if you're asking this question. The ruling class has long since gone global. The US, at least as far as our ruling class goes, won't be trying to stop anything. They'll be working closely with China's ruling class since their interests (keeping the working class in line) align.
It's kind of weird, when you say it like that, it sounds just like what I've heard from a lot of Trump supporters (nafta superhighway etc)
What makes you think they 'switched to capitalism'?
Ensuring private property rights and allowing capitalists to join the party were huge milestones in the switch to capitalism. The only vestiges of Communism now in China are the name, and publicly placed guards in museums, who often look very bored.
They hate the West and all it stands for just like they always have, and want to destroy us and everything we're about, make the Earth one big Communist state full of good little obedient Communist automatons that don't question the Party, don't complain about anything,
What are you even talking about here? Your comments are informed by ignorance. Not only Rare communism/capitalism economic systems and not a government systems, but the best way to understand the Chinese government these days is to think of it as an extension of the old Imperial system. Of course, if you don't know what the imperial system was like, that won't help you.
make a better life for their one State-allowed child.
Showing your ignorance again. The one-child policy ended years ago.
Which may cost her the Speakership, either not getting it this time, or lose it a year in. Sleeping with the enemy won't play well with today's Democrats.
They'll get along with it. She knows what she's doing. She just doesn't make a big deal of it, and lets the normal fighting go on while she's getting things done in the background.
I notice the article doesn't have any actual hard numbers, nor specific accusations.
When I worked for an ad company it was between 15%-30% fraud. No one knew for sure, and the company pretended to care, made a token effort to stop it, but in actuality didn't care.
They'll spend 90% of their time, energy, and press on a futile, symbolic push to impeach Trump for paying off a woman he had an affair with
That is unlikely. When Pelosi was in charge before, she rose above that kind of petty vindictiveness ("Impeach Bush" sort of thing) and ended up working with Bush to get a LOT of what she wanted. She says she wants to do the same thing now, and Trump is kind of a liberal anyway, so he might be willing to go along with it. (This is all my opinion, of course).
Note that even if Slashdot invented a perfect moderation system, a good percentage of the people would leave rather than see their misconceptions challenged.
It brings to movies a technique that was common in comic books long ago: Increase suspense and drama by killing main characters off.
It works really well because the general movie-viewing audience hasn't seen the technique before, doesn't realize that important characters will be revived, and also doesn't realize how convoluted and un-wieldy the plot will eventually become.
Neither side is accurate. Oil companies prefer to keep the profits and hedge their bets by investing in alternative energy. The left side is just ridiculous I don't need to explain what is wrong with it.
people responsible for managing marketing emails for corporations use the unsubscribe link to verify your email address is valid.
They used to, but if marketers do this, gmail starts routing all their stuff into the spam folder. So legitimate companies don't do that anymore (spammers don't care).
Things like "Certificate renewal" and "DNS renewal" should have reminders (or errors, or whatever) in your monitoring tool, well in advance. That can be an extra double-check to make sure you get it done, in case you forget (or quit, and someone replaces you has to do it).
No difference than multiple linux distributions. They all use the same core and all fix it. And then add their stuff outside of the core system.
If Linux becomes the dominant system, that will begin to be a problem, just like it was when Windows was the dominant system. Monoculture is a bad thing.
Slashdot Mirror
if you're asking this question. The ruling class has long since gone global. The US, at least as far as our ruling class goes, won't be trying to stop anything. They'll be working closely with China's ruling class since their interests (keeping the working class in line) align.
It's kind of weird, when you say it like that, it sounds just like what I've heard from a lot of Trump supporters (nafta superhighway etc)
China as we know it is not going to be around a decade from now.
From my perspective, China seems more stable than it was 20 years ago. Certainly much more stable than in the 80s.
What makes you think they 'switched to capitalism'?
Ensuring private property rights and allowing capitalists to join the party were huge milestones in the switch to capitalism. The only vestiges of Communism now in China are the name, and publicly placed guards in museums, who often look very bored.
They hate the West and all it stands for just like they always have, and want to destroy us and everything we're about, make the Earth one big Communist state full of good little obedient Communist automatons that don't question the Party, don't complain about anything,
What are you even talking about here? Your comments are informed by ignorance. Not only Rare communism/capitalism economic systems and not a government systems, but the best way to understand the Chinese government these days is to think of it as an extension of the old Imperial system. Of course, if you don't know what the imperial system was like, that won't help you.
make a better life for their one State-allowed child.
Showing your ignorance again. The one-child policy ended years ago.
Which may cost her the Speakership, either not getting it this time, or lose it a year in. Sleeping with the enemy won't play well with today's Democrats.
They'll get along with it. She knows what she's doing. She just doesn't make a big deal of it, and lets the normal fighting go on while she's getting things done in the background.
What are your areas of interest and application?
I notice the article doesn't have any actual hard numbers, nor specific accusations.
When I worked for an ad company it was between 15%-30% fraud. No one knew for sure, and the company pretended to care, made a token effort to stop it, but in actuality didn't care.
They'll spend 90% of their time, energy, and press on a futile, symbolic push to impeach Trump for paying off a woman he had an affair with
That is unlikely. When Pelosi was in charge before, she rose above that kind of petty vindictiveness ("Impeach Bush" sort of thing) and ended up working with Bush to get a LOT of what she wanted. She says she wants to do the same thing now, and Trump is kind of a liberal anyway, so he might be willing to go along with it. (This is all my opinion, of course).
I think he was just bitter and wanted everyone to feel the same pain he felt when his family died.
What model are you talking about, exactly?
Note that even if Slashdot invented a perfect moderation system, a good percentage of the people would leave rather than see their misconceptions challenged.
It brings to movies a technique that was common in comic books long ago: Increase suspense and drama by killing main characters off.
It works really well because the general movie-viewing audience hasn't seen the technique before, doesn't realize that important characters will be revived, and also doesn't realize how convoluted and un-wieldy the plot will eventually become.
Of course it self-regulated. Advertisers get ripped off. I couldn't think of a better thing to happen.
It warms my heart just to think about it. Merry Christmas, everyone! (Even you, people who've foe'd me, Merry Christmas because advertisers suck!)
When you add a thread, you add a bug.
Ruby is faster than Python by many metrics. It doesn't really matter: execution speed isn't the bottle-neck for the vast majority of websites.
IT was all a distraction. He should have been rejected because his logic is weak and his writing poor.
That won't get through a spam filter at all.
Neither side is accurate. Oil companies prefer to keep the profits and hedge their bets by investing in alternative energy. The left side is just ridiculous I don't need to explain what is wrong with it.
people responsible for managing marketing emails for corporations use the unsubscribe link to verify your email address is valid.
They used to, but if marketers do this, gmail starts routing all their stuff into the spam folder. So legitimate companies don't do that anymore (spammers don't care).
Using them to protect trade secrets is one thing,
Using them without giving fair compensation (aka lots of money) is unacceptable.
Unsubscribe doesn't work for spam, but for company promos, just unsubscribe. There's no reason to keep that stuff around
When a stock is going up, it will probably keep going up.
The only thing it has changed is that instead of it being 90% of my portfolio, in 3 years it will only be 50-60% as I continue to diversify.
What are you switching to?
Things like "Certificate renewal" and "DNS renewal" should have reminders (or errors, or whatever) in your monitoring tool, well in advance. That can be an extra double-check to make sure you get it done, in case you forget (or quit, and someone replaces you has to do it).
Oh yeah, that's true, I see that one a lot, too.
No difference than multiple linux distributions. They all use the same core and all fix it. And then add their stuff outside of the core system.
If Linux becomes the dominant system, that will begin to be a problem, just like it was when Windows was the dominant system. Monoculture is a bad thing.