They should use the Creative Commons Zero copyright waiver, as it is designed for releasing copyright without regard to specific jurisdiction.
The full legal text of the license (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode) contains both a copyright waiver and a fully-permissive license. This way, in case the copyright waiver is found legally unenforceable or invalid, the fully-permissive license kicks in and protects the Affirmer (person who applied the license to the work) and licensee (person using the work). (It protects the Affirmer by ensuring the work stays in the public domain (his successors can't have all rights to the work restored, as has happened in several cases before), and it protects the licensee from the same potential problem.
I have to disagree. I'm able to put together musical ideas very quickly using LilyPond and a text editor. It's way faster for me to use the text editor than it is to use a GUI-based entry system.
As for publishing, I agree; LilyPond is excellent. However, I think most publishers use SCORE for publishing.
If a threatening company buys out the main devs for a project. the community can always maintain and actively develop a fork under the GPL or other free software license. It worked for LibreOffice.
Installed Arch in 2011 at an installfest. Wiped the preinstalled Windows 7 partition a few months later. Never looked back.
Linux does everything I need it to do, and it's so damn flexible and customizable. Not to mention FAST. Boot and shutdown times are 1/3 of what they were on Windows.
Installed Lubuntu on the family computer. No one has any complaints about it. It does lag sometimes, but that's the fault of the shitty P4 it's running on.
So what exactly is gonna differentiate this from a mid-level to high-end gaming rig? And does it run Linux (and will Linux not be snatched away as if it's their right to tell us what we can use our own hardware for)?
The US $2 bill would become a LOT more popular than it is now. Many people still mistakenly think they're collectible.
Plus, we could consider printing our banknotes on polymers instead of paper. Polymer banknotes last longer than paper banknotes, which would mean less printing.
> Food can't (yet...) be DRMed, so no ink cartridge refill schemes. https://news.nationalgeographi...
They should use the Creative Commons Zero copyright waiver, as it is designed for releasing copyright without regard to specific jurisdiction. The full legal text of the license (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode) contains both a copyright waiver and a fully-permissive license. This way, in case the copyright waiver is found legally unenforceable or invalid, the fully-permissive license kicks in and protects the Affirmer (person who applied the license to the work) and licensee (person using the work). (It protects the Affirmer by ensuring the work stays in the public domain (his successors can't have all rights to the work restored, as has happened in several cases before), and it protects the licensee from the same potential problem.
Ah, bad kerning strikes again.
I just can't believe he's getting so defensive and angry about lightbulbs, of all things.
You didn't even read the *summary*, did you? The boxes will support free calls to anywhere in the US.
HTML5 on the other hand, is a bit of a bitch if you want to embed resources in a single file for distribution.
It's not impossible. You can use the data: URI scheme to embed Base64-encoded files. It increases the filesize considerably, though.
http://xkcd.com/810/
I have to disagree. I'm able to put together musical ideas very quickly using LilyPond and a text editor. It's way faster for me to use the text editor than it is to use a GUI-based entry system.
As for publishing, I agree; LilyPond is excellent. However, I think most publishers use SCORE for publishing.
PCMan is the original author of LXDE.
It's time to start playing Indian Love Call.
.tv is the ccTLD for Tuvalu. But they're a small island, so they sell those domains to anyone who wants to build video-related websites.
If a threatening company buys out the main devs for a project. the community can always maintain and actively develop a fork under the GPL or other free software license. It worked for LibreOffice.
Installed Arch in 2011 at an installfest. Wiped the preinstalled Windows 7 partition a few months later. Never looked back.
Linux does everything I need it to do, and it's so damn flexible and customizable. Not to mention FAST. Boot and shutdown times are 1/3 of what they were on Windows.
Installed Lubuntu on the family computer. No one has any complaints about it. It does lag sometimes, but that's the fault of the shitty P4 it's running on.
So what exactly is gonna differentiate this from a mid-level to high-end gaming rig? And does it run Linux (and will Linux not be snatched away as if it's their right to tell us what we can use our own hardware for)?
Normally this would be spam, but the irony of this comment is not lost on me. :-)
Whoooosh...
So you've never herad of Angry Birds...?
Stop hugging me!
I'm thinking Google should just remove any and all links to anything that even just has the movie studios' name on it. Including their own websites.
The US $2 bill would become a LOT more popular than it is now. Many people still mistakenly think they're collectible. Plus, we could consider printing our banknotes on polymers instead of paper. Polymer banknotes last longer than paper banknotes, which would mean less printing.
*whoooosh*
spoken like an anonymous coward.
FTFY.
Well, the US did have selective availability enabled for a while. Perhaps European civilians don't want to be affected by US decisions.
Actually, the altitude might be affecting the Reality Distortion Field...
Agreed! They've got a lot to deal with!