Do not be stupid. Of course it is a valid defence.
Most viruses do not need an unsecure os, just a clueless person. Of course I do not think it was a virus, but *if* it was a virus, then of course it would be an excuse.
Well SGI is 64-bit, Apple is not (no 64-bit OS). SGI has many CAD programs, Apple has not. Apple is expensive, SGI is more expensive. Apple only got one mouse button, not good for cad.
I would guess that the opteron is better then both the mips and the G5.
Because there is a webserver in the linux kernel, I guess (I know it is a webserver in the kernel, but I do not know if your comments has to do with it).
You do not need a license to use GPL software, only to distribute it, the problem is not for the consumer, it is for the distributer that can not opt away their warranty and such things, i.e. you seem to be liable even if you give it away for free.
Now, as of 16 June, we also increased our claims amount to include all AIX-derived hardware, software
^^^^^^^^ and services, given that they are now - in deriving that revenue - on an unauthorised route for use of the software.
Yeah, but you can not use more than 2, 3 or 4 gig ram (per process, do not know much of mach/bsd/darwin, but I would guess the limmit is 2 gig)
And in no way can you use 64 bit pointers.
So what you do have is a nice 64-bit machine running in 32-bit mode at a speed of a budget athlon/p4. I myself do prefer PowerPC ISA, but hey, who program in assambly language today.
It has nothing to do with linux, it is the GNU environment...
Debian GNU/linux -- GNU on Linux Debian GNU/Hurd -- GNU on The Hurd Debian GNU/NetBSD -- GNU on NetBSD kernel NetBSD -- NetBSD userland on NetBSD
kernel
No, but we are talking about program licenses. I do not think documentation licenses need to fullfill free software guidelines.
Neither does the fsf, otherwise they would not have published the license. The GFDL has these "problematic" parts for a reason; resons that are not as valuable in software.
Is the question "is the documentation free software" sane?
I, personly think there is a difference, and I think the GFDL is okey for documentation, but NOT for software, maby we should have another license for music!
Slashdot Mirror
Do not be stupid. Of course it is a valid defence.
Most viruses do not need an unsecure os, just a clueless person. Of course I do not think it was
a virus, but *if* it was a virus, then of course it would be an excuse.
* Make terrorist attack
* Profit!!!
Finaly the killer reason for terrorism.
This is wrong.
Ignore him.
That still does not explain why they did not cut
out the first half houre. It was *bad* and
had *no* meaning
>Secondly its annoying that it naggs you if you save .doc format and tries to make you use its own
>in
>proprietary format.
It uses xml.
If you can handle the complex procedure of buying
a mouse, you surly do not need a mac.
In CPU power, yes, but MacOSX can only address
4 gig of ram (I would guess only 2 gig per prosess).
If you want a fast cpu use an intel or AMD depending
on what you want to do.
If you want a fast cpu that can address much mem
use an opteron or itanic (itanic is fast on
number crunching).
Can *what*?
Well SGI is 64-bit, Apple is not (no 64-bit OS).
SGI has many CAD programs, Apple has not.
Apple is expensive, SGI is more expensive.
Apple only got one mouse button, not good for cad.
I would guess that the opteron is better then both
the mips and the G5.
Because there is a webserver in the linux kernel, I guess (I know it is a webserver in the kernel, but
I do not know if your comments has to do with it).
You do not need a license to use GPL software,
only to distribute it, the problem is not for the
consumer, it is for the distributer that can not opt
away their warranty and such things, i.e. you seem
to be liable even if you give it away for free.
Computers are not needed for small kids.
It is better for them to learn some math,
or more important their language.
Wine may work for you, it is win32api on top of unix.
http://www.winehq.com/
Now, as of 16 June, we also increased our claims
amount to include all AIX-derived hardware, software
^^^^^^^^
and services, given that they are now - in deriving
that revenue - on an unauthorised route for use of
the software.
>> shouldn't it be BSD/GNU/Linux?
No, it should be GNU/Linux/BSD
as most of he bsd stuff is drivers.
Do you got ICC as a kernel module?
Yeah, but you can not use more than
2, 3 or 4 gig ram (per process, do
not know much of mach/bsd/darwin, but
I would guess the limmit is 2 gig)
And in no way can you use 64 bit pointers.
So what you do have is a nice 64-bit machine
running in 32-bit mode at a speed of a budget
athlon/p4. I myself do prefer PowerPC ISA,
but hey, who program in assambly language
today.
Yeah, but how do you use more than
4 gig on a 32-bit os?
Run GNU/linux?
OS, Web Server and Hosting History for sco.com
OS Server Last changed IP address Netblock Owner
Linux Apache/1.3.14 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.7.1 OpenSSL/0.9.6 PHP/4.3.2-RC 17-Jun-2003 216.250.140.112 NFT
Linux Apache/1.3.14 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.7.1 OpenSSL/0.9.6 PHP/4.0.3pl1 28-Nov-2002 216.250.140.112 NFT
Linux Apache/1.3.14 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.7.1 OpenSSL/0.9.6 PHP/4.0.3pl1 12-Aug-2002 216.250.140.125 NFT
SCO UNIX Netscape-FastTrack/2.01 26-Mar-2002 132.147.210.109 Caldera, Inc.
SCO UNIX unknown 24-Mar-2002 132.147.210.109 Caldera, Inc.
SCO UNIX Netscape-FastTrack/2.01 10-Oct-2001 132.147.210.109 Caldera, Inc.
SCO UNIX Netscape-Enterprise/2.01 30-Mar-2001 209.1.8.14 Cable & Wireless
SCO UNIX unknown 29-Mar-2001 209.1.8.14 Cable & Wireless
SCO UNIX Netscape-Enterprise/2.01 23-Dec-2000 209.1.8.14 Cable & Wireless
SCO UNIX unknown 22-Dec-2000 209.1.8.14 Cable & Wireless
Use bzip2, it is usaly better...
BNU religion, it boots the Hurd!
i.e. it is the one and only bootloader...
>Since when has Debian been ok with BSD licenses?
Like FSF, Allways, BSD is as free as you can get it.
It has nothing to do with linux, it is the GNU environment...
Debian GNU/linux -- GNU on Linux
Debian GNU/Hurd -- GNU on The Hurd
Debian GNU/NetBSD -- GNU on NetBSD kernel
NetBSD -- NetBSD userland on NetBSD
kernel
No, but we are talking about program licenses.
I do not think documentation licenses need to
fullfill free software guidelines.
Neither does the fsf, otherwise they would not
have published the license. The GFDL has these
"problematic" parts for a reason; resons that
are not as valuable in software.
Is the question "is the documentation free
software" sane?
I, personly think there is a difference, and
I think the GFDL is okey for documentation,
but NOT for software, maby we should have
another license for music!
Do you now get what I mean?
I think you are totaly wrong.
That is why I like debian.