"I think Opera is honest" is not the point.
You're being asked to trust criminals not to figure out that Opera is probably an easy target, since they probably don't have a big security team and mandatory audits the way banks and large ecommerce sites do.
You're being asked to trust Opera to perform well in an area (security internal and external) that isn't their core competency.
So they think a 30-second commercial is long enough to disclose drug risks? Or anything else than a many-page highly technical report that assumes the reader knows all the implications of the implications? And when the risks are often not even well-known in the first place?
By their definitions,
* North Carolina is a "subversive organization" since it "conducts" its government through the use of force (via the police).
* Anyone who interacts with the global economy meets the "affiliated...indirectly" part of being under "foreign control".
* Anyone who hears a foreign government official quoted on the news and has their opinion influenced (no matter how slightly) meets the definition of a "foreign agent".
Is it really possible to make a prediction on black holes of this size, without a theory of quantum gravity? I'm no physicist, but I keep reading that the current theory of relativity is not usable at the quantum scale.
I'm happy with 2 buttons and a gesture utility (StrokeIt for Windows, xGestures for Mac OS X) especially when combined with a macro utility (QuicKeys for Mac OS X).
"The winning submission this year fooled 25% of judges"...
That's about the same number of people who still give President Bush their approval. The next 25% will be harder. Setting the prize threshold at 30% was a bad idea.
I'm using a great anti-spam product which so far is 100% effective. (It's not a filter; it's a throwaway-address solution.)
But I don't tell people about it, because it's not unbreakable, and if it ever becomes popular, the spammers will find a way around it.
This is one instance of a general phenomenon which is often discussed (vehemently;-) on Slashdot in the context of Linux: Security Through Unpopularity.
Another example: Please don't set up a company to distribute prebuilt MythTv boxes, or the FCC will wake up and try to regulate the commercial-skipping feature.
Slashdot Mirror
"I think Opera is honest" is not the point. You're being asked to trust criminals not to figure out that Opera is probably an easy target, since they probably don't have a big security team and mandatory audits the way banks and large ecommerce sites do. You're being asked to trust Opera to perform well in an area (security internal and external) that isn't their core competency.
So they think a 30-second commercial is long enough to disclose drug risks? Or anything else than a many-page highly technical report that assumes the reader knows all the implications of the implications? And when the risks are often not even well-known in the first place?
By their definitions, * North Carolina is a "subversive organization" since it "conducts" its government through the use of force (via the police). * Anyone who interacts with the global economy meets the "affiliated...indirectly" part of being under "foreign control". * Anyone who hears a foreign government official quoted on the news and has their opinion influenced (no matter how slightly) meets the definition of a "foreign agent".
Is it really possible to make a prediction on black holes of this size, without a theory of quantum gravity? I'm no physicist, but I keep reading that the current theory of relativity is not usable at the quantum scale.
Gestures will do the trick instead: StrokeIt for Windows and xGestures for Mac.
Will someone please give me "generous amounts of aid" so I can become "self-sufficient" too?
I'm happy with 2 buttons and a gesture utility (StrokeIt for Windows, xGestures for Mac OS X) especially when combined with a macro utility (QuicKeys for Mac OS X).
"The winning submission this year fooled 25% of judges"... That's about the same number of people who still give President Bush their approval. The next 25% will be harder. Setting the prize threshold at 30% was a bad idea.
So what? 60% of Americans also believe any number of crazy and contradictory things.
If they have banded together, they're not independent any more.
So the title should read, "Independent Cartoonists Give Up Independence for Success."
But I don't tell people about it, because it's not unbreakable, and if it ever becomes popular, the spammers will find a way around it.
This is one instance of a general phenomenon which is often discussed (vehemently ;-) on Slashdot in the context of Linux: Security Through Unpopularity.
Another example: Please don't set up a company to distribute prebuilt MythTv boxes, or the FCC will wake up and try to regulate the commercial-skipping feature.
(Remember Security Through Obsolescence?)