Old earth creationists are a much larger group. They accept that the earth has been around a long time and when dinosaurs existed. They accept heliocentrism
Even the Catholic Church accepts that, and it has for hundreds of years. What are you talking about?
After all, there are passages in Genesis that make reference to God setting up the pillars that support the four corners of the earth.
No, there aren't. However, in Isaiah and Ezekiel, there are references to "the corners" and "the four corners of the land", which refers to being scattered to the farthest reaches of the known world. Job also mentions the pillars of the earth. But that's in the KJV and the word translated "pillar" means something that supports a structure; so unless you want to argue the Earth is hollow, that is a reasonable interpretation.
Logically, that only makes sense if you can point out where it says they had no other children. Your argument is similar to a witness to a robbery describing the perp as wearing jeans and a blue T-shirt, and the news subsequently reporting that he wore no shoes.
Cain was marked so that no would kill him. But since he was driven away, who would kill him? Obviously there are people outside of Adam and Eves family...actually it's obviously an allegory.
That would be the simple answer, but it's more because carbon dating assumes that the ratio of carbon isotopes in the atmosphere remained constant. But reading up on someone's arguments isn't as much fun as ridiculing them.
I thought that "Darwinism" was a term thought up by the religious anti-evolution side.
No, it was first used by Thomas Henry Huxley in 1860.
Darwin, of course, studied theology at Cambridge University. He was also a depressive, presumably because of how stupid (and stubbornly-so) most people were. I think he would be depressed today. Especially if he saw the creationism museum.
I don't mind the 747 "cattle car" so much as the vile 737 "chicken coop". Six abreast, one aisle, and no additional overhead space. I would rather travel across the country on a Greyhound; at least there is more legroom.
He shouldn't complain. I had this happen to me, but suddenly they "fixed the glitch", so I stopped getting my paycheck. They also had the audacity to take my Swingline stapler, which is superior to the Bostich and with which I had used Swingline brand staples purchased out of my own pocket to maintain compatibility. Unfortunately, I had no recourse but to set the building on fire.
To use the climate change lobby's methodology, it must have been J. S. Bach's offspring that caused the increase. He was really cranking them out at that time!
I ran OS/2 at that time, as I didn't like recompiling my kernel every time I added hardware and I also liked being able to run DOS and Windows programs. Linux 1.x was really just for tinkering.
I do, too. Maybe once churches stop accepting exemptions, the government will stop trying to tell congregations what they can say and do in both the churches and in the community. Naahhh...
It sounds like you got cheap MLCs instead of SLCs, so you're actually accessing two blocks at once every time you have to write. Your anecdotal evidence is merely proof that some SSDs really stink.
On Windows land, MS is stuck with NTFS emulating MS-DOS junk (8.3 OS parts etc.) so it is beyond hopeless.
FAT requirements are a subset of NTFS requirements. Also, with the use of 16-bit programs becoming obsolete on 64-bit Windows, they are not "stuck" with "MS-DOS junk". I don't even understand how NTFS is even relevant to the rest of your post. I suppose you were just flexing your Mac zealotry.
Slashdot Mirror
Even the Catholic Church accepts that, and it has for hundreds of years. What are you talking about?
I forgot to answer this; it is because it is still mentioned in the NT (Paul's letters) as such.
No, there aren't. However, in Isaiah and Ezekiel, there are references to "the corners" and "the four corners of the land", which refers to being scattered to the farthest reaches of the known world. Job also mentions the pillars of the earth. But that's in the KJV and the word translated "pillar" means something that supports a structure; so unless you want to argue the Earth is hollow, that is a reasonable interpretation.
Logically, that only makes sense if you can point out where it says they had no other children. Your argument is similar to a witness to a robbery describing the perp as wearing jeans and a blue T-shirt, and the news subsequently reporting that he wore no shoes.
Actually, your logic needs work.
That would be the simple answer, but it's more because carbon dating assumes that the ratio of carbon isotopes in the atmosphere remained constant. But reading up on someone's arguments isn't as much fun as ridiculing them.
No, it was first used by Thomas Henry Huxley in 1860.
Or your inflammatory post.
I don't mind the 747 "cattle car" so much as the vile 737 "chicken coop". Six abreast, one aisle, and no additional overhead space. I would rather travel across the country on a Greyhound; at least there is more legroom.
Wow, what you said made very little sense. Why give away the key to the real data when you can give away the key to the fake? Either is very easy.
He shouldn't complain. I had this happen to me, but suddenly they "fixed the glitch", so I stopped getting my paycheck. They also had the audacity to take my Swingline stapler, which is superior to the Bostich and with which I had used Swingline brand staples purchased out of my own pocket to maintain compatibility. Unfortunately, I had no recourse but to set the building on fire.
Unfortunately, many thieves are bloodthirsty morons who kill the clerk anyway.
If you hide the encrypted partition (and especially, create a second, unencrypted partition if the OS is encrypted), you have plausible deniability.
To use the climate change lobby's methodology, it must have been J. S. Bach's offspring that caused the increase. He was really cranking them out at that time!
Kinda like a crooked judge presiding at his own trial, isn't it?
One degree is staggering? Oh, BTW: that one degree was already erased in the time span from 1998-2008.
By using the fake word "denialist" in your response, you proved his point. Pathetic.
I wouldn't dare to fire a "machine gun" that cost only $10.
I ran OS/2 at that time, as I didn't like recompiling my kernel every time I added hardware and I also liked being able to run DOS and Windows programs. Linux 1.x was really just for tinkering.
I do, too. Maybe once churches stop accepting exemptions, the government will stop trying to tell congregations what they can say and do in both the churches and in the community. Naahhh...
Really? You mean police only arrest people if they're at the crime scene?
Red herring. I don't want anyone touching me without just cause because of my right to personal liberty.
Well, the IIe came out after the C64, had greatly inferior sound, and was more expensive.
It sounds like you got cheap MLCs instead of SLCs, so you're actually accessing two blocks at once every time you have to write. Your anecdotal evidence is merely proof that some SSDs really stink.
FAT requirements are a subset of NTFS requirements. Also, with the use of 16-bit programs becoming obsolete on 64-bit Windows, they are not "stuck" with "MS-DOS junk". I don't even understand how NTFS is even relevant to the rest of your post. I suppose you were just flexing your Mac zealotry.
Hard disks already do this, FWIW.
FTFY
I tried circle-strafing with the fire extinguisher and it didn't work very well.