But where will he get the sword to smite the enemy and pose for a good 10 seconds? And we must decide for who to be the nameless bald government guy who gives critical information of a meaningless nature. Oh, and we can't forget to put pieces of seemingly unrelated stuff in certian places, so Seagal can come to an astounding 'eureka' after precisely 11.375 seconds!
Well, you should see some of those cars they are pumping out nowadays... And once you get a soccer mom with a cell phone in it, well, humanity better watch out!
But who chooses which acorn is which? I suggest we get a group of 12 people to deliberate about if for several days, and then, only after they choose, is the squirle let out to get one, upon which they imediately proclaim which was which.
Actually, the older ones took a longer time to crash. Take my win98 box in a '99 emachine for example. Nowadays it will first Bsod on startup, hit space, it goes away. Then it will bsod again a couple times when the ram starts getting full. Auto -close fuction for the background programs I call it. Then, it will start to get sluggish, the cpu light will start going full tilt, till she either stops, or inexplicibly restarts.
Now If I had a new machine, it would crash a lot faster, and I would get less work done.
No, actually we are all on daylight savings time, the whole friggen year. They want to add a super-double-secret-probation-bonus savings time to it, but that would be stupid.
Well, electrolysis isn't cheap. Why do you think we recycle alumnium? There is probably some other mechanism that they use that is just a few dollars cheaper. Any chem majors who are further along want to back me up or squash me like the petty bug I am?
Yes, but there is a critical point at which the rate of unused genes stops disappearing rapidly, and they for all intents and purposes, exist forever. It's not like humans are single celled organisms, where the existence or lack there of, of a couple non functioning genes might make or break the survival chances of itself. Also, there is also some slight proof that genes do function better when there is some separation between functioning, and non-functioning base pairs. In my opinion it's in the benefit of humans to have unused genes, as over time, mutations in them may spring beneficial genes. Lastly, I have a question for you. What evolutionary purpose would disappearing genes serve? The benefits seem so minuscule to me.
By your comment I can see that you have never been up here where it actually gets cold and snows then. Some pine trees can carry nearly twice their weight in snow. And what the hell are you talking about hardwood trees getting the sap out of the trunk? If the trees did that, they'd die. Sap doesn't freeze until it gets really cold, and even then, when trees to crack, it's usually nothing major.
So please shut up and stop talking out of your ass.
Believe me when I say dial-up users being infected do not cause any problems. You could take 40 dial-up'ers DDOSing the same site for 24/7, and it would be equivilant to having a single cable line doing the same, except that the people on dial-up would be much more likely to fix it, as they would instantly notice that something was wrong.
Here, let me sell you my pattented 'smallest hash file generator in the world!!!!' With any input, it produces a one digit binary hash. Completely flawless. Have +110% security!!! Just send some money to my bank acound in nigeria and I will send you money!!!!
Not necessarily. Even small hashes can be made unpredictable.
What if one got the hex value for each character in decimal, and when computing the hex, used the h value twice, the l value 4 and 2 times, the o value once and half of the e value, (basically multiplied by a function depending on where the initial value was located) and then, when computing the final hex, used these numbers more than once in the calculation.
Doing this, and getting the results from modular division, the number in the hundredths placeholder of the original value over the total value...
There are lots of methods to create a seemingly random but predictable string from an input, and even with low-level hashes, its completely unpredictable. Even if one tried to use a small enough input value for the computation, a good hash sum generator would have compensations for this, ie, the total string value is changed to 10^(e+1) - x.yz...*10^e then the result is multiplied by the an original hash value.
If you don't think I am making any sense, look at this example. I am making a hash value of two different inputs, one is '100' (a) and the other is '101' (b) Method: [10^(e+1) - x.yz...*10^e]*[(ones placeholder +3)-(hundreds placeholder*45) modular divided by 34)] Then the result is modular divided by 104.5. If the result is negative, it is converted to a positive value. Then, the value is doubled string-wise, ie xy --> xyxy and is put to the power of (x+y+sum of original char's*.1). Then it is rounded to the nearest one.
a) [1000-100] * (3-135)/34]/104.5
hash = (900 * -30)/104.5
hash = 39(39)^(12.1)
hash = 3.1927900973916559543780941642248*10^43 (calc won't go any further)
And that was just a simple hash, that I created off the top of my head. Defiantly longer than the input value, and one could probably just modular divide to 32 decimals for convenience. Now imagine what a person who actually makes hash algorithms could do. (This is only my second ever pseudo-hash.)
Slashdot Mirror
But where will he get the sword to smite the enemy and pose for a good 10 seconds? And we must decide for who to be the nameless bald government guy who gives critical information of a meaningless nature. Oh, and we can't forget to put pieces of seemingly unrelated stuff in certian places, so Seagal can come to an astounding 'eureka' after precisely 11.375 seconds!
Well, you should see some of those cars they are pumping out nowadays... And once you get a soccer mom with a cell phone in it, well, humanity better watch out!
But who chooses which acorn is which? I suggest we get a group of 12 people to deliberate about if for several days, and then, only after they choose, is the squirle let out to get one, upon which they imediately proclaim which was which.
But can you imagine how friggen long decompression would take?
Actually, the older ones took a longer time to crash. Take my win98 box in a '99 emachine for example. Nowadays it will first Bsod on startup, hit space, it goes away. Then it will bsod again a couple times when the ram starts getting full. Auto -close fuction for the background programs I call it. Then, it will start to get sluggish, the cpu light will start going full tilt, till she either stops, or inexplicibly restarts.
Now If I had a new machine, it would crash a lot faster, and I would get less work done.
No, actually we are all on daylight savings time, the whole friggen year. They want to add a super-double-secret-probation-bonus savings time to it, but that would be stupid.
Well, electrolysis isn't cheap. Why do you think we recycle alumnium? There is probably some other mechanism that they use that is just a few dollars cheaper. Any chem majors who are further along want to back me up or squash me like the petty bug I am?
Back in my day, we didn't even have buttons. We had to move the cursonr, and *wait*!
Please stop trolling, thank you.
What if the suspect was slouching?
Yes, but there is a critical point at which the rate of unused genes stops disappearing rapidly, and they for all intents and purposes, exist forever. It's not like humans are single celled organisms, where the existence or lack there of, of a couple non functioning genes might make or break the survival chances of itself. Also, there is also some slight proof that genes do function better when there is some separation between functioning, and non-functioning base pairs. In my opinion it's in the benefit of humans to have unused genes, as over time, mutations in them may spring beneficial genes. Lastly, I have a question for you. What evolutionary purpose would disappearing genes serve? The benefits seem so minuscule to me.
That there appendix, how's she going?
Unused genes disappear. That's only true for the more simple organisms, mind you. An intestinal parisite is by no means very simple.
By your comment I can see that you have never been up here where it actually gets cold and snows then. Some pine trees can carry nearly twice their weight in snow. And what the hell are you talking about hardwood trees getting the sap out of the trunk? If the trees did that, they'd die. Sap doesn't freeze until it gets really cold, and even then, when trees to crack, it's usually nothing major.
So please shut up and stop talking out of your ass.
Ahh, but what do most people think?
Well, they just don't put much effort at trying to convince anyone that they are...
Er... not to bust your bubble or anything, but that would be E^2 = m^2c^4 + (MV)^2c^2
Believe me when I say dial-up users being infected do not cause any problems. You could take 40 dial-up'ers DDOSing the same site for 24/7, and it would be equivilant to having a single cable line doing the same, except that the people on dial-up would be much more likely to fix it, as they would instantly notice that something was wrong.
Here, let me sell you my pattented 'smallest hash file generator in the world!!!!' With any input, it produces a one digit binary hash. Completely flawless. Have +110% security!!! Just send some money to my bank acound in nigeria and I will send you money!!!!
Not necessarily. Even small hashes can be made unpredictable.
What if one got the hex value for each character in decimal, and when computing the hex, used the h value twice, the l value 4 and 2 times, the o value once and half of the e value, (basically multiplied by a function depending on where the initial value was located) and then, when computing the final hex, used these numbers more than once in the calculation.
Doing this, and getting the results from modular division, the number in the hundredths placeholder of the original value over the total value...
There are lots of methods to create a seemingly random but predictable string from an input, and even with low-level hashes, its completely unpredictable. Even if one tried to use a small enough input value for the computation, a good hash sum generator would have compensations for this, ie, the total string value is changed to 10^(e+1) - x.yz...*10^e then the result is multiplied by the an original hash value.
If you don't think I am making any sense, look at this example. I am making a hash value of two different inputs, one is '100' (a) and the other is '101' (b)
Method: [10^(e+1) - x.yz...*10^e]*[(ones placeholder +3)-(hundreds placeholder*45) modular divided by 34)] Then the result is modular divided by 104.5. If the result is negative, it is converted to a positive value. Then, the value is doubled string-wise, ie xy --> xyxy and is put to the power of (x+y+sum of original char's*.1). Then it is rounded to the nearest one.
a) [1000-100] * (3-135)/34]/104.5
hash = (900 * -30)/104.5
hash = 39(39)^(12.1)
hash = 3.1927900973916559543780941642248*10^43 (calc won't go any further)
b) [1000-101] * (4-134)/34]/104.5
hash = (899 * -28)/104.5
hash = 92(92)^(11.2)
hash = 2.7721903833553211943079134140892*10^44 (ditto)
And that was just a simple hash, that I created off the top of my head. Defiantly longer than the input value, and one could probably just modular divide to 32 decimals for convenience. Now imagine what a person who actually makes hash algorithms could do. (This is only my second ever pseudo-hash.)
Well, that is arguable... It does cause other protiens to fold over when it comes into contact with them, no?
Can I intrest you in some H492? *Non-Refundable*
If I could, I'd mod you up out of sheer spite.
Bah. I'm sure we could just get a H+ ion floating around He and call it a molecule, couldn't we? ;)
It's either that, or there patenting the idea of self teaching. Now there's the dangerous idea...