In an extremely general sense: Somewhere in the program the validation code will either pass or fail. This is done with a conditional branch instruction in the assembly. Crackers use a debugger to find where this branch is, then change it to an instruction that will always branch to the pass condition.
Of course there are countermeasures used, and sometimes crackers will be able to reverse-engineer the validation check to create a keygen, etc, but the general process is still to disassemble the executable and modify or inspect the validation check.
It can work both ways, but in the case of aircraft motion sickness it's most commonly that you feel motion but don't see it. Any disconnect between vision and inner-ear can cause motion sickness.
Yes, I was somewhat careless with my phrasing. Any disconnect between the inner ear's acceleration sense and that received from other senses can cause motion sickness. On aircraft, for most people (AFAIK), it's caused by feeling the acceleration with the ear and not seeing it with the eyes. For some, it gets reversed: they see too much movement out the window compared to what they feel, and so do better with aisle seats.
Other way around. It's when you sense an acceleration (inner ear) but don't see it that you get motion sickness. That's why looking out a window helps.
Yep. If dark matter only interacts via gravity, and not via any of the other forces, then these results wouldn't constrain it. It would also mean that it's not going to be directly observable any time soon, so most scientists hope that's not the case, but it's certainly a possibility. Sterile neutrinos are one possibility for this.
Well, if you mean "destroyed the internal DNA payload and left only the outer protein shell" as being somehow equivalent to "watered down" then yes. But since the process has nothing to do with simple dilution that's not a very good comparison.
Batch search & replace just screams "Beta reduction of lambda calculus statements" to those who love Turing tarpits. Or perhaps Church tarpits in this case.
Actually, 192kHz is the sample rate. That's a maximum of 96kHz output frequency.
The only point of such a sample rate is that it allows some audio modification techniques to have a lower distortion of the waveform in the audible spectrum range. It's very minor, far more of the effect comes from spending more money and the resulting placebo effect: the music sounds better and IS more pleasing, because the buyer thinks it should sound better. The effect on perception is real, even though the actual sound is identical to that of a cheaper system.
Hand sanitizer IS breeding antibiotic resistant bacteria. There are two kinds of sanitizer: The old alcohol-based ones, and the newer triclosan (an antibiotic) based ones. The triclosan sanitizers are often marketed as not drying out the skin, and so became popular. Resistance to triclosan tends to convey resistance to some other related antibiotics as well.
Alcohol based sanitizers are fine. Just use moisturizer after if you're worried about dry skin.
No. Net neutrality allows ISPs to follow the DS field, just not to set it on traffic they didn't create.
Of course, there's always the possibility of a legislature screwing it up and outlawing QoS, but redefinition of ISPs under FCC Title 2 wouldn't have that problem.
They don't even have to restrict bandwidth. They can also just store packets from non-preferred providers in a long queue, thereby vastly increasing latency. VoIP is especially sensitive to this.
I put "random crap" generated by my password manager, and store it in the password manager. Security questions are just secondary passwords to the same account. They need to have the same amount of entropy as the real password to be of any use whatsoever.
My Mother's maiden name is 52Vg8alTkWjJ92AXLq8c. I was born in the town of iyUJuoE5go9pWhylGHJT, where I got my first pet, 9DurEntFD7WU9lpZJCKI.
If you ever tell the truth with a security question, you've done it wrong. If you ever use the same answer to a security question twice, you've done it wrong. If your answers have less entropy than your passwords, you've done it wrong.
There's also the matter that better ECCs cost more overhead. You can detect single bit errors with a simple parity bit, but double errors will go undetected. And even something like Reed-Solomon can't correct all the errors it can detect. Spacecraft going to mars have very limited mass budgets, there are often better places to spend the extra mass than on an additional redundant flash chip (and associated circuitry).
No, it was that any of the clones would have the full version history of the entire source tree. You still want a primary repo from which you make your releases, but all the developers can have a copy of the whole thing. They can also make changes to their local clones when offline, then merge all the changes later. Anyone can branch from any point, and the whole thing works on snapshots of the repo instead of sets of incremental changes to each file.
Specifically, the space shuttle didn't have a launch escape system. Mercury, Gemini, Apollo, Vostok, Shenzhou and Soyuz all do/did, though Vostok and Gemini used ejection seats for the purpose instead of taking the whole capsule. The shuttle test flights had ejection seats, but those were removed when normal operations started. After Challenger a method to escape the shuttle was added: get into a controlled glide, get to the rear hatch, jump out, and parachute to safety...
If by "three-letter government agencies" you mean the USN, specifically the Office of Naval Research, then you're correct. But most people in the US call the USN "the Navy", so there are some extra letters.
Slashdot Mirror
In an extremely general sense:
Somewhere in the program the validation code will either pass or fail. This is done with a conditional branch instruction in the assembly. Crackers use a debugger to find where this branch is, then change it to an instruction that will always branch to the pass condition.
Of course there are countermeasures used, and sometimes crackers will be able to reverse-engineer the validation check to create a keygen, etc, but the general process is still to disassemble the executable and modify or inspect the validation check.
It can work both ways, but in the case of aircraft motion sickness it's most commonly that you feel motion but don't see it. Any disconnect between vision and inner-ear can cause motion sickness.
Yes, I was somewhat careless with my phrasing. Any disconnect between the inner ear's acceleration sense and that received from other senses can cause motion sickness. On aircraft, for most people (AFAIK), it's caused by feeling the acceleration with the ear and not seeing it with the eyes. For some, it gets reversed: they see too much movement out the window compared to what they feel, and so do better with aisle seats.
Other way around. It's when you sense an acceleration (inner ear) but don't see it that you get motion sickness. That's why looking out a window helps.
Yep. If dark matter only interacts via gravity, and not via any of the other forces, then these results wouldn't constrain it. It would also mean that it's not going to be directly observable any time soon, so most scientists hope that's not the case, but it's certainly a possibility. Sterile neutrinos are one possibility for this.
Git is the best repository because it's the easiest to insult when something goes wrong. "Stupid git!" is a lot better than "Stupid CVS!"
You should try it with a lungfish. They're smart enough to breathe.
Well, if you mean "destroyed the internal DNA payload and left only the outer protein shell" as being somehow equivalent to "watered down" then yes. But since the process has nothing to do with simple dilution that's not a very good comparison.
They're not writing to the filesystem, so that won't help.
Batch search & replace just screams "Beta reduction of lambda calculus statements" to those who love Turing tarpits. Or perhaps Church tarpits in this case.
Actually, 192kHz is the sample rate. That's a maximum of 96kHz output frequency.
The only point of such a sample rate is that it allows some audio modification techniques to have a lower distortion of the waveform in the audible spectrum range. It's very minor, far more of the effect comes from spending more money and the resulting placebo effect: the music sounds better and IS more pleasing, because the buyer thinks it should sound better. The effect on perception is real, even though the actual sound is identical to that of a cheaper system.
Hand sanitizer IS breeding antibiotic resistant bacteria. There are two kinds of sanitizer: The old alcohol-based ones, and the newer triclosan (an antibiotic) based ones. The triclosan sanitizers are often marketed as not drying out the skin, and so became popular. Resistance to triclosan tends to convey resistance to some other related antibiotics as well.
Alcohol based sanitizers are fine. Just use moisturizer after if you're worried about dry skin.
And 5772. Don't leave the Euler-Mascheroni constant all alone!
No. Net neutrality allows ISPs to follow the DS field, just not to set it on traffic they didn't create.
Of course, there's always the possibility of a legislature screwing it up and outlawing QoS, but redefinition of ISPs under FCC Title 2 wouldn't have that problem.
They don't even have to restrict bandwidth. They can also just store packets from non-preferred providers in a long queue, thereby vastly increasing latency. VoIP is especially sensitive to this.
No, it's a separate password for the same account. You can set it to expire or not, as you choose. Cookies aren't involved.
I put "random crap" generated by my password manager, and store it in the password manager. Security questions are just secondary passwords to the same account. They need to have the same amount of entropy as the real password to be of any use whatsoever.
My Mother's maiden name is 52Vg8alTkWjJ92AXLq8c. I was born in the town of iyUJuoE5go9pWhylGHJT, where I got my first pet, 9DurEntFD7WU9lpZJCKI.
If you ever tell the truth with a security question, you've done it wrong. If you ever use the same answer to a security question twice, you've done it wrong. If your answers have less entropy than your passwords, you've done it wrong.
There's also the matter that better ECCs cost more overhead. You can detect single bit errors with a simple parity bit, but double errors will go undetected. And even something like Reed-Solomon can't correct all the errors it can detect. Spacecraft going to mars have very limited mass budgets, there are often better places to spend the extra mass than on an additional redundant flash chip (and associated circuitry).
No, it was that any of the clones would have the full version history of the entire source tree. You still want a primary repo from which you make your releases, but all the developers can have a copy of the whole thing. They can also make changes to their local clones when offline, then merge all the changes later. Anyone can branch from any point, and the whole thing works on snapshots of the repo instead of sets of incremental changes to each file.
64-bit isn't just about ram, it's also about the extra registers & instructions.
ChromeIPass + KeePass works rather well.
Specifically, the space shuttle didn't have a launch escape system. Mercury, Gemini, Apollo, Vostok, Shenzhou and Soyuz all do/did, though Vostok and Gemini used ejection seats for the purpose instead of taking the whole capsule. The shuttle test flights had ejection seats, but those were removed when normal operations started. After Challenger a method to escape the shuttle was added: get into a controlled glide, get to the rear hatch, jump out, and parachute to safety...
Or just heat the water in a kettle on the stove. Most (electric) stoves use 240V outlets.
If by "three-letter government agencies" you mean the USN, specifically the Office of Naval Research, then you're correct. But most people in the US call the USN "the Navy", so there are some extra letters.