Though I know that IBM has sold its consumer hard drive assets to Hitachi I still have to wonder why IBM is not a member of this consortium, since IBM has a very active and large research department. Wester Digital is also "missing"...
Well, of course 4.3.0 is more "optimized" for Apache 2 than the previous version, but as said before it is still marked as experimental. Just look at the PHP 4.3.0 release notes.
Thanks go to the PHP team for all this great work!!:-)
It's a pity though that Apache 2 support is still experimental. I hope the Apache and the PHP team get the work done fast so that Apache 2 can spread faster!:)
If the server which hosts www.dashpc.com is obviously too slow to handle the load of the typical slashdot effect, why don't you host it at your Sourceforge webspace?
Noone here said he has broken any laws (which, as far as I know, is not as clear though). But I haven't either - still my record is/will be searched and is/will be available for many people who I don't like to have my records.
So why not make Poindexter's records available too?
..is that I can never decide to buy a CD set because everytime I think wait one release, the next one will have new feature xxx included!! (Where xxx is some new pf feature, or systrace, or SMP, or....
You also might be interested in this OpenBSD Journal article about the same subject. Usually the discussions about the articles are very insightful on deadly.org
A difference I noticed: "A dynamically peeling Vorbis stream server would be able to peel the stream down smoothly" (quoted from the linked summary)
As far as I know it isn't possible to reduce the quality of a progressive JPEG by chopping off more and more data from the file.
Ok, now think about for example Kazaa without all those evil pirates. Guess what - this cool technology wouldn't exist and wouldn't be used without them.
The article on theregister says they have to pay for "illegally downloading copyright material". The article on slashdot says "for sharing copyrighted material". The article on reuters says also for downloading material.
So what?! Why put funny things in the slashdot article?!
I thought ISOC was about to run the.org TLD in cooperation with afilias? I've never heard about UltraDNS before - do you have any further links about UltraDNS managing.org?
I bet they (the spammers) will find ways around whitelisting too. What stops them from automatically sending a reply to each "authentication request"? There will be some schemes for such a request, 10, 20, perhaps 100 schemes. So what - they can reprogram their robots. Character recognition gets better every day.
So what? Useless, if you ask me. It's just the same as spam filter - delaying tactics, not more.
Slashdot Mirror
This article is formatted for the blind, right? Header size: 120px; text size: 80px; ...
*g*
Though I know that IBM has sold its consumer hard drive assets to Hitachi I still have to wonder why IBM is not a member of this consortium, since IBM has a very active and large research department.
Wester Digital is also "missing"...
Anyone who knows more?
Well, of course 4.3.0 is more "optimized" for Apache 2 than the previous version, but as said before it is still marked as experimental. Just look at the PHP 4.3.0 release notes.
Hey, it works already! Just try it: Open your brows^WMicrosoft Internet Explorer and type php.NET. ;)
Great, isn't it?
Thanks go to the PHP team for all this great work!! :-)
:)
It's a pity though that Apache 2 support is still experimental. I hope the Apache and the PHP team get the work done fast so that Apache 2 can spread faster!
How about spending a bit spare time with your family and/or friends? I guess it could be quite nice and it won't do much harm either! :-)
Two stories, both posted at 4:09. I never ever saw two stories with zero comments before.
Go Europe, go! I knew you weren't as stupid as the american goverment! :)
If the server which hosts www.dashpc.com is obviously too slow to handle the load of the typical slashdot effect, why don't you host it at your Sourceforge webspace?
:)
Just curious
nice troll. i think it has quite good chances, great potential. good luck for the future!
;-)
Noone here said he has broken any laws (which, as far as I know, is not as clear though). But I haven't either - still my record is/will be searched and is/will be available for many people who I don't like to have my records.
So why not make Poindexter's records available too?
I guess blind-deaf users need day-to-day-help anyway so there should be another person there all the time.
..is that I can never decide to buy a CD set because everytime I think wait one release, the next one will have new feature xxx included!! (Where xxx is some new pf feature, or systrace, or SMP, or....
Perhaps you are also interested in reading this press release/article on Linux Weekly News. :-)
Just FYI
You also might be interested in this OpenBSD Journal article about the same subject. Usually the discussions about the articles are very insightful on deadly.org
That's exactly what the linked summary of the mailing list says! :)
You people can't read this really short story which is linked, can't you?!
That's exactly what the linked summary of the mailing list says!!!
Net radio would be a crucial nail in the RIAA's coffin
Distributed, anonymous net radio would be! Just look at what RIAA is doing to all "normal" net radios!
A difference I noticed: "A dynamically peeling Vorbis stream server would be able to peel the stream down smoothly" (quoted from the linked summary)
As far as I know it isn't possible to reduce the quality of a progressive JPEG by chopping off more and more data from the file.
Actually I wonder who this is possible at all...
i said n/t
Ok, now think about for example Kazaa without all those evil pirates. Guess what - this cool technology wouldn't exist and wouldn't be used without them.
The article on theregister says they have to pay for "illegally downloading copyright material". The article on slashdot says "for sharing copyrighted material". The article on reuters says also for downloading material.
So what?! Why put funny things in the slashdot article?!
Thank you very much, this was exactly what I was looking for!
I thought ISOC was about to run the .org TLD in cooperation with afilias? I've never heard about UltraDNS before - do you have any further links about UltraDNS managing .org?
Thank you very much!
I bet they (the spammers) will find ways around whitelisting too. What stops them from automatically sending a reply to each "authentication request"? There will be some schemes for such a request, 10, 20, perhaps 100 schemes. So what - they can reprogram their robots. Character recognition gets better every day.
So what? Useless, if you ask me. It's just the same as spam filter - delaying tactics, not more.