Slashdot Mirror


User: Crazieeman

Crazieeman's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
57
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 57

  1. Re:I am a US Postal Employee on U.S. Postal Service To Develop 'Intelligent Mail' · · Score: 1

    Haha, I picked that years ago, before working there. I don't even intend on being there long from now. And drop one of the e's. It generally depicts how I play in FPS games.

  2. Re:I am a US Postal Employee on U.S. Postal Service To Develop 'Intelligent Mail' · · Score: 1

    Note - The problem is the VOLUME of people that do not add St or Avenue.

    When I mentioned Kansas City metro as being frustrating. I MEANT IT! The number out of the facility itself is 72% of inter-KCmetro addressing drops off the suffix.

  3. Re:I am a US Postal Employee on U.S. Postal Service To Develop 'Intelligent Mail' · · Score: 2, Informative

    Wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong

    BIG Misconception - We don't give a damn about anything above the address line unless it is a business/non-person entity, or a building (by name).

    You could be John Smith Jr and get mail addressed as Michael Jackson. As long as the address is correct, it goes there.

    I said specifically, MOST of the problem lies with bad addressing. Granted things happen like letters getting stuck in mail trays at facilities and not being discovered for a few days, but putting mail through manual sorting because some dumbass neglected to add a St or Ave and we have to hunt down a solution is extremely time consuming.

  4. Re:I am a US Postal Employee on U.S. Postal Service To Develop 'Intelligent Mail' · · Score: 1

    Actually, yeah. That'd help a lot. Most printed mail gets through the software. We still get a lot of it, usually if the camera is dirty, but not nearly as much as handwritten mail.

  5. I am a US Postal Employee on U.S. Postal Service To Develop 'Intelligent Mail' · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The biggest problem with mail arriving late lies with people unable to write, unable to address, and unable to even stamp mailpieces properly.

    How the badly addressed mail process works in short:

    Mail is brought to the General Mail Facility, where it is run through machines that attempt to read the addresses. The software isn't perfect, quite a few aren't readable to it. The digital image is sent to various Remote Encoding Sites in which people (like me) try to decipher the addresses and input them properly. The information is sent back to the GMF, barcode is printed on, and the piece goes its way. If we cannot decipher it, the image gets rejected, and the mailpiece goes to manual sorting.

    Why it takes so long sometimes

    A tremendous amount of people do not know how to address. They do not include directionals. They do not include street suffixes. Transposition of zip codes, or downright incorrect ones in contrast to the city destination. If you want your mail to get somewhere fast, place a Zip+4 and make sure it is correct. That is the first number we look at.

    Directionals and suffixes are important. An especially frustrating case is the Kansas City metro area. Where there can be a 31st Street, Place, Avenue, Road, Circle, Court, Terrace. On top of that, North/South/East/West.

    Abbreviation of streets and cities is another frustrating issue. I work in Wichita, KS. We receive images from facilities in Kansas, Nebraska, South Dakota, North Dakota, Minnesota, Illinois, Wisconsin, Iowa, Missouri, and New York. Some street in Minneapolis with a long name that is routinely abbreviated by residents is foreign to those 800 miles away. Please write the street in full.

    Zip Codes. These are very important. The computers read these first. We read these first. An irritating tendancy for people in the northeast is to drop off the 0 in their 5 digit zips. This is especially true in Connecticut. Ever wonder why sometimes it really takes 7-9 days for something to go across town? Because its getting sent to Kansas City and run through the system before it gets straightened out and sent back.

    Lastly, bad handwriting. Try to be careful about 5 and S, Zero and O, and 9 and 4.

  6. Hey hey, to be fair to nVidia on FutureMark Confirms nVidia's Benchmark Cheating · · Score: 2, Informative

    ATI had their own cheating debacle a few years back.

    Quake 3 vs Quack 3

  7. Puffs of compressed air to seperate sticky pages? on Book-Digitizing Robots · · Score: -1, Redundant

    Guess that clinches it. We can finally digitize every Playboy printed.

  8. Re:Late breaking news! on NASA Sending Probe to Saturn · · Score: 1

    Its not the method or length of the period I'm pointing out, its how long ago it happened and poking fun at /.'s consistent way of putting out ancient information... in this case, years old.

  9. Late breaking news! on NASA Sending Probe to Saturn · · Score: 2, Funny

    There was a sudden mass extinction of dinosaurs. More on this as it develops.

  10. Ugh, this is 6 1/2 years old on NASA Sending Probe to Saturn · · Score: 4, Funny

    I knew /. liked to post old stuff, but its starting to get out of hand

  11. Re:What's good for the goose... on RIAA Plans Cyberwar Effort · · Score: 3, Funny

    Check out The RIAA's Website Unresponsive. Looks like we got the opening salvo.

  12. Re:dot matrix on Are Printers What They Used To Be? · · Score: 1

    I still use a perfectly functional 13 year old Citizen GSX-130 dot matrix. And I'm pretty sure the 21 year old Commodore printer would still work if I hadn't dismantled it years ago, hehe.

  13. Re:Questioning global warming on Still More on Global Warming · · Score: 1

    1940-1975 was about the same time when the "Global Warming Crowd" was the "Global Cooling Crowd" But because of junk science and twisted media, they are allowed to have it both ways.

  14. Re:This is a dupe on Build Your Own Sherman Tank · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Guess not. Maybe I should RTFA. I was thinking of another tank thingie. I didn't want that karma anyway.

  15. This is a dupe on Build Your Own Sherman Tank · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I know its a dupe, I remember seeing it, I just can't find the damn article in the archives [yet].

  16. Correction: on 65 CPUs From 100 MHz to 3066 MHz · · Score: 1

    Were running a webserver after we're through with it.

  17. Re:Simple enough... on RFID: The New Big Brother ? · · Score: 1

    I also vote for going to the bathroom more frequently.

  18. Re:Aha, so... on Voters News Service: What Went Wrong · · Score: 1

    Ahh, Slashdot. Flamebait through truth. Someone's got a political bone to pick to mod that one down.

  19. Re:But,,, on Build a Nuclear Fusion Reactor at Home · · Score: 2, Informative

    Tritium is highly radioactive.

    Deuterium is not.

    And they're the elements needed to undergo fusion, not byproducts.

    Byproduct of fusion of that sort is a neutron and a helium atom.

  20. Re:5 to 10 a day? on Jupiter Forecasts 50% Increase In Spam · · Score: 1

    IMs are already spammed to death. Load up ICQ, AIM, YIM, MSNIM - get spammed.

    I get more spam through messengers than email, oddly enough.

  21. Re:Since when? on BitKeeper EULA Forbids Working On Competition · · Score: 1

    Nobody.

    They probably write in special clauses that include transfer of ownership of soul and all worldly possessions etc etc.

  22. Re:Grammar, man, grammar on SETI to Upgrade Software, Telescope · · Score: 1

    But chicks apparently dig guys who try to define what the meaning of "is" is.

    So do we find some sort of happy medium?

  23. Re:Strong Evidence Found on SETI to Upgrade Software, Telescope · · Score: 1

    Parkes telescope.

    Bah, I cannot type at 5:30 in the morning.

  24. Re:Point that telescope this-a-way... on SETI to Upgrade Software, Telescope · · Score: 1

    2618? Nice, I'm up to 2794.

    However, I'm bringing several more systems online to work the data over as well, to give credit to myself =)

    I seriously can't wait to see the new Aussie telescope data, I spend a lot of time pouring over the data chunks I get out of Arecibo on my own, its really fascinating stuff.

  25. Re:Strong Evidence Found on SETI to Upgrade Software, Telescope · · Score: 4, Informative

    There is no logical reason why one part of the sky will have more chance of detecting a signal than any other.

    Yes there is. The Arecibo radio telescope is situated in the northern hemisphere, which can only view the outer arms of the Milky Way. Not only that, Aricebo can only sweep 30 degrees of the sky with 1 beam.

    Parkers is in the southern hemisphere, which can view the central dense mass (laymans' term - lots of freaking stars in the middle) of the Milky Way, and sweep 70 degrees of the sky with 13 beams.

    In other words, we went all over 30 degrees in the northern hemisphere, lets take a look at the highly populated (star-wise) section of the Milky Way in the unscanned southern hemisphere with a bigger and better telescope.

    Common sense, really.