Maybe. I'm not sure. You have to realize most of the readership in a political campaign have short attention spans and existing bias. What you describe works for people who are looking to educate themselves; for people who need their emotional basis or their beliefs changed, you need something different.
If you want to make an emotional impact, start with How will this benefit me. Really. Your page is hard to understand because of the organization difficulties. Your writing (in general) is hard to understand because you don't use "topic sentence" and "supporting sentence" method of organization.
And of course a small group of motivated people can change the world: indeed, it's the only thing that ever has!
I don't deny that $250k is a small number, but arguing that you can't start a company with quarter of a million dollars is ridiculous. Not all startups have to be unicorns.
I don't think people are saying you can't, rather that it is unlikely the visa is being used for this purpose.
It should be mentioned that if you get a job, even the lowest paying job around, then you lose your welfare. So by getting a job, people get less money than they would on welfare.
I think I would change the outline of your page to something like this:
1) How this will benefit me (roughly, since every reader is a different 'me')
2) What problem in particular creates a need for this solution (for society in general, for particular unfortunate individuals etc)
3) How much it will cost me
4) Details on how to pay for it
You don't need to make a separate heading for each one of those, but if you pay attention to the structure, I think it will be a lot more readable.
If you watch the clip, John Oliver was very careful in the way he spoke. He didn't say, "Coal guy said X" instead he said, "the newspaper reported that Coal guy said X." I'm sure they had lawyers reviewing the script before airing.
People talk about the plight of the poor and start attacking the rich instead of proposing solutions--as if they don't care about the poor at all,
Yeah they don't care about poor people. Ask them when was the last time they complained about homeless people? Someone should fix those problems, but it's not going to be me!
If she has the skills and can do the job, then I'd hire her. If she 'whistleblows' on sexist practices, so what? I don't want that kind of stuff at my company. She would make the place better.
The expansion joints thing is just another example of why you don't turn to a biochemist for a lecture on engineering. Most HSR doesn't have expansion joints either. Lots of things don't have expansion joints
Incidentally, continuous rail is really, really cool.
He wasn't a good guy. He was barely holding it together, cut off from parental ties that would have kept him well grounded and unable to bond with his new community.
The Force Awakens as a movie, and I definitely think the directing/acting in episodes 1 thru 3 was terrible (save for Anakin's mother).
Palpatine was solid too, he took his role seriously.
I would also argue that Jar Jar Binks did a great job in the third movie, based on the horror that the entire audience felt upon his appearance. Not easy getting an emotional reaction like that. Dexter Jettster did a good job, and a few other characters were good as well.
and we have at the very least "criminally negligent" on the NSA's part here
That's an interesting legal theory. What law did they break? (Or even, what law did they break that "normal" people would be exposed to, since of course the NSA gets special treatment).
even if someone wanted to live a 1930s lifestyle, how many employers really want someone who will only work 15 hours/week?
Plenty of "gig economy" jobs will take you.
People don't want to live a 1930s lifestyle, they want to have more than their neighbors. And what they do in their freetime is mostly a waste, so why not use it to make money instead?
ok, that way of saying it clarifies your meaning.
I can't think of a Google query to verify that claim haha. Probably would have to use the wayback machine or something.
In theory that's how they're going to make auto-pilot good enough that it doesn't need human intervention......collecting data over time to avoid more and more problems until they approach the limit of zero problems.
Slashdot Mirror
or WannaCry wouldn't have happened, even on non-updated machines
That's a good point. A known vulnerability is surely one of the easiest heuristics to catch.
Maybe. I'm not sure. You have to realize most of the readership in a political campaign have short attention spans and existing bias. What you describe works for people who are looking to educate themselves; for people who need their emotional basis or their beliefs changed, you need something different.
If you want to make an emotional impact, start with How will this benefit me. Really. Your page is hard to understand because of the organization difficulties. Your writing (in general) is hard to understand because you don't use "topic sentence" and "supporting sentence" method of organization.
And of course a small group of motivated people can change the world: indeed, it's the only thing that ever has!
I don't deny that $250k is a small number, but arguing that you can't start a company with quarter of a million dollars is ridiculous. Not all startups have to be unicorns.
I don't think people are saying you can't, rather that it is unlikely the visa is being used for this purpose.
It should be mentioned that if you get a job, even the lowest paying job around, then you lose your welfare. So by getting a job, people get less money than they would on welfare.
I think I would change the outline of your page to something like this:
1) How this will benefit me (roughly, since every reader is a different 'me')
2) What problem in particular creates a need for this solution (for society in general, for particular unfortunate individuals etc)
3) How much it will cost me
4) Details on how to pay for it
You don't need to make a separate heading for each one of those, but if you pay attention to the structure, I think it will be a lot more readable.
If you watch the clip, John Oliver was very careful in the way he spoke. He didn't say, "Coal guy said X" instead he said, "the newspaper reported that Coal guy said X." I'm sure they had lawyers reviewing the script before airing.
Here it is in the context of the longer episode: https://youtu.be/aw6RsUhw1Q8?t=764
People talk about the plight of the poor and start attacking the rich instead of proposing solutions--as if they don't care about the poor at all,
Yeah they don't care about poor people. Ask them when was the last time they complained about homeless people? Someone should fix those problems, but it's not going to be me!
If she has the skills and can do the job, then I'd hire her. If she 'whistleblows' on sexist practices, so what? I don't want that kind of stuff at my company. She would make the place better.
The expansion joints thing is just another example of why you don't turn to a biochemist for a lecture on engineering. Most HSR doesn't have expansion joints either. Lots of things don't have expansion joints
Incidentally, continuous rail is really, really cool.
AC motors are kind of the canonical example of something that won't work at a different voltage level. Especially hair dryers.
Adding antivirus gives malware writers an even larger surface to attack. All the major antivirus vendors have had vulnerabilities, some of them extremely serious. Furthermore, they don't protect against new threats.
As long as people keep buying tickets, the formula will be followed.
. He goes from good guy
He wasn't a good guy. He was barely holding it together, cut off from parental ties that would have kept him well grounded and unable to bond with his new community.
The Force Awakens as a movie, and I definitely think the directing/acting in episodes 1 thru 3 was terrible (save for Anakin's mother).
Palpatine was solid too, he took his role seriously.
I would also argue that Jar Jar Binks did a great job in the third movie, based on the horror that the entire audience felt upon his appearance. Not easy getting an emotional reaction like that. Dexter Jettster did a good job, and a few other characters were good as well.
This is probably kind of relevant here, too.
and we have at the very least "criminally negligent" on the NSA's part here
That's an interesting legal theory. What law did they break? (Or even, what law did they break that "normal" people would be exposed to, since of course the NSA gets special treatment).
even if someone wanted to live a 1930s lifestyle, how many employers really want someone who will only work 15 hours/week?
Plenty of "gig economy" jobs will take you.
People don't want to live a 1930s lifestyle, they want to have more than their neighbors. And what they do in their freetime is mostly a waste, so why not use it to make money instead?
Good point. :)
The rest of what I said is true though
ok, that way of saying it clarifies your meaning.
I can't think of a Google query to verify that claim haha. Probably would have to use the wayback machine or something.
FYI the drought in California is over.
It was easy to debunk because the scare was actually in the 50s and 60s. In the media it peaked in the 70s, but not in the scientific community.
Yeah, all you really need is a terminal, and actually "echo" mode on is kind of a waste of bandwidth.
How is that difference from a regular search engine with filtering (and maybe a relevance score)?
In theory that's how they're going to make auto-pilot good enough that it doesn't need human intervention......collecting data over time to avoid more and more problems until they approach the limit of zero problems.