Corporations are not individuals. Let the people who work for it or own it give donations. I would prefer no money be used this way, but the US electorate is too brainwashed for that.
I say two years. No reason not too, Nvidia already showed an SoC pushing 2560*1440, and that is hardware no need for hardware acceleration on work desktops.
At least those have nice clear rules and are fairly portable across languages. English has dialects so far apart they are not easily understood by other native speakers. I once offended a Dell support person when I asked to be transferred to someone with better English and he informed me he was in the Southern US and a native. An Indian would have been far easier to understand.
Take apart an older Mac, they used to be well built, they used to use scsi drives. These days they have what, a metal frame in their laptops? Oh Wow, same as the thinkpad and not as nice as the toughbook. Really great.
Take some of it apart sometime, it is built the same as everyone else. Clips that you have to use a plastic tool to pop apart, etc. Heck, Apple is worse in the sense that batteries are a pain to replace compared to other vendors.
The best manufactured hardware? Foxxcon will build at whatever quality you want for anyone. Product Engineering is just slapping COTS stuff together in a shiny case.
Really? I have been trying to compare this recently. I own a Q8300 based machine for my living room, so no anti-intel bigot here, and am looking to replace an aging desktop but can't find any intel stuff that seems to compete at my price point. For comparison I am looking at a phenom 965 black, ~$160. I am planning on spending about $100 on the mobo. So for ~$250 I want the best quad core setup I can get, no matter who makes it. Before you ask, having 4 cores is more important in what I will use them for than having the best single core performance.
Unless maybe you needs lots of cpus. Intel still does not have a 12 core CPU. 4 x 12 core, gives 48 cpus, which is great for virtual desktops and dbs. Both places where you need more CPUs rather than fast ones.
Please provide some links. I will make it easy for you. Phenom 965 black, which retails at $160 and a very nice mobo is $100. So your challenge is to find a CPU + mobo that gives 50%-100% performance increase for only a 50% increase in price including mobo.
Slashdot Mirror
Corporations are not individuals. Let the people who work for it or own it give donations. I would prefer no money be used this way, but the US electorate is too brainwashed for that.
Since when?
What laws allows you to convict the dead and take their former assets?
Is wikileaks hosted in the USA?
I really doubt that.
So you can't update WoW?
2. encrypt everything.
For some small value of freedom.
Yup, Said it better than I did.
I say two years. No reason not too, Nvidia already showed an SoC pushing 2560*1440, and that is hardware no need for hardware acceleration on work desktops.
Forget the Bavarians, try talking to a northerner one time.
Wir kÃnnen alles ausser Hochdeutsch.
Keyboard can connect via usb or bluetooth, monitors of hdmi. There are already phones on the market that can do both of these.
At least those have nice clear rules and are fairly portable across languages. English has dialects so far apart they are not easily understood by other native speakers. I once offended a Dell support person when I asked to be transferred to someone with better English and he informed me he was in the Southern US and a native. An Indian would have been far easier to understand.
Take apart an older Mac, they used to be well built, they used to use scsi drives. These days they have what, a metal frame in their laptops? Oh Wow, same as the thinkpad and not as nice as the toughbook. Really great.
Nope, those come out of revenue and would give you a loss, or a negative profit if you like. It would not give you negative revenue.
Take some of it apart sometime, it is built the same as everyone else. Clips that you have to use a plastic tool to pop apart, etc. Heck, Apple is worse in the sense that batteries are a pain to replace compared to other vendors.
You mean in totally unrelated news. Put in a story when the rumor gets upgraded to reality.
The Best OS? Which one? And based on what?
The best manufactured hardware? Foxxcon will build at whatever quality you want for anyone. Product Engineering is just slapping COTS stuff together in a shiny case.
Really?
I have been trying to compare this recently. I own a Q8300 based machine for my living room, so no anti-intel bigot here, and am looking to replace an aging desktop but can't find any intel stuff that seems to compete at my price point. For comparison I am looking at a phenom 965 black, ~$160. I am planning on spending about $100 on the mobo. So for ~$250 I want the best quad core setup I can get, no matter who makes it. Before you ask, having 4 cores is more important in what I will use them for than having the best single core performance.
Cheap way to buy Nokia. Take a look at novell, that will be nokia soon enough.
Why pay MS for a feature phone OS when they already have one they can use?
You can get mid range AM3 boards for $80, The cheapest 1366 board is twice that.
Unless maybe you needs lots of cpus. Intel still does not have a 12 core CPU. 4 x 12 core, gives 48 cpus, which is great for virtual desktops and dbs. Both places where you need more CPUs rather than fast ones.
AM3 does not support DDR2. AM2+ does. AM3 CPUs can be used in AM2+ boards. This means that the on die controller is not used in that instance.
Please provide some links. I will make it easy for you. Phenom 965 black, which retails at $160 and a very nice mobo is $100. So your challenge is to find a CPU + mobo that gives 50%-100% performance increase for only a 50% increase in price including mobo.
Now add in the cost of the Mobo.
Those terms are not exclusive of each other at all. Leftist libertarians exist, and are actually the group modern American libertarians came from.
Democrats are center right. They are not extreme left, they are not even moderate left.