Barack Obama is an enemy of the United States, as evidenced by his support of Islam. There is very little that he did that the U.S. would be better off retaining.
...if there was actually another realistic option beside subsidized fossil fuels
Too many words. Try this:
...if there was actually another realistic option beside fossil fuels
Because there is not now a realistic alternative to widespread use of fossil fuels. This is based on the reality disclosed by chemistry, physics, etc.. Implicit in the claim that fossil fuel providers should be penalized for providing fossil fuels is the belief that there is some magical way to live in an advanced civilization without any pollution whatsoever. This is only one of many lunacies of the political left.
Reasonable people balance benefits against disadvantages. If you're dying of thirst, you shouldn't sue the person offering you a cup of water because he didn't remove every speck of dust from the cup.
High quality camera lenses have been using nano-coatings for several years. Each manufacturer has its own secret process. It's reasonable to assume that the concept "anti-reflection coating for solar cells" is both too general and too-long established to be properly patented. A specific patent would only cover one nano-coating process, and other processes would be possible.
Lawsuits, often frivolous, were causing vaccine manufacturers to leave the business. The law was part of an attempt to ensure that there was at least one U.S. vaccine manufacturer that stayed in business.
"Stents don't work" is vastly overstating the claim of the studies. The studies appear to conclude that stents aren't the best, or aren't necessary, treatment for stable angina.
That's very different from treating an active heart attack, where a stent can be (my opinion) the best treatment, preventing death in a one hour operation. Trying to use drugs in this case involves achieving an ongoing delicate balance of blood pressure control medicines and other circulatory medicines that have
dangerous side effects.
No placebo will eliminate the pain or the damage of an actual heart attack.
there's nothing you can learn at MIT that isn't freely available on the web.
That's almost true. There's an advantage to be gained from being among brighter students and teachers, and to have access to slightly better equipment.
There are undoubtedly estrogenic chemicals in soy, but they cause problems only at high intake levels and the sorts of problems they cause aren't always in the direction implied by their nature as estrogens.
The United States is not now and has never been a democracy. One of the foremost principles of the United States is rule of law, which automatically excludes democracy.
Speaking of rule of law, if Obama violated a law the punishment for which is imprisonment, he should be indicted, tried, convicted and sent to prison. It is far more important to show that the powerful cannot escape responsibility for their misdeeds than to protect a popular person from justice.
"The road of purges and reprisals" is a hallmark of lawless societies. When a popular politician is prosecuted, it's important than the charges and the evidence are clear to the public, so that the accusation of purges can be refuted.
Because they are powerful, high level politicians must be held tightly to the law, otherwise we have things like... the Obama administration.
Assuming the various tales are true, then NO, the Jews did not kill Jesus. He was executed under Roman law by Roman authorities, and the religion of Rome was a polytheism based on Jupiter, Juno, Mars, Neptune, Pluto, et.al., and also involved the Romulus-Remus myth.
Actually, life does not begin at conception, not even human life. Life began roughly 2 billion years ago, human life maybe 200,000, and has existed as a continuum ever since. The cell that leads to a new individual is formed at conception, and a new individual comes into existence at birth.
Whether it is right to impose legal restrictions on terminating a pregnancy is a valid question, but the discussion is not helped by defective definitions.
...abortion. There's still nothing in the Constitution that remotely protects that right...
It's right there in the PREAMBLE.
secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity
Specifically, the liberty not to be forced to bear a child.
Whether the mechanisms properly exist for the federal government to side one way or the other other on abortion is a different issue, and I have my doubts.
Slashdot Mirror
Barack Obama is an enemy of the United States, as evidenced by his support of Islam. There is very little that he did that the U.S. would be better off retaining.
A government takeover of 1/6 of the economy is pure leftist.
Trump won on a vision of an America advancing by removing the fetters of government.
Contrast that with Obama, who won on the premise that he would effect vengeance on those who were prejudiced.
Inside Allah, your brain will be digested.
Please learn English.
Too many words. Try this:
...if there was actually another realistic option beside fossil fuels
Because there is not now a realistic alternative to widespread use of fossil fuels. This is based on the reality disclosed by chemistry, physics, etc.. Implicit in the claim that fossil fuel providers should be penalized for providing fossil fuels is the belief that there is some magical way to live in an advanced civilization without any pollution whatsoever. This is only one of many lunacies of the political left.
Reasonable people balance benefits against disadvantages. If you're dying of thirst, you shouldn't sue the person offering you a cup of water because he didn't remove every speck of dust from the cup.
That's what they think, until the lights go out and the water stops coming out of the faucet. Or perhaps NYC runs on coal.
Some fabrics do contain nanotechnology https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanofabrics
High quality camera lenses have been using nano-coatings for several years. Each manufacturer has its own secret process. It's reasonable to assume that the concept "anti-reflection coating for solar cells" is both too general and too-long established to be properly patented. A specific patent would only cover one nano-coating process, and other processes would be possible.
Lawsuits, often frivolous, were causing vaccine manufacturers to leave the business. The law was part of an attempt to ensure that there was at least one U.S. vaccine manufacturer that stayed in business.
"Stents don't work" is vastly overstating the claim of the studies. The studies appear to conclude that stents aren't the best, or aren't necessary, treatment for stable angina.
That's very different from treating an active heart attack, where a stent can be (my opinion) the best treatment, preventing death in a one hour operation. Trying to use drugs in this case involves achieving an ongoing delicate balance of blood pressure control medicines and other circulatory medicines that have dangerous side effects.
No placebo will eliminate the pain or the damage of an actual heart attack.
That's almost true. There's an advantage to be gained from being among brighter students and teachers, and to have access to slightly better equipment.
Have fun with your social disease.
Mother Theresa was worse than Jack Kevorkian. She wanted to keep terribly suffering people alive so that they could suffer longer.
Here's a summary with evidence pointing in both directions.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3074428/
There are undoubtedly estrogenic chemicals in soy, but they cause problems only at high intake levels and the sorts of problems they cause aren't always in the direction implied by their nature as estrogens.
1955 called. It wants its politics back.
The United States is not now and has never been a democracy. One of the foremost principles of the United States is rule of law, which automatically excludes democracy.
Speaking of rule of law, if Obama violated a law the punishment for which is imprisonment, he should be indicted, tried, convicted and sent to prison. It is far more important to show that the powerful cannot escape responsibility for their misdeeds than to protect a popular person from justice.
"The road of purges and reprisals" is a hallmark of lawless societies. When a popular politician is prosecuted, it's important than the charges and the evidence are clear to the public, so that the accusation of purges can be refuted.
Because they are powerful, high level politicians must be held tightly to the law, otherwise we have things like ... the Obama administration.
Assuming the various tales are true, then NO, the Jews did not kill Jesus. He was executed under Roman law by Roman authorities, and the religion of Rome was a polytheism based on Jupiter, Juno, Mars, Neptune, Pluto, et.al., and also involved the Romulus-Remus myth.
It's summer at the South pole. Go for it, and take your friends.
Taking an idea to its logical extreme to demonstrate its absurdity is a valid technique.
More plant matter -- like sugar. like holly berries. like cactus needles.
Even your grammar is incorrect. Meat is a physical object. Murder is an action. They cannot be equated.
Actually, life does not begin at conception, not even human life. Life began roughly 2 billion years ago, human life maybe 200,000, and has existed as a continuum ever since. The cell that leads to a new individual is formed at conception, and a new individual comes into existence at birth.
Whether it is right to impose legal restrictions on terminating a pregnancy is a valid question, but the discussion is not helped by defective definitions.
It's right there in the PREAMBLE.
Specifically, the liberty not to be forced to bear a child.
Whether the mechanisms properly exist for the federal government to side one way or the other other on abortion is a different issue, and I have my doubts.