Slashdot Mirror


The Majority of Americans Prefer To Be Greeted With 'Merry Christmas' Over 'Happy Holidays', a Poll Finds

"Merry Christmas" is the preferred greeting of a strong majority of Americans. A survey carried in conjunction by news outlet Axios and SurveyMonkey found that 65 percent of the participants wish to be greeted with "Merry Christmas," while 28% prefer "Happy Holidays."

410 comments

  1. Preference vs. STRONG preference by mi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    65 percent of the participants wish to be greeted with "Merry Christmas," while 28% prefer "Happy Holidays."

    But the minority is willing to use violence , so we are all stuck with the neutered version.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by JoshuaZ · · Score: 4, Insightful

      One can easily find behavior by people upset and angry over either version of this. The problem there is people engaging in violence in general over minor things. If you think that violent behavior is relegated to almost any single position on some issue, then you are probably wrong.

    2. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Haha! Confirmation bias much? I really don't care what most people prefer or even what offends people. If I know someone is a Christian then I'll say "Merry Christmas", but if I don't know then I'll say "Happy Holidays". I'm don't say because it's politically correct or to avoid offending people, but because it seems ridiculous and idiotic to say "Merry Christmas" to someone who might not give a flying fuck about Christmas.

    3. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oops, didn't mean to type "I'm don't say"...

    4. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and you side used violence against someone saying happy holidays

    5. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The story offers no facts to support your conclusion. Nothing in it suggests the bell ringer wouldn't have gotten punched for saying happy holidays instead. For all you know, the reverend may have molested the attacker's kid (seems to be a common theme with Christian religious leaders).

      What we do have is a hell have a lot of whiny Christians who get offended when someone uses a generic holiday greeting that includes non-Christians..

    6. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by AvitarX · · Score: 0

      I has happy holidays Thanksgiving through new year.

      If I know someone hates Thanksgiving and New year's day I tell them merry Christmas, also if it's the 24th or the 25th.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    7. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by jellomizer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It depends on which side of the political spectrum you are in. Some people say Merry Christmas in a tone to say. Most of us are Christians so deal with it, vs just a friendly well wishing of the holidays.
      I tend to use Happy Holidays myself when dealing with people I don’t know. Not because I am trying to be PC or afraid they will be insulted for using a Christian holiday. But because I may not see this person for a few months so they will go then the holiday gauntlet thanks giving, Christmas and new years. And if they are celebrating some other holiday I hope they have a good time with it as well.
      If it is someone closer to me then I’ll use Merry Christmas just because I know they are celebrating Christmas and I’ll probably see them for other holidays.
      There is being PC then there is just being kind.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    8. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And, in that video he linked. That too.

    9. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because there are a shedload of holy days in winter, amite? Gotta cover 'em all...might be some of Odin's followers still kicking around.

      And for those about to say 'but but holiday just means a day off now days!'...what OTHER part of the year do you say 'happy holidays'? President's Day? Columbus Day? MLK?

    10. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Christmas is the official Federal holiday; what other Federal holiday is there on or around December 25th?

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    11. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you've heard of Hanukkah which start the exact same day?

    12. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and also just happens to be the holiday celebrated by people who consider Jesus to be anything from a complete fabrication to the worst of all the false messiahs

    13. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are many holidays this time of year.

    14. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The dates of Hanukkah vary in the Gregorian calendar, but they frequently overlap with Christmas.

    15. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess the actual dates are based on the Hebrew calendar so they vary from year to year, but last year it started on Dec 24 and will overlap again in 2019

    16. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Goddamn Gallows - Y'all Motherfuckers Need Jesus

      And a Merry Christmas to all of you.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    17. Re: Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I knew this thread would be chock full of racist idiots.

    18. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 0

      But the minority is willing to use violence

      You mean the Christian minority?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    19. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by Megol · · Score: 1

      No. I'll not explain why because if you made that connection your don't grok logic.

    20. Re: Preference vs. STRONG preference by sound+vision · · Score: 1

      It seems like "I don't care" was not an option on this poll. I think it would have been far and away the winning option. But then you wouldn't get sites like Slashdot linking to your blog or whatever.

    21. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      Citation needed.

    22. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      No it doesn't. Chanukah ended on December 20th this year. A full 5 days before Christmas day.

    23. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Happy holidays" is a catch all term, because not everybody celebrates xmas. To say "Merry christmas" to someone without knowing their culture or whether they are even religious is the height of arrogance and disrespect.

    24. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Christmas is the official Federal holiday

      Which is a problem, it shouldn't be. Separation of church and state and all of that. I'd also like "In god we trust" removed from US money; I personally cross that part off of every single bill I get.

      Also, do you go around saying "Happy Columbus day" to people? I mean it's a federal holiday too (education tip: the word "federal" isn't a proper noun and isn't supposed to be capitalised).

    25. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A belief in Norse gods is every bit as valid as a belief in a christian god. That is, they are all myths and faerie tales.

      It's pathetic that you can't see that.

    26. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I say "happy solstice" to everyone because it's something that anyone with a brain knows about (sorry, flat-earther nutjobs) which is a real occurrence (unlike all of that biblical garbage). It's a direct homage to our sun, without which none of us would or could exist.

    27. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by mschwanke97402 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Also, do you go around saying "Happy Columbus day"

      Why yes, I do. Also Veterans Day and others too.

    28. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by fredrated · · Score: 1

      One example does not a principle make.

    29. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Maybe the constant begging and ringing of the damn bell caused that person to flip. I sure can sympathize.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    30. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, Christmas, the day when people of all religions come together to celebrate collecting gifts.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    31. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      This is an exaggerated story with details added that aren't there. The bell ringer was indeed beaten. There is no evidence whatsoever that he was beaten for saying "Merry Christmas", and no evidence that the beaten would have been averted if he had said "Happy Holidays".

      Nobody really cares that much over this issue, and we've been saying Merry Christmas long before Trump claimed he was leading the charge.

    32. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      It's not just including non-Christians. It's including New Years. It's called "Happy Holidays" because there are many holidays within a short period of time. We said both Happy Holidays and Merry Christmas in my small town growing up that was predominately Christian. In a greeting card it's fine to be wordy and say "Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year", but as a greeting it's a bit unwieldy.

    33. Re: Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sound like a lot of fun to hang out with!

    34. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      If someone says "Merry Christmas" in order to present themselves are holier than you are, then that's a very un-Christian greeting.

    35. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm an atheist. And to me the difference between a delusion and a religion is basically the amount of people who share the delusion. Look up the textbook definition of delusion an tell me with a straight face that if it wasn't for the explicit exemption of religions from the definition that it would not fully, 100% describe basically any religion out there.

      Still, if someone wishes me a Merry Christmas, I wish them the same. Not because or despite any religion but because I know how they mean it. It is a happy wish from someone who wishes you to be happy. And the very last thing I could think of in that moment is how offended I could possibly be because he assumes that I share his delusion.

      At some point you just have to understand what people mean when they say something and not assume the worst. This is one of the occasions when it would be wrong to do so.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    36. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BACON DAY!

    37. Re: Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when is christmas a religious thing? Santa is a thing of his own.

    38. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One guy loses his shit, and "the minority is willing to use violence"?

    39. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many examples would suffice, then? Rhetorical question, because for certain people who favor a political slant over logic, there could never be enough, or the examples would somehow never apply according to them.

    40. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      True, however they have been told by some media outlets about some war on Christmas, so as good soldiers they must defend it.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    41. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing you're a leftist, since you decide to twist the facts into the opposite of reality.

      It's the leftists in the school systems and government who demand that references to Christmas be taken out of everything, because it might offend someone. This action of destroying an existing tradition and part of Western culture is what offends the rational, existing population.

      Of course, the same leftists hypocritically won't try to make the same claim for any other religion, and regularly do the exact opposite: demand that Western nations accommodate a foreign religion, lest they start screaming accusations of some sort of something-o-phobe.

      As is always the irony with the left, they will end up having the exact opposite result of what they intend. They are so abrasive and pushy in their agenda that they rub regular non-partisan folk the wrong way. People are wising up to this assault on their culture, and people who were ambivalent to many of the traditions are standing up and calling out the bullshit of the left, and siding with tradition. I've seen a fairly noticeable trend back to "Merry Christmas" and school "Christmas Concerts" this year, which is much nicer than the neo-bolshevik movement I saw in the past.

    42. Re: Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean "the minority is allowed to use violence"...

      I mean, there are laws against that, but when judges side with the perpetrators and give lenient or minimal sentences, what does that tell the rest off us?

      I guess it's okay to threaten others into behaving a certain way that days... Doesn't sound like the America I love.

      We should all be treated equal, especially when it comes to violence. To grant one side permission to misbehave is... enabling bad behavior, at best.

      Merry Christmas everyone!

    43. Re: Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So in your educational upbringing what did the Christ part of Christmas mean?

    44. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by cold+fjord · · Score: 0, Troll

      Unlikely, but you just keep stirring the pot.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    45. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good. It's about time we sane (non-religious) people started fighting back against the bullying and tyranny of religious whackos.

      Oh, you also forgot to mention all of the religious nutjobs who sit outside of Planned Parenthood and abortion clinics harassing and assaulting people. Those aren't just one offs, they have happened numerous times too. You also forgot to mention the crusades, where millions were tortured and killed if they didn't "convert".

    46. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So Scandinavians don't exist in your world? You're in faerie tale land again, nutjob.

      Also, fuck Jesus Christ and fuck your (man-made) god. I shit on both and on you for being such a fucking myopic, small-minded, childish idiot and wipe my ass with your bible.

    47. Re: Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, a non crazy person. If someone says "happy Kwanzaa " or " happy Hanukkah " to you and you aren't those religions, are you offended ? No , of course not. They are saying happy holiday of THEIR holiday.

      You can say "you too" - you can say "happy holidays" whatever. Because it's your frame of reference. It's insanity to try to say things in the frame of reference of the person you're speaking TO.

      Taking offense to someone telling you merry Christmas when you're not a Christian (I am also not), is fucking insane.

    48. Re: Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, because I don't believe in childish faerie tales and mythology like some mindless sheep, I must not be fun. Because I stand up for equality, I must not be fun. Because I won't tolerate the disrespect I receive from religious nutjobs every day of the year, I must not be fun.

      You, on the other hand, sound like a naive imbecile. I can imagine your idea of fun right now. Sitting around with a party hat on, listening to xmas carols with your equally "wholesome", uncultured and stupid family.

    49. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you are the only one who does.

    50. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I'll help him. The burden of carrying the idiotic, religious masses is getting tiresome. It's about time we fought back.

      If you are religious, you are utterly worthless.

    51. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, no. I reject ALL religion and do not associate with anyone who I know to be religious. Fortunately I live in a country that is predominately non-religious.

      For someone to say "merry christmas" to me is to be extremely disrespectful.

    52. Re: Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. As Practice. You Have To Start Out Learning To Believe The Little Lies.

      "So we can believe the big ones?"

      YES. JUSTICE. MERCY. DUTY. THAT SORT OF THING.

    53. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > But the minority is willing to use violence

      Perhaps the attacker was sexually abused by salvation army when the attacker was a child? Perhaps the attacker had schizophrenia and had hallucination that the bell ringer was actually hostile. Perhaps the attacker made a bet. Why do people assume the attack happened because of just those words instead of thousands of other possible reasons?

      Also note that the person has been ringing bells for 14 years and this was the first time this has ever happened. So to summarize:
      - We don't know if the person belongs to minority
      - We only know of one incident when violence has been used
      - We don't know if violence was used willingly, or did someone perhaps force the attacker to do the attack.
      - We don't know the motive

    54. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > One can easily find behavior by people upset and angry over either version of this.

      OK, we have Trump who seems to be very angry about saying Happy Holidays as he considers it an "assault" according to his tweet..

      But I have never seen anyone being angry about saying Merry Christmas. I tried to google it, but still couldn't find. Can you show some proof that someone is actually angry about people who say Merry Christmas? Preferably an interview where the person explains why it makes the person angry, but any verbal evidence where person says something that can be understood as the person being angry is enough.

    55. Re: Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen :)

    56. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But as "the holiday celebrated by people who consider Jesus to be anything from a complete fabrication to the worst of all the false messiahs" was a bit of a mouthful even for federal nomenclature, it was abbreviated as "Christmas".

    57. Re: Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I wish you a happy Fuck You!

    58. Re: Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a way of misspelling the X in Xmas?

    59. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have proof that there is no God?
      Then you, too, have an evidence-free belief - exactly like the religions you mock,

      There are only two rational positions on God - agnosticism and apathy. "I don't know" or "I don't care". Everything else is faith.

    60. Re: Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesnâ(TM)t sound like youâ(TM)ve studied Christianity at all. You have more faith being an atheist. Christianity is a faith of reason and evidence. Study what historians have said. Study archeology and literature. You will be surprised how valid Christianity is. It doesnâ(TM)t require ritual or large buildings. It doesnâ(TM)t even require âoeworksâ to achieve salvation. Oh yes, and it doesnâ(TM)t conflict with science at all. Science might explain how but Christianity has the most explanation of why. Again, if you study it (and I donâ(TM)t mean uneducated leftist disinformation like Zeitgeist), you will come to a logical defense of Christianity.

      Go to YouTube and look up Dr. John Lennox vs. any atheist.

    61. Re: Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spot on.

      Leftism is the problem. They are responsible for more death and destruction than anyone else in history.

      What is ironic is that feel good leftists who are anti war, give to the poor, donâ(TM)t be wealthy at the expense of others, etc, should be followers of Jesus because that is his message.

    62. Re: Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now why the fuck would I waste my time studying your faerie tales? I have more important shit to do. None of you religious crazies have ever produced even a single shred of evidence to support your idiotic claims.

      And by the way, I'm not an atheist, but I shouldn't be surprised that you would fabricate shit without supporting evidence. Your entire belief system and existence is based on lies, jumping to conclusions and zero evidence.

    63. Re: Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      can you explain what gravity is?

      Gravity is a dent in the fabric of three dimensional, Euclidean space-time.

      What energy is?

      The problem with your questions is that they are overly simplistic and lack any specificity. What do you mean by "what is energy"? There are many ways that could be answered. The simplest textbook answer is that energy is the property of matter and radiation which is manifest as a capacity to perform work. The lengthier and more encompassing answer is this.

      Where the universe came from?

      Nope, but I never claimed to and, unlike you flat-earthers and religious types, I'm not afraid to say "I don't know, I'm still working on it".

      You have to have a lot of faith to say it was always there.

      Which I never said.

      Did you know Big Bang theory was originally dismissed because it sounded too biblical? It supports that there was a beginning, which is the first part of Genesis in the Bible.

      The big bang theory was never "dismissed". There were religious idiots who didn't agree with it and believed that the universe was always in a steady state, but it was never dismissed by the scientific community.

      Christians created the University... and the Bible tells us to do science. It started with God commanding us to give taxonomy to all the animals.

      Christians didn't create anything but a bunch of bullshit. The bible is a collection of faerie tales written by men and "god" is a concept fabricated by men.

      Now let me ask you a question that any grade school child should know the answer to. Why is the sky blue? I'm betting anything that you as an uneducated flat-earther/religious nutter won't know the answer and will have to look it up. Oh and hint, it's not "god did it".

    64. Re: Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is actually less offensive than saying "merry christmas".

    65. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, it doesn't work like that kid. No god and no religion is the default state of existence. The burden of proof is squarely on those that posit a belief. That's you and every other religious nutter out there.

    66. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean like christians have been known to do to people who say happy holidays??

      You can take your exceptional cherry picked, spotlighted example and go fuck yourself with it until your bleed out through your asshole.

    67. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not true. Transgender people claim they're not delusional, but the same definition applies.

    68. Re: Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can only say that my mother gets upset about it. Target makes them say happy holidays not merry Christmas, and she hates it.

    69. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by JoshuaZ · · Score: 1

      No strong evidence or the like no; the closest I can find is things like what the AC I was replying to linked where the assertion is made that that someone was angry over that but where there's no real confirmation.

    70. Re: Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry youâ(TM)re wrong

    71. Re: Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're making blind accusations from ignorance and being quite rude and contradictory while doing it. Why are you so angry? I hope you have a lovely week.

    72. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      I personally cross that part off of every single bill I get.

      you got WAY to much time on your hands

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    73. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bzzzzzt. The third option is to consider the unproven to be false by default. Mainstream science currently does not do this, for reasons, but it's a consistent position.

    74. Re: Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You realize Christmas was invented by the Christian Church as a way to coax Pagans to "see the light," right? Christianity is as fake as all the other religions. Grow a backbone and stop propping your self esteem up with fairytales.

    75. Re: Preference vs. STRONG preference by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I'd probably ask them about their religious customs. Mostly 'cause I don't know anyone personally who celebrates either and I'd sure want to know more about them.

      Such a wish would probably start a conversation about their custom, actually, provided they're willing to talk about it with someone who will certainly not incorporate it into his life but only wants to know about it out of curiosity.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    76. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      Do you have proof that there is no invisible dwarf living under your house? If not, then why don't you leave out milk and cookies on the porch, because else he might damage your foundation. Should you ever have a damaged foundation, this is proof that there is a dwarf living under your house. Don't say I didn't warn you.

      That's just one of the things I could come up with in the 2 minutes of writing this. Give me an hour and I have a ton of things you cannot prove wrong and an equally large amount of things you should do "just in case", you'll be busy your whole life.

      Or you could do the sensible thing and brush them all aside, saying that you can dismiss without an argument assertions made without any proof.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    77. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You cannot prove a negative, so therefore you cannot prove god doesn't exist. The ENTIRE burden of proof is on those that claim he exists.

    78. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Sorry, no. The "verifiably false" part of the definition does not apply. I cannot look into the head of a transgender person and determine whether they are really feeling in the "wrong" body or whether it's false. That they generally are more happy with their body and their gender after the transition would point towards them actually being right.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    79. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Oh, Hanukkah is a Federal holiday? Really? What other FEDERAL holiday is there on or around December 25th?

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    80. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One example does not prove the mean. Go away with this.

    81. Re: Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It suddenly occurred to me at work when I wished my coworker a merry Christmas... An atheist wishing a Hindu a merry Christmas...

      Look at all the fucks I give?

    82. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Also, do you go around saying "Happy Columbus day" to people?

      Are you not happy about days? I greet people with "Happy ${DAYOFNOTE}" all the time. Quite often where there's no day of note I still greet them that way.

      Happy Tuesday all!

      *This post is a bit lost today but since I'm not going to wait till tomorrow to post: Happy Boxing Day.

    83. Re: Preference vs. STRONG preference by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      In another unrelated news story, Hog calling competitions are not increasing.

    84. Re: Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What part of December 25th is about Christ?

      Two can play that game. Pagan.

    85. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Merry Christmas

    86. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by hey! · · Score: 1

      You're acting almost as if when you wish someone a happy or merry something you actually want them to experience some kind of positive emotion. What does that do for you?

      Every greeting in the month of December should be approached as a skirmish in the culture wars. You don't want people you greet to come away from an encounter with you feeling good, your aim should be to break their morale.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    87. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by mcolgin · · Score: 1

      r/ThatHappened

      --
      I made this: http://www.bpftpserver.com
    88. Re: Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No they are not. Post ops have a tremendously high suicide rate well above the rest of the population.

      Transgenderism is a pike of political crap that keeps sick people from getting the serious psychiatric help they need.

      Instead we now encourage them to seek mutilation.

      This is immoral and unethical.

    89. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you've heard of Hanukkah which start the exact same day?

      What a coincidence! Was the Jewish improbable deity born on the 25th too?

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    90. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      The perfect rejoinder is not violence, but merely "Yes, the days are Holy, Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!"

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    91. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by rsborg · · Score: 1

      I'm an atheist. And to me the difference between a delusion and a religion is basically the amount of people who share the delusion. Look up the textbook definition of delusion an tell me with a straight face that if it wasn't for the explicit exemption of religions from the definition that it would not fully, 100% describe basically any religion out there.

      Still, if someone wishes me a Merry Christmas, I wish them the same. Not because or despite any religion but because I know how they mean it. It is a happy wish from someone who wishes you to be happy. And the very last thing I could think of in that moment is how offended I could possibly be because he assumes that I share his delusion.

      At some point you just have to understand what people mean when they say something and not assume the worst. This is one of the occasions when it would be wrong to do so.

      If the world was full of people with your EQ it would be a better place. I must admit at some times, if I hear a holier-than-thou "Merry Christmas" (I don't look Christian/American) ... I sometimes respond with Happy Holidays (because fuck them).

      But I should take your advice and just chill... tis the season, after all.

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    92. Re: Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember that this whole story requires Christians to be butthurt that someone might say "happy holidays" instead of "merry Christmas".

      Hope you're having wonderful holidays.

    93. Re: Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus. You're not kidding.

    94. Re: Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps. On the other hand, it's only leftist if you were Christian and are converting to something else.

      If your Orthodox Jew, then removing references to a false god is definitely conservative. Same Muslim. Or Hindu.

      Even families that have been atheist for generations might be considered conservative and right wing for that.

      Engel v. Vitale, a key supreme Court case regarding prayer in schools, was brought about primarily by a Jew. Is it left wing to not want to be forced to worship a god you don't believe in?

      I guess so. All hail Satan!

    95. Re: Preference vs. STRONG preference by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      Odd. That would deserve some closer examination. All the trans people I know are doing WAY better after than before. Sure, anecdotes are no proof but I'd really want to see some research done in that area.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    96. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I have zero EQ. I'm the guy that goes to a convention for Kurdish diabetics and orders Turkish Honey as a snack.

      The point is just that it does not affect me if they wish Merry Christmas. Why shouldn't I wish them the same? I neither care for Christmas nor does it affect me negatively, but it might just be important to them, so what's my loss by wishing them a Merry Christmas, or what is my gain in refusing?

      Actually, not doing it has a chance of pissing them off and them going out of their way to piss me off in retaliation. Now why the fuck would I want that?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    97. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by basecastula+ · · Score: 1

      Exactly what I read.

    98. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a wonderful succinct description, I wish more where so mindful. Well said.

    99. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by ahodgson · · Score: 1

      I just say Merry Christmas. Christmas is about feasting and spending time with family, not to mention movies we've seen a hundred times before, a pagan tree/light display and gross consumerism. Why anyone thinks the word Christmas has anything to do with Christianity is beyond me. The only reason Christians claimed the date as their prophet's birth was to co-op the existing holiday, anyway. Just take the word, it doesn't mean anything.

    100. Re: Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should apply Bayes' Theorem. The probability is extremely high that the person you are speaking to celebrates Christmas, or at least participates in some of its traditions. If not, at the very least they are familiar and comfortable with Christmas' place in North American culture, and certainly not offended to be wished its greetings from a participant.

    101. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      You're entitled to your uninformed opinion. Is it useless? Probably.

      There were a number of officially atheist societies in the last 100 years that engaged in brutal suppression of religion. They didn't go very well. You probably should learn from their failures and not try to repeat them as you seem intent on doing.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    102. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Promise me to never go to Bavaria or Austria. Their "good day" is basically "Gruess Gott".

      And yes, that's still in use. You'd probably be offended whenever you enter a store.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    103. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by DutchUncle · · Score: 1

      Amen. In the generic sense of "What he said!" or "So say we all." As a member of a minority religion, I am very accustomed to accepting and returning holiday greetings that I do not celebrate, taking them as generally celebratory phrases rather than literal ones.

    104. Re: Preference vs. STRONG preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any proof that "leftists are responsible for more death and destruction" than anyone else in history?

      At the top of the death toll you'll find World War 2 (hard to blame leftists for that one), the Mongol Conquests (old Bolshevik Genghis, as they called him), and European conquest/colonization of the Americas (another well-known leftist plot). If you are willing to include all causes of death and destruction, you've also got the plague.

      Man, there are some real ideological idiots here on Slashdot, a site that one would think would have a smart community of commenters.

    105. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      "And the very last thing I could think of in that moment is how offended I could possibly be ..."

      You would make a horrible progressive.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    106. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I'm a liberal. Classical style. As in "swing your fist as much as you like as long as it doesn't hit me". I'm in no means responsible nor entitled to policy your language or behaviour.

      I can, and I do reserve the right to, respond to whatever viewpoint you will present. And if it's bullshit, I'll tell you that it's bullshit. And even why.

      So yes. The first part makes me a horrible progressive. And the second makes me horribly for progressives. They're essentially the left wing variant of the right wing religious nutjob. Entrenched in their own world view and unable and unwilling to even consider that they might be wrong, no matter what prove you bring to the table. There is simply no sensible discussion possible with either of them. And thus I stopped discussing with them and started ridiculing them.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    107. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      Could be. Those bell-ringers are one of the two worst aspects of this time of the year. The other is the omnipresent and unrelenting Christmas music.

    108. Re:Preference vs. STRONG preference by drewlake2000 · · Score: 1

      There is no gap for gods to fit into any more. No I can't prove that gods don't exist, but it's quite easy to prove that the bible is not entirely accurate as it contradicts itself thus lacks basic logical consistency. Religion fails a basic scientific test of the null hypothesis. The null hypothesis is that there is no god. There is insufficient evidence to reject that null, therefore god does not exist (P0.05, a lot less with the evidence to hand P=0). Once you have a single piece of evidence for omniscient omnipotent entities we can discuss this again.

  2. $100 Bill by CrystalShepard · · Score: 1, Funny

    I'd prefer to be greeted by being given a hundred dollar bill. I'm not going to expect or demand that it happen.

    1. Re:$100 Bill by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      I'd prefer to be greeted by being given a hundred dollar bill. I'm not going to expect or demand that it happen.

      So are you part of the church of the sub genius or a scientologist?

    2. Re:$100 Bill by mcscary13 · · Score: 1

      Praise Bob!

    3. Re:$100 Bill by grcumb · · Score: 2

      I'd prefer to be greeted by being given a hundred dollar bill. I'm not going to expect or demand that it happen.

      You know which one I prefer? FUCK YOU, that's the one I prefer.

      Merry fucking fuck you and happy fuck off.

      Christmas is beyond a travesty now. It's the fucking Gargantua and Pantagruel of holidays—a grotesquerie of selfishness, self-indulgence and fatuous self-congratulatory solemnity that purports to celebrate the most meaningless of moments. Okay, so Christ was a great guy. And he was born, just like every other living creature on the face of this globe, barring the parthenogenesis crowd. Big fucking deal. You want to celebrate something? Celebrate his caring. Celebrate his admonition to seek transcendence by discarding the material things of this world, to leave everything behind and to fucking love one another.

      Instead we have this bizarre, distorted twisted mythos of some guy who was too fucking holy to be born because some guy stuck his dick in it. No sir, that could never have happened, because that would be dirty, and the Lord, oh the LORD is so pure. So let's celebrate his pristinity through conspicuous consumption; let's celebrate our unity by driving home to every homeless person, every reject and everyone unloved man, woman and child just how fucking unloved they really are.

      Let's celebrate his compassion and caring by making an entire fucking season in which we're forced to confront the despair and the hollowness of our meaningless, pointless existence unless we accept that Mary went spunkless and her boy lives in the sky.

      Let's remind every thinking, intelligent person who ever gave it even a moment's passing thought that a massive portion of this species simply cannot allow you to remain aloof of this collective pathology, and if you reject it, or even question it momentarily, you're somehow waging war on society.

      So fuck all of you. Fuck you and fuck your elves and fuck your Ho-ho-horrible hyprocrisy and everything it represents.

      And next time, mom, don't make me wear this stupid sweater. Just get me an XBox like I asked.

      Fuck all of you.

      --
      Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
    4. Re:$100 Bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you, but I slightly prefer and angry fuck to a merry fuck.

    5. Re:$100 Bill by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      Religions are simple things. The best way to view them is a man standing in the street, pointing at the moon, shouting "Moon!
        Look at the moon!!!" He is surrounded by a throng of people: amazed, awed, angered, and rapt. Every one of them staring at the end of his finger.

      So when the Bible says something about how humans are generally filled with self-doubt, self-recrimination, self-abuse, and negative self talk, and as a result are disoriented to their own value and blocked from experiencing happiness and fulfillment on a daily basis, all you can see is shame, holier than thou arrogance, and hypocrisy.

      Staring at the finger all day, never seeing the moon. Railing against some dirt under the finger nail, the color of the skin, how long since his last manicure...completely missing that the finger you are so preoccupied with has absolutely nothing to do with the message.

      If, one day, you realize that the man is pointing at the moon, and you finally see the moon, what are you left with? You standing in the street, pointing, shouting "The moon! Look at the moon!!!" and everyone looking at the end of your finger.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    6. Re:$100 Bill by drewlake2000 · · Score: 1

      It's just returning to the festival it always was before the christians stole it. Yule was always an orgy of food and drink, a midwinter festival so strong it defies the self-flagellation of christianity. A festival older than some magic gas raping a teenager.

  3. Nobody gives a fuck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Conservative snowflakes need to be reminded of Jesus Christ, the Liberal activist? Too bad they don't seem to know anything about his teachings.

    1. Re:Nobody gives a fuck. by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 2

      What don't they know? The greatest commandment which starts with loving God with everything, first?

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    2. Re: Nobody gives a fuck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is a silly post. Let's discuss all the reasons why.

      Christmas has its origins as a religious holiday, and is still celebrated as such. It's also the largest secular holiday of the year. No other holiday has nearly a month of special TV programming or the level of decorations that are given to Christmas. It's a federal holiday, as well. It's also become extremely commercialized. And there's also a lot of encouragement during the Christmas season to donate to charity and to more generally show good will toward others. One need not be a Christian to celebrate most of what Christmas has become. There is a very large secular and cultural element to the Christmas holiday. Aside from trees, Santa Claus is probably the most recognizable symbol of Christmas. Although the origins of Santa Claus are also religious, it's become almost totally secular and extremely commercialized.

      In regard to saying 'Happy Holidays', there are other holidays celebrated around the same time such as Hanukkah and, more recently, Kwanzaa. There's also the universal and secular holiday of New Year's Day. Happy holidays could include New Year's Day. It can also recognize that other people celebrate other holidays around the same time as Christmas. I have no problem with this.

      However, it's stupid to say 'Happy Holidays' if the reason is to risk not offending others. If you're offended by someone saying 'Merry Christmas', that is ridiculous. It's a case of being overly politically correct, and that is harmful. We're too afraid of offending people, especially because most people are sensible enough to not he offended by someone wishing them a Merry Christmas.

      Personally, I believe that wishing someone a Merry Christmas evokes more feelings of warmth and joy than wishing Happy Holidays. In large part, this is because of the cultural element of giving to others at Christmas and treating each other with good will. If you ignore the religious aspects of Christmas, there are many wonderful cultural and totally secular aspects of the holiday that everyone should be able to appreciate. That's why I prefer to be wished a Merry Christmas.

    3. Re: Nobody gives a fuck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And really, who cares that many Jews consider Jesus to be an incredibly damaging false messiah? Maybe in December we can also start celebrating Emperor Nero's birthday because what evokes feelings of warmth more than burning Christians on an open fire?

    4. Re:Nobody gives a fuck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What don't they know? The greatest commandment which starts with loving God with everything, first?

      And continues

      In Mark, when asked "which is the great commandment in the law?", the Greek New Testament reports that Jesus answered, "Hear, O Israel! The Lord our God, The Lord is One; Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind",[2] before also referring to a second commandment, "Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself."[3] Most Christian denominations consider these two commandments the core of the Christian religion.[4]

      Did they lose count after one?

    5. Re: Nobody gives a fuck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nero massacred Christians. Your reference to that shows an ignorance of history, though, because he also massacred a lot of Jews leading up to when Jerusalem was packed in 70 CE. Nero died a couple of years earlier, but the conflict started in 66 CE during Nero's reign. A lot of Jews would be offended by that, too.

      Jesus didn't massacre anyone. He used the spoken word to influence people. That's a far cry from anything Nero did. Again, nice false equivalence.

      There is a holiday that honors someone who has far more in common with Nero than Jesus does. That holiday is Columbus Day, and it truly is offensive.

      The damage Jesus caused to Judaism has a lot to do with the corrupt Jewish leadership 2,000 years ago. The damage caused by Jesus was via the spoken word, rather than by the sword. It's also not the concern of a secular society in the present day.

      Wishing someone a Merry Christmas isn't offensive. It's not proselytism, which actually would be a problem.

      Let's abolish Columbus Day, and then stop acting like snowflakes about everything else. I prefer 'Merry Christmas', but I'm not offended by 'Happy Holidays' either. Anyone with half a clue can tell the difference between genuinely wishing someone well and proselytism.

    6. Re: Nobody gives a fuck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Christmas primarily has its origins in a religious holiday, but a pagan one. It took several hundred years for a date to be established, and many more before it became a significant festival. Several Christian groups have not celebrated it, or sought to have its celebration banned in modern times.

      I think it has strayed a great deal from its Christian heritage, but as a secular holiday that celebrates family, I think there is a lot to recommend it, as long as people (and I should take note if what I'm about to say and abide by it) takes into account those who are down on their luck or lonely.

    7. Re:Nobody gives a fuck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, *you* don't give a fuck because you're an asshole who doesn't give a fuck about anyone other than yourself. And if you do the math, 100 - 65 - 28 = 7, so only7% don't give a fuck.

    8. Re:Nobody gives a fuck. by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      No, not at all! But before you get to number 2, you have to go through number 1 - and I find that, usually those who claim Christians aren't being Christian for the way they treat others forget that often the way people are treated is a direct result of number 1 - God first. For those who follow the first commandment, sin (as defined in the Christian belief system) is something to be avoided, something we are called to condemn and not help others with. Self-destructive behavior, injuring others, etc. Meaning that Christians should WANT to have their sinning nature identified and condemned by fellow Christians. So doing that very action is, in fact, commandment number 2.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    9. Re:Nobody gives a fuck. by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

      Yeah, like how Jesus went around stoning adulterers and reprimanding everyone for being too soft on them before.

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    10. Re:Nobody gives a fuck. by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      No, he did what the 2nd greatest commandment said - he told them to go and sin no more. He called out their actions as sinful, reminded them of it, then told them to stop it. Is that not acceptable?

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    11. Re:Nobody gives a fuck. by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

      Point is that considering someone a sinner doesn't stop you from being nice to them, so on a modern social policy level, putting God first isn't really an excuse for opposing policies aimed at alleviating suffering, which is the un-Christian behavior GGP was accusing Christians of. Jesus wouldn't have said "yeah but those suffering people are sinners so we can't help them or we'll just be enabling their sinful lifestyle."

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    12. Re:Nobody gives a fuck. by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Fully agree with that! However, in today's society, what happens if you call someone out on their sin? Even if you say "I see you've fallen because of XYZ, let me help you"? You're called a bigot, a hater, a phobe. And you're called not Christian.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    13. Re:Nobody gives a fuck. by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      Your understanding and description of sin is decidedly extra-biblical. Either you are very bad at reading and understanding, or you have adsorbed wrongheadedness from others who are.

      Sin is between God and man. Saying that Christians should want to have their sinning nature pointed out by other humans is, well, not even wrong. A Christian's directive concerning sin is pointed out specifically in 1st John 1:9. Name or cite it, know that it is not held to your account, and move on. That is the extent of it. Nothing more, nothing less.

      Condemning someone for sin is completely against what the Bible says. God doesn't even do that.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
  4. Newspeak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Avoiding the title Christ is just one expression of the Newspeak campaign we are experiencing since years. Good to know not everyone has successfully been brainwashed yet!

    1. Re: Newspeak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recall been on a conference call with Macromedia and I said at the end, âoeHave a happy Christmasâ, as we do in the UK.

      One chap was surprised and said it was nice to hear that, rather than âoeholidaysâ.

      It is Christmas, though Iâ(TM)m using Jul nowadays ;-)

      If it was a holiday event for, say, Hindus Iâ(TM)d wish them the best. Same would go for any religion.

      Iâ(TM)m not even baptised and not daft enough to believe in a space elf but itâ(TM)s what folks say.

      Similar to when someone sneezes. We say, âoebless youâ and not the German gezondheit (spelling might be Dutch from me)

  5. Worst slashdot article ever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    "Happy Holidays" was invented because 100% of Americans aren't Christian. But 65%? Congratulations! You just found a percentage of your sample audience that is Christian! Now you just have to ask yourself: Do you support tolerance of others?

    1. Re:Worst slashdot article ever? by HanzoSpam · · Score: 4, Interesting

      No.

      "Tolerance and apathy are the last virtues of a dying society."
      --Aristotle

      --

      Progressivism: Parasites helping parasites to help themselves - to other people's stuff.
    2. Re:Worst slashdot article ever? by Noamin · · Score: 0

      That's a fake attribution. No sentence like that appears in anything written by Aristotle.

    3. Re: Worst slashdot article ever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For a start he wrote in Ancient Greek.

    4. Re:Worst slashdot article ever? by GrumpySteen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "The downward movement of a mass of lead or gold or of any other body endowed with weight is quicker in proportion to its size"
      --Aristotle

      Being a famous philosopher doesn't mean you're always right.

    5. Re:Worst slashdot article ever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's a fake attribution. No sentence like that appears in anything written by Aristotle.

      "Go fuck yourself."

      - Gandi

    6. Re: Worst slashdot article ever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, "happy holidays" was invented because Christmas day isn't the only thing celebrated by Christians around this time of year

    7. Re:Worst slashdot article ever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a fake attribution. No sentence like that appears in anything written by Aristotle.

      "Go fuck yourself."

      - Gandi

      "Eat me!" - Mother Theresa

    8. Re:Worst slashdot article ever? by superwiz · · Score: 1

      No, but it does make you often right.

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    9. Re:Worst slashdot article ever? by superwiz · · Score: 1

      I don't know if the gp quote is by Aristotle, but the fact that Aristotle was wrong on gravity does not mean that Aristotle was wrong on politics. In fact, Aristotle essentially invented political science.

      He was shown to be wrong on gravity by Newton. Newton was did not account for relativity in his laws of motion. The fact that Newton didn't account for relativity does not mean that he was wrong on gravity.

      The relativity was developed by Einstein. Which showd that Newton was only locally right (and globally wrong). Einstein was wrong about about quantum mechanics. The fact that Einstein was wrong on quantum mechanics does not mean that Einstein was wrong about relativity.

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    10. Re:Worst slashdot article ever? by GrumpySteen · · Score: 1

      And yet Newton's second law still stands as incorrect and Aristotle was and is still wrong.

      Appeal to authority is a logical fallacy and anyone using a single, out-of-context quote from an authoritative figure as the sole proof to back up their opinion should not be trusted.

    11. Re:Worst slashdot article ever? by GrumpySteen · · Score: 1

      "Newton's second law still stands as correct", that is

      Goddamn voice recognition. Earlier it decided that "Merry Christmas, chum" was actually "Messy Christina's, chump."

    12. Re:Worst slashdot article ever? by Megol · · Score: 1

      I guess you think NSDAP was the best thing ever then?

      Bullshit quote, bullshit message, bullshit poster. Have a shitty holiday!

    13. Re: Worst slashdot article ever? by nitehawk214 · · Score: 3, Informative

      "Our words are backed by NUCLEAR WEAPONS!" -Ghandi

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    14. Re: Worst slashdot article ever? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      That's what you get when you create a leader so peaceful that he overflows.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    15. Re:Worst slashdot article ever? by superwiz · · Score: 1
      Again,

      I don't know if the gp quote is by Aristotle, but the fact that Aristotle was wrong on gravity does not mean that Aristotle was wrong on politics. In fact, Aristotle essentially invented political science.

      He was shown to be wrong on gravity by Newton. Newton did not account for relativity in his laws of motion. The fact that Newton didn't account for relativity does not mean that he was wrong on gravity.

      The relativity was developed by Einstein. Which showed that Newton was only locally right (and globally wrong). Einstein was wrong about about quantum mechanics. The fact that Einstein was wrong on quantum mechanics does not mean that Einstein was wrong about relativity.

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    16. Re:Worst slashdot article ever? by GrumpySteen · · Score: 1

      Feel free to list all the societies that were saved by intolerance to freedom of religion (because that is what we're discussing here). Or one. Just one society that saved itself from collapse by being intolerant of other religions.

      Once you do that, I'll accept that maybe the AC's use of that Aristotle quote wasn't wrong.

      Failing that, maybe you should take a good long look at what you're defending; yet another ass who thinks saying "happy holidays" is an attack on Christianity.
      .

    17. Re:Worst slashdot article ever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you've annoyed another far-left Trotskyite, you know you're on the righteous path.

    18. Re:Worst slashdot article ever? by superwiz · · Score: 1

      because that is what we're discussing here

      Nice try. That is not at all what we are discussing here. Not even a little bit. You used a logically fallacious argument and I pointed it out. It's been mentioned that the Aristotle quote may be fake. And, well, garbage in - garbage out.

      There is a few counteractive trends at play here. So if any one of them wins out, it does show a magnified imbalance towards the end of the trend. While I don't think the absolute statement is true, it's not that hard to have examples in history which improved by focusing inwards for a while. It turned out to be a bad long-term strategy, but in the short term, it made them more stable. Of course, in the long term, ignoring external developments did prove disastrous. Although concentrating externally did make empires fall as well. But I don't think Aristotle would have been a good student of such trends simply because most of his examples (or study cases) were Greek city-states.

      Failing that, maybe you should take a good long look at what you're defending; yet another ass who thinks saying "happy holidays" is an attack on Christianity.

      Well, I wasn't defending anyone, but rather attacking you for being illogical. If you have a good argument against what you think is someone being an ass, great! But if you present a dumb argument to counter them, you just buttress their statement.

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    19. Re:Worst slashdot article ever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm an atheist. I prefer calling the holiday by its actual name instead of the generic, inoffensive substitute. Not everyone cares for your feelings or sense of 'tolerance'.

    20. Re:Worst slashdot article ever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you support tolerance of others?

      A better question these days is whether or not the minority tolerates the majority without trying to displace them or intimidate them into silence. It appears that many are not, demanding tolerance for themselves while displaying none whatsoever for those already present.

    21. Re:Worst slashdot article ever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you are for the majority oppressing the minority, like ISIS did to christians in it's conquered lands. Nice to know what kind of vile person you are.

    22. Re:Worst slashdot article ever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do I support tolerance of bad behavior (ex: emasculating men, robbing women of their femininity, gender delusion)? No. Do I support tolerance towards rewarding bad behavior (ex: amnesty for illegal immigrants, pharma bro jacking up drug prices)? No. Does my right to life exceed somebody else's desire to visit/immigrate to the US when a sizeable portion of their home country's population wants to kill Americans? Yep.

      So no, I don't support "tolerance". When you move to another country, you accept their customs or accept that you're in a minority and deal with it. If I were to move, I would rapidly do the same. If you're weird, you work towards understanding why you're weird so you can become normal, like I did. You don't lash out against the rest of society. It's up to you to adapt to society and normality; it is not up to society to put up with your crazy.

    23. Re:Worst slashdot article ever? by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 1

      Lol, well if Aristotle said it then I know for sure it is wrong. Aristotle was a fucking moron.

      --
      Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
    24. Re:Worst slashdot article ever? by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      "Happy Holidays" was invented because 100% of Americans aren't Christian.

      No, "Happy Holidays" was invented because it refers to the entire holiday season, which encompasses more that just Christmas.

  6. Please report to the nearest correction center. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, I meant "fun camp".

  7. Why is this on slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tell me please... "news for nerds stuff that matters"

  8. Yes, but that's not the issue. by JoshuaZ · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Happy holidays is inclusive for everyone, and includes people who don't celebrate Christmas. Merry Christmas is fundamentally exclusionary. I'm Jewish, and I don't care much, but after living in Alabama for a while, I can see why people care. Let me tell a story that's relevant that occurred with a work colleague (who already knew I was Jewish based on earlier conversations) when I was in Alabama (this occurred about December 20th or so last year):

    Colleague: So are you going anywhere for Christmas break? Me: Well, for break, I'll be spending time with my family who is going to be in Puerto Rico, and my wife is going back to visit her family back North. Colleague: So you won't be together for Christmas? That's sad! Me: Well, the relevant winter holiday for Jews is Channukah, which isn't a big family holiday for us. The big family holidays are Passover and the Jewish New Year. Colleague: Oh ok, have a Merry Christmas, Me: You too, NAME.

    It was like he could not get in his head that someone didn't celebrate Christmas. Given that, it isn't at all surprising that some people find the repeated "Merry Christmas" really uncomfortable.

    1. Re: Yes, but that's not the issue. by tjansen · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But isn't wishing a Merry Christmas like wishing someone to have a great weekend? It feels odd when someone says it even though you're going to work all weekend, but it's just a custom and well intentioned.

    2. Re: Yes, but that's not the issue. by JoshuaZ · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Pretty much every single thing in your statement is wrong. First of all, the US isn't a country based off of Christian law. Second, of all obeying the law has nothing to do what greetings people use during holiday seasons. Third, I'm more than happy to say "Merry Christmas" to people who are Christian. Moreover, I explicitly said that *I don't care* if someone says Merry Christmas to me. The entire point was that experiences like the one I had make me understand why people would be directly uncomfortable with it.

    3. Re: Yes, but that's not the issue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm Jewish

      Every. Single. Time.

    4. Re:Yes, but that's not the issue. by theheadandfriends · · Score: 1

      It's about as painful as when people refuse to understand why you don't want ranch or mayonnaise. WHY CAN'T I JUST HAVE MY SALAD PLAIN?

    5. Re:Yes, but that's not the issue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Jews killed Jesus so they probably don't really celebrate Christmas.

    6. Re:Yes, but that's not the issue. by iNaya · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't celebrate Christmas, and I don't give a damn if someone says "Merry Christmas" or anything else. I also don't care if people celebrate other religious holidays. It's not exclusionary - they're not excluding anyone. What kind of self-righteous dickhead does someone have to be to be offended by someone saying "Merry Christmas" or "Happy Channukah", or spreading their joy of a Hindu holiday or whatever. Who honestly gives a fuck?

      --
      The Unicode standard is over 20 years old. Why does Slashdot not support it?
    7. Re:Yes, but that's not the issue. by guruevi · · Score: 1

      What response do you expect when you treat people like they're stupid. Pretty much all adults in the US know all about the Jewish holidays,

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    8. Re:Yes, but that's not the issue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      TL;DR Filthy goyim your culture is making me uncomfortable, please erase it.

    9. Re:Yes, but that's not the issue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Merry Christmas is fundamentally exclusionary.

      So is "Happy Holidays". What if you don't celebrate any holiday? I'm agnostic, and don't believe in any of the dominant western religions. When you say "happy holidays" you're excluding me. That's OK.

      I don't expect to be included in everything. People talk about the local sports team all the time and I have no idea or clue how they're doing. This hardly seems any different. Isn't the world big enough that people can have their own thing, and don't have to be part of EVERYTHING? Either one is fine, I just don't care. What bothers me though is when people make this into some big thing where they turn something largely innocuous like a choice of greeting into a way of separating people. I recognize people have their beliefs, and that can't always include everyone. That's the nature of being into something. Others aren't going to be into that too. If we dilute everything into some weird common denominator we've lost the spice of life.

      There's so many legitimate things to be upset about that getting your panties in a bunch over one, it is really a waste of time to get upset over which holiday greeting you prefer.

    10. Re:Yes, but that's not the issue. by JoshuaZ · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing that you haven't spent much time in the South. I can assure you that this is very much not the case.

    11. Re:Yes, but that's not the issue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Muslims wish me "Id Mubarak", Hindus wish me "Happy Diwali" and Christians and Non-Christians wish me "Merry Christmas". I am an atheist so I celebrate none of those, and I have the right to celebrate any of those if I wish to. No, it does not bother me to smile and wish them back. If people include me in their festival greetings, that is being inclusive, and that is a good thing as 'being inclusive' is the point of a festival in the 1st place.

    12. Re:Yes, but that's not the issue. by ckatko · · Score: 0

      If you've got time to worry what words people use, you're life is easier than 99% of people.

      We're too busy trying to feed our children to give a shit whether your religion is inclusive of mine. People are different. That shouldn't surprise you. When someone says "Praise Allah" I don't lose my shit about how "exclusionary" it is to my Jewish beliefs.

    13. Re: Yes, but that's not the issue. by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Merry Christmas is fundamentally exclusionary.

      Technically it's pagan in origin (Winter Solstice/Yule) but it has become entirely cultural.

    14. Re:Yes, but that's not the issue. by Insanity+Defense · · Score: 2

      Jews killed Jesus so they probably don't really celebrate Christmas.

      And Jesus if he existed was himself Jewish and one of Gods Chosen people. You aren't of the chosen people.

    15. Re: Yes, but that's not the issue. by GerryGilmore · · Score: 1

      Thanks, JZ - you made my point better than I could have. It's amazing - still! - to me the tripe that people believe....

    16. Re:Yes, but that's not the issue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Quite frankly, I think you're just being really touchy about the whole issue with your work colleague. As someone else said, he just wanted to wish you a good day on what he considered a special day. You seem desperately needing to be offended in some way by someone who's only trying to inquire about your family and plans. I think that's a big problem in our society right now.

      Your colleague is certainly tolerate and accepting of your different religion. He's not particularly knowledgeable about yours, and why should he be? If you were into Football, and he's into basketball, do you have to get all huffy when he doesn't know about when your Big Game is?

      I can also understand why people get huffy about "merry christmas". I understand a lot of people get huffy about a lot of things that they shouldn't be. I also understand why wars happen. Understanding something and agreeing with it are two different things.

    17. Re:Yes, but that's not the issue. by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1, Informative

      Assuming the various tales are true, then NO, the Jews did not kill Jesus. He was executed under Roman law by Roman authorities, and the religion of Rome was a polytheism based on Jupiter, Juno, Mars, Neptune, Pluto, et.al., and also involved the Romulus-Remus myth.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    18. Re:Yes, but that's not the issue. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Jews killed Jesus

      It was Jew on Jew crime.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    19. Re:Yes, but that's not the issue. by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

      Or, you know, people can very well celebrate the non-religious aspects of the civil holiday of Christmas like taking the day off work, exchanging gifts, eating too much ham, and getting tipsy on eggnog and port; without actually observing it religiously as christ's mass. After all, it's pretty well known and understood that the historical Jesus Christ, son of god or not, was definitely NOT born on December 25th, and that there early church moved just his birthday, in a PR campaign, so as to glom on to the solstice holiday that most religions already celebrated.

      Hell, I don't consider myself christian, or religious at all really. But I celebrate Christmas, easter, and the like. Give me a day off work and a party to goto, and I'll happily celebrate Hannukah, Passover, Disting, Freyfest, Chinese New Year, and Eid too.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    20. Re: Yes, but that's not the issue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Read your Bible...

      Then the leading priests and the older Jewish leaders had a meeting at the palace where the high priest lived. The high priestâ(TM)s name was Caiaphas. 4 In the meeting they tried to find a way to arrest and kill Jesus without anyone knowing what they were doing. They planned to arrest Jesus and kill him. 5 They said, âoeWe cannot arrest Jesus during Passover. We donâ(TM)t want the people to become angry and cause a riot.â

    21. Re:Yes, but that's not the issue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you mean like they're stupid?

    22. Re: Yes, but that's not the issue. by Kjella · · Score: 1

      But isn't wishing a Merry Christmas like wishing someone to have a great weekend? It feels odd when someone says it even though you're going to work all weekend, but it's just a custom and well intentioned.

      I don't think they're equal because the weekend is the weekend, whether you're working or not. Is Christmas Christmas if you don't believe in Christ? Imagine an online conversation that went like "So what are you doing for Independence Day?" "Nothing, I'm not American and nor in the US so it's nothing to me" "Well okay, happy Independence Day then" and you wouldn't go a little WTF? I know we've done it with ancient religions because nobody bats an eye that Thursday is dedicated to the Norse god Thor and Saturday to the Roman god Saturn but I don't think Christmas is that secularized that it simply means these holidays. Not that I'd bother at all if I was in an Islam-dominated area and they wished me happy Ramadan or Eid or whatever. If you keep using it after I say "thanks, not Muslim though" it gets weird.

      I assume that there's a few OCD nutcases who can't help to stop and lecture people that they're not Christians and they don't celebrate Christmas who insist nobody says Merry Christmas to them. That any form of Christmas decoration, Santa Claus and whatnot is really religious propaganda. To me it's a little bit like the people who think Harry Potter promotes witchcraft. The modern jolly bearded fatso in a red suit flying a sled of reindeer going down chimneys got so little to do with St. Nicholas that it's laughable. I mean if anything it's the Christians who should object to this twisted caricature, if he wasn't such an accepted way to teach kids about invisible men who know if you've been naughty or nice. Then again today most graduate to adult Santa, very little fire and brimstone left...

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    23. Re: Yes, but that's not the issue. by c6gunner · · Score: 2

      Great summary, but I'll add that in your example with week days it's not just Thursday and Saturday; it's pretty much the whole week.

      Monday = Moon's Day / Roman Goddess Luna
      Tuesday = Tiw's Day / Norse God
      Wednesday = Wodan's Day / Norse God
      Thursday = Thor's Day / Norse God
      Friday = Frige's Day / Anglo-Saxon Goddess
      Saturday = Saturn's Day / Roman God
      Sunday = Sun's Day / A god in many religions

      Our week is pretty goddamn multicultural, and very religious.

    24. Re: Yes, but that's not the issue. by meglon · · Score: 1

      No, we don't. We actually live in a society based on the format of laws from the codex of Hammurabi.

      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
    25. Re: Yes, but that's not the issue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Civil holiday is an oxymoron. Only religions can have holidays because only religions consider anything holy or sacred, i.e. a rule so important they would murder you for violating it.

      The United States, with a theory of separating church and state, should definitely NOT have any "federal holidays" and they definitely should NOT coincide woth the religious holidays of just one religion.

      I don't mind someone telling me "Merry Christmas", they are just being nice, and it's better than "happy holidays" or the really awful "season's greetings!" which is a meta greeting.

    26. Re: Yes, but that's not the issue. by Megol · · Score: 1

      Too bad that the roman empire was a well structured one, one that deliberately stayed out of religious business as much as possible and one that documented almost everything. Those things were important for keeping a huge empire of many cultures together.

      The Romans didn't execute a Jesus as described.
      Events described in the bible can't have happened as described.
      Some important events are complete fiction.
      There are written texts mentioning other would-be messiahs but not THE one. At the same time, same place that is.

      Reading the NT as a more humanistic take of the old school Judaism is one thing, reading it as a collection of factual events and teachings is foolish.

    27. Re:Yes, but that's not the issue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So is "Happy Holidays". What if you don't celebrate any holiday? I'm agnostic, and don't believe in any of the dominant western religions. When you say "happy holidays" you're excluding me. That's OK.

      Independence Day is a holiday, are you excluded from it...?

    28. Re: Yes, but that's not the issue. by rmdingler · · Score: 1

      But isn't wishing a Merry Christmas like wishing someone to have a great weekend? It feels odd when someone says it even though you're going to work all weekend, but it's just a custom and well intentioned.

      Yes, I believe you're onto something there. Christmas may have begun as a Christian Holiday, that perhaps borrowed from earlier religious celebrations, yet it has evolved into a seasonal celebration with family and loved ones in which giving is emphasized.

      In some respects, Thanksgiving has evolved into the same sort of family gathering, but being thankful for the blessings one has is the focus.

      Neither are exclusive to devout, even irregular, church goers or god worshipers.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    29. Re: Yes, but that's not the issue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "based off Christian law"

      Lol, no.

    30. Re: Yes, but that's not the issue. by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Great summary, but I'll add that in your example with week days it's not just Thursday and Saturday; it's pretty much the whole week.

      Yeah and you could do half the months too, I just thought that would be over-explaining the point. You could also use Ramadan as example, if you live in a country that uses the the Islamic calendar it's a month whether you're a Muslim or not. It's not just not a special month.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    31. Re: Yes, but that's not the issue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do know that the American founding fathers were not all Christians, right? Many of them were deists. Some of them explicitly denied belief in the trinity.

    32. Re:Yes, but that's not the issue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. Red snowflakes get all bent out of shape if you don't say Merry Christmas. It's their holiday or the highway.

    33. Re:Yes, but that's not the issue. by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      That response is still better than my "Merry Christmas" story. We were in a local Wal-Mart doing some shopping before the holiday season. We got in the elevator with another couple. (Yes, this Wal-Mart has an elevator... they converted an old Sam's Club downstairs/Wal-Mart upstairs into a 2 story Wal-Mart.) The couple asked my boys if they were excited for Christmas. My oldest son informed her that we are Jewish and don't celebrate Christmas. She then starts a pitch about how we can worship Jesus and still remain Jewish (no you can't). I politely declined, but she went on about how we should really accept Jesus, etc. etc. etc. When the elevator doors opened, we quickly went away from them. If I'm ever going to change my religious beliefs, it's not going to be in a Wal-Mart elevator, that's for sure!

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    34. Re: Yes, but that's not the issue. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's the merry part I object to. I am not a merry man!

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    35. Re:Yes, but that's not the issue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I remember the story correctly, he was crucified for sedition by the Romans.

    36. Re: Yes, but that's not the issue. by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      Many of the same people who go on and on about the "War On Christmas" (there was never one) and getting everyone to say "Merry Christmas" again (you were never banned from saying it) are also the same people who insist on "putting the Christ back in Christmas." They want to return Christmas to its religious roots instead of it being a commercial holiday whose sole purpose seems to be to generate sales at retail shops and toy stores. Now, I can't say I blame these people for wanting to cut back on the commercialism and restore the religious meaning to their holiday, but that puts it at odds with using "Merry Christmas" as a general greeting. If I were to wish you "Happy Chanukah", would you take it as a general greeting or would you feel like I was implying that you celebrated Chanukah?

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    37. Re:Yes, but that's not the issue. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The problem with Christmas is that it's not just a religious holiday any more, it's a mandatory retail and work event.

      For two months of the year, 1/6th of your life, it's hard to avoid. Every shop and public space has the same shitty Christmas music, all the stuff you want to buy was moved to stores to make way for red and white tat, and the car parks are full to overflowing because everyone wants to buy some crap to wrap up for their friends and family.

      I've managed to stop any gift giving for a few years now, which is a huge load off. These days I tend to just fly east to where it's not such a big deal.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    38. Re:Yes, but that's not the issue. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Provided the reports are accurate, the Romans killed Jesus. The Jews could not have killed him. Even if they wanted. Judea was a province of the Roman empire at that time and even though the Romans made it a habit to install puppet regimes that nominally kept the local nobility in place, the true power was in the hands of their governors, which were invariably Romans. And only they could hand out capital punishment.

      If the Jews had killed Jesus, he would've been stoned to death. And, let's be honest here, do you think a pile of rubble in every church would look as cool as a cross?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    39. Re:Yes, but that's not the issue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is the actual Federal holiday named Christmas or not?

      I'm also very sorry for you, that you find your colleague's attempts to wish you well in the cultural patterns that are most familiar to him or her to be insulting.

      Many people who enjoy Christmas believe it to actually be the most wonderful time of the year. They want other people to feel as wonderful as they do if they are friendly at all. If people attempting to be inclusive of others in the things that give them great joy is bad, then I'm clearly a threat to society.

    40. Re: Yes, but that's not the issue. by skam240 · · Score: 1

      Oh, right. So all of those manger scenes with baby Jesus are totally non religious, right? Just because the history of Christmas is tied to the appropriating of European pagan holidays as a means of converting pagans doesn't mean Christmas isn't religious.

      You're engaging in self delusion if you think that the most fundamental Christian holiday isn't religious. It's literally celebrating the reason the religion even exists; the birth of Christ.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    41. Re:Yes, but that's not the issue. by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      No, what it sounds like is that he was offering a positive wish, asked a mild question (to which a simple "no" would have been an answer) and got a complicated reply he didn't give the faintest shit about.

      So no, please don't misconstrue: the offering of MERRY CHRISTMAS is polite, but rarely heartfelt. Most of us Christians that offer it (or seculars that say it) don't really give a crap what your story is.

      --
      -Styopa
    42. Re:Yes, but that's not the issue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What kind of self-righteous dickhead does someone have to be to be offended by someone saying "Merry Christmas" or "Happy Channukah" ... ?

      Yup - same with "Happy Holidays", too. Bottom line, if you get pissed off because someone wishes you well, but not in the specific way you prefer, you are the asshole.

    43. Re: Yes, but that's not the issue. by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should start acquainting yourself with history instead of just making faulty assertions. Here is somewhere you can start:

      Luke claimed to be an historian, and to this day he is considered a first-rate historian. Sir William Ramsay, a Nobel Prize recipient and professor of humanities at Aberdeen University in Scotland, was reputed to have been the foremost expert on geography and history of ancient Asia Minor during the 20th century. Considered to be one of the world's most eminent scholars, Ramsay was at one time highly critical of the Bible. But eventually he was compelled to consider the writings of Dr. Luke, and after much research he concluded that Luke was one of the world's greatest historians. In fact, after carefully evaluating Luke's records, he wrote a book entitled Luke, the Beloved Physician! In one of Ramsay's classic works he wrote of Luke, "I take the view that Luke's history is unsurpassed in regard to its trustworthiness. You may press the words of Luke in a degree beyond any other historian, and they will stand the keenest scrutiny and the hardest treatment. Luke is a historian of the fist rank. This author should be placed among the very greatest of historians." - How Do We Know the Bible is True, Volume 2, by Ken Ham, Bodie Hodge, p. 50-51

      Was There Really A Census During the Time of Caesar Augustus?

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    44. Re: Yes, but that's not the issue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A guy that wrote a book saying Luke was a first rate historian gives glowing reviews about Luke? Color me surprised.

    45. Re: Yes, but that's not the issue. by Stormy+Dragon · · Score: 1

      Well you live in a society based off Christian law

      Or not, since the US, like the UK, is a common law country, which originated from Norse (That is, pagan) legal traditions and explicitly rejected the more Biblical Civil law used in most of the rest of Europe. There is a reason there is a book in the old testament called Judges, but not one called Juries.

    46. Re: Yes, but that's not the issue. by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Somehow you seem to have skipped over this bit, " ... Ramsay was at one time highly critical of the Bible. But eventually he was compelled to consider the writings of Dr. Luke, and after much research he concluded that Luke was one of the world's greatest historians. In fact, after carefully evaluating Luke's records, ..."

      Should I be surprised by your seeming omission?

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    47. Re: Yes, but that's not the issue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Happy Birthday!

    48. Re: Yes, but that's not the issue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it is better to wish them Happy Yule. https://wicca.com/celtic/akasha/yule.htm

    49. Re: Yes, but that's not the issue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Christmas may have begun as a Christian Holiday

      "The pre-Christian Germanic peoples—including the Anglo-Saxons and the Norse—celebrated a winter festival called Yule, held in the late December to early January period"

      "There are those who have determined not only the year of our Lord's birth, but also the day; and they say that it took place in the 28th year of Augustus, and in the 25th day of [the Egyptian month] Pachon [May 20] Further, others say that He was born on the 24th or 25th of Pharmuthi [April 20 or 21]."

      "The first recorded Christmas celebration was in Rome in 336."

      "Many modern Christmas customs have been directly influenced by such festivals, including:
              Gift-giving and merrymaking from the Roman Saturnalia,
              Greenery, lights, and charity from the Roman New Year, and
              Yule logs and various foods from Germanic feasts."

      So no, Christmas did not begun as a "Christian Holiday". It was originally a pagan holiday.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christmas#Choice_of_December_25_date

    50. Re: Yes, but that's not the issue. by tjansen · · Score: 1

      Yes, Christmas is definitely still something you can celebrate when you don't believe in Christ. I celebrate Christmas without being religious at all, and I come from a family of at least three generations of atheists. Christmas trees, Santa Claus, family gatherings and gift giving don't require any religious beliefs.

    51. Re:Yes, but that's not the issue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, we have a small tradition in our Jewish family. First of all, we greet each other in Yiddish with "A freilekeh Kraistmachtchshchshch" and go out as a family and eat Chinese food. :-)

    52. Re: Yes, but that's not the issue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are confusing the Christian celebration known as Christmas with what most people actually celebrate when they use the word Christmas (i.e., Yule). Only Christians think of manger scenes and the baby Jesus. Other people think of Christmas trees, lights family dinners and songs.

    53. Re:Yes, but that's not the issue. by houghi · · Score: 1

      I have never seen Christmas as a Christian holiday. To me it is just a period you do not have to work and spend time with family. I work in Brussels together with many Muslims and probably several Jews and Atheists and what not. Most of them do something with their family for Christmas and they wish each other a merry Christmas.

      They even talk about how stupid it is that the winter market is not called a Christmas market.

      To me Happy Holidays is just the whole period from the 24th till the 2nd of January where most people will have some or all days off. To me that means like "Have q nice time off" where "Marry Christmas" means "Hove a nice time with friends and family during the 24th and/or the 25th.

      So the latter is more personal, the former more generic. And as an agnostic, I do not care, as long as I can enjoy my paid vacation as God intended it.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    54. Re: Yes, but that's not the issue. by Quirkz · · Score: 2

      Civil holiday is an oxymoron. Only religions can have holidays because only religions consider anything holy or sacred, i.e. a rule so important they would murder you for violating it.

      You're letting your semantics override your common sense. "Holiday" may come from "holy day" but it definitely has a broader definition than that. Just imagine all the Brits who "go on holiday" every time they have a vacation. Then again, I personally count almost all time off as holy, but that's a matter of personal faith, I guess.

    55. Re:Yes, but that's not the issue. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Who honestly gives a fuck?

      Enough idiots to make this a platform issue of a political rally in a country of $350+ million people. Just let that sad state of affairs sink in for a moment.

    56. Re: Yes, but that's not the issue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But, but...Do you wear tights?

    57. Re: Yes, but that's not the issue. by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

      Okay Worf.

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    58. Re:Yes, but that's not the issue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fake jews!

      #maga

    59. Re:Yes, but that's not the issue. by rsborg · · Score: 1

      > Colleague: So you won't be together for Christmas? That's sad!

      At this point, I would have just repeated "Merry Christmas!" and cut short the conversation to let the other know their comment was not charitable or received well. Some people gotta learn how to converse without judgement.

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    60. Re: Yes, but that's not the issue. by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Your quote seems to be unclear. Who was this Dr. Luke? If it was the guy who allegedly wrote one of the gospels, why the "Dr."? How could any historian verify what the gospel says as accurate, without extensive other sources? How could the gospel guy be one of the world's greatest historians based on an account of one man's life, death, and afterlife? Certainly a great historian would have set it into better context rather than just reporting some oddities.

      I was cured of trusting Nobel Prize winners by Linus Pauling and his Vitamin C crusade. If you want me to trust Sir William Ramsay, provide me with the evidence, and I'll make up my own mind.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    61. Re:Yes, but that's not the issue. by DutchUncle · · Score: 1

      The puppet government led by the convert Herod, appointed by the Roman Senate and with the country under Roman Army occupation, executed a political troublemaker. If he was really a god, he shouldn't have been so killable.

    62. Re: Yes, but that's not the issue. by DutchUncle · · Score: 1

      Huh? The Romans suppressed native language and native religion everywhere they went. That's why half of Europe speaks "Romance" languages.

    63. Re:Yes, but that's not the issue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except in the context of the "OMG its a WAR ON CHRISTMAS", "Merry Christmas" can be feel like a giant FU to non-Christans.

  9. If it's Christmas... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  10. Holidays? by rossdee · · Score: 2

    I have to work tonight, You Insensitive Clod!
    and I worked last night (Christmas Eve) as well

    1. Re:Holidays? by Jason+Levine · · Score: 2

      I used to volunteer to work on Christmas Day. I don't celebrate the holiday and I can get a lot of work done without people calling/e-mailing with little tasks that take "only two minutes." Sadly, my company decided to stop allowing this a few years ago so now I'm required to take the day off.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  11. Who cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    except americans?

    1. Re:Who cares by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      I care enough to comment from the other side of the world and as it's Boxing Day I'm embarking on family roadtrip for summer vacation!

      Based on my limited sample size of North American friends on Facebook, several atheists and a Jain are celebrating neo-Pagan winter solstice, a jewish friend, who earlier in the month had posted about Hannukah, has a witty Catmas post but even my Muslim friends from Canada are posting Christmas messages and don't seem that bothered by sectarian divisions.

      Just maybe we're living in a post-PC world where peace and goodwill extends to shoving the offensively non-offensive "happy holidays" up your bum! :)

      A big shout out to the Palestinians in Bethlehem...

  12. I do not care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Happy Holidays

  13. In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    100% of vegetarians prefer vegetarian food.

    https://www.axios.com/the-votes-are-in-merry-christmas-wins-2519396832.html

    Which phrase are you most likely to use? “Merry Christmas” All respondents 65%

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_the_United_States#Christianity

    The most popular religion in the U.S. is Christianity, comprising the majority of the population (70.6% of adults in 2014).

    Move on

  14. Majority by Tailhook · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The majority of Americans aren't hate-filled malcontents that actively seek opportunities to be offended by nothing little holiday traditions. The majority of Americans know there is nothing in "Merry Christmas" that needs to be fixed and have low regard the shitheels that think there is.

    --
    Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
    1. Re:Majority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There's plenty in "Merry Christmas" that needs to be fixed. For one thing, the mere idolization of Santa is an abomination that reflects poorly on the true sanctity of the spirit. For another, there's a massive amount of commercialization that is corroding society as people think that getting (or even giving) gifts is the proper behavior, as opposed to behavior that is moral, sound, and just on its own, not reliant on the ephemeral rewards of the temporal plane. And finally, it's wrong to be merry, as that implies a bacchanal mindset that reveres pleasure over the much sounder emotional state of tranquility. Then we have all the pagan paraphernalia such as the lights, the trees, and the reindeer. All holdovers that should have been purged with the last of the Norsemen. But instead? They linger on, subtly warping our minds with their heathen origins.

      In conclusion, Jesus finds our celebration of the holiday offensive, and he will kill us all for defiling his holy grace.

       

    2. Re:Majority by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      The majority of Americans aren't hate-filled malcontents that actively seek opportunities to be offended by nothing little holiday traditions. The majority of Americans know there is nothing in "Merry Christmas" that needs to be fixed and have low regard the shitheels that think there is.

      Exactly. Most realize it is just to remind you of the impending holiday sales and after Christmas clearance sales. Merry Merchandizing just doesn't have the same ring to it.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    3. Re:Majority by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      For one thing, the mere idolization of Santa is an abomination that reflects poorly on the true sanctity of the spirit.

      Wait, wait, wait, are you fat-shaming?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:Majority by skam240 · · Score: 1, Informative

      The majority of Americans also knows that when some one says "Happy Holidays" that there's no reason to be offended. Meanwhile there's a minority of shitheels who want to be thought police and control what people say during the holidays.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    5. Re:Majority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The majority of Americans aren't hate-filled malcontents that actively seek opportunities to be offended by nothing little holiday traditions. The majority of Americans know there is nothing in "Merry Christmas" that needs to be fixed and have low regard the shitheels that think there is.

      The MAGA stuff is the usual us vs them thing you see since well forever. It is all linked together. Those that don't say Merry Christmas enough times are the "Them" Obama was of course a "Them" for tons of made up reasons. Hillary was a "Them" I think as much as anything for not fitting the stereotype of what a woman should be. She stepped out of her "place". Trump of course made Mexicans, Muslims, etc, etc "Thems" The wall was an obvious line between "Us" and "Them", protecting "Us" from "Them" His whole spiel during the campaign even had "Them" paying for the protection of "Us" It was absurd.

      It is all pretty classical methods of manipulating a populace. Prop up various enemies. Blame the enemies for everything. Keep finding ways to denounce those enemies and keep the populace's anger focused where you want it. Hell Herman Goering might have considered Trump his very own disciple.

      The nice thing about the whole war on Christmas spiel, is when you make up a fake enemy you can of course claim to have vanquished that fake enemy as well. Mission Accomplished. The benefit of course is you keep your base riled up and in your corner, to some extent at least.

      The problem is all this stuff works to some extent and I think will always work to some extent. The line between order and chaos is perhaps closer than most think it is. I don't have any answers, though if we could somehow convince that 30% or so that there really is no war on Christmas it would be start...

    6. Re:Majority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Happy Holidays" is a PC attack on people of religion. What "HOLY DAY" are you celebrating? Christmas, most likely. A Jew might be celebrating Hanukkah, in which case the appropriate response is "Happy Hanukkah".

      When you go through all the trappings of religion - taking the day off, giving gifts, being together with family, etc - but require that other people remove the name, you are being utterly dishonest.

      Remember, the point of Political Correctness is to control thought by controlling the words people are allowed to speak. When you try to punish people for mentioning Christmas, you are attempting to prevent people from celebrating their religion.

  15. Loathing by mentil · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The only reason 'happy holidays' exists is because of people who are triggered by hearing 'merry christmas'. Unless the poll records how many people HATE 'merry christmas', then it won't reveal why 'happy holidays' exists.

    --
    Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    1. Re:Loathing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it's due to these entirely not made-up people who hate being wished a merry Christmas who are definitely not a figment of your idiot imagination.

    2. Re:Loathing by Insanity+Defense · · Score: 1

      t. butthurt atheist faggot who hates being wished merry christmas and puts bibles in the fiction section at bookstores

      So why are you so "butthurt" that he puts religious works in the section he believes they belong? He is still stocking them and apparently you still find them, so what is the problem? Don't like it do your business elsewhere.

    3. Re:Loathing by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Fuck that. I'm not triggered, I just don't celebrate Christmas, so I wish people a "Happy Holidays" instead.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    4. Re:Loathing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only reason 'happy holidays' exists is because of people who are triggered by hearing 'merry christmas'.

      This is untrue. It exists due to good old fashioned American Capitalism. Lots of holidays exist in the winter. Companies want to sell to everybody with the money to buy. "Happy Holidays" reaches everyone's winter holiday without having to make twenty signs and spend worker time cycling them in and out-leaving aside any changes to product stock and display. Happy Holidays is a triumph of efficiency, and the triggering is by nominal Christians who can't handle the concept that other religions exist. Frankly, there is no war on Christmas-it is Christmas that is fighting a war on Halloween-How much holiday stuff gets put out in October? Never mind Santa holding parades in Conquered Thanksgiving.

    5. Re:Loathing by quantaman · · Score: 1

      The only reason 'happy holidays' exists is because of people who are triggered by hearing 'merry christmas'. Unless the poll records how many people HATE 'merry christmas', then it won't reveal why 'happy holidays' exists.

      It's not about triggering, it's about inclusiveness.

      I personally feel a bit weird wishing Merry Christmas to someone whom I know is Muslim or Jewish. Not because I don't want to offend or trigger them, but because it implies that I didn't know their faith, or I didn't realize their culture didn't celebrate Christmas in the same way mine did. I usually use something like "enjoy the holidays" unless they lead with "Merry Christmas" themselves.

      But it's a different issue for businesses, if the business says "Merry Christmas" it identifies the business as Christian. It doesn't seem like much to you but to every non-Christian who hears it there's a subtext that as a non-Christian they don't quite belong in that business and the community of customers that patronizes it. Smart business-people doesn't go around implying that their customers don't belong in their store.

      Of course, that's the same reason some people really want to hear "Merry Christmas" and some businesses use it. It carries the message that this store is part of the culture with a Christian heritage, that their community is still a distinctly Christian one, and so the Christians who shop there feel a bit more at home.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    6. Re:Loathing by bradley.uffner2292 · · Score: 1

      No, it's because there are multiple holidays that almost overlap, and it is faster to say "Happy Holidays" than "Happy X, Happy Y, or Happy Z" to everyone. It really isn't any more complicated than that.

    7. Re:Loathing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congratulations, you took the bait. A tip of the fedora to thee, sir.

    8. Re:Loathing by Megol · · Score: 2

      No. It's because it's a generic phrase that covers those that sees the holidays as religious (several religions), those that aren't religious and those that don't give a fuck. It is a generic well-wishing that applies to all.

      The triggering is from the Christians that can't accept (or perhaps understand) that this isn't something only for celebrating the birth of a carpenter a long time ago. Reasonable people - including Christians - aren't triggered.

    9. Re:Loathing by gurps_npc · · Score: 2

      Happy Holidays exists not because people got visibly offended by the constant slights to non-Christians. And they do exist.

      Instead what happened was that the majority of the world is not christian and enough non-Christians owned companies and these non-Christians started saying Happy Holiday because they are not christian, so why would they wish some one to have a Merry Christmas. It was simply what people that are not christian did.

      But Christians also started saying it. Do you want to know why?

      Because those Christians that were NOT religious bigots realized that unless it is ACTUALLY Christmas and you know you are talking to a Christian, then it obviously makes more sense to say Happy Holiday. It's inclusive, not exclusive. Like saying "Welcome Ladies and Gentleman" rather than just saying "Welcome Gentleman".

      But then something else happened. A bunch of religious bigots came along and objected to wishing anyone a happy holiday. The idea of including the Jews and the Muslims, and the rest of the world made them physically ill. They couldn't stand the idea of being polite to a Jew or a Muslim.

      But the little Nazi bigots didn't dare actually say they refused to wish the Jews a Happy Holidays. They knew what would happen if they dared admit their dirty little secret.

      So instead they whined about not being allowed to say Merry Christmas. The truly religious are fine saying Happy Holiday. It's only the tiny, cowardly neo-nazies that object.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    10. Re:Loathing by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      The only reason 'happy holidays' exists is because of people who are triggered by hearing 'merry christmas'. Unless the poll records how many people HATE 'merry christmas', then it won't reveal why 'happy holidays' exists.

      True.

      However, I would contend that "Christmas" is less of a Christian thing and now more of a secular thing. After all, how many times have you heard "Christmas is so commerciallized these days".

      Basically it's an orgy of gift-giving and overspending and visiting family and friends, and Christmas Day is more about gift giving.

      Oh sure, perhaps a few people attend Mass on the 24th, but I'm sure the vast majority of the population does not. (And for a lot of people, Mass was the only time they'd go to church).

      So really, I'm guessing since it's really more a secular thing (I've seen Muslims, Hindus and others participate) that "Merry Christmas" is in reference to secular Christmas. Perhaps if we rewound the clock 30-40 years when there was a religious tinge to it still that Happy Holidays was more appropriate to be inclusive. Today? It's a nice gift-giving and sharing and generally universal peace-on-earth type day.

      I've noticed many more businesses and all that saying Merry Christmas these days, and many immigrants participate because it's one of the few things people can be inclusive about. Just because your religion doesn't celebrate doesn't exclude me from inviting you in and giving gifts. And I'm sure your religion doesn't mind you doing same. Heck, many Syrian refugees get surprised at the tradition (being Muslim, of course) but are always appreciative and eager to learn about the culture of the people that "adopted" them.

  16. Re:Of course they are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    Merry Christmas, you snowflake!

  17. Happy Festivus by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 5, Funny

    Welcome, newcomers. The tradition of Festivus begins with the airing of grievances. I got a lot of problems with you people! And now you're gonna hear about it!

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
    1. Re:Happy Festivus by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      The tradition of Festivus begins with the airing of grievances

      Today I learned that every call to my parents starts Festivus!

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  18. I'm not on holidays. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While Christmas day/boxing day are statutory holidays where I'm from, I'm not necessarily on holidays on the 24th or the 27th, etc, so to me it's nonsensical that anyone would wish me "happy holidays" for the entire fucking month. So I always respond with a deliberately quizzical look and mention "I'm not on holidays".

    1. Re: I'm not on holidays. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does your shithole cuntry not have STATUTORY HOLIDAYS???

      Jesus Christ.. you're stupid.

    2. Re: I'm not on holidays. by Insanity+Defense · · Score: 1

      Does your shithole cuntry not have STATUTORY HOLIDAYS???

      Jesus Christ.. you're stupid.

      Does your shit hole country not have jobs that MUST run 24 hours every day of the year? Most countries do.

    3. Re: I'm not on holidays. by Megol · · Score: 1

      Does your shit hole country not have a dictionary that DESCRIBES the meaning of the phrase? Most countries do.

      PS stop being an idiot asshole during the holidays - and that doesn't mean you _have_ to be on a holiday. Some people...

  19. slashdot totally misrepresents the poll by ysth · · Score: 2

    First, the poll was of "likely" greetings, not "preferred" ones. Huge difference there.

    Second, the poll was of what greetings the respondents used, not received. Even bigger difference.

    1. Re: slashdot totally misrepresents the poll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think thats bad, you should read the bullshit bitcoin "news" that gets pushed here. Such shameful shilling...

    2. Re:slashdot totally misrepresents the poll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      goddamit you insensitive clode this is not a reality based community!

  20. Bah... by Subm · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Humbug!

  21. Hot take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you care either way, you're just an asshole.

  22. As an atheist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It can't bother me because I don't believe in any of this in the first place.

  23. Happy winter solstice celebrations! by Mascot · · Score: 1

    That would be my preference. But I'm not American, so I don't count. Also, I agree it doesn't exactly run off the tongue.

    1. Re:Happy winter solstice celebrations! by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      Happy Boxing Day Test, then.

      It's The Ashes, where we remember a heroic piece of wood that was sacrificially burned to eternally honour the bond of Australia-English conflict.

  24. Greetings are from the greeter’s point of vi by Picodon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Frankly, I don’t see anything in that conversation showing that your colleague “could not get in his head that someome didn’t celebrate Christmas”. He heard you, and on his way out, merely wished you an enjoyable day on the day that he calls Christmas Day.

    Seasonal greetings are not a reference to you, your culture and your lifestyle. They are a reference to those of the person greeting you (and, typically, of the larger community around you).

    For example, on Thanksgiving day, people who were not born in America likely won’t care a bit. Does that mean that it’s not Thanksgiving Day for them? Don’t they have the day off like everyone else? Should we care that they aren’t going to celebrate it? We wish them a happy day, and that day is named Thanksgiving Day. So Happy Thanksgiving everyone!

    Same thing for Christmas and any other holiday that’s massively followed by the larger part of the population. There’s nothing oppressive about it, unless one chooses to feel oppressed by it. Conversely, there is something oppressive about telling people that they may not name traditions that their community has long been widely following.

    If a Jewish faithful said something like “Happy Hanukkah” to me, I would absolutely find it oppressive on my part to tell him that I feel harassed by it. Personally, I would find his greeting inclusive on his part. I’d feel that he was mostly expressing friendship, while sharing a bit of his faith and culture, in a welcoming way, without trying to force it on me: a greeting is not the same thing as proselytising!

  25. No doubt by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    Most people prefer their own religion to the one of other people, especially if they're in the majority.
    It's called 'bigotry'.

    1. Re:No doubt by Known+Nutter · · Score: 3, Informative

      Most people prefer their own religion to the one of other people, especially if they're in the majority. It's called 'bigotry'.

      Sorry, but no.

      Preference does not require intolerance, but bigotry does.

      --
      Beware of the Leopard.
  26. Fuckin A right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Merry Christmas to all!

  27. happy holidays! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    "offending" right wing evangelicals is just a bonus gift you can give yourself.

  28. Merry Christmas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Merry Christmas to all

  29. I prefer "Merry Newtonmas"! "Happy Halloween" also by ToTheStars · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Sir Isaac Newton was definitely verifiably born on Dec 25, 1642. To be fair, that was under the Julian Calendar, which corresponds to Jan 4 on our calendar, but it's as good a reason for the season as any. (Well, after axial tilt, of course, and orbital eccentricity on certain planets.) Sometimes I get really mixed up and say "Happy Halloween" because, y'know, DEC 25 == OCT 31.

    Aside: even ca. 200 AD, people were mostly guessing when Jesus Christ was actually born. The Church picked the date December 25 to align with the Roman celebration of the winter solstice, even though the date was "probably" wrong (and in fact some Eastern churches celebrate Christmas on Dec 25 in non-Gregorian calendars, and they definitely can't all be right), because the point of Christmas is celebrating Jesus's birth (and life, teachings, and death/resurrection^H^H^H^H bad weekend), not getting the exact dates right.

  30. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  31. NEWSFLASH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    USAmericans are predominantly assholes!?!

    Anyone who has ever visited that thirdworld shithole could tell you that.

  32. Re:Of course they are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The campaign, dubbed Project Cassandra, was launched in 2008

    Obama didn't become President until 2009.

    Funny how that article completely glosses over that fact. It's almost like the author might be biased.

  33. Moron doesn't understand reality. by gurps_npc · · Score: 1, Informative

    I would love to be greeted by a oral sex from every single 20 year old woman that weighs less than 150 lbs. But that is not the issue. What is the issue is how the people that do NOT want to do that feel.

    On Dec 24 and Dec 25th, I enjoy being wished a Merry Christmas. It's a great sentiment and I reply the same. So on Dec 24 and on Dec 25th, I wish everyone a Merry Christmas.

    But I do not do that on Thanksgiving. Nor do I do it on New Year's Eve. Doing that would be obnoxious. I wish everyone a Happy Thanksgiving or a Happy New Year on those days.

    Similarly, on Hanuka I wish everyone a Happy Hanuka. It's kind of a dick move to wish someone a Merry Christmas on Dec 13th, the first day of Hannuka.

    The rule should be:
    If you know someone is christian, or today actually IS Christmas or Christmas Eve, again, wish them a Merry Christmas.

    But for all other situations, wish them Happy Holidays, so you don't do force your religion on them.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    1. Re: Moron doesn't understand reality. by Type44Q · · Score: 3, Funny

      I would love to be greeted by a oral sex from every single 20 year old woman that weighs less than 150 lbs.

      Why so picky?

    2. Re:Moron doesn't understand reality. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      I would love to be greeted by a oral sex from every single 20 year old woman that weighs less than 150 lbs. But that is not the issue.

      Not really sure that's the best pool of candidates, but to each their own. Merry New Year.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    3. Re:Moron doesn't understand reality. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I Never heard of such a greeting...well, except for one girlfriend when I was in college. was a great greeting. But I'd not like such a greeting from most women...would get rather worn out!

    4. Re:Moron doesn't understand reality. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the ever hand, I'd strongly advise against wishing any non-American "Happy Holidays", because that sounds horribly American.

      Here in the UK very few people are Christians, but we have this bank holiday on the first weekday following Dec 24, and the official name of that bank holiday, for historical reasons, is "Christmas", so feel free to wish people a good one.

      Of course, some of the actual Christians are Orthodox Christians and celebrate Christmas about 13 days later in any case. Unless they're Syriac Orthodox Christians, who use the Western date...

    5. Re:Moron doesn't understand reality. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize that Hanuka is a holiday that celebrates the of genocide of the Syrians, Greeks and Romans and in general is used as a holiday to celebrate the genocide and destruction of the West, right?

    6. Re: Moron doesn't understand reality. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps he doesn't enjoy being beaten up by the husbands?

    7. Re:Moron doesn't understand reality. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Greeting someone with Merry Christmas is not forcing anything on anyone. Deal with your mental demons on your own.

    8. Re: Moron doesn't understand reality. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You use the word 'genocide', but clearly you do not know what it means.

  34. Well duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The majority of Americans are not from some other country or religion that hates everything nice.

  35. Re:The US is a Christian nation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    founded by Christians and Christian principles. The majority of Americans are Christian. Saying "happy holidays" is revising your history. I'm glad we finally have a president with a spine in the White house that's not afraid to call things as they are, and who doesn't pander to fringe minority viewpoints.

    So the USA was founded on Christian principles? Show me in the constitution the number of times where the name "God", "Moses" or "Jesus" is mentioned.

    I will give you a hint. Zero!

  36. Re:Happy Holidays! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    its true if u go 2 a chinese restaurant on xmas its filled with jews.

  37. Re: Happy Holidays! by Type44Q · · Score: 1

    A href="https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xTq20prt0K8">Enjoy.

  38. Uh... no by rsilvergun · · Score: 5, Insightful

    it mostly came out of government functions. Schools, court buildings, etc. People were 'triggered' because a lot of non Christians get kinda nervous about the cult-like atmosphere of the evangelicals, the fact that many of our closest allies are still theocracies and the thousands of years of recorded history of religion being used in conjuncture with government to oppress.

    Through a lot of hard fought battles America became a secular nation, there are those of us who want to keep it that way. And then there are those among us who do not.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Uh... no by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I always thought it was because there is supposed to be separation of state and religion. That bit on the constitution about not establishing religion, for example.

      That's why government buildings don't have religious decorations, right?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:Uh... no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're allies with Saudi Arabia? But they 9/11ed us. 15/19 hijackers.

      I don't get it.

    3. Re:Uh... no by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      After quite a few years of study and observation, I've seen absolutely no reason to change my view that mixing religion and government is bad for both.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  39. Portuguese, on the other hand... by quetzyg · · Score: 1

    prefer to be greeted with:
    Boas festas, caralho!

  40. Re:I prefer "Merry Newtonmas"! "Happy Halloween" a by CODiNE · · Score: 1

    As to "Probably wrong"...

    Luke chapter 2 says shepherds were sleeping outside overnight with their flocks when he was born so... yeah, it wasn't likely anywhere near Dec 25 by a large margin.

    The fact that nobody even remembered the date makes sense when you consider that Jews and Christians of the first century considered birthdays a pagan custom and would have been somewhat repulsed by the idea. At the time both groups were hated by the Romans for refusing to join into the state religion and culture. Possibly they ignored plenty of Saturnalia and solstice greetings in their day.

    But I digress, yeah... probably not Dec 25th.

    --
    Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
  41. Re:Of course they are by ravenshrike · · Score: 0, Troll

    It takes time for an investigation to turn up any results fuckface. Especially one investigating high level money trails.

  42. Re:Poll in 1955 "Most Americans prefer N*gger..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exactly. Who cares what most people think. Most people think the new Star Wars was a great movie. Most people are morons.

  43. Re:Poll in 1955 "Most Americans prefer N*gger..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who cares what most people think?

    It's the electoral votes that count.

  44. The problem is not one over the other by WindBourne · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The problem is when 1 of the many greetings are forced on ppl. Seriously, back in the 60s, we used both, but probably more merry Christmas. However, the far left started pushing out merry Christmas, then the far right tried to force it on everyone, and finally, the extreme far right runs around screaming that it is all about baby Jesus birth, hates santa, trees, etc and ignores the evidence in the Bible that proves, he was either spring/fall.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:The problem is not one over the other by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually the issue is the far right got butt burt because people tried to tell them to stop being dickheads and assume everyone celebrated Christmas. When they were told there are people who don't celebrate Christmas it only emboldened them to force saying merry Christmas. Then faux news picked up on it to win points with the racist crowds, and make some kind of distinction and now suddenly it is considered an issue. Most people, especially the far left don't give a rats ass because there are real issues people are facing and they don't care. But fox news and other neonazi groups jump on this to make leftist issues with capitalism seem as nonsensical as hating Christmas.

    2. Re:The problem is not one over the other by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you sterile?

      Captcha: insults

  45. Re:The US is a Christian nation by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 2, Informative

    You should check the Declaration of Independence. The Constitution is the framework for operations, the Declaration of Independence is the reason for the nation to exist. And the Declaration does start off with God and the Creator right in the first two paragraphs. Deism was central to the creation of the US - our rights come from our Creator, not from man or anything else. At least according to the founders.

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  46. Re:The US is a Christian nation by Topwiz · · Score: 1

    Several of the men known as Founding Fathers were either full on Deists (Thomas Paine, Ben Franklin) or had Deist leanings. The term "Nature's God" from the Declaration of Independence comes from Paine's book on Deism which was widely read at the time. Pastors who knew George Washington described him a significantly influenced by Deism. Thomas Jefferson spent a good amount of time in office cutting out the bible passages he agreed with and pasting them together into what is now known as the Jefferson Bible. John Jay, Samuel Adams, and Patrick Henry were very much hard-line evangelicals but the rest were either full Deists or Christians with Deist beliefs. If the US was really founded as a Christian nation then we wouldn't have constitutional limits on government involvement in religion.

  47. Re:The US is a Christian nation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Incorporating principles, or practices based on principles, into a document does not require listing the persons that stated the principle.

    And look at that! Even though I am anonymous you can still apply the principle I stated!

    "Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." -- John Adams

    Did America Have a Christian Founding?

  48. Merry Christmas! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and a Happy New Year!

  49. Friendly greeting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm content that someone greeted me in a polite and friendly manor with warm wishes....

  50. Re:The US is a Christian nation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where is Hong Kong's declaration of independence... :)

  51. Re: Poll in 1955 "Most Americans prefer N*gger..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a dumb example. There is no equivalence between the n-word and Christmas. One of those is a nasty term intended to be demeaning and racist. The other is a holiday that has a focus on peace, good will toward others, welcoming strangers, and generosity toward others. The origins of those aspects of the holiday are certainly religious: the message of the angel to the shephers in the field, being welcoming to Jesus when there was no room in the inn for his parents, and the gifts from the Magi. However, those have also been adopted as secular aspects of the holiday. There is absolutely nothing that needs to change about those aspects of Christmas. And they're also the complete opposite of everything the n-word represents.

    Finally, in his homily at the midnight mass from the Vatican, Pope Francis had a lot a lot to say about being welcoming to refugees. Again, it's the complete opposite of everything the n-word represents.

    Your post is ridiculous. There is nothing in common between the n-word and Christmas.

  52. Re:The US is a Christian nation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion.

  53. Io Saturnalia!! to all you Xtian asshats by haruchai · · Score: 1

    and a Joyous Festivus for the rest of us

    --
    Pain is merely failure leaving the body
  54. It's a Festivus Miracle! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's ditch/dial way back the commercialization and do Festivus Frank proud.

    P.S. Merry Christmas!

    1. Re:It's a Festivus Miracle! by Babel-17 · · Score: 1

      Bah, humbug, I wasn't logged in and unknowingly posted as an AC. :)

  55. May you have a gleeful winter consumerist holiday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    May you be able to pay off your credit cards next month.

    Seems to piss off everyone.

  56. Saturnalia? by DrYak · · Score: 2

    No sorry, I didn't hear : I was too busy celebrating saturnalia~~

    In all seriousness, people have been celebrating the period of the year with the shortest days for as long as they've been able to look up in the sky, and notice what a solstice is (provided they've moved far away enough out of the tropical region to actually have an easily observable solstice).

    The fact the one specific small group decided to link this time of the year with some mythology about the birth of some dude who eventually ends up getting nailed on some wooden cross is at best a small foot note on the scale of the whole history of Homo sapiens.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:Saturnalia? by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Informative

      What makes the whole shit even more hilarious is that of all the things celebrated at this day, the birth of Jesus is the only one that certainly didn't happen at this day.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re: Saturnalia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you ever have an actual education?

    3. Re:Saturnalia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What day was he born on then? How do you know it *wasn't* the 25th December? Or perhaps you are suggesting that no-one celebrates his birthday at all simply because we don't know exactly which day it was that he was born on?

    4. Re:Saturnalia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really?

      Here:
      https://www.ucg.org/the-good-news/biblical-evidence-shows-jesus-christ-wasnt-born-on-dec-25

      The bible says he wasn't born on the 25th slugger. The celebration on the 25th was to appease converting pagans.

    5. Re:Saturnalia? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      The problem is it is probably impossible by now to determine his birthday, provided he existed altogether. The whole part about his birth in the Bible is useless because it most likely never happened that way.

      A census taking place would probably make sense from the perspective of the ruler because that way he'd know what taxes to expect from the different provinces of his empire. People traveling back to their ancestral lands for this makes zero sense whatsoever, though. First it's a logistical nightmare. We're talking about a time when traveling was a huge endeavor and even small distances took weeks if not months. What would happen in such a scenario is that the whole country de facto shuts down for months because people have to travel across it twice. Imagine Thanksgiving in the US without airplanes and cars, and you HAVE TO go to your parents, even if they don't live anymore. This might give you a faint idea what that would be like.

      And for what? What exactly would the ruler who orders something like this gain? For tax purposes it's worthless because the people will go back to where they came from afterwards. Why would the Romans, who ruled that area at that time, give a fuck about some Jews' lineage? Hell, even a Jewish ruler most likely wouldn't.

      And even if, even if you actually give a shit about where someone came from, why not simply ask them (because you don't have anything besides someone's word anyway, it's not like people had birth certificates back then) where they are living, note it down and send the documents?

      The whole story makes exactly ZERO sense. Unless of course you have to fulfill some prophecy in Isaiah talking about where the saviour of the Jews will be born. And since Jesus fits none of the other traits this saviour should have, from name to behaviour to knowledge to ... anything, at least his birthplace should be correct. That was probably the easiest to fake.

      So no, we don't have much to pinpoint the birthday of Jesus, provided he ever existed. It would be a curious coincidence if it was the 25th of December, though, when most pagan religions celebrate the return of the sun after the longest night in Winter. And the Christian faith has never been shy when it came to redefining feast, turning gods into saints or building churches on places of pagan worship. So it's more likely that this is another one of these "refurnished" festivities.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re:Saturnalia? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Every year, my wife and I throw a Solstice-Related Holiday Of Your Choice party. We're not fussy.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    7. Re:Saturnalia? by drewlake2000 · · Score: 1

      Never mind the fact that half the gospels spend an inordinate amount of time detailing Joseph’s lineage to prove that the bloke they say was cuckolded by an invisible being was related in some way to the royal line. Neither of which agree.

    8. Re:Saturnalia? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Cuckoldry and whoring has a certain tradition in that lineage. Proof? Genesis 38.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  57. Re:Greetings are from the greeter’s point of by sysrammer · · Score: 1

    Nice post. Wanted to mod you up but you are maxxed already. It appears that 56% of /. agree with you.

    Merry New Year to all, and to all, a good pint!

    --
    His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
  58. News flash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The whole "war o Christmas" this is a fabricated wedge issue created by the religious right to further their so-called persecution by supporters of the establishment clause (the only original part of the bill of rights)

  59. Re:I prefer "Merry Newtonmas"! "Happy Halloween" a by PCM2 · · Score: 1

    Luke chapter 2 says shepherds were sleeping outside overnight with their flocks when he was born so... yeah, it wasn't likely anywhere near Dec 25 by a large margin.

    I dunno, the interwebs tells me that weather in Bethlehem in December averages around 59 degrees Fahrenheit, with record temperatures of up to 83 degrees -- so it doesn't sound crazy. You live the shepherd life back then, you're probably sleeping outdoors a lot.

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
  60. average white male here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't give a shit

    Can't all you assholes just get along?

  61. Re:The US is a Christian nation by meglon · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The Declaration of Independence is not the reason this country exists, it was a declaration, mid-war, that the colonies would no longer submit to rule by the crown; that the relationship between colonies and crown were dissolved. It said nothing other than that about the future.

    ....as for religion....

    You should check out the Constitution where the only references to religion is:

    Article VI, subsection 3

    ....but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.

    ...or the Bill of Rights....

    Amendment 1

    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof....

    Both of those are explicit prohibitions on government from promoting any given religion over any other.

    Or check out the Treaty of Tripoli....

    Article 11

    As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion.....

    The Treaty of Tripoli was signed 10 years after the Constitution, and was passed unanimously by congress. Over half of the members of congress at that time had also signed the Constitutional.

    --
    Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
  62. And a happy midvinterblot to you! by Megol · · Score: 1

    Don't forget to paint your yuletree with the blood of a freshly slaughtered pig or Odin may get pissed.

  63. Re: Poll in 1955 "Most Americans prefer N*gger..." by meglon · · Score: 1
    I'll go ahead and point out a couple things:

    ....is a holiday that has a focus on peace, good will toward others, welcoming strangers, and generosity toward others.

    ....Pope Francis had a lot a lot to say about being welcoming to refugees.

    The people most likely to complain about "Merry Christmas" not being used are people who do not practice those things you mentioned. They call themselves "christians," but they live pretty much the exact opposite of Jesus' teachings. Their only focus is gay marriage and abortion, and not the things that Jesus teaches are important. IF (conservative) christians in the US actually lived as Jesus taught them to, instead of following their false prophets, this country wouldn't be in the downward spiral we are now... and i'd be more than happy to say Merry Christmas all they want.

    Seriously, do you think Jesus would give a shit about the choice of greetings when there are people living in the streets, people starving, people sick who can't get treatment, and people being killed simply for being different? Anyone who thinks his concern would be which greeting to use over all of those other things is NOT a Christian.

    --
    Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
  64. and by meglon · · Score: 1

    A Glorious Saturnalia to all.

    --
    Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
  65. Re: The US is a Christian nation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, the first phrase on the declaration of Independence is "When in the Course of Human Events" rather than divine command or other assertion.

    As such, they were making the express statement of their sovereign right as humans, not making themselves subject to any higher power.

    In any case, as you have argued yourself, the Declaration of Independence is not an official document of governance for the United States, thus it has no value as precedent or authority. Sorry, but that's what you said, and you have to stand by it. Thus all we have is the Constitution and it prohibits religious dogma as a guiding basis.

    That means no forced birth, virgin or otherwise, and no compulsory Christmas participation. You will have to keep your tyranny restrained to your own theocracy instead.

  66. I always find this discussion ironic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...makes me think of this...

    Two guys are sitting in a bar and overhear someone wish someone else Merry Christmas.

    Person A: That's great to hear, you never hear Merry Christmas anymore. Why anyone would be offended by it is beyond me. I mean, I wouldn't be offended if someone said happy Hanukkah, happy Kwanzaa, or happy Ramadan. Would you?

    Person B: No, of course not.

    (Person A finishes his drink)

    Person A: Ok, I'm going to take off. See you later.

    Person B: Ok, take care, happy holidays!

    Person A: INSENSITIVE JERK! I JUST TOLD YOU I SAY MERRY CHRISTMAS, NOT HAPPY HOLIDAYS!

  67. Re: The US is a Christian nation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." -- John Adams

    No wonder he spent his presidency trying to destroy the country by his acts of usurpation and coercion.

  68. Survey Methodology? Statistical Margin of Error? by ZipK · · Score: 1

    Valid population sample? Useless opt-in survey?

  69. Either way..... by MerlTurkin · · Score: 1

    is fine with me. I'm not religious anyway. I'm a baby eater.

  70. Re:Greetings are from the greeter’s point of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think thou does protest too much.

  71. Our leaders teach us by jimbrooking · · Score: 1

    It's all fake news anyway.

  72. Ask yourself some questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do you live in the US then? NEWSFLASH: it has always been a Christian country. Don't you have your so-called "promised land" now? Haven't you jews stolen an entire country from the Palestinians for that purpose? Then why don't you all move there? Why are you still bothering the people in the western part of the world that have never really liked you since the time of the Roman Empire? If I belonged to a group of people who have always been disliked for over 2000 years, probably I would start asking myself some questions instead of whining on Slashdot.

  73. Merry Christmas by sgunhouse · · Score: 1

    Years ago now, Wal-mart went on record as preferring Merry Christmas. And of course many agnostics still set up a Christmas tree and exchange gifts, even if they don't care about the birth of Jesus (which by the way, Biblical scholars agree was in the spring since sheep would be in the barn during winter). Christmas and Hannukah (their spelling) are listed on the calendar, the latter being the 13th of December this year. And unfortunately most people do get a Christmas break and not Hannukah so ... it is what it is.

    Having said that, I saw a TV commercial a week ago last Saturday (on the 16th) for a football game to be broadcast on the 23rd, the commercial described it as "Holiday weekend, Saturday, December 23" As Hannukah was before that - so was Thanksgiving - and New Year's is later, that particular usage makes no sense at all. Either say "Next Saturday" or actually say "Christmas weekend, Saturday". Christmas is December 25th, regardless of what you do that day, and referring to that date by that name should not in itself be considered offensive.

  74. Humbug! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I prefer you don't speak to me at all...

  75. Re:Greetings are from the greeter’s point of by skam240 · · Score: 1

    I couldnt disagree more. If you know some one doesnt celebrate a holiday then what are you doing wishing them have a happy version of the holiday? They arent participating so from the recipients point of view all you're doing is pointing that out and making them feel like they arent part of the heard.

    In doing something like this you're either being an idiot (which is what the above scenario sounds like) or trying to put your own holiday onto people who dont want it.

    --
    I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
  76. Re:The US is a Christian nation by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

    And the reasons for all of these were because:

    1) The Deists and others who came to America were fleeing persecution back home in England. They wanted to ensure that the government they were forming wouldn't start persecuting them again for being the "wrong" religion.

    2) The government WAS the church in England. The King was the head of the church and could make religious declarations. If the King decided that every Tuesday, people should walk around with a chicken on their head, that would be a religious edict and anyone not following it could be punished. The founders not only didn't want religion to dictate government policy, but they wanted to keep government from dictating religious practice. I challenge anyone who is religious to look at Congress now (I won't even include the President) and honestly say they would want those people deciding how they practice their religion.

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  77. Re:Greetings are from the greeter’s point of by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    Whoa, I don't think the GP meant it was oppressive!

    It's just the assumption and the inability to understand that you don't participate that is the issue. It's annoying when people keep asking you stuff that you already told them doesn't apply, right?

    I get this too at work. It would be fine if people were more considerate. Saying happy holidays shows that they at least understand you might not be a Christian or whatever non-religious Christmas fans are called.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  78. Re:The US is a Christian nation by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Actually no. The very first amendment flies right in the face of any "Christian principle". The first amendment and the first commandment are fundamentally incompatible.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  79. Re:May you have a gleeful winter consumerist holid by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    But it's at least a honest, happy wish.

    Merry Spendmess to you too.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  80. A lot of them do by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    Especially down south. The religious right here are constantly trying to gain ground. They're also working hard to get evolution out of schools and theology back in (they call it "intelligent design" to make it sound like science). They're very well funded and I don't think they're intentions are pure. I see it more as a push for the more authoritarian side of religion. The folks I see doing it don't spend much time talking about helping the poor or ending wars. Just expanisionism.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  81. Re:Greetings are from the greeter’s point of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know how I can tell you're not in any minority groups?

  82. Re:The US is a Christian nation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are two mentions of god ("Nature's God" in the first paragraph and "their Creator" in the second"), and absolutely none of Jesus. In both cases, god is invoked solely to point out that human rights are innate, not granted by a king. This in no way supports the assertion that the nation was founded on Christian principles.
     
    Also, Deism is not a form of Christianity.

  83. Re:Greetings are from the greeter’s point of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I feel the same way. Someone is wishing you well, how the hell can you possibly get all bent out of shape over that?

    Whether someone wishes me merry Christmas, happy Ramadan, a great Kwanza, or whatever, I'm glad and I wish them the same in return. People get bent up about this because they're being told they shouldn't wish someone a merry Christmas, and instead being told they have to use some alternate term, when you've personally been using the phrase for near 50 years. This attitude of "we want you to throw out all of your traditions and bend over backward for some inane PC reason" is what pisses of the rest of us. I never see any articles that mention schools having to avoid a happy Hanukkah phrasing, but I sure see a lot that say schools have to avoid a merry Christmas phrasing. It's all very one sided, and very obvious as to why.

  84. The reason this poll sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is because I don't care either way isn't an option. I think that would be the majority.

  85. It's ok to say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Happy Holidays until it's actually Christmas, then if you voluntarily decide to disclose to anyone that Dec 25 is a holiday, then stop being a dumb ass and say Christmas because it objectively is. Think about it, after the 25th, who still says "Happy Holidays?"

  86. Re:Greetings are from the greeter’s point of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The difference is if they live here, it is a national holiday. So it is theirs as well (thanksgiving). Choosing not to celebrate it doesn't make it any less their nations holiday.

    That is not at all true of Christmas.

  87. Re:Greetings are from the greeter’s point of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sincerely fuck you and the intolerant fuck-facery you represent.

  88. US Cristisn majoritu...news at 11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    House is thus surprising when the US is overwhelmingly Christian...72%.

    So the surprise is that it's not 72%

  89. In the grim darkness of the far future... by Karmashock · · Score: 0

    ... There is only culture war.

    This is never going to end. You could surrender and it wouldn't end because someone else would fight about something else. Its been this way for the last 10,000 years and its showing no signs of stopping.

    It will never stop.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  90. Inclusive is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, thanks, prick, for reminding me AGAIN that I got harassed at work by my boss and the corrupt HR department to the point of making me physically ill, then I got fired while I was on sick leave.
    So now I don't have a job, and "Happy Holidays" just reminds me all over again. Painfully.
    So, no, on behalf of all the involuntarily unemployed, it's NOT inclusive to say "Happy Holidays".
    I don't want a holiday, I want a job again.
    I'm even happy to work on YOUR "happy holiday" days.
    I'm not Christian either, but I'd prefer "Merry Christmas" to your pretend "consideration".
    Some people just don't even want to think that others' circumstances might be different from theirs...

  91. would that be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    His teaching that he did not come to undo or change the older laws, and he not only re-affirmed but doubed-down on the traditional definition of marriage?
    Perhaps thata part where, after resuing a prostitute from being stoned, he tells her to go forth, "AND SIN NO MORE"?
    Or perhaps his teaching that those who do not work should not eat?
    Possibly the bit where he tells his follwers NOT to expend a particular resource on the poor, who he says will be with us always?

    Jesus is a serious person with many difficult lessons for people across the political spectrum, NOT a cartoon character like "buddy Christ". If you are not going to learn about any other historical character by only reading individual sentences about him/her out of context, then do not do it about Jesus; be intellectually consistent.

    It's always amusing to see smug liberals cherry picking the seeimingly liberal stuff Jesus said or did and then snarkily attacking non-libbies as people who ignorantly miss the idea that Jesus was some sort of chairman Mao/Che'/Karl Marx leftie. Those who would seek to wrap themselves in Jesus, and those who despise Jesus would both benefit from actually studing the complete Biblical accounts before just running away with their own ignorant fractured, partial view. Jesus was neither a Republican nor a Democrat. And, no, the current left-wing trend of claiming Jesus was a Palestinian illegal immigrant is not true either as anybody who actually READ the texts would know.

  92. Re: Happy Holidays! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, not true. I am Jewish, but guess what... All the other people in the Chinese restaurant tonight were actually Asian!

  93. As tradition dictates... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...you say "Merry Christmas" and go shopping. Who the hell is this Jesus kid thingie?

  94. ignorance being displayed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, I'm not saying you are dumb, just that youdisplay a lack of information.

    [1] There is no "separation of church and state" in the Constitution. There IS a prohibition on the federal government creating its own religion as countries like England had done (google: Church of England). The phrase "separation of church and state" comes from a letter Thomas Jefferson (NOT an author of the Constitution) sent to a church explaining to them that they should sign-on to the newly written Constitution because it would protect them from ANY interference by the federal government while not in any way affecting their ability to influence government (i.e. a one-way barrier, the Americans who wrote and who accepted the Constitution would have not accepted a two-way wall)

    [2] Huge numbers of US Government buildings have religious decorations. Ever heard of the US Capitol where congress meets? Ever heard of the Supreme Court building? How about the Christian chapels on military bases and the military academies?

    Are you aware that our founders held Chrisitan church services every week in the original Capital and that each of the original 13 colonies had its own "established" and official religion? The Constitution was written by our founders to apply to the FEDERAL government. Each state had its own constitution to limit the poweres of STATE governments; as such each state was perfectly within its Constitutional rights to have an official religion. 12 of the 13 original colonies were protestant Christian and one was Catholic. None were officially atheist, deist, Hindu, Budhist, Jewish Muslim, etc.

  95. um, no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most Americans di NOT use "the N word" (I hate this childish construct but in modern millenial newspeak America you cannot even safely quote a nasty Democrat term without getting labelled as a bigot or worse).

    Also note:

    1. Slavery was NEVER in most of what is currently the United States - it only existed under Democrats and only in about 1/4 of the country.

    2. Segregation and Jim Crow laws NEVER existed in most of what is currently the United States - they were implemented in Democrat-controlled places by Democtats.

    3. The US Constitution NEVER says that blacks are 3/5ths of a person, and anybody who actually takes the time to READ it knows that. The Constitution tried to LIMIT the spread of slavery by saying that slave states could only count each non-free person (of ANY COLOR) as 3/5ths of a person FOR THE PURPOSE OF ALLOCATING SEATS IN CONGRESS (thus limiting the ability of slave owners to get more seats in congress by counting their slaves even though those slaves would have no power to vote for those congressmen).

    Dishonest rhetoric may work on the ignorant, but most of us prefer FACTS.

  96. you point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You attack Christians for not living up to the standards you believe they should live up to.

    Interesting.

    First, because in failing to live up to their standards they are actually [a] being consistent with their beliefs which hold as a core element that all are sinners who fail to live up to those standards, and [b] at least HAVING standrards.

    I'll tell you why so many Christians focus on the things you want them to avoid: They Focus on the areas of extreme immorality where anti-Chrisitans are pushing hardest. Currently theese are the planned targeted and deliberate slaughter of the most-innocent (the unborn, over 60 million of whom have been killed since Roe v Wade), and homosexuality which is one of the few sins the Bible calls out as an abomination and which is contrary to the Biblical definition of Marriage which the Old Testament established into Jewish law and which Jesus reaffirmed and even tightened-up.

    Second, there are plenty of very serious Christians who spend a lot of time and energy calling out both false teachers and false prophets (there's a big difference), which you would know if you were serious.

    Third, many Christians would point out that the country was almost entirely protestant Christian when founded, with a notable Catholic minority and a tiny Jewish population and that mix remained quite stable until a large inrush of Catholics shanged the Catholic-Protestant balance in the era of Ellis Island but it remained overwhelingly Christian all the way up until the 1970s and that the current plunge into the cultural and political toilet has coincided with the reduction of Chrsitianity in the country. No matter how much influence the "religious right" seems to gain, it is a tiny fraction of the political power Chrsitians used to have in the country.

    Fourth, you have a minor point that Jesus would not worry about the exact words people use to greet each other (after all, he did NOT speak English and did not found a Baptist, Episcopal, Methodist, or Catholic Church. He did not say "verily, I thusly create a religion which shall be called Chrsitianity and its members shall greet each other one a year with the words Merry Christmas". The attacks on the use of the phrase "Merry Christmas" are however an in-your-face indicator to Christians that all the associated beliefs and values are being attacked.

    Finally, I am as shocked by atheists being inconsistent with THEIR beliefs, and Muslims with their beliefs, etc as you are toward Christians. I watch as the majority of Muslims fail to murder non-Muslims, participate in court proceedings where non-Muslims are allowed to give testimony of equal weight to the testimony of non-Muslims, etc. I watch as people who believe in evolution express revulsion at racism and eugenics when they SHOULD boldly embrace both. I see atheists who claim to believe in recycling and conservation yet refuse to eat their relatives when they die... I am surrounded by people of ALL beliefs who do things contrary to the things they claim to believe...

    1. Re:you point? by meglon · · Score: 1
      I'm pointing out how fake christians do not follow the teachings of Jesus.

      If you're standards are to lie and hate, and to live exactly opposite of how Jesus tells you to live, then yes, these fake christians have standards. Really shitty standards, but they're standards none the less.

      These fake christians focus on the things they do, gay marriage and abortion, because they follow false prophets who do not teach the words of Jesus, but teach their own twisted opinions and lie about those opinions being Jesus' teachings. They're not, they're abuses of the religion. The only time abortion is mentioned in the bible is when the priest are told they MUST carry one out if the husband requests it (Numbers). All other bible verses used to suggest Jesus, or God had an issue with abortion are generic verses that have been interpreted to mean abortion in recent years. Again... nothing more than abusing the bible through lying by false prophets.

      Additionally, Jesus would have lives under Roman rule in Judea. Everyone there would have been knowledgeable of Roman society, whether they liked it or not. The Romans used an herb to induce abortions fairly commonly, and by that i mean: so common was the herb used that they literally drove it into extinction. Yet Jesus said the following about the procedure:

      ....

      And if we need any more evidence from the bible about God's sincerest compassion for the unborn, we can look to a verse that doesn't need any "interpretation" at all:

      Hosea 13:16 Samaria shall become desolate; for she hath rebelled against her God: they shall fall by the sword: their infants shall be dashed in pieces, and their women with child shall be ripped up.

      Anyone who tells you Jesus was against abortion is lying. They are a false prophet.

      Abominations in the bible... clearly you haven't read the bible. I'm not even going to try to list your "few" abominations, there's sites that do.... here's a list of 50 or 60 of them:

      http://richardwaynegarganta.co...

      So, while "men laying with men" is on the list, so is idolatry (like that cross people wear as jewelry, or that statue behind the later, or making images), eating unclean things (like pork, shellfish, shrimp and a whole shitload more), adultery (you know, getting a divorce then remarrying), sowing discord (you know, like Limbaugh, Hannity, Trump), and wearing cloths of mixes fabrics. If you've ever worn polyester, or a 60/40 cotton mix, you are as much an abomination in the eyes of God as a man who has lain with a man. And that whole eating bacon thing... yeh, you're going to hell for that one.

      Biblical marriage? Which version. Again, someone saying the bible defines marriage simply shows you've never actually read the bible (and you're spreading lies... which is another abomination, btw). I'll let Betty explain it, as she's certainly a far better christian that you:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      So, anyone teaching that abortion and gay marriage are the big ticket items (or even items on the ticket at all) for Jesus is a liar. They are false prophets, and anyone following them (instead of Jesus' teachings) are not Christians.

      Third seems to be you attempting to say this is a christian country. it's not. Again, another lie told by religious people to attempt to gain power over others (and nothing to do with the teachings of Jesus)... oh yes, lying is another abomination.

      Fourth... there was no attack on Merry Christmas. Really whiny people who need to play the victim may think so because their ego's are bruised or they don't understand why everyone doesn't believe their lies, but those people are narcissistic (yet another abomination) and delusional.

      I'm shocked that people who despise the teachings of Jesus still claim to be Christian. I'm shocke

      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
  97. Re:Of course they are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're right!
    The Bush Administration started a worldwide hunt of terrorist drug smugglers in 2008. This program was called Project Cassandra. Over the next EIGHT YEARS it amassed a treasure trove of evidence against the Hizballah terrorist organization and their Iranian enablers.

    Then, when Obama took over and decided he wanted to help Iran, he squashed the investigations, fired the investigators, released captured terrorists and their supporters, and prevented and prosecutions. This climaxed in the 2016 final shutdown of the program, the release or reassignment of the last employees, and destruction of evidence.

    Obama didn't start Project Cassandra - the investigation into Hizballah drug smuggling - but he did kill it. And that's what the article says.

  98. Lazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use Happy Holidays because I'm lazy. I don't have to say (or write) "Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year". It is the same reason I write x-mas occasionally, I'm inherently Lazy.

  99. SurveyMonkey?? by MoarSauce123 · · Score: 1

    Delete the cookies and vote again. SurveyMonkey makes it far too easy to stuff the ballot box. - That aside, didn't Trump just claim he invented the term "Merry Christmas"? So how could the survey participants know about it? In that sense: Seasons Greetings!

  100. Re:Greetings are from the greeter’s point of by houghi · · Score: 1

    Living outside the US, I have met several Americans that where confused when I said "working" when they asked what I was going to do on July, 4th,

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  101. Playing it safe by dskoll · · Score: 1

    I prefer to play it really safe, so I use "Trick or Treat!"

  102. Re:Greetings are from the greeter’s point of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suppose he could have changed his mind and told him to have a shitty Christmas instead!

    Oh, were you ignoring the sentiment behind the message? My bad, I sometimes forget what tools people can be.

  103. How about "I DON'T GIVE A SHIT" by ne7minder · · Score: 1

    Seems they missed an option that probably would have beaten both

  104. Re:Greetings are from the greeter’s point of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stop... Just stop.

    You have the choice to be offended. If you choose to be offended you gave that power over you to someone else. Don't do that. Refuse to be offended and thank them for them wishing you a happy whatever.

  105. Duh by whistlingtony · · Score: 1

    1. Duh, we all knew that. Big Whoop.

    2. Hi. My name is Tony and I'm an Atheist. Santa isn't real. God isn't real. Jesus isn't real. And I still don't care about "Merry Christmas" in the slightest. Hell, I say it to people!

    3. Christmas is awesome. I just spent several days eating good food, hanging out with friends and family, giving out gifts, taking it easy, and watching my Grandfather play with my daughter for hours. Christmas is a good thing.

    4. The "War on Christmas" is fought only in the heads of Christians, and they're fighting the wrong people. Go talk to the stores putting up Santa displays instead of Jesus displays and leave the rest of us alone. Besides, who cares if your neighbor believes in Buddha or Krishna or whomever? Get over it, and stop being such pansy sensitive crybabies! Other people live here too.

    1. Re:Duh by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      pfft, all the Christians I know have santa decorations too. The real St. Nick was a Christian after all.....

  106. Good! by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    Should never had been anything but MERRY CHRISTmas.

  107. Re:I prefer "Merry Newtonmas"! "Happy Halloween" a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're looking at average highs. The temperatures drop precipitously overnight. The lows (when people would be sleeping) are closer to 40F; quite a bit chillier. Not unlivable with enough blankets, but without a tent, in the wind (and possibly rain; December through March is the height of the rainy season there), not something you'd volunteer for if you had any other options.

  108. Gravity by sjbe · · Score: 1

    He was shown to be wrong on gravity by Newton.

    Earlier than that actually. Newton established the theory but experiments had proven Aristotle wrong about gravity before Newton was born.

  109. Why does this need to be a problem? by EndlessNameless · · Score: 1

    I'll respond with either "Merry Christmas" or "Happy Holidays" depending on what the other person has said. It's not hard to be good-willed and accommodating.

    People worried about either diversity or "the war on Christmas" need to relax. Easily 9/10 Christmas traditions were stolen from Pagan faiths in the first place, so it's more of a generic European tradition than a Christian one anyway.

    --

    ---
    According to the latest ruleset, this post should be modded as Vorpal Flamebait +5.
  110. I prefer by SCVonSteroids · · Score: 1

    That people are being nice, regardless of how they greet me.

    --
    I tend to rant.
  111. Epic Troll by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    read the article. They never caught the guy. There's no indication that the 'Merry Christmas' had anything to do with the assault. It's more likely the perpetrator was coked up and would have slugged the guy no matter what he said. You should be ashamed of yourself for posting that clap-trap.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  112. Why do you care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, to anyone that cares deeply about this:

    If this is a topic that riles you up, then you have far too few real problems to deal with.

    Get some sorely needed perspective.

    Snowflakes, all of you.

    Sickening.

  113. Re:Happy Holidays! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CREIMER' SUBMISSIONS UPDATE:
    Note also that creimer is trying to regain karma by getting his submissions published as articles on /. so make sure to go to:
    https://slashdot.org/~cdreimer
    https://slashdot.org/~Anonymou...
    https://slashdot.org/~FatCashe...
    https://slashdot.org/~ILoveFat...
    https://slashdot.org/~IHateFat...
    https://slashdot.org/~IAteFatC...
    https://slashdot.org/~ITapeFat...
    https://slashdot.org/~IApeFatC...
    https://slashdot.org/~IPrayFat...
    https://slashdot.org/~FatCashe...
    and mod down his submissions as well. The great thing is that you don't even need mod points to mod down a submission, just click on the "minus" icon!

    Yes, believe it or not, creimer owns all the above sock puppet accounts. It is a mystery why Slashdot management tolerates it!

    creimer wrote:

    I don't bother with mod points. I'm doing something much more sinister. It took ten story submissions ? I'll have to double check the number ? to move cdreimer's karma from neutral to excellent without ever being exposed to the capricious mods. Mmmmmwwwwahahahahahahaha!

    https://slashdot.org/comments....

    Danger, Will Robinson, Danger! Creimy is posting more than 2 posts a day. Hurry! mod down otherwise /. will go to hell again!

    Note: you can mod down even if already at -1 to lower karma and to prevent lost /. users to accidentally mod up.

    creimer wrote:

    All you need to do is find a website with a permissive TOS, say, Slashdot, create a Python script to scrape your own comments, sprinkle Amazon affiliate links in various posts, and then re-post past links whenever possible. Won't be long before you start making "coffee money" each month.

    https://slashdot.org/comments....

    C.D. Reimer is a renowned Slashdot collaborator, as he puts it himself; "Because of the quality of my posts and my article submissions, I'm a highly rated commentator and moderator."

    But does anybody ever wondered what "C.D." stands for? Well, it stands for Creimy Dumpty of course!

    Creimy Dumpty sat on the wall,
    Creimy Dumpty had a great fall.
    All the king's horses
    And all the king's men
    Couldn't put Creimy Dumpty
    Together again.

    Creimy's siblings video and theme song, very realistic, especially the pants, just like Creimy's:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    With "Vice President Pence Vowing US Astronauts Will Return To the Moon", we are sure they will need miracle workers up there, here is what it would look like. Note that Creimy takes care of bringing a lot of food to the moon as depicted below:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    Creimy's real pictures:
    Before the sex change:
    https://ibb.co/cc7Ddw
    After the sex change:
    https://ibb.co/gVad65

    Creimy's "enterprise-level" chair, he talks about it all the time on slashdot:
    http://www.keynamics.com/image...

    Creimy's head, while his supervisor was talking to him, not with him, since it is impossible to do with Creimy:

  114. Re:The US is a Christian nation by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    If I remember the First Commandment aright, it's about having no deity but God or something like that. That doesn't imply that religion has to be incorporated into government. A person who worships God and has a secular government isn't violating the commandment.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  115. Re:The US is a Christian nation by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    The first commandment basically says that a faithful Jew (and Christian for that matter) should have one god, and only one god. It gets expanded into "and don't you dare not to" in some other parts. Deuteronomy 17 expands this to basically the requirement to kill anyone who dares to turn his back to this god. Deuteronomy 13 requires the same concerning the worship of other gods. And in Numbers 31 a town gets sacked because someone from that town came and tried to convert people.

    How exactly would you make this go along with "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;"?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  116. Re:Happy Holidays! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You must be a real sad arse no life cunt to be so obsessed with another poster.
    How about heaving your fat smelly arse out of moms basement and getting a real life?

  117. Re: Greetings are from the greeter’s point o by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You got mail on Christmas? Received some othe non-essential government service? Had your garbage collected? No, no you did not. Because in the US Christmas is a national holiday.

  118. jump in with both feet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So blowing up Muslims and wishing people happy holidays is ok if you love god enough first. He just looks the other way does he, no need to bother with all the rest then.

  119. Re:Greetings are selfish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FTFY.

    Your point of view is profoundly selfish and lacking a grasp on reality.

    We invented language to facilitate communication and your argument amounts to "he calls day X day Y, so just call it Y".

  120. Re:Happy Holidays! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what's your excuse for tracking *that* poster, Chris?

  121. I'm willing to bet by JohnFen · · Score: 1

    I'm willing to bet that the majority of Americans don't really care much one way or the other. The "Merry Christmas" vs "Happy Holidays" debate is a BS issue manufactured by a group of people who really enjoy pretending that they're being victimized.

  122. Re:The US is a Christian nation by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    If you're a Christian, go ahead and obey the Commandments. You can do that as an individual. The Commandments look to me like they want individual obedience. I'm not a Christian or Jew, and have no obligation to obey them, or pay attention to the Bible for that matter.

    It would be unconstitutional to establish the Commandments as law

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  123. Re:The US is a Christian nation by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    And that's exactly why the US are not a Christian nation.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  124. Re:Happy Holidays! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No. The people watching creimer are doing the site a huge service.

  125. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  126. Re:The US is a Christian nation by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    Well, yes. The US is not a Christian nation, although most of its citizens have normally been Christians. Have we been in violent agreement?

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  127. Re:The US is a Christian nation by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    The OP in this subthread was about the US being a Christian nation, which it is not. Yes, you can be a Christian in a secular country, there is no Christian law (that I'd know about at least) that requires you to only acknowledge governments that govern by the Bible (Mark 12:13-17 kinda implies that temporal governments and the secular, otherworldly kingdom Jesus promised are not linked and do not or even should not interfere with each other).

    So yes, we do actually agree. Being Christian in the US works, the US being Christian does not.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  128. Re: Happy Holidays! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He is a barely functional autist and nothing said on slashdot is going to change that. You are just picking on the fat weird kid.

  129. Re:The US is a Christian nation by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Or maybe there was deadlock between the different sects, and they were all afraid of the others getting the power - so they dropped it, no doubt with a plan B of sneaking something in if they got the opportunity

    It doesn't alter the fact that there's more overt religious symbolism around all the paraphernalia of government than you'd see in most other countries. Leaving aside the Vatican, maybe.

    Can you see an atheist president happening any time soon?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."