:Soaking up the gamma by dj245 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So, should the place be preserved as-is for historical significance, or should the dead zone be shrunk as the radiation decreases in the outlying radiuses? Belarus in particular was devastated by the contamination the accident caused; many thousands of square miles of farmland made completely useless. Now Belarus is a leading producer of farm tractors. Maybe the dead zone should decrease in size every year as a function of the decay rate of the primary radioactive materials contaminating the area?

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    60. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      If it's not suitable for human habitation, it's not really suitable for conservation efforts. Most of the buildings are crumbling away, and by the time it will be safe enough to resettle, much of the historical significance will have been eroded away.

    61. Re:Soaking up the gamma by wagnerer · · Score: 1

      For DU the greatest health risk by far is from kidney damage due to Uranium being a heavy metal, the radiological risk is negligable in comparison. Handling chunks of it is not a problem as long as you don't throw it across the ground to watch the sparks, UO2 fumes, it gives off when it skips.

    62. Re:Soaking up the gamma by wagnerer · · Score: 1

      Just an FYI part of the problem they had in the region around Chornobyl is the standard diet was notable deficient in Iodine. As a result everyone was Iodine starved and when the plant released it as a radioactive airborne gas the thyroids of the people in the plume just soaked it up like a sponge. Given that the western world adds iodine to its salt, and the amount of salt consumed, I would not be suprised if most westerner's thyroids are already saturated. Not counting those health nuts of course who would refuse to set foot in a McDonalds and use sea salt on their food.

    63. Re:Soaking up the gamma by wagnerer · · Score: 1

      Now what we really need are the pictures of the corium slag. Parts of the Uranium are oxidizing even further now into a less dense state similar to yellow cake. The lack of disturbance has allowed eloborate crystalline flowers to form, budding out of the corium.

    64. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Teahouse · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Uh, the USSR idiot

      The US bombed the Japanese, and then helped clean and study the sites afterward. The USSR evacuated the whole area and just left it. Granted, the pollution from Chernobyl is far larget than what is left over from a nuke airburst.

      --
      "Curiosity killed the cat, but for a while I was a suspect."- Steven Wright
    65. Re:Soaking up the gamma by caller9 · · Score: 1

      RTFA, Sure under normal conditions, your brick house will emmit more radiation than wood. When that same wood is next to a lot of radiation, "it is like sponge." Think about the sensitivity of our cockroach replacements! Years from now the wooden houses will be far worse for the insects and lichen! Get a grip people.

    66. Re:Soaking up the gamma by RKBA · · Score: 1
      "I can't even imagine the dose she's soaking up."

      Her Geiger counter was reading out micro-roentgens per hour (we all get about 10 to 12 micro-roentgens/hour of exposure 24/7 as normal background radiation). When I had the two radioactive-synovectomies on my right knee (it was done twice on the same knee), my knee initially radiated about 30 milli-roentgens per hour (30,000 micro-roentgens/hour, or about 60 times the average 500 micro-roentgens/hour Elena was exposed to during her trip. Note that this is what I was able to measure externally - the radiation levels inside my synovial cavity were probably much higher). The material injected into my knee was the P-32 isotope of phosphorus (as chromium phosphate in liquid solution). The radioactive solution was confined to the synovial cavity of my knee pretty well, but a tiny bit did leak out into my general blood circulation, and I was exposed to around 1,000 micro-roentgens for several days until the P-32 dissipated away (it's half-life is about two weeks), and thus far I have shown no ill effects from the treatment - in fact I would highly recommend this rather than surgical synovectomy because it non-intrusive (except for the injection into the knee) and very much less traumatic and less expensive than surgery, as well as being more effective because although a surgeon might miss a piece of diseased tissue, the radiation won't.

    67. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One form of radiation that can leave the target radioactive is neutron radiation. Free neutrons travelling this way can join the nuclei of non-radioactive isotopes, yielding a radioactive isotope which will later decay, releasing back some of the energy as ionising radiation.

      Neutron radiation is a bit tricky though, so I'm not sure how much that actually happens. I think it mostly heats things up or indirectly ionises them (by bouncing into charged particles).

    68. Re:Soaking up the gamma by multipartmixed · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hmm, my mother told me salt was iodized to prevent goiters.

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    69. Re:Soaking up the gamma by gotak · · Score: 1

      Well tis more difficult to clean up the reactor then a single bomb. The bomb left radiation all over but it's in the open. Sending even robots into the reactor would surely kill the electronics within minutes so you couldn't very well do meaningful work there.

    70. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Endive4Ever · · Score: 1

      A 'poorly ventilated house' is also known as a 'modern, energy-efficient house,' since a big part of the energy-efficiency is the house is more tightly sealed. Hence it holds in the radon gas much more 'efficiently.'

      Thank goodness I live in a house built in 1900...

      --
      ---
    71. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The rest of the world (ie., us) found out about the accident when Swedish scientists reported a radioactive cloud passing overhead.

      Yeah... and according to Elena's web pages, it was only when this was reported in Western media that most of the people in the area found out how serious the accident had been! (Except for those people who were observant enough to figure out that an unusual number were getting sick and dying...)

    72. Re:Soaking up the gamma by qoa · · Score: 1

      There's a lot of information here.

      --
      Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit upon his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats.
    73. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell is that supposed to mean? Because we used the atom bomb we aren't free?

    74. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      There is a visible phenomenon - Cerenkov radiation - a beautiful blue glow produced when fast moving particles strike water (speed of light in a transparent medium is a function of refractive index -- if particles have to "slow down", that energy has to go somewhere - it gets shot out in a cone of radiation).

      It's not really a question of striking water or of particles suddenly slowing down.

      Cerenkov radiation is emitted when a charged particle travels faster than the speed of light in a medium. (such as water).

      As you say, this is a question of refractive index. The angle of the cone of light depends on the ratio of the speed of the charged particle and the speed of light in the medium. I *guess* that it looks mainly blue in water because blue (or maybe near-UV) is the highest frequency of light that will propagate in water, but I could easily be wrong about that.

      Anyway, you won't see Cerenkov radiation in air because the index of refraction for air is so close to 1. An ultrarelativistic charged particle will lose energy very quickly by showering, so you just aren't going to have anything fast enough.

      Also, neutrons do not directly cause Cerenkov radiation. I imagine that the glow that is seen from fuel rods in containment pools is due to beta emitters in the fuel rods. This is because alpha particles move too slowly (rest mass of 4 Gev, KE of a few MeV), and neutrons and gammas are obviously not charged particles. It is conceivable that a gamma could produce some "knock-on" electrons (delta rays) of sufficient energy, but for typical isotopes this is surely a comparatively tiny contribution compared to that due to beta emission.

    75. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Gabrill · · Score: 1

      [quote] At least she's documenting her journeys.[/quote]I get an eirie reminder of the guy that photo'd Mt St Helens.

      --
      Always going forward, 'cause we can't find reverse.
    76. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --Yep, I'm a biker myself; and nothing turns me on faster than a biker-chick - especially if she's got red hair.

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    77. Re:Soaking up the gamma by mr100percent · · Score: 1

      Incident? I'd say it was an accident. Although the line has blurred. What is the difference, an accident is an incident with fatalities?

    78. Re:Soaking up the gamma by sarahbau · · Score: 1

      I saw a special on Chernobyl on The History Channel a while ago. I can't remember everything that happened, but I do remember some details that I haven't seen mentioned on any web pages. They were supposed to run a scheduled test of reactor #4. The test required bringing the power output to something like 20%. The two top guys at the plant were there for the test, but right before they were about to start it, someone higher up (can't remember who) demanded that they output more power (I can't remember why...maybe another plant had gone down, and they needed to compensate). By the time they were able to bring the output back down, it was on the night shift, and none of the top guys were there to supervise. They decided to run the test while they had the chance. They started bringing the power output down, but it went down farther than it was supposed to. They didn't want it to drop too low, or the reactor would shut down completely, and would take a long time to get back online. They started pulling the control rods back out, but the power wasn't increasing (or the monitors weren't showing an increase at least). They pulled the rods all the way out, but still nothing. Then, the power output started rapidly increasing, and the reactor was overheating. When they tried to put the control rods back in, they wouldn't move. I think I remember them saying that they even tried to push them in by hand. In any case, they couldn't get the reactor cooled down, and eventually the top of the reactor was blown off. The fire department was called, and simply told that there was a "fire" at one of the reactors. Some of the firefighters lived in hospital beds for a couple days before they died. I don't know if any of them survived. Anyone feel free to correct me. I'm sure I missed some of that.

    79. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I'm not sure a motorcycle ride is worth even a 1 in 10K chance of getting cancer.

      I think you will find you have a far greater chance of being killed in a motor accident, even on a clear road. Motor cycles.. my father stated to me that I was a "Temporary Citizen" on one.

    80. Re:Soaking up the gamma by True+Grit · · Score: 5, Interesting
      1. So much for safe, clean, and efficient nuclear power


      Nuclear power has 3 problems: 1) it generates waste that is toxic for a long period of time, 2) it was over-sold and over-hyped when it was first introduced in the US, which led us to jump into this technology before we were competent with it, and 3) in the minds of average people its hopelessly linked to nuclear weapons, and the fear of mass destruction, even though the technology and goals are completely different between the 2 disciplines.

      If you want to bash it on those reasons, especially the waste problem, fine, I can understand that, but I'm tired of hearing people use Chernobyl as the example of why nuclear power is "too dangerous".

      There was *never* any such thing as a safe, clean, and efficient *anything* in the old Soviet Union. They routinely built nuclear reactors (and a hell of a lot of other buildings for that matter) that would never have been built in the West because of their atrocious design and lack of safety. Chernobyl isn't proof that nuclear power is too dangerous to use, its just proof that a communistic system of government is a greater threat to its own people than any outside "enemy".

      NP can be safely used now, now that we've had 30+ years of experience. Look at France and Japan. Heck, did you read about the experimental mini-reactor being used by a village in Alaska? Totally self-contained and safe, its interior is sealed at the factory and isn't opened again until its decommissioned 15-20 years later when its fuel is exhausted. It can't melt-down or have a run-away reaction because there literally isn't enough fuel in the system to reach critical mass. The thing is about the size of a trailer, transportable, and thus removeable after its core is depleted. The company that makes it just comes back once its core is gone, takes it back to the factory for dismantling and salvaging/reprocessing. The irony may be that NP really is an answer to some of our problems, our mistake was spending 30 years thinking "big", when we should have been thinking *small*.

      I can understand the criticism of the 1st and 2nd generation nuclear power plants (NPP), but while the US has virtually stopped development of NPPs, the rest of the world is working on the 4th and 5th generations of NPP design, just when they are starting to get *really* good.

      As for NP technology *today*, as opposed to 30 years ago? When the founder of Greenpeace changes his mind and becomes pro-NP after his initial fanatical opposition to it, that should make a lot of people stop and reevaluate it, I think, at least those people still rational and open-minded enough to consider changing their minds on this subject.
    81. Re:Soaking up the gamma by omarin · · Score: 5, Informative
      One thing that people are forgetting is that, like it or not, radioactivity is EVERYWHERE. Even before our nuclear age, nature has been putting out radioactivity. Unfortunately many of us don't know this fact and act like hypochondriacs when the topic is mentioned. Here is a list of natural radioactivity (from various web sources):


      1. Our bodies: about half of the radioactivity in our bodies comes from Potassium-40 (naturally-occurring radioactive form of potassium.) Potassium is important for the brain and muscles. Most of the rest of our bodies' radioactivity is from Carbon-14 and tritium, a radioactive form of hydrogen. These naturally-occurring radioactive substances expose our bodies to about 25 "millirem" per year, abbreviated as "mrem/yr".)


      2. Radioactivity in food and water: for example, the radio- (and non-radio) active forms of iodine and sodium. The food we eat contains radium-226, thorium-232, potassium-40, carbon-14, and hydrogen-3, also known as tritium.

      To quote a web page: The U. S. Department of Energy gives the following concentrations as examples:

      • Salad Oil 4,900 pCi/l
      • Milk 1,400 pCi/l
      • Whiskey 1,200 pCi/l
      • Beer 390 pCi/l
      • Tap Water 20 pCi/l
      • Brazil Nuts 14.00 pCi/g
      • Bananas 3.00 pCi/g
      • Tea 0.40 pCi/g
      • Flour 0.14 pCi/g
      • Peanuts and Peanut butter 0.12 pCi/g.

      3. Flying: Flying in an airplane increases our exposure to cosmic radiation. A coast-to-coast round trip gives us a dose of about four millirem.

      4. Living at higher altitudes: Generally, for each 100-foot increase in altitude, there is an increased dose of one millirem per year. (So, San Francisco vs. Boulder, for example)...

      5. The rocks, soils and beaches around us are radioactive: In Ohio, radiation in soil and rocks contributes about 60 millirem in one year to our exposure. In Colorado, it is about 105 millirem per year. In Kerala, India, this radioactivity from soil and rocks can be 3,000 millirem per year, and at a beach in Guarapari, Brazil, it is over 5 millirem in a single hour -- but only a few residents who use that beach receive doses in excess of 500 millirem per year.

      6. Radioactivity in our homes:
      A: If you live in a wood house, the natural radioactivity in the building materials gives you a dose of 30 to 50 millirem per year.
      B: In a brick house, it is 50 to 100 millirem per year.
      C: In a tightly sealed house with little ventilation, natural radioactive gases (radon) can be trapped for a longer period of time and increase your dose.

      7. People/coworkers: Each person with whom we spend eight hours a day gives us a dose of about 0.1 millirem in a year.

      8. Cooking: Using a gas stove can increase the dose by about two millirem per year because of radioactive materials in the natural gas.

      9. Smoking: A person who smokes two packs of cigarettes a day receives a radiation dose of about 1,300 millrem per year. This is because polonium (a radioactive element) is part of the smoke and when inhaled, it gets trapped in the lungs.

      10. Misc: There's also the sun, and medical X-rays...

      Basically, on the whole we need not fear natural radioactivity, as our bodies evolved to cope with it (cellular repair). What we need to fear/respect is man-made radioactivity and its waste products, because when human error/greed/fallibility get involved, that is when man-made radioactivity bites us in the ass...
    82. Re:Soaking up the gamma by superyooser · · Score: 3, Informative
      That picture does not do it justice.

      More pictures here

      Then again, I'm sure these pictures still don't do it justice.

    83. Re:Soaking up the gamma by deglr6328 · · Score: 1

      Interesting you should mention this. I had a few of the same thoughts after reading the last /. article and I initially thought it was Cerenkov in air they saw too.

      What did those people see exactly, what color was it, did it move with the wind, how bright was it, and were they frightened? After having a back and forth with someone in the last posting we came to the conclusion (I think...) that what they were probably seeing was in fact not Cerenkov radiation but actually the direct ionization (then fluorescence as electrons fell from their excited states back to ground states) of the air by mostly beta and gamma radiation.(I believe you mistakenly attribute the effect of Cerenkov radiation to Neutrons though, as Neutrons are chargeless and Cerenkov is an effect of CHARGED particles moving faster than the speed of light through a substance as an above response to your post notes)

      This ionization of the air would also produce a blue glow and while it may be plauseable, as you note, to consider a small amount of Cerenkov radiation being produced in the steam cloud (tiny water droplets) of the explosion, I think the direct ionization of air is much more likely an explanation, though no less horrifying.

      You can immediately disregard the possibility of the people who saw this accident actually having seen Cerenkov in the vitreous humor of the eye though, as they were far too distant from the radiation of the Chernobyl blast to have this effect (though this IS a real effect, well documented by astronauts traveling through the high radiation Van Allen belts on thier way to the moon). Also they clearly saw the "radiation glow" DIRECTIONALLY, meaning it absolutely was not Cerenkov in the eye which would have appeared to come from everywhere at once since it was happening inside your eye. I think that witnesses of criticality accidents (Slotin, the Tokaimura accident, etc.) also for the most part were seeing the effects of ionization in air for the same reasons.

      A particularly enlightening usenet thread from a few years ago deals with this very topic.

      --
      - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
    84. Re:Soaking up the gamma by lars_stefan_axelsson · · Score: 4, Insightful
      The rest of the world (ie., us) found out about the accident when Swedish scientists reported a radioactive cloud passing overhead.

      And it should be noted that it was actually the staff of the westernmost, northernmost nuclear power plant (Forsmark) that noticed the increased radiation levels. As in: "We have a leak!". The whole emergency plan for evacuation/containment was put into motion before the operators could figure out that something was 'funny'; "If we have a leak, then why is the radiation levels higher outside the plant than inside?"

      It was more or less only bad luck that we got any fallout at all. There was a weather system that moved west during the day and settled over the norther parts where it started to precipicate. The prevaling winds are westerly so chances are we otherwise wouldn't have learned about this incident at all save for several days later when the satellite photos could have provided confirmation.

      Sweden now has a nation wide radiation detection system integrated with the weather station network. We never thought we'd have to have one before...

      --
      Stefan Axelsson
    85. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, she isn't going to go out with you.

    86. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is ... many times less than a number of natural locations [angelfire.com].
      Well, duh. A uranium mine is an example of a "natural location". Natural != healthy.

    87. Re:Soaking up the gamma by frdmfghtr · · Score: 2, Informative

      Something to bear in mind:

      Assuming that she's not mistranslating the prefix, she is expressing radiation doses in microroentgen per hour. Now, from the food you eat, you aer exposed to about 40millirem (rem=roentgen equivalent man). http://www.oversight.state.id.us/radiation/radiati on.htm

      Now, at the rate of 500 microroentgens/hour (or .5mR er hour) it would take 80 hours of exposure to get the same dose that your food gives you in a year. Highly accelerated? Yes. Does she spend 80 hours in that strong a radiation field? No. I didn't see anything regarding the time she spent riding (although I probably missed it) but her overall exposure is significant mathematically but probably not physiologically.

      Some other interesting facts about radiation:

      Your average overall dose is 360millirem per year (http://www.oversight.state.id.us/radiation/yourra ddose.htm)

      Radiation workers (of which I used to be one) are allowed a full 5 REM per year. That is 10,000 hours of .5mREM/hour exposure, or nearly 417 full days meaning that I cannot exceed a Federal limit by being exposed for a full year.

      Obviously, for hotter areas radiation-wise, the story is different.

      It's been years since I did this kind of thinking, so if I made a mistake, somebody chime in.

      --
      Government's idea of a balanced budget: take money from the right pocket to balance...oh who am I kidding?
    88. Re:Soaking up the gamma by SmackCrackandPot · · Score: 1

      Aberdeen, Scotland is a city, just about built exclusively from granite. Supposed to be that the extra radiation creates a slightly higher than average incidence of leukemia in children. Although it always felt safer in a building with twelve inch thick granite walls than in stucco/wooden frame buildings.

    89. Re:Soaking up the gamma by sxpert · · Score: 3, Interesting

      no, that one is categorized as "intentionnal crime by application of weapons of mass destruction"

    90. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Czernobog · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yep I have to agree, that picture doesn't do it justice.
      I saw this at the experimental reactor they got right in the middle of Athens, and that blue light is quite possibly the most beautiful light I've ever seen.

      --
      /. Where the truth
    91. Re:Soaking up the gamma by subtropolis · · Score: 1

      I recently was sent this link by a friend. One of the witnesses says,

      And I looked outside. It was so blue! It was so blue! I couldn't see ten feet ahead of myself! I got scared.
      I really didn't know what to make of that. The testimonials seem honest to me, but the comments about the air being blue just seemed weird. What do you make of that?
      --
      "Our interests are to see if we can't scale it up to something more exciting," he said.
    92. Re:Soaking up the gamma by colk99 · · Score: 1

      Yes she is making herself more sterile every day which proves that some people are selected by nature not to have children at all

    93. Re:Soaking up the gamma by swb · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You misspelled "victorious limited strategic nuclear bombing campaign."

      The real war crimes were the firebombing of Hamburg and Dresden.

    94. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I did the same to New York, would you like it?

    95. Re:Soaking up the gamma by SloWave · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not to mention Nanking and Manila...

    96. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it was a war crime. The bombing didn't follow the principle of proportionality, it didn't primarily attack a military target.

    97. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You probably do not know much about history, so I may enlighten you. Believe if or not, but Japan attacked up in a place called Pearl Harbor. Read about it (don't see the movie). They were fighting a war of expansion. At that point, we were facing a choice; end the war by nuke or invade the mainland. Frankly more people would have died if we invaded the mainland. Your comparison to New York is utterly irrelevant.

      I find it so interesting that people talk about Hiroshima, yet in WWII, more people have died in the firebombings of Dresden, Hamburg and Tokyo for that matter. People just do not know history nowadays.

    98. Re:Soaking up the gamma by True+Grit · · Score: 1

      Minor correction (responding to myself):

      The mini reactor thing was about 6-8 months ago, the village hadn't started actually using the mini-reactor, they were just talking about it. A quick google shows this article, but I didn't see anything more recent about it (I didn't look very hard though, someone else may want to hunt around a little harder on this).

    99. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You probably do not know much about history, so I may enlighten you.

      Ahh yes, history. You do realise that Japan was on the verge of giving up and had already asked for a conditional surrender when the bomb was droped? The U.S knew who the next enemy was going to be, so decided to drop those bombs on Japan anyway, as a demonstration of its power to the USSR. They could have chosen to drop a bomb off of the coast of Japan; as a warning shot and a demonstration to the Russians, but chose to go ahead and drop them on land, over inhabited targets.

      Go figure.

    100. Re:Soaking up the gamma by tilmanb · · Score: 0

      Nuclear power has 3 problems: 1) it generates waste that is toxic for a long period of time, 2) it was over-sold and over-hyped when it was first introduced in the US, which led us to jump into this technology before we were competent with it, and 3) in the minds of average people its hopelessly linked to nuclear weapons, and the fear of mass destruction, even though the technology and goals are completely different between the 2 disciplines.

      IANANS, but you are wrong with Numer 3: The spent fuel from german (and french, british) reactors is reprocessed at the factorys in La Hague and Sellafield where plutonium is a by-product of reprocessal. Thil plutonium can then be enhanced to weapon-grade plutonium for use in a nuclear bomb with little to no effort. So much for "no connection".

      As far as the waste is concerned, how can you advocate the use of next generation nuclear plants if you do not have a final, "eternal" (read: eternity compliant) disposal site?

      And for "the rest of the world": germany has govenrment-imposed plans to get out of nuclear power within the next 25 to 30 years (which is - in my opinion - too long a period to produce waste nobody can dispose of).

      A german study found that EVERY german power plant would suffer a meltdown if attacked by a commercial airliner with half a tank of kerosine. Are there similar studies in the US?

      --
      cd pub; more beer
    101. Re:Soaking up the gamma by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Hmm, my mother told me salt was iodized to prevent goiters.
      You are right. Mea Culpa I was taught about iodized salt in the 60's, but it was taught as being about radiation. air force brat and all

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    102. Re:Soaking up the gamma by dustmite · · Score: 1

      its just proof that a communistic system of government is a greater threat to its own people than any outside "enemy"

      Believing that the human failures that resulted in Chernobyl are only present under communist governments, or that a capitalist system is somehow magically immune to such human failures of reasoning, is dangerous and quite frankly terrifying.

      The US is not in any way immune to nuclear-related accidents (http://www.lutins.org/nukes.html), it is just plain lucky that it has not had one on the same scale as Chernobyl, many things might have happened differently that could have resulted in a terrible nuclear accident in the US.

      This has nothing to do with communism, this is an essentially human problem that we all need to learn from and understand when designing any system. The first failure in any industrial accident is believing that something bad isn't going to happen to *you*; there are many reasons believe that, believing that these are "communist problems" is only one such reason.

      (Note, I agree with the rest of your post, NP technologies today are not only much safer than ever in the past, but they are still in the process of becoming even safer, and compared to e.g. burning coal are far more environmentally friendly. Compared to all other currently viable energy solutions, NP is the only viable one in the human future.)

    103. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder how much of the "radiation is bad" fear came out of early programs with the intention to keep other governments from playing in the field. There are some very hot places in the world such as a few in S. Africa that are hoter than Chernobyl ever was. A large number of the guys who watched hundreds of nuke tests died of old age and some are still going along in their 90's without the high cancer risk.

    104. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Japanese 5th Army HQ isn't a military target? Nor is a shipping port? Please read the Making of the Atomic Bomb by Richard Rhodes. It may be enlightening.

    105. Re:Soaking up the gamma by skajake · · Score: 1

      Or the response to the "international crime of taking over the world"

      --

      ~ Maintainer of the Skajake Projects

    106. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thats cos we in europe only keep our animals and garden tools in wooden buildings (also known as a shed), not people

    107. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Harinezumi · · Score: 1
      To quote the site, P.S. Police start shooting marauders as only first radiactive tv sets appeared on a second hand market, in Kiev.

      In Russian, the word "marodior" (marauder) is the term used to describe any kind of looter. Trust me, you do not want to get yourself shot while looking for radioactive souvenirs.

    108. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was a couple of reasons why it was chosen to attack first. The firebombings of various cities (ex. Tokyo where 100,000 died) didn't scare the Japanese. If we were to test the incindiaries over their ports rather than their cities it wouldn't have made them surrender. Similarly with the atomic bombs, it's unlikely that if we tested them over ports rather than cities that the Japanese would have bowed down. They would know of these 'most destructive and cruel weapons' but they would also have time to mentally prepare themselves (similar to what kamakaze's do). Additionally since the US only had 2 atomic bombs in the area, with a third able to be shipped out in about a month, and additional bombs taking up to 6 months to bring out (due to damage in the plutonium production reactors--due to graphite swelling in a neutron flux), prolonging the war any longer would have been a crime. It was expected that Japan would surrender on the first bomb. Didn't work, so we used the second. Didn't initally appear to work (due to the Japanese military imprisoning the emperor for wanting to surrender) and we gave the order to ship out the third bomb and drastically increase bomb production. It appeared that we were going to have to destroy every city, but luckily the military freed the emperor and he surrendered.

    109. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This seems to be a huge misconception on /. All the radioactive contamination in the Chernobyl area except the reactor sarcophagous is cleaned up. All the numbers you saw her show you were background levels. The area isn't abandoned because its radioactive, its abandoned because if the sarcophagous fails, it will soon be. Its like evacuating an island before a volcano blows. If the sarcophogaus is ever cleaned up, people will be able to move back into the area.

    110. Re:Soaking up the gamma by User0x45 · · Score: 0

      Elena is a hoax.

      How could a cool chick on a big bike, flying through a place called the dead zone not elicit the least bit of suspicion here in /.

      So she speaks of prefering to be alone on these trip (how daring, and aloof) yet there are several picture of *her*. Who took these? How does this little indy biker chick get a /.-proof webserver in Belorusse. Which of the beautiful pictures on the site look the least bit like *any* of the amaturish pictures I take.

      English-speaking, loner, big bike riding, website making, great picture taking. Come on, get real. She fit into the Kawasawki jacket so she was hired to stand in a couple of the pictures.

      The pictures on this site are great, very interesting. The 'Elena' is fiction.
      "We won't be fooled again. No, no, won't be fooled again."

    111. Re:Soaking up the gamma by goodhell · · Score: 4, Informative

      Ummmm, Chernobyl was tiny compared to other nuclear accidents that happened in the Soviet Union. The only reason it is so well, known is its location. It is very close to other European borders. When it went off, other national communities saw a huge spike in radiation levels coming from that region. The Soviet Union denied anything happened, but after repeated requests to know what happened they finally caved in and said what happened.

      I've lived in areas in the former Soviet Union that had worse nuclear accidents. With Chernobyl, they had a crack that formed over the waste plant, and from that it started to spew waste from it. They flew a chopper over it and dropped some cement over it to stop the process.

      Chelyabinsk Sorok (40 kilometers from the city) had much worse problems. In the '50's and the '60's it had a couple accidents. It blew the top off the waste plant completely. There was no stopping the waste from coming out. They had to bring people from outside the region to clean it up, because the residents in the area knew what it was and would not clean it up. (Normally the Soviet Union would have only those who were in the area clean it up, so rumors wouldn't spread.) This happened again in the '60's. And another time they decided that because there are so many lakes in the area, why not take and dump some of the nuclear waste and dump it in one of those?

      Another city that a huge nuclear accident happened at was Novosibirsk. Although I am less familiar with the details. I just know that some days were "warmer" than others depending on how the wind blew.

      (Please note that I actually lived there and conversed with many people in Chelyabinsk -- who openly scoffed at Chernobyl. I've even conversed with a person who cleaned it up. He was so cancer-ridden that he could barely move.)

    112. Re:Soaking up the gamma by deglr6328 · · Score: 1

      there's no way that testimony is real. either that person was senile or the whole thing was made up with the intent of duping a gullible readership. That site is full of idiotic misinformation and scare tactics. TMI only released about 20 curies of Iodine 131 to the environment, a completely negligible amount, and a few million curies of noble gas emissions (which produce only very small exposures) resulting in a total exposure of ~2millirem of additional exposure per person in the surrounding 2 million person population. compare this with the many millions of curies of I-131 released from the Chernobyl explosion.

      --
      - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
    113. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Dr.+Zowie · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hamburg and Dresden were contributing to the war effort for Germany. Firebombing them sucked, but the "war crime" story started as German propaganda.

    114. Re:Soaking up the gamma by willtsmith · · Score: 1

      She talked about bringing along a few friends occasionally.

      Either that, or she just brought a tripod.

      --
      -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    115. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Afty0r · · Score: 1

      A german study found that EVERY german power plant would suffer a meltdown if attacked by a commercial airliner with half a tank of kerosine. Are there similar studies in the US?

      Do you have a link? Because a UK study into this found that an airliner with half a tank of kerosine and significant amounts of explosives onboard would not make even a dent in our reactors - while flying fairly fast a commercial airliner has only limited mass and cannot penetrate into anything "meaty" in the process.

      I would be surprised if the German ones were different, as much of the same expertise and guidelines were used in their construction - most of them are designed with a limited amount of hardening in mind to prevent military attack.

    116. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      None of that changes the fact that the Japanese had already attempted a conditional surrender before the first bomb was dropped. It is believed by many military historians that if a bomb was dropped off of the coast as a demonstration the U.S could have achieved the unconditional surrender it wanted.

      Of course that's conjecture. None of it can change the fact that two fission bombs were droped on Japan. Was it a tragedy? I don't know. It was certainly war.

    117. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hiroshima and Nagasaki certainly were military targets. So were the other ten possible targets.

      The U.S even went to the trouble of leafleting each possible target to warn the civilian population of the impending attack. They didn't have to, but they did.

      I don't agree that the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were necasary or the correct thing to do, but just pointing that out.

    118. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks, I'd never heard of those. There is even some information available. Time to read!

    119. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think not.

      As a sample..

      http://www.fpp.co.uk/reviews/Dresden/Esquire1163 .h tml

    120. Re:Soaking up the gamma by subtropolis · · Score: 1

      Like i said - i really didn't know what to make of it. I don't know the physics very well, and i certainly don't remember the details of the TMI event. I didn't look at much else on that site, so i can't speak for that, either. But what struck me was that comment about the air being blue. Really strange, and not what one would really expect to hear from someone bullshitting about this. It's just so odd. Even it was Cerenkov radiation, i can't see as how it would be that intense.

      When i read your post i thought i'd offer it up for you or someone else with more knowlege than me about the science to ponder.

      Incidently, i've seen the reactor pool at the Chalk River plant, in Ontario. Definitely blue. And there's a kid's mitten at the bottom ;-)

      BTW, i sent an email to the publisher of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientist, suggesting they might want to host Elena's files. I gave him both the /. article and the mirror links.

      --
      "Our interests are to see if we can't scale it up to something more exciting," he said.
    121. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Chalybeous · · Score: 1

      As parent says, it certainly does look like a hell of a ride. Elena's work is haunting, and as a part-time poet, I find it deeply inspirational.
      I'm hoping to write a short series based on some of these memorable images, and will definitely have to try and forward some to Elena when I'm finished!

      --

      "It is dark. You are likely to be eaten by a grue." -- Zork

    122. Re:Soaking up the gamma by gumbi+west · · Score: 2

      On the Airplanes part, the UN's report on radiation pointed out that it is airline workers that receive the most radiation dose, not power plant workers or medical professionals!

    123. Re:Soaking up the gamma by gumbi+west · · Score: 1

      sorry, 2R/yr is the administrative limit. That is, if you get above 2R/yr the radiation safety officer has to work with you to alter your work pratices to decrease your anual dose. At the same time, it is true that you can have 5 R years.

    124. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I must be missing something here... isn't mining a human activity?

    125. Re:Soaking up the gamma by darco · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression that the reactor at Chernobyl did more than crack, it all out ruptured in a steam explosion. Given that you seem to be much more familiar with the incident than I, I would like to know more. If you have a link or anything that I can go to to learn more about the specifics of the reactor malfunction, I would appreciate it.

      --
      — darco
    126. Re:Soaking up the gamma by nutshell42 · · Score: 1
      That's wrong. Both were long after the war was won on non-military targets of no strategic value. In the case of Dresden they first bombed all other cities in the region to concentrate as many refugees as possible in one city just to see the amount of damage possible.

      We shouldn't forget Tokyo btw. It was the worst bombing of the war with over 125,000 deaths in one night, about the same as both atomic bombs combined with not even 1/10th of the strategic effect

      --
      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage
    127. Re:Soaking up the gamma by CowboyMeal · · Score: 1

      For example, if you smoke you get an additional 1000 mR/year (1 R/year) in addition to all the other things in the tobaco.

      I call shenanigans.

      From Princeton:
      The Roentgen (R) is the special unit of exposure, which is the measure of the ionization produced in air by x or gamma radiation.

      So, are you saying that a cigarette produces more x-rays or gamma rays than other things that would normally be put into our mouths?

      Smoking is bad and causes cancer, but not because it's radioactive.

      --
      Your credit card information wants to be free.
    128. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Uriel · · Score: 1

      What about the bombing of London and other parts of England?

    129. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      So much for "no connection".

      *Sigh* The parent never said that there was no connection, but that the goals and technologies are completely different. This is referring to the fact that nuclear reactors are designed NOT to go critical, while nuclear weapons are explicitly designed to go critical in the worst way possible.

      A german study found that EVERY german power plant would suffer a meltdown if attacked by a commercial airliner with half a tank of kerosine.

      I call bullshit. Provide a link, English or German. All nuclear power plants were designed with bomb attacks in mind in the US, the UK, France, and the former USSR. I doubt that the Germans were stupid enough to not build a good concrete shield over their reactors.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    130. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Aglassis · · Score: 2, Informative

      You said: "sorry, 2R/yr is the administrative limit. That is, if you get above 2R/yr the radiation safety officer has to work with you to alter your work pratices to decrease your anual dose. At the same time, it is true that you can have 5 R years."

      Administrative limits are different from legal limits. For example, I have an administrative limit a fraction of the legal limit and a local control limit that is a fraction of that (though extensions that allow up to my administrative limit are allowed). If certain work permits and waivers are signed, I can go up to the full 3 rem/qtr or 5 rem/yr (but they are difficult to get). In casualities I can go up even higher depending upon whether equipment or lives are at stake.

      The purpose of these limits is to follow the ALARA (as low as reasonably attainable) campaign. If I was to work in a radiation area of 5 mrem/hr and had a local limit remaining of perhaps 10 mrem (hypothetically--obviously this is very low to be considering doing any high radiation work), I should probably leave the area to check my dose at about an hour (having used up about 5 mrem) or when my self-indicating dosimeter reads 5 mrem. If the job is so complex that it requires more hours, additional shielding and cycling other personnel through would prevent any one person from exceeding their local control limit. If I had exceeded my 10 mrem of local control limit left, I would be blocked from additional radiation work until I could get an extension to my local limit.

      --
      Suddenly, the hairy finger of a familiar monkey tapped me on the shoulder. It was time.--G. T.
    131. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Talla · · Score: 1

      As a motorcycle rider, I can tell you that the increase in safety margins she enjoys riding on empty roads is probably 1000 times greater than the increased health risk the radiation poses.

      No offence, but if you think that, you don't know much about motorcycle accidents. Most accidents (in Norway about 60%) happen without interference from other people. On the other hand, in the remaining 40%, the other part is usually to blame.

    132. Re:Soaking up the gamma by rapiddescent · · Score: 1
      The UK also has a radiation detection system called RIMNET that was built in 1988 and is currently in the process of being upgraded. There are lots of detectors all over the country that feed data back. Scotland was hit by the chernobyl radioactive cloud - I remember all the sheep being taken away from the fields to be culled!!!

      rd

    133. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Phronesis · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The bomb at Hiroshima killed about 64,000 people. Chernobyl killed 30 people immediately after the accident and it is estimated that Chernobyl will, over the 50 years after the accident, kill a total of 3500 people (Greenpeace estimates 2500). The most authoritative study, by the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation points out that this compares to 4,500 deaths in the U.S. from exposure to fallout from the Nevada nuclear weapons tests.

      It's kind of misleading to talk about Hiroshima and Chernobyl as though they were the same.

    134. Re:Soaking up the gamma by dukeisgod · · Score: 1

      Not to make excuses, but bombing the fsck out of Tokyo was massively demoralizing to the Japanese, especially after Hirohito said the Americans could not touch Tokyo. And was going to take more than just a few little bombs with medals on them. A real hit was called for, not just symbolism.

    135. Re:Soaking up the gamma by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > Some people smoke. Others drive their motorcycle through [Chernobyl]

      Indeed, but which is the more dangerous activity? As a one-time activity,
      I think I'd have to rate the cycle ride through Chernobyl as more dangerous,
      but over the long term smoking might be worse, because you tend to do more
      and more of it; after ten years of visiting Chernobyl you probably wouldn't
      spend any more time there per month than the first month, possibly even less,
      but after ten years of smoking you'll be lighting up every twenty minutes.
      So over the decades, smoking might actually get to be worse for you.

      Then again, if after your nth visit to Chernobyl you get brave and decide to
      go poking around inside some of those buildings... "Say, I've never seen
      inside that sarcophagus thingy over the fourth reactor..." That could get
      to be a pretty significant health risk...

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    136. Re:Soaking up the gamma by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > The highest reading she shows or talks about is 3 mR/hr.

      Actually, she does talk a little about some higher ratings in a couple of
      places. Notably, there's one place where she talks about here meter going
      "off scale" (meaning, presumably, that the _reading_ is off the scale of
      what the meter can measure; she doesn't stay there long), and another place
      later on wherein she talks about a custom-built meter that another person
      has that doesn't go off scale (presumably, because it can measure the higher
      readings), and about how having one of these is necessary for going into the
      buildings in Pripyat', presumably because the readings are high enough that
      you need to be concerned about how many roetwhatevers you're getting in a
      shorter timeframe than an hour. I would have liked a little more detail in
      her explanation of that (e.g., some actual numbers).

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    137. Re:Soaking up the gamma by jmv · · Score: 1

      I suppose you'll explain how Dresden was contributing to the war effort?

    138. Re:Soaking up the gamma by lars_stefan_axelsson · · Score: 1
      The UK also has a radiation detection system called RIMNET that was built in 1988 and is currently in the process of being upgraded. There are lots of detectors all over the country that feed data back.

      Well you ( having associated a Scotsman with the English) have Windscale, which is such a disaster it had to be renamed Sellafield for PR reasons, so of course you need a radiation detection system. :-) We sort of counted on you guys telling us the next time though, no one thought of the scenario with an easterly wind and a Russian disaster. (I'm only a bit surprised that they waited till after Chernobyl, maybe you also counted on Sellafield to give you a ring the next time. :-)

      Scotland was hit by the chernobyl radioactive cloud - I remember all the sheep being taken away from the fields to be culled!!!

      Yes, I could have been clearer. Most of western Europe was eventually hit. But it hit Sweden first. Actually it passed over Finland and the baltic but with no precipitation so it wasn't detectable there.

      --
      Stefan Axelsson
    139. Re:Soaking up the gamma by juhaz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Basically, on the whole we need not fear natural radioactivity, as our bodies evolved to cope with it (cellular repair). What we need to fear/respect is man-made radioactivity and its waste products, because when human error/greed/fallibility get involved, that is when man-made radioactivity bites us in the ass...

      Correction: We need not fear radioactivity, be it natural or man-made, as long as it's within sane limits.

      Getting 1300 "extra" millirems by working in nuclear plant is in no way different than those you would get from smoking.

      Getting 3000 "extra" millirems by scouring Chernobyl area in motorcycle will not bite you in the ass any more than living in Kerala, India.

      Numbers are probably off, but you get the idea.

      I guess you were trying to say tha man-made radiation can sometimes be much more intense than natural (unless you're in deep space or something), and THEN we need to fear it.

    140. Re:Soaking up the gamma by EigenHombre · · Score: 1
      Clarification about Cerenkov radiation:

      Cerenkov radiation is caused by charged particles moving through a medium at a speed faster than light IN THAT MEDIUM. So neutrons (being neutral) travelling through your eye won't radiate Cerenkov light, although their decay products might.

      Also, Cerenkov light can be generated in the air itself (the speed of light in air is slightly slower than in vacuum), so the flux of charged particles doesn't necessarily have to travel through your eyeballs to be detected. This is how some earth-bound cosmic ray detectors work (they "see" the sudden blue Cerenkov footprint on the ground caused by showers of particles produced by very high energy cosmic rays hitting the top of the atmosphere).

      You'd have to work out the fluxes and efficiencies to see if one could have seen Cerenkov light from the reactor, but my suspicion is that any Cerenkov light produced near the reactor would have been drowned out by other light sources.

      --
      EOT
    141. Re:Soaking up the gamma by SmurfBoy04 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And yet the night before their surrender, many of the soldiers attempted to stop word of the surrender from getting out and even attempted to kidnap the emporer. The only reason why they did not succeed, which would have meant either more atomic bombs (I believe 3 or 5 more would be dropped, including one on Tokyo) or an invasion that was estimated at a million dead Allies and at least three million dead (mostly civilians) Japanese, was that an air raid by B-29s on Tokyo allowed some wise and honorable Japanese men to hide the recorded announcement from the soldiers attempting the coup.

      IMO although it was unfortunate that those hundred(s) of thousands of Japanese people had to die, it was far better than over a million Allied soldiers and an estimated 3 million dead Japanese, though that number probably would approach 10 million within a year or two after the war finally ended. Also dropping the two atomic bombs then was much better than waiting, because that was all the nuclear material the United States had at the time, and had they waited they might have instead dropped even more (as was at least one plan to end the war in the Pacific).

      --

      I didn't spend all that time playing Dungeons and Dragons and not learn a little something about courage.
    142. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Lost+Race · · Score: 1

      What about simple incandescence from the meltdown itself? Wouldn't the uncooled fuel and melting/burning building structures give off a red glow?

    143. Re:Soaking up the gamma by True+Grit · · Score: 1
      1. Believing that the human failures that resulted in Chernobyl are only present under communist governments, or that a capitalist system is somehow magically immune to such human failures of reasoning, is dangerous and quite frankly terrifying.


      I never said this. A capitalist system is not immune, true, but our system did have something the communist system didn't: a legal system that allows the public to 1) sue someone, including the government, for monetary damages if they are injured by negligent action, and 2) try to block government actions due to the action violating existing law (in the US the basis is environmental law).

      Because the public has a greater level of influence, in the West the standards for NPPs are dramatically more stringent than they were in the USSR. The risk of litigation also means that private companies involved in NPPs must be very careful in the design, construction, and operation of the plants, unlike the communist government that has no checks on its power, doesn't have to worry about lawsuits against it for negligent behavior, or a judicial system, that is essentially uncontrollable by the government, that can block the government's actions.

      The fact still remains that the USSR built NPPs that would have been illegal in the West.
    144. Re:Soaking up the gamma by llefler · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, the wildlife that's beginning to swarm in the Dead Zone is as dangerous to a biker as any cell-distracted SUVer.

      As a biker myself, I have doubts that anything is as dangerous as an SUVer, distracted or otherwise. Ever had anyone tailgate you, nearly run you off the road passing you (he was straddling the double yellow), and then slam on their brakes in front of you because he was pissed that you were only driving the speed limit? Give me deer any day.

      One of the most dangerous things you can do to a biker is tailgate them. And it happens to me every time I ride in traffic. Regardless of how much I'm exceeding the speedlimit.

      --
      It is amazing what you can accomplish if you do not care who gets the credit. -- Harry Truman
    145. Re:Soaking up the gamma by fm6 · · Score: 1
      Ever had anyone tailgate you, nearly run you off the road passing you (he was straddling the double yellow), and then slam on their brakes in front of you because he was pissed that you were only driving the speed limit?
      Actually, I have. Which is scary in a Honda Civic. Don't even care to think about it on a motorcycle.

      But deer in ones and twoos like you see in this country is not what Elena is up against. She's beginning to encounter huge herds, not just of deer, but also of wild boar. Even more aggressive than an SUV driver, though arguably much more intelligent!

    146. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So much for safe, clean, and efficient nuclear power.
      Indeed. There's a Russian saying about this - "Vsya Evropa kroet matom nash Sovetskiy mirniy atom". It can be translated as "The whole Europe curses foul our Soviet peaceful atom".

    147. Re:Soaking up the gamma by goodhell · · Score: 1

      Late, I know. But maybe you'll see this link.

      I'm not exactly sure what happened, but I know that Chelyabinsk was much worse and since it was in the middle of the soviet union and the technology to detect radiation was not as advanced, they were able to keep it hidden from the outside world.

      Chernobyl
      http://www.chernobyl.info

      I can't find any links on the net to the Chelyabinsk, but one of my friends has a book about it. I can't remember if it's in Russian or English, though.

      Anyway, I hope that helps. Sorry about the late post, but you don't have an available email. ( I could track you down through other means --slashdot stuff, but I'm lazy and tired.)

    148. Re:Soaking up the gamma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are a lot of people who have been in Pripyat, I think the Elena pictures are real.

      take an example:

      http://pripiat.com/
      http://www.wsu.edu/~brians/ chernobyl_poems/chernob yl_index.html
      http://www.wsu.edu/~brians/chernoby l_poems/photoin tro.html

      gH

  3. threepio! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's too dangerous with all the Slashdot people around...

  4. Dawn of the Dead by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 0

    Anyone else reminded of that zombie flick while looking at these pictures?

    creepy....

    --
    "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
    1. Re:Dawn of the Dead by Rew190 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, it reminded me more of "Day of the Dead," the Romero flick from the 80's.

    2. Re:Dawn of the Dead by digitalsushi · · Score: 2, Informative

      check out www.infiltration.org for more urban exploration.

      --
      slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
    3. Re:Dawn of the Dead by Rew190 · · Score: 1

      Yep, I'm a huge fan of the series. Day of the Dead (the sequel to Dawn) takes place somewhere on the south east coast. The movie opens with the main characters searching for survivors in a city that's run down and crappy looking, quite reminiscent of the webpages' pics.

    4. Re:Dawn of the Dead by Tantrum420 · · Score: 1

      Me too.

      Especially the part where she said that researchers stay away from the Magic Wood and the cemetary because that's where they buried a bunch of graphite.

      The first thing I thought is, "DAMN! They buried a pile of extremely radioactive material in a cemetary?! Don't they ever read comics or watch movies?!"

      *Shivers*

      T

    5. Re:Dawn of the Dead by Tantrum420 · · Score: 1

      That's a damn cool link, thx.

      It reminds me of my younger days growing up in the Midwest. There are a lot of abandoned farmhouses and barns in this country. Each trip was a glimpse into somebody's past. I'm finding out that there's a lot of places like that in the mountains, too. Each new trip seems so bittersweet.

      T

    6. Re:Dawn of the Dead by Rew190 · · Score: 1

      I love those movies, very smart and socially realistic. Have you seen the 1978 Dawn DVD that just got released? I've got the theatrical DVD, not sure if the new one is worth it or not.

    7. Re:Dawn of the Dead by bishiraver · · Score: 1

      Abandonded Places is another site that does this sort of thing. The author goes through old eastern european buildings primarily and photographs them, mostly in black and white.

      They can be eerily beautiful.

  5. it is good to subscribe by trolman · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Without subscribing to slashdot I would never have seen this site since it is All graphics. What a world.

  6. where do the new images start? by jeff+munkyfaces · · Score: 1

    someone linky for us dialuppers..

    1. Re:where do the new images start? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      at the beginning..

    2. Re:where do the new images start? by nazh · · Score: 2, Informative

      they are mixed in with the old. so you have to go throught it all.

  7. Not yet. by Bon+bons · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's disturbing to think that the town is going to be like that for 100 years.

    Regardless of how many breakthroughs there have been in fission technology, I'd like to see twice as many breakthroughs in radiation cleanup before I embrace the technology.

    Some of us still remember Three Mile Island.

    1. Re:Not yet. by BiggyP · · Score: 2, Funny

      100 years? but the article clearly states 48 years, very precisely as well, i think she put it as 48.000

    2. Re:Not yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Oh please.

      TMI was a non-incident. The only reason anyone thinks it was a big deal was because of press coverage, and because of TV personalities arguing about it live on nightly news. The most exposure anyone got was around 100millirems, which is about the same as an x-ray at a doctor's office.

    3. Re:Not yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's 48,000

    4. Re:Not yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      You do realize that Three Mile Island was the single lamest nuclear "disaster" in history, right? Standing with my hand on the reactor, I would get the same amount of radiation from said reactor in one second as I get from the rest of the environment in one second. Compare to smoking, which (on average) quadrouples your radiation dose.

    5. Re:Not yet. by davandhol · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Europeans write 48,000 as 48.000. Decimals instead of commas.

    6. Re:Not yet. by LordKronos · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sure, maybe it was lame because nothing terrible ended up happening. However, I was watching a documentary of it on the History Channel last week, and the most frightening thing about it was how poorly the situation was handled. As the situation inside the plant was deteriorating, they kept telling the public "there was a problem, but we've handled it". At one point, their engineers and the NRC had miscalculated the rate of buildup of explosive gasses. Their calculations showed that the containment facility was in danger of blowing open in a matter of hours, yet they made no effort to evacuate the nearby residents (later on they recommended that only pregnant women and small children evacuate).

    7. Re:Not yet. by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, the investors rightly considered it a big deal -- it utterly wrecked a billion-dollar reactor installation.

    8. Re:Not yet. by BiggyP · · Score: 1

      dreadfully sorry, i forgot to wink ;-)

      ok?

    9. Re:Not yet. by Aglassis · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You said: " You do realize that Three Mile Island was the single lamest nuclear "disaster" in history, right? Standing with my hand on the reactor, I would get the same amount of radiation from said reactor in one second as I get from the rest of the environment in one second. Compare to smoking, which (on average) quadrouples your radiation dose."

      No. This is not true.

      You could not do that for a small plant, and TMI-2 (anniversary is on the 28th btw), was a big plant (~3GW thermal). The Atomic Energy Act pretty much makes it impossible for me to give you any real numbers for the radiation levels outside the reactor pressure vessel shutdown or critical (though they may be published somewhere), I can tell you that it is not background. Civil nuclear plants typically start up, operate for 18 months at full power, shutdown to refuel and perform maintenance, and then repeat. Since TMI-2 was in the operating stage when its accident occured, there was a significant amount of fission products in the reactor core at the time of the accident. If you are standing next to the reactor core you do not have the full amount of radiation shielding that the general public has, so the radiation dose will be much higher. Also considering that some fission products escaped from the fuel and circulated through the coolant (of which some was released into the containment structure due to the pressure relief which set of the radiation alarms during the casuality), there will be alot of radiation in the general area not coming from the reactor vessel (which again will be significantly higher than background).

      --
      Suddenly, the hairy finger of a familiar monkey tapped me on the shoulder. It was time.--G. T.
    10. Re:Not yet. by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      What do they use for decimals, I wonder?

    11. Re:Not yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      commas.

    12. Re:Not yet. by jkcity · · Score: 1

      nnot all of us do, in the Uk we use commas.

    13. Re:Not yet. by Faeton · · Score: 1
      Their calculations showed that the containment facility was in danger...

      Containment facility? Umm.. that was their problem. There was NO containment. All they had was a heavy lid on the reactor, which blew off due to steam pressure caused by a power spike. The containment facility (aka the Sarcophagus) was built after the meltdown.

      It still pisses me off to know that USSR was so negligent in their design. Due to the meltdown, which was also caused by human intervention (hey, let's bypass safety interlocks!), nuclear has become so misunderstood and feared. The repercussions of the meltdown on the environment is astronomical. Not because of the radiation dust (not a huge deal really), but the massive stigma placed on nuclear plants thereafter. Literally billions of tons of CO2 could have been prevented if nuclear plants were the norm today rather than the feared bogyman they are now.

    14. Re:Not yet. by afidel · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yeah, sure. It's a non-event only if you realize how close they were to core meltdown which would have poisoned the water table across a large swatch of the east coast (lookup china syndrome), and ignore the fact that the reactor containment facility STILL (a quarter centyry later) has places too radioactivly hot to enter. And several years after the incident considerably more radiation was released:

      For 11 days, in June-July, 1980, Met Ed illegally vented 43,000 curies of radioactive Krypton-85 (beta and gamma; 10 year half life) and other radioactive gasses into the environment without having scrubbers in place. In November 1980, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled that the krypton venting was illegal.
      link

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    15. Re:Not yet. by afidel · · Score: 1

      Uh, you are VERY misinformed, the containment building is still too hot to enter for more than a couple hours with protective suits and there are areas in the basement that are so hot that NO amount of exposure is safe.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    16. Re:Not yet. by LordKronos · · Score: 1

      Actually, I was talking about Three Mile Island, not Chernobyl.

    17. Re:Not yet. by silverbolt · · Score: 1

      The use commas.

    18. Re:Not yet. by RedX · · Score: 1

      I believe the parent you replied to was referring to Three Mile Island, not Chernobyl.

    19. Re:Not yet. by silverfuck · · Score: 1

      Actually, in the UK we use commas (48,000), on the continent they mostly use spaces (48 000).

      --
      You know you've been IMing too long when you almost say 'lol' out loud to a non-geeky friend...
    20. Re:Not yet. by Wavemaker · · Score: 0

      commas

    21. Re:Not yet. by BrainInAJar · · Score: 1

      Only it didn't, is the thing. As long as you don't run your plant with wonderful Soviet efficiency, nuclear power is safer and cleaner than any alternatives. In fact, I'm not sure the numbers, but a properly working coal fueled plant dumps TONS of radioactive uranium in to the air, and a nuclear plant dumps none

    22. Re:Not yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe he means the containment, not the reactor. Most people think of the containment as the reactor.

    23. Re:Not yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      care to provide links documenting this? If not, you're just another yammering idiot on slashdot.

    24. Re:Not yet. by hayden · · Score: 1
      It's a non-event only if you realize how close they were to core meltdown ...
      The biggest differenc between Chernobyl and Three Mile Island appears to be a combination of luck, lack of a dangerous test and reactor design. Timelines for both incidents:

      Chernobyl (towards the bottom)

      Three Mile Island

      Three Mile Island, it took seven and a half hours to apply the correct remidy for the problem (for over five of which the reactor core was exposed). At nine hours there was an explosion in the reactor core. After 15 hours the core was covered in coolent again.

      Compare with Chernobyl. After an hour and 23 minutes of getting the reactor in a dangerously unstable state, a minute and a half later into the test the roof of the reactor had blown off, the core was a molten lump and the building was on fire.

      --
      Nerd: Derogatory term typically directed at anybody with a lower Slashdot ID than you.
    25. Re:Not yet. by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      Three Mile Island, it took seven and a half hours to apply the correct remidy for the problem (for over five of which the reactor core was exposed). At nine hours there was an explosion in the reactor core. After 15 hours the core was covered in coolent again.

      The explosion was in the primary containment (the concrete structure housing the reactor vessel), not the core. What happened was hydrogen vented into the containment, and the exploded - resulting in a sharp pressure spike, but no failure of the containment (i.e. it did what it was designed to do).

      As a side note, had the TMI operators done nothing but watch the safety systems respond, TMI would have been a non-event. Unfortunately, the operators failed to realize a pressurizer relief was open (valve position is measured from teh valve operationg mechanism, not the actual valve - just as you decide a faucet is closed because you no longer can turn it; and the downstream temperatures were near atmospheric temp, misleading the operators into think no steam was escaping since it would be nearly 1000 deg F - forgetting that expanding gases cool, so the temperature was that of steam at the exit pressure) and were afraid of overpressurizing the vessel, so they shut off the safety injection systems.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    26. Re:Not yet. by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      The big difference is in reactor design, that is for sure.

      Every civilian reactor built in sane countries has a containment dome which is several feet of very strong steel-reinforced concrete.

      Chernobyl just had a reactor in a building. A regular old building, like where you might put an expensive computer or something. When the reactor exploded, there was nothing substantial to stop it. If a similar incident happened in a Western reactor, there would be a lot of really alarmed people scurrying around, but nothing would breach the containment dome.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    27. Re:Not yet. by op00to · · Score: 1

      What do they use for decimals, I wonder?

      ,

    28. Re:Not yet. by afidel · · Score: 1

      Additional work is limited because of high radiation dose rates in the vicinity of tanks containing contaminated water.
      link

      There are other reports which mention the high level of radiation in the water being cleaned up from the basement.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    29. Re:Not yet. by Alioth · · Score: 1

      The China Syndrome is fiction. The fuel will very rapidly go non-critical as it disperses, and won't penetrate particularly far. Indeed, at Chernobyl it collected at the bottom of the plant (they sent robotic explorers with cameras down there to take a look).

    30. Re:Not yet. by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      The Atomic Energy Act pretty much makes it impossible for me to give you any real numbers ...

      I'm curious -- why?
      Laws the prevent public disclosure always bother me, so I'd like to know.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    31. Re:Not yet. by Aglassis · · Score: 1

      You said: "I'm curious -- why?
      Laws the prevent public disclosure always bother me, so I'd like to know.
      "

      In the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, Title 1 Chapter 12 (warning--big pdf) Control of Information, certain data such reactor designs, nuclear weapons designs, etc. are designated as Restricted Data. While you might think much of this wouldn't apply to a nuclear reactor you have to remember that civil nuclear reactors produce a small amount of plutonium and therefore also fall under any of the weapons restrictions in that chapter. Certain exemptions exist as listed in section 144 but they are difficult to get (requires Presidential approval). This basically makes everything about the technology of a nuclear power plant classified--hence radiation levels will also fall under this guidance. The NRC issues accident reports that declassify much data in the case of accidents or incidents because they feel it is good for public review. Of course they have section 144 approval to do so.

      --
      Suddenly, the hairy finger of a familiar monkey tapped me on the shoulder. It was time.--G. T.
  8. 'who are those slashdot people? by FooAtWFU · · Score: 2, Funny
    'who are those slashdot people? they swept over like Mongol-Tartars.'

    Hi. You must be new here. :)

    --
    The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    1. Re:'who are those slashdot people? by maelstrom · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Hi, you must be new here. The whole, "Hi. You must be new here" has been beaten to death. Lay off it already. This was funny once maybe twice. Now its just tiring.

      --
      The more you know, the less you understand.
    2. Re:'who are those slashdot people? by merdark · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not to mention that this person obviously doesn't now what slashdot is... so duh.. yeah.. she's new here. And somehow that guy got modded funny for pointing out the obvious.

      Sky is up.

      Mod me funny now too.

    3. Re:'who are those slashdot people? by bobsled · · Score: 1

      Can't you just hear 'Ala` ad-Din in 1219 saying "who are those Mongols? They're sweeping over like those damned /.'ers!"

      --
      Life would be so much easier if we could just look at the source code...
    4. Re:'who are those slashdot people? by Ironica · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that this person obviously doesn't now what slashdot is... so duh.. yeah.. she's new here. And somehow that guy got modded funny for pointing out the obvious.

      Perhaps we're laughing *at* him, not *with* him. ;-)

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    5. Re:'who are those slashdot people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So are you, with that UID. Damn rookies.

    6. Re:'who are those slashdot people? by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Everybody knows that Mongol-Tartars have a far better grasp of English than the average Slashdotter.

    7. Re:'who are those slashdot people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      .... and a far, far better sex life.

    8. Re:'who are those slashdot people? by dumdeedum · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This was funny once maybe twice. Now its just tiring.

      Hi, you must be new here.

    9. Re:'who are those slashdot people? by merdark · · Score: 1

      uh... yeah... me too... I was referring to the original poster :)

    10. Re:'who are those slashdot people? by SigmaDelta · · Score: 0

      'who are those slashdot people? they swept over like Mongol-Tartars.'

      Aww, c'mon baby, we're just a bunch of horned up geeks who'll swoon on any chick who is even halfway technically literate, not to mention a motorcycle rider. How about slashdot doing an interview with her? :-)
    11. Re:'who are those slashdot people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hi. you must be nude here.

    12. Re:'who are those slashdot people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was great. :-)

  9. And once again... by afabbro · · Score: 1, Insightful
    ...Slashdot irresponsibly sucks up someone's bandwidth quota on a free site like angelfire.

    Readers keep recommending Slashdot mirror sites. But of course, that would mean (a) editors would have to read the site to know what we think, and (b) they would have to do some actual work.

    --
    Advice: on VPS providers
    1. Re:And once again... by elykyllek · · Score: 1

      I always try archive.org first, they've got fat pipes.

      Here's the link: kidofspeed

    2. Re:And once again... by CTho9305 · · Score: 1

      1. The site is still loading fine.
      2. Isn't the point of putting stuff on the web having people see it?

    3. Re:And once again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are reasons they don't mirror it.

      1. They would be stealing advertising revenue from the sites that host the original content.
      2. Asking for permission could take many hours to days to get. Nobody wants old news.

      Besides, often times some nice person sets up a mirror of their own.

    4. Re:And once again... by eclectro · · Score: 1


      I think this is a time that I would have used a "donate" button for paypal if it had been available, to help pay for bandwidth.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    5. Re:And once again... by jmv · · Score: 1

      You forget c) which is more important: it's illegal unless you get permission first.

    6. Re:And once again... by Mr.+Ophidian+Jones · · Score: 1

      Readers keep recommending Slashdot mirror sites. But of course, that would mean (a) editors would have to read the site to know what we think,

      Of course they read they site. How else would they know whom to bitchslap?

    7. Re:And once again... by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      I sense a need for organ donation if she continues travelling through.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
  10. OH yeeaahhhh by morelife · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    We're Mongol-Tartars ok, in more ways than one :=}

  11. Re:Slashdot What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Leave it to a former SOVIET RUSSIAN to come up with the most apt description yet of...YOU.

  12. Bok bok baaaAAAK! by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

    Re Giant Egg: "big egg as we passing 86th kilometer we'll see this big egg. This is where civilisation ends and where Chernobyl ride begin. Someone brought this egg from Germany. The significance of this egg is LIFE that will break through, life that will survive through radiation."

    I don't think that symbolism will work. People instead will think of Giant Mutant Chickens and run like hell.

    1. Re:Bok bok baaaAAAK! by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Woah, flashbacks to hours spent doing Black & White - Creature Isle, training my creature to train his pet giant chicken.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:Bok bok baaaAAAK! by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Symbolism, like many other things, is lost on Slashdotters!

    3. Re:Bok bok baaaAAAK! by angst_ridden_hipster · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ah, yes.

      I've heard of rumors of the giant, self-cooking Chicken Kiev...

      --
      Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachtani?
      www.fogbound.net
    4. Re:Bok bok baaaAAAK! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Egg? Germany? Huh?

    5. Re:Bok bok baaaAAAK! by jesser · · Score: 1

      I thought is was the smothering rover from The Prisoner.

      --
      The shareholder is always right.
    6. Re:Bok bok baaaAAAK! by metlin · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia, chicken cooks YOU!!!

      Sorry, couldn't resist ;-)

    7. Re:Bok bok baaaAAAK! by DaveAtFraud · · Score: 1
      I don't think that symbolism will work. People instead will think of Giant Mutant Chickens and run like hell.
      Now would those be boneless Giant Mutant Chickens? We ought to:

      1) Buy some land near Chernobyl (should be cheap).
      2) Start a Giant Mutant Boneless Chickens Ranch.
      3) Breed them to be self cooking.
      ...
      Profit!

      --
      They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.
      Ben
    8. Re:Bok bok baaaAAAK! by funkmotor · · Score: 1

      When they catch the mutant chicken and cut it open it will be full of...
      GARLIC BUTTER!!!

    9. Re:Bok bok baaaAAAK! by cthugha · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia, new giant mutant chicken overlords welcome YOU!

  13. Reminds me of by Jediman1138 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    the recent Danny Boyle film 28 Days Later.

    While the evacuated scenes of London in the film don't have the wear and tear of a few decades of desertion like Chernobyl does, it kind of gives you a representation of what it might be like to be there.

    Scary stuff...What's our world coming to?

    _________________________________________

    --

    nothing.can.stop.me.now

    1. Re:Reminds me of by fm6 · · Score: 1

      When Elena first posted her pictures, my first thought was "That's a great place to film a post-apocalypse movie." But I can't imagine who would agree to star in it!

    2. Re:Reminds me of by cr@ckwhore · · Score: 1

      Scary stuff...What's our world coming to?

      What's our world coming to?

      It already went there in '86. Besides, it's their world, isn't it? Chernobyl is over there.

      --
      Skiers and Riders -- http://www.snowjournal.com
    3. Re:Reminds me of by oldManSquad · · Score: 1
      Let us all hope that we only ever experience something like this through films/pictures etc or as a tourist, and that it remains in the past and in our imaginations.

      Unfortunatly, what with all these Al Qaeda Asshats wanting us all back in the dark ages, this reminds me of what could still happen if some them decide to target our own reactors.

      Scary stuff indeed.

    4. Re:Reminds me of by attaboy · · Score: 1


      Maybe her?

      --
      The facts have a liberal bias. --The Daily Show
    5. Re:Reminds me of by fm6 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Well, if you know a backer who will underwrite the production and distribution of a Major Motion Picture starring a unknown Ukranian Biker Chick... Brother, can you spare 10 million bucks?

      Oh God. I just had a horrible thought. I shouldn't say it. If I say it, it will probably happen. If I don't say it, nobody will even think of it. But I can't help myself:

      SURVIVOR: CHERNOBYL!!!!
    6. Re:Reminds me of by Control-Z · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is one of the most interesting things I've seen in a long time. I don't think I would have gone there but the pictures are amazing.

      It also reminds me of a book called "Earth Abides" by George R. Stewart. It's one of my favorite books. Most of the US population is wiped out by a disease, leaving only a small number of survivors. They raid grocery stores for canned food, drive whatever car they want on freeways littered with deserted cars, and live in whatever house they want. As time goes by, the electricity starts flickering and finally goes off, the water stops flowing, things gradually break down. Eventually they learn to raise food for themselves and seek out other survivors.

    7. Re:Reminds me of by enigmatichmachine · · Score: 1

      i go to school on the remains of Fort Ord, in monterey, california, it looks a lot like this, 10 years ago the miltary decided to up and leave a small town, leaving everything behind to fall apart, going in all the abandoned milatry buildings is interesting to say the least.

      --
      -and occasionaly a giant moose.
    8. Re:Reminds me of by glesga_kiss · · Score: 3, Funny
      Unfortunatly, what with all these Al Qaeda Asshats wanting us all back in the dark ages, this reminds me of what could still happen if some them decide to target our own reactors.

      Yeah. You'd better vote for Bush so he can protect you.

    9. Re:Reminds me of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do not listen to the Kerry. The Kerry is defective. I am the Bush. I am here to protect you. Protect you from the terrible secret of Al Quieda.

  14. Mainly one question. by gr3g · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I think the primary question is of course, is she single?

    I suppose a secondary question (assuming a negative answer to the first) would be will she provide me with a tour?

    --
    "It has always been this way and it won't change, god bless the fucked up USA" The Briefs
  15. Iiiihaaa! At it again! by Squashee · · Score: 2, Funny

    So just to drive in the finer points of the answer to her question, we do it to her again. I'm sure she's likes it even better the second time around...

    --
    When in doubt, act determined. Business 101
  16. Radiation dosage levels by Fiz+Ocelot · · Score: 1
    The same thing came up on the last discussion on this, and it seems that the radiation levels on roads is much less than other areas since all of the radioactive junk gets washed off due to rain etc.

    Now going inside houses and all that is another story. Really amazing pictures, I wish someone could build a drone to go inside some of those areas.

    1. Re:Radiation dosage levels by wampus · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure I saw something about rovers that troll the reactor for leaks and cracks on Nova about 10 years ago...

  17. Egad by TechnologyX · · Score: 1

    Makes me really think about living in the town that I live in currently, we're downwind of a Nuclear power plant about 40-50 miles away.

    --
    Slashdot sucks
  18. Such an amazing and atypical slashdot article by daddy+norcal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The pictures and story she has on her site are quite simply amazing.

    Being an American kid at the time of the incident, I was fairly well removed, both politically and geographically, from the disaster, but Elena's pictures serve as a reminder of just how terrible and far reaching the effects of the meltdown were. From the initial coverup to the resulting FUD pumped out by the Russian government during the aftermath, it is easy to lose sight of the fact that this event displaced tens of thousands of people, and many more are still dealing with the legacy or horrors the fallout has inflicted.

    Kudos to Elena and the editors for a great human interest story.

    1. Re:Such an amazing and atypical slashdot article by cybermace5 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It is pretty amazing, and a horrifying reminder. The most striking group of photos is here. As Elena said, these photos don't need any explanation, they speak for themselves.

      --
      ...
    2. Re:Such an amazing and atypical slashdot article by VividU · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Probably one of the best web sites I've seen. A real testament to the power of the Internet.

    3. Re:Such an amazing and atypical slashdot article by Hello+this+is+Linus · · Score: 1

      I have a question... How did she take pictures of her back? Like this one: http://www.angelfire.com/extreme4/kiddofspeed/imag e11.1.jpg

      She must have 3 arms, or she must be a really good photographer.

      --
      Hello, this is Linus Torvalds, and I pronounce Linux as Linux!
    4. Re:Such an amazing and atypical slashdot article by Ryvar · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you read through it she mentions that she brings one of the local die-hards who refuses to leave with her for exploring buildings because of the safety issues involved. Presumably said girl took the photo.

    5. Re:Such an amazing and atypical slashdot article by Hello+this+is+Linus · · Score: 1

      Oh yea...makes sense, thanks.

      --
      Hello, this is Linus Torvalds, and I pronounce Linux as Linux!
    6. Re:Such an amazing and atypical slashdot article by CheeseTroll · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. Can you imagine if the internet (as we know it today) existed in '86? In the Soviet Union? The things we take for granted today!

      --
      A post a day keeps productivity at bay.
    7. Re:Such an amazing and atypical slashdot article by Siniset · · Score: 3, Interesting
      My friend from high school grew up in kiev, and talked about the summer where there were no kids in Kiev, because of concerns over nuclear fallout. Just really blew me away when she talked about it. Imagine a major american city, where all the kids have been sent away to live with relatives or friends in the country.

    8. Re:Such an amazing and atypical slashdot article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know nothing can compare to the disaster suffered at Chernobyl, but some of her pictures of nature "reclaiming" concrete and steel reminded me of the neglected parts of Detroit.

    9. Re:Such an amazing and atypical slashdot article by Blimbo · · Score: 1

      Agreed !
      I intended to just have a quick look at a couple pics, but I found it so compelling and spooky I just could not stop until I reached the end.

      Right now I feel a bit spooked out, like i just watched a really scary movie or just work up from a bad dream or something...

    10. Re:Such an amazing and atypical slashdot article by JimBobJoe · · Score: 1

      Kudos to Elena and the editors for a great human interest story.

      On the last page she has left her mailing address. (Ex-soviet bloc mail is, amusingly enough, addressed in reverse of ours--country first, then city, next line address, post box, last line name.)

      She may very well have no need for money at all, but perhaps the well off slashdotters would consider sending her a token of appreciation.

      Though at this moment in time, I can't exactly figure out the best way of doing that :-)

      (Apparently Ukraine doesn't take international money orders.)

    11. Re:Such an amazing and atypical slashdot article by WhiteBandit · · Score: 1

      I was also a kid at the time of the incident. In fact, I believe I was only 4 years old, so I was quite far removed. However, looking back on it, it really is a HUGE deal.

      A friend of mine's dad wrote an interesting policy paper on Chernobyl and how it contributed to the downfall of the Soviet Union. He posted the paper here: http://central.masterzen.net/index.php?showtopic=3 249&st=0&#entry66842

      Overall, it is an excellent read as it does delve into what exactly happened and the aftermath.

    12. Re:Such an amazing and atypical slashdot article by Endive4Ever · · Score: 1

      Put a dollar bill in an envelope. Seal. Address. Stamp.

      --
      ---
    13. Re:Such an amazing and atypical slashdot article by Chicane-UK · · Score: 1

      Agreed - I couldn't help but read right through to the last page, as every page of pictures was more fascinating than the last.

      Best site linked from Slashdot in a LONG time.

      --
      "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
    14. Re:Such an amazing and atypical slashdot article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Before visiting the site, I didn't see what the big fucking deal was over all these slashdot posts. Granted, Chernobyl is a big "nothing" to me since I was only eight years old when it occured and I have no memory of it. I only know of it from occasional references pointing to it (such as "his bedroom looked like chernobyl!").

      After visiting her page and reading/viewing all of her content... I am quite satisfied to say that every dreadfully disgusting site on the internet. Every dirty, crude, inaccurate, bullshit, crappy piece of information or time waster on the internet. All of the hate and spite and flamewars and porn.. it all is worth tolerating for a medium that can deliver us this amazing piece of history that she was able to bring us. Something we never would have seen otherwise. Her story and photos are probably the most beautiful and mesmerizing thing I've ever witness on the web and having shared in this, I can't help but feel enriched and rewarded.

    15. Re:Such an amazing and atypical slashdot article by yooHoo202 · · Score: 1

      There are about 20 before/after photos of Chernobyl here including one with the American Pioneer robot that was sent in to take a look; obnoxiously flying the Stars & Stripes...

      Interestingly, the plant was still operational until 2000 - here's a history of all the reactors. *

      Unit 1: shut down on 11/30/96.
      Unit 2: A fire at Unit 2 resulted in its shutdown in 10/91.
      Unit 3: Shut down on 15 December 2000.
      Unit 4: destroyed in the 4/86 disaster.

      People have pointed to this accident as one of the hallmark turnarounds in reactor safety, but I don't think the Russian mindset changed post-1986.

      From NTI: "Units 1 and 3 were shut down in 1991 after an accident at the similar Leningrad Nuclear Power Plant in Russia, but were restarted in December and October of 1992, respectively. The restart decision was taken against the advice of the Ukrainian State Committee for Nuclear and Radiation Safety."

      Under Communism, the Russians couldn't build a safe reactor, under capitalism, they couldn't afford to shut it down. Choose your poison, boys!

    16. Re:Such an amazing and atypical slashdot article by Imperator · · Score: 1

      This also happened during WWII. Children were sent out of the cities of Europe to protect them from the bombings those cities received. I don't know if this happened in Japan or China, but I assume it must have on some scale.

      --

      Gates' Law: Every 18 months, the speed of software halves.
  19. Fitting Reminder by Yoje · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is very fitting timing, and a reminder, to the Three Mile Island accident which happened 25 years ago on March 28. We were extremely close to experiencing a total catsrophe, but avoided it narrowly mostly due to luck.

    1. Re:Fitting Reminder by Dun+Malg · · Score: 3, Insightful
      This is very fitting timing, and a reminder, to the Three Mile Island accident which happened 25 years ago on March 28. We were extremely close to experiencing a total catsrophe, but avoided it narrowly mostly due to luck.

      Luck? TMI not being a catastrophe wasn't due to luck. It was Due to adequate containment vessel design. Whay do you call adequate engineering "luck"?

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    2. Re:Fitting Reminder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      To some people, engineering is indistinguishable from magic.

    3. Re:Fitting Reminder by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      Luck? TMI not being a catastrophe wasn't due to luck. It was Due to adequate containment vessel design. Whay do you call adequate engineering "luck"?

      ONe word: Ford

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
  20. Who are these slashdot people? by cgenman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "They swept over like Mongol-Tartars."

    And so you post her to the front page. Again. That's just spiteful.

    You can't buy this kind of publicity, but you are sure going to pay for it. Hopefully the bill falls on anglefire and not our friend on the bike.

    1. Re:Who are these slashdot people? by Almost-Retired · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Hopefully the bill falls on anglefire and not our friend on the bike.

      Me too. Its a rather sad state of affairs when someone like Elena takes the time, fuel, and a camera along and lets the rest of the world see what its really like, and then might have to pay for the bandwidth to boot.

      For the visual information that came out of her camera, I'll gladly forgive her occasionaly poor command of the english language. The pictures tell the story far better than any amount of words anyway. I followed the whole site, wondering when the server was going to melt down like it did the last time, apparently before I even got there, but this time it held up quite well.

      Many thanks to a totally cool lady. And to the hosting site for putting up with the rest of the geek world that represents the average /. reader.

      Cheers and many thanks Elena, Gene

    2. Re:Who are these slashdot people? by usrusr · · Score: 1

      "poor command of the english language"?

      for me it makes the effect so much more real, someone telling who is not caring for linguistic perfection, but for pure content delivery, to borrow some jargon from media convergence capitalists.

      (ps: sorry, no intention to excuse my own poor english)

      --
      [i have an opinion and i am not afraid to use it]
    3. Re:Who are these slashdot people? by Perky_Goth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      i just wish i could make sense of her address so i can say what i felt...

    4. Re:Who are these slashdot people? by Almost-Retired · · Score: 1

      In retrospect, I probably shouldn't have mentioned it at all, it was very poor taste on my part.

      Cheers, Gene

    5. Re:Who are these slashdot people? by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > for me it makes the effect so much more real, someone telling who is not caring for linguistic perfection, but for pure content delivery, to borrow some jargon from media convergence capitalists.

      Agreed. Her English is a hell of a lot better than my Russian.

      I have new respect for Heinlein and his ability to write The Moon is a Harsh Mistress.

    6. Re:Who are these slashdot people? by Bombcar · · Score: 1

      See here for the whois information on her new domain.

    7. Re:Who are these slashdot people? by FattMattP · · Score: 1
      Its a rather sad state of affairs when someone like Elena takes the time, fuel, and a camera along and lets the rest of the world see what its really like, and then might have to pay for the bandwidth to boot.
      Please. It's not a sad state of affairs. Stop trying to paint people as victims. People put up public web sites to get traffic. It's clear from the writing that she wants people to see what she has to share.

      Getting a lot of traffic at once is a fact of life that one has to plan for. The onus is on her to plan ahead with her hosting provider for just such an event. Maybe she has. Who knows? It's not slashdot's fault and it's not the story submittor's fault if she didn't and ends up paying for it. Hell, she's already been slashdotted once before. I'm sure she's got her act together on whose paying for the traffic.

      --
      Prevent email address forgery. Publish SPF records for y
    8. Re:Who are these slashdot people? by mysticalreaper · · Score: 1

      Me too. Its a rather sad state of affairs when someone like Elena takes the time, fuel, and a camera along and lets the rest of the world see what its really like, and then might have to pay for the bandwidth to boot.

      Apparently you're new around, well, the internet. Back in the day, there were PLENTY of free hosting sites. Geocities, Angelfire, and quite a few others. They all had that broken business model where you give stuff away for free then worry about making money later. Somehow, they didn't all die.

      Anyway, from Angelfire's Site:

      ----
      FREE ANGELFIRE
      Where can you get 20MB of space, great building tools, and a blog of your very own - all without spending a dime? Angelfire FREE, that's where! Who says the best things in life are free? We do! Sign up today. You'll be glad you did.
      ----

      See? Free. Really. If you want, you can get your own space. Remember geeks run their own sites, non-geeks use free services like this, which are usually kinda huge. So don't worry about bandwidth.

      I followed the whole site, wondering when the server was going to melt down like it did the last time, apparently before I even got there, but this time it held up quite well.

      It *didn't* melt down, dude. Did you see her message? It said she had temporarily removed it to add more content. Now, it's back. The server didn't melt, it was always available.

      Sorry if i seem harsh on you, Almost-Retired, but i just feel the need to point out how your entirely made up theories on this site are unfounded, and incorrect. For the sake of accuracy, and so we don't feel sorry for her paying this ficticious money to this free site.

    9. Re:Who are these slashdot people? by Loualbano2 · · Score: 1

      I've got some money for this type of interesting material

      The second she puts up any kind of way to donate I am there with at least a 20 spot.

      Who's with me?

    10. Re:Who are these slashdot people? by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      >Hopefully the bill falls on anglefire and not our friend on the bike.

      Angelfire is providing her with bandwidth.

    11. Re:Who are these slashdot people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where did she write the sentence about the tartars? If she send a mail to CowboyNeal, then I would presume that he was kind of him to write back.

    12. Re:Who are these slashdot people? by Almost-Retired · · Score: 1

      Who's with me?

      Well, as I've been told by several people now, the site itself is free. And, judgeing from her manner of dress and a $15,000 bike, my guess is that she isn't terribly in need to funds to continue. Obviously she has income for discretionary spending, unlike most in that vast country, whose lives have not been materially enhanced by Putin's now over-extended tenure.

      That said, if there was a donation page, or a useable address at least, it would be nice to send a message that what she is doing is publishable, with some actual profit to her being accrued.

      Thank God there aren't any more Chernobyls. Yes we had TMI, but it was contained, so Chernobyl is a unique place on this planet, and in history.

      It needs to be documented for future generations. She is doing that, but really, these 2 tours and a few more like it to expand upon the tragedy, could and should be committed to a more durable medium than some hard drive with a 3 year lifetime at an ISP. I'd love the chance to be some place where I could have turned by last big bike loose without having to worry about a radar gun over the next hill. There is something about that sort of freedom that not even MasterCard can buy.

      Archival quality hardcopy, for sale at B&N or Waldenbooks for instance. I'd pay 30 USD for this on decent paper, and 50 if a couple more fills of the memory card in her camera were added, along with more captions to ident exactly where and when the shot was taken.

      It would become in time, a far better testimony to mans inability to truely control the atom than anything done before. Governments try to cover their asses, or find scapegoats. What she has done so far doesn't seem to be tainted by any attempts to do anything else but show whats there now, often including the dosimeter readings.

      Thats 'priceless' as the MC commercial says.

      And preferably on tear proof paper.

      Cheers, Gene

    13. Re:Who are these slashdot people? by Insipid+Trunculance · · Score: 1

      I'll gladly forgive her occasionaly poor command of the english language

      And I am sure so will a professor of English at Oxford or Cambridge that of yours.

      --
      Wanted : A Signature.
    14. Re:Who are these slashdot people? by Almost-Retired · · Score: 1

      Humph! I don't even consider english english and american english to be the same languages any more.

      Written is close, spoken gets seperated by the accentuation used, to the point of occasionally missing the meaning altogether because so much time is spent mentally translating the accents.

      However, I'd also note that the differences are actually becoming less over the last 20 years, thanks to the universality and pervasiveness of satellite news. I'd imagine that in another 50 years, the differences will become ever less as the next generations mature. As to who is correct, I won't say because its such a moving target.

      I wish I hadn't made that statement now. Its so petty and inconsequential when compared to the story being told, and makes me out to be a bigot, something that offends me. But I did make it, and its been one of the most controversial statements I've made. Unfortunately, later apologies cannot undo...

      Cheers, Gene

    15. Re:Who are these slashdot people? by llefler · · Score: 1

      Well, as I've been told by several people now, the site itself is free. And, judgeing from her manner of dress and a $15,000 bike, my guess is that she isn't terribly in need to funds to continue.

      I don't think her finances are relevant. The site makes an impact and is worthy of a donation. I'd dust off my paypal account if it encouraged more sites like this. Besides, Kawasaki, she obviously has good taste. :-)

      --
      It is amazing what you can accomplish if you do not care who gets the credit. -- Harry Truman
    16. Re:Who are these slashdot people? by Almost-Retired · · Score: 1

      Well, first I'd have to sign up with PayPal, and thats something I have no intentions of doing after my last reading of their TOS. Very few people have access to my bank account besides me, and PayPal isn't one of them.

      I think the Ninja is a very good bike, and for a 160+ MPH ride, I've observed that its surprisingly docile around town. If I were 20 years younger, I'd probably have one. The Ninja has finally lived down the Kawi's reputation for taking you anyplace, but always comeing home in a pickup. I had an old KZ-750 for a couple of years and lost track of the number of times it came back from someplace in a pickup, usually because the countershaft and front sprocket had parted company. That eventually ran me back to a Suzuki, which always brought me home but it was too big and got traded down for a 500cc v-twin Honda which usually brought me home.

      But reflexes get slow, and I figured it was time to hang it up sometime around my 67th birthday a couple of years ago & sold it.

      Back to the girl & her site, you are correct in that this sort of thing needs to be encouraged. I just don't know that a PayPal donation would do any good, and in any event, she'll need to ask for it. We can't force PayPal to run her down and hand her money AFAIK if she doesn't setup the account from her end.

      Cheers, Gene

  21. More Proper. by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 5, Funny

    'who are those slashdot people? they swept over like Mongol-Tartars.'

    The Nazgul.

    --
    I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
    I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
  22. Is she single? Looking? by YetAnotherName · · Score: 5, Funny

    Come on, this is slashdot ... motorcycle riding photo-snapping babe through nuclear wasteland ... show me a geek that isn't drooling by now.

  23. Good location for a movie by ericspinder · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Come to think about it, it would be a great location for a disaster flick. Getting people over their fear of going there might be a problem. You'd have to pay a little more than scale.

    --
    The grass is only greener, if you don't take care of your own lawn.
  24. Favorite quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    To die quietly human need to acquire a tan of 500 roentgen within 5 hours.

  25. Re:MOD PARENT +1 INSIGHTFUL by Egonis · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There are many things people do everyday that shorten your or reduce your health, mainly: Using Gasoline!

    >I too agree that the USSR should be ashamed and we should be Proud Americans.

    It's not like accidents don't happen in the United States, and I don't quite see where your statement is founded.... simply because another country has a disaster, does not give Americans, nor any other country in the world bragging rights. I think what should be truly done, is that we all learn from examples, so this won't happen to humanity again.

  26. Chernobyl/Springfield by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "in year 1986 a guy named Akimov pushed wrong button and launched the biggest nuclear catastrophe ..."

    Hmm, looks like they had a Russian version of Homer Simpson working there. He was probably looking for the "donut button".

    1. Re:Chernobyl/Springfield by weeboo0104 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hmm, looks like they had a Russian version of Homer Simpson working there

      D'ohsky!

      --
      It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men. -Frederick Douglass
    2. Re:Chernobyl/Springfield by GnrcMan · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia, the doughnut eats you

    3. Re:Chernobyl/Springfield by dukeisgod · · Score: 1

      Mmmm, Borscht.....

    4. Re:Chernobyl/Springfield by lrucker · · Score: 1
      "in year 1986 a guy named Akimov pushed wrong button and launched the biggest nuclear catastrophe ..."

      Hmm, looks like they had a Russian version of Homer Simpson working there. He was probably looking for the "donut button".

      According to this analysis of the political and technical causes of Chernobyl, Chernobyl and the Downfall of the Soviet Union, the "wrong button" was the shutdown button, at a point where a quick shutdown was impossible:

      Homer Simpson was not only working at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Station, he was the plant manager, the chief engineer, and the head of nuclear safety.

      ...

      The standard procedure for recovering from such a situation is to shut down the reactor, wait 24 hours for the iodine and xenon to decay, and then restart. But when Toptunov announced that he was going to shut down the reactor, Deputy Chief Engineer Dyatlov, who was overseeing the experiment, countermanded him. Toptunov was backed up by the operations shift foreman, Aleksandr Akimov; but Dyatlov began storming around the control room, verbally abusing the operators and accusing them of ruining the experiment. He ordered them to increase the power in the reactor and stabilize it.

      Toptunov and Akimov refused at first, but Dyatlov threatened to replace them with the foreman and reaction control engineer who had just come off the shift at midnight and were still hanging around to watch the results of the experiment. The weak Akimov and the inexperienced Toptunov then gave in and raised the power levels in the reactor in the only way it was now possible, by removing most of the control rods from the reactor. This is an absolute violation of all reactor safety rules, but Toptunov told the investigators before his death (he died of acute radiation poisoning in the Moscow clinic a few weeks after the accident) that he was torn between his fear of causing a power surge and his fear of being fired if he didn't follow the orders of the Deputy Chief Engineer.

      ...

      The reactor was running out of control. Akimov announced that he was initiating an emergency shutdown and pressed the red button that causes all of the control rods to descend into the core of the reactor.

      At this point, a third major design flaw of the RBMK-1000 reactor that had not previously been recognized came into play. The control rods are 7 meters long, but when fully inserted into the core, the tips extend below the bottom. The tip of each control rod contains no graphite for the first meter of its length (the final one meter at the opposite end also is hollow). This means that the graphite in the control rods cannot begin absorbing excess neutrons and slowing the chain reaction until the rods have descended most of the way into the core. Furthermore, the weight of 300 hollow-tipped rods plunging down from the top of the reactor all at once compressed the steam and the ongoing nuclear reactions toward the bottom of the core as the rods began their descent. Rather than causing an immediate reduction in reactivity, pressing the emergency shut-down button caused another powerful surge in neutron production in the center and bottom of the core that happened to coincide with a power surge caused by the reactor's positive void coefficient.

  27. Yesterday by Vilim · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I saw this new page yesterday and when I visited it the hit counter was at about 6000 now it is at ~20000. Well show here who these Slashdot people are!

    --
    History will be kind to me, for I intend to write it - Sir Winston Churchill
  28. Re:Be ashamed. by reborn · · Score: 0, Troll

    (Oh, I wasn't suggesting that any American actually does feel proud, just a heat of the moment thing!)

  29. If you put up a site for the world to see. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...be prepared for the world to see it. It's simple as that, son. Accept it, or shut up.

  30. I for one.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    think she'd make a great candidate for a slashdot interview.....

    1. Re:I for one.... by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      Seconded.

      This lady defines courageous + geek.

      Another reply to this thread mentioned marriage proposals. *grin*

      Well, heh.

      I want to get in on the ground floor, there.

      Elena; I'm a securely employed American who lives within a few minutes distance of biker heaven - Sturgis, South Dakota. I'll sponsor you to come over if you like. No obligations - seriously - I just think America would be a better place if it had you in it. What do you think? No Chernobyl here... but we do have Wyoming, one can put the dosimeter to good use there :)

      (yup, it's a bit tongue in cheek, but seriously, who wouldn't want to get to know her, even as a friend? )

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    2. Re:I for one.... by lbredeso · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This would be the single greatest Slashdot interview ever!

    3. Re:I for one.... by The+Bullroarer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      A motion has been made and seconded. Request the chair to call for a vote?

      As for contact info, the young lady does include a postal address on the last page of her photojournal.

      Moreover, with a little sleuthing, I uncovered an e-mail address! You'll notice that some of the pictures bear the legend "kidofspeed.com"? Well, the URL has a "coming soon" page, which I found only mildly surprising. However a Whois lookup revealed that it was just registered on March 11th, so that explains a lack of content. Moreover, the lookup gave contact information that is very similar to Elena's postal address. It also gave an e-mail address, which I post here for the benefit of the Slashdot editors:

      <crocodile@bk.ru>

      I only gave this info up because I'm too shy to use it myself, but I really want to see a Slashdot interview! Honestly, I don't have anything to offer her but US citizenship, but I still wish I had the guts to write to her!

      Seriously, if she gets a thousand e-mails from horny Slashotters, how do you think she would respond? My guess is that after reading the first few with growing disgust, she would delete the rest without opening them (like Tom Hanks in Sleepless in Seattle), unless for some reason one of them manages to forcefully hijack her attention. (Actually, it would be more likely that her e-mail server would be slashdotted, and she couldn't read any.)

      So, a word from the wise to any would-be Romeos: Unless you honestly think you can impress this woman, don't bother her. Let Cowboy Neal, or one of the other editors, represent Slashdot in the interview. I'm sure then we'd find out if she's at all interested in meeting American men....

      One last thought: OTOH, if she is so interested, her chances of success are much better than those girls you see on the "Russian Mail-Order Brides" websites. Even if that is her eventual object, (which I highly doubt), she still deserves kudos for her intelligence in concocting such a scheme. I, for one, would still want to see if I could make an American lady out of her!

      --
      Frodo Lives!!
    4. Re:I for one.... by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      /me bows to someone with superior ski33z (or shall we say, more time? :) in the tracking realm...

      Too true as to the numbers of (possibly) superior suiters... the links thou givest to the Most Superior Dude Hanks, I do understand, and bowest my head in shame :)

      I basically figure my chances are about that of a snowball in a gasoline fire. In other words, normal :) Especially being so near Forty that I be :)

      But I'd be a total loss if I didn't at least try :)

      Somehow (where the tongue in cheek comes in) I doubt she'd be interested in leaving her family and life anyway...and making an "American lady" out of her would pretty much be a desecration, would it not? *grin*

      Let Cowboy Neal

      *snort* ;-)

      Cheers, BullRoarer

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    5. Re:I for one.... by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      ski33z

      and that's what happens to one when you are typing in the dark, Friday night drunk, and don't Preview (Let that be a warning :)

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    6. Re:I for one.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. Here's hoping Slashdot does it!

    7. Re:I for one.... by amper · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, I, for one, think she'd make a great candidate for a Pulitzer Prize, or a National Geographic Medal, or perhaps other honors.

  31. They should try by AndroidCat · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Scientology's Purification Rundown. Of course, they don't talk about the liver damage and other problems that might result. But they wouldn't lie, would they? (Oops, >a href="http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/Narconon/source s/reports/hogg.htm">they might.)

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  32. Re:Is she single? Looking? by weeboo0104 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Tell me about it! I'm still looking for the picture of her in leather and a shotgun strapped to her bike, riding down the road.

    --
    It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men. -Frederick Douglass
  33. Umm, moron, this is about Russia. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You really don't know that Chernobyl is 1) in Russia, and was 2) built by Russia? This is all Russia's doing, not the US's.

    1. Re:Umm, moron, this is about Russia. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not Russia comrade - Soviet Ukraine.

      There was difference, yes?

      P.S. I can type asshole on here?! Farking mahvelous.

  34. wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    wow, very poignant. It reminds us of the fragility of life.

    The last few pages were difficult to view,of the preschool... /cry

  35. Soviet calendar? by klui · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Looks like they only show 6 days/week. Why is this?? http://www.angelfire.com/extreme4/kiddofspeed/imag e21.3.JPG

    1. Re:Soviet calendar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks to me like the calendar accounts for seven days per week, but shows only six.

      Anybody else have a guess?

    2. Re:Soviet calendar? by psyki · · Score: 1

      If you look at the numbers you'll see a week is still 7 days long, for some reason they just skip it on the calendar.

      IE, the top left month shows:
      (going down) 2 3 4 (next column) 6 7 8 9 10 11

    3. Re:Soviet calendar? by mightymik2 · · Score: 1

      notice it skips a number as well? i GUESSING that there was another row of numbers, maybe in red, that has faded out over the years.

    4. Re:Soviet calendar? by dead_penguin · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Look at the numbers. Every seventh one is missing. They were probably printed in a different colour which has now faded away -- maybe red for Sundays?

      It's interesting though how the weeks run top to bottom instead of left to right like they do on "our" calendars.

      --

      It's only software!
    5. Re:Soviet calendar? by bsDaemon · · Score: 1

      why have a sabbath in a forced aethiest communist regieme?

    6. Re:Soviet calendar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look at the upper left month. Notice the circle directly below the 18. Presumably there once was a 19 inside that circle, until the ink faded.

    7. Re:Soviet calendar? by fugspit · · Score: 0

      Sounds plausible to me. Especially when you notice that January 19th has been circled. Or rather the space where that date would be if it hadn't faded away is circled.

    8. Re:Soviet calendar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you look at the January calendar, the place where the 19th should be is circled in pencil. The ink for Sunday was a different color that faded much faster (probably red).

    9. Re:Soviet calendar? by boomka · · Score: 4, Informative

      On the left there are abbreviated weekdays written, and they go from Monday to Saturday. Traditionally in Soviet Union everyone worked 6 day per week, and this calendar only shows the working days.

      --
      Human history becomes more and more a race between education and catastrophe.
      H.G. Wells, "The Outline of History"
    10. Re:Soviet calendar? by Like2Byte · · Score: 1

      What I find profound is the fact that the months are labeled from left to right (Horizontally) while the days of the month are labeled top to bottom (Vertically).

    11. Re:Soviet calendar? by nazh · · Score: 1

      no, if you look at the left there is only written 6 days, the calender is probably just showing working days,
      you also tell by the other "red-letter days" as 8th of mars and 1th of may, they are also lacking from the calendar

    12. Re:Soviet calendar? by CaptainPinko · · Score: 0

      in Poland they usually are red (so by extension I'll guess it was the same for them too) and red fades the quickest as anyone who owns a canadian flag knows

      --
      Your CPU is not doing anything else, at least do something.
    13. Re:Soviet calendar? by Bombcar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You are right. Notice that under 18 in the first month there is a circle around a date that has faded away.

      If someone wants to run that through the Gimp, I think you'll find that there is a "1986" at the bottom of the Calendar, which was in red and has faded.

    14. Re:Soviet calendar? by xandroid · · Score: 1

      I think you're right -- see how there's a circle where January 19th would be?

      --
      $ echo "ceci n'est pas une pipe" | sed -Ee 's/(eci n|pas )//g'
    15. Re:Soviet calendar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      more than that - holidays like May day are also missing - I think you're right

    16. Re:Soviet calendar? by nzhuk98 · · Score: 1
      Traditionally in Soviet Union everyone worked 6 day per week
      No, the normal work week was and is 5 days. And Sundays were in red as someone suggested. I am originally from Ukraine, btw.
    17. Re:Soviet calendar? by Ironica · · Score: 2

      Traditionally in Soviet Union everyone worked 6 day per week, and this calendar only shows the working days.

      Funny how they circled a day in January that wasn't on the calendar, then... ;-)

      I think the poster who suggested that Sunday was in a different color ink that has since faded probably has the right of it.

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    18. Re:Soviet calendar? by BACPro · · Score: 1

      IF you look close at January (?) 19th, the spot that the numeral should be is circled.

      There was probably different ink used for the non-working day and it has faded.

    19. Re:Soviet calendar? by macserv · · Score: 1

      It actually looks like he has Sunday, January 19 circled. It's an empty cirle, just below the 18th.

    20. Re:Soviet calendar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      This is because, as some others have suggested, the other colours simply faded away. If you look at it carefully, not only the Sundays, but also the major holidays are missing: May 1st, March 8th, May 9th, October 7th... (just some of the ones that come to mind). The most likely reason is that those, along with the Sundays, were printed in a different ink (red, most likely, though could've been anything), which did not prove to be as resistant to time as the black/blue inks. You can look at the picture above the calendar as well - note the deep blue tint? That's most likely because the same red pigment faded there as well.

    21. Re:Soviet calendar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right. I just ran this through GIMP and can see the 1986 clearly, and can almost see the outlines of the other days.

    22. Re:Soviet calendar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



      Good spotting!

    23. Re:Soviet calendar? by Bytal · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The upper left month has an empty space circled. Since I doubt anyone would circle an empty space that's where the faded numbers used to be :)

    24. Re:Soviet calendar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      all Soviet holidays (7 november, 1,2,9 May) - are missing too - meaning the red ink just faded.

    25. Re:Soviet calendar? by klui · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the insights. I thought that all "ink" on a page regardless of color would fade at the same rate. But since the colors react to different wavelengths my assumption is wrong.

    26. Re:Soviet calendar? by SmackCrackandPot · · Score: 1

      We have some anti-litter signs on the bus-stop outside our flat. The amount of the fine was originally in red ink, but has now faded to a glossy reflection.

    27. Re:Soviet calendar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lending credence to that, the calender has "missing" days like May 1 (Labor Day, USSR-style as she mentions). Also, May 7 and Oct 7. Not sure what May 7 is, but Oct 7 is the October Revolution.

    28. Re:Soviet calendar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Analyze it logically:

      Notice month in upper left corner:
      can't read the "1"
      Looks like the "19" is circled but can't see the "19" itself

      Month to right is 28 days - February, months go left to right, top to
      bottom.

      Calendar year is 1986

      "holidays" (or whatever probably used the same color) and Sundays are in
      an ink color which is now effectively invisible in the photo

      Note the non-Sunday "holidays":
      1986-01-01
      1986-03-08
      1986-05-01
      1 986-05-02
      1986-05-09
      1986-10-07
      1986-11-07
      198 6-11-08

  36. Re:Be ashamed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what in the flying fuck are you talking about, asshole?

  37. Question for physics people by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    Am I correct in assuming that roengen is the Russian term for rem, or are they using a different unit of measurement?

    1. Re:Question for physics people by BossTree · · Score: 2, Informative

      Roentgen is a measurement of ionization energy in air. rem is a measurement of human-risk/exposure. for the high-energy forms of ionizing radiation (gamma/X), roentgen=rem, but for other forms (beta/neutrons, notably, alpha and sf would only be an issue if internalized), rem >> roentgen

    2. Re:Question for physics people by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 5, Informative

      Very different units.

      Roentgens measure ionizing radiation in air/free field. Rems (actually REM, an acronym for Roentgen-Equivalent Man) are a measure of how much biological damage a given amount of radiation does. Basically, one roentgen of gamma radiation is appx. equivalent to one rad absorbed is appx. equivalent to one rem. However, other types of radiation have different conversions - for instance, one rad of alpha radiation is appx. equivalent to 20 rems of exposure.

      The short version - "In summary, the roentgen is a unit of exposure, the rad is a unit of absorbed dose, and the rem is a unit of biological dose."

      (data from http://www.radford.edu/~fac-man/Safety/Radiation/c hp5.htm)

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    3. Re:Question for physics people by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 4, Informative

      Roentgen: radiation intensity required to produce and ionization charge of 0.000258 coulombs per kilogram of air.

      Rem: absorbed dose of 0.01 joules of energy per kilogram of tissue

      One roentgen of gamma radiation exposure results in about one rad of absorbed dose.

  38. who needs uranium when you have W by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reminds me of this article about Economic Ghost Towns

  39. She's doing fine. by douglips · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Roentgens, the unit used in her journal, measure ionization of the air. The general conversion is that 1 Roentgen = 1 REM, the unit we use for human radiation exposure in the US.

    In one transcontinental roundtrip flight, you get 6 millirem, which is equal to 6000 microroentgen. Her little counter is reading microroentgen per hour, so she can go somewhere where her counter is reading 500 and it's just like she's sitting on an airliner at 35000 feet.

    Your yearly dose is about 300 millirem, so in order for her to soak that up in hours, as you claim, she'd have to sit somewhere that her counter reads 100000 or more. She's being very smart. If she were walking around without the dosimeter, she could get in trouble.

    This is what she means when she says people fear what they don't understand. Once you understand the risks involved, you see her radiation exposure is much less risky than, say, smoking, or even riding motorcycles at all.

    1. Re:She's doing fine. by zymurgy_cat · · Score: 2, Informative

      Roentgens, the unit used in her journal, measure ionization of the air. The general conversion is that 1 Roentgen = 1 REM, the unit we use for human radiation exposure in the US.

      That's usually true for beta radiation and gamma, too, if I'm not mistaken. Alpha radiation has a factor of something like 20 (ie, 20 rem for 1 rad of alpha radiation). For those not versed in things nuclear, that's because alpha radiation is massively ionizing compared to others. Neutron radiation has different factors depending on whether it's thermal or fast neutrons.

      For a quick explanation on all these units and radiation dosage in general, check here.

      --
      -- Fugacity: Confusing chemists since 1908
  40. Perspective by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 2, Insightful

    She's riding a fast motorcycle on unswept roads in a place where nobody's going to come along to find you for a long, long time.

    A few rem won't add materially to her risk.

  41. Re:MOD PARENT +1 INSIGHTFUL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > I too agree that the USSR should be ashamed and we should be Proud Americans.

    Let's see shall we?

    Three mile island ring any bells?

    And then there's the deliberate ones, hiroshima and nagasaki.

    Still proud?

  42. What I would not give... by Mr.+Flibble · · Score: 1

    I have a few old bikes, specifically Nortons. I would really like to get my 1962 650 SS up and running and take it over there just to ride around.

    Sure, it won't even come close to her bike - but hell, I wanted to get it restored and ride across Canada from coast to coast, now taking it to the ghost town seems somehow much more appealing.

    I wonder how many people will start doing this?

    In the end, I hope she makes some $$$ as a tour guide. Similar to what she mentions other people do.

    --
    Try to hack my 31337 firewall!
    1. Re:What I would not give... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FARKING Red Rose, eh...

  43. holy shit by NME · · Score: 1

    Tarkofsky was a prophet! Down to the people making their living as guides in The Zone. But, of course we didn't need anything to fall from the sky. We did it ourselves. Yay us! -nme!

    1. Re:holy shit by HarryCaul · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I saw that. Of course, I'd already emailed this story to some people as a "real life Stalker".

    2. Re:holy shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually it's not Tarkovsky who is the prophet in this case.
      He was the director of a movie, which was (loosely) based on a book by Strugatzky brothers called Roadside Picnic
      You can read it for instance here

  44. Quite a tan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "to die quietly humans need to acquire a tan of 500 roentgen within 5 hours"

  45. Something to think about... by fm6 · · Score: 1

    ..when your mom, girlfriend, or whatever complains that your room needs dusting!

  46. Re:Be ashamed. by reborn · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I blame the beer. Like I said in two other posts (?), I made a mistake, it's amazing how often people do actually make mistakes, learn to live with it fuckmook.

  47. This quote sums it up... by reality-bytes · · Score: 2, Funny

    I shouldn't do this first gear hard launch in front of leading personal and some committee.. that's fine with me... after all, what did I lose, except for those several hundreds microroengen

    Thats my kind of radiation-researcher ;)

    --
    Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
  48. You're a geek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Act like one.

    Primarily you should ask how many Rods to the HoggsHead does she get on that kawasaki, and then you ask for a tour... for scientific porpuses ;)

  49. Re:Is she single? Looking? by lambent · · Score: 1

    Speaking of it being slashdot ... where are the dinks complaining about her grammatical skills? C'mon, I want a free lesson in professional writing from an AC!

  50. still impresive by Rams�s+Morales · · Score: 1

    For some reason, that's one place I think I need to visit.

    Can anyone explain how the trees got red because of the radiation? That IS scary.

    1. Re:still impresive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "red" is a jargon for very high radioactivity. Lethal levels.

    2. Re:still impresive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Nope, they really turned red. They were mostly Scotch pine and they died more or less instantly when the cloud blew over (the aspen and birch trees are more resistant). It's the subject of some research - search for Chernobyl and "Red Forest" to find some. Not just how they turned red, but what happens now with tons of radioactive wood buried and decomposing into the groundwater.

    3. Re:still impresive by dedazo · · Score: 1

      Patriotism?

      --
      Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
    4. Re:still impresive by Tackhead · · Score: 3, Interesting
      > Nope, they really turned red. They were mostly Scotch pine and they died more or less instantly when the cloud blew over (the aspen and birch trees are more resistant). It's the subject of some research - search for Chernobyl and "Red Forest" to find some. Not just how they turned red, but what happens now with tons of radioactive wood buried and decomposing into the groundwater.

      Pictures of the Red Forest - trees vs. 60 Grays. Holy shit.

    5. Re:still impresive by shlong · · Score: 1

      [...]but what happens now with tons of radioactive wood buried and decomposing into the groundwater.


      I wondered about this too, and my initial thought was that it was silly to just cut and bury the entire forest. Then it occurred to me that allowing all of that dead wood to stand would have made it very susecptible to a fire. A fire would re-release all of the absorbed radioactive particles back into the air, and it would have been another disaster down-wind. Since the area is evacuated, there would have been little chance to stop it once it started. So doing what they did was probably the lesser of evils.

      --
      Cat, the other, tastier white meat.
    6. Re:still impresive by srvivn21 · · Score: 1
      > Nope, they really turned red. They were mostly Scotch pine and they died more or less instantly when the cloud blew over (the aspen and birch trees are more resistant). It's the subject of some research - search for Chernobyl and "Red Forest" to find some. Not just how they turned red, but what happens now with tons of radioactive wood buried and decomposing into the groundwater.


      Pictures of the Red Forest - trees vs. 60 Grays. Holy shit.



      Same pictures with english text...
  51. how ironic by boomka · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In the last picture in chapter 9, there is this big slogan across the room. In Ukrainian, it reads:
    "Long live communism - the bright future for the whole mankind!"

    Truly, you may never know how the words you say today will be _seen_ tomorrow.

    --
    Human history becomes more and more a race between education and catastrophe.
    H.G. Wells, "The Outline of History"
    1. Re:how ironic by srmalloy · · Score: 2, Funny
      In the last picture in chapter 9, there is this big slogan across the room. In Ukrainian, it reads:
      "Long live communism - the bright future for the whole mankind!"
      Well, if we're all glowing in the dark, that's a bright future, isn't it?
    2. Re:how ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It is no different than "War on Terrorism", "Axis of Evil", "They hate our freedom", and the other recent absurdities. Trust me, the USA is becoming just as much a socialist state as the USSR was.

    3. Re:how ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except people come to America by the millions - that can't be said for the Soviet Union.

    4. Re:how ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, god forbid we actually do something that might keep the country from being attacked again. Or are you one of those people who believes that if only we take the troops out of Saudi Arabia and quit buying mideast oil, then terrorism will go away?

    5. Re:how ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I believe that he's trying to draw attention to the parallels between Soviet and American jingoism.

    6. Re:how ironic by jimmyswimmy · · Score: 1

      My favorite is the picture of the faded wording on the side of a building on chapter 12. It is part of the old Soviet national anthem, roughly translated (my Russian is kinda rusty):

      "Party of Lenin, the strength of the people, communism marches solemnly towards us."

      Haven't seen that one in years. For some reason nobody likes communism anymore (hmm, wonder why).

      --

      Just my $0.55 (US inflation, 1774-2008, for $0.02)
    7. Re:how ironic by superyooser · · Score: 1
      For some reason nobody likes communism anymore

      Sadly, that is not true. Some people never learn.

      [insert pithy quote about infinite human stupidity]

    8. Re:how ironic by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You mean totalitarian? Socialism is an ecconomic system that is working quite nicely in many places. It's propaganda and totalitarianism that are our common enemy.

    9. Re:how ironic by JoeBaldwin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not exactly socialist. America is moving in the opposite direction (i.e fascism, marrying of corporation and state).

      The propaganda is Soviet; the politics is not.

    10. Re:how ironic by 11223 · · Score: 1
      In Soviet Russia, communism marches solemnly towards YOU!

      Sadly there are a lot of people who still like communism, the most prominent being International ANSWER, the group who organized most of the anti-Iraq war rallies (and which has ties to North Korea). As they say on ProtestWarrior, Communism only killed 100 million people; let's give it another chance!

    11. Re:how ironic by lawpoop · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Socialist? You mean authoritarian police state.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
  52. Trek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She looks like Ensign Roe (without the nose gills)

  53. Re:Is she single? Looking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Is she single?

    I certainly hope so... I don't think she should be having children :-)

  54. Only driven on Sundays by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and less than 3000 rotegens!

  55. Product Placement by ccTech · · Score: 1

    I think I shall now go buy a Shoei helment, so that we can ride together into the Red Sunset together.

    ~
    Terra
    ~

  56. MOD PARENT UP by Max+Threshold · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    And all that jazz.

  57. Pictures by srcosmo · · Score: 2
    She said she likes to explore alone, but then who took pictures like this one?

    Unless she set the camera on a, uh, really high fence post. Or maybe she has a tripod, I guess...

    --
    free speach
    Did you mean: free speech
    1. Re:Pictures by js3 · · Score: 1

      on one of the pages she talks about a guide in the city.. you can try to find it yourself

      --
      did you forget to take your meds?
    2. Re:Pictures by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      That's not in the city yet. That's a camp of radiation scientists. There are thousands of people there, so no wonder someone took a photo of her. By "alone" she probably means she doesn't drag people around with her, but she doesn't avoid random meetings :)

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  58. Temporary mirror for when angelfire quota runs out by frostyboy · · Score: 3, Informative
    https://netfiles.uiuc.edu/benoc/mirrors/www.angelf ire.com/extreme4/kiddofspeed/

    Those pictures are just great at showing the sense of "creepiness" of those places. I can definitely understand why folks are afraid of venturing into the dead zone, even though these aren't terribly large doses of radiation.

    Everyone should definitely take the time to look through ALL of the pages. Thanks to the author/photographer for a great photo-essay.



    Visit the oldest running human webcam on the internet:
    http://www.mitwebcam.com
    --
    Who is General Failure? And why is he reading my disk????
  59. I tell you, if it's not the inbreeding.... by modder · · Score: 1

    ...that gets you, it's the radiation.

    From the linked site: "It must be sectarian village, one of the sect where brothers have been marrying sisters and they all used to have one last name."

  60. Re:In the new Soviet Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Re:In the new Soviet Slashdot

    Especially those that use mod points on AC comments!

  61. good article by raflmoe · · Score: 1

    I reckon this is one of the most interesting articles / sites I've ever read. Going to to Chernobyl is quite amazing, and especially sharing it with us. :D

    1. Re:good article by HarryCaul · · Score: 1

      Without a doubt one of the best websites I've ever visited, and that's saying something. Wow.

  62. Thank you, Slashdot by Dr.+Mu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is the most profound and disturbing story I've ever seen here. It underscores, where words alone are hopelessly inadequate, the depraved hubris in thinking we've "tamed the atom". My kudos to the editors for choosing to post it!

    1. Re:Thank you, Slashdot by Endive4Ever · · Score: 1

      Likewise, a photo or two of a burning building underscores, where words alone are hopelessly inadequate, the depraved hubris in thinking we've "tamed fire".

      Hope you don't mind shivering in the cold, dude.

      --
      ---
    2. Re:Thank you, Slashdot by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      This is the most profound and disturbing story I've ever seen here. It underscores, where words alone are hopelessly inadequate, the depraved hubris in thinking we've "tamed the atom".
      No. It shows what happens when you run a reactor whose default operating mode is unsafe, and the surround this unsafe and unstable reactor with tons of flammable materials. The atom is well and truly tamed, as the hundreds of reactors operating around the world prove.
    3. Re:Thank you, Slashdot by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      {sigh} no matter the track record of atomic power in the world today, there will alway be those that oppose it. Usually on very shaky ground. And I've found that those people are usually willfully ignorant of facts, and prefer to remain that way. Reasonably safe reactors have been a reality for some time, and they're only getting safer as our experience grows and technology improves. It irritates me when people use Chernobyl as proof that all reactors are just bombs waiting to explode. ALL dense power sources carry some penalty for widespread use, but that's the price we pay for maintaining a high-energy industrial economy. I suppose we could all go back to living on farms (or in caves) but I for one like the benefits of technic civilization, and won't give them up easily. Ultimately, we need very energy-dense power sources, and nuclear is the most practical of all from that perspective. Yes, if we ever achieve practical fusion power that would be superior, but the odds don't look any too good on that right now, so my money is on fission.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    4. Re:Thank you, Slashdot by daviddennis · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's worse than that. They disabled the automated safety features of the reactor.

      The accident was eloquent testimony to the power of human stupidity.

      D

    5. Re:Thank you, Slashdot by Dr.+Mu · · Score: 1
      When determining whether a technology is "tamed", you have to ask two questions:
      1. How likely is it to make a mistake with dire consequences?
      2. How dire can those consequences be?
      Given that a nuclear screwup can cost thousands of lives and that its calamitous effects can last 10,000 years or more, to consider the technology "tamed", it damn well better be idiot-proof. Chernobyl stands as stark testimony that it is not.
    6. Re:Thank you, Slashdot by ax_42 · · Score: 1
      It underscores, where words alone are hopelessly inadequate, the depraved hubris in thinking we've "tamed the atom". My kudos to the editors for choosing to post it!


      Dear 1902 newspaper, thank you for publishing the report on the accident of the horseless carriage, it underscores, where words alone are hopelessly inadequate, the depraved hubris in thinking we've "tamed the internal combustion engine".

      Bullshit -- Chernobyl was a crappily designed reactor which was a disaster waiting to happen (not that reactors like that are no longer in production or anything.....) Check out more modern reactors before spouting FUD though.

    7. Re:Thank you, Slashdot by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      Given that a nuclear screwup can cost thousands of lives and that its calamitous effects can last 10,000 years or more, to consider the technology "tamed", it damn well better be idiot-proof. Chernobyl stands as stark testimony that it is not.
      Only idiots who don't understand the difference between a PWR and a graphite moderated BWR believe that.
  63. Re:Is she single? Looking? by BossTree · · Score: 3, Insightful

    grammatical skills completely dwarfed by "dramatical" skills

  64. Re:Is she single? Looking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Puddles of drool. Now if only I were single and looking...sigh

    But wow...aside from the fact that she probably glows in the dark, this girl is pretty amazing: photographer, journalist, adventurer, quite beautiful, and isn't afraid of doing 170km/h. Can we say geek dream come true? Am I the only one disappointed that she was wise enough to not include an email?

  65. Hehe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Elena wrote 'who are those slashdot people? they swept over like Mongol-Tartars.'"

    In Soviet Russia, websites view you!

    A slashdotting is a little like standing under the nickel slot machine when it dumps twenty pounds of nickels all at once - in one way you're glad they're there, but - OW!

  66. Re:MOD PARENT +1 INSIGHTFUL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    lets just a hope that "rug" called Yucca Mountains you are sweeping your oh-so-clean nuclear waste under is still stable in a 1000years or USA might look like those pics, of course it will be radioactive in 10,000 years so keep sweeping !!

  67. Re:Why the moderation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because it's fucking dumb

  68. Re:seriously! by xtermin8 · · Score: 1

    "if I walk few hundred meters towards reactor, then I will find 3 roengen. If I keep walking all the way to reactor, then at the end of a journey I will glow in a dark. May be this is why they call it a magic wood. this sort of a magic when one walk in in a biker leather and coming out like a knight in a shinning armour. "

  69. In Soviet Russia, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the motorcycle rides YOU!!!

  70. Re:Is she single? Looking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "aside from the fact that she probably glows in the dark"

    Is that a downside or a bonus?

  71. Send your love to her :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last page:

    Ukraine
    03187 Kiev-187
    Zabolotnogo 20/A
    Post Box 25
    Elena

  72. real hosting? by Suppafly · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why don't we, as a community, set her up with some real hosting for her pics.. maybe something with moveable type and plenty of room for pictures.

    1. Re:real hosting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't we, as a community, set her up with some real hosting for her pics..

      Well, Angelfire seems to be holding up to this slashdotting. If that isn't "real" hosting, then I don't know what is.


      BTW, she posted her address. Ukraine 03187 Kiev-187 Zabolotnogo 20/A Post Box 25 Elena
      She deserves a few rubles/dollars/euros!

  73. In Soviet Russia Smirnov village names you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I saw that all people that lived in this village for last 200 years were Smirnovs. It must be sectarian village, one of the sect where brothers have been marrying sisters and they all used to have one last name. I put this village on my map as Smirnovka.

    We have places like that in America too. On our map we call them West Virginia.

  74. I wonder if her mailbox will get flooded too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Ukraine 03187 Kiev-187 Zabolotnogo 20/A Post Box 25 Elena

    Go on, send a post card.

    1. Re:I wonder if her mailbox will get flooded too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Red Rose

  75. Quote is inexact by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

    500 roentgen of alpha radiation is a lot, lot worse than 500 roentgen of x-rays... they both might be enough to kill you, but the quote should really use proper units - rems (or Sieverts), the unit of biological dose.

    --

    ---
    Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
    (I read with sigs off.)
    1. Re:Quote is inexact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      500 roentgen of alpha radiation is a lot, lot worse than 500 roentgen of x-rays...

      I'd refine that a little to say: alpha radiation aborbed by living tissue will do more damage, rad for rad, than gammas or x-rays.

      But for that very same reason, alpha particles are almost entirely stopped by the outside layer of dead skin (the epidermis) and by clothing, and so unless you inhale or ingest an alpha-emitter, they are basically irrelevant. (this is true for those from a nuclear source -- i.e. having a few MeV. cosmics can have more energy, but will shower in the upper atmosphere.)

      the quote should really use proper units - rems (or Sieverts), the unit of biological dose.

      That is true. Of course, rems are not what is usually measured in the field. To estimate a dose in terms of rems requires either some analysis or else a fairly sophisticated instrument. It's quite understandable that she speaks in terms of what she actually measures.

  76. Mongol-Tatars by Semantic+Anomaly · · Score: 1
    Elena wrote 'who are those slashdot people? they swept over like Mongol-Tartars.'

    Scratch a Russian and find a... Slashdot reader?

  77. Wow by Snarfvs+Maximvs · · Score: 5, Funny

    She's hot, she rides a motorcycle, and she has an accent.

    I think I'm in love.

    Of course, our kids will each have 9 heads. :-(

    --
    -----------------------

    To understand recursion, one must first understand recursion.

    1. Re:Wow by eclectro · · Score: 1

      I think I'm in love.

      You and about another 10,000 slashdotters, each cramming her inbox with spam asking for a date.

      Of course, our kids will each have 9 heads. :-(

      I'm all for biodiversity, and they're gonna be my nine headed kids.

      Get in line. I was first.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    2. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      She's hot...

      and the dosimeter confirms it.

    3. Re:Wow by dragoness · · Score: 1

      Oh, no, she won't be having kids.

      Obligatory Futurama quote:

      Bender: "What should we point it at first?"
      Fry: "I dunno. Try it on me!" *zap* "Ow! My sperm!"
      Bender: "Wow! Neat! Mind if I try that again?" *zap*
      Fry: "Huh, didn't hurt that time."

      --

      -----
      show me salvation, and i'll hate it.
    4. Re:wow by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      I drank it too.
      1) The drink "Lugola" looked nothing like cola. I remember it: A full, normal glass of what looked like clean water and tasted exactly like apple seeds (take apple seeds from the apple core, peel them and eat - that's the taste, not even really unpleasant)
      2) Stettin is in Poland. An average American may need extra guidelines like "close to Germany" but you could assume /. crowd is more savvy about that stuff. Besides, it's the furthest corner of Poland from the place of accident.
      3) The drink was meant to supply extra iodine to people's organisms so they don't absorb the contaminated iodine from food. Giving the drink to people AFTER the radioactive cloud passed was pretty much pointless and was more of a gesture that the government does something than any real help. (Don't blame the polish government though. They didn't know until it was too late too.)

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    5. Re:Wow by catscan2000 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, as they say, nine heads are better than one.

      :-)

    6. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, because well all know what they say about guys with nine heads.

    7. Re:wow by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      Giving the drink to people AFTER the radioactive cloud passed was pretty much pointless and was more of a gesture that the government does something than any real help. (Don't blame the polish government though. They didn't know until it was too late too.)

      This is the same government that built glass-bottom boats, after all.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    8. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, our kids will each have 9 heads. :-(

      but think of the head they will give when they get older. ;)

    9. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well if you always wanted a smart kid, then a combined IQ of around 900 would be a good start =P

  78. Exposure levels by earthforce_1 · · Score: 5, Informative

    From
    http://ldml.stanford.edu/cisac/pdf/Nuc_terr_ back.p df
    20,000 millirem will mutate DNA enough to produce noticeable health effects. Above 100,000 millirem, diseases manifest.

    10,000 millirem is enough to increase your cancer risk.
    5,000 millirem per year is the maximum allowable annual dosage.

    25,000-100.000 mrem - Temporary blood changes
    35,000 - Loss of appetite, nausea
    50,000 - Temporary sterility in males
    100,000 - 2x normal incidence of genetic defects
    100,000 - 300,000 - Vomiting, diarrhea
    300,000 - 500,000 - 50% chance of death if not treated
    300,000+ - Permanent sterility for females
    400,000-1,000,000 - Acute illnes, death within days if not treated.

    Her meter was showing over 800 millirem per hour, when she was standing a few hundred metres from the reactor.

    I am facinated by these pictures, I would love to (briefly) visit these places, but I fear she will do herself serious harm over time. The area is an incredible time capsule.

    --
    My rights don't need management.
    1. Re:Exposure levels by Krystofer · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, if you sort through her broken English, her dosimeter is reading in MICROrem, not millirem, which means she was getting over .8 millirem per hour. Not quite as bad, is it?

    2. Re:Exposure levels by man_ls · · Score: 5, Informative

      Her meter was microretnogen/hour.

      (spelling is wrong)

      REM is retnogen enhanced modifier or something to that effect -- it's the dose * an absorbtion factor.

      not quite the same thing.

    3. Re:Exposure levels by smellygeek · · Score: 1

      50,000 - Temporary sterility in males

      Cool. Where do I sign up?

    4. Re:Exposure levels by BossTree · · Score: 2, Informative

      Her meter was roentgen- see posts above for roentgen vs. REM. For gamma/x, nearly the same, but not for beta and other forms. You'd need some other measurements to map the meter she had into mREM.

    5. Re:Exposure levels by Krystofer · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected (or sit typing corrected)

      It's still a lot less than the dosage that some people are thinking it is, right?

    6. Re:Exposure levels by man_ls · · Score: 1

      It's ~hundreds of times above background but it's not at a level where it'll noticably cause health effects if she's in it for long.

      Assuming she takes precautions like taking a shower and washing her clothes when she gets out/burning her clothes when she gets out, she'll be fine. (i.e. its probably only reducing her lifespan by the actual amount of time she's in the deadzone.)

    7. Re:Exposure levels by Phanatic1a · · Score: 5, Informative

      Her meter was showing over 800 millirem per hour

      No, it wasn't. It was showing 800 microroentgen per hour.

      One of the things that confuses people about radioation are the different measurements.

      A roentgen is the amount of X or gamma radiation needed to deposit in dry air 2.58E-4 Coulombs per kilogram, or roughly 100 ergs per gram.

      Rads are the absorbed dose, the amount of energy actually absorbed in a material. 1 rad is equal to 100 ergs per gram.

      Rems are the equivalent dose, a relationship between the absorbed energy and actual biological damage. Take the rads, multiply by a quality factor which is based on the type of radiation under discussion, and you the get rems.

      A Curie is the unit of radioactivity, one Curie being equal to 37,000,000,000 radioactive decays per second.

      Flip over to SI, and you have Grays as the absorbed dose (1 Gy = 100 rads), Sieverts as the equivalent dose (1 Sv = 100 rem), and Becquerels as the radioactivty (3.7E10 Bq in one Ci).

      Her meter was showing 800 microroentgen per hour. That's gammas and x-rays, by the way. Those have a quality factor of 1; they're very penetrating, but also chargeless, massless, and very small, so they have a weak interaction cross-section. 800 microroentgen per hour translates to 800 microrads per hour, which when you multiply by the quality factor of 1 is, surprise, 800 microrem per hour.

      So to get "maximum allowable annual doseage" (allowable by whom, exactly?) of 5,000 millirem, she'd have to hang around the reactor for 260 days, which is about 2/3rds of a year to begin with. I don't think she's going to be doing herself serious harm.

      And the alphas and the betas? Lousy mean free path through air.

    8. Re:Exposure levels by BossTree · · Score: 1
      Yes, alpha-emitting isotopes aren't an issue: unless you injest them. Skin is a sufficient shield, but I wouldn't suggest breathing deeply. Beta emitters are worth knowing about- there are many isotopes that emit high-energy betas. Beta particles have reaonsable good mean free paths in air (usually in measurement of meters), and you really wouldn't want to injest them. Metal shielding is generally recommended. Since beta is directly ionizing radition (as opposed to gamma), they have a much higher 'quality factor' (one of the more ironic terms I've ever had to use...)

      Hands down, the most dangerous part of her whole visit is the possibility (probability?) of injestion. Whatever the meter says in air doesn't mean squat if you get even a microgram in your lungs. Seen a few too many health-physics versions of "Red Asphalt" to want to think much about that...

    9. Re:Exposure levels by t14m4t · · Score: 2, Interesting

      REM = Roenkgen Equivelant in Man

      a Rem is the measure of damage caused by a Roenkgen (R) to the marrow of the thigh bone.

      1 R is the amount of energy deposited by 100 ergs/cc radiation in dry air.

      and, of course, 1 erg is the amount of radiation caused by 3 billion uranium-238 atoms fissioning.

      or some shit like that....

      the equation is REM = R*factor. for humans, the factors are:

      beta/gamma: 1
      neutron: 2
      alpha: 10

      of course, alphas get absorbed by your clothing before they ever reach you, and betas get absorbed by the dead skin in your epidermal layer, and radiation is rarely neutron, so for most cases:

      1 R = 1 REM

      kinda nice that they set it up that way, huh?

      weylin

      --
      67.5% Slashdot Pure I guess I need to work on that.... :)
    10. Re:Exposure levels by man_ls · · Score: 1

      Thank you for explaining it in the way I tried to but didn't know enough to make work.

      Do you do this kind of thing for a career, or just something you picked up along the way?

    11. Re:Exposure levels by t14m4t · · Score: 1

      actually, I've been a US submarine nuke for about 2.5 years now. right now I'm in school to become a certified nuclear engineer. luckily, this is the kind of thing I've been able to find in alternate sources so I don't mind talking about it.

      I wouldn't trust the numbers though (except the beta/gama factor). i'm going off the top of my head, so things like the fission rate to get 1 R is probably a little off.

      weylin

      --
      67.5% Slashdot Pure I guess I need to work on that.... :)
    12. Re:Exposure levels by wagnerer · · Score: 1

      These numbers only apply to acute doses, i.e. getting it all within a few minutes. The threshold for chronic exposure limits is currently unknown so most regulators simply assume there is no benefit from the time a body has to repairs itself.

      Think of a chemotherapy patient getting all the chemo they normally get in a month in one day. You'd have a corpse on hand after the first day. The same holds for radiation, its just that given the presumed effect of chronic radiaiton is cancer and 1/5 of everyone is expected to get it you'd need lots of people living in a place like Chornobyl to get any good numbers for real risk. Anyone care to volunteer, I hear its a quiet neighborhood?

    13. Re:Exposure levels by SmackCrackandPot · · Score: 1

      400,000-1,000,000 - Acute illnes, death within days if not treated

      What treatments are there for someone with such dosage?

  79. An idea by DigiShaman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Has anyone thought of an idea to do P2P website hosting? I think it would be an interesting idea to have a slashdot client running on your computer. That way, ever website you visit gets cached to the client. And because it's cached, you also end up hosting the website for other slashdotters happen to have the same client program, yet arn't able to gain access to the original URL.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
    1. Re:An idea by \\ · · Score: 1

      A "slashdot" apache module would be far more interesting and useful, methinks.

      If installed, if a (configurable) large number of hits comes from one source in a short period of time, offload a site mirror (or something) to another site and redirect the users, or shut down, or do something.

      Hell, set something up on slashdot itself to check for the "slashdot" module, and if it exists, slashdot can mirror the site. You could make this work for any location, though the security problems are obvious.. not to mention the number of people that would actually install the module would be slim, because after all, who knows they're going to get randomly slashdotted?

      Whatever, though. Some kind of apache module to detect a slashdot effect and then do something in response would be pretty fucking useful.

    2. Re:An idea by RefriedBean · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Like Freenet?

    3. Re:An idea by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      The problem is, who's going to host a mirror? Bandwidth costs money. With a P2P scheme, everyone can share the load.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    4. Re:An idea by Pathwalker · · Score: 1

      Isn't that what bittorrent is for? The more people download, the more copies there are feeding the netowrk...

      (BTW - like everyone else probably did, I saved a mirror copy in case the site goes down.
      Even though the site is only 5 megs or so, I also set up a torrent here.)

    5. Re:An idea by Pathwalker · · Score: 1

      heh - pasted the wrong link - torrent file is here...

    6. Re:An idea by root+66 · · Score: 1

      Great idea. -- Now, where's the fun??

      --
      -- I love the smell of Blue Screens in the morning.
    7. Re:An idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be great until people start replacing the cached content with goatse.

    8. Re:An idea by \\ · · Score: 1

      That would be the supposed beauty of it. The bringer of the traffic would host the mirror. Slashdot would mirror site-x with site-x's consent thanks to the installation of the "slashdot" module.

      Lots of holes in that idea, though. If you automated the process, you could fake a large amount of unique traffic and trigger a backup to a site, which could then just turn around and throw ads on it and say it's the original poster of said content. Etc etc etc.

      So, yeah, automation bad, but maybe a module that JUST notices heavy amounts of bandwidth consumption from one referer could automatically put up a "not accept traffic from referer x" or "site is busy come back later" or something page instead of showing content. That'd be nice and supposedly simple.

  80. HERE IS A SEMI-MIRROR by dexterpexter · · Score: 1

    I got most of it, I think. So, in case the angelfire page goes down, here is a semi-mirror. Some of the images didn't save, but I got most everything.

    It looks like the angelfire page is still there, but this might help her page load a little.

    HERE IS THE PAGE:
    http://www.ee.utulsa.edu/~tellis/mirror/kiddofspee d.html

    --

    *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
    "We are Linux. Resistance is measured in Ohms."
  81. Irony? by OverlordQ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The licence plate on her bike is KIA.

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    1. Re:Irony? by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      Might not be significant in Ukranian.

      I'll bet there are a lot of innocent US licese plates that come off as terribly funny or ironic to speakers of other languages.

    2. Re:Irony? by genka · · Score: 1

      KIA on her plates means that the bike is registered in Kiev. First two letters- location, the last one is sequential

    3. Re:Irony? by ArsSineArtificio · · Score: 1
      The licence plate on her bike is KIA.

      For non-native English speakers: this is the common military abbreviation for "killed in action", meaning a combatant who died while fighting.

      --
      All employees must wash hands before seeking equitable relief.
  82. Re:Is she single? Looking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As pointed out elsewhere, she also looks like Ensign Roe of NG Trek fame. If you date her, just don't make her wear nose-gills in bed. Her Geek Meter would go off the scale.

  83. I want to have her children. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cause she sure as hell can't have any.

    -rimshot-

    No, by 'rimshot', I meant...oh, forget it...although, thinking about it, it -would- help prevent kids....

    *cough*

  84. How much waste... by Stween · · Score: 1

    I thought this the first time the photos were posted and with the new ones this time round: Look at the amount of rubbish that's left in the various buildings from when people were evacuated.

    How much of that just won't be biodegradable? How about how much more stuff we've manufactured over the years?

    What are future civilisations going to think when all they find of ours are plastic baby dolls?

    (Laugh. It's a joke, that might just make you think.)

    1. Re:How much waste... by Endive4Ever · · Score: 1

      What are future civilisations going to think when all they find of ours are plastic baby dolls?


      They will find the plastic and think 'thank goodness they didn't burn up ALL the petrochemicals' and then they will scoop it up into the bin so it can be processed into something useful.

      Seriously. In a few hundred years some of the most valuable land on earth will be the landfills.

      --
      ---
  85. OT: Re:Soaking up the gamma by angst_ridden_hipster · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Hey, as a potter, you're probably getting a few handfuls more radiation than the general populace just by virtue of your glaze materials.

    But then, if you do exclusively anagama, that's not a problem.

    I had a high school physics prof bring in some happy yellow Fiestaware bowls that she bought in New Mexico when she was working on the bomb. That yellow was from the Uranium Oxide in the glaze. Those things got the Geiger counter screaming, I can tell you. "How'd you like to eat your Wheaties from that?" she'd ask.

    I often wonder what isotopes my cobalt carbonate or manganese have in 'em...

    --
    Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachtani?
    www.fogbound.net
    1. Re:OT: Re:Soaking up the gamma by anagama · · Score: 1

      • Hey, as a potter, you're probably getting a few handfuls more radiation than the general populace just by virtue of your glaze materials.
      Nice call! In fact, half the reason I built an anagama was so I could give up glazing - I've never enjoyed that part. The other half is satisfaction of my pyromaniac urges with a socially acceptable activity.
      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  86. What happened during the meltdown? by DroopyStonx · · Score: 1

    Reactor 4 exploded, but to what degree? Was it a contained explosion that resulted in the spread of radioactive materials or was the explosion equivalent to that of an a-bomb where it just decimated everything within a few mile radius?

    --
    We have secretly replaced these Slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice!!
    1. Re:What happened during the meltdown? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The graphite reactor slagged down. It Melted the atomic pile. The Pile is still molten and melting it's way toward the earths core.

      This doesn't happen to the reactors used to make electricity in the west they have a containment vessel so none of the "bad stuff" can get out if this happens. (as long as the vessel stays intact)

    2. Re:What happened during the meltdown? by destiny_uk · · Score: 0

      Well, consider the fact that they carried on running the plant for about 10 more years after the explosion since Ukraine didn't have enough generating capacity to shut it down!

  87. All these animals living in the area? by modder · · Score: 1

    This can't be good.

    Are we soon going to have large populations of mutant radioactive animals here?

    1. Re:All these animals living in the area? by berniecase · · Score: 1

      Are we soon going to have large populations of mutant radioactive animals here?

      Sure, just as soon as these radioactive animals really mutate and fly across the Atlantic to the states. Pigs will fly. Radioactive pigs, that is.

    2. Re:All these animals living in the area? by modder · · Score: 1

      By *here* I meant on earth...

  88. wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I remeber when this happened, I was a little kid back then (i think 2nd grade), and the entire city (about 10,000 people) had to go (kids went to school) and get special medication, which was in a little vile, looked like pepsi, but tasted awful. scary thing was, I was living in Stettin, which was probably about 1300 miles away from Charnobyl, in a different country! (close to Germany)
    horrible, horrible thing what happened there :(

  89. What a delightful feeling these pictures convey... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Peace, serenity, and absolute freedom. Sometimes I dream of places like this, with all the people gone, and it is beautiful.

    Sometimes our own stupidity is the most exquisite personification of the forces of Nature.

  90. Re:Thanks Michael! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't mess with Michael or I'll have to come down there myself, you farking icehole

  91. I wish Michael would go to Chernobyl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fuck off and die, asswipe.

    1. Re:I wish Michael would go to Chernobyl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But first he'd get to do her, virgin loser.

  92. Re:Is she single? Looking? by ghostrider_one · · Score: 1

    Come on, this is slashdot ... motorcycle riding photo-snapping babe through nuclear wasteland ... show me a geek that isn't drooling by now.

    I believe you mean "motorcycle riding photo-snapping Russian babe through nuclear wasteland" ;)

    <drool>

  93. Re:seriously! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amen good Sir Knight

  94. wildly inflated death count by wes33 · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is a very interesting article but the figure of 300,000 to 400,000 deaths is ludicrous. So far as I can tell, Chernobyl accident is responsible for less than 10,000 fatalities (there will be more as time goes on).

    Of course, that's a horrible number of deaths from an industrial accident. Comparable or perhaps not as bad as Bhopal.

    See this rather old reference

    1. Re:wildly inflated death count by wes33 · · Score: 1

      sorry, the link did not work properly. It is here

    2. Re:wildly inflated death count by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      10.000 fatalities as direct result. What about long-term effects? People dying from cancer worldwide?
      Say the radioactive cloud that swept through the Europe increased average chance of cancer by 0.01%. Now consider the number of Europeans who died from cancer ever since, 0.01% of them is still a lot.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  95. Re:Is she single? Looking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe you mean "motorcycle riding photo-snapping Russian babe through nuclear wasteland" ;)

    Hell, it's probaly the best chance many of us have. "In SOVIET RUSSIA, hot babe lusts after YOU!"

  96. Re:Is she single? Looking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You say that as if it's a bad thing. Maybe if you really get her blood pumping she'll glow brighter. :)

    - RustyTaco

  97. How I remember it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was 6 years old living in Kharkov, Ukraine. We were told nothing about what happened. My dad went camping not to far from the city, and they got caught in a huge rain storm. My dad's friends were physisists who had access to more news then most people as well as Giger(sp?) counters. When they got back from the trip they scanned their clothing. The reading were off the scale. They had to burn everything they were wearing on the trip as well as all the camping gear. None of it made much sence to me back then, but it seems pretty scarry now. Luckily, almost 20 years since, none of those people had any health problems that could be directly traced to Chernobyl. Also keep in mind that Kharkov was hundreds of miles away from the reactor and the wind was in the other direction, and there was still a lot of radiation. Moral of the story? If you're ever in Ukraine, eat imported vegies.

  98. They should make it a national park or such thing by haggar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Maybe a place of historical heritage... Fact is, it's not really suitable for people to use it for living, and won't be, for the foreseable future. But even if it was, living there would almost be like desacrating a graveyard.

    Quite interesting that the author (the biker girl) confirmed what I thought all along: the place has become a heaven for wildlife. Animals don't care about shorter life expectancy, as long as they are freed from the intimidating human presence.

    --
    Sigged!
  99. Re:Is she single? Looking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on, this is slashdot ... motorcycle riding photo-snapping babe through nuclear wasteland ... show me a geek that isn't drooling by now.

    I'm sure alot of geeks are doing more than drooling right about now...

  100. And so it goes again by davmoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Since the powers that be at Slashdot have once again shown what inconsiderate boobs they are, as have some of the readers of Slashdot (I can't believe you bastards that reload the poor girl's page just to see how fast the hit counter goes up), I have set up a mirror at:

    http://www.myownlittleserver.us/chernobyl

    My bandwidth may not be free, but I have a hell of a lot more of it than she does.

    I have mirrored the whole site, as far as I can tell, except for the hit counter. The children among you have shown why its not good to have a public hit counter.

    You whould think that a group of people who like to preach "information should be free" would try to have a little more respect. Information may be free, but unlimited bandwidth and server space is not.

    --
    I want a new quote. One that won't spill. One that don't cost too much. Or come in a pill.
    1. Re:And so it goes again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Who says server space and bandwidth isn't free? >:D

      Ethics? We don't need no stinkin' ethics...

    2. Re:And so it goes again by sensei_brandon · · Score: 1

      i think they were just commenting on the hit counter, not trying to manipulate it. you come across as a total self-righteous jagoff in that post (not that I don't here) i have also mirrored it at barbeeb.no-ip.com/chernobyl/chapter1.html by the way

    3. Re:And so it goes again by Deitheres · · Score: 0

      Not to be intentionally antagonistic, but (unless I'm mistaken) the site is hosted on Angelfire.com, which is a free hosting website similar to Geocities. So, while it is not free, I'm not paying for it, you're not paying for it, and our cute russian motorcycle riding girl isn't paying for it. Who is? Whatever giant conglomerate owns angelfire.

      I say reload away.

      --
      Just like driving a car:
      (D) to go forward
      (R) to go backward

    4. Re:And so it goes again by Endive4Ever · · Score: 1

      Ummm, when people 'reload that page just so see how fast the counter goes up' they are loading the images from a local cache on their machine. IOW get a damned clue. They're not chewing up that much bandwidth. In addition, it's an angelfire site, I doubt if the woman who put up the site is directly paying for the bandwidth consumed.

      --
      ---
    5. Re:And so it goes again by davmoo · · Score: 1

      The reason I come off as a jagoff is because a lot of people here deserve it. Someone puts up a site that really serves a useful purpose, and then half of Slashdot thinks its funny when the site goes dark because either the server crashed or the bandwidth limit was exceeded. I've bitched, literally for years, that if Slashdot is going to post a news item about a site that is hosted on a freebie or otherwise bandwidth-limited site, the least they could do is mirror it themselves. We already hosed this lady's site a few months ago. Do we really need to do it again?

      --
      I want a new quote. One that won't spill. One that don't cost too much. Or come in a pill.
    6. Re:And so it goes again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm, when people 'reload that page just so see how fast the counter goes up' they are loading the images from a local cache on their machine.

      If you're saying the other images on the site are cached locally, you're right.

      But the image for the counter itself is not cached. If it were, then the counter wouldn't be increasing - you'd still see the tally from your first load of the page.

    7. Re:And so it goes again by Da+Fokka · · Score: 1

      Thank you - I defied Slashdot logic and RTFA and I glad I did it - this is the most powerful page I've seen in months.

  101. Don't forget your multipass by cgenman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Don't forget, she is cleared for nuclear wastelands. Because she didn't post personal information to the site I won't blow her cover, but with a little due dilligence you can find out that she didn't just buy one.

    And that probably is enough to keep the average people from doing what she is doing. In fact, the checkpoint is probably there exactly to stop average people from doing what she is doing. I won't want anyone going in there that didn't have a professional appreciation of the idea that where you are may be safe but four feet to your right may be death. Plus that keeps the ghost town a ghost town, and not one of those terrible run-down tourist traps.

    Besides, the concept of ecological armageddon tourism is just a little... Creepy.

    1. Re:Don't forget your multipass by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > In fact, the checkpoint is probably there exactly to stop average people from doing what she is doing. I won't want anyone going in there that didn't have a professional appreciation of the idea that where you are may be safe but four feet to your right may be death.

      More to the point - if you go in, and go four feet to your right, and come back out - you are at risk of harming (over the long term) more than yourself when you get home, because of what might be on your shoes or in your clothing.

      Althogh what she was doing was safe - awareness of her surroundings (i.e. the general relationship between geography, surface characteristics, and probable exposure) and a dosimeter as a backup in the event that she stumble upon an unsafe area (they buried what?!?! here?!?!?!) despite her knowledge - the environment is not appropriate for tourism.

      One of the most telling sentences in the entire article was the one about the scientist who built and calibrated his own dosimeter -- presumably because that dosimeter was the one he knew he could trust, presumably in conjunction with the other one he was no doubt carrying.

    2. Re:Don't forget your multipass by Mr.+Flibble · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well yeah - her father is a nuclear physicist, and she is familiar with how radiation works. She also carries the proper gear.

      That would all be required stuff to travel in the area. I am not so insane as to suggest that I would travel into said area without proper research, permission (because I don't want a bullet ruining my day), and of course a geiger counter and dosimeter.

      I think it would be an interesting place to see, and, as she mentions, it would be one hell of a place to ride a motorcycle too.

      --
      Try to hack my 31337 firewall!
    3. Re:Don't forget your multipass by qoa · · Score: 1

      They actually give tours of the area. The people making the game S.t.a.l.k.e.r have been there a few times, pictures are here. sorry for the redundancy.

      --
      Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit upon his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats.
  102. KIA = Killed In Action by laing · · Score: 1

    "road on Chernobyl

    Time to fill bike with fuel and open throttle, we are on best road in this area, this one lead from big egg to Chernobyl. There is no commercial gas stations in a dead zone, so tank must be full. We don't need to run out of fuel on the middle of some nuclear desert."

    I couldn't help but make the KIA association while looking at the photograph of the rear motorcycle. Just imagine the risk she is taking! What would happen to her if she had a flat tire, or some other mechanical breakdown in the wrong spot?

    --
    This space for rent

    1. Re:KIA = Killed In Action by craXORjack · · Score: 1
      Just imagine the risk she is taking! What would happen to her if she had a flat tire, or some other mechanical breakdown in the wrong spot?

      Most of the readings she took were in the milli-rem range but IIRC she said you must have 15 rem in 5 hours to die or something thereabout. She did mention two places though that are still extremely high and might cause death quickly, the Magic Woods and the Cemetary in town.

      --
      Liberals call everyone Nazis yet they are the closest thing to it.
  103. Mongol Tartars? by jmichaelg · · Score: 2, Funny

    Isn't that what you put on fish?

    1. Re:Mongol Tartars? by kwalker · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, that's what you put on a Korean dog dish.

      Oh, wait. That's mongrel tartar.

      --
      ... And so it comes to this.
  104. cool by Beer_Smurf · · Score: 1

    Brave, kinda wacky girl who rides a motorcycle. Reminds me of a girlfriend I used to have. Too Cool.

  105. Re:Is she single? Looking? by Woy · · Score: 5, Funny
    I believe you mean "motorcycle riding photo-snapping Russian babe through nuclear wasteland" ;)

    In Capitalist America, the Russian Babe rides YOU!

    --
    "If God created us in his own image we have more than reciprocated." - Voltaire
  106. More poetry by SYFer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This haunting bit of unintentional free verse is directly from her site:

    She is native here and literate in issues of atom.
    There are bad places where no one goes.

    --
    "...all the labours of the ages, all the devotion, all the inspiration, all the noonday brightness..." yada yada
    1. Re:More poetry by mahdi13 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Having a couple Russian female friends, I have to say that they talk just like you read there. Only the female Russian accent is truely beautiful, to bad we were all married, and not to each other...that accent is such a turn on!

      --
      "Some things have to be believed to be seen." - Ralph Hodgson
  107. Not all Soviet ideas were bad ones by sulli · · Score: 1
    Election protocol:

    It's was quite boring to go on ellection where one could only vote for one candidate and for one party. People haven't been coming. Then, in order to bring people on ellections, authorities arranged free drinks.

    Even in a two party system, this would be a nice enhancement!

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
    1. Re:Not all Soviet ideas were bad ones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When the Whigs were a major political party in the US, they used to give out cider at voting places I believe.

    2. Re:Not all Soviet ideas were bad ones by Eccles · · Score: 1

      Even in a two party system, [free drinks for voters] would be a nice enhancement!

      Given the candidates we have, yeah, I could certainly use a couple of stiff ones before I vote...

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  108. Glad You're Happy With Your Story Michael. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But you're not fooling anybody. Still.

  109. BitTorrent by CaptainPinko · · Score: 0

    modify BitTorrent perhaps? It is OSS IIRC...

    --
    Your CPU is not doing anything else, at least do something.
  110. This was the best article... by Cranx · · Score: 4, Funny

    This was the best Slashdot article I've read to date. It's got a pretty young Russian girl riding around on a Ninja motorcycle through uninhabitable nuclear disaster areas taking pictures of everything, including herself. That pretty much does it for me.

    1. Re:This was the best article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...maybe she's blindfolded and has a lightsaber dangling from the passenger helmet lock on the back of the Ninja?

    2. Re:This was the best article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...oh yeah - and she hates it when you ignorant slobs call her a farking Russian. She isn't you know.

      Elena drinks Red Rose TEA damnit

    3. Re:This was the best article... by Cranx · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      No, that would be one of YOUR requirements, another of which is your purple buttplug.

  111. You people are making me paranoid. by CheeseTroll · · Score: 4, Funny

    Where's my lead suit?!?

    --
    A post a day keeps productivity at bay.
  112. It is not Tartars... by CaPn+Corelian · · Score: 1
    Elena wrote 'who are those slashdot people? they swept over like Mongol-Tartars.'"

    The correct word is "Tatars"

    1. Re:It is not Tartars... by CaPn+Corelian · · Score: 1

      Heres the link on Wikipedia

  113. Yet another mirror by Knifethrower · · Score: 1

    http://s87773201.onlinehome.us/kiddofspeed/ Just thought I'ld share the love, and my free webspace. HTTrack rules.

  114. MOD PARENT DOWN! -1 REDUNDANT! KARMA WHORE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You already posted the mirror once. You don't need to whore karma. Mod the parent down.

  115. thanks! by johnrpenner · · Score: 4, Insightful


    just wanted to say 'thanks elena -- for being our eyes into this fascinating wasteland'.
    your photo-journal is one of the most haunting things i've ever seen.
    safe speed be with you.

    john penner
    (toronto)

    1. Re:thanks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks John,

      You have spoken for so many of us, bye simply thanking Elena for taking us with her to her breahtaking rides.

      Random.Nick

  116. Only 400 of them left out of 3,500 by craXORjack · · Score: 3, Interesting
    This old man lives in Chernobyl area, he is one of 3.500 people that either refused to leave or returned to their villages after 1986. I admire those people, each of them is a philosopher in own way. When you ask if they not afraid to die, they telling that at home they may die with radiation and in some other place they would definately die with home-sickness. They eat food from own gardens, drink milk of their caws and claim that they are healthy, but we can't get away from facts, only 400 of them left out of 3.500. It appears that stubborn people, those of fortitude- are first victims

    I wonder how old they were on average when they went back. After 18 years I wouldn't be too surprised that many had died if they were generally seniors in the first place so how much effect does the pollution actually have? Someone must be keeping track of them if she can say how many are still alive and how many went back in. I think this is a good thing because we can study the effects of radiation exposure over long periods on willing subjects. I hope someone is checking on each resident and recording radiation levels where they live and at different times of the year.

    --
    Liberals call everyone Nazis yet they are the closest thing to it.
    1. Re:Only 400 of them left out of 3,500 by soup_laser · · Score: 1

      That seems like a good question to me too. Our authoress is short on words when she has such strong photo's. She may know the answer to this question, but I don't. So, did a quick web search...
      http://www.belarusembassy.cz/en/belarus /chernobyl/ examination.shtm
      This web site was quite informative-going into detail of radiological nature and physiological nature that I do not comprehend.

      My summary would read: Many institutions that make radiological medicine their specialty have continued to track the health of a population that number's near 2 million people. These are the people who were caught in the wake of the Chernobyl accident. The study began in 1987 and continues to this day, with results gathered from the care and treatment being recorded in data banks. Thyroid diseases have a high occurance in the children from evacuation areas. Iodine was scarce in their diet normally and when the incident made radioactive iodine available their thyroid's didn't know better than to make use of it. They also suffer from other internal organ problems. Other ailments suggest accelerated aging.
      I'll end with a quote from the site that answers whether this population was dying from natural old age.
      "The average annual growth of the death rate among the registered population groups for 10 years passed since the Chernobyl Incident has increased in the most damaged Gomel Oblast by 5 times and more, and over the Republic as a whole - by 2.2 times as compared with the similar period prior to the emergency."

    2. Re:Only 400 of them left out of 3,500 by swb · · Score: 1

      The other followup to this thread posts a summary of the increase in death rates. I wonder if they have taken into account the other meltdown that happened, the meltdown of the Soviet Union annd former members' economies, and the decline of quality of life for a lot of rural Russians.

      Then there's also the question of access to healthcare even if they could afford it -- I'd imagine that the better doctors, facilities, etc. aren't locating there -- and what impact that has on lifespan or overall heatlth.

    3. Re:Only 400 of them left out of 3,500 by Radical+Rad · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The 5x and 2.2x numbers do give some answers, but they seem to only be looking at those who were exposed to high levels of radiation right after the meltdown and who then moved out of the poisoned area. I am curious about those who were never exposed to the highest levels and have been living with moderate levels of radiation for years now.

      There was an article in Scientific American magazine several months ago which talked about a theory that exposure to higher than normal (but not excessive) radiation and trace chemicals might actually make people live longer due to the body having to repair itself and triage its cells more diligently. This seems like a good opportunity to test that theory.

      Also, the area may be a good approximation of the populated areas after a nuclear war. Even though the cold war is over between the US and USSR, we may be closer to seeing millions die from nuclear weapons for example between India and Pakistan or from terrorist bombings in London or New York.

  117. In WV, everything is relative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    new state motto

  118. Post apocalyptic wastelands of death and decay by Operating+Thetan · · Score: 1

    What are they all about? Are they good or are they whack?

    --
    Worried you might not keep your virginity forever? Try new Linux(TM), guaranteed twice as effective as LARPing
  119. Safer? That's far from obvious.... by Mistlefoot · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm not so sure she's safer.

    The obvious potential hazard of the radiation aside, she has mentioned riding at high speeds as well as animals on the road slowing her down.

    One of the mostest important aspects of driving or riding safely is expectations. A bike racer can expect that if he follows the leader at 180mph, and is only separated from his rivals back tire by an inch or two, he is in most regards, safe. You cannot do that while riding in public.

    Elena's biggest safety risk may very well be "the unexpected".

  120. YES, MOD PARENT UP! by ChipMonk · · Score: 1

    Then she can find out how truly nice and insightful the Mongol-Tartar... uh, Slashdot community can be. (Once the trolls are filtered out, that is.)

  121. No cell phone coverage either by motown · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The girl in the article mentioned among other things not having any cellular coverage there.

    Since Chernobyl was permanently evacuated long before public cellular networks became prevalent in Easter Europe, no cellular towers were ever placed in that area.

    The parent has a point: she's alone, quite a distance away from civilization in a desolate region, with no means of communication with the outside world. Comtemplating all of this, it is a bit scary indeed.

    It might be a good idea to bring along a satellite phone next time, just in case.

    She's a very brave young lady to undertake such an adventure! She sure has my respect.

    --
    "Oooh, does that mean we get to kick some puffy white mad zionist butt?"
    1. Re:No cell phone coverage either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was a time not long ago when hardly anyone had a cell phone. It was considered quite the status symbol, actually.

      Even without cell phones, many people still did things like drive through vast swathes of empty desert to get from NY to LA without giving any thought to the dangers involved.

      I wouldn't consider this woman's expeditions much more dangerous than that, so long as she keeps an eye on that geiger counter.

    2. Re:No cell phone coverage either by qoa · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not as alone as you would imagine. They give regular tours of the exclusion areas. The devlopers of the game S.T.A.L.K.E.R have travelled there twice taking pictures. They explain a lot about the processes of getting there and what is safe to go to. Pictures are here. I find how close they go to actual power plant to be a little unsettling.

      --
      Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit upon his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats.
    3. Re:No cell phone coverage either by starman97 · · Score: 1

      I'd suggest she carry a portable shortwave transceiver, whatever the local amateur regulations allow. If she wiped out on the bike, no one would know where to find her. Of course a SAT phone would be nice, but that's an expensive unit.

      --
      Starman97@Gmail.com (bring it on spammers)
    4. Re:No cell phone coverage either by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --It actually shouldn't be *that* hard to get rescued, at least within a 12-24 hour period. Simply tell a friend you're going to Chernobyl; and if they don't hear from you by $time, send out the search party.

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    5. Re:No cell phone coverage either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bring along a satellite phone next time, just in case

      I bet you'd class shopping without your mobile as an extreme sport. Good god, it's just a piece of technology. Engage your brain and workaround its absence.... Not engage your wallet and purchase some more tech. Besides getting away from civilisation with no means of communication is some people's idea of heaven.

    6. Re:No cell phone coverage either by willtsmith · · Score: 1

      I'm curious, would radiation interfere with a GPS receiver???

      It would be useful if she needed to radio her location to someone. When you think about it, it's not that different from being in ANY wilderness (save some National Parks now have cell phone coverage).

      --
      -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    7. Re:No cell phone coverage either by syukton · · Score: 1

      I saw a Russian film once, ironically entitled Stalker. It too made reference to "the zone" though not to chernobyl by name. Boring movie, painfully so. Didn't finish watching the whole thing. heh.

      --
      Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
    8. Re:No cell phone coverage either by qoa · · Score: 1

      The game is based on that movie and the book.

      --
      Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit upon his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats.
    9. Re:No cell phone coverage either by syukton · · Score: 1

      That makes baby jesus cry.

      --
      Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
  122. YES. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    let me agree with you. (of course the author will need to delete the approx. 200 marriage proposals...)

  123. Re:Exposure levels - negligible harm from gamma by Faeton · · Score: 5, Interesting
    800 millirem per hour might sound like a lot, but I don't think she's going to hang around there long. What I would be worried about is the radioactive particulate that still might be around. Once it gets into your lungs, that's bad news because both beta and alpha radiation can wreck havoc on your insides. Gamma isn't as big as a deal (since it just usually goes through stuff anyways).

    I work at a nuclear power plant, and there are fields in certain places that go upwards to 25 REM/h. So, what do you do? Don't stand near it and get your buddy to (unknowingly) shield you!

  124. Re:Temporary mirror for when angelfire quota runs by LinearBob · · Score: 1

    I agree, Elena's bike trip through Chernobyl is one hell of a photo-essay. While I am not able to do this, probably someone here can, namely, set up an account somewhere so we can chip in to help pay for the bandwidth we used from her hosting site.

    As I skimmed each of the 26 chapters, I also saved them to disk, so I can look them over again, taking more more time on each, without taking up any more of her limited bandwidth.

    BTM, her English is a whole lot better than my Russian.

    Kudos and a big Thank You to Elena!

    Bob

    --
    An analog gray hair frantically clinging to the trailing edge of technology. :-)
  125. Thats just the first page-Still links to angelfire by schmaltz · · Score: 1

    Was this a joke? The link from the first page to the second points back to angelfire, redirecting traffic back to her site!

    --
    Big Daddy, Johnny, Burp, Aunt Zelda, Scott, Slurp, Big Momma ... where's Siggy?
  126. TMI 25th Anniversary March 28 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's kind of funny how this is posted two days before the 25th anniversary of TMI, when there's a lot of stuff on TV talking about it.

    I have something of a vested interest in nuclear disasters: I live in the small, wealthy town of Camp Hill, Pop. 7000, 12 miles from Three Mile Island.

  127. They are still chalking up deaths to WWII nukes... by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1
    I am too lazy to look it up at the moment, but I recently [in the last 6 months, or so] read in my local paper how survivors of Hiroshima and Nagasaki are still dying from the effects of the bombs.

    This may not be PC, but my first thought was, damn! I'd like to still be dying of something after being nuked, almost 50 years later!

    I know, war sucks, and all [hey, I watched Saving Private Ryan] but if you are gonna have one, you might as well do it right! Nuke your enemy. Christ, they way they run wars now-a-days, you'd think there was money to be made in it or something, rather than the principal... um, wait a minute...

    Anyhow, the Sun will burn all the excess isotopes off the surface of this rock, sooner or later. Cheers.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  128. I wanna meet her by MajorDick · · Score: 2, Funny

    I mean, I dig chicks, I did bikes, especially Kaw's (H2 my persona fav), I dig russia , I mean hey a russian broad whos not afraid of a little roadrash OR radiation, sounds like a date to ME !

    1. Re:I wanna meet her by Endive4Ever · · Score: 1

      You and hundreds of other Slashbots who seem to have transformed into knuckle-dragging bikers at the posting of a site.

      --
      ---
    2. Re:I wanna meet her by MajorDick · · Score: 1

      Yeah but I really am a Knuckle Draggin, Drag Racing, Bike Riding, Computer programming Geek :) 27 broken bones tfrom my racing days , whats a little radiation....

    3. Re:I wanna meet her by Endive4Ever · · Score: 1

      Nice looking car.

      --
      ---
    4. Re:I wanna meet her by MajorDick · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I put it together last year, 12 coats of competition yellow had it painted to match my FZR, Runs 12 flat in a Quarter, not bad for a 6k lb monster with only a 351C in it.

  129. Thats one crazy chick by xot · · Score: 1

    Even though the radiation levels are pretty low, would'nt it catch up if you hang around nuclear waste for too long? By her writing it looks like shes a regular visitor in the areas.
    Not too many people would taken the risk of riding bikes in 'Ghosttowns' just to have an open road and good weather(my idea of god weather isnt snow).Even though she gives some brilliant insight into the whole matter.I had always imagined the chernobyl area to be a mess but this is the first time im seeing the photo's of a nuclear disaster site and it MORE than a mess.

    --
    Lord of the Binges.
  130. amazing by timmarhy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    this is amazing, and a perfect example of what the net is really about.

    --
    If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
  131. Re:Safer? That's far from obvious.... by shadowbearer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Elena's biggest safety risk may very well be "the unexpected".

    On a bike (hell, anywhere in life, really) that is nearly always the demon factor that gets you... damned near got me once, twelve years ago, going into a series of S-turns that I'd been thru many times, and some dickhead had spilled pea gravel all over the low side of the bank - apparently spillover from shoulder maintenance.

    Trashed the bike, but I more or less walked away. I was goddamned fucking lucky, tho.

    SB

    --
    It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
  132. It wasn't a melt-down by snStarter · · Score: 1

    The core didn't melt - caught FIRE. The reactor used carbon moderation and the carbon caught fire and carried the fuel with it's fission fragments into the air.

    1. Re:It wasn't a melt-down by qoa · · Score: 1

      There was a steam explosion that exposed the core, which caused the graphite to catch fire.

      --
      Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit upon his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats.
    2. Re:It wasn't a melt-down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The core didn't melt..

      Once the graphite had caught fire, it and the fuel pretty quickly melted and burnt through the reactor vesal floor and into the basements and sub-basements below.

      The now-solidified material is glass-like, and known as Chernobylite.

  133. AGREED. by SharpFang · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    yep...

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  134. Re:Is she single? Looking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't you mean Ukrainian?

    I've been to Ukraine and have seen the sad state of affairs there (not in Kiev but in the east). Sadly, the outsides of the buildings look the same (in the city) everywhere. Communist "style" seems to be consistent even in a wasteland.

    The women are beautiful though. Without a doubt, the women are absolutely beautiful.

  135. Don't get your hopes too high. by SharpFang · · Score: 1

    Fishes that glow in darkness got banned already. Chicks come next.

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  136. Translation Request by c0dedude · · Score: 1

    People have already theorized why sundays aren't present (different color, faded) but what do the characters to the left of the numbers mean? Image here. The top one looks like Pi then H.

    --
    Since when has this country used intellectual elite as a pejorative term?
    1. Re:Translation Request by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      Cyrillic PN, VT, SR, CshT, PT, SB...
      Ponyedyelnyk=monday,
      Vtornyk=tuesday,
      Sry eda=Wednesday...

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    2. Re:Translation Request by LordArathres · · Score: 1

      I know Croatian and our days are the same as russian.

      Ponedeljak = Monday

      Utorak = Tuesday

      Srieda = Wednesday

      Cetvrtak = Thrusday

      Petak = Friday

      Subota = Saturday

      Nedelja = Sunday

      I dont know why Sunday is omitted.

    3. Re:Translation Request by JediTrainer · · Score: 1

      Since this is Ukraine, is it possible that it's in Ukrainian?

      Ponedilok = monday
      Vivtorok = tuesday
      Sereda = wednesday
      Chetver = thursday
      Pyatnetsya = friday
      Subota = saturday
      Nedilya = sunday

      --

      You can accomplish anything you set your mind to. The impossible just takes a little longer.
    4. Re:Translation Request by Endive4Ever · · Score: 1

      About your tagline. You should tack on:

      "And said citizen, who crosses the ocean to fight for democracy, will find a 'Democratic' political party back at home vigorously working to nullify or cancel his/her absentee vote."

      --
      ---
  137. It blew the roof off man! by Chordonblue · · Score: 4, Informative

    It in fact blew the roof some 2,000 feet into the air spreading the worst of the worst particles far and wide.

    White-hot graphite rods were exposed to cold water - these exploded and that was what caused the explosion. The outside world first learned of it when some Norwegian folks at a nuclear plant picked up some off the scale readings.

    The majority of the reactor was buried under tons of concrete and steel (which is now in danger of cracking open). Many firefighters died attempting to contain nuclear fire and most of those had no idea what they were dealing with at the time.

    More info here:

    http://www.uic.com.au/nip22.htm

    --
    "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
    1. Re:It blew the roof off man! by rich951 · · Score: 1
      This quote in that report seems a little odd:

      An authoritative UN report in 2000 concluded that there is no scientific evidence of any significant radiation-related health effects to most people exposed.

      Of course, they hardly seem an unbiased source :)

    2. Re:It blew the roof off man! by Chordonblue · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you know I saw that too and I have to say that when it comes to radiation exposure - it's all guesswork in a white coat. Given the U.N.'s track record about making decisions that matter (Kosovo and Africa come to mind), I have difficulty trusting their opinion.

      It's a known fact that some people are more sensitive to radiation than others and symptoms manifest themselves differently. Now that you have that knowledge - feel lucky? No, neither do I.

      One thing is certain - the poor workers cleaning up the plutonium around the reactor's blown core (protected with nothing but shovels) were definately 'evidence'. You can find their radiation-saturated bodies buried next to pieces of the graphite rods.

      --
      "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
  138. I agree. by rarose · · Score: 1

    We must show her we can use the /.-effect for good, not evil. :-)

    --
    --Rob
  139. Re:MOD PARENT +1 INSIGHTFUL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Yes

    Deaths from Three Mile Island: Zero

    More people were killed in Nanking, China in one week period than both atomic bombs put together.

    Chernobyl killed more people than both atomic bombs put together.

    Today, Japan is one of the most powerful, and democratic, countries in the world.

  140. Re:seriously! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    armor doesn't have a u in it, you stupid fucking brit.

  141. Worried about surface contamination by snStarter · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I found myself worrying about surface contamination as she walked through the buildings and on the tires of her motorcycle. She wasn't wearing gloves as she walked through the buildings nor booties.

    She was very concerned about monitoring the direct radiation but what she might have stirred up is another issue. I hope she checked.

    1. Re:Worried about surface contamination by ColaMan · · Score: 2, Informative

      There's the decon guys at the checkpoints in and out of the place - I'm sure if there was anything nasty she'd get a shower.

      Oh, alright then maybe a shower just in case ;-)

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
  142. Don't forget that ... by chris_sawtell · · Score: 1

    there have been some very near misses in the West as well. The classic one was 25 years ago at Thee Mile Island near Middletown, Pennsylvania. Interesting government style paper, but no sex appeal. Sorry.

  143. Apt description by plnrtrvlr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's an apt description of us anyways, no matter what the "most correct" word is. We have rampaged across the 'net leaving destruction in our wake. No where is safe: we shall decend upon you unexpectedly, pillage your music and movies, delight in your women, and rampage off to new conquests faster than the attention span of a child.... Our hordes shall be feared throughout the net!! Or at least by servers everywhere.....

  144. You gentlemen can't fight in here... by modder · · Score: 1

    This is the war room.

    1. Re:You gentlemen can't fight in here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The correct quote is "Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the war room." Beotch!

    2. Re:You gentlemen can't fight in here... by modder · · Score: 1

      A fella' could have a pretty good time in Vegas with all that criticism.

    3. Re:You gentlemen can't fight in here... by joew · · Score: 1

      Yeeeeeehaaaaa wooo hooooooo

  145. Did anyone catch her licence plate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.angelfire.com/extreme4/kiddofspeed/imag e4.3.jpg

    maybe someone should tell her what 'KIA' means ;)

  146. Re:Is she single? Looking? by Safety+Cap · · Score: 1
    I'm still looking for the picture of her in leather and a shotgun strapped to her bike
    In the grand tradition of Fark, have at it!
    --
    Yeah, right.
  147. Match by va3atc · · Score: 1

    Come on, this is slashdot ... motorcycle riding photo-snapping babe through nuclear wasteland ... show me a geek that isn't drooling by now

    I'm glowing right now!

    --
    Candle burns its brightest in the dark
  148. poor command of the english language? by cbv · · Score: 5, Funny

    For the visual information that came out of her camera, I'll gladly forgive her occasionaly poor command of the english language.

    Very nice of you. But I figure her English is better than your Russian.

    1. Re:poor command of the english language? by Almost-Retired · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Touche` My knowledge of Russian is absolutely zip, and in fairness, I should never have mentioned it.

      The story was in the pictures, which really have no "native" language. Very humbling pictures.

      Cheers, Gene

    2. Re:poor command of the english language? by grvsmth · · Score: 1

      Probably even better than your Ukrainian.

    3. Re:poor command of the english language? by ilctoh · · Score: 1

      Her English may even be better than your english. (English is a proper noun, thus needs to be capitalized.)

      --
      How many slashes would a slashdot dot, if a slashdot could dot slashes?
    4. Re:poor command of the english language? by Permission+Denied · · Score: 3, Informative
      Very nice of you. But I figure her English is better than your Russian.

      And her Ukrainian may be even better than her Russian.

      They are separate languages. Russian was forced on the Ukrainians by the Soviets, just like in the rest of the USSR. I'm sure she does speak Russian, but you cannot assume which is her "native" language.

    5. Re:poor command of the english language? by Erxud · · Score: 1

      Almost all Ukranian people know Russian very well. the motto "Speak only Ukranian" had appeared just after the 1991 - after Soviet Union diappeared. Russian is very similar to Ukranian. Russians and unkrainans in most cases even do not need a translator to communicate

    6. Re:poor command of the english language? by berkut7 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Before Soviet Union solapesed, almost all TV, radio, many books were in Russian. It was used in bussinesses and was a mandatory subject in school alongside another foreign language. Howevr, it's wrong to assume Russian and Ukrainian are very similar (another reply to parent). Ukrainians understand Russian very well because of the above reasons, but Russians can barely make out anything said in Ukrainian.

    7. Re:poor command of the english language? by arose · · Score: 1

      That doesn't stop the Kremlin from claiming Ukraines (and others) as part of the "Russian speaking minority" of Latvia, thwe rights of which are somehow "violated" by having ~1/2 of their highschool lessons in Latvian.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    8. Re:poor command of the english language? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Russians and unkrainans in most cases even do not need a translator to communicate

      Sort of like English and the language spoken in America?

    9. Re:poor command of the english language? by Erxud · · Score: 1

      Yes. Maybe even Royal English and modern american language. Although there are a plenty of words that sound quite differently in Ukranian and Russianwhile having same meaning. But in such cases there always exisit a synonym. It even can be noticed, that russian language becomes more like Ukranian when travelling towards the Ukraine through the russian villages.

    10. Re:poor command of the english language? by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      I can speak with perfect fluency every Russian word I know.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    11. Re:poor command of the english language? by jupitercore · · Score: 1

      Now living in Hungary, which was part of the Eastern Block, I can state for the record that just because the Soviets forced the language does not mean people speak it. My fiancee remembers a few choice words, but after a few years of it in school, remembers NONE of it. She does, however, speak fluent Hungarian, English and Spanish. The same is true with her friends as well.

      Many other people hardly speak the language. Her parents, like many others here, detest the language and have forced themselves to forget that which was brought onto them. I've learned to NEVER assume someone speaks a language (that whole American in another country thing).

  149. Re:MOD PARENT +1 INSIGHTFUL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    So because we have space shuttles blowing up and the Russian Soyuz rockets don't explode, should we be ashamed?

  150. Let's be serious by CherniyVolk · · Score: 1


    I'm sure this idea has been relayed already, but
    I'm going to mention it again. Emphasis in this
    matter certainly deserves no bounds.

    9/11, Chernobyl (if there could be a comparison)
    are prime examples that at a moments notice, your
    Life can be flipped upside down.

    I also live in San Diego. I wonder how many other
    San Diegans realize one of the largest fusion reactors in the world sits right in their back yard? http://www.gat.com

    1. Re:Let's be serious by dukeisgod · · Score: 1

      A fusion reactor? I didn't think we had those going yet?

  151. Re:MOD PARENT +1 INSIGHTFUL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It took less than 100 years to go from a simple airplane to traveling to the moon.

    Do you really think nuclear waste is going to sit around for 10,000 years?

    Do you not have schools in your little country?

  152. Re:MOD PARENT +1 INSIGHTFUL by Egonis · · Score: 1

    I don't recall mentioning anyone being ashamed... nor did I make a comparison between the Americans and the former Soviets.

    Do you have a complex?

  153. Mirror! by chris_eineke · · Score: 1
    --
    "All you have to do is be fragile and grateful. So stay the underdog." Chuck Palahniuk, Choke
  154. Admit it.. by thellamaman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is fascinating, but admit it, folks, half the reason you enjoy this website is that the girl's cute and has just a touch of geekiness.

    1. Re:Admit it.. by 44BSD · · Score: 1

      Call me a pollyanna, but I'd think that such a unique way of educating people about this tragedy would be met with something other than a minor uptick in the demand for hand lotion and tissues.

      Losers commenting on this woman's "hotness" are not only pathetic, they're insulting.

  155. Re:MOD PARENT +1 INSIGHTFUL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since when is democracy a good thing? Fuck that shit. Why is some halfwit's opinion considered just as valuable as an intelligent person's?

  156. Here's a neat picture by squarooticus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...of the Elephant's Foot below reactor number four.

    --
    [ home ]
    1. Re:Here's a neat picture by grunherz · · Score: 1

      Funny, seeing that pic was the first time in my life I ever thought of putting the words "radioactive" and "turd" together.

      --
      Four weeks, Twenty papers, that's two dollars ... plus tip.
  157. Re:They should make it a national park or such thi by bluGill · · Score: 1

    Wildlife isn't concerned about humans in general. Humans are more concerned about wildlife, and tend to wipe it out. In addition human activity tends to limit some animals, but those animals are not afraid of people, they just want to eat. Thus we have imbalances, in areas where humans are. Now that we have reached a point where we are not so concerned about eat animals and things are changing. There are deer in Minneapolis, and once in a while one makes it downtown. (parks and yards just outside of downtown are good deer habitat, downtown itself isn't) Bear have been known to eat from bird feeders not too far away either.

    Humans do not intimidate animals. They are scared at first, but that passes. After that it is a matter of can they live. Some do better around humans than others, but unless humans are hunting animals do not learn fear of people. (and in city situations hunting is rare)

  158. Re:Be ashamed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope you are now posting at -1 by default, Sir Goatse-a-lot.

  159. Obligatory... by SAN1701 · · Score: 1

    "Homer, your bravery and quick thinking have turned a potential Chernobyl into a mere Three-mile island. Bravo"

  160. Elena's US Bike Tour by rarose · · Score: 1

    At this rate she could take a bike tour of the US and Canada and be wined & dined by a continent full of geeks.

    Forget "Europe on $5 a Day"... Elena could do "6 months in the US for free".

    --
    --Rob
    1. Re:Elena's US Bike Tour by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      *grin* Six months, my ass.... I'd say she has an open invite forever... *grinning wider*

      (dusts off his 20 year old Russian language textbooks)

      In all seriousness, this is one hell of a lady. I would feel very priviliged to be able to wine and dine her for even one night. It's a damned shame Robert (Heinlein) wasn't around to see this...

      Cheers!

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    2. Re:Elena's US Bike Tour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find myself in complete agreement friend.

      Loads ebay in separate window for Russian language texts...

      I'd say she would be a very interesting person to meet, talk with, talk photography...

      Makes me want to get a bike even more.. ;-) Anyone want to donate some $$$ so I can get that Sportster 883 lowered Custom???

      Have a nice day y'all!

    3. Re:Elena's US Bike Tour by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      Sportster 883 lowered Custom

      droooolll....

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    4. Re:Elena's US Bike Tour by daviddennis · · Score: 1

      I don't think she'd like our speed limits :-(.

      D

    5. Re:Elena's US Bike Tour by dukeisgod · · Score: 1

      Damn right. She sounds like an interesting person for sure. If she made it over here, I'd have to buy her a round at bike night just to hear some stories.

    6. Re:Elena's US Bike Tour by juhaz · · Score: 1

      As if there aren't enough /. reading geeks in Europe to wine & dine her by two continents full of geeks.

      Australia and South America could probably get into that list as well.

  161. much more by happyhamster · · Score: 1

    "this event displaced tens of thousands of people"

    The displacement was in the MILLIONS. The area was densely populated. Also, Kiev, the capital of Ukraine, was nearby, about 3 mln. residents. I was there when this happened. As soon as the rumors of what actually happened started to spread, everyone who could, left. It was close to ghost town all summer and for the next year, probably 2.5 mln left, very few people remained. Some left forever. Overall, probably close to 7-10 mln moved.

  162. does Elena have an email? if not, here's a mssg by Goeland86 · · Score: 1

    God, I wish there was a way to email her, or leave a comment on her website... I mean, she's gut guts and a really cool head. Maybe a little help with the english in some spots could help, but DAMN!!! She was lucky herself, her father knowing and getting her and her father out of the place... I also have a few questions, did she ever happen to see any weird animals? Back in the mid-nineties (I was about 10 then...) there were rumors of double-headed veals, 8 legged newborn horses and featherless chickens (which by now we have without radiation!) and plants that looked like they came from a prehistoric age... Elena, your sharing of those pictures with the world might help teach mankind of the power of science and avoid an even worse thing from happening again. And that is something you can be proud of, even if your life is short, you have accomplished a great deal by revealing publicly one of the taboos of the modern world. For this I would like to thank you. John

    --
    ---- I am certain of only one thing : I know nothing else.
  163. Mod this up... by Aslan72 · · Score: 1
    Hey, is there anyway someone could mirror this so that her account isn't buried?

    That was *really* amazing. --pete

  164. Re:Is she single? Looking? by _randy_64 · · Score: 1

    No doubt she's on the OSDN singles network, sign up and check her out! ;-)

    --
    I mod down all the "free iPod"-sig losers.
  165. ...uh... by blair1q · · Score: 1

    ...boshemoi...

  166. Re:MOD PARENT +1 INSIGHTFUL by soup_laser · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The USSR had their government to cover things up and we've our share of businesses that let profit get ahead of the well being of their neighbors and the environment. A simple and easily approached example might be to watch the movie Erin Brockovich. Not all wide spread disasters were (and will be) of a nuclear nature.

  167. Instant Poll... Pick Your Favorite Sentence. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    1. Re:Instant Poll... Pick Your Favorite Sentence. by mamba-mamba · · Score: 1

      Actually, I liked the one about hitting redline then closing the throttle and listening to the ghosts scream.

      I tried to go back and get the exact quote, but the mirror was starting to lag.

      MM
      --

      --
      By including this sig, the copyright holders of this work or collection unreservedly place it in the public domain.
    2. Re:Instant Poll... Pick Your Favorite Sentence. by eyeye · · Score: 1

      I thought the best comment was about coming out of the magic forest wearing armour.

      --
      Bush and Blair ate my sig!
  168. Wow by psyconaut · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's one of the coolest, neatest, most awe inpsiring things I've ever seen on Slashdot. I'm not sure why exactly, but it is :-)

    -psy

  169. What? No metric? by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

    "Label tells- motorcycle Chezet, 26hp, 343cc, price 1050 rubles... Chezet! that was a dream bike for all young people in a Soviet Union. Crowd of boys have been hunging around in those stores dreaming of what they could do with 26 hp bike if Grandpas had only 15 ponnies and how can you afford it,"

    I would have thought that the worker's paradise (of all places) would be selling engines rated in kilowatts.

  170. what ever happened to the chernobyl dome? by Cybernetist · · Score: 1

    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/12/29/199209 &mode=thread&tid=134

  171. She's got snail mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ukraine 03187 Kiev-187 Zabolotnogo 20/A Post Box 25 Elena

    You can send her a nice postcard, as I did.

  172. She looks like the chick from the Matrix. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmmm. Maybe their filming another sequel in Ukraine.

  173. It's over there..... by rune2 · · Score: 5, Funny

    by your tinfoil hat ;-)

  174. Re:MOD PARENT +1 INSIGHTFUL by The+Analog+Kid · · Score: 3, Insightful

    More importantly, we should come together as a species and help one another, ofcourse it would only happen on a show like Star Trek, but it's wishful thinking for the better.

    I too agree that the USSR should be ashamed and we should be Proud Americans.


    Yes, when the world comes to an end, I too want everyone to remember the numerous toxic waste sites, polluted rivers, and massive deforestation of United States of America. I too want to stand proud of all the positive things my country has done for our enviroment.

    Come on, you can't blame the entire USSR for that accident, though their government did downplay the damage of the event in the typical Russian way. If anyone should be ashamed it's probably the idiots inside the plant that cause the disaster to take place. I'm sure they new full well what could happen if they did what they did, but they went ahead and did it anyway. Now all that's left is an area frozen in time.

  175. Chernobyl, the laboratory by victorvodka · · Score: 1

    The dead zone and these abandoned buildings seem like a prime laboratory for the study of what happens to unmaintained materials and objects. It also provides a stunning visual idea of how a post-human earth will look once a killer disease or neutron war finally wipes us all out. It's creepy looking at these pictures when you think that this is a snapshot of our future.

    --

    The flag just makes more sense than the constitution. - Judas Gutenberg

  176. Radiant Female Bikers of the World: UNITE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You could start there: http://www.google.com/search?q=nuclear+waste+radio active+pollution

  177. Tours by Merovign · · Score: 1

    I'd take that tour. If I could take it on a Ducati 999 with no speed limits (and obviously no insurance - kind of like diving with sharks). Maybe take a shot at Elena in 6th gear, :)

    Oh, well. At least the world we live in is not entirely devoid yet of extraordinary individuals in extraordinary places.

  178. Obligatory sick joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Q: What is the cost of chicken in Kiev market?

    A: Life.

  179. Re:seriously! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They call it magic wood because you get wood magically while reading this story.

  180. Loose a day per trip? by nlinecomputers · · Score: 1

    So if I follow you correctly she is probably loosing one day of her life for every trip through the zone?

    --
    Slashdot, home of supporters of free software, free music, and free speech.Except for Moderators that disagree with you.
    1. Re:Loose a day per trip? by man_ls · · Score: 1

      Yes.

    2. Re:Loose a day per trip? by athakur999 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I lose an hour of my life everytime I visit Slashdot, so I don't see what the hoopla is about.

      --
      "People that quote themselves in their signatures bother me" - athakur999
  181. News flash! by fm6 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The world is full of small risks. Deal with it. You can't escape radiation -- you need it to live! (Unless you're an abyssal sea-dweller, of course.) But you probably run less risk from every-day radiation then you do from driving 10 MPH over the speed limit on your way home from work!

  182. Thryroid Cancers in exposed residents by WindPwr · · Score: 5, Informative

    I recently worked on a project with a group of radiologists at the research university I'm employed by to develop an expert system to more quickly train operators of portable ultrasound imaging equipment. This group is part of a world wide organization of physicians dealing with the long term irradiation effects of hundreds of thousands of people exposed to Chernobyl's fallout. Specifically, detecting thyroid cancer with ultrasound requires much experience and there is great urgency to speed training to detect these cancers early before they become too advanced for successful treatment. This group began monitoring residents in the fallout area shortly after the accident was made public. Children exposed then are now beginning to show higher rates of thyroid cancers.

  183. Re: they swept over like Mongol-Tartars by t-10056 · · Score: 2, Informative

    That would be Tatars rather than Tartars. A Mongol tartar is what you'd get at a russian tavern at the end of 15th century.

  184. Not just slashdot by jefu · · Score: 1
    I saw many more references to this site the last time around than just on slashdot. At one point it was in top three of indexed blog sites.

    Given all that I'm surprised her hit counter is only in the 60K or so range.

    And, given the attention it was getting, I'd hope that angelfire was smart enough to recognize that making the pages available would be to their own benefit as well as to ours (and Elena's).

  185. Re:seriously! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stupid fucking Yank, it does. There's no such thing as US english.

  186. Wow and lessons to be learned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First - Amazing site. What a treat. One of the best websites ever.

    I can vaguely remember when this happened, it was early highschool for me, so I of course I dont remember much. But the tell of the tape in these photos is that this was one aweful human experience that is still being lived in scattered unseen ways. I.E. where are all the families now, etc. I think people knew it was bad then. But really, nothing was shown, imagine the firemen being ordered in! All those trucks are really startling. And the family photos. It makes it all so personal. Really the government never wants you to know much. The slice of reality we saw almost 20 years ago was not close to what can be gleaned in these images.

    The lesson is for the consuming public (me.. and you) and the journalists. the bad things are much worse then we are told, have acess too, and the spin is always more insideous than it seems.

    Ok, enough preachy.

    lastly, I bet this girl can pay for all her bandwith for the next hundred years if she put up some posters of herself on that bike in the hot zone for sale here on /. Or just run an auction for a one of a kind.

    1. Re:Wow and lessons to be learned by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      lastly, I bet this girl can pay for all her bandwith for the next hundred years if she put up some posters of herself on that bike in the hot zone for sale here on /. Or just run an auction for a one of a kind.

      Ah hell yeah, I'd take that. :) I've never been a fan of posters of hot chicks on motorcycles, either, but that's one poster that would be far more than sexy. There's a girl that's appealing on all levels. ;)

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
  187. I really love some of the captions by Murphy(c) · · Score: 1, Funny

    It's was quite boring to go on ellection where one could only vote for one candidate and for one party. People haven't been coming. Then, in order to bring people on ellections, authorities arranged free drinks.

    And I though George(c) thought of everything, I guess he still has a margin for improvement in his campaign.

    Murphy

  188. Re: mirror works now by Falc0n · · Score: 0

    Fixed that problem with it going back to Angelfire.. hehehe

  189. Local die-hards by geekwench · · Score: 1
    The old chap in the photo reminds me of those who refused to evacuate their homes just before Mt. Saint Helens blew. It's amazing, if disturbing, to see such a profound love of place displayed.

    Elena, I add my thanks and congratulations to you for shooting these haunting photographs, and providing your commentary to accompany them.
    Bolshoi spasibo; i berech'. (Many thanks, and keep safe.)

    --
    Doing my level best to piss off the religious right wing...
  190. This means "lumber" in Russian by melted · · Score: 1

    no text

  191. IS SHE A SCIENTIST`? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cause she says she uses a "researcher's pass" somehwere.

  192. Re:Exposure levels - negligible harm from gamma by t14m4t · · Score: 5, Informative
    heh. this is one of those few nuclear topics that I can actually comment on.

    those numbers that are being quoted are for a burst dose -- ie you get it all at once. the effects change if you get a continuous, lower dose to the same levels.

    I'm currently in the Navy's Nuclear Engineer school (2 more weeks and hopefully I'll be a certified nuclear engineer! hooray!). I don't have the numbers memorized, but this is along the lines of what they tell us (and yes, it's unclassified):

    1 Rem = 1 mRem (milliRem)

    The following are effects from burst doses

    • 1 Rem

    Prognossis: Excellent
    Effects: none
    Treatment: tell the guys he's a dumbass for thinking there's a problem

    • 25 Rem

    Prognossis: Excellent
    Effects: none
    Treatment: have him see a doctor just to make sure, but there's still really no problem. possible rise in chance to get cancer.

    • 100 Rem

    Prognossis: Good
    Effects: headache. 5% chance of vomitting within 4 hrs.
    Treatment: seek medical attention.

    • 500 Rem

    Prognossis: OK
    Effects: headache. 50% chance of vomitting within 2 hr. 5% chance of death within 4 months.
    Treatment: seek medical attention immediately.

    • 1000 Rem

    Prognossis: Guarded
    Effects: headache. 100% chance of vomiting within 1 hr. 50% chance of death within a short period (can't rememebr the time).
    Treatment: better get him to a doctor NOW!

    • 5000 Rem

    Prognossis: hopeless
    Effects: headache. 100% chance vomitting within 30 min. 100% chance of death within 48 hrs.
    Treatment: Give him sedatives. Call the morgue.

    For those that are curious, the guys on K-19 probably got more than 5000 Rem.

    And what do these mean? here are some numbers to compare against:

    I work daily 15 feet from an operational reactor (I work on US submarines).
    my exposure last month: 4 mrem.
    my lifetime exposure: .106 (approx 1/10) Rem. (I've been doing this job for 2.5 yrs)
    The radiation levels in the Reactor Compartment 15 minutes after shutting down the reactor: ~50 mRem/hr (avg)

    a day at the beach: 10 mRem per day
    smoking for a year: 1 Rem
    standing next to a bag of fertilizer: 2 mRem / day
    eating a banana: 4 mRem each

    those numbers are mostly from betas and gammas. alphas only affect you if you get them inside you, which is why smokers get so much radiation, and neutron mostly is (a) really low-level and (b) passes right through you.

    so what's my point?

    1. I get less radiation from work that I do from living.
    2. those numbers that they got from Chyrnobl are HUGE, but they can't happen on US Naval Reactors. Even if we were to completely melt down and spray our stuff all over the place, we would still be relatively clean (we use tiny reactors; we only need to power a 300' boat to 25+ knots, we don;t need to power an entire metropolis). besides, the most likely time that would occur is if we get hit with a depth charge, at which point's we'll sit on the bottom of the ocean and get covered with a whole hell of a lot of water! :-)

    weylin
    --
    67.5% Slashdot Pure I guess I need to work on that.... :)
  193. Re:seriously! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  194. Only an hour? by nlinecomputers · · Score: 1

    Must be a windows user.

    *ducks*

    --
    Slashdot, home of supporters of free software, free music, and free speech.Except for Moderators that disagree with you.
    1. Re:Only an hour? by Endive4Ever · · Score: 1

      You're right.

      It takes a lot longer to read the whole discussion on a VT100 terminal with Lynx.

      --
      ---
  195. oops. wrong units (Re:Exposure levels - negligib) by t14m4t · · Score: 2

    oops. sorry. 1 Rem = 1000 mRem.

    sorry. my bad

    weylin

    --
    67.5% Slashdot Pure I guess I need to work on that.... :)
  196. and hey... by Doktor+Memory · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...it makes her hot in more ways than one.

    --

    News for Nerds. Stuff that Matters? Like hell.

    1. Re:and hey... by qoa · · Score: 1

      aha, you'd have a point if I had one sir.

      --
      Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit upon his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats.
  197. steekin badgers by Doktor+Memory · · Score: 4, Funny

    So you're suggesting trying to bluff your way past a Russian military checkpoint into a restricted area, using a fake ID you've assembled from scans on the net?

    You first.

    --

    News for Nerds. Stuff that Matters? Like hell.

    1. Re:steekin badgers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dont forget to videotape it tho :)

    2. Re:steekin badgers by *bjorn* · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's in Ukraine not in Russia

      Silly American :)

    3. Re:steekin badgers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alcohol, Woman, and/or Money have a strange effect on bored, low paid border checkpoint guards.

    4. Re:steekin badgers by caluml · · Score: 1

      A bottle of vodka works wonders. When I was in Russia, I almost got the chance to be taken up in a MiG by a Russian air force pilot, but I didn't have enough time :( <kicks self>

    5. Re:steekin badgers by Doktor+Memory · · Score: 1

      D'oh. You are of course correct. How embarrassing.

      Sorry man, the habits of childhood die hard -- for most Americans, growing up, the entire USSR was effectively "Russia".

      --

      News for Nerds. Stuff that Matters? Like hell.

  198. She didn't take THIS picture. by RayBender · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I will admit that along with every other geek on /. I'm madly in love with this hot, hot biker chick. I guess I'm glad she didn't take this picture. Yes, that's a chunk of the reactor fuel itself.

    --
    Human genome = 3 billion base pairs = 6 GBit. Windows + Office = 20 Gbit. Which is more impressive?
    1. Re:She didn't take THIS picture. by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If that's uranium slag, wouldn't it expose the film, preventing the picture from being taken?

    2. Re:She didn't take THIS picture. by RayBender · · Score: 2, Informative
      If that's uranium slag, wouldn't it expose the film, preventing the picture from being taken?

      Not necessarily. It depends on the activity level, particularly in highly penetrating types (neutrons and gammas). It would appear that after a few years (this was taken in the late 80s) the fuel had cooled enough (activity-wise) that it could be approached briefly. They talk of dose rates of 30 rem for the guy who took this picture. He also approached it close enough to get a sample. I kid you not.

      --
      Human genome = 3 billion base pairs = 6 GBit. Windows + Office = 20 Gbit. Which is more impressive?
    3. Re:She didn't take THIS picture. by Bandman · · Score: 3, Funny

      I kinda figured they took it with the lens cap still on ;-)

    4. Re:She didn't take THIS picture. by orangepeel · · Score: 1

      At some point long ago I saw a documentary about Chernobyl that included a segment on the slag that collected beneath the reactor. It included video taken of the "elephants foot". They also showed a police sharpshooter being called in to shoot/chip off a piece of the slag for analysis. I suspect that's how anyone has wound up with a piece of the slag for analysis. I doubt anyone would go near it.

      --
      Whoever designed level 61 in Frozen Bubble is a sadistic bastard.
    5. Re:She didn't take THIS picture. by RayBender · · Score: 1
      There used to be a picture on the web that was really neat: it was a long-exposure taken pointing toward the Elephants Foot. During the exposure a guy carrying a flashlight walked up to it and took a sample - you could see him all smeared out. But I can't find the picture anymore, even on with Google..

      --
      Human genome = 3 billion base pairs = 6 GBit. Windows + Office = 20 Gbit. Which is more impressive?
    6. Re:She didn't take THIS picture. by robinjo · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't put that much faith on that page. The part about Finland and Sweden destroying herds of reindeer is utter rubbish.

    7. Re:She didn't take THIS picture. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't put that much faith on that page. The part about Finland and Sweden destroying herds of reindeer is utter rubbish.

      Bzzt. I'm from Sweden, and although I was only 11 at the time, I have a clear memory of this. Of course, not all reindeer were destroyed, but all animals that were supposed to be sold as food that year had to be shipped away and treated as hazardous waste. Fortunately, changing the feed to something non-radioactive solved the problem for the following years.

    8. Re:She didn't take THIS picture. by juhaz · · Score: 1

      I think there may have been some slight precautionary measures on reindeer _meat_, but you're correct, no reindeer-herd-massacre has been done in Finland because of Chernobyl. Dunno about the Swedes.

      Here is a nice chart of Cs-137 amounts in reindeer meat, courtesy of Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority of Finland. Which tells quite nicely how slight the Chernobyl hit (86-) actually was up here. The enormously bigger 60-80 elevations are from atmospheric nuclear weapon tests. And today the amounts are actually smaller than before Chernobyl.

  199. Re:They are still chalking up deaths to WWII nukes by tftp · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I recently read in my local paper how survivors of Hiroshima and Nagasaki are still dying from the effects of the bombs.

    I do not want to discount the bombs, but those people probably die from old age far more than from radiation. The nuclear attack occurred almost 60 years ago.

  200. Re:Is she single? Looking? by 11223 · · Score: 1

    Wow, best underrated funny comment of the month.

  201. Re:Exposure levels - negligible harm from gamma by base3 · · Score: 1

    Don't you have some high chlorides in the port main condensate header to attend to :)?

    --
    One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
  202. Magic wood? by gmuslera · · Score: 1

    Maybe pear trees? sapient pear trees? If so, looks like a nice place to put a luggage factory.

  203. cbv - took the words out of my mouth! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Her English is better than my Russian, Italian, Spanish, Latin...

  204. How Like A God by technoCon · · Score: 1

    The SF novel _How Like A God_ by Brenda Clough had this guy named Gilgamesh living in the middle of a Ruskie nuke testing desert because he didn't want to be around people.

  205. Re:Safer? That's far from obvious.... by wcdw · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As a long-time rider, I can assure you that any bike rider's biggest safety risk is _ALWAYS_ the unexpected. This is just as true in racing (what happens when the lead bike blows a gasket?) as it is in street riding.

    Although Elena's site focuses more on the result than the process, I get the impression that she is an experienced rider, and thus cannot fail to be aware of that.

    There ARE only two kinds of motorcycle riders, after all -- those that have had accidents, and those that will. (And the two are NOT mutually exclusive, what's worse. ;)

    But one doesn't ride a motorcycle because one is concerned about one's safety among all else, either....

    (I echo an earlier poster's sentiments about the appeal of women who ride!)

    --
    If you're not living on the edge, you're just taking up space!
  206. Re:Is she single? Looking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Motorcycle. $4000
    Camera. $300
    Black leather jackett. $200
    Making Slashdot readers drool lustfully. Priceless.

  207. don't mock this by cygnusx197 · · Score: 1

    You guys are making jokes, but I'm sorry... this is the most haunting thing I've read in a long time.

  208. Stephen King's "The Shinning" by autophile · · Score: 1
    I have never heard of radiation producing visible evidence (immediately, that is), but then again, there was a lot of it. What is this "shinning" all about?

    It's telepathy.

    --Rob

    --
    Towards the Singularity.
  209. 1000 comedians.... by Himring · · Score: 0, Redundant

    If I keep walking all the way to reactor, then at the end of a journey I will glow in a dark. May be this is why they call it a magic wood. this sort of a magic when one walk in in a biker leather and coming out like a knight in a shinning armour.

    There was a 1000, bad, russian comedians who died during the Chernobyl disaster and this lady's trying to be funny....

    --
    "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
  210. I second the notion! by technoCon · · Score: 1, Redundant

    She'd be a great slashdot interview.

    And if either she and/or her interviewer are ever in Grand Rapids, I'll buy their favorite beverage.

  211. I concur by BarakMich · · Score: 1

    One can only imagine what it would be like to speak with her -- her experiences would be fascinating to heard described, and for our curious questions to be answered. Great mods in the sky, please hear this AC's plea.

  212. Deserted town in the USA by Sanat · · Score: 4, Informative

    Back in the early 80's a small town - Times Beach, Missouri was found to have dioxin sprayed on the dirt streets and caused the government to buy out the whole town and relocate everybody.

    It is eery to drive down I-44 just outside of St. Louis and see this town that is totally deserted. just sitting there...

    I've moved from the area since so have not seen it in a few years so don't know what it looks like today, but it was said that the streets contained 2,000,000 times the amount of dioxin considered to be a dangerous level.

    People living there would rake up dead birds and animals died at an alarming rate. over 50 horses died at a single stable from the spraying.

    Now it is just a ghost town frozen in time from the early 80's.

    A massive cleanup was to be put in place collecting the dirt, processing it and later putting back the cleaned dirt... but it may be a never ending project.

    Any locals from St. Louis area care to elaborate further and update what is going on and if the town is still there?

    --
    And in the end, the love you take is equal to the love you make
    1. Re:Deserted town in the USA by freshmkr · · Score: 4, Informative
      Back in the early 80's a small town - Times Beach, Missouri was found to have dioxin sprayed on the dirt streets and caused the government to buy out the whole town and relocate everybody.


      Any locals from St. Louis area care to elaborate further and update what is going on and if the town is still there?


      Contaminated soil and other debris from Times Beach was completely incinerated by 1997. The buildings and houses were leveled years before that. Know what you mean, though--when I was a kid, I used to hold my breath when we drove by on 44.


      Googling for "times beach cleanup" turns up this PDF summary. A quote:


      The Times Beach cleanup has been completed. All residents and businesses were permanently relocated, the purchase of the remaining parcels by FEMA has been completed, and the ownership of the parcels of land has been conveyed to the State of Missouri. The demolition and disposal of the structures at Times Beach has been completed. Excavation of dioxin-contaminated soils, interim placement in temporary on-site storage, and final destruction of site contaminants by incineration has been completed. Thermal treatment of dioxin-contaminated soils from Times Beach and other sites was completed in June 1997, and the site has been restored to a state park.


      --Tom

    2. Re:Deserted town in the USA by LMCBoy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There's another one in PA called Centralia. This town sits above a coal mine that caught fire 40 years ago. They couldn't put out the fire, so the town was evacuated.

      Now, when I say "they couldn't put out the fire", I mean it. It's still burning! Well, smoldering anyway. There are fissures all over the town with smoke coming out. I haven't been there, but I'd love to check it out sometime.

      --
      Liberal (adj.): Free from bigotry; open to progress; tolerant of others.
    3. Re:Deserted town in the USA by swb · · Score: 1

      There was a neighborhood/municipality near St. Paul, MN, called Lillydale along the banks of the Mississippi River that got flooded so often they eventually just tore it down. It was turned into parkland which was improved significantly (parking lots, etc) in the late 90s, but prior to that it was possible to still see some old sidewalks, foundations and the occasional set of stairs.

      Nothing as dramatic as Times Beach, MO or Centralia, PA, but still kind of eerie, at least partly because of the location -- sandwiched between the Mississippi river and a wetland, with the steep bluffs beyond that, and a fairly dense tree canopy and undergrowth. It was like being in the woods, even though with a little effort you could see the St. Paul skyline about 1.5 miles away.

      I can't see any evidence of the community anymore, I think the area with the most obvious last occupation was where they built the parking lot and boat access.

    4. Re:Deserted town in the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Furthermore, after cleanup the Missouri Department of Natural Resources turned Times Beach into Route 66 State Park:

      http://www.mostateparks.com/route66.htm

      They have some good biking trails in there. And no, I haven't gotten sick after riding there.

    5. Re:Deserted town in the USA by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      not to mention PA54 (or is it 44) having to take a detail around a broken up area of the highway - They literally just mounded up dirt and detoured the road about 1/10 of a mile to the east. If you don't know the road, it jumps right up at you. I had no clue I was actually NEAR centralia until I stopped to explore.

    6. Re:Deserted town in the USA by Spunk · · Score: 1

      How did it get to be like that?

    7. Re:Deserted town in the USA by Qwaniton · · Score: 1

      It is (was) PA 61. At the southern end of Centralia, PA 61 was closed permanently, due to the total destruction of the road due to the fire. It's literally a ghost road.

      I was there six months ago today. You can find some pictures from our Centralia visit at PAHighways.com by Jeff Kitsko.

    8. Re:Deserted town in the USA by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      61! yeesh. GOt my numbers all mixed up. 54 is in close vicinity tho.

      http://www.pahighways.com/graphics/features/Cent ra lia1.jpg

      That would be where I about ran it off the road thinking it would be a nice, big turn. Not quite when you're trying to drink a coffee. Oops.

    9. Re:Deserted town in the USA by Sanat · · Score: 1

      There was contaminated oil from manufacturing "agent orange" (used in Vietnam for defoliaging the trees) that was sold cheaply and so a man named Bliss bought some and used it to oil down the streets of Times Beach. He was not aware that the oil was contaminated... nor were many of those that sold it to him.

      Google will have more on the details which are hazy in my mind after 20 years. Search for "dioxin" and "Times Beach" and you will probably have plenty to read.

      --
      And in the end, the love you take is equal to the love you make
    10. Re:Deserted town in the USA by 14erCleaner · · Score: 1
      The town is now gone, and the cleanup of Times Beach is complete, according to the EPA:

      The town of Times Beach, Missouri, captured the attention of the nation when EPA closed it down after discovering dangerous levels of dioxin. Roads to the town were blocked off, and the site was patrolled around-the-clock by security guards. Thus began one of the most extensive cleanups in Superfund history. The contamination happened when the town regularly sprayed dioxin-contaminated waste oil on its streets and parking lots to control dust. In 1983, EPA added the site to its list of hazardous waste sites needing cleanup. After the site was listed, EPA permanently relocated more than 2,000 people and tore down all of the homes and businesses. By the end of 1997, cleanup of the site was complete, and the state, which now owns the property, took advantage of its easy highway access and riverside location to develop it as a park. In the fall of 1999, a new 500-acre state park, commemorating the famous Route 66, will replace what was one of the most highly contaminated sites in the country. When the park opens, thousands of visitors will again be able to enjoy the scenic riverside area.

      --
      Have you read my blog lately?
  213. Alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    -alone, quite a distance away from civilization in a desolate region, with no means of communication with the outside world.

    My definition of paradise...

  214. Thank you Elena... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Elena -

    Thank you for your wonderfull photography, and a great website detailing your trips into the "Dead Zone". I hope to one day create/capture half the number of compelling photos as you already have in your life.

    And please forgive us Mongol-Tartars Slashdot readers for making your hit counter spin like crazy. :-)

  215. They're working on fixing the situation... by dimension6 · · Score: 1
    1. Re:They're working on fixing the situation... by cdn-programmer · · Score: 1

      The artical you reference is very intersting. Here is a direct quote from it:

      "Safety analyses show there are still about 1,000 square meters (1,200 square yards) of holes in the roof and sides," said Eric Schmieman, chief engineer for environmental technology at Battelle Memorial Institute's Pacific Northwest National Laboratory in Richland, Wash. "A significant amount of water can go in, and dust can go out, and birds and squirrels come and go all the time."

      If birds and squirrels are living in the sarcophagus then this is a really interesting development and a wonderful opportunity to study the effects of radiation on higher animals.

      According to Elena, the radiation in the area is so high that were she to walk up to the plant she would come back glowing like a knight in shinning armour... Yet, the squirrels are ok?

      The OBVIOUS thing to do is to treat what is within the area is an ore and mine it! Then the highly radioactive isotopes can be reprocessed into fuel and burned in other reactors. Trying to store this stuff is just nutz. Why store unwanted and dangerous isotopes when you can simply burn them and make electricity from them.

  216. Fallout boy by crumbz · · Score: 1

    Fallout boy meet fallout girl. God I loved that game and Wasteland too.....her photojournal is making me long for the Vault.

  217. Re:Exposure levels - negligible harm from gamma by t14m4t · · Score: 1

    I'll get to that after I fix the clogged seawater system, and the SCRAM the reactor operator inserted to fix it :-)

    weylin

    --
    67.5% Slashdot Pure I guess I need to work on that.... :)
  218. More pictures of abandoned Chernobyl in book form! by everdave · · Score: 1

    For all interested in Elena's wonderful, interesting site, you may be interested in this book on Amazon, it is called:

    Legacy: Photographs From the Chernobyl Exclusion

    http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASI N/1899235582/raretshirts-20?creative=125581&camp=2 321&link_code=as1

    --
    Elliott Smith Tribute CD available now on Double D Records! Visit www.doubledrecords.com to order.
  219. Re:Is she single? Looking? by damien_kane · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In Capitalist America, the Russian Babe rides YOU!

    For a fee... of course...
    Or possibly for a green card?

  220. stalker by Whitecloud · · Score: 1

    the photo at the bottom is in the ovie demo for the game stalker, which is set in this area. Nice to see how real its looking.

    --

    Do you need a website upgrade?

  221. Alpha not a factor. by douglips · · Score: 1

    You're right about alpha being much worse than gamma, but that's only if it gets to you. Alpha is stopped by a decent amount of air, or your clothing or even your epidermis without harming you. It really harms you if you ingest it and it can get to your cells without passing through clothes first.

    So, since she's not eating any of the dirt around her, she'll be fine. I suppose she should watch for dust storms, though.

    1. Re:Alpha not a factor. by magarity · · Score: 1

      I suppose she should watch for dust storms, though.

      If you read the complete text in with the pictures, she goes by herself to avoid having another motorcycle kicking up dust for this very reason.

    2. Re:Alpha not a factor. by zymurgy_cat · · Score: 1

      You're right about alpha being much worse than gamma, but that's only if it gets to you. Alpha is stopped by a decent amount of air, or your clothing or even your epidermis without harming you. It really harms you if you ingest it and it can get to your cells without passing through clothes first.

      True, I failed to mention that. Still, I'd imagine there'd be a lot of dust, dirt, etc. in an abandoned town that one could easily inhale. If you ride with her, stay on the side, not behind her!

      --
      -- Fugacity: Confusing chemists since 1908
  222. Choice Quote by KidSock · · Score: 1

    This is the highest building in town. In a day of disaster people gothered on the roof of this builing and have been looking at a beautiful shining above Atomic Plant. This was the shinning of radiation.

  223. SL-1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.radiationworks.com/sl1reactor.htm

    Not too many people know about it but there was a mis-hap in idaho. The operators were trying to do some type of rod drop test. The man was physically pulling on the control rod. It was stuck. When it finally gave, he pulled it too far. The Rx went promptcritical, shot the rod out, impaling him, and supposedly pinning him to the roof.

  224. Maybe it can't count that high? by WhiteBandit · · Score: 1

    When I try to view the counter now, it gives me a broken image. Perhaps it can't count that high? ;)

    1. Re:Maybe it can't count that high? by jooniqzb1tch · · Score: 1

      you just can't access the counter directly, as it's the referal from her page that generates it :p

  225. Page 6.... by OtakuHawk · · Score: 1

    Junkyard digger's heaven... wow. Too bad it's all contaminated.

  226. No, it's a bait-and-switch troll by bonch · · Score: 1

    It's listed at anti-slash.org right now. The link will alternate from mirror to Bearload link; it uses one of anti-slash's troll tools.

  227. Correction by wagnerer · · Score: 1

    RAD: absorbed dose of 0.01 J
    REM = RAD x QF
    Where QF is a number of much debate for neutrons, alphas, and betas. Its based on 1 for gammas, everything else depends on who you ask.

    Its a common mistake to say 1 Roentgen is 1 Rad. First you only get Roentgen's in air and energies less than 3 million electron volts. Second if you're in a 1 Roentgen/hr field you're getting 0.7 Rad/hr. Nearly everyone rounds it up to 1 to 1 to save on the calculator which is going to cause a big problem one of these days.

    1. Re:Correction by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      Exposure of 1 roentgen of radiation results in an absorbed dose to tissue of 0.97 rad. For purposes of radiation protection and dosimetry, it is usually assumed that the roentgen, rad, and rem are numerically equivalent for gamma rays and x-rays.

      source

  228. Re:seriously! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We'll kick your ass in war if we have to... Again.

  229. Re:Exposure levels - negligible harm from gamma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Even if we were to completely melt down and spray our stuff all over the place, we would still be relatively clean

    If you read the section of the Navy waterchem manual entitled "Reactor Plant Chemistry" it has a list of the reasons for chemistry control and I think its the 6th? one down that states.

    "An operating reactor contains over 1 billion curies of activity..."

    Which even at a good distance is a ridiculous dose rate. I think that a nice spray of our stuff all over the place would in fact be double plus ungood.

  230. Shielding by wagnerer · · Score: 3, Informative

    Best shielding for:
    Gammas: DU or lead
    Betas: Plastic, water (avoid metal at all costs, especially heavy metals)
    Alpha: Basically anything
    Neutron: Parafin to slow them down and lithium to absorb them

    An x-ray is made by slamming an electron into a heavy, dense metal, usually tungsten in machines. A beta is a very fast electron so shield them with metal and you have an x-ray source.

  231. Mixed emotions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This chick is fsck'ing crazy.. but thinking about it and her descriptions... she's pretty damn cool too (but still plenty crazy)

  232. A Different Point by The-Dalai-LLama · · Score: 1

    That the story is powerful and compelling has been stated by people far more insightful and eloquent than me, but something that I haven't seen is anybody pointing out the fact that we are able to read it at all.

    This story is the most perfect example I have seen of how the internet puts the awesome power of truly global communication into the hands of the average person.

    These pictures weren't distributed by Clear Channel, the Associated Press, or CNN. Some Russian chick just gassed up her scoot and created a world-class photo essay that thousands of people around the world are able to appreciate for nothing. I mean, for the love of Pete, they're posted on Angelfire!

    The Dalai LLama
    power to the people, indeed...

  233. on elections by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    "It's was quite boring to go on ellection where one could only vote for one candidate and for one party. People haven't been coming. Then, in order to bring people on ellections, authorities arranged free drinks."

    This sounds familiar, except Soviet America, they call the Party by two different names...

  234. Re:Safer? That's far from obvious.... by Endive4Ever · · Score: 1

    I've often felt that in states where there is a mandatory helmet law, riders should be allowed to ride without a helmet. As long as they're identified as an 'organ donor' on their driver's license.

    --
    ---
  235. Notes From A U.S. Cousin City by IgnacioB · · Score: 1

    I would think the folks of Three Mile Island would identify most although that one was contained. I live and work near Hanford, Washington which incidentally has a graphite reactor like Cherynobyl. This piece has an extra poignancy. Running about 11-13 Roegnen around here I see those figures os hundreds and go, "Oh boy!". Don't go stirring up the dust around that place and take an internal deposition of nasty stuff. Yet, hauling ass on a bike and stay ahead of the wake and you would minimize exposure in a sort of way that would make a U.S. Rad Tech. freak purple twinkies. Closest equivalent in the U.S. would be to do a tour of an old nuclear missile silo.

    1. Re:Notes From A U.S. Cousin City by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      My father was the captain of an EOD squad during the Vietnam era. During training in handling nuclear munitions and the like, part of the exercises involved getting into a protective suit, then sloshing around in a field full of either barium or radium (I don't recall which) slush. Not exactly the kind of environmental situation you really like to hear about!

  236. Guerrilla marketing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    OK, I'm probably just being paranoid, but...

    What if this is a piece of guerrilla marketing for Kawasaki, in the same vein as the "robot built from a Mini Cooper" thing that was posted on Slashdot a couple of weeks back? Elena mentions a couple of times how much she loves her 147-horsepower Kawasaki, and her story embodies everything that motorbike marketing seeks to convey -- adventure, discovery, going-it-alone-ness -- plus, hey, she's a cute chick.

    Please don't label me a cynic for this and hear me out. I myself am not at all sure this is a fake, on the contrary. There were a few points, though, that seemed kind of suspicious to me. Elena, if your story is real (and I want to believe it is), please forgive me...

    OK, here's the first point I found strange: Just how many young women in the Ukraine can afford to buy a 147-horsepower, top-of-the-line Kawasaki motorbike? The rest of her gear (including that Kawasaki jacket) is nice too... Now you might point out that her dad is a nuclear physicist... but AFAIA, nuclear scientists in the former USSR don't get paid quite as well as their Western counterparts. (Remember all those scare stories of Russian scientists helping unsavoury nations build the bomb because their salary at home won't pay the bills?)

    Next, the language. It's a tough call, but it sounds to me as if this is a native speaker trying to sound foreign. On one hand, Elena's English is full of elementary mistakes -- she gets her articles wrong all the time, mixes up singular and plural, uses the wrong tenses. On the other hand, though, she sometimes handles idiom very competently: "back in 1986", "they speak for themselves", "diary of a teacher is interesting read" (of course, the articles are wrong, but the use of "read" as a noun in this way is a typically English idiom). And check out this sentence: "Here is map that shows radiation level in different parts of dead zone and which I updated for our local biker club in March 16 of this year." What is the grammar rule that this sentence so ably demonstrates? A relative clause that is defining should use "that", whereas a relative clause that gives additional information must use "which". Want to tell me that Elena has the grammatical savvy to get this right (many native speakers don't) but doesn't know she should say "a map" and "the dead zone"?

    Let's turn to the pictures. There's one picture that I'm convinced is a fake, but I'll admit the real Elena could have done it herself, just to spice things up a bit. I'm talking about the "television picture":

    http://www.angelfire.com/extreme4/kiddofspeed/ch ap ter14.html

    To me, there's no way that the proportions in that picture are right. If that much of her really fits into the screen, that TV is BIG! (Think they had TVs that size in the Ukraine in 1986?) There's a reflection (presumably from the flash) on the TV -- why, then, no reflection on her sunglasses? Also, if you look at the shadow that the TV and part of the "reception desk" cast on the wall, it looks as if the desk is pretty much backed up against the wall -- not a lot of space for Elena to stand. All in all, this picture has "tourist guy" written all over it...

    There are no other pictures that are as obviously bogus, but my impression is that all of the pictures that show Elena before a background that is clearly in the "dead zone" could have been composited quite easily. As I say, nothing that's obviously fake, but I'd like to point out one more picture that my "realness instinct" is slightly uneasy about:

    http://www.angelfire.com/extreme4/kiddofspeed/ch ap ter6.html

    (the one where she's looking through the binoculars). Is it the reflections on her jacket, even though the sky is overcast (true, could be the flash)? Is it that she seems to be too big relative to the size of the road? Is it where her (and the photographer) seem to be standing? Seems she's just on the edge of the road or slightly on

    1. Re:Guerrilla marketing? by bhima · · Score: 1

      I think you sound like you should be wearing a tinfoil hat!

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    2. Re:Guerrilla marketing? by dukeisgod · · Score: 1

      Kawi has motors putting out a good bit more than 147hp now. More importantly, all the competitors are putting out more power. If it really was some sneaky ad ploy, they'd be pushing a current flagship product.

    3. Re:Guerrilla marketing? by edb · · Score: 1

      Yes, you're being paranoid.

      I was visiting Kiev and the area near Chernobyl in 1992, and I met many people who were not only well educated but quite fluent in spoken English, and written English at least as good or better than many native English speakers here on /. There was also a strong middle class, as well as numerous entrepreneurs moving in after the "Second Revolution". (there was also a huge downtrodden lower class, and a feeling of near desperation in some areas, not unlike parts of the US after the dot-Com bust, but more so...)

      I was very impressed by the people I met, and Elena reminds me very much of two in particular. They were strong, intelligent, analytical yet warm. Exactly as many of us might like to think ourselves to be.

      Thank you Elena!

      --
      In theory, practice and theory are the same. In practice, they rarely are.
    4. Re:Guerrilla marketing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop it! You're making me paranoid!

  237. Re:Is she single? Looking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's probably what he meant. He made quite a profound statement.

  238. ?erenkov blue---what a color! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that blue light at the bottom of the pool was probably the most beautiful thing I have ever seen. There's just no way to describe the color. It's so vivid and so intense.

    Indeed! I've seen it twice, a first time in a research reactor was not very impresive, and a second... oh my! in a visit to an industrial irradiation plant using cobalt-60. That one I'll never forget. We got to stand by the pool (more like an inundated shaft) where the cobalt rods were stored, several meters underwater below us. Then they turned off the lights! We stood there, the only light being the eerie blue ?erenkov coming from below! My knees weakened more than a little, I confess.

    Well, kudos to Lena. Some story to tell her children (or may be not, oh my!)

  239. Re:They should make it a national park or such thi by thelovebus · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure it's a matter of the animals not caring about a shortened lifespan "as long as they are freed from the intimidating human presence."

    Lots of animals actually tend to do much better in what we would consider dangerous levels of radiation than the average human would. While there are still negative effects, they tend to be less pronounced in animals.

    While Elena's site does not mention it, even in disaster areas that claimed the lives of humans (citizens who did not evacuate and rescue workers) very quickly, the animal populations in those areas continued living for a much longer period of time, although most of the animals did eventually die from the radiation, as well.

    And of course wild animals are going to take over somewhere that humans have moved out of, they're going to exist whereever they can, even within range of "the intimidating human presence."

  240. Chernobyl body count by infolib · · Score: 3, Informative

    Quoting chapter 6:

    Some tell that 400.000 dead, soyuzchernobyl report of 300.000 people that died since 1986 and this is not over, in 30 years people will still die

    These numbers are WILDLY inflated! The number of deaths from radiation are probably rather in the dozens. Check here, or here

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced libertarian utopia is indistinguishable from government.
    1. Re:Chernobyl body count by smash · · Score: 1
      What do you trust more - an account of someone who lives there, or a UN report? :D

      smash.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    2. Re:Chernobyl body count by infolib · · Score: 1

      She doesn't give sources or mention observations to back up her numbers. I doubt she counted 300'000 extra cancer cases and did the statistical analysis all by herself, so this is not an eyewitness account. Until she cites evidence - just any kind of evidence - I think the reports that actually do are more credible. Thanks for asking.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced libertarian utopia is indistinguishable from government.
  241. Re:Is she single? Looking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She's not Russian. She's Ukrainan. There is a huge fucking difference.

  242. Re:Is she single? Looking? by ksheff · · Score: 1

    she included her mail address though.

    --
    the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
  243. Re:They should make it a national park or such thi by stephanruby · · Score: 1
    Animals don't care about shorter life expectancy, as long as they are freed from the intimidating human presence.

    Animals try to survive and reproduce wherever they can. Who are you to say that animal care or don't care?

  244. Re:They should make it a national park or such thi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are deer in Minneapolis because there aren't enough people hunting them in the surrounding areas. I would think a metro bow season would be appropriate.

  245. Re:seriously! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We'll wait for the Iraqi resistance to finish kicking yours first. We've got the time.

  246. Pennsylvania town on fire for some 40 + years by DavidNWelton · · Score: 1

    The town of Centralia, Pennsylvania has been on fire (or rather the coal beneath the town has) for more than 40 years. Check it out here:

    http://www.offroaders.com/album/centralia/centra li a.htm

  247. We have the time, too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tony Blair is going to get his ass kicked out of office and you are going to get a pussy as Prime Minister. He is going to take a stance similar to Spain's. Both of your countries will be assraped by terrorists because they know you are fucking weak.

    1. Re:We have the time, too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better than being ass-raped by cheney-bush.

      At least terrorists have the balls to fight instead of hiding when the bombs start flying.

      Fscking republican pussies.

  248. Re:Is she single? Looking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    She's not Russian. She's Ukrainan. There is a huge fucking difference.

    Not that I have any experience in the matter, but I'm not sure there's a huge fucking-difference.

  249. Very moving by Cally · · Score: 2, Insightful
    My girlfriend grew up in the old Soviet Union and then Yugoslavia - both times and places that have gone forever. The photos of detritus of everyday life in communist 1986, in Pripyat, fascinated her. She can never go back, but of course none of us can do. Imagine if you could ride up the rode to a frozen piece of your past.

    Let's just hope no-one does anything stupid and evil that makes us abandon another city in this way...

    --
    "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe
    1. Re:Very moving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I grew up in the east part of Romania (within 300 miles of Chernobyl). I remember exactly the moment I heard the news, May 1st (like a week after it happened), the rumors that a radioactive cloud is approaching town,... The only big advice the idiots gave us was to drink bottled water (guess how long the store's supply lasted). Even if the image of a ghost city is disturbing, is something you can see somewhere else(been to Detroit lately?). What shocks me is the snapshot of the communist era in its late moments, not something you can see elsewhere. In Eastern Europe the cities are changing, Coca Cola and fast food stores are at every corner, people are better dressed, German cars are common, not much to remember of that era...

    2. Re:Very moving by jonadab · · Score: 1

      Pripyat, incidentally, is the city that has been labelled "ghosttown" in the
      article. I initially figure this out by correlating the map in the article
      with my atlas, but a number of pages further into the article there are photos
      from the place which, if you can make anything out of cyrrilic characters, make
      it pretty clear that Pripyat is the name of the town.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  250. Wah? Checkpoints in ex-soviet countries? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think a couple of bottles of Vodka and some Kolbasa (sausage) and maybe some cucumbers would do the trick- no ID needed.

    --Coder

    1. Re:Wah? Checkpoints in ex-soviet countries? by Rower · · Score: 2, Funny

      In Worlds most dangerous places, Robert Young Pelton said that in Chechnya you could get thru any Soviet roadblock with a loaf of bread. Vodka and tobacco would get you an armed escort where ever you wanted to go.
      I though it was funny when he said that these weren't the "robust shovel jawed blondes (the russian soilders) from stallone and van damme movies".

      --
      Hooo Son! This'uns a Hawg!
  251. Re:They should make it a national park or such thi by qoa · · Score: 1

    One some sites, they say that there are cat fish in the lake around the plant that are large enough to swallow a loaf of bread whole.

    --
    Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit upon his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats.
  252. Tours! by qoa · · Score: 1

    After looking around, I found this site about tours of the exclusion zone.

    --
    Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit upon his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats.
  253. Re:Is she single? Looking? by Simon+Brooke · · Score: 1
    I believe you mean "motorcycle riding photo-snapping Russian babe through nuclear wasteland" ;)

    Don't you know any geography? Can't you even read? She isn't Russian. She's Ukrainian. There's no worse insult you can make to a Ukrainian than to call them Russian.

    --
    I'm old enough to remember when discussions on Slashdot were well informed.
  254. Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The highest radiation she talks about is 8R/h, more than 2000x than what you state.

  255. In the words of Governor Schwarznegger by runlvl0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "who are those slashdot people? they swept over like Mongol-Tartars."


    "...what is best in life?"

    "To slashdot your enemies, see their hit counters roll over before you, and to hear the lamentation of their servers!"

    --

    Carthago delenda est!
    1. Re:In the words of Governor Schwarznegger by NeoBeans · · Score: 0

      ROTFLMAO! This is the funniest posting I've seen on slashdot in ages! Somone, mod this guy up as funny!

  256. Somebody should make a movie with her by Simon+Brooke · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Subject says it all, really. She would make a great subject for a short documentary movie, taking a ride through the dead zone and talking about it. I would pay to watch it. I might even invest in it. It wouldn't cost very much to make.

    --
    I'm old enough to remember when discussions on Slashdot were well informed.
  257. Re:Is she single? Looking? by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

    That's like saying that there's a huge difference between someone from Maine and someone from Canada.

  258. Radon levels in the UK by prandal · · Score: 2, Informative

    Interesting map and info at Radon Map.

  259. Oh man, I'm screwed! by Undefined+Parameter · · Score: 2, Funny

    I lived for a year in a brick house in Wyoming, which is chock full of granite and uranium.

    Wyoming: if the weather, the animals, or the locals won't kill ya', the radiation will!

    (Assuming, of course, that you're smart enough to not go skinny dipping in a random hotspring....)

    ~UP

    --
    Eat the Path.
  260. Another website by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.ninja-assassin.com/mirror/Chernobyl/ It has some more pics of Elena and her story

  261. Re:seriously! by Jexx+Dragon · · Score: 1

    Listen. Only Americans drop the us from words like armour, colour, honour. Why? Because the want to seperate themselves from the rest of the world. Don't complain if someone spells somthing differntly then you do. All it will gain you is a flame war, which annoys those of use who are here to learn and enrich our minds.

    --
    I don't have time to comment my code, the program is late already.
  262. Re:Is she single? Looking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Capitalist America, the Russian Babe rides YOU!


    A variation of the old, worn-out "In Soviet Russia" joke that's actually funny?

    I'll go see if Hell's frozen over yet...

  263. Elena has requested that people not duplicate site by 0x0d0a · · Score: 5, Informative

    Elena has started posting on sport-touring.net.

    When someone put up a mirror, worried about bandwidth, Elena asked him to take it down because she was concerned that her updates wouldn't get propagated, and that people would only see an old version.

    elena

    I asked to remove copied site, because need to update and need to make some corrections.


    Original Elena post here.

    While I realize that folks just want to help out, I think that, given that this is Elena's work (and one that she had to venture into hazardous environments to produce and is giving away freely), her wishes should be respected WRT mirrors. (That doesn't mean that I'm not going to make a personal wget -rk --no-parent'ed copy just in case the site ever goes away permanently, though.)

  264. Thank you, Elena. by Undefined+Parameter · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This deed that you have done is invaluable. As a human being and as a historian-in-training, I am humbled by what you have presented. The impact, emotionally and otherwise, that this gives... I don't think I have any words suitable to describe it.

    All I can say is that you are a beautiful person, both inside and out.

    Pax Vobiscum,

    Ted

    --
    Eat the Path.
  265. Elena also feeling harassed by 0x0d0a · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you read a bit further in the thread I linked to in my parent post, you'll also notice that Elena removed her facial portrait and email address (leaving only the postal address) from her original pages -- the body of her documentary work is still present, without some of the personal information. She originally deliberately took her site down for a short period after it first "hit the Web awareness". As folks have noticed, there has been a lot of online commenting on her sex appeal, etc, and a good guess is that she's been uncomfortable with the email that she's been getting since her original site was put up.

    Seriously -- appreciate the work for what it is -- a unique, honest set of images and insights into the most horrific nuclear disaster the world has ever seen. However, please try and avoid creeping the author out. I'd like to continue to see more of this material.

    Thanks.

    1. Re:Elena also feeling harassed by jupitercore · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I found Elena's site (the first time round) 2 days before it hit Slashdot on another popular website. If there's another group out there that can cause mass slashdotting of sites, and bring some of the worst minds I've seen on the net, it's them.

      That's not to say we're not creeping her out, but there are other mass communities as well.

  266. In 1998 only 39 peple had died from the accident by langeland · · Score: 1

    At some point Elena writes:
    "who can count how many people died of radiation? no one, even approximately. Some tell that 400.000 dead,soyuzchernobyl report of 300.000 people that died since 1986 and this is not over, in 30 years people will still die"

    This is probably not realistic. In 2002 the UN published a repport, which described the effects of the accident.
    You can find it here:

    http://www.undp.org/dpa/publications/chernobyl.pdf

    Here I quote some of the passages, which describes the worst consequences of the accident:

    1.26 "Morbidity in the affected areas continues to reflect the pattern in other parts of the Former Soviet Union".

    1.28 "No reliable evidence has emerged of an increase in leukemias, which had been predicted to result from the accident. Howerver, som two thousand cases of thyriod cancer have so far been diagnosed among young people exposed to radioactive iodine in April and May 1986. According to conservative extimates, this figure is likely to rise to 8-10.000 over the coming years. While thyroid cancer can be treated, all of these people will need continuing medical attention".

    4.15 Box 4.2
    "The most prominent deterministic effect following the Chernobyl accident was the death of 28 highly exposed individuals from acute radiation sickness within 4 months of exposure. (In addition, up to the end of 1998 eleven others have died)."

    ----
    So in 1998 39 peoble had died because of the accident, and 2000 cases of thyriod cancer had been diagnosed. This type of cancer is treatable, but some of these cases may die because of the missing opportunities for treatment in the area.

    Although the death of 39 people (and probably some more since 1998) certainly is a tragedy it is not comparable to the 3-400.000 Elena mentions.

  267. Soviet Museum by adeyadey · · Score: 2, Insightful

    One thing that strikes me - this area is a sort of Soviet-era time-capsule - some things are left as they were on the day of evacuation. When the radiation dies down, someone will buy it up and turn it into a theme park..

    --
    "You lied to me! There is a Swansea!"
  268. Re:Poor Girl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't cry for me Argentina. /IMF rant

  269. Hot Girl On Bike Requires Documentary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This woman's story is too fascinating to be denied a wider exposure. Where are the film crews? A girl on a motorcycle riding around irradiated wasteland warrants at least a documentary. Filmmakers take note.

    1. Re:Hot Girl On Bike Requires Documentary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hot girl?

      You need to get out more. I can find better-looking girls working at the Home Depot.

      steve

  270. Re:Thank you, Slashdot - TIRE-FIRE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't there a tire-fire in Springfield or somesuch. Seems somewhat related on a philosophical/Simpsons level.

    The mods will decide I suppose.

    Party on Wayne... (goes to Tim Horton's for an Ice Cap)

  271. Yuo're obviously new here by hayden · · Score: 1

    Yuo get modded as "insightful" for stating the obvious.

    --
    Nerd: Derogatory term typically directed at anybody with a lower Slashdot ID than you.
  272. TIME Magazine: CHERNOBYL NOTES 1986 - 1995 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    pretty comprehensive resource

  273. Absolutely tasteless by andrewuoft · · Score: 1, Insightful

    What an absolutely offensive comment. If you have any guts, try making similar comments towards a visible minority and we'll see how funny people think you are. Andrew, a Ukrainian-Canadian.

    1. Re:Absolutely tasteless by liquidsin · · Score: 1

      Dude, if you're so offended, DON'T READ. Are you going to stalk your way through this whole thread and call everyone who makes a joke tasteless? This is the second time I've seen you bitching, and I've only been reading the thread for five minutes.

      --
      do not read this line twice.
    2. Re:Absolutely tasteless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have any guts, try making similar comments towards a visible minority and we'll see how funny people think you are.

      Surely, if they glow in the dark, they'll be visible enough?

  274. Published in a book by hey · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Would be nice to see this published in a book.
    Maybe Oreilly would want to publish their first
    coffee table book.

  275. Public by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "You cannot do that while riding in public."

    Public? The centre of a nuclear dead-zone is public now?

  276. Re:Exposure levels - negligible harm from gamma by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 1

    You really are the optimist on board, aren't you? :P

  277. Articles like this are why I still read Slashdot. by uloveus · · Score: 1

    Articles like this are why I haven't given up on slashdot despite all the MS vs Unix crap.

  278. It almost happened here... by AetherBurner · · Score: 1, Informative

    Grab the book "We Almost Lost Detroit". It is about the partial meltdown of Fermi #1 (if I remember right). The book details the issues involved on how an afterthought design change that was believed to help out in case of a core meltdown backfired and almost caused what it was to help control.

  279. has any1 actually sent $/tried to help her bandwid by metoikos · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Pardon the horrid number slang, but the subject line is too damn short. Has anyone actually sent her $ to upgrade her bandwidth? There was talk of it with the last article, but I didn't I hear anything more. Maybe start a fund (pity PayPal isn't trustable). I mean, her page is a public service, I would give her money. If there was an easy way how. She posted a mailing address but I don't trust Russian post.

  280. Re:They should make it a national park or such thi by haggar · · Score: 1

    I agree and disagree at the same time. I know that you are right in that animals are not necessarily afraid, as long as the culture of the people living there is of a respectful kind. I live in Finland, and here people seem to genuinely like the wildlife, and take pride in the peaceful, almost harmonious coexistence that even urban areas like the capital itself, enjoy. I can personally say that there's nothing as relaxing after a hard day at work as watching a bunch of squirrels chasing each other, in front of my feet, or interacting with me in funny ways that surprise me many times. These little beasts have saved me from countless burnouts. The wild rabbits and pheasants are nice, too. The bears may not be as nice, but I have not met them personally, yet. They really do try to keep away from humans.

    Now, said all that, I also have to add that it's not just the animals' choice: unfortunately, human population is increasing unstoppably, gradually encroaching the natural habitat of these beasts. Most people's solution to this problem is to hunt down the animals. I find that barbaric, and in the long run, devastating for humanity itself.

    --
    Sigged!
  281. The 'empty' sarcophagus of Chernobyl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    In western Europe we were told that most of the core material was trapped underneath the concrete sarcophagus that engineers died for when created. Imagine our shock as we heard that the sarcophagus was starting to break down recently. What would come from underneath? Do we need to send money and robots to seal the sarcophagus?

    Finding the truth was hard, but researchers found that the radiation was low, expeditions were set up right down into the sarcophagus, what we found was that the disaster was bigger then reported by international organizations. Almost all core material had escaped during the disaster. Even today we were told that most had been contained. The environmental damage had been way bigger then even recently calculated.

    This conclusion also had a strange side effect. The breaking down of the sarcophagus is no new disaster, we don't have to costly fix it. All that we could do is build a simple roof so that rain water is kept out and that groundwater is not polluted anymore then it already is, so that wildlife has more chance. Then just wait for radiation to slowly reduce by itself.

    Dennis SCP (source: Public TV noorderlicht.vpro.nl)

  282. Rontken, ronken, renktegon, errrm... by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    Ok Folks, don't want to be picky, but just for your information, the name is:

    Roentgen
    Konrad Roentgen

    He discovered the X-Ray, btw.
    Curiously, they're called Roentgen-Rays (Roentgenstrahlen) in germany.

    R o e n t g e n
    Roentgen.
    Closest pronounciation in english would be 'Rent-gen'. Make a hard 'g', like in 'gender'.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  283. Re:Exposure levels - negligible harm from gamma by zonix · · Score: 1

    2. those numbers that they got from Chyrnobl are HUGE, but they can't happen on US Naval Reactors. Even if we were to completely melt down and spray our stuff all over the place, we would still be relatively clean (we use tiny reactors; we only need to power a 300' boat to 25+ knots, we don;t need to power an entire metropolis). besides, the most likely time that would occur is if we get hit with a depth charge, at which point's we'll sit on the bottom of the ocean and get covered with a whole hell of a lot of water! :-)

    How would you compare a submarine carrying nuclear warheads in this respect?

    Don't get me wrong, I'm pro nuclear (energy)! Just curious.

    z
    --
    What would an EWOULDBLOCK block, if an EWOULDBLOCK could block would? -- me
  284. "..people inside of each vehicle.." by swb · · Score: 1
    On this page with fields of abandoned heavy vehicles, helicopters, etc. her caption reads:
    radiactive technics as far as only eyes can see. There were people inside of each vehicle.
    I'm presuming that she means people *used* these vehicles as part of the catastrophe and perhaps all had died due to contamination, and not that there were actual dead bodies in the vehicles.

    The entire place is creepy enough, corpses in abandoned vehicles would be too much.
    1. Re:"..people inside of each vehicle.." by qoa · · Score: 1

      Yeah, she means people were in them cleaning up the disaster.

      --
      Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit upon his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats.
  285. Re:She said she was proud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Newsflash: All gods are invented by humans.

  286. Don't forget the original, Love Canal by georgeha · · Score: 1

    I've driven through Love Canal, all the deserted houses looking like people just stepped out, the lawns still mowed, the bright green grass over the clay containment facility, and new tract housing not to far away. Eerie.

  287. Who's taking the pictures if she's all alone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are many pictures with her in the foreground. They are taken from relatively high angles (eye-level) which would lead me to belive there was another person taking the picture (vs. balancing a camera on timer on her bike). I do not think her all alone.

  288. OT: hotsprings? by JerkBoB · · Score: 1

    (Assuming, of course, that you're smart enough to not go skinny dipping in a random hotspring....)

    Please enlighten this dumb city slicker about why that's a bad thing. I spent a couple of weeks out near Jackson Hole, and the locals showed me a few isolated springs to hang out in. I wore swim trunks, and didn't drink any of it, but that just seems like common sense.

    --
    A host is a host from coast to coast...
    Unless it's down, or slow, or fails to POST!
    1. Re:OT: hotsprings? by fm6 · · Score: 1
      I'm confused as well. There are people who pay to soak in hot springs and volcanic mud.

      And people drink hot spring water too. But I wouldn't drink water from any spring, hot or cold, that hadn't been tested.

    2. Re:OT: hotsprings? by fm6 · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing, but it occurs to me that it might be hazardous to bath in a hot spring if you didn't know how often the volcanic source heated up or cooled down.

    3. Re:OT: hotsprings? by Undefined+Parameter · · Score: 2, Informative

      The operative word was "random." There are still a few people who die by falling or jumping into a hotspring in or near Yellowstone National Park. The problem isn't in the purity of the water, it's in the temperature. There are still quite a few hotsprings which are "unlabled"; that is, they don't have signs posted as to whether or not they are safe.

      A greater majority of people who run into these hotsprings are smart enough to know to steer clear of them, but there are a few who want to get a closer look, and then fall in, or stupidly assume that every hotspring is safe or that the random, deep pool of water isn't a hotspring, and then jump into one. Even worse is when someone decides to "take a closer look" or take a swim in one despite warning signs and metal handrails constructed to prevent them from doing so. Unfortunately, the usual result is a gruesome death (I'll spare you the details).

      So that line about the hotsprings was a bit of black humor.

      Google can probably help you find more information on this and the other dangers of being a tourist in the Yellowstone/Wyoming area. If you'd like to get more out of me, I'd request it be done through email, as we're rather off-topic as it is.

      Thanks,

      UP

      --
      Eat the Path.
  289. Yeah by ThousandStars · · Score: 1
    What's even better is that she's featured here too (look for the one in the mask.

    And she's brilliant,and a risk taker. Need I say more?

  290. sick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thats pretty fuckedu p

  291. Lost in Translation by telstar · · Score: 1

    It's nice to see that Babelfish has made such great strides in translation.

  292. Hiroshima was NO accident... by Grog6 · · Score: 1

    That's just what we do when we get REALLY pissed off.

    Hiroshima and Nagisaki were toasted with kiloton devices.
    Our fusion triggers are bigger than that, now.

    Multiple warheads per ICBM; Thousands ready at a moments notice;
    Now THAT's a superpower.

    My only question is: Who's next?

    Any votes?

    --
    Truth isn't Truth - Guliani
  293. Re:Safer? That's far from obvious.... by wcdw · · Score: 1

    Getting futher off topic ;), the usual justification for helmet laws is the cost of maintaining the vegetable formerly known as a rider. The cost of cleanup is typically less than an auto accident, if it comes to that.

    Since I'd rather not become said veggie, I wear a helmet even though it is not _really_ required by my state (which specifies "adequate head protection", but does not define same).

    Either way, though, helmetless or not, I'm not likely to injure you inside your huge steel wrapper, so why do you care if I'm an organ donor? (I am, but that's beside the point.)

    Every day people perform activities which have much more inherent risk than not wearing a helmet on a motorcycle. Would you have all of those people be requisite organ donors, as well?

    --
    If you're not living on the edge, you're just taking up space!
  294. Solution: by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    Drop spent nuclear fuel into a tectonic subduction zone.

    Problem solved. Now you just have to find a waste disposal company who can do it cheaply and reliably. SOMEONE will find a way.

    --

    +++ATH0
  295. Star Trek Land by willtsmith · · Score: 1


    What is interesting is that wildlife seems to be thriving in some of "not so hot" areas. I'm curious if nature will evolve creatures in these zones that are genetically more resilient to the radiation effects.

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
  296. Cycle duds by willtsmith · · Score: 1


    What kinda surprises me is that she goes into the zone wearing leathers and no additional protection. Don't those leathers soak up some of that radiation.

    I would suspect she'd have access to radiation gear since her father is a nuclear scientist. Basically, just wear the radiation suit over the leathers so they don't get contaminated.

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    1. Re:Cycle duds by fm6 · · Score: 1
      What's radiation gear supposed to do? She can't possibly ride her bike if she wears a lead vest, like your dentist has. Her father's gear probably doesn't have any actual shielding. It just protects him from getting fallout on his clothes and skin, and in his lungs. And it's too bulky to use just for walking around -- you would just wear it when you had to work in a "hot" area.

      The meltdown didn't turn the dead zone into one big glowing mass. It just created fallout: radioactive dust. Elena mostly avoids dangerous levels of radiation by avoiding dust. The roads she loves to scream down are relatively safe, because those smooth asphalt surfaces only accumulate dust between rain storms. But once off the roads, keep an eye on your dosimeter!

      That actually used to be an issue in the U.S. Before they banned surface testing, fallout would appear downwind from the blast sites. At first, the radiation levels were dismissed as too low to be hazardous. But living things have a way of accumulating fallout. Cow's milk started to show worrysome levels, and women experienced high incidences of breast cancer.

      I do hope Elena packs in her food and drink!

  297. Don't forget ... by willtsmith · · Score: 1


    Getting out in the Sun gets you some radiation as well. Hopefully, we can keep the Ozone layer intact so that level won't be climbing.

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    1. Re:Don't forget ... by fm6 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Even without ozone depletion, sun exposure is something you have to be careful about. People get the chills at the thought of visiting Chernobyl, but think a nice "healthy" tan is no problem. Wrong!

  298. Two words ... by willtsmith · · Score: 1


    Heat Exchanger. A good house will compeletely exchange the air in a couple hours.

    But I do agree that excessive insulation against air leaks is ... excessive.

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
  299. Was just wondering... by ryen · · Score: 1

    does her recent popularity on Slashdot count as her 15 minutes of fame?

  300. slashdot trying to hog the spotlight by grindking · · Score: 0

    i'm tired of slashdot trying to take credit for stories or pages that were available way before they ever even knew they existed. all i ever see now is 'originally slashdot had this news story 5 years ago' blah blah blah, no one cares. quit taking credit from other pages

  301. firewall alerts when browsing anglefire site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My firewall lit up with NNap Xmas Scan,
    ports scans and invalid TCP headers. Anyone else had problems?

  302. The two scariest words in America ... by willtsmith · · Score: 0, Troll

    Nuclear ... Enron

    We fail to understand that the corporation is fundamentally evil. It's stated purpose is to generate profit ... PERIOD.

    The same capitalistic forces that created the Enron scandal also create toxic waste dumping grounds. The almighty dollar dictates the cutting of corners and sacrifice of long term stability for short-term profit.

    Until we can figure out a proper way to dispose of nuclear waste, it should be considered dangerous. It's only cheap when you leave out the cost of disposal. Then it gets VERY expensive (Most things in costs in America leave out disposal, thats why recycling is considered un-profitable).

    Honestly, I'm not very concerned about a Chernobyl or Three Mile Island. I'm far more concerned about nuclear waste sinking into the soil and contaminating vast areas through seepage (radon, unusable ground water).

    It's my sincere hope that we can eventually find a way to build deep earth disposal vehicles that burrow into hot layers and melt the waste make into a volcanic soup. Until then, we're stuck with that shit and no has figured out a good way to nuetralize it and store it safely.

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    1. Re:The two scariest words in America ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We fail to understand that the corporation is fundamentally evil.

      Crap. Corporations are just a collection of people. They're no more fundamentally evil than other collections of people, like, say, governments. Or Greenpeace.

      It's stated purpose is to generate profit

      Of course. When pursuing economic activity, you naturally want to do something that produces more value than what you consume doing so. That's called "profit". Repeatedly performing activities that result in a net loss of value for everyone, by producing less than the resources consumed, is called "stupid".

    2. Re:The two scariest words in America ... by dustmite · · Score: 1

      Corporations are just a collection of people. They're no more fundamentally evil than other collections of people, like, say, governments. Or Greenpeace

      I think the point was that corporations were the most likely group in the USA to create some sort of nuclear accident (because in the US they, of all groups, have the biggest motive to, i.e. organizations have OFTEN historically placed profits ahead of ethics, leading to e.g. industrial accidents). In this sense corporations ARE more "fundamentally evil" in that sense, because organizations like the government or greenpeace do not have the same financial incentives (or competitive forces) to lead them to misbehave. Hence there is nothing wrong (as you imply) with saying that the problem is that a corporation's stated purpose is to generate profit, as it is this primary motivation (to generate profit) that causes companies to take chances, especially when their survival is threatened by competition - hence there is a *natural* tendency for companies to "push the limits" and take chances, unlike, say, the government. But yes, it is quite possible for the government, and greenpeace, to *also* do stupid things. Cf. Times Beach, Seveso, Love Canal etc.

  303. BBC 30 minute special by dydxjessedydt · · Score: 1

    Here is a link to the story of Chernobyl by the BBC. http://news.bbc.co.uk/olmedia/cta/progs/02/earth_r eport/26apr.ram

  304. I bet nature is thriving ... by willtsmith · · Score: 1


    And I bet that nature is thriving in that area.

    Interesting that the holdouts may end up commanding serious mineral rights fees from the Mining company over the Anthracite.

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    1. Re:I bet nature is thriving ... by Qwaniton · · Score: 1

      It's thriving, except for the white-as-ash trees that got burned to death from the roots up.

  305. Not Alone by djroute66 · · Score: 1

    She is not alone. She said a few times that she is with her "doctor".

  306. At the very least by willtsmith · · Score: 1


    Honestly, I think the leather are probably good for blocking radiation. But I'd be concerned that it would soak up moisture and dust that's radioactive.

    I guess that they don't have access to disposable Tyvex suits in the Ukraine. I really didn't have heavy lead suits in mind. Just something light and disposable.

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    1. Re:At the very least by fm6 · · Score: 1
      Can you imagine this woman cruising around on her overpowered cycle, blasting through the abandoned town, in a paper suit?????!!!!

      Anyway, relying on little technological protections is a strategy for people who want to feel safe. In a situation like this, real protection comes from acting safe.

  307. Re:In 1998 only 39 peple had died from the acciden by cdn-programmer · · Score: 1

    Yes, I pointed out this rather large discrepancy in the last story and was called "heartless"!

    I do not know why it is that we cannot get good reliable data on this. One thing that seems quite clear to me is that radiation dangers have been vastly overrated. Certainly radiation can kill and this is one of the reasons it is used in Cancer therapy. The issue is that we don't hear of a cancer patients dying from radiation induced affects - unless from a accidental overdoes - and these seem to be in the news far more often than I would expect!

    The fact there are healthy animals in the area, reproducing and living normal lives, and the fact that several hundred people have simply ignored the warnings and moved back does bode for a repopulation of the area long before the suggested 900 year curfew is over.

    Yet, I do not wish to make light of this tradegy. The amount of heartache and human suffering as a result of this accident is horrific.

    Still, this does not change the facts. The facts seem to be pointing to the idea that radiation dangers have been greatly exagerated and if so then perhaps a lot of the human suffering due to this accident should be attributed to the way it was mismanaged. Certainly it waa very clear at the time of the accident that the authorities were mismanaging things. Iodine tablets for instance were identified as being critical to thwart off the effects of radioactive Iodine isotopes and as I recall, the offers fell of deaf ears until far too late.

  308. Re:Safer? That's far from obvious.... by Endive4Ever · · Score: 1

    The cost of cleanup is typically less than an auto accident, if it comes to that.

    Auto accidents don't typically ensue because someone spilled a little pea gravel at a spot on the road where some biker noticed 'some groovy chick' and dumped his bike showing off.

    Getting _further_ off topic: why do motorcycles, with limited one/two passenger capacity, make MORE noise that cars with 4-6 passenger capacity.

    Muffle that fucking thing, Harley rider. It sounds like a flatulent anal-sex enthusiast.

    --
    ---
  309. so what you're saying here is... by Doktor+Memory · · Score: 1

    ...after taking a motorcycle tour through the Chernobyl interdiction zone, it's contact with slashdotters that is creeping her out.

    Well, okay, actually I'll buy that.

    --

    News for Nerds. Stuff that Matters? Like hell.

  310. Re:Safer? That's far from obvious.... by wcdw · · Score: 1

    Perhaps, but the 'cost of cleanup' from most 'little pea gravel [spots]' is the energy to lug the bike upright and continue down the road, perhaps with some road rash. In 20 years, I've only encountered one situation on the bike that I could have negotiated in the car, but could not on the bike. That involved an oil slick and a descending S-curve. And I rode away from that one.

    As for noise, I have to keep the radio on my bimmer cranked if anyone is going to hear me. 'Blipping' the throttle to warn some errant driver in the next lane is almost completely ineffective, as the bike just doesn't make enough noise.

    On some days I might lean towards agreement with "loud pipes save lifes", but I've never been a Harley fan to begin with (I prefer a bike I can actually ride, when, where and for however long I choose). But don't get me started on Harleys vs. real motorcycles. ;)

    --
    If you're not living on the edge, you're just taking up space!
  311. Re:Safer? That's far from obvious.... by Elias+Serge · · Score: 1

    ER workers call them 'donorcycles'. wouldnt make me stop riding, though...

  312. thank you by juu · · Score: 1

    Thanks, Elena, for sharing the pictures (though I doubt you'll ever read this).

    Then being a 6 year old kid in Riga, Latvia (still occupied by USSR at the time) I remember little of the accident or the Soviet way of life and treating their people that partially caused the whole damned thing to happen.

    Godspeed and best of luck to you!

  313. quit. by Bongzilla · · Score: 0


    I wonder if all the hits to her site and the great karma because it is really interesting to see these pictures and her narration is great, is causing her to take greater risks--it seems like this latest series has taken her closer to the reactor, and I kind of shuddered to see her sitting on the ferris wheel with the geiger counter.

    I wish it was easier to get {stuff people want}. But I guess then it wouldn't be so valuable. Kind of reminds me of Mohammed Ali hurting himself for his career, or 50 cent "I'll do it again, if it means I'm gonna win."

    Horrifying when you think about it. B/c there's a part of me which says, "cool! more cherobyl pics!"

    ugh.

    --

    ;///////////////////////////////////////////////// /
  314. Re:You are a dumbass... by HarryCaul · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Call me crazy, but I bet she didn't put her email and full name on the website because she didn't want a million emails.

    So why post it here? To show you can lookup?

    Seriously, we should respect her wishes and NOT contact her except via snail mail.

    Repsect is not that difficult a concept.

  315. As a Mongolian Tatar... by mnmn · · Score: 1

    I take offence from her words. We never slashdotted anyone, we warned before we tcpblasted ourselves...

    Of course you realize I'm kidding. I'm a big fan of her site, and its good to know we're not the only ones to do harm to those good Russian people.

    --
    "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
  316. Most Moving Thing I Have Read On Slashdot by gone.fishing · · Score: 2

    Elena,

    We Slashdotters are a curious crowd. We come from many walks of life, from many different counties, and political persuasions. When one of us reads a story that we think others may like we submit a short synopsis of it to the editors. If the editors agree, the synopsis and a link to the story are posted on Slashdot. Slashdotters share some common interests, mostly in technology.

    You are only one person, but what you have done, what you have said has affected thousands of people. Your story has made us take a good hard look at life, technology, and our own contribution to society. There is a real sadness to your story, a sadness caused by something intended to be good. There is a lesson for all of us in that. Your story shows us what can happen when technology goes wrong.

    Your Ghost Ride is more important than you may have imagined. You have reached not only the minds but the hearts of thousands of Slashdot readers. It is a well presented first-person story that reminds that terrible things can and do happen.

    It is not uncommon for people familiar with dangers and risks to minimize them. To some degree everyone thinks; "It can't happen here." I'm sure the people of Chernobyl felt that way before the accident. Many of us work in industries where we can apply what you have taught us to our work. Plan for the worst and hope for the best. It doesn't take much of a mistake to cause a chain-reaction that ends in disaster and it doesn't need to be in a nuclear reactor for that to happen.

    On Monday, when I go back to work, I pledge to you that I will remain mindful of your story. It will make a difference in my work and in my life.

    I urge to take this further. You have told a powerful story. This can be the end of it or, it can be just the beginning. It is up to you. In the days and weeks ahead, you can change lives. You are an exceptional storyteller. What you have done transcends differences in language and in societies. You can be an agent of change. Please use it. I would like to hear more from you!

  317. Re:They should make it a national park or such thi by ksp · · Score: 1
    This will of course disappear deep down in the thread where nobody reads it, but still:

    http://www.nsrl.ttu.edu/chernobyl/wildlifepreserve .htm"In reality, radioactivity at the level associated with the Chornobyl meltdown does have discernible, negative impacts on plant and animal life [4,5]. However, the benefit of excluding humans from this highly contaminated ecosystem appears to outweigh significantly any negative cost associated with Chornobyl radiation [8]."

    --
    What is the sound of one hand clapping?
    cat /dev/null > /dev/audio
  318. We did tame it by Valdrax · · Score: 1

    We have "tamed the atom." ...but even a loyal, trained dog can snap if deliberately abused.

    What the idiots are Chernobyl was "poking it with a stick" and "saying bad things about its mother." They ran the reactor with all the safeties turned off in a deliberately unsafe mode and neglected all the warning signs.

    What's next? If someone blows up a city block by sloshing around a gas pump while smoking and trying to huff the fumes, will you talk about "the depraved hubris in thinking we've 'tamed the oil wells?'"

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  319. what might save us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    me and you
    is if the Russians
    love their children too

  320. Way OT: Re:Soaking up the gamma by angst_ridden_hipster · · Score: 1

    I ruin more pieces by glazing...

    I've never done anagama, but I have done pit firing, which satisfies the pyromaniac in me ... even if we are burning cow chips.

    But these days, I've been using a dark, black cone-10 clay (Laguna's "Dark Brown") that doesn't really need much in the way of glaze, especially if you fire in a strong reduction. I'd hate to think what rare-earth isotopes are floating around in it, though.

    And hey, I don't do particularly functional ware anyway.

    --
    Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachtani?
    www.fogbound.net
    1. Re:Way OT: Re:Soaking up the gamma by anagama · · Score: 1


      I'm still very much in the learning stages regarding anagama kilns, and merely a hobbyist potter, but you might find this interesting. Email me if you want to fire sometime (pacific northwest region).

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  321. bah by bmajik · · Score: 1

    where are my mod points. This is a troll.

    Nothing about the WW2 bombings was "incidental". You can agree or disagree with the decisions that were made but revisionist history doesn't do people any good.

    Furthermore, this coment has nothing to do with the discussino at hand - it's just a way for you to get people riled up.

    So in effect, regardless of the merits of your viewpoint, you're trolling.

    --
    My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
  322. Re:Most Moving Thing I Have Read On Slashdot by LinearBob · · Score: 1

    Well Said!

    Thanks for saying what I am sure many of us are thinking, and Thank You to Elena for one of the best photo-journalism stories I have seen/read anywhere.

    --
    An analog gray hair frantically clinging to the trailing edge of technology. :-)
  323. Incredible by crulx · · Score: 1

    Many people probably don't understand from her broken English, but she took this picture IN FRONT OF THE SARCOPHAGUS OF CHORNOBYL!!!!
    Man. I cannot even begin to imagine.
    ---
    Remember, there is no sig.

  324. Re:They should make it a national park or such thi by haggar · · Score: 1

    Thanks for posting this, it does confirm exactly what I was thinking.

    --
    Sigged!
  325. Missing The Point? by yeschat · · Score: 1

    Yes, the girl is attractive, but it seems to be in bad taste to kept mentioning it. I honestly am not flaming anyone, but let's try maybe to stop commenting on hot biker girls and focus on her deeds for the rest of the time this article keeps getting comments.

    Anyways, a few quick thoughts:

    As someone said in another comment, I was also pretty spooked after reading through the whole story.I really found what she said about tourists not being able to take the silence for very long in the ghost town disturbing. Hard to imagine what that is like, I would probably have trouble dealing with it myself. I would assume one would get used to it (obviously she deals ok with it).

    And also, for all the crap I do online, I gotta say THIS story and her pics reminds me of how great the internet can be. I have seen some shows about the whole thing on tv sometimes, but really they dont even come close to what this girl has done and showed us. It's really too bad there isn't more things like this on the web. That's just what I think, I'm sure others find other things just as interesting online.

    Overall very scary and it really is a wake up call.

    1. Re:Missing The Point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In radioactive Ukraine, the coffee glows *and* listens to you as you wake up...

  326. cancer vs. cell damage by r00t · · Score: 0

    For the cancer, affects build over time.
    Every bit of radiation gives you some chance
    of cancer.

    Radiation sickness is different. It's more
    like alcohol: no problem if you get a bit every
    day, but you die if you get lots at once or
    a moderate amount every day.

  327. Re:Safer? That's far from obvious.... by tbuskey · · Score: 1

    How about automatic organ donor if you don't wear a seat belt?

    Personally, I think not wearing helmets *reduces* the cost to the state if you get in an accident. If you're wearing a helmet, you're going to live. No helmet, you're more likely to die.

    Me, I paid over $500 for my helmet and $1100 for my motorcycle.....

  328. Evolution not necessary by fm6 · · Score: 1

    I suppose there will be some selection for radiation resistence, but I wouldn't expect to see a lot of rad-proof animals. Wild animals often get sick from various causes, and get picked off by predators. The ones that are more resistent to radiation will have some advantage, but that's only one survival factor among many.

  329. Also by willtsmith · · Score: 1


    Big corporations tend to attract a different type of leadership than non-profits.

    Folks going into large corporations (or startups) are in it for the money. This is what motivates them. You are far more likely to get rotten black hearts once the executive selection process is over with. In fact the more black-hearted someone is, the more vicious they are in destroying their competitions.

    Non-profits, by contrast, tend to attract people who are more interested in the mission. Beyond keeping the organization afloat, they generally wouldn't sell them-selves out for extra money. They've already demonstrated their ethics by passing over bigger offers from corporations.

    Political types are a mixed bag. Beginners make shit. But the those on top of the food chain have the potential to make major $$$ in high stakes campaign and lobbying (for major corporations).

    But still, I'd trust the typical beauracrat more than I trust the typical corporate executive. The beauracrat WILL protect his own turf. The big difference is that he's typically not after EVERYONE ELSE's turf like the corporate executive.

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
  330. Re:Safer? That's far from obvious.... by rkrabath · · Score: 1

    Harley has that sound copyrighted, according to my business teacher. To muffle it would defeat the purpose, at least to them.

    --
    Who do I have to blackmail to get some representation around here!?!?!?!?
  331. Oscar Winning Doco in this... by Danious · · Score: 1

    Geez, if I was a doco maker, I'd be on the next plane over to film a guided tour with Elana. You wouldn't need to do much in the way of voiceovers or editing, just her and the remaining locals telling it like it is.

    Be the best anti-nuke power film ever.

    John.

  332. Oh Jesus Christ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...don't be so fucking melodramatic. Anything that happened there is exceptionally pale in comparison to the Holocaust or the slave trade in this country. Get a grip.

    I feel that every american should be required to view that entire website...

    -1 Overrated Please

    1. Re:Oh Jesus Christ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wahh, mister not enough balls to post as NON AC whines because he cant get anything he posted to a +5.

      boo hoo, little baby... boo hoo...

      oh and from what I remember of your generation... they are running around whining that "it really didin't happen"

      and you wont admit that the USA was who tought the germans how to torture and kill...duh, the US did it to the american indians, and the Nazi power in germany simply did what WE did...yet you dont hear of any americans admitting that we performed genocide and sick expierements on american indians... or the spanish and what they did to the astecs or what the english have done to the irish?

      oh yeah, it was nice of the english to make sure no food came in during the blight, and to steal the land in the only places where you can grow food other than potatoes..

      you know black slaves in the USA even saw that the irish had it worse than they did...

    2. Re:Oh Jesus Christ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see that YOU also don't have enough balls to post non-AC. Pot, Kettle, Black... You're a motherfucker you bitch. I'm posting AC simply because I don't want to harm my already good karma you piece of shit. Now fuck off before I come back and bitchslap you.

      Michael

  333. AGREED!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would love to read an interview!

  334. 3500? by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    Death toll estimates I've seen elsewhere are WAY higher.

    If you look at her site, 3500 would almost be entirely accounted for only by the people who refused to leave the dead zone. (3500 stayed, 400 still alive.)

    I've seen death toll estimates in the hundreds of thousands (long-term, that is.)

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    1. Re:3500? by Phronesis · · Score: 2, Interesting
      There are no credible sources for estimates of hundreds of thousands of deaths. Even Greenpeace estimates the death toll at about 2500.

      What's tough is that Chernobyl-induced cancer cases amount to an increase of between 0.004% and 0.01% above the baseline rate of cancers (the exact number is subject to dispute, but is commonly agreed to lie in this range). Thyroid cancer rates are the only ones observed to have increased after Chernobyl, with an increase of 0.9% for the adult population as a whole and 5% for children under 14. Thyroid cancer is very treatable and has a mortality rate of 0.7%, so 100,000 excess cases of thyroid cancer would cause only about 700 deaths.

      Some anti-nuclear activists assert that these numbers dramatically underestimate the number of deaths due to Chernobyl because they want to count as Chernobyl deaths the number of abortions (frequently estimated at 50,000-100,000) performed on frightened mothers throughout Europe in the wake Chernobyl. I hadn't seen the anti-nuke crowd join the pro-life movement before this.

      According to the UNSCEAR, the only long-term effect that's been seen is an increase in thyroid cancer. They were surprised to see no increase in leukemia, whose connection to exposure to radiation is well documented and well understood.

      The exact toll of the Chernobyl accident may never be known. Determining which cancers are caused by fallout and which by other causes is not possible and the numbers are so small as to be statistically uncertain. Perhaps the WHO number of 3500 deaths that I cited was low by a factor of two or three (another estimate, published in the anti-nuke Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, puts the toll at 6000 and rising as of 1996), but there's no credible estimate that puts Chernobyl't toll within a factor of five of Hiroshima.

  335. Dude by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    Those things do NOT work.

    Trust me... I live in an area where car/deer collisions are frequent. We used to use the whistles, but 8-10 years ago we stopped replacing them when the adhesive wore out and they fell off our cars.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    1. Re:Dude by juhaz · · Score: 1

      Yup. If the animals would be scared by loud noise, the damn car itself would be repellent enough!

      Stupid things just don't understand to be afraid of "unnatural" noise.

    2. Re:Dude by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Well, the point of those whistles is that they're supposed to sound at a frequency deer are sensitive too. But since Andy seems to know what he's talking about, I'll save my $8.

  336. Nope by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    They don't.

    I'm lucky - Most Cornell engineering students got a tour of the Ward Lab reactor facility their freshman year as part of a required engineering seminar. The view down into the pool was breathtaking.

    The reactor was shut down permanently my senior year.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  337. ugly by falsification · · Score: 0, Troll
    What is wrong with you people? That chick is butt ugly.

    Woof woof.

  338. Re:Exposure levels - negligible harm from gamma by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    I believe nuclear warheads have so many safety features designed in to prevent detonation that you could shoot it with a gun/drop it off a cliff/set off an explosion next to it, and it wouldn't detonate.

    Making a warhead detonate with full yield requires a very precise conventional explosion to compress the nuclear material. Unless a warhead is intentionally detonated, the chances of it exploding with full yield are slim to non. (At worst you'll have a "dirty bomb" rather than a nuclear explosion.)

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  339. Something in-between by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    Contained - hell no.

    An actual nuclear explosion - No on that count either.

    Chernobyl was a steam explosion, followed by days of slow combustion of radioactive material. (i.e. once the lid blew off the reactor, which wouldn't have been THAT bad, the superheated graphite came in contact with air and began burning instantly - THAT was what spread the majority of the radiation.)

    If the same thing had happened in a U.S. civilian power reactor, the steam explosion would have been contained within the reactor containment building and there would have been no graphite to combust. (Such a steam explosion in a U.S. civilian reactor would have been even harder to create than the one the idiots running Chernobyl created, due to reactor design differences. Using a graphite moderator is unsafe for a multitude of reasons, the final reason being that it burns readily.)

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    1. Re:Something in-between by llefler · · Score: 1

      If the same thing had happened in a U.S. civilian power reactor, the steam explosion would have been contained within the reactor containment building and there would have been no graphite to combust.

      There would be no graphite, but at TMI they were extremely worried that the hydrogen gas might explode and breach the containment dome. That is why the vented some of the steam/gas.

      --
      It is amazing what you can accomplish if you do not care who gets the credit. -- Harry Truman
  340. Re:Exposure levels - negligible harm from gamma by zonix · · Score: 1

    Oh, I'm aware of the safety features (for US nukes anyway)! I assure you, it was meant as a hypothetical quetion. :-)

    z
    --
    What would an EWOULDBLOCK block, if an EWOULDBLOCK could block would? -- me
  341. Re:What? No metric? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, Poland still sells gasoline in dm3, not in liters...

  342. Arranged marriage? Yeah. Right. by HiggsBison · · Score: 1
    One cow to choose from. What, is this some kind of "arranged" marriage? Yeah. That's gonna work real good. I've heard the beer is pretty good in Germany. Didja try lookin' there?

    HiggsBison (the one grazing in the Higgs' field)

    --
    My other car is a 1984 Nark Avenger.
  343. 9/11: Etched in grime on back of truck: NUKE 'EM by iamcf13 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Not long after 2001-09-11 attrocities, I saw the words 'NUKE 'EM' scrawled in the grime on the back of a semi truck trailer traveling down the highway.

    That the USA didn't rain down instant death and destruction on the homeland(s) of those perceived responsible for the attacks shows a commendable measure of restraint on the USA's behalf not to 'replay' Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

    In a ghoulish(?) coincidence, the death toll at Pearl Harbor (1941-12-07) is about the same as that of '9/11'. Is it no wonder that the events of 2001-09-11 are now inextricably linked to the date 'which will live in infamy': 1941-12-07?

    What a day '9/11' was....

    The attacks were vivid, simple, and brutal.

    THEY GOT THE WHOLE WORLD TO TAKE NOTICE--the hallmark of such activites.

    As an 'encore' of sorts, we now have the terrible events of '3/11' in Madrid, Spain (2004-03-11).

    How does one defend against such attacks by using 'the right tool for the right job' without the 'kill 'em all, let God sort 'em out' results one would get using nukes in retaliation against the homeland(s) of the perpetrators of such attacks? Take a look at what happened in the past:

    Pearl Harbor: 2,403 dead. Source.

    Hiroshima/Nagasaki: 350,000 dead. Source.

    Take a look at what is happening now in Iraq:

    US soldiers killed: 544 Source.

    Iraqi civillians killed: 8,700-10,000+ Source.

    The punishment(s) doesn't seem to fit the crime to me....

  344. Context makes the images and story by s-meister · · Score: 1
    When I started looking at the site I was immediately reminded of The Fabulous Ruins Of Detroit. A ruin is a ruin, but the images taken out of context (and without the obvious headliner of the reactor) could be of any rundown area. Some of them remind me of places near my home, but without the Cyrillic!

    What makes this so powerful is the narrative in its fractured English, and the fear. She might well know what she's doing, but would you go there? Serious subject for a Slashdot poll...

  345. Re:Safer? That's far from obvious.... by llefler · · Score: 1

    Getting _further_ off topic: why do motorcycles, with limited one/two passenger capacity, make MORE noise that cars with 4-6 passenger capacity.

    Muffle that fucking thing, Harley rider. It sounds like a flatulent anal-sex enthusiast.


    They are under the impression that you are too busy with your head up your.... I mean on your cell phone to pay attention. So they want a bike that is loud enough that you will hear them. Motorcycles ran with their lights on before anyone ever considered doing it with cars. Yet the one accident I have had, any every near accident, has been because someone in a car didn't see me.

    If you've never ridden, you probably don't realize how alert a safe biker must be. They don't have the luxury of talking on the phone, fiddling with the radio, eating lunch, or applying their makeup. Particularly if you're in an area that grows potholes.

    --
    It is amazing what you can accomplish if you do not care who gets the credit. -- Harry Truman
  346. Chernobyl revisited by fullofangst · · Score: 1

    For anyone that doesn't know the full story... Quoted from a good friend of mine posting on a forum about the URL mentioned in the headline:

    From the start, I'd say that I would not go. But this is based on my assessment of the risk/benefit. You have to make your mind up based on your own judgement.

    But to do that properly, you have to understand the risk properly. Sorry if this gets techie or boring, but this is basically the kind of stuff I do for a living so I'm entitled to mouth off (just this once)

    The Accident

    The accident was caused by a combination of bad design and manufacture, and operators not following procedures during an unusual experimental procedure. The electrical control system was being checked for function during conditions of power outage and the emergency safety interlocks had been removed. During the experiment there were significant variations in the temperature and coolant flow rate. The temperature fluctuations broke up the zirconium fuel channels in the core and allowed the fuel to mix with the pressurised cooling water. This intimate mixing allowed rapid heat exchange and a large increase in energy output because of the increased moderation. This process took six seconds to generate a shock wave in the water from the temperature increase which blew open the pressurised cooling system. The opening of the system allowed the release of the stored pressure and the coolant water immediately flashed into steam.

    The force of this explosion of steam was enough to lift the entire reactor up. Thousands of tonnes of it. Hmm. Anyway, this explosion removed all the cooling water from the reactor, meaning that the fuel, which stayed, increased in reactivity and energy output again. This vapourised the fuel in the middle of the core, which again exploded about a minute later, destroying the core and most of the reactor hall building. A lot of the core, nuclear material and other ancilliary equipment was thrown up out of the reactor building and onto surrounding buildings. This was the first spread of contamination.

    All this hot material flying around started multiple fires on the roofs of the buildings which were conveniently coated in highly flammable tar. Fun. Firemen struggled to control these fires and got most out and the main reactor fire under control within about four hours. Lots died.

    About sixteen hours later the main reactor material had self-heated itself to the degree that it started to react with the water being used to control it, which generated hydrogen. Which also burns. This new fire burnt with a plume stretching about fifty metres above the roof.

    Over the next ten days, thousands of tonnes of damping materials such as boron compounds, lead, sand and clay were dropped on the core to try and stop the fire. Remember that the smoke from these fires was transporting more material out into the environment. An attempt was also made to cool the fire by flooding it with liquid nitrogen.

    Eventually the material burnt it's way out through the lower environmental shield and spread out across the lower levels under the reactor. In doing so it cooled and lost it's reactivity of it's own accord and quite quickly solidified and stopped.

    The Consequences

    It can only be estimated how much of the nuclear material was lost because of the dispersion around the remains of the facility, and the fact that a large amount is buried under the tonnes of control materials and in the too-hot-to-investigate lower halls. The best guess is that about a quarter of the original inventory went walkies, about twenty tonnes or so.

    The spread of this material spans from particles thrown out by the initial blasts to the smoke produced by the various fires which was carried by the wind all across europe, being brought down as the wind died or changed and in rain. The two most important isotopes are 131-iodine (mainly decayed now) and 137-caesium
    (still around). The fall out of this material is arranged in patterns around the site d

    1. Re:Chernobyl revisited by iBallz · · Score: 1

      Very good comment and much appreciated.

      I've changed my mind ... much rather stay away than go seeking *these* thrills.

      Cheers - Andy

      --
      Always be sincere - whether you mean it or not.
  347. Re:They are still chalking up deaths to WWII nukes by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1
    Friday was soooo long ago, but I think that was my point. I too don't discount the fact that being nuked is a bitch, and I hope I am not near the next one that goes off*

    But... I think my point was meant to be why would a newspaper report various cancers in 70 year old people as nuke related... Maybe there is still statistically higher rates, maybe it is anti-nuke-in-general bias.

    * and it will probably be some nice first world country, set off by someone who thinks God told him to do it.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  348. Dear fucking moron, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *I* was not the person who posted her email address, asshole. It was this post by "The Bullroarer".

    Then someone responded saying "OMG y0u have l33t ski11s!@#! I b0w to yu0r l33t tr4ck1ng prow3ss~!@!#!$"

    I then responded telling this person how much of a moron he was, since the "leet skills" were no more than typing "whois kidofspeed.com". And by the way, dipshit:

    1. "kidofspeed.com" is plastered all over half the pictures on her website
    2. the registration info is public
    3. I wasn't the person who originally posted it

    Go back and reread the thread and see if you can figure it out.

    And fuck off.

  349. Troll-ing for effective antiterrorist measures.... by iamcf13 · · Score: 1

    My parent post was deemed a troll post.

    My aim was to spark an honest discussion as to how to deal with terrorists and terrorism without (preferably) killing any innocent civillians in the process. The examples cited in my parent post illustrate what I believe to be an improper magnitude of difference in numbers in the groups of people killed during armed conflict.

    To reiterate, my goal was not to be inflammitory and disruptive, but to start an honest discussion about viable solutions to the problem of terrorism and how to minimize--peferably eliminate--loss of life to all parties concerned....

  350. Re:Exposure levels - negligible harm from gamma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    smoking for a year: 1 Rem
    eating a banana: 4 mRem each


    So, a banana every day for a year would expose you to 4*365.25 = 1,461 mRem = 1.5 Rem, i.e. a Banana a day exposes you to more radiation than smoking.

    Eh, presumably the radiation dissipates or something and the smoking figure accounts for it while the banana figure doesn't? You never hear of cancer from bananas...