I do not like MacOSX, if I had a G5 system I would install NetBSD and Linux on it. Its like asking why would any one put Linux on a PC; well for the normal person, Windows is the normal choise(?) as is MacOSX on Macs.
What's wrong with it is that some deeply religious people consider it a symbol of evil, and make stupid assumptions about people using the logo or wearing it on t-shirts etc., such as believing them to be satanists. It might not have been a problem if people knew what BSD was, but for most people "NetBSD" is as meaningful as a string of random characters.
They had some on aceshardware.com for a while
ago. The Athlon64 did better when compiled
to a 64 bit binary. Most of the gain is that
you get more registers, not that you can handle 64
bit registers. They got some more speed when
using the NUMA support in the kernel (Some of the tests where SMP tests).
Jews are less "Jews" than Palestinians because they have been living in Europe and US for so long.
If it is religion you are talking about, then Israel is higly anti-semitic against black Jews.
Anti-Zionism has nothing to do with rasism at all. In fact I do know Anti-Zionist Jews. You should not mix the meaning of words and how stupid people use them. I do not think it is a good idea to form a country because of religion.
The fact is that it is the same people having three religions (jewish, christian and muslim).
So if we take God out of the picture they are all the same.
Slashdot Mirror
NFS has no security, i.e. you have to trust the network.
You should use AFS, not NFS.
Though I have had problems with AFS on OSX,
files saved from Illustrator gets a size of 0
if they are saved over AFS. This is *not* good.
Its free, it works, and you are used to it.
Have AFS working?
Not that fun getting zero byte files when run over AFS?
You get a single AMD64 for *much* less.
No! It is only Microsoft that is eeeeevil when
they boundle software with hardware.
Its a matter of taste I would say.
I do not like MacOSX, if I had a G5 system
I would install NetBSD and Linux on it.
Its like asking why would any one put Linux
on a PC; well for the normal person, Windows
is the normal choise(?) as is MacOSX on Macs.
Say that we define "immediatly" as less than half a second.
Then you are saying that you get 8 times faster
programs when compiling for 686???
Do you actually think that gcc will be 3 times faster?
Or that an SQL query will be 3 times faster?
That is simply not true, *especially* when a great deal of the load time is due to the harddrive.
Where did you get that information?
The 386 did 64 bit math.
I tried once to learn some, but the pronunciation is damn hard. You are the first to comment on it though.
No, I still belive they are able to fire them in less than 5 minutes.
Well than we should ask Intel, don't you think?
And a "secure" fish, I guess that is why the
encryption algorithm is called so.
Its like Linux.
2.1 is dev version for 2.2
2.3 is dev version for 2.4
2.5 is dev version for 2.6 (some wanted it to be 3.0)
I.e. odd numbers are dev versions and even number
are pruduktion releses.
It is based on the BSD kernel *and* Mach.
MacOSX uses Mach more like a HAL and then BSD
kernel on top.
Unlike Hurd it does not use the Mach kernel as
a microkernel, instead all drivers, filesystems
and network code is in the kernel.
It *allso* uses the BSD userland.
You where right. It is based on the BSD kernel.
It allso uses som Mach code.
So has Microsoft. Using a lot of BSD code, and even some GPL, but when it is Microsoft it is called *stealing*.
It is easyer to install debian.
1.3 is the dev version of 2.0
"...but they also don't become obsolete AS quickly..."
Because time is relative?
They had some on aceshardware.com for a while ago. The Athlon64 did better when compiled to a 64 bit binary. Most of the gain is that you get more registers, not that you can handle 64 bit registers. They got some more speed when using the NUMA support in the kernel (Some of the tests where SMP tests).
No.
Palestinians and Jews are the *same* people.
Jews are less "Jews" than Palestinians because
they have been living in Europe and US for so long.
If it is religion you are talking about, then
Israel is higly anti-semitic against black Jews.
Anti-Zionism has nothing to do with rasism at all.
In fact I do know Anti-Zionist Jews. You should
not mix the meaning of words and how stupid people use them. I do not think it is a good idea to form
a country because of religion.
The fact is that it is the same people having
three religions (jewish, christian and muslim).
So if we take God out of the picture they are all
the same.
Saddam's army attacked US troops, *not* peacekeepers.
I *have* heard of the 9/11 attack, It
was not Afganistan. It was a group of
mostly Saudi people, not by a nation.
US was not retaliating Panama.
9/11 30 years ago. Ironic is it not?