Slashdot Mirror


Your Apple Products Are Getting More Expensive. Here's How They Get Away With It. (washingtonpost.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report: Apple has never made cheap stuff. But this fall many of its prices increased 20 percent or more. The MacBook Air went from $1,000 to $1,200. A Mac Mini leaped from $500 to $800. It felt as though the value proposition that has made Apple products no-brainers might unravel. For some perspective, we charted out the past few years of prices on a few iconic Apple products. Then we compared them with other brands and some proprietary data about Americans' phone purchase habits from mobile analytics firm BayStreet Research.

What we learned: Being loyal to Apple is getting expensive. Many Apple product prices are rising faster than inflation -- faster, even, than the price of prescription drugs or going to college. Yet when Apple offers cheaper options for its most important product, the iPhone, Americans tend to take the more expensive choice. So while Apple isn't charging all customers more, it's definitely extracting more money from frequent upgraders.

[...] Apple says prices go up because it introduces new technologies such as Face ID and invests in making products that last a long time. Yet it has clearly been feeling price discomfort from some quarters. This week, amid reports of lagging sales that took its stock far out of the trillion-dollar club, it dedicated its home page to a used-car sales technique that's uncharacteristic for an aspirational luxury brand. It offered a "limited-time" deal to trade in an old iPhone and get a new iPhone XR for $450, a $300 discount.

410 comments

  1. Zombies. by pecosdave · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Apple users want new well branded, logo showing bling the same way zombies want brains.

    --
    The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
    1. Re: Zombies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The iPhone 6 looked just like an iPhone 8...the colorful iPhone is also the cheap one.

    2. Re: Zombies. by pecosdave · · Score: 1, Informative

      I know they're not out yet, and yes, I have an Android phone that does a lot more than an equivalently priced iPhone, but I'm sort of looking forward to getting away from Android too.

      --
      The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
    3. Re: Zombies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I apple users are feeling the pinch. Most apple fanboys I know are keeping their devices much longer and now are considering other brands. These are engineers that can afford this stuff too.

      Comparing a dell xps 13 developer vs a 13 macbook pro is now challenging. The prices are not even roughly the same but the benchmarks have them roughly the same.

    4. Re: Zombies. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Be warned, that phone looks like a scam.

      Looking at the product page they make some clearly untrue claims without qualification. For example, they say the software is "fully open", but also admit that they have non-free hardware (and presumably drivers) such as the modem, i.e. the bit that communicates with the world. They also make some false statements about the competition, such as claiming that Android isn't Linux.

      They don't even list the hardware specs.

      If you are really concerned about this stuff then a better and cheaper option is to get a phone well supported by Lineage OS. If you are really worried you can even build your own OS from source with ASOP, although of course just like Librem you need some binary blobs.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:Zombies. by garcia · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm an Apple user but you're making sweeping generalizations of which I've honestly only heard from non-Apple users. The only people who care that someone has an Apple product seems to be those who use Android.

      I used to use any number of different products across any number of platforms (OS/2, Debian, Windows, etc, etc, etc) but to say I want to use it because of the logo is objectively ridiculous.

      I use it because I've used one for years and don't see any reason to change. I haven't had to pay anything (except standard mobile contract fees) for any of these phones and my laptops are solidly killing it years later.

      Do your thing, by all means; but stop spouting off ridiculous theories of which have little basis in reality.

    6. Re: Zombies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Librem 5 24-inch Monitor kit
              $1,399.00 Add to cart
      Librem 5 30-inch Monitor kit
              $1,699.00 Add to cart

      Whatarethey NUTS!
      I noticed that the phone price is NOT listed on the page ...
      Very suspicious ...

      CAP === 'lonelier'

    7. Re:Zombies. by wes.mcclure · · Score: 1

      I second this...

    8. Re: Zombies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My 2013 macbook pro is 10% slower than the 2018 model in single core performance for teice the price

    9. Re: Zombies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Android isn't Linux. This is one promises to be more like a linux PC. Want to upgrade from debian 10 to debian 11? It should be doable since most everything is supported in the mainline linux kernel.
      The modem is non free but it's on the USB bus (does that mean you can use a user space driver?). You have no control over a 4G tower or McDonalds's wifi either (maybe this argument is a cop out, but well. use VPN, another DNS, etc.)

      They're crowdfunding an non-existing product, not a Chinese company that makes a product first then crowdfunds the launch. That is the "scam" part. But devkit exists (it's late). Phone will probably be delayed months from this April date.

    10. Re:Zombies. by StormReaver · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I haven't had to pay anything (except standard mobile contract fees)

      That's like saying, "I haven't had to pay anything for my house (except standard mortgage payments)."

    11. Re:Zombies. by amicusNYCL · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The only people who care that someone has an Apple product seems to be those who use Android.

      People who drive around with Apple stickers on the back of their car would seem to offer a counterpoint to that argument. I've seen cars with 3 or 4 Apple stickers on the back in a neat row, apparently they want to make their car as attractive a target as possible for a smash-n-grab.

      I use it because I've used one for years and don't see any reason to change.

      There are better products for the same price or less, which is a reason to change. There ARE reasons to change, but once you get deeply enough into the Apple ecosystem then it becomes a burden to move to a different platform. Which goes back to the headline about how Apple gets away with making their products more expensive.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    12. Re:Zombies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was a guy who got a Zune tattoo. Who cares? Whatever.

      Apple is the only computer company from the 70s that I can think of that is still around making personal computers. The reason why is because they avoided getting into price wars and focused on delivering consistent value to their customers.

      When I was working at IBM years ago someone explained to me that IBM customers are essentially paying for IBM to investigate new technologies, not release new things prematurely, and support what they sell. Apple is doing the same thing. They consistently put out good quality products that you can expect to get years of use from. They support them with software updates for a long time.

      I’m not saying Apple is perfect or that other products are bad. I’m saying that if you are a long time Apple customer then you rely on Apple to take care of you and for your stuff to continue to work for a long time which it does. That’s why I’ve been a Mac user since 1993.

    13. Re: Zombies. by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      Can you define "a lot more" because I can't see how your Android phone does more or less.

    14. Re:Zombies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Byteboi gaffots love to pay, bigboi Cook his blojob day. Thousand buck$ and more they simper , H1-Bs to prod and whimper. Burmashave.

    15. Re:Zombies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More like "except standard utility costs."

    16. Re: Zombies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So why you upgrade your iphone every year?

    17. Re:Zombies. by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      There are better products for the same price or less, which is a reason to change.

      Not when you get more than ONE of those products of the same brand/platform TOGETHER, there aren't.

      Which is a reason NOT to change.

      Now what?

    18. Re: Zombies. by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 0

      Sure thing, fanboi. Whatever you need to tell yourself to not feel like a fucking dupe.

      So sez the ANONYMOUS COWARD.

      Name says it all...

    19. Re: Zombies. by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 2

      My 2013 macbook pro is 10% slower than the 2018 model in single core performance for teice the price

      You can thank:

      1. Intel

      2. The speed of light

      For the (lack) of incredible speed increases. That's why NOBODY replaces their computers as often as they used to.

    20. Re:Zombies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People who drive around with Apple stickers on the back of their car would seem to offer a counterpoint to that argument. I've seen cars with 3 or 4 Apple stickers on the back in a neat row, apparently they want to make their car as attractive a target as possible for a smash-n-grab.

      Maybe they're Android users displaying them ironically. Or just idiots trying to score some hipster geek cred (but only the rainbow ones count for that). You're already selecting the population of people who put stickers on their car, so they're not really a representative sample of anything.

      There are better products for the same price or less, which is a reason to change.

      Changing costs more than just using the thing you have that already does what you need it to do. And if you have a thing that did what you needed it to do for much longer than the expected lifetime, then you're more likely to go with another of said thing when you need to get a replacement because there's less risk. And much of the "better" out there these days is of only marginal benefit. Thing A does what I need, works the way I'm used to, and is from the company that made Old Thing, which lasted 4 or 6 or 10 or more years without giving me any trouble. Thing B does what I need, claims slightly better specs than Thing A, costs a little less, works slightly differently, and is from a company I haven't bought from before. Which is the better choice?

      There ARE reasons to change, but once you get deeply enough into the Apple ecosystem then it becomes a burden to move to a different platform.

      It's the same as SLR cameras. Sure, Nikon's models are ranked better than Canon's now and Pentax's are cheaper and just as good or better for many uses. But if I already have a full set of Canon lenses and accessories, the difference just isn't significant enough to justify switching to an entirely different system. I've had Blackberry and Android phones and every time I couldn't wait to get rid of the piece of junk. Then I got an iPhone and it just did its job without pissing me off. So I got another one when I was in the market again and that one will probably be just fine until 5G is widely available. I don't baby my equipment - my phones, like my cameras, need to be able to handle heat, cold, pouring rain, getting knocked around, etc. Canon's products can take it, so can Apple's. So I'll keep buying their products until that changes because I know they make what works for me, "better" be damned.

      Which goes back to the headline about how Apple gets away with making their products more expensive.

      They get away with making their products more expensive because their customers don't see price as the most important feature. They need to make their products more expensive because their durability has become the dominant factor in their usable lifetime, not the limits of the technology. But that just feeds back into the value part of the equation, which makes people more willing to pay the higher price. And so it goes...

      But, like cars, that also makes the used market an attractive option for customers on a budget. If you don't need the latest model, which probably has (or doesn't have) some feature that is pissing off the early adopters, you can get a slightly older model at a steep discount. So why bother switching to something different?

    21. Re:Zombies. by halofan_sd · · Score: 0

      a Samsung Galaxy S9/Note9 is $800-1000, a Microsoft Surface Pro tablet can be $1500+, why are people acting like non-Apple products sell for $100?

    22. Re:Zombies. by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 2

      and for your stuff to continue to work for a long time

      Not really, Anonymous Coward. If I were able to copy DonkeyKong.exe from a 5.25" IBM "PC-compatible" floppy I have in the attic onto a thumb drive, and load it in the Windows 10 MS Surface I'm typing this on, it would run. Likely so blindingly fast it would be unplayable, but it would run, sound effects and all. Ditto my dBase II disks.

      However, were I to try to run Lode Runner from a Mac Classic onto a modern Macbook Air, it wouldn't work. Fairly regularly, Apple kills off all backwards compatibility. Sure there are emulators, blah blah blah, but Apple's stuff almost never "continues to work for a long time."

    23. Re: Zombies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who said i had an android

    24. Re: Zombies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I should switch to macbooks pro, try keeping a windows laptop that long

    25. Re: Zombies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only way that's true is via some very artificial benchmark. My 2014 is more than 20% faster than the 2013 I had, both at equivalent levels when bought: top cpu, same size storage and RAM. The new ones are at least 25% faster than my 2014 in the slowest of benchmarks, and likely much faster on the best given that they're using newer RAM and a faster I/O controller and disk.

    26. Re: Zombies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      makes a product first then crowdfunds the launch

      I much prefer people doing that over these asshole scammer who have nothing, collect a bunch of money and proceed to do nothing. If you are going to crowdsource your funds, you should have working product on hand already, even if the product is still being fine tuned.

    27. Re:Zombies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a former apple user (loved OS X until they borked it), and I can say it's not a sweeping generalization... it's a fact. Having seen the lines of people waiting for OS X 10.4, I can safely say, Apple's a bloody cult.

      If you want reality, stop buying Apple products.

    28. Re: Zombies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geekbench has it at 22%increase of the mid 2018 to late 2013 best spec to best spec single core
      https://browser.geekbench.com/macs/431

      Anon is right, still not worth the upgrade for the dollar

    29. Re: Zombies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Access to multiple software shops/repositories. A massively larger library of software available. Totally open source OS that I can configure and make work any way that I want. Massively larger userbase, ensuring developer attention and longevity.

      The iPhone is on a death spiral. It won't even be a thing in 10 years.

    30. Re:Zombies. by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      That's a great counterpoint, and you're entirely right of course. Apple don't maintain backwards compatibility, even though it's perfectly clear that the OP meant instead that their hardware keeps going, and their software updates keep coming.

      The trouble with MS maintaining all this backwards compatibility for ever, and ever, and ever - is that they're stuck with decades worth of cruft in their APIs, and it really, really, really shows.

    31. Re:Zombies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd be incorrect as you can run that Lode Runner on a modern Macbook Air.

      As for that DonkeyKong.exe, it won't run on your Win10 system either. You'd more than likely need Dosbox or something similar, and even then it'll be questionable because some of those games were tied to specific hardware or quirks of the system at the time of release. You already mentioned it'd likely have a clock issue, my guess is your troubles wouldn't be limited to that.

    32. Re: Zombies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL. Ahhhh I figured I'd see you here letting Apple off the hook.

      Never apples fault amiright?

    33. Re: Zombies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So sez the resident Apple cock sucking faggot.

      Post your real name or STFU, because you and I are no different.

    34. Re: Zombies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're only looking at the top end. Apple does not sell a wide range of hardware at both ends of the price spectrum. Everyone else does.

    35. Re: Zombies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's your fault for buying into the Apple ecosystem you faggot. A problem that you handwave away.

    36. Re: Zombies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are comparing a tablet to a phone.

      Also, how many people are actually buying a surface? From my research not many. Too expensive, too limited.

    37. Re: Zombies. by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      LOL. Ahhhh I figured I'd see you here letting Apple off the hook.

      Never apples fault amiright?

      Generally, a Benchmark is measuring CPU and/or GPU speed rather directly. Therefore, the final arbiter of speed is the speed of that particular CPU and/or GPU. I would expect a Windows or Linux system with the same CPU and GPU configuration as the Mac to have very similar results, assuming the author of the Benchmark paid attention to making the Benchmark itself the same instructions (or at least the same number of cycles) per inner-loop of the test.

      And the speed of light is pretty damned constant across all computers in this particular dimension of the Multiverse... ;-)

      So, unless the Benchmark is testing OS Calls, it pretty much CAN'T be Apple's fault.

      Now tell me how I'm wrong.

    38. Re: Zombies. by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      So sez the resident Apple cock sucking faggot.

      Post your real name or STFU, because you and I are no different.

      Wrong.

      I've got my Slashdot "reputation" (Karma score) on the line; while ACs can (and DO) say ANY FUCKING THING that comes into their little peabrains, WITHOUT FEAR OF REPRISAL.

      THAT's the DIFFERENCE, FUCKFACE!

    39. Re: Zombies. by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      That's your fault for buying into the Apple ecosystem you faggot. A problem that you handwave away.

      Excuse me, I don't think you read my comment correctly.

      Assuming you CAN read with comprehension.

    40. Re: Zombies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is Apple so incompetent that they choose crappy processors and then charge through the nose for them?

    41. Re: Zombies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know they're not out yet, and yes, I have an Android phone that does a lot more than an equivalently priced iPhone, but I'm sort of looking forward to getting away from Android too.

      That company is a just a monument to bullshit. Stuff like "does not track you", how do you have a cell phone that can't be tracked? Even the most basic cell phone is trackable by its very nature. This nonsense that it doesn't lock you into an ecosystem? So do its apps run on other platforms? No of course they don't, if you buy apps for it you're locked into its platform just like iOS or Android.

      Then there's nonsense like this: "Unlike the rest of the industry indulging in fads and forcefully replacing the most standard audio connector to gain “control of the accessories market”". Clearly they don't understand that Bluetooth is a standard that these companies do not "control", or maybe they just assume their potential customer base is completely stupid.

      "Lifetime updates"? But no model for how they will actually fund development of these updates, we all know this claim to be bullshit because you need to fund it somehow and developers don't simply work for free so unless you're paying them at some point the updates will stop.

      In the end it's still open source software running on top of closed source hardware and software.

    42. Re:Zombies. by Solandri · · Score: 2

      The only people who care that someone has an Apple product seems to be those who use Android.

      The proliferation of iPhone cases with a cutout to show off the Apple logo contradicts your belief. Android users aren't buying those cases for iPhone owners. The iPhone owners are preferentially selecting those cases themselves. It's part and parcel of treating your phone as a (branded) fashion accessory, rather than as a technological tool.

    43. Re:Zombies. by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      There was a guy who got a Zune tattoo. Who cares? Whatever.

      OK. So, Android users aren't the only people who care who uses Apple. OK? That was the point.

      I’m saying that if you are a long time Apple customer then you rely on Apple to take care of you and for your stuff to continue to work for a long time which it does.

      OK, great. Does that mean there is no reason to switch away from Apple? No, it doesn't. There are reasons, and there are costs associated with switching because of how deeply people get into the ecosystem, and how Apple tries to lock people in. You should know, they've had you for 25 years. Think about what happens if the next computer you want to buy is 50% more but the performance doesn't scale with the price. Are you going to switch to a different brand? Of course not, you'll buy the new one because you're too invested, the cost of switching is more expensive to you than the obvious premium you're paying. It should be said that this has been the case for the majority of the time you've been a customer of theirs, too. The experience you get with Apple is not unique to Apple. It's not like they're the only company who offers customer support.

      I'm not sure what the point of your post was.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    44. Re: Zombies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember that many slower cores trump high speed single core on OS X due to Grand Central Dispatch. Windows also benefits from many cores even if each individual core is slower due the crazy use of threading.

      Linux less so as many parts of the system (e.g. Xorg) are single threaded

    45. Re:Zombies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't had to pay anything (except standard mobile contract fees)

      That's like saying, "I haven't had to pay anything for my house (except standard mortgage payments)."

      I've had both Android and iPhones and I agree, other than the price of the device, I don't have any additional fees. Apple is no longer the only $1000 player in town by the way

    46. Re:Zombies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple users want new well branded, logo showing bling the same way zombies want brains.

      I proudly wear the badge of Apple surviving Windows, and it serves as a good reminder if I ever forget that.

    47. Re: Zombies. by registrations_suck · · Score: 0

      No, we just want something that works, with minimal bullshit and without demanding conformance to some philosophy as to how we think the world should be.

      I recently bought a iPhone XS Max, for $1200 or so all-in. It replaced my 6s Plus, which I had for 3 years. If I have the new phone for three years, even assuming itâ(TM)s value goes ALL THE WAY TO ZERO, that is less than $1/day to have this phone. BIG FUCKING DEAL!

    48. Re: Zombies. by registrations_suck · · Score: 1

      UAG case on my shiny new iPhone here. No logo cutout.

    49. Re:Zombies. by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't that only be true on 32 bit Win10? Can you boot into DOS on that Surface?

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    50. Re: Zombies. by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      Why is Apple so incompetent that they choose crappy processors and then charge through the nose for them?

      Because Intel only MAKES crappy Processors.

      Just wait a couple of years until Apple is in charge of its own "CPU roadmap".

    51. Re:Zombies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think more than likely DonkeyKong.exe from a 5.25" floppy would be a 16-bit executable that would not actually run on Windows 10. In fact, many Windows 95-98 era games (the original Heroes of Might and Magic for instance) were built on 16-bit libraries and can no longer be run on modern windows without some kind of virtualization or wrapper.

    52. Re:Zombies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dont care how many apples you get together ; its all still crap; just expensive crap.

    53. Re: Zombies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow you have so many imaginary hit points. Make you feel magical; doesn't it. I'm so impressed with what you risk everyday being a paid apple shill.

    54. Re: Zombies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      100 percent correct there, part of being a thoughtless follower in the apple cult is never ever admitting apple has any fault in anything.

    55. Re: Zombies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great the sooner apple totally breaks off from the rest of the industry the sooner the rest of the industry can dump apple.

    56. Re: Zombies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And who chose to put that CPU and GPU into their computer?

    57. Re:Zombies. by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      Apple is the only computer company from the 70s that I can think of that is still around making personal computers.

      I would think that HP counts.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    58. Re:Zombies. by NicBenjamin · · Score: 1

      The only people who care that someone has an Apple product seems to be those who use Android.

      People who drive around with Apple stickers on the back of their car would seem to offer a counterpoint to that argument. I've seen cars with 3 or 4 Apple stickers on the back in a neat row, apparently they want to make their car as attractive a target as possible for a smash-n-grab.

      Pics or it didn't happen.

      I use it because I've used one for years and don't see any reason to change.

      There are better products for the same price or less, which is a reason to change. There ARE reasons to change, but once you get deeply enough into the Apple ecosystem then it becomes a burden to move to a different platform. Which goes back to the headline about how Apple gets away with making their products more expensive.

      Correction:
      There are products with better price/performance in specs Android and Windows fanbois care about then Apple's.

      In particular, they have better price/performance because the hardware is independent of the software. Which means you can get the cheapest hardware that will still work and still run the software. This leads to issues like Windows updates that destroy certain pieces of hardware because it's humanly impossible for them to test on every single config, Windows driver hell, people paying hundred$ for Android phones that don't receive software updates, etc.

      With Apple you're either going ridiculous lengths to hackintosh, or you're buying from Apple. That means they know which graphics card you have, they know which SSD you have, etc. and if that machine supports the next version it just happens.

      If you like that trade-off more power to you. Tinker away at your most cost-effective hardware+glitchier software combo. I actually have a homebuilt PC sitting right under my MacPro tower so I see the appeal.

      But please stop whining that other people dare choose a different trade-off.

    59. Re:Zombies. by Can'tNot · · Score: 1

      I'm an Apple user but you're making sweeping generalizations of which I've honestly only heard from non-Apple users.

      Why on earth would Apple users make derogatory generalizations about themselves?

    60. Re:Zombies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try it. 16-bit programs haven't worked in most installs of Windows for a decade+, and most DOS-era programs require emulation, especially games or graphical software in general. XD

      Granted, yes, Apple's far worse on compatibility. Even Android games often work from several years back.

    61. Re: Zombies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Android is Linux in all ways but ones that count, hehe.
      I guess you'll get GNU/Linux herdists saying same about latest Ubuntu, though, too.

    62. Re: Zombies. by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Pics or it didn't happen.

      I guess you apple types have never heard of google image search.

      https://www.google.com/search?...

    63. Re: Zombies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you aware that beats commands a huge marketshare of the wireless headphones?

      That one comment is actually true.

    64. Re: Zombies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My SONY laptop is about 7 to 8 years old now. Started with Windows Vista and now I'm on w10.

      What's this bullshit about lasting longer?

    65. Re: Zombies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find you are the exception rather than the rule.

      Many times, people choose i devices even if they run into the same problems (battery issues) or change their behaviors for it.

      I know one person who never bought any electronic software\media in her life because she's extremely frugal (and she knows she may have trouble supporting herself once her parents go)... Yet she buys games and irreleavnt crap on her i device.

      Just one example.

    66. Re: Zombies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've home built dozens of computers and I've never had problems with any of them regarding updates.

      Then again, I don't bargain basement everything. If you do, that's on you.

      Most platforms give you the choice of higher risk for cheaper parts.

    67. Re:Zombies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and for your stuff to continue to work for a long time

      Not really, Anonymous Coward. If I were able to copy DonkeyKong.exe from a 5.25" IBM "PC-compatible" floppy I have in the attic onto a thumb drive, and load it in the Windows 10 MS Surface I'm typing this on, it would run. Likely so blindingly fast it would be unplayable, but it would run, sound effects and all. Ditto my dBase II disks.

      However, were I to try to run Lode Runner from a Mac Classic onto a modern Macbook Air, it wouldn't work. Fairly regularly, Apple kills off all backwards compatibility. Sure there are emulators, blah blah blah, but Apple's stuff almost never "continues to work for a long time."

      Agreed.. AND if you ran DonkeyKong.exe in DOSBox, then you could select an appropiate emulation speed, such that the game would run at the desired speed...

      Apple gear has always been bought by "No Brainers"... atleast since Steve returned... and especially after he died and left Tim in charge....

    68. Re:Zombies. by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      I'm not whining about anything, people are trying to assert that there are no reasons to switch from Apple and that's simply not true.

      This leads to issues like Windows updates that destroy certain pieces of hardware

      I must be one of the lucky ones then, I've been building my own computers for the last 25 years and the number of hardware devices which have been destroyed by Windows updates is exactly 0. For me though, the reason why I build my own is not because it's necessarily cost-effective, I'm not trying to minimize the price at the expense of everything else. I build my own so I can put together something that works for me. My current gaming computer has been running with zero hardware failures since 2011 when I built it for Skyrim. The only thing I've done since is to recently upgrade the video card. So, even though I don't set out to minimize cost, having a computer still running flawlessly 7 years later without a single SSD or memory or any other failure does turn out to be a good deal. As far as glitchy software, that's limited to games, and I'm not going to be switching to a Mac for gaming any time soon. No reason to cut off my nose to spite my face. I also have a computer hooked up to the TV that I built just for that, which has been going for about the same time. With that one, my priority was noise so I chose a case and fan and component layout that would minimize noise (many large, slow fans). I had to vacuum the dust out of that once, but that's been doing pretty well too.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    69. Re:Zombies. by BlackOverflow · · Score: 1

      You better hope your config.sys and autoexec.bat files have the correct memory allocations (expanded or extended?!) and other configuration things you may need (soundblaster or adlib audio drivers, etc)!

    70. Re: Zombies. by pecosdave · · Score: 1

      I can charge it with an common standards off-the-shelf unlicensed cable and charger for one.

      --
      The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
    71. Re: Zombies. by pecosdave · · Score: 1

      Also, I can add to my spacious 128 GBs on board with an SD card.

      I can use NFC in any capacity NFC works, not just Apple blessed register transactions (phone to phone for example).

      I can install games from the Humble Bundles I buy.

      I can plug in a pair of $3 ear buds from a discount store. (That doesn't mean I can't use a $400 Bluetooth pair).

      --
      The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
    72. Re: Zombies. by pecosdave · · Score: 1

      In the end it's still open source software running on top of closed source hardware and software.

      You obviously didn't look to close.

      It's open source software, even the phone is supposed to be SIP, not actual mobile phone. It's pure I.P.

      Some of the hardware may be closed source, who cares, the software can be pretty much any Linux distro (or theoretically something else) you can get to run on it, it's an unlocked system. The radio may have some closed-source components, but that's all but mandatory due to FCC rules. Even most other-wise open source WiFi drivers in Linux have closed source components due to this tidbit.

      --
      The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
  2. So? by p51d007 · · Score: 1, Troll

    As long as people are willing to put up with it, you think they are going to LOWER the prices out of the goodness of their heart? Not that the prices were low when Jobs was alive, but, now that he is gone, the puppet Cook, just does what the stock holders tell him to do.

  3. $1000 phones by 110010001000 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I never thought anyone would buy a $1000 phone that was built for $140. That is probably why I am not in sales.

    1. Re:$1000 phones by jon3k · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's probably for a few reasons. First, it costs more than 2.5x more than you are suggesting to build it. Then you also don't understand what it costs to develop the software that runs on it or maintain that software for the (relative to the rest of the industry) excessively long lifespan of Apple devices (the iPhone 6 released in 2014 still runs the latest version of iOS) or the marketing and distribution of those products or the customer support.

      So while Apple has the healthiest margins in the industry, no one sells a $140 phone for $1,000.

    2. Re: $1000 phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My iPhone 6 doesn't run the latest version of iOS.

      But by refusing updates, my iPhone 6 will continue to perform to hardware spec for several more years.

    3. Re:$1000 phones by jellomizer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The $140 isn't the true cost of the product either. There is a lot of money in the Administrative costs of such a device. The R&D probably factoring in hundreds of rejected designed and ideas that cost a lot money before it was rejected, staff from the executives down to the maintenance workers, who needs to get paid no matter how many units are sold.
      Now Apple is one of the biggest companies in the world, they are making a good amount of profit off each unit sold, but the cost to build one unit, isn't the true cost.

      Now that being said, there is danger in the Race to the bottom sales tactic. Where you sell your product less then your competitor, then your competitor cuts their prices to be below you and then you return back again. At first you may assume that this is good for the consumer, however it isn't long in this race to the bottom sacrifices are made to where the product gets crappier and crappier every price cut, because the company will still try to keep its margins, and will not sell at a loss.

      If you look at historic Desktop PC makers back in the late 1990's
      1995ish, Gateway 2000 was gaining a lot of ground, one of its biggest points was its product quality. Sure you will pay more for it but it is worth it. Then in a few years it tried to compete with lower cost competitors such as Compaq which then caused the quality to drop rapidly as your $2k PC is now $900 but the drives will fail, and 3rd party components would undoubtedly crash Windows rapidly because the drivers were never quite right.
      1997ish, Dell begin to gain a lot of ground, one of its biggest points was its product quality. Sure you will pay more for it but it is worth it. Then in a few years it was trying to compete with eMachenes which then caused the quality to drop rapidly as your $2k PC is now $900 but the drives will fail, 3rd party components would crash win....

      Apple isn't the perfect company and their products are not perfect. However they have mostly maintained a high quality in their products (with their share of duds) often the big scandals like the iPhones 4 antenna problem and the iPhones 6+ bending problems, are actually small problems, however people got angry because of the standard that Apple normally has. But if Apple would try to make their products cheaper it will only open the door for their competition to sell better quality products and take Apples spot.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    4. Re: $1000 phones by fluffernutter · · Score: 2

      I have an iPhone 6 that I use as a test device and an mp3 player. The thing that annoys me about it is that it will continue to nag me about upgrades; like literally every time I unlock it I have to say no don't upgrade. It also nags me about registering an Apple account (no I don't want to attach my account, shut up!). Since I have iTunes set up to talk to this iPhone I can't help my mother in law with hers on my system lest iTunes get hopelessly confused and try to morph her phone into mine. It seems terribly designed.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    5. Re: $1000 phones by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      Should add that setting up a production line is certainly not a zero dollar affair either. Moulds, for example, cost a fair amount of money, so you need to sell a certain number if units to recoup the cost. Also, not all units pass the production line and there are plenty of people wanting that complementary support.

      Even with all the other costs factored in, no one in their right mind would sell an item at cost. It would actually work out to be a loss maker and you generally charge what the market is willing to pay.

      If someone can afford to pay for a new phone every year then we should let them. Most of the rest of us should be happy to replace it every three years. Heck, it isnâ(TM)t as if the phone really is irrelevant by then, based on current iterations.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    6. Re:$1000 phones by CoolCash · · Score: 1

      Well no. Its not $140. Its closer to $450. Of course since you're not in sales you don't know anything about marketing, R&D, sales people, employee costs. Which also add on to the prices.

    7. Re: $1000 phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same with Google. *Every* time I open maps, it wants me to turn on location tracking. At least once a week it wants me to add a cellphone number and an alternate email address. The options are "Yes" and "No thanks". Oddly there is no "Fuck off and quit asking me" option.

    8. Re:$1000 phones by dfghjk · · Score: 5, Informative

      You are a terrible historian.

      Gateway was never a quality product, it was a low cost one. Gateway designed absolutely nothing. They were eliminated when high quality manufacturers collapsed the price umbrella that eliminated parasites like them.

      Dell had a mix of in-house products (Optiplex) and co-developed ones (Dimension). In fact, Gateway's boxes, effectively rebranded Dimensions, had a lot of Dell engineering in them. Dell was the leader in collapsing the profit model and causing Gateway's extinction. By then, Dell wasn't "gaining ground", it was a tier 1 supplier. Dell, though, was never a brand where you paid a premium for quality, it only appeared so when compared to the lowest cost boxes. Dell offered high quality PCs at lower cost than other tier 1 suppliers.

      Dell never cared in the slightest about eMachines. Dell cared about Gateway who was essentially selling Dell machines at lower cost. We know how that turned out.

      The cause of quality issues in the industry is not as you describe. Intel moved to monopolize every aspect of the PC (including the mindshare aspect with the "Intel Inside" campaign). PC manufacturers could not fight this and it led to a loss of differentiation on quality. When the core PC is always the same, it's a commodity. Reversion to the mean was inevitable and it was caused by Intel, not by anything you describe.

      Apple, throughout the bulk of their resurgence, sold Intel PCs with Intel chipsets and Intel quality. Apple merely restricted compatibility deliberately. Curious that a move like that would lead to an image of superior quality, eh?

      Apple does not have to lower quality to "make their products cheaper". In the end of a long-winded and largely incorrect exposition, you make quite an ignorant claim. In fact, the whole point of this article is Apple's remarkably high margins.

    9. Re: $1000 phones by methano · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have an iPhone 6 and I updated the software to iOS 12.1.1 last night. So you're basically full of it.

    10. Re: $1000 phones by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      What is the point of using Google Maps without location tracking?

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    11. Re:$1000 phones by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Thats baloney. There aren't billions spent in R&D on every iPhone model. Give me a break.

    12. Re:$1000 phones by 110010001000 · · Score: 0

      Wow, so it costs $550 per iphone in marketing, R&D, sales, etc? Amazing. Christ, people are dumb, but that is why I am not in sales. Enjoy paying $1000 for your device.

    13. Re: $1000 phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being wrong repeatedly makes you look like the moron. Maybe you just like being a dirt bag.

    14. Re:$1000 phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Apple has ALWAYS made cheap stuff." There, fixed that! And its more like $5.00 to $10.00 than $140.00.

      (Cr)apple has somehow managed to get stupid people (iDiots) to think of their products as more akin to jewelry than technology! The iDiots think that their (Cr)apple products are something to show off, that somehow owning them makes a person cool or hip somehow. But in reality, compared to other much superior products, (Cr)apple products are more like extremely cheap costume jewelry compared to the the crown jewels! iDiots that get sucked into paying insanely inflated prices for (Cr)apple products just don't see how the rest of us are laughing at them!

    15. Re: $1000 phones by jon3k · · Score: 1

      The markup you are describing ONLY considers the hardware costs. It does not include all the other things I listed. Yes, Apple still has good margins. I wish there was a good alternative that had great performance and I knew would get updates for 4+ years, immediately, with premium hardware. Unfortunately there just are not any other good options I'm aware of that meet my criteria. I'm not sure how that makes me a "moron".

    16. Re: $1000 phones by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      "I'm not sure how that makes me a "moron"."

      Anyone who willingly transfers their money to a corporation with margins like Apple is a moron. Apple doesn't have "good margins", it has INCREDIBLE margins. They make $20 billion in net income every 3 months. Until people like you stop being morons, Apple will continue to raise prices. Apparently no price is too high.

    17. Re: $1000 phones by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Sorry snowflake that you can't handle the truth, but the truth is that you have given all your money away to corporations. But enjoy your iPhone!

    18. Re:$1000 phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The parent is correct, you are wrong. Gateway 2000 sold high end computers and none of their products were rebranded Dell's, nor did they use Dell parts. The Optiplex and Dimension didn't even exist when Gateway 2000 began selling computers.

    19. Re: $1000 phones by bkr1_2k · · Score: 3, Insightful

      To find things. I already know how to use a map, I just need to see where it is I'm going. They don't need my location to provide the location of something else.

      --
      "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
    20. Re: $1000 phones by bkr1_2k · · Score: 2

      Did you read the actual comment? AC chooses not to run the latest iOS because updating "breaks" older phones. No one said anything about it not actually being able to be updated.

      --
      "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
    21. Re:$1000 phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Without getting political, I muse how much of this is to protect profits in a tradewar?

      Companies DO watch these things. When the payroll taxes for the following year were definitely going to be raised, our company shifted gears and got the bonuses paid in December, where they were always done in January before. Savings for them, but with 2 bonuses "in a year", I definitely paid a higher tax rate.

    22. Re:$1000 phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ...excessively long lifespan of Apple devices (the iPhone 6 released in 2014 still runs the latest version of iOS)

      ....Four years is an "excessively long lifespan"? Man, someone's been drinking a lot of Apple's Planned Obsolescence kool-aid

    23. Re: $1000 phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Face id; you need a better hobby.

    24. Re: $1000 phones by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

      Thank you. I have said this (to myself) innumerable times when using Google Maps on my PC (I don't have a "smart" phone). There is no need to know where I'm at right now. All I asked for was where something else is located. That's all.

      This same nonsense occurs when, on those rare occasions, I use the iPhone issued to me and use their mapping service. Apple does not need to know where I'm at when I ask for the location of an address. Just give me what I ask for.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    25. Re:$1000 phones by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      I never stated that Billions were spent in R&D. But there is more to the cost of such a device. Then the parts and labor to make it.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    26. Re:$1000 phones by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      I never thought anyone would buy a $1000 phone that was built for $140. That is probably why I am not in sales.

      Yep, same here.

      I can get a phone that does everything I want - navigate roads, web browse, email, make calls, stupid yet useful apps (e.g. restaurant coupons) - for $100 - $200. Headphone jack, removable battery.

      WTH would I want to pay $100+ for it?

    27. Re:$1000 phones by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      I never thought anyone would buy a $1000 phone that was built for $140. That is probably why I am not in sales.

      Yep, same here.

      I can get a phone that does everything I want - navigate roads, web browse, email, make calls, stupid yet useful apps (e.g. restaurant coupons) - for $100 - $200. Headphone jack, removable battery.

      WTH would I want to pay $100+ for it?

      Missed a 0 there, but you get the idea, lol

    28. Re: $1000 phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly this. Mod this guy way up.

    29. Re:$1000 phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a fucking moron.

    30. Re: $1000 phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have offline maps on a phone with Lineage OS ; this doesn't even use network access.
      It's rather slow (old phone, but still)
      I would use the GPS to save me some scrolling but it doesn't seem to work (on the whole phone). So, I stop everything I'm doing and scroll or try to use the bookmarks/landmarks/whatever or maybe should I enter a street name.

      It feels like always having a swiss knife just in case and never using it.

    31. Re: $1000 phones by jeff4747 · · Score: 2

      That's a lovely philosophical argument. But you completely ignored the use-case. Where's the Android phone with 4+ years of updates with premium hardware?

      I'd like to switch, but if I do companies like Samsung won't send out updates after a ridiculously short period of time. Resulting in me paying Samsung far more money than I pay Apple since I have to upgrade the hardware at least twice as often.

    32. Re: $1000 phones by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1, Informative

      I have an iPhone 6 that I use as a test device and an mp3 player. The thing that annoys me about it is that it will continue to nag me about upgrades; like literally every time I unlock it I have to say no don't upgrade. It also nags me about registering an Apple account (no I don't want to attach my account, shut up!). Since I have iTunes set up to talk to this iPhone I can't help my mother in law with hers on my system lest iTunes get hopelessly confused and try to morph her phone into mine. It seems terribly designed.

      Boy you are one stupid motherfucker!

      Here's how you handle multiple iPhones/iPads on one computer without crossing the streams:

      https://www.imore.com/how-use-...

      And here is the same information for both Mac or Windows:

      https://smallbusiness.chron.co...

      So, that took approximately 500 nanoseconds to find on Google. What's YOUR problem?

    33. Re:$1000 phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      somebody remembers how it truly was...

      to the dude with the high quality gateway 2000 machines - lol... they had one advantage and that was cheap prices. compaq cheap? lol again. compaqs were some of the more expensive pcs (if not the most expensive along with the hps). dells started as low cost, cheap pcs too.

    34. Re: $1000 phones by methano · · Score: 1

      You have a point, but not a particularly good one. I suspect that most people would interpret what AC said the same way that I did. For the people who read it as I did, I felt that it would be useful to know that the iPhone 6 does run iOS 12.1.1 just fine.

      But there is enough room for ambiguity that maybe I should have just thought him to be full of it, rather than explicitly stating it.

    35. Re: $1000 phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      My iPhone 6 Plus runs iOS 12 just fine. Quite a bit better than iOS 11, in fact.

    36. Re: $1000 phones by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      How many 2014 Android phones are still getting updates from their manufacturer?

    37. Re: $1000 phones by squiggleslash · · Score: 2

      I suspect that most people would interpret what AC said the same way that I did.

      No, I think most of us understand English and know the way you interpreted it bore no relation to the words the AC used. The quote you're pretending meant "It's impossible to upgrade an iPhone 6 to 12.1.1" read "But by refusing updates, my iPhone 6 will continue to perform to hardware spec for several more years."

      I HATE this shit. I HATE the fact that Slashdot is full of shitheads like you who ignore what people say and attack them for saying something else, often saying the complete fucking opposite of what they actually said.

      I can understand making a mistake, people do that, it's when fuckers like you DOUBLE DOWN and continue to pretend that you didn't slip up and completely misread the comment and that your miscomprehension was legitimate that I really get pissed off. It's one of the reasons why it's so hard to have a sane conversation here.

      I really wish people like you would just die.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    38. Re: $1000 phones by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      I suspect that most people would interpret what AC said the same way that I did.

      You're wrong. Even partially literate people would have no trouble understanding "by refusing updates, my iPhone 6 "

      For the people who read it as I did, I felt that it would be useful to know that the iPhone 6 does run iOS 12.1.1 just fine. But there is enough room for ambiguity that maybe I should have just thought him to be full of it, rather than explicitly stating it.

      There is zero ambiguity in what he said. You being unable to understand a pretty simply sentence is not an indication that that sentence is ambiguous, it's an indication that maybe english isn't your first language.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    39. Re: $1000 phones by jon3k · · Score: 1

      I don't understand this argument. Someone makes a good product but it has a high margin so I'm a moron for buying it? That's not a logical conclusion. This isn't a commodity. I didn't just spend more for the sake of spending more. I clearly outlined my requirements, I'd LOVE to find less expensive options, I'm just not aware of any, are you? What should I be buying? I could spend $600 on an Android phone I replace every 2 years because I cannot get updates or I buy an iPhone for $1,000 that I can keep for four years (or more). But I should spend more because the manufacturer has lower margins? Huh? The manufacturers margins does not equate to direct value for me as the consumer, you understand that, right?

    40. Re:$1000 phones by Littleman_TAMU · · Score: 1

      You understand that a company has to make a net profit to stay in business right? You have to make enough money on the products you're currently selling to support them and develop the next version.

      You sound like a bitter engineer that doesn't understand that a good company has engineering, sales, support, and marketing all working together to make a successful company.

    41. Re: $1000 phones by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      The latest version of iOS is faster - why you wouldn't upgrade is a bit beyond me.

    42. Re: $1000 phones by Powercntrl · · Score: 2

      The thing that annoys me about it is that it will continue to nag me about upgrades; like literally every time I unlock it I have to say no don't upgrade.

      Install the TVOS beta profile and it will stop nagging you to update (iOS allows the profile to be installed, but since the iPhone can't run TVOS, it will always think there is no update available). Granted, this solution isn't immediately obvious (googling for "iOS block updates" turns up info on blocking app updates), but it became commonplace in the jailbreak scene to prevent an accidental iOS upgrade.

      --

      ---
      DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
    43. Re: $1000 phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you seem angry. My wife and I had iPhones and tried doing that(granted a few generations ago, so may be better),but that didn't work for us. After having the phones erase and redownload stuff from the other phone, we stopped trying. I had two apples geniuses try to get it to work and they were baffled. It should just work, but it didn't.

      So, go fuck yourself. Sometimes it doesn't just work.

    44. Re: $1000 phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many of those non security updates are adding anything useful?

    45. Re: $1000 phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He never said it wouldn't run it. He said he CHOOSES not to run it.

      Jesus Christ you fan boys are so fucking stupid

    46. Re: $1000 phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are thinking of compaq not gateway.

    47. Re: $1000 phones by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      TheFakeTimCook is always angry when people find faults with his products.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    48. Re: $1000 phones by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      Wow, you seem angry. My wife and I had iPhones and tried doing that(granted a few generations ago, so may be better),but that didn't work for us. After having the phones erase and redownload stuff from the other phone, we stopped trying. I had two apples geniuses try to get it to work and they were baffled. It should just work, but it didn't.

      So, go fuck yourself. Sometimes it doesn't just work.

      Sorry. It HAS to work.

      One macOS User shares VERY LITTLE with another, especially when it comes to DATA in the User's Home Directory (like iTunes Settings and Media).

      So, I think you are simply lying, COWARD.

    49. Re: $1000 phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really wish people like you would just die.

      Whoa! Who shat in your Cheerios? You know what I wish for? World peace. Reciprocity in the law. An end to hypocrisy. If a magic genie appeared you would wish some guy on the internet dead? That's messed up.

      These angry people, who then come to the internet to vent their suppressed anger from their daily lives, are what ruins Slashdot. ;)

    50. Re: $1000 phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks!

    51. Re: $1000 phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God your a terrible human being. Im sure even among the other cultists they think you are an ass.

    52. Re: $1000 phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it always seems to be the apple cultist that do this. Taking after their false idol apple and never admitting then they are wrong.

    53. Re:$1000 phones by tdailey · · Score: 1

      Do you have a job? I greatly doubt that what you expect to be paid is just the break-even cost of what it takes to do your work.

    54. Re: $1000 phones by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      I dunno mate. I guess no software should ever have any new features or improvements or bug fixes and we should all still be using MS DOS or IBM mainframes.

    55. Re: $1000 phones by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      The markup you are describing ONLY considers the hardware costs.

      You pay big bucks for running stores, paying the employees, doing warranty repairs, accepting returns when customers don't like their phones and so on.

      Frankly, anyone comparing bill-of-parts and sale price is an idiot. You _can_ look at gross margin (which is a lot less, still quite high for Apple, but at least a meaningful number). "Gross margin" answers the question: "If I pick an iPhone XS from the shelf and walk to the checkout, how much is Apple better off if I take out my card and buy the phone, compared to me putting it back on the shelf". This includes every penny that Apple has to pay because I bought the phone, like warranty, support, but not advertisement which is paid whether I buy or not.

      And then there is "net profit", a smaller number again, which subtracts _all_ the cost related to iPhones from the sales price.

    56. Re: $1000 phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FWIW, my main and only phone, an iPhone 5C, is also running 12.1.1. Flawlessly, I might add.

    57. Re:$1000 phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lets not forget they sold less phones, but made more money. They moved their per unit average income from $640 to $780.

      This is after the cost to build and to develop software. While the build costs are higher-ish, they profit margins cover everything including a bump in profits.

      Thanks kind of thing can't go on forever. Price goes up or build cost goes down, but profits must always go up.

    58. Re:$1000 phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But don't forget, they sold less of the devices, but made more money.

      You can argue all day about what goes into the cost of the product, but Apple is making more money every time, so you can toss out the expenses.

      The margins have increased on average, and the only thing that keeps it their is mind share.

      Apple products are just very properly promoted.

  4. Could that be because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the equivalent quality/feature device is the higher priced one, so only Apple customers without the available disposable income will choose the cheaper product over the more expensive one?

  5. It's pretty simple by Brett+Buck · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Apple can sell these for more money because everything else is treated like a knockoff. They are the dominant player, everyone knows that, and no one checks specs since they are all close enough to each other that it doesn't matter.

          I know we can expect a raft of posts to follow that explain the important technical and religious differences, but the vast, vast majority of the people buying these just don't care about that stuff, they want to have what is socially considered the best.

    1. Re: It's pretty simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      well are we taking social best of the educated or the monkey see monkey do crowd?

    2. Re:It's pretty simple by mccalli · · Score: 1

      Most are treated as knock-offs because they actually are - witness the notch nonsense, which wasn't even Apple's idea to start with. And then how every manufacturer suddenly came out with a laptop that like a MacBook Air - some of them are still embarrassingly obvious MacBook Pro clones

      I like things that stand on their own. I like my MacBook, but I like Thinkpads too which have their own design language. I like the Surface Go, I like some of the Yoga range...there's room in the world for good design that doesn't rip off Apple. I wish more manufacturers would make them.

    3. Re:It's pretty simple by jon3k · · Score: 3

      I think most people do not check specs because they do not understand them. What they check is how the device performs when they use it. Just like the average person doesn't care about GDI, number of valves per cylinder or compression ration. They just know how it feels when they step on the gas. We are the (tiny minority) exceptions. The technical people comparing the clock speed, core count and amount and speed of memory.

    4. Re:It's pretty simple by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Most are treated as knock-offs because they actually are - witness the notch nonsense, which wasn't even Apple's idea to start with. And then how every manufacturer suddenly came out with a laptop that like a MacBook Air - some of them are still embarrassingly obvious MacBook Pro clones.

      If I ran a competing company and could poach any one employee from Apple- it would be their head of marketing.

      What you say is true, other companies do copy Apple. (sure Apple copies the competition too- but there is more Apple mimicry than the other way around).

      It's not that Apple is the only company with good ideas, and it's not that all the features copied from Apple are good ideas- some of them are terrible, but other companies copy them nonetheless. Somehow much of society has the idea that Apple is the end product that others should strive to be (even if in somecases the competition has a better product).

      I'm not sure how they did it, but their head of marketing must be a genius.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    5. Re: It's pretty simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Specs in someways are like statistics, often made up values that can help advertise a product but where they have little comparison value across models.

      While iPhones might not have the best specs,they often even after a generation still perform better than many newer high end Android phones, while this is due to many things, software being one of them, in the end it's unlikely that anyone now with a phone even 2 generations back either Android or iPhone has any reason to upgrade performance wise.

      Also if you look at a high end Android phone it will cost about the same as an iPhone. For most people it's also one of their most used items so spending 300-500 a year what it costs to have a new high end phone every 2 years isn't a big deal. I would bet many people complaining about the price spend as much or even more on consoles and games.

    6. Re:It's pretty simple by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure how they did it, but their head of marketing must be a genius.

      If it's only marketing, why didn't another company with superior products and/or prices put Apple out of business decades ago? It's not like Steve Jobs placed snipers on Madison Avenue to keep competitors from running their own advertising.

    7. Re:It's pretty simple by Holi · · Score: 1

      Bullshit, it's all about keeping up with the Johnsons.

      Apple charges a premium because they are a status symbol, and that's the end of it.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    8. Re:It's pretty simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      everything else is treated like a knockoff

      Even original Apple products are knockoffs if you import them without Apple's permission.

    9. Re:It's pretty simple by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Apple did almost go out of business, but then they realized that idiots will pay 60% margin for shiny things and they made a comeback.

    10. Re:It's pretty simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You want Phil the Shill? Are you sure you don't want Tim Cock, Jony Ego, Eddy Clueless, Craig Ferengi, or Angela Airhead instead?

    11. Re:It's pretty simple by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      They might be pushing up against a boundary though. Most of my net worth is tied up in Apple stock, and between my wife and myself I have five Apple computers in use, two iphones, two ipads, two 2nd generation Apple Watches, and a handful of ipods and Apple TVs.

      While I did upgrade my iMac last year, as well as an iPhone X, everything else I am stretching out the life on, and looking at alternatives (with limited success). I should upgrade my iPad; it is five years old now and will likely fail soon, but a few of the apps I use a lot haven't been updated in years and losing them would reduce the value of an iPad to me, and the premium for adequate storage is way too high. I upgraded my iMac Air's SSD rather than replace it, because the value proposition just really wasn't there. My Mac mini is looking like it will be replaced by a Pine64, as VNC is good enough for what I really use it for. I would love to get a 4th generation Apple Watch, but I went for the Edition on the 2nd generation and don't really want to take the step back.

      But, the bottom line is price per spec is comparable with the competitors. A ChromeBook that has reasonable specs ends up costing the same as a MacBook Air. It isn't just an Apple thing, it is a market condition. Dropping the prices for increased specifications will reduce the long-term value proposition to the point where there will likely be a bigger crash.

      But, as a stockholder I am not really worried. Apple is pivoting much more towards services and likely is seeing the next big thing already. The only thing it has changed is that instead of it being 90% of my portfolio, in 3 years it will only be 50-60% as I continue to diversify.

    12. Re:It's pretty simple by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      You have 90% of your stocks in one company?? You've realized this is a bad idea, but are only going to correct that to 50%?

    13. Re:It's pretty simple by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      The only thing it has changed is that instead of it being 90% of my portfolio, in 3 years it will only be 50-60% as I continue to diversify.

      What are you switching to?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    14. Re:It's pretty simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is when the cult was formed.

    15. Re:It's pretty simple by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      Had; it was a strategy that served me well at the time. It is closer to 75-80% right now. Diversifying in absolute terms is hard when the stock you need to sell is going up and the ones you want to buy are staying flat. I sold calls to establish a divestment strategy though, which gets me down to about 50% in a couple years. If my case for investing in Apple changes I will divest more.

      The problem is that I don't see many better investments.

    16. Re:It's pretty simple by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      I am double to triple long on TSLA and AMZN, and have some dividend stocks in T, VZ, HD. SBUX dividends pay my habit there. Other than that I have LULU, IRBT, UBNT, and a few smaller holdings. I contemplate BRK, WM, and GS. Wife's (solo) 401k has SIEN and BA, which I am considering adding to my portfolio.

      Basically, I want to limit to about 5-10% of my portfolio to any of the stocks I hold for diversification purposes. I still see TSLA and AMZN as having growth opportunity, which will hopefully help reduce the AAPL percentage with growth.

    17. Re:It's pretty simple by hackertourist · · Score: 1

      How they did it? For more than a decade starting in 1984, they really were 'the end product that others should strive to be'. The Mac OS, combined with the Macintosh Human Interface Guidelines blew everything else out of the water.
      Added to that were lesser innovations (zero-configuration expansion cards, effortless multi-monitor desktops, daisy-chainable port for keyboards, mice etc, excellent construction, SCSI, etc) that all helped make the Mac the machine to choose when you wanted to concentrate on your work instead of learning how to use and maintain the computer.

      "Indeed, it would not be an exaggeration to describe the history of the computer industry for the past decade as a massive effort to keep up with Apple... (the Mac) went on to pioneer or popularize almost every innovation in personal computing."

      BYTE, December 1994

      In 1985 Microsoft finally came up with a desktop environment that could somewhat compete with Mac OS, although it always felt ramshackle next to Apple's finished product.

      Then Apple repeated that 1984 moment with the iPod, and again the iPhone. For ordinary consumers, the 3 most important products of the entire computer industry, and more breakthroughs than the rest of the industry combined. That's how Apple got its halo.

    18. Re:It's pretty simple by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      When a stock is going up, it will probably keep going up.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    19. Re:It's pretty simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > A ChromeBook that has reasonable specs ends up costing the same as a MacBook Air.

      Well, I doubt the high-specced ChromeBooks sell particularly well, so they have to be higher priced to make up for low volume. The term "high-end ChromeBook" is an oxymoron as the entire consumer interest in them is that they were cheaper than Windows machines at the time of introduction.

      On the Windows side of things, prices and specs are much more competitive. A quad-core gaming laptop costs less than an iPad Pro.

      For $1200, you can get a Dell 2-in-1 with a quad-core i7, 16 GB of RAM, a 512 GB SSD, and a 4K display (https://bit.ly/2L2KvV3). It's specs are far better than the entry-level MacBook Air which also costs $1200.

    20. Re:It's pretty simple by bob4u2c · · Score: 1
      Not quite. People were already Apple fans, but knock offs that were Apple Compatible (see Psystar) were luring away those who didn't bother to check the Apple pedigree. So Apple sued them into the ground and anyone else who dared to claim Apple Compatibility. Then then started the Apple Certified program which allowed vendors to make products that worked with Apple, but Apple still maintained the reigns over what it would allow and at what price point (yes even forcing vendors to raise prices to keep a perceived price point). Jobs was even quoted as saying that he wouldn't sell a product the company doesn't make a 50% profit on.

      He did this by not focusing on the price, the product, or any offerings. He sold people dreams, the dream that owning his product would make you better. The dream that a phone, a mp3 player, or a laptop would make your life more meaningful.

      It may come as shock, but your customers don't care about your product, service, company, or idea. They care about themselves--their hopes, dreams, and quality of life. Tell them how your product will improve their life and you'll have their attention. -- Steve Jobs

      The sad and not so sad part of this is that these things are just a piles of metal, plastic, and sand. What you do with any pile of metal, plastic, and sand is way more important than the tool you use.

    21. Re:It's pretty simple by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Apple Computer, IPod and iPhone are all great examples of marketing though. None of them were the first of their industries. In the case of the iPhone it was quite a lot better than the competition at the time (not quite true about the first Apple computers or iPod though). The were made paramount in the industry through slick marketing.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    22. Re:It's pretty simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure how they did it, but their head of marketing must be a genius.

      One of the most genius things Apple did with the iPhone in the beginning was make their ads be mini-tutorials in how to use it. Their ads show people using the phone and how it helps them in their every day life - but the important bit is that they show how the touch UI works, so by the time you get an iPhone, you already know how to use it because you've been seeing mini-tutorials for months.

      This leads directly to what you were saying:

      Somehow much of society has the idea that Apple is the end product that others should strive to be (even if in somecases the competition has a better product).

      How? Because Apple has taught everyone how to use their phones and so everyone expects all smartphones to act like iPhones, because they've been taught how to use iPhones. By Apple ads.

      More recent Apple ads do less of this, but a lot of Apple advertising - especially when the iPhone was originally released - were intended to show how the phone was used. And it worked. It made the UI seem really intuitive, when really, you'd just been shown how to use it over and over again.

      You can see something similar in current Amazon Echo and Google Home ads - they're designed to showcase how you'd use them to do things you do in your every day life. Part of this is just "here's why you'd want this" but part of this is also to demo how the product is used at all.

    23. Re:It's pretty simple by epine · · Score: 1

      I know we can expect a raft of posts to follow that explain the important technical and religious differences, but the vast, vast majority of the people buying these just don't care about that stuff, they want to have what is socially considered the best.

      That is not a correct recap.

      In all human systems, any organized contingent of mindless behaviour is progressively and relentlessly exploited until it hits a boundary condition where the mindless behaviour reaches an unstable inflection point, and system reorganizes.

      Apple, of course, has a good thing going right now and somewhere deep down, they would like to keep it going for a long time. But this wish is almost completely precluded by standard game-theoretic dynamics.

      Corporations famously incentivize their internal behaviour on very short clocks (often explicitly tied to the thock-thocking quarterly report metronome).

      Because of this, the time value of shearing sheep is largely valued over the next four to eight quarters—anything beyond this horizon is the dreamy domain of people who don't fully understand the implicit hazards built into their stock option packages.

      So there is always internal pressure to push things as far as you can possibly get away with—not to leave a single nickel for the next guy—and to play very close to the edge of a mass customer sea change, where they all suddenly decide to pay full attention to Apple's outrageous pricing model, and to reassign their mindless behaviour to some other domain, which entirely different ventures will soon detect and strive to capture (this phase usually involves an intense tug of war over precisely where this coveted mass mindlessness finally lands; it took Jobs thirty years—including more than one brush with an existential survival risk to Apple itself, and to his own position within Apple—to finally land the meaty dinosaur on Apple's lawn).

      In some cases, such a as Kodak, the long view is that there is no long view, and that you should take while you can get while you can get it. Oh, you pretend that you can be the king of digital, but no-one really believes this, because these kinds of transitions rarely happen, and the reason is not accidental, but central to what makes most corporations tick on the deepest level: those toothy short-term compensation packages embedded in the management suite. Milking the existing cow takes two years. Option package achieved.

      Transitioning from chemistry to computer science takes four to eight years. If it takes four years (it won't) maybe your options vest. If it takes eight years, kiss your options goodbye. As the gorilla, you're already getting good sex. You'd like to swap out the wife with a long history of being an enthusiastic partner in the sack (photo-chemistry) for a younger-model (digital sensors) because you and the wife are of an age now where hot and bothered is a game you play merely to remember what sex used to be like.

      Meanwhile, your competition to gain control over the younger model (digital sensors) has a workforce entirely composed of undercompensated spring chickens, none of whom are presently getting any, who express their frustration over this state of affairs by working 16 hour days, seven days a week. You have huge advantages: budgets (with actual funds attached), infrastructure, fiscal credibility, sales channels.

      But all of these things have inertia, because people on all sides are attached to what they're presently getting, and this huge hull won't prove easy to turn, if it turns at all (around the time of Midway, both the Japanese and Americans had converted hulls originally designed to become some other kind of ship into serviceable but inefficient flat tops—and for both sides, the whole deal was compromise from stem to stern and an operational PITA throughout). Plus you could piss off the wife, and then all your chips would be in the younger model basket sooner th

    24. Re: It's pretty simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fyi, as far as a surface go and the yoga book go...

      The surface go felt a lot nicer to play with. But I saw a deal on the yoga book for $350 and since it was half the price once you include the keyboard and pen, I got that instead.

      If it is a toy, the yoga is fine. The atom isn't much slower than the silver or gold and the 4gb is manageable. 64gb and a microsd is fine. The Go with 8gb/128gb emc would have been better for a daily driver, but I really, really, really wanted the Tron keyboard.

      The part that sucks is you can't charge and have usb anything else connected. Some report otg cables work, but none of mine have as yet. Some screwy combination of third party charger and otg is needed.

      Great product for $350 on Amazon is you see it (new). Windows model ftw.

    25. Re:It's pretty simple by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      There is one thing wrong with your post: There _were_ companies that had licensed MacOS (like PowerComputing), and they were a big problem for Apple that Steve Jobs got rid off when he returned to Apple.

      Psystar, on the other hand, was just two chancers with no license to install MacOS X on their computers at all. They sold less than 1,000 computers. They get hit with $30,000 for copyright infringement (statutory damages for copying ONE work, MacOS X - if I make illegal copies of a CD with 15 rubbish songs, that's 15 songs, so I can be charged 15 times as much), and $2,500 per computer sold for DMCA violation. Apple never saw a penny of this, nor did Psystar's lawyers ever paid. Because they managed to sell a few computers with MacOS X installed, but they didn't manage to make a profit.

    26. Re:It's pretty simple by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Apple did almost go out of business, but then they realized that idiots will pay 60% margin for shiny things and they made a comeback.

      GOTO 001: Then why hasn't another company with superior products and/or prices paid for their own campaign, established their own cult and driven Apple out of business.

  6. Brace yourselves. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For the incoming horde of apple apologists and hard code cultists decrying this with lame excuses and whataboutisms out their asses.

  7. EVERYTHING is getting more expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    except labor... wages havent moved in 30 years.

    1. Re:EVERYTHING is getting more expensive by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Wages went up 3% last year. Does that even beat inflation?

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    2. Re:EVERYTHING is getting more expensive by ranton · · Score: 3, Informative

      EVERYTHING is getting more expensive ... except labor... wages haven't moved in 30 years.

      Wages have moved significantly in the last 30 years. Just not for the working or middle class. The upper middle class which makes up most of Apple's customers has been growing rapidly for the last few decades.

      Total compensation for the middle class has been rising as well, but almost entirely in the form of health care benefits. For instance the employer portion of health care coverage has increased 10% from 2015-2018. That is a compensation increase for those workers, they just don't see it in their salary figures. If health care plans were not tied to employers then it would be more obvious that pay has been increasing for most workers faster than inflation. Unfortunately so has health care costs.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    3. Re: EVERYTHING is getting more expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I donâ(TM)t know what Obama promised and did in general, but he did protect the country from total collapse following GW Bush. This current guy, is doing more to destroy the country than any other US president. The MAGA agenda is actually MAFI (Make America F@king Irrelavent) in disguise.

    4. Re: EVERYTHING is getting more expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Is it physically painful to be so retarded? I sure hope so.

    5. Re: EVERYTHING is getting more expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you tell us.

      Jackass.

    6. Re:EVERYTHING is getting more expensive by Tom · · Score: 1

      Wages have moved significantly in the last 30 years. Just not for the working or middle class. The upper middle class which makes up most of Apple's customers has been growing rapidly for the last few decades.

      Not in Europe. The 0.1% have dramatically improved their share, at the expense of everyone else. I consider myself at the upper end of the middle class, and things have become more and more difficult over the past years. I've heard similar impressions from people who earn considerably more than me, but are not among the super-rich (millionaires, but not billionaires).

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  8. Profit Margin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Keeps going up for them, because they never update the hardware. I always wanted to pay more now for the same hardware I could have bought, for less, years ago!

  9. It's all about the stock price by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    With falling market share, and flat unit sales, the only way to increase revenue and keep that stock price climbing is by charging more per unit. So - they do. And they do their best to market that increased price as best they can, to drive the dwindling consumer demand to pay that higher price.

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    1. Re:It's all about the stock price by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      When products don't sell, you increase stock prices via massive layoffs to offset the expenditure. There's a direct correlation between the events. You do a layoff, then you see a massive increase in stock prices the next day.

      Apple is bloated. They won't get rid of their top talent. Middle managers however will be a blood bath.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
  10. Moving on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've been an Apple fan for years because the hardware *just works*. But back then I could at least upgrade the harddrives, add a gpu, ram etc. My last Mac was a Mini from 2012 with an i7 cpu (faster than the mini which came out in 2014 and fast enough that upgrading to the new mini is akin to throwing out money).

    But over the last few years Apple has become increasing hostile to users. Gluing the batteries into the laptop case, soldered memory, middle of the road gpus etc. And now I'm seeing Apple charge $600 for a 1TB ssd upgrade for the new mini when that same drive is $150 on Amazon. GPU's now come in their own $600 case outside of the damn hardware — and now this T2 chip from hell which prevents user or third-party upgrades/fixes?! What. The. Hell. Apple. I suspect this will get much worse as Apple uses the fear of encryption + hackers to lock down their hardware even further under the pretence they are making you safer.

    That said, I've been honing up on Linux the last few months and will build a rig in the new year and fully switch to Linux. It's the first time I'll use Linux as a *desktop* OS as opposed to a cloud service. Linux has come so far in recent years that in my testing I haven't found anything lacking (hell, Steam runs fine on it!).

    I don't want to crap on Apple for invoking their right to be a capitalist company, I'm sure the shareholders are happy. But I'm done handing my money over to a trillion dollar company (I'll give it to Amazon instead — irony is not lost on me here...).

    1. Re:Moving on... by fluffernutter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      When my mother in law has a problem with her iPhone and I plug it into my PC which is set up with my iPhone it does not 'just work'. It tries to erase the second phone. When I don't want to accept an upgrade or register my Apple ID it does not 'just work'. It nags me with no way to stop it. Apple fans tend to say 'it just works' without realizing that it just happens to work for them.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    2. Re:Moving on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to the world of open source. I switched to it years ago, and have been very happy. Not everything I run is open source, but dumping Office for LibreOffice, Adobe products for alternatives, and most of my Windows for Linux has made using computers so much more enjoyable. I just need some of the current games I play to have proper Linux versions so I can fully drop Windows. Copy protection and anti-cheat are two major hurdles.

      captcha = broaden

    3. Re:Moving on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm more sensitive now to Apple's micro-aggrssions and dark patterns than I ever was in the past. Since both your iPhones are outside the Apple ecosystem (ie, you're on Windows) I suspect Apple is "baking in" these micro-aggressions intentionally in the hopes that your frustration is directed at Windows. It's a big part of why I want out of this eco-system altogether (Mac hardware and iPhone included).

    4. Re:Moving on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, it just works so long as you conform to the use case we imagine everyone ought to use.

  11. Purchase price is the least important part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Meh.

    Apple understands that the purchase price of a device is in fact pretty much the least important things about it.

    Considering the time I spend with my devices, and considering my personal value of my time, I'd rather get the one I want that works the way I want, then have the frustration of one that is cheap but not really what I wanted.

    There are people for whom the purchase price is a key consideration. You know what? These people don't buy Apple stuff.

    1. Re:Purchase price is the least important part by ranton · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Apple understands that the purchase price of a device is in fact pretty much the least important things about it.

      It isn't different than any other luxury device like an expensive home, car, clothing, etc. Once someone reaches a level of income where their time has significant value, the cost of luxury items is not nearly as relevant. The difference between a $1000 phone and $200 phone purchases every other year is $1 per day. It is the difference between a small fry and a large fry at McDonalds. If you have enough income where you aren't struggling to pay the mortgage, pay for car repairs, and feed yourself, how trivial is the difference between a small fry and large fry when eating fast food?

      If someone is having trouble balancing their budget, buying an expensive phone every other year probably won't even make the top 20 things to fix in their spending habits.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    2. Re:Purchase price is the least important part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Apple understands that the purchase price of a device is in fact pretty much the least important things about it.

      Actually for a luxury good, it's one of the most important things about it; the high price is actually necessary to generate the sense of exclusivity around the product. That is why many luxury goods manufacturers do their best to prevent retailers discounting their products, and will even buy back and destroy excess stock rather than sell it off cheap.

    3. Re:Purchase price is the least important part by bob4u2c · · Score: 1

      The difference between a $1000 phone and $200 phone purchases every other year is $1 per day. It is the difference between a small fry and a large fry at McDonalds.

      Didn't you see that movie "Super Size Me"? First eating at a fast food place every day for two years is a bad idea, second upgrading fries every time is doubly so.

      But if you break anything down into small re-occurring fees I could sell you a house for about $1 a day. The loan term would be a about a thousand years though, with interest.

      P.S. your $800 spread would be more like $1.10 a day. Plus if you bought the cheaper phone and it broke, you could replace it 4 times for the same cost as your $1000 model!

    4. Re:Purchase price is the least important part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Way to miss the point re: small vs. large fries. Actually, way to miss the point with everything in your post.

      1. It's about budgeting, not about debating healthy/unhealthy diets.
      2. Who buys one house per thousand years? Actually, I'd like to take you up on that deal! It's quite a bargain.
      3. Actually, the $800 spread would be $1.0959...but it's still about a dollar.

    5. Re:Purchase price is the least important part by Powercntrl · · Score: 1

      If someone is having trouble balancing their budget, buying an expensive phone every other year probably won't even make the top 20 things to fix in their spending habits.

      Many people spend more money on Starbucks/cigarettes/cable bill/booze than a $1k biennial smartphone purchase. But God forbid you're a ne'er-do-well with an iPhone, because it's obviously the cause of your financial woes.

      The naysayers also tend to forget there's a thriving secondary market for cell phones, to recoup some of the cost of the new phone. Good luck selling those used cigarettes.

      --

      ---
      DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
    6. Re: Purchase price is the least important part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "But if you break anything down into small re-occurring fees I could sell you a house for about $1 a day. The loan term would be a about a thousand years though, with interest."

      You just let me know where I can get a mortgage for a real house with a low enough interest rate that $365 per year pays down any principle at all and I'm all over it. Your analogy fails.

    7. Re: Purchase price is the least important part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are lots of houses sold for a dollar at auction in blighted areas or where you owe the back taxes that are not part of the mortgage.

      But yeah, gp doesn't understand NPV, interest or economics in general.

    8. Re:Purchase price is the least important part by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      Didn't you see that movie "Super Size Me"? First eating at a fast food place every day for two years is a bad idea, second upgrading fries every time is doubly so.

      So it's healthier to buy an iPhone XS for $999 and small fries every day for three years, than a $200 phone and large fries every day.

  12. Fanbois line up to pay for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Apple isn't "getting away" with anything.

    If people thought the phones were too expensive, THEY WOULDN'T BUY THEM.

    How much it costs Apple to make the phones is completely irrelevant - something is worth what others are willing to pay for it.

  13. They don't get my money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but then I am a value kind of guy that could care less about the label on something. My neighbour on the other hand, they get lots of her money. And I know other people where brand is everything. One guy I know complains about some mac machine model that throttled due to poor cooling but he still bought it. As long as those types of people do not abandon Apple, they will be fine. Me, I have my 350 (new) moto z and my 699 laptop. Both are as good as any apple equiv. Maybe better, the phone has an SD card slot and I can add an external battery.

  14. buy one high-end laptop instead of three others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so we're buying one $3k laptop with upgraded specs that will last 10 years instead of three $1k laptops that will become obsolete on schedule and need replacing? yes the market has changed, where the middle ground has disappeared - the only people buying the $3k laptops are professionals who can (easily) afford $300-500/year for their most important piece of gear, so...???

    no one is "getting away" with anything - apple, dell, lenovo all have basically the same prices (except dell has holiday discounts!) for the same specs - if you want junk, get an hp or acer at wal-mart

    just like snap-on "gets away" with high-end tools for professionals who would wear consumer-quality tools in a few days

    1. Re:buy one high-end laptop instead of three others by rl117 · · Score: 1

      With the new apple keyboards, they are failing all the time. It really loses its value proposition when you might be without it for days while they replace half of the case.

  15. It’s True by jittles · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What they’re talking about is 100% true. I have tons of Apple devices. Multiple Mac Minis, iPads, iPhones, etc. And I found that the plastic parts of my MacBook Pro (2011) are failing and the hinge for the laptop lid will soon fail entirely. So I started shopping for a replacement. What I found is that the MacBook Air is insanely expensive for the performance you get. And if I buy a MacBook Pro? Also insanely expensive. They solder in all the RAM and NVMe drives. The real kicker for me? Paying $500 for an NVMe SATA drive that I cannot upgrade when I can buy a 1TB NVMe PCIe drive that has WAY better throughput when dealing with smaller files. In fact, the throughput difference is so huge that switching from SATA to PCIe drops a compile time on one of my projects by 70%, So what did I end up doing? I ordered a Lenovo laptop that supports NVMe PCIe, has removeable RAM, AND weighs half a pound less than the MacBook Pro. Oh did I mention that it also has a better processor and almost the exact same battery life? And I am paying $1000 less out the door, including buying my own NVMe PCIe drive to upgrade it with. I will never buy another Apple computer again. The only reason I own an iPhone is due to Apple making its money off of hardware sales and Google making its money off of spying.

    1. Re:It’s True by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You believe Apple isn't spying?

    2. Re:It’s True by jittles · · Score: 1

      You believe Apple isn't spying?

      Not like Google is. Like I said, Apple makes its money on hardware. The more Google spies, the more valuable you are to them.

    3. Re:It’s True by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple has used PCIe SSDs in all their MacBook Pros since 2013 and they have been consistently benchmarked to be some of the fastest.

      I am guessing you are a poser since you don't know this basic information.

    4. Re:It’s True by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasn't Apple the first to use PCIe SSD? (soldered). And NVMe SATA doesn't exist, NVMe is NVMe (invariably PCIe but may apply to flash on DIMMs, I don't know)
      PCIe AHCI used to be a thing but I think the first mac book pro with PCIe SSD had a fast one anyway.

      That said you would be paying through the nose, then be stuck with external PCIe Thunderbolt SSD for upgrades (hundreds of dollars for something so easily lost or stolen?)
      So I think you were technically wrong on the SSD but that doesn't change much the picture. Maybe the file system sucks I don't know.

      They did something crass with the iPad Pro too. Want iPad Pro with 6GB RAM instead of 4GB? Buy the 1TB storage model, with or without LTE. (they're advertising it for Photoshop and what not)

    5. Re:It’s True by fermion · · Score: 1
      On trick of clickbait like this, or any report that is meant to imply they consumer is being ripped off, is to set the baseline so that your analysis looks valid. It is a valid trick, but a trick nonetheless.

      Let's look at reality. IN 1995 the top of the line MacBook was $3500. Not fully ticked out, just the top base model. That is $6,000 in todays dollars. I can get a 1 terabyte iPad that does so much more for $2000 in todays dollars.

      Moving forward a bit, a Palm V, the PDA without a phone, was around $500. In todays dollars that is $700, without a phone. In 2000 or so, a motorola razr was, inflation adjusted, around $900.

      In 2000 a good MacBook pro was $2500. Again, that is almost $4000 dollars in todays dollars.

      The reality is the Apple has done a better job of controlling prices than most other companies, given that it is much more aggressive about using top of the line tech. They were the first to use LCD displays. Almost all machines now come with SSD.

      A base iMac is $1300, and I can't get a decent PC all in one for less than a $1000, and that is without and SSD or I7.

      One valid criticism is that we expect prices to fall all the time. The response to this is that Apple never sells last year product as the new model. Sure, it might not update for a few years, but you are getting really tech, not whatever fell off the garbage truck this morning,

      You MS or google product is in no way cheaper than an Apple product.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    6. Re:It’s True by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Macbooks were among the first laptops to drop SATA.

    7. Re:It’s True by jittles · · Score: 1

      On trick of clickbait like this, or any report that is meant to imply they consumer is being ripped off, is to set the baseline so that your analysis looks valid. It is a valid trick, but a trick nonetheless.

      What trick am I using here? I compared specs for MacBook Pro and a Lenovo system that is using the current generation of high end laptop processor (not Xeon). It uses the Cannon Lake PCH. Which, by the way, the Apple one does not. I can give you the exact specs if you want. Apple overcharges for old technology. Period.

      Let's look at reality. IN 1995 the top of the line MacBook was $3500. Not fully ticked out, just the top base model. That is $6,000 in todays dollars. I can get a 1 terabyte iPad that does so much more for $2000 in todays dollars.

      Moving forward a bit, a Palm V, the PDA without a phone, was around $500. In todays dollars that is $700, without a phone. In 2000 or so, a motorola razr was, inflation adjusted, around $900.

      In 2000 a good MacBook pro was $2500. Again, that is almost $4000 dollars in todays dollars.

      What does this historical analysis have to do with today’s laptop market? Every single one of those computers were design to be upgraded, by the way. Even the Palm V could have its storage upgraded by use of a memory card.

      The reality is the Apple has done a better job of controlling prices than most other companies, given that it is much more aggressive about using top of the line tech. They were the first to use LCD displays. Almost all machines now come with SSD.

      First of all, no. You’re wrong. You can buy the top end device from any other manufacturer for less. Apple has done a better job of controlling margins than any other company. There is a huge difference. Oh, and by the way, SSD is NOT the latest tech. Even when it is NVMe SSD. It is still bound by the Serial ATA protocol which limits throughput as well as number of operations that can be performed per second. SATA caps out at 600MB/s. I forget how many individual file operations it can do per second, I think 256. The latest generation of M.2 can do over 4000MB/s AND can do up to 65535 operations per second. Did you miss the part where I indicated that switching from PCIe Sata to PCIe NVMe drops compile times by 70% for one of my projects? That cuts a 30 minute compile down to 10 minutes. That is a HUGE savings in time. So go ahead and brag about Apple using mostly old technology, but Apple just barely even added a driver for M.2 in Mojave and who knows when they will actually manufacture a device that takes advantage of it.

      A base iMac is $1300, and I can't get a decent PC all in one for less than a $1000, and that is without and SSD or I7.

      Did you read that carefully when you looked at the pricing? That i7 iMac has a 1TB Mechanical drive. The biggest SSD you can get for it? 500GB for a whopping $500. You can get a 1TB M.2 drive for less than that.

      One valid criticism is that we expect prices to fall all the time. The response to this is that Apple never sells last year product as the new model. Sure, it might not update for a few years, but you are getting really tech, not whatever fell off the garbage truck this morning,

      Your ‘valid response’ to that criticism is that the price doesn’t drop because Apple is using older technology that it picks up at a lower price and therefore has a larger margin on? Are you delirious? I hate to resort to ad hominen attacks, really. But I honestly don’t know how anyone, even Steve Jobs, could type that with a straight face. Let’s be honest, Apple is doing the equivalent of going to TJ MAxx or Marshall’s and buying last year’s overstock to sell to you. And unlike Marshall’s, TJ Maxx, or whoever you like to shop at, they’re charging you extra for the privilege.

      Oh and t

    8. Re: It’s True by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple solders then in. And if you want a bigger ssd drive, guess what, your fucked.

      So being fast means fuck all when they cost bout 75% more than the competition.

    9. Re:It’s True by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > A base iMac is $1300, and I can't get a decent PC all in one for less than a $1000, and that is without and SSD or I7.

      That's because the PC market knows all-in-ones are niche products. A laptop would be a better purchase since they come with a screen and are portable, yet can also connect to a TV/monitor and external keyboard, thus acting very similar to an all-in-one.

      Anyone serious about computing will get a tower since it's easier to make a triple monitor setup. You can upgrade individual components as they drop in price on the open market.

      The iMac Pro is ludicrous since it's a pro machine that's difficult to service.

    10. Re:It’s True by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      I hear you man, but here's the trouble;

      There's nothing that compares with OSX. iOS I can live without, but OSX beats everything else hands down. Life's too short for Linux, and Windows is total and complete pig. What can I do?

    11. Re:It’s True by tepples · · Score: 1

      (soldered)

      Deal killer.

    12. Re:It’s True by tepples · · Score: 1

      In fact, the throughput difference is so huge that switching from SATA to PCIe drops a compile time on one of my projects by 70%, So what did I end up doing? I ordered a Lenovo laptop that supports NVMe PCIe [...] I will never buy another Apple computer again.

      Not even when asked to compile and test a macOS or iOS port of the application that you are compiling?

    13. Re:It’s True by jittles · · Score: 1

      In fact, the throughput difference is so huge that switching from SATA to PCIe drops a compile time on one of my projects by 70%, So what did I end up doing? I ordered a Lenovo laptop that supports NVMe PCIe [...] I will never buy another Apple computer again.

      Not even when asked to compile and test a macOS or iOS port of the application that you are compiling?

      Actually, Apple licenses the source to one of the projects I work on and they compile it on... Windows! Though Windows is not my personal choice for any sort of work project. It is the only platform that has the build tools required, though the company that provides the build tools is starting to transition their tools over to Linux.

    14. Re: It’s True by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google sells notebook and phones too.
      Just like Apple.
      Google has an app store.
      Just like Apple.

      Face it, they both sell you. If they can get you to buy their hardware too, that's just icing.

      Hell, even Amazon, who sells everything ("everything?" "EVERYTHING!" with apologies to Leon), makes more from their cloud than they do seeling products.

    15. Re: It’s True by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The parent's comment was MBP use an SATA SSD, which is wrong, and I was correcting. I am not exactly why you are responding to me with an off-topic comment.

      FYI -- Spec a bigger SSD when buying.

  16. Sagging sales by QuietLagoon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Probably due to Apple's insistence upon a steeply-increasing price for its products because of the development costs of features that Apple tells its customer they want, as opposed to features that Apple's customers tell Apple they need.

    1. Re:Sagging sales by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to realize that the things a few thousand /.ers want compared to a billion 'users' want are not the same.

      The billion are going to get their features every single time.

      I had over 200 accounts on here at one time, so there are far fewer 'members' than the ID indicates.

      Millions of /.ers, no way Sherlock.

  17. Overpriced junk by WCMI92 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Apple makes good but not great products. They sell based on their reputation which they haven't deserved in years.

    --
    Corporatism != Free Market
    1. Re:Overpriced junk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, they sell good products. And then other times, they sell Beats headphones. *shudders*

    2. Re:Overpriced junk by ljw1004 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Apple makes good but not great products. They sell based on their reputation which they haven't deserved in years.

      I think they have a reputation for protecting your privacy better than the alternatives, which they have and continue to deserve.

    3. Re:Overpriced junk by Moof123 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The contrast is the shit-show that is Android. It is a wild west scene of outdated OS versions, sporadic and unreliable security updates, non-removable bloatware, apparently rampant Chinese spyware, etc. Even otherwise good brands turn around and do this crap on their entry level and mid-range phones with just a few notable exceptions.

      I have an Android phone, and I am amazed at the rampant pitfalls one has to navigate to pick a good phone at a low price. The safe ways to avoid this seem to be to get a flagship phone from the likes of Samsung or Google, or to get an Apple phone. I did not begrudge my rather non-technically minded wife when her iPhone 5s wore out and she wanted an 8. I've had to do ZERO to help her out. $800 was very cheap for marital bliss, and the phone will likely keep her going for a good 3+ years.

      The peanut gallery will tell you to just root your android phone and load Lineage OS, or similar. For 99% of the buying public that is useless advice.

    4. Re:Overpriced junk by kamapuaa · · Score: 1

      Well let's compare them to the competition: fucking Windows, and Linux (with all its aggravations and no MS Office + general lack of software).

      OK I do run Linux for several systems at work and it's a non-issue. But for a personal computer, I'd much rather use OS X, and using Windows doesn't even enter the range of possibility.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    5. Re:Overpriced junk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which alternatives?
      How does Debian protect your privacy worse?
      How do Dell or Asus protect your privacy worse?
      Or are you only talking about the mobile phone shitshow case? (Cyanogen used to be an alternative there, but LineageOS is dropping device support so quickly you don't really have a chance of buying a supported device anymore)

    6. Re:Overpriced junk by budsetr · · Score: 1

      But Google search is on every iphone. Apple has sold out to Google for roughly $6Billion a year. Apple is not collecting the info but they have no problem letting Google do it.

    7. Re:Overpriced junk by ediron2 · · Score: 1

      Seconded.

      I love poking around in gadgets and mobile devices and tablets and stuff, but the most-robust mobile phones I have are iphones, Apple's software works well, the app store is relatively benign. Other things, I hack. But my work phone needs to be drama-free. Coworkers replace their droids about 30-50% more often than I do iphones. Longer if one considers I pass along my past iphones or resell them.

    8. Re:Overpriced junk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple's products are no longer great, nor good.

      No optical drive?

      No headphone jack?

      No function keys?

      No ports?

      No 17" laptop?

      No replaceable RAM, battery, etc.?

      Their products suck now. If they didn't, I'd be buying many of them.

    9. Re:Overpriced junk by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      The peanut gallery will tell you to just root your android phone and load Lineage OS, or similar. For 99% of the buying public that is useless advice.

      You can "just" buy an Essential PH-1 for $249 on Amazon whenever a sale is going on. It's almost pure Android and the security updates come out within an hour of Google's. LTE band 13 and easily rooted and updated w/ root.

      The downside is that the camera is worthless (even with the latest Google Camera app), but for the missing $950 you can buy an amazing point-and-shoot to carry if you have a second pocket. Maybe get a $300 one and pocket the savings. I get that this is a non-ideal solution for going clubbing but for the typical nerd it works competently.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    10. Re:Overpriced junk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are advising people to buy an phone from a company on the verge of bankruptcy and carry around a point-and-shoot second camera.

      What is it like having shit for brains?

  18. Schrodingers immigrant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    simultaneously too lazy to work & also stealing your job.

  19. oh oh me sir me sir I know by stealth_finger · · Score: 0

    It's because idiots keep paying for it en masse because they just have to have the latest igadget and believe lines like apple make long lasting products and makes new technology when they do neither. They rarely even update their products so they can't be spending that much on r&d. The only thing they do do is iOS and make out like its so impressive the latest version works on old hardware that is not much worse spec than the current model.

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    1. Re:oh oh me sir me sir I know by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      It's because idiots keep paying for it en masse because they just have to have the latest igadget and believe lines like apple make long lasting products and makes new technology when they do neither.

      Proof's in the pudding.

      I've been buying (mostly used) Apple equipment for, well, as long as there has BEEN Apple equipment, and, other than a used eMac that seemed to suffer a Power Supply failure, I have sent every single one of my Apple computers (and my one upgraded iPhone) to my "Computer Museum" (spare bedroom) FULLY FUNCTIONAL. I could plug ANY of them in (back to my Apple 1!!!), and they would obediently boot right up and be ready for service, just like the day they were "decommissioned".

      So, blow it out your ass; I've got over FORTY YEARS of Apple Hardware that handily BELIES your claims.

      Oh, and as for your snarky "Gotta have the latest iGadget" remark, my NEWEST Apple gear is as follows:

      1. A 4th Generation Apple TV that I bought to cut the cord about 2 years ago.

      2. A mid-2012 MacBook Pro, which I bought new =in mid 2013, and which is my daily-driver at home.

      3. An iPad 2 (which was a gift from my employer something like 5 years ago). I still use it every single day.

      Obviously, NONE of that gear qualifies as "the latest iGadget". So again, quit with the false Apple Hater memes, willya?

    2. Re:oh oh me sir me sir I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      STFU stupid tech hating apple cultist.
      apple is overpriced shit.

    3. Re:oh oh me sir me sir I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congrats, that is just your style. The rest of the Apple cult is not like you, but willya try again next time?

    4. Re:oh oh me sir me sir I know by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      Congrats, that is just your style. The rest of the Apple cult is not like you, but willya try again next time?

      Funny. It's JUST like the other Apple-owning people I know.

      One just bought an iMac in 2017 to replace his 2009 iMac, which he uses for his Architectural Consulting business (he is 87 y/o BTW). His MacBook Pro is also from around 2011, IIRC. His wife just replaced her 2009 Mac mini with the new 2018 model. Their iPhones are a few generations old (can't remember how old), and his iPad is at least 3 years old.

      Another just replaced her 2011 MacBook Pro with a 2017 version. I'm pretty sure she has an Android phone because she is on some sort of family plan with her husband. Husband is a Windows user.

      Another friend has a frickin' Titanium POWERBOOK, and an iPhone 4 (may have upgraded that last year). His wife has a 2009 Mac mini (first Intel version).

      In fact, I really have NEVER known one of these MYTHICAL "Gotta Have the New Shiny" Apple Users Slashtards keep yapping about. Wonder where they all are???

    5. Re:oh oh me sir me sir I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Avoiding you because you are a narcissistic asshole?

    6. Re:oh oh me sir me sir I know by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      So people lose their shit and queue up overnight every year for 5/6 year old devices? Right. You may be typical of the older apple user but not of the current generation and like it or not you are associated with them. Deal with it. Apple is overpriced, its not better, it's just more expensive.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    7. Re:oh oh me sir me sir I know by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      So people lose their shit and queue up overnight every year for 5/6 year old devices? Right. You may be typical of the older apple user but not of the current generation and like it or not you are associated with them. Deal with it. Apple is overpriced, its not better, it's just more expensive.

      If you don't think Apple hardware and software is better overall, then you just aren't paying attention.

      Apple isn't perfect; just almost always much better than everyone else making this shit.

      And younger fandroids have the EXACT same "problem" with "gotta have the new shiny". It has NOTHING to do SPECIFICALLY with Apple. It's just the rampant consumerism that is the hallmark of this vacuous "Me First" generation.

    8. Re:oh oh me sir me sir I know by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      If you think Apple hardware and software is better overall, then you just aren't paying attention.

      Apple isn't perfect; they make stuff just as cheaply and cut all the same corners but they spend lots of time and effort on making it pretty so people think it's better and they ramp the price up.

      And younger fandroids have the EXACT same "problem" with "gotta have the new shiny". It is just highlighted and taken to extremes with apple. You don't see midnight release events, days long queues at samsung or lg etc shops even when they try for it. It's just the rampant consumerism that is the hallmark of this vacuous "Me First" generation intersects nicely with the apple fanboy market.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    9. Re:oh oh me sir me sir I know by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      If you think Apple hardware and software is better overall, then you just aren't paying attention.

      Apple isn't perfect; they make stuff just as cheaply and cut all the same corners but they spend lots of time and effort on making it pretty so people think it's better and they ramp the price up.

      And younger fandroids have the EXACT same "problem" with "gotta have the new shiny". It is just highlighted and taken to extremes with apple. You don't see midnight release events, days long queues at samsung or lg etc shops even when they try for it. It's just the rampant consumerism that is the hallmark of this vacuous "Me First" generation intersects nicely with the apple fanboy market.

      Apple is pretty transparent when they release a model that has been "cost reduced", like the iPhone XR vs. the X's. And you will note that, in that case, they reduced the cost NOT by reducing the QUALITY of the components used; but rather by reducing the FEATURE-SET supported. That's how they can retain PERFORMANCE metrics such as overall camera-quality, even without the extra cost of an additional rear camera, rather than just putting in a shitty camera, or last-year's SoC, etc.

      In fact, Apple has never done the hideous "who's hard drives or memory are cheapest THIS week" crap that OEMs like Dell have been (in)famous for for DECADES. They just don't. If you open a MacBook Pro that was produced in June, 2018, it will al last certainly have the same exact components as one opened in February, 2019 (unless there is some unusual supplier problem, of course). That is NOT the case with the vast majority of other OEMs, especially when it comes to "commodity" components.

      Apple hasn't done a midnight launch event since the first days of the iPhone (I don't think they even did one for the first iPad); so, to even bring that up at this point is disingenuous, at best.

      And as for long lines (queues) for (usually iPhone) launches: Those are NOT "orchestrated" by Apple; but rather are a measure of (amazingly continued) excitement over their product-lines by the general public. And don't tell me that Samsung, Google, LG, Huwaei(sp?) and all the rest wouldn't KILL for the same enthusiasm, year after year, by MILLIONS AND MILLIONS of people, young and old, rich and poor.

      Talk to any real marketing expert and ask them if they wouldn't like to bottle that particular brand of lightning.

    10. Re:oh oh me sir me sir I know by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      I'm sure they would kill for it but that's part of the rampant must have iphoneism that you claim to deny exists. They are made in the same chinese factories by the same chinese workers with the same mass produced parts, they cost about the same to make as any similar featured phones but they put a massive mark up because they can and that the power the apple logo commands these days which has basically nothing to do with the actual quality of their goods. Fair enough from a business perspective but it doesnt mean they are any better. 20 years ago you might have had a point but apple are a shadow of their former selves hiding in bling. Nonexpandable, nonfixable, nonupgradable mass produced crap just like the rest but it pretends to be better.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    11. Re:oh oh me sir me sir I know by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      I'm sure they would kill for it but that's part of the rampant must have iphoneism that you claim to deny exists. They are made in the same chinese factories by the same chinese workers with the same mass produced parts, they cost about the same to make as any similar featured phones but they put a massive mark up because they can and that the power the apple logo commands these days which has basically nothing to do with the actual quality of their goods. Fair enough from a business perspective but it doesnt mean they are any better. 20 years ago you might have had a point but apple are a shadow of their former selves hiding in bling. Nonexpandable, nonfixable, nonupgradable mass produced crap just like the rest but it pretends to be better.

      Excuse me.

      IPhones have the Ax SoCs. No one else does. Their performance is head and shoulders above everyone else. Makes a difference. They also have the most well-integrated software-hardware "ecosystem" (yes I hate that term). And while iOS is is some ways not as sophisticated as Android (in ways that matter to about .0001% of the general public), overall, it still provides a better experience to most users. And again, they may not know why; but they intuitively "feel" that. Android, OTOH, still feels a little janky by comparison.

      So it DOES mean they are "any better". That's what you "claim to deny exists".

      And the rest of Apple gear is STILL Best In Class.

      There will always be stuff that has one metric or another that "beats Apple" (temporarily), but all in all, and again, factoring in the fact that, for example, macOS is the best desktop OS, and an OS that dovetails seamlessly into iOS, WatchOS, and TVOS, and you have a series of products that deliver a more desirable experience, and one that only gets more and more better-er the more of those products you own.

      No one else has that, either. And guess what? People notice. They may not understand the tech behind it all (why do they need to?), but they certainly recognize and appreciate the quiet synergy that Apple brings to their product family.

    12. Re:oh oh me sir me sir I know by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      And the rest of Apple gear is STILL Best In Class.

      What, the two to three year old fixed designs they sell? The same "pro" laptops that are locked down and only have one or two ports? Best in class? Fuck off, just stop. I don't care if you like apple and think they are the best thing to ever happen to computers but they are just not.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    13. Re:oh oh me sir me sir I know by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      And the rest of Apple gear is STILL Best In Class.

      What, the two to three year old fixed designs they sell? The same "pro" laptops that are locked down and only have one or two ports? Best in class? Fuck off, just stop. I don't care if you like apple and think they are the best thing to ever happen to computers but they are just not.

      In your not-so-humble OPINION

      Unfortunately for you, their sales would tend to indicate that you are somewhat "outvoted".

    14. Re:oh oh me sir me sir I know by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      sales != quality

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    15. Re:oh oh me sir me sir I know by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 0

      sales != quality

      After a sufficient amount of time, it does when you don't have a monopoly.

      That meme only works when you are the only viable game in town, like Microsoft was with their Office and Server products.

      But that meme has never applied to any Apple product; because there have always been viable alternatives available.

  20. Off the backs of exploited workers. by bitfist · · Score: 0

    Despite having BILLIONS in revenue, Apple makes a point of making sure that the manufacturers are not compensated fairly for their labor. https://www.aljazeera.com/prog... Rectifying this grave injustice is not even a rounding error for Apple, but they will never do this because their business model rejects it. The consumers could get Apple to correct this injustice, but they never will because the consumers could care less, even when showed.It is all sickening.

    1. Re: Off the backs of exploited workers. by UnknowingFool · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You do know that Foxconn makes devices for almost every manufacturer right? That means your ire covers Dell, Lenovo, HP, LG, etc.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  21. seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it really took that long to figure that out? the prices you thought were worth it have never been from the very start, let alone all the other accessories you have to buy because of them creating their own standards. there's reasons why certain people, mainly practical people, will never buy an apple product and for those that see technology as something to help people accomplish things in life in a simpler way they have been detrimental to that end.

    1. Re:seriously by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      it really took that long to figure that out? the prices you thought were worth it have never been from the very start, let alone all the other accessories you have to buy because of them creating their own standards. there's reasons why certain people, mainly practical people, will never buy an apple product and for those that see technology as something to help people accomplish things in life in a simpler way they have been detrimental to that end.

      What standards has Apple created lately? The last one they created was Lightning, and that was because they just couldn't abide putting a piece of SHIT microUSB connector on their mobile devices, and the EU was giving them shit about the 30 pin Dock connector. But, they are now moving away from that, and going with the INDUSTRY-STANDARD USB-C connector.

      But, other than Lightning, name ONE Proprietary Standard that Apple has CREATED in the past decade or so. I'll wait. Even Facetime was SUPPOSED to be Open; but then a Patent Troll (VirnexT) swooped-in a ruined THAT idea for EVERYBODY.

    2. Re:seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are right. apple has never created anything. They just keep copying the innovators.

    3. Re:seriously by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      You are right. apple has never created anything. They just keep copying the innovators.

      Haha. Nice try, COWARD.

  22. Here's how they get away with it: lack of competit by metamatic · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I was a happy Android user for 7+ years. But to reliably get OS updates and upgrades, and not have to put up with a botched Android UI and bloatware, that meant buying a Nexus phone and tablet. Which I did, every 2 years or so.

    But then Google decided to give up on Android tablets entirely, and give up on mid-price phones. They jacked up their prices, and a Pixel 3 now starts at $799. Well, guess what, that's the same price as an iPhone XR. And Google's last Android tablet offering before they gave up was actually more expensive than an iPad. So I switched.

    With computers, nobody else is even offering a good Unix-based computer. Linux isn't competitive -- I use it for work, but sound and video are still a dumpster fire and don't count on hibernation working as well as a Mac either. If I didn't need to edit 4K video and work on music, I'd probably buy a ChromeBook, and sales of ChromeBooks seem to suggest that indeed there's an underserved market there.

    Basically, nobody is putting in the time and money to clean up Linux (or BSD) and offer systems where sound and video editing, hibernation, and all the other basic functionality of a Mac is right there and just works. If you want that, you either have to put up with Windows and its myriad deficiencies, or you have to buy a Mac.

    I'm a little surprised that nobody's deliberately setting out to build laptops that have exactly the same hardware as a Mac and are perfectly suited to hackintosh use. Give me a laptop with a proper keyboard and hardware that all worked properly with macOS and I'd be very tempted.

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  23. Apple Stores by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Ever since the Apple 2 line was discontinued, I lost faith in Apple. However, a neighbor recently asked to take her iMac to the Apple Store 25 miles away. Fifty employees and hundreds of customers waiting to get their crappy Apple products fixed. And as many of you know, Apple reduced their estimated life of product from 3 years to 2 years just so people would have buy more. It's not sad. It's disgusting.

    1. Re:Apple Stores by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      Ever since the Apple 2 line was discontinued, I lost faith in Apple. However, a neighbor recently asked to take her iMac to the Apple Store 25 miles away. Fifty employees and hundreds of customers waiting to get their crappy Apple products fixed. And as many of you know, Apple reduced their estimated life of product from 3 years to 2 years just so people would have buy more. It's not sad. It's disgusting.

      STOP LYING!

    2. Re:Apple Stores by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly this. Spot on and well thought out. If only the apple faithful could be so smart.

    3. Re:Apple Stores by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here. I loved my 2e, 2c, and 2gs, but Apple has been pretty much dead to me since then.

    4. Re:Apple Stores by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      Same here. I loved my 2e, 2c, and 2gs, but Apple has been pretty much dead to me since then.

      So instead, you'd rather use the 88th iteration of the 1978 IBM PC, running the 10th Iteration of a 1993 OS.

      Yeah, that's forward-thinking!

    5. Re:Apple Stores by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Id rather use a 8086 than anything apple makes.

  24. Apple users are idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    99% of them don't even know what's inside a computer, nor how it works, and couldn't build one even if their lives depended on it.
    As for the idiots who queue up outside Apple stores for hours (or even days) to buy the latest iPhone, words fail me.

    1. Re:Apple users are idiots by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      99% of them don't even know what's inside a computer, nor how it works, and couldn't build one even if their lives depended on it.
      As for the idiots who queue up outside Apple stores for hours (or even days) to buy the latest iPhone, words fail me.

      Worked as an Embedded Dev. (both hw and sw) for over FOUR DECADES (and did as much Embedded Dev. on Macs as practical (which was admittedly not so easy back in the day). I Have built DOZENS of Windows computers. Write Windows Application sw for a living now. As such, I also help Admin several of our Windows Dev. Servers, stretching from Server 2003 to 2016.

      I have several Engineering-type friends that use Macs, too.

      So, next bullshit meme?

    2. Re: Apple users are idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are such a moronic apple shill.

    3. Re: Apple users are idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We don't believe you, you are a lying faggot Apple shill. Post your real name and address or stfu. Gerald did it, you won't tho cuz you are too pussy.

      Pussy boy.

    4. Re: Apple users are idiots by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      We don't believe you, you are a lying faggot Apple shill. Post your real name and address or stfu. Gerald did it, you won't tho cuz you are too pussy.

      Pussy boy.

      So sez the

      ANONYMOUS

      COWARD.

      I don't even know who this "Gerald" is, you dumbfuck Slashtard. Login and fight like a man!

      How many tens of thousands of lines of C and Assembler and other languages code would I have to post to prove at least the software side of my claims?

      The answer is "Infinity"; because you would always come back with some snarky remark, or continue to move the goalposts.

      FOAD. I know what I have done. I'm frickin' over 60 years old, and still employed full-time doing (unfortunately, Windows) Software Development. When I started making money with microcontrollers, the term "Embedded Development" hadn't even been INVENTED yet!

  25. Huh? by lengel · · Score: 5, Funny

    "It felt as though the value proposition that has made Apple products no-brainers might unravel."

    In what universe of delusion has Apple ever been a value proposition???????

    1. Re: Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The value is in looking like you have money, which a surprisingly large number of people seem to care about. The problem is they also make themselves targets and no-one is interested in "them"...just their money.

      And the silly thing is these people don't have any money, because they spent it all on an iPhone.

    2. Re:Huh? by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      "It felt as though the value proposition that has made Apple products no-brainers might unravel."

      In what universe of delusion has Apple ever been a value proposition???????

      In the one where people value their TIME and their PRIVACY.

      Next stupid question?

    3. Re: Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol. Liar

    4. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the PPC days, Apple computers would be a long term investment, and I've seen some of those machines last more than a decade. Once they switched to Intel, they were the Gateway Computers of the modern PC market. Shoddy hardware.

    5. Re: Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you agree that their computers aren't of value? Glad you admitted it.

    6. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well it never has if you equate value to performance. Apple has always sold less performance per dollar, but people perceive the value to be in their simplicity of the design. Simple people... salt of the earth, you know... morons.

    7. Re: Huh? by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      Lol. Liar

      Prove it, or STFU.

    8. Re: Huh? by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      So you agree that their computers aren't of value? Glad you admitted it.

      You can't even READ. Go away.

    9. Re:Huh? by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      In the PPC days, Apple computers would be a long term investment, and I've seen some of those machines last more than a decade. Once they switched to Intel, they were the Gateway Computers of the modern PC market. Shoddy hardware.

      You're full of shit. A friend of mine just replaced his 2009 Intel iMac with a 2017 version last summer. The 2009 version is still working fine; he just moved it into a "Secondary computer" role.

      About a week ago, I just helped replace his Wife's 2006 Intel Mac mini with the new 2018 model. It was also working fine; but she wanted one that was faster and that could run the latest version of macOS.

      I have another friend with a 2006 Intel Mac mini which I think she is still using.

      NONE of them have EVER had a failure of those systems.

    10. Re:Huh? by _merlin · · Score: 1

      I've owned a whole lot of Macs, and the quality has dropped. The 2001 iBook was very tough and well-built, but the first-generation MacBooks were terrible. Top case broke, optical drive got misaligned with the slot on the case, GMA950 graphics would cause regular kernel panics. The unibody MacBook Pros bend far too easily, and because they're made of aluminium, they stay bent. The older designs were a lot more resilient. I have a 2010 MacBook Pro, and the interrupt controller now only works intermittently, so it will kernel panic or lock up regularly. Funny thing is, I have a "Snakebite" dual G4 that still works fine, and even a couple of working 68k Macs. Apple quality isn't what it used to be.

    11. Re:Huh? by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      I've owned a whole lot of Macs, and the quality has dropped. The 2001 iBook was very tough and well-built, but the first-generation MacBooks were terrible. Top case broke, optical drive got misaligned with the slot on the case, GMA950 graphics would cause regular kernel panics. The unibody MacBook Pros bend far too easily, and because they're made of aluminium, they stay bent. The older designs were a lot more resilient. I have a 2010 MacBook Pro, and the interrupt controller now only works intermittently, so it will kernel panic or lock up regularly. Funny thing is, I have a "Snakebite" dual G4 that still works fine, and even a couple of working 68k Macs. Apple quality isn't what it used to be.

      This is not unique to Apple, and it is caused almost exclusively by two factors; both of which are largely out of Apple's (and other OEMs') control, to wit:

      1. Those old Macs had ZERO Ball Grid Array (BGA)- packaged ICs. The problem with BGAs is that they are hyper-sensitive to "coplanarity" (warping of chip and/or PCB) problems. EVERYONE now has this problem on and off. Your 2010 "intermittent" interrupt controller is likely victim to one or both of the above issues (neither of which your 2001 iBook, your b4 tower, or 68k Macs had to deal with). A competent repair facility should be able to reflow that chip's connections, and you'd be good to go.

      2. RoHS edicts that FORBADE the use of Lead-Tin SOLDER alloys. This is pretty well settled now (bit lead-free solder STILL sucks co pared with the stuff we HAD been using for CENTURIES. And when the EU basically Ruined the entire electronics industry worldwide, starting in about 2005, pretty much ALL electronics took a steep nosedive in overall reliability.

      As for Uninody bending, I see no reason why you couldn't (carefully!) un-bend the case. In fact, have you ever tried to Google for a technique? Bet not!

    12. Re: Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have been WRONG all through these comments; please continue to be wrong for our amusement.

    13. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BLAH BLAH BLAH
      apples poor quality is never apple fault.

  26. Apple has never been a value proposition. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    It felt as though the value proposition that has made Apple products no-brainers might unravel.

    That's a bit like saying that Gucci is a "value proposition". Apple relies on brand name, cachet, and wealth signaling. By carrying around an Apple product you're signaling that you're "not just like everyone else!", and also that you have enough money to "not be like everyone else". It's NEVER been about value. It's like buying a Cadillac in the 1980s, which (used to be) a symbol of upper class success. Now it's a giant SUV.

    The Apple "Mac/PC" ads made this abundantly clear. Apple owners were the cool, hip, knowledgeable people like Steve Jobs. PC people were the square, unhip, broken, corporate types like Bill Gates. (Never mind that both companies are massive Fortune 500 companies that are equally greedy.... that'd spoil the illusion).

    And this is exactly the reason the price increased. Apple figures its customers are willing to pay more for cachet and wealth signaling. They're going to sell less of them because they've already largely saturated the market, so it's time to make Apple products even MORE exclusive.

    1. Re:Apple has never been a value proposition. by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      And this is exactly the reason the price increased. Apple figures its customers are willing to pay more for cachet and wealth signaling. They're going to sell less of them because they've already largely saturated the market, so it's time to make Apple products even MORE exclusive.

      So, what explains the sudden surge in CHROMEBOOK prices, eh???

      Don't believe me? Believe THIS Slashdot poster, who said:

      "I'm typing this on a refurbushed ThinkPad X220 in which I just upgraded the SDD to 1TB yesterday (runs Manjaro i3 Linux) and got meself a Chromebook a few months back to try out the cheap ARM-based secure "Lord-Google-watches-over-me" option. Not sure if that test will come out positive, still carefully evaluating. The suddenly increasing (!) price in Chromebooks lately isn't helping though IMHO."

      https://apple.slashdot.org/com...

      Certainly no "Brand Cachet" or "Wealth Signaling" with THOSE POS machines! So, perhaps it more like worries about Tariffs and general economic instability that is causing an ACROSS THE BOARD price increase in "tech" products (which are nearly universally Made in China)...

      BTW, my newest piece of Apple Gear (other than the Apple TV I bought a couple of years ago) is a mid-2012 MacBook Pro. I also have an iPad 2. None of that stuff is particularly about "Cachet" or "Wealth Signaling".

      I buy the stuff because it works, is quite reliable, and because the company respects and actually honors my Privacy.

      And because I develop Windows software for a living, and am immersed in THAT "ecosystem" all day, every day at work; so I KNOW the difference!

      So blow your effete crapola out your ass. But I see that that is actually unecessary; because that's OBVIOUSLY where it came from to begin with!

    2. Re: Apple has never been a value proposition. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chrome books cost between $100-300.

      You are comparing apples and oranges you faggot shill.

      You are the dumbest person on this forum. Seriously. Post your real name and address or stfu.

    3. Re: Apple has never been a value proposition. by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      Chrome books cost between $100-300.

      You are comparing apples and oranges you faggot shill.

      You are the dumbest person on this forum. Seriously. Post your real name and address or stfu.

      You first, COWARD.

  27. Not with me they don't. Moving away from Apple. by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    I've been pondering a new hardware update cycle in the last 2-3 years. Waiting for the cheap viable Apple option to come around. Didn't happen with Apple lately. I'm in the process of moving away from Apple hardware and basically finished with that. I'm typing this on a refurbushed ThinkPad X220 in which I just upgraded the SDD to 1TB yesterday (runs Manjaro i3 Linux) and got meself a Chromebook a few months back to try out the cheap ARM-based secure "Lord-Google-watches-over-me" option. Not sure if that test will come out positive, still carefully evaluating. The suddenly increasing (!) price in Chromebooks lately isn't helping though IMHO.

    Long story short: The articles assessment is spot on. Apple is an all-out fashion brand for people who care for a high minimum of quality but not about objective price-performance. That has Apple earning obscene amounts of money. Good for them. I'm out however. I've been eyeing the new iPad Pro - a truely amazing device - but it's just too damn expensive and too much Apple-service lock-in with iOS.

    Only at work am I still using a neat retina 27" iMac with a bunch of FOSS software (homebrew, iTerm, Gimp, Inkscape, etc.) added. Nice. But if a work HW upgrade is due, my next one will inlcude a fanless custom Linux box and a extra-wide 4k display and some luxury KB & Mouse. And still be cheaper than the sub-par Apple option.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:Not with me they don't. Moving away from Apple. by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      I've been pondering a new hardware update cycle in the last 2-3 years. Waiting for the cheap viable Apple option to come around. Didn't happen with Apple lately.

      HOW cheap?!? What's "Viable"?

      The suddenly increasing (!) price in Chromebooks lately isn't helping though IMHO.

      Hmmm. Chromebook prices are "suddenly increasing", yet it is APPLE's prices that ALWAYS get the "
      Price Gouging" treatment. Wonder why???

      Only at work am I still using a neat retina 27" iMac with a bunch of FOSS software (homebrew, iTerm, Gimp, Inkscape, etc.) added. Nice. But if a work HW upgrade is due, my next one will inlcude a fanless custom Linux box and a extra-wide 4k display and some luxury KB & Mouse. And still be cheaper than the sub-par Apple option.

      And, at the end of all that, it will be a sub-par experience that will consume ??? of your time (which is free, right?) getting it to run and keeping it running.

      Good luck with that.

  28. The products are not getting more expensive, by Snufu · · Score: 1

    you're just holding them wrong.

    That, and reality distortion fields don't grow on trees.

    1. Re:The products are not getting more expensive, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod up unintentionally insightful. People are holding them wrong - they're holding on to them too long. If it lasts twice as long, you're paying the same amount at twice the price.

  29. Apple charges more to solve problems they create by JoeyRox · · Score: 4, Informative

    Apple says prices go up because it introduces new technologies such as Face ID

    And Face ID wouldn't be necessary if they hadn't removed the fingerprint reader, so in other words they're imposing the cost of solving problems to its customers that Apple itself caused.

  30. Missing the point by erp_consultant · · Score: 1

    Apple products have never been about low prices. They charge premium prices for what they believe is a premium product. Their customers seem to agree. A lot of people put a premium on ease of use and visual esthetics. And they are willing to pay more for that.

    I equate it to German cars. Some people believe it is worth it to spend more for a BMW or Merc because they believe it handles better and has superior engineering. Other people see those cars and just think money pit. There is no right answer. If you feel it's worth the extra money then go for it.

    Where some people get in trouble is when they buy the expensive iPhone but can't really afford it. If they are honest with themselves they will realize that their budget doesn't allow for a $1000 phone. But the iPhone, like the German car, is an asperational product. It conveys status and success, at least in some eyes. So Apple lures them in by allowing them to spread the payments over 2 years. Then it doesn't seem like that much money. Just like the 3-4 year car lease.

    My wife has an iPhone and she loves it. I'm an Android guy. We manage to coexist. I can see the appeal of the iPhone but I prefer the control that Android give me. To each their own.

    1. Re:Missing the point by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 0

      Apple products have never been about low prices. They charge premium prices for what they believe is a premium product. Their customers seem to agree. A lot of people put a premium on ease of use and visual esthetics. And they are willing to pay more for that.

      I equate it to German cars. Some people believe it is worth it to spend more for a BMW or Merc because they believe it handles better and has superior engineering. Other people see those cars and just think money pit. There is no right answer. If you feel it's worth the extra money then go for it.

      Where some people get in trouble is when they buy the expensive iPhone but can't really afford it. If they are honest with themselves they will realize that their budget doesn't allow for a $1000 phone. But the iPhone, like the German car, is an asperational product. It conveys status and success, at least in some eyes. So Apple lures them in by allowing them to spread the payments over 2 years. Then it doesn't seem like that much money. Just like the 3-4 year car lease.

      My wife has an iPhone and she loves it. I'm an Android guy. We manage to coexist. I can see the appeal of the iPhone but I prefer the control that Android give me. To each their own.

      People that purchase Apple products fundamentally understand the difference between PRICE and VALUE.

      Unfortunately, those people are fairly rare in the U.S., where most people just focus on FEATURE-COUNT (nevermind that those "features" simply don't work at all, or don't work well) as being greater "Bang for the Buck".

    2. Re: Missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Modded down again. Nice. I loved that the slashdot collective mind keeps calling out this faggot shill.

      Mod down all his posts he does nothing but cheerlead and suck on Apple cock.

    3. Re:Missing the point by quenda · · Score: 1

      Apple products have never been about low prices.

      No, but a lot of their products were seen as great value for money, taking into account the component quality and software.
      I'd say the standard iPad still is, but not much else.

  31. Wrong Focus by monkeyxpress · · Score: 1

    Apple is going in the wrong direction. They should be reducing the price and pushing market share, while pivoting the company towards offering more services. This is where the future is. Google has been steadily working towards this, and even Microsoft has gotten the message. In another 5-10 years phones will be dirt cheap (maybe even free) and the funding model will be through the services you use on it (though you might be paying though ad services, or indirectly e.g. uber). This is just pretty obvious.

    I think they are really going to stuff themselves with this current strategy. By the time they realise they have a problem, their market will be too small and exclusive, and those users will quickly disappear as the centre of mass in the industry shifts away.

    The company appears to be stuck with the last set of 'commandments' brought down from the mountain by Jobs. Only he could change those commandments (which he did regularly) so they are now stuck on autopilot.

    1. Re: Wrong Focus by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Apple is going in the wrong direction. They should be reducing the price and pushing market share, while pivoting the company towards offering more services.

      You mean like every other company? It seems that you are suggesting that Apple do less to distinguish themselves in all markets and be another Dell. How does that work for other companies? Did Kmart win against Walmart by being another Walmart?

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    2. Re: Wrong Focus by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 0

      Apple is going in the wrong direction. They should be reducing the price and pushing market share, while pivoting the company towards offering more services.

      You mean like every other company? It seems that you are suggesting that Apple do less to distinguish themselves in all markets and be another Dell. How does that work for other companies? Did Kmart win against Walmart by being another Walmart?

      The Haters just can't handle the fact that, by and large, Apple SETS trends, rather than FOLLOWS them.

      Why Slashdot is filled to the brim with Luddite "technorati" that can't get past that beige-box, cookie-cutter, Wintel-Inspired mindset, rather than at least ACKNOWLEDGING the fact that Apple tries VERY hard to march to the beat of their own drummer. Sometimes it's a hit and a miss; but at least they TRY.

    3. Re:Wrong Focus by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      Apple is going in the wrong direction. They should be reducing the price

      There is a term for that: It's called "A Race to the Bottom."

      And the planet is riddled with the carcasses of dead companies and even whole industries that tried that method (or believed they were FORCED into it!), and failed.

      NO ONE has EVER successfully pulled-out of that economic tailspin. It CANNOT be done.

    4. Re: Wrong Focus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Modded down for lying. You keep intentionally lying to prove a point. Not cool man.

      - smidge(AC because mods)

    5. Re: Wrong Focus by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      Modded down for lying. You keep intentionally lying to prove a point. Not cool man.

      - smidge(AC because mods)

      As I said, People POST SHADE under the cover of AC; then turn around and MOD under their Username.

      Not cool man.

    6. Re:Wrong Focus by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      So... phones are currently getting more and more expensive, and your prediction is that they will suddenly become free?

      Ok.

    7. Re: Wrong Focus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yes its all a grand conspiracy against you.
      Honestly seek help.

    8. Re: Wrong Focus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple has already said they will be focusing on services going forward. The selling less phones and making more profit trick cannot last forever.

      If they don't lower their prices today, they will in the future. The last batch of phones sold less, but made more money because of the increased margins.

      If you make more money in services, you can lower your margins and fill in with services income.

      It's the only way forward. When no one cares about phones who will buy an iphone?

  32. Like the old saying says..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Costs More...
    Does Less...
    It's that simple!

    1. Re:Like the old saying says..... by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      Costs More...
      Does Less...
      It's that simple!

      Citation.

      It's that simple!

    2. Re: Like the old saying says..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Awwwww someone is having a meltdown today. Your favoritest brand being picked on.
      Poor 'leave apple alone guy'

  33. It's actually not at all simple by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Interesting

    no one checks specs

    Anyone intelligent does not check specs on mobile devices these days, because it's not raw hardware or software alone that matters - it is the combination of the two.

    That is why iOS devices can get away with less RAM. Technically it's "lower spec" than some Android devices, but it ends up working better because iOS simply needs much less RAM to function well.

    Same for battery, if you "check the specs" on an android device you might find a bigger battery where the entire phone has much worse real-life battery life than a similar iOS device.

    Even highly technical people like myself stopped "checking the spec" some time ago for this very reason - my remain cognizant of what the specs are, but keep them in perspective within the entire function of the device.

    "Checking specs" makes more sense with desktop and laptop hardware because there all of the OS choices have been heavily optimized over a long time (though even then the administration overhead matters a lot to me which is why I still will not run Windows).

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:It's actually not at all simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Translation: Apple's specs are miserable compared to Android's so now specs don't matter.

  34. You know you can....not buy their products, right? by Uberbah · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Summary not just written and powered by smarmy Hatorade, its a honey pot for the same. You know Zombie Steve isn't holding a gun to your heads, right? You are perfectly free to buy an Android phone - even if it comes with a notch and costs just as much as an iPhone XR.

  35. Get away with it? by Holi · · Score: 2

    We are a capitalist society, they are not "getting away" with anything.
    They can charge what they want, and if people continue to buy then they are not charging too much.

    --
    Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    1. Re:Get away with it? by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      We are a capitalist society, they are not "getting away" with anything.

      They can charge what they want, and if people continue to buy then they are not charging too much.

      How DARE you ruin a perfectly good Fake News story with FACTS?

    2. Re: Get away with it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahhhhhh fake news because you choose to ignore it. That's fine. Apple is reaching a tipping point.

  36. Librem 5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cool idea, I love the concept but specs could be better.

    3GB RAM, 32GB internal flash memory is not enough

  37. Getting ahead of tariffs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe Apple is just getting ahead of the impact from tariffs. Its not like any of their products are manufactured in the US.

  38. Value Proposition? by scourfish · · Score: 1

    Their designs are decent, but I've never seen them as a value proposition.

    1. Re:Value Proposition? by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      Their designs are decent, but I've never seen them as a value proposition.

      And so, neither should anyone else.

      Is that about right?

    2. Re: Value Proposition? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did he fucking say that? There you go again putting words in people's mouths. Because they don't worship Apple they must be wrong right? They must be anti Apple right?

      This is what's wrong with you. You are so blinded by Apple that you willfully IGNORE all complaints coming your way. You can't look at it without cheerleading. You can't analyze their products and give an opinion because you are so stuck up apples ass, it's hard to believe you.

      And when you can't back up Apple anymore? And when you are against the wall and people CALL out your lies. You just put words in their mouths and shill some more.

      Typical.

  39. Apple is NOT getting away with it by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    The central premise of this article is wrong. The high price of the latest product releases has impacted sales, causing a significant drop in stock price. The new features are reviewing well, but the perception of Apple users is that an innovation like face unlock will become standard at lower prices in the future, so why jump in at this early-adopter price point?

    1. Re:Apple is NOT getting away with it by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      The central premise of this article is wrong. The high price of the latest product releases has impacted sales, causing a significant drop in stock price. The new features are reviewing well, but the perception of Apple users is that an innovation like face unlock will become standard at lower prices in the future, so why jump in at this early-adopter price point?

      Hey!

      In case you haven't noticed, EVERYONE's U.S. Stock is DOWN! It's called a RECESSION: Look into it.

    2. Re:Apple is NOT getting away with it by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      You have to compare the Apple price with the Microsoft price. AAPL is disproportionately down.

    3. Re:Apple is NOT getting away with it by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      You have to compare the Apple price with the Microsoft price. AAPL is disproportionately down.

      If that is true (and it really depends on what hour you look), it isn't by much, percentage-wise.

      Three factors that haven't helped: Most analysts agreed that Apple's stock WAS overvalued, and that a "correction" was due. Plus, Apple's price ALWAYS goes down right after a New Product Event because Analysts are STOOOOPID. Apple had TWO Events in as many months. That didn't help. And, as I said, the ENTIRE Stock Market is in a TAILSPIN right now.

      Let's come back in 6 months and see if things haven't shaken-out. The Stock Market is a "long con". Even month-to-month "trends" are virtually meaningless, historically...

    4. Re:Apple is NOT getting away with it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only con here is apple and their sub par products

  40. I'm done with Apple and their SJW shit.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...will be moving away from their ecosystem with every new purchase.

  41. My Kid wants iMessage by rsilvergun · · Score: 3, Informative

    because it's got a ton of extra features that only work when you're texting somebody on an iPhone. It's a defacto social network. Take iMessage away and she'd buy a Samsung.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  42. Re: Not with me they don't. Moving away from Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just traded in most of my Apple gear - a Mac Pro, Mac Mini, iPad and watch. The downside is they only pay out in Apple giftcards so I'll get my wife a new iPad for Christmas.

    The funny thing is I bought most of this gear for my Job at Apple, mostly because Apple is too cheap to give their engineers dev machines (???). We had 3 iPhones for a team of hundreds. I quit before I got to use the machines actually, too much backstabbing and white collar shadiness goes on there for my tastes.

  43. The Order of Apple by AndyKron · · Score: 0

    Being a member of the Apple cult is getting more expensive.

    1. Re:The Order of Apple by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 0

      Being a member of the Apple cult is getting more expensive.

      While being a member of the Apple Hater's Cult is as worthless as ever...

  44. Apple's intangible costs by agent_blue · · Score: 1

    What many people miss are Apple's intangible costs like their commitment to renewable energy, sustainable materials and recycling and insistence on fair working conditions (however successful that may be). these things will drive up the costs of Apple's products but you can't find them on bill of materials for their phones and products.

    If you want the highest performance, most eco-friendly tech product, then Apple is the best manufacturer.

    1. Re:Apple's intangible costs by 110010001000 · · Score: 0

      You must be kidding. Apple crap is made in sweatshops overseas and their stuff ends up in landfills as they introduce new models every 3 months to keep the fanboy money pouring in.

    2. Re:Apple's intangible costs by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      What many people miss are Apple's intangible costs like their commitment to renewable energy, sustainable materials and recycling and insistence on fair working conditions (however successful that may be). these things will drive up the costs of Apple's products but you can't find them on bill of materials for their phones and products.

      If you want the highest performance, most eco-friendly tech product, then Apple is the best manufacturer.

      Well said!

    3. Re: Apple's intangible costs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL. Somebody drank the coolaid.

      Mac products are made in Foxconn factories using cheap foreign labor.

      Environmental friendly? LOLOLOL citation needed.

      Of course, the Apple shill will chime in and say "well said" because you praised Apple. All the while providing no citations. Stay classy Apple fanboys.

    4. Re: Apple's intangible costs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ^ I called it. See below.

    5. Re: Apple's intangible costs by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      LOL. Somebody drank the coolaid.

      Mac products are made in Foxconn factories using cheap foreign labor.

      Environmental friendly? LOLOLOL citation needed.

      Of course, the Apple shill will chime in and say "well said" because you praised Apple. All the while providing no citations. Stay classy Apple fanboys.

      Here's Apple's Environmental Report for 2018:

      https://www.apple.com/environm...

      They are hard to look up (one of the big "awards" is called the "Green Apple" award, so it pollutes the search results) But, here's just a few Environmental Awards I can find that Apple has recently received:

      https://9to5mac.com/2018/05/14...

      https://9to5mac.com/2017/01/10...

  45. Think Different Together by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    Being loyal to Apple is getting expensive.

    You can't put a price on the ability to feel superior to those who use lesser brands, and the self-satisfaction of showing what a unique individual you are by displaying the same logo as everyone else in your local coffee shop.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  46. It makes sense if you know math by SuperKendall · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Even if that was accurate, why would anyone pay $1000+ for a $390 phone?

    Because no-one is making a phone for $390 and selling it at $390.

    Also because if I wanted to build an equivalent phone myself it would probably cost around $10 million+, and work like crap (see: so many lower tier Android handset makers).

    Idiotic

    Only if you hate nice things, and are super-bad at math to figure out your average cost per day...

    The iPhone X last year is by far my favorite phone I have ever owned. Over many years some upgrades were just kind of slight advances, but all of the things in the iPhone X made it feel like a real step forward again. I like it so much will probably not even upgrade next year either, making for a good three year run on a phone. At that point the difference between a $1k phone and a $390 phone is nothing, with better economics of enjoyment than just about anything on this planet.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re: It makes sense if you know math by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Step forward to WHAT???? My iphone SE (64gb, used $160) runs the same ios as iphone x. There is nothing the iphonex does that warrants that kind of price. You are deluding yourself.

      --
      Good-bye
    2. Re:It makes sense if you know math by amicusNYCL · · Score: 2

      Because no-one is making a phone for $390 and selling it at $390.
      I like it so much will probably not even upgrade next year either, making for a good three year run on a phone.

      You should look at OnePlus. I bought the first one in 2014 for $350, paid in full, I own the device. When the OnePlus 5 came out in 2017 my original was doing fine but I bought two, for $450 each or something, because my wife needed a new phone. Again, we own the phones, we aren't renting them from a carrier and paying the price back in monthly charges. My OnePlus One still works fine, although the Five does have dual sim cards, international radios, etc that warranted an upgrade. I didn't need to upgrade because of any issues with bad hardware or software, though, I could have gotten another year or two at least out of the One.

      If you want to sit in your bubble and act like an iPhone is the single biggest source of enjoyment in today's world then that's fine, but don't act like you're using the iPhone for any reason other than your rabid devotion to Apple. There are plenty of companies out there doing good things with their products who aren't sitting on enormous piles of tax-avoiding cash, but if you want to shovel your money at Apple then go right ahead. Again, just don't act like Apple is doing something that no other company is doing other than hoarding huge piles of cash that they aren't paying taxes on.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    3. Re:It makes sense if you know math by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      You are an Apple fanboy and complete idiot. The gross margin on an iPhone is over 60%. That is outrageous. Corporations have never had such margin. And if you think there isn't much difference between $1,000 is $390 you aren't too bright. No wonder people don't have any savings. You give it all to corporations for overpriced junk you throw away in 2-3 years. Once we hit a recession you will learn the value of a dollar.

      Even if that were true (and it isn't), GROSS margin isn't what COUNTS.

      What counts is NET margin. And you suspiciously don't favor us with THAT number. Why not?

  47. Re:Apple charges more to solve problems they creat by metamatic · · Score: 1

    I use both on a regular basis, and Face ID is vastly more reliable than the fingerprint reader.

    Dry skin from ambient weather? Sorry, your fingerprint isn't recognized. Damp skin from washing your hands? Sorry, your fingerprint isn't recognized. Got out of the pool less than an hour ago? Sorry, your fingerprint isn't recognized.

    I thought Face ID was stupid until I used it.

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  48. Re:WTFm8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's even more trivial for users to make sure they're not using unicode characters.

  49. Re:Here's how they get away with it: lack of compe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was also a happy Android user for years and years but made the switch to an iPhone 6s Plus back in 2015. I was tired of Androidmanufactures not releasing new OS versions in a timely manner...or at all. If I had bought a Nexus 6P that was released at the same time as the iphone 6s I would have a phone that was already abandoned by google itself. There is a good chance my iPhone 6s Plus will also outlive the first gen Pixel phone in regards to OS upgrades.

  50. Nothing but a Fashion Statement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember 'Think Different'?

    Now it's 'Conform'..

  51. You fondle your iphone more than your wife by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    Apple even tells you now how many hours your phone was fondled. Something that intimate in your life is consuming valuable life cycles. The purchase price isn't really the expensive part.

    Additionally, people are not upgrading things as fast probably for the same reason these things are getting more expensive. At first all the breaktrhough changes were cheap to do. Many times they even made the phone cheaper. E.g. a more efficient radio or screen means smaller battery. When scale let you start winding your own batteries in custom shapes it also reduced the cost. Incorporating other profit centers like app stores made the phone cost less.

    Now that the low hanging fruit is devoured the new advances perhaps are more costly to achieve. But as the quality goes up and the incremental size of the changes go down people get more milage out of their phones. So the replacement period stretches out.

    Detroit found the same thing out when they started making quality cars in the 80s. the cars lasted longer.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:You fondle your iphone more than your wife by xjerky · · Score: 1

      I also think the people forget just how many things the iPhone 4 brought to the table when it came out: Retina Display Multitasking Facetime Video Recording Selfie Camera Airplay No other iteration came close to offering as much in a single release, and probably never will again.

      --
      A sentence you'll never see on an Internet discussion board: "You know what? You're right."
    2. Re:You fondle your iphone more than your wife by xjerky · · Score: 1

      Damn formatting:

      Retina Display

      Multitasking

      Facetime

      Video Recording

      Selfie Camera

      Airplay

      --
      A sentence you'll never see on an Internet discussion board: "You know what? You're right."
  52. mac pro 2020 (late 2019) needs to be $2999 max sta by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    mac pro 2020 (late 2019) needs to be $2999 max starting price.

    No need for 1TB or more base pci-e storage (start at 256-512) at apples price 1TB or more is insane to start with.
    No need for an high end / upper mid range card video card as starting point and (no duel video cards as base)
    At least 32GB ram (fill all channels) (and have slots)
    Start with an lower cpu then the imac pro.

  53. Macs are now actually CHEAPER than ever before by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

    You can look at history and see the REAL truth: Adjusting for inflation, Macs are now LESS EXPENSIVE than at any time in their 30 year history.

    Get the FACTS:

    https://appleinsider.com/artic...

    1. Re:Macs are now actually CHEAPER than ever before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple needs a return of the blindly faithful idiots to make $5,000 seem like a drop in the bucket. The cycle is now complete!

    2. Re: Macs are now actually CHEAPER than ever before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meanwhile, you ignore that the price for ALL computers dropped in that time.

      So the Apple fanboy has to compare prices from 30 years ago when computers were still new, to even remotely make it seem like a good deal.

      LOL do you even listen to yourself.

      That's like saying "in 2018 a Tesla 3 cost $45k, but now in 2048, Tesla's only cost 40k, see they are cheaper."

      All while ignoring the fact that new tech cost more because GASP it's new.

  54. Company Profit Margins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone here complaining about Apple's profit margins need to look at General Motors profit margins off of their pickups and SUVs that they drive - they are obscene.

  55. They DON'T get away with it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I stopped buying Apple stuff about 10-12 years ago, when they stopped having any good products. If Apple ever wants to sell me anything again, they're going to have to make something which doesn't happen to be hilariously awful. And even if they manage to do that, there will be competitors so either their prices will have to be low or, or instead of merely not-being-awful, they would have to have a good product. And given their focus on iOS and related devices, that's pretty damn unlikely.

  56. Re:Here's how they get away with it: lack of compe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a little surprised that nobody's deliberately setting out to build laptops that have exactly the same hardware as a Mac and are perfectly suited to hackintosh use.

    Encouraging your customers to ignore the EULA of their OS is not exactly a winning business plan...

  57. They're padding themselves for the Big Fall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's gonna be a long "rainy day" soon..

  58. Re:It's True by Mousit · · Score: 2

    With you there. I'm not fanboy but I've enjoyed their hardware for years, and I have a lot of it too. Yet I feel like they're going out of their way to deliberately sabotage the "low end" (well, their version of it). Started seeing it first in the iPhones, with the lower models getting horrible base storage options for one, and reserving arbitrary features for the "flagship" phones. Now their other hardware lines too.

    I really, really wanted the Air. Or rather, I wanted what the rumors suspected of it. A lower-power machine with the features I personally needed. The machine that came out though feels.. purposely hobbled. Most especially the two USB-C ports, on only one side of the machine, and nothing else. Power, external video, everything goes through those two ports. God forbid I'm right-handed and have a need for some kind of wired input device..

    Other than Lenovo (also Dell XPS 13), consider the System76 Galago Pro (itself a re-branded Clevo machine). It's almost the same dimensions and weight as the new Air (about an inch bigger on one side, and like 150 grams heavier; so some difference but not much). In that almost-the-same form factor they managed to offer a significantly better CPU (with slightly better on-board graphics because of it, for what that's worth), a 13" 3K screen (which has higher DPI and more resolution than the Air's new Retina screen). They offer a USB-C port with Thunderbolt 3 on it, which is capable of power input/charging, external video output, and all the rest that the Air's two ports offer, so there's feature-parity there. However, in that same chassis they also offer USB3 Type-A ports (on both sides!), HDMI and mini-DisplayPort, a DC power input, an SD card slot the Air removed, and even a wired Ethernet port. Most of the other things like the webcam and such are parity with the Air, no better but no worse. The Galago admittedly does not offer fingerprint reading or Secure Enclave or such that the Air has, so there is that. The Galago does offer faster NVMe M.2 options for storage, up to 2TB. A Galago Pro configured with the same RAM and storage space (at the high-end NVMe option) still manages to be $300 less than the Air.

    Oh, and it did all this in a machine that was released over a year before the Air (early-to-mid 2017), by the way.

    Is it necessarily a better machine than the Air? That's a matter of opinion. The port options I sure as hell think so. It doesn't get nearly as good battery life as the Air though thanks to that much more powerful processor. However I also don't have to eat up one of only two precious USB-C ports to connect power to it, unlike the Air. The Galago also isn't unibody aluminum, which tends to make it less durable (though reports are it isn't fragile either). On the flip-side, the Galago can also be opened and serviced, and its RAM and storage are swappable by the user. Hell, the damn CPU isn't even soldered down.

    Anyway, I'm quickly rambling off-topic here. Point is, I think stuff like the Galago shows Apple could've fucking done better, and easily so. They have the design prowess, I don't think there's much question of that. It just feels like they didn't give a shit about something "lower end" and less profit margin like the Air, so they pissed out a hobbled design, had the gall to up the price on it, and then called it a day. And I don't blindly throw money at that.

  59. Re:You know you can....not buy their products, rig by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

    Summary not just written and powered by smarmy Hatorade, its a honey pot for the same. You know Zombie Steve isn't holding a gun to your heads, right? You are perfectly free to buy an Android phone - even if it comes with a notch and costs just as much as an iPhone XR.

    Exactly!

  60. Face ID and invests in making products that last by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have eyes, and Apples only last as long as there's a warranty.

  61. Apple is for fanbois only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had the original iPad. It needed a wireless card reader to be useful without constant payments to the Apple Store. With the wireless card reader you could read PDFs or watch ripped movies on external drives. Without it, you have to go through the Apple Store for everything. Apple decided not to support the iPad and plugins in the Apple Store are not compatible with it. They just say, "F you, buy new every year or go to hell".

    I'm loving the PC ecosystem with Linux now. I'll never buy an Apple product.

  62. Re: Not with me they don't. Moving away from Apple by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 0

    I just traded in most of my Apple gear - a Mac Pro, Mac Mini, iPad and watch. The downside is they only pay out in Apple giftcards so I'll get my wife a new iPad for Christmas.

    The funny thing is I bought most of this gear for my Job at Apple, mostly because Apple is too cheap to give their engineers dev machines (???). We had 3 iPhones for a team of hundreds. I quit before I got to use the machines actually, too much backstabbing and white collar shadiness goes on there for my tastes.

    You're a liar.

    1. You would have gotten MUCH more for that Apple Gear on eBay. And it would have been CASH. Or are you REALLY that stupid?

    2. So, were you on the iOS Dev. Team, the macOS Dev. Team, or WHAT? You seem to have "needed" a lot of disparate Apple Gear to "do your job". CERTAINLY you wouldn't have needed BOTH a Mac Pro AND a Mac mini for ANY Development Job; so why don't you just QUIT LYING?

    3. Do you want us to SERIOUSLY believe that you had to "Bring your own Tools" at a Company that MAKES COMPUTERS?!? Bullshit.

  63. So what's the problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what's the problem, if people want to keep forking out $$ for their products I have no problem with that. It's their money.

  64. Biased much? by StuartHankins · · Score: 1

    Apple products work for me, saving me time and frustration. They may not work for you. I am primarily interested in their benefits for me, and if I had to pay another 20% I would do it without much thought. YMMV.

    I don't see the reason for all the bitterness that substitutes for real discourse around here. Sure it's funny at times but I really feel more often that I am wasting my time here with a quality of discussion that's on a downward spiral. And that's fucking sad because I've had some really interesting conversations here over the years.

    1. Re:Biased much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This article was floated by short sellers who have WaPo journalists in their rolodex. Don't get too worked up about it.

  65. Re:Here's how they get away with it: lack of compe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sony might be good and they make both phones and tablets.. But that would be an unsure bet (even that Pixel 3 is like, 3 years support from launch date?)

    I would try Ubuntu Studio to do media work, it would probably suck but well. Still probably a better computer than phone with Lineage OS + F-Droid.
    I know there's Da vinci resolve as freeware video editor and kdenlive as Free software. BUT I would just do some stuff, as a beginner and ignoring that other software on other OSes exist. But I know it's doable. All I can say is I tried handbrake and it worked first time lol.

  66. THERE WILL BE CONSEQUENCES NAZI FAGGOT KEN DOLL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    THERE WILL BE CONSEQUENCES FOR YOUR LIES NAZI FAGGOT KEN DOLL

    Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING. Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.

  67. I know by SuperKendall · · Score: 0

    Step forward to WHAT???? My iphone SE (64gb, used $160) runs the same ios as iphone x.

    I am an iOS developer - so I have (and have used) most previous iPhones. You do not even own an iPhone X to compare day to day...

    So I can say with absolute confidence the iPhone X is a big step forward, in so many respects....

    There is nothing the iphonex does that warrants that kind of price.

    Face ID alone is worth 2k easy. Especially in winter.

    You are deluding yourself.

    Or.... maybe it is you, who claims a $160 much older phone is "the same" as a newer model device with greatly improved speed, screen, and authentication tech, that suffers from a delusion. It's like you are claiming your Sopwith Camel is just as good as any modern jet because you can see the city from above.

    It's great you like your old phone. My wife for example is perfectly happy with her iPhone 6 and has no plans to upgrade for a few more years still. Use your old phone for as long as you can, and be happy in that life...

    But let's not pretend there is not sometimes massive value to be had in newer technology. FaceID especially was a huge leap forward, vastly better in every regard than TouchID or any fingerprint based tech. Like I said, $2k feature all by itself, never mind the other improvements the iPhone X has. And also like I said, I have no desire for this years models - that is how I can tell it was a real step, because the iterations after feel again just like slight improvements where I can wait for some cycles before an upgrade.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:I know by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      I should have looked at the username before responding...you are an insufferable fool.

      --
      Good-bye
  68. Re:You know you can....not buy their products, rig by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 2

    You know Zombie Steve isn't holding a gun to your heads, right? You are perfectly free to buy an Android phone - even if it comes with a notch and costs just as much as an iPhone XR.

    Or even if it's perfectly usable, notch-less, has a headphone jack and removable battery, and costs $100 - $200.

  69. NAZI FAGGOT KEN DOLL THERE WILL BE CONSEQUENCES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    THERE WILL BE CONSEQUENCES FOR YOUR LIES NAZI FAGGOT KEN DOLL FOR YOUR ENTIRE FAMILY BITCH

    Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING. Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.

  70. Re:mac pro 2020 (late 2019) needs to be $2999 max by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the new Mac Mini might be an indication of where they're going to. An improvement, but not cheap, cheaper than an imac pro.
    Could have "Vega Pro 20"/"Vega Pro 16" as starting vid card (this "only" has 4GB) but I wonder if it'd be some proprietary module again.
    Might have only four RAM slots like the iMac Pro.
    Internal storage? Nope, maybe some silly external PCIe thing like sidecars on Ti-99/4A

  71. Re:Here's how they get away with it: lack of compe by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

    I was a happy Android user for 7+ years. But to reliably get OS updates and upgrades, and not have to put up with a botched Android UI and bloatware, that meant buying a Nexus phone and tablet. Which I did, every 2 years or so.

    But then Google decided to give up on Android tablets entirely, and give up on mid-price phones. They jacked up their prices, and a Pixel 3 now starts at $799. Well, guess what, that's the same price as an iPhone XR. And Google's last Android tablet offering before they gave up was actually more expensive than an iPad. So I switched.

    With computers, nobody else is even offering a good Unix-based computer. Linux isn't competitive -- I use it for work, but sound and video are still a dumpster fire and don't count on hibernation working as well as a Mac either. If I didn't need to edit 4K video and work on music, I'd probably buy a ChromeBook, and sales of ChromeBooks seem to suggest that indeed there's an underserved market there.

    Basically, nobody is putting in the time and money to clean up Linux (or BSD) and offer systems where sound and video editing, hibernation, and all the other basic functionality of a Mac is right there and just works. If you want that, you either have to put up with Windows and its myriad deficiencies, or you have to buy a Mac.

    I'm a little surprised that nobody's deliberately setting out to build laptops that have exactly the same hardware as a Mac and are perfectly suited to hackintosh use. Give me a laptop with a proper keyboard and hardware that all worked properly with macOS and I'd be very tempted.

    And this is the bottom line.

  72. The 1st Amendment by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    Our right to practice religion allows cults like Apple to legally operate.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  73. Pricing Power! by BishopBerkeley · · Score: 1

    The article and just about everyone in the comments here seem to miss the economic point: pricing power. Apple is not the only one exercising its pricing power. When the new mini was introduced, I searched to find Windows machines with the same form factor and power, and the closest things to the mini, the Asus mini PCs, are about the same price. The same goes for Dell and HP laptops. The giants are exercising their pricing power. And, they need to do so in order to deliver higher profits with lower sales. As the article shows, people are waiting longer to upgrade their phones. The article is misleading in one regard. Apple's products tend to be cutting edge in their first generation. Comparing these prices to the prices of the average device achieves nothing. The more meaningful comparison is with devices in the same class. Clearly, prices for Samsung's and Google's flagship phones are keeping pace with Apple's because of, yes, pricing power. There isn't enough competition at the top.

    --
    "...who search the reason of things
    Are those who bring the most sorrow on themselves." --Euripides, The Medea
  74. Here's How They Get Away With It. by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 1

    1: They make a new version of a product.
    2: They price that new product higher than the one from last year.
    3: Enough people buy the new one at the higher price that they make a profit.
    THEY GOT AWAY WITH IT!!!

    --
    0 1 - just my two bits
  75. Re:Apple charges more to solve problems they creat by fluffernutter · · Score: 0

    That's just because it was a shitty fingerprint reader.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  76. Slashdot is full of Apple Shills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the only site I've seen with so many paid Apple shills. I guess this the only way this irrelevant site gets traffic these days.

    1. Re:Slashdot is full of Apple Shills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you're just an out of touch old boomer who is too dumb to realize his Google phone is spying on him.

    2. Re:Slashdot is full of Apple Shills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the only site I've seen with so many paid Apple shills. I guess this the only way this irrelevant site gets traffic these days.

      No, they pay for the privilege of being an Apple shill.

  77. Mixed bag of truths here by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    You only have to spend a little time perusing the web forums designed for Mac enthusiasts (macrumors, etc.) to see that plenty of "Mac faithful" users are getting irritated with the high prices and lack of really innovative changes coming from Apple in recent years.

    Of course, the problem is -- choosing to use a computer, or entire "ecosystem" of devices that aren't part of the "Microsoft Windows world" meant a pretty big investment. You have all the software products you've grown familiar with and have data saved in their, sometimes proprietary, formats. You have the prospect of buying some of that over again if you switch back to another OS platform. You also have the headaches that come with trying to resell all of the Apple gear that you're getting rid of.

    So it's not really so shocking that people already invested in Macs will grudgingly put up with things like $700 for a new Mac Mini that used to cost more like $400, or even the prospect of having to shell out over $3,000 for the high-end Macbook Pro 15" with the new Vega video chipset in it.

    If your home is already automated with a bunch of control devices that use Apple HomeKit, and you use Apple Airplay to stream music to speakers around your place, and you have a lot of purchased movie or video content in iTunes that you watch directly off an AppleTV set top box? It's better to upgrade that one machine that needs it, even at these inflated prices, than to tear it all out and start over from ground zero!

    Even in our workplace, almost all of the creative professionals and sales staff are using Mac laptops. We really disliked the value proposition of going with new Macbook Pro 13" laptops instead of the good old Macbook Airs that we'd issued as kind of a standard since back in 2011-2012. But what can you do? In the big picture, these folks work on client projects that are often $1 million each. If they feel like they do better work on a $2,700 Mac than on a $1500 Microsoft Surface Pro - you buy them the Mac. In some cases, one of these people can use their computer to do something in one DAY that more than justifies the entire cost of the machine.

    I've been using Macs since 1999 or 2000 consistently, over here. And it's obvious to me that the company just isn't the same, post Steve Jobs. But then, Apple was his baby. He clearly felt it more important to him than even his own family. You can't just appoint somebody as the new CEO and expect they have the same passion for it. It'll be the same situation if Elon Musk dies and they pick some outside guy from another auto-maker to run Tesla.....

    What Apple does have is a pretty nice foundation for its products, between using the iOS platform or the Mac OS X platform. It also has enough of a presence in the smartphone market that it will probably always own a significant chunk of it, barring some utter and complete screw-up. If they price things so high that sales decline more than the price increases net them, they'll make adjustments. But I think they're definitely trying to see how much margin they can add before that happens.

  78. this started with the piece of shit touchbar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a Macbook Pro. I like it a lot, but the touchbar was the first piece of unwanted tech Apple forced on us as an excuse to crank the price. I have never used the touchbar anything. Actually, I have. When the external monitor would cause MacOS to crash and I had to open it and the touchbar would be stuck in multimonitor mode, i would have to tap it before rebooting. They finally fixed that bug in the last update, but for a while there I was reboot 1-2 times a day. If I can't run my PyTorch models on CreateML with GPU acceleration on the Radeon GPU by the time it's time to upgrade, I'm going to switch to Linux with a stack of Nvidia GPUs. Tim Cook is really pushing his luck with this shit. Now that Redhat is owned by IBM, and Ubuntu is spyware akin to Google, I'm not looking forward to using Linux these days, but if Apple keeps overcharging for buggy shit, it'll be the only option.

  79. Fair to me by jf_moreira · · Score: 2

    I simply think that Apple admirers deserve the price they pay for ridiculously expensive hardware that, for Apple, is costing less and less. People who buy Apple products are either stupid or looking for design and status.

  80. Value proposition? by Pascoea · · Score: 2

    It felt as though the value proposition that has made Apple products no-brainers might unravel

    I can't tell, was this written tongue-in-cheek? When was the Apple choice a "no-brainer"?

  81. Not good enough for SJW. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Something must be done because people can't make their own decisions regarding their lives or their property!

  82. THERE WILL BE CONSEQUENCES NAZI FAGGOT KEN DOLL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    THERE WILL BE CONSEQUENCES FOR YOUR LIES RETARDED INCEL NAZI FAGGOT KEN DOLL

    Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING. Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.

  83. Cost of a trade war by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

    While helping a friend buy a Kindle I noticed those prices went up 30% this fall too... in the US. I think there was something about a trade war with China?

  84. THERE WILL BE CONSEQUENCES FOR YOUR LIES NAZI FAG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    THERE WILL BE CONSEQUENCES FOR YOUR LIES NAZI FAGGOT KEN DOLL

    Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING. Filter error!

  85. THERE WILL BE CONSEQUENCES FOR YOUR LIES KEN DOLL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    THERE WILL BE CONSEQUENCES FOR YOUR LIES RETARDED INCEL NAZI FAGGOT KEN DOLL

    Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING. Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING

  86. Here's how they get away with it: by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

    People keep buying them.

  87. Elitist Pricing by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 1

    Demanding top tier prices for your goods works well for a while, but it doesn't last forever. Especially if you have a market full of cheaper competition.

    The best example I can think of off the top of my head would be Silicon Graphics.

    They used to be the top dog of the CGI hardware world.
    Eventually, everyone dropped them like a bad habit due to the availability of much lower priced hardware.

    Apple should probably enjoy the market while they can because it will eventually reach a point where their prices will actually start forcing folks to look at alternatives.

  88. Movie popcorn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can say the same thing about movie popcorn. People are still willing to pay the price. So why not keep the prices high.

  89. Troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple is teh Gay.

  90. No root by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Simply disable and/or uninstall all the apps that arent used including Google's. Fuck Google . Other than gmail and voice and play services framework....all that other shit is turned off. Fuck location...that stays off too unless needed. Then go to F-Droid and install FOSS replacements. Then your low end 1GB RAM and 8GB Storage el cheapo phone will run like a fucking flagship....fuck Google. And Apple too.

    1. Re:No root by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, and install a noroot firewall/vpn that blocks internet access to apps and shit you want sandboxed. Fuck them too. And revoke app permissions.

      You can certainly minimize Google on android. It just takes a little knowhow.

      And fuck that Google Assistant also. Off.

  91. Re:Apple charges more to solve problems they creat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple: The cause of, and solution to, all of Apple user's problems.

  92. Re: Not with me they don't. Moving away from Appl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Modded down. Nice. I'm glad slashdot doesn't believe this faggot shill.

    And since he's complaining about ACs all the time. He will realize that only accounts can mod. So actual logged in users are modding his lies down.

    Now, nobody believes anything you say. You get modded down every single day you shill for Apple.

    How does it feel to love Apple so much, but you HAVE to work with Microsoft because Apple doesn't provide you with the tools you need? Must suck to cheerlead for a company you can't even find work for.

    So fucking sad watching you decline more and more each day.

  93. Re: Not with me they don't. Moving away from Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple shill comparing 200$ chrome books to $3000 MacBooks and says MacBooks are better.
    Go figure.

  94. Re: Apple charges more to solve problems they crea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Never had any of these issues. If your hands are wet it won't work. Makes perfect sense.

    I'm not staring at a screen to unlock it. Fuck off.

  95. Need to buy 2 Macs to get the required ROM by tepples · · Score: 1

    However, were I to try to run Lode Runner from a Mac Classic onto a modern Macbook Air, it wouldn't work.

    You'd be incorrect as you can run that Lode Runner on a modern Macbook Air

    ...using the Mini vMac emulator. But as I understand the CopyRoms procedure, lawful use of Mini vMac requires buying two old Macintosh computers in addition to the MacBook Air: a Macintosh Plus to write the internal ROM to a file on an 800K floppy disk and another Mac with an Ethernet port and a floppy drive that can read 800K disks.

    Another emulator that runs Mac software using a reimplemented ROM is Executor, but I don't know whether it builds or runs on recent macOS.

  96. Can't cross-test for responsiveness by tepples · · Score: 1

    The only people who care that someone has an Apple product seems to be those who use Android.

    And software developers that need to support end users who use macOS or iOS. Even if you can cross-compile using your GNU/Linux PC, it's a bit harder to cross-test. Even if you can afford to rent remote access to someone else's Mac or iPhone, remote access distorts the results of interactive responsiveness testing.

  97. Re: Not with me they don't. Moving away from Appl by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

    And since he's complaining about ACs all the time. He will realize that only accounts can mod. So actual logged in users are modding his lies down.

    I NEVER said those ACs weren't actually Logged-In USERS. They just "Post Anonymously" when they want to DEFAME someone, and then turn around and MOD under their LOGIN.

  98. What's needed for switching by Solandri · · Score: 1

    Is the ability to use the apps you bought on any supported platform, regardless of whether you bought it on iOS or Android. Adobe does this for Mac/PC - if you buy a copy of Photoshop, you're allowed to use both the PC and Mac versions (they also let you install two copies - one on a desktop, one on a laptop).

    The argument of everyone selling copyrighted stuff is that you're buying a license, not a product. Time for them to put their money where their mouth is and let you use that license on a different platform if you decide to switch.

  99. Re:It's True by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do you like the touchpad on the Galago?

  100. No one ever accused Apple users of intelligence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And I won't do so now.

  101. Re:You know you can....not buy their products, rig by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

    Or even if it's perfectly usable, notch-less, has a headphone jack and removable battery, and costs $100 - $200.

    .... and is total shit, and receives zero support.

  102. Re:Here's how they get away with it: lack of compe by quenda · · Score: 1

    to reliably get OS updates and upgrades, and not have to put up with a botched Android UI and bloatware, that meant buying a Nexus phone and tablet. ... But then Google decided to give up on mid-price phones. They jacked up their prices, and a Pixel 3 now starts at $799.

    True, but you have missed what replaced the Nexus. Google is using the same strategy as Microsoft in selling high-end aspirational hardware, while assisting other companies to provide cheaper versions.
    For cheaper "non-botched UI", you should now be looking at the Android One program, and HMD Golbal ("Nokia") phones. before that, Lenovo/Motorola were doing excellent mid-range handsets, without bloating or "botching" the UI like Samsung.

    https://www.android.com/one/

  103. Don't upgrade so often? by antdude · · Score: 1

    Others and I are still using stuff like iPhones (4S and 6+), MacBook Pros from 2012 and 2008, etc. I still use my decade old PCs.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  104. Re:Apple charges more to solve problems they creat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    True but only after apple ignores the problem, then denies the problem and after a class action suit is brought against them; THEN there is a solution.

  105. Give up on mid price phones? by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    I've got a $250 lg phone that's just fine. Does everything but play Fortnite (and I can't imagine wanting to play a game like that on my phone). There are $400 Motorolas with user serviceable parts and super fast processors. There's tons of mid range options. Heck, I don't know why anyone would buy the $800 google phone. My coworker's got one and their kinda meh. Near as I can tell You buy it to buy it. Either because you want to own the "cutting edge" or you want folks to think you do.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  106. Re: It's True by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try the $200ish 4GB, 64GB 11.6 Asus models for a lightweight low cost model. There are usually $3-$400 version in 1080p (or $2**ish from the "bad" China models) if you really need it on the go vs a generic $50 everything usb3 dock too. A little pokey during IO due to the low end emc, but a damn fine representation of the category. Asus. Yup.

  107. value is in the eye of the client by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Appli IIE was selling for 800$, with no graphics hardware to speak of, while Atari 800 sold for a third, with superior hardware for everything.
    So, this is not new. Apple give customers something they want. Just because whoever wrote this piece can't identify that something, does not mean it is not there.
    (that Apple II was the last hardware I bought from them, ever)

  108. Re: Here's how they get away with it: lack of comp by metamatic · · Score: 1

    Android One wasnâ(TM)t around in the US until last year, and then only via Project Fi. Iâ(TM)d given up and switched by then. And Google still donâ(TM)t have anything like Android One for tablets.

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  109. Re: Here's how they get away with it: lack of comp by quenda · · Score: 1

    Android One wasnâ(TM)t around in the US until last year,

    That's why I said "before that, Lenovo/Motorola were doing excellent mid-range handsets, without bloating".

  110. Re: Here's how they get away with it: lack of comp by metamatic · · Score: 1

    Motorola's handset update track record was spotty — my wife had one. Lenovo didn't sell their handsets in the US, or I'd have bought one, as I get discounts on Lenovo hardware.

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  111. Re: You know you can....not buy their products, ri by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

    Nope, and I haven't needed any support.

  112. This is not new. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In 2015 Timmy Cook put the prices up twice in Australia because the US dollar was strong against other currencies. The 15 inch MacBook Pro went up 300 dollars in March 2015 then another 300 dollars in September 2015. That machine went from $2500 to $3100 in 6 months. Then the 2016 touchbar model comes out in October 2016 and it is $3600 dollars. So in just over a year and a half or 19 months that 15 inch notebook went up $1100 dollars. They should be ashamed of themselves at Apple. Saying this kind of pricing increase was justified because they put an OLED touchbar in a laptop is disgusting. The goodwill of Apple to bring out something new that is better but cheaper died in 2015.

  113. Re:You know you can....not buy their products, rig by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    Or even if it's perfectly usable, notch-less, has a headphone jack and removable battery, and costs $100 - $200.

    Congrats on getting the point - buy whatever it is you want at whatever price you're willing to pay. But - no one cares about removable batteries. Even the people who say they care, don't care. Removable batteries are small and easy to lose - so you'd use a case with a built in battery back up instead. Or an external power brick. Both options will give you 24/7 uptime on a cell phone, for those who absolutely-cannot-be-without-service-for-one-minute.

  114. The Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want an overpriced product to become less expensive, it's quite simple; you and a few hundred thousand friends STOP BUYING IT! There, the problem is self correcting.

    Have a nice Day.