Slashdot Mirror


NetBSD Announces Logo Design Competition

jschauma writes "The NetBSD Project has announced that it has launched an international competition for the creation of a new logo. There is a cash prize of US $100.00 for the winning entry. The successful logo will also have wide exposure, featuring in all NetBSD material including, but not limited to; the NetBSD.org web site, software media, apparel, and business systems. The competition will close on February 29, 2004. The rules of the competition, submission information and the design brief can be found in the official announcement, which has already spawned some discussion on the netbsd-advocacy and current-users MailingLists." The announcement notes that the current logo is "too complicated... hard to reproduce... [and] has negative cultural, and religious ramifications."

503 comments

  1. devil? by nempo · · Score: 1, Interesting

    What's wrong with the devil ? Paint the word 'NetBSD' on his belly/chest and we're all set.

    --
    --- No, english is not my mother tongue.
    1. Re:devil? by Daengbo · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I suggest the currently skewered and dying Devil thrashing like a dolphin in a fishing net. Gets the entire concept across, donchaknow?

    2. Re:devil? by vidarh · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with it is that some deeply religious people consider it a symbol of evil, and make stupid assumptions about people using the logo or wearing it on t-shirts etc., such as believing them to be satanists. It might not have been a problem if people knew what BSD was, but for most people "NetBSD" is as meaningful as a string of random characters.

    3. Re:devil? by badger.foo · · Score: 1

      It's a deamon, actually.

      One example of what can happen can be found at http://www.hut.fi/~hynde/humor/DevilStory.html (it's also in Greg Lehey's CFBSD, btw)

      --
      -- That grumpy BSD guy - http://bsdly.blogspot.com/
    4. Re:devil? by lederhosen · · Score: 2, Insightful
      What's wrong with it is that some deeply religious people consider it a symbol of evil, and make stupid assumptions about people using the logo or wearing it on t-shirts etc., such as believing them to be satanists. It might not have been a problem if people knew what BSD was, but for most people "NetBSD" is as meaningful as a string of random characters.
      And? I do not think we should care for fanatics.
    5. Re:devil? by mirko · · Score: 1

      You could also make him a nude fellow so that Ceren might actually have to imitate him in forthcoming BSD con :)

      OK, jokes apart, I'd suggest removing his trident and changing his color and we'll get a nice boy.

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    6. Re:devil? by arcanumas · · Score: 1
      wtf?! I made a completely valid point here and it gets modded redundant?

      It seems to me that everything that is wrong in Slashdot (moderation abuses, trolls ,etc) is multiplied in the BSD section.

      --
      Slashdot Sig. version 0.1alpha. Use at your own risk.
    7. Re:devil? by diersing · · Score: 2, Funny
      True, I've noticed the Duke Blue Devils and New Jersey Devils are also aflicted by this terrible religious ignorance. Where for some reason the Anaheim Angles continue to prosper under His umbrella of tolerance and understanding.

      I can totally understand updating or changing a logo to get attention or even seperate NetBSD from the other distros, but if anyone changes a logo because of stupid assumptions then I must abandon it based on principle. I fear deeply computer-illetirate people might view find it a symbol of evil because it runs on the a computer it must be Microsoft.

    8. Re:devil? by chadm1967 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yes, you're correct. To us "Geeks" and "Techies", it's a deamon. To others, that know nothing of BSD, it's a devil.

    9. Re:devil? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about this for a logo?

    10. Re:devil? by AndrewRUK · · Score: 1

      Maybe because the answer to your question was in the Slashdot story. You didn't even need to RTFA to discover that "The announcement notes that the current logo is "too complicated... hard to reproduce... [and] has negative cultural, and religious ramifications.""

    11. Re:devil? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how about this then?

      www.luserfriendly.org

    12. Re:devil? by theonetruekeebler · · Score: 2, Funny

      Because when people see a picture of Bill Gates, they pretty much assume they're getting a Microsoft product.

      --
      This is not my sandwich.
    13. Re:devil? by SpaceRook · · Score: 1

      The current logo isn't just the devil, it's a picture of several devils lifting up a pitch-fork in a style like the Iwo Jima memorial. Jeez, I wonder why some people would find that offensive? Besides, it is too complicated to reproduce (all that shading) and has no color. The computers they are standing on look ugly, too.

    14. Re:devil? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... And to those of us who can spell, it's a daemon.

      HTH, HAND. :)

    15. Re:devil? by Artifakt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not just deeply religious people, or computer illiterate people, or people who leap quickly to stupid assumptions that make this logo a problem. First, the name isn't clear or catchy enough to be widely recognized, so the devil image becomes all most people have to go on. Imagine running across the person wearing a Duke Blue Devils sweatshirt, but the First word is "Forxgnarb", you've never heard the term before, there's no thing or place named that anywhere nearby, and when you ask what the blue devil stands for, the first things you hear are all about vaguely political issues, as seen by some small minority organization. How stupid is it really, to jump to the conclusion the sweatshirt wearer is in some cult?
      NetBSD isn't going to get brand recognition from the word, just like Adidas didn't build brand recognition just on the word. It sounds too odd for that. Like Adidas, it's competing against words that have more relevance to the area (Microsoft sounded like computer stuff way back when it started, with words like software already paving the way for recognition - Nike is the greek goddess of victory, as most Olympic atheletes know).
      If anything, the cuteness of the logo works against it more than an association with evil. It's a Warner Bros toon style devil. That's already saying "fine for home users, but would you trust a business to it?".

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    16. Re:devil? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am a techy and I call it a devil
      oh no a geek calling it a devil, Call the national guard

    17. Re:devil? by boog3r · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Quick nitpik - it is "Athena Nike" that is the Greek goddess of victory. Athena took a couple other forms too, like "Athena Parthenos".

      --
      signatures are for fools with hands
    18. Re:devil? by christopherfinke · · Score: 1
      I do not think we should care for fanatics.
      That's the same reason given by different organizations for Ogg Vorbis not being supported by many of the current MP3 players and popular software not being ported to Linux: We ARE the fanatics.
    19. Re:devil? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Forxgnarb" - COOL ! That'd make on HELL of a new logo!!!

    20. Re:devil? by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but parthenos would be a silly name for a shoe.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
  2. Looking for a politicly correct logo? by HanzoSpam · · Score: 5, Funny

    "too complicated... hard to reproduce... [and] has negative cultural, and religious ramifications."

    So political correctness has made it to open source.

    Oy!

    --

    Progressivism: Parasites helping parasites to help themselves - to other people's stuff.
    1. Re:Looking for a politicly correct logo? by ads.osdn.com.blocked · · Score: 0

      No. It just plain sux.

      --

      public final transient String president = DUBYA;
    2. Re:Looking for a politicly correct logo? by LarsWestergren · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      So political correctness has made it to open source.

      Political correctness is mostly associated with the "left". I'd say most people who react negatively to an image of a devil are conservative Christians. I have been yelled at for wearing a Monster Magnet t-shirt. It wasn't even "satanic", it was a stylized bull head on a flaming background. I read an anecdote here on Slashdot about someone who was in the American Deep South on holidays and was thrown out of a store for wearing a BSD shirt, and veiled hints that he had better leave town.

      But I guess its only bad if us darn liber-uhls do it, eh?

      --

      Being bitter is drinking poison and hoping someone else will die

    3. Re:Looking for a politicly correct logo? by HanzoSpam · · Score: 0

      Political correctness is mostly associated with the "left". I'd say most people who react negatively to an image of a devil are conservative Christians.

      I take you assume that because I'm not a liberal, I must be a conservative Christian.

      Hello? There's more than two ways of looking at the world. It isn't a binary proposition.

      But I guess its only bad if us darn liber-uhls do it, eh?

      Perhaps you could point out where I said or implied that?

      --

      Progressivism: Parasites helping parasites to help themselves - to other people's stuff.
    4. Re:Looking for a politicly correct logo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello? There's more than two ways of looking at the world. It isn't a binary proposition.
      Damn liberal

    5. Re:Looking for a politicly correct logo? by quantum+bit · · Score: 3, Funny

      I read an anecdote here on Slashdot about someone who was in the American Deep South on holidays and was thrown out of a store for wearing a BSD shirt, and veiled hints that he had better leave town.

      The store owner probably mistook the BSD daemon for the New Jersey Devils logo. Likely, the Stars were playing the Devils that week and that's why there was such a strong reaction.

    6. Re:Looking for a politicly correct logo? by DG · · Score: 4, Interesting

      True story:

      Driving south on I-69 heading to Indianapolis, pull off to get something to eat at the typical "McDonalds on an exit" that are scattered all over the US.

      My McMeal rings up as $6.66. Teenaged girl behind counter flips out, and insists that the food is free. When I try and tell her it's no big deal; I'm not afraid of a number she gets REAL upset and flat-out REFUSES to take my money.

      Rather than cause more of a scene that was already developing, I accepted, and her relief was palpable - like my immortal soul had been just snatched back from the firey jaws of Satan himself.

      Some people REALLY believe this devil shit is BAD.

      DG

      --
      Want to learn about race cars? Read my Book
    7. Re:Looking for a politicly correct logo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oy!

      I am deeply offended at this over-the-top portrayal of the Jewish people as Yiddish-spewing whiners.

      Now... what were you saying?

    8. Re:Looking for a politicly correct logo? by Kosgrove · · Score: 2, Funny
      My McMeal rings up as $6.66. Teenaged girl behind counter flips out, and insists that the food is free. When I try and tell her it's no big deal; I'm not afraid of a number she gets REAL upset and flat-out REFUSES to take my money.


      You wouldn't happen to remember what you ordered, would you? I eat live for free and just travel around the bible belt....
    9. Re:Looking for a politicly correct logo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Follow a supernatural tribal religion, and they replace your brain with cabbage.

    10. Re:Looking for a politicly correct logo? by ninejaguar · · Score: 1
      You were incorrectly moderated as Flamebait.

      If anyone gets the parent as a meta-moderated post, please rate the moderation as unfair. The poster is on subject regarding the article, and has corrected a misconception appropriately.

      = 9J =

    11. Re:Looking for a politicly correct logo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A Great Daemon Story
      --------------------

      Linda Branagan is an expert on daemons. She has a T-shirt that sports
      the daemon in tennis shoes that appears on the cover of the 4.3BSD manuals
      and _The Design and Implementation of the 4.3BSD UNIX Operating System_ by
      S. Leffler, M. McKusick, M. Karels, J. Quarterman, Addison-Wesley
      Publishing Company, Reading, MA 1989.

      She tells the following story about wearing the 4.3BSD daemon T-shirt:

      Last week I walked into a local "home style cookin' restaurant/watering
      hole" in Texas to pick up a take-out order. I spoke briefly to the
      waitress behind the counter, who told me my order would be done in a few
      minutes.
      So, while I was busy gazing at the farm implements hanging on the walls,
      I was approached by two ``natives.'' These guys might just be the original
      Texas rednecks.
      ``Pardon us, ma'am. Mind if we ask you a question?''
      Well, people keep telling me that Texans are real friendly, so I nodded.
      ``Are you a Satanist?''
      Well, at least they didn't ask me if I liked to party.
      ``Uh, no, I can't say that I am.''
      ``Gee, ma'am. Are you sure about that?'' they asked.
      I put on my biggest, brightest Dallas Cowboys cheerleader smile and
      said, ``No, I'm positive. The closest I've ever come to Satanism is
      watching Geraldo.''
      ``Hmmm. Interesting. See, we was just wondering why it is you have the
      lord of darkness on your chest there.''
      I was this close to slapping one of them and causing a scene -- then I
      stopped and noticed the shirt I happened to be wearing that day. Sure
      enough, it had a picture of a small, devilish-looking creature that has for
      some time now been associated with a certain operating system. In this
      particular representation, the creature was wearing sneakers.
      They continued: ``See, ma'am, we don't exactly appreciate it when people
      show off pictures of the devil. Especially when he's lookin' so
      friendly.''
      These idiots sounded terrifyingly serious.
      Me: ``Oh, well, see, this isn't really the devil, it's just, well, it's
      sort of a mascot.
      Native: ``And what kind of football team has the devil as a mascot?''
      Me: ``Oh, it's not a team. It's an operating -- uh, a kind of
      computer.''
      I figured that an ATM machine was about as much technology as these guys
      could handle, and I knew that if I so much as uttered the word ``UNIX'' I
      would only make things worse.
      Native: ``Where does this satanical computer come from?''
      Me: ``California. And there's nothing satanical about it really.''
      Somewhere along the line here, the waitress noticed my predicament --
      but these guys probably outweighed her by 600 pounds, so all she did was
      look at me sympathetically and run off into the kitchen.
      Native: ``Ma'am, I think you're lying. And we'd appreciate it if you'd
      leave the premises now.''
      Fortunately, the waitress returned that very instant with my order, and
      they agreed that it would be okay for me to actually pay for my food before
      I left. While I was at the cash register, they amused themselves by
      talking to each other.
      Native #1: ``Do you think the police know about these devil computers?''
      Native #2: ``If they come from California, then the FBI oughta know
      about 'em.''
      They escorted me to the door. I tried one last time: ``You're really
      blowing this all out of proportion. A lot of people use this `kind of
      computers.' Universities, researchers, businesses. They're actually very
      useful.''
      Big, big, BIG mistake. I should have guessed at what came next.
      Native: ``Does the government use these devil computers?''
      Me: ``Yes.''
      Another BIG boo-boo.
      Native: ``And does the government pay for 'em? With our tax dollars?''
      I decided that it was time to jump ship.
      Me: ``No. Nope. Not at all. Your tax dollars never entered the
      picture at al

    12. Re:Looking for a politicly correct logo? by trippinonbsd · · Score: 1

      This probably only applys in a few states w/ either the same sales tax or no sales tax, but still worth a shot.

    13. Re:Looking for a politicly correct logo? by homerjs42 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I once paid Jesus $6.66 for my lunch. Even more ironically it was right after church too :-)
      And some of us think "this devil shit" is bad, but aren't afraid of a number showing up on our bill for lunch.

    14. Re:Looking for a politicly correct logo? by gc8005 · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of when the Pope visited Phoenix. He spoke in only of the largest venues in Phoenix - Sun Devil Stadium at Arizona State University. ASU's mascot is a devil (a bit like the BSD logo). Sparky (the devil) was covered up for the Pope's visit. http://www.doney.net/aroundaz/celebrity/johnpaulii _pope.htm

    15. Re:Looking for a politicly correct logo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you mean? Open source has always been about political correctness.

    16. Re:Looking for a politicly correct logo? by lylfyl · · Score: 4, Funny

      How unusual was your order?

      I can imagine that poor girl having a breakdown if $6.66 popped up everytime someone ordered something common.

      Customer#1: "I'll have 2 Big Macs and a large Coke."
      Cashier: "That'll be $6.66. AAAH! EVIL! Your meal is free."
      Customer#2: "Cool! I'll have 2 Big Macs and a large Coke, too."
      Cashier: "AAAH! It's free!"
      Customer#3: "I'll have what they're having.."
      Cashier: "AAAH! My soul! It's burning!"

    17. Re:Looking for a politicly correct logo? by LarsWestergren · · Score: 1

      Thanks, glad you agreed. I guess the last sentence could have been formulated in a less confrontative manner though. I got a bit annoyed at the .sig of the parent poster with its talk of beating up liberals.

      Still, I have karma to spend. :-)

      Cheers,
      Lars

      --

      Being bitter is drinking poison and hoping someone else will die

    18. Re:Looking for a politicly correct logo? by nuintari · · Score: 1

      Except that I'd be more afraid of some Marine vets from WWII seeing the current NetBSD logo. Its not the devils that would bother most people, but the fact that the action of raising the flag in the manner depicted is reminiscent of the flag raising on Mount Surabachi(spell?) during the Battle of Iwo Jima. Not only was it one of the bloodiest battles of the war, but many marines consider that pose as the embodiment of the Corp's finest hour. From what I know of the USMC, devils or not, no logo in any form should take any inspiration, for any reason, from this now famous picture and statue. As far as any marine is concerned, this would be sacrilage. I should know, I grew up with one.

      Time for dinner, no time for spell check!

      --

      --Nuintari

      slashdot : where an opinion can be wrong.

    19. Re:Looking for a politicly correct logo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Canada it's a Double Quarter Punder (w/cheese) combo, Super Size fries and small coke.

      mmmmmmmmmmmm. grease.

    20. Re:Looking for a politicly correct logo? by babbage · · Score: 1

      Ya know, now that you mention it, it occurs to me that three of Florida's most pleasant major exports are [a] supermarket tabloids, [b] email spam, and [c] telemarketing calls.

      I wonder how much having a 666-nnnn telephone number helped keep down the flood of telemarkers calling my house before the state & federal do not call lists. I can just picture the Bible Belt call center staff now -- they have to make however many dozens of calls per hour, they've got a huge list of numbers to work with, and then they get to the batch with the creepy yankees with their devil phone numbers.... "maybe I'll just skip down the list a bit...".

      I'm sure it happened at least some of the time -- as you say, fundamentalism and superstititious numerology seem to go hand and hand, and even in heathen New England I meet people surprised that I wasn't spooked to accept a 666 prefix from the phone company... :-)

    21. Re:Looking for a politicly correct logo? by cms108 · · Score: 1

      Intel processor speeds:

      (something along the lines of)

      25
      33
      50
      66
      100
      133
      166
      200
      233
      266
      30 0
      333
      blah blah blah
      600
      667 .... hmmm....

      also see other coment somewhere about not using "sex" prefix for 80686

    22. Re:Looking for a politicly correct logo? by LarsWestergren · · Score: 1

      I take you assume that because I'm not a liberal, I must be a conservative Christian.

      No, I wasn't talking about you, I was talking about "people in general".

      Hello? There's more than two ways of looking at the world. It isn't a binary proposition.

      Right, a lecture on keeping an open mind and tolerance from a guy who jokes about physical voilence against me in his sig. Fuck you and the high horse you rode in on.

      --

      Being bitter is drinking poison and hoping someone else will die

  3. angels? by hyphun · · Score: 1, Funny

    so now we're going to change it to angels, i hope?
    OR... Winnie the pooh!
    OR... http://www.sco.com/images/sco_logo_blue.gif

    1. Re:angels? by turgid · · Score: 1
      so now we're going to change it to angels, i hope?

      I'm sure the church has that copyrighted or trademarked or something.

    2. Re:angels? by perly-king-69 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      So now we're going to change it to angels, i hope?

      Wasn't the devil just a corrupted angel anyway?

      --

      --
      This sig is inoffensive.

    3. Re:angels? by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

      so now we're going to change it to angels, i hope?

      No. That would offend the Pagans and the Satanists.

    4. Re:angels? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually prefer a circile of clerics in robes with torches beating bill gates to death.... but I'm doubting that will be accepted.

    5. Re:angels? by E-Rock · · Score: 1

      Or an angel unwilling to blindly serve his creator and master. Remember, Angels are God's slaves. They are not gifted with free will.

    6. Re:angels? by dasunt · · Score: 2, Informative

      According to Christian Theology and Mythology, Lucifer (Son of Morning) was God's right hand man, basically the most capable and intelligent angel.

      Then he rebelled and took a 1/3rd of the angels with him.

  4. $100? by perly-king-69 · · Score: 4, Funny

    There is a cash prize of US $100.00 for the winning entry.

    With the dollar going the way it is it'll cost me more to bank the cheque than it is worth over here!

    --

    --
    This sig is inoffensive.

    1. Re:$100? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flamebait? .... I guess it was an upset american who marked this posting that way... I was thinking the exact sam thing... Although, if I had a chance in hell to win, there's probably some good way of donating it to some US-based charity that can do something useful with the check. //fatal

    2. Re:$100? by perly-king-69 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Joke! Don't be so touchy.

      But, in 2001 $100 would have bought me 71. Today it'll buy me 55, which I reckon to be about 1/3rd less.

      --

      --
      This sig is inoffensive.

    3. Re:$100? by mirko · · Score: 1

      well, 100$ would cover the price of 16 months of goatse.cx registartion (75$/year).
      The problem is .CX doesn't want it to be resolved again.

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    4. Re:$100? by TheMidget · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      With the dollar going the way it is it'll cost me more to bank the cheque than it is worth over here!

      The cheque will still make nice kindling for the fireplace. Or, if you don't mind its scruffiness, you can still use it for a more obvious use, demonstrating your opinion of the American economy...

    5. Re:$100? by metulj · · Score: 1

      The American Dollar is weak. This is a fact. Get over it. It is a strategy to ramp up US exports to Europe and Asia, by the crack economist Bush. It's called Voodoo Economics, acc to his father and it has NEVER worked.

    6. Re:$100? by ericspinder · · Score: 2
      The American Dollar is weak...It's called Voodoo Economics,...
      Bush (the senior) called Reagan's Trickle down economics "Voodoo Economics", and that had nothing to do with exchange rates, directly. It was more about tax cuts for the wealthy, he also advocated spending cuts to match the tax cuts, but that legislation failed, and the defict sky-rocketed.

      However, every action of a economy, and political structure does have impact on the exchange rate. The (internationally) unpopular war in Iraq, the soaring defict, the stagnate economy, growing confidence in the euro, etc, etc, are all factors in the weakening dollar. International currency exchange rates and their economic impact is [well] very complex. Some favor a 'weaker' dollar, others a 'stronger' one.

      For example, American Exports are now cheaper, but our imports are now more expensive, A student could write a thesis just on that fact alone. One consideration [there are hundreds] is that, consumers only have so much money to spend, and most consumer products don't even have an American manufacturing company in the market. Another effect is the "local currency price" for a foreign investor of the American Stock Market, billions have been lost by these investors (but unless they believe it will just get weaker, now is the time for them to buy).

      Personally, I think that the dollar was a little high, and needed to get knocked down some, but what do I know, I am just a programmer.

      Anyways, $100 is like "chump change", not that I would turn it down, but it is a small chance of even "winning", so it's unlikely to get any serious competetion (read: art students), and mostly be a contest for bragging rights.

      --
      The grass is only greener, if you don't take care of your own lawn.
    7. Re:$100? by TheMidget · · Score: 1

      Modded down as Flamebait, how appropriate! Good to know that I've got some karma to burn!

    8. Re:$100? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know whay you were intending by that picture, but that definatley isn't american money that guy is burning. $500 bills haven't been printed since 1934, and from that picture looks nothing like anything printed in the US.

    9. Re:$100? by nicolas.e · · Score: 1

      These are two 500 FF (french francs) bills. They were burnt by the french singer Serges Gainsbourg on a TV show.

      It caused a big scandal in France a few years ago.

  5. Looks fine to me! by CaptainAlbert · · Score: 3, Insightful

    > too complicated...

    for whom? for what?

    > hard to reproduce...

    == hard to forge...

    > [and] has negative cultural, and religious
    > ramifications.

    No, it doesn't. It's a cartoon devil. It doesn't offend anyone. Really. Unless you're one of those freaks who won't let their kids watch Scoobie-doo because it's got ghosts in it. Trust me. If it were hanging on a cross or wearing a turban, *then* maybe it'd need changing.

    Sheesh!

    --
    These sigs are more interesting tha
    1. Re:Looks fine to me! by dave420 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      It's a devil. Devils are evil. Cartoon or not, it's a symbol with evil connotations, which some people could feasibly find offensive.

      For any sort of organisation to have a logo which could cause offense isn't a good start.

      After all, with your logic, a swastika is just a bunch of lines... how could that offend anyone?

    2. Re:Looks fine to me! by KillerLoop · · Score: 4, Insightful

      *not* the BSD devil, check out the link given in the story.

    3. Re:Looks fine to me! by Yorrike · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What's wrong with wearing a turban?

      --

      Looks can be deceiving. Or CAN they?

    4. Re:Looks fine to me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Unless you're one of those freaks

      How are they going to run xBSD or Linux without a few daemons? (Perhaps the archaic spelling fooled them?)

    5. Re:Looks fine to me! by Tellarin · · Score: 1


      regarding the swastika it was a symbol of Love and Life and a symbol to protect against evil

      that's precisely why the Nazis used that, so even a "good" symbol can now represent evil

      what about an supposed "evil" symbol like a devil (ok, ok, it's a daemon)?

      of course some people will fill offended

    6. Re:Looks fine to me! by AllUsernamesAreGone · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "It doesn't offend anyone."

      Okay, I challenge you to wear a BSD t-shirt and walk around several south-US states (texas would be a good one).

      Trust me, those religious nuts will have you arrested. And bring the asbestos underwear because they'll probably try burning you as a devil worshiper...

      IMO the devils logo is good, the more religious nuts it pisses off the better - maybe someday they'll realise how rediculous they sound. Although I doubt it.

      (/me wonders how long it'll take for this to get modded as flamebait.. meh, I've got karma spare..)

    7. Re:Looks fine to me! by Ubi_NL · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, it doesn't. It's a cartoon devil. It doesn't offend anyone. Really. Unless you're one of those freaks who won't let their kids watch Scoobie-doo because it's got ghosts in it. Trust me. If it were hanging on a cross or wearing a turban, *then* maybe it'd need changing.

      It has nothing to do with the devils. It's a cartoon of a statue in which american soldiers are planting an american flag. That makes it culturally biased.

      Although you have to be an idiot to be offended by it, loads of people (especially in some 'liberated' countries) are suchs type of idiots and there is no reason to get into this unnecessary type of trouble

      --

      If an experiment works, something has gone wrong.
    8. Re:Looks fine to me! by Bish.dk · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, it doesn't. It's a cartoon devil. It doesn't offend anyone. Really. Unless you're one of those freaks who won't let their kids watch Scoobie-doo because it's got ghosts in it.

      Reminds me of this story featuring a poor sysadmin's experience in Hick Town, Texas.

    9. Re:Looks fine to me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It's the fact that they are taking an event from U.S. history and displaying the soldiers as devils. If this were a political cartoon one could take it to mean that the U.S. are a bunch of evil devils. This is what they meant by cultural ramifications, or at least I'm assuming that's what they meant.

    10. Re:Looks fine to me! by adrianbaugh · · Score: 5, Funny

      > It's a devil.

      It's not, it's a daemon. A friendly helper that lives inside your computer serving websites, answering your spam and being fingered. Really, if I had to put up with all that it'd be enough to make me grow horns and a tail!

      --
      "'I pass the test,' she said. 'I will diminish, and go into the West, and remain Galadriel.'"
      - JRR Tolkien.
    11. Re:Looks fine to me! by asm0deu5 · · Score: 1

      He's talking about a demon wearing a turban as being potentially offensive to some.

    12. Re:Looks fine to me! by dipipanone · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's a devil. Devils are evil.

      Perhaps they might be if they existed outside of the fevered imaginations of religious fundamentalists, but as they are, at most, a metaphor it's hard to see why rational people would be bothered. And why would you try and accomodate the prospective rantings of irrational people? There's no predicting what those could be.

      Cartoon or not, it's a symbol with evil connotations, which some people could feasibly find offensive.

      Rather like the SCO trademark, you mean?

      After all, with your logic, a swastika is just a bunch of lines.

      Not really. A swastika is the symbol of an organization that verifiably eradicated six million jews and similar numbers of gay people, Romany gypsies, etc.

      When people can point to similar empirically verifiable actions done in the name of a little red man with horns, a pitchfork and a pointed tail, I might take this argument seriously.

      Did anyone ever see that episode of Jackass, where a guy dressed in a red devil suit was being assaulted by passers-by, who clearly thought that by punching a guy in a red suit, they were doing battle with the true Prince of Darkness?

      Perhaps Net-Bsd should substitute the face of Saddam or Osama for the devil? That should really get the product shifting off the shelves. (OK then, the FTP servers for the pedants out there.)

    13. Re:Looks fine to me! by Ashtead · · Score: 5, Insightful
      The single cute "cartoon devil" (whose name may or may not be Chuck) that we see here on slashdot as the section logo for BSD, and which is really meant to be a visualization of a daemon, is not what's under consideration here. As a symbol for BSD, it is about as well-known and effective as Tux is for Linux.

      However, these angry troll/devil hybrids in sneakers trampling over what appears to be a lot of desktop computer hardware however, is evidently what is found in need of an update.

      I can list a few likely reasons for changing this, off the top of my head:

      One thing is that devils is a somewhat religious device, not found in all religions.

      Then there is the aesthetics of this. The logo is just kinda ugly. These guys are not all that different in appearance from some football hooligans... and after all, there is a strong element of marketing here, whether we like it or not. Would you want to buy an operating systems from these guys?

      Political correctness or accusations of same, marketing and aestetics aside, I would say it is just as much that the design of the monitors is becoming dated, since many of us now have relatively skinny LCDs, not fat CRT-based ones. If nothing else, the logo is becoming tecnically dated.

      All these could, individually, be considered warrants for change.

      --
      SIGBUS @ NO-07.308
    14. Re:Looks fine to me! by EinarH · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Trust me, those religious nuts will have you arrested.
      Yeah, but that is because they dropped out of school. If they had had any historic sence they probably would have recognized the original picture, and then it would have been okay for them.
      (and let us not get into the discussion on wheter the picture is fake or not, that's offtopic)
      --

      Melius mori in libertate quam vivere in servitute.

    15. Re:Looks fine to me! by dipipanone · · Score: 1

      I'm an Evangelical Baptist pastor; I love the little guy.

      You mean in the same way that Jimmy Swaggart and Jim and Tammy Bakker did? ;-)

    16. Re:Looks fine to me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "which some people could feasibly find offensive."

      You do realize that no matter what you come up with someone will have a problem with it.

      Politically Correct was only ever meant to stop people from calling mentally challenged people
      "re-tards." It was to erase some very inconsiderate
      expressions. It is now the flag which is raised everytime someone can't deal with someone else's "ways."

    17. Re:Looks fine to me! by Queuetue · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, before the nazis co-opted it, the swastika was known to stand for the 4 "l"s intertwined - Love, Life, Luck and Light. It was used in the same places the Red Cross is used these days, and often on correspondance like we use X's and O's in the US. For ages, one of India's most loved goes, Ganesha, uses the swastika as a personal symbol (although not as much these days.) It was used by the ancient greeks to indicate something was wholesome and trustworthy - and was remembered that way by the Europeans of the 20's and 30's. That's exactly why the fascists picked it.

      In other words, the swastika is a symbol of love and light. Or it's symbolic of the evil of the Nazi party.

      Or, in reality, yes - it's just a bunch of lines. Any power given to them is just silly and artificial.

      Also, if someone finds a picture offensive, I'd recommend s/he not look at it. I'm getting sick of all of the P.C. thuggery that takes place and is claimed to be "tolerance." The candyasses that I encounter on a daily basis are making the modern world weak and unfit to survive. If we can't get it together, the developing world will replace us - and we'll deserve it.

    18. Re:Looks fine to me! by siliconjunkie02 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So, what do I get for regularly wearing my FreeBSD T-shirt in Houston? And, I have never had a single word said to me about it...

      So, perhaps you should realize that just because we are in Texas, we aren't a bunch of backwoods religious zealots as you think.

    19. Re:Looks fine to me! by Motherfucking+Shit · · Score: 1
      Okay, I challenge you to wear a BSD t-shirt and walk around several south-US states (texas would be a good one). Trust me, those religious nuts will have you arrested. And bring the asbestos underwear because they'll probably try burning you as a devil worshiper...
      I live in Tennessee, which is as bible-belt as anywhere else, and there would be no problem walking around here with a NetBSD logo (or FreeBSD Beastie) T-shirt unless you went looking for trouble, e.g. going into a church with that shirt on. About the only thing you'd catch flak for here is if you - being a pasty white unix geek like myself, no doubt - walked around wearing a T-shirt with some sort of racial reference.

      One of my favorite quotes comes from the movie Hoodlum - which, incidentally, was about black gangsters in 1930s Harlem - and it goes something like "God and I have an agreement. He stays out of my house and I stay out of his." Picture Laurence Fishburne saying that in his most serious tone of voice and you'll get the reference. I don't remember the exact quote as it's been some time since I've seen the movie, but I've used the paraphrased line a few times on bible-thumpers who are trying to proselytize my way. It's always a good one to have handy when the Jehova's Witnesses come a-knockin'.
      IMO the devils logo is good, the more religious nuts it pisses off the better - maybe someday they'll realise how rediculous they sound. Although I doubt it.
      Don't doubt it. Like the jesus freaks say, "have faith!" ;)
      --
      "BSD: Free as in speech. Linux: Free as in beer. Windows 10: Free as in herpes." --Man On Pink Corner in #52607549.
    20. Re:Looks fine to me! by Emil+Brink · · Score: 1

      Um, I'm not from the US, so for me it's not such a big deal, but I *suspect* that the NetBSD flag logo (which I hadn't seen before today) is meant to in some way give a nod to this rather famous photo. Maybe you knew this and didn't mention it for humouristic reasons, or maybe the likeness is just a coincidence. I would really be surprised if that's the case, though. Gee, pointing this out makes me look historically well read, which I certainly am not.

      --
      main(O){10<putchar(4^--O?77-(15&5128 >>4*O):10)&&main(2+O);}
    21. Re:Looks fine to me! by Evil+Grinn · · Score: 1

      Then there is the aesthetics of this. The logo is just kinda ugly. These guys are not all that different in appearance from some football hooligans... and after all, there is a strong element of marketing here, whether we like it or not. Would you want to buy an operating systems from these guys?

      Devils aside, this obvious parody of American soliders raising the flag on Iwo Jima (or American firemen raising the flag on 9/11) cannot stand in this time of war.

      Also, it looks like an orgy.

    22. Re:Looks fine to me! by Azghoul · · Score: 2, Informative

      Someone tell this idiot he's not insightful.

      "Trust me", give me a break. "burning you as a devil"... I don't know if you're trying to be funny or you're more ignorant than the people you're trying (and failing miserably) to belittle.

      Grow up.

    23. Re:Looks fine to me! by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1, Insightful

      >Okay, I challenge you to wear a BSD t-shirt and walk around several south-US states

      And I challenge you to walk around the south while being black or gay. Just because people take exception to something doesn't mean its wrong or should be changed.

    24. Re:Looks fine to me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was to erase some very inconsiderate expressions. It is now the flag which is raised everytime someone can't deal with someone else's "ways."

      Usually the people that go about whining about how they are being "offended" are offending several other people in the process. They say stuff along the lines of "Hey you shouldn't be saying that you bigoted religious right-winger ass monkey!". Ok, drop the ass monkey part, but still, they're really just close minded people themselves. If you don't like what someone has to say, don't listen to them. If you don't like the netbsd logo that's just tough crap. Nobody is forcing you to use the os. Heck, nobody is forcing you to look at the logo for that matter.

    25. Re:Looks fine to me! by Ashtead · · Score: 1
      You're probably right when it comes to the photo.

      I am still not sure if that exonerates the NetBSD logo however. The analogy of american soldiers == devils is not likely to be one which is desirable to propagate.

      (OT) Cool .sig :)

      --
      SIGBUS @ NO-07.308
    26. Re:Looks fine to me! by LarsWestergren · · Score: 1

      Also, it looks like an orgy.

      Hah! Good, I wasn't the only one who got that connotation. I thought "Hmm, maybe these guys should put some pants on?" Still, I don't mind. Actually quite cute those li'l devils. ;-)

      --

      Being bitter is drinking poison and hoping someone else will die

    27. Re:Looks fine to me! by tacocat · · Score: 1

      Actually, the swastika was a highly religious symbol with very positive connotations until circa 1930. Since then it has been completely changed in the psyche of most of the world. In this case, it might be best to leave the swastika in the bad category. This is despite the fact that a reverse (counterclockwise?) swastika is actually a symbol from American Indian Cultures (I think you can find it in Navajo patterns). The point is that so much damage has been done under this symbol that is transgresses any kind of religious, political, or racial barriers.

      This difference is that everyone's been affected by the swastika of Nazism.

      The imagery of The Devil is strictly a Christian based ideology and is not as wide spread in the world as the experiences with the swastika. Using your logic of one religious/political group taking offense means it's bad for everyone equates to the Jewish Star being totally Evil in the eyes of everyone who is non-Jewish in the Middle East. Especially the Palistines.

      However, the BSD daemon has the distinct appearance of looking cute or disarming. If someone want's to see this as a satanical reference they might do better elsewhere.

      I think it is high time you started to get past your phobias and started looking at things for more than two seconds. Your's is the voice of Righteous InTolerance and Fear Driven Protectionism rather than risking alternative ideas or even thinking about alternative ideas and to test your faiths (religious and otherwise) to validate them or to improve upon them. That's living. Clinging to an ancient scripture and refusing to even consider it's interpretation is a muted death.

      But the link provided in the original post was not of this nature. Reminded me more of Iwo Jima only with some violence in there.

      Not having read anything on this, I'm guessing that the logo contest is not about the cute little deamon, but the larger graphic identifying NetBSD as distinct from *BSD or *nix software

    28. Re:Looks fine to me! by CaptainAlbert · · Score: 1

      Whoops, someone modded me "Insightful" when I was trying to be "Funny". Can't win 'em all, I suppose. :) And I admit that I didn't read the article this time [slaps own wrists].

      > with your logic, a swastika is just a bunch of lines... how could that offend anyone?

      I think that's a little different, although I can't quite put my finger on why (probably not enough coffee). Here goes anyway.

      The BSD devil isn't really a devil; certainly, it doesn't depict the Biblical concept of Satan as I am familiar with it. It looks more of an imp, or a daemon. It doesn't look particularly evil. It looks like it is trying to evoke the "devil on your shoulder" concept that has been used in cartoons since, gosh, the 17th Century (or earlier? Anyone?). So intrinsically, it has little power to offend, since recognizing it as such would be the most likely reaction to it.

      (Now, we could have a big theological discourse here, since the outward appearance of that which is evil may be far from unpleasant, and is thus made all the more evil for its deceitfulness, but that's a story for another day.)

      The swastika, before it ever appeared on the Nazi flag, was as you rightly say, just a bunch of lines. But there can be few people in the world today who don't recognize it as a sign used by fascists and racists. You couldn't sell a product with a swastika motif on it unless it be to one of the above groups. So I think trying to compare the two is quite difficult.

      It strikes me as strange that the most powerful and prominent pieces of iconography are not likenesses of good, evil, destructive, wholesome, natural or supernatural things; rather, they are simple symbols and lines: the swastika, the cross, the swatch, and, of course, /. :)

      --
      These sigs are more interesting tha
    29. Re:Looks fine to me! by BESTouff · · Score: 1

      So, I guess it's time to liberate Texas ! Let's gather soldiers, let's ask the US congress for some big amounts of money, let's pay a big media campaign to "explain" that to the public, and attack attack attack !

    30. Re:Looks fine to me! by CmdrGravy · · Score: 0

      I think he even mentioned a demon wearing a turban being crucified on a cross

    31. Re:Looks fine to me! by zerocool^ · · Score: 5, Informative

      Demon comes from the greek word diamon, or, more accurately delta-iota-alpha-mu-omicron-nu, depending on how it's declined. That's singular nominative (i think).

      In helenistic greek, i.e. around the time of the peloponnesian wars, the word diamon meant sort of "guardian spirit", but implying that it could be either a mischievous spirit or a malevolent spirit. To blame things on a kakodiamon was to say that you had bad luck, and imply that you must be plagued by a mischievous diamon.

      When the word was moved into other languages (i think it came to english via romance languages, stemming from latin), it changed to demon, and was christianized to mean "demon", i.e. servant of the dark lord (satan, not your boss, or bill gates, or $funny_guy_we_hate).

      Yeah for me with my taking greek 1105. It was hard as crap, but wow, I learned a lot. For instance, this happened to a lot of words in greek. Take, for instance, the word that's used (at least in the new testamant in sinaiticus and the vatican codex) to mean "sin". In ancient greek, it meant "mistake" not "transgression". Although, I think that's one that the greeks had started to shift the meaning of before the christians got to it.

      But, yeah, I've got this big thing for etymology, being 18 hours away from a history degree, and still eagerly taking every social sciences class I can fit in. For instance, when I see WindowsXP, I see windows, version christ. XP are the greek letters Chi Rho, which are the first letters of the word "christ", chi-rho-iota-sigma-tau-omicron-sigma. They're the letters constantine the great saw in the sky when he converted his army to christianity at the milvian bridge in 312(? i'm close, and i'm not looking it up).

      Also, if you know a little greek, you know jack chick is full of shit in his Death Cookie tract, which says that IHS on the cookie that catholics eat at communion stand for Isis, Horus, and Seb, egyptian gods, and that it's pagan worship to be a catholic. Sorry, Chick, but IHS are the first three leters of jesus in greek, iota-eta-sigma-upsulon-sigma (remember, indiana jones and the last crusade? "Jehova starts with an I"? Yeah, there is no J in greek, it was Iota, in both jehova and jesus).

      But, look, here, i've done rattled off my head for ever about nothing.

      Just suffice it to say, when you see demon, you don't have to think servant of satan, from the pits of hell, sent to torment the true believing christians. It's just a spirit, who may have the attitude of a prankster.

      ~Will

      --
      sig?
    32. Re:Looks fine to me! by dfn_deux · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if i'm ignorant or what, but I don't understand the connection between the iwojima picture and the devil logo. Care to fill me in?

      --
      -*The above statement is printed entirely on recycled electrons*-
    33. Re:Looks fine to me! by snake_dad · · Score: 1
      Okay, I challenge you to wear a BSD t-shirt and walk around several south-US states (texas would be a good one).

      Trust me, those religious nuts will have you arrested. And bring the asbestos underwear because they'll probably try burning you as a devil worshiper...

      That has been done.. Read this nice short story :)

      --
      karma capped .sig seeking available Slashdot poster for long-term relationship.
    34. Re:Looks fine to me! by EinarH · · Score: 1

      It's not the "normal" BSD devil logo (the one one used on BSD stories on Slashdot) we are talking about, but the NetBSD logo. That logo contains a refference/connection to the Iwo Jima picture.

      --

      Melius mori in libertate quam vivere in servitute.

    35. Re:Looks fine to me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RTFStory!

      "... the current logo is 'too complicated... hard to reproduce... [and] has negative cultural, and religious ramifications'."

      Hint: click on "current logo".

    36. Re:Looks fine to me! by fiddlesticks · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > Unless you're one of those freaks who won't let
      > their kids watch Scoobie-doo because it's got
      > ghosts in it. Trust me. If it were hanging on a
      > cross or wearing a turban, *then* maybe it'd need
      > changing.

      Yeah, your culturally sensitive input really helps

      > It's a cartoon of a statue in which american
      > soldiers are planting an american flag.

      > Although you have to be an idiot to be offended by it,

      Or hate America? Or hate war? Or hate stuff which has _nothing_ to do with NetBSD? and so they don't want to mix an OS up with the US military-industrial-complex?

      Man I can see why they wanna change that logo.

    37. Re:Looks fine to me! by Deacon+Jones · · Score: 1

      Yes, everyone in Texas is a backwoods idiot...nevermind Austin, Dallas, Houston, e.t.c...its all like you see on TV. And everyone in small southern Towns, especially Texas, are religious nuts.


      I'm betting you've never been to Texas. As a lifelong Texan, however, I've never read of anyone, anywhere getting arrested for wearing a T-shirt. This quote getting modded as insightful shows quite a bit about real cultural bias, methinks. And its "Texas" not "texas", and absolutely you should have been modded as flamebait.
      --
      I pulled a jack move to cop this sig
    38. Re:Looks fine to me! by henrygb · · Score: 1
      freaks who won't let their kids watch Scoobie-doo because it's got ghosts in it

      When I was young many decades ago all the ghosts, monsters etc. in Scoobie-doo were fake. Now only half of them are, so the message to kids is confused. The old episodes were funnier too - try them.

    39. Re:Looks fine to me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mod Azghoul up. The stereotype of "ignorant redneck Texans" perpetuated on TV, internet urban legend, and movies has now infected slashdot. Main thread parent is obviously in much more need of cultural sensitivity then those (s)he is choosing to mock.

    40. Re:Looks fine to me! by tremor_tj · · Score: 1

      This isn't insightful, it's pandering to the stereotypes of southern culture.

      Have you ever BEEN to Texas or any of those southern states?

    41. Re:Looks fine to me! by Asmodai · · Score: 1

      I think you meant 'daimon', not diamon.

      --
      Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai
    42. Re:Looks fine to me! by theonetruekeebler · · Score: 1

      I don't know which is worse: your regionalist prejudices or the regionalist prejudices of whoever thinks you are "insightful" or "interesting". At least two Texas high schools have devils as their mascots if Google is to be trusted; why would they have devils as their mascots if they are as ignorant as you have demonstrated yourself to be?

      --
      This is not my sandwich.
    43. Re:Looks fine to me! by adrianbaugh · · Score: 1

      Demon comes from the greek word diamon, or, more accurately delta-iota-alpha-mu-omicron-nu, depending on how it's declined. That's singular nominative (i think).

      Careful with all that Greek. You might be mistaken for Darl McBride...

      --
      "'I pass the test,' she said. 'I will diminish, and go into the West, and remain Galadriel.'"
      - JRR Tolkien.
    44. Re: Looks fine to me! by Punk+Walrus · · Score: 4, Informative
      > > [and] has negative cultural, and religious
      > > ramifications.

      > No, it doesn't. It's a cartoon devil.

      No, it's not. It's a series of daemons putting up a flag, reminicent of the famous photo of Iwo Jima. Check the links.

      > It doesn't offend anyone. Really.

      I don't know, if I was Japanese, I'd probably be offended. A lot of American soldiers killed a lot of Japanese. When it was all over there were only 250 Japanese prisoners out of the original 22,000 defenders of the island. The rest were killed. General Kuribayashi commited suicide (hari kari). The Marines lost 7,000 killed and 19,000 wounded. International conflict is not comfortable thing to talk about, and not a good idea for a world-wide logo.

      Also, have you ever heard the fates of these soldiers in that famous photo? Three of the men were killed in combat within days of the flag raising. Not exactly inspiring for a logo, either.

      > If it were hanging on a cross or wearing a
      > turban, *then* maybe it'd need changing.

      Cross, probably. Turban? A lot of cultures have turbans. What's wrong with a turban? Keeps your hair up, head shaded from the sun, is a symbol of wisdom, and a cool place to store your cobra...! No, wait, skip the last one.

    45. Re:Looks fine to me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All major metro areas are more tolerant of differing viewpoints than the surrounding smaller towns and cities are.

    46. Re:Looks fine to me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although you have to be an idiot to be offended by it ...

      Try telling that to the families of the dead Marines and Corpsmen, and the thousands of Marine veterans who fought that battle. Then thank them for your freedom to make stupid statements like that.

    47. Re:Looks fine to me! by GypC · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The south is full of black people, and mostly we get along fine. Black people had a saying in the 60's, "Northerners love the black race, but can't stand black people. Southerners hate the black race, but get along with black people just fine."

      Texas also has a lot of openly gay people. Haven't you ever heard the expression "steers and queers"? ;-) There is truth in it.

      Another ignorant yankee...

    48. Re:Looks fine to me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about a daemon wearing a turban being crucified on a cross impaled on the baby Jesus who is getting skullfucked by Hitler?

    49. Re:Looks fine to me! by quantum+bit · · Score: 1

      To blame things on a kakodiamon was to say that you had bad luck

      Isn't that one of those creepy floating red things in Doom?

    50. Re:Looks fine to me! by Asmodai · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not really. A swastika is the symbol of an organization that verifiably eradicated six million jews and similar numbers of gay people, Romany gypsies, etc.

      Bah, learn proper history before commenting. The swastika is a Hindu holy symbol and associated with Ganesh, the Hindu god of good luck/fortune. It is also highly used by the Buddhists in the world since the arms symbolise the chain of rebirth and death. The four 'L's are associated with Life, Love, Luck, and Light.

      In the World War Adolf Hitler was smart enough to take an established symbol like the Indian swastika and mirrored it and made it a symbol for the Nazis to be proud of. He did the same to the Napolean Iron Cross.

      *wishing people who take their collective political correct heads our of their political correct arses, not everything revolves around the west and the middle east*

      --
      Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai
    51. Re:Looks fine to me! by endx7 · · Score: 1

      It's a cartoon devil.

      No. It isn't. It's a daemon.

    52. Re:Looks fine to me! by dave420 · · Score: 1
      That's the thing - your point about the swastika applies to the demon. It's instantly recognisable as a biblical icon of evil. It doesn't matter if it has a cutesy face and a wry smile, it's still a demon. Just like putting a smiley in the middle of a swastika doesn't make it any less of a swastika.

      The very fact that it can cause offence is something marketing people try and stay away from (especially in computing - in fashion it's a completely different game). The slightest possibility of a company's brand being associated with the occult or evil forces isn't what people strive for (unless you're Mom's Occult and Evil Force store, in which case help yourself). It is, after all, something that could seriously backfire later on down the road.

      Imagine if the Pope wanted to make the Catholic church 100% open-source, but then he saw some literature from BSD, plastered in little devils. He'd need a change of pants. That's exactly the thing people don't want - their business having negative connotations in some circles.

      Seeing as how some Christians are already up in arms about 'nixes (apparently, the 666 permission gets to them the most - go figure), keeping the demon around might not help things. After all, 'nixes want to be accepted, not vilified.

    53. Re:Looks fine to me! by mbbac · · Score: 1

      Only terrorists wear turbans! Don't you know anything?

      --

      mbbac

    54. Re:Looks fine to me! by alib001 · · Score: 1

      Yes and the same people that find the cartoon imp offensive are likely to object to "evil" daemon processes and "sexist" man pages.

      And, FYI, the swastika was around long before Hitler used it.

    55. Re:Looks fine to me! by zerocool^ · · Score: 1

      Yeah, my bad. It's still early. But, spelling errors aside, the etymology and meaning should be right.

      --
      sig?
    56. Re:Looks fine to me! by mbbac · · Score: 1

      So, you're sterotyping the South because a few people in the South stereotyped someone wearing a BSD logo as a satan worshipper?

      --

      mbbac

    57. Re:Looks fine to me! by zerocool^ · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, the flying thing with the blue mouth and the horns? Yeah, that was a cacodemon, probably a reference to a kakodaimon.

      --
      sig?
    58. Re:Looks fine to me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Careful, you will be labeled a heretic! Don't you dare quote definitions and meanings, the Christian religion (in general) and Roman Catholic church (specifically) attempted to destroy.

      Bah sheep, baaah sheep.

      How many cultures and societies were lost because of the 'cleansing'!?

      How much "knowledge" was lost!?

      Bah sheep, baaah sheep.

      BTW, I am a White North American Male. I choose to think for myself though....I do not choose to be ignorant or 'stoopid'. Do you give your children a choice, or make them go to 'your' church?

      Even your christian leaders have referred to you as chattle since your religion was started. And you flame amongst yourselves (my christianity is true-er than yours neener neener neener).

      Bah sheep, baaah sheep.

      Blah, blah.....I choose me.

    59. Re:Looks fine to me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...and being fingered

      Ooooooo! I Like that!

    60. Re:Looks fine to me! by dave420 · · Score: 1

      I'm well aware of the swastika's history and its use in various religions around the world. That was never in question. ;)

    61. Re:Looks fine to me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I for one welcome our new dark overlord.

    62. Re:Looks fine to me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think we could take Texas?

    63. Re:Looks fine to me! by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 2, Funny

      My Big Fat Greek Wedding:
      Father: All words come from Greek! Give me a word and I'll show you how it came from Greek!
      Friend: OK... "Kimono".
      Father: Let's see. Oh! I know!

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    64. Re:Looks fine to me! by nakedsource · · Score: 1

      I went to high school in Arkansas and the school mascot is a Red Devil (as in the Red Devils football team). And we had prayer before each game, and everone understood a mascot was not a religious symbol. No one asked for forgiviness for playing for the 'Red Devils', except when they had a losing season. Which was most of the time :).

    65. Re:Looks fine to me! by Rallion · · Score: 1
      The BSD devil isn't really a devil; certainly, it doesn't depict the Biblical concept of Satan as I am familiar with it. It looks more of an imp, or a daemon. It doesn't look particularly evil. It looks like it is trying to evoke the "devil on your shoulder" concept that has been used in cartoons since, gosh, the 17th Century (or earlier? Anyone?). So intrinsically, it has little power to offend, since recognizing it as such would be the most likely reaction to it.
      Now, I think it's the cutest devil anywhere. But I seriously think you're underestimating some people's capacity to get offended. Remember, there are people who think that the entire fantasy genre should be banned because some of it involves magic. Magic not performed by agents of God! (In the case of LotR, not THEIR God.) And that means they can only be agents of the dark lord and as such the existence of fantasy corrupts young minds, etc. etc. and nobody knows what they say after that because everybody has already stopped listening. Where the prattling leads is a mystery that will endure forever.

      Anyway, they just want to avoid the possibility of offending somebody, and I don'tsee the problem with that. Anybody who's ever just agreed with somebody because it was more work to argue with them should understnad the reason.
    66. Re:Looks fine to me! by NonSequor · · Score: 1

      I was told that IHS stands for Iehus Hominum Salvator (or something along those lines; maybe it was some form of humanus instead for the second word). That's Jesus, savior of men. Either way, claiming that Catholics are pagans is seriously messed up.

      --
      My only political goal is to see to it that no political party achieves its goals.
    67. Re:Looks fine to me! by wcrowe · · Score: 1

      Yes, I understand (being an amateur etymologist myself) but the average person doesn't have a clue. Look at all the hay made out of the simple word "niggardly", which has all but disappeared out of the language due to political correctness.

      When it comes to a new logo, the questions to be asked are what makes NetBSD unique? then create a simple logo which represents that idea. OpenBSD uses the puffer fish, for example. I think the idea here is that it's "prickley", i.e., secure.

      --
      Proverbs 21:19
    68. Re:Looks fine to me! by swb · · Score: 1

      It mimicks the photo of the Americans planting the flag at Iwo Jima, but what's necessarily negative about the US crushing the Imperial Japanese Army? Did I get taught the wrong history? Did the Japanese not invade much of Southeast Asia and commit all manner of atrocities (Bataan Death March, Rape of Nanking) that the Japanese themselves refuse to acknowledge in their own history books to this day?

      I know that we have reached rock bottom as a culture when we refuse to acknowledge even our most noble military victories over demonstrably evil and corrupt foes.

    69. Re:Looks fine to me! by Rallion · · Score: 1
      Perhaps they might be if they existed outside of the fevered imaginations of religious fundamentalists, but as they are, at most, a metaphor it's hard to see why rational people would be bothered. And why would you try and accomodate the prospective rantings of irrational people? There's no predicting what those could be.
      There are two reasons. One is to not lose them as users. I think there are a lot of people who I wouldn't call irrational, or even fundamentalists, who would be turned off on some level by the logo. Don't be an elitist who doesn't accept others who are different than you. It's irrational. Second reason is because the really crazy ones can be annoying. Might as well just avoid that.
      Rather like the SCO trademark, you mean?
      As many things as I could say about this, I'm just gonna go with this one: So...you're supporting SCO, then?
      Not really. A swastika is the symbol of an organization that verifiably eradicated six million jews and similar numbers of gay people, Romany gypsies, etc.
      And the devil is the symbol of the same evil that lots of those murderers saw in their victims. And not just during the Nazi period, but for the last couple millenia. The concept of the devil has resulted in far more deaths than the swastika ever did. Be rational about it.
      Did anyone ever see that episode of Jackass, where a guy dressed in a red devil suit was being assaulted by passers-by, who clearly thought that by punching a guy in a red suit, they were doing battle with the true Prince of Darkness?
      While I do think attacking the guy is nearly as juvenile as being the guy, I think your closed-minded elitism is shown in sharp relief by that comment. I'm SURE they didn't think they were "doing battle with the true Prince of Darkness," and so are you. They were offended by his arrogance and mistreating of a subject that is very important to them. They got angry, and understandably so.
    70. Re:Looks fine to me! by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1
      They should change the logo because it's ugly, complicated and requires too much interpretation and specific historical knowledge to understand (based on the massive misunderstandings evidenced in this thread). Not because the liberation of Europe and Asia in World War II could possibly be offensive to anybody but a tyrant or dictator.


      People offended by the concept of freedom are people the world is better without.

    71. Re:Looks fine to me! by RealAlaskan · · Score: 1
      >>It's a devil. Devils are evil.

      >Perhaps they might be if they existed outside of the fevered imaginations of religious fundamentalists, but as they are, at most, a metaphor ...

      Can you prove that? I'm pretty sure that I can't prove that devils do exist, so I doubt that you can prove the converse. Saying that another way, I suspect that anything you could use as ``proof'' of nonexistance, I could twist to be an equally valid proof of existance.

      And why would you try and accomodate the prospective rantings of irrational people? There's no predicting what those could be.

      That's true, but trite, and it ignores an important point: what about the rational objections of rational Christians? Or can you prove that they, also, don't exist?

    72. Re:Looks fine to me! by alib001 · · Score: 1

      I thought you might... but that seemed like a nice summary for anyone else reading. :)

      I don't think people should necessarily change or not use a logo because it has some negative connotations (pandering to the lowest common denominator and all that) but I guess there comes a point when people get tired of explaining.

      Needless to say: they can take the FreeBSD imp off me when they pry it off my cold, dead... LCD; case badges; CDs etc. ;)

    73. Re:Looks fine to me! by Larsing · · Score: 1

      Either way, claiming that Catholics are pagans is seriously messed up.

      Not if you're a Lutheran Protestant... ;-)

      --
      Ethics is what you say you do. Morals is what you actually do.
    74. Re:Looks fine to me! by ninejaguar · · Score: 1
      Hey, except for the spelling, you're right! Aside from pranks (which would indicate a sprite or pixie), your daimon can also be your genius.

      = 9J =

    75. Re:Looks fine to me! by Larsing · · Score: 2, Funny

      He did the same to the Napolean Iron Cross.

      And what on Earth has the Teutonic Iron Cross got to do with Napoleon!?!?!?

      --
      Ethics is what you say you do. Morals is what you actually do.
    76. Re:Looks fine to me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But what does a daemon (or however you want to spell it) look like? You can say 'it's a daemon, not a devil' all you want, but when it looks so much like a little devil that's not very convincing.

      If you look at the linked to logo, it looks more like a bunch of little guys dressed up in devil suits, and really is too complicated for a logo whatever the figures are.

      Perhaps the starting point for a new logo would be a daemon as the Greeks thought of one. The current little guy probably traces his appearance more back to Pan than any daemon.

    77. Re:Looks fine to me! by harmonica · · Score: 1

      too complicated...

      for whom? for what?


      Logos must have a simple structure. It must be possible to recognize them in black and white, when scaled down to a very small size, etc.

      That existing picture is not a logo.

      hard to reproduce...

      == hard to forge...


      So what? That may be a good quality for a banknote, but we're talking about a logo. Take a look at the logo of Deutsche Bank. Everybody can copy it in three seconds, nonetheless it's a great logo. It's a great logo because it's so easy to memorize and associate with the brand.

    78. Re:Looks fine to me! by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      They want to replace the flag raising symbol, but the rules specify that it can not contain the daemon. I guess I don't really see the difference between this and not blatently serving meat around vegitarians, or pork around Jews or Muslems, or beef to Indians. I might not agree that that is the right way to live, but I'm certainly going to provide an option for them to live within their beliefs. It seems like common courtesy would be to show some understanding that those around you have different opinions about things that are ok for you but not to someone else. Especially when the use/development of your project depends almost entirely on goodwill.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    79. Re:Looks fine to me! by Grotus · · Score: 1
      Haven't you ever heard the expression "steers and queers"?


      I thought it was "beers, steers, and queers", but maybe I just listen to too much RevCo.
      --
      "From my cold, dead hands you damn, dirty apes!" - CH
    80. Re:Looks fine to me! by Larsing · · Score: 1

      The analogy of american soldiers == devils is not likely to be one which is desirable to propagate.

      Certainly nothing we need to wast our energy on, since they seem to be making a rather good job of it themselves...

      --
      Ethics is what you say you do. Morals is what you actually do.
    81. Re:Looks fine to me! by Huge+Pi+Removal · · Score: 1

      Actually, I thought the Nazi's took the original clockwise swastika and turned it anticlockwise, to make it resemble two "s"s. (Clockwise means that if you attached rockets to the little sticky-out bits, it'd turn clockwise.)

      Either way, I wouldn't make a swastika my company logo, clockwise or anti-clockwise - it'd cause trouble whatever.

      --
      - Oliver

      The right to bear arms is only slightly less stupid than the right to arm bears...
    82. Re:Looks fine to me! by Queuetue · · Score: 1
      Also, if you know a little greek, you know jack chick is full of shit in his Death Cookie tract, which says that IHS on the cookie that catholics eat at communion stand for Isis, Horus, and Seb, egyptian gods, and that it's pagan worship to be a catholic.
      I don't know about IHS, but if you cut the beginning and the end off of that cartoon, it sure sums us the whole religion thing pretty darned well.

      Make stuff up to control the masses. Destroy them if they argue. I also like the weasely, money-grubbing pope, which is just about nails the real pope perfectly. It's unfortunate that at the end, this cartoonist is only trying to convince you that one silly religion is false so he can fool you into believing his silly religion instead, rather than the more valuable lesson - that all religions are false.

      All in all, thanks for the chuckle.
    83. Re:Looks fine to me! by radish · · Score: 1

      Regardless of the politics, it's just a really crappy logo for lots of other reasons. It's way too complex, it's meaningless unless you already know what it is, it can't reproduce well at small scale, etc etc. I don't recall ever seeing it before, but man is it awful.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    84. Re:Looks fine to me! by razjml · · Score: 1

      This is inherit in the consciousness of all cultures. A major part of someone's identity is often the country or culture you are a part of. For example, people in the US are often very proud to be americans. So when a country commits an atrocity, that atrocity is also tied to your personal identity as a citizen of that country. Naturally, people believe that they, themselves are good. No one believes that they are a bad person. So there is a fundamental conflict in the citizens of the country within themselves. It is for this reason that mass denial or rationalization of atrocities will occur in the citizens of a country that commit an atrocity. This has happened everywhere: in Germany, in Japan, and in the US (during the Vietnam war, the US carpeted the rural, civilian country of Laos with land mines. It is the 2nd most densely landmined region in the world. Hundreds of civilian casualties, mostly children, result from the still active landmines every year. To this day the US government refuses to help remove the land mines, provide information on dismantling them, or even acknowledge their continuing threat to the people of Laos. It is as if we deny their existence).

    85. Re:Looks fine to me! by rainman_bc · · Score: 0

      My Goodness! The dad from My Big Fat Greek Wedding (Kosta) is posting on Slashdot! Wholly! Tell me a word... Any Word... I bet you it come from Greek!

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    86. Re:Looks fine to me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "As a lifelong Texan, however, I've never read"

      Somehow, I don't doubt that in the least.

    87. Re:Looks fine to me! by akorvemaker · · Score: 1

      I've heard that one too, but I'm pretty sure the use of it as a short form of the Greek IESOUS is a significantly older tradition.

    88. Re:Looks fine to me! by dipipanone · · Score: 0

      Bah, learn proper history before commenting.

      Perhaps you should learn not to make assumptions.

      The swastika is a Hindu holy symbol and associated with Ganesh, the Hindu god of good luck/fortune.

      So what? How is that a.) relevant to the point that I was addressing, and b.) does it invalidate anything that I said?

      Meanwhile, here's a clue for you as you're clearly in need of one. Regardless of how much *you* might wish it to be so, whenever most people see a swastika, they *don't* associate it with good luck/fortune, hinduism, paganism or any of it's other postulated uses. They associate it with Dachau, Belsen and six million Jews being put to death for having the wrong genetic origins.

      The four 'L's are associated with Life, Love, Luck, and Light.

      Right. And I assume that this must have been because the founders of Hinduism and Buddhism wrote all of their sacred screeds using English words, and constructed their symbols using English letters?

    89. Re:Looks fine to me! by nlindstrom · · Score: 1

      For those who can't be bothered to click the link, and thereby may miss out on a delightful illustration of exactly how stupid and backwards folk living in the bible belt really are....

      Linda Branagan is an expert on daemons. She has a T-shirt that sports the daemon in tennis shoes that appears on the cover of the 4.3BSD manuals and _The Design and Implementation of the 4.3BSD UNIX Operating System_ by S. Leffler, M. McKusick, M. Karels, J. Quarterman, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA 1989.

      She tells the following story about wearing the 4.3BSD daemon T-shirt:

      Last week I walked into a local "home style cookin' restaurant/watering hole" in Texas to pick up a take-out order. I spoke briefly to the waitress behind the counter, who told me my order would be done in a few minutes.

      So, while I was busy gazing at the farm implements hanging on the walls, I was approached by two ``natives.'' These guys might just be the original Texas rednecks.

      ``Pardon us, ma'am. Mind if we ask you a question?''

      Well, people keep telling me that Texans are real friendly, so I nodded.

      ``Are you a Satanist?''

      Well, at least they didn't ask me if I liked to party.

      ``Uh, no, I can't say that I am.''

      ``Gee, ma'am. Are you sure about that?'' they asked.

      I put on my biggest, brightest Dallas Cowboys cheerleader smile and said, ``No, I'm positive. The closest I've ever come to Satanism is watching Geraldo.''

      ``Hmmm. Interesting. See, we was just wondering why it is you have the lord of darkness on your chest there.''

      I was this close to slapping one of them and causing a scene -- then I stopped and noticed the shirt I happened to be wearing that day. Sure enough, it had a picture of a small, devilish-looking creature that has for some time now been associated with a certain operating system. In this particular representation, the creature was wearing sneakers.

      They continued: ``See, ma'am, we don't exactly appreciate it when people show off pictures of the devil. Especially when he's lookin' so friendly.''

      These idiots sounded terrifyingly serious.

      Me: ``Oh, well, see, this isn't really the devil, it's just, well, it's sort of a mascot.

      Native: ``And what kind of football team has the devil as a mascot?''

      Me: ``Oh, it's not a team. It's an operating -- uh, a kind of computer.''

      I figured that an ATM machine was about as much technology as these guys could handle, and I knew that if I so much as uttered the word ``UNIX'' I would only make things worse.

      Native: ``Where does this satanical computer come from?''

      Me: ``California. And there's nothing satanical about it really.''

      Somewhere along the line here, the waitress noticed my predicament -- but these guys probably outweighed her by 600 pounds, so all she did was look at me sympathetically and run off into the kitchen.

      Native: ``Ma'am, I think you're lying. And we'd appreciate it if you'd leave the premises now.''

      Fortunately, the waitress returned that very instant with my order, and they agreed that it would be okay for me to actually pay for my food before I left. While I was at the cash register, they amused themselves by talking to each other.

      Native #1: ``Do you think the police know about these devil computers?''

      Native #2: ``If they come from California, then the FBI oughta know about 'em.''

      They escorted me to the door. I tried one last time: ``You're really blowing this all out of proportion. A lot of people use this `kind of computers.' Universities, researchers, businesses. They're actually very useful.''

      Big, big, BIG mistake. I should have guessed at what came next.

      Native: ``Does the government use these devil computers?''

      Me: ``Yes.''

      Another BIG boo-boo.

      Native: ``And does the government pay for 'em? With our tax dollars?''

      I decided that it was time to jump ship.

      Me: ``No. Nope. Not at all. Your tax dollars never entered the picture at all. I promise. No sir, not a penny. Our good Christian congressmen would never let something like that happen. Nope. Never. Bye.''

      Texas. What a country.

    90. Re:Looks fine to me! by nlindstrom · · Score: 1
      Actually, I find the NetBSD logo to be quite humorous. An even more entertaining logo may be found here, for the PC Weasel 2000 product.

      (No, I am not affiliated with them in any way; I don't even use their products. I just always though their logo was very funny, is all.)

    91. Re:Looks fine to me! by dipipanone · · Score: 1

      Can you prove that?

      No, I say it on the basis of probability, in light of what I regard as the available empirical evidence. If you have a better evidence than I've heard so far, I'm open to listening to it -- though I have to say that I don't expect to be convinced.

      That's true, but trite, and it ignores an important point: what about the rational objections of rational Christians?

      I do accept the existance of rational Christians. Despite my own atheism, I'm actually married to one. (OK, most of her beliefs are rational. For example, when I confront her about the miracle of transubstantiation, her excuse is that she just brackets her rational response and accepts the mystical power of the sacrament.)

      But are you trying to argue that rational Christians would have a problem with representations of the BSD daemon? What possible problems would they be -- other than a simple 'it offends my supernatural beliefs'?

    92. Re:Looks fine to me! by dipipanone · · Score: 1

      Don't be an elitist who doesn't accept others who are different than you.

      I don't discriminate on the basis of difference. I do discriminate on the basis of people who wish to prevent me from exercising various freedoms. I think that that's wrong -- and I don't actually think my position is irrational. On the contrary, I think that not to discriminate against such people is irrational because by not doing so, you ultimately deny yourself a desired good -- ie, more freedom.

      And I understand perfectly that some people who are involved with NetBSD might see the symbol as uncommercial, or want to increase their user base and I don't have any problem with their losing it on that basis. I personally wouldn't change it for that reason, but as I'm not involved with NetBSD, my views are just more hot air -- but if it were me, I'd prefer not to have personal or professional associations with people who are as irrationally oversensitive. I find it makes my life far easier in the long run.

      I'm SURE they didn't think they were "doing battle with the true Prince of Darkness," and so are you.

      I'm not sure of any such thing. I don't mean that they thought that the guy wearing the suit was Beelzebub himself. I mean they hold the belief that by displaying a representation of Satan, the person wearing the suit was doing Satan's work, and therefore by physically attacking the wearer, they were quite literally, attacking Satanism and therefore Satan and all his works.

      They were offended by his arrogance and mistreating of a subject that is very important to them. They got angry, and understandably so.

      I don't think it's understandable at all. Who's next? Children dressed up in Halloween costumes? There are lots of things that offend me and upset me as well, but I hope that I can avoid mistaking a representation of the thing, for the thing itself. If you ever catch *me* confusing the two, you have my full permission to commit me to an asylum for the insane.

      Bear in mind that I'm not saying that these people aren't entitled to their views. I'm more than happy for them to hold them and to share them with like-minded associates. I just don't think they have any business imposing them on others -- though in this case, it isn't necessary because the NetBSD group seems more than happy to accomodate them.

    93. Re:Looks fine to me! by dipipanone · · Score: 1

      Damn, where are those modpoints when you need 'em?

    94. Re:Looks fine to me! by Rallion · · Score: 1
      I don't discriminate on the basis of difference. I do discriminate on the basis of people who wish to prevent me from exercising various freedoms. I think that that's wrong -- and I don't actually think my position is irrational. On the contrary, I think that not to discriminate against such people is irrational because by not doing so, you ultimately deny yourself a desired good -- ie, more freedom.
      Okay, just have to say, that was good. I'm not really sure what freedoms your talking about, but hell, I feel pretty boxed in by too-popular fundamentalist ideas often enough that I don't care.
      I'd prefer not to have personal or professional associations with people who are as irrationally oversensitive. I find it makes my life far easier in the long run.
      The first thing I thought while reading the summary was that it was probably a good idea just so they can avoid harassment. I'd bet that at some point somebody's gotten an e-mail about it. And if (when) popularity increases...Maybe some people just cause problems no matter how you deal with them.
      Who's next? Children dressed up in Halloween costumes?
      Actually, yes, they're against Halloween. Mostly because of the costumes.
      There are lots of things that offend me and upset me as well, but I hope that I can avoid mistaking a representation of the thing, for the thing itself.
      Yeah, me too. Hmm...I need an analogy. But there isn't one. Part of what makes Satan such a problem for them is that he's a mockery of God. It's that mockery and disrespect that fuels the anger.

      In all truth, I'm probably more bitter about the fact that things like this logo-changing have to happen (though I really think it's more important to them just to make it simpler, you know what I mean). At the same time, I'm more informed than most about why it needs to happen. Dated a girl in a crazy-religious (and not in a smart kind of way) family for three years. These people are everywhere.
    95. Re:Looks fine to me! by dipipanone · · Score: 1

      I live in Tennessee, which is as bible-belt as anywhere else, and there would be no problem walking around here with a NetBSD logo (or FreeBSD Beastie) T-shirt unless you went looking for trouble, e.g. going into a church with that shirt on.

      Opening lines that may spell trouble:

      "Did you spill my drink?"
      "Are you staring at my girlfriend's tits?"
      "Did you wear that BSD t-shirt to church on Sunday?"

    96. Re: Looks fine to me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Hari kari)

      I think you mean "Hara kiri" ... from "hara" belly and "kiri" cutting

    97. Re:Looks fine to me! by dipipanone · · Score: 1

      The south is full of black people, and mostly we get along fine.

      Well, they mostly do until they start having sex with white girls.

    98. Re:Looks fine to me! by edhall · · Score: 1

      You're right about it being a cartoon based on the famous statue of planting the flag at Iwo Jima. But in your rush to bash "cultural bias" you failed to consider that US veterans might be similarly offended. That statue has deep significance to WW-II veterans, and the NetBSD logo trivializes it.

      -Ed
    99. Re:Looks fine to me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That makes it culturally biased.

      What isn't "culturally biased" ?
    100. Re: Looks fine to me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I don't know, if I was Japanese, I'd probably be offended. A lot of American soldiers killed a lot of Japanese. When it was all over there were only 250 Japanese prisoners out of the original 22,000 defenders of the island. The rest were killed. General Kuribayashi commited suicide (hari kari). The Marines lost 7,000 killed and 19,000 wounded. International conflict is not comfortable thing to talk about, and not a good idea for a world-wide logo.

      A) They had no business trying to take over a hemisphere

      B) Japanese soldiers in that era were trained from day one that when you go to battle you either emerge victorious or don't come back at all. Hari kari and kamakazi are the two most obvious examples of this. THIS is why so many Japanese died. In most battles, both sides usually have a far larger "wounded" rate than a "killed" rate, but not the Japanese. Talk to any Allied soldier from that period and they will probably tell you that the Japanese and their tactics tended to scare the shit out of everybody. Did Americans kill more Japanese than Japanese killed Americans? Of course. That is how you win a war, typically. But don't minimize the importance of this conflict (and the war proper) to both sides by misrepresenting the statistics.

    101. Re: Looks fine to me! by dasunt · · Score: 1

      Er, don't you mean that General Kuribayashi committed `seppeku'. I thought that `hari kari' was the vulgar term for it, roughly meaning `belly cutting'.

      Just in the interests of being culturally sensitive, y'know.

      Speaking of which, why does `culturally sensitive' include the idea of not admitting to past fuckups? Most people would agree that the Japanese Co-Prosperity Sphere was a bad idea. Taking over the world is a bad thing. Same way that the US was wrong for hyping a series of events that lead up to the Spanish-American War.

      Countries, communities, and people screw up. It happens. But if we don't remember our screwups, we create another problem.

    102. Re:Looks fine to me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's dai/mo^n delta-alpha-iota-mu-omega-nu

    103. Re:Looks fine to me! by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      " In the World War Adolf Hitler was smart enough to take an established symbol like the Indian swastika and mirrored it and made it a symbol for the Nazis to be proud of. He did the same to the Napolean Iron Cross. "

      Ah, Godwin strikes again.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    104. Re:Looks fine to me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps they might be if they existed outside of the fevered imaginations of religious fundamentalists, but as they are, at most, a metaphor it's hard to see why rational people would be bothered. And why would you try and accomodate the prospective rantings of irrational people? There's no predicting what those could be.

      A metaphor at most? I wholeheartedly agree with the rest of your post (actually laughed out loud), but is it so hard to believe in angelic beings? Most /.ers probably accept the likelihood of alien beings, but why not angelic beings? What's that you say? Because they're obviously mythological creatures written about by primitives thousnds of years ago? It's presumptuous to claim the Nephilim were the creations of primitives with superstitious beliefs....were you there? The phenomenologist in me is more inclined to take the first hand account of the ancients over the modern-day naysaying of pseudo sophisticates who fancy themselves advanced because we've got, you know, computers and stuff...Linux...wireless/radio....the atom....so we must know better.

      Okay, maybe I smoked just a little too much weed just now. Sorry.

      Anyway, it seems that the dismissal of angelic beings (and by implication, demonic beings) is borne mostly of counter-cultural geekdom's desire to shun organized religion...because organized religion is bad, mmkay? You don't wanna be a droid like those super Christians, do you?

    105. Re:Looks fine to me! by mini_me · · Score: 1

      Right. And I assume that this must have been because the founders of Hinduism and Buddhism wrote all of their sacred screeds using English words, and constructed their symbols using English letters?

      You probably meant the Latin alphabet. The English certainly didn't come up with that one.

    106. Re:Looks fine to me! by cpeterso · · Score: 1


      XP are the greek letters Chi Rho

      I think Windows "XP" is a pun on Chi-Rho and "Cairo". Cairo was the codename for Microsoft's "Information at your fingertips" concept, including a new Object File System. It was supposed to be Windows NT 5.0 (Windows 2000), but wasn't ready in time. Some of the Cairo features were supposedly shipped in XP, but more are expected in Longhorn.

    107. Re:Looks fine to me! by be-fan · · Score: 1

      So someone wearing a turban is more offensive than a demon? Something hanging on a cross is a definite religious symbol, but a demon is not necessarily a religious symbol, and a turban is just clothing.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    108. Re:Looks fine to me! by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Eh? Americans, like every other country in the world, are in no place to get morally righteous about anything. Our country was founded in blood. To expand our country from one end of the continent to the other, we nearly destroyed an entire race of people. Our agricultural success was originally built on the backs of slaves. We didn't end slavery until half a century after old Europe ended it. We have continuously supported brutal regimes. We gave weapons and money to Saddam. We gave weapons and money to the Mujahideen in Afghanistan that would later become the Taliban. To this day, we support oppresive monarchies in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait.

      People don't get pissed off at the US because they think the US is less moral than everyone else. Anybody that does is a hypocrite, because all the powerful countries have skeletons in their closets. On the balance of things, the US actually has a pretty decent track record, especially with respect to civil rights for minorities. People get mad at the US because it keeps doing things that other countries have stopped doing, and more importantly, many vocal Americans keep bragging about America's moral superiority.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    109. Re: Looks fine to me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know, if I was Japanese, I'd probably be offended.

      WHAT THE FUCK? The Japanese were fucking animals during WWII.
      Ever heard of the rape of Nanking?
      What they did to N. Korea? My
      god. Only a PC moron would be embarrased by
      what those proud marines did to beat back
      Japan.

    110. Re:Looks fine to me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you just wait on threads until someone even mentions the word "Nazi" or "Hitler?"
      Please, refrain from invoking this law until it is actually appropriate to do so, and perhaps even then.

    111. Re:Looks fine to me! by Avihson · · Score: 1

      Caution Religious Generalities below! Stop reading if easily offended, or devout anything!

      ---"Either way, claiming that Catholics are pagans is seriously messed up.

      Not if you're a Lutheran Protestant... ;-)"---


      Children always think their parents are demons! But they mature and become just like the 'rents they despise.

      Religions are the same way. Each schism of Christianity demonizes the root church from which it split. Just as Christianity demonized Judism and the newest major religion, Islam demonizes both! BTW, Roman Catholicism demonized Coptic Christianity, from which it grew.

      The only thing all churches have in common is the belief that they hold exclusive right to the One Truth.
      The newest Christian sects believe that all the older ones are corrupt and they are the only true way.

      Funny how this parallels human development where the youth believe that they posess all the knowledge and wisdom of the world, when in fact they are just crouching on the shoulders of giants.

    112. Re:Looks fine to me! by Sacks · · Score: 0
      The only thing all churches have in common is the belief that they hold exclusive right to the One Truth.

      I disagree. There are a lot more common beliefs in different religions than just this. It is one of the common beliefs though.

      The one thing I learned early and believe is that all religions say and do mainly the same thing, but in different ways. I was brought up as a Roman Catholic. But I think my eyes have seen the good in different religions and believe that all should be able to worship as they see fit. That does not give one the ability to prosecute the others because of their beliefs though.

      To me, saying that the logo is anti-religious should get a healthy dose of reality. Just because the logo is a devil (small one at that) doesn't mean it is evil.

      I like the logo and I think it should stay. What say you ........

    113. Re:Looks fine to me! by kitzilla · · Score: 1

      I live in the Bible Belt (as in, "Don't believe the Bible? We're gonna belt ya'!"), but my first impression of the NET BSD logo was the Iwo Jima image, not the little devils. That logo has to be HUGE in Japan.

      --
      This is my post. There are many others like it. If you don't like what you read here, go try one of the others.
    114. Re:Looks fine to me! by Nimey · · Score: 1

      I think that's spelt "daimon", actually.

      Very interesting post otherwise.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    115. Re: Looks fine to me! by Nimey · · Score: 1

      I can see where someone might be offended about the "marines raising the flag" imagery. It could be seen to make light of the sacrifices the American fighting men have made.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    116. Re:Looks fine to me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the Christian conception of the universe there are God, angels, Satan and his minions. There are no "just a spirit, who may have the attitude of a prankster." Therefore, if it isn't God or an angel, it's Satanic. Never mind the intent, it's not relevant to the Christian ethos.

    117. Re:Looks fine to me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Meanwhile, here's a clue for you as you're clearly in need of one. Regardless of how much *you* might wish it to be so, whenever most people see a swastika, they *don't* associate it with good luck/fortune, hinduism, paganism or any of it's other postulated uses. They associate it with Dachau, Belsen and six million Jews being put to death for having the wrong genetic origins.

      Hate to say it friend, but in this respect, you are the one who is wrong. Most of the world lives in India and China. In China, people wear Swastika-looking necklaces and such all the time (though the orientation is reversed from the Nazi symbol) and think nothing of it. I should know, I live here. Freaked the fuck out of me when I first saw it. In Asia, the average person knows as much about the Holocaust as you do about the Rape of Nanjing, which is probably not much. And even if you knew about it in theory, you probably wouldn't think about it the way the Chinese do (they view it much as the Jews view the Holocaust).

      The four 'L's are associated with Life, Love, Luck, and Light. Right. And I assume that this must have been because the founders of Hinduism and Buddhism wrote all of their sacred screeds using English words, and constructed their symbols using English letters?

      This, however, is a load of crap cooked up by newage hippies from the west trying to appropriate some of the credit for Buddhist/Hinduist symbols. I agree with you completely, though as another poster pointed out, these aren't English letters but Roman letters (though as the words are English it's a mood point.)

      Basically, you're right to use your bullshit-o-meter, but remember that most of the world is not in Europe, the Middle East, or the Americas.

    118. Re:Looks fine to me! by RealAlaskan · · Score: 1
      No, I say it on the basis of probability, in light of what I regard as the available empirical evidence. If you have a better evidence than I've heard so far, I'm open to listening to it -- though I have to say that I don't expect to be convinced.

      No, no evidence. My point was that any argument which supports your side can equally well support the other. All it takes is a change of belief. One of the reasons that I'm no longer an athiest is that I noticed that everything I thought was a proof of God's non-existance was also being touted as a proof of the opposite. It got me started thinking. I finally realized that God wants us to take Him on faith, or not at all, so there won't be any irrefutable evidence or proof.

      But are you trying to argue that rational Christians would have a problem with representations of the BSD daemon? What possible problems would they be -- other than a simple 'it offends my supernatural beliefs'?

      How about this one: By using a cute caricature of evil as the mascot for something good, we blur, just a little, our ability to distinguish good from evil. The Germans followed Nietze a whole lot farther down a similar path around the turn of the last century, and the euthanasia program resulted. That predated Hitler and the Nazis, by the way.

      There's nothing wrong with the BSD daemon, or the NetBSD logo, except for the effect they might have on future decisions. If they're ok, so is something just a little more extreme, and so on. The little guy with the horns is cute, but I'm not sure that it's a wise choice for logo.

      How about if we get back to Maxwell's demon, and use a funny little guy with his hand on a gate? Or a cute polar bear, to go along with the polar theme which worked so well for Linux?

      Changing the subject a bit, is your wife a recent convert? The bible warns us strongly against marrying unbelievers[1]. My wife and I married when I was athiest and she was pagen. Fortunately, we both acknowleged God at about the same time, so that saved one or the other of us a lot of worry and trouble.

      [1] The bible also tells us we should stick to an unbelieving spouse.

    119. Re:Looks fine to me! by danaris · · Score: 1

      The only thing all churches have in common is the belief that they hold exclusive right to the One Truth.

      Actually, Episcopalians, at least most of the ones I know, believe basically that there is no One Truth: that God will accept you and forgive you whoever you are, so long as you're not actually evil. Our way is a good way, but there may be other ways, too.

      Dan Aris

      --
      Fun. Free. Online. RPG. BattleMaster.
    120. Re:Looks fine to me! by dfn_deux · · Score: 1

      Hey, if you're gonna be such an ass, why don't you come down from your high horse and post with your login instead of anonymous... Jerk

      --
      -*The above statement is printed entirely on recycled electrons*-
  6. A whopping $100 by muyuubyou · · Score: 1

    Looks like it's cheap to finance international contests lately.

    I think I'm announcing a couple of them and probably slashdot will be kind enough to dedicate me a post.

  7. sympathy for the devil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    geez even open source starts to stinks and sucks >:-(

  8. Cool by Realistic_Dragon · · Score: 1

    I'm going to submit a drawing of a penguin. After all that has no negative cultural or religious ramifications right? Seems perfect to me.

    --
    Beep beep.
    1. Re:Cool by Rhubarb+Crumble · · Score: 1
      I'm going to submit a drawing of a penguin. After all that has no negative cultural or religious ramifications right?

      Blasphemer! Bow down and worship Pengra, the Baby Penguin God.

  9. Re:Its Official by HanzoSpam · · Score: 0, Funny

    It's offical, Netcraft confirms Net BSD's logo is dying

    Maybe they should change the logo to a closed casket.

    --

    Progressivism: Parasites helping parasites to help themselves - to other people's stuff.
  10. Logo Suggestion by Giant+Ape+Skeleton · · Score: 3, Funny
    I think a penguin would be...
    oh, wait. nevermind.

    --
    The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits.
    1. Re:Logo Suggestion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Courtesy of the Department of Redundancy Dept.

  11. This is SOOO obvious by Phekko · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The BSD d(a)emon holding a gladiator-like net.

    --

    Sigs for Nerds. Sigs that Matter.
    1. Re:This is SOOO obvious by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1
      The BSD d(a)emon holding a gladiator-like net.

      But they want to get away from religious figures in their logo. I think it'd be best to come up with a simple text "NetBSD" in Gimp and then add a lens-flare effect. $100 here I come!

    2. Re:This is SOOO obvious by InfoVore · · Score: 1

      I immediately pictured a logo with the little red guy slam dunking a basketball, with the caption "NetBSD: Nothing But Net" might be good.

      I.V.

      --
      "These laws they're passing won't even compile anymore, let alone execute." - anon
    3. Re:This is SOOO obvious by kindbud · · Score: 1

      Or it could be the BSD daemon wearing fishnet stockings. Who says the daemon is a dude daemon?

      --
      Edith Keeler Must Die
    4. Re:This is SOOO obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who says dude daemons don't wear fishnets?

  12. Re:wow by Duty · · Score: 3, Funny

    NetBSD's claim to fame is running on everything from your PC to a dead squirrel in a cardboard box.

  13. Re:wow by spoodie · · Score: 1

    It's another flavour of UNIX, information on how it differs from other flavours will be discussed on the website www.netbsd.org.

    --
    I don't need a compass to tell me which way the wind shines.
  14. OpenBSD should consider the idea by ospirata · · Score: 1

    Well, as long as we are talking about BSD, the OpenBSD should consider changing its logo as well.
    Let's face it: what's is the point of a BSD system with a fat-sad-tired fish?

    1. Re:OpenBSD should consider the idea by TCM · · Score: 0

      Blowfish as in the encryption algorithm. Get it?

      --
      Of course it runs NetBSD. BTC: 1NT7QvbetmANwaMzhpVL6
    2. Re:OpenBSD should consider the idea by lederhosen · · Score: 1

      And a "secure" fish, I guess that is why the
      encryption algorithm is called so.

  15. Support the Religious Reich? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, what's wrong with the devil? Too hard to reproduce? It's called creating another set of art that is "CAMERA READY" for reproduction on t-shirts, or whatever else. When you see that little devil, you think BSD. Anybody who is too concerned that it's "EEEEEVIL" doesn't work with computers well enough to understand how to run BSD.

    Just because BSD runs on PCs doesn't mean that they need to be PC. That's a load of crap.

  16. Hm.... by dillee1 · · Score: 1

    Hm.... The current frontierman image suits the ethics of netbsd quite well. Conquer any platfrom and make then run BSD.

  17. current logo rocks, by k0d0 · · Score: 0

    it's the reason why I installed NetBSD on one of my boxen. So if they change the logo and I don't like it...I'll have to setup OpenBSD or FreeBSD again ;)

    no seriously I don't see any reason why the current logo should offend anyone...it's just a cartoon!

  18. It's not that they're devils .... by binaryDigit · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Several people have posted (in the usual /. manner) that they don't see an issue with the devil, it's a cartoon, right wing religious wackos, etc. Well its not the devil, it's what the devils are doing. The devils are in a pose that mimics one that is usually associated with valour and the giving of ones life for "liberty" (whether or not you agree that this particular pose does or not is for another discussion). So now you have a logo that uses characters associated with negative deeds (the devil, cartoon or not) in the place of men associated with honor and self sacrafice. Given the current events, I could see how this logo, while passing under the radar for many years, is now suddenly considered inappropriate.

    I can understand how many would find it inappropriate, which is unfortunate because for those who've been around the BSD and the computer scene for a while know exactly what the logo is trying to represent and it's quite accurate in that regard.

    1. Re:It's not that they're devils .... by Florian+Weimer · · Score: 1

      The devils are in a pose that mimics one that is usually associated with valour and the giving of ones life for "liberty" (whether or not you agree that this particular pose does or not is for another discussion).

      I'm struggling to find the correct reference for the logo. Is that Delacroix painting? Or is it something else?

    2. Re:It's not that they're devils .... by tiluki · · Score: 5, Informative

      Try explaining that to some people.

      Apple, BSD, daemon processes... They just see their own association and fit it to whatever ideological conditioning they've been reared on, before propagating the next generation in the perpetual cycle of ignorance and fear...

    3. Re:It's not that they're devils .... by hatrisc · · Score: 1

      nope. this one looks like this. it makes sense to me that they'd want to change the logo. i'm quite a fan of it, it's pretty funny and fun, but, the new logo might be even better! just hope someone is creative.

      --
      I write code.
    4. Re:It's not that they're devils .... by Simon+Lyngshede · · Score: 1

      Is that site for real? I mean it is really funny, but I don't think that was the intention.

    5. Re:It's not that they're devils .... by Florian+Weimer · · Score: 1

      nope. this one [netbsd.org] looks like this [tamu.edu].

      Oops, cultural references are always a problem if you don't share the culture.

      Actually, it's modelled quite literally after this photo. I think I've seen that photo before (of course), but I didn't associate it with WWII at all.

    6. Re:It's not that they're devils .... by Dr.Zong · · Score: 1

      That site is by far one of thoe most scary, right wing, religeous, propogandist spewing sites I've seen in a long, long, long time.... It's scary that people like that guy actually spread that kind or crap around - he's a professor!

      It's one thing to be religeous, but to have your head in the sand and that afraid of everything - come on!

      --

      Party?!? What kind of party is this? Where's the damn keg?
      Virtus Junxit Mors Non Separabit
    7. Re:It's not that they're devils .... by Bigman · · Score: 1

      Sadly, I fear it is. In my youth I was a 'born again' Christian and its precisely this kind of wooly headed thinking, all too common, that finally made me give up on wanted to be associated with the word 'Christian'. In one sense it's a shame because there are a great many erudite and interesting Christian academics around that have a lot of relevant things to say about the world. Unfortunately, they tend to be swamped by the miasma of lame-brained, half thought out claptrap that the evangelical organisations trot out.

      --
      *--BigMan--- Time flies like an arrow.. but personally I prefer a nice glass of wine!
    8. Re:It's not that they're devils .... by hatrisc · · Score: 1

      yes, that is a better picture, however, i searched google for iwa jima and that was the first photo that was decent. :)

      --
      I write code.
    9. Re:It's not that they're devils .... by trash+eighty · · Score: 1

      i thought it was a joke like landover baptist but then i saw they wanted that website shut down so maybe it is "real", damned funny anyway!

    10. Re:It's not that they're devils .... by joshmccormack · · Score: 1

      who is 'they?' I'd recommend caution in phrasing things this way, as racism, political and religious persecution often are encouraged by blanket statements about 'they.' Just as not all politically left of center people are communist revolutionaries, or not all Muslims are terrorists, so you should address specific people with their specific faults. I think 'they'd' like it that way.

    11. Re:It's not that they're devils .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had no idea my computer was sooo evil. DAMN YOU EVIL MACHINE DAMN YOU YOU DAMN ME TO HELL.

      and open source is communisum? Man what is the world coming to.

    12. Re:It's not that they're devils .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >The devils are in a pose that mimics one that is usually associated with valour and the giving of ones life for "liberty"

      Really? It looks to me like they are just mimicking the military

      >now you have a logo that uses characters associated with negative deeds in the place of men associated with ...

      other negative deeds.

      This didn't pass 'under the radar' for many years... it's just that previously radar didn't trigger on such trivial non-issues.

    13. Re:It's not that they're devils .... by kiolbasa · · Score: 1

      I've seen that site before. I don't remember all the exact research I did, but I came to my own conclusion that it was a hoax. Though we all see your point, that there are people who think this way, I don't think that site represents them honestly.

      --

      Beer wants to be free
    14. Re:It's not that they're devils .... by Andrewkov · · Score: 1
      That site is by far one of thoe most scary, right wing, religeous, propogandist spewing sites I've seen in a long, long, long time....

      Yeah, and I bet you probably get your news from The Onion also.

    15. Re:It's not that they're devils .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I get it.

      You're talking about that Bush in a flight suit thing, right?

    16. Re:It's not that they're devils .... by Dr.Zong · · Score: 1

      uhhhhh, no. My sarcasm and/or flame detector is wonky right now, so I am not sure exactly which way you are trying to poke at me...

      However to rebut, I do find The Onion funny - satire, simply stated as satire - no claims otherwise. That other website (jesussaves.us) makes no claims to be satire - which is what makes it scary. That page written by "Professor" Dr. Richard Paley is nothing but a disguise for fear... seriously he even picks apart Apple's ancient ads and groups everyone in Open Source as Communist... Puh-lease...

      Did you actually RTFW - or are you just trying to start some kind of a verbal war?

      --

      Party?!? What kind of party is this? Where's the damn keg?
      Virtus Junxit Mors Non Separabit
    17. Re:It's not that they're devils .... by sindarin2001 · · Score: 1

      That page has me horribly terrified. Though I am a fairly religious Christian, these people embarass me. There were a couple of times I wanted to reach through my screen and choke the idiots who made it to knock some sense into them.

    18. Re:It's not that they're devils .... by Imperator · · Score: 4, Informative

      That site is a hoax, like Landover but subtle enough that most people don't figure it out. I can't find it anymore but on their "4KIDZ" page they had a peppered moth teaching about creationism. No real creationists would ever mention the peppered moth, unless they were trying to discredit the evidence. There are lots of other things that are just a bit too ridiculous to be real. That's not to say that real creationists aren't ridiculous, but they don't explicitly point out the hilarious consequences of their beliefs, like kangaroos in the Middle East. If you don't know any of these people it's easy to think this site represents their views, but it's just a little bit over the top.

      --

      Gates' Law: Every 18 months, the speed of software halves.
    19. Re:It's not that they're devils .... by Andrewkov · · Score: 1

      Nah, I was just trying to point out that the religous zealot site looks a lot like The Onion... I don't think it's supposed to be a serious site, I think it's trying to poke fun at religous nuts.

    20. Re:It's not that they're devils .... by Dr.Zong · · Score: 1

      Oh ok... sorry 'bout that...

      I really, really don't think it is a joke though... check out the root of objective.jesussaves.us pretty "scary" stuff, not that I have anything against those with faith...

      I just think these people take it too far, as the muslim faith has their share of extremists (we all know that lesson a little too well), so does the christian faith, as does probably every other faith in the world. Some people can take iconism and language a little too far and use them to bastardize anything that really meant nothing in the first place.

      Ok... I stop now... :-)

      --

      Party?!? What kind of party is this? Where's the damn keg?
      Virtus Junxit Mors Non Separabit
    21. Re:It's not that they're devils .... by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      If you really want to screw with your satire detector, hie thee to The Church of the SubGenius and try to decide whether they're joking.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    22. Re:It's not that they're devils .... by coaxial · · Score: 1

      Though we all see your point, that there are people who think this way, I don't think that site represents them honestly.

      Perhaps. But this one does.

    23. Re:It's not that they're devils .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It looks like a cross between the flag raising on Iwo Jima (which has it's own controversy), and the painting by Delacroix of Liberty leading the French revolution. I agree that it's much too complicated, strictly from a graphic design point of view.

    24. Re:It's not that they're devils .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In parts of Asia, that image is not associated with "valor" or "liberty", rather with American pride of conquering the Japanese race. Maybe the Japanese needed to be conquered, but that's beside the point. I wouldn't expect this to be a good trademark to use on a product in Japan any more than I'd use a swastika in the West.

    25. Re:It's not that they're devils .... by AchmedHabib · · Score: 1

      but here: For instance, an industry standard connection for peripherals is idiosyncratically retermed "FireWire" (or should we just be honest and call it "HellFireWire"?) while the familiar Recycle Bin is given its new cult name of "Trash Can".
      I mean "HellFireWire" is a bit far fetched, even for that page and "Trash Can", where's the devil in that.
      Besides from that, I would love to meet a guy like that, while I am wearing a FreeBSD T-shirt.

    26. Re:It's not that they're devils .... by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      It's not just associated with valour and giving ones life for "liberty".

      It's a direct reference to a specific photograph of Iwo Jima. It is also associated with WWII. Landover Baptist might have a problem with the daemons, but the rest of the world might have a problem with the association with the US military.

      Plus, it really is a crappy logo. It's a cute cartoon, and I appreciate its sentiment, but it's not going to get used in any magazine article on NetBSD, though. Not nearly as cool as Hexley, the Darwin logo. (He's a platypus wearing a daemon costume. Get it? Isn't he cute! If he weren't so dark skinned, they'd use him in magazines *everywhere*.)

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    27. Re:It's not that they're devils .... by UserGoogol · · Score: 1

      It could go either way, but I think they're fake. Besides the fact that I think someone told me they are:

      1) They discuss "Landover Baptists" directly and call them filthy sinners. It seems like the kind of thing parodiers might want to do.

      2) "Christian Game Theory" has too odd a combination of knowledge and incompetence to not be written by someone who's doing a spoof.

      3) "4 Kidz" is too damned perfect.

      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
    28. Re:It's not that they're devils .... by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Heh. I know the feeling. I'm a rather liberal liberal, but I want to kill some of the people I see on TV "representing" our viewpoint...

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    29. Re:It's not that they're devils .... by chickenwing · · Score: 1

      Wow Apple can't win. Not only do the Christians
      so do the Satanists!

    30. Re:It's not that they're devils .... by jonhuang · · Score: 1

      I really wish this site would place a disclaimer--it keeps popping up on slashdot and elsewhere. Always confuses people and wastes time. bah.

  19. Oh, this makes me angry... by spoodie · · Score: 1

    ...put Jesus, Buddha or Muhammed on the end of the Devil's trident and maybe you'd have a case!

    --
    I don't need a compass to tell me which way the wind shines.
    1. Re:Oh, this makes me angry... by gizmonic · · Score: 1

      You know, a trident does have three points...

      Wow. One little picture like that and you could effectively piss off a vast majority of the population of the planet.

      As a whole, Humans are stupid.

      --
      WWJD?
      JWRTFM!
  20. NetBSD is LAME for getting rid of the daemon logo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The logo does not show the 'devil' -- it show's daemons. According to Merriam-Webster, a daemon is:

    2 usually daemon : an attendant power or spirit : GENIUS
    3 usually daemon : a supernatural being of Greek mythology intermediate between gods and men
    4 : one that has exceptional enthusiasm, drive, or effectiveness

    Definition states that it is an evil spirit that intends to do harm, however that definition refers to the 'demon' spelling, not the 'daemon' spelling popular in Unix culture.

    NetBSD is now getting politically correct? Time for me to switch to a new OS. OpenBSD and FreeBSD both suddenly got much more attractive to me.

  21. I know why (lol) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's because of Photoshop. You can't open an devil image in Photoshop CS v2 LOL.

    If BSD starts to sux you know why, there is already a nice logo with an Apple and an X (is the X too porn for the free open source mind?)

  22. Iwo Jima photo by Joe Rosenthal by basingwerk · · Score: 3, Informative

    The original Iwo Jima photo by Joe Rosenthal was faked the day after the victory. In the NetBSD reproduction, the US troops have been replaced by devils, and the mountain top is a pile of computer hardware. The US flag has become a simple banner proclaiming NET Bsd. Notwithstanding any political correctness in this decision, it is hard to see the relevance of the current logo.

    --
    I stole this .sig
    1. Re:Iwo Jima photo by Joe Rosenthal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At the time it was conceived, it probably symbolized the victory over AT&T -- leading to the release of the 4.3BSD NET/2 sources -- and the struggle ahead of the project to do something useful with them.

      But that was the last time a Bush was in the White House, if that.

    2. Re:Iwo Jima photo by Joe Rosenthal by towzzer · · Score: 3, Informative

      Acutally the flag raising was done twice right after each other, the first flag was very small so they decided to take it down and find a larger pole to put it on, as it was being put up the photographer 'Joe Rosenthal' snapped the picture as he was just coming to the top of mountain. Later , when the flag was fully raised, he took a posed picture. Of course the accidental picture was the one that became famous.

    3. Re:Iwo Jima photo by Joe Rosenthal by Bob+Cat+-+NYMPHS · · Score: 0

      It was NOT faked.
      Why don't you apologize to Mr Rosenthal for spreading that lie?

    4. Re:Iwo Jima photo by Joe Rosenthal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The original Iwo Jima photo by Joe Rosenthal was faked the day after the victory.

      No, it was not faked. There were two flag raisings on the same morning. Rosenthal just happen to catch the second one. And it was not the day after the victory. The actual raising was the instant they took Mt. Suribachi.

      Here is the Associated Press account of what happened. (not that that is a credible source, though) The story is about half way thru the article.

      I never did like the NetBSD logo. It shows me that the people who designed it, at the least, don't really know what kind of sacrifice those Marines made that day. At worse, it's just downright disrespectful. I'm not saying they can't draw what they want, they certainly can. But I'm just as free to draw my own conclusinos about them based on what they draw.

    5. Re:Iwo Jima photo by Joe Rosenthal by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      The original Iwo Jima photo by Joe Rosenthal was faked the day after the victory.

      I wouldn't exactly call a planned re-staging to be "faked", myself. It's not like the flagpole was Photoshopped in after the fact.

      Then again, I'm not a photojournalist, and can't claim to speak for the ethics of such.

    6. Re:Iwo Jima photo by Joe Rosenthal by basingwerk · · Score: 1

      I did not make the comment to be disrespectful to Mr Rosenthal. As you must know, there is a famous controversy about the authenticity of the picture, which has raged for years. I mentioned it mostly in passing. I thought that perhaps the image was chosen as the logo for NetBSD because NetBSD is an alternative Unix, created after the original, similarly (according to some accounts) to Mr Rosenthal's picture.

      --
      I stole this .sig
    7. Re:Iwo Jima photo by Joe Rosenthal by Bob+Cat+-+NYMPHS · · Score: 1

      There is no controversy, there is an urban legend, which you should not spread. Rosenthal had to listen to people say he faked it his whole life. Nice reward for risking your life by pointing a camera while others are pointing guns at you.

    8. Re:Iwo Jima photo by Joe Rosenthal by basingwerk · · Score: 1

      You seem quite sure of yourself. What actually happened?

      --
      I stole this .sig
    9. Re:Iwo Jima photo by Joe Rosenthal by Bob+Cat+-+NYMPHS · · Score: 1

      Rosenthal arrived just in time to snap the picture of the second flag raising. The first flag was from USS Missoula, and was much smaller. There is a picture of the flag-raisers posed in FRONT of the flag and a *film* of the raising, which you may see here http://www.iwojima.com/raising/raisingb.htm
      along with the posed photos. The raisers bios are here http://www.iwojima.com/raising/raisingc.htm
      and here http://www.history.navy.mil/faqs/faq87-3l.htm a 1945 interview with a raiser.

  23. Suggestion by junics · · Score: 1

    They always said it can be run on a toaster so why not a toaster logo?

    1. Re:Suggestion by that+_evil+_gleek · · Score: 1

      http://www.bsdmall.com/tshirts.html

      They should see if their $100 would get them rights to use one these T-shirt logos

      I like the Architect one... and, I may have installed Netbsd just so I could wear the shirt, but I'll never tell ;-]

  24. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you're asking about the OS, it's pretty good. The troll below was thinking of OpenBSD -- and a bit off the mark -- but basically, think OpenBSD without the security focus, with the conveniences of FreeBSD (sometimes done better; pkgsrc is rather sweet, and claims to handle builds on Linux as well!), relatively small installation size, cutting-edge features, and of course, ridiculous portability. Definitely Just The Thing for that 486DX2-50 collecting dust (unless it's to be a firewall or bastion host - then you want OpenBSD), and quite useful anywhere else as well.

    If you're planning an 'intensive' workload (more specifically, "if you're planning something that will actually put stress on a $2,000+ server"), then FreeBSD and soon DragonFly will be worth looking into. (DragonFly will be cool for other reasons, but then, I'm a fanboy.)

    As to this logo business... Well, in a perfect world, people would use BSDs more often, and accept any lingering 'incorrectness' to the logo (it's supposed to be a daemon, not a demon, so the saying goes) as the price paid for getting a great, maintainable, don't-even-have-to-follow-GPL-sharealike-rules OS. But pragmatically, a lot of NetBSD core seems to work for Wasabi Systems -- call them the RedHat of NetBSD, but of course, the overall NetBSD community doesn't quite have the size and clout of the 'Linux community,' so keeping those guys fed is more intrinsic to the project's survival in the near term. If the logo's losing them contracts (and what's worse than losing a contract for nontechnical reasons?), then hey, maybe it's time for the weird to turn pro.

  25. Suggestions by WhyteRabbyt · · Score: 2, Funny

    1) Change the colour. Red is too demonic. Black would be good, no-one objects to Tux after all, but you wanna make the face stand out. Make that much lighter, and slightly more prominent.
    2) Lose the horns. Something like big round ears would be friendlier.
    3) Lose the pitchfork and tail. You want something that gives an air of class - like white gloves
    4) No nudity, please; we need more than trainers or this is just pornography. Put shorts on the dude or something. You could even make them red, sort of a homage to the original. But you'd need to simplify the footwear.

    That would be perfect. No-one could ever object to that.

    It would look something like this : google link

    --
    free experimental electronic music netlabel at www.viablehybrid.com
    1. Re:Suggestions by TheMidget · · Score: 1
      Wow, that logo is right out offensive! Don't you have any sense of decency!

      That's far worse than eternal damnation, it's eternal copyright!

  26. Best Logos Ever, Eric Schwartz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get Eric Schwartz to do something. his amizilla logo is amazing. A reptile with mammaries!. Who cares. it looks good.

    I'm sure he could do something tasteful and mediocre if he needed.

  27. Obvious movie reference by binaryDigit · · Score: 1, Funny

    SCENE: Dr Evil addressing /. audience ...

    Dr. Evil: ... and the reward for best logo will be ... [PAUSE FOR EFFECT] 1 HUUUNNNDREED DOLLARS!

    [FAST ZOOM ON DR. EVILS MOUTH/PINKY]

    Dr. Evil: And can I get a logo with devils with frickin lasers on their heads!

  28. formerly 'off limits' melinda gates touts BugWear? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    on tv?

    taking a ?pr firm? hypenosys cue from robbIE/the won-eyed girl's feenominull suckssass eye gas, no DOWt?

  29. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The new logo is supposed to represent the goals of the NetBSD project. So, from what you said, are we to assume that your recommendation for the new NetBSD logo is a dead squirrel in a cardboard box ?

  30. Similarities, but not quite to Intel's Pentium by deunan_k · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Pentium

    It is called "Pentium" because it is the fifth in the 80x86 line. It would have been called the 80586 had a US court not ruled that you can't trademark a number.

    The successors are the Pentium Pro and Pentium II.

    The following Pentium variants all belong to "x86 Family 6", as reported by "Microsoft Windows" when identifying the CPU:

    Model Name
    1 Pentium Pro
    2 ?
    3 Pentium II
    4 ?
    5, 6 Celeron or Pentium II
    7 Pentium III
    8 Celeron uPGA2 or Mobile Pentium III

    The name was chosen because of difficulties Intel had in trademarking a number. It suggests the number five (implying 586) while (according to Intel) conveying a meaning of strength "like
    titanium".

    Intel did not stick to this convention when naming its P6 processor the Pentium Pro; many believe this is due to difficulties in selling a chip with "sex" in its name. Successor chips have been
    called `Pentium II' and `Pentium III'.

    Sorry, the above comments I pirate it off - http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=pentium

    The last paragraph is more closely related to NetBSD (or all BSDs in general) problem. I read an article somewhere years ago that, Intel actually engaged a consulting firm in order to come out with a name for suitable for the 586. One of the criterias was that it must be something not offensive in any languages spoken worldwide.

    Call it political correctness, but you don't offend anyone if you can help it. Especially a wold class entity doing business worldwide.

    NetBSD, is an entity that transact with people all over the world. People from all walks of life. Personally, I love the BSD daemon, kinda cute.. But I'm sure it is not the OS of choice for some/most religious organization.. Esp. those conservative ones who have yet to discover fire.

    Well, if they decide on a new logo in order not to offend the sensibilities of 'potential' customers, why not indeed?

    Regards all and everyone - peace!

    --
    Will sys-admin for food
    1. Re:Similarities, but not quite to Intel's Pentium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Regards all and everyone - peace!
      I'm offended. The politically correct way to convey such a message is:

      "Propz to all my niggas, fuck tha war!"

      Hmm, I should submit that as my entry to the NetBSD logo competition :)
    2. Re:Similarities, but not quite to Intel's Pentium by Seahawk · · Score: 1

      NetBSD, is an entity that transact with people all over the world.

      Nono - BSD is dead you know - noone actually uses it... ;)

      (If you dont understand ironi, ignore this message...)

    3. Re:Similarities, but not quite to Intel's Pentium by beanyk · · Score: 1
      Intel did not stick to this convention when naming its P6 processor the Pentium Pro; many believe this is due to difficulties in selling a chip with "sex" in its name.


      The problem with this reasoning is that "pentium" is directly of Greek origin, *not* Latin (otherwise, it would be based on "quinque", not "pente"). Thus the next in the series would have been the "hexium", *not* "sexium".

      So they wouldn't have to have avoided "sex" in the name if they'd been consistent.
    4. Re:Similarities, but not quite to Intel's Pentium by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 0

      Woe too thee oh Earth and sea
      For the Devil send the beast with wrath
      because he knows the time is short
      Let him who hath understandin reckon
      the number of the beast
      for it is a human number
      This number
      Is six hundred and sixety six

      Free your MIND!!!!!!!!!

      Laught at Religion!!!!!!!!!!

      Up the Irons!

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    5. Re:Similarities, but not quite to Intel's Pentium by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

      The problem with this reasoning is that "pentium" is directly of Greek origin, *not* Latin (otherwise, it would be based on "quinque", not "pente"). Thus the next in the series would have been the "hexium", *not* "sexium".
      Yeah, but hexium sounds like witchcraft.

    6. Re:Similarities, but not quite to Intel's Pentium by coaxial · · Score: 1

      The last paragraph is more closely related to NetBSD (or all BSDs in general) problem. I read an article somewhere years ago that, Intel actually engaged a consulting firm in order to come out with a name for suitable for the 586. One of the criterias was that it must be something not offensive in any languages spoken worldwide.

      Call it political correctness, but you don't offend anyone if you can help it. Especially a wo
      [r]ld class entity doing business worldwide.

      You know people always defend creating bogus words bysaying that "we can't offend someone in another language". That's utter bullshit. Why?

      China.

      If you sell products in China, you must label them in Chinese. This is not simple transliteration because Chinese doesn't have a phonetic alphabet. Chinese uses ideograms. Each character represents both a phoneme and an idea (either concrete or abstract). This means that EVERY word including bullshit like "Pentium", "Levitra", and "xyzzy" means something. It may not make sense, but it does mean something.

      For example, Subway resturants are called
      "si ba wei" which means something like "four thousand tastes". My girlfriend (who's from China) likes this name because it's actually clever. Most of time nonChinese names have questionable, if not outright meaningless names. (Think Lisa Simpson when she reads the movie marquee "Young Einstien Staring Yahoo Serious". ("I know these words, but that sign doesn't make any sense.")) Another example is "Johnson" (as in "Johnson's & Johnson's" is "qiang sheng" which means "strength birth". Still others end up meaning little more than "robot monkey carburator" or "Yahoo Serious".

      zhongwen.com has a faq about his very topic.

  31. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a BSD flavour to be correct. Or YAUL (Yet another unix like)

  32. Forget Beastie.... by sethadam1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Beastie, although he is really a BSD thing in general, is most associated with FreeBSD. OpenBSD adopted Puff the Blowfish and it is instantly recognizable as obsd. I think NetBSD design submitters ought to choose a new animal - perhaps a stingray, a lobster, a crab, or some other creature that can defend itself - and go for it. Then NetBSD will have some individual recognizable identity to those outside the BSD aware.

    1. Re:Forget Beastie.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about a borg to simbolizing its power to assimilate any platform, even my toaster.

    2. Re:Forget Beastie.... by LarsWestergren · · Score: 1

      Puff the Blowfish and it is instantly recognizable as obsd.

      Yes, I agree, the fish instantly recognizable as obese. Oh, wait...

      --

      Being bitter is drinking poison and hoping someone else will die

    3. Re:Forget Beastie.... by Eagle7 · · Score: 1

      or some other creature that can defend itself

      How about an attractive woman packing heat? From reading slashdot regularly, one can deduce that hot women seem to have univesal international apeal amongst open source geeks.

      --
      _sig_ is away
    4. Re:Forget Beastie.... by Walles · · Score: 1

      They should have something that can be associated with NetBSD's wide platform support. Like a chameleon or a cockroach or something.

      --
      Installed the Bubblemon yet?
    5. Re:Forget Beastie.... by mobby_6kl · · Score: 0

      IMHO the logo should look something like this: Warriors Of The World, but with the guy in the front substituted with Beastie, and everybody else with penguins ;-)

    6. Re:Forget Beastie.... by that+_evil+_gleek · · Score: 1

      What? No, first appearance was 4.2 BSD manuals published by
      Usenix Association. Google for Timeline_0378_BsdDaemon.jpg
      Or if this link is still good:
      http://www.old-computers.com/history/images /Timeli ne_0378_BsdDaemon.jpg

      At any rate they must keep Beastie, IMO, in fact I'd loose interest in NetBSD
      if they did, moving away from Beastie suggests moving away from BSD historic roots.
      Something more like the original.. Or Maybe just get the rights to use
      one of the better T-Shirt logos.

    7. Re:Forget Beastie.... by KilobyteKnight · · Score: 1

      I think NetBSD design submitters ought to choose a new animal

      Or maybe a bottle of Windex.

      --
      When will Windows be ready for the desktop?
    8. Re:Forget Beastie.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I think NetBSD design submitters ought to choose a new animal - perhaps a stingray, a lobster, a crab, or some other creature that can defend itself - and go for it.

      How about a cockroach? They're champions at surviving everywhere, even in the most adverse conditions.

      Regards, Felix.

    9. Re:Forget Beastie.... by twain · · Score: 1

      SuSE's logo has a chameleon already so that leaves the cockaroaches competing for the world championship title in cuteness against Tux and Puff. Too bad they can't steal the bad mofo thing from MIB.

    10. Re:Forget Beastie.... by scrytch · · Score: 1

      > Beastie, although he is really a BSD thing in general, is most associated with FreeBSD.

      His name is Chuck.

      --
      I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
  33. Sympathy for the daemon by k98sven · · Score: 4, Funny

    Please allow me to introduce myself
    I'm an OS of wealth and taste
    I've been around for a long, long year
    Stole many a man's soul and faith

    And I was 'round when Gary Kildall
    Had his moment of doubt and pain
    Made damn sure that Bill Gates
    Washed his hands and sealed his fate

    Pleased to meet you
    Hope you guess my name
    But what's puzzling you
    Is the nature of my game

    I stuck around Digital
    When I saw it was a time for a change
    Killed VMS and its decendents
    The VAXen screamed in vain

    I rode my way
    through USLs day
    when the lawsuit raged
    and the licenses stank

    Hope you guess my name, oh yeah
    Ah, what's puzzling you
    Is the nature of my game, oh yeah

    I watched with glee
    While your kings and queens
    Fought for ten decades
    For the OSes they made
    I shouted out,
    Who killed System V?
    When after all
    It was you and me

    etc... my apology to the Rolling Stones..

    1. Re:Sympathy for the daemon by displague · · Score: 0

      did anyone else read this in the singing voice of Perry Ferrell? (jane's addiction, great cover)...

      --
      Marques Johansson
    2. Re:Sympathy for the daemon by the+real+darkskye · · Score: 1

      Never heard JA's verson, but the Guns 'n' Roses cover rocks
      On a side note, one of the funniest BSD is dead/dying trolls i've seen for a while.

      --
      Music is everybody's possession.
      It's only publishers who think that people own it.
      Fuck Beta
      ~John Lenno
    3. Re:Sympathy for the daemon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You sir have surpassed the geekiest misanthrope hopes of all Slashdotdom.

      Congrats. Please close your parents basement door next time you start beating the bishop.

    4. Re:Sympathy for the daemon by gregarican · · Score: 1

      Yep. Jane's Addiction's first album. Good one. Jane Says and some other good acoustic tunes.

    5. Re:Sympathy for the daemon by MavEtJu · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the song, added it to my songbook:
      http://www.mavetju.org/unix/freebsd-son gbook.php

      --
      bash$ :(){ :|:&};:
  34. Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about a Jesus Lizard?

    They can run anywhere...

  35. Why cash? Go Open Source! by millwall · · Score: 1

    "There is a cash prize of US $100.00 for the winning entry."

    Why don't they just make it an Open Source competition?

    If it works for code it can work for graphic/logos!

  36. won-eyed girl/ms gates, chosen over illegal aliens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to pilot the fairytail georgewellian fuddite corepirate nazi execrable moon/mars/bars shot, & time machine projects?

    there's rumour that the illegal aliens backed out of the deal on concerns about the won-eyed girl's failure to provide requested health status documentation.

    sales of turnbulltax's illegal alien edition have dropped off dramatically, as a result of their (the alien's) failure to puppetize.

    the fuddites have now proposed an illegal alien deletion devise, to corewrecked the 'problem'. further rumour indicates it's (the deletion devise) now being tested on that o'neill guy?

  37. In contrast to the bashing by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I believe this is a good idea, from a branding standpoint.

    The loss of the BSD daemon may be unfortunate, but looking at major brands it's pretty clear recognition doesn't require a cool mascot. To name a few: Nike, Adidas, Mercedez-Benz and Nokia all have rather simple comporate symbols.

    If the NetBSD project wishes to look more professional in the eyes of marketeers, this is a good move.

    --
    .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
    1. Re:In contrast to the bashing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny. I used to sell Nokia phones and Even I have to think about what their logo is!

    2. Re:In contrast to the bashing by Avalanche_Joe · · Score: 1

      I agree that it is good from a branding standpoint. They are even going about it on the cheap: Give someone $100 for a brand image that might one day be as recognizable as the Nike Swoosh (hey, it could happen), and NetBSD will be really pleased with themselves. I mean, companies spend hundreds of thousands of dollars on branding... Regards, 'Joe

  38. Re:wow by dipipanone · · Score: 1

    maybe it's time for the weird to turn pro

    In this instance, it's more of a case of the pro turning weird, surely?

  39. Re:my logo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sadly, it is already taken: http://www.amatproduct-gold.com/OpenImg.asp?Title= Betty%20Los%20!%20Piss%20Ab%20!!&ImageURL=http://w ww.sulfurishop.com/ImagesProducts/28001_L.jpg

  40. Politically correct NetBSD Logo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Can be found here...

  41. Offended that they are offended! by bhima · · Score: 1
    I use NetBSD at home on my Qube2. I like the Demon; in fact I like it a lot. I get the NetBSD logo and I'm amused by it. I don't particularly like though so I agree that a change could be good.

    However! I am honestly offended by suggestions that a cartoon demon could be offensive to a sane religion or society. The religions and societies that do find offense in these sorts of things are looking for any excuse to spread hate and frankly I'm sick of it.

    --
    Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    1. Re:Offended that they are offended! by xA40D · · Score: 1

      any excuse to spread hate

      It seems to me that the religions of the world exist merely to provide people with reasons to hate - it's what they do best. So picking on the lil' beastie is to be expected. Sad, but expected.

      frankly I'm sick of it.

      Me too.

      --
      Do you mind, your karma has just run over my dogma.
  42. Got one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about a the middle finger? Don't you think it's the perfect symbol of corporates dealing with people? Cum on BSD mail me my 100 bucks :)

  43. new Mascot? by POds · · Score: 1

    Does NetBSD have a mostcot? If so, i assume its the BSD daemon? In which case, does new logo imply new mascot?

    --


    Giving IE users a taste of their own medicine since 2005 - http://pods.-is-a-geek.net/
  44. Combine OpenBSD logo with FreeBSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > OpenBSD adopted Puff the Blowfish and it is instantly recognizable
    > as obsd. I think NetBSD design submitters ought to
    > choose a new animal - perhaps a stingray,

    How about combining the fish idea of OpenBSD and the daemon from BSD. Here are a few idea:
    * Red or Blue Devil Fish
    * Ghost Fish
    * Spirit Fish
    * Devil Stingray

    1. Re:Combine OpenBSD logo with FreeBSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      although, a _GREAT_ idea, that takes away the fact that all three { Net, Open, Free } have different ideas, strengths and weeknesses. combining the two logos is like combining the windows logo and apple logo to become the new linux logo. (since those 3 oses are probably the most common oses).

    2. Re:Combine OpenBSD logo with FreeBSD by dipipanone · · Score: 1

      So why not have the Open BSD blowfish being caught in a net?

      Or a picture of Dave 'Devilfish' Uliot

  45. How about this one? by Attaturk · · Score: 1
  46. Sexium? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    many believe this is due to difficulties in selling a chip with "sex" in its name. Successor chips have been called `Pentium II' and `Pentium III'.

    Nice bar room and water cooler fodder, but please. Intel wanted to include the 5 (pent) because up until then people were used to the progression of numbers. By the time the Pentium took hold, Intel realized that they had a large investment (market investment, not just money) in what had become a marketable product family name, which the x86 chips never had. Then it made a lot more sense to keep the "pentium" name as the product name, and use some other means to distinguish between them. After all, who knows (or cares) which "generation" the current P4 is relative to the 486?

    Heck, if the "sex" part was such an issue, Intel could have just skipped it and named it's next chip the Septium and touted it as a major innovation warranting the skipping over gen 6. But then you have a whole new name you have to get established and you've set yourself up to have to go through this cycle every several years.

  47. Wait . . . by shystershep · · Score: 3, Funny
    The successful logo will also have wide exposure

    Wait a minute - this is NETBSD we're talking about here, right?

    --
    The bigotry of the nonbeliever is for me nearly as funny as the bigotry of the believer. - Albert Einstein
    1. Re:Wait . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently there's a guy whose picture is often featured on Slashdot who is well known for his wide exposure. I'm not sure if his picture would make a good logo, however.

  48. So I'm Fired... by BSDevil · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...and they didn't even tell me.

    Way to gout out of your way there, Net BSD. After years of loyal servitude, this is how you treat me.

    --
    Cue The Sun...
  49. Too american by kivaapina · · Score: 0

    It's too american because they are raising a flag together. I think it's better if people don't consider NetBSD an american software project because developers are all over the world.

  50. black cat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about a logo of a black cat, but without the pitchfork? I have (see igor) a pretty little back cat that runs on *anything*.

  51. Re:Only idiots would find it inappropriate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Perhaps people should get their heads out of their politically correct backsides and get a life instead of worrying about this sort of thing.

    Hmmm, who needs to get a life and stop worrying about this sort of thing? It's THEIR logo, THEY want to change it for whatever reason THEY have, who are YOU to say what is a good reason or not? What next, hyprocrites telling organizations what is and isn't a good reason to change logos?

    POT/KETTLE/BLACK

  52. My proposal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I propose a pentagram surrounded by three sixes, on a background of flames.

    Then again, the flames might be difficult to reproduce.

  53. Angel Instead by turgid · · Score: 1
    So, if you used an angel instead, would they lynch you too for assocaiting something wholesome and all-American with some godless-pinko-commie-un-American-terrorist-lefty-o pen-source stuff?

    Just wondering.

    1. Re:Angel Instead by AllUsernamesAreGone · · Score: 1

      No, then you'd probably be sacrificed by the devil worshiping religious nuts....

  54. negative religious ramifications? Then why darwin? by compactable · · Score: 1

    Here's what I don't get: their motive for changing the logo is (among other things) "negative cultural, and religious ramifications". They then suggest Darwin's mascot hexley as a refence logo / mascot. The thing is holding a pitchfork. Is this not a negative religious ramification? Where is the line drawn. I am confsed...

  55. Yes, that's a good idea: by advid.net · · Score: 1
    Here is a picture grabbed on google if anyone want to draw a logo from it.

    Jesus Lizard

    Then think of the tee-shirt:
    On the logo the lizard run from water to dirt and the text reads
    NetBSD: It can run everywhere!

    Mod the parent up for this good idea, since this is one of the main characteristics of NetBSD.

  56. Cultural, Shmultural! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Forget the cultural ramifications, the logo is very, VERY gay. Please someone, design something that is a little less homo-erotic and we'll give you a C-note.

  57. Re:my logo by keeboo · · Score: 1

    AFAIR a certain green friend of yours owns it already..

  58. oh, oh, me, me, me (jumps up and down excitedly :) by cliveholloway · · Score: 2, Funny
    Considering how much BSD code was used in Windows services for UNIX, how about this.

    .02

    cLive ;-)

    --
    -- Trinity in high heels carrying a whip: The donimatrix - there is no spoonerism
  59. religion by Tom · · Score: 1

    has negative cultural, and religious ramifications."

    Seriously, I'd consider that an advantage. What kind of people would refuse to run an OS because its mascot is a cuddly depiction of an image that was attached to the negative side of their religion sometime during the early middle ages?

    Is it not a great bonus to not have these people as users?

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  60. *This* is SOOO obvious by Krapangor · · Score: 1
    --
    Owner of a Mensa membership card.
    1. Re:*This* is SOOO obvious by gomoX · · Score: 1

      *ROFLMAO*
      if only i had mod points - *snif*

      --
      My english is sow-sow. Sowhat?
  61. WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wtf is "Mircosoft"?

  62. negative cultural, and religious ramifications? by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

    This is ridiculous. The trickster archtype is as old as humanity and serves an important function as the rebel, the defender of the non-conventional, etc. I always loved this little character because he more or less represented the non-mainstream, something that couldnt be "MS-ified." Come on, this isn't exactly a Church of Satan horned muscle-bound monstrosity with a huge schlong hanging between its legs.

    He's also drawn in a very cute anime-like way which pretty much puts the kibosh on the whole "its the devil" nonsense. Last I checked the US wasn't a theocracy.

    Well, here's to another bit of creativity killed by "comittee thinking." I await the eventual swirl design that corporate america seems to love.

    As a side note: did you know that it was recently discovered that penguins can projectile defecate? It helps keep their nests clean. Linux's mascot is pretty much a bird that can shoot its shit. Quickly someone pick a new mascot! That's how the BSD people seem to be acting.

    1. Re:negative cultural, and religious ramifications? by aallan · · Score: 4, Funny

      Last I checked the US wasn't a theocracy...

      When was the last time you checked?

      Al.
      --
      The Daily ACK - Eclectic posts by yet another hacker
    2. Re:negative cultural, and religious ramifications? by Bigman · · Score: 1
      Last I checked the US wasn't a theocracy

      Erm.. NetBSD hopes to sell outside the USA, no? I mean, you do know there is somewhere outside of the USA?


      Seriously, if you intend to distribute your wares around the world to peoples of different race and belief, it pays to be a little sensitive to the cultural context of any symbols or trademarks you use. Just ask anyone who tried to sell a Chevy Nova in Spain..

      --
      *--BigMan--- Time flies like an arrow.. but personally I prefer a nice glass of wine!
    3. Re:negative cultural, and religious ramifications? by metulj · · Score: 1

      Last I checked the US wasn't a theocracy
      Well, when John Ashcroft's Mormom minions kick in your front door, you'll wish you had checked.

  63. NetBSD going PC by oddityfds · · Score: 1

    So, NetBSD is going politically correct? Well, the Linux Penguin is non-PC in a more subtle way. :-)

  64. Think about it for a minute by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

    Considering you can get *BSD for free, and all the value it provides, surely $100 for a logo design isn't asking too much. If they were going to hire a professional graphic artist for that much, sure it'd be a lowball price. But for volunteers submitting what essentially amounts to a "patch" for some bit of outdated IP which will then be shared freely with the world, how is that asking too much for too little in return?

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    1. Re:Think about it for a minute by muyuubyou · · Score: 1

      I'd say give just the recognition then... or the right for a link in the front page. $100 is just ridiculous.

      They could give some mechandise for instance, if it's a "fan" contest. The $100 tip can be even insulting for some.

  65. Remember Procter and Gamble by rcastro0 · · Score: 1
    This reminds of what P&G went through. Anyone here remember their familiar old logo ? Apparently someone thought the numbers 666 were hidden in there somehow, and from there everything started to be blown out of proportion.
    'Procter & Gamble has answered more than 150,000 calls and letters about these false stories... Calls and letters peaked in 1982, 1985 and again in 1990... Procter & Gamble, which had worldwide sales of $19 billion last year, is still getting as many as 80 calls a month about the rumors. The high was as many as 15,000 a month, when Procter & Gamble had to add staffers to handle the deluge of calls on a nationwide toll-free consumers' line...' (full story)
    They eventually changed their logo to dull stylized letters.

    *sigh* sadly some people are still living in the dark ages, even in the most modern countries... Renaissance, anyone ?
    --
    Quem a paca cara compra, paca cara pagará.
    1. Re:Remember Procter and Gamble by AchmedHabib · · Score: 1

      They eventually changed their logo to dull stylized letters.
      Are you nuts??
      There are heavy sexual references in that logo. It seems to be promoting threeway intercourse. Look at the 'P' (which we all know what really stands for), almost spoons the willing '&', while the (very open) 'G' tries to pull away from the two arms of the '&' that tries to embrace it. It is very erotic and shoud be removed.

  66. Photo here, was Re:Iwo Jima photo by Joe Rosenthal by bourne · · Score: 1

    Of course the accidental picture was the one that became famous.

    For those that aren't making the connection, the famous photo and a number of others taken at the time are here. There was a stamp made of it too. And it was made into a statue for the Marine Corps War Memorial.

  67. If its good enough for manchester united... by tinla · · Score: 1

    The biggest (in terms of value, profits and probably fan base) soccer team in the world (Manchester United) has the devil as its logo/mascot.

    They even have a fluffy man-in-suit devil called 'Fred the Red' that greets kids at the game and appears in comic strips in the match program. They used to be widely known as 'The Red Devils' but this does seem to have lost some popularity recently.

    If they can turn over many, many millions with a devil on every shirt is it really a hinderence to an OS?

    I think the name 'Red Devils' was originally used by a local rugby league team (Salford) who were given it when touring.. apparently some opponent(s) was/were badly injured (or killed) during the tour. The name then jumped a couple of miles to Manchester United. Looks like Salford are now 'The Salford City Reds'. How pleasant.

    --
    0daymeme.com: Great stuff.
    1. Re:If its good enough for manchester united... by KingJoshi · · Score: 1

      Why can't people get it's not just about "devil"? One of the most popular teams in college basketball is the Duke Blue Devils. It's also a good school and in the south (North Carolina). People don't have problem with the team, school or logo.

      New Jersey Devils is one of the most popular hockey teams and usually have good teams. No one complains about their logo.

      Maybe it's just more acceptable is sports. But that's not the point.

      The main issue should be the complexity of the logo. There are too many daemons and the connotations with other imagery is unnecessary (well, I'm not a NetBSD user and haven't been so I could be wrong here). A simple, easily recognizable daemon representing NetBSD would do. but I'm not an artist...

      --
      In times like these, it is helpful to remember that there have always been times like these. - Paul Harvey
    2. Re:If its good enough for manchester united... by cxvx · · Score: 1

      Belgiums national football (that is soccer for you US barbarians :) team is called "The red devils" and has, surprisingly, a red devil las its mascot (pic here).

      I've never heard of anyone taking offense to it here.

      --
      If only I could come up with a good sig ...
  68. It's not the daemon, people! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Beastie, although he is really a BSD thing in general, is most associated with FreeBSD.
    You, along with many other people posting to this thread, apparently neglected to click on the current logo link in the story.

    The "cute little daemon" is generic BSD. Beastie is FreeBSD. NetBSD's logo is comprised of several daemons standing on conquered computers, hoisting a flag proclaiming 'BSD', in a manner which pays undeniable respect and tribute to this photograph.

    It's that admittedly US-centric photograph which some NetBSD users have found to be culturally biased. I don't believe religion plays a part in the search for a logo replacement, regardless of NetBSD's statement, and I would not be surprised if the winning logo incorporates a daemon.

    It's not the daemon that's pissing people off. It's the "America Uber Alles" vibe that NetBSD's current logo gives off to people living outside the US. As a previous poster mentioned, this flew well under the radar for a number of years, but now that we've started "liberating" other countries, there are a lot of people in this world who find images of American supremacy to be offensive. And god damned rightly so.
    1. Re:It's not the daemon, people! by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1
      As a previous poster mentioned, this flew well under the radar for a number of years, but now that we've started "liberating" other countries, there are a lot of people in this world who find images of American supremacy to be offensive. And god damned rightly so.


      No, it's just that we used to be recognized for actually liberating other countries. It's pretty much impossible to deny that Japan and Germany ended up (in the case of Germany it took 50 years thanks to the Soviets) far more free than they started out. So there is really nothing offensive about that image at all. The problem is the perception based on the last 2 years of foreign policy that "liberate" is a pseudonym for "invade to take over their oil". I think most rational thinkers would agree this perception is flagrantly wrong. Afghanistan is certainly far more free now than it was under the Taliban. Iraq is the one flagrant example of a questionable, turbulent situation. And many Americans don't really think the war was justified at the time we entered into it.


      But to suggest to the millions of American soldiers who gave or risked their lives in World War II that the war they fought was some sort of sham, or that their endeavour to liberate Europe and Asia is offensive to people of the world, is itself extremely offensive, not only to Americans but also to the people of every country that lost lives in World War II.


      Those offended by that logo should do us all a favor and remove themselves from this planet. I agree the NetBSD logo sucks for purely aesthetic reasons, but it should not be changed because it's offensive, when the only offensive thing going on is the suggestion that the liberation referenced therein was not genuine.

    2. Re:It's not the daemon, people! by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

      The current logo could stand for NetBsd's liberation of computers,etc. What's wrong with it is as they said, it's a large image. Linux, freeBSD, OpenBSD, RedHat, Mandrake, etc all have smaller images that are alot easier to use.

      So howabout just using the NetBSD flag hoisted on the pitchfork as the logo?

    3. Re:It's not the daemon, people! by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1

      I agree it's a bad logo, too large, too complicated. The story submitter and the post I responded to seemed to suggest it was a bad logo for its somehow offensive content, which I reject as inconceivably false.

  69. A logo is not enough !!!!... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The fact NetBSD thinks they need a new logo, is a good symptom if we want to have better ways to identify and give some credibility to the free and open source projects. But is not enough.
    What's the use of spending hundreds of dollars in a logo contest when then this full-fledge brand new logo is poorly applied in a shabby designed page?
    IMHO, what has to be done is to make an open competition for design offices or anyone who wants and can submit proposals, giving integral solutions for the identity, which would include logo, webpage templates, documents..
    In the architecture field is very common to make 'idea competitions' where many archictectural offices are involved, and at the end the rainbow of proposals is wider and you can surely get a design that fits best the demands (or can even make you realise about needs you didn't).
    So i propose to change the contest: from 'Logo Design Competition' to 'Identity Design Competition'

    signed: an anonymous coward designer

  70. Been there, Done that... by Noryungi · · Score: 1


    I just sent my logo submission to the NetBSD Foundation. I don't think I'll ever win this competition, but I felt like sending something! ;-)

    --
    The right to offend is far more important than the right not to be offended. (Rowan Atkinson)
  71. LOL - Mod Parent up! by Slashamatic · · Score: 1

    But I thought we spoke about those negative connotations.

  72. Logo != BSD Deamon by tacocat · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    I was reading through some of these posts and it would would be nice if someone would actually read the fucking article and the fucking announcement. Then they might realize that the Logo Contest isn't about the cute little Deamon that we all know and love so well.

    It's about the pile of Deamons doing the Iwo Jima thing on top of all your Monitors.

    This image is a little tricky to duplicate and has some rather aggressive connotations. Far more aggressive than anything in the more generic BSD Deamon that you find on this slashdot page. I think their contest is well warranted and appropriate.

    1. Re:Logo != BSD Deamon by xA40D · · Score: 1

      Reading the article, one of the reasons for the change is: Has negative cultural, and religious ramifications.

      Then under the judgement criteria: "Due to the issues identified above, the current NetBSD daemon character cannot be used. " and "It must be distinctive in the quality and originality of its visual image and not offend any national, cultural or religious sensitivity."

      So I'd say, having read the article, that the NetBSD crowd consider the lil' beastie IS an issue.

      --
      Do you mind, your karma has just run over my dogma.
  73. Misread the subject by FJ · · Score: 1

    I thought NetBSD was doing a Lego contest. I was really excited until I realized it was a logo contest. With Lego returning to blocks I thought my hour of glory had finally arrived.

    I guess I need to draw more than stick figures to win. That leaves me out.

    Maybe I'll use PhotoShop to copy a $100.00 bill and submit that for the logo...

    1. Re:Misread the subject by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn, and I went in the basement to dust my old Lego storage box...

  74. Too hard to reproduce? by Phekko · · Score: 1

    Allrighty then, how about just having NetBSD printed with the standard system font as a logo, then? Call it a minimalist no-nonsense logo, or something.

    --

    Sigs for Nerds. Sigs that Matter.
  75. Re:A polar bear! by axxackall · · Score: 2, Informative
    Polar bears have no chance to eat pinguins - they are living on opposite poles. So, polar bears would be more appropriate for Microsoft.

    --

    Less is more !
  76. Inexpensive Premade Logos by kyoorius · · Score: 1

    Does anyone get this spam like 30 times a day?

    From: "Shayla Roy"
    Subject: Inexpensive Premade Logos

    lnexpensive Premade Logos

    Do you need a guality yet cheap logo? Ready Made Logos offer high guaIity Ioqo design templates for onIy $49.95. You can choose from pIenty of qreat desiqns, and have your loqo ready for use the same moment .As soon as you ordered your Iogo you wilI be able to download it in editable CDR and Al fiIes that are suitable for your Internet buyers. All you need to do is type in your company name. If you are not fluent in Adobe Illustrator or Corel Draw or wish to modify the design some way, we will be glad to customize the logo for you.

    Our logo store is the best choice for SOHO companies, non-profit websites, corporate events, and business plans. It is also an unique opportunity to gain more profit for web designers, commercial printers, marketing & business formation consultants, domain registrars, and other companies and individuals, which may need quality yet low cost logos for their website visitors.

    Order your logo now!

    Shayla Roy
    Order your logo now!
    ____________________________________________ ______ _
    Press here to remove your address from this list

  77. Toaster's Taken by Mhtsos · · Score: 1

    It's the logo of the After Dark Screen Saver. That was a flying toaster but I think it's still too similar.

    1. Re:Toaster's Taken by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Are they still in existance? Amazing that screen savers were such a big niche 10 years ago. As for flying toasters, you can use one so long as it's a helicopter toaster. (Which is what Delrina did when After Dark objected to the Bloom County screen saver with Opus shooting them.)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  78. Notsomuch by sethadam1 · · Score: 1

    Excuse me, sir, I did not "neglect to click the link." I've used NetBSD various times over the last 4 years and I'm well acquainted with the current logo. They are going for a "*new* logo," and there's a good bet that submitters will build using the daemon as a starting point.

    My advice still holds: let's choose an identity for NetBSD via a mascot. It's pretty friggin hard to identify NetBSD and say, "you know - the one with the demons all hiking up the computers to plant the NetBSD flag Iwo Jima style?"

  79. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's supposed to be a daemon, not a demon

    If that's in any way related to vampyr/vampire and wymyn/women, I don't want anything to do with it.

  80. Re:Its Official by HBI · · Score: 1

    I actually was thinking about this also :-)

    Maybe a casket with space for horns at the top.

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
  81. Rhino by axxackall · · Score: 1

    Elephant is on the logo of PostgreSQL, which is also coming from Berkley historically. I guess Rhino, who lives close to Elephants, will remind that fact. Besides, that thing on its head reminds me existing BSD daemon head :)

    --

    Less is more !
  82. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    There's an obvious solution to this.

  83. Coffin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    How about a coffin. We all know BSD is dead.

  84. I like the current logo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like the current logo. I just find it a nice logo.
    If they don't like it, put BSD or so instead on the screen, ... What about all the people that don't want to change it. Has there been a poll among users????

  85. I See Their Point by MyHair · · Score: 1

    When reading the summary I realized I knew what FreeBSD's and OpenBSD's logos were but couldn't think of NetBSD's. And after reading the comments at least half the people think the FreeBSD daemon is NetBSD's logo. Mod this whole discussion as +Funny.

    Furthermore, while Tux, the FreeBSD daemon and and the OpenBSD fish are cute, reposable and reusable the NetBSD logo isn't cute or reposable but looks like a daily cartoon that won't make it into next year's calendar.

  86. MOD PARENT UP by waferhead · · Score: 0

    This cleanly describes the issue... and excactly what logo they are talking about...as opposed to the /. blurb.

  87. Re:A polar bear! by palutz · · Score: 0

    Because polar bears eat penguins, right?
    mmmmmmm WRONG
    Polar bears live in the artic and penguins in the antarctic.

  88. A tomato. by zsau · · Score: 1

    Tomatoes grow everywhere. The redness of a tomato will be a reminder of Beastie.

    Cons: I cannot stand the smell of fresh tomato. I have some weird problem that prevents me from eating the stuff. On the other hand, I've used Linux, FreeBSD and, briefly, OpenBSD, but never NetBSD...

    --
    Look out!
  89. reply instead of mod by gosand · · Score: 1
    >> [and] has negative cultural, and religious
    >> ramifications.

    > No, it doesn't. It's a cartoon devil. It doesn't
    > offend anyone. Really. Unless you're one of
    > those freaks who won't let their kids watch
    > Scoobie-doo because it's got ghosts in it. Trust
    > me.

    *sigh* instead of modding you down as a troll, which you obviously are, I'll try to do the nice thing and throw you a little education bone...


    Did you even look at what was linked? It wasn't just the cartoon devil, it was a group of devils re-enacting Iwo Jima. Holy symbolism Batman, I can see how that might be just a wee bit offensive to some people. And let's not be ignorant enough to assume that everyone in the world sits on their ass and watches cartoons on television. Or do you believe that the entire world wants to live and act like Americans?


    > If it were hanging on a cross or wearing a
    > turban, *then* maybe it'd need changing.


    Any why would it need changing if it was wearing a turban? What are the negative connotations of wearing a turban? Seriously. I know what you probably think they are, but let us all in on it. Show your true colors. Let us all in on your ignorance.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    1. Re:reply instead of mod by tolan-b · · Score: 1

      I think perhaps the image of a demon wearing a turban could be offensive to people who wear turbans.

      They might feel they were being 'daemonised'

    2. Re:reply instead of mod by gosand · · Score: 1
      I think perhaps the image of a demon wearing a turban could be offensive to people who wear turbans. They might feel they were being 'daemonised'

      I get that part. But the original poster said:

      > No, it doesn't. It's a cartoon devil. It doesn't > offend anyone. Really.

      So unless he/she was flip-flopping within the same post, then it was a negative comment about people who wear turbans. But I suppose the flip-flop was possible...

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    3. Re:reply instead of mod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I can see how that might be just a wee bit offensive to some people.

      Yeah, I guess if I lost WWII, I might be offended ;-)

    4. Re:reply instead of mod by ezy · · Score: 1


      And.. if you actually read the requirements, dumbass.. one of them is that the devil no longer be used. What did they say about people with glass brains? :-)

  90. Shouldn't the money go toward further development by suckass · · Score: 1

    Instead of a new logo? Come on folks, if you're giving money away do it for something that will fix a current issue or add a needed feature.

    --
    blah, blah, blah
  91. Am I the only one that went "Huh?" by Kjella · · Score: 1

    ...that someone found the devil offensive, and then double "Huh?" when they said it wasn't the devil, but the pose.

    So in case you had absolutely no clue wtf they're talking about, here is the original picture, which is of the 28th marine regiment raising the american flag atop mt suribachi on february 23, 1945.

    My personal opinion? Keep the deamon, lose the pose. The logo *is* too complex, as a logo. And no need to step on anyone's toes over the look-a-like pose. But the daemon is cool. Geez, you see much worse things in kid's shows these days. you have to be a real wuss to get offended by that one.

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  92. Why give a nod to proprietary graphics programs? by ThePretender · · Score: 1

    The official announcement mentions two products from Adobe and Macromedia, but no mention of The Gimp anywhere that I found. That is sad, give the open source solution a free plug when you can. The Gimp could surely be used for most if not all of the creation of a new logo.

  93. Bad Pizza and Religious Imagery by Colonel+Cholling · · Score: 2, Interesting

    First of all, let me say that the daemons in the logo look more to me like the Noid from the Domino's Pizza commercials of the mid-1980s.

    Second, these cartoon daemons bear even less resemblance to the Biblical devil than the modern-day Santa Claus image does to St. Nicholas of Myra. Nowhere in the Bible is Satan described as a red, scaly gentleman with horns and a bifurcated tail who carries a hayfork. That image is a product of the Middle Ages. The BSD version is a cariacature at that. There's simply nothing here that should offend anyone's religious sensibilities.

    --

    I am Sartre of the Borg. Existence is futile.
  94. official debian logo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hopefully this one isn't going to look like the official debian log an official logo that looks pretty dumb and one that most debian users aren't aware of.

  95. has negative cultural, and religious ramifications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RTFS...

  96. Re:A polar bear! by CausticWindow · · Score: 1

    No.

    --
    How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
  97. Oh yes, people like that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My sister was offended that I would send her little kids Thomas The Tank Engine chocolate lollipops for Xmas stocking stuffers. She said they didn't support Disney because Disney supports gay rights.

    Personally, I wouldn't have even guessed that Disney had anything to do with Thomas, but that's besides the point. There are a lot of easily offended bigiots in the world.

  98. An opportunity... by pschmied · · Score: 4, Insightful
    ...to raise awareness about one of the cooler OS projects out there shouldn't be wasted.

    I know that the conventional wisdom is:
    • FreeBSD is for servers
    • OpenBSD is for firewalls
    • NetBSD is for obscure hardware

    But, in reality, NetBSD runs on so many platforms as a side effect of their stated policy to implement things the Right Way rather than ever relying on hacks.

    NetBSD is one of the cleanest, most logical, and most innovative open source projects out there.

    For example, NetBSD takes an insanely good idea (the FreeBSD ports collection) and makes it even better. Pkgsrc (NetBSD's answer to ports) is built in such a way that allows you to run it on Solaris, Linux, and a number of other operating systems. Plus it has a built-in package security auditing tool.

    FreeBSD et al are moving toward NetBSD's innovative init system which in my mind combines the power of SysV and the ease of use of *BSD.

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe NetBSD was the first OS anywhere to support ipv6.

    NetBSD always seems to chug away in relative obscurity, with even BSD folk ignoring and misunderstanding it. Yeah, it's great for embedded work. Yeah, it'll run on almost anything. But it's also a really great workstation. And their uncompromising approach to quality and correct implementation make it a very stable and logical general purpose OS.

    So, I for one welcome the new logo, and hope that it helps to bring NetBSD out of the shadows and allows my fellow open source users to enjoy another excellent operating system.

    -Peter
    1. Re:An opportunity... by SteelX · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've been thinking about checking out NetBSD's pkgsrc for quite a while. It sounds like a really cool idea. You seem to have experience with NetBSD and I was wondering if you could answer a question that I have been pondering for some time.

      Would it be possible to use pkgsrc as the main package management system on a Linux box, say, Slackware? What I mean is, forget Slackware's package management system altogether and replace it with NetBSD's pkgsrc.

    2. Re:An opportunity... by pschmied · · Score: 2, Informative
      Would it be possible to use pkgsrc as the main package management system on a Linux box, say, Slackware? What I mean is, forget Slackware's package management system altogether and replace it with NetBSD's pkgsrc.


      NetBSD has pre-built binaries for just what you describe! Check out http://www.pkgsrc.org for details.

      They've got bootstrap source that will compile on a lot, plus binary packages for a bunch of operating systems including Slackware (And Darwin. And Debian. And Irix. And Solaris :-) )

      I'm not sure of the state of all the packages on all the different platforms, but my guess is that it works similarly to on NetBSD.

      One of the cool side effects of their correct and clean implementation is that you can do interesting things like build embedded NetBSD from a Windows workstation. The cross-compile support is quite simply the most complete.

      -Peter
  99. Re:A polar bear! by wild_berry · · Score: 1

    No, they can't get the wrappers off.

    You set 'em up, I knock 'em down.

    (A note for non-Brit friends: McVitie's make a chocolate biscuit snack bar called the Penguin. You can order them in various places, such as here.

    Take care.
    Ken.Lewis

  100. Re:Why give a nod to proprietary graphics programs by daltec · · Score: 1

    Not if it won't do CMYK or vector images, it won't. Well, at least not entirely. You could create the logo in the Gimp, but then it would have to be converted to CMYK in some other software. Also, if they are looking for an easy-to-reproduce logo, vector art is the way to go, and the Gimp is a raster-based program, isn't it? I am looking forward to the day when there is an industrial-strength image editing program for Linux....

    --
    We have to eat happy eggs from happy chickens.
  101. I was thinking a dead daemon by siskbc · · Score: 1
    But then I thought, how do you kill a daemon? Daemons are already dead, right? So does that mean BSD has always been dead? No chance from the start?

    These are the important questions of our age, people.

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    1. Re:I was thinking a dead daemon by sethstorm · · Score: 1

      Well, I dunno about the kind that you may be referring to, but there is a way to kill the kind that are on computers:

      kill -KILL processid

      or read the manual page on kill if you want to know more on slaying daemons in this manner. Not recommended when facing in-the-flesh daemons/demons.

      * Your lantern darkens.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  102. Why not a... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    daemon with a penguin hanging out of it's mouth?

  103. Lame and geeky logo by helix_r · · Score: 1


    I'm glad that netbsd is trying to change their logo. While many people may think this is a trivial issue, logos and names are critical for public acceptance.

    Too many free software project have logos that from a graphic design perspective are a total joke. The gnu logo is a good example. It looks like a pencil sketch scanned from the back of the beer coaster (so does the netbsd logo BTW).

    Get some decent logos please. Graphic designers spend years developing their skills. Pay them and let them do their work.

    1. Re:Lame and geeky logo by that+_evil+_gleek · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What's so wrong with Pencil? Abstract wierd font logos is very 1980's IMO.
      EA's (Electronic Arts) Logo was the best of the genre, and I feel that that really thats stuff has become cookie-cutter, mainly complained about by Comerical Artists looking for work... As far the GNU ... regarding Net's logo, it isn't the pencil in itself, but the fact that its large, and doesnt resemble the classic beasty, and as someone said in another thread they resemble the noids... The thing is too big
      To /some/ extent pencil art from an actual contributer to the project to me has more value than a formaliac profesional going-rate-per-hour work. To me that kind of abstract type face logo stuff, has been doon so much, so many tools to do just, that its hardly even applied art, but has become a very /safe/ , bland, choice.

  104. Eric, do a tasteful piece of artwork? by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    ::uncontrollable fits of laughter::

    You've got the wrong artist, AC. He's one fucked-up furry, I'll tell you what. Not that there's anything wrong with that.

    The NetBSD logo should look like this:

    A net descending upon the globe (outline of continents only), followed by block-face "BSD".

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  105. Re:Only idiots would find it inappropriate by Viol8 · · Score: 1

    >POT/KETTLE/BLACK

    Err , I think your logic is a bit flawed, but never mind , you'll figure it out once you've had your IQ transplant.

  106. Having been in the Graphic Design business... by Perl_Monk · · Score: 0, Troll

    ...I find it interesting that they would offer such a LOW prize for this little contest! Usually, a logo design for a nationally branded product can run anywhere from 10-50K, and sometimes up into the half million dollar range, depending on complexity, desired look and feel, and a ton of 'little' factors that involve psychological impact due to font choices, colors, and design preferences. Usually, when a company wants logos designed, they want to see an entire portfolio of different designs that fall within the stated parameters, and choose the best dozen or so to bring before their Board, or owner. When I see a contest like this with a measly $100 prize, it reminds me of the 'Good Deal' that Nike got in the early '70's, running a design contest similiar to this one, where the winner was a College student, for VERY little money. And the Swoosh(tm) was born.

    1. Re:Having been in the Graphic Design business... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strange. Why does everyone want (or even request) free work from software developers, but if we want something from artists and the like it is unreasonable to not provide full pay.

    2. Re:Having been in the Graphic Design business... by liquidsin · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and having been in the computer programming business, I find it odd that they would write such an incredible OS and give it away for free. Ok, seriously, I'm not in the programming business, but I *am* a graphic designer and I plan to submit at least one or two ideas, and if I do happen to win, I plan to tell them that they can keep their money.

      --
      do not read this line twice.
  107. logo: Net over pixelated globe, block letters: BSD by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    Wherein the letters are blockface, and of the same height as the globe (making the "net" aboveline).

    The net implies it encompasses the whole "world" of computing (the pixelated globe)

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  108. I have an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have an idea for a good logo, the only downside being the fact that people might think BSD stands for bondage sado domination, however in my opinion that would be acceptable.

    1. Re:I have an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good, but there needs to be a net involved.

    2. Re:I have an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good point. Hmmm... A net, you say? I migh have some ideas...

  109. the west Earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "a swastika is now universally negative."

    Throughout the far east the swastika remains a good symbol; or more accuratly, a symbol of something other than Hitler/Nazi/aryan/WWII.

  110. The main problem is... by instruktlab · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ok, it seems to me most people here don't seem to look at logo design from an ease of use or professionality standpoint, let alone from a design aspect. Everyone seems to be skating around the fact that with exception to the religious or mythical issues and the problem with a off-the-wall politcal cartoon feel, the design itself is quite the opposite of a business/ease of use point-of-view. Sure it's open source but NetBSD is in the "business" of supplying an open source medium for its users to enjoy and interact with. If anything the logo should almost have a conservative corporate fee, with just a wee bit of open-source attitude to the side just to show that open-source is the sort of black sheep child of the WWW network infrastructure not to mention the software world. So keep your minds open guys. This is a world-based community, and there's probably someone out there offended by the spoof of the Iwo Jima memorial and there could also be some "religious stiff" offended by the devil/daemon aspect. Also remember that the general public doesn't know anything about the greek background of language and their english counterparts, let alone would they really want a lecture on it. When designing you have to take the audience seriously but not yourself too seriously. Creativity can come in spades but if you don't know how to apply it properly it won't get you anything but trouble.

    1. Re:The main problem is... by that+_evil+_gleek · · Score: 1

      IMO, there so much hyper-bole that , on the net, where one can't really see the expression of the contenance, or the tone of the voice, that one can't really tell legimate feelings of offense from Mock-offense. Let me explain a little. Someone could have lost a loved one on that island, in that battle, in fact let me turn P.C. on it's side at point out, that as I understand, the no-one in the orginial iconographic picture survived that war, so a relative of one of the american soldiers pictured in the originial, could have a reaction, different than that the artists intends. The intent, IMO, was to capture the struggle ( and the glory that comes ) of working on a Open Source O.S. as portable as NetBSD by borrowing on the originial, which has similiar themes....
      Then there's the guys who think that something's lame, and even though not personally offended, they quickly craft the most vritiolic, and in my consideration 'facil', attack, just to serve their desire to argue against, and quickly polarize the argument. And, once polarized the argument is, just so much, easier to deal with, kind of like dealing with 1-bit color bit-maps, and it's , so easy to apply those filters isn't it.
      (Not aiming at you)

      Anyway, having gotten that of my chest, let's see what conclusions follow:
      Pro/Anti U.S. sentiments become academic, as even a patriot might have a reaction, if not , in fact offense, would be in-apropriate for the purpose of logo.
      The art itself is derivative in composition, establishing its theme of 'struggle' by borrowing on the theme of the original. And, the work isn't that good, the deamons or devils don't look that much like the BSD beastie at all,

    2. Re:The main problem is... by instruktlab · · Score: 1
      Well put.

      What I was really trying to get at is that that image isn't really a logo, in terms of design. It's a wonderful cartoon that in essence depicts very well the struggles to keep software open-source and the continuing struggles to keep open source up-to-date with the latest windows facilitations.

      IMO the image is just a cartoon, and just that. It's not a viable design solution for a logo nor is it practical in its application.

  111. Death Cookie by tepples · · Score: 1

    you know jack chick is full of shit in his Death Cookie tract

    Other than the confusion between JESus and three Egyptian deities, does Jack Chick get anything else materially wrong in that tract?

    1. Re:Death Cookie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kind of creepy, huh? I'd never heard any of that until the parent linked to it.

    2. Re:Death Cookie by aWalrus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Jack Chick is full of shit in more ways than I can count. A lot of the stuff in that tract is a good exposition of the systems of control that the catholic church uses, but it's ignoring and corrupting the basic premises that support those sacraments. Furthermore, the idea of a vengeful god that rules by fear is somewhat outdated in the catholic roman Church (old testament stuff). Salvation (or the wafer thing) is not to be denied arbitrarily in order to acquire power. Furthermore, what is exposed there amounts to finding an example of a pedophile priest and jumping to the conclusion that all priests are pedophiles.

      Check out some more of the site. It's basically a collection of hate speech (particularly against gay people) in disguise of religious teachings.

      --
      Overcaffeinated. Angry geeks.
    3. Re:Death Cookie by zerocool^ · · Score: 1

      OH, dude, I know. I know. In fact, this morning, i registered anti-chick.com, and I plan to set up a site showing how he's full of shit.

      But, I've been a long time follower of jack chick's idocy.

      --
      sig?
    4. Re:Death Cookie by forgotmypassword · · Score: 1

      Wow

      I though it was a humor site.
      I visit occasionally for a good laugh.

      It's even more funny now, thanks.

    5. Re:Death Cookie by welshsocialist · · Score: 1

      The Catholic communion wafer is not the only thing Chick is off base on. He believes that non-King James Bibles are tools to decieve people. This all boils down the the choice of Greek New Testament texts. Most Bibles are translated from texts that originate from Egypt. Some of these Egyptian Greek texts have ended up in the Vatican Libary over the years. To Chick, this, is in his mind, means that the newer Bibles are all Catholic plants. See his tract The Attack for more. (If you look at the cover of the tract, you'll see that there's a burning Bible on the front. Looks like Chick is flaming in all directions.)

      The other Greek texts originate from modern day Turkey and Syria. These texts are favored by Chick, mainly in the Textus Receptus flavor. This love for the Textus Receptus, has caused Chick to reject the New King James Bible, which was translated from the same Greek text as the King James people used back in the day.

      This belief system is sad, since there is evidence that both Greek texts are the same 40% to 50% of the time.

      For more infomation, Google is your Friend.

      --
      Support the Chagossians
    6. Re:Death Cookie by zerocool^ · · Score: 1

      Sir:

      If I were anywhere near you, I'd buy you a beer, and we could sit down and chat for hours.

      This is exactly where my specialty of personal research tends to run.

      Chick's contention is that the "pure" texts, the ones from asia minor / anatolia are the correct ones, cause they're from "god's church" in antioch. He claims that the textus receptus is the correct version because not only did it come from there, but there are more versions of it than any other version.

      He claims that we should go with the majority and not with the oldest versions because the majority rules. He neglects to mention that the textus receptus didn't appear until at least XII. And that the christians in the later roman (byzantine) empire had a vested interest in making as many copies of their text as they could, in order to get it to the masses. And that they had an interest in making sure it said what they wanted it to say.

      And he totally neglects that sinaiticus has any worth whatsoever.

      Man, it's nice to meet someone who cares about this stuff.

      ~Will

      --
      sig?
    7. Re:Death Cookie by welshsocialist · · Score: 1

      Will,

      Thanks for your comment.

      For more on the textual problem in the Greek NT, check out James White's The King James Only Controversy. White takes on Chick, and minons like him. ISBN.nu is your friend.

      What Chick and his minons don't tell you is that there are four Textus Receptuses floating around. One is the Scrivener Textus Receptus, which is dated 1894. Scrivener tried to bring the Textus Receptus back to the Textus Receptus the KJV translators used. The other is the Stephanus Textus Receptus, dated 1550, which (I think) was a spin off of Erasmus' Textus Receptus. The third is the Beza Textus Receptus which is dated 1565-1604, which (I think) was used by the KJV translators. The fourth is the Eramus Textus Receptus, which is dated 1519 and is the first Textus Receptus.

      This evidence shows the problem with Chick's viewpoint. If you believe the Textus Receptus is the one and only, then which Textus Receptus? David Cloud (i'm not kidding, that's his real name!), holds some of Chick's views. He wrote an article on this topic called "WHICH EDITION OF THE RECEIVED TEXT IS THE PRESERVED WORD OF GOD?" He didn't opine on which Textus Receptus was The One And Only(TM). Instead he took the cop-out of telling to trust the KJV in textual matters! The site is currently offline. I will be more than happy to send you the piece. My address is in my /. profile.

      If you want to see both Textus Receptuses, check out the Bible Gateway. Both Textus Receptuses are there plus the Westcott-Hort Text (which has the Nestle-Aland 27/UBS 4 varants embedded). There's also software that you can download to compare the Textus Receptuses at Crosswire. It's FOSS, and is available for GNU/Linux, Win32, and Mac OS X.

      I wish you well.

      --
      Support the Chagossians
  112. Theo de Raadt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm amazed it's taken them this long -- the Iwo Jima logo is copyright Theo de Raadt, now of OpenBSD.

  113. Forget the logo altogether ... just use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SCO :)

  114. Re:wow by MrNybbles · · Score: 2, Funny
    "
    It's a BSD flavour to be correct. Or YAUL (Yet another unix like)" -- Anonymous Coward

    NAA! (Not Another Acronym!)

    --
    Losing faith in humanity one person at a time.
  115. A strong possibility. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IIRC, the story came out in 2000, the year the New Jersey Devils defeated the Dallas Stars in the Stanley Cup Finals.

  116. Re:Oh yes, people like that [Off-Topic] by Lifewolf · · Score: 1
    My sister was offended that I would send her little kids Thomas The Tank Engine chocolate lollipops for Xmas stocking stuffers. She said they didn't support Disney because Disney supports gay rights.

    Similar story: This Christmas, my in-laws gave my brother-in-law's daughter a Fisher-Price Little People Noah's Ark. As we're sitting around playing with the little plastic animals, my brother-in-law noticed the flag for the top of the ark. Visibly furious, he turned to me and hissed, "Why is there a rainbow on this flag?" Now, I'm not a religious guy, but I managed to recall a rainbow at the end of Noah's story in the Bible. He disagreed with my reasoning and insisted that this, like all rainbows, was a pro-gay-rights symbol.

    If a rainbow sticker (with the colors in the wrong order for a rainbow, no less) on a child's toy and a lollipop shaped like a cartoon train can offend, then I'm sure folks will manage to find the "three daemons raise a pitchfork" image offensive.

    --
    "Be Happy or Die." -- AoN
  117. copyright infringement by ChristTrekker · · Score: 1

    The problem is that using Lara Croft as the NetBSD mascot might land them in some legal quagmires.

  118. Here's my submission... by 3Suns · · Score: 1

    This submission is a quick mock-up. I can do a better one if you think it's good...

    --

    -3Suns

    ~~~~
    The Revolution will be Slashdotted
  119. That's good! by sethadam1 · · Score: 1

    That's really good! A cockroach, with a motto like "Surviving all conditions and terrains."

    1. Re:That's good! by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Please never get into marketing. That's a clever idea, but very unappealing...

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  120. hmmm... polar bears... by ChristTrekker · · Score: 1

    This is positive indication that Pepsi should be winning the cola wars among Linux users. Because penguin == !polar bear == !Coke == Pepsi, right?

  121. Simple, change it to a hot babe. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A female devil:)

  122. Re:Of course it runs netbsd... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about a creature known for adapting to many environments

  123. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Were you hoping to be modded-up +5, Informative, you sycophant?

  124. Daemon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...I do not like to see him go.

    Those whom are offended by it should be educated.

  125. What about a dandelion? by leoboiko · · Score: 1

    Portable: dandelions grow everywhere, and its flying seeds are a strong sign of portability.

    Adaptable: the flowers close at night or when raining, and it is active in all seasons.

    Useful: with dandelions you can make salads, wine, or medicine. Kids like to play with them.

    Simple: dandelions are simple yet elegant. Furthermore, they're a familiar sight to everyone.

    Well-designed: the leaves form channels to bring all the rain water to the root, which otherwise would not get enough. Well, flowers are evolved and not designed, but you get the idea.

    Unique: with all those animal logos, a flower will be easy to remember.

    Not a mascot: since it is a logo, not a mascot, NetBSD people can informally keep Beastie.

    --
    Prescriptive grammar:linguistics :: alchemy:chemistry. Stop being a nazi and learn some science.
  126. To Hell With Them by dasheel · · Score: 1

    All the religious nutz need to go to their respective hell, and leave technology alone.

  127. I propose: The Poodle. by wcrowe · · Score: 1

    Wait a minute. Hear me out.

    Poodles come in a wide variety of sizes, from the diminuitive "tea cup" variety weighing two pounds, to the standard, weighing as much as seventy pounds.

    They also come in a wide variety of colors, including the mottled or parti-colored variety.

    They are about the most versatile dog on the planet. Poodles make great companions; are show dogs; hunting dogs; retrievers; service dogs; protection dogs; law enforcement; therapy dogs; search and rescue; and poodles love to play games.

    They are found almost everywhere in the world, and while the French claim them as their own, their origins are truly unknown and are probably a mixture of breeds from various places.

    Poodles are about the smartest dogs anywhere.

    Finally, who, WHO could possibly be offended by a poodle logo?

    Give me a red poodle with a pitchfork and you've got your NetBSD logo.

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
  128. Re:it mostly has to do with daemons by eggplant · · Score: 1
    Read the announcement:

    * Due to the issues identified above, the current NetBSD daemon character cannot be used.

    ... it specifically says the daemon character is a big problem. People may have been offended by the similarity to the imagery of (WWII) US Marines raising the flag over Iwo Jima, but NetBSD specifically wants to get rid of the daemon.

  129. but ... but ... but ... by duck_prime · · Score: 1
    Demon comes from the greek word diamon, or, more accurately delta-iota-alpha-mu-omicron-nu, depending on how it's declined. That's singular nominative (i think). [...]

    In helenistic greek, i.e. around the time of the peloponnesian wars, [...]

    When the word was moved into other languages (i think it came to english via romance languages, stemming from latin), it changed to demon, [...]

    [... all words come from Greek, obviously ...] [... Windows XP as secret Christian reference ...] Just suffice it to say, when you see demon, you don't have to think servant of satan, from the pits of hell, sent to torment the true believing christians. It's just a spirit, who may have the attitude of a prankster.
    Thanks for the historical overview; it was very neat. I do think you're overlooking one thing: that long series of derivations and meaning-shifts you mentioned did happen, and that's why modern Christians may be discomfited by the BSD daemon. If we were still Hellenistic Greeks there'd be no problem.

    (Well, okay, maybe a little problem ... imagine you're at Komdeks, ready to start the demo, when you realize Paulos forgot to bring the damned-to-hades sacrificial bull! Oh, the embarrassment.)

    Personally, I'm a Christian and I don't get too creeped out by the BSD daemon, but I'll be just as happy when it's gone.
  130. Blue Devil by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

    Just change his color to blue. That should be more socialy "acceptable". If Duke University tries to pull a SCO, point out that the character is actually a daemon.

    --
    I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
  131. Vector or bitmap required by openSoar · · Score: 1

    The submission guidelines seem to contradict themselves or am i missing something?
    The relevant paragraph starts "The final design must be submitted as a scalable vector
    format EPS (Adobe Illustrator, Macromedia Freehand or similar), therefore no halftone
    (photographic or bitmap)" but then goes on to say "All designs shall be submitted for
    judging in electronic form as JPEG or PNG.". The original JPEG format (which I'm sure
    they mean) doesn't support vectors and PNG isn't the most obvious choice for a vector format.

    1. Re:Vector or bitmap required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, you missed the significance of the words "for judging".
      They want a vector format so that it can scale for any use,
      and they want a bitmap that so that anyone can look at the proposal with any old browser or bitmap viewer.

  132. Wow a whole $100!! by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    If I win. I could spend the prize money a new 486 to install NetBSD on!!

    But seriously. I think we should chip in a couple bucks to the cash prize and fatten the pot. Who is with me? I think NetBSD deserves are really fantastic logo, and I think whoever comes up with it should be rewarded!

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re:Wow a whole $100!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I for one would chip in too! I don't use NetBSD, I use FreeBSD & OpenBSD but, OpenBSD is based on NetBSD so I'd be happy to help them out.

    2. Re:Wow a whole $100!! by eclectro · · Score: 1


      While not much, it might be enough for some graphic artist somewhere to take on so they could put this in their "portfolio".

      It would be a nice feather in their cap.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
  133. Stupid brain.. by Bitmanhome · · Score: 1

    Why would NetBSD run a Lego competition?? Oh wait .. nevermind.

    --
    Not that this wasn't entirely predictable.
  134. Let's not forget what the BSD logo stands for !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think we are forgetting here what the old logo stands for:

    http://www.xahlee.org/UnixResource_dir/gki/linux wo rld2000/DSCF0032.JPG

    and

    http://www.graphics-muse.com/editorial/2000/7/im ag es/bsdgirls-tn.jpg

    and

    http://www.xahlee.org/UnixResource_dir/gki/Secur eB SD.jpg

    let's not forget what we stand for.

  135. Re:Of course it runs netbsd... by genner · · Score: 1

    Of course the netbsd jellyfish!!! Found in tropic and artic waters.

  136. squirrel by silicon+not+in+the+v · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Ya know, I have a story about a dead squirrel I had in a cardboard box(really), and I never thought it would be on topic in a Slashdot forum. I don't think the dead squirrel was running NetBSD, but whatever OS it did have had apparently crashed hard. :)

    --
    We may experience some slight turbulence and then...explode. -Capt. Mal Reynolds
  137. Re:A polar bear! by silicon+not+in+the+v · · Score: 1

    Wow, I just recently changed my sig, and it's already on topic! I don't really want to change, though, so I stay out of Soviet Russia. (Does subtlety help here?)

    --
    We may experience some slight turbulence and then...explode. -Capt. Mal Reynolds
  138. You've got the wrong kind of evolution by the-matt-mobile · · Score: 1

    The pepperered moth is an example of MICRO-evolution, not MACRO-evolution. MICRO-evolution fits with Darwin's "survival of the fittest" notion where certain EXISTING attributes cause one group to thrive rather than another. In the example of the peppered moth, more of the darker moths survive in a polluted environment because they camouflage better than white moths and therefore are less likely to be caught by predators.

    MACRO-evolution is the next step in that concept which asserts that certain previously NON-EXISTANT attributes develop over time due to some magical mutation which occurs during breeding (ie: the monkey-to-man concept). Creationists have no problem with the concept of micro-evolution. It's a common misconception. And, just because micro-evolution is true, doesn't mean that macro-evolution is necessarily correct.

    1. Re:You've got the wrong kind of evolution by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Both macro and micro evolution operate on the same principles. During breeding, there are random changes to the genetic code. Since there are only a limited number of these changes, most of them manifest themselves as small modifications of existing traits. However, these random changes can easily create significantly different traits.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  139. May I propose this high-quality logo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  140. Re:Oh yes, people like that [Off-Topic] by lahi · · Score: 1

    I wonder what your brother-in-law does whenever he sees a rainbow in the sky?

    -Lasse

  141. Little Devil by jahmike · · Score: 1

    ohhhhhhhh come on, he's just a little devil!

    This is a democracy and as such, majority wins AND majority says ... we don't like devils or for that matter anything that might make us think of devils!!!

    --
    ... rules the jungle without fear.
  142. Hey... A unixlike OS for a PC doesn't mean P.C.! by Quixadhal · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hmmmm, troll looks HUNGRY.. guess I'll toss a bone.

    I, personally, am deeply offended by the insane attempts of far too many otherwise intelligent people in this decade to bury the age-old stereotypes, differences of belief, and general feelings beneath a very thin veneer of political correctness. What's so wrong about being honest?

    I'm not against integration, and I cherish diversity. Learning about other cultures is a good thing, but pretending they aren't different when they are is stupid. If wearing a red shirt is offensive to the group of people who were extras on ST:TOS, should everyone stop wearing red shirts because they MIGHT feel bad? I'd suggest that those people who become upset over P.C. issues should ask themselves why they're upset... and maybe grow up a little.

    Where are the Satanists to defend their beliefs? Seriously, if Christians can get all bent out of shape at the logo of a devil, why can't Satanists demand that the cross be banned from public display because it offends them? Either it works both ways, or not at all.

    The logo in question is being dragged through the mud because a few religious zealots woke up and started looking at free operating systems and saw a devil? What, are they so stupid that they assumed this literally meant "Satan Inside"? Didn't the cute smile tip them off about the concept of caricature?

    I checked my calendar... it's not 040401 yet, and 040104 has passed (YYMMDD anyways), so let's repost this when the time is right.

  143. Re:wow by Flunitrazepam · · Score: 1

    That looks like a retarded 11 year old

    --
    1) Your analysis is based on bad assumptions so your result is way off. 2) You're a sick bastard for fucking a horse.
  144. My Entry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about the logo currently on display at http://www.sco.com/ It should be for sale cheap, quite soon.

  145. Here's an Idea by RoloDMonkey · · Score: 1

    Why not piss off religious extremists and violate copyright at the same time by using the Tazmanian Devil as a logo?

    --
    Long live the Speaker Bracelet
    Rolo D. Monkey
  146. Re:Iwo Memorial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is offensive about the Iwo Jima Monument? Is it the fact that it reminds hippies of americans raising a flag?

    I doubt if any Marine would be insulted that a bunch of freaks from Berkely want to emulate anything related to a Marine victory!

    Mt suribachi is a good analogy for what netBSD is up against, climbing a mountain of freeBSD ignorance, while getting sniped at by openBSD holdouts.

  147. Why not use a free logo? by Dukael_Mikakis · · Score: 1

    I've got a logo that NetBSD could use for free ... well, in a couple of months or so. Just change the 'S', 'C', and 'O' to a 'B', 'S', and a 'D'.

    If people want religious, I don't think you can get much more religious than Utah, where (I hear) this logo comes from.

  148. What about the other dirty number? by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised she'd consent to working at a McD's that was on a road with such a filthy name.

    "I sixty-nine."

    I mean, really.

    --

    +++ATH0
  149. IHS == In Hoc Signe by bsDaemon · · Score: 1

    In Hoc Signe Vincet -- In this sign you shall conquer, Constantine I -- St. Constantine the Great. Remember. The burning Chi-Rho in the sky? reunification of the Roman Empire...??

  150. I know how you feel.... by bsDaemon · · Score: 1

    I'm trying to mate with that Darwin platapus in order to make offspring which will carry on the fight.

  151. How about a cockroach? by a1291762 · · Score: 1

    Seriously, they are everywhere. NetBSD wants to run on everything. Cockroaches do run on everything (literally).

    If I could draw, I'd make a logo with a cockroach coming out of (or from behind) a computer, or maybe a front on shot showing a cockroach standing over a computer (with perspective making it seem large compared to the computer). The catchphrase could be something like "we'll look after your machine".

  152. Pity the Daemon is out. There's a logical logo. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    has negative cultural, and religious ramifications.

    So political correctness has made it to open source.


    Afriad so.

    It's a pity the Daemon is out. There's a logical derivative of the BSD Daemon-in-tennies-with-pitchfork that just REEKS of NetBSD.

    Dress him up as a retiarius!

    He's already got a bare head and the trident in his right hand. Put him in a tunic, put a dagger in his belt, and put a round, weighted net in his left hand. (Keep the tenni-runners and grin, of course.)

    For those of you not familiar with it, a retiarius ("net-thrower") is one of the classic arms-and-armor forms for a Roman gladiator - and perhaps the most formidable.

    In a battle with his common and more well-known opponent (the "secutor" - short sword, smooth helm {to avoid entanglement in the net}, some body armor, curved rectangular shield - much like a private in the Roman army), the retiarius was the winner likely winner - fending off the sword and attacking the legs and exposed part of the arms with the trident, entangling him in the net, pulling him over with the net or tripping him with the trident (all from a distance), then finishing him off (if the audience thought the secutor had performed badly) with the dagger. (This was such a foregone conclusion that the secutor's helm typically had a fish on it as its only potentially net-tangling ornimentation - to indicate that he was the retiarius' natural prey.)

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  153. Best Chick Tract EVAR!!!111 by sbszine · · Score: 1

    Have a look at this Jack Chick tract where he exhorts us all to accept Cthulhu as our personal saviour. Heartwarming stuff.

    --

    Vino, gyno, and techno -Bruce Sterling

  154. It's that they're devils .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That damn link just crashed my SGI!
    DAMN X-ISTS!!

    prabob

  155. a logo tour by xahlee · · Score: 1

    for a tour of unix logos, please see http://xahlee.org/UnixResource_dir/freebooks.html for a tour of the lambda logo, see http://xahlee.org/UnixResource_dir/lambda_logo.htm l

    --
    Xah
    xahlee.org
    http://xahlee.org/PageTwo_dir/more.html
  156. I find it ironic.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not able to access http://www.netbsd.org/images/NetBSD.gif (probably due to Slashdotting), I hopped on the Google Bus.

    Considering the issues surrounding the proposed replacement of the NetBSD image, I find it very ironic that the first image showing up in a Google Image Search for NetBSD.gif was in fact the homepage of the Japan NetBSD Users' Group.

  157. Aquatic Birds by drpickett · · Score: 1

    I think that the penguin for Linux is cute - Maybe a Puffin?

  158. six million by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not really. A swastika is the symbol of an organization that verifiably eradicated six million jews and similar numbers of gay people, Romany gypsies, etc.

    Did six million really die?

    My history book says 5-6 million, so is it verified?

  159. rec.humor.funny devil in texas joke (old old joke) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (from rec.humor.funny archive)
    http://www.netfunny.com/rhf/jokes/new89/ satan.773. html

    The following is a true story.

    Last week I walked into a local "home style cookin' restaurant/watering hole" to pick up a take out order. I spoke briefly to the waitress behind the counter, who told me my order would be done in a few minutes.

    So, while I was busy gazing at the farm implements hanging on the walls, I was approached by two, uh, um... well, let's call them "natives." These guys might just be the original Texas rednecks--complete with ten-gallon hats, snakeskin boots and the pervasive odor of cheap beer and whiskey.

    "Pardon us, ma'am. Mind of we ask you a question?"

    Well, people keep telling me that Texans are real friendly, so I nodded.

    "Are you a Satanist?"

    Well, at least they didn't ask me if I liked to party.

    "Uh, no, I can't say that I am."

    "Gee ma'am. Are you sure about that?" they asked.

    I put on my biggest, brightest Dallas Cowboys cheerleader smile and said, "No, I'm positive. The closest I've ever come to Satanism is watching Geraldo."

    "Hmm. Interesting. See, we was just wondering why it is you have the lord of darkness on your chest there."

    I was this close to slapping one of them and causing a scene--then I stopped and noticed the T-shirt I happened to be wearing that day. Sure enough, it had a picture of a small, devilish looking creature that has for quite some time now been associated with a certain operating system. In this particular representation, the creature was wearing sneakers.

    They continued: "See, ma'am, we don't exactly appreciate it when people show off pictures of the devil. Especially when he's lookin' so friendly."

    These idiots sounded terrifyingly serious.

    Me: "Oh, well, see, this isn't really the devil, it's just, well, it's sort of a mascot."

    Native: "And what kind of football team has the devil as a mascot?"

    Me: "Oh, it's not a team. It's an operating-- uh, a kind of computer."

    I figured that an ATM machine was about as much technology as these guys could handle, and I knew that if I so much as uttered the word "unix" I would only make things worse.

    Native: "Where does this satanical computer come from?"

    Me: "California. And there's nothing satanical about it really."

    Somewhere along the line here, the waitress has noticed my predicament--but these guys probably outweighed her by 600 pounds, so all she did was look at me sympathetically and run off into the kitchen.

    Native: "Ma'am, I think you're lying. And we'd appreciate it if you'd leave the premises now."

    Fortunately, the waitress returned that very instant with my order, and they agreed that it would be okay for me to actually pay for my food before I left. While I was at the cash register, they amused themselves by talking to each other.

    Native #1: "Do you think the police know about these devil computers?"

    Native #2: "If they come from California, then the FBI oughta know about 'em."

    They escorted me to the door. I tried one last time: "You're really blowing this all out of proportion. A lot of people use this `kind of computers.' Universities, researchers, businesses. They're actually very useful."

    Big, big, BIG mistake. I should have guessed at what came next.

    Native: "Does the government use these devil computers?"

    Me: "Yes."

    Another BIG boo-boo.

    Native: "And does the government pay for 'em? With our tax dollars?"

    I decided that it was time to jump ship.

    Me: "No. Nope. Not at all. You're tax dollars never entered the picture at all. I promise. No sir, not a penny. Our good Christian congressmen would never let something like that happen. Nope. Never. Bye."

    Texas. What a country.