Slashdot Mirror


Bitcoin Thefts Surge, DDoS Hackers Take Millions

CowboyRobot writes "In November, Denmark-based Bitcoin Internet Payment System suffered a DDoS attack. Unfortunately for users of the company's free online wallets for storing bitcoins, the DDoS attack was merely a smokescreen for a digital heist that quickly drained numerous wallets, netting the attackers a reported 1,295 bitcoins — worth nearly $1 million — and leaving wallet users with little chance that they'd ever see their money again. Given the potential spoils from a successful online heist, related attacks are becoming more common. But not all bitcoin heists have been executed via hack attacks or malware. For example, a China-based bitcoin exchange called GBL launched in May. Almost 1,000 people used the service to deposit bitcoins worth about $4.1 million. But the exchange was revealed to be an elaborate scam after whoever launched the site shut it down on October 26 and absconded with the funds. The warnings are all the same: 'Don't trust any online wallet', 'Find alternative storage solutions as soon as possible', and 'You don't have to keep your Bitcoins online with someone else. You can store your Bitcoins yourself, encrypted and offline.'"

305 comments

  1. A limited number of Bitcoins by fustakrakich · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Pretty soon they'll all be stolen, kinda like land

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    1. Re:A limited number of Bitcoins by kthreadd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Then someone will invent a new currency and the cycle repeat itself.

    2. Re:A limited number of Bitcoins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      a reported 1,295 bitcoins — worth nearly $1 million

      No they aren't really worth that much. Sure, you can extract $1 million from the market now, but if everyone does that the prices will fall to zero, the liquidity is pathetic compared to the $15 billion capitalization. And the only reason people don't run to crash the market is because they hope they will be able to earn even more in the future - a.k.a "The Greater Fool Game".

    3. Re:A limited number of Bitcoins by master5o1 · · Score: 1

      Then someone will invent a new currency and the cycle repeat itself.

      With blackjack, and hookers...

      --
      signature is pants
    4. Re: A limited number of Bitcoins by zevans · · Score: 1

      FOR black ops! And hookers!

      --
      "... and more and more now there are all kinds of electronic goodies available" -- Pink Floyd 1972
    5. Re:A limited number of Bitcoins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So your 3rd sentence proves your 2nd sentence wrong. They could easily sell all 1295 bitcoins and pocket $1 million due to buyers betting on the greater fool game.

      When most of the news about bitcoin is about how easy it is to lose, even the fools will start to take notice.

    6. Re:A limited number of Bitcoins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fact, forget about the new currency and the blackjack. Ahh, screw the whole thing.

    7. Re:A limited number of Bitcoins by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Funny

      They could easily sell all 1295 bitcoins and pocket $1 million due to buyers betting on the greater fool game.

      It depends. Will someone have the $1mil to buy them all? If they start selling in smaller lots, the value will go down with each transaction.

      The only difference between bitcoins and tulips is that at least you could smell the tulips.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    8. Re:A limited number of Bitcoins by luther349 · · Score: 1

      you mean naimecoin and lightcoin. lol.

    9. Re:A limited number of Bitcoins by daninaustin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you can sell them for $1 million, then by definition they are worth $1 million.

    10. Re:A limited number of Bitcoins by daninaustin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      $1 million isn't all that much now. There are multiple exchanges processing 80k+ bitcoins per day.

    11. Re:A limited number of Bitcoins by Bram+Stolk · · Score: 4, Informative

      The effect of selling is less than you think.
      mtgox is not the biggest exchange, but it can easily do a $1M exchange without affecting price in a too dramatic way.

      The nice thing is that their bid book is open for every one to see, so you can predict what happens to price at large orders.
      See: http://mtgoxlive.com/orders
      At the time of writing, a $1M sell or buy would move the mtgox exchange price 5% in either direction.

      If you sell in the largest exchange in the world, which I understand is in China, it would move the market less than this.

      --
      Bram Stolk http://stolk.org/tlctc/
    12. Re:A limited number of Bitcoins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you can sell them for $1 million, then by definition they are worth $1 million.

      Sure, but the point is that there is not that much 'depth' behind the very high bids and offers on the exchanges. Any substantial sale would quickly fill all of the bids and make the prices 'gap' downwards. The average price you could actually move 1,000 bitcoins for might be substantially less than the current price of ~$1,000. The bids around that price might well be real and not fraudulent but their total size is not necessarily economically meaningful. On the other hand you can trade tens of billions a day or more between the major currencies and not move the market significantly.

    13. Re:A limited number of Bitcoins by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 1

      Sure, you can extract $1 million from the market now, but if everyone does that the prices will fall to zero, the liquidity is pathetic compared to the $15 billion capitalization. And the only reason people don't run to crash the market is because they hope they will be able to earn even more in the future - a.k.a "The Greater Fool Game".

      How is that different from the stock market?

    14. Re:A limited number of Bitcoins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Stock markets are in the trillions in liquidity.

    15. Re:A limited number of Bitcoins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're worth 1295 bitcoins. When a UK news article makes it to the US, they will typically say something like 1 million UK pounds (1.6 million US dollars). Do you also complain that really they're worth 0 US dollars because they're only worth what people will pay for them, and what people will pay for them is always because they hope to earn more in the future?

    16. Re:A limited number of Bitcoins by mysidia · · Score: 2

      It depends. Will someone have the $1mil to buy them all? If they start selling in smaller lots, the value will go down with each transaction.

      No they won't; the exchanges that take a percentage commission, have an interest in keeping the price high.

      Buys while the prices is going up proceed at full speed. As the prices start going down latency will gear up, via the artificial braking that prevents a sudden price drop --- the volume of successfully completed trades is forced down, by artificially added processing delays

      If the price goes down too much, the exchanges will halt trading and blame it on DDoS

    17. Re:A limited number of Bitcoins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So what is a bitcoin? Is bitcoin supposed to be a fluid currency or an investment? It seems that answer depends on who you ask and when. That is not a good thing for either side. If it's an investment, there is no way around it being a pyramid scheme because you are not investing in anything real, only some fake thing. No ones pays their electric bill or buys anything from a store with a stock certificate. If it is a currency, it's not going to go well if the main incentive of everyone that has it is holding on to it and waiting for the value to go up. Why spend it now if the value will be more tomorrow? The funny thing is everyone that has bitcoins always talks about how great it is in theory and the utopian version of what they vision it will become but they themselves are not actually using it and spending it. They are holding on to it waiting for everyone else to start using it and just talking about what they could do with it. When is this group of people going to come in that do not think like the existing users wanting to cash in?

    18. Re:A limited number of Bitcoins by schnell · · Score: 5, Informative

      If you can sell them for $1 million, then by definition they are worth $1 million.

      It seems pretty simple on the surface but it's actually not. The point that the GP post was trying to make is that in a small or illiquid market, large sales volumes can actually depress prices by introducing too much inventory to sell vs. people willing to buy. This is a somewhat different example, but back in the day when Bill Gates still had a meaningful percentage of all Microsoft's shares, he would be said in the media to be worth "[his share total] x [current MSFT quote]." But people who knew the market actually understood that if he ever decided to liquidate his shares all at once they would be worth far less because he would actually flood the market (leaving aside the fact that if people figured out that Bill Gates was selling all his MSFT shares, they would flee the stock in droves assuming he knew something they didn't.)

      So long story short - if I have a trivial number of [shares, rare items, whatever] compared to the market size, then, yes, they are worth [quantity] x [going price]. But if I have a quantity that is significant to the size of the ability to make markets and I try to sell it all at once, it will invariably be worth far less.

      --
      "95% of all Slashdot .sig quotes are incorrect or completely fabricated." -Benjamin Franklin
    19. Re:A limited number of Bitcoins by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If the price goes down too much, the exchanges will halt trading and blame it on DDoS

      You don't have any problem with that?

      You talk about the Bitcoin marketplace as if it was some mature, regulated system. It's not. It's value is purely based on how loudly the proponents of Bitcoin are willing to clap. As soon as it can be traded for other currencies, other commodities, at a large scale, Bitcoin enthusiasts are in for a rude awakening.

      Besides, I'll bet that there will be subsequent private currencies that will replace Bitcoin as the flavor of the week and then you'll see fluctuations that make the current 50% swings look like child's play.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    20. Re:A limited number of Bitcoins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what is a bitcoin? Is bitcoin supposed to be a fluid currency or an investment? It seems that answer depends on who you ask and when.

      Same could be said of traditional currencies. Not to say the investment part can't screw up intended or other uses of things, everything from gold and oil to currencies can be messed up if investing drives the prices instead of direct use.

    21. Re:A limited number of Bitcoins by sg_oneill · · Score: 2

      If you can sell them for $1 million, then by definition they are worth $1 million.

      Except its *really* hard to turn bitcoin to actual coin, compared to the other way around. Most of the sites have huge waits, or pathetic maximum transferal amounts,

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    22. Re:A limited number of Bitcoins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are now aware that the stock market exists.

    23. Re:A limited number of Bitcoins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By 4-5 orders of magnitude.

    24. Re:A limited number of Bitcoins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you take proper security precautions such as storing your wallet in "cold storage" and using end to end encryption when conducting transactions you can actually be relatively secure using the currency and not have to worry about getting robbed.

    25. Re:A limited number of Bitcoins by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      I suggest we take small pieces of precious metals in common weights. Then the currency can actually have a worth other than the publics intrinsic faith in it. Should all faith in such money fail, you could just melt down the coins and sell the precarious metal. Also it's even more anonymous than bitcoin!!!

    26. Re:A limited number of Bitcoins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $1 million isn't all that much now. There are multiple exchanges processing 80k+ bitcoins per day.

      bitcoin to bitcoin or bitcoin to local currency?

    27. Re:A limited number of Bitcoins by Srin+Tuar · · Score: 1

      True, and insightful, however there is one difference: due to the nature of transactions,
      coins are effectively melted down and recast each time they are moved. Even with
      only a tiny percentage of coins having been directly stolen or used for nefarious purposes,
      they would very quickly spread a taint through the whole body of moving coins.

    28. Re:A limited number of Bitcoins by mysidia · · Score: 1

      You don't have any problem with that?

      Does it matter if I have a problem with it?

      Bitcoin IS mature.

      The uninhibited, unregulated trade; is Bitcoin's greatest strength.

      It's just all the "exchanges" or ways of trading USD for Bitcoin or vice-versa, are shady, and believed to be engaged in practices that are either outright illegal, or have questionable legality.

    29. Re:A limited number of Bitcoins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you can sell them for $1 million, then by definition they are worth $1 million.

      Just because they are being advertised as "worth $1 million" doesn't mean there's anybody out there who is actually willing to hand you $1million in exchange for your coins. Just because someone is willing to exchange 1 coin for $X doesn't mean they're willing to exchange 100 or 1,000 coins at the same rate.

      It's like trying to sell your extra tokens to some kid at the local arcade- sure he'll pay you $1 for 4, and maybe even $10 for 40, but that doesn't mean he can or will shell out $10,000 even if you have 40,000 tokens to sell him.

    30. Re:A limited number of Bitcoins by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

      obviously, you don't sell them all at once, so you don't move the market with your actions. it doesn't make them any more or less valuable.

    31. Re:A limited number of Bitcoins by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 1

      That's an issue of scale. The complaint that "if everyone cashes out the price will go to 0" still applies to the stock market.

    32. Re:A limited number of Bitcoins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WEll, this has already been tried. Turns out some people would shave some of the precious metal from the coins, then use the coins, and repeat long enough to get a big lump of the precious metal. That kinda makes trading difficult because you now need to ensure every coin actually weights as much as it should, and you also have to make sure they actually are made of the precious metal.

      This was fixed by using coins that are alost as expensive to manufacture as they are "worth". The worth in them is backed by some nations promise to take them back, and offer something of value for them. Said nations usually ensure the "taking them back" part by making said tokens "legal tender", and thereby forcing their own population to use the tokens by the slightest notion of a threat of violence. Works better than the precious metal tokens for sure. You can also manipulate the amount of exchange tokens on the market, and make them gradually to lose value if you sit on them for too long, to make people actually rotate them around, and use them as means of exchange, and not as means of gathered wealth. ( For that you can use the forementioned precious metals, or promises of using violence to guarantee some area of land or property is "yours" )

    33. Re:A limited number of Bitcoins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      i'd consider liquidity to be part of the value of an asset. if I can't move it quickly it's worth less.

    34. Re:A limited number of Bitcoins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The value Chinese interests are putting into BitCoin are not going anywhere. Since the currency now has real value, it isn't going anywhere anytime soon, only up.

    35. Re:A limited number of Bitcoins by XcepticZP · · Score: 2

      Agreed... Just the other day I decided I wanted to buy some bitcoin, just to give it a go. I was perfectly willing to buy. Yet every single place I looked at didn't want to accept a credit card, or paypal, or Skrill(Moneybookers). There were a few dodgy ones I could have plausibly gone for like "convert to Linden dollars(SecondLife currency) via creditcard/paypal, then use the Linden dollars to buy bitcoins here". I mean, come on. The rest all wanted bank wire transfers with up to three days to process, plus 5% transaction fees. I sense that the normal financial institutions are putting up barriers that make it unfeasible for us to buy bitcoin easily. Either that, or they're just plain incompatible like it is with Paypal and it's reversal poliucy.

      At this rate, if I wanted to buy bitcoins, I'd be better off buying a dedicated mining rig/asic. Which is also bullshit, because all the feasible ones are either on backorder, or you have to pay anything from $2000 to $15000. Which is pretty much insane. Makes me wish I got in on the bitcoin craze back in the start just so I wouldn't have to buy bitcoins now using one of the dodgy payment options on the various exchanges.

    36. Re:A limited number of Bitcoins by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      You are not alone, regardless of your intent values will fluctuate. Face it, when you create a currency to facilitate crime don't be surprised when it becomes bogged down with crime.The majority of those drawn to the currency are inherently liars, cheats and thieves that is the purpose of the currency. You can bet deaths are bound to start occurring and holding the currency will become extremely dangerous for your health.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    37. Re:A limited number of Bitcoins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Makes me wish I got in on the bitcoin craze back in the start just so I wouldn't have to buy bitcoins now using one of the dodgy payment options on the various exchanges.

      This is what everyone was saying when they found that for some reason they were too far in the back of the queue to get in on Ponzi's famous scheme. It gets all difficult to get in. Well if Bitcoin is $1000 a piece, it can sure make your $1 thumbdrive feel expensive, but it's worth nothing but heartache if nobody YOU respect is willing to pay YOU for it.

    38. Re:A limited number of Bitcoins by qubezz · · Score: 1

      All those payment systems you list are the dodgy ones, Bitcoin is not. Scammers can dispute or chargeback funds, or just use stolen numbers or accounts to defraud. It is the Bitcoins that are trustable once you've received them.

    39. Re:A limited number of Bitcoins by qubezz · · Score: 1

      You are wrong, I can execute an order for $1.3million right now on Mtgox for 1244BTC, just one exchange, and not even drop the price below $1000.

    40. Re:A limited number of Bitcoins by XcepticZP · · Score: 1

      I agree with you fully. Thing is, I'm struggling to exchange my currency for bitcoin in an easy and reliable fashion. Right now, it seems the only reliable way to do it is via bank transfer. This is something that they sorely need to address if they want people to use it more. I understand that once a sizeable chunk of people have bitcoins, it will flow more readily and conversion to USD or other currencies will become less important and less frequent. But until such a point, we need ways to get bitcoin.

    41. Re:A limited number of Bitcoins by xorsyst · · Score: 1

      Buy them off ebay using paypal - easy enough?

      --
      Get free bitcoins: http://freebitco.in
    42. Re:A limited number of Bitcoins by u38cg · · Score: 1

      No, the marginal value of one bitcoin may be $1k, but that is not the aggregate value the market will place on the whole supply. At best it is the value the market places on the daily or weekly volume of bitcoin bought and sold.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    43. Re:A limited number of Bitcoins by jythie · · Score: 1

      Beyond that problem, precious metal coins had issues with deflation. They did not scale with the economy or population growth, and could still be easily disrupted by a mine or two changing production quotas.

    44. Re:A limited number of Bitcoins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Picking and choosing small individual bits of things to reply to and state we "so does other fiat currency" or "it's the same" in an attempt to discredit all negative comments about bitcoin is not going to fool people.

      Specific to your comment..
      It is NOT the same. Look at the percentage of people and percentage of money that is not speculated on and actually in use and rotation of any currency compared to the bitcoin. The bitcoin has so much out there and there is just about no where to spend it. There is very little incentive for the mass population of the world to start using it. It offers nothing above and beyond what people are getting now and will never be generally accepted. Every comparison I hear of bitcoin is "so does every other currency" even though that is not true, even if it was then why use it? It being "cheaper" to transfer from person A to person B in a different county is not enough that the world will switch over.

    45. Re:A limited number of Bitcoins by dargaud · · Score: 1

      Makes me wish I got in on the bitcoin craze back in the start

      Well, I did run a miner for a month back at the start. Then I forgot about it. The recent story about the guy who put 18$ in BT 4 years ago and just bought a house with it, made me check my wallet. It took an entire day to catch up and then I had... exactly 0 BT ! Something escapes me here.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    46. Re:A limited number of Bitcoins by schnell · · Score: 1

      it doesn't make them any more or less valuable.

      Not necessarily. What it means is that my bitcoins are not worth [coins] x [current value], but instead are worth [what I sell today] x [current value], and [what I sell tomorrow] x [whatever the value is then], and so on. The actual number could end up being either much higher or much lower.

      --
      "95% of all Slashdot .sig quotes are incorrect or completely fabricated." -Benjamin Franklin
    47. Re:A limited number of Bitcoins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until one day money is declared obsolete...

    48. Re:A limited number of Bitcoins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember trying to explain this on a real estate board circa ~2004. I was saying yes, houses are worth this much now, but if people start to sell all at once prices will decline. People were saying I was an idiot for saying prices could go down. I flipped one house for a decent profit, and had people tell me I should hang on to it. The next year came the crash. There are always people out there without the slightest grasp of basic economics.

    49. Re:A limited number of Bitcoins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I sense that the normal financial institutions are putting up barriers that make it unfeasible for us to buy bitcoin easily. Either that, or they're just plain incompatible like it is with Paypal and it's reversal policy.

      As much as I'd love to blame the legacy financial institutions, it's really just due to asymmetric reversal policies. If you live in a major city I suggest in-person trades like localbitcoins.com, otherwise you'll want to find someone to whom you can just snail mail the cash. If you absolutely need to use a bank transfer, buy a new prepaid card and withdraw its cash from an ATM to avoid any risk of chargeback.

      Yeah I know, this sucks. A decentralized exchange is one of the community's top priorities right now - it looks like Open-Transactions might be the first decent solution.

    50. Re:A limited number of Bitcoins by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      localbitcoins.com

    51. Re:A limited number of Bitcoins by daninaustin · · Score: 1

      Bitcoin to $ or other currencies. You may be limited on how much you are allowed to convert per day, depending on the exchange. I know Coinbase has a 50 Bitcoin/day limit, but there are multiple exchanges so you could break it up that way or have your spouse create an account to double your limit.

    52. Re:A limited number of Bitcoins by jbssm · · Score: 1

      1000 BTC is a trivial amount of shares, at much you would loose 5% of their value in dollars if you sold them all in one transaction. MtGox has several transactions like that every day,

    53. Re:A limited number of Bitcoins by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Buy them off ebay using paypal - easy enough?

      That works, but the premium you pay will be enormous, and the amount you can buy will be limited.

      The bit about the amount you can easily buy being limited is probably a good thing at this point in time ---- the supposed price of a Bitcoin is at stratospheric levels.

      Like Dutch tulip mania levels.

    54. Re:A limited number of Bitcoins by volmtech · · Score: 1

      Microsoft, yes, Apple, no. Many companies have billions in tangible assets.

    55. Re: A limited number of Bitcoins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow... did you really?

      You are the /. equivalent of a dude wearing a pink shirt with a popped collar. I believe that is the definition of a D-bag.

    56. Re:A limited number of Bitcoins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you won't see that money for weeks because no exchange can get their shit together.

    57. Re:A limited number of Bitcoins by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      obviously, you don't sell them all at once, so you don't move the market with your actions. it doesn't make them any more or less valuable.

      Suppose I want to buy 50 cars worth $20k each. That will cost me $1M. If I walk into a car dealer with a check for $1M from a major bank, I could walk out with all 50 cars as quickly as they can find the keys and sign the paperwork.

      If I walk in with $1M in $100 bills, then I can do the same assuming the dealer is willing to file the required paperwork reporting a large cash transaction. In that sense, cash is actually less liquid than a check in bulk.

      If I walk in with what you'd consider $1M in bitcoins most likely they would not be accepted. If I wanted to convert those to something that would be accepted it would probably take some time and I might not get the full $1M.

      If I scaled this whole thing up 10x the issue with bitcoins becomes bigger. If you called up a large auto dealership and told them you had a $10M check that was burning a hole in your pocket they could probably take care of you same-day. Try to liquidate $10M in bitcoins to buy cars and you're likely to have real problems.

      If your goal is to buy 500 cars, then having $10M in a US bank account is more useful than having "$10M" in a bitcoin wallet. That makes the former more valuable in the same way that cash is more valuable than an IOU, even if the issuer is good for the money.

    58. Re:A limited number of Bitcoins by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Face it, when you create a currency to facilitate crime don't be surprised when it becomes bogged down with crime.The majority of those drawn to the currency are inherently liars, cheats and thieves that is the purpose of the currency. You can bet deaths are bound to start occurring and holding the currency will become extremely dangerous for your health.

      I don't think anybody created bitcoin for the purpose of facilitating crime, though it can be used in that manner in the same way that US dollars can be.

      One of defining attributes of cash is that legal ownership is (practically speaking) the same as physical possession. If I sell you a house, you need to make sure that I actually own the house I'm trying to sell you or you could be in trouble. If I offer you a $20 bill to pay for some service you perform, you don't have to worry about whether I own the $20 bill. Cash would not be nearly as useful for low-value transactions if you had to validate its ownership on every transaction, or buy title insurance on every bill that you receive.

      That very attribute is what makes any form of cash a target for thieves. If they can gain physical possession without immediately getting caught, they have increased their wealth.

      US Dollars aren't specifically designed to facilitate crime, and yet you can easily be taken advantage of by criminals if you handle them foolishly. I can create a website in 10 minutes advertising a bank and just ask you to mail me a check to make your initial deposit. If I cash those checks and run off with the money, you're going to have a hard time getting it back. What I did would be illegal, just as what this bitcoin bank did was illegal, but that isn't going to get your money back. If you want your deposit to be FDIC insured, then make sure your bank is FDIC insured.

    59. Re:A limited number of Bitcoins by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      That's an issue of scale. The complaint that "if everyone cashes out the price will go to 0" still applies to the stock market.

      Sure, but scale matters. Your SSL connection depends on it, and for that matter so does the supply of bitcoins.

      There is a big difference between a currency that can handle $1B transactions without issues, and one that can only handle $1k transactions without issues.

    60. Re:A limited number of Bitcoins by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      All those payment systems you list are the dodgy ones, Bitcoin is not.

      Strange that it seems to be so popular with US law enforcement and the the US congress.

      I'm not sure there is any reason to believe the NSA has not already crawled up inside bitcoin's crypto. A 100% traceable currency? It's a tyrant's dream.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    61. Re:A limited number of Bitcoins by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Something escapes me here.

      It's called the "Bigger Idiot" rule.

      Bubbles are fine as long as there's one more idiot out there who will buy. It's possible to be successful and be an idiot, as long as there's a bigger idiot.

      I am interested in cryptocurrency and like the idea of private currency, but there are going to be a whole bunch of people hurt in this bitcoin bubble.

      It's funny that the big proponents of bitcoin are hostile to fiat currency, since bitcoin is nothing but fiat. It's great until the music stops and then you better hope you're not left standing.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    62. Re:A limited number of Bitcoins by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      If you live in a major city I suggest in-person trades like localbitcoins.com

      Innovative digital currency that should only be traded hand to hand. Perfect.

      You'll want to have some popcorn on hand for this one. It'll run up until you start getting regular people buying bitcoins with money they can't afford to lose, and then it's going to get very interesting.

      The funny part is a lot of the big bitcoin proponents are people who would consider themselves "skeptics". They're about to get a lesson in "woo".

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    63. Re:A limited number of Bitcoins by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

      "the liquidity is pathetic compared to the $15 billion capitalization"

      This is terrible if you're a speculator and great for everyone else.

  2. Something I've been ruminating about all day by astralagos · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Somebody more familiar with bitcoin can answer this for me, undoubtedly, but based on my limited understanding, if the wallet file is lost or destroyed, the coins within it are effectively gone, correct? If so, then at some point there's an expected loss over time (fraction of the population who don't back up their wallet, expected size of wallet, drive failure rate), and at some point that's going to intersect with the size at which the pool expands, so that the total supply of bitcoins over time actually decreases. Theoretically, we'd hit some point where bitcoins are just being destroyed through loss. The situation will be exacerbated with thefts and personal storage.

    1. Re:Something I've been ruminating about all day by rasmusbr · · Score: 5, Informative

      Somebody more familiar with bitcoin can answer this for me, undoubtedly, but based on my limited understanding, if the wallet file is lost or destroyed, the coins within it are effectively gone, correct? If so, then at some point there's an expected loss over time (fraction of the population who don't back up their wallet, expected size of wallet, drive failure rate), and at some point that's going to intersect with the size at which the pool expands, so that the total supply of bitcoins over time actually decreases. Theoretically, we'd hit some point where bitcoins are just being destroyed through loss. The situation will be exacerbated with thefts and personal storage.

      Yep, that's correct. Bitcoin is designed to be ridiculously scarce in the long run.

    2. Re:Something I've been ruminating about all day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      obligatory xkcd

      Extrapolating
      http://xkcd.com/605/

      Without knowing rate of loss vs rate of pool expansion there is no way to theoretically mark a point where bitcoin loss>bitcoin gain. Theft still leaves bitcoins in the system, so no real loss there (to the system). I can see a clever developer/maker creating a usb/sd bitcoin wallet. Keep the assets stored off the computer, in a safe place and no risk of government seisure.

    3. Re:Something I've been ruminating about all day by shaitand · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Of course. That's why bitcoin divides to trillions of units. The idea that trade will involve smaller and smaller units. For instance when the price hit $1000 for a BTC it made more sense to think of Bitmils .001 than Bitcoins for transactions because a bitmil was essentially a dollar.

    4. Re:Something I've been ruminating about all day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The protocol is designed to gradually throttle the creation of bitcoins, so will only produce a total of 21 million. Yes, slow deflation after the mining rewards end. But each of those bitcoins can be subdivided into ten million pieces. Nobody is going to "run out of bitcoins".

    5. Re:Something I've been ruminating about all day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is true. However, it is not really a problem in the long run unless every last bitcoin is lost. You can divide bitcoin in infinity and trade with micro-bitcoins or pico-botcoins instead. So at first though this seems like an issue but I argue it isn't.

      Regards,
      Tagide
      dotbit.me

    6. Re:Something I've been ruminating about all day by viperidaenz · · Score: 2

      So if I hoard my bitcoins, I'll make lots of money.
      Why would I ever want to sell them? They'll be worth more tomorrow.

    7. Re:Something I've been ruminating about all day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      We don't need to know the rate of pool expansion. We already know that there is an upper limit to the number of available coins. When that limit is reached we will only lose bitcoins due to the exact reasons the GP raised.

      So your "obligatory xkcd" is not appropriate at all. Back to your drawing board.

    8. Re:Something I've been ruminating about all day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Loss is theoretically unbounded, whereas gain has a theoretical maximum.

      If there's a way to reclaim lost bitcoins (crack the encryption), then you can get a stability point.

      If there's not, then deflation is inevitable, although it could be at a glacial rate compared to population changes (lowering the population of users would tend to inflate the currency, and vice-versa).

    9. Re:Something I've been ruminating about all day by Jack9 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      > But each of those bitcoins can be subdivided into ten million pieces

      100 million. Not that it makes a big difference right now.
      https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Myths

      --

      Often wrong but never in doubt.
      I am Jack9.
      Everyone knows me.
    10. Re:Something I've been ruminating about all day by fastest+fascist · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They *might* be worth more tomorrow. There's no guarantee of that. You will, however, definitely need to eat regularly. Usually spending money is involved in that.

      Look at it this way, computers get better all the time. If you wait a while, you can get better value for your money. Somehow, people still buy computers all the time.

    11. Re:Something I've been ruminating about all day by Athrac · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That is true. However, it is not really a problem in the long run unless every last bitcoin is lost. You can divide bitcoin in infinity and trade with micro-bitcoins or pico-botcoins instead. So at first though this seems like an issue but I argue it isn't.

      You can't divide it infinitely. The smallest unit ("satoshi") is 10^-8 bitcoins, so in total, there will only be 2.1*10^15 units of money. For reference, the total M1 money supply in the world is equivalent to about $25 trillion, or 2.5*10^15 dollar cents. If bitcoin becomes a major world currency and we assume a currency loss rate of couple of percent per year, it's gonna become a problem within couple of decades.

      There could of course be a change in the protocol so that let's say any bitcoins not used in 50 years could be remined. But it's something that requires acceptance from majority of miners.

    12. Re:Something I've been ruminating about all day by LocalH · · Score: 1

      Keep the assets stored off the computer, in a safe place and no risk of government seisure.

      Yeah, like cash that is stored outside of a bank, in a safe place, has no risk of government seizure...

      --
      FC Closer
    13. Re:Something I've been ruminating about all day by petermgreen · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The rate of production is laregely known and is not significantly affected* by changes in mining power.

      The rate of loss is a trickier one, it is not possible for an analysist to tell the difference between a permanently bitcoins (one where all copies of the private key have been destroyed), temporally lost bitcoins (where the private key still exists and may be found but the owner has forgotten where it's stored or is having difficulty remembering the passphrase or whatever), and hoarded bitcoins (where the owner knows how to access the bitcoins but has decided not to do anything with them).

      * Short term fluctuations can happen since the difficultry takes time to adjust.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    14. Re:Something I've been ruminating about all day by codebonobo · · Score: 1

      Bitcoins are divided 8 decimal places so even if many are lost this won't be a problem. Additionally, bitcoins can be divided by up to 13 decimal places with use of fractions of satoshi's without any fork in the code. If more and more coins are lost than their may be an agreed upon fork where additional decimals are added to provide sufficient volume.

    15. Re:Something I've been ruminating about all day by codebonobo · · Score: 1

      ....Or additional decimal places can be added to provide sufficient volume. Your idea sounds like another good work around however.

    16. Re:Something I've been ruminating about all day by a_n_d_e_r_s · · Score: 1

      Given the fact that the gain will reach 0 one day. Its built in that it will happen.
      That day the bitcoins will slowly get eroded away and lost in the big bucket in the sky.

      In the end most bitcoins will mostly be nothings - lost bitcoins that will never be recoverable and the total worth of the bitcoin market will be highly exaggerated without anyone knowing if they still exists or are lost.

      --
      Just saying it like it are.
    17. Re:Something I've been ruminating about all day by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Somebody more familiar with bitcoin can answer this for me, undoubtedly, but based on my limited understanding, if the wallet file is lost or destroyed, the coins within it are effectively gone, correct?

      If the private key is lost or destroyed, then yes, those bitcoins are essentially dead for all intents and purposes; you need the asymmetric private key (encryption key) to sign a transaction using those bitcoins, and there is no recovery in that case.

      However, the total number of bitcoins in the system then goes down --- new BTCs will be mined in the future. And bitcoins are subdivisible down to as small as 1 Satoshi = 0.00000001 BTC

      If there is an issue; it is possible, in theory, that in the future, updates to the Bitcoin protocol, if accepted throughout the network could allow even smaller divisions -- or increase the total number of BTCs that will ever be awarded.

    18. Re:Something I've been ruminating about all day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah that's the thing with nothing. It's scarce. I have nothing. My hands are empty, or scarce as you might say.

    19. Re:Something I've been ruminating about all day by femtobyte · · Score: 1

      However, bitcoin speculators may have other sources of wealth to handle the "eating" part of their needs. Assuming that you aren't both living hand-to-mouth and paid wages in BTC, then you'll be inclined to sit on your BTC while spending your $$ to buy daily bread. People do buy computers now --- but rarely more than a limited amount that does not exhaust their total resources, or cut into their retirement fund stocks. The practical upshot is that BTC is more likely to remain a deflationary speculative gambling instrument, rather than a useful currency for buying food (a function far better facilitated by existing mildly inflationary currencies, which favor economic activity over hoarding).

    20. Re:Something I've been ruminating about all day by ArbitraryName · · Score: 3, Informative

      You can't divide it infinitely.

      Yes, you can. Eight decimal places is just a fairly arbitrary number. If it becomes necessary, smaller transaction can be supported.

    21. Re:Something I've been ruminating about all day by Eskarel · · Score: 0

      Except that involves massive deflation and is a terrible idea.

    22. Re:Something I've been ruminating about all day by Srin+Tuar · · Score: 1

      > if the wallet file is lost or destroyed, the coins within it are effectively gone, correct?

      If all copies everywhere are lost, and the wallet is a pure random one, yes.
      Many types of wallets can be recovered with just a passphrase.

      >If so, then at some point there's an expected loss over time
      Absolutely correct.
      At some point, 8 decimal places wont be enough, and the currency will need to be divided down into smaller fractions.

      The interesting part, in my opinion, will be determining a fair way to prune ancient unspents, so the blockchain ETXO doesnt
      grow endlessly.

    23. Re:Something I've been ruminating about all day by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

      However, the total number of bitcoins in the system then goes down --- new BTCs will be mined in the future.

      but how can you tell if a bitcoin has been lost, i.e. the PW is lost or wallet file destroyed, or if it is being horded, i.e. tucked away for a rainy day? it would seem wrong to artificially expand new bit coins in the future because some are being saved now.

    24. Re:Something I've been ruminating about all day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and if you believe that we must fierce and relentless and must terminate terrorism then you are a Republican!

    25. Re:Something I've been ruminating about all day by mysidia · · Score: 1

      but how can you tell if a bitcoin has been lost, i.e. the PW is lost or wallet file destroyed, or if it is being horded, i.e. tucked away for a rainy day?

      There is no mechanism that allows you to prove that the private key has been lost forever.

      Some day in the distant future, you can probably guarantee the private key will be recovered; if it is still valuable.Because, eventually, technological advances, will allow the RSA algorithm to be defeated, and then the old private keys can be cracked ----- if cracking the older key can generate sufficient value to offset the cost of cracking it, then someone other than the owner will probably crack the asymmetric key, and recover the bitcoins; 100 years from now or so.

      it would seem wrong to artificially expand new bit coins in the future because some are being saved now.

      Difficult, yes, since so many stakeholders would have to agree to the change -- or else the network would face a divergence of the blockchain.

      But what do you mean here by "wrong" ?

      If someone is "saving" Bitcoins, say, without transacting ---- there is no promise to these people that everything about BTC will continue perpetually into the future, functioning exactly the way it does today, with no protocol updates or other changes. That would be a totally unrealistic expectation: and all participants are (or should be) aware, that potential changes to the protocol have the potential to create new risks --- your BTCs in BTC terms may be safer than most fiat currencies, but don't delude yourself into thinking Bitcoin itself isn't fiat, or delude yourself into thinking there are no economic risks.

      If circumstances arise, that cause the miners to collectively agree that increasing the total amount that will ever be awarded is the expedient solution, then Bitcoin will evolve that way.

    26. Re:Something I've been ruminating about all day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll be dead tomorrow. Use them now.

    27. Re:Something I've been ruminating about all day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, let me ask you this: When will you use all the wealth you have accumulated through sitting on your bitcoins? At some point you HAVE TO use them for something, unless you are planning on leaving them to your grand kids. You can't eat bitcoins, you can't drive on water with them, you can't live in them. You can't wear them. They won't keep you warm, or cool you. Your wealth is only potentional wealth before you actually use it to make something you can experience. This goes for "real" money also. If aliens land tomorrow and hand everyone a replicator your wealth will be gone. If they hand just one person a replicator your wealth will be gone, just maybe not overnight.

    28. Re:Something I've been ruminating about all day by lxs · · Score: 3, Informative

      If there's a way to reclaim lost bitcoins (crack the encryption), then you can get a stability point.

      The public keys and contents of all addresses that have been involved in transactions are public knowledge through the blockchain.
      If someone cracks the encryption, no bitcoin is safe from theft any more not even those stored on paper locked in a safe.
      But I guess a value of zero is a stability point too.

    29. Re:Something I've been ruminating about all day by udoschuermann · · Score: 1

      Correct. I wager that plenty of people were toying with Bitoins at some point but shrugged it off and deleted (or lost) their wallet for one reason or another (see the story of the guy who lost 7500 BTC). Wallet gone, coins are gone, forever.

      My encrypted wallet is backed up periodically so that a hard disk crash won't wipe me out. If Mt.Gox goes evil, a lot of people will lose their cash/coins, myself included, but Mt. Gox makes a pretty chunk on every (frequent) trade, so they stand to gain a lot more from being cool than being evil, which serves everyone.

      Bottom line is that Bitcoin is an extremely interesting technical experiment, but more of a gamble than a secured investment. It could all go sour in a minute, or turn into a mind-boggling foundation of a world economy, but fools are parted with their bitcoins on a regular basis, as the story shows.

      Don't hand over your wallet to some guy at the street corner, I'm just sayin'

      --
      --Udo.
    30. Re:Something I've been ruminating about all day by lxs · · Score: 1

      Cash has bulk. A micro SD card or a postage stamp sized piece of paper are very easily hidden.

    31. Re:Something I've been ruminating about all day by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      You have a causality problem. The ability to divide a unit infinitely does not cause deflation. If I'm suddenly able to earn money in 0.1c increments absolutely nothing would directly change as a result of it.

      If on the other hand there's a massive inflation in the price of bitcoin it may necessitate a finer subdivision to allow trading to reasonably continue. Otherwise in the future how could you buy e.g. a bottle a coke if each satoshi is worth $10?

    32. Re:Something I've been ruminating about all day by Alioth · · Score: 2

      The problem with Bitcoin at this moment is that it is in a period of hyperdeflation, so much so it's useless for anything other than either speculation or the black market. If Bitcoin was stable relative to other currencies, it would be useful. And I wish it were, and soon, because it means the possibility of ditching PayPal forever.

    33. Re:Something I've been ruminating about all day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet another Keynesian cultist follower fuck tard. You should definitely drink more wine.

    34. Re: Something I've been ruminating about all day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't there a trope of finding stock certificates under grandpa's old bedside cabinet? Perhaps in future we'll see the scooby gang solving a plot involving the old gardener trying to scare off the rightful heirs while he follows cryptic clues toward a hidden memory card-bitcoin wallet.

    35. Re:Something I've been ruminating about all day by ultranova · · Score: 1

      So if I hoard my bitcoins, I'll make lots of money.
      Why would I ever want to sell them? They'll be worth more tomorrow.

      If you invest in stock market, your expected return is greater than if you spend some of your money on candy, so how come candy makers stay in business?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    36. Re:Something I've been ruminating about all day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Devide them by 6 zeroes or so - and suddenly it's not so bad.

    37. Re:Something I've been ruminating about all day by jythie · · Score: 1

      Says a person living in a time and country under keynesian economics who is living in more wealth then any other time and place in history, including ones using earlier less functional economic systems.

    38. Re:Something I've been ruminating about all day by shaitand · · Score: 1

      You have it backwards. Neither inflation nor deflation changes how much economic activity over hoarding is favored. In both cases the innate human desire to hoard is what drives economic activity. People want more than they have, no matter how much they have. It's the rate of deflation/inflation that sets the base.

      Right now BTC is growing rapidly but it isn't actually growing rapidly as a result of deflation, it is growing rapidly as a result of increased economic activity. The Bitcoin economy is growing rapidly. Vendors are starting to accept bitcoin, thanks to the FBI we know the silk road drug trade (which has simply shifted to other markets, including SR 2.0) was a 1.2b bitcoin based economy, investors are converting their dollars, euros, and yen buying power into bitcoin buying power now that the SEC, DoJ, and US Senate have given their blessing to Bitcoin.

      Additionally, not all Bitcoin is distributed yet. Bitcoin transaction/mining technology is rapidly advancing and there is huge investment in the equipment to do it because it is highly profitable. Yes the miners are profiting from this but those vendors and consumers are benefiting as well. It used to take a day to send someone bitcoin and have the transaction confirmed. Now it takes less than 30mins.

      This is no different than a successful business in an emerging market where someone investing early stands to make huge gains. Later the market will mature. The rate of deflation will stabilize and the everyone will still be greedy. The challenge for all investments will then be to get a return greater than the rate of deflation. The rate of deflation becomes the new baseline. Just like all businesses need to charge enough to cover the rate of inflation now they will need to charge enough for goods and services to cover the rate of deflation with BTC because their investors are going to charge interest greater than that rate for their venture capital. And since consumers (the ones who actually move money in both an inflationary and deflationary system) still need to consume they will ultimately have to pay a mark-up greater than the rate of deflation for their goods and services.

    39. Re:Something I've been ruminating about all day by femtobyte · · Score: 1

      Right, so, in summary, BTC shifts further costs to consumers (who lose out by needing to spend money that provides benefits to hoarders) to favor the profits of wealthy investors (who get to hoard the profit-accumulating money, at the expense of consumers). To me, this is a big negative for a currency, since I'd prefer to not trickle-up wealth while grinding down the common man. However, I suppose this makes BTC look great to the tiny wealth-hoarding class at the top.

    40. Re:Something I've been ruminating about all day by Eskarel · · Score: 1

      No, the ability to divide a unit doesn't cause deflation, but the need to subdivide a bitcoin will only happen because of deflation. Subdividing bitcoins won't magically reset the market, you might earn then in .1 bitcoin amounts, but the folks who already have thousands of them don't all of a sudden get theirs taken away and replaced with .1 bitcoins. They've still got the same amount of bitcoins which are now worth 10x more. That's the definition of deflation. If/when we get to that maximum level of subdivision the folks who already own most of the bitcoins will make folks like Mitt Romney look poor. Bitcoin isn't just deflationary, it's massively economy shatteringly deflationary. The entire bitcoin supply divided up into it's tiniest subdivision is about equal to the total world money supply, and well over half of all bitcoins are already owned by a few thousand people. Imagine how rich those guys will be.

    41. Re:Something I've been ruminating about all day by Eskarel · · Score: 1

      Leaving aside deflationary vs inflationary currency which is an argument that I'm obviously not going to win because you have no concept of reality. Bitcoin isn't just a little deflationary, it's massively deflationary. If you had an equivalent level of inflation it would make Germany between the wars look economically stable.

    42. Re:Something I've been ruminating about all day by shaitand · · Score: 1

      Price increase != Deflation. The rapid price increase is caused by hyper increases in the Bitcoin economy not deflation. The Bitcoin economy has grown by billions in actual use as a currency and billions more worth of investment.

      Some say investment is bullshit I say they are full of shit. Gentleman played early on in Bitcoin had thousands in a wallet which he'd forgotten about. Heard a bitcoin story and took a look and found out he has a few million worth now. Thanks to speculators making the market liquid he was able to sell coin and buy a flat for $250,000 (in Euro actually). Now you could claim that because he converted his BTC to Euro the Euro was worth a flat but I say it makes no difference. Had I bought the same flat from the US I'd have to convert my dollars to Euros but I'd still view it as a $250,000 purchase and my dollars as having bought it for me and $250,000 worth of Bitcoin still changed hands.

    43. Re:Something I've been ruminating about all day by shaitand · · Score: 1

      As opposed to the tiny wealth hoarding class that gets the cost of inflation trickled up to them from the bottom?

      Either way you look at it consumers and laborers are what drive the economy and investors leech from it. Inflation and Deflation don't change any of that. Deflation actually benefits those with less because it increases the buying power of their wages and forces investors to assume more risk in order to generate returns higher than deflation. Higher risk means more freely available credit and a greater chance of losing, which will cause more investment in new business and wealth to shift hands more quickly.

      Inflation is a tax on everyone holding any quantity of money. It encourages producing more money. Deflation is a dividend paid to everyone holding any quantity of money. That dividend ultimately comes from higher risk credit and increased production/consumption of goods and services. So deflation encourages the production of more goods and services. That benefits everyone.

    44. Re:Something I've been ruminating about all day by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Because people like eating candy.

    45. Re:Something I've been ruminating about all day by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      Deflation is inevitable. The question is whether that is an issue. Quite a few of us believe that it is not and that the idea that it is is a lie created by those who want to inflate the currency in order to confiscate your wealth.

    46. Re: Something I've been ruminating about all day by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      I have considered a similar plot but perhaps with a QR code printed on a T-shirt worn by somebody in a photograph...

    47. Re:Something I've been ruminating about all day by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      The "market cap" is meaningless anyway.

    48. Re:Something I've been ruminating about all day by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      It's currently still inflating (the monetary base is increasing). The exchange rate with the dollar is on a bit of a climb though.

    49. Re:Something I've been ruminating about all day by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      We don't live under Keynesian economics, we live under real-world economics that's being fucked up by intervention by Keynesian economists (though many/most of those aren't so much Keynesian so much as they recognize a good excuse to steal your wealth when they see it).

    50. Re:Something I've been ruminating about all day by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      How so? Bear in mind that simple variances in the exchange rate do not make a currency inflationary or deflationary. Bitcoin is currently still in an inflationary stage.

    51. Re:Something I've been ruminating about all day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've somehow got your macroeconomics completely mixed up; half right, then reaching the exact wrong conclusions. Indeed, "Inflation is a tax on everyone holding any quantity of money" --- which is generally great for the economy; instead of hoarding, money-holders have to go out and open factories and shops and businesses to produce growth from goods/services. Deflation is a dividend paid to everyone holding any quantity of money --- which benefits no one but the ultra rich with money to sit on. There's a reason that the ultra-rich tend to throw a fit about the government not doing enough to curb inflation, and that we are bombarded by propaganda against inflation from the billionaire bankster class: it's in their interests, rather than the common peoples', to prioritize low inflation over domestic job creation (even by "printing money" and handing it out to the working class for, e.g., infrastructure construction).

    52. Re:Something I've been ruminating about all day by shaitand · · Score: 1

      "You've somehow got your macroeconomics completely mixed up; half right, then reaching the exact wrong conclusions"

      No. I just haven't reached the same wrong conclusions that have fscked the global fiat economy.

      "Deflation is a dividend paid to everyone holding any quantity of money --- which benefits no one but the ultra rich with money to sit on."

      An assertion that is commonly touted by those who support the idea that inflation is needed to drive an economy and which I thoroughly debunked in my previous posts in this thread. You don't need inflation to force the rich to try to use their wealth to become more wealthy. The rich spend, and need to replace what they spend, additionally the rich are greedy like everyone else and want to increase their wealth. The rate of deflation/inflation just a set minimum bar for the returns your ventures must yield to be worthwhile. Deflation sets the bar higher, and since return on investment directly correlates to risk a higher bar means assuming more risk. That means ease of access to credit because higher risk credit yields greater ROI. Ease of access to credit means more startups and more ventures. Businesses in turn will need to expand in order to do better than they would do by simply sitting on their money.

      Deflation provides interest without a bank. To everyone, every minute of every day. If you make 25 Bitmils/hour you will get a built in raise from week to week at the rate of deflation. That means your employer must expand operations or otherwise increase the value they offer to continue to pay your salary. The deflation doesn't magically come from air. It comes from increased goods and services.

      Someone who legitimately just sits on their wealth and hoards it has little to no impact on the economy since their money isn't in circulation and the reduced supply of money will cause the value of each unit that is in circulation to increase to compensate. That doesn't cause a problem unless there aren't enough units of money. That is a problem on the gold standard. That is no problem in Bitcoin. Bitcoin has trillions of units and it is actually fairly simple to expand the number of digits used to track Bitcoin. So even though Bitcoin is deflationary, it can expand to a theoretically unlimited number of currency units. It could also cause a problem if there were a huge number of people in that position but like you said, we are talking about a very tiny number of wealthy people and their personal contribution to the production of goods and services is essentially nil and their consumption of goods and services is already far below their personal wealth.

    53. Re:Something I've been ruminating about all day by jbssm · · Score: 1

      Yep, that's correct. Bitcoin is designed to be ridiculously scarce in the long run.

      So is gold.

    54. Re:Something I've been ruminating about all day by Eskarel · · Score: 1

      There is a limited supply of bitcoins, after which no more will ever be mined, that's deliberate and as you can see from the post I responded to the supporters of bitcoin are fundamentally opposed to any kind of inflationary devaluation and so will not change this. Well before we reach that point we will have to start subdividing bitcoins down towards satoshi which are 0.00000001 of a bitcoin, Subdividing bitcoins will result in an "increase" in the money supply of about 8 orders of magnitude, but unlike regular money supply increases where additional money is printed and the value of existing dollars go down, with bitcoin the number of coins in the economy remains roughly constant(there will still be some new coins coming into the market as this happens), so as we subdivide and adjust prices downwards in bitcoins the value of the whole coins already owned increases proportionately, so by the time we get to a satoshi the value of a single coin will have, roughly speaking increased in value by about 8 orders of magnitude.

      In theory if you had a nice slow adoption curve this could be tolerable. You'd still have a fairly deflationary currency which would be bad for debt and investment but at least in the medium term it would probably be tolerable. The thing is, that's not what is going to happen. If we take the assumption that a deflationary digital coin which stores its entire transaction history forever and ever and is essentially Big Brother's fondest fantasy come true is a good idea and we'll see Bitcoin become the world currency, the economy will reach a tipping point after which Bitcoin adoption will skyrocket while the economy rapidly transitions to Bitcoin. When you have a massive spike in demand against a static supply you see dramatic increases in value. When a currency rapidly increases in value you get deflation.

      According to what I could find with a quick search in 2008 there was a world money supply of about 60 trillion dollars, it's probably more than that now, but we'll pretend it hasn't increased as it makes things less scary not more so.

      There are currently apparently about 12 million bitcoins mined. If we switched the money supply over today that would mean that one current bitcoin would be worth approximately $US 5 million compared to the speculation fueled grand it's theoretically worth today. That's just to replace the current money supply mind you. It appears the bitcoin max is a little under 21 million so if we had the full number of bitcoins that will ever be available they'd be worth about 2.5 million dollars a piece, which isn't really much better. That's 250000% deflation, which is pretty economy wrecking.

      What's even worse is that as we can see, more than half of all bitcoins have already been mined and are in the hands of a reasonably small number of people, probably a few hundred thousand if we're super generous, with the vast majority of coins being held by a much smaller number of people out of a world population of 7 billion. If bitcoin takes off the guys who currently have these coins will make current world inequality seem like a minor inconvenience. Imagine for a moment that the population of a small US city held more than half the world's monetary wealth. Then of course imagine how an economy would work where monetary wealth was that concentrated while physical wealth remained in totally different hands.

    55. Re:Something I've been ruminating about all day by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Keep the assets stored off the computer, in a safe place and no risk of government seisure.

      Yeah, like cash that is stored outside of a bank, in a safe place, has no risk of government seizure...

      Well, you can encrypt and backup your bitcoins - they can seize you, but they can't actually seize your bitcoins. In fact, if you have a friend you trust with your backup they could transfer your coins to another wallet and render the wallet seized by the government worthless, as long as they do so before the government gets you to divulge the decryption key. So, bitcoins are actually defensible from seizure. Of course, your friend could just spend your coins even if they aren't seized by the government, so it is a security tradeoff.

    56. Re:Something I've been ruminating about all day by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      It's currently still inflating (the monetary base is increasing). The exchange rate with the dollar is on a bit of a climb though.

      I guess it depends on what school of economics you subscribe to, but inflation is not the result of a larger monetary base, but rather in increase of the supply of a currency compared to its demand. When demand is constant then your statement holds.

      The idea that demand for money changes is the main argument behind having government regulate the supply of money - the practical buying power of currency can be held more constant in that case. Of course, the concept behind bitcoin/gold/etc is that the government cannot be trusted with this authority, and in those cases the value of the currency itself can fluctuate, causing its buying power to fluctuate as well.

    57. Re:Something I've been ruminating about all day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the end most bitcoins will mostly be nothings - lost bitcoins that will never be recoverable and the total worth of the bitcoin market will be highly exaggerated without anyone knowing if they still exists or are lost.

      Yes, but given the high divisibility of Bitcoins, by the time that happens, some other "better" cryptocurrency will likely have replaced Bitcoin.

  3. no, this time it will be different by turkeydance · · Score: 1

    ok. like how?

  4. Savings Accounts by lgw · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ever wonder why banks can pay less than inflation for savings accounts and still get customers? Government insurance against the bank getting robbed / going broke / just absconding with the cash lets them provide a service that's worth a small cost.

    In a way, Bitcoin is a bet that the risk of the government itself being the ones to take your money exceeds the risk that individuals will do so. History shows plenty of risk both ways, but I could certainly see the value in banks offering Eurobitcoin accounts.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    1. Re:Savings Accounts by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Less than inflation is still > 0.
      If you stick your cash in your mattress, you get 0%.

    2. Re:Savings Accounts by lgw · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There are many other choices than "savings account" or "mattress". There are a wide variety of bond investments, bond ETFs and mutual funds, money market accounts, and so on. But you pay a lot for safety, and you also pay for the convenience of liquidity, trading in very small amounts, and retail convenience.

      The Internet has nearly removed those last two concerns, however. If you educate yourself on the risks of bonds (both inflation and default risks), which is no harder than educating yourself about how bitcoin works, it's easy to match inflation with funds with daily liquidity, ability to move small amounts, and really quite small risk. But if you want that government backing against default risk, you're going to lose vs inflation - you have to pay for that insurance.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    3. Re:Savings Accounts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In the UK you can save with the government and cut out the middle man. The UK government owns a bank named the National Savings Bank (actually they own several banks, but this is the only one that offers savings accounts to regular people) which offers a middling interest rate and various long-term bonds. When you "invest" in the government's bank instead of it lending the money to somebody else like a regular bank it just spends it on government projects. The money to pay you back later comes from taxation. So in effect it allows the government to borrow from the ordinary consumer at a better rate than they'd get from a foreign bank, and it lets the consumer save with a 100% trustworthy bank.

      Anyway, for long term savings the National Savings Bank will give you points over inflation. They will promise to track better than the rate of inflation in interest. They can do this because they are, after all, the government, if they can't make it worthwhile to borrow money at points over inflation they definitely shouldn't be borrowing from foreign banks! Of course "worthwhile" gets to be over a long view when you're a government. Money spent today ensuring a five year old is healthy and well educated pays off twenty, forty, sixty years down the line.

      (You might say, what if the government can't pay it back? Maybe the tax base collapses, or the country is invaded or something. But in this case the country will default, EVERYBODY in the UK gets screwed if that happens, regardless of whether they use the government owned bank).

    4. Re:Savings Accounts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not in terms of actual value since it won't buy as much as if it had increased at the rate of inflation, but you're still right that mattress money will devalue faster.

    5. Re:Savings Accounts by lgw · · Score: 1

      Anyway, for long term savings the National Savings Bank will give you points over inflation. They will promise to track better than the rate of inflation in interest. They can do this because they are, after all, the government, if they can't make it worthwhile to borrow money at points over inflation they definitely shouldn't be borrowing from foreign banks! Of course "worthwhile" gets to be over a long view when you're a government. Money spent today ensuring a five year old is healthy and well educated pays off twenty, forty, sixty years down the line.

      America has bonds like this too (TIPS). However, "inflation adjusted" is based on inflation numbers that the government has a huge incentive to understate. IMO the only way our government can avoid fiscal collapse is to do just that. Again, it's just your judgment call on how much you trust the government that backs this stuff.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  5. 4.1 million since may?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm in the wrong business :/

  6. Bitcoin hype over? by globaljustin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Are we seeing the Zenith of Bitcoin? Is it all downhill from here?

    I'm not anti-Bitcoin philosophically, but I have worked in academic level IT & networking so I know what's going on...

    The problem is exchanging Bitcoin for real currency...there is no accountability for the value exchange. Mt. Gox? Seriously? How do you even pronounce it? "mount Gox"? "M. T. Gox"? Who do you call if you have a problem? Bank Of America even has a brick and mortar location at least...

    These aren't trivial issues.

    In order for Bitcoin to work, people have to believe it is a trustworthy place to abstract and store economic value.

    People have to **USE** Bitcoin or Bitcoin dies...until you can directly exchange Bitcoin to currency this will just be an elaborate hoax.

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
    1. Re:Bitcoin hype over? by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Insightful

      but I have worked in academic level IT & networking so I know what's going on...

      Only at the level of how you store it, not in any aspects of how it works as a currency.

      The problem is exchanging Bitcoin for real currency

      But in theory you don't need to do that often, the idea is that it is a currency you can accept and use for payments.

      It's a bit tricky for me to convert USD into some other currency also, but since I don't do so very often it doesn't matter.

      As more places accept BitC for payment that concern becomes much less an issue.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    2. Re:Bitcoin hype over? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't need to exchange Bitcoin into currency to use it. If you can buy things with Bitcoin without any cash being involved at any point you can still use it.

      But of course it's mainly speculation right now. Buying things with something that has gone from $13 to $1000 in value within a year is silly. Keeping it and hoping it will rise much higher before flattening out before you spend it is much more clever.

      I'm not saying that this will happen, mind you. But *anyone* major accepting Bitcoin for paying is going to keep it alive.

    3. Re:Bitcoin hype over? by istartedi · · Score: 1

      People have to **USE** Bitcoin or Bitcoin dies..

      It "dies" in the sense that it fails as currency. That doesn't necessarily mean that it loses value. Many things have value but are not used as currency.

      For example, any given art collection at a major museum is a financial success in terms of wealth preservation; but a failure as currency. Nobody trades fractional Metropolitans. Any sales to or from the museum are converted into currency first. Auctions are conducted in currency, etc.

      You might say that comparing bits to art is ridiculous, since one has aesthetic value and can draw tourists and the other doesn't. Art, however, is a matter of taste. All value apart from bare essentials like food, shelter and clothing is somewhat of a collective delusion. There's nothing to bar one BitCoin from beating the Mona Lisa, except taste.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    4. Re:Bitcoin hype over? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      magic the gathering ox. seriously. they traded magic cards before bitcoins came along.

    5. Re:Bitcoin hype over? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't need to exchange Bitcoin into currency to use it. If you can buy things with Bitcoin without any cash being involved at any point you can still use it.

      And you have the answer there already. It is a very very very big if.

      I can't buy food or pay my rent with bitcoins. Neither can I pay my electricity bill nor fiber connection. So if I want to mine coins at home, the coins I get cannot pay for the infrastructure I need (shelter, sustenance, power) to mine and potentially use them.

      Sure, if more places accepted bitcoins it would be fine, but the day my local grocery store or my electric company starts accepting bitcoins, that will be the day the government will make sure that they get their cut of the taxes and people will no longer be interested in using bitcoins for the reasons they use them today.

      I would like to see a global currency work, but I have very strong doubt that bitcoin is that currency.

    6. Re:Bitcoin hype over? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will bet a lot of money that, if BitCoin fails as a currency, it will never beat Mona Lisa.

      I would bet a significantly lesser amount of money that BitCoin will fail as a currency.

      In fact, I have bet that, by *not* buying in even though I keep seeing it go up and up and figure that if it becomes a worldwide currency it pretty much has to go up a lot further. Though I kind of regret not buying at least a little at single digits when I was considering it for the bubble effect at this point.... If I was prescient enough I could have retired.

    7. Re:Bitcoin hype over? by dasacc22 · · Score: 1

      People have to use it?! Of course! and banks aren't part of the equation for decentralized currency. So see, you took a valid issue here, people need to use bitcoin, but left off the important part, "as intended".

      Bitcoin is a decentralized currency and people are going to have to learn what that really means and how to use it properly for bitcoin to succeed.

    8. Re:Bitcoin hype over? by Kiuas · · Score: 2

      People have to **USE** Bitcoin or Bitcoin dies...until you can directly exchange Bitcoin to currency this will just be an elaborate hoax.

      The ease of exchange is not nearly the only problem with BC. Let me list a few others:

      1. Deflation. Because there's a set cap on the total amount of Bitcoins that can ever exist (made worse by the fact that it is possible for coins to disappear permanently, limiting the supply even more), the currency is by nature deflationary (this does not however mean that it cannot go down in value but I'll get to that later). Deflation is of course good for those who use BC for investment/speculative purposes, but very bad for anyone wanting to actually use it for trade. For the consumer, having currency that looks like it will be worth more next week than now does not really encourage spending in any way. Pricing is difficult as hell because of the deflation since you have to keep adjusting prices down because of the deflation (and people have to convert the amounts to standard currencies anway, because saying something is worth "0,02 bitcoins", doesn't really tell you anything unless you go and check how much the current rate is)

      2. Useability: let's be honest: what's the one thing people use BC for at the moment in addition to speculating? Paying for suspicious goods or services online. And I know there are other things you can get with bitcoins as well, but the main reasons people exchange their regular currencies for bitcoins is because even though BC is not anonymous (unlike some people think), it's the closest/most used equivalent we currently have for cash in the online world, making it the currency of choice for those who want to order something which they do not want to get caught buying (not just drugs btw, gambling is also a big thing with BC).

      Now, these two factors are entwined: currencies only have value because people expect that they will be accepted (ie. retain their value) later on. In the case of bitcoin, the reason the value has shot up as fast as it has, and what makes it so lucrative at the moment for speculators, is the 'quasi-anonymous' nature of it - and services such as silkroad. That is to say, in a completely hypothetical scenario wherein drugs would become legal to buy and sell online using 'old fashioned' currencies the price of the BC would likely plummet fast. Now, while such a scenario seems rather unlikely, it's just meant to show how dependent BC currently is on such sites/services. For reference, this is what happened to the exchange rates of bitcoin when silkroad was closed. Which gets us to the third point:

      3. Volatility. Right now BC has been fairly steadily increasing in value, as people have become more interested in it, but there is no guarantee that this situation will continue. In fact, looking at the rather massive increase in value and comparing it to a classic model of a bubble (got the links from a recent BC story and its comments here on /. but unfortunately I no longer remember the original poster) one cannot help but to wonder how long it will keep rising before it eventually comes down. How hard and how fast it will come down is another question, and I'm not saying it will necessarily crash and burn over night but there is no reason to assume the rise will continue indefinitely. If the early adopters start dumping their coins, if more popular BC based sites are shut down by the officials, or if someone develops a new, more anonymous/easier to use 'online cash' type of currency or a number of other things happens BC will lose its value quickly.

      You're right, people need to use bitcoin or it dies, but the essential question is: would you be confide

      --
      "It is the business of the future to be dangerous" -Alfred North Whitehead
    9. Re:Bitcoin hype over? by faedle · · Score: 3, Funny

      > Mt. Gox? Seriously? How do you even pronounce it?

      "Magic the Gathering Online Exchange."

      That should scare you.

    10. Re:Bitcoin hype over? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, the dollar isn't a trustworthy plavce to store economical value. It inflates all the time. That on the other hand makes is a perfect thing to use as fast as you possibly can. The optimum point would be right in the middle of inflation and deflation. Then you could store value, but wouldn't really benefit from sitting on your coins.

      Most state issued currencies seem to be leaning on the "use it now, value diminishes over time" side. I believe this is for at least two reasons. One is they want to encourage people to do trades, thereby spreading the wealth. At the same time the ones that control the trading can siphon a slice from every transaction. The other is printing money. It just happens to be very convinient you can simply print more and hand it over to yourself, keeping the inflation at a nice level, and basically stealing a tiny amount of every already existing unit of money.

    11. Re:Bitcoin hype over? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " the only benefit you'll get from using bitcoins compared to regular currencies is that it makes it harder (but not impossible) to trace the purchase to you." - Have you dealt with transferring money internationally? Recently? Have you tried to set up a business to receive credit card payments? Have you dealt with Paypal?

      When was the last time you received a letter? An email?

      Sometimes a little easier is enough and in this case it is A LOT easier.

    12. Re:Bitcoin hype over? by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, Silk Road that was shutdown and the price barely blipped downward before starting on a new upward trend. Essential to Bitcoin?

    13. Re:Bitcoin hype over? by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      Yes. I thought this was an inside joke for a couple of months before I found out the truth.

    14. Re:Bitcoin hype over? by jbssm · · Score: 1

      until you can directly exchange Bitcoin to currency this will just be an elaborate hoax.

      I do that about, hum, let me see... every day.

    15. Re:Bitcoin hype over? by jbssm · · Score: 1

      Sure, if more places accepted bitcoins it would be fine, but the day my local grocery store or my electric company starts accepting bitcoins, that will be the day the government will make sure that they get their cut of the taxes and people will no longer be interested in using bitcoins for the reasons they use them today.

      My grocery store doesn't accept electron for payment, and still, I can go to an ATM machine, exchange some electrons to some green paper and pay my groceries. Using Bticoin, I first convert some electrons on bitstamp to other electrons in my bank account, then go to an ATM... well, you get the idea.

    16. Re:Bitcoin hype over? by jbssm · · Score: 1

      And Bayer factories produced Zyklon-B... but you don't see people complaining about that when they take an aspirin, do you?

    17. Re:Bitcoin hype over? by jbssm · · Score: 1

      what's the one thing people use BC for at the moment in addition to speculating? Paying for suspicious goods or services online

      I always pay for my Humble Bundle game deals with bitcoins. OMG, are you telling me Humble Bundle is actually a Pedofile, Terrorist, Marxist organization??? I knew it! I knew it all along!

  7. Convenient timing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, we all want Bitcoin to keep falling.

    No, this being posted on Slashdot right now will probably not make people keep selling to lower the price. Sorry.

    1. Re:Convenient timing by khallow · · Score: 1

      Let me guess, you're a "bitshort". I'm here all week.

  8. Mine are safe by raftpeople · · Score: 4, Funny

    in the couch

    1. Re:Mine are safe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I keep my Bitcoins safely buried in a Scottish garbage dump!

  9. Idiots by wbr1 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Keep...your...own...fucking...wallet...

    I do. Encrypt and backup your wallet.dat file. When you restore it, even if it is old, you can rescan the block chain and have all your funds. Except for transfers, why hand your entire wallet to someone? Would you do that on the subway, or in walmart?

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
    1. Re:Idiots by timeOday · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually it is idiots that keep all their savings in their own wallets, or in paper bag in the freezer, or buried in the yard. Whereas normal people do entrust their saving to complete strangers, all the time, in a thing called a "bank." This turns out to be much safer than holding it yourself, thanks to "regulations" enforced by "governments." Kind of impressive if you step back and think about it.

    2. Re:Idiots by EdZ · · Score: 1

      Encrypt [...] your wallet.dat

      And for goodness sake write down your password somewhere. Or you end up with a wallet full of a handful of bitcoins you acquired ages ago but now can't do anything with.

    3. Re:Idiots by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      Also, don't throw away the hard drive with the wallet on it.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    4. Re:Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This turns out to be much safer than holding it yourself

      Depends on for how long. For example, any cash you saved before the 2008 banking crisis is only worth ~90% of its value now. For banks to be "safer", cold wallets will need over 2% annual risk of loss - even more if you count BTC deflation.

    5. Re:Idiots by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      It's an illusion. Ask the people of Cyprus.

      Have you looked at how much federal insurance is available to the banks? It doesn't cover enough. Of course, in the event of a catastrophe, the government will just bail them out and run the presses (read: steal money from everyone to bail out the rich).

    6. Re:Idiots by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      And make a backup.

  10. Re: Just starting by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2

    Now since CNN and real Wall Street brokers are getting into the act I expect the value to go skyhigh! It went up 1000% in just 12 months.

    Even if you think that is non sense Tulip bubble mania all over again you can't ignore the fact that this got some Wall Street investors attention. With supercomputers and high trading algorithms you can bet they will automate the process and prevent it from crashing. Remember if you have a super computer you can make money too by shorting the bitcoin.

    You make free money the more volatile it is. This is much more profitable than the dow jones. At this point I doubt it will go away anytime soon.

  11. Re:Idiots .. use a VM by Billly+Gates · · Score: 4, Informative

    ... and use a VM just for that purpose. Since I do IT I have a copy of VMware workstation and will utilize this for just that purpose to play it safe.

    I have one for porn and one I am going to make for litecoin trading as bitcoin is too expensive already :-(

    Firefox and Chrome with flash can get you just as infected as IE under Windows in this day and age so any browser is bad. A VM is the only way to stay safe sadly.

  12. Re:Idiots .. use a VM by wbr1 · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you are really paranoid, you can use whonix, which puts a vm in a vm, piping everything through tor and preventing just about any leak of IP information or exposure of OS exploits.

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
  13. Already done by DrYak · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Then someone will invent a new currency and the cycle repeat itself.

    It has already been done. And far more than once.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  14. Re:Idiots .. use a VM by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    Thanks man!

    I work hard for my limited money and something like this is a life saver in case I get a trojaned mining app or a website. This will prevent it from getting through.

    I

  15. I'll stick to real money thanks by viperidaenz · · Score: 2

    If someone hacks my bank and steals my money, the bank replaces it.
    If someone steals my wallet and takes off with my credit cards, I'm not liable for the transactions.

    1. Re:I'll stick to real money thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That is a service you pay for via taxes and bank charges. In a bitcoin economy you could pay an insurance company for the same security at the same or probably lower cost.

      Regards,
      Tagide
      dotbit.me

    2. Re:I'll stick to real money thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless it's the bank or the government that steals it.

    3. Re:I'll stick to real money thanks by Nyder · · Score: 1

      If someone hacks my bank and steals my money, the bank replaces it.
      If someone steals my wallet and takes off with my credit cards, I'm not liable for the transactions.

      Cept bitcoins aren't credit card, they are money.

      So if you had any cash in your wallet, that would be gone and you could NOT replace it, much like bitcoins.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    4. Re:I'll stick to real money thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unlike real coins you'd get to sit back and watch how your money was being spent.

    5. Re:I'll stick to real money thanks by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2

      Ok

      Where can I sign up for such a security policy? I am willing to to even have them take 5% or more of my earnings for security as I have to share bank account or credit card info to buy and sell and that scares the shit out of me more than losing some bitcoins!!

    6. Re:I'll stick to real money thanks by tftp · · Score: 1

      So if you had any cash in your wallet, that would be gone and you could NOT replace it, much like bitcoins.

      This is one of many reasons why nearly everyone pays with plastic. Cash is used only if you have no bank account. I keep very little cash, never carry it, and only use it for transactions at a flea market, for example.

      Not only using plastic is free and safe; it is also profitable (to you) because the bank shares with you a small part of the 2% that the c/c networks charge for transactions. The vendors simply overcharge the cash customers for those 2% and keep the money.

    7. Re:I'll stick to real money thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not free to you. Everything costs 2% more than it should. You give 2% of EVERYTHING YOU BUY to Visa/MC.

    8. Re:I'll stick to real money thanks by tftp · · Score: 2

      This is not something I can change. These 2% are a business agreement between the merchant and the payment network. The merchant is allowed by the contract (or was allowed, at least) to offer cash discounts. But rare a vendor does that. Some gas stations are the only example I can think of.

      So, here we are. The 2% are built into the fabric of the entire economy. It does not matter if I pay with plastic or cash. What do you propose, outside of marching with torches and pitchforks toward the VISA HQ?

    9. Re:I'll stick to real money thanks by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      So, bitcoins are money and not an investment. You should explain that to the people in the other threads who are talking like bitcoins are investments.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    10. Re:I'll stick to real money thanks by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      My debit card has the same guarantee. That's pretty much like cash.

      Bitcoins aren't money either. No more than gold bars or stock is money.

    11. Re:I'll stick to real money thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here is some reality basement boy.
      I have an AMEX, zero annual/daily/monthly fees, I carry no balance so I pay no interest charges AND I get an average of 2% back in a check per year. I pay NOTHING at all for the card and using it and get a check for about $500-800 back per year. I also get 90 days of accidental breakage/theft/loss coverage and I get an additional 1 year warranty on everything I buy. Sure, retailer raise their prices to cover the AMEX fees but they are same if I used cash.

      If I use botcoins, I get NONE of that and I have to pay a transaction fee

      My taxes are paid based on my income through a W2 that my employers send to the IRS. My state sales taxes are to be paid by me when doing my state income tax forms by claiming any things I bought in or out of the state that I did not pay state on. How I decide to pay for things does not change any one of those or how much tax I am obligated to pay.

    12. Re:I'll stick to real money thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is a service you pay for via taxes and bank charges. In a bitcoin economy you could pay an insurance company for the same security at the same or probably lower cost.

      We're already paying the taxes, and my federally-insured credit union doesn't charge members that have direct deposit, so I haven't had to pay a dime for my checking &savings accounts, VISA debit card, ATMuse, or anything else. Since CUs are non-profit orgs owned by members rather than controlled by Wall Street stockholders it's extremely unlikely to take off with my money.

      As far as the government is concerned, I'd be far more concerned about bitcoins being confiscated than having money taken beyond my share of the taxes.

    13. Re:I'll stick to real money thanks by hibiki_r · · Score: 1

      But who wouldn't want to go back to a world before the invention of banking?

      Imagine a world running on bitcoin. How long until a bank issues its own form of cryptocurrency that only it can mine, and then starts to use it on loans, as a form of fractional reserve banking?

    14. Re:I'll stick to real money thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If someone hacks my bank and steals my money, the bank replaces it.
      If someone steals my wallet and takes off with my credit cards, I'm not liable for the transactions.

      Cept bitcoins aren't credit card, they are money.

      So if you had any cash in your wallet, that would be gone and you could NOT replace it, much like bitcoins.

      No, but the hacks are being made on bulk storage sites, which are acting as banks (even if they're not actually so). You're comparing bitcoins with physical cash, but cash can also be stored in a bank (that's what bank vaults are for).

      If I had a large stash of physical cash (or anything else of value, if you prefer) stored in a bank vault and someone broke into the bank and stole it, I would expect the bank to compensate me. Furthermore, I would expect them to have competent security systems in place to prevent it from happening in the first place. And finally I would expect them to be suitably insured against the possibility so that if it did happen they would be able to afford the compensation.

      The problem with all these hacked bitcoin accounts is that the sites that are being set up to to act as bitcoin "banks" are not being run to banking standards.

      The trouble is those banking standards are expensive; it is extremely tempting to cut corners in order to make your service cheaper; good security is invisible anyway, so customers won't be able to tell the difference until they're hacked.

      And that's where government regulation starts to creep in, because there is a need for some kind of authority to certify that a bank has met all the required standards and is secure. Self-regulation of the industry fails (as demonstrated by events like the Lehman Brothers collapse), so an independant authority is required. That authority needs to be trustworthy, so that the public can know that that certified banks have met the criteria. Who better than a publically elected body? Step forward the government.

      Or you could just keep your cash under your matress and hope you don't have a house fire, or keep your bitcoins on your PC and hope you don't lose them somehow. Your choice. The point of a bank is that it's supposed to be more secure and convenient than keeping your cash yourself.

    15. Re:I'll stick to real money thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vs. the convenience and absolute lack of risk? never having to carry cash? Count change? worry about theft?

      Fuck it. I get 4% back anyway.

    16. Re:I'll stick to real money thanks by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      Bitcoin doesn't care what box you want to put it in.

      Bitcoin doesn't care, period.

      And that's a real period, not one of those Obama ones.

  16. dreamworld by globaljustin · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The problem is exchanging Bitcoin for real currency

    in theory you don't need to do that often

    in theory...

    when I only need to pay my bills "in theory" then you might have made a productive statement...

    I know **all about** how Bitcoin works, not just how you store it. I have a business that sells online and have considered accepting Bitcoin. I researched it through and through.

    **that** combined with my other skills & the fact that I have common sense means that I'm a fool to accept Bitcoin at these exchange rates ***UNLESS I CAN SEE IT PLACED IN MY $$$ BANK ACCOUNT IN REAL TIME***

    I typed that all bold b/c you irrational fanbois need to re-read it and think aobut it over and over b/c it is the core of what makes anything have value in this economy.

    If a customer buys one of my products, WooCommerce (grumble...) can show me in real time the path of the money to my bank, then I can check my business bank account and see those $$dollars added to my bank account...then i can withraw that cash right at the ATM and buy ****anything****

    Until bitcoin can do that it's just a game for hackers...

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
    1. Re:dreamworld by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There is a solution for people in your position, they will take a cut though.
      https://bitpay.com/

    2. Re:dreamworld by Ambvai · · Score: 2, Informative

      Interestingly enough, a lot of the small/medium businesses I work with that do business internationally have the exact same concerns with international currencies. (Dollar, Yen, Euro, Pound are accepted as safe... but even a currency as significant as Renminbi makes some people skittish.)

    3. Re:dreamworld by dex22 · · Score: 1

      This is exactly what BitPay does. They calculate the BTC price of your $ item, collect the BTC, convert that immediately at a known rate to $ and put it in your account.

    4. Re:dreamworld by dex22 · · Score: 2

      And a credit/debit card processor or bank won't do that? :)

    5. Re:dreamworld by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      How reliable are they? Who are they? Are they Russian mob owned etc?

    6. Re:dreamworld by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this helps prove why bitcoin will not work, not why bitcoins would be a viable alternative. Why do those businesses fear the currency exchange? Because it can change before it can be converted and hurt them wiping out any profit they may have had. Bitcoins can and DO change by too much on one day, probably worse than just about any of the worlds most used currencies. That is also the same reason a lot of small international businesses won't take just any currency, they want the transaction done in Euros, dollars, Yen, pound etc for predictability.

      The bitcoin fans have a vested interest in more people jumping on board because they can directly profit from it. That is the reason it is being pushed so hard. Those that got in early benefit the most. Many of these bitcoin pushers are smart and truly do understand the negatives and risks but their profit motive is twisting their reality or they really do not understand money systems. They are just repeating, creating, and fine tuning the bitcoin advantages. I don't think they really understand what they are repeating though. It's not a pyramid scheme though, LOL

    7. Re:dreamworld by Orgasmatron · · Score: 0

      I was going to consolidate all of your questions in this entire thread into a single reply that would answer all of them. But now I see that there is no point. You already know **all about** how bitcoin works.

      Your dictionary must be different from mine. Mine would never let me claim to know **all about** something while I was asking basic FAQ-level questions about it.

      Your musings about the unknown actors that pick blocks, and the unknown forces that cause the block subsidy to right-shift according on schedule were side-splittingly funny, when read **in context**.

      That said, drop me a line if you ever learn the basics of bitcoin and still have questions.

      --
      See that "Preview" button?
    8. Re:dreamworld by Srin+Tuar · · Score: 1

      So you trust dollars implicitly and are leery of bitcoins, thats a perfectly understandable and reasonable position.

      If you feel like taking part in the trendy thing, you can still sign your store up to accept bitcoins but instantly convert into dollars, and set your prices in dollars as well, so that your payment processor takes on any currency exchange risk for you.

      If it gets to the point where you are leery of dollars and can buy **** anything **** with btc, then you can always
      change it up and start accepting btc directly.

    9. Re:dreamworld by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know nothing John Snow, or far less than you would have Slashdot believe.

      ***UNLESS I CAN SEE IT PLACED IN MY $$$ BANK ACCOUNT IN REAL TIME***

      There are already many bitcoin services that allow this, all cheaper than bank fees , paypal or credit card.

      In order for Bitcoin to work, people have to believe it is a trustworthy place to abstract and store economic value.

      There is nothing to trust, only yourself (personal responsibility) and the cryptographic algorithm, which is proven. If you or society can't trust those 2 things then there are far larger problems you should worry about than bitcoin.

      People have to **USE** Bitcoin or Bitcoin dies...until you can directly exchange Bitcoin to currency this will just be an elaborate hoax.

      People already are:
      Merchants to receive payments.
      Customers to buy goods.
      People use it to save as a hedge against inflation.
      Speculators speculate.
      Travelers and international workers use it to move money internationally and avoid the exorbitant bank fees.
      People use it to send money home for their families without having to pay banks for the privilege.

  17. control by globaljustin · · Score: 1

    who decides how many BTC you get for mining a transaction?

    remember how it halved not too long ago? who made that call? **kind of a big deal**

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
    1. Re:control by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Easy you short them when they fall in value by a computer program and you get a bump while the other guy waits for the value to fall.

      Or since since bitcoins vanish over time the value goes up unlike housing so economic wise the value has to go no where else but up due to its design as the law of supply vs demand kicks in.

    2. Re:control by Ambvai · · Score: 2

      "The reward for solving a block is automatically adjusted so that roughly every four years of operation of the Bitcoin network, half the amount of bitcoins created in the prior 4 years are created. 10,500,000 bitcoins were created in the first 4 (approx.) years from January 2009 to November 2012. Every four years thereafter this amount halves, so it will be 5,250,000 over years 4-8, 2,625,000 over years 8-12, and so on. Thus the total number of bitcoins in existence will never exceed 21,000,000. Blocks are mined every 10 minutes, on average, and for the first four years (210,000 blocks) each block included 50 new bitcoins. As the amount of processing power directed at mining changes, the difficulty of creating new bitcoins changes. This difficulty factor is calculated every 2016 blocks and is based upon the time taken to generate the previous 2016 blocks"

    3. Re:control by shentino · · Score: 1

      Supply and demand.

      You look for the cheapest miners, and they in turn give their priority to the transactions with the highest margins. If you're impatient or you are stingy, you'll get outbid by transactions with higher margins jumping ahead of you in line.

    4. Re:control by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      remember how it halved not too long ago? who made that call? **kind of a big deal**

      The rules for what can go into blocks (including mining rewards and many other things) were baked into the bitcoin software when it was written. If you want an authoritative source for what the rules are I would suggest you read the sourcecode.

      Any miner who modifies their software to generate blocks that don't follow the rules will find their blocks rejected by everyone else and therefore any coins created in those blocks will be worthless.

      To loosen the rules would require getting both the vast majority of miners (or your blocks will be "forked off") and the vast majority of merchants (or you won't be able to spend your coins) to agree that your new looser rules were now the valid rules. That is unlikely to happen.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  18. Re:Idiots .. use a VM by joe_frisch · · Score: 1

    Properly setting up a VM, or in fact doing any proper security or even backups is beyond the abilities of most people. If those sorts of measures are required, bitcoins can't become a universal currency.

  19. Amateurs at best ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want to see how the pros do it, look back at the recent history
    of Lehman Brothers, or Countrywide Mortgage. THAT is how you
    steal, and the numbers involved are staggering.

    1. Re:Amateurs at best ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Fed can provide elasticity though. It creates new currency, so that deflation doesn't happen. Deflation benefits banks more than borrowers. So eventually you get a system where hoarders rule, and silos of grain rot while others go hungry, because "I got mine Jack, keep your hands off my stack."

  20. The Real World by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ***UNLESS I CAN SEE IT PLACED IN MY $$$ BANK ACCOUNT IN REAL TIME***

    Which goes to show you are missing the point of using it as a currency. A real currency is something you hold onto, not exchange at first opportunity.

    You only think you need to do that because you think the exchange rate of BitC against some other currency is too high. Why? Are you SURE about that? Because lots of people were saying the same thing all along, at much lower values. What if BitC doubles in value again? Then you would have been an idiot to exchange it away.

    I'm not even a huge BitC proponent, I have only a tiny amount myself. But I can see that worry about the value of BitC against other currencies seems overblown, and there is a constant track-record of underestimating BitC, with every action that is supposed to bring the hammer down on exchange rates (like the closure of Silk Road) having the opposite effect instead. And I see real merchants slowly adopting payment using this currency. If there are enough real objects I can use BitC to buy then I am insulated from swings in value, and it makes more sense to hold than to get rid of right away.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:The Real World by globaljustin · · Score: 1, Insightful

      hey thanks for the comment...

      because you think the exchange rate of BitC against some other currency is too high. Why? Are you SURE about that? Because lots of people were saying the same thing all along, at much lower values. What if BitC doubles in value again? Then you would have been an idiot to exchange it away.

      I wanted to address this part specifically b/c there's some important distinctions.

      I don't "think" the exchange rate of BTC is "too high"....I know this.

      I know because I don't know. What I mean is, the ammount of uncertainty in BTC is much, much higher than in dollars. Uncertainty in every way. From it's relative value to its ability to be exchanged w/o electronics. There is just too much uncertainty.

      The **CORE** of that uncertainty is the number of BTC awarded per transaction mined.

      That number is set arbitrarily...by unknown actors.

      You tacitly acknowledge this, I just want to draw attention to how important this is...you make BTC by mining BTC....when you mine BTC you compete by using an algorythm to find a number for a transaction...the number of BTC awarded to who finds the proper number/transaction is arbitrary.

      I'm not saying I wouldn't be messing around w/ BTC if I was like, an independent day trader or wealthy or w/e but that's not really at issue here.

      --
      Thank you Dave Raggett
    2. Re:The Real World by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I know because I don't know. What I mean is, the ammount of uncertainty in BTC is much, much higher than in dollars.

      Really? I actually don't know that at all. In fact the value of USD could go haywire in a lot of ways, in case you hadn't noticed the price of metals like gold and platinum has skyrocketed, meaning a lot of other people think so too.

      Just because the USD HAS been more stable, does not mean it has to continue to do so.

      The **CORE** of that uncertainty is the number of BTC awarded per transaction mined.

      Not sure I follow that statement, in a transaction you get a specific amount of BitC from someone else. When mining you get a specific amount of BitC per block. Where is the uncertainty in ether aspect? The only uncertainty is how much other currency someone is willing to give you for BitC. But as more people want and use it, the more the value will rise.

      the number of BTC awarded to who finds the proper number/transaction is arbitrary.

      Again, how is this arbitrary? I do mine (slowly) and it seems no arbitrary at all.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    3. Re:The Real World by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      ***UNLESS I CAN SEE IT PLACED IN MY $$$ BANK ACCOUNT IN REAL TIME***

      Which goes to show you are missing the point of using it as a currency. A real currency is something you hold onto, not exchange at first opportunity.

      You hold onto a real currency because you are confident it will retain its value over time. As a result, there is no pressing need to get rid of it because what costs a dollar today will probably cost the same tomorrow. When the value of currency is uncertain, such as the hyper inflation some countries experienced or when governments limit liquidity, people generally dump the currency as fat as they can.

      You only think you need to do that because you think the exchange rate of BitC against some other currency is too high. Why? Are you SURE about that? Because lots of people were saying the same thing all along, at much lower values. What if BitC doubles in value again? Then you would have been an idiot to exchange it away.

      What you are describing is not a currency but an investment. People buy it because they think it will increase in value and hold on to it; not because they can use it to buy stuff. Th problem is Bitcoins are thinly traded and not very liquid. If you decide you want to dump a million dollars worth it is not as easy as putting in a market order for a stock and knowing you can sell it because market makers keep the market liquid.

      As with currency, investments require a degree of trust in the system. Scams such as occurred in China or the recent thefts damage that trust and will ultimately drive people form the market, making Bitcoin even less liquid.

      That's not tos ay Bitcoin can't succeed or find its niche long term; just that there are serious issues it needs to address before it will become a real, viable currency.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    4. Re:The Real World by fastest+fascist · · Score: 2

      One of the least uncertain aspects of Bitcoin is the number of BTC awarded per block mined. That is dictated by the protocol. The code is open source so you can check if you're willing and able.

      Basically, though, the block reward gets halved every 210,000 blocks. That's happened once so far, and no-one pulled any switch to do it. Everyone running a Bitcoin node or miner simply runs code that has the same requirements to accept a block as valid. Some miner could have modified their software to produce 50-coin blocks even after block 210,000, but that would be pointless if other peers in the network weren't running software with the same modification.

      You also stated block creation must be faster than one per 10 minutes on average now. It's possible that's temporarily true, but the network retargets the difficulty of finding a block to maintain the balance at 10 minutes per block. This is done by comparing the time it took to calculate the previous 2016 blocks, starting from the previous difficulty retarget, to the expected time of two weeks. If it's less, or more, the difficulty required for a block to be valid is adjusted to compensate, making it harder or easier to find a block. All the information needed to do this retargeting is publicly available.
      You may want to have a look at: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Difficulty

      In brief, there are no mystery hands behind the curtains pulling strings to make things happen. You're right that many of the basic choices were arbitrary - the maximum of just short of 21,000,000 BTC and the block creation time being obvious examples. The rules are, however, transparent, and in order to change any of them you'd have to modify the core software and convince people to start using your modified version. That wouldn't be very easy, since it would create a competing currency forking off the Bitcoin blockchain. Anyone holding Bitcoins would likely be pretty wary of such modifications, because the effects on the value of BTC could be deleterious.

    5. Re:The Real World by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      I know because I don't know. What I mean is, the ammount of uncertainty in BTC is much, much higher than in dollars.

      Really? I actually don't know that at all. In fact the value of USD could go haywire in a lot of ways, in case you hadn't noticed the price of metals like gold and platinum has skyrocketed, meaning a lot of other people think so too.

      Actually, gold is way off its Sep 11 peak (down by about a third) and trading roughly where it was a little more than 3 years ago. Anybody who bought over the last few years and held it has pretty much taken a beating. I would not be surprised to see many of the "We buy gold" places close shop as they lose money on the price drop between purchase and sale or start offering way below spot for purchases. One jeweler I know has slow chis purchase simply because he didn't want the downside risk.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    6. Re:The Real World by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Which goes to show you are missing the point of using it as a currency. A real currency is something you hold onto, not exchange at first opportunity.

      Um, no. A currency is, by definition, a medium of exchange. "Something you hold onto" is an investment vehicle, not a currency. Bitcoin is supposed to be a currency, not an investment vehicle.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    7. Re:The Real World by hibiki_r · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's more important for a currency to be a viable method of account: If there is no significant market whose prices stay relatively fixed with respect to the currency, it's not much of a currency. Bitcoin does even worse at this than as a method of exchange.

      Either way, yes, if it's being held mostly as an investment vehicle, one is clearly not using it as a method of account, and thus it isn't being used as a currency, but as an asset. One can hold foreign currencies as assets in specific circumstances, but it takes a very twisted frame of reference to think that bitcoin is the stable currency, and whatever your local currency is happens to be the volatile one. I might as well claim that the sun and the moon are orbiting around my navel, and that every time I sit in a car, the earth is the one doing the moving.

    8. Re:The Real World by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Many people hold on to bitcoins, especially with their value increasing at the current rate...

      Many people don't hold on to traditional currencies, and exchange them for goods/services almost as soon as they get them, lots of people live from one payday to the next like this.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    9. Re:The Real World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A currency is a unit of account, store of value, and medium of exchange, not just a medium of exchange. Most retailers don't treat Bitcoin like a real currency because they immediately convert their Bitcoin holdings into dollars or some other real money and Bitcoin is only used as the Internet transmission mechanism.

  21. ^this by globaljustin · · Score: 0

    ^this is how I actually feel. I'm using strong language b/c it seems this is the miinority view.

    I really don't hate BTC. I think the concept is cool. I totally swear I bought 5 BTC back in late 09 when I was in grad school but I have no clue wtf I did w/ my wallet...

    I just want to hear some common sense. The world is watching! This is tech if anything is....and we have gotten the behemoth to stop and scratch.

    IDK the solution...IMHO maybe we need to pin BTC to the dollar until a major bank accepts it transactionally.

    The mining exchange rate is a major problem to all that...its arbitrary. How much BTC does a miner get per found/completed transaction? Who decides that? If you research it the answer is......um.....Mr. Bitcoin?.....it just 'is decided'......

    That's gotta change IMHO

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
    1. Re:^this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I am sick of reading you post this all over the place. It is decided by the protocol. Those values were decided @ the beginning and coded in. You can read the code. I'm not going to waste my time to find it, but you can if you wish. It's all open source. Read the code and figure it out, but stop writing "ZOMG! Conspiracy! Who decides it? Arbitrary!" Do some research you tard. You sound like fucking Bill Oreilly.

  22. Re:Idiots .. use a VM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > If those sorts of measures are required, bitcoins can't become a universal currency.

    I agree with the insight in concept, but I don't think maintaining a server would be the defacto way to manage any serious currency. This is the stone age of cryptocurrencies. The fact that bitcoins are often stored this way, now, is an opportunity for another cryptocurrency to address the problem.

  23. Re: Just starting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do you go short on bitcoins? Details please.

  24. still arbitrary by globaljustin · · Score: 1

    right...getting technical...but my core critcism still applies...thanks for getting that text btw...its the text from the BTC wiki if I'm not mistaken...something quasi-official.

    So, true, **according to this random block of text** with no source...the "reward for solving a block" is automatically adjusted.

    We can't verify that, but lets assume it's true.

    **how** is it automatically adjusted????

    this paragraph was written with assumptions that are no longer true, requiring more explanation.

    BTC mining has increased more than anyone anticipated with the +$1,000.00 valuation. That means that when this says,

    "Blocks are mined every 10 minutes on average"

    That average is completely blown out...(we can't verify this but logically it must be much larger now)

    Also, the 'difficulty factory' is arbitrary....2016 blocks is not part of the alleged "automatically adjusted reward for solving blocks" yet it directly affects it.

    Again...you presented **no citations or source**...I am trying so I gave the benefit of the doubt...

    Still, none of the factors that comprise the "automatically adjusted" part of the block creation are publicly known and are, at any rate, based on a much smaller scale than is at work today.

    bottom line: it's still arbitrary!

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
    1. Re:still arbitrary by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      It uses a block chain network for each transactio with everyone else. When you mine you add blocks to the chain so mathematically it is controlled. You cant mine or transact without the control of the block network

  25. uh... by Tom · · Score: 2

    'You don't have to keep your Bitcoins online with someone else.

    In fact, why in all hells would you even think of storing your wallet with someone else??? I'm fairly new to bitcoin, but the thought was so far from my mind that it took me a while to understand what the problem with these kinds of attacks was.

    Don't people get it that Bitcoin is money? Storing your wallet on someone elses server is like giving them your money. You do that with a bank, but not with some random Internet site.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    1. Re:uh... by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Well that or you give out your bank account or credit info on these sites.

      I mean you need to buy and sell them with real currency right? Right now I need to find a trustworthy place and that is my weakness. I want to invest but do not trust anyone listening via a man in the middle or the server being compromised or worse having it store my info so the Russian mobfia can have it.

      If you have an alternative I want to hear it?

    2. Re:uh... by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      It is easier and faster to do transactions if one's wallet is stored with an exchange. That is why people do it. Also, they falsely conflate these exchanges with banks and assume they have the same level of security.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  26. Mostly, yes by DrYak · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As a small addendum to what rasmusbr has already said:

    if the wallet file is lost or destroyed, the coins within it are effectively gone, correct?

    The short answer is yes. The long answer is a little bit more complicated.
    If hacker still has copy of the wallet.dat file, the coin could still be stolen (in theory the file can optionnally be encrypted. In practice we all know how good humans are at picking good passwords).

    key pairs in a wallet can also be generated using passphrases (so called brain wallet).
    in theory the owner is the only one to know the passphrases generating the key pair and thus the only one able to use the private key.
    in practice, again, we all know how good humans are at that task
    (and before you ask: yes someone has decided to make a keypair using xkcd's "correct horse battery staple" comic).

    worst citizens are the web services. they use their own wallet to process coin. you sent an amount to them, and then they process on your behalf. (some even allow you to upload key pairs). You have to trust that they are honnest people. You have also to trust their security measures that their key don't get stolen.

    So out of all the various "lost" coins, some are possibly going to re-appear due to poor password strategies, or due to less scrupulous online companie which will decide to re-purpose un-claimed bitcoin account, or outright scam people into giving them coins and then running away with them.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:Mostly, yes by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      This aspect of trust is no different to existing banks, and it is the reason why banks started to be regulated and insured.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  27. Re:Idiots .. use a VM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a vm in a vm

    Yo dawg I heard you like VMs so I put a VM in your VM so you can VM while you VM.

  28. Re: Just starting by tompaulco · · Score: 1

    How do you go short on bitcoins? Details please.

    Same as shorting a stock, or anything else. You have to do it through a brokerage of some sort. They lend you the bitcoins to sell somebody else and the proceeds of the sale go into your account. At some later date, you "cover" your position by buying an equal number to the ones you shorted.
    For instance, if you had shorted last year 100 bitcoins at about $8, you would have borrowed said 100 bitcoins from a willing brokerage, and you would have gotten $800. Then a year later, if you decided to cover your position and pay back the 100 bitcoins that you owed the brokerage, you would have to come up with $100,000 to do so. The brokerage also charges you interest on the loan of the 100 bitcoins.
    This is a simplistic case. In real life, there would have been a margin call at some point and you would have been forced to cover your position earlier or deposit funds to cover your unrealized loss on the position. In stocks, a lot of time, you can't even short a stock unless you have the cash or other not shorted stocks to cover a certain percentage of loss.
    I don't know if any brokers are actually doing this for people. It is probably too dangerous to do this right now, with the price going up so quickly. A brokerage may not even be able to collect on a margin call before the short trader is quickly in the hole for large sums of money.
    With shorting stocks, your upside is limited, but your downside is unlimited. This is the opposite of purchasing a stock, where your downside is limited to your investment, but the upside is unlimited.

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  29. Re:Idiots .. use a VM by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    Properly setting up a VM, or in fact doing any proper security or even backups is beyond the abilities of most people. If those sorts of measures are required, bitcoins can't become a universal currency.

    This is the attitude of someone who is poor or broke. Those who want to make it find a way to do it and learn. VMs are mentioned for anyone who wants to learn about security and computers. If you are investing your hard earned savings it is prudent. I think even Grandma knows about hackers and how things are not always safe. Before you invest real money you research.

    I am still researching wallets and transactions as I type this even though I am in IT. I want to prepare before I take the scary step of using a my bank debit card to buy shit off God knows where. Always prepare.

  30. A backup question. by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

    If I store my wallet offline and create an exact copy, how does someone know which is real? If someone stole one wallet what's to stop transactions from a backup?

    --
    I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    1. Re:A backup question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any copy of your wallet can take the bitcoins. A wallet is really just a key to the bitcoins. Just like if you have a copy made of your house key, any copy of that house key will open your house.

    2. Re:A backup question. by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Both are equally "real", a "wallet" file doesn't store bitcoins as such, it stores the keys which allow transfer of those bitcoins.

      If someone hacked into your system and made an unencrypted copy* of your "wallet" file then they could use the keys in that file to transfer the money to addresses they control. Once they do that you will no longer have access to the coins. On the other hand if they just made a copy and didn't do anything with it (unlikely) then you wouldn't notice anything at all.

      * Either because it wasn't encrypted in the first place or because they managed to steal the encryption key for the wallet too.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    3. Re:A backup question. by pjviitas · · Score: 1

      Your wallet file is nothing more than a bankbook and reflects its participation in what is known as the blockchain. Like all things bitcoin, this "bankbook" is completely anonymous...without it you cant get your money.

      The block chain is a record of every transaction in bitcoin history...currently its around 13GB.

      This bankbook (wallet file) and bank ledger (blockchain) should only be stored offline...any idiot who stores it online is an idiot.

      With this being said, storing small amounts of bitcoin in an online wallet is useful if one wants to use bitcoin the same way people use cash or credit cards.

      Think:
      Offline - Bank Account
      Online - Wallet in your back pocket

  31. gnolololo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Step one - Collect Bitcoin
    Step two -
    Step three - Profit!

    I know, I know, Step two is actually play the hacked card take all their users money. BC is like the fucking wild west right now, not gonna lie it's pretty fun.

  32. This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also, how did a value, any value, ever get assigned to a bitcoin? US currency was originally backed by gold, i.e. replaced gold over time (through the ultimate shell game). I don't grasp how bitcoins ever had any value at all. It is like saying Pac Man world records have a monetary value.

    1. Re:This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How did value ever get assigned to gold?

    2. Re:This by Tom · · Score: 1

      Also, how did a value, any value, ever get assigned to a bitcoin?

      The same way value gets assigned to everything. If you find someone who is willing to give you $10 for your X, then your X has a value of $10. It also works the other way around: If you can buy dinner for $10, then the dinner is worth $10 - and your $10 are worth one dinner.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  33. still: still arbitrary by globaljustin · · Score: 1

    yes...and that is set at 2016 blocks by whom?

    I know when you mine you add blocks to the chain....but it is not just "mathematically it is controlled"...it is allocated by a rule...a rule that is not made public or checkable...you are **assuming**

    a couple Stanford undergrads could have the abilityo to change how the system finds the next transaction to process...that varies by alot of unsated factors

    the block network has arbitrary controls

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
    1. Re:still: still arbitrary by ArbitraryName · · Score: 2

      Who do you believe is setting "hidden rules" on a decentralized network using open source clients? That's a pretty significant level of paranoia.

    2. Re:still: still arbitrary by Alioth · · Score: 1

      It's set by the algorithm. The paper describing the mathematics behind Bitcoin is online, the clients are open source and can be examined to see how they work, all the information on how it works is freely available. No one is currently deciding "OK, today we halve the mining rate", the change in mining rate is an emergent property of the mathematics. Just like no one arbitrarily decides and has to control the shape of a graph of a log function, the shape of that graph is an emergent property of the log function.

    3. Re:still: still arbitrary by XcepticZP · · Score: 1

      Ignore the obvious troll. Just mark "globaljustin" red and move along. It's best not to waste time on them, you're just giving them trolling practice.

  34. not as certain as you say by globaljustin · · Score: 1

    I know BTC per block mined is "dictated by protocol"

    what we don't know is how blocks are chosen

    with so many blocks mined, there are several acceptable solutions to start the next block, but they are not rewarded which was found first...they have to match each other another way...

    ex: my local fiber ring...from an IT networking perspective I could initiate BTC transactions with myself and get first in line b/c the transmission of the record of my transaction has to go out to the BTC 'core'...if I mine solution numbers for transactions ****AND**** initiate transactions from inside the same fiber ring, I can guarantee my solution number gets picked as the one for the next block, because it's ***closer***

    that's just one example...I understand and thank you for your response. I appreciate you acknoledge that hte 21,000,000 BTC limit is arbitrary...what you dont discuss is how things will change as the next "halving" approaches and finally as the last BTC gets mined...then you have infinite inflation unless you allow more BTC to be mined...then it becomes ***another arbitrary choice***

    there **are** ways for mystery hands to pull strings behinds the curtains and **no one would know**

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
    1. Re: not as certain as you say by fastest+fascist · · Score: 1

      Some times miners do solve the next block more or less simultaneously. The block chain then splits for a moment, until one of the chains started is definitively longer than the other. The shorter chain then gets discarded, its blocks becoming 'orphaned'. This happens regularly and is expected. As for your example, per this behaviour your own blockchain would have to be longer than the one everyne else was on, or it would never be accpeted as valid. This would require some very serious computing power for you to have any appreciable chance of pulling your attack off. As for the hidden ways Bitcoin can be influenced... can you name some examples?

    2. Re:not as certain as you say by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      Well, it works like this:

      In the event that two miners manage to mine a block (lets call them A and B blocks) a the same time, the blocks propagate trough the network and various other miners start mining the next block (lets call it C) using A or B as "previous block" - depending on which block they received first). When somebody mines block C, the chain including C becomes the longest and the only one valid.

      However, usually blocks will be seconds or minutes apart with the previous block given enough time to propagate trough the network.

  35. Sheep Marketplace by DiSKiLLeR · · Score: 1

    Surprised NO ONE is mentioning this....

    Sheep Marketplace went down yesterday after weeks of suspicious behavior such as disabling withdrawals of money, a countdown to when withdrawals would be available but running at a slower speed, still no withdrawal when it expired, minimum of 1BTC withdrawal so people would deposit money, and more.

    So far it appears some $47 million worth of bitcoins was stolen.

    http://www.forbes.com/sites/andygreenberg/2013/12/01/silk-road-competitor-shuts-down-and-another-plans-to-go-offline-after-6-million-theft/

    --
    You can tell how powerful someone is by the magnitude of the crime they can commit and be able to get away with.
    1. Re:Sheep Marketplace by DogDude · · Score: 1

      "Sheep Marketplace"? Hahaha!

      I think that somebody could do very well with a site called "IWillStealYourBitCoins.com"

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    2. Re:Sheep Marketplace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You put untraceable money into a black market bank and you expect what???
      A fool and his Bitcoin are soon parted.

  36. Re:Idiots .. use a VM by joe_frisch · · Score: 1

    I'm not poor or broke, but I don't know how to set up a VM, and I'm not sure my computer security is very good. I also don't know how to rebuild the engine of a car, skin a deer, use a forge, do an appendectomy, use a gun, or perform a host of other valuable skills. The miracle of civilization is that since I know how to operate a linear accelerator, fly an airplane, and build femtosecond timing systems, I can somehow trade those skills for the vast array of skills that I'm missing. My computer skills are sufficient to protect the low value information that I have from casual hackers. I would not have the skill to protect a large value in bitcoins from a skilled attacker (and my computer skills are far above national average).

    The advantage of conventional banks is that they can be used to provide good security for large amounts of value with minimal skill.

  37. Re:Idiots .. use a VM by DogDude · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Boy, now that's some real convenience! Sign me up for this whole Bitcoin thing! An encrypted digital wallet in VM in a VM? That's SO MUCH EASIER than dealing with cash with all of the putting in the pocket and the removing from the pocket with the fingers.

    I'm starting to think that Bitcoin is a collaboration of a lot of very brilliant performance artists attempting to see how bizarre and complicated they can make the relatively simple concept of "money".

    Either that, or Bitcoin evangelists are just a bunch of morons.

    But I'm optimistic, and I try to assume the best of people. So, I'm going to keep imagining all of you smart performance artists taking us all for a ride. Keep it up! It gets sillier every day!

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
  38. ha! by globaljustin · · Score: 2

    this is fun...I appreciate that you know how the system works, for real

    As for the hidden ways Bitcoin can be influenced... can you name some examples?

    I just said a bunch, plus other points (what happens after 21,000,000 BTC)...but you can always come up with an academic response that makes your argument at least seem plausible

    like this:

    Some times miners do solve the next block more or less simultaneously.....The shorter chain then gets discarded, its blocks becoming 'orphaned'. This happens regularly and is expected.

    not exactly! it is **expected** to happen regularly...that's the whole point...

    you basically admit that my idea would work with enough computing power...in theory...

    but whatever...I'm not doing this for posterity anymore as anyone who is still undecided about BTC at this point in the conversation can't be pursuaded by any other evidence

    good luck to you...if I had BTC i'd be parlaying that shit...

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
  39. Re:Idiots .. use a VM by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

    This is the attitude of someone who is poor or broke.

    No, that is the attitude of people who are rich. Someone who is financially successful doesn't have time to learn an entire professional level skillset just to do simple financial transactions, especially when there are much better and easier alternatives.

    If you are investing your hard earned savings it is prudent.

    Investing? Is Bitcoin a currency or an investment vehicle? Currencies aren't investments or investment vehicles, they are mediums of exchange. One can make money currency trading but that is not investing, it is speculating on a change in value in the short term.

    As an investment vehicle, they are a poor choice because they are volatile and easy to steal. As a currency, they are a poor choice if one has to implement the security measures the parent posts suggest. Either way, it is a poor choice.

    --
    There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  40. Someone needs to invent a proxy service app by scorp1us · · Score: 1

    I don't have a better word than "proxy", but here is how it works:
    You have two accounts registered in the software, your exchange account, and your wallet (the one that is all yours on your local machine).
    When you receive funds in your exchange account not from your wallet, it immediately shuffles it to your wallet.
    When you receive funds in your wallet account not from your exchange, it immediately shuffles it to your exchange.

    This way hacking the exchanges won't net anything, except accounts. Maybe integrate a canary feature so the exchange can turn off receiving funds if the canary is set (exchange is compromised) so you don't send funds into a hacked account.

    --
    Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
    1. Re:Someone needs to invent a proxy service app by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Smart people like you are the primary reason why most bitcoin web services are so professionaly implemented and ran by competent people who are familiar with possible security scenarios. Thefts never happen, it's bad karma campaign by evil governments.

      I agree people should focus more on security/technical aspect, unfortunately this does not align well with interests of BTC deep pockets financing development of stuff - everything has to be quick & dirty (with a lot of tweeting) because just like in everything else today, security comes last - important is to be first to the market and expand, and fuck the rest.

      What you're saying is partially doable for OTC exchange (atomic swap between two blockchains) and buyer protection of goods (multisig or ECC based escrow), however it falls apart when fiat and need for central orderbook arbiter arises, OTC markets cannot compete in terms of efficiency.

      There are few technical solutions around, but cumbersome and mostly in early stages of implementation. The motivation is simply not there as there are crowds of people very keen to remind us what needs to be done, yet they're silent when it comes to actual engineering issues, or, god forbid, actual code.

  41. Why steal bitcoins? by scorp1us · · Score: 1

    It seems to me that we could follow the trail from source to destination accounts in the block chain, so we can identify who has the stolen bitcoins.

    Even with a mixing service, it should still be traceable in the long run.

    --
    Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
    1. Re:Why steal bitcoins? by mysidia · · Score: 2

      It seems to me that we could follow the trail from source to destination accounts in the block chain, so we can identify who has the stolen bitcoins.

      That depends on what the person who got illicit control of the BTC does.

      What do you suppose occurs, if the "thief" doesn't spend their illicit booty? Perhaps they have their lawyer figure out the statute of limitations for any potential crime they might get charged with, and plan their BTC transactions to occur, after that all runs out.

      Perhaps they will pass the private key to access the BTC down to their great-great grandchildren; and the spends may occur, 100 years after the crimes have been forgotten.

      If they go deposit it in an exchange account, and take out $1m in US Dollars; then, yes, they will be identifiable.

      On the other hand.... what if they only use BTC in anonymous transactions with other criminals?

      Whether such evil black market transactions can ever be traced someday or not, depends if their partners in crime get caught.

      Other possibilities are: the thief just takes the BTC out of the market --- and benefits from the other BTC they are holding increasing in value (due to less BTC in the market).

  42. Re:Idiots .. use a VM by rdnetto · · Score: 1

    I have one for porn and one I am going to make for litecoin trading as bitcoin is too expensive already :-(

    Why is the high price an issue, given that it's divisible down to 8 decimal places?

    --
    Most human behaviour can be explained in terms of identity.
  43. Re: Just starting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You were asked

    How do you go short on bitcoins? Details please.

    You responded with a definition of shorting. How do you go about right shorting bitcoins? Discuss how someone would actually short bitcoins.

    Q: How do I take a trip to Venus?
    A: You find someone with a spaceship that can get to Venus, then you pay for a ticket, then you travel on that space ship.

    Thanks for the help bro.

  44. Real value? by asmkm22 · · Score: 1

    How easy is it to exchange bitcoins for actual money? I bought 150 years ago, which is supposedly worth quite a bit at the moment, but the only options I've seen for unloading them seems a bit shady (create an online account somewhere and deposit them...)

    With the current exchange rate, they're basically too valuable for use in any kind of actual commodity since I can't pay for anything online with them.

    So my question is, what's the real value, and why are the prices going so high? They must be selling somewhere, but what's the process?

    1. Re:Real value? by pjviitas · · Score: 1

      As long as someone is willing to accept bitcoin, you can carry out a transaction with them...its actually easier than using a credit card or a debit card.

      The buyer simply provides the seller with a transaction id...no fees, no cards, no special hand held terminal devices, no cash registers, no banks and no governments.

      If you want to buy or sell bitcoin it takes about 10 days because now you need to deal with a bank transfer.

    2. Re:Real value? by davidhoude · · Score: 2

      I have a hard time believing that you refuse to do a few minutes worth of research to claim over $150,000. If you did, you'd know that there are places that will make deposits into your bank account fairly easily. There may be delays involved, but it can be done. You should be doing your own homework when it comes to this stuff, asking strangers will result in your wallet becoming one of these statistics.

    3. Re:Real value? by asmkm22 · · Score: 1

      That's sort of my point though. I can't buy anything with the bitcoins because anything I'd want to purchase online isn't worth the $1k+ value of a single coin. Selling them seems shaky because there's no reputable source that I've seen which doesn't require basically handing over all of your banking information and photo id up front.

    4. Re:Real value? by pjviitas · · Score: 1

      Spending fractions of a bitcoin is extremely common.

      Once you actually posses bitcoin, banks and photo id are irrelevant.

    5. Re:Real value? by Alioth · · Score: 1

      If you've got 150 bitcoins, with that sort of money it would be worth opening a bank account specifically to receive the funds from the bitcoins (and not risk your main day-to-day bank account).

    6. Re:Real value? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can buy lots of things with them. Search "Bitcoin Black Friday". Or look at sites like Gyft, you can get Amazon gift cards delivered instantly.

    7. Re:Real value? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How easy is it to exchange bitcoins for actual money? I bought 150 years ago ....

      Bitcoin hasn't been around that long. Hell, computers haven't been around for 150 years either.

  45. Re:Idiots .. use a VM by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    I am here to make money only and so are 95% of everyone interested. Otherwise dollars would be easier.

    If I need to make money I need to learn things or I will end up broke. Smart people learn all their is in everything money related whether it is a career or investment. Warren Buffett refuses to invest in things he doesn't understand. It is common sense.

    If you want to take the risk you need to learn and since everyone gets paid in dollars why risk if there is no money to be made?

  46. Re:Idiots .. use a VM by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    My point is if you are smart with your money you will learn before you take the plunge right? You do not make investments in things you do not understand right? Same principle.

    If computer stuff scares you and you do not like risk then bitcoin and or litecoin is not for you. There are other ways to get rich. But, even Warren Buffett does not invest in industries he is not sharp in.

    I know computer shit and I am still on the sidelines until I find a secure way to make transactions and secure a wallet and find a site I trust before I make bets and give out debit card info. Common sense.

  47. blockchin.info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am moving my 0.0005 bitcoins out of blockchain.info to Electrum. Thanks for the warning qt client is to slow. It needs to download 200,000 blocks to synchronize with the block chain. i just downloaded qt client a few minutes ago.

  48. a fool and his money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    were parted before they were parted...

  49. Re:Don't trust any online wallet by pjviitas · · Score: 1

    Its interesting how you would use the phrase "guaranteed by the same mechanisms as your normal currency"

    In what way do you feel that normal currency is guaranteed?

  50. pass the cut on to the customer by globaljustin · · Score: 1

    There is a solution for people in your position, they will take a cut though.
    https://bitpay.com/

    I looked at bitpay.com same problem as Mt. Gox...

    But yes, I agree that theoretically I could set up a BTC wallet, take BTC orders online then process each of them at the end of the day into my $$$ account via Bitpay

    first, you only "solved" one part of the Mt Gox problem...Bitpay still isnt a brick/mortar place I can demand redress for an error.

    but to continue...since Bitpay "takes a cut" of each transaction, **i'm actually paying for my customer to use Bitcoin**

    Please understand what I just said...the system now makes the vendor pay for the customer's convenience...

    That's why if I ever **do** take BTC I'm making my own flat BTC fee or giving the customer a surcharge...which would incite anarchy...which is why i'm not taking BTC at all for now.

    why should I have to take a cut in profits so my customer can use BTC???

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
    1. Re:pass the cut on to the customer by XcepticZP · · Score: 1

      Do you not already pay fees when using a credit card processor? I've always been under that impression, so I'm quite curious if you've got a credit card payment processor that doesn't take a fee on transactions?

    2. Re:pass the cut on to the customer by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      God forbid he should ever want to sell internationally. He'd have a fit.

  51. they **already do** that's the problem by globaljustin · · Score: 2

    yes...banks charge ridiculous fees...everyone knows this...

    ***your solution is to add another processing fee***

    the processing fees are the whole problem that BTC was made to solve...now I have to **pay** for the privilidge of accepting the currency???

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
    1. Re:they **already do** that's the problem by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      No, you have to pay for the privilege of having $$$.

      You have a fiat problem, not a Bitcoin problem.

  52. Re:oh noooooes! by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

    i can't believe a bit coin heist wasn't included in GTA V.

  53. Re:Don't trust any online wallet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's guaranteed that I have to pay my taxes with normal currency or men with guns will come shoot me.

  54. Re:Don't trust any online wallet by pjviitas · · Score: 1

    True...normal currency is legal tender and its what the government insists on being paid with.

    I am still curious in what way you feel that normal currency is guaranteed?

  55. Re:Idiots .. use a VM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    there have been many hypervisor breakouts too. i have source for a vmware workstation one right here... you are adding another layer to that onion, but its still able to be cut to the core. if you are truly concerned then use a separate physical machine.

  56. Bitcoins are NOT owned by one person by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 1

    Your story of Bill Gates' share in Microsoft does not apply to the working of the Bitcoin market, for at least 2 reasons ---

    1. Unlike Bill Gates' shares in Microsoft (when he used to own a large portion of it), no one wallet contains more than 10% of total number of available bitcoins worldwide.

    2. That 1000+ bitcoins that were stolen amount to less than 0.01% of the amount of bitcoins that have already been successfully mined.

    In other words, even if Bill Gates was to sell 0.01% of the total number of Microsoft's share in the market it would not cause a run on Microsoft's share price.

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:Bitcoins are NOT owned by one person by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it'd be more comparable to Gates selling his Microsoft stock, and expecting it'd cause the entire Nasdaq to crash. The Nasdaq total market cap would be upwards of $4 trillion. Assuming Gates owned 100% of Microsoft's shares, with its current market cap of $318.31 billion (around 0.4% of the Nasdaq market cap), it's still a blip.

      Such a sale on the part of Gates would be far more significant than someone selling 0.01% of the world's magical Internet monies.

  57. So... you are actually insane, what is that like? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You are talking of a single transaction shifting the market 5% and you call that small?

    Real economic markets panic of fractions of a percent shift with billions in transactions.

    If a real currency could suffer a 5% inflation with the selling of a single million, everyone would conclude that currency is totally non-viable.

    Basically you are saying that if you own bitcoins, you could lose 5% anytime someone sells a single million of a currency supposedly worth billions. That is NOT a stable reliable currency.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  58. Stolen bitcoins = right to refuse service? by KreAture · · Score: 1
    Following a blockchain can't you trace bitcoins coming from a "heist" assuming the victims can document their original wallet and keys?
    Could one then trace the blockchain once funds are received, and then say sorry, I won't deliver the merchandise as you are paying with stolen money. Bitcoins could even be returned to the rightfull owner less a appropriate "finders fee"?

    Utopia I am sure, but technically could it be done?

  59. Alrighty then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My Pac Man records are hereby for sale.

  60. Real exchange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can we excahange bitcoins as well against the money?
    http://muhammadkhojaye.blogspot.com

    1. Re:Real exchange by pjviitas · · Score: 1

      Using bitcoin is actually easier than using fiat currency...exchanging bitcoin for other currencies...not so much.

  61. more idiots by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    Another mostly one-sided scare story. At least they mentioned that everyone everywhere knows if you use an online wallet service, you'll lose your coins. Stupid people lose any form of currency every day. Bitcoins aren't immune.

  62. Re:Idiots .. use a VM by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

    Properly setting up a VM, or in fact doing any proper security or even backups is beyond the abilities of most people. If those sorts of measures are required, bitcoins can't become a universal currency.

    This is the attitude of someone who is poor or broke.

    and that would be most of the people on the planet. You don't want bitcoin to be used by most of the people on the planet?

    --
    In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
  63. Re:Idiots .. use a VM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not poor or broke, but I don't know how to set up a VM

    It's not rocket science. I'd never had anything to do with VMs before, then I had a need a few years ago to run Win98 on new hardware which would not support it. It took about 15mins to get it up and running, including installing the VM software and then creating the Windows VM. It's all clicky-clicky gui stuff, guides you through the process, no prior knowledge required.

  64. Re:Idiots .. use a VM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    whonix is not a VM within a VM. It's just multiple VM's. There is one front-end user VM that connects over a private (virtual) network to another VM that acts as a gateway.

    Virtual machines are not as secure as everyone thinks. The virtual machine software (kernel modules, etc) has root access to the host. If software within a client exploits the VM software it can gain root access to the host. Even a VM within a VM would not be secure. In some ways it's actually less secure to run stuff in a VM.

  65. Re:Don't trust any online wallet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well I'm not actually the guy who originally posted but the point is I have to pay my taxes with normal currency. Which means if someone wants to buy something from me I'm likely to accept normal currency. Theres a guarantee that as long as people are paying their taxes normal currency will have some value. Technically the US currency is backed by the US Military and thats a pretty damned strong guarantee. Whereas the only guarantee with bitcoin is that drug addicts don't like to be traced and they haven't yet figured out that bitcoins aren't anonymous at all.

  66. Re:So... you are actually insane, what is that lik by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If a real currency could suffer a 5% inflation with the selling of a single million

    That's not inflation. It's exchange rate fluctuation. Indeed, I doubt that at the current time a meaningful calculation of inflation can be done with bitcoins.

  67. Self-Trust by DrYak · · Score: 1

    This aspect of trust is no different to existing banks, and it is the reason why banks started to be regulated and insured.

    with one small difference:
    - With Bank, your only choice is trying to find one that you can trust.
    - With crpyto-currencies, you can also run your own node and in a way be your own bank.

    In that case, you can trust yourself that you're note going to scam yourself.
    And you also know more or less what security measures you're using

    Bitcoin's concept of wallet simply adds the users as a possible element in the equation.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:Self-Trust by imbezol · · Score: 1

      A bank can provide a level of security that the average person cannot provide themselves. Perhaps the same will be true for crypto currencies at some point. The average person will not have the skill set required to secure their own money while still maintaining the ability to use it conveniently, and so online banks will be entrusted to keep the money.

  68. Re:Don't trust any online wallet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Normal currency is guaranteed by central banks, which are given the task of managing the currency by governments.

    As an interesting example, I found an old £20 banknote in the back of a drawer just before I moved to London, which was no longer accepted as legal tender in shops. On the front of it (and all other UK banknotes) it says "I promise to pay the bearer on demand the sum of twenty pounds". I did a bit of online research and found that you could get it redeemed in person at the Bank of England, so I went along when I was visiting the area and after passing through the rather grandiose building there was a counter where they did indeed exchange it immediately for a crisp new one.

    The main threat to a currency's real value is when exchange rates with other currencies get seriously damaged due to badly managed national finances. Then you get things like hyperinflation which can't really happen with bitcoin due to its' inbuilt scarcity, Howewver, it's so overvalued right now that I think that the only way is down unless it really just becomes a convenient money transfer mechanism for criminal activity in which case ways to redeem them in boring traditional currencies will then be stopped verry quickly.

  69. it is **another** fee by globaljustin · · Score: 1

    I don't have a fiat problem, I have a troll problem

    taking BTC for commercial transactions **adds a new fee**

    yes fees suck...using BTC makes it worse...

    because it adds another fee layer to get to the cash

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
    1. Re:it is **another** fee by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      Taking BTC is free. Wanting $$$ from your BTC is not free.

      It is OK that you don't want to take BTC. Just understand where the issue actually is.

    2. Re:it is **another** fee by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      However, suppose I start a business using BTC in the US.

      At the end of each quarter, the IRS is going to want dollars. I'm going to have to convert quite a few BTC to dollars, and I've got a strict deadline.

      If I sell stuff for BTC, and buy stuff with BTC, the excess BTC will be considered profit by the IRS, and I'll have to pay taxes on them. Which means I need to record dollar values and convert more BTC to dollars.

      There's also the fact that a great many places I do business with do not accept BTC (my grocery store, the book store, the mortgage company, etc.), so I need to convert BTC to dollars for my personal use.

      This doesn't mean it's necessarily a bad idea to accept BTC, but it's a lot more of a hassle. It's also a lot more risky, since the number of dollars I can get for my BTC changes fast. If I think I'm going to get enough additional business to compensate for the hassle, expense, and risk, that's one thing. Just don't pretend the hassle, expense, and risk aren't there.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    3. Re:it is **another** fee by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      You have it correct. The issue becomes the requirement for $$$ and the payment of taxes. Note that if you ran a dual payment system, it is quite possible that you could make enough $$$ to pay your taxes entirely from that part of the income and keep the BTC as BTC. Of course, then there are issues of how you actually spend those BTC. But that is all part of the adoption curve.

      However, the point is that it's cheap and easy to receive the BTC. The conversion to dollars, or other currency, if required, is a separate issue of infrastructure, not an issue with Bitcoin itself. I think you understand it but globaljustin does not.

  70. Re:Idiots .. use a VM by Richy_T · · Score: 1

    Forget the VM then. Buy a small, cheap netbook, set up a client and keep it shutdown and offline when not performing transactions.

    That's still a little over-pricey but cheap hardware wallets are on their way.

    Bootable USB keys also work.

  71. Re:Idiots .. use a VM by Richy_T · · Score: 1

    If you are rich, you pay someone else to set up your VM, no? Or more likely you have a dedicated system.

  72. Re:Idiots .. use a VM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am still researching wallets and transactions as I type this even though I am in IT. I want to prepare before I take the scary step of using a my bank debit card to buy shit off God knows where.

    "debit card"?
    Don't do that.

  73. Re: Just starting by jbssm · · Score: 1

    How do you go short on bitcoins? Details please.

    Ok, for the sake of convenience I'll pass over the part where you plug in your computer to the electricity, press the power butoon, and open your browser. I must assume that at least you know something.
    1 - Write: www.bitstamp.net in your browser address space
    2 - Put your user name
    3 - Put your password
    4 - Press the enter key (it's that big one on the right of your keyboard)
    5 - Transfer your bitcoins to the address provided in the bitstamp.net page (sorry mate I can't help you with this one since I don't know what bitcoin wallet you use).
    6 - Click: Sell bitcoins
    7 - Go to the withdrawals page
    8 - Fill in your bank details
    9 - Click "withdraw money"

    I know, it's quite an obscure and difficult process, but this is a brave new world, and things like clicking in the internet explorer icon and login in onto a website are only easy for those crazy early adopters of technology. Just keep trying there and one day you'll make it like the other genius that accomplished the feat before you.

  74. still wrong... by globaljustin · · Score: 1

    ...

    I *want* to take BTC...but if I do, it is **not free** for me!

    I don't consider the transaction complete until it is $$$dollars$$$ in the bank

    That goes for *anything*...you can't run a business with any other notion.

    BTC is a wallet is not currency. It becomes currency when it is transfered to legal tender.

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
  75. You are right... dollar is safe. by jbssm · · Score: 1

    My grandmother stored enough money to buy a car 40 years ago under her mattress and now it's enough to buy an hamburger. I stored enough money to buy an hamburger in my bitcoin wallet 1 year ago, and now is enough to buy a car.

  76. Re:Don't trust any online wallet by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    There aren't many guarantees, but there's a lot of structure that is missing from BTC.

    First, there's a guaranteed market for dollars: the various governments in the US. All taxes etc. are due in dollars.

    Second, there's tradition: everybody in the US is used to using dollars, so I can buy almost anything I want with sufficiently many. This isn't true for bitcoins.

    Third, there's the US government, which will try to keep the value of the dollar from varying wildly by various means. It doesn't always work, but there's very strong financial forces for stability.

    Fourth, there's regulations and mandatory insurance on banks that use dollars. I bank with institutions that have been around for a while, and are probably reliable. This isn't a guarantee of future existence, given how fast a rogue trader can lose billions, but it's better than any bitcoin institution I know of. Moreover, if one of my banks goes away, I'm guaranteed to get up to $100K of my savings back. The only way this could fail is a truly cataclysmic financial upheaval, and all bets are off anyway if that happens.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  77. Re:So... you are actually insane, what is that lik by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

    You cannot "panic" a market that is experiencing huge fluctuations in prices already. There is no panic here, as most people already expect huge fluctuations. I'm sure there will be many bubble n burst cycles in the BitCoin market. This is not a market for the timid.

    So, in short a 5% drop is NOTHING to people in BitCoin Market, and when the price recovers. The real problem is the larger Bubble that is occurring at the moment, at some point, people buying at $2000 will find the coins back down at $250 when someone liquidates 50 million to fund their new yacht.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.