So drive a truck full of octocopters to an area, send them off, ten minutes later they're all back. And something like 80% of deliveries are 2kg. As for wind, obviously it's only useful in suitable climates. But I suspect you're overestimating the amount of wind you get in many majro urban areas.
Two beers is more than enough to impair your driving performance. I don't give a shit about you, but I have to share the road with people like you. Fuck off and don't do it.
No, the marginal value of one bitcoin may be $1k, but that is not the aggregate value the market will place on the whole supply. At best it is the value the market places on the daily or weekly volume of bitcoin bought and sold.
Oddly, I read CITR as a very alienated teenager and got nothing out of it. Re-reading it as a slightly more balanced adult, I find it far more interesting.
HR types are often woefully underinformed, but the flipside of that is that it's very obvious most/. posters have no idea what their job actually is. It's significantly more than posting adverts and filtering resumes.
Or where it's legal. In the UK, for example, there's a trend for large supermarkets to offer financial services. They write their terms and conditions to allow sharing of data between loyalty schemes, pricing, and marketing. It's not illegal, though consumers are often in the dark as to what's going on.
Generally scepticism is not a bad approach to anything new. I'd judge it's 50/50 whether Bitcoin will be a serious "thing" in the long run.
I think the point most people miss about Bitcoin pricing is that it happens at the margins. There may be ten million bitcoins in existence (say) but if only a thousand of them are available on any given day, the only thing that affects the price on that day is supply and demand for those 1000 bitcoins, hence the volatility.
There are two possibilities. (a) You are ignorant. (b) All members of the art world everywhere are engaged in a giant conspiracy. Paging Occam to the front desk, please. Occam to the front desk. Seriously, there are courses and books about this shit. Educate yourself.
It doesn't "make" them better, but it doesn't seem unreasonable that it makes them more motivated, which is really the main driver behind intellectual achievement.
There are two seperate issues - one is the fraud of getting unauthorised access with a non-standard access card. The other is the use of a federal ID, which is probably governed under its own law and I'd guess written loosely enough to cover use in this kind of way.
In any case, doing so is stupid, because presumably transactions are logged and ultimately traceable back to the ID holder.
Astonishingly, studies show that men and women have similar rates of introversion. However given the reception they get in the community most of them prefer to fuck off and do something else by themselves.
The commonest problem is some sort of systematic data issue. For example the last UK census revealed a problem with systematic overestimation of the population at ages >90.
You're partly correct. The increase in healthy life years is less than the overall increase, so yes, people are living longer in non-healthy states. However, it's worth noting that people are still living healthy lives in retirement for far, far longer than previous generations. It's not so long since death a few years after retirement was normal.
Acutally the generation that lived through the late thirties/forties is displaying extraordinarily good mortality, so much so that demographers have labelled it the "golden cohort".
Who knows what the dying want? I've seen my relatives progress in slow decline from health to slow and painful death. For a long time they knew they were declining, that every day got a little harder, a little more painful, their world a little smaller. And they made the choice, every day, to keep going.
The gold standard meant that the monetary base could not be expanded. This in turn lead to a deflationary spiral. None of the countries involved managed to stay on gold, and the quicker they came off, the quicker they recovered.
Umm, the Depression happened because (a) the US was on gold and (b) no-one in charge had any idea how to handle a monetary crisis. It had nothing to do with some people being rich. Financial crises happen from time to time, but in 2008 we did significantly better because neither of those things were true.
Given that you had a massive population, huge resources and massive amounts of land you'd have had to have had a really fucked up system not to make massive gains.
Slashdot Mirror
So drive a truck full of octocopters to an area, send them off, ten minutes later they're all back. And something like 80% of deliveries are 2kg. As for wind, obviously it's only useful in suitable climates. But I suspect you're overestimating the amount of wind you get in many majro urban areas.
Two beers is more than enough to impair your driving performance. I don't give a shit about you, but I have to share the road with people like you. Fuck off and don't do it.
No, the marginal value of one bitcoin may be $1k, but that is not the aggregate value the market will place on the whole supply. At best it is the value the market places on the daily or weekly volume of bitcoin bought and sold.
Yep. This guy's blog is fascinating. It's an extraordinarily complex area with a lot of legislation and rules intersecting.
Oddly, I read CITR as a very alienated teenager and got nothing out of it. Re-reading it as a slightly more balanced adult, I find it far more interesting.
HR types are often woefully underinformed, but the flipside of that is that it's very obvious most /. posters have no idea what their job actually is. It's significantly more than posting adverts and filtering resumes.
Not unreasonable. Whatever way you use to manage one million lines is going to scale up to ten million.
Or where it's legal. In the UK, for example, there's a trend for large supermarkets to offer financial services. They write their terms and conditions to allow sharing of data between loyalty schemes, pricing, and marketing. It's not illegal, though consumers are often in the dark as to what's going on.
I think the point most people miss about Bitcoin pricing is that it happens at the margins. There may be ten million bitcoins in existence (say) but if only a thousand of them are available on any given day, the only thing that affects the price on that day is supply and demand for those 1000 bitcoins, hence the volatility.
Ask the medics. There are plenty of situations in medical trials where full double blind is impossible for one reason or another.
Ten years? Where the law allows it, those kind of analyses are already being done.
There are two possibilities. (a) You are ignorant. (b) All members of the art world everywhere are engaged in a giant conspiracy. Paging Occam to the front desk, please. Occam to the front desk. Seriously, there are courses and books about this shit. Educate yourself.
OK, oh great art critic. Fuck off and sell your "random crap on a medium" to the highest bidder. Best of luck.
It doesn't "make" them better, but it doesn't seem unreasonable that it makes them more motivated, which is really the main driver behind intellectual achievement.
In any case, doing so is stupid, because presumably transactions are logged and ultimately traceable back to the ID holder.
Astonishingly, studies show that men and women have similar rates of introversion. However given the reception they get in the community most of them prefer to fuck off and do something else by themselves.
Actually, that group has displayed the opposite trend in mortality, at least in the UK. Google the "golden cohort".
The commonest problem is some sort of systematic data issue. For example the last UK census revealed a problem with systematic overestimation of the population at ages >90.
You're partly correct. The increase in healthy life years is less than the overall increase, so yes, people are living longer in non-healthy states. However, it's worth noting that people are still living healthy lives in retirement for far, far longer than previous generations. It's not so long since death a few years after retirement was normal.
Acutally the generation that lived through the late thirties/forties is displaying extraordinarily good mortality, so much so that demographers have labelled it the "golden cohort".
Who knows what the dying want? I've seen my relatives progress in slow decline from health to slow and painful death. For a long time they knew they were declining, that every day got a little harder, a little more painful, their world a little smaller. And they made the choice, every day, to keep going.
The gold standard meant that the monetary base could not be expanded. This in turn lead to a deflationary spiral. None of the countries involved managed to stay on gold, and the quicker they came off, the quicker they recovered.
Or indeed, just "confirms".
Umm, the Depression happened because (a) the US was on gold and (b) no-one in charge had any idea how to handle a monetary crisis. It had nothing to do with some people being rich. Financial crises happen from time to time, but in 2008 we did significantly better because neither of those things were true.
Given that you had a massive population, huge resources and massive amounts of land you'd have had to have had a really fucked up system not to make massive gains.