Then a few of us will die, but the rest of us keep our freedom. It sure beats having more of us die under runaway tyrannical regimes while the rest of us toil under them. Ever notice how those who spy on others get more maniacal the more dirt they get? It builds a culture of paranoid delusion. Americans saw it first hand after 9/11. The reality is the threat never goes away. We can only choose how we live in spite of it.
However, that doesn't mean we can't take action. If such people really are the threats claimed, then it's time to declare war on the countries enabling them. Compromising western values is exactly what they want us to do.
All that's needed is a disclaimer stating that functionality is only guaranteed with certified accessories. Perhaps pop it up when associating uncertified products.
1. RTS games, esp with lots of units and cpu opponents. 2. FPS games during multiplayer. despite common belief, today's engines physics are heavily cpu dependent. The simplistic physics of quake are long behind us. 3. simulation - video encoding - ray tracing - faster multi core on the cheap (compared with your expensive xeons). a 4.7ghz 4core chip will do better than an 8 core at 2.6ghz, yet is much cheaper. You might be a rich bastard, but lots aren't. 4. emulation - very cpu heavy, it uses relatively few cores and wants them as fast as possible. low clocked xeons fail here too.
An oc cpu comes with higher IPS, faster cache, and faster IO. It's worth it if you know what you're doing and don't have a corporate sized budget.
Laws and regulation != competition. Therefore what is being charged isn't necessarily represented by what the market will bear. This leads to crazy fares. Of course, that's ok, but when uber does it, it's the end of the world, right? There's nothing special about transportation services that requires 'medallions' and artificial exclusivity.
I doubt the driver agreed to anything. I'm sure it was buried in some EULA. This doesn't change the reality of user-hostility billed as convenience or safety, especially if there's no choice to permanently shut it off or opt out.
While it's hard to sympathize in this case, I do not want to live in a world where owner-hostile behavior is built into consumer products. The real danger is when it is mandated by politicians beating the safety drum or included by default as a feature with no permanent opt out.
Yeah, but it's the left that's been anti uber/lyft. You can bitch about uber's pricing but it's not like taxi service hasn't been a ripoff. Some competition should help settle market prices. Look what lack of competition did to the american car market. There's a reason americans buy foreign, and why detroit is now a hellhole. Competition is a needed element to keep businesses limber. Otherwise, they turn into bloated, inefficient monopolies like any other state service.
Part of the problem of 'living wage' is the unseen inflation caused by deficit spending. This hurts the 20-30k/yr working class much more than your 1% (which includes a lot of liberals btw). The left wing solutions always revolve around increasing minimum wages, welfare services, and taxes, which in turn inflates the currency yet more. If you want to help those people, reduce their tax load and support paying down debt. Eliminate tax loopholes and simplify.
The people who 'have the vote' are the soccer mom idiots who think the world owes them a hugbox and a blanket. I do not want to live in such an orwellian panopticon.
There shouldn't be a computer to debate with in the first place.
Slashdot Mirror
Then a few of us will die, but the rest of us keep our freedom. It sure beats having more of us die under runaway tyrannical regimes while the rest of us toil under them. Ever notice how those who spy on others get more maniacal the more dirt they get? It builds a culture of paranoid delusion. Americans saw it first hand after 9/11. The reality is the threat never goes away. We can only choose how we live in spite of it.
However, that doesn't mean we can't take action. If such people really are the threats claimed, then it's time to declare war on the countries enabling them. Compromising western values is exactly what they want us to do.
The goa'uld.
To state heretical truth.
All that's needed is a disclaimer stating that functionality is only guaranteed with certified accessories. Perhaps pop it up when associating uncertified products.
The internet of things will help ensure that network administrators have full time jobs. Check your privilege. Light is a service now. Get over it.
Ever try ad block?
Sadly, this is the mentality taught to young people nowadays.
The US government is not the only government that lies. They all do.
yeah because vanity fair is a reliable source
It also means something small. "A speck of dust."
http://www.merriam-webster.com...
1. RTS games, esp with lots of units and cpu opponents.
2. FPS games during multiplayer. despite common belief, today's engines physics are heavily cpu dependent. The simplistic physics of quake are long behind us.
3. simulation - video encoding - ray tracing - faster multi core on the cheap (compared with your expensive xeons). a 4.7ghz 4core chip will do better than an 8 core at 2.6ghz, yet is much cheaper. You might be a rich bastard, but lots aren't.
4. emulation - very cpu heavy, it uses relatively few cores and wants them as fast as possible. low clocked xeons fail here too.
An oc cpu comes with higher IPS, faster cache, and faster IO. It's worth it if you know what you're doing and don't have a corporate sized budget.
apperating system. I'll have to remember that one.
Laws and regulation != competition. Therefore what is being charged isn't necessarily represented by what the market will bear. This leads to crazy fares. Of course, that's ok, but when uber does it, it's the end of the world, right? There's nothing special about transportation services that requires 'medallions' and artificial exclusivity.
Everything in life is a trade off. I want the power to decide. I don't want it decided for me by insurance companies or the state.
I doubt the driver agreed to anything. I'm sure it was buried in some EULA. This doesn't change the reality of user-hostility billed as convenience or safety, especially if there's no choice to permanently shut it off or opt out.
While it's hard to sympathize in this case, I do not want to live in a world where owner-hostile behavior is built into consumer products. The real danger is when it is mandated by politicians beating the safety drum or included by default as a feature with no permanent opt out.
Yeah, but it's the left that's been anti uber/lyft. You can bitch about uber's pricing but it's not like taxi service hasn't been a ripoff. Some competition should help settle market prices. Look what lack of competition did to the american car market. There's a reason americans buy foreign, and why detroit is now a hellhole. Competition is a needed element to keep businesses limber. Otherwise, they turn into bloated, inefficient monopolies like any other state service.
Part of the problem of 'living wage' is the unseen inflation caused by deficit spending. This hurts the 20-30k/yr working class much more than your 1% (which includes a lot of liberals btw). The left wing solutions always revolve around increasing minimum wages, welfare services, and taxes, which in turn inflates the currency yet more. If you want to help those people, reduce their tax load and support paying down debt. Eliminate tax loopholes and simplify.
you lefties are a riot. Equating murder for hire with taxi services is the mark of crazy.
Oh. What language is that? javascript?
No. Sometimes Clang produces faster code. Read the rest of that review.
The people who 'have the vote' are the soccer mom idiots who think the world owes them a hugbox and a blanket. I do not want to live in such an orwellian panopticon.
There shouldn't be a computer to debate with in the first place.
Those who want to fire in secret would simply disable the transmitter anyway.
You mention your fallacy and then override it? That's rich. People like you enable tyranny.
Not wanting your devices snitching != thinking it's moral to leave the scene of an accident when someone is hurt.
or it'll just be run by politicrats who will bias the 'exhibits' to their political agenda. It'll be the leftist version of the creation museum.
(Never explained why they were poking around our executable with strings)
It's on his computer. That gives him the right.