Slashdot Mirror


Is It Time For the US To Ditch the Dollar Bill?

coondoggie writes "It seems well past time that the U.S. ditch its $1 bill — considering such a move could save the country somewhere in the neighborhood of $4 billion. But there is much resistance, or perhaps a lack of real consideration of the issue from most people. Watchdogs at the Government Accountability Office this week testified before a Congressional hearing on the topic, and said dollar coins could save $4.4 billion over 30 years (PDF), or an average of about $146 million per year."

943 comments

  1. I'll be the first to say... by thesameguy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dollar coins at the strip club sounds both dangerous and hilarious.

    1. Re:I'll be the first to say... by tverbeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That will just bump the tips up to higher denominations.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    2. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you think we do in Canada?

    3. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Canada we have dollar and two dollar coins and I can tell you. You wouldn't believe what the strippers can do with coins.. I don't recommend touching the coins afterwards though...

    4. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Russ1642 · · Score: 3, Funny

      They spread em and then you chuck loonies ($1 coins) and if you can get them stuck in the slot they'll give you a poster or something. As much as I like naked women I still can't figure out how they came up with this stupid game.

    5. Re:I'll be the first to say... by toejam13 · · Score: 1

      Most strippers won't even give you the time of day for a dollar anymore. Inflation has made it to where you need at least a two dollar bill or preferably a five dollar bill to get their attention.

    6. Re:I'll be the first to say... by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 0

      What will affect more people is the newly priced $1 cans of soda/pop...

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    7. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dollar coins at the strip club sounds both dangerous and hilarious.

      Windsor, Ontario Canada has a ton of strip clubs that have been doing great business for the last 10-15 years where the dollar bill has been non existent.
      This might have something to do with Colbert proclaiming it to be the worlds rectum however...

    8. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That will just bump the tips up to higher denominations.

      I'd really expect more of a bang for my higher denomination bucks then.

    9. Re:I'll be the first to say... by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What will affect more people is the newly priced $1 cans of soda/pop...

      Sweet!!!

      You mean we'd get an immediate price drop for the usual $1.25+ it costs in the machines nowdays?!?!

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    10. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2 dollar bills?

      When was the last time these strippers had a pay rise?

    11. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Applekid · · Score: 1

      Where do you live that has such sad excuses for strip clubs in it?

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    12. Re:I'll be the first to say... by sexconker · · Score: 1

      What will affect more people is the newly priced $1 cans of soda/pop...

      Sweet!!!

      You mean we'd get an immediate price drop for the usual $1.25+ it costs in the machines nowdays?!?!

      12 ounce cans are typically under a dollar.
      $1.25 gets you a 20 ounce bottle.

      Of course if you're at an amusement park, airport, zoo, whatever, triple all prices.

    13. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Kneo24 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Strippers will coin the phrase, "making it hail".

    14. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They're .25-.50 where I live (Kansas City).

    15. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Genda · · Score: 4, Funny

      So now you can answer that question your Momma always asked... "Go wash you hands,,, do you know where that thing's been!!!?

    16. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      not if the strippers are of the same caliber as they are now.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    17. Re:I'll be the first to say... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      In Canada we have dollar and two dollar coins and I can tell you. You wouldn't believe what the strippers can do with coins.. I don't recommend touching the coins afterwards though...

      Give the girl a Ningi instead of a dollar. Sit back and have fun. :-)

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    18. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 1

      I think the soda machines are probably one of the biggest problems in introducing a dollar coin: It's the only place I even use cash on a regular basis, and most won't get updated to take new coins. (But they can take new bills just fine...)

      Give the vending machine operators $101 for every hundred dollars in dollar coins they accept. Watch as the whole country uses dollar coins overnight.

      --
      'Sensible' is a curse word.
    19. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't find a machine to vend 12 oz cans.

    20. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you missunderstood the term "coinslot"....

    21. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strippers in Canadian strip clubs have a stick with a magnet on the end to pick up their tips at the end of a performance. Seems to work out OK for them.

    22. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give the vending machine operators $101 for every hundred dollars in dollar coins they accept. Watch as all of the dollar coins are withdrawn and then redeposited by vending machines operatory overnight.

      FTFY.

      http://articles.businessinsider.com/2011-07-22/lifestyle/29975853_1_dollar-coins-chase-freedom-credit-card

    23. Re:I'll be the first to say... by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 1

      You can do it like we have in Canada for the last 20 years or so: "Make it hail bee-atch."

    24. Re:I'll be the first to say... by booyoh · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I can't find a machine to vend 12 oz cans.

      There are still around. I have seen quite few of them this week on Auto Repair Shops. I noted that the cheaper the soda can price ( Cheapest was $0.60 USD) the cheaper the quote. Most expensive was $0.90 USD

    25. Re:I'll be the first to say... by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 5, Informative

      That is so much crap. Within a few weeks of dollar coins being out vending machines would be updated. They are a business and need to be able to take your money. Canada converted to $1 coins and then $2 coins, lots of EU countries completely changed their currencies and things kept working etc. The gov might have to give incentives to help particular industries convert initially but over but the long term it will work out.

    26. Re:I'll be the first to say... by ebh · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Most vending machines these days take dollar coins. The reason the vending machine industry wants to keep the dollar bill is that it's a lot easier to get a slug past the coin mech than it is to get a counterfeit $1 past the bill acceptor.

    27. Re:I'll be the first to say... by tverbeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

      From what I've heard, vending machine manufacturers and operators hate dollar bills. Those scanners are easily faked out, but also have a high false-negative rate, get jammed with damaged bills, frustrate customers whose bills aren't new enough, etc. Vendors only started adding them to machines because they didn't want people to have to feed half a dozen (or more) coins into a machine to get a Pepsi.

      A one-time conversion to accept $5 and $1 coins would result in much less hassle for the vending machine folks, because coin-counting devices are fairly difficult to fake out (you can't produce counterfeit metal quarters with a computer and inkjet printer) and much more reliable.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    28. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Boycott+BMG · · Score: 5, Informative

      This might be correct if the dollar coin were a new thing, but dollar coins have been in circulation since the Carter administration. Vending machines that take the Susan B. Anthony dollar should also take the newer Sacagewea dollars and Presidential dollars, because they were manufactured to be electrically compatible. So any vending machine that has been updated since the 80s should accept dollar coins.

    29. Re:I'll be the first to say... by phorm · · Score: 1

      Canada has dollar coins for a long time.
      I have a friend who actually exchanges for US dollar bills for this purpose (waving a wad of ones looks more impressive than a couple of fives). I guess if the U.S. drops dollar bills he'll have to come up with something new.

    30. Re:I'll be the first to say... by MachDelta · · Score: 3, Funny

      How to get a free dental extraction in Canada:

      1) Grab a couple "Loonies" ($1 coins) and some big bills.
      2) Head to the strip club
      3) Get shitfaced. Trust me, you'll need the anesthesia.
      4) Use your lighter to heat the $1 coin until you can't handle it
      5) Throw hot coin at the stripper
      6) Repeat
      7) Wait patiently for the "surgeon" to take you to his alley, er, office.
      8) ???
      9) No teeth!

    31. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It'd effectively make $5 the minimum tip, so strippers would be all in favor I think.

    32. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meh, the club could just sell house notes at the bar...

      OvO

    33. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most vending machines I have seen in the Seattle area ALREADY accept dollar coins.

    34. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They accept dollar coins already. There have been Sacagawea coins for years. They may not be made in such large numbers, if at all anymore, but they are the last common dollar coin I can think of. Neat things, but tarnish quite fast. The machines on my campus accept(ed) them last time I had some.

    35. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Canada the solution to this problem is that strippers wear boots with coin slots in the heel.

    36. Re:I'll be the first to say... by wiedzmin · · Score: 2

      As a Canadian, I can tell you that Canadian strippers hate Americans and their dollar bills. Minimum Canadian tip is $5 - tossing coins on stage will get you thrown out :)

      --
      Bow before me, for I am root.
    37. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of mine already accept dollar coins... the mechanism has been out for awhile now and its pretty trivial to change it out though they do run about $300dollars

    38. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nope not at all... its because the coin hopper fill up way too fast as it is... without the dollar bill acceptor they would fill up even faster. High volume machines would need to be emptied daily.

    39. Re:I'll be the first to say... by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      coins are easier to fake, you generally need a metal that's roughly the same weight as the original and plate it to be the right colour, and then get stamping. The point of making coins in these denominations is that you don't care so much as they're not worth much and its tricky to forge enough to make it worth your while. Not to mention tricky to launder enough - no-one's going to go to a bank with a truck stuffed with $10m of coins!

      This is why you never see $100 coins, but you do see 1c pennies.

    40. Re:I'll be the first to say... by asylumx · · Score: 1

      Also, most of the change-makers that sit next to vending machines will give you dollar coins as change for a 5, 10, or 20 dollar bill. The ones I've seen give you a couple dollars in quarters and the rest in $1 coins. Yes, it sucks to change a $20 bill for 28 coins since nobody usually buys $20 worth of stuff from vending machines!

    41. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Xeno+man · · Score: 1

      What, machines will magically stop accepting quarters?

    42. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize a ton of them already accept the newer golden dollar coin....

    43. Re:I'll be the first to say... by shaitand · · Score: 1

      And that is a good thing for strip club visitors how?

    44. Re:I'll be the first to say... by lattyware · · Score: 4, Informative

      You say that, but here in the UK, we introduced £2 coins ($3.2USD - must admit, I find a note for around 60p crazy, our lowest note is £5, or $8USD) and while, yes, there was a small period in which it was a little awkward, fast forward a few years and it was all sorted. It really didn't take long.

      There are a lot of calls here to scrap 1p/2p coins, actually, as everyone doesn't really value them, and there is literally nothing you buy for less than 5p any more.

      --
      -- Lattyware (www.lattyware.co.uk)
    45. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I use presidential and Sacagawea dollars in the vending machine all the time - they're awesome. You don't have to worry about bills not being in good enough shape to be accepted, you don't need four pounds of change to get a sandwich, bag of chips and a beverage. They're easily distinguishable by their color so you don't accidentally spend them as quarters like the Susan B Anthony dollars.

    46. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dollar coins at the strip club sounds both dangerous and hilarious.

      Dude. They are not slot machines.

    47. Re:I'll be the first to say... by SEE · · Score: 5, Informative

      Um, no. The vending machine industry (under the name Dollar Coin Alliance) doesn't want to keep the dollar bill; they're the primary lobby for getting rid of it. To quote them, "Jammed $1 bills in vending machines cost the industry hundreds of millions in annual repair costs and lost sales."

    48. Re:I'll be the first to say... by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

      Dollar coins at the strip club sounds both dangerous and hilarious.

      It'll work just fine. Insert them into the appropriate slot.

    49. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      American here, and here's my stance. I'd like America to ditch the one dollar bill, but more phased out than cutting us off cold turkey. In other words, see how it goes over time. I'd also wouldn't mind pennies being "phased" out, as inflation is making them worth less and less. That doesn't mean existing pennies necessarily need to be disposed of.

    50. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      introducing a dollar coin? We already have many of them (susan b anthony, sacagawea, presidents, etc). This is about phasing the dollar bill out in favor of existing and new dollar coins.

    51. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trust me, it'll make it much, much worse. A clean break means everyone is forced to update stuff, so it'll happen - if you try and do it 'phased out' - you'll find nothing will happen until it's all over, which will just cause annoyance and anger (probably resulting in it never happening).

    52. Re:I'll be the first to say... by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      There are a variety of one troy ounce gold coins, currently worth about $1720 each.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    53. Re:I'll be the first to say... by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      $300? Can I pay in quarters?

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    54. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Canada, we have fucktards who heat them up with a lighter, then throw them at a ladys nether region. It's really quite saddening.

      It's also another reason to never put coins in your mouth.

    55. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That will just bump the tips up to higher denominations.

      Or you could get $2 bills. While they have to be specially ordered at one of your local bank branches, are legal tender.

    56. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Chrontius · · Score: 1

      I don't patronize strip clubs often, but I've had restaurant service where $5 is completely unjustified. Granted, it's frequently on a $6 sandwich, but I don't make a habit of tipping 80%. No, it's the $50 sushi platter where I have to pour my own water because the wait staff couldn't be arsed.

    57. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      I'm starting to see how Canada managed to pass copyright reform legislation that limited non-commercial infringement penalties, and other such common sense notions, without violating the Law of Conservation of Common Sense.

      You're balancing out your excessive usage of common sense with some truly bizarro world ideas. :P

    58. Re:I'll be the first to say... by ebh · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected.

      Sidebar: A friend of mine used to work with both armored car companies and the people who processed tollbooth coins in very large volumes, and it was amazing what people got away with tossing in the toll baskets.

    59. Re:I'll be the first to say... by mikael · · Score: 1

      Do what Coca Cola does in some European countries (Norway for one) - have a vending machine that can be payed by SMS. You send a text tag, something like "ajx005" to the five digit number for that area, and the machine is credited with that amount. Perhaps they could make it simpler by having a QR code to read to eliminate the need for typing, and also to allow the selection of multiple items.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    60. Re:I'll be the first to say... by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1

      A neat thing to do is stick a dollar in your teeth and have the stripper pull it out with her boobs.

      I don't know about you, but I find that metal hurts my teeth, not to mention damages them.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    61. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "overall in the long run it will work out"

      Sure, if we can get passed Dec 21st that is...

    62. Re:I'll be the first to say... by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 1

      Yeah but you are more likely to get a bag of chips and a drink if you have $20 of change to "get rid of". Sure giving bills for change would be difficult but I suspect that the reason for the lack of trying is that the people that work near a vending machine will eventually feed the whole $20 in the machine if you make them carry it around.

    63. Re:I'll be the first to say... by fostware · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yeah, cos that method worked well for IPv6

      --
      "We know what happens to people who stay in the middle of the road. They get run over." - Aneurin Bevan
    64. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is so much crap. Within a few weeks of dollar coins being out vending machines would be updated.

      I'm sure most have already been updated. Our lunchroom's machines have taken dollar coins since the middle of 2007.

    65. Re:I'll be the first to say... by jonwil · · Score: 1

      Yeah but there is no point in counterfeiting those coins since retail stores wont accept them and the few places that would take em (e.g. maybe banks or pawn shops) are gonna know to check that its real gold before they pay out.

    66. Re:I'll be the first to say... by slick7 · · Score: 1

      Dollar coins at the strip club sounds both dangerous and hilarious.

      If you've ever been to Olongapo, you would know exactly how to use dollar coins. I'm a fool for the city.

      --
      The mind conceives, the body achieves, the spirit manifests.
    67. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You jest, but in all seriousness there are possible reasons for keeping some paper currency. It certainly keeps better. I don't mind keeping some paper money in my wallet, but a pocketful of coins clanking around in my pocket is a nuissance to be rid of ASAP. I like many people just keep a coin jar at home that any excess change gets tossed into at the end of the day to be eventually traded back in for "real" money.

      If they wanted to reduce the number of bills in circulation, I'd say it'd be a wise idea to ramp up two rarely issued monetary denominations: the $1 coin AND the $2 paper bill. That would provide a stop gap where people wanting to carry smaller bills would still have something of value (but we'd need fewer of them) and we'd still have the dollar coins.

      And for the strippers, I'd say its about time they got a raise anyways. ;) People have been tipping $1 at a time for over 20 years. Give em $2 bills :).

    68. Re:I'll be the first to say... by theArtificial · · Score: 1

      You mean like the fun you can have with $2 bills?

      --
      Man blir trött av att gå och göra ingenting.
    69. Re:I'll be the first to say... by manu0601 · · Score: 1

      lots of EU countries completely changed their currencies and things kept working etc.

      Well, actually, we managed to build an uncontrollable monetary system that ultimately led to our own economy destruction, but this is not a problem with coins.

    70. Re:I'll be the first to say... by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      It's a global financial crisis, not a euro-zone financial crisis.

      The Euro has made for some extra hurt, but it didn't cause the financial crisis.

      (Can we call it a depression yet?)

    71. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      I haven't seen a vending machine for a long time, that wouldn't take dollar coins. Not to mention, anyplace that has more than one or two vending machines invariably has a change machine.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    72. Re:I'll be the first to say... by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Coins are easier to fake, you generally need a metal that's roughly the same weight as the original and plate it to be the right colour, and then get stamping.

      No, there are other also characteristics that modern coin mechs test for. It's electromagnetic properties. Some even photograph the coin and do image processing.

      Slugs aren't nearly so easy to make as they once were.

    73. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then why can't I find a vending machine that actually accepts dollar coins? Modern or otherwise?

    74. Re:I'll be the first to say... by manu0601 · · Score: 1

      It's a global financial crisis, not a euro-zone financial crisis.

      Sure, but you should ask you why the crisis moved from subprimes to euro-zone sovereign debts, and why it does not move from there.

      The dirty little secret of the euro-zone is that it just cannot work. We have member states that are sovereign on their budgets, but cannot control their money. Usually when your sovereign debt costs too much, you create money, devaluating its value, and therefore lowering the cost of your debt. This stabilization mechanism is not possible in the euro-zone.

      UE politician rushed to introduce UE control over member state budgets. They did it without involving member state people agreement, and with a bias toward austerity. That will not work for a long time, except if we remove democracy from the equation.

    75. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good! Then they can spend some of it paying people, who otherwise might not have a job.

    76. Re:I'll be the first to say... by BasilBrush · · Score: 2

      The USA manages a single currency across it's 50 states. There's no reason why Europe can't. It's the F word that's required... federalisation.

    77. Re:I'll be the first to say... by mapinguari · · Score: 1

      Dollar coins have been in circulation since 1794, predating the Carter administration.

    78. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dollar coins at the strip club sounds both dangerous and hilarious

      You just insert them into an available slot.

    79. Re:I'll be the first to say... by swb · · Score: 1

      There was a great documentary on History channel or one of this similar channels about a retired machinist who made counterfeit slot machine tokens back when casinos took tokens.

      He used wire EDM to make a perfect copy of a coin as a stamping die but was totally flummoxed when the slot machine spit his fakes back out. He figured out that the machine was using the electromagnetic signature of the token, not just the size and weight (which he had cloned perfectly).

      As it turns out there was a fairly unusual stainless steel composition used for silverware that was about the best match. Once he got that right his counterfeits were perfect.

      As is typical, guy got greedy and sloppy and ended up getting caught, but had he done it right he could have really made bank.

    80. Re:I'll be the first to say... by manu0601 · · Score: 2

      The USA manages a single currency across it's 50 states. There's no reason why Europe can't. It's the F word that's required... federalisation.

      Exactly, there are two systems that works: one is confederation where each member state keeps budget and money sovereignty, the other is federation, where all member states abandon budget and money sovereignty to a supranational federal state

      There is a requirement for federalism and democracy to live together: we would need the peoples of Europe to consider themselves as a single people, the rich regions being ready to pay for the poorest. This is not the case. UE has been built by bureaucrats without the peoples, and now it is built against the will of the peoples.

      If we carry on toward federalism, we will have to give up democracy. I would rather prefer dumping federalism, and go back to confederalism, which gave us things nice things like Ariane or Erasmus

    81. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, 1794 certainly predates the Carter administration.

    82. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      absolutely. i hate it in europe when i am expected to stick a five euro note down the panties.. just image all the coins jingling down there..

    83. Re:I'll be the first to say... by camperdave · · Score: 1

      That is so much crap. Within a few weeks of dollar coins being out vending machines would be updated.

      I thought the US had dollar coins ages ago, but they weren't being used because the paper bill was still around. Are they just commemorative coins, or are they circulating tender?

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    84. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vending machine companies are actually lobbying for the switch to the dollar coin. It's easier for them to deal with coins than cash.

    85. Re:I'll be the first to say... by riverat1 · · Score: 1

      Dollar coins at the strip club sounds both dangerous and hilarious.

      And I'll just say you sound like a cheap bastard to me.

    86. Re:I'll be the first to say... by egcagrac0 · · Score: 1

      I upgraded my soda vending machine to take "Susie" sized dollar coins (not the larger silver dollars) with about 20 minutes and a Dremel grinder. My experience is that most of the coin mechs inside take dollars just fine (and escrow them correctly and issue appropriate change); the slot in the front of the vender for dropping them into is just a little too small to allow the diameter.

      This is a 10 column single price unit from around 1990, with a Coinco mech (sorry, I don't recall the model). Never had a bill acceptor fitted, and I didn't feel like spending a few hundred bucks to buy one.

      There is a vending company that maintains other vending machines in the building - they all accept dollar coins already.

      If you didn't want to go and enlarge the slot in your own vending machine, you could just buy a replacement part - that was an option, but I felt like hacking the existing stuff.

    87. Re:I'll be the first to say... by riverat1 · · Score: 1

      The new style dollar coins have been around for a while. The Susan B. Anthony dollar was first minted in 1979 but it was too much like a quarter. The Sacagawea dollars in 2000. Here's the Wikipedia article on them.

      I've been trying to eliminate dollar bills from my wallet just because of the issues mentioned in the article. I go down to the bank every few months and get several rolls of dollar coins and use them to keep from getting dollar bills in change. You can still get $2 bills too. Of course many people are going all electronic nowadays but it will be a long time before physical currency completely disappears if ever.

    88. Re:I'll be the first to say... by riverat1 · · Score: 1

      True but the ones before the Susan B. Anthony dollar were much larger.

    89. Re:I'll be the first to say... by ehiris · · Score: 1

      Some of them actually take the dollar coin. I had one from the post office and tried it in a Coke machine along with a couple of quarters and it didn't work, so I dropped it in a Pepsi machine, and bang, it worked. Conclusion: Coke hates freedom. (the coin has the statue of liberty on it)

    90. Re:I'll be the first to say... by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      ...but once you do...

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    91. Re:I'll be the first to say... by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      "Is there anyone here who hasn't had a C-section?"

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    92. Re:I'll be the first to say... by nateb · · Score: 1

      I heard a few years ago that the Canadian strippers had a cup on stage to collect the coins. Is this not true (anymore)?

      --
      -- Nate
    93. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we would need the peoples of Europe to consider themselves as a single people, the rich regions being ready to pay for the poorest

      You're implying a false dichotomy. It's not that we can either consider ourselves one single people or refuse to "pay for the poorest". Parents who love their children more than anything else in the world still don't give them an unlimited credit card. Even if we're one people, we can still expect and demand responsible behavior from each other. The European Union transfers huge sums to help economically challenged countries. When you write "pay for the poorest", what you actually mean is that we don't bail out Greece and therefore we are not one people. No. Greece is not poor. Greece is loose with the money. That's an important difference.

    94. Re:I'll be the first to say... by kenh · · Score: 1

      Vending machines that take the Susan B. Anthony dollar should also take the newer Sacagewea dollars and Presidential dollars, because they were manufactured to be electrically compatible.

      I think you mean dimensionally, not electrically.

      --
      Ken
    95. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      What's the proposed bill? And it should be on Dec 21st.

      I think most legislatures will be on holiday anyway...

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    96. Re:I'll be the first to say... by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      there are loads of commemorative coins that are legal tender, but might not actually get accepted anywhere but a London bank or back at the Royal Mint.

      I did mean ordinary coinage, not these exceptional ones - I don't see anyone accepting a coin weighing a kilogram for example.

    97. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can't produce counterfeit metal quarters with a computer and inkjet printer)

      For now... One day we'll have selective laser melting on the desktop.

    98. Re:I'll be the first to say... by jonadab · · Score: 1

      Yes, but they reacting emotionally rather than thinking the issue through. Do they really think if the treasury doesn't issue $1 bills people will carry coins around all the time? Stop and think about that for just a moment.

      We already have $1 coins. We've had them since, I don't know, a long time ago. Something like 0.01% of the population carries and spends them. Everyone else considers them as either something to collect or just totally pointless, because $1 bills are so much more convenient. Most vendors don't even have a spot in their cash drawers for $1 coins, because they're not *used* enough to warrant it.

      People dump coins in jars at the first opportunity and carry bills not because the coins aren't worth money but because they are annoying to carry around all the time. Americans have preferred bills over coins of the same denomination since sometime in the nineteenth century. The dollar is worth WAY less now than it was then, but the fact that people prefer to carry a $1 bill over a $1 coin given the choice has not changed at all. If we had fifty-cent bills and dollar coins, people would carry the fifty-cent bills and leave the dollar coins in a jar.

      In other words, if we don't have $1 bills, the vending machines will be jamming with fives and tens instead of ones, but the usage of bills versus coins will barely change at all.

      Anyway, the bills I'd want to get rid of are the $10 and the $50. There are only four fives in a twenty and only five twenties in a hundred. The $10 and the $50 aren't needed. The same is also true of the dime and the fifty-cent piece.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    99. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      A lot of them already take $1 coins. At least here in Boston they do. The fact that the Charlie Card vending machines (fare cards for public transit) give out $1 coins as change may be a factor.

      Vending machine companies will love this switch because it will allow most of them to get rid of those fussy, unreliable bill slots. The ones selling high-value items (like those Charlie Card machines) will still need them for larger bills.

    100. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      It's not that easy to fake a coin. Most vending machines don't just rely on weight. They also check the magnetic properties of the coins, which means that counterfeits that aren't made of metals similar to the real coins won't work. That's one reason we ended up with the sandwich of metals used in the dime and quarter; that combination made them react similarly to the silver coins they replaced, as well as being the right weight and color.

      The few machines that take pennies aren't very fussy (exception: coin counting machines like the Coinstar things found in some supermarkets) so we were able to replace copper pennies with plated zinc pennies without a fuss. No sane person is going to counterfeit pennies in any case; the metal value of them exceeds their face value.

    101. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dollar coins at the strip club sounds both dangerous and hilarious.

      go see how they do it in canada. (it is both)

    102. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      If we carry on toward federalism, we will have to give up democracy.

      Germany is federal. Spain is, sort of. How about Australia and the USA? Are they not democracies?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    103. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      You're implying a false dichotomy. It's not that we can either consider ourselves one single people or refuse to "pay for the poorest". Parents who love their children more than anything else in the world still don't give them an unlimited credit card.

      You're the one throwing the false dichotomy around. It's not a case of either giving the wops^H southern nations all your money or nothing at all.

      The European Union transfers huge sums to help economically challenged countries.

      Proportionally they're quite small, compared to the amounts Uncle Sam moves around.

      I won't argue that a lot of it isn't poorly targeted and badly spent, though, and in consequence it's still too much.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    104. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      US vending machines already accept dollar coins. The change machine at my job site exclusively gives out Sacagawea and Presidential dollar coins. I have yet to encounter a vending machine or cashier that refuses to take them (though the cashiers do sometimes look at them briefly as some kind of novelty). I suppose older machines with mechanical coin acceptors or electronics that can't be updated with new currency profiles would have issues, but I imagine those would be in the great minority, owned by individuals rather than vending machine corps. Even then, I doubt such machines would have accepted dollar bills in the first place.

    105. Re:I'll be the first to say... by highphilosopher · · Score: 1

      Interestingly, I saw a guy one time toss a quarter to a stripper. Painful experience. Not for her, but she threw it back as hard as she could. I bet it left a bruise.

    106. Re:I'll be the first to say... by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      Dollar coins at the strip club sounds both dangerous and hilarious.

      In most countries, the dollar bill or equivalent has gone the way of the do-do bird.

      In Canada, we converted to the dollar coin with a national bird (the Loon picture), so, our dollar bill became the dollar coin or (slang) Loonie.. At the same time we got rid of the two dollar bill and introduced the "doubloon" (double loonie).
      Its about 15 years that the transition was started and completed.

      Vending machines were converted over in a two year period.
      As you know, most of your vending machines take coins, so mechanically they had to be setup to detect the diameter and weight of the two mentioned coins.

      These past two years, Canada adopted plastic bills. Part of the new hundred, and the tweny dollar bills is transparent, with a holigraphic image, and the other part is solid as before. There are braile bumps to distinguish currencies.

      The counterfeiters have not succeeded at duplicating the currency. The bills are waterproof, so if you forget them in your clothing, which gets into the wash, there is no problem; they come out clean. These new bills last about 10x to 20x longer than the expensive paper money which, as you know, is easily counterfeited.

      Do recall, the USA had the silver dollar and the fifty cent piece. Both are collectors items now.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    107. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dollar coins at the strip club sounds both dangerous and hilarious.

      This post is camouflage for an avid strip club patron. One who is quite aware that a doller bill is just as useless in a titty bar as it is elsewhere.

    108. Re:I'll be the first to say... by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 1

      Agreed. EU = subisidies out of the wazoo. Germany and France are the big examples of "success". However, a large amount of their exchange and banking assets are the crap countries that really couldn't afford the stuff in the first place. Then the banks countries and companies need to be bailed out because surprise surprise the average Spaniard can't afford 3 houses, Greece can't afford 20% unemployment and crazy social programs etc.Single currency only works with similar economies which Greece and say Germany are not.

    109. Re:I'll be the first to say... by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 1

      I love that they went with Sacagawea for the dollar. Not sure if the US is the same as Canada (but I suspect it is the case) the natives are pissed on and then to pretend to have an interesting culture we pull out some native names/art on our money and maybe have a rain dance at a football game and feel all good about ourselves again. Nice.

    110. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Geosota · · Score: 1

      Outside the British Museum in London is a plex donation box. All the pound & euro coins drop to the bottom and the box appears to be entirely filled with US dollars. I overheard a little boy ask his dad what they were. He answered without editorial. Weird moment, for sure.

    111. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Occams · · Score: 1

      "Dollar coins at the strip club sounds both dangerous and hilarious." The correct method is to insert them in the slot, but don't expect change.

      --
      Heavy is the head that wears the tinfoil hat.
    112. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Occams · · Score: 1

      Why don't we convert to metric measures at the same time? Because this is a deeply conservative country.

      --
      Heavy is the head that wears the tinfoil hat.
    113. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Occams · · Score: 1

      Europe is not a federation. The USA is one country, so no big feat there.

      --
      Heavy is the head that wears the tinfoil hat.
    114. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Occams · · Score: 1

      Who cares about difficulties for vending machine folks?

      --
      Heavy is the head that wears the tinfoil hat.
    115. Re:I'll be the first to say... by manu0601 · · Score: 1

      Single currency only works with similar economies which Greece and say Germany are not.

      Not quite. Single currency works fine if there is solidarity between rich regions and poor regions. Take two regions of France, for instance : Ile de France and Corsica. They both shared the same currency, and enjoy similar social standards, despite the fact that Ile de France GDP per capita is twice Corsica's one.

      It works because of wealth transfers through taxes. And taxes are accepted because Ile de France and Corisa share the same people. Nobody in France political spectrum claims that Ile de France citizen pay too much taxes for lazy people from southern Corsica

      Eurozone is built on competition, not solidarity. When we "help" a southern country, we lend money with interests, and we ask for social standards to be lowered.

      In a nutshell, you need to choose two items in the three item set: (same currency, competition, different economies). Once you bring the third one, it gets unstable.

    116. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or you will have to find another place to put the money

    117. Re:I'll be the first to say... by manu0601 · · Score: 1

      If we carry on toward federalism, we will have to give up democracy.

      Germany is federal. Spain is, sort of. How about Australia and the USA? Are they not democracies?

      I meant UE federalism. The difference with countries you cite is that theses are nations. Each of they have a single people, where wealth transfers between rich and poor regions of the nation are accepted.

      UE is a different beast. There is no UE people, and nobody is ready to pay for the others. You can built federalism with democracy if you have a single people. If you do not, you create federal state structure against the will of the peoples, which is exactly what is done in the UE for now.

      But let's go back to Spain now. We see that the crisis with UE austerity rules are pushing the regions of existing nations to separate. Not only UE failed to create a UE federal nation, but it is even pushing the existing member nations toward destruction. We are playing a very dangerous game here.

    118. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is like that random microtransactions thing (you're compensating for your micro-what?). "I will randomly give 20% of my strippers a $5 bill and it will all average out"

    119. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Boycott+BMG · · Score: 1

      Vending machines that take the Susan B. Anthony dollar should also take the newer Sacagewea dollars and Presidential dollars, because they were manufactured to be electrically compatible.

      I think you mean dimensionally, not electrically.

      No, I mean electrically, as in vending machines measure the electrical impedance of each coin you stick in to determine if you are actually inserting US currency and not iron slugs/foreign coins.

    120. Re:I'll be the first to say... by IrquiM · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but you cannot compare US and their states to Europe and their contries

      --
      This is blinging
    121. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    122. Re:I'll be the first to say... by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Sure you can. Just as you can compare and apple tree and an oak tree. They're not the same, but they have lots of similarities. Indeed there is little point in comparing two things that are exactly the same.

    123. Re:I'll be the first to say... by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      My comment that you replied to consisted or one line with 3 sentences. It appears you are so lazy you didn't get to the third, which pointed out that federalisation is needed.

    124. Re:I'll be the first to say... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but you cannot compare US and their states to Europe and their countries

      Well, but for the past few decades with the over extention of the federal power due to the bastardization of the interstate trade clause....you could.

      Constitutionally, the majority of the powers in the US IS supposed to reside with the states and not the federal govt.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    125. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can someone explain to me, if dollar scanners are so troublesome, why do vending machines in Japan often accept 10,000 yen bills (~$120 or so), and manage to spit out both paper & coinage as change? The failure rate, in my experience, also seems to be much much lower. Is it something about how they designed their currency?

    126. Re:I'll be the first to say... by isorox · · Score: 1

      The USA manages a single currency across it's 50 states. There's no reason why Europe can't. It's the F word that's required... federalisation.

      Language too. It's easier to move from new York to Maine for work than france to Italy.

    127. Re:I'll be the first to say... by po8crg · · Score: 1

      This is why Spain is breaking up - because (comparatively) rich Catalans are objecting to paying taxes for the south and west.

      Italy has had this same problem for years; relatively rich Lombards, Piedmontese and even Tuscans object to funding the Mezzogiorno and the Sicilian Mafia. The Lega Nord is a political party based on that principle.

      Britain is different - Scotland has almost exactly the average income for the UK, and that's the bit that's closest to leaving.

    128. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a bit off. They have a rolled up poster... umm... lightly clenched, so to speak. Your goal is to knock it out with a loonie.

    129. Re:I'll be the first to say... by wiedzmin · · Score: 1

      It's either a tongue-in-cheek/slander attempt or something only true for small towns. Certainly has never been allowed nor encouraged in larger cities.

      --
      Bow before me, for I am root.
    130. Re:I'll be the first to say... by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      France to Italy, not too bad. They're both romance languages and so it's not difficult for a speaker of one to learn the other.

      England to France is harder. But still lots of people do it.

    131. Re:I'll be the first to say... by wiedzmin · · Score: 1

      You can use coins in the restaurant. The severs aren't generally on stage, nor expect the tip to be stuck into their underwear or be tossed at them from a distance :) The usual 15-20% tip applies there, so a buck if fine for a $6 sandwich.

      --
      Bow before me, for I am root.
    132. Re:I'll be the first to say... by TripleE78 · · Score: 1

      Clearly, you've never been to a Canadian strip club. So much more awesome due to the loonie.

    133. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Chrontius · · Score: 1

      And if our smallest currency denomination is a five-dollar coin?

    134. Re:I'll be the first to say... by wiedzmin · · Score: 1

      Where is that being suggested? I thought the conversation is about getting rid of the paper bill, not smaller denomination coins?

      --
      Bow before me, for I am root.
    135. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Chrontius · · Score: 1

      Maybe I misread it, but different threads of this discussion have suggested both. I thought I was replying to "Ditch the $1 denomination", not just the paper bills.

      I'd be happy enough to switch to dollar coins, I guess, but there goes my commitment to having the lightest and thinnest wallet possible.

    136. Re:I'll be the first to say... by thesameguy · · Score: 1

      Your post intrigues me. Tell me more.

    137. Re:I'll be the first to say... by TripleE78 · · Score: 1

      Ok, to be fair, this was from crossing the border as a 19/20 year old in the late 90's, so things may have changed a bit. At the time, the girls often would collect tips with their breasts from a customers mouth or the bridge of their glasses, and other various forms of close contact. You'd sometimes see one stripper pick up a coin from another stripper using her girl bits.

      No idea if things have changed. It's entirely possible the tips are all 5 dollar bills now or something. $DEITY, I hope not.

      ~EEE~

    138. Re:I'll be the first to say... by manu0601 · · Score: 1

      The European Union core value is competition: between nations, regions, persons. This is just the opposite of cooperation, and that explains why we see nations exploding.

    139. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From what I've heard, vending machine manufacturers and operators hate dollar bills. Those scanners are easily faked out, but also have a high false-negative rate, get jammed with damaged bills, frustrate customers whose bills aren't new enough, etc. Vendors only started adding them to machines because they didn't want people to have to feed half a dozen (or more) coins into a machine to get a Pepsi.

      A one-time conversion to accept $5 and $1 coins would result in much less hassle for the vending machine folks, because coin-counting devices are fairly difficult to fake out (you can't produce counterfeit metal quarters with a computer and inkjet printer) and much more reliable.

      ==
      Canada went through the elimination of one and two dollar bills eons ago. There was no backlash, no hassle, it made sense. Paper bills in the wash are effectively destroyed. It costs more than a dollar to make a dollar bill.
      And the coins don't require serial numbers. Commemorative coins can be produced, with different images, etc. The Canadian one dollar coin first came out with an image of the loon, a bird indigenous to Canada. Ergo, the coin picked up the nick-name looney. The two dollar coin earned the nickname tooney.

      Now our hundred and our twenty dollar bills are being produced in a very durable plastic. Part of the bill is transparent, where we see a holographic image, and the other part which shows an image and coloring. The bill also has ridges for braile encoding. These new bills can be washed, are virtually impossible to tear in half.
      I would say to the USA, go for it. Save a few billion dollars of taxpayer's money every year.

    140. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To the surveys, gentlemen!!
      Is it because of the shop owners' sense of real value of sugar vs. the value of skills to change the oil, the owners' ages (and loss of touch with inflation), or the shop location and clientele?

    141. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's like saying "if all the good citizens of California can accept a sales tax rate of 10%, why can't all the good citizens of Alabama accept a sales tax rate of 10%?" You're talking about multiple sovereign nations versus our one single nation.

    142. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      Well, but for the past few decades with the over extention of the federal power due to the bastardization of the interstate trade clause....you could.

      No. The United States government is not a federation of states, and has not been since the Constitution was adopted. It's "We the People", not "We the States."

      As Madison wrote, "It was generally agreed that the objects of the Union could not be secured by any system founded on the principle of a confederation of Sovereign States....Hence was embraced the alternative of a Government which instead of operating, on the States, should operate without their intervention on the individuals composing them..."

      Constitutionally, the majority of the powers in the US IS supposed to reside with the states and not the federal govt.

      Again, no. The Constitution grants wide powers to the federal government, and removes powers needed for sovereignty from the states. This is especially clear in the area of commerce. Again, quoting Madison: "As to the remark that the States ought to be under the controul of the Genl. Govt. at least as much as they formerly were under the King & B. parliament, it amounts as it stands when taken in its presumable meaning, to nothing more than what actually makes a part of the Constitution; the powers of Congs. being much greater, especially on the great points of taxation & trade than the B. Legislature were ever permitted to exercise..."

      While there is legitimate debate to be had about the balance of powers in federalism, the "states rights" crowd is mostly ignorant of history and still buying into bullshit promulgated by anti-civil-rights conservatives in the 1960s.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    143. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Phoghat · · Score: 1

      Not if they were magnetized. Just sayin'

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
    144. Re:I'll be the first to say... by Phoghat · · Score: 1

      Have you evedr been out of the US? like say, Canada, Mexico where coins are common ?

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
  2. Not yet... by broggyr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Not gonna happen; we still have pennies, for chrissakes!

    --
    Irony? Yea, it's like goldy and bronzy, only it's made of iron!
    1. Re:Not yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pennies are a relevant fraction of the currency, such that it's difficult to give 37 cents in change without them. This is in no way equivalent to, or reasonably relational to, changing an easily damaged piece of paper into a durable coin.

    2. Re:Not yet... by redback · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This will not happen until Americans can let go of their irrational attachment to dollar bills and pennies.

      In Australia we ditched $1 and $2 notes for coins in 1984 and 1988. 1c and 2c coins were dropped in 1992.

    3. Re:Not yet... by boristdog · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, my wife bitches when I say we should get rid of pennies and just have purchase totals rounded up or down to the nearest five cents.
      Her: "But the retailers will price everything so it gets rounded up!"
      Me: "No, multiple item purchases will make it just as likely to round down, and that's only for cash transactions."
      Her: "But I still may pay more when I go to the store!"
      Me: "Uh yeah, If you make 10 CASH transactions per week you might pay about 30 cents more per week, or about $15/year."
      Her: "It's a way to rip me off!"

      She makes over $100K/year. People like her are why we will always be stuck with pennies.

    4. Re:Not yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      In Australia we ditched $1 and $2 notes[...]

      In the USA, we still like to pretend our currency has value.

    5. Re:Not yet... by MrEricSir · · Score: 1

      I was in Denmark earlier this month. The smallest currency I saw there was 50 ore (half a krone) which works out to about 8 US cents. A lot of stores didn't even bother with those and just rounded.

      Wish we'd do something similar here. Rolling up pennies is a waste of time.

      --
      There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    6. Re:Not yet... by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      What I want to know is why the US has quarters instead of 20c coins. 25c is such a pain in the ass to work with. If you want say 83c, I personally would find it a lot easier to figure out I need 50+20+10+2+1 than 50+25+5+2+1.

    7. Re:Not yet... by Nutria · · Score: 1

      Shame on you for not vetting her more carefully. (Bitching about pennies can't be her only irrationality.)

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    8. Re:Not yet... by marcovje · · Score: 1

      Hmm, here in the NL we had quarters (called kwartjes btw) when it was still guilders, and now we have 20 c coins. Can't say that it was really different or hard to get used to.

    9. Re:Not yet... by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      That said, many countries (Canada included) have or are eliminating the penny. The smallest denomination is the nickel, and there are very simple rules in place for stores to do rounding (on the cash registers) that averages out over time.

    10. Re:Not yet... by Applekid · · Score: 1

      If they weren't 25 cents, we couldn't keep calling them quarters...

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    11. Re:Not yet... by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Don't roll them. Dump them into one of those counting machines at the super market and get a gift card. Normally at least amazon is available, often the grocery store the machine is in as well.

    12. Re:Not yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Any paper and coin currency at all is 'irrational'.

      We 'tried' dollar coins before. It was a failure not because of any attachment. (I prefer them myself. Give me $2 coins as well and I'm in heaven. Hell, even a $5 coin.) It was a failure because few were made, they weren't promoted, and no one had them to exchange. You could redeem them in post office vending machines and you could get them as change there. Everywhere else... so few were actually being circulated it was meaningless.

      As for the penny, I can't remember the last time I spent one. I usually don't pay cash. When I do the coins generally going into my collection never to return or to be returned to a bank years later.

      I don't think the average American really cares either way. (Although I am sure regarding the penny people will reject the idea of rounding up. I always pay with credit anyway.)

    13. Re:Not yet... by operagost · · Score: 0

      As an Australian, you have no idea why we still have $1 bills and pennies. It may or may not be an "irrational attachment", but since you haven't actual spoken to any real Americans about it you just don't know. You don't know whether it's irrational, or an attachment. What you have done is post yet another elitist, ignorant rant on Slashdot.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    14. Re:Not yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pennies and the one party system. People are assholes when it comes right down to it. They fear real change and progress.

    15. Re:Not yet... by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      I would go with 3x25+5+3x1, don't even have to think about it.

      Luckily in Canada we're officially getting rid of the penny. At the cafeteria at work they stopped giving out pennies years ago. So I see 0.83 and think 3x75+10

      With my experience traveling, when coin denominations are different than what you're used to, it can really throw you off.

    16. Re:Not yet... by Smallpond · · Score: 1

      And it would be confusing to call them fifths.

    17. Re:Not yet... by MozeeToby · · Score: 3, Insightful

      When they got rid of the half-penny, the penny (the newly lowest denomination) was worth $.23 in today's money. There's nothing inherently specially about the $.01 value. If I had it my way I'd get rid of everything up to the dime and replace the dollar bill with a coin. But then, I think spending $.025 on making pennies, and $.11 on nickels is ridiculous. And wasting money on reprinting worn out $1 bills when coins would last much longer equally so.

    18. Re:Not yet... by redback · · Score: 1

      You should look in the mirror.

    19. Re:Not yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pennies are a relevant fraction of the currency, such that it's difficult to give 37 cents in change without them. This is in no way equivalent to, or reasonably relational to, changing an easily damaged piece of paper into a durable coin.

      Well, it's related in that eliminating pennies will give merchants a place to keep the new dollar coins in their cash drawers.

    20. Re:Not yet... by stabiesoft · · Score: 1

      Agreed, we could round to the nearest tenth of a dollar and drop pennies, nickels and substitute 20c pieces for quarters.

    21. Re:Not yet... by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 4, Funny

      I like fifths ... Jack, Jim, Jose ...

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    22. Re:Not yet... by Krokus · · Score: 1

      C.G.P. Grey has a couple of good videos in support of getting rid of the penny here and here.

    23. Re:Not yet... by PhotoJim · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It was a failure because the US didn't pull the $1 bill out of circulation.

      Canada started withdrawing paper $1 bills when the $1 coin was introduced. If you didn't want a $1 coin in your change, within a few weeks all a store could give you instead was quarters or smaller instead. That got rid of a lot of people's resistance. (Mind, we still had $2 bills and they were increased in circulation, but they were withdrawn in the same manner for a $2 coin a few years later.)

      Before long no one worries about it anymore. It is what it is and people get used to it.

      We've lost 10-cent bus fare, 10-cent payphone calls and 1-cent candy and managed to do just fine. We can live without small bills too.

      (Perhaps interestingly, the Canadian paper money in largest circulation is not the $5, it's the $20 bill... because of bank machines.)

    24. Re:Not yet... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      we still have pennies, for chrissakes!

      The US has never had pennies. The penny is a UK coinage.

      The US has always had cents. Not pence, nor sixpence, nor shillings, florins or pounds.

    25. Re:Not yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And pennies aren't going anywhere until the average schmo reads £2.99 as $3. I'm not holding my breath.

    26. Re:Not yet... by NReitzel · · Score: 2

      It's not a question of "irrational" - though that is the case. It's more a case of having a bunch of congresspeople who are technically invertebrates. If they had any spine at all, they would do what other close neighbors have done. Don't make a big PR push about "converting" - just stay shut up, and then stop printing the one dollar bills. After a few years, the problem will be an unproblem. And because it isn't a "changeover" shoved at the public, there won't be any organized resistance.

      Given the way our Congress works, there's even an easy way to approach this. Treasury can simply "delay" printing one dollar bills for whatever reason they want to dream up. As the circulating bills start to resemble wet paper towels, dollar coins will gain in popularity.

      --

      Don't take life too seriously; it isn't permanent.

    27. Re:Not yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      50+20+10+2+1 ... 50+25+5+2+1.

      Bolded relevant...

      50?! In the US?! ARE YOU INSANE?! I don't know the last time I even SAW one of those damn things... 2 quarters is the way it always is.

    28. Re:Not yet... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      The U.S. had a 20 cent coin for a short time in the mid 19th Century. There also were silver half dimes (before the Nickle five cent piece was introduced) and 2 and 3 cent pieces.

    29. Re:Not yet... by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 4, Funny

      I wonder if it would help to engrave a pair of fabulous tits on the new dollar coin.
      Hmmm... George Washington, tits. George Washington, tits. It could work.

    30. Re:Not yet... by operagost · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I see an American, not a prissy Australian who can't be trusted with firearms or violent video games.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    31. Re:Not yet... by kwerle · · Score: 1

      That's kind of awesome. How did it get done? Was there much resistance?

    32. Re:Not yet... by compro01 · · Score: 2

      They must charge a smaller fee where you are. Up here, they gouge for 11.7%. I'll do my own rolling (with my handy-dandy motorized coin sorter) and keep my $30-40.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    33. Re:Not yet... by Kergan · · Score: 1

      In Australia we ditched $1 and $2 notes[...]

      In the USA, we still like to pretend our currency has value.

      Quote from a French politician:

      Q: "What's the point of €.01 and €.02 coins anyway? Won't store owners just round prices to the nearest €.05, leading to price inflation?"

      A: "The answer lies in the question." -- Laurent Fabius

    34. Re:Not yet... by nedlohs · · Score: 2

      You don't need to give change for such ludicrously small amounts of value. We used to price to the half cent, and the world didn't end when that was dropped.

    35. Re:Not yet... by jeff4747 · · Score: 4, Funny

      You might wanna find out what actually happened in the US before laying on too much sanctimony.

      We've tried to replace the dollar with coins three times so far, and it's failed.

      The problem is the size and shape of the old dollar coins. They're very close to quarters in size and weight. In our first attempt, the dollar coins were also silver like the quarters. So it was hard to quickly identify which coins are dollars and which are quarters.

      But while that mistake was going on, all sorts of equipment was built to accept dollar coins that were that size and shape. So when it came time for serious attempt #2 (Sacagawea dollar) the coin still had to be the same size and shape or every vending machine would have to be replaced. So they tried changing the color to gold in order to satisfy humans and machines.

      Well, it was the only gold coin most people in the US have seen, so it was odd. And it still felt like a quarter in your pocket. So still didn't win much acceptance. Plus a lot of people responded to the name of the coin with "Sack a Jew what?"

      We're trying again with the Presidential Dollar Coins. They're still close to quarters to satisfy the vending machines, and gold to try and satisfy the humans. And they've got "normal" names.

      Realistically, the changeover will happen in one of three ways:

      • Very slowly
      • Screwing over the vending machines so we get a coin that feels different
      • Congress banning the paper dollar, which will piss off a lot of people who need something to be angry about.
    36. Re:Not yet... by FrankSchwab · · Score: 4, Interesting

      100% agree...Kill the penny, kill the nickel, kill the quarter, kill the $1 and $5 bills.

      The dime (the physically smallest coin) becomes the smallest denomination. 10 of'em to the dollar. If you absolutely have to, create a 50 cent piece that's a bit larger than the dime.

      Build a dollar coin that DOESN'T LOOK LIKE A QUARTER, goddammit. Even the gold Sacajawea dollars, after a couple of years, tarnished to look like an older quarter. Build it with an external polygonal rim, or put a hole in the middle of it,. Maybe make it about the size of a penny, or nickel so coin holders in cars, etc., will hold the new dollar. .Build a 5 dollar coin if you must, just a bit larger.

      In my world, that'd be two coins ($0.1 and $1.0). The numismatists (who single-handedly keep the penny alive) would probably require 4 ($0.1, $0.5, $1.0, $5.0). Then, three bills - $10, $20, $50. Despite my misgivings about losing a cash economy, the ease of counterfeiting (especially at the nation-state level) probably means that making higher denomination bills is a poor choice.

      --
      And the worms ate into his brain.
    37. Re:Not yet... by oodaloop · · Score: 1

      Actually, we don't. We officially have Lincoln Head One-cent Pieces, colloquially known as pennies. Hey, this is slashdot. Where else can I be this pedantic?

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    38. Re:Not yet... by nedlohs · · Score: 2

      Sure if you get cash from them, but the gift cards tend to give you the full amount (I assume that amazon pays the company running the machine - since now you have to spend that money with them). Since I'm going to buy something from amazon anyway...

    39. Re:Not yet... by uncqual · · Score: 1

      Supermarkets I shop at offer self-serve checkout and they take cash (paper and coin) and allow you to pay with multiple methods. So, I start by paying cash and putting any change I have in my pocket into the machine, then I pay the balance w/a credit card. Since I started doing that, I no longer have change piling up and I pay no surcharges. Obviously it's a way to maintain the "no extra change" steady state but not a good way to get rid of a backlog of change.

      --
      Why is there an "insightful" mod and why isn't it "-1"? If I wanted insight, I wouldn't be reading /.
    40. Re:Not yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Pretend away. Australian dollars are worth more than US dollars.

        Currency reform for USA.
      Go to $1 and $2 coins
      Use polymer currency (outsource printing to Australia like the other 20 countries we currently print for)
      Save oh, 40 billion, stop international counterfeiters backed by shady governments.

        Funnel into education, space program, pay off debts etc.

    41. Re:Not yet... by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2

      Hi. I'm right here in the good old USA, and I can confirm for everybody that is in fact 100% an irrational attachment.

      It's a relatively recent development, too. I was around in the 1970s, and I don't recall anybody back then insisting that the government introduce 1/4-cent pieces and paper 25-cent bills to address the value points filled by the current dollars and pennies.

    42. Re:Not yet... by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Canada will only be eliminating the penny from circulation. Amounts will still be charged to the penny, however. When cash is used, bottom line totals will be required rounded up or down to the nearest nickel, as appropriate.

      So that means you might get one or two cents savings by paying cash instead of electronically, but it's also possible you could pay one or two cents more.

    43. Re:Not yet... by boristdog · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's a small price to pay for a nice body and a healthy sex drive, though.

    44. Re:Not yet... by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 4, Informative

      What I want to know is why the US has quarters instead of 20c coins.

      I'll bet it's because the US dollar was modeled after the Spanish dollar, which was in turn worth 8 "reals" (aka "bits"), and was introduced centuries before decimalization came into vogue. That's why a quarter is still sometimes called "two bits".

    45. Re:Not yet... by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Oh no! Someone used a common colloquial, better shut that down!

      Do you complain when people claim to have "quarters" when the US has no such thing, "quarter dollars" are what those coins are called after all.

    46. Re:Not yet... by compro01 · · Score: 1

      Never seen a machine that gives out gift cards around here.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    47. Re:Not yet... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'd use $0.04, $0.08, $0.32, $0.64 and $1.00 coins. But I'd also have 128 cents to the dollar, for I like round numbers.

    48. Re:Not yet... by mister_playboy · · Score: 3, Informative

      The problem is the size and shape of the old dollar coins. They're very close to quarters in size and weight.

      No, the problem is the size and shape of the newer dollar coins. For most of US history, dollar coins (orginally silver) up until the Eisenhower (71-78) were logically larger than half dollars.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eisenhower_dollar

      It was the '79 Susan B. Anthony that started the quarter/dollar confusion.

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
    49. Re:Not yet... by nukenerd · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You might wanna find out what actually happened in the US before laying on too much sanctimony.

      We've tried to replace the dollar with coins three times so far, and it's failed.

      Being in the UK where the pound note was replaced by a coin about 15 years ago, amid much moaning from some, I do not understand what is meant by "failed". So what happened? Did people throw them away when given them (in change or payement)? Or did they refuse the transaction entirely (and then do without the business)? Historically, there was great difficulty getting people to accept notes in the first place rather than coin; so what irony!

      In the UK, the pound coins just started appearing to the public in change from shops, and notes just disappeared over a timescale of a few weeks because, when they passed through a bank, the bank withdrew them (as they would withdraw worn-out notes). In fact once the process started people became reluctant to accept a pound note because they did not want to get stuck with it (although banks would accept them for a long time after).

      Personally, I always find money very acceptable.. Yes, anyone could "refuse to accept" coins like they can alway "refuse to accept" cars, the Internet, electricity, the sun, rain, whatever .....

    50. Re:Not yet... by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Actually, the $1 and $2 coins in Canada were handled very differently.

      As far as my understanding goes, the ordinary policy with Canadian currency is that bills and coins will remain in circulation until they have experienced a certain amount of physical wear and tear. As a matter of general practice, when such a worn note or coin makes its way to a bank, it is not returned to the public, but is instead supposed to be returned to the Mint for destruction. As worn currency is returned to the mint, as long as it is still in circulation, additional currency is manufactured to replace what has been destroyed. When the mint actually wants something removed from circulation, again as a general practice, the bank simply returns *all* such currency to the mint, regardless of its condition, and does not (generally speaking) distribute it back to the public.

      When the $1 coin was introduced, Canada did not actually remove the $1 from circulation... and, in fact, still continued to print them, albeit at much lower quantity. It was noted, however, that usage of the $1 bill was not experiencing the expected considerable drop (and the bills were wearing out faster, because there were fewer of them, and so they got used that much more, which was necessitating the printing of additional $1 bills), the $1 bill was eventually pulled from circulation entirely, and the $1 coin, widely known almost immediately as the "loonie", a nickname intended to be a pun on the fact that the coin bore a loon on one side, and to imply that at the time, many people thought it was "loony" to be replacing the incredibly useful $1 bill with a coin, finally started becoming widely adopted.

      When Canada introduced the $2 coin, the mint simultaneously removed the $2 bill from circulation, which sped up its adoption considerably.

    51. Re:Not yet... by runeghost · · Score: 2

      We could always revalue the currency, so that pennies, nickles, and so on are actually relevant denominations again. But that would really drive home to the public how much inflation there's been in their lifetimes, and the government certainly doesn't want anyone thinking about the causes of inflation...

    52. Re:Not yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canada too, and we're doing just fine. I find the dollar bills kind of irritating when I visit the States, actually.

    53. Re:Not yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Big flaw in your counting plan. We functionally don't have 50c coins either. (They technically exist, but no one carries them and not even the post office hands them out in change.) Neither do we have a 2c coin. Haven't had in a VERY long time.

      I would also suggest you only find it easier to count the other way because you've not had to deal with a 25c coin. It's second nature to most people here. 83c is obviously 75c plus 8c, meaning three quarters plus a nickel plus three pennies. Very simple.

    54. Re:Not yet... by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      The problem is the size and shape of the old dollar coins. They're very close to quarters in size and weight. In our first attempt, the dollar coins were also silver like the quarters. So it was hard to quickly identify which coins are dollars and which are quarters.

      Funny, but US notes are all the same color, so if I'm looking at a pile of US dollars, I have to spread 'em out to count 'em individually to figure out how much I have.

      Unlike say, every other country's notes which are color coded, so I can quickly glance through my wallet and count.

      Or, I can also hand over a note to the cashier which I know how much is there without needing ot visually inspect and have said cashier also inspect. (In Canada - blue = $5, purple = $10, green = $20, red = $50, and brown = $100. If I need $5, I grab the blue note. No need to go through my stack and see if I have a $5 note or accidentally give 4 $1 notes and 1 $10 note...

    55. Re:Not yet... by mark-t · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The reason it failed was because the USA didn't actually make the decision to stop printing $1 bills.

      Canada initially made a similar error when we introduced the loonie here. The $1 bill was not actually removed from circulation (they only reduced the number of $1 bills printed) for a number of months after the coin's introduction, during which the $1 bills that existed were wearing out faster (because people preferred them to coins and would use them so much more frequently), and this necessitated the mint printing more than initially estimated. The solution, Canada determined, was to discontinue the $1 bill entirely and increase production of the $1 coin to compensate.

      It worked.

    56. Re:Not yet... by xaxa · · Score: 5, Informative

      The British (technically, English) £1 note was abandoned before I was born, but here's an article from the time: http://www.guardian.co.uk/theguardian/2012/nov/13/pound-note-replaced-coin-1984

      And here's another: http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/november/12/newsid_2518000/2518637.stm

      British coins are very easy to tell apart -- low-value (½p, discontinued), 1p and 2p are brown with plain edges, mid value coins are silver: 5p and 10p are thin and have milled edges, 20p and 50p are heptagonal with plain edges; £1 and £2 are gold-coloured and thick.

    57. Re:Not yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      50+25+5+2+1

      The US has no 2 cent coins either.

    58. Re:Not yet... by Xeno+man · · Score: 1

      It averages out over the long run but it already doesn't matter. Pennies are already worth so little that people don't care about them now. Customers often tell cashiers to keep the 1c or 2c change or cashiers often round up to 5c instead of counting out 4 cents.

    59. Re:Not yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Join a credit union and use their in-branch counting machine for free and get actual cash back rather than a gift card. Deposit the cash into your account at said institution and actually make interest on your coin stash.

    60. Re:Not yet... by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 3, Informative

      In the US, dollar bills were never withdrawn from circulation. Nobody made you take coins, you could always have bills. And that's what everybody continued to use, while the coins sat in the vaults, untouched.

    61. Re:Not yet... by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 2

      The problem is the size and shape of the old dollar coins. They're very close to quarters in size and weight.

      Yes. And the Susan B. Anthony's perhaps were confusing. But the Sacagawea's aren't confusing at all.

      There's no "problem" except the fact that the Treasury Department keeps printing dollar bills. Stop printing them, and people will stop using them. People use what is familiar... and if you have two things in circulation that do the same thing and one is less familiar, people will continue to use the old one.

      But just stop handing out the old ones. The average life of a dollar bill in circulation is pretty short, so most of them will disappear pretty quickly as banks hand in bills but only get coins back. But people will still want to buy crap. Hence, they will learn to carry coins.

      There's no other "problem" at all.

    62. Re:Not yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're wife is right it will get priced so that it gets rounded up for single purchases. If you're smart enough to buy things so that you get it rounded down then you've just bought more from the seller, it's kinda win win for the seller there. That said you're right too, this level of being ripped off is unimportant.

    63. Re:Not yet... by Macman408 · · Score: 2

      I was recently in Australia for a week, and in that time, I found $4 on the street - two $1 coins and a $2 coin. Now losing a couple quarters is no big deal - worth maybe a can of soda. But lose a couple of the quite small $2 coins, and there goes a latte - and you know how us Americans are with our Starbucks! With such small but high-value coins, the wealth that's caught in the couch cushions down under could probably solve the financial crisis of a small European country!

      Seriously though, I prefer plastic to paper, and paper to metal. Mainly just because that's what's easiest to carry in my wallet. If I spend cash and get change (which is rare - I usually just do it on small purchases for the benefit of the merchant to avoid high credit card fees), that change sits in my pocket for the rest of the day. At the end of the day it gets dumped on my desk. After a week or two, whatever change is on my desk gets dumped in a jar somewhere. And about every 5 years, that jar goes to the bank. If I start dumping a couple dollars at a time into that jar, it holds a lot more money. And I'm not likely to carry coins around with me, since I rarely go somewhere intending to use cash.

      If we ditch the dollar bill, I don't care if we replace it with a particular coin - but let's fix the problem of high credit card fees on tiny transactions so that it makes sense to use a credit card for everything. Then we'll be one step closer to getting rid of the rest of our currency too.

    64. Re:Not yet... by kiddygrinder · · Score: 1

      in aus they just re-priced everything to $x.95

      --
      This is a joke. I am joking. Joke joke joke.
    65. Re:Not yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Knuth would sure like that. We could put his face on the 0x$1.00 coin/bill. His secretary wouldn't have to make so much change anymore, and he wouldn't even have to sign his own name! Brilliant!

    66. Re:Not yet... by Carewolf · · Score: 3, Informative

      They never produced enough of the dollars coins plus the cowardly Americans never did have the balls to phase out the dollar bill while introducing the coins.

      In the end all the dollar coins ended up at collectors.

      Another way of saying it: They never even tried. They never even tried three times.

    67. Re:Not yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a small price to pay for a nice body and a healthy sex drive, though.

      Then my wife should be all for getting rid of pennies!

    68. Re:Not yet... by lattyware · · Score: 1

      The US also uses Imperial measurements for general usage, so I think a 25c coin is the saner of the problems on hand.

      --
      -- Lattyware (www.lattyware.co.uk)
    69. Re:Not yet... by shaitand · · Score: 1

      Maybe we should work on making it a more reasonable value rather than doing away with it.

    70. Re:Not yet... by shaitand · · Score: 1

      "Or, I can also hand over a note to the cashier which I know how much is there without needing ot visually inspect and have said cashier also inspect."

      Doesn't sound like a feature if you want to prevent counterfeiting. You've reduced the barrier for passing a fake bill to replicating a color. Probably even lower since other nations will likely make similar colored bills for you.

    71. Re:Not yet... by shaitand · · Score: 0, Troll

      "Canada initially made a similar error when we introduced the loonie here."

      One could argue that the mistake was to force people to use the coin when the people of Canada clearly preferred the bill.

    72. Re:Not yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I want to know is why the US has quarters instead of 20c coins. 25c is such a pain in the ass to work with. If you want say 83c, I personally would find it a lot easier to figure out I need 50+20+10+2+1 than 50+25+5+2+1.

      I don't see how that makes things any better It's still 5 coins to get to your 83c, and each dollar has to be broken down into 5 parts instead of just four, As far as the US using the 25 instead of 20 cent coin goes, It's based in part on the use of the Spanish Real in the late 1700s which was divided into halves and quarters http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quarter_(United_States_coin)
      There was a 20 cent coin for a few years starting in 1875 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twenty-cent_piece_(United_States_coin) which didn't live well with the Quarter

    73. Re:Not yet... by mrbester · · Score: 2

      Originally the 5p and 10p coins were minted to be the same size and weight as the shilling and florin (2 shilling piece) as it aided the transition to decimalisation in 1971 from pounds, shillings and pence and were worth the same. As the banks received shillings they were replaced with the new pence equivalent. The half crown (12 1/2p) and crown (25p) were withdrawn immediately and the heptagonal 50p piece replaced the 10 shilling note. The Royal Mint started minting 50p pieces a full two years before decimalisation to deal with that.

      Around 1982 the heptagonal 20p piece was introduced and the pound note was replaced by the coin a couple of years later. A few years later we finally got rid of the halfpenny bit.

      Subsequent to that there was a replacement of all 5p, 10p and 50p pieces with smaller coins that are the ones currently in use and the £2 coin was introduced which is a larger version of the £1 with a silver inner circle.

      There is a £5 coin produced but it isn't legal tender as it is only used for commemorative coins. When it is made legal tender it will remain the same size and weight.

      All non-copper coins that are round have milled edges.

      In over 40 years the 1p and 2p pieces have never changed since their introduction.

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    74. Re:Not yet... by shaitand · · Score: 0

      Why force people to deal with coins at all? I think you'll find that most people have a jar or other location where they dump coins they get stuck with as soon as possible. Nobody wants to have to deal with coins except old ladies.

    75. Re:Not yet... by tru3ntropy · · Score: 1
      --
      In Google we trust.
    76. Re:Not yet... by kwerle · · Score: 1

      England had some experience with this sort of thing, already, having done away with the shilling, etc.

    77. Re:Not yet... by shaitand · · Score: 0

      "We've lost 10-cent bus fare, 10-cent payphone calls and 1-cent candy and managed to do just fine. We can live without small bills too."

      You realize that nothing on that list is a good thing?

    78. Re:Not yet... by mrbester · · Score: 1

      Not only are other countries' notes a different colour for each denomination, they are also a different size based on the face value; bigger denomination, bigger note. This doesn't just aid the (colour) blind...

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    79. Re:Not yet... by shaitand · · Score: 2

      Not to mention a wife who pulls in 6 figures. My wife costs money.

    80. Re:Not yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Donald Knuth? Is that you?

    81. Re:Not yet... by shaitand · · Score: 1

      I'm for this. But the only ones have their wealth adjusted should be those with more than a million dollars worth of cash and assets. Everyone else gets a dollar for dollar exchange for the corrected money.

      It'll only be a few weeks before the top 1% got it all back but hey things would be better for a few weeks.

    82. Re:Not yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a small price to pay for a nice body and a healthy sex drive, though.

      It is a small price to pay until you round up and get neither.

    83. Re:Not yet... by shaitand · · Score: 1

      how do you end up with that much change? There aren't that many places you have to use cash anymore.

    84. Re:Not yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is the size and shape of the old dollar coins. They're very close to quarters in size and weight. In our first attempt, the dollar coins were also silver like the quarters. So it was hard to quickly identify which coins are dollars and which are quarters.

      You already have this problem with your notes, right? If I may lay on another helping of sanctimony, Australian notes are all different colours and slightly different sizes, making it easy to distinguish between them (and possible, with some care, for blind people to do so). Not to mention that they're plastic rather than paper, so you can go swimming with them...

    85. Re:Not yet... by shaitand · · Score: 1

      You could also just use the machine at the bank that charges no fee and gives you a paper slip to take to the teller.

    86. Re:Not yet... by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

      That said, many countries (Canada included) have or are eliminating the penny. The smallest denomination is the nickel, and there are very simple rules in place for stores to do rounding (on the cash registers) that averages out over time.

      That sucks because pennies make great inexpensive ammo for slingshots.

    87. Re:Not yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps interestingly, the Canadian paper money in largest circulation is not the $5, it's the $20 bill... because of bank machines.

      And because C$50 bills were so easy to counterfeit for so many years that many stores wouldn't take them.

    88. Re:Not yet... by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      All the ones around here are https://coinstar.com/ ones that have a bunch of gift card options all at no charge (getting cash skims off 10% or so).

    89. Re:Not yet... by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      There's too much debt in the systems to do that.

    90. Re:Not yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was a failure because the US didn't pull the $1 bill out of circulation.

      Canada started withdrawing paper $1 bills when the $1 coin was introduced. If you didn't want a $1 coin in your change, within a few weeks all a store could give you instead was quarters or smaller instead. That got rid of a lot of people's resistance. (Mind, we still had $2 bills and they were increased in circulation, but they were withdrawn in the same manner for a $2 coin a few years later.)

      Before long no one worries about it anymore. It is what it is and people get used to it.

      We've lost 10-cent bus fare, 10-cent payphone calls and 1-cent candy and managed to do just fine. We can live without small bills too.

      (Perhaps interestingly, the Canadian paper money in largest circulation is not the $5, it's the $20 bill... because of bank machines.)

      I would say it was a failure because how the fuck else are you going to conveniently pay that fee when rounded up to the nearest 1/100th of 1 Dollar? For example the US gasoline/diesel fuel tax is calculated in 1/1000th of 1 Dollar.

      So, in a way that also justifies my feeling of being fucked in the ass by Uncle Sam by 1/10th of a penny on every gallon of gas I've ever bought (I assume the Feds get the round-off).

      Stop charging things in 1/1000th 1/100th and 1 whole Dollar and I guess that problem goes away?

    91. Re:Not yet... by mark-t · · Score: 1
      Of course people preferred the bill.

      The point of the change was not to adopt to what people preferred, but what would save money. The coin's longevity was desirable... and when it was seen that just reducing the print runs on $1 bills only created more demand for them, it was seen as most prudent to cut the bill out entirely.

    92. Re:Not yet... by kiehlster · · Score: 1

      Thought you'd like to know the half dollar has been in existence for hundreds of years, Half dollar coin. What doesn't make sense is that they're the largest coin of the bunch, and I mean HUGE. Also, the new dollar coins I have look pretty good, and they're a different size than the quarter, Presidential dollar coins.

      I would be worried what would happen if we made a move like this. There would be a lot of churn during a transition like this from old bills to new bills.

    93. Re:Not yet... by Nutria · · Score: 1

      Hunh. Beauty and "enthusiasm" don't last forever...

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    94. Re:Not yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't introduce a new standard while still producing the old "comfortable" standards.

    95. Re:Not yet... by edjs · · Score: 1

      The change jar might be the only savings/pension plan many people are left with ...

      But in this Canadian's experience, the toonies, loonies, and maybe some quarters get retained as pocket change, since you can still buy stuff with only a few such coins or top up a purchase otherwise using bills. What pocket change used to be. The main purpose now, it seems, for quarters and smaller coins is to give the impatient cause to groan when somone ahead in line dumps literal handfuls of change on the counter.

    96. Re:Not yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For $15 per year you cannot get a sex-care worker to visit even once, much less live in and do the dishes.

    97. Re:Not yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this is also the basis for the phrase "two-bit whore".

    98. Re:Not yet... by Guppy06 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      We've tried to replace the dollar with coins three times so far, and it's failed.

      We've never been without dollar coins, since 1776. It's the greenback that's new.

      The problem is the size and shape of the old dollar coins. They're very close to quarters in size and weight.

      Until coins marked 1965 and newer, all reeded US coins (dimes, quarters, halves, dollars) were 0.9 fine silver; the reeding was to discourage filing of the precious metal. The values of the coins were based on their weight in silver, a ratio (though not their original weights) that persists today: a half-dollar weighs as much as two quarters, which weighs as much as five dimes, and any combination of all three that equals $20 weighs 1 lb avoirdupois.

      After all circulating coins were reduced to base metals, the Eisenhower dollar coin was introduced in 1971. However, it was the same size as the old (true) silver dollars, weighing as much as four quarters, proving to be an unwieldy size. This large size made sense when they were minted of precious metal, but not so much with base metal. It failed to catch on.

      (Meanwhile, the half-dollar fell out of common circulation, because everyone obsessed over JFK.)

      The Anthony dollar of 1979 was an effort to fix this. In order to distinguish it from other denominations, it was originally going to be a different shape: a curve of continuous width, with 11 sides (in honor of Apollo 11, whose mission patch was on the reverse). This original feature can be seen in the artwork of the coin, with both the obverse and reverse having a hendecagon inscribed around the edge. However, coin-operated machinery operators were concerned about the reliability of their equipment accepting such an unusual shape at the time, resulting in a last-minute change to a circular coin.

      It should be noted that Canada essentially copied the Anthony dollar's original design in their current "loonie," only changing the color. The number 11 doesn't hold the historical significance to Canada as it does to the US, but the loonie has 11 sides just the same.

      So when it came time for serious attempt #2 (Sacagawea dollar) the coin still had to be the same size and shape or every vending machine would have to be replaced.

      As noted above, the loonie is the same thickness and diameter as the Anthony dollar. In addition to this, Canadian pennies, nickels, dimes and quarters are also the same size and shape (and color) as US coins of the same denomination. (Half-dollars are different, but are rarely seen in either country regardless.)

      Because of this, coin-sorting equipment can be made to easily switch between US and Canadian coins, which only really differ in weight and metallurgy (i. e. magnetic signature). Keeping the newer golden dollars the same size and shape as the Anthony dollars wasn't just a matter of backwards-compatibility but cross-compatibility as well. The yellow color of the golden US dollars also continues the trend of using the same colors for the same denominations.

      The real issue for the golden dollar was maintaining the same magnetic signature as the Anthony dollar, in spite of using a different color alloy.

      And it still felt like a quarter in your pocket.

      Until you feel the smooth edge. It doesn't have the loonie's corners, but it's still easily distinguished from quarters by touch, just as you can distinguish between quarters and nickels, and between dimes and pennies.

      We're trying again with the Presidential Dollar Coins.

      Past tense. Production was halted prematurely this year, with Grover Cleveland's first term.

      Besides, they were always intended as a limited issue, much like the "50 State Quarters" program. Sacagawea dollars were minted alongside them, along with some special, limited-issue reverses reflecting "Native American heritage." The only permanent change is moving "In God We Trust" from the edge-printing to the obverse, after a certain well-publicized snafu with the Presidential dollars.

    99. Re:Not yet... by jamesh · · Score: 1

      This will not happen until Americans can let go of their irrational attachment to dollar bills and pennies.

      In Australia we ditched $1 and $2 notes for coins in 1984 and 1988. 1c and 2c coins were dropped in 1992.

      5c coins are now the most annoying thing - none of the parking meters I use will take them and they are pretty much the only way I spend coins.

    100. Re:Not yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AFAIK the Royal Bank of Scotland still issues £1 notes. No banknote in Scotland is "legal tender" (not even Bank of England). The British Crown Dependencies (Jersey, Guernsey, Isle of Man) issue their own currency at par with Sterling and they still issue £1 notes. Given the low number in circulation, I would expect these banks to continue to print £1 notes more as a commemorative issue than for normal day-to-day trade.

    101. Re:Not yet... by jamesh · · Score: 1

      (Perhaps interestingly, the Canadian paper money in largest circulation is not the $5, it's the $20 bill... because of bank machines.)

      I guess Australia is pretty much on par with Canada then. We have $1 and $2 coins, not notes, and our ATM's hand out $20 and $50 notes. My withdrawals are normally for $60 so I get 3 x $20.

      Once they start making parking ticket machines take credit card or sms payment's i'll pretty much be done with physical currency except for an emergency stash.

    102. Re:Not yet... by scared+masked+man · · Score: 0

      I just wish banks would connect those machines to the ATM system like a deposit ATM, so you didn't have to go and queue up after you've deposited the money.

    103. Re:Not yet... by russotto · · Score: 1

      What I want to know is why the US has quarters instead of 20c coins.

      Pieces of eight, Spanish dollars; a quarter is two bits, which of course got you a shave and a haircut at some time in the distant past. But there never was a single bit coin, as far as I know.

    104. Re:Not yet... by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      considering the obesity rate maybe the lose of 1cent candy is for the best though. :-P

      (hey dice now that you own slashdot can you fix the Unicode support to i can use a cent symbol or maybe let it accept &#162 html entity for it)

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    105. Re:Not yet... by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      hmm lets way out the pro's and cons here;
      con - she likes pennies.
      pros - sex, sex, sex, oh and sex.
      she gets to stay

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    106. Re:Not yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, but the real reason is that 1, 5, 10, and 25 are the optimal denominations for making change most efficiently using the fewest coins.

      This is where the Euro got it wrong - they use 20 and 50 coins rather than a 25 coin. That even with one fewer denomination in use, you can still make change using fewer coins overall, FOR THE AMOUNTS MOST COMMONLY NEEDED.

      Turns out, the very large majority of "change" needed is less than 50 cents. Even with tax on top, buying several things priced at $X.99 leaves you just a bit below a round number, rather than just a bit over. Or, a complimentary case, where several items, each 80-99 cents, adds up to be about X.40 or so, then you add on tax to make the total X.80 or so. This was particularly true in places where (a) tax is already included in the price, which is still $X.99, and (b) in former times, when sales tax was far less common.

      So, it's better to have a 25 than a 20 and 50, in actual use. And, even in statistical use, a 25 is only slightly less efficient than a 20/50 combo, and you save a whole lot on not needed another denomination coin.

    107. Re:Not yet... by daffmeister · · Score: 1
    108. Re:Not yet... by dryeo · · Score: 1

      They're not one colour, just predominately one colour with various anti-counterfeiting features such as a metallic holographic area. The new ones are actually partially transparent with translucent parts. Also plastic.
      Here's what we've been using until this year, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Canadian_bills2.jpg and their replacements so far, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frontier_Series. For completeness, our $1 and $2 coins, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Canadian_1_and_2_dollar_coins.png note that the coins also changed this year into thinner lighter versions (and the vending machine companies did adjust) and the penny is no longer being minted.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    109. Re:Not yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just don't do what those idiot Australians did, namely making the $2 coin smaller than the $1 coin. What a bunch of maroons!

    110. Re:Not yet... by dryeo · · Score: 2

      The people also wanted a balanced budget and this was one step in that direction. We did end up with a balanced budget, at least until the right wingers came to power with their philosophy of cutting taxes, services and increasing spending on spying on citizens, locking people up and war. Nothing like no bid military contracts to create a deficit.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    111. Re:Not yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is also why a dollar is still sometimes called a "byte."

    112. Re:Not yet... by AdamWill · · Score: 1

      If you have high-value coins you start carrying them around.

      I carry toonies, loonies and quarters, everything else goes in the change jar. Or rather, money pig.

    113. Re:Not yet... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Animals without backbones hid from each other, or fell down....

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    114. Re:Not yet... by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      um no, then you would only make the rich poorer (and only for a short while, they did not get rich for being stupid (unless they got rich on reality TV shows the n they got rich for being very stupid)) and not of changed the value of the currency significantly. oh and those rich you are so happy to take money away from are the ones that employ all of our asses. you go trying to take their money and the will pack up their shit and leave with most of their money that will screw the economy even more.
        the rich buy stuff and build the factories that in turn employ people and make stuff more stuff.
        lets look at William Randolf Hurst for example the arch type for the evil capitalist commonly attacked for the building of his massive Hurst Castle which cost over 10 million dollars in 1920-40 money at that. but what was the economic influence on the economy of the area? that would be a an influx of billion of dollars (in modern money) paid to hundred of contractors construction workers and more that they would not of had if Hurst had not built is privet castle and instead bought a preexisting home.
        If not for the rich we would have no jobs and no money.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    115. Re:Not yet... by runeghost · · Score: 1

      If you bother to do any research you'll find that from entrepreneurs to economists to business magazines to the mostly incompetent mainstream media, the consensus everywhere outside of pure propaganda for the 1% is that "the rich" are not job creators but wealth-hoarders.

      You are cordially invited to go fuck yourself with a red hot poker.

    116. Re:Not yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find the name fitting though.

    117. Re:Not yet... by tknd · · Score: 1

      This is kind of how the Japanese yen works except they haven't phased out there version of a "nickle" and "penny". In Yen, they have 1 yen, 5 yen, 10 yen, 50 yen, 100 yen, and 500 yen coins. The smallest bill is 1000 yen. About 100 yen feels like $1 in their economy.

      Japanese people hate the 1yen coins just as much as we hate pennies and there is usually a donation box at the register of big chain stores for you to donate your 1 yen coins. Or you can go to a shrine or temple and get rid of them there. The 5 yen coin, however, seems to symbolize some kind of luck in their culture so they probably will never phase out the 5 yen coin.

      I'm all for USA switching to dimes and dollar coins as well as reintroducing the half dollar coin while phasing out $1 bills and all of the existing coins.

      But but, what about vending machines! Just give up. One thing I hate about today's American culture is how everyone expects their opinion to be preserved for their own benefit when it is clearly dragging down everyone else.

    118. Re:Not yet... by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Notes are always removed from circulation. When they get torn and dirty and thin and pass through a bank. Then they passed to the government and incinerated.

      So the mistake was to keep on issuing new dollar bills. Had the government simply started supplying new coins instead, the changeover would have happened gradually and inevitably. The stores can only offer bills as change if they actually have them in the cash register.

    119. Re:Not yet... by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      One could argue that the mistake was to force people to use the coin when the people of Canada clearly preferred the bill.

      People dislike change. But once the change has happened they get used to the new thing. This is certainly true with changing bills to coins. I've experienced the process twice in two countries where I've lived.

      Pandering to people's fear of change, when the replacement has many advantages - that would be the mistake.

    120. Re:Not yet... by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      People dump worthless coins in jars. In the UK, people don't chuck their pound coins in jars, nor in Europe do they chuck their Euros in jars.

    121. Re:Not yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Manley due to marketing research. A study a
      Was done that showed that more people were liable to buy a product at .99 the a dollar but in reality people are out to save money where ever they can. If they did the study to compare a 5 cent difference the lower would still win out. Personally I would like to see the whole 99 cent bs disappear. I get the dollar coins when ever I can and SPEND them in the machines. All of our machines accept dollar coins. Unfortunately as long as places keep pushing dollar bills due to cotton growers lobby I don't see them ever really taking off. Besides, .. In today's economy how many people actually use cash on a daily basis, or have more then one or two dollar bills in their pockets on a common basis. I for one live off my debit card and don't Cary cash. Someone robs me the cards are canceled in ten minutes, the cash is gone forever.

    122. Re:Not yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought the same thing about my ex. But crazy is crazy, and there is only so much shit you can put up with.

    123. Re:Not yet... by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      As an aside, the colour, size and weight of the Sacagawea dollars are very very close to the Australian $1 coin. As an Australian that moved to the US, this meant I actually felt very comfortable with them and they literally 'felt' like a dollar to me, unlike the $1 bills. I have to admit though I did wonder why you called them such an awkward name ... it's not like it even needs a "name". What's wrong with just "$1 coin"?

      I understand that some Americans do confuse them with quarters due to their size/weight. Wasn't an issue for me though cause I really don't like quarters. Another artefact of growing up in Australia where the coins were 5c/10c/20c/50c - doing the math with 25c denominations has never felt natural to me so I subconsciously avoid it I guess. If something is 60c I really have to think "duhh so ok that's 2 quarters and a dime" (whereas back in AU it'd just be three 20c coins).

    124. Re:Not yet... by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      The problem is you gave people a choice. You introduced $1 coins, but didn't take away the bills. It's default human nature to stick with the familiar - so if there's two equally easy paths, but one involves change (no matter how small), then people will avoid it.

      In Australia the replacement of $1 and $2 bills with coins worked, I think, because the coins were introduced AND the bills were taken away at the same time. Well not "taken away" ... any bills you had were still legal tender of course ... but they just stopped producing them, and within a couple of years they were removed from circulation through natural attrition. This happens very quickly with highly circulated, low denomination bills like the $1 - I think I read that the average lifespan of a US $1 bill is only a couple of years.

    125. Re:Not yet... by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      to may people head would pop. i think it would be amusing to no longer have billionaires but giganaires and government spending measured teradollars

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    126. Re:Not yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We broke parity with the US dollar quite some time ago, our dollar buys more. Sorry to rain on your parade there.

    127. Re:Not yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if either of those summations gives you a problem to calculate then you have bigger problems than quarters and 20c pieces.

    128. Re:Not yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why noy? The dime is smaller than the penny and the nickel.

    129. Re:Not yet... by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      popular belief does not make something true

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    130. Re:Not yet... by tokencode · · Score: 1

      Round coins have certain advantages such as rolling that are utilized in some vending machines and coin counters.

    131. Re:Not yet... by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Tits, eh? Giving up on the eagle?

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    132. Re:Not yet... by A+bsd+fool · · Score: 1

      How is this a 'troll'?? Good grief slashdot, pull your heads out.

      I spent about 9 months living in Canada. The $1 and $2 coins were an unabashed nightmare. Walking around with pockets full of heavy coins is not fun. Neither is accidentally dropping a couple dollars into the charity/tip jar when you get your change.

      Save four billion dollars? There are four billion other ways to save more in our outrageously wasteful government.

    133. Re:Not yet... by camperdave · · Score: 1

      In the olden days, when the dollar coins were a dollar worth of silver, you would make change by snapping or cutting the coin in half. In fact, I believe there were score marks on some coins to facilitate that. The half coins could be snapped into quarters, and the quarters into pie shaped bits. A quarter was literally a quarter of a dollar. Whole dollar coins are the "Pieces of Eight" of pirate lore, because they are a piece made of eight.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    134. Re:Not yet... by DeathElk · · Score: 1

      Fuck me dead. You should not only look in the mirror, you should get an Australian to ram your fucking face into it. I volunteer.

    135. Re:Not yet... by DeathElk · · Score: 1

      Pictures or it didn't happen. (Ducks)

    136. Re:Not yet... by shaitand · · Score: 1

      It is 4 billion over 30 years!

    137. Re:Not yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Am I on Slashbook or Facedot?

    138. Re:Not yet... by shaitand · · Score: 1

      It isn't the place of government to pander to the people. It is the place of government to do what its told by them.

      Some people aren't afraid of change but rather genuinely prefer not to have coins of significant value so they have to haul around pockets full of heavy bulky objects that spill out when they fish for keys. Especially to save a pathetic $130 million a year. I think it is safe to say most of us enjoy not having any good reason to carry any change in our pockets most of the time and would be willing to contribute our less than 50 cents a year to avoid the need to start.

    139. Re:Not yet... by shaitand · · Score: 1

      At $133 million a year this isn't likely to bring us a balanced budget the 4 billion is spread over 30 years. That wouldn't even be a significant line item in the budget of a major city in the US let alone the federal government.

      Spending an extra 50 cents per person each year to avoid carrying around pockets full of bulky metal seems more than reasonable. I'd argue that the nations that think having done this already makes them 'ahead' and that not having done so makes the US 'behind' need to re-evaluate their priorities.

    140. Re:Not yet... by shaitand · · Score: 1

      "The point of the change was not to adopt to what people preferred"

      If you have a democracy the point of every change is to adopt what the people prefer. If the people prefer saving money you use coins if they prefer paper bills you do that instead. It is after all their money and they may spend it on paper bills if they wish. Otherwise, stop pretending you are a democracy.

      "The coin's longevity was desirable..." to someone who thought their desires trumped that of the population of Canada.

      The purpose of the government is to serve AND obey the people. It is not the place of the government to decide they know better than the people. Are things so out of whack in Canada that they've forgotten that the people and not government bean counters decide what is desirable? That truly is looney.

      According to these estimates this would save a measly $133 million a year. That certainly isn't enough to justify forcing people to haul around bulky and heavy bits of metal in their pockets. I know I'm willing to chip in my mere 50 cents a year to avoid having to haul around pockets full of change. It is the nations that have gotten so miserly they've implemented such a measure that have fallen behind.

    141. Re:Not yet... by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sorry, this is complete crap.

      I'm going to compare the USA 1,5,10,25,100 system against the very common 1,2,5,10,20,50,100 system (125 system, for short.)

      By my calculation (done by hand, so may be a little out) to make all the quantities of change from 0 to 99, the USA system needs 470 coins, the 125 system needs 340 coins. The only quantities for which the USA system needs fewer coins are 25, 26, 35 and 36, for which it is one coin more efficient in each case.

      If you took away the 2c coin to have 1,5,10,20,50 (i.e. a 20 and 50 instead of a 25 compared to the USA system) you'd still need only 420 coins (vs 470) for all change from 0 to 99c.

      The 125 system works so well because the denominations are nearly equally spaced logarithmically. Starting with 1, you get the next denominations by multiplying by 2, 2.5, 2, 2, 2.5, 2. In the USA system, the multipliers are 5, 2, 2.5, 4. It is those large multipliers (5 and 4) which make the system so inefficient.

      If you wanted to span the 1-100 range with just four coins, I believe 1, 3, 10, 30 would be optimal, as it is closest to logarithmic spacing. (Actually, 1,3,10,32 might be better, but that would be a real pain to make change with.) (Even more efficient would be a true logarithmic system: 1,2,4,8,16... or 1,3,9,27,81,... or 1,4,16,64,256... but none of these mesh well with our decimal system.)

      On what evidence do you know "THE AMOUNTS MOST COMMONLY NEEDED"? Even accepting your unsupported claim "the very large majority of "change" needed is less than 50 cents", for each amount of change 0 to 49 cents, USA system needs 185 coins vs 145 for the 125 system, so you fail on this count too. If you remove the 2c from 125 and consider only change less than 50c (effectively removing the 50c from the 125 system as we'll never use it, so denominations are 1,5,10,20) then you *finally* get marginally ahead: 185 vs 190. Against this, the 125 system is about one coin better for every number from 50c to 99c, so your 'very large majority' will have to be greater than 90% to even get marginally ahead. (And remember, this is without the 2c, which the 125 system would normally have.)

      --
      Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
    142. Re:Not yet... by daver00 · · Score: 1

      and you know how us Americans are with our Starbucks!

      We Australians have no fucking idea how you are with Starbucks... Starbucks Australia went broke and had to basically exit the country almost as soon as it started opening stores, because compared to Australian coffee it was plain trash. You spent a week in Australia, I hope you realise how bad Starbucks coffee is now! Australia is renowned for having the highest standards for coffee.

    143. Re:Not yet... by riverat1 · · Score: 1

      The other problem with the Susan B. Anthony Dollar was it had a milled edge like a Quarter. The Sacagawea and Presidential Dollars have a smooth edge so it's not hard to tell them apart from a Quarter.

    144. Re:Not yet... by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      Im guessing you didn't read the GP. In America, people don't change unless it's less painful to change.
      I'm American, I know this from our history just over the last century.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    145. Re:Not yet... by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      I've heard that a lot, but every time I've had a Susan B Anthony in my pocket I've never had a problem differentiating it from a quarter since the weight is different. I also have a tendency to look at my money...

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    146. Re:Not yet... by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      Coins are an afterthought, no worries there.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    147. Re:Not yet... by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      83 cents = 3 quarters, 1 nickel, 3 pennies
      instead of
      4 20-cent pieces and 3 pennies.
      Same number of coins...

      Why is that hard?

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    148. Re:Not yet... by riverat1 · · Score: 1

      Well, you're right, I've never had that problem either. But some people aren't as perceptive as we are, eh?

    149. Re:Not yet... by chrismcb · · Score: 1

      Hi. I'm right here in the good old USA, and I can confirm for everybody that is in fact 100% an irrational attachment.

      It isn't irrational, at least from a consumer point of view. A pocket full of dollar coins is heavy. It is one thing I hate about London (granted their pounds feel like pounds)

    150. Re:Not yet... by nateb · · Score: 1

      Government spending is already measured in trillions.

      --
      -- Nate
    151. Re:Not yet... by GNious · · Score: 1

      We replaced a 1 DKR coin with a different 1 DKR coin (smaller, less metal, hole in it); After that I met people who refused to receive the new coins, because they "were worth less" due to the reduced amount of metal.

      Yes, people will come up with any reason for keeping what they are used to.

    152. Re:Not yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So it was hard to quickly identify which coins are dollars and which are quarters.

      This is wonderfully ironic when coupled with the American banknotes. Every other country has different sized notes, but in the states each bill is the same size and same colour - leading to a difficulty in quickly identifying which was the $50 you just took out of the ATM and which was the random $1 you happened to have.

    153. Re:Not yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the end all the dollar coins ended up at collectors.

      Bullshit, there are plenty out there and you can get them at damn near any bank if you want. I've seen plenty of change machines that will take 1's, 5's, 10's, and 20's and kick out the $1 coins.

      Americans never did have the balls to phase out the dollar bill

      Spare me the rhetoric, most people don't care either way. Yes, it was mostly because the Treasury kept printing bills. But a lot of it has to do with retail stores not wanting to change their cash handling procedures. Bills are easier for them to deal with, coins are heavier and harder to count because while most businesses have at least one bill counting machine, almost none of them have a coin counting machine. When it comes to vending machines, some will accept the $1 coins but many do not, and the owners don't want to pay to install the mechanisms which can handle them.
      People like to keep their cash in a wallet, and hate dealing with coins, and using the dollar coins means a pocketful of noisy, bulky metal. Personally, I like the dollar coins but hate having to argue with idiot minimum wage clerks about whether or not it's "real money". Same reason I don't like using $2 bills.

    154. Re:Not yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Tits We Trust... (Considering the boobs we keep electing to office in this country, the slogan would fit...)

    155. Re:Not yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is better to have loved and lost than to be stuck with the psycho for the rest of your life...

    156. Re:Not yet... by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Actually no. Just declare that "new dollars" are worth half of dollars, design and print new notes, design and mint new coins, and give people time to exchange their old currency.

      It's very possible and very easy. See also: Large economies in Europe switching to the Euro.

    157. Re:Not yet... by amorsen · · Score: 1

      Err, giga is 1000000000 and tera is 1000000000000. You already have giganaires and teradollars.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    158. Re:Not yet... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      British coins are very easy to tell apart -- low-value (½p, discontinued), 1p and 2p are brown with plain edges, mid value coins are silver: 5p and 10p are thin and have milled edges, 20p and 50p are heptagonal with plain edges; £1 and £2 are gold-coloured and thick.

      Additionally, within a group, coins get larger as their value increases. US coins are confusing, with the 10 being much smaller than the 5.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    159. Re:Not yet... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Funny, but US notes are all the same color, so if I'm looking at a pile of US dollars, I have to spread 'em out to count 'em individually to figure out how much I have.

      They're also different sizes in most countries. This makes it possible for blind people to tell them apart. US notes are all the same size, which makes this much harder. It's a bit surprising that this isn't a violation of ADA..

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    160. Re:Not yet... by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      That doesn make a dollar a more reasonable value. That creates an entirely different dollar, which is completely unrelated with changing the current purchasing power of a currency.

    161. Re:Not yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the USA, we still like to pretend our currency has value.

      ... same for our antiquated system of measurements. We seem to have an irrational hold on historical artifacts and allow them to define them who we are to the detriment of progress.

    162. Re:Not yet... by Cederic · · Score: 1

      No shit. You then replace the existing currency with the new one, rename (if wanted) the new one to match the name of the existing one et voila: Dollars now worth less than they used to be. No reduction in real debt. No loss of real wealth.

      It's been done. It's easy.

    163. Re:Not yet... by mark-t · · Score: 1
      The reason people didn't use the bill was not simply because of the practical advantages of the bill, but simply because people are adverse to change. That's not a good enough reason to not do something that is otherwise quite beneficial. Indeed... in at least one informal survey taken recently, in the aftermath of the announcement of Canada's switching to a new type of foldable curency that is considerably more durable than paper (and would thus render the financial reasons for switching to the coin in the first place as correspondingly much less significant), much of the Canada's modern population would apparently now actually *resist* the reintroduction of the $1 bill , if the mint were to consider it, which shows that even the very practical benefits that people were listing as justification to resist the introduction of the $1 coin are far outweighed by people's desire to avoid change.

      In a nutshell, the reason that people gave to avoid using the coin was bullshit, and in hindsight, legitimately justifies the government's decision to ignore what people merely *believed* that they wanted.

    164. Re:Not yet... by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      "work on making it a more reasonable value" isn't replacing the currency - it's changing the existing one. That involves price deflation, which doesn't have to be a problem but no government is going to try that when they themselves have huge amounts of debt.

    165. Re:Not yet... by Cederic · · Score: 1

      My apologies, I hadn't realised that giving you an effective workable viable proven mechanism for achieving your aims wasn't actually what you wanted.

    166. Re:Not yet... by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Some people aren't afraid of change but rather genuinely prefer not to have coins of significant value so they have to haul...

      Yeah, as I say, I've been through this twice in other countries. I know both my own reactions and those about me.

      You are simply reacting as most people do before the change. For absolute certain, your view a year after the change will be quite different. You can't see it yet, but I know it, having seen it in everyone around me.

      It isn't the place of government to pander to the people. It is the place of government to do what its told by them.

      No. In a representative democracy, representatives are elected to do what they believe is right. They don't have to follow what the often ill-informed public think about every issue.

      This is a case in point. Your view is ill-informed about this topic because you haven't been through it. You are just imagining. Your politicians would do better to look to the experience in foreign countries that have already actually done it.

    167. Re:Not yet... by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Afaict people generally withdraw relatively large denominations from the bank and then spend them in shops taking change in smaller denominations which they either spend back in the shops or put in a jar and take back to the bank.

      So for dollar coins to become widespread they need to find their way into shop tills in significant numbers. For that to happen one of two things need to happen

      1: shopkeepers decide to order dollar coins instead of dollar bills from the bank
      2: the banks stop distributing dollar bills.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    168. Re:Not yet... by vakuona · · Score: 1

      A little inflation is good. Encourages people to invest or spend rather than keep money in their mattress. Economic activity should be more valued the more recent it is, therefore money made 50 years ago should be worth less today.

    169. Re:Not yet... by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      It doesn't achieve what I though was the aim - to increase the purchasing power of people's existing money. Of course I may have misunderstood it wasn't my aim or proposal and you stating it was doesn't change that.

    170. Re:Not yet... by darkonc · · Score: 1

      It was a failure because the US didn't pull the $1 bill out of circulation.

      it was also a failure because the $1 coin looked way too much like a quarter. I remember getting some $1coins at the time, and everybody (including me) mistook them for quarters. There were a few cases where I ended up paying $2 for a $1.25 snack. and didn't realize until later.

      Canada put a good deal of work into making sure that the $1 coin was noticably different than other coins in circulation, and that went a long way in ensuring their acceptance.

      --
      Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
    171. Re:Not yet... by dargaud · · Score: 1

      I know many americans who simply throw the coins away after each transactions, finding they 'unwieldy'. Or at best they put them in a cookie jar when they get home and convert them when it gets full. I think part of the fault lies with wallet makers who hardly ever include a practical coin holder on the wallets. Since US $ bills are much smaller than most other currencies, so are the US wallets, meaning there's no room for an extra pocket for coins. In Europe I have a big wallet which is mostly flat. In the US I have a small wallet which is almost cubical what with all the credit and membership cards I have to put up with. The former has plenty of margin for keeping extra coins, the latter, understandably, doesn't.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    172. Re:Not yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When people would get cash from the bank they would ask for bills rather than coins. Businesses never had them for change, and customers never requested them. They are an oddity to see, and the banks don't even offer them anymore.

    173. Re:Not yet... by darkonc · · Score: 2

      $/99 plus a 5% sales tax would come to 1.04 with $.96 in change -- meaning that you'll now eed to buy a boat load of $.99 items to get to the 'below $.50 range that you claim most change sits in. In reality, most change ammounts should be randomly distributed.

      --
      Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
    174. Re:Not yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being in the UK where the pound note was replaced by a coin about 15 years ago, amid much moaning from some, I do not understand what is meant by "failed". So what happened?

      "Failed" means they never ended up in normal circulation. But not really failed because we (the US) didn't try.

      Did people throw them away when given them (in change or payement)? Or did they refuse the transaction entirely (and then do without the business)? Historically, there was great difficulty getting people to accept notes in the first place rather than coin; so what irony!

      People never got them as change. For starters there isn't even a place for them in many cash register drawers, so businesses don't have a place to put them other than their safe. Thus the banks didn't distribute them to businesses in any significant amount. The only place I ever received ANY was from US Post Office vending machines. Not even the USPS human tellers gave them as change. Even if you requested them. If you weren't ordering a roll, you had to deliberately purchase an odd assortment of stamps from a vending machine that would have more than $1 change. And no, you couldn't buy 1 30 or 40 something cent stamp with a $20 bill and get 19 of them back. Their old vending machines had rules about how you could pay, and the new ones are credit/debit card only. My bank never had any when I asked. I was intentionally trying to get the coins and found that a difficult process. I only came across 6 or 7 over 2 years. If banks don't request them, the coins can't end up in people's hands.

      I can easily see stores refusing to take them due to ignorance. Stores have even called police departments here over $2 bills, because neither the cashier nor manager thought they were real notes. What's sad is when the officer has to call a bank because he isn't sure either.

      In the UK, the pound coins just started appearing to the public in change from shops, and notes just disappeared over a timescale of a few weeks because, when they passed through a bank, the bank withdrew them (as they would withdraw worn-out notes). In fact once the process started people became reluctant to accept a pound note because they did not want to get stuck with it (although banks would accept them for a long time after).

      We had dollar coins for nearly 2 centuries in the US. Americans have found bills a better solution. In the 18th century a dollar was roughly a day's wage, so too small a coin was bad. Currently a dollar will barely buy a bottle of water or soda, so too large a coin is bad. Personally, I don't even carry coins. A dollar coin weighs 8x as much as a bill and makes noise while walking.

      As for banks removing paper notes and replacing them with coins, the Treasury would have to do something much more significant than it has tried in the past. They coined about 1.25 billion Sacagawea $1 coins but there are roughly 10 billion $1 notes floating about. To make matters worse, they even said coming in they wouldn't be coining enough to replace the dollar bill, and it was around the same time they started fucking with quarters. They don't make it easy for people to get used to new money. They put out 5 new quarter designs per year. They are now also doing that with the Presidential Series dollar coins by putting out 4 new dollar coin designs PER YEAR. Many people don't even see it as normal currency because they produce too many different coins like collectors items in small amounts.

      So the non-scientific conclusion from an American? 1) I'm frankly burnt out on new shit with money, 2) coins in general are inconvenient since I can't put them in my wallet where they will fold and not slide around making noise like bills will do, and most importantly 3) Americans were originally racist toward Injans and we don't want them on our damn money cause next thing will be blacks. The biggest result from forcibly removing $1 notes from circulation will be larger numbers of debit/credit card transactions under $2. The card provider companies will love that.

    175. Re:Not yet... by stretch0611 · · Score: 1

      Not to mention a wife who pulls in 6 figures. My wife costs money.

      You are assuming that she is spending less than $100,000 a year. If she has expensive tastes, she can still be costing money in spite of the 6 figure salary.

      --
      Looking for a job?
      Want your resume written professionally?
      DON'T USE TUNAREZ!!!
    176. Re:Not yet... by Macman408 · · Score: 1

      I actually don't drink coffee at all. ;-) My wife does - I think Starbucks is a fallback for her - when nothing's familiar, and you don't know a good coffee place, Starbucks has consistent quality. (I make no claims as to whether that is high quality or low quality, however - just consistent.) Of course, she doesn't drink straight coffee either, it's usually a mocha, so having the chocolate helps hide bad coffee too.

    177. Re:Not yet... by jsrjsr · · Score: 1

      At the bar where I worked when Suzie B's first came out we chucked them under the cash drawer becaues there was not a slot for them. This worked well until one day when the bar owner confused them with quarters and stocked the cash drawers with them. She gave them out in change as quarters all day before one of the night bartenders told her what she was doing (she asked him why we kept putting quarters under the drawer). She never made that mistake again, but we kept chucking them under the drawer.

    178. Re:Not yet... by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Then I can not help you, for my proposed approach does indeed increase the purchasing power of people's money.

      Well, technically it doesn't as the same level of wealth before and after buys the same amount of bread. However the number on the price tag has gone down, which is what you asked for.

      Perhaps if you intended to ask for something else you could both clarify, and explain why my suggestion is inadequate.

    179. Re:Not yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that just a government agency decision. The American people really don't care that much. Just do it!

    180. Re:Not yet... by bhiestand · · Score: 1

      Honest question... are you color blind? The gold vs. silver contrast is glaring to me... I think the dollar coin is the easiest to pick out from a stack.

      I assume you are referring to the sacagawea dollar? From "$1.25 snack", it's unlike to be the Susan B. Anthony, and I don't think the silver eagle is in general circulation.

      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
    181. Re:Not yet... by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

      Why force people to deal with coins at all?

      No one's forcing you to use coins in most situations. For almost all purchases these days, you can use a credit or debit card... avoiding any cash in any form.

      I think you'll find that most people have a jar or other location where they dump coins they get stuck with as soon as possible.

      People throw change in jars because those coins are relatively worthless. If you had a coin that could actually buy you something more than a gumball, you might actually want to carry it.

      And anyhow... "why force people to deal with coins"? Well, the alternative is costing the government (and hence -- YOU -- in taxes) a significant amount of money. Should it be the first priority in spending reduction for the government? Maybe not. But how much is it really worth for you not to have the inconvenience of handling coins, when in the vast majority of transactions today, most people don't even handle cash AT ALL?

    182. Re:Not yet... by shaitand · · Score: 1

      "That's not a good enough reason to not do something that is otherwise quite beneficial."

      Who are you to make that determination? Who says the reason was that people are adverse to change? Exactly what is this supposed benefit? Coins are less desirable a format than bills and there isn't really a significant cost savings.

      "new type of foldable curency that... would thus render the financial reasons for switching to the coin in the first place as correspondingly much less significant"

      That is impressive considering how insignificant they were in the first place!

      "much of the Canada's modern population would apparently now actually *resist* the reintroduction of the $1 bill"

      In other words people want to leave well enough alone. You think negating this opinion is worth dissolving the idea of democracy? Interesting view.

      If you support the idea of democracy there is no such thing as a time when it is justified for a government ruled by the people to ignore their orders.

    183. Re:Not yet... by shaitand · · Score: 1

      The cost savings is less than 50 cents per person per year. That isn't enough to justify changing much of anything.

    184. Re:Not yet... by shaitand · · Score: 1

      Considering that the top 1% has more than 90% of the wealth in the nation, it seems reasonable to call them wealth hoarders.

    185. Re:Not yet... by gohmifune · · Score: 1

      Polymer currency really is a good idea. You are correct concerning that.

    186. Re:Not yet... by DutchUncle · · Score: 1

      I remember getting big silver dollar coins as birthday money. When the SBA dollars were being designed, there was been some publicity about them being non-round like British 20 and 50 pence pieces to distinguish them from quarters; people were so freaked out that they were changed to be round with an *inner* non-round table area (unfortunately barely detectable). That's probably the most sensible way to go, as it could achieve the same weight and other characteristics needed to satisfy the vending machines.

    187. Re:Not yet... by mark-t · · Score: 1

      I might suggest that the very fact that most people are evidently now *opposed* to the notion of reintroducing the $1 bill, in spite of the fact that most were also originally opposed to the removal of it, and the fact that had the new and more durable bills been available at the time, the cost savings created by switching to coins would have been substantially less (because the entire reason that coins save money is because bills were getting used so much that they were wearing out unacceptably quickly, necessitating the printing of more bills to replace the worn ones, causing otherwise preventable inflation), and would not have justified the switch in the first place, suggests strongly that the underlying reasons amount to nothing more than fear of change.

      And I would maintain is reasonable for a democratically elected government to ignore the whining by its people who are opposed to change for nothing more than the sake of being opposed to change. That's simply not a good enough reason to change direction from doing some lasting good. If you believe otherwise, then it would make sense for any elected government to also, for example, eliminate taxation... since most people are opposed to that as well. But truthfully, such a move would not actually be in the best long term interests of the nation.

    188. Re:Not yet... by shaitand · · Score: 1

      You have yet to establish any cause for believing the change would do any significant lasting good in the first place or prevent any substantial inflation. This great good you think is worth overriding the will of the people amounts to less than a penny a week.

      "If you believe otherwise, then it would make sense for any elected government to also, for example, eliminate taxation... since most people are opposed to that as well. But truthfully, such a move would not actually be in the best long term interests of the nation."

      Your asserting something does not magically transform your opinion into fact. Whether or not taxation is in the best long term interests of the people is a matter of opinion and not fact. Personally I am opposed to an income tax. I believe that competition is good. With a weaker federal government that must get its operating funds from the states the states are stronger and therefore more likely to have varied laws and policies whereas now they are mostly clones. That means the individual gains the ability to vote by moving to the state that more closely matches his views and thereby we have states competing. States in turn would compete with policies more desirable to the people so that they would gain their skills and the ability to derive revenues from a state level tax. I think that tax should be based on wealth and not sales or income. You tax the man who ends up with the wealth. Taxes discourage or encourage activity. Why would you discourage creating wealth by drawing income or stimulating the fluidity of wealth by punishing spending, when you can discourage the hoarding and accumulating of wealth? Which fiscal policy ultimately results in a more even distribution of national assets?

      However, I am fairly certain that you are incorrect. My opinion is a minority opinion. The vast majority of the populace may not like taxes but actually believes taxation to be necessary. The reason you hear so many people complaining about taxation is that most of those opposed to it are wealthy and the wealthy have a much louder voice. Taxation rarely benefits the wealthy. For the wealthy it is better to lose the economy of scale and pay a premium for the services they personally need than to pay a proportionate share of the cost for the services needed by all the people who actually performed the labor needed to generate their wealth.

    189. Re:Not yet... by mark-t · · Score: 1

      You have yet to establish any cause for believing the change would do any significant lasting good in the first place or prevent any substantial inflation

      This was cited as the entire impetus for making the change in the first place. Yes, it's actually less than a penny a week, but that's for every single man, woman, and child living in Canada... which adds up to a fair amount of money every year. Nonetheless, even that "small" amount was not determined to be worth listening to the objections of people who were opposed to it for no better reason other than the sake of being opposed to change. There was the convenience factor of bills to be considered, which is the reason that higher denomination bills were not also switched over to coins... but this had to be factored into how frequently the unit of currency was actually used, necessitating eventual replacement, and the long term benefits to society of not needing to mint as much currency every year outweighed that. If not switching had been seen to have the longest term benefits (or, in fact, if bills had been much more durable, such as what the new Canadian currency is), the switch would probably not have ever been made. It was, however... and debating the sensibility of that decision, or suggesting that it was not a legitimate decision for an allegedly democratic government to have done, about a quarter of a century after the decision was made in the first place is pointless.

    190. Re:Not yet... by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Tits, eh? Giving up on the eagle?

      Why not both? Eagle with tits? Surely we can come up with a compromise.

    191. Re:Not yet... by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      For absolute certain, your view a year after the change will be quite different. You can't see it yet, but I know it, having seen it in everyone around me.

      Then please, turn around and ask the random people around you why the heck they would prefer dollar/pound/etc coins to bills.

      I can think of one, and exactly one effect that the switch will have on me, and that is I'll end up carrying a lot more coins around, and I will HATE that.

      Because right now you're using the language that someone brainwashed would say. I don't mean to imply that you have been or any such nonsense, but no one in the thread has been able to give logical arguments why I would like coins better, there's just a vague "if you embrace it... you will understand." From the outside, it just sounds weird.

    192. Re:Not yet... by arwel · · Score: 1

      If you mean Bank of England £1 notes, it was much closer to 30 years ago. £1 coins were introduced in 1983, not initially to great acclaim, because people didn't much like the royal coat of arms design on the back rather than the size and weight of it, which is why they introduced the idea of changing the design every year between each of the constituent nations in turn. The Bank of England stopped issuing £1 notes in 1984 and withdrew them all from circulation in 1988 (though if you still have one you can still get it exchanged for current money at face value by returning it to the bank, as you can for any note it has issued since 1695).

    193. Re:Not yet... by arwel · · Score: 1

      A few corrections here. The half crown (a very nice coin to receive when you were a kid - you knew your relatives really liked you when they gave you one!) was actually withdrawn in 1969, the same year as the old halfpenny. The 50p coin was introduced and the old ten-shilling note withdrawn in 1969. Decimal 5p and 10p coins were issued from 1968 in place of old one and two shilling coins, which were the same size and weight and which remained in circulation until the 5p and 10p were reduced in size in 1990/1992. The Crown (5-shilling) coin was only issued as a commemorative coin and didn't normally circulate; they continued to issue coins of this (huge) size as commemorative 25p coins until 1990, and since then commemorative coins of this size are still sometimes issued, but with a face value of £5. The decimal halfpenny was withdrawn on 31.12.1984.

      20p coins were introduced in 1982, and £1 coins in 1983, with the Bank of England ceasing to issue £1 notes in 1984 (there were also large, thick £2 coins occasionally issued from this time, similar to the £1 coin, but they were commemoratives and rarely found in circulation). £2 circulating bimetallic coins were issued from 1997 (the earliest coins are dated 1996 but introduction was delayed because London Transport couldn't modify their ticket machines in time).

      1p and 2p coins are the same weight and diameter as when they were first issued in 1971, but they are slightly thicker as they're now made of copper-plated steel, since fluctuations in the world price of copper occasionally made them worth twice their face value for their metal.

    194. Re:Not yet... by arwel · · Score: 1

      Yes, you also had 2.50 guilder coins, and 25 and 250 guilder notes, which were a bit strange when you first came across them but you soon got used to them - I remember wondering what on earth I was going to do with the two 250 fl notes I was given at the GWK at Amsterdam CS once, but strangely enough my hotel had no trouble accepting them!

    195. Re:Not yet... by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Maybe understanding that I didn't ask for it would help. I stated my interpretation of someone elses statement, I see no purpose in doing so again.

      Lowering the number on the price tag is merely a side effect of what is desired, just doing that is pointless.

    196. Re:Not yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We need pennies, cause I am not going to let the store round up and make $0.04 per transaction. Fuck Them.

      What we need to do is convert to 1 & 5 currency, get rid of the rest.

      $0.01 coin
      $0.05 coin
      $0.10 coin
      $0.50 coin (replace the quarter)
      $1.00 paper or coin
      $5.00 paper or coin
      $10.00 paper
      $50.00 paper
      etc

      Also, make the coins bigger as denomination increases. This would help the visually impaired as well as help save the money on the cost of making pennies.

      And for all the strip club comments, if you make the coins ferrous based they could just use a magnet to pick up all the tips at the end of the stage and have a magnetic belt that you could attach them too.

    197. Re:Not yet... by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      I never at any point said people prefer coins. Simply that the desire for bills disappears. After a period of a year or two after the change, people simply don't care. The difference is not important.

      It's not brainwashing, it's simply knowledge, brought about by the fact that I've seen it already. Twice. I can't persuade the people in the US that think there's some strong reasons for keeping the dollar bill. Before I experienced the change I thought similar things as them. But I was wrong, and so are they. And only experience will change their minds.

    198. Re:Not yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmmm.... $1 AUD = $1.04 US...... Keep pretending bro.

    199. Re:Not yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot the old sixpence that remained legal tender for a while after decimalisation. It was worth 2½p.

    200. Re:Not yet... by po8crg · · Score: 1

      Equilaterally curved (Reuleux) heptagons work fine. The UK 50p and 20p use that shape, and they roll.

      They have constant diameter, but not constant radius.

    201. Re:Not yet... by po8crg · · Score: 1

      US coins come from the US Mint, bills from the Federal Reserve.

      In a normal transition, banks get lots of $1 bills, return them to the government and get $1 coins in exchange.

      But, because of the turf war between two arms of government, the Fed keeps printing new $1 bills and exchanging them for old ones, rather than taking in the $1 bills and replacing them with coins.

    202. Re:Not yet... by po8crg · · Score: 1

      Small pocket coin-purse is really useful.

      They're like £2 or so in any market, or even on Amazon or eBay - http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B008K09YAY/

      Also, you don't need to carry your wallet, with lots of notes in; you can pay a bus fare and buy a sandwich or a beer or two with that pocket-full of coins.

    203. Re:Not yet... by po8crg · · Score: 1

      An eagle eating a pair of great tits ?

    204. Re:Not yet... by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      It was a failure because they made them in a size that was nearly identical to the quarter. When you can't reach into your pocket and distinguish them without looking, it's a poor design.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    205. Re:Not yet... by operagost · · Score: 1

      And yet this jackass is not modded down. You don't know me, so how could you ever call me a hypocrite? And a necrophile, to boot. Even your insults are rubbish. Go upstairs, your mother is calling you, you ignorant cretin.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    206. Re:Not yet... by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Ah, the sacrifices we must make. I did the same with my first wife. As you get older, your priorities will reverse in order. I can recommend a good divorce attorney.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    207. Re:Not yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the US, dollar bills were never withdrawn from circulation. Nobody made you take coins, you could always have bills. And that's what everybody continued to use, while the coins sat in the vaults, untouched.

      Which is sad because my kids LOVE getting the coins, but we've only ever seen them if we got multi-$ change from a USPS vending machine.

    208. Re:Not yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People like her are why we will always be stuck with pennies.

      People like her are why we have the Congress we currently have. Shrill, irrational, and ignorant.

    209. Re:Not yet... by clodney · · Score: 1

      We've tried to replace the dollar with coins three times so far, and it's failed.

      The problem is the size and shape of the old dollar coins. They're very close to quarters in size and weight. In our first attempt, the dollar coins were also silver like the quarters. So it was hard to quickly identify which coins are dollars and which are quarters.

      In my mind, the big failure was that we didn't replace the dollar with coins, we added new dollar coins and kept the dollar bill in circulation. Inertia was enough to doom the changeover.

      The benefits of the change mostly accrue to the government - coins last an order of magnitude longer, but aren't that much more expensive to produce. From the consumer perspective it is not obvious that one is preferable to the other, so why bother to switch?

    210. Re:Not yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not a bad idea, but not quite there. The *obvious* course is to print an actual "tail" on the back of the dollar coin.

    211. Re:Not yet... by master811 · · Score: 1

      There is a £5 coin produced but it isn't legal tender as it is only used for commemorative coins.

      Actually they are. http://www.royalmint.com/aboutus/policies-and-guidelines/legal-tender-guidelines

    212. Re:Not yet... by compro01 · · Score: 1

      Daily lunch paid with cash. Much quicker than credit cards or interac. Multiply $2-3 of change per work day by a few months and it adds up.

      Also, I'm Canadian, so our change is a good deal more valuable. The vast majority of that $300-400 of change is in loonies and toonies.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    213. Re:Not yet... by hoboroadie · · Score: 1

      Well, it's related in that eliminating pennies will give merchants a place to keep the new dollar coins in their cash drawers.

      More likely the paper clips and rubber bands that they can bring forward from the $2 bill slot.

      --
      They feared that it could be used to suppress protest or support unpopular rule.
    214. Re:Not yet... by shaitand · · Score: 1

      Cash is definitely not quicker than a debit card. No interaction, no counting or making change, just swipe and enter a pin number.

      The other point about the loonies is exactly why a dollar coin is a bad idea. I'm willing to contribute my 50 cents a year to keep the paper dollar. If I've got that much change in my pocket I'd give it to a beggar (and often do) rather than carry it around.

    215. Re:Not yet... by compro01 · · Score: 1

      Debit card (Interac, not Visa/Mastercard based) is insert card (chip), wait, select account, pin number, wait for processing, remove card.

      If your cashier is slower at small amounts of change than that, they've either got severe arthritis or they need some serious remedial math classes.

      Furthermore, I'll take a coin over having to shuffle through bunches of shinplasters in my wallet to find a bill of actual worth, especially with the green monochrome your currency designers seem obsessed with.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    216. Re:Not yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just pointing out, that if you nuke the quarter as you suggest, the dollar looking like a quarter will cease to matter.

    217. Re:Not yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Money is a way of keeping track of numbers during an exchange and I like the fact that we have more significant digits to do so than by getting rid of intermediate coinage. I was in Mexico in 1994 when they lopped off a zero from the peso, to create the Nuevo Peso. In Israel they are considering dropping the New from the phrase New Shekel (well it has been almost 30 years). A new shekel was worth 1000 of the old shekel(im) so they dropped off 3 significant digits. Perhaps, a new system of coins and bills might signal we are aware of inflation but I would like to postpone as long as possible. The new Peso could easily lop off another 0 without difficulty but the pain it inflicts on those who use the old currency is pretty striking, since they have to get rid of all their stored coins and bills pretty quickly. Maybe in the US, the system would not treat the change as if the new stuff was just script.

    218. Re:Not yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a small caveat, approximately 2% of british pound coins are fakes - If it gets much worse the Bank of England is going to have to remove them from circulation. Doesn't help there's beeen a different design every year since they were introduced - makes spotting a dud even harder.

    219. Re:Not yet... by wallsg · · Score: 1

      Tits, eh? Giving up on the eagle?

      Why not both? Eagle with tits? Surely we can come up with a compromise.

      That's called a Harpy.

    220. Re:Not yet... by wallsg · · Score: 1

      When they got rid of the half-penny, the penny (the newly lowest denomination) was worth $.23 in today's money. There's nothing inherently specially about the $.01 value. If I had it my way I'd get rid of everything up to the dime and replace the dollar bill with a coin. But then, I think spending $.025 on making pennies, and $.11 on nickels is ridiculous. And wasting money on reprinting worn out $1 bills when coins would last much longer equally so.

      I'm holding out for Bottle Caps...

    221. Re:Not yet... by shaitand · · Score: 1

      All the debit cards I've had in the states in the last 10 years were either visa or mastercard. Slide card, confirm total, enter pin, decide if you need cash for one of those annoying places that require it. There is processing but it is nearly instant so not really worth listing, faster than me counting out some cash let alone the cashier fumbling in the drawer for change.

      You also aren't counting the time it takes to get the cash in the first place. With everyone doing direct deposit they press a button and money is instantly credited to your account and you can instantly spend it with your card.

    222. Re:Not yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking as a female, I'd prefer something other than tits, if you know what I mean....

    223. Re:Not yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The true problem is the State continued to produce 1$ bills. When Canada and Australia switched to the coins all bills deposited and exchanged in banks went directly to the crown and destroyed. No new bills were printed.

      Steve

    224. Re:Not yet... by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      And what's worse, they've replicated that goddamn failure every single time they go back to make another try at $1 coins, because they don't want vending machine owners to have to deal with two different "$1" coins.

      Replace dollar bills with $1 coins that look like Canada's $2 coins (bi-metallic coin-in-a-coin). Make them TOTALLY unlike the nickel, dime, and quarter. Say, a coin the size of a Kennedy 50-cent piece, consisting of nickel alloy surrounding a copper disc. A copper disc that's the same thickness as the outer nickel ring, but not quite flush, so it sticks out on one side, and sinks into the other (nice for stacking and identifying them by feel). Stamp Washington's head into the copper disc on one side, Lincoln's head into the copper disc on the other, and embed the "ONE"-related text and stuff into the nickel rings.

      OK, having created a totally cool new coin, there's an easy way to abolish pennies and dollar bills from circulation almost overnight:

      1. Pass a law making it unambiguously legal, when giving change in actual US currency, to round .01 and .02 down to .00, and .03 and .04 up to .05. Electronic transactions would still have to be calculated to the nearest cent. Declare that pennies are still legal tender, but REQUIRE rounding to the nearest 5 cents EVEN WHEN payment or change includes pennies.

      2. Have the Federal Reserve charge banks 1.11 cents per penny (55 cents per 50), and $1.10 per dollar bill, and allow them to pass along the higher charge to customers -- but ONLY if the customer DEMANDS payment/change in pennies/dollar bills, and ONLY when handing out crisp, virgin, brand new dollar bills and pennies newly-acquired from the mint. In other words, only the "first purchaser" of the dollar bill or penny is legally allowed to pass along the surcharge (otherwise, they'd recirculate tattered old bills forever to wring the extra fee out of customers forever).

      By making pennies and dollar bills slightly more expensive than their nominal value, it will eliminate them both as viable units of currency almost overnight. Some people will hoard them, most will decline to pay extra for them, but either way, they'll be dead as active currency. Don't believe me? OK, when's the last time YOU paid for something with a $2 bill, or a 50-cent piece? Or even SAW a $2 bill or 50-cent piece being used as payment for something... as opposed to a gift, or in a jar, or anywhere besides somebody's wallet? The moment people think a bill or coin is worth more than its face value, they quit using it, because now it's "too valuable" to spend. Even $2 bills, whose acquisition price at the bank RIGHT now is... $2 (not sure about 50-cent pieces).

      Rather than deal with "old" and "new" dollar bills, banks would quit bothering with "old" $1 bills -- they'd just send them straight back to the Fed, and sell brand new ones for $1.10 apiece so they wouldn't have to deal with two categories of dollar bills. Businesses wouldn't buy them, because (unlike banks), they WOULDN'T be allowed to pass along the surcharge, so it would be money straight out of their pockets. And consumers would be in a frenzy to sell each other $1 bills for more than $1, but less than $1.10, until they ended up in the hands of people who'd think they were as valuable as gold & hoard them forever. Either way, 99.99999% of dollar bills would be out of active circulation within a matter of weeks.

    225. Re:Not yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny considering the AU$ is currently valued more than the US$ and has been for the past 12 months bar a dip in mid-May - You keep on pretending buddy :)

    226. Re:Not yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      f you have a democracy the point of every change is to adopt what the people prefer.

      Total rubbish.

      A *representative* democracy does not and is not supposed to work like this. You vote for a government on the basis that you agree with more of its policies that its rivals, in the full knowledge that it will do some things you approve of and some you don't, and you will judge it on this balance at the end of its term. In such a system a government is under no legal or moral obligation to follow the opinion polls on every issue - although obviously constantly going against public opinion on major issues will not typically improve your re-election chances.

      A government which simply followed the polls (or, for it to be properly valid, referendums) would not be a real government at all. And, in extremis, such a system *cannot* work since there is nothing to stop people from voting for mutually exclusive options (e.g. one poll says raise spending; another says cut taxes; a third says borrow less - but you can't do all three) In reality it is for governments to attempt to resolve these dilemmas.

      Also, polls showing opposition to something like this note to coin change are highly susceptible to the nature of the question.
      Consider:
      Do you want to change from Dollar notes to coins?

      or

      Do you want to change from Dollar notes to coins (this measure is estimated to save taxpayers $x per annum)?

      These will typically get quite different responses. Which is the most appropriate?

  3. Won't someone think of the strippers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm thinking about them right now .....

    1. Re:Won't someone think of the strippers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you think strippers in other countries handle that situation? Playing loonies at the peelers is a national past time. They're not dangerous it's a game. Knock the loonie off the lady bits with another loonie :). A beer jug between the jugs is another one.

  4. Data? by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

    So that's $146,000,000/yr.

    Does the projection for the future savings take inflation into account?

    1. Re:Data? by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1, Redundant

      ...and I'm not talking about the inflation mentioned in the article. ("purchasing power").

      I mean actual value of the dollar inflation.

    2. Re:Data? by Obfuscant · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So that's $146,000,000/yr.

      No, no. That's not the right way to look at it. It's 4 BILLION being saved. What? Yes, that's over THIRTY years, but so what? Doesn't "4 BILLION" sound so much better than "1 BILLION" or even just "146 MILLION"?

      Now we have the latest style of inflation: the number of years a small savings is multiplied by to produce the sensational amount to be reported by the media. With the budget, it's typically been 10 years (so they won't say "this cut to spending will save just 100 million", they report savings of "1 billion". Now it's 30 years. We've automatically saved three times as much as before!

    3. Re:Data? by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      I give you a +1. By 2112, you will be a +36,500 awesome /.er!

      I love your reply btw. :)

    4. Re:Data? by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you stopped reading the summary a bit early. They already did the math to get to $146M/yr. Frankly, I don't believe it.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
  5. Dollar Bill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How about the penny first.

    1. Re:Dollar Bill? by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      Actually, I propose a Decimal Shift. Make $.10 (dime, ten cents etc) and make it the new "penny", just by shifting the decimal point over to the left one digit. Have the new coinage set, new paper currency ready, and give people one month to change out all their old coins and dollars bills. Ten Pennies fo the new penny;.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    2. Re:Dollar Bill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called "denomination".

    3. Re:Dollar Bill? by Todd+Palin · · Score: 1

      I totally agree. I have been refusing to take pennies for several years. I'll take some from the penny bowl, or just refuse them. The effort to handle them is way not worth it. I understand it costs more than a penny to make a penny anyway. I really don't understand why a major retailer hasn't started rounding down all purchases. While I'm at it, what about the .9 cent gas prices. If pennies don't make sense, tenths of cents make even less sense.

    4. Re:Dollar Bill? by mrbester · · Score: 1

      France did similar. Casino Royale (the book) has 10 million franc pots which were equivalent to 10,000 francs by the time I was old enough to read it.

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
  6. pace by alienzed · · Score: 2

    It seems like everything in the US takes forever to accomplish. Everything changed when the internet came to be. We can do things now in seconds that used to take days. The governing system needs to learn a thing or two from this. However, Canada gave up the dollar bill a long long time ago, and soon we're getting rid of the penny. It seems more and more like we're the real leaders in North America now.

    --
    Never say never. Ah!! I did it again!
    1. Re:pace by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 5, Insightful

      We have a government where powerful politicians can openly claim that significant scientific theories are "lies from the pit of hell", and that came up with the TSA and Gitmo. They're inefficient and slow on purpose, do you really want these people to be able to take significant actions quickly and efficiently?

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    2. Re:pace by mycroft822 · · Score: 1

      It seems more and more like we're the real leaders in North America now.

      The US is just making an effort to be leading from the rear. 'Merica!

    3. Re:pace by Smallpond · · Score: 1

      The second mouse gets the cheese.

    4. Re:pace by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      It seems like everything in the US takes forever to accomplish. Everything changed when the internet came to be. We can do things now in seconds that used to take days. The governing system needs to learn a thing or two from this.
      However, Canada gave up the dollar bill a long long time ago, and soon we're getting rid of the penny. It seems more and more like we're the real leaders in North America now.

      We've also had metric for 30 years, though even that is basterdized because butter is sold in 454g packages and meat and produce is advertised in per pound prices, while measured and sold in per kg prices. Gas is sold in litres, odometers measure kilometres, yet a lot of people still talk about fuel economy in Imperial-MPG (not to be confused with US MPG which is 84.4% the size).

    5. Re:pace by mlts · · Score: 1

      Tell me about it... there is a whole list of things that I really wish the US would adapt to, such as the metric system [1].

      I just don't see what's so wrong about ditching the paper dollar? If people are wanting it for a collection, have the US make a "proof set" with the bill. With how little a dollar buys, we might be better off replacing the dollar, the $5, the $10, and the $20 with coins. Save the $50s and the C-notes for the guys with the grills.

      If laws like the DMCA and such can be passed, maybe something constructive but unpopular like a currency revamp using the latest anti-counterfeit measures for coins might be useful in the long term? Maybe sneak in some text on the next omnibus law through Congress requiring the Metric system for all dimensions and measures for Federal contracts as well?

      [1]: OK, save the Imperial measurements so people can have their .50 caliber revolvers, and 2x4 planks will be 2x4s... but virtually everything else needs to be in the same units the rest of the world uses.

    6. Re:pace by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      and 2x4 planks will be 2x4s.

      2x4s haven't been 2 by 4 for a very long time, my friend. I can remember when they actually were.

      Isn't the metric system wonderful? Yes. I can buy 2.54mm headers that fit very well in the holes for the .1" headers I used to buy. But much more modern.

      Now get off my lawn.

    7. Re:pace by shaitand · · Score: 1

      That's right, take pride in the rapid rate at which you devalue your currency!

    8. Re:pace by shaitand · · Score: 1

      The problem is that while the metric system is built on more easy conversions for math and science the traditional units were derived by consensus by builders, bakers, etc and tend to be more practical and useful day-to-day.

    9. Re:pace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It seems like everything in the US takes forever to accomplish."

      We'll ban the dollar just after we convert to the decimal system, honest!

    10. Re:pace by Abreu · · Score: 1

      We've also had metric for 30 years, though even that is basterdized because butter is sold in 454g packages and meat and produce is advertised in per pound prices, while measured and sold in per kg prices. Gas is sold in litres, odometers measure kilometres, yet a lot of people still talk about fuel economy in Imperial-MPG (not to be confused with US MPG which is 84.4% the size).

      We've had metric in Mexico for over a hundred years, and if anything, we've seen a retreat in metrification because of so many products standarizing in US sizes.

      We've always had 355ml soda cans, 113 gram hamburgers, etc. But now it's worse, now we are seeing gallon and half-gallon milk containers, along with the traditional liter cartons.

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    11. Re:pace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US leads from behind.

  7. Allowance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If we get rid of dollar bills, how am i supposed to pay my girls their allowance every two weeks?

    And no, this isn't a euphemism for a visit to a strip club. i have two daughters. They earn an allowance.

    1. Re:Allowance by Radres · · Score: 4, Insightful

      With dollar coins?

    2. Re:Allowance by s0nicfreak · · Score: 1

      In $5 dollar bills. Unless you're not giving them enough to actually buy anything?

    3. Re:Allowance by magarity · · Score: 2

      I give my daughter her allowance in dollar coins (the gold colored presidential series and sacageweas); she has absolutely no problem at all putting them into circulation...

    4. Re:Allowance by Guspaz · · Score: 2

      The idea isn't to eliminate the unit of currency, but replace the physical form with a more durable one. I fail to see how that changes anything in terms of you giving your children an allowance.

    5. Re:Allowance by broggyr · · Score: 1

      Give them $5?

      --
      Irony? Yea, it's like goldy and bronzy, only it's made of iron!
    6. Re:Allowance by Sperbels · · Score: 1

      If it's not some sort of euphemism, then I'm confused about what the problem is. Pay them with coins instead of paper. What's the problem with that?

    7. Re:Allowance by nedlohs · · Score: 2

      Are the too sickly to handle the weight of a coin? Or just too stupid to understand what a coin is?

    8. Re:Allowance by coolsnowmen · · Score: 1

      AC likes to make it rain and doesn't want to injure his loved ones.

    9. Re:Allowance by shaitand · · Score: 1

      I hate the idea of introducing another coin. I'd rather introduce paper units to replace the coins we've got.

      That said, stop being cheap and giving an allowance under $5.

    10. Re:Allowance by shaitand · · Score: 1

      Not stupid enough to want their funds in a bulky, heavy, and inconvenient form?

    11. Re:Allowance by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      s/dollar bills/dollar coins/g

      Not a terribly hard concept...

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    12. Re:Allowance by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      So a combination of sickly enough to find carrying a few coins heavy and stupid enough to not think of exchanging 2 or 5 coins for a far more easily damaged but lighter form of currency?

    13. Re:Allowance by shaitand · · Score: 1

      First of all being sickly isn't a crime you inconsiderate bastard. And Sickly has nothing to do with it. Not wanting your pants to try to fall down defines heavy in this case.

      First of all $2 bills exist but are not in common circulation so lets not pretend you can go exchanging for them left and right. And why would you want to exchange for $5 bills when you could just keep $1 bills for less than 50 cents a year? That 4 billion crap was a hyper inflated number derived by adding up the savings over 30 years. I'd give the 50 cents to avoid having change in my pocket even one day (in fact I have, many bums are happy that they were around when I found I had annoying change in my pocket) let alone to avoid it for 365!

  8. Elsewhere by Sparticus789 · · Score: 1

    No stripper is worth a $5 tip to watch them on stage.

    --
    sudo make me a sandwich
    1. Re:Elsewhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second this, i felt awkward giving coins to strippers in canada.

    2. Re:Elsewhere by superslacker87 · · Score: 1

      So use $2 bills!

      --
      I run Ubuntu skinned to look like a Mac on a PC. Go figure.
    3. Re:Elsewhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They still make $2 bills.

    4. Re:Elsewhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the smallest euro bill is 5€, the smallest bill here is worth ~10usd

    5. Re:Elsewhere by Noughmad · · Score: 2

      the smallest euro bill is 5€, the smallest bill here is worth ~10usd

      Unless you try to buy electronics with it, then it's only worth like 3usd.

      --
      PlusFive Slashdot reader for Android. Can post comments.
  9. And the penny! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please for to abadon the penny!

  10. END FIAT CURRENCY! END THE FED! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about this! If we took the power away from a bunch of secret bank mobsters to PRINT MONEY and instead backed it with gold or some other finite, precious commodity, the dollar would retain its value.

    I'm sick and tired of this implicit tax that I have just because I *HOLD* a dollar. Read Greenspan's "Gold and Economic Freedom" essay. Once it's started, that money which is printed out can only be repaid by printing more money. This is the shabby key to the (corporate/social) welfare state that exists today.

    1. Re:END FIAT CURRENCY! END THE FED! by PhilHibbs · · Score: 2

      Backing up a currency is a tragic waste of gold, which has substantial industrial uses but sadly is too expensive because of the irrational attachment that people have to it. Plus if a new source of very large amounts of gold were to be discovered, then it would endanger the economy.

    2. Re:END FIAT CURRENCY! END THE FED! by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

      Or as I said elsewhere there's also the pesky problem that even with a billion or less people in the entire world we were still constantly making the dollar worth less and less gold over time. DO it today and you're going to wind up needing avogadro's number to figure out what your dollar's worth in gold.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    3. Re:END FIAT CURRENCY! END THE FED! by magarity · · Score: 1

      Plus if a new source of very large amounts of gold were to be discovered, then it would endanger the economy.

      While there are legitimate concerns with gold backed currency, this is not one of them. The danger to a gold based economy of a new gold deposit is nothing at all compared with the ability of the government to inflate fiat currency with short term self serving monetary policy.

    4. Re:END FIAT CURRENCY! END THE FED! by artao · · Score: 1

      ABSOLUTELY!!!
      Most people don't realize that the U.S. BORROWS paper money. Every piece of paper currency comes with IMMEDIATE debt. That is seriously messed up, and really really really needs to end.
      It's a ridiculous situation, clearly designed to put money into the pockets of the rich.

    5. Re:END FIAT CURRENCY! END THE FED! by shaitand · · Score: 1

      The scarcity of gold makes it a poor and short sighted use for said industrial purposes.

    6. Re:END FIAT CURRENCY! END THE FED! by shaitand · · Score: 1

      You could divide your dollars into smaller units and leave your gold value alone. The division of gold is finite. The resistance to moving the decimal on the currency is silly. Why people think that the math somehow works if you have a decimal that slides in one direction but doesn't work if the decimal slides the other direction I have no idea.

      The only real difference is that it becomes more obvious and easy to calculate how much your purchasing power is changing.

    7. Re:END FIAT CURRENCY! END THE FED! by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Read up on what happened to the Spanish Empire. Also to a lesser extent, the American economy in the latter part of the 19th century. In Americas case it was as much silver as gold.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    8. Re:END FIAT CURRENCY! END THE FED! by dryeo · · Score: 1

      But it would just be weird having a loaf of bread going up and down on a day to day basis. Plus when I think how I lost out on the gold I bought in the late '70's thinking it was a safe bet. Much better to use something with actual worth such as chickens. A chicken is always worth a chicken dinner, gives eggs as interest, needs to be looked after to keep it's value and the supply can naturally be increased to reflect the price of wheat.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    9. Re:END FIAT CURRENCY! END THE FED! by magarity · · Score: 1

      The great European empires had problems because of monetary policy, not because of a gold standard. Look up problems associated with the mercantile system.

    10. Re:END FIAT CURRENCY! END THE FED! by dryeo · · Score: 1

      I was thinking more of the inflation problems brought on by the massive amounts of gold that was taken from the Americas.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    11. Re:END FIAT CURRENCY! END THE FED! by riverat1 · · Score: 1

      Oh come on! It's corrosion resistance and electrical conductivity make it by far the best material for a whole host of applications.

    12. Re:END FIAT CURRENCY! END THE FED! by magarity · · Score: 1

      Yes, again, the inflation to which you refer was a product of the merchantile system, not of a metal standard per se. There is an excellent analysis of merchantilism and its associated inflation in the chapters titled "Of the Principle of the Commercial or Mercantile System" and "Of Restraints upon the Importation" in Smith's Wealth of Nations.

  11. dollar bills are not necessary by Xicor · · Score: 0

    i cant remember a time where anything ever cost less than a dollar once tax is included. and honestly, if stores did a decent job of not charging pennies then we wouldnt need those either

    1. Re:dollar bills are not necessary by riverat1 · · Score: 1

      You must be pretty young.

  12. One step at a time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Start with the penny

  13. Inflation beware by Jack+Malmostoso · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Here in Europe it is widespread belief that the fact that 1 and 2 euros are in coins are a reason for inflation. You think twice before spending a bill, while psychologically a coin is easier to part with.
    It does happen quite often to have 10-20eur in coins so it's probably not all wrong.

    1. Re:Inflation beware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      widespread belief[citation needed]

    2. Re:Inflation beware by tverbeek · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You have this backward. €1 and €2 are coins because of inflation, not the other way around. You shouldn't think twice about spending €1 on something because it isn't much money.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    3. Re:Inflation beware by Noughmad · · Score: 1

      This is true, I don't know why it was modded down. The second reason is that one euro is worth much more than one unit of any pre-euro currency.

      You would think people got over this (even we got euros more than 5 years ago), but many don't. I suppose one needs something to blame.

      --
      PlusFive Slashdot reader for Android. Can post comments.
    4. Re:Inflation beware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To coin a phrase, they just don't fit the bill.

    5. Re:Inflation beware by PhotoJim · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That must be why the Swiss franc is so weak. They have 1, 2 and 5 franc coins and have for decades. Their smallest paper bill is a 10 franc note.

      No, wait... the franc isn't weak. Guess that means these things don't correlate. :)

    6. Re:Inflation beware by Serious+Callers+Only · · Score: 1

      That's right, it's worth more than one dollar though, around 1.3 USD. So really the fact that they're used elsewhere with no ill effects (the pound coin is another example) means its surprising that the US is so behind on this issue.

    7. Re:Inflation beware by patchmaster · · Score: 1

      The fact that it may be psychologically easier to part with coins than bills has nothing to do with inflation. It may explain why you have less money in your pocket at the end of the week, but it has no impact on the cost of goods.

    8. Re:Inflation beware by xaxa · · Score: 2

      Irish, Maltese and Cypriot pounds were worth more than €1.

      (Not sure about those currencies, but the British pound had £1 and £2 coins when the Euro was introduced, which were worth something like €1.60 and €3.20 at the time.)

    9. Re:Inflation beware by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Here in Europe it is widespread belief that the fact that 1 and 2 euros are in coins are a reason for inflation.

      Personally I wish you'd get rid of most of the crazy cent coins, still got some from this summer... seriously, 1 euro-cent = 1.3 US cents? Here in Norway we just recently dropped the 0.5 NOK = 8.8 US cents so the smallest unit is 1 NOK = US 17.6 cents. Just the time wasted in the cashier line as somebody tries to count out 23 cents should let you know this is a drag on productivity, not counting all the effort spent producing it and having it in circulation. Oh well, not really my problem I guess.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    10. Re:Inflation beware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I call this bullshit.

      I very much doubt the daily spending that happens in the range of 1 and 2 Euros has any effect of a multi-trillion economy.

    11. Re:Inflation beware by sveinungkv · · Score: 1

      If this was true inflation would be easy to fix: Just add gold or silver to the coins until spending them hurts.

      --
      Spelling/grammar nazis welcome (English is not my first language and I am trying to improve my spelling/grammar)
    12. Re:Inflation beware by arwel · · Score: 1

      Yep, an Irish Pound was worth €1.37.

    13. Re:Inflation beware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If bills included tenth of a euro notes, you'd rapidly start claiming you think twice before spending a 'real' bill.

    14. Re:Inflation beware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The pre-Euro period had higher inflation than post-Euro, so that's directly at odds with history, you can track this graph back to 1991. and the Euro came in in 1996. Inflation in the Eurozone has generally been lower since it's inception.

      http://www.tradingeconomics.com/euro-area/inflation-cpi

  14. Long been time. by Microlith · · Score: 1

    In fact, we should ditch the five dollar bill as well. One and five dollar denomination coins, possibly even adding a two dollar denomination, wouldn't be a bad thing. It'd be effectively mirroring what exists in other countries and would save a considerable amount of money printing bills that barely last 18 months as it is, replacing them with coins that last decades.

    I think the only hard thing would be finding a metal that isn't worth more per weight (I'm guessing Zinc is still cheap) than the coin stamped into it. Or we could look into other alloys and materials (carbon fiber coins anyone?) Maybe do like other countries and start punching holes in them.

    1. Re:Long been time. by operagost · · Score: 2

      You want to carry a stack of 1 and 5 dollar coins in your pocket? Or will it be in a sack tied to your belt?

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    2. Re:Long been time. by Microlith · · Score: 2

      I already don't carry around cash much. Even the vending machines in my office take cards (most evil thing ever.) Chances are I'd end up saving more when I did have cash on me as I'd toss 'em in the bucket I have of coins at home, grabbing a handful when I need them.

      Not that I can withdraw 1s and 5s at the bank as it is. Minimum of $20 and a multiple of $20 from there.

    3. Re:Long been time. by Smallpond · · Score: 1

      Here's the geekiest solution for that.

    4. Re:Long been time. by operagost · · Score: 1

      Next to the onion...

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    5. Re:Long been time. by Guspaz · · Score: 2

      Why would you have a ton of them? You cycle through them. If you have some loonies or toonies, you pay for your coffee with that. If you don't, you break a bill, and get some coins, and pay for the coffee with coins the next time. Since most vending machine payments are with loonies or toonies, that also eats them up pretty fast.

      Americans love coming up with reasons why the transition to coins is impractical, except most countries already did the transition and didn't have any of those problems.

    6. Re:Long been time. by gagol · · Score: 1

      In Canada 1$ and 2$ have been minted over a decade ago, and it is not a problem. Plus, most people pay using their debit/credit cards now.

      --
      Tomorrow is another day...
    7. Re:Long been time. by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      how about adding 10 and 20 and 50 coins then ;)

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    8. Re:Long been time. by painandgreed · · Score: 2

      You want to carry a stack of 1 and 5 dollar coins in your pocket? Or will it be in a sack tied to your belt?

      Having gone to many trips through the countries of Europe, I can say that you typically don't have a stack of coins in your pocket. Now that your change is worth something, you spend it first and only go to paper afterwards, rather than just using your pocket as a dump for all your change which gets emptied out at the end of the day. If you do get an uncomfortable amount of change in your pocket, that is just a reminder to use it first the next time you buy something and the problem is resolved. Because you use your coins first, you also tend to use all those small denominations too for exact change. Even if you pay with paper, you still pay off the change bit if you have it because you've already checked your pocket for enough money. End result is that I have less coins in my pocket than I usually do back in the States.

    9. Re:Long been time. by Obfuscant · · Score: 2

      Not that I can withdraw 1s and 5s at the bank as it is. Minimum of $20 and a multiple of $20 from there.

      I can tell you for a fact that banks (and credit unions) have 1 and 5 dollar bills on hand, as well as a full range of coins. They have to, since very few people have accounts that are an integer multiple of $20 and they have to be able to allow you to take your money out.

      Maybe you're complaining because the ATMs don't hold anything but $20 bills? That's not the only way to withdraw money from the bank. It's the cheapest way for the banks, and it's cheaper to make a machine that deals only with one kind of bill, so that's what the ATMs do.

    10. Re:Long been time. by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Having gone to many trips through the countries of Europe, I can say that you typically don't have a stack of coins in your pocket.

      Yes, I do wind up with a stack of coins in my pocket, and I don't care what you say I have.

      Now that your change is worth something, you spend it first and only go to paper afterwards,

      Nope. I find it much easier to pull a paper bill out of my wallet than to fish around in my pocket looking for the right coin or three, having to actually look at them to figure out what their value is since I don't use them often enough to memorize by feel what they are.

      Oh, you want 4 euro? Here's a paper bill that is larger than 4 euro, give me my change. Much easier than "let's see, here's 50p, here's 20p, that makes 70p, oops that was only a 10p so I'm at 60p, how much did you want again?"

      Because you use your coins first,

      But I don't. The ONLY time I try to use coins first is during the last day of my trip when I know I'll have to deal with all those useless coins when I get home so I better spend them now. It becomes more important to use coins first when you know you're just going to have to pull them out of your pocket and throw them into your bag so you can go through security.

      Even if you pay with paper, you still pay off the change bit if you have it because you've already checked your pocket for enough money.

      I usually keep a pretty close tab on how much money I've got with me, I don't have to look through my pockets every time I buy something to "check my pocket for enough money". So, I've not reached into my front pocket for change to count it every ten minutes, and reaching into my back pocket for a wallet is so much easier so why would I do both?

      End result is that I have less coins in my pocket than I usually do back in the States.

      That's you. I usually have as many, if not more, coins when I travel elsewhere than when I'm at home.

    11. Re:Long been time. by rmdingler · · Score: 1

      Nope. Received tens mixed with twenties last time out at the ATM...

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    12. Re:Long been time. by riverat1 · · Score: 1

      A stack of 10 dollar coins is only 0.8 inches long and about an inch in diameter. I often carry that much in my pocket without noticing. I'll bet you can't fold up a dollar bill smaller than a dollar coin.

    13. Re:Long been time. by hoboroadie · · Score: 1

      Not a bad idea. I'd let my $2 bills go if I could use coins, same for $5. I already use the $1 coin and the $2 bill as my primary units (even before $20 bills, at which point I move toward plastic.)
      I chose my bank based on their policy of stocking the $1 coin and $2 bills. If I need paper money, it's almost always for coffee, beer, or burritos. The service staff immediately correlate the cash used in my purchase with the fat tip in the jar. I'm a star at all my usual spots.

      --
      They feared that it could be used to suppress protest or support unpopular rule.
  15. But, think of the strippers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What are we expected to do, tip with coins? Purchase tickets of some kind?

    1. Re:But, think of the strippers! by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2

      RFID tags in their outfits, and when you go in you get given a "watch" wristband that will read the tag and credit that stripper's account. You prepay at the bar or on the door, and you charge your drinks to it too. If you go over, just top it up with the handy credit card machine that a hostess will bring to the table with your next round of drinks.

      You can keep it anonymous, or you can register with the system for a discount on drinks and to make sure you always get a dance from your favourite girl.

      This one's free, bitches. You know who you heard it from first.

    2. Re:But, think of the strippers! by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

      You insert them in the slot.

      Is this really that hard to figure out?

    3. Re:But, think of the strippers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or you could just make a variation of what the casinos do, chips

    4. Re:But, think of the strippers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have been to a strip club that used its own currency, much like fairs and arcades. I think it was the Penthouse club in Austin before it became Perfect 10. I could see this happening again if dollar bills are eliminated.

    5. Re:But, think of the strippers! by __Paul__ · · Score: 1

      You could just make sure that employers pay their staff properly, and get rid of the stupid custom of tipping.

      I'm so glad I live in a country where I don't ever need to do that.

      --
      worldmobilenet.com -- World Prepaid Wireless Internet plans
    6. Re:But, think of the strippers! by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      bet your wait staff at you countries restaurant love it when your there don't tip and are never tempted to spit on your food

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    7. Re:But, think of the strippers! by __Paul__ · · Score: 1

      Why would they do that? They don't expect tips.

      No-one tips me in my day-to-day job, why are wait-staff so special?

      --
      worldmobilenet.com -- World Prepaid Wireless Internet plans
  16. A agree completely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suggest we move to a system built on barter and bitcoins.

  17. It worked for Canada... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe the US can start there then more onto the metric system.

    1. Re:It worked for Canada... by Smallpond · · Score: 1

      The US has been officially metric since 1969. Compliance is of course voluntary.

    2. Re:It worked for Canada... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the US can start there then more onto the metric system.

      Ha! we did metric MONEY back when the Empire was still juggling pounds, shillings and pence!

      As for metric weights and measures, we save that for the important stuff like Mustang engines and Coca-Cola bottles.

    3. Re:It worked for Canada... by mister_playboy · · Score: 1

      Most of our measurements are actually defined by the metric system.

      One inch is exactly 25.4 mm.

      One pound is exactly 0.45359237 kg.

      So we are using the metric system, just in a very roundabout way.

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
    4. Re:It worked for Canada... by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      90 percent of what you buy in the US is packaged in metric, you just don't realize it.

      They just label it so it looks like English.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    5. Re:It worked for Canada... by Abreu · · Score: 1

      That's because the dollar was not created tied to the british pound, it was tied to the Spanish/Mexican silver Peso, which was decimalized in 1863.

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    6. Re:It worked for Canada... by dryeo · · Score: 2

      That's strange as 80% of stuff in Canada is things like 3.78 l, 454 g, 473 ml and so on.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  18. Great for tracking... by dyingtolive · · Score: 1

    Really, subject says it all. I sometimes get cash out of the ATM, just because I like to have some on hand. The great thing about cash is that if you end up in a bad position, anyone anywhere will accept it. I got to thinking about it the other day though, and I'm kind of surprised they don't record they serial number of the bills they dispense to you and track where they end up in order to better track purchases that go under the radar because there's no 'card trail'.

    Not that I WANT this, mind you, but from a marketing point of view, the most interesting demographic has got to be the one that is trying it's damned to prevent you from finding out about it.

    --
    Support the EFF and Creative Commons. The war is coming, and they're supporting you...
    1. Re:Great for tracking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? ATM's are handing out dollar bills?

    2. Re:Great for tracking... by magarity · · Score: 2

      Really, subject says it all. I sometimes get cash out of the ATM, just because I like to have some on hand. The great thing about cash is that if you end up in a bad position, anyone anywhere will accept it.

      Well that's great and all but rather off topic. Cash for in case of a bad position comes in the form of a 20 or larger, not a stack of singles. And the topic at hand is dollar *coins* which are much better for privacy if you stop to think about it since unlke dollar bills, dollar coins don't even have serial numbers.

    3. Re:Great for tracking... by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      I've been watching a few shows on TV lately, and I can tell you, there is a huge underground economy that is pure cash. People buy and sell things for cash, making sometimes large profits without a single government trace on the transaction. I'm 100% sure these people do not pay the taxes on purchases and income that they should be, all because the transaction is 100% under the table, cash only business.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    4. Re:Great for tracking... by ls671 · · Score: 1

      dollar *coins* which are much better for privacy if you stop to think about it since unlke dollar bills, dollar coins don't even have serial numbers.

      I was just thinking about that, it just made me realize that the "traceability" might play a role in the decision making about which denominations to turn into coins.

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
  19. Familiarity by girlintraining · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Wait, they're saying we can save potentially billions of dollars, by simply changing our expectations and habits in a very slight and non-destructive fashion? Unless we can declare war on it as some kind of abstract ideological concept, nobody's going to go for that. This is America, dude, where we turn off the lights when we leave the bathroom to save the environment while we let petroleum producers dump thousands of tonnes of oil into the water because they half-assed the construction and bypassed most of the safety procedures. We come in peace, ignore the Predator drones.

    The only sensible way to do this is to shove it down the average person's throat with them screaming bloody murder... only to find out a few years later that they actually like it better the new way. It's how things have always been done here. Don't ask me why, I don't know whether it's human nature, or there's something in the water that makes people this resistant to beneficial change, but will happily make useless changes to everything...

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:Familiarity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not really billions of dollars. According to TFS, by switching from dollar bills to dollar coins we could save $0.50 per person per year.

      I am pretty sure that switching from dollar bills to dollar coins will cost me personally a lot more than $0.50 per year in lost coins.

    2. Re:Familiarity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's simply "I'm right and you're wrong" syndrome. You want someone to refuse a perfectly logical thing?

      FORCE them to do it.

      That's all you have to do. Nothing more. You want to get someone who is fat to be thin? Go to their house and threaten to beat them if they don't eat.

      The useless changes tend to be done as "Why not try xyz?" instead of "We're going to take xyz from you. By force, if necessary."

    3. Re:Familiarity by Nutria · · Score: 1

      Any amount of savings adds up to billions of dollars if you extend it out for an adequate number of decades.

      Real savings comes from slashing entitlements and the Defense department.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    4. Re:Familiarity by redback · · Score: 1

      be more careful with your money?

    5. Re:Familiarity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could save thousands of words just by saying "[insert I'm-smarter-than-everyone-else trope here]", but I don't see you making the change. (Hint: You're not actually smarter or even more thoughtful.) In this case the "benefit" is the transfer of wealth from people who use cash to the government. Since I use credit almost exclusively, I have no problem with it. (Or the government could simply mint less and bring us some deflation...)

      Continue on with your pointless "Americans are stupid" rant, though. That'll get big mod points, I'm sure.

    6. Re:Familiarity by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      What, do you regularly take out your wallet, open the change pouch, and shake it around while looking in the other direction?

    7. Re:Familiarity by z4ce · · Score: 1

      Note the GAO says it will save the GOVERNMENT billions of dollars. Ask yourself.. how is that possible?

      Here is how it is possible. The GAO is projecting that the dollar coins will be stored in jars -- exactly because they are undesirable.

      So here is how it makes the government money. Treasury creates coin. The treasury deposits coin with federal reserve effectively buying coin for $1 (treasury makes 98 cent profit or so), Coin is distributed to a bank, a bank gives a business, business gives it to a customer.. customer throws it in a jar for several years. Tada. The US government just made a dollar, hey, hey.

    8. Re:Familiarity by girlintraining · · Score: 1

      What, do you regularly take out your wallet, open the change pouch, and shake it around while looking in the other direction?

      Only to attract younger (and invariably broke) lesbians.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    9. Re:Familiarity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally, I'm more interested in the proponents of this exercise. If they do make coins to replace the bill, I do not want the coins to be worth in metal what the nomination is. That would invite people go buy millions of coins, commit the federal offense of melting them, and reselling the metal when the price suites them.

      Dimes are famous for this, and it should not happen as long as we don't have a metal standard such as metal for the currency. I'd propose to replace all coins with cheap, varied colored metals that do not have any likely-hood to be worth more than their face value.

    10. Re:Familiarity by khallow · · Score: 1

      Wait, they're saying we can save potentially billions of dollars, by simply changing our expectations and habits in a very slight and non-destructive fashion?

      How about clothing and medical expenses? These things weigh eight times as much as a bill. 25 or 50 of them in a pocket will mess up a lot of clothing with cheaply sown pockets. And banks, vendors, etc will be hauling around a lot of metal, as well as women carrying around heavier purses, leading to greater medical expenses (from back problems and other lifting injuries).

      When you say "save potentially billions of dollars", that is for the federal government, not the people who use those coins in place of bills. What we know of the public is that they won't use these coins even when they're given them as long as bills are available.

    11. Re:Familiarity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah... in America, we don't say "tonnes," we say "tons."

    12. Re:Familiarity by captjc · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but do you know the minimum recommended amount of dollar bills required to "make it rain"? If I throw that many dollar coins in the air, that poor stripper is probably going to receive some serious head trauma.

      Won't someone please think of the strippers.

      --
      Slow Down Cowboy! It's been 1 hour, 47 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment
    13. Re:Familiarity by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Lots of people on this page think they're entitled to a paper dollar though I agree that doing something about those 0.1%ers who think they're entitled to a 20% raise every year no matter how badly they did would be a good start.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    14. Re:Familiarity by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      Cutting entitlements? You means social security and medicaid? You can't make substantial cuts there unless you are willing to kill people.

    15. Re:Familiarity by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Don't be daft, you spend the coins. The most I ever have in my pocket is about $10, which is perhaps 3 toonies, 3 loonies, and assorted small change. What I used to really hate was having a 20 or 50 ones in my wallet. Not only did it make my wallet unfoldable but it would turn out I only had $20 instead of hundreds.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    16. Re:Familiarity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only sensible way to do this is to shove it down the average person's throat with them screaming bloody murder... only to find out a few years later that they actually like it better the new way. It's how things have always been done here.

      If you look at the comments above, you can see it was done that exact way in Canada and Australia. From personal experience I can tell you the came thing happened in the Netherlands with the transition from 5 guilder bills to coins. There must be some universal rule at play there.

  20. Man, I hate coins. Hate 'em. by InvisibleClergy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's all there is to this comment. I throw away pennies. The only coins I save are quarters, and I only do that out of frustration. I don't carry a coin pouch. Seriously.

    1. Re:Man, I hate coins. Hate 'em. by tverbeek · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You might feel differently if coins were worth something.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    2. Re:Man, I hate coins. Hate 'em. by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      Isn't that just because you're used to working with almost-worthless notes like $1?

    3. Re:Man, I hate coins. Hate 'em. by Mathieu+Lu · · Score: 1

      I rarely have more than 3-4 dollar coins in my wallet. You can easily use them on a payment.

      1 or 5 Â coins, on the other hand, keep accumulating unless you want to waste time counting the exact cash while other people are waiting in line. I'm glad Canada is getting rid of the 1Â.

      The attachment of people in the US to their dollar bill reflects how hard, as a nation, it is to move forward.. people are strongly attached to silly symbols.

    4. Re:Man, I hate coins. Hate 'em. by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      Then you would prefer that all denominations were paper money, right? 5 cent bill, 10 cent bill, 25 cent bill, etc.

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    5. Re:Man, I hate coins. Hate 'em. by crazycheetah · · Score: 1

      You're missing out. I save all of my coins (I don't carry a coin pouch either--just empty my pockets at the end of the day), and end up having around $600 extra every 3-12 months (depending on how much cash I'm using; some cash-heavy months leave me with a lot of extra change, whereas other months barely add anything at all). It's not a huge gain, but just having a decent enough sides container in the closet that I throw my change it works quite well. In fact, right now, mine's getting pretty full; it's been about a year since I last emptied it, but that extra money is going to pay for Christmas for me instead of having to take it out of my paycheck.

    6. Re:Man, I hate coins. Hate 'em. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I throw away pennies

      Men and ecosystems are destroyed in the pursuit of zinc and copper. The least you could do is hold onto them and feed them to a Coinstar machine when you find the time. You have a zinc and copper mine in your pocket, and you don't even have to breathe dust or run the risk of getting injured by heavy machinery. True, it's illegal to melt this "ore" down right now; but if we stop minting these coins it will once again become legal. How about giving them to somebody who enjoys working with metal?

    7. Re:Man, I hate coins. Hate 'em. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coin pouch? We call them pockets.

    8. Re:Man, I hate coins. Hate 'em. by artor3 · · Score: 1

      While I don't throw away coins (better to save them for coinstar every few years), I do agree. I keep my bills in my wallet, sorted by denomination. It makes it very easy to quickly pull out the needed amount, or count how much I have. I don't want to be forced to carry around a coin pouch. I don't want to have to dig through it with my finger tips trying to differentiate between the nickels and quarters and dollar coins, keeping track of whether or not I've already counted each coin. Coins are a pain in the ass to use, and the "savings" of 4 billion dollars over thirty years is a joke. Better to just stick with paper money, which is becoming less important thanks to electronic payment anyway. If you want to eliminate a type of currency, start with the penny.

    9. Re:Man, I hate coins. Hate 'em. by c++0xFF · · Score: 1

      No. I prefer modern payment methods over either coins or paper. For everything else, there's the occasional paper bill I keep in my wallet.

      Since I pay with a debit card for most everything, I almost never receive change of either kind. Thus, I never have to keep a wad of change in my pocket. On the rare occasion that I pay with cash, any change goes to a cup for the occasional ice cream cone or something (which is pretty rare, since I never get change anyway).

      So, if I got to pick if I'd rather have the $1 change in paper or coin, I'd choose the paper since I don't carry coins around with me anyway.

      Could I deal with a transition away from $1 paper? Of course. It just makes my life that one tiny bit more annoying, and then I'd move on. More ice cream for me, in the end.

    10. Re:Man, I hate coins. Hate 'em. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the US I hate em too. In Britain though I love em. Here we have 1, 2, 5, 10, 20, 50, 100, 200 pence coins and it means you can have a handful of shrapnel and have it be actually worth something. It means you pull it out, and actually notice that you can give exact change and so use it up.

      In the US most things are over a dollar, and those that aren't are closer to a dollar than not. This means, given I'm already paying with a note, why the hell would I check to see if I can get rid of change. Moreover I hate the notes in the US too! They're all the same size, and colour. How the hell are you meant to be able to distinguish them easily if they all look the freaking same. Bloody ridiculous!

    11. Re:Man, I hate coins. Hate 'em. by Mashiki · · Score: 2

      Yeah, just wait until you have $1 and $2 coins in your pocket like we do in Canada. And at the end of the week, you dump out all the change and there's $50 worth.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    12. Re:Man, I hate coins. Hate 'em. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. There's no good place to put them in a wallet.

    13. Re:Man, I hate coins. Hate 'em. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you carry pockets? I've found them to be adequate receptacles for coins.

    14. Re:Man, I hate coins. Hate 'em. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Surprisingly, this is not true. People really hate carrying coins so much that they will discard or lose them, even if they're worth a whole dollar. Much of the "savings" claimed is actually due to this fact. The government receives existing money and replaces it with coins that eventually disappear from the economy. The net effect is a tax on people who hate coins.

      "Just stop printing dollar bills" doesn't change this. When Canada and the UK replaced bills with coins, they issued 1.6 coins for every bill that had been in circulation. That 0.6 of a coin is a transfer of wealth from the people to the government.

      http://www.npr.org/blogs/money/2012/11/29/166103071/no-killing-the-dollar-bill-would-not-save-the-government-money

    15. Re:Man, I hate coins. Hate 'em. by neurophil12 · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised no one posted this sooner. Mod parent up informative! This is a vital part of the conversation. And I even like having some dollar coins around.

    16. Re:Man, I hate coins. Hate 'em. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have 1$ and 2$ coins in Canada and I don't like carrying those either. I would hate to have all our bills (5, 10, 20, 50, 100) as coins instead.
      Of course, I don't discard them. I throw all my coins either under the front seat of the car, or in a bucket at home and change them into bills once a year or two.
      I wouldn't mind if they went back to printing 2$ bills with the polymer banknotes they are slowly releasing; for their purported durability, even though they aren't as durable as coins.

    17. Re:Man, I hate coins. Hate 'em. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My friend hates pennies because of a 'Kids in the Hall' skit where an actor said he feels power over people by sticking pennies up his ass then putting them back into circulation. Ass pennies....

    18. Re:Man, I hate coins. Hate 'em. by dryeo · · Score: 1

      The parent is full of shit. The first year they minted 1.6 coins for every bill and every year afterwards they minted closer to .25 coins for how many bills would have been printed. Besides, while I won't bother picking up a penny, I will pick up a loonie so even if people lose them, others will find them.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    19. Re:Man, I hate coins. Hate 'em. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you just sew all of your pockets shut? Or do you carefully cut a hole slightly smaller than a quarter, so everything else falls out?

    20. Re:Man, I hate coins. Hate 'em. by magarity · · Score: 1

      True, it's illegal to melt this "ore" down right now

      Several other comments above are along the same lines. This is just a rumor. There's nothing illegal about either melting coins or destroying notes.

  21. No by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    I dont want to carry around a bunch of change just for a can of coke or a candy bar.

    There is a vast weight difference in the 2.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:No by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      vast yes, significant no

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
  22. Sure why not, but damn'it by 3seas · · Score: 1

    ... keep the penny

  23. Strike a zero, keep the dollar by istartedi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We should just strike a zero from the coins and keep the dollar. In other words, the pennies sitting in your piggy would immediately be worth $0.10. Paper money and the existing dollar coins would keep the same value, just multiply the value of all the other coins.

    1. Really not that expensive compared to the national debt.

    2. It would be a form of stimulus that goes to middle class people with jars full of coins, not fat cats. It would spark the kind of spending they want to stimulate, just in time for Christmas.

    3. The mint would once again be making money minting pennies and nickles instead of losing it. In the long run it would pay for itself. As an added bonus, you don't need to change the minting process.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    1. Re:Strike a zero, keep the dollar by operagost · · Score: 1

      Well, that's brilliant. You just increased the national debt to 160 trillion dollars.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    2. Re:Strike a zero, keep the dollar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Number two is why that cant happen. The only stimulus the middle and lower class are allowed to get is stimulus to scramble around for money, work.

      The desperation of the masses for money is what gives it value.

    3. Re:Strike a zero, keep the dollar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm sure you mean "For all intents and purposes" in your signature, as "For all intensive purposes" is nonsensical.

    4. Re:Strike a zero, keep the dollar by istartedi · · Score: 1

      No. I was only suggesting revaluing some coins. What you are talking about is striking zeros from all the ledgers, which would require a massive reprogramming effort and a "flag day" for financial transactions.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    5. Re:Strike a zero, keep the dollar by operagost · · Score: 1

      If a penny is suddenly 10 cents, it has increased in value tenfold. The government is now on the hook for 10x the value of all coins in circulation.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    6. Re:Strike a zero, keep the dollar by istartedi · · Score: 1

      All the pennies in circulation are roughly 219 billion, with a face value about $2.19 billion. We're adding value, not multiplying, so the cost is 9*$2.19 billion, or roughly. $19.7 billion. Doing that to the penny is not a budget killer by any means.

      Maybe I'll track down the nickel figures later; but if the penny is any indicator it won't be too bad. Maybe we should leave the quarter alone though. The nickel becomes a $0.50 piece which is not popular but not unheard of. AFAIK we've never had a $2.50 piece.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    7. Re:Strike a zero, keep the dollar by jtnix · · Score: 1

      LOL, and the fact his comment title and first paragraph say 'strike a zero' from coin values but in the last half of his comment reverses it to ADDing a zero to their value. LOL again. and then ROFL to points 2) (what previous AC said) and 3) umm, no you would have to change the face value to mean the literal value of the coin. the minting process would most definitely need to change to represent actual face value for future runs, so that's a new engraving for each side of each coin. There's probably some law or code that states the face value must be the actual value. Even if not, people are dumb; face value will need to be changed or updated at some point for all coins.

      But then I get thinking (dangerous, I know) and the fact that 'get rid of dollar/cent' debate has arisen several times in recent decades and the current dangerous state of, not just the US but, worldwide economies has me guessing that we're headed for some sort of drastic market REvaluation, to what purpose is hard to say, but istartedi's wish might come true sooner than anyone's psychologically prepared for.

      --
      She blinded me with science, she tricked me with technology. ~ Thomas Dolby
    8. Re:Strike a zero, keep the dollar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The direct cost of that would be about $10 billion.

      The "stimulus" would mostly go to people who are able to acquire coins on a secondary market in between finding that this highly irrational bill is likely to succeed and its implementation date.

    9. Re:Strike a zero, keep the dollar by istartedi · · Score: 1

      I started off thinking about striking a zero from all transactions (ie, all prices would be quoted at 1/10th) then yeah, I kinda changed horses mid-stream when I considered all the electronic implications. It seemed like isolating it to problem coins is a better idea. Most people get the idea though. Yes, you'd want all new coins to reflect actual value. If having "mis-labeled" coins is illegal or unappealing, the change could be brought about by having the government simply exchanging coins like they did when they rolled out the Euro.

      Come to think of it, that's a far better and cheaper idea--offer people $0.03 for copper pennies and $0.02 for the zinc ones. That's more than they're worth, but far less than 10X. Simply roll them up, bring them to any bank and get new coins. We certainly have the infrastructure to do that.

      Anyway, this is a lot of free conversation on the Internet. I spent, oh... half an hour of my time for grins and giggles. It's not like I'm sitting at some policy group in Washington DC getting paid $250k/year to come up with plans.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    10. Re:Strike a zero, keep the dollar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wff?

      so a quarter is now $2.50 but $1 bill/coin is still $1 ?

    11. Re:Strike a zero, keep the dollar by istartedi · · Score: 1

      Read the whole thread. I was thinking out loud. I think maybe buying out pennies and nickels at slightly above metalic value, and then issuing new coins makes more sense.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    12. Re:Strike a zero, keep the dollar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You CANNOT strike a 0 and keep the same currency!

      All currency requires replacement if you start cutting zeros.

      Aside: mint doesn't "make" money on coins or bills. They just say that bullshit as something "interesting". A mint is paid to manufacture coins and bills. They don't make more by making $100 vs. $5 bill.

    13. Re:Strike a zero, keep the dollar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is this, Mexico?

    14. Re:Strike a zero, keep the dollar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      During the planning process for this change, everyone would start hoarding cash, and it would paralyze the economy.

    15. Re:Strike a zero, keep the dollar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the best thing would be for CONGRESS to exercise their right/responsibility to regulate the value of money.

      If they regulated it by slowly turning the knob back to the point it was at, say 50 to 100 years ago, money would have
      value again. A Penny would have the buying power of a current day quarter. This continuous inflation is the root cause, and just because you get rid of the dollar, penny, nickle this month, doesn't mean that you won't be getting rid of the new penny (quarter) and twenty dollar bill (new dollar bill) a year or decade later.

      Just FIX THE PROBLEM!!!!!! Regulate money back to where it is supposed to be in value. If the US did it, the rest of the world would follow suit right now, as they are all sort of tied to dollars.

      Constitutionally it is the US Congresses responsibility, not the FED!! They don't belong in the system any more than it makes sense to outsource the Commander in Chief functions to say the president of Libya or somewhere else. Totally nuts. Why is it ok to allow a private bank to perform a CONSTITUTIONAL function?

      Just my two cents here, I'm just saying LOOK at the REAL problem, or you will be doing weird stuff forever.

    16. Re:Strike a zero, keep the dollar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People are already hoarding pennies and nickels, as well as hoarding cash, silver and gold. The Fed has gone past the point of diminishing returns and into negative return on "stimulus". They just don't realize it because they drink their own kool-aid.

    17. Re:Strike a zero, keep the dollar by arwel · · Score: 1

      Err, no. When you have a redenomination you apply the same factor to all denominations of notes and coins. When Turkey did this to the lira in 2005, they simply chopped six zeroes off everything (they'd been preparing for this by printing notes with the last six zeroes in a different colour, or smaller figures on coins). When 2005 came around, instead of printing 20,000,000 lira notes (then worth about $13), they printed 20 "new lira" notes instead, and four years later when everyone was used to the new values they dropped the "new" and went back to talking of their currency as liras.

    18. Re:Strike a zero, keep the dollar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you mathed wrong, since it sounds like you're trying to completely revalue the dollar.

      1 penny suddenly becoming $0.10 means that your penny is now worth 10 cents. Thus meaning that one dollar would be worth 10 dollars. So what you're saying is that you want more coins in your pocket, but only shittier, old coins.

      Nobody would realistically ever carry or use a $20, because that's now worth $200 in your system. $100 bill? Like anyone would carry $1000 with them. Even the $10 and $5 would basically be carried by nobody, since robbing anyone would mean theyy're getting $100 and $50 for each bill you have.

      So realistically, the only two bills you'd ever use are the $1, and $2 if you even have that... which I'm pretty sure you don't. So... the 1 dollar bill is for all intents and purposes the only bill in your wallet on a regular basis. The rest is a massive pocket full of change... because guess what, there's still a lot of things worth less than $10. Never mind making change for it.

      tl;dr: You're an idiot. Look at Canada's system. 1. Coins for the smaller bills. Very simple and efficient. 2. Ditch the penny entirely, so you don't screw everything up entirely revaluing the entire countrys currency. 3. Plastic bills that for some god-forsaken reason you Americans hate so much, despite them lasting a hundred times longer than your shitty paper bills.

    19. Re:Strike a zero, keep the dollar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Millionaires would buy up all the coins, 10x their money, sell them all back. Not a good plan, unless the government somehow did it without telling anyone first... but that's not going to happen.

  24. Penny First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We can't even get rid of the penny. How are we going to get rid of paper dollar bills first?

  25. End fiat currency! End THE FEDERAL RESERVE!!! by kdawson+(3715) · · Score: 0, Insightful

    I saw this insightful comment and will post it here.

    How about this! If we took the power away from a bunch of secret bank mobsters to PRINT MONEY and instead backed it with gold or some other finite, precious commodity, the dollar would retain its value.

    I'm sick and tired of this implicit tax that I have just because I *HOLD* a dollar. Read Greenspan's "Gold and Economic Freedom" essay. Once it's started, that money which is printed out can only be repaid by printing more money. This is the shabby key to the (corporate/social) welfare state that exists today.

    The reference is here: http://www.321gold.com/fed/greenspan/1966.html

    1. Re:End fiat currency! End THE FEDERAL RESERVE!!! by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

      That might've worked when there were less than a billion people in the entire world but even then they had to keep making the dollar worth smaller and smaller amounts of gold to keep up. In a world of 7bn+ people... it's just not feasible

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    2. Re:End fiat currency! End THE FEDERAL RESERVE!!! by Smallpond · · Score: 2

      Nothing is stopping you from buying gold.

    3. Re:End fiat currency! End THE FEDERAL RESERVE!!! by Genda · · Score: 1

      Yet...

    4. Re:End fiat currency! End THE FEDERAL RESERVE!!! by thomasw_lrd · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I once thought this way too. But it is possible. Instead of a $1 USD buying a loaf a bread, it might actually buy 4 loaves of bread. I wish I could find the post that pointed this out, but I'm too lazy. We would still have money, but it would be worth more in the long run.

    5. Re:End fiat currency! End THE FEDERAL RESERVE!!! by NatasRevol · · Score: 4, Funny

      Aside from the price!

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    6. Re:End fiat currency! End THE FEDERAL RESERVE!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, because inflation hasn't driven the price of a loaf of bread beyond $0.25 since we came off the gold standard.

      Idiot.

    7. Re:End fiat currency! End THE FEDERAL RESERVE!!! by runeghost · · Score: 1

      Nothing except the United States government. They smacked down e-gold nice and hard.
      http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2007/April/07_crm_301.html

    8. Re:End fiat currency! End THE FEDERAL RESERVE!!! by Jetra · · Score: 2

      I'm more concerned that the government might be conditioning us to get ready for when they finally introduce the Amero, linking us, Mexio, and Canada in some sort of Euro-esqe society.

    9. Re:End fiat currency! End THE FEDERAL RESERVE!!! by dbIII · · Score: 2

      Instead of speculation from the economist that steered things into a bubble and crash why not consider the old "cross of gold" speech from back when a gold standard was causing problems?

    10. Re:End fiat currency! End THE FEDERAL RESERVE!!! by shaitand · · Score: 1

      why is there some reason a dollar has to represent a significant amount of gold?

    11. Re:End fiat currency! End THE FEDERAL RESERVE!!! by Algae_94 · · Score: 2

      That sounds nothing like an individual buying gold.

    12. Re:End fiat currency! End THE FEDERAL RESERVE!!! by shaitand · · Score: 3, Informative

      The gold standard wasn't the problem. The problem is that people weren't bright enough realize it is easier to divide the dollar to further decimal places than to divide a piece of gold.

    13. Re:End fiat currency! End THE FEDERAL RESERVE!!! by SteveFoerster · · Score: 2, Informative

      They also killed the Liberty Dollar, which was backed by silver and gold, calling its founder a "domestic terrorist". Seriously.

      --
      Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
    14. Re:End fiat currency! End THE FEDERAL RESERVE!!! by swalve · · Score: 1

      He got smacked down because he didn't have the gold in the vaults like he said he did.

    15. Re:End fiat currency! End THE FEDERAL RESERVE!!! by dbIII · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually it was a problem since it created an increasing barrier of entry to people who wanted to use any sort of resource to do anything. The golden rule was that whoever had the gold made the rules. In that sort of system "startups" are impossible without an old money patron. The shift away from such things over the last few centuries resulted in modern society instead of static feudalism.

    16. Re:End fiat currency! End THE FEDERAL RESERVE!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He got smacked down because he didn't have the gold in the vaults like he said he did.

      He didn't after the Feds took it, that's for sure. You don't really think that any competition to the Federal Reserve Note is going to be permitted, do you?

    17. Re:End fiat currency! End THE FEDERAL RESERVE!!! by SteveFoerster · · Score: 1

      Citation needed.

      --
      Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
    18. Re:End fiat currency! End THE FEDERAL RESERVE!!! by Runaway1956 · · Score: 0

      I won't be around in another fifty years. I hope someone drops me a postcard or something, to let me know how well that fiat money works out, after China has become the global economic power. I can't see it being much good at all. Eventually, we'll have to link our dollar to China's yuan, and the exchange rates are going to blow worse than the lowest budget porn flick you've ever seen.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    19. Re:End fiat currency! End THE FEDERAL RESERVE!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoever has the dollar still makes the rules.

    20. Re:End fiat currency! End THE FEDERAL RESERVE!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trust me, no form of government is going to make you "Euro-esqe"

    21. Re:End fiat currency! End THE FEDERAL RESERVE!!! by Dr+Damage+I · · Score: 1

      that's a relief.

      --
      "Cursed is he who rises early in the morning..." Isiah 5:11
    22. Re:End fiat currency! End THE FEDERAL RESERVE!!! by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Tell that to the government of Zimbabwe or anywhere else where the local currency is ignored and something else is used.

    23. Re:End fiat currency! End THE FEDERAL RESERVE!!! by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      I do not think you know what gold is, apparently... it's a physical object...

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    24. Re:End fiat currency! End THE FEDERAL RESERVE!!! by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Nothing is stopping you from buying gold.

      But there are laws that say you can't stipulate a contract to be paid in gold. You can stipulate a contract that involves you being paid in other forms, but gold is explicitly banned.

    25. Re:End fiat currency! End THE FEDERAL RESERVE!!! by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      I saw this insightful comment and will post it here.

      How about this! If we took the power away from a bunch of secret bank mobsters to PRINT MONEY and instead backed it with gold or some other finite, precious commodity, the dollar would retain its value.

      I'm sick and tired of this implicit tax that I have just because I *HOLD* a dollar. Read Greenspan's "Gold and Economic Freedom" essay. Once it's started, that money which is printed out can only be repaid by printing more money. This is the shabby key to the (corporate/social) welfare state that exists today.

      The reference is here: http://www.321gold.com/fed/greenspan/1966.html

      I'm actually ok with fiat currency. It allows for adjusting the money supply for various reasons. The problem I have is with debt-backed fiat currency like teh Federal Reserve gives us. The USA basically borrows all of its money from the Fed. Why should a nation borrow all of its money, when it could print it itself? The US treasury could print money and spend it into existence, rather than us borrowing it into existence.

      It's not a perfect system. But neither is the gold standard. I think reasonable people can disagree, but I haven't found anyone who agrees that we should borrow all our money. Of course, most people don't realize we borrow all of our money. Hence why I chose the sig I did.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    26. Re:End fiat currency! End THE FEDERAL RESERVE!!! by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      Nothing is stopping you from buying gold.

      That's really not the same thing.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    27. Re:End fiat currency! End THE FEDERAL RESERVE!!! by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      I think it is incorrect to assume that gold will always retain a constant value with respect to other commodities. I also wonder what the cost burden will be for everyone to have to have scales and mass spectrometers to assess the purity and weight of the currency they receive.

    28. Re:End fiat currency! End THE FEDERAL RESERVE!!! by andymadigan · · Score: 1

      Your information is laughably out of date

      Gold clauses were reinstated in 1977, some 35 years ago (at least in the U.S., perhaps there's another country out there that barred gold clauses). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gold_clause

      In any case, a currency's value comes from acceptance and trust in future acceptance, by both merchants and the government. Individuals rely on the government to ensure that the currency does not become worthless. This doesn't always work. When the U.S. dollar was backed by gold, it did vary in value, sometimes in "shocks" that would cause the value to change drastically in a matter of weeks. What's the point of tying currency to a metal when the value actually comes from the ability to trade the currency?

      Metals change in value, fiat currency changes in value, everything changes in value. It's preferable to keep currency somewhat stable in value (avoid rapid changes) so that wages and prices don't have to be adjusted every week. Long term, changes in the value will happen no matter what the currency is based on, and that really only affects debt. Lenders have to take inflation into account when calculating interest. If you're worried about your savings getting inflated away, buy a productive asset. If you really think a hunk of metal will have a good value in the future, you can even buy that. Personally, I think it's more likely a business will continue to have value in the future. For instance, a profitable brewery (a business that can command a premium on its work-product) is likely to hold its value well, so buy an interest in the brewery. If you're worried about one particular brewery losing value, spread your risk by buying interests in many breweries. If you're worried the whole industry will lose value, buy interest in many industries.

      Money's primary usefulness is short-term, a medium of exchange. That's the aspect of it that needs to be preserved, not its ability to hold long-term value.

      --
      The right to protest the State is more sacred than the State.
    29. Re:End fiat currency! End THE FEDERAL RESERVE!!! by Xifer · · Score: 1

      That is a vary intriguing idea and more in keeping with a real just free market system. It would mean an end to lies and games in the market place if the golld or silver dollar had its content set by its scarcity in the marketplace as a fixed currency and then we could make coins of lesser value as needed to buy everyday goods as dollars grew in value. We might need to have coins for thousands and ten thousands of the dollar but it would all be in relationship to the fixed unit1, as in the metric system. If a silver oz cost 33.440 Federal Reserve Notes, and a silver dollar was .77344 oz than your two cents worth would be worth about .52 FRN's at the going market price. And it would be constant value rather than the variable value we have now so you could decide how much money you wanted to put into the minting of a given coin.

    30. Re:End fiat currency! End THE FEDERAL RESERVE!!! by NickGnome · · Score: 1
      How badly over-populated the world is, is irrelevant.
      ...

      Hard currency, with some inherent rarity, as opposed to endlessly inflatable scrip, would be a huge improvement.

      Coincidentally, I was just reading a bit of history, yesterday, which mentioned that Marco Polo was impressed by Kublai Khan's abuse of scrip. He was powerful enough to get away with murdering anyone who would not accept his scrip, and sensible enough to limit how much he issued. OTOH, as soon as he died, the scam fell apart.

      The story has been repeated many times, whether it was scrip or debased coinage (made from cheaper metals).

      The government has floated this dollar coin idea several times because the coins stay in circulation longer than paper. But they made a huge design error. People were still aware of the near-full-bodied silver coins that had existed before. They might get away with Johnson slugs -- copper-nickel alloy masquerading as silver small change -- but they keep insisting on trying to make the copper-nickel dollars essentially the same size and thickness as a quarter.

      The one ounce of silver silver dollars were both thicker and bigger around, so people who are savvy or have been around longer just keep on rejecting them.

      At the same time, the feral federal government has been issuing over-priced "medallions", with nowhere near the current market value of silver in them as marked on the face. It's a total fraud... but then, that's the whole idea of scrip, to commit fraud on the little people who can't effectively defend themselves.

      Hmmm, that's also why the patriotic western Pennsylvanians used their whiskey in exchange instead of the government scrip, and then tarred, feathered and burned down the houses of the government thugs who tried to extort more from them through Hamilton's hated unconstitutional tax on whiskey.

    31. Re:End fiat currency! End THE FEDERAL RESERVE!!! by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

      And how is an X standard where you constantly keep making the dollar worth less and less X any different than fiat currency alterations?

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    32. Re:End fiat currency! End THE FEDERAL RESERVE!!! by Electricity+Likes+Me · · Score: 1

      Mean time to liberatarian on Slashdot: 3 posts.

    33. Re:End fiat currency! End THE FEDERAL RESERVE!!! by elfprince13 · · Score: 1

      Don't have to make it a gold standard. Just abolish legal tender laws and let the market sort it. Or wait for Google ("Planetary Resources") to dump one of those shiny new asteroids full of platinum and gold a few years down the line.

  26. Came here looking for the Planet Money link by guises · · Score: 5, Informative

    Planet Money did a whole podcast on this. Don't see anyone linking to it, so here's the most current thing:

    http://www.npr.org/blogs/money/2012/11/29/166103071/no-killing-the-dollar-bill-would-not-save-the-government-money

    The short is: switching to dollar coins is both less convenient and more expensive than sticking with bills. It's surprising, given the much longer lifetime of coins, but unambiguous.

    1. Re:Came here looking for the Planet Money link by Mathieu+Lu · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Although the main argument of the linked article on why it's more expensive, is that people tend to hold on to coins (put them in useless jars) rather than use them, so the government had to produce 1.6 dollar coins for each 1$ paper billed replaced.

      In the linked PDF file [1], search for "1.6", you will find this sentence in the same paragraph:

      "However, in both cases, once the transition was complete, coin
      production was very low or even nil in some years. Therefore, we
      determined that a 1.5-to-1 replacement rate would be appropriate for our analysisâ"low enough to avoid an excess of $1 coins without creating an undue risk of producing too few."

      It was only a transition issue, there is no mention about people forgetting about those coins in jars. A 1$ coin is useful, it's what is usually given as a tip for a beer in a pub, so I find the argument that people put them in jars kind of odd..

      [1]Âhttp://www.gao.gov/new.items/d11281.pdf

    2. Re:Came here looking for the Planet Money link by iguana · · Score: 1

      Thought of that Planet Money episode as soon as I saw the title. The TL;DL (too long; didn't listen) of the podcast is coins aren't continually circulated like paper bills. People throw them in jars and leave them there for months, years. So *more* coins than bills are actually needed in order to keep the normal supply circulating.

    3. Re:Came here looking for the Planet Money link by medv4380 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if I buy into the logic of the argument. I've been able to get dollar coins form a vending machine at work. However, because the transition never really happened when I'd try to use them people were always confused. I put a coin into the bus and the driver stat their dumbfounded until he figured out the machine was registering a dollar. Then New version of the coins wouldn't work at all. Their little lets put a different president on each run really made vending machines hit or miss with them. If I used them with a clerk they would think I only game them a quarter. Too much of that, and yea I'll just be putting them in jars till I have enough to put in a coin machine and get cash for coin.

    4. Re:Came here looking for the Planet Money link by xaxa · · Score: 1

      I think that's irrelevant. Some people do keep a change jar, but it's only the low-value coins -- exactly the same as many Americans who presumably already have a jar of 25 (or less) coins.

      A coin worth £1 has actual value, and a jar of them is worth a *lot*. Just this many (hardly a handful) looks like £16, i.e. US$25. It's unusual, but no-one would mind you paying for something with 16 £1 coins.

    5. Re:Came here looking for the Planet Money link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This article appears to be horribly misleading. The article argues that all the savings from switching to a $1 coin are derived from people being more likely to hoard coins and they back this up with the following quote from a GAO report "a transfer from the public, and not a cost-saving change in production. ... these are benefits to the government and not necessarily to the public at large."
      However, the article cherry picked this quote from the larger sentence "Second, the benefits derive from seigniorage, a transfer from the public, and not a cost-saving change in production." Seigniorage according to the report refers to the difference between the cost of producing a coin or note versus its face value. So while some of the savings are a transfer from the public it also concludes that its cheaper to produce the coins.
      The full gains from switching to coins are long term and there are short term costs but the report certainly can't be summarized as coins are both less convenient and more expensive than bills.

    6. Re:Came here looking for the Planet Money link by neurophil12 · · Score: 1

      I think that's irrelevant. Some people do keep a change jar, but it's only the low-value coins -- exactly the same as many Americans who presumably already have a jar of 25 (or less) coins.

      I can't remember for certain, but my sense was that they were taking into account the value of the coin based on the use of similarly valued coins in other nations. Can anyone comment on this?

      Frankly I'd love to see dollar coins more in circulation, and I do use them whenever I can get my hands on them, but it seems like I'm not very representative. Regardless of how people would react or adapt to the dollar coin if made more available, I've just been dumbfounded at the utter lack of effort to actually get the coin out there. I listened to all of the Planet Money episodes about the dollar coins, particularly those piling up in government warehouses, and I couldn't help wondering where the signs were in banks to let people know they could ask for dollar coins. More than half the time when I request them at the bank someone has to go looking for them, and at least a quarter of the time they can't find any, or any more than a dozen or so. I mean, maybe people don't like the coins, but it's silly to use the argument that no one is asking for them to say they're unpopular if most people are simply unaware of them.

    7. Re:Came here looking for the Planet Money link by Chuckstar · · Score: 1

      I think people would be more likely to let a few dollar coins sit around (in jars, drawers, etc.) than dollar bills. Only because bills are easier to carry around than coins. Sometimes you put all your coins somewhere out of convenience, and they sit there for longer than a bill would sit around. But this is a one-time thing. Any individual would tend to have a certain number of dollar coins sitting in a jar/drawer/etc. at any time. But it wouldn't grow over time.

      In other words, right now I have no one-dollar-bills sitting in my dresser drawer. If we switched to coins, I wouldn't be surprised if at any time I didn't have 2-4 one-dollar-coins sitting in that drawer. So effectively, $2-4 dollars is out of circulation. But a year later, it's still the same $2-4. It didn't grow to $4-8.

    8. Re:Came here looking for the Planet Money link by Chuckstar · · Score: 1

      I think confusion would be a very short-term problem. If they really did remove dollar bills from circulation, people would figure out the coins pretty quick. When they leave the bills in circulation and just circulate a few additional coins, then people are confused by the coins. They really just need to decide "do we want dollar coins or dollar bills?"

      Personally, I really like the idea of dollar coins. I find the existence of coins in that price range for Euro and Pounds to be much more convenient than bills.

    9. Re:Came here looking for the Planet Money link by xaxa · · Score: 1

      I've now read the document someone else linked to: http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d11281.pdf

      It says both Canada and the UK replaced notes with coins at a ratio of 1:1.6 to make up for people keeping them (in jars, pockets etc), which increases the initial cost but makes extra money from seigniorage.

      I was on holiday in the US (as a child) when one of the $1 coins was introduced, and a relative gave me about $30 worth -- I'm not sure why -- which I never spent. I went back last year, and took them along to spend. I obviously didn't want to carry them all at once, but didn't want them left-over at the end of the trip, so I took a few to spend each day. I sometimes had trouble -- people didn't want to accept them, or thought (given my accent) they were foreign. I put most of them in machines in the end, but was still surprised to find machines that didn't accept them.

      Unless you run a business, I think getting coins from banks is odd (a few people have commented about doing that). I've never withdrawn coins from a bank; I get coins in change, almost always in amounts less than £5. Getting more than £5 in coins as change comes with an apology, and usually an effort to increase the change due to £10 to avoid it, I wouldn't do it voluntarily!

    10. Re:Came here looking for the Planet Money link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Planet Money did a whole podcast on this. Don't see anyone linking to it, so here's the most current thing:
      http://www.npr.org/blogs/money/2012/11/29/166103071/no-killing-the-dollar-bill-would-not-save-the-government-money
      The short is: switching to dollar coins is both less convenient and more expensive than sticking with bills. It's surprising, given the much longer lifetime of coins, but unambiguous.

      Instead of relying on someone's opinion based solely on their own behaviour, why not look at the experience in one of the countries that have dropped the dollar note? For example, the UK, Canada, Australia, or New Zealand.

    11. Re:Came here looking for the Planet Money link by j-beda · · Score: 1

      Thought of that Planet Money episode as soon as I saw the title. The TL;DL (too long; didn't listen) of the podcast is coins aren't continually circulated like paper bills. People throw them in jars and leave them there for months, years. So *more* coins than bills are actually needed in order to keep the normal supply circulating.

      Even if true though, that is a transition issue, eventually you reach a point where the coins start to come out of the jars - even if that takes months or a few years. The value of the coin has a huge impact on this. A roll of pennies is worth $1 while a roll of dollar coins is worth $25. A handful of dollar coins is useful, and does not stay locked away in a jar the way pennies, nickles and dimes might.

    12. Re:Came here looking for the Planet Money link by guises · · Score: 1

      No, the idea is that the government makes effectively the same amount of money (seigniorage) from selling bills as it does coins. The actual cost of minting the coins is greater than printing the bills, but the bills have to be replaced sooner so the net cost is very similar between them. The greater income from coins comes from this hoarding behavior necessitating a larger number of coins than bills. So they're making more money by selling more coins.

    13. Re:Came here looking for the Planet Money link by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Here in Canada, all reports are the switch saved quite a bit of money. When a handful of change is worth $10+ you're more likely to spend it and even if you put it in a jar, you take it out again as that jar could be worth hundreds.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    14. Re:Came here looking for the Planet Money link by neurophil12 · · Score: 1

      I don't know the detailed numbers, but it may be it did actually save money in Canada because the Canadian dollar bill was of poorer quality/value. The US dollar bill can stay in circulation considerably longer than any other bill in the world.

    15. Re:Came here looking for the Planet Money link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As you said yourself, they put them in a tip jar.

    16. Re:Came here looking for the Planet Money link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's some random opinion blog with no figures behind it but "gut feeling". Try again with a source that makes sense.

  27. Not a big deal... by Atticka · · Score: 2

    Up north we have 1$ and 2$ coins and its really NOT an issue. Time to get over the "no way, not ever, coins are icky" attitude and do the responsible thing to save money.

    Honestly, something has to be done to reduce government expenditure and this is a simple, no brainer way to go about it.

    --
    No sig here...
  28. It adds up further than you think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    average of about $146 million per year

    It may not sound like much but for that amount of money we could afford more than a third of an Apple CEO every year.

  29. No, it won't save money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They've been through this before. There's a relevant Planet Money story about this.

    The short version is that people tend to hoard coins whereas they tend to spend bills. This means the government would have to have more coins in circulation than if they were using bills. They ran the numbers and concluded that it would actually cost more to replace all dollar bills with dollar coins.

    1. Re:No, it won't save money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does not ignore it. They said when they took that into account, it was a wash. I like the story because it taught me something I hadn't thought of: that people don't like to spend coins.

    2. Re:No, it won't save money by dryeo · · Score: 1

      It does not ignore it. They said when they took that into account, it was a wash. I like the story because it taught me something I hadn't thought of: that people don't like to spend coins.

      They do when the coin is actually worth something, much like people put up with having a big wad of singles in their pocket, yet wouldn't put up with 10 cent notes

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  30. Yep - Bills need to go! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd be very happy if we did away with the bills and went to strictly $1 coins. In fact, I'd also be happy to see us ditch the penny from circulation and perhaps go as far as to say start making $5 coins with the eventual goal to eliminate the $5 bill.

  31. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Think of all the public healthcare that could be funded with that money!

  32. Canadian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You now have our socalized healthcare, now be able to afford it as well by adopting 1 & 2 dollar coins just like Canada, in fact, skip a step, and delete pennies at the same time.

    You know what prevented the US from making this happen last time (Sacajawea dollar coin) was the fact that your banks didn't have the balls to pull the notes, and the government didn't have enough reach to do so.

    On second thought you should move to our socialized, government sanctioned banks at the same time as well.

    You know cause if you want something done either pay a shizzle ton of money for it (capitalism) or get a government to mandate it.

    Countdown too some Tea Party drooler doing their best Mel Gibson "...but you cant take our FREEDOM" tirade to shout down the potential savings.

  33. Drop the $2 and the penny while you're at it by toejam13 · · Score: 1

    Dollar bills are horrible for vending machines. About half of the bills in my wallet are in questionable condition, and most aren't even a decade old. Meanwhile, I have have a couple of coins in my pocket that are from the 1950s and 60s. Still perfectly good.

    The two dollar bill never really took off in the US. Supposedly some people find them unlucky. Dump 'em for a $2 coin. Works for Canada.

    If you really want to get bold, move the currency from two decimal places to one (coins would be $0.1, $0.2 and $0.5). The penny has less real value today than the half-penny had in its day when it was dropped. Sure, we could just round to the nearest nickle to keep 5Â and 25Â pieces good, but we're almost to a point where it costs more to mint a nickle than what its face value is.

    1. Re:Drop the $2 and the penny while you're at it by PhotoJim · · Score: 1

      $2 bills were unpopular in western Canada... until we got rid of $1 bills. Acceptance shot up rapidly after that.

      If people won't take them, offer them $1 coins instead. People will relent in a hurry.

      At the end of the day, money is money. The only downside to $1 and $2 coins is size and weight, but you get used to them. If the weight bothers you, give them to charity or plug someone's parking meter.

  34. $146M won't pay for the debates! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, $146M in savings for a year-- will that even pay for the Congress critter hearings? Why is this even in front of Congress? Shouldn't this be a question for the Treasury Department. Repub's want "hand's off, small, efficient government" -- they let the Treasury Dept make the decision -- if you want them to behave like a business then let them tend to their business. I'm also willing to bet that Treas has a better grasp on ramifications w.r.t. counterfitting than Congress. Bunch a PHB's....

    Sometimes ya gotta let people do their work.

  35. Hopefully soon. by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

    We should abolish all change below the dime, and turn the one and five into coins.

  36. Why the odd timeframes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why are we talking about 4 billion in 30 years? What about a per year rate? It's like when the politicians talk about deficit reduction. They come out an throw out a number of a couple hundred billion and only later you find out they mean "over 7 years." What about next year?
     
    4 billion is an exciting number until you understand that it's over nearly half a human's life span.

  37. It probably wouldn't save money by ihop0 · · Score: 1

    Planet Money did an analysis of the issue awhile back, and discovered that the habit of people to let coins collect in jars & drawers, while it would benefit the government, would alter the math and not end up saving us if we made the switch.

    http://www.npr.org/blogs/money/2012/11/29/166103071/no-killing-the-dollar-bill-would-not-save-the-government-money

    http://www.npr.org/blogs/money/2012/04/19/150976150/should-we-kill-the-dollar-bill

    1. Re:It probably wouldn't save money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. When you read the report you see that GAO wants to replace 1 $1 bill with 1.5 $1 coins for this very reason. That 0.5 extra in circulation is worth a half billion of the $4.4 billion GAO is claiming.

      In the report the CBO looked at only a 10-year horizon and found that a switch to the coin would cost $500 million dollars.

      Maybe the mint should move from Cotton/Linen to BOPP like the Australian dollar did?

  38. Not again by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 1

    Not yet, because nobody wants them.

    This isn't news. They made the same argument in 1979, with the "Susan B. Anthony" which nobody used; and in 2000 with the "Sacagawea dollar", which nobody used.

    http://consumerist.com/2012/11/30/if-no-one-likes-the-dollar-coin-why-is-the-u-s-government-trying-to-push-it-so-hard/

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    1. Re:Not again by h4rr4r · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I use them. Way easier to keep a bunch in the ash tray to pay tolls with.

      People would use them if they stopped printing dollar bills.

    2. Re:Not again by Guspaz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It doesn't matter if anybody wants them or not, the solution is simple. Start making one dollar coins. Stop making one dollar bills. Very quickly, your entire economy has switched.

      That's what happened in Canada. What, you think there wasn't resistance when we eliminated our one dollar bill or two dollar bill (which was far more commonly used than in the US)? Of course there was. And it didn't matter, because people didn't get a choice. The government decided they wanted to save money, so they did. It's not an election-level issue, so they could do that sort of thing.

      The only reason that the dollar coin has not succeeded in the US is because the US government doesn't know how to do such transitions.

    3. Re:Not again by operagost · · Score: 1

      Well, duh. People would all go to Taco Bell if the government forced every other restaurant to shut down, too. We still wouldn't have any idea how to use the shells.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    4. Re:Not again by Smallpond · · Score: 1

      I think it was the vending machine lobby that made them continue to print bills. Most won't take $1 coins.

    5. Re:Not again by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Except that would actually hurt someone.

      There is no point in making dollar coins and notes, unless you just want to waste money.

    6. Re:Not again by PhotoJim · · Score: 1

      They'll relent. Canadian vending machines take $1 and $2 coins. Making coins similar in size and weight to Canadian ones, and adapting Canadian-type hardware, would let you have modern vending machines at very little cost.

      It wouldn't surprise me if a lot of current US vending machines can already accept Canadian dollar coins if programmed correctly, so it would be a very easy transition to customize them to US coins of similar specifications.

    7. Re:Not again by PhotoJim · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Getting rid of $1 bills isn't despotism, it's pragmatism.

      Should the US start printing 25-cent bills? 10-cent bills? More choice is better, right?

      At a certain point, you have to realize that having unlimited choices is just silly. A $1 coin functions just as well in an economy as a $1 bill (and lasts longer, thus costing society less). If you don't like increasing amounts of change, do what most Americans do and use credit or debit cards.

      As a side effect, use cash, save those increasing piles of change and you can put hundreds of dollars into your savings account every year just by rolling it all up.

    8. Re:Not again by operagost · · Score: 1

      I didn't say that changing the currency was despotism; I was saying that the attitude that the government will just make decisions that favor it over the people is a sign of despotism.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    9. Re:Not again by Smallpond · · Score: 1

      The problem is that they can't make them TOO close. I think it was New Jersey that made some tokens that were the same size as New York subway tokens, which cost a lot more. This led to high sales in New Jersey and a loss of revenue in New York until they phased out tokens.

    10. Re:Not again by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      And yet again with the "Presidential Gold Coins"

    11. Re:Not again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The currency is government-issue in the first place. You've got to be kidding. You may have a right to dollars for your currency, but you do not have the (individual) right to demand a certain format of dollar be produced in perpetuity.

      This doesn't relate to the Patriot Act in the slightest. Nor the affordable healthcare act (which isn't despotism either, whether or not you personally agree with it). Despotism. For fuck's sake. Learn what words mean.

    12. Re:Not again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the way the Canadian Government did the transition to the metric system. They just went out and changed the highway signs. One weekend they were in miles per hour, next weekend they were in kilometers per hour. Bam. I don't remember any riots in the streets or people shouting "Tyranny!" Might be one difference between Canadian vs American solutions to things. We don't go apeshit over stuff that doesn't really matter in the long run.

    13. Re:Not again by Zalbik · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I was saying that the attitude that the government will just make decisions that favor it over the people is a sign of despotism.

      But this isn't one of those decisions. Removing the $1 bill saves the people money. It doesn't particularly help the government at all. So how is this despotism?

    14. Re:Not again by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      Which is surprising, because it should be a bunch cheaper to make machines that only support coins (as most in Canada do) rather than make machines that support both coins and bills (as most in the US do).

    15. Re:Not again by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      As long as the dollar is near parity, it doesn't much matter. US and Canadian currency is typically interchangeable at up to the $0.25 level anyhow, in that stores won't care which country they're from. Many vending machines don't seem to care either.

    16. Re:Not again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We don't go apeshit over stuff that doesn't really matter in the long run.

      Really?

    17. Re:Not again by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      At the same time, the Canadian transition to metric never really finished. For some units and measurements, it was. Younger Canadians tend to have no real concept of temperatures in Fahrenheit, or volumes in quarts or gallons (excepting the pint, because of beer), or distances in miles. But at the same time, few Canadians could tell you their height in centimeters (I'm 5'10", but have no idea what that is in cm), and many still measure short distances in inches and feet.

      Canada's use of the metric system is varied like this in many categories, with metric use being more prevalent in younger Canadians than older ones. This is mostly due to influence from the US.

    18. Re:Not again by ebh · · Score: 1

      Well, there is the old Hong Kong 1 cent note (worth about $0.0013 US). It was about the size of a small Post-It, only printed on one side, and was legal tender only for amounts less than HK$1, which meant you couldn't pay your rent using a wheelbarrow full of them.

    19. Re:Not again by ebh · · Score: 1

      What really happened was that when NYC considered a new city income tax law that disproportionately hurt NJ commuters, NJ threatened to make Garden State Parkway tokens (worth 33 cents) identical to the NYC subway tokens ($1.25 IIRC) of the time.

    20. Re:Not again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A typical teatard who has no idea what the word of "despotism" actually means.

      Countless millions of victims have died at the hands of actual despots throughout history, but operagost feels he counts among them because he's slightly annoyed by a proposed adjustment to currency to track inflation.

      We need to get out our 3-cornered hats and fight this oppression!

    21. Re:Not again by Smallpond · · Score: 1

      That's why all new transit systems use cards.

    22. Re:Not again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The government decided they wanted to save money, so they did. It's not an election-level issue, so they could do that sort of thing. The only reason that the dollar coin has not succeeded in the US is because the US government doesn't know how to do such transitions.

      Could you be any more incorrect?

      1) In the US the people are the government
      2) Because of 1. it becomes not only a federal issue but a state issue
      3) Because of 2. it becomes a local level issue: who pays the costs of making the change? Who pays the costs when dollar bills are still in circulation?

    23. Re:Not again by khallow · · Score: 1

      Removing the $1 bill saves the people money.

      No, it saves the federal government money. For the people who now have to haul around money eight times as heavy as the old bill, it's not saving them money or things that they consider equivalent to money.

    24. Re:Not again by artor3 · · Score: 1

      The US government knows full well how to force such a transition. They're not doing it because there's no reason to. The cost is trivial, and people don't want to switch. What sort of democratic government forces an unwanted change on its people just to save 0.004% of the budget?

    25. Re:Not again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why there needs to exist a vending machine lobby is beyond me.

    26. Re:Not again by xaxa · · Score: 1

      That's why all new transit systems use cards.

      Several I used in China use plastic coins with an embedded RFID chip. They worked quite nicely -- I think the coin slot on the exit gates was more obvious to tourists holding a plastic coin than the ticket-shaped slot on the older systems with both one-use and multi-use tickets.

    27. Re:Not again by lattyware · · Score: 1

      I wish the UK government would do that already. It's insane we are metric for everything, but have roads in miles. They are not even putting both measurements onto new signs or anything.

      --
      -- Lattyware (www.lattyware.co.uk)
    28. Re:Not again by misexistentialist · · Score: 0

      More like the paper lobby. John Kerry has so few accomplishments that the other Congressmen just don't have the heart to take this from him.

    29. Re:Not again by shaitand · · Score: 1

      It would hurt everyone who doesn't want to deal with carrying coins. A dollar is still a significant unit of value and we'd be forced to keep coins if there was a dollar coin. I don't know anyone who WANTS to deal with coins.

    30. Re:Not again by shaitand · · Score: 1

      I love how people are touting a democracy forcing a change the majority of the population is opposed to on them as an example of something done right.

    31. Re:Not again by shaitand · · Score: 1

      I think you mean indistinguishable. Stores do not want your Canadian currency, the cashier just failed to detect you slipping in a Canadian slug. Banks reject them.

    32. Re:Not again by shaitand · · Score: 1

      The people would rather pay the money than use dollar coins. Doing something other than the will of the people may not be despotism but it certainly isn't democracy.

    33. Re:Not again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck your face.

    34. Re:Not again by Xtifr · · Score: 1

      "Haul around"? I rarely have more than three dollars in ones at any given time. And I often have a couple more in quarters; those would be much better as two coins instead of eight.

      If a couple of extra coins in your pocket is really something that you have to describe as "hauling around", then you might want to consider going to the gym. Or, at the very least, getting out of your chair more often than once a week! :)

    35. Re:Not again by khallow · · Score: 1

      I rarely have more than three dollars in ones at any given time.

      Don't make the mistake of assuming everyone behaves like you. Not everyone carries just a couple extra dollar bills in their pocket. Consider also the people who as part of their job are going to be hauling these huge boxes of coins around.

      It's also worth noting that apparently in the UK and Canada, it took something like 60% more coins to cover bill circulation (apparently people were putting those coins in jars rather than spending them).

      Sure, it's nice from the point of view of the government to have all this money paid for and out of circulation. But not from the point of view of the people who actually use the coins.

    36. Re:Not again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See the metric system for more fail.

    37. Re:Not again by captjc · · Score: 2

      Ask any Scotsman, football is serious business. Any game that doesn't end in a riot wasn't a real game.

      I believe Philadelphia Eagles fans are the same way.

      --
      Slow Down Cowboy! It's been 1 hour, 47 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment
    38. Re:Not again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I visited Nicaragua 15 years ago, when they were printing 25-centavo bills. They were great... for marking your place in books. Other than that, they were so useless that even the beggars tossed them on the ground.

    39. Re:Not again by dryeo · · Score: 1

      The people also wanted a balanced budget, this was a step in that direction. Often in democracies there is conflict as the people want conflicting things and in this case it was decided balancing the budget was more important. We ended up with a balanced budget without the people having to suffer much, at least until the right wingers got in. Now it's both people suffering and deficit spending with a promise that since they're conservative, they're better at balancing the budget and in just 5 years they'll do it.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    40. Re:Not again by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Do the banks really reject Canadian currency? That seems so weird as American coins have always been treated as currency here. Most all stores also except American notes though they'll ding you a couple of percent on top of the going exchange so the American $5 in my wallet is probably actually $4.75 or so.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    41. Re:Not again by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      i like the rfid chip idea, maybe make a dollar coin also contain a bitcoin :-P

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    42. Re:Not again by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      saving 0.004% of 3.796 trillion( the total enacted expenditures for 2012) means a savings of $151,850,000 if wolfram alpha is to be believed i would be more than happy if they would do this for that "little" of a savings. if people bitched tell them they can have the dollar bill back once they caugh up even half of the price difference. bitching about it would stop rather quickly then

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    43. Re:Not again by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      Are you sure about that? Thinking back to when we got rid of $1/$2 bills here in Australia and replaced them with coins, vending machine companies/parking meter operators etc. were some of the biggest supporters of the move - no more jammed bills in the mechanism! And no need to have separate slots for bills and coins ... can just have a single coin slot. Simpler and easier to empty the machines and less likely to break.

    44. Re:Not again by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      Interesting. The more I read about other English-speaking countries that transitioned to metric, the more I realise that we here in Australia seem to have 'converted' more than most of them. I'm 30 and have no idea about my height in feet. I'm 178 cm - that's all I have ever known.

      I did know about the continued use of miles in the UK, but the "still thinking of height in feet" in Canada was new to me.

    45. Re:Not again by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Once the change was complete, they minted way fewer coins then they used to print bills. And when coins are actually worth money, those jars get emptied regularly and spent.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    46. Re:Not again by Xtifr · · Score: 1

      I often carry $50-$100 in cash. The point is that almost none of it is ones! I know nobody who deliberately carries around huge piles of ones.

      I'm pretty sure that most money that gets hauled around is $20s, since those are far and away the most commonly used bill these days. There's probably also a lot of fives and tens. All of those will still be bills. Your end-of-the-world scenario seems far-fetched, to put it mildly.

    47. Re:Not again by khallow · · Score: 1
      Remember what I said?

      Don't make the mistake of assuming everyone behaves like you.

      Please stop doing that.

      Your end-of-the-world scenario seems far-fetched, to put it mildly.

      And your hyperbole is tiresome.

    48. Re:Not again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't matter if anybody wants them or not, the solution is simple. Start making one dollar coins. Stop making one dollar bills. Very quickly, your entire economy has switched.

      That's what happened in Canada. What, you think there wasn't resistance when we eliminated our one dollar bill or two dollar bill (which was far more commonly used than in the US)? Of course there was. And it didn't matter, because people didn't get a choice. The government decided they wanted to save money, so they did. It's not an election-level issue, so they could do that sort of thing.

      The only reason that the dollar coin has not succeeded in the US is because the US government doesn't know how to do such transitions.

      There were several failures in the attempt to use coins.
      The first two, the Susan B. and Sacajewea, had women instead of men on them. That breaks with tradition, and a lot of people found it distasteful that one of the women was a feminist and the other was a Native.
      The secondary issue with those two coins was the Susan B. was too easy to mistake for a quarter, and the Saca was just plain fucking ugly.

      By the time they got around to issuing a coin with Washington on it, most people had given up trying to use them. Most vending machines don't take them, and there are so many fucking idiots working retail that you get really sick of arguing about the money being real or not and waiting for them to call their manager over to sort it out.

      If they want to go with coin, then fine, I have no problem with it. Keep minting the gold Washington dollars to keep the bigots from revolting, and take the bills out of circulation, and everybody will use them without bitching within a decade.

    49. Re:Not again by Xtifr · · Score: 1

      I'm not assuming everyone behaves like me. I'm aware that there are a certain percentage of unredeemable idiots in the world. I simply don't care about their problems.

      I suppose I should feel a little sorrow for people with OCD who will have trouble changing their habits in response to a changing world, but really, it's hard to do so.

      And your hyperbole is tiresome.

      Funny, it seemed like a perfectly reasonable response to the hyperbole that provoked it.

    50. Re:Not again by khallow · · Score: 1

      I'm not assuming everyone behaves like me.

      Then why do you talk only about how little you are inconvenienced? And categorize everyone who doesn't behave like you as "unredeemable idiots"?

    51. Re:Not again by shaitand · · Score: 1

      Yes they do. Most coin sorter machines can detect the lighter Canadian coins and spit them out as rejects. Maybe the difference is that historically American currency is actually worth more than Canadian so it would make sense for Canadian stores to take the more valuable American currency but would not make sense for American stores to take the less valuable Canadian.

      They might be more tolerant closer to the border.

    52. Re:Not again by riverat1 · · Score: 1

      Maybe you're right but if it was strictly a business decision dollar bills would have disappeared years ago to save around $150 million / year.

    53. Re:Not again by dryeo · · Score: 1

      According to wiki, they are more tolerant close to the border. This is probably the big thing, a large portion of Americans live a long ways from Canada so interactions, including money, would be rare. Meanwhile most Canadians live close to the border.
      It's only recent history that saw American currency worth more then Canadian whereas through most of history the Canadian dollar has been worth slightly more, America used worn Spanish dollars to set the weight of the American dollar whereas Canada used the minted weight. Up till the mid-60's the common coins (excepting the nickel) had basically the same weight and percent of silver as well. I do remember American coins from before the C$ lost value.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    54. Re:Not again by riverat1 · · Score: 1

      And coincidentally 5'10" is 178 cm (rounding 177.8 cm up).

    55. Re:Not again by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      Canada is something of a special case, because of the high degree of integration between us and our closest neighbour, the US. About 90% of our population lives within 160 km of the US border, and at just shy of 9,000 km, it's a rather long border. I live in the second largest city in Canada, and the closest US city is less than an hour's drive away. There is a very high degree of cultural cross-polination due to the proximity and similar languages (less so in Quebec, where the primary language is French).

      Because the population of the US outnumbers us 10 to 1, the cultural influence is mostly in one direction. We have a very high degree of exposure to US culture. Basic cable packages in Canada always include the major US networks (ABC, CBS, NBC, FOX), and US television and radio stations close to the border typically cater to a Canadian viewing public as much as American, depending on the relative city sizes (Montreal's GMA is roughly 200x more populous than the closest "major" US city, Plattsburgh, New York).

    56. Re:Not again by PhotoJim · · Score: 1

      Canada overproduced the $1 and $2 coins in their first year of production, to make up for the fact that all existing $1 and $2 bills were being withdrawn. Think of your change today. Almost none of it is this year's mintage. Thus, when you introduce a new coin you have to produce a lot of it to make up for that lack of prior production.

      We still have a ton of 1987 $1 coins in our change in Canada because of that, which is evidence as to their durability and the fact that at least some of them circulate widely.

    57. Re:Not again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People worried about ending up with too much change in $1 or $2 denominations, I'm in Australia and that's such a non-problem. It doesn't take many of those coins to buy a cup of coffee or something ...

    58. Re:Not again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The people want the government not to waste money.
      The people want the government to keep notes.

      If the first one is more important to more people (I'd bet it is), the government should switch to coins.

  39. Please answer this question by operagost · · Score: 1

    How do I carry dollar coins in my wallet, again? The dollar used to be worth something, so you could carry a handful of mixed change (including silver and gold $1, 3, 5, 10, and 20) to use during the day. I guess that eliminating the $1 bill is a tacit admission that is it worthless and not worth carrying.

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    1. Re:Please answer this question by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      The same way you carry quarters. Whatever you are using for that will work.

      Why would we need to admit how little $1 is worth. Just go to the store and look around. Not like it has been worth much for a long time.

    2. Re:Please answer this question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I guess that eliminating the $1 bill is a tacit admission that is it worthless and not worth carrying."

      duh

    3. Re:Please answer this question by MachDelta · · Score: 1

      You put the coins in your pocket - the same place your wallet goes (preferably in different pockets though).

      -Canada

    4. Re:Please answer this question by neminem · · Score: 1

      I don't carry quarters. There are plenty of things you can buy with a dollar or two. If they replaced dollars with dollar coins, I'd just start carrying around more fives, and my random coin bin in my car for when I need to pay a parking meter or something would be worth more. And it would be lame.

    5. Re:Please answer this question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You get a wallet with a change compartment, like mine. It cost about £6/$9. I don't even notice the extra weight of coins.

  40. Value of $1 by SirGarlon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    According to Wolfram Alpha, $1 in 1950 had the approximate purchasing power of $9.54 today. So the dollar is the new dime. Pop quiz: did it make sense to print ten-cent notes in 1950? (Hint: no) Then why retain the $1 bill today?

    --
    [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
    1. Re:Value of $1 by JStyle · · Score: 1

      This sounds more like a reason to get rid of the dime than the dollar. A dime in 1950 could get you a burger. Now a $1 bill will get you a burger. The dime won't get you anything.

    2. Re:Value of $1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutely, we've delayed the inevitable so long. It is time to replace the $1 (and $5) bill with coins, and eliminate the 1c and 5c.

      Has anybody seen a half cent piece? They stopped minting those before the civil war.

    3. Re:Value of $1 by PRMan · · Score: 2

      Now a $1 bill will get you a burger.

      Where?

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    4. Re:Value of $1 by VisceralLogic · · Score: 2

      Now a $1 bill will get you a burger.

      Where?

      Welcome to America: http://www.mcdonalds.com/us/en/food/meal_bundles/dollar_menu.html

      --
      Stop! Dremel time!
    5. Re:Value of $1 by artor3 · · Score: 1

      Who says it didn't make sense to print ten-cent notes in the 50s? The fact that they didn't do it is not proof that it would have been a bad idea. And even if it were a bad idea back then, the world has changed over the past sixty years. People have different habits, printing technology is cheaper, etc.

    6. Re:Value of $1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eliminating 5c and still having quarters complicates things. That's why sane countries have 10c,20c,50c. Things run well with or without 1c and 5c in that case.

    7. Re:Value of $1 by psithurism · · Score: 1

      Now a $1 bill will get you a burger.

      Where?

      At the world's largest chain of hamburger fast food restaurants, serving around 68 million customers daily, of course! There, you can not only get a double-patty burger for $1 as advertised frequently on television, radio and the internet.

    8. Re:Value of $1 by fnj · · Score: 1

      Wendy's and Burger King both, the last time I checked, and it wasn't that long ago. The kids like the massive mega-layer burgers but us old guys dig the 99 cent burger still.

      They count on you paying through the nose for fries and a drink. Refuse. Order just a burger.

    9. Re:Value of $1 by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Wendys has cheeseburgers on the dollar menu. If you live somewhere without sales tax....

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    10. Re:Value of $1 by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      Pop quiz: did it make sense to print ten-cent notes in 1950?

      Dimes in 1950 were 0.9 fine silver.

    11. Re:Value of $1 by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      That is not a burger

    12. Re:Value of $1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Getting fat has never been cheaper!

  41. Abandon $50 and $100 bills! by Microsift · · Score: 1

    The $1 bill is useful for everyday transactions, the $100 bill is useful for gamblers in Las Vegas and drug dealers. While I have no problem with the former, making it more difficult for drug dealers to do business seems like a good policy. Also, it would be two fewer bills that we would have to worry about people counterfeiting.

    --
    My other sig is extremely clever...
    1. Re:Abandon $50 and $100 bills! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent interesting...

    2. Re:Abandon $50 and $100 bills! by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      The $100 bill is far more useful for everyday transactions. Try to buy dinner with a bunch of ones, a hundred or two generally covers that and the bar tab. If you got rid of 50s how many 20s am I going to have to carry?

      The $1 is near totally useless, you can buy nearly nothing with it.

    3. Re:Abandon $50 and $100 bills! by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

      Where the fuck are you eating that needs 100's to cover it??? I can easily feed myself for a week on $70, and thats in NY no less...

      --
      C|N>K
    4. Re:Abandon $50 and $100 bills! by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      several chains of dollar stores would beg to differ on that point. they are a great place to pick up cheap head phones if you forgot your normal ones or if they broke. also cheap place to get some cola or dishes for collage students apartment.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    5. Re:Abandon $50 and $100 bills! by Meeni · · Score: 1

      Rich guy's tough life :)

      Another lesser rich guy issue is that coins are inconvenient. They have a large volume, make noise and always settle in uncomfortable jean bulge. I'd rather see all coins turned into bills than the contrary. I hate coins.

      Now I'm surprised that it costs less to stamp metallic coins than to print paper. Due to wear and turnover ?

    6. Re:Abandon $50 and $100 bills! by kenh · · Score: 1

      People don't counterfeit $1 bills, it isn't worth it. If $1 bills were being counterfeited in any number the Treasury would protect them like they do the larger denominations.

      Counterfeiters bleach $1 bills to use the bills to create $100 bills

      --
      Ken
    7. Re:Abandon $50 and $100 bills! by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Take 4 adults to any decent/normal restaurant.
      2 Appetizers $30 + 4 meals (4 * 20) + 4 drinks (4 * 10) = $150

      So even if you have two people you are talking ~$70 for a pretty normal meal. Are you eating only at mcdonalds?

  42. But those coins are a pain to carry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having lived briefly in Canada I must say dollar coins are *highly annoying* and being a male with a wallet (instead of a woman with a purse where she can keep a coin holder) makes it even more annoying. I would arrive home from work and dump all the coins in a recipient and keep them there. You end up using $1 and $2 coins only to do laundry. It's a pain to carry that stuff around.

    1. Re:But those coins are a pain to carry by redback · · Score: 1

      wallet with coin holder?

      pants with pockets?

    2. Re:But those coins are a pain to carry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Both those solutions are annoying; they're exactly what I was referring to. In the story above, I'd arrive home with my pockets full of coins. Walking around like that is what I was complaining about.

    3. Re:But those coins are a pain to carry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you wear tight pants or something? Men's pants pockets should be large enough and you shouldn't end up with too many coins if you watch how you give and receive change. Many laundromats have switched to using cards instead coins. If I'm not wearing cargo pants, the typical distribution is :
      RF: keys w RSA token, Leatherman, coins, and either microfiber cloth for glasses or eye drops for contacts
      LF: cell phone, blue tooth, EagleTac P20C2, and sometimes receipts
      RR: wallet
      LR: tissue because I live in an area with lots of pollen.

  43. This wouldn't actually "save" any money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.npr.org/blogs/money/2012/04/19/150976150/should-we-kill-the-dollar-bill
    http://www.npr.org/blogs/money/2012/11/29/166103071/no-killing-the-dollar-bill-would-not-save-the-government-money

    Even the GAO admitted that the plan to replace dollar bills with dollar coins would pretty much just be seigniorage. The government would make a profit on dollar coins from lack of use, not any actual savings.

  44. Dollar coins already exist by Todd+Knarr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We've tried several. The big problem is that the Treasury won't simply ditch the dollar bill in favor of coins. They try to issue the coins along with dollar bills, so of course people treat the coins as collectibles instead of currency and they never catch on.

    The right way to do it is to just do it: issue the coins and stop issuing dollar bills. Bills would still be in circulation and accepted, but no new $1 bills would be issued to banks. If a bank orders $1s, it'd receive them in coins. Any dollar bills received by the Federal Reserve banks or the Treasury would be destroyed, and any replacement would be done with coins. I figure within a year we'd be on coins completely, most dollar bills would've been returned as worn and destroyed and with no new bills being issued coins would become so prevalent that they wouldn't be collectibles anymore.

    1. Re:Dollar coins already exist by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 1

      This was done in Canada, and it worked. Within about a year the one dollar bills were basically gone.

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    2. Re:Dollar coins already exist by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      "The right way to do it is to just do it: issue the coins and stop issuing dollar bills."

      Now you're being silly. Just because it's worked for every other country that's tried it doesn't mean it will work for the US. We're exceptional!

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    3. Re:Dollar coins already exist by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      But the Canadian $1 coin had edges and the $2 coin had an inset, so you could tell it apart from the quarter.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    4. Re:Dollar coins already exist by kenh · · Score: 1

      Paper money lasts, on average, 40 months.

      In other (most) parts of the world, it is very common to carry a 'coin purse' or a wallet with a coin pocket, not so in America.

      We have over a century invested in primarily paper money, to suggest simply going cold turkey and pulling all paper dollar bills out of circulation will work is to deny the scope of the changes involved. Are they insurmountable? Of course not, but they are numerous.

      --
      Ken
    5. Re:Dollar coins already exist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We've tried several. The big problem is that the Treasury won't simply ditch the dollar bill in favor of coins. They try to issue the coins along with dollar bills, so of course people treat the coins as collectibles instead of currency and they never catch on.

      The right way to do it is to just do it: issue the coins and stop issuing dollar bills. Bills would still be in circulation and accepted, but no new $1 bills would be issued to banks. If a bank orders $1s, it'd receive them in coins. Any dollar bills received by the Federal Reserve banks or the Treasury would be destroyed, and any replacement would be done with coins. I figure within a year we'd be on coins completely, most dollar bills would've been returned as worn and destroyed and with no new bills being issued coins would become so prevalent that they wouldn't be collectibles anymore.

      I would rather have a roll of bills in my pocket rather than a bunch of coins weighing me down. It doesn't matter anyway, the US is defunct and a change from a paper bill to a coin is the least of our worries.

  45. Yes. by sco08y · · Score: 1

    And get rid of pennies, too.

  46. Dumb ideas never die by Freddybear · · Score: 1

    It was a dumb idea when they issued the Susan B. Anthony dollar.
    It was a dumb idea when they issued the Sacagawea dollar.
    It's still a dumb idea.

    No, it won't save anything. There are more costs to changing the currency than just the printing costs at the US Mint.

    The only place I ever saw dollar coins in actual use was the Miami metrorail system.

    1. Re:Dumb ideas never die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never been to Canada, I take it?

    2. Re:Dumb ideas never die by DaveAtFraud · · Score: 1

      ....The only place I ever saw dollar coins in actual use was the Miami metrorail system.

      Denver light rail uses them for change from their ticket vending machines, too. Got stuck with only a $20 and needed a ticket. Took me forever to get rid of all the $1 coins I got in change.

      The problem with the $1 coins the mint issued recently (Susan B.s and Sacagaweas) is they were almost indistiguishable from a quarter. If they made them big like the old "Liberty" silver dollars, noone would want them because they're too big and heavy. If they do something like make them multi-sided instead of round, all of the vending machines choke on them. If you make them anywhere close to the size of a quarter, people confuse them with quarters and don't want them.

      Cheers,
      Dave

      --
      They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.
      Ben
    3. Re:Dumb ideas never die by fnj · · Score: 1

      I don't CARE if it saves anything. I don't want the filthy, smelly, crumpled dollar bills. That's not "dumb".

    4. Re:Dumb ideas never die by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      So if all the vending machines choke on them, how come in Canada I can buy coke and chips from a vending machine using $1 and $2 coins? ... waiting ...

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    5. Re:Dumb ideas never die by DaveAtFraud · · Score: 1

      I haven't been to the great white north for a while but the images I get from a Google search show both round and multi-sided coins. Don't know which is currently in circulation or if it's both.

      Getting a vending machine to take a different size round coin is easy. Getting it to take an almost round but muti-sided coin is a tad harder if it also still has to accept round coins. Getting it to take coins with distinct facets around the perimeter is even harder.

      Cheers,
      Dave

      --
      They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.
      Ben
    6. Re:Dumb ideas never die by j-beda · · Score: 1

      ....The only place I ever saw dollar coins in actual use was the Miami metrorail system.

      Denver light rail uses them for change from their ticket vending machines, too. Got stuck with only a $20 and needed a ticket. Took me forever to get rid of all the $1 coins I got in change.

      I have never had any difficulty spending US $1 coins, Susan/Saq/or presidential. No more difficulty than in spending $1 bills in any case. At the very-very-very least, you bank would take them you know?

  47. Look at Loonies and Toonies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Canada did this in 1987 for $1 bills, and 1996 for $2, and phased in the coins over a couple of years. Are they heavy and a pain? Yes and no. All it really means is that you tend not to carry around $10 in small change anymore. When something costs, say, $7, instead of handing someone a $10 and getting $2 in change all the time, you hand them a $5 and a toonie. There's never much reason to keep a lot of loonies and toonies in your pocket, and because of the weight you simply prioritize getting rid of them with each transaction that doesn't round off evenly to $5 or $10 increments. It's only if you can't do math that you let them pile up until they are a problem.

    If it's going to save over $100 million a year, that seems worth a minor inconvenience.

  48. the dollar bill, the penny, the nickel.... by tverbeek · · Score: 1

    Nearly every other economy with a unit of money roughly comparable to the US dollar has replaced their corresponding banknote with a coin. Canadian dollar. Australian dollar. United Kingdom pound. Brazilian real. New Zealand dollar. The Whole Freakin' EuroZone's euro. Swiss Franc. Countries whose money is off by a major factor have coins with roughly the value of the US dollar (e.g. Japanese yen, Russian rubles). Do you think maybe they're onto something?

    US money is way overdue for an overhaul. It's time to drop the penny and the nickel, and start rounding prices to the nearest 1/10 of a dollar, which would keep the math simple. Stop printing disposable bank notes worth less than $10, and replace them with durable coins.

    I'm sure that part of the psychological resistance to this comes down to two words: Washington and Lincoln. They're the two most popular presidents, and they're on three out of the four items we need to discontinue. So reassign them. Put George on the new $1 coin, and Abe on the new $5 coin. Since George is already on the quarter, move Jefferson there (from the nickel). Problem solved.

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    1. Re:the dollar bill, the penny, the nickel.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this comes down to two words: Washington and Lincoln

      1. Washington.
      2. and.
      3. Lincoln.

      That's 3 words!

    2. Re:the dollar bill, the penny, the nickel.... by neurophil12 · · Score: 1

      All true, but we also have the best dollar bill in the world. That is, it holds up for far longer than any other, long enough that even though each bill is more expensive to print it is more valuable than others in the world. From the Planet Money story:

      "As to the question of why it made sense for other countries to switch from small denomination bills to coins, the answer seems to be: Their bills did not last nearly as long as U.S. bills. The Federal Reserve says typical lifetimes of bills from those countries were just three to six months."

      http://www.npr.org/blogs/money/2012/04/19/150976150/should-we-kill-the-dollar-bill

    3. Re:the dollar bill, the penny, the nickel.... by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      Yep agreed. Three things that almost EVERY other OECD country has done or is doing curently that the US hasn't:

      - Got rid of 1c coins, round cash transactions to nearest 5c
      - Replace $1 (and $2, if applicable) bills with coins
      - Replace linen bills with polymer (lasts way longer, harder to counterfeit, can go through the wash with no ill effects, don't get all crumpled up etc.)

      Get on it guys! I like visiting the US but absolutely hate dealing with your money.

    4. Re:the dollar bill, the penny, the nickel.... by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      That's another thing, isn't it time you stopped using paper? :)

      In Australia, we've been using polymer notes for nearly 25 years - around the time we phased out the $2 note in favour of coins.

    5. Re:the dollar bill, the penny, the nickel.... by neurophil12 · · Score: 1

      It's made from cotton, which is sustainable, while polymers are made from fossil fuels. So, nah, I don't think it's time we stopped ;)

  49. What about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Strippers? There's probably not enough $2 bills for that market.

    1. Re:What about... by Synerg1y · · Score: 1

      Time to start equipping them with credit card processing.

  50. A dollar coin is fine if it looks like one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The revised size of the dollar coin is too close to the size of a quarter. Needs to be easily distinguished, like the ones with Eisenhower on them. No chance of mistaking that for a quarter in dim light or a hurry. That was of course one of the problems with the Susan B coins. A much smaller gold coin would also be
    workable, but it must not duplicate the size of any other coin.
    What is more disturbing is the constant drop in value of the dollar. Think for example that a haircut in the 1950s cost maybe 75 cents. Now it's more
    like $15 and counting. The factor of ~20 is constant for most everything else, will probably grow since that's what happens when you print more money.
    A dollar coin like the old Eisenhower one (even being made of the LBJ cupro-nickel alloy) might be worth enough to slightly discourage printing
    money. Logically you'd want to make coins in $5, $10, $20, $50, $100 and $500 denominations too and drop paper. There are govt types who find cash
    too hard to trace and would love to make it impossible to trade without leaving traces. If it's too heavy to carry, cash becomes pushed out.
    Is this really desirable?

  51. Renfair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are great at renaissance fairs!
    A bag of clinking, goldish coins looks a lot more properly medieval than a wad of limp, grubby pieces of paper.

  52. Why is this on networkworld.com? by who_stole_my_kidneys · · Score: 1

    seriously?

  53. I predict.. by Synerg1y · · Score: 1

    The homeless person with the sign on the side of the road with the fake amputee limb look will get a lot more money and bruises to match.

  54. Abolish all coins but dimes by Kuukai · · Score: 1

    When the U.S. first began minting our fabulous decimal currency, the lowest denomination—the half-penny—was worth a little more than today's dime. Anything less than a dime represents a value so low it wasn't worth dealing with in 1792, and it certainly isn't worth dealing with now. There are many big advantages in switching to a dimes-only coinage versus any other system:
    -Dimes are an established coin in American society, and an extremely light coin, making a dimes-only system an easy plan to adopt, and easy to use.
    -10 dimes to a dollar, not much is simpler than that. Any transaction would only require between 0 and 9 dimes, and only using a single coin makes counting a much simpler process.
    -Rather than rounding to nickels like Australia, we can simply get rid of that pesky second decimal place. E.g. $9.5

    There are a thousand arguments for other systems, and this is an arbitrary idea. But I would argue it's the cleanest arbitrary idea we've got. The dime is inefficient, and the dollar bill is inefficient, but these problems pale in comparison to the clusterfuck cause by the penny, the nickel, and everything else. The true primary hurdles would be solved by:
    -Making dimes out of zinc, to appease the stupid zinc lobby.
    -Putting Lincoln on it.

    Then, a hundred years from now, that god we trust in willing, we ditch the dime for the dollar coin.

    --
    Sendou Wave Kick!!
    1. Re:Abolish all coins but dimes by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      -Making dimes out of zinc, to appease the stupid zinc lobby.

      No. The zinc people are already screwing everybody with their easily stripped screws.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  55. Backward compatibility by Razgorov+Prikazka · · Score: 1

    As long as there are "illuminaty" signs on the coin to keep the tinfoil folks happy... And one can roll it up to snort ehmm medicine, to keep the party people happy... I am happy...

    --
    rm -rf --no-preserve-root / ...and let /dev/null sort them out...
  56. Keep the $1 and get rid of the coins by Not-a-Neg · · Score: 1

    I would rather keep the $1 bill and get rid of all the coins. Put an end to all the $0.99 nonsense pricing and make taxes/tips easier to calculate. I don't even mind if they make it so all sales taxes round up to the nearest dollar. I'm tired of trying to find an efficient way to store and, later, spend coins. They weigh my pants down and cause the pockets to wear out sooner.

    --
    -==- Buy a Mac and leave me alone!
    1. Re:Keep the $1 and get rid of the coins by Digicrat · · Score: 1

      I would rather keep the $1 bill and get rid of all the coins. Put an end to all the $0.99 nonsense pricing and make taxes/tips easier to calculate. I don't even mind if they make it so all sales taxes round up to the nearest dollar. I'm tired of trying to find an efficient way to store and, later, spend coins. They weigh my pants down and cause the pockets to wear out sooner.

      +1

      I've visited Europe a few times in the past few years, and in each case I find it a royal pain to figure out how to carry/sort the Euro Coins for small purchases. Carrying a coin pouch has been common in the past, but why should we revert to that today when bills are so much lighter? Then again, a cashless society would be even more efficient.

      An ideal system in my head would be:
      - Coins relegated to collectible souvenirs
      - Add a half-dollar bill, and round all transactions to the nearest half-dollar (digital and physical for fairness)
      - For the blind, consider giving each bill a slightly different size (Euro-style), or even better, texture.
      - Use Tax Incentives/Banking regulation to accelerate the move to a primarily cashless society. Eventually, bills will only be used for small off-the-record transactions, kids allowances, senior citizens, and (maybe) tourists.
      - Simplify electronic banking - specifically person-to-person transfers, including guaranteeing access to anonymous prepaid accounts (freedom of money = freedom of speech), and usage of cash will eventually disappear altogether.

  57. Electronic Payment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it really worth the hassle to go through all of the changes necessary when more and more transactions are being carried out electronically? There are a lot of changes that would have to be put into place to get dollar coins more convenient, vending machines being the first that jumps into my mind. At a time when our economy is moving sluggishly forward, wouldn't it make more sense to maintain the status quo and once things have actually rebounded then spring all these costs of change onto our businesses.

    Though I guess the hidden benefit is that the salvation army will likely see their donations increase.

  58. legend of zelda by Xicor · · Score: 0

    hey.. if they switch to dollar coins, we can all be like link.... go out and get yourself a bigger bag for your coins.

  59. Re:Yes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If lack of coins stopped people from downing cans of soda and candy bars, they might enjoy the resulting vast weight difference. :-)

  60. this is a stupid proposal by ThorGod · · Score: 1

    Meanwhile, we should be cutting way more than 4 billion from the DoD and transferring it *all* to NASA.

    But let's talk about what dollar bills we should or should not be printed instead. You know, for reasons.

    --
    PS: I don't reply to ACs.
  61. Cold turkey by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 1

    If you want to do it you have to go cold turkey. Just like other countries have done. Stop printing $1 bills, start issuing $1 coins. Done.

    In the 20th Century in Canada we ditched $0.25, $1 and $2 notes in favour of coins, and ditched $1000 notes entirely. The last series of 25 cent notes were dated 1923, withdrawn by the Bank of Canada with the 1935 series, BTW.

    ...laura

  62. Sacajawea dollars in Ecuador by Dwedit · · Score: 4, Interesting

    For anyone wondering where all the Sacajawea dollars went to, they are mostly in Ecuador. Ecuador uses US dollars as the currency, and people there use dollar coins all the time. You can see some photos of dirty tarnished dollar coins that have obviously been used, which is unheard of in the US.

    1. Re:Sacajawea dollars in Ecuador by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for posting that ... I was about to say the same

      I have never seen a $1 bill in Ecuador but returned from there with a pocket full of $1 coins .. .Likewise I've never a $1 coin in circulation in USA but have many $1 notes from travel there.

  63. Cash Money? by Thyamine · · Score: 1

    I don't have a problem with this, but I almost never carry cash. It's always an after thought with a 'Oh, hmm, they may only take cash at the parking garage'. I'm surprised sometimes how people who complain about carrying coins, carry so much paper money. If it's a hassel use your check card which is the same as cash. Although if you are the tin foil hat type, then you have a whole litany of why you won't.

    --
    I will shred my adversaries. Pull their eyes out just enough to turn them towards their mewing, mutilated faces. Illyria
  64. the USA will drop the Dollar Bill... by idji · · Score: 2

    ..when they drop inches, Fahrenheit, SUVs, bipartisan politics, Creationism, buying on credit, pork barrelling, guns, corn syrup, jingoism, Hollywood and voting machines.

    1. Re:the USA will drop the Dollar Bill... by iguana · · Score: 1

      'merica! f' yeah!

    2. Re:the USA will drop the Dollar Bill... by master811 · · Score: 1

      buying on credit

      There is nothing wrong with this, I buy on credit all the time, it actually saves me money as it either gives me cashback or keeps the money in my savings account earning interest for longer. The problem is most people don't know how to manage it properly.......

  65. Not Now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If we were living in glorious economic health a plan to change currencies would not attract so much fear and loathing. But right now the public is half out of their minds with woes and miseries and any changes to currency would be met with howling hatred and endless accusations.

  66. Call me crazy but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't mind having 30 or 40 one dollar bills in my pocket, but I think I'd have a problem with 30 - 40 1$ coins !!
    that's over 2 pounds of metal pulling my pants down around my ass. No Thanks!

  67. Paper Cash Only Vending Machines by detain · · Score: 1

    What about the paper cash only vending machines? I see this being a big problem with them when people are going to be forced to always put in $5+ just to get a small item. They will run out of spare money really fast.

    --
    http://interserver.net/
  68. Sacajawea: Government screwing this up by bradgoodman · · Score: 1
    I've been hearing heated debate about this for years. One government office saying it's going to cost a fortune - another government office saying it will cost a fortune.

    Unfortunately, we already tried doing this - but the ingenious government concluded 3 1/2 days after the release of the Sacajawea dollar coin that people "Just saw them as a rarity, and were squirilling them away (rather than recirculating them)" - so what did they do? Stopped producing them, as *that* would solve this issue!

    This of course, was after a lot of people spent a lot of their money retrofitting vending machines to use the new currency.

    So - no - now the Government (assuming they can figure out if it's going to *cost* or *save* money) - is going to do it again? And want's people to retrofit their machines over to the *new* system???

    Sure...they'll go for that...

  69. MOD PARENT UP!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Exactly. Here's some reading for you.

    Link

    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by ackthpt · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Exactly. Here's some reading for you.

      Link

      Varying valuations of silver and gold are the reason we left the Gold Standard. There was a time in the 1890's when a silver dollar face value was less than the silver content value, so the US Treasury stopped minting them (very exciting pieces for collectors as they have low mintages.)

      Trust me, you don't ever want us to return to coins made of gold and silver.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Obviously, you didn't read the article in the link. The price of gold changes almost entirely because the value of the currency fluctuates. It isn't the other way around.

      And to add something to that, what would you rather have: 1., a dollar whose purchasing value is a few PERCENT of what it was a few generations ago, or 2., a currency backed by an element whose true value is never going to fluctuate more than a few percent?

      The REASON that the US left the gold standard was because of Keynsian economics. It's much easier to manipulate the economy when you have full control over the supply of a fiat currency. Read about what happened between the England and US in the '20s when there was gold price fixing. This is what led to the Depression!

      I NEVER said that I wanted gold or silver-minted coins. I merely want a gold-backed system. Again, read the GP's link.

    3. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by shaitand · · Score: 2

      Money BACKED by gold and silver doesn't have to be made of gold and silver. You could fix the dollar to the gram for instance. You can never have more dollars in the system than you do grams of gold at that point. This might seem to limit how much currency is usable but there is no particular reason the dollar can't be divided into smaller units than hundredths.

    4. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by Xeranar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The problem with the gold standard is that it uses a division principle to adjust for inflation so that the rich get markedly richer while the poor literally starve. The point of fiat currency is that the stronger your GDP is the more money you can print without hurting your economy. Thus the guy who sits on his 100 million at 3% interest will meet inflation but the average worker every time we raise the minimum wage will see a vastly larger benefit. In short we need fiat currency to keep a modern economy working because of the huge surplus labor pool mixed with the insanely large world economy.

    5. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Since 2006 the price of gold in dollars has tripled. The dollar has not lost 2/3rds of its value. Clearly something other than currency value fluctuations is accounting for the overwhelming majority of the variability in gold price.

    6. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Think again. Compared to gold, silver, copper, oil, wheat, corn, soybeans, and many other commodities, the dollar has lost a pretty good chunk of it's value.

    7. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The purpose of fiat currency is to defraud the holder of the currency and advance the wellbeing of tyrants.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    8. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by icebike · · Score: 0

      The problem with the gold standard is that it uses a division principle to adjust for inflation so that the rich get markedly richer while the poor literally starve. The point of fiat currency is that the stronger your GDP is the more money you can print without hurting your economy. Thus the guy who sits on his 100 million at 3% interest will meet inflation but the average worker every time we raise the minimum wage will see a vastly larger benefit. In short we need fiat currency to keep a modern economy working because of the huge surplus labor pool mixed with the insanely large world economy.

      Are you getting your economic theory on ebay again!!!

      With a currency tied to gold, everything else is tied to gold as well. A loaf of bread, a car, a house.
      There is no inflation. Inflation occurs because fiat currency is tied to nothing.

      There still may be greed, and some may charge more than a dollar a loaf, but the bread will go un-bought if it is too expensive.

      The minimum wage is also a creation of fiat currency which becomes unnecessary (and actually impossible) with a currency tied to gold.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    9. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by Trilkin · · Score: 1

      So how are you paying rent?

      --
      Nobody cares what the CAPTCHA for your post was.
    10. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by alexander_686 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, it causes deflation.
                Gold is basically fixed in quantity. Mining has little effect on the overall supply.
                As the economy grows and the money supply is fixed, the value of money increases.
                This shifts wealth to those people who hold cash, a non-productive asset.
                This increase real interest rates, deterring investments in productive assets.
      It is a horrible, horrible thing.

      See “A Monetary History of the United States “ by Milton Friedman

    11. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by Xifer · · Score: 2

      An original US gold dollar contained a gram and a half of gold on close order and at today's gold price was worth about 85.34 Federal Reserve Notes. A seated Liberty silver dollar contained .77344 troy oz of silver (about 3/4 of a troy oz) and was worth about 25.86 Federal Reserve Notes today. When i grew up in Eastern Montana, we almost always spent cartwheels and almost never saw a silver or gold certificates as the state motto is Oro Y Plata. There is a move afoot in this state to move to trade in silver by weight as it would be paying for things with real market goods or art works instead of fictitious paper goods foisted on us on by an entity that is not our real government. Silver dimes are worth somewhere around 3 FRN's and silver quarters are worth somewhere in the vicinity of 6 FRN's and silver fifty cent pcs come out around 11 dollars or so.

    12. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by rohan972 · · Score: 1

      Other than the fact that you can print money as required, what else makes you think that perpetual growth is possible?

    13. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Another big issue that many haven't considered:

      Coin money is issued by the Government, not the Fed. So a $1 coin (no matter what it is made of or how it is backed), is not "borrowed" from the Fed and has no interest.

    14. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by ackthpt · · Score: 2

      Think again. Compared to gold, silver, copper, oil, wheat, corn, soybeans, and many other commodities, the dollar has lost a pretty good chunk of it's value.*

      *Citation needed

      The major problem with tying a currency to a precious metal (or commodity) is when the supply and/or demand of that commodity changes, radically, in a short period of time, as happened in the 1890's.

      As another example, look at the attempt to manipulate silver prices in the late 1970's and early 1980's by the Hunt brothers.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    15. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by Sabriel · · Score: 2

      Which is all well and good until the first asteroid miner brings home a literal gigatonne of gold.

      It occurs to me that there's really only three fundamental commodities: Time * People = Happiness. Anything we can produce requires an investment of time by one or more people, whether it's six people spending eight hours sweating away over a forge or one person spending one second pushing a button in an air-conditioned office, and everything we do in life affects our happiness.

      Society called the factor of the first two units the "man-hour", and since for any given population there is always a finite, precious amount of it available, projects were undertaken based on three datums: first, the cost in "man-hours" to complete and maintain the project (e.g. digging a well and keeping it clean), second, the return in "man-hours" after the project was completed (e.g. no longer having to walk each day to and from the nearest freshwater river), and third, the happiness, or quality of life, for those involved before, during and after the project (e.g. no longer having to worry about whether the tribe upriver is dumping their crap in it), with the primary goal being to obtain the most happiness with the secondary goal of doing so for the smallest cost and the greatest return.

      Has anyone seriously investigated the feasibility of building a modern economic system based more closely on these fundamental commodities and objectives? The dollar is supposed to be a measure of this (in a Winston Churchill "democracy is the worst form of government except for all others that have been tried" kind of way), but our present system seems to be increasingly distancing the source and destination of those dollars (and as many a revolution demonstrates, e.g. the American Revolution, societal happiness is strongly proportional to the inverse of that distance).

    16. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, it causes deflation.

                Gold is basically fixed in quantity. Mining has little effect on the overall supply.

                As the economy grows and the money supply is fixed, the value of money increases.

                This shifts wealth to those people who hold cash, a non-productive asset.

                This increase real interest rates, deterring investments in productive assets.
      It is a horrible, horrible thing.

      See “A Monetary History of the United States “ by Milton Friedman

      That is simplistic bullsh1t. This is a good example of why economists are pathetic.

      Even if money is increasing in value due to deflation, would you hold money to get a 3% return, or invest in a company that has a 90% chance of making a 10% return?

      It is incredible how much stupid garbage is written by Federal Reserve apologists.

    17. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Also, Making Money by Terry Pratchett.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    18. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by EuclideanSilence · · Score: 1

      Yes people holding cash will see an increase in spending power. However, people who invest will see the same offset to their investment. If a person sitting on cash in the bank made a 5% improvement in a year, then an investor would see 5% over what his investment would make in a non-inflationary or deflationary environment. A person working an hourly job would get a 5% raise in spending power just by virtue of living through a year.

      I don't argue for a gold standard, but a fixed currency would grow our economy better than the back-room handouts that the federal reserve gives out. The only really decent argument I've heard for printing money is the possibility of doing so to offset taxes, by printing money instead of collecting it. Otherwise, it's just counterfeit by proxy.

    19. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      This is only true if you're holding vast amounts of currency and your definition of tyranny is that a lot of really poor people elected people to go to congress to represent their interests.

      A fiat currency means that instead of having magic rocks determine our economic future, output of industry, GDP and our credit rating do.

      In libertarian fantasy land, this would be a disaster as we wouldn't be able to on demand inflate or deflate the currency to deal with unexpected hard times like a drought or recession.

      And no, fiat currencies and the Federal Reserve are not the only causes of recessions and economic hard times. Endless unchecked growth is not only infeasible it is impossible. Unchecked growth isn't sound fiscal policy, it's cancer.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    20. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by stranger_to_himself · · Score: 1

      Which is all well and good until the first asteroid miner brings home a literal gigatonne of gold.

      It occurs to me that there's really only three fundamental commodities: Time * People = Happiness. Anything we can produce requires an investment of time by one or more people, whether it's six people spending eight hours sweating away over a forge or one person spending one second pushing a button in an air-conditioned office, and everything we do in life affects our happiness.

      This used to be true (ie every cost is really a labour cost) but with increasing scarcity of food/energy/water/real estate etc and and over-supply of labour and machines to do all the work I don't think time*people is your real commodity any more.

    21. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by Antonovich · · Score: 2

      And this comment is modded Insightful! Just shows that /. people are pretty tech-based and don't have much sophistication in other areas...
      The lunacy of the idea of perpetual growth on a finite planet is beginning to become evident with environmental degradation now starting to show the cracks in the system. Completely virtual fiat currencies are the most unjust and undemocratic instruments known to man - together with deregulation of the financial markets they lead to massive transfers of capital to those who create no actual wealth.

      And aside from that, there is a major practical flaw in your argument, as shown typically by the tech industry. Screens are a perfect example - I have a 25" LCD screen plugged into my laptop. 15 years ago it would have cost many thousands of dollars. 3 years ago I paid a couple of hundred and today it would probably only cost a hundred or so. HORRIBLE DEFLATION!!!!!!!!!!!!! Run for the hills my friends, we're all doomed!!!!!!!

      Isn't, in reality, deflation in the price of a particular good or service a true reflection of "progress" or "advancement"? As we become more efficient at doing a particular thing and as competition increases, isn't it in fact the only natural and logical result?

      I believe that the problem is not with having a fixed money supply but rather foolish economists (and most of us for believing without reserve) who can't imagine other, more efficient ways of doing things. After all, what is the "purpose" of the monetary system? Perpetual growth? Nope, it's to facilitate the (hopefully maximally) efficient distribution of scarce resources in a particular economy/society...

    22. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by nateb · · Score: 1

      The only really decent argument I've heard for printing money is the possibility of doing so to offset taxes, by printing money instead of collecting it.

      Another option is to deflate away your debt. $16T sounds like a lot of money today, but in 30 years when a candy bar costs $5, it wont seem so bad.

      --
      -- Nate
    23. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      With a currency tied to gold, everything else is tied to gold as well. A loaf of bread, a car, a house.
      There is no inflation.

      Only if supply & demand for those goods and the amount of gold stay in the proportion.

      If there's a bad harvest, bread will become more expensive. If there's an increase in the amount of gold, there'll be inflation. This isn't theory, it happened in Europe when the Spanish stole loads of it from the Incas and the English stole it from them.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    24. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Even if money is increasing in value due to deflation, would you hold money to get a 3% return, or invest in a company that has a 90% chance of making a 10% return?

      Depends on what the other possible outcome is, surely.

      P.S. Out of karma again, r_m?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    25. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by Cederic · · Score: 1

      With a currency tied to gold, everything else is tied to gold as well. A loaf of bread, a car, a house.
      There is no inflation

      If I dig more gold out of the ground, then I can spend more than you. Prices rise.

      That's inflation.

    26. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by mysidia · · Score: 1

      There is no inflation. Inflation occurs because fiat currency is tied to nothing.

      No... with a currency tied to gold; there tends to be deflation, when economic activity increases, due to increased demand for currency. And an insufficient supply of currency to generate further business, resulting in economic growth being depressed.

      The scarcity of the gold-based currency essentially dampens economic growth.

      And economic growth is necessary for the government to pay for all those expensive government programs, cover its debt, and increase the wealth and quality of life of its people.

      And that is the reason for fiat currencies.

    27. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by synaptik · · Score: 1

      This shifts wealth to those people who hold cash, a non-productive asset.
      This increase real interest rates, deterring investments in productive assets.

      I followed your line of reasoning until that last line. If you assume this cash is held in a bank, then these dollars are still lendable (even multiple times over, if you assume we haven't also done away with fractional reserve, along with this presumed return to a gold standard.) Or, are you assuming that these wealthy people are squirreling all their gold-backed currency away under their mattresses?

      --
      HSJ$$*&#^!#+++ATH0
      NO CARRIER
    28. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by EuclideanSilence · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you mean to 'inflate' away our debt? With enough inflation a child would have a trillion dollars in their piggy bank, and it would be worthless. Deflation makes held debt more valuable.

    29. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by EuclideanSilence · · Score: 1

      Also, unless we actually move to a fixed currency, in 30 years a candy bar will cost around $35 due do inflation, but maybe a bit less as technology might find better ways of making candy bars, or maybe a bit more if regulations make it more burdensome to make them.

    30. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by eric_harris_76 · · Score: 1
      There's been some work on monetary theory -- and some experience in economies -- since that was published. It could be its conclusions are not as valid as they once were.

      Regardless of the merits (or lack of them) of any specific change to the definition of the dollar, freedom of choice in currencies seems like an obvious thing to permit. If people would rather use some other currency for some purposes -- or all purposes -- makes sense to let them.

      That also sends a signal to the Fed to get their act together, if people increasingly prefer to use Canadian dollars or Euros or British pounds or whatever when ordering printer ink or getting paid at their job or getting (or offering) a home mortgage. (It sends an even more powerful signal if they prefer first-class "forever stamps" or pre-1965 silver coins or Big-Mac-fifty-percent-off coupons. :-) )

      --
      There's no time like the present. Well, the past used to be.
    31. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by CptNerd · · Score: 1

      When the US was on the gold standard, there was still inflation.

      --
      By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
    32. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by icebike · · Score: 1

      If there's a bad harvest, bread will become more expensive. If there's an increase in the amount of gold, there'll be inflation. This isn't theory, it happened in Europe when the Spanish stole loads of it from the Incas and the English stole it from them.

      A bad harvest raising the price of bread has nothing at all to do with the gold standard (or lack there of).

      Its not inflation. It is simply the market allocating scarce resources, the way it is supposed to work.

      If you mine more gold, you could theoretically induce a small amount of inflation. However, there isn't enough gold in the world, which, (not coincidentally) is precisely why it was chosen as the standard. You simply can't increase gold production enough.

      A currency tied to a fixed commodity is the very foundation of money. After all, would you barter a day's labor painting my house in exchange for something I could pull out of thin air, such as plastic bags filled with air? If something isn't scarce or hard to get, it isn't worth anything.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    33. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by icebike · · Score: 1

      But gold is scares. You simply can't find enough to hurt the market.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    34. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by icebike · · Score: 1

      No... with a currency tied to gold; there tends to be deflation, when economic activity increases, due to increased demand for currency. And an insufficient supply of currency to generate further business, resulting in economic growth being depressed.

      The scarcity of the gold-based currency essentially dampens economic growth.

      And economic growth is necessary for the government to pay for all those expensive government programs,
        cover its debt, and increase the wealth and quality of life of its people.

      And that is the reason for fiat currencies.

      That is nonsense.
      Money is is divisible. If your gold coin is worth too much to by a pair of boots, you exchange it for a smaller denomination.
      Deflation doesn't matter. (it actually rewards frugality).

      But deflation is not a characteristic of a currency tied to a gold standard. Several will try to tell you it is, but these are
      people who live in an era where they could always expect government induced inflation.
      You can not increase the wealth and quality of life by inducing inflation.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    35. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by mysidia · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That is nonsense. Money is is divisible. If your gold coin is worth too much to by a pair of boots, you exchange it for a smaller denomination. Deflation doesn't matter.

      The requirement to use smaller denominations, mean the higher denominations are worth more. It seems that you are admitting deflation happens, but hand waving it away with a suggestion that it "doesn't matter". There is a lot of literature out there that says otherwise, and it is quite unlikely that deflation doesn't matter, so if you want to say deflation doesn't matter or is better than the current situation, then, the burden of proof is on you to show that.

      Deflation has tangible negative effects on folks that are not rich -- when you borrow some money, the deflationary effect essentially means that you might never be able to pay back the loan, because the value of the gold in real terms that you have to pay back is increasing, on top of the actual interest charges; you can't know the economic growth in advance....

      If the economic growth doesn't happen, there's no job for you to get to repay your loan or buy a house. If the economic growth does happen, and you owe money, then your debt becomes as much more burdensome as the rate of inflation caused by that growth, with a non-fiat currency.

      It also means, that as the economy grows, wages will continuously go down -- a certain amount of gold becomes worth more over time, therefore, to be paying the same rate, the employers have to continuously decrease the amount of gold paid, and employers who hold large quantities of money have the advantage, since they receive money from the revenue making activities of their business, and there is a delay before they pay employees; whereas, in an inflationary environment, wages continuously increase, and this works to the disadvantage of the employer who has large quantities of cash, and to the advantage of the lower/middle-class laborers .

      You can not increase the wealth and quality of life by inducing inflation.

      Sure you can... inflation acts as a stimulus, encouraging new investment and revenue generating activities; just leaving your money in the bank is marginally penalized, due to the gradual decrease in value.

      Investment is rewarded, with inflation and economic growth -- resulting in more productive use of the money, then sticking it in a bank account.

      Non-inflationary currency rewards stagnation --- leave your money in safe keeping. It will just continuously be worth more and more over time, and you will need smaller and smaller denominations to pay for products and services with.

      This means the other businesses you are buying products from, and laborers you are buying services from are at a disadvantage, because over time they are receiving smaller and smaller denominations of gold for their services.

      E.g. You get just an artificial reward for holding onto the currency you obtained, before demand increased, instead of investing in profitable activities.

      Not that there is a problem with saving money -- but it is nothing to base a system of trade on, at least not one that is expected to excel.

    36. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by gumbi+west · · Score: 1

      Gold is scarce, but it is only valuable because people value it and it is useful for dental fillings (a small part of demand). But value because of value is just like paper money.

    37. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by Shompol · · Score: 1

      The above shouldn’t surprise us owing to one of the chief reasons we left gold to begin with: a desire to undercut Japanese imports with a weaker dollar.

      What a load of BS! The whole world was on Gold Standard for a while and had to abandon it in a haste with great losses. The Wikipedia article gently scratches the surfance of what happened. The reasons that make gold standard not feasible are simple:

      1. Free trade.

      2. Free exchange of currency.

      So if your country, let's say Germany, is very successful, German goods are sold around the world, and payment for them has to be made in deuche marks -- the importers race to the German Central Bank to exchange currency, but marks are backed by gold, and Central Bank run out of gold -- end of free exchange!

      In modern world we have free trade of currency, and if German goods become valuable, their currency will appreciate as well, something that was impossible with Gold Standard.

    38. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      Despite what Keysian economists tell you, Deflation can be and is a good thing.

      Trying to avoid it at all costs, one of the purposes of the Federal Reserve, is, however, a bad thing that will eventually come around to bit in a very very big way.

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    39. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      Also, unless we actually move to a fixed currency, in 30 years a candy bar will cost around $35 due do inflation, but maybe a bit less as technology might find better ways of making candy bars, or maybe a bit more if regulations make it more burdensome to make them.

      Not likely. Since the 1950's we've gone from a Candy Bar costing 5-10 cents to now at least $1, usually for something slightly smaller in size at that. So, in another 50-60 years time frame, going from $1 to $10 is very likely and even expected under current policies.

      The question is - is that wise? I'd say no. I think a candy bar should still be around 5-10 cents.

      Yes, I'd like to see a deflation of the dollar back to 1950 levels; it would actually strengthen the economy significantly. But that won't happen as long as we have the Federal Reserve and it remains tasked to keep inflation positive and under control. There are good reasons to have the Federal Reserve around, but we need to stop being so arrogant as to try to keep deflation from ever happening - eventually it'll catch up to us.

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    40. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      You can not increase the wealth and quality of life by inducing inflation.

      Correct. Nor do you need inflation for population growth, as many Fiat Currenty defendents will tell you.

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    41. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      Deflation has tangible negative effects on folks that are not rich -- when you borrow some money, the deflationary effect essentially means that you might never be able to pay back the loan, because the value of the gold in real terms that you have to pay back is increasing, on top of the actual interest charges; you can't know the economic growth in advance....

      Deflation also keeps inflation and economies in check. Like Inflation there are both good and bad aspects to Deflation. Trying to avoid deflation is just arrogant. It is part of the natural cycle of economies and one that needs to happen from time to time - if that cycle is not allowed to happen then when it does it'll be that much greater.

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    42. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by Electricity+Likes+Me · · Score: 1

      No industrial process is 100% efficient, nor will ever be 100% efficient.

      But it is likely we can continually get incrementally closer to 100% efficiency, barring hard physical limitations.

      Ergo, perpetual growth even with finite resources is possible, since the future will always be slightly more productive then the past.

    43. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by dcollins · · Score: 1

      "Investment is rewarded, with inflation and economic growth..."

      Well, that seems like a problem to me. Having our society based perpetually on a "growth" economy seems unrealistic in the long term. At some point we will outstrip all available resources and cause a collapse. Better, it would seem, to be honest about our instantiation on a world with finite resources, and tie our money directly to one of those concrete finite resources. And if that tempers economic growth and people have to deal with that, then it seems like a feature not a bug.

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    44. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by mysidia · · Score: 0

      Well, that seems like a problem to me. Having our society based perpetually on a "growth" economy seems unrealistic in the long term.

      A problem with that is, there is continuous population growth.

      If there is no economic growth or stagnant economy, then there is also no job growth. Or the growth in population outpaces job growth consistently. In addition, without economic growth, there becomes increased demand for things like food -- as the lack of economic growth means little growth in resources to produce those things.

      Since you have a finite number of jobs, and a growing population, the inherit result is, you have a reduction in the percentage of people who can get jobs.

      Thanks to government welfare programs; people who can't get jobs still get food and shelter, therefore, they still survive and reproduce, despite not being "fit", E.g. Natural selection doesn't apply, the rate of population growth accelerates, because the welfare programs actually reward parents who have larger numbers of children by giving them more money/resources.

      The population keeps growing, until the government implodes, due to no longer being able to pay its debts, pay for those people, AND no longer being able to print lots of extra money to cover its debts, causing a massive calamity, which is not good for any involved.

    45. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, strangely enough reminds me of bitcoins.

    46. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      Gold is basically fixed in quantity. Mining has little effect on the overall supply.

      I believe this graph show that the statement is patently untrue. Since all other statements are based on this falsehood they are also untrue. You might want to check your facts first before posting.

    47. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by alexander_686 · · Score: 1

      You provided a broken link - which is kind of false so I don't know what that means about your argument - but I think you missed the point on mine.

      The money supply is tied to the amount of currency. (the simple version.)
      If currency grows faster then GNP you get inflation. If GNP grows faster you get deflation. In 1849 cheap gold was found in CA. causing global inflation.
      So, if the world economy were to grow 2 to 3% a year - exponentially - we would want the supply of gold to grow 2 to 3% a year exponentially IIRC, gold mining adds significantly less then 1% a year.

      The problem with gold is that it's production is not tied to GNP. Nor is it value magically tied to GNP.

    48. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      Sorry, here is the link. Notice how the amount of gold has changed in the past 150 years and how it is still fluctuating?

    49. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by alexander_686 · · Score: 1

      I found this – which I think is fun:
      http://www.numbersleuth.org/worlds-gold/

      o.k. – we are talking about 2 different things. I am talking about the total supply of gold above ground. That is pretty constant. (but with a recent growth rate of above 1% a year – that surprised me)

      Your chart shows a dip in gold after 1960 – that is the supply of gold is decreasing. It’s not because that would mean the supply of gold is evaporating into thin air.

      You are talking about the amount of gold held by central banks. Before 1860 most money circulated either as gold coins or as paper money backed by a private bank that held gold reserves. After 1860 the governments got more active in issuing paper money backed by gold. As the economy grew the demand for money increased – for every new bill put in circulations gold had to be added to the reserve – hence the big increase. Then, after the 1960s, governments went off the gold supply. Why burry a bunch of metal in a vault to sit? So they dumped it.

      Maybe you are trying to argue that bullion gold gets converted to industrial or jewelry. Well, if gold is currency then it does not matter what form it is in – gold is money. Also, little goes into industry. And I would argue that jewelry is a soft argument. A lot of people use gold jewelry as an alternative to a savings account.

      Currently there is 165,000 metric tons above ground. Or 24 grams per person.

      2,400 metric tons where mined on average for the past 5 years.
      This increased total world supply by 1.4%. (Which, I admit, is higher than I though.) I would assert that production is higher than average because high gold prices have stimulated demand.
      http://minerals.usgs.gov/ds/2005/140/ds140-gold.pdf

      On the other hand, the world economy has been growing around 2% a year for the past 5 years. I would assert that was below average – year world recession.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gross_world_product

      I would argue from a historical standpoint that a spread of 1% between GDP growth and gold is low –but let’s go with that. If currency had to be backed by gold, holding everything else equal, we would have a 1% deflation rate.

  70. E-Z Re:Not again by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 1

    I use them. Way easier to keep a bunch in the ash tray to pay tolls with.

    What, they don't have easypass in your state? Tell them to join the 21st century.

    People would use them if they stopped printing dollar bills.

    But why should the government want to make their money heavy, bulky, and more inconvenient? To encourage people to switch over to Mastercard and Visa?

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    1. Re:E-Z Re:Not again by shaitand · · Score: 1

      "To encourage people to switch over to Mastercard and Visa?"

      This. It is far easier to track people's purchasing this way and further invade their privacy and control their lives.

    2. Re:E-Z Re:Not again by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      I don't have that much experience with toll roads here in WA we only have one toll bridge i believe, so i may be wrong but is it possible that it would not be worth the bother to get any easypass but often enough to keep a few coins in the ash tray?

      as for making the money heavy and bulky by the time you have enough dollar coins for that to approach being an issue you could just exchange them for a larger denomination bill. As for encouraging people to switch over to credit/debit card why would they not want that? it would make all of you transactions easier to fallow and give them more people in between to collect taxes from and they could cut cost of cash production as less of it would be used therefor less needed and less made so less money spent. where is the down side for the government?

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
  71. My vote - keep $1 bills by TheSync · · Score: 1

    Whenever I travel in countries with high-value coins, I hate it! I do not want $1, $2, $5 coins jangling around in my pocket.

  72. how about the penny? by farble1670 · · Score: 1

    the dollar bill? how about the penny!?!?

  73. And they suck by erice · · Score: 1

    We've tried several. The big problem is that the Treasury won't simply ditch the dollar bill in favor of coins.

    No. The problem is that every coin that has been tried has been massively less convenient than a note in the quantity that $1 units are carried.

    1) Eisenhower Dollar: Practically speaking, before my time, but anyone who has seen one knows that they are god-awfully huge and totally impractical for daily use.
    2) Susan B Anthony Dollar: Visibly so similar to a quarter than humans and machines have problems. They are very heavy. You don't want to have more than a couple in your wallet.
    3) Sacagawea dollar: more visibly distinct but still easily confused in dim light and just as heavy. Getting change for a $20 in Sacagawea dollars is still a horror.

    A viable dollar coin needs to be visibly and tacitly distinct from any other coin. It also needs to be light enough than ten of them can be carried without noticeable inconvenience. Perhaps something like the Australian $2 coin. It it small, distinctively thick and surprisingly light. Come to think of it, that might the trick. Abolish the $1 note and create a $2 coin. It wouldn't have to be quite as light if you only needed to carry half as many.

    1. Re:And they suck by captjc · · Score: 1

      Abolish the $1 note and create a $2 coin. It wouldn't have to be quite as light if you only needed to carry half as many.

      Or we could just abolish the $1 note and massively increase the circulation of the current $2 note.

      --
      Slow Down Cowboy! It's been 1 hour, 47 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment
    2. Re:And they suck by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      i though Eisenhower was on the 50 cent piece.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    3. Re:And they suck by erice · · Score: 1

      i though Eisenhower was on the 50 cent piece.

      Nope. Eisenhower was on the dollar. JFK was on the half dollar.

  74. Sacagawea dollar in 2000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When the US introduced the Sacagawea dollar in 2000, it ran TV commercials encouraging people to use it.
    However, people don't choose their forms of money. They get from the ATM, mostly $20 bills, or from other sources whatever denominations they get. It is the stores that decide whether to stock $1 bills or coins. So, it isn't a question of popular acceptance, it is a question of what stores choose to give out in change.

    1. Re:Sacagawea dollar in 2000 by PPH · · Score: 1
      They began to be used when businesses could order roles of (new) Sacagawea dollars. Problems arose as they passed back through the banking system and were re-rolled and issued mixed with Susan B. Anthony dollars.* When these hit the cash registers, the same old problems arose: Is that a dollar or a quarter? Businesses responded by returning to dollar bills.

      Prior to reintroducing new dollar coins, take all the SBA dollars and destroy them. Then the changeover might work.

      *I suspect that there are many millions of dollars of SBA dollars which no-one wants, sitting in bank vaults.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  75. Pocket-makers of the USA unite! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not only would the USA save lots of money by not printing dollar bills or pennies - but the clothing manufactures could make some money by adding better pockets to all pants. "Stronger pockets for all that gold.®"

  76. Try $2 bills instead by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Twice the buying power, same amount of paper!

    Seriously, I don't see the dollar coin being a success, but I DO see $2 bills being accepted if - and only if - $1 bills are made artificially scarce AND bill-accepting vending machines are adapted to accept them BEFORE the "big push."

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:Try $2 bills instead by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      In Canada they have 2 dollar coins. The one dollar coin is the Loonie, and the two dollar coin is the Toonie.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    2. Re:Try $2 bills instead by PPH · · Score: 1

      Stripper inflation.

      Can't stuff a dollar coin in a g-string. So its either bring back the twos or we'll have to use fivers.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  77. the real problem by khallow · · Score: 1

    I'll just mention as someone who handles money, including (by US federal mandate) a small number of dollar coins, that I see a huge desire among the vast majority of my customers to completely avoid dollar coins. They will get rid of coins the moment they get them. I received over last summer less than one dollar coin per thousand bills.

    So there is this vast preference for dollar bills.

    Now consider that the US is storing indefinitely somewhere around a billion dollar coins. How did they get this so wrong?

    So why do dollar coins have such a big negative preference? I believe it's because of how heavy and bulky they are. They mass 8 grams compared to 1 gram for the bill. Eight times as heavy. Bulkwise the two are probably comparable in density per $. But the bill can be folded while the coin is a rigid circular shape. I don't see myself putting 25 dollar coins in my wallet any time soon.

    And we see the usual rather unthinking authoritarian pattern of burdening hundreds of millions of people to save a few bucks. It's worth noting that dollar coins are currently worth as metal about 6% of their face value. If the US gets a large bout of inflation, that's going to make these coins very expensive to produce. Paper bills just don't have that problem.

    I imagine I won't surprise many people by saying that I don't see a case for phasing out the dollar bill under these circumstances. Maybe if the dollar coin was much smaller, cheaper, and had a more convenient form factor with actually adoption from some portion of the public.

    1. Re:the real problem by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      In my country we have $1 and $2 coins and $5 notes. Since $5 notes are readily in circulation, it's rare you'll carry more than $10 in coins and in any case, coffee shops readily accept coins for your morning $3.30 cafe latte. So my experience is you'll generally have only two or three such coins in your pocket, exchanged with each transaction under $10.

      By comparison, an LG Nexus 4 weighs 139g, so how is 25g extra in coins a problem?

      Then again, except at fancy restaurants we don't have an entrenched tipping culture in Australia as the minimum wage is higher (built into the pricing) Is that part of the issue - carrying a wad of dollar bills to offload to each and every service worker one meets and that tipping with a coin wouldn't seem right?

    2. Re:the real problem by khallow · · Score: 1
      First, you aren't everyone. This change in currency wouldn't effect just you (assuming you ever spend US currency in the first place), but over 300 million people who have already shown a vast and profound preference for bills.

      By comparison, an LG Nexus 4 weighs 139g, so how is 25g extra in coins a problem?

      How about an extra 250 grams of coins in an already overloaded purse? How about a few extra eight kilogram boxes handled every day by people who aren't know for weight lifting?

      Then again, except at fancy restaurants we don't have an entrenched tipping culture in Australia as the minimum wage is higher (built into the pricing) Is that part of the issue - carrying a wad of dollar bills to offload to each and every service worker one meets and that tipping with a coin wouldn't seem right?

      I've tipped with dollar coins before so no, that's not it. Why is it so hard to understand that increasing the weight of the most commonly used currency by a factor of eight is a real problem?

    3. Re:the real problem by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      Why is it so hard to understand that increasing the weight of the most commonly used currency by a factor of eight is a real problem?

      Because other advanced western economies including the UK, Canada, Australia, NZ, eurozone have all made a transition from dollar bills to 1 and 2 dollar coins (or equivalent) with minimal fuss, and some time ago.

  78. Piggy bank by phorm · · Score: 2

    Coins, I might add, fit very nicely into a piggy bank and the added jingle tends to be more impressive to children.

  79. Great idea..real money saver... by Enry · · Score: 1

    Until you consider how expensive it's going to be for every single company out there to change their cash registers, bill scanners, etc. to handle a dollar coin. Sure, the companies themselves will pay it, but that's now a business expense. That they'll deduct from their taxes. And I'll take a bet that that writeoff will be in the billions of dollars over the next few years if it got implemented.

    Look, dollar bills and the penny are here to stay, just like CDMA here in the states and left-hand driving in the UK. Squawk all you want, but it's not changing anytime soon.

    1. Re:Great idea..real money saver... by robbak · · Score: 1

      We did it, here in Australia. It required spending one of the new dollar coins on a piece of plastic to convert the dollar note slot into two coin containers. If you had an old register, it already had a couple of empty coin containers that used to hold 1 and 2 cent coins.
      Ditch the penny, and 5c (nickel?), get yourself a few shiny new $1 and $2 coins, and join the sane world, peoples!

      --
      Prediction for end of Universe #42: Fencepost error in Quantum_bogosort.cpp
  80. $4billion over 30!! years. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The savings are over 30 years. In the first 7 years, it ends up costing $500m. This is not something that you do when you're trying to balance the budget.

  81. we still don't have metric for chrissake by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Insightful

    if you hadn't noticed, there's a particularly loud virulent strain of "oppose all common sense progress as evil" in the USA

    i know such stubborn blockheadedness isn't unique to the USA. but they seem more powerful here. how do other countries quash this loud ignorant sort?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:we still don't have metric for chrissake by shaitand · · Score: 0

      Coins are quite a hassle to deal with. Currently I can generally avoid them. On the rare occasions I have to deal with cash it neatly folds in my wallet. If I get stuck with change I get rid of it. Not because I don't consider less than a dollar to be worthwhile but because it is worth paying up to a dollar to not have anything clanking in my pockets and confusing my fingers that are reaching for keys.

    2. Re:we still don't have metric for chrissake by __Paul__ · · Score: 5, Insightful

      how do other countries quash this loud ignorant sort?

      Free education.

      --
      worldmobilenet.com -- World Prepaid Wireless Internet plans
    3. Re:we still don't have metric for chrissake by Celarent+Darii · · Score: 1

      Most of the time they elected to some minor political function where they make a lot of noise but do less damage. Or they become managers.

    4. Re:we still don't have metric for chrissake by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      You're easily confused. Most people don't have a problem with coins.

    5. Re:we still don't have metric for chrissake by BasilBrush · · Score: 2

      how do other countries quash this loud ignorant sort?

      We don't vote for them.

    6. Re:we still don't have metric for chrissake by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      how do other countries quash this loud ignorant sort?

      We don't, we just ignore them.

      You should always listen to what people have to say, but if it is stupid, you ignore it.

    7. Re:we still don't have metric for chrissake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yes, as a man, I know *I* want to carry a change purse!

  82. Fixing the Symptom, not the Condition by AdamStarks · · Score: 1

    With constant inflation, I'm pretty sure at some point the $5, $10, $20, etc bills will also stop making economic sense, which is kinda ridiculous. Maybe this is a transitional thing on the way to digital currency? Or people are thinking that with the population starting to level off that constant inflation will be less important?

  83. Ged rid of the penny first by Nyder · · Score: 1

    We can talk getting rid of dollars after we do away with pennies.

    --
    Be seeing you...
  84. Oh, it's about saving money you say... by thestudio_bob · · Score: 1

    I get so sick of hearing how this and that will save us billions of dollars, when in fact all its doing is lining the pockets of some politician, lobbyist and a private interest group.

    Why don't they just focus on cutting all funding for Homeland security? It seems that every terrorist plot has been foiled by the average passenger so far. How much money would that save us??? Plus you would get the added benefit of some dude not touching your "special place" when you travel and opt out of the porno scanners.

    --
    The real Sig captains the Northwestern. This one captains /.
  85. Depends what it is replaced with by dadioflex · · Score: 1

    If you replace the one dollar bill with a scorpion then it's going to shake up most high street transactions. How much is that? $8.99? Here's ten bucks and keep the change...

  86. Energy consumption by crnx · · Score: 1

    What eve you gain you will mostlikley lose just from energy consumption. 1 pennie is 3 times the wheight of a dollar bill. Transporting that isnt cheap.

  87. If they take coins already and are electronic ... by dbIII · · Score: 1

    A lot of US made coin mechanisms in video games, vending machines etc have been taking $1 and $2 coins without any problems in Australia for well over a decade. I'd bet they don't have a special "export" mechanism and it would just be a case of changing a few switch settings to set them into a range for a new US $1 coin.

  88. No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wiki:

    The reason why journalists use that style of headline is that they know the story is probably bollocks, and don’t actually have the sources and facts to back it up, but still want to run it.

    On a side note: no, it's not time, it is way past time.

  89. Be nice to tell how much money I have by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    It would be nice to tell how much money I've got in my pocket when I go out drinking, without having to open a billfold and count it.

    Got used to doing that in the Canadian Army and when I was in Europe.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  90. Trust the estimates? I think not. by sabt-pestnu · · Score: 1

    The first warning sign is the "over 30 years". This will be based on "if things keep on keeping on". But they won't. Everyone knows that.

    The second warning sign is scale. $4.4 billion over 30 years. $4.4 billion sounds like a lot. The "Average 146 million a year" almost certainly includes inflation and the associated escalating costs. That is, most of the savings will be in the last 10 of those 30 years, not the first 10. And saying "average 30 million a year over 10 years" doesn't sound anywhere nearly as impressive. *

    For the US government, we're talking about a very very small impact on the annual budget.

    * 30 million: figure pulled out of a hat. Do not mistake for estimate based on actual study. Use with extreme caution.

  91. Roll them on your knuckles by asylumx · · Score: 1

    For what it's worth, US $1 coins work much better for rolling across your knuckles than US $0.25 coins do.

  92. How about pennies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who gives a sh*t about a bill, let's get rid of the useless penny.

  93. BitCoins by PPH · · Score: 1

    There. Fixed it for you.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  94. Hate Coins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally I hate coins and would hate for paper money to go away. Change always falls out of my pockets when I sit down. But instead of it being pennys, quarters and dimes it would quickly add up to real money. Coins add up to a heavy amount very fast and are generally annoying.

  95. And eliminate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Coins worth less than a quarter. The last time a coin was removed from circulation was the half cent which, adjusted for inflation was worth a dime in today's coinage.

  96. Don't forget the others! by sidthegeek · · Score: 1

    The US $2 bill would become a LOT more popular than it is now. Many people still mistakenly think they're collectible. Plus, we could consider printing our banknotes on polymers instead of paper. Polymer banknotes last longer than paper banknotes, which would mean less printing.

  97. Why Canada has the Loonie by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

    And the reason we have the loonie at all is because the weekend they shipped the stamps for the original mass market $1 coin design to the mint in Winnipeg was the weekend Winnipeg had one of its worst winter storms of the 20th century. Because of the severity of the storm and the disruption to any sort of normal transportation, they lost the stamps for the original coin design. The loonie was the backup dollar coin design. The Canadian dollar coin was originally supposed to be the traditional Voyageur design. Since the stamps went missing it would be too easy for someone to make their own coins if they fell into the wrong hands, so production was delayed and we have the loonie. (Is it counterfeiting if you are using the officials stamps? :)

    When the storm was over there were two story snow banks. During the storm when people needed to go to the hospital emergency room and even when women went into labour, they sent out snowmobiles with trailers instead of ambulances, since everything was pretty much impassible in the city. I was putting myself through school working overnight at a 45 table pool hall (20 snooker tables at the time, and 25 9 ball tables). I got snowed in at the pool hall from Friday night to Sunday afternoon. Right in the downtown. Almost no-one was there except for local neighbourhood people who would drop in. Since we couldn't go home we just kept working between hands in the two day poker sessions.

    --
    -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
  98. Yes they should adopt the euro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And be run by the Germans that actually know how to run things and currencies

  99. Yeah, $4.4 billion in dollars bills, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but how much is that in dollar coins?

  100. Pennies and Dollars are different problems by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Replacing dollar bills with dollar coins doesn't change transaction prices, just the tokens used for the transaction. Junking the penny does change prices. (And we junked the 2c coin long long ago, and the $2 bill is around but not common.) I wouldn't mind junking pennies.

    For most purposes, I hate dollar coins. The two ways I acquire the things are change from the train-ticket machines and from the post-office stamp vending machine, and in both cases I end up with a big heavy pile of metal in my pants pocket. It's too clunky to carry around, and if we had old-style silver dollars it would be even clunkier. Nothing irrational about it, the things are a lot more trouble than flat pieces of paper.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Pennies and Dollars are different problems by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      You're just voicing conservatism, not practicality.

      Speaking from experience, people moan before the bills are abolished, and for a short time after. But very soon epople get used to having coins rather than notes. And men don't find it a problem to carry them in their pants, and women don't find it a problem to carry them in their purses.

      Trust the voices of experience from other countries that tell you it's not a problem. You think it's a problem now, but truely it's not.

    2. Re:Pennies and Dollars are different problems by bhiestand · · Score: 1

      Replacing dollar bills with dollar coins doesn't change transaction prices, just the tokens used for the transaction. Junking the penny does change prices.

      I'm not convinced of this. MIlitary stationed overseas frequently find themselves penny-less... base exchanges, stores, restaurants, etc. just don't find pennies worth carrying. Instead, prices are rounded up or down to the nearest $0.05. I spent a lot of time overseas, and I never heard anyone complain that they missed pennies. Personally, I'm ready to eliminate pennies, nickels, and dimes... going straight to the quarter. A nickel doesn't even buy more than a couple minutes at a parking meter these days.

      Currently, nearly every jurisdiction has a sales tax. Tax calculations inevitably produce transactions at the sub-penny level: 7.25% sales tax means a $1 purchase requires 7 + 1/4 pennies. We obviously don't have sub-penny units, so we just round down to 7 pennies. Other transactions round up, I'm sure. In the end, someone could game the system by using advanced models to ensure more purchase combinations result in rounding up, but really... at a penny per transaction? I doubt many businesses would risk the bad publicity... and even if they did, it's probably a lot cheaper for consumers than paying for all that change to be lugged around, counted, and transacted.

      In short: This week, I spent several minutes in a grocery store checkout... behind an old woman counting change and looking in her purse for more.

      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
  101. Not irrational - we don't want them by billstewart · · Score: 1

    I don't know why you want to force me to carry around a big pile of metal in my pocket instead of convenient flat paper, but I assume your reasons are irrational. As far as Congresscritters having spines goes, yes, they're well-known not to possess them, but this isn't an issue where I want Congress deciding to inconvenience me just to make you happy, and enough other people don't like dollar coins that they're not going to push it.

    Some countries have gone the other direction - I was in Egypt in the mid-80s, and they had 10p and 20p banknotes in addition to coins; I think the pound was worth about US$2 at the time. They were small notes, maybe 1/4 as large as the pound note, so they were moderately convenient for making change.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  102. Actually they made too many $1 coins by billstewart · · Score: 1

    They've got far more of them printed than the public wants to carry around, and they're talking about stopping minting them. I'm disappointed - I really want the Richard Nixon dollar coin to come out, and it's still scheduled for a few years away.

    The old silver dollars were cool because they were actually silver, and actually worth something, and the quarter and dime coins are the same size as when they were worth that weight of silver. But now that it's all cheap metals, there's no reason that a coin is more useful than an otherwise-worthless banknote.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  103. US mnotes are different colors these days by billstewart · · Score: 1

    They're not radically different colors like the banknotes in most of the wold, but they're not all green any more, and they've moved the Dead Presidents' faces around to different parts of the front.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  104. Nonsense by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Hating to carry a big pile of metal around in my pockets is not irrational. And a dollar now may be worth what a quarter was then, but it's bigger and clunkier, and if we replace dollar bills with coins we'll start needing a lot more $5 bills, because right now if you buy something with a $20 yuppie food coupon and the change is in $1 bills, it's ok, but getting a dozen heavy coins is really annoying (and pretty common, if you use transit fare machines or post office stamp vending machines.)

    Half-pennies and 2c coins are long long gone. 1/10 cent coins were issued by many states on a not-legal-tender basis, both because nobody had money during the Depression and because they were useful for paying sales taxes before everybody decided that that was stupid and rounded off the payment thresholds.

    But I've used 10p and 20p banknotes (in Egypt, in the 80s) which were in dual circulation along with coins, and they were pretty convenient. They were about 1/4 the size of a 1-pound note, which was about the size of a dollar or pound.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Nonsense by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      So someone needs to start a "reverse change" machine business. Put five one dollar coins, plus a dime or nickle in the tray, shove it in, and get a $5 bill back. People would do that, they barely value nickles at all now.

  105. That's correct - it's a "pieces of 8" leftover by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Yarrr! You've got it exactly correct.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  106. Save the Penny and Nickel! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Killing the Penny and Nickel ... which WILL happen this year by Geithner/Obama fiat (Geithner announced it in a press conference a few days ago) is BAD for ordinary people.

    Killing small coins is a way to hide inflation. Everything gets rounded up to the nearest ten cents or so, and you don't notice the constant inflation that you do when prices are dollars and cents.

    Geithner/Obama, to save a massive ... $49 million*, want to do away with pennies and nickels (well they are) in 2013, and do away with dimes in 2014. Again the motivation is to hide inflation from consumers.

    I like the idea of a $1 coin, a $2 coin, and a $5 coin, but don't do away with the smaller coins. The only check we have as consumers on inflation is careful shopping and refusing to buy items that constantly rise in price. A cash economy give not only privacy, but is a proven way to save (spending via cards encourages free spending by consumers) and the risk of constant hacking, not just physical card readers but intrusions at retailers, banks, and card processing businesses, make using them increasingly risky (and the risk is opaque and ill-reported to consumers).

    *$50 million is what a single Obama vacation costs, fully loaded with security costs, overtime, fuel for the planes, pre-positioned limos, etc. If he was really concerned about money he could take fewer trips on the public dime, and just stay in the White House. The real reason is to hide inflation from ordinary people.

    1. Re:Save the Penny and Nickel! by mab · · Score: 1

      There is one in every crowd.

    2. Re:Save the Penny and Nickel! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Killing the Penny and Nickel ... which WILL happen this year by Geithner/Obama fiat (Geithner announced it in a press conference a few days ago)

      No, this never happened; the story was a hoax:
      http://www.coinworld.com/articles/demise-of-1-5-premature/

  107. Mostly inconvenient, except tolls, parking by billstewart · · Score: 1

    For tolls, California has been trying to force us all to use FastTrack; I'd rather not be tracked fast, thank you very much.

    And for parking, most of the meters are old enough that they don't take dollar coins, and when parking fees are high enough that that's a problem, the rapidly decreasing cost of dollar-bill readers makes it economical for cities to install fancier machines that cover a bunch of parking places on the block and rip you off by not letting you use unexpired meter time if the previous person leaves early. (They're probably also more efficient about telling meter maids whether they've got expired spaces, so they don't need to look at every meter as they drive by.)

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Mostly inconvenient, except tolls, parking by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      For tolls, California has been trying to force us all to use FastTrack; I'd rather not be tracked fast, thank you very much.

      You already are, cameras take pictures of your license plate every time you cross a bridge.

  108. No quarters? That's ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get rid of the quarter? Then how are thousands of college kids going to do laundry? Not all of us could take it home to mom every weekend.

  109. Bitcoins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I heard thats where its at.

  110. US has done it longer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1987 - Canadian "Loonie" dollar coin introduced in circulation
    1979 - Susan B Anthony dollar coin introduced in circulation

    1. Re:US has done it longer by akgooseman · · Score: 1

      The US may have done it longer, but we've sucked at it.

    2. Re:US has done it longer by nessman · · Score: 0

      Actually the US has been minting dollar coins since 1794.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dollar_coin_(United_States)

  111. Three times? by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    Read a little
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dollar_coin_(United_States)
    there have been 13 listed in wikipedia.

    I'm always collecting Eisenhower dollars myself,
    they are great for paying tolls on a motorcycle,
    easy to grab, even with gloves....

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  112. Australians have it backward, as usual. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Aussies made the dollar coin larger than the two dollar coin.

    Everywhere else with the same denomination coins made the two dollar coin larger than the one dollar coin.

    I guess Australians for some reason assumed that it's how the USA would do it, and, ever desperate to be American themselves, they did the same.

  113. The day the Dollar became a cent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bye, bye Miss American Pie ...
    A long long time ago
      I can still remember how
      That music used to make me smile
      And I knew if I had my chance
      That I could make those people dance
      And maybe they'd be happy for a while
      But February made me shiver
      With every paper I'd deliver
      Bad news on the doorstep
      I couldn't take one more step
      I can't remember if I cried
      When I read about his widowed bride
      But something touched me deep inside
    The day the music died

  114. Not Going To Happen by christurkel · · Score: 1

    I live in the next over from where they print the paper used on $1 bills. $1 bills are by far the most common demonination and it's loss would be economic disaster for the region. There is just no way to absorb all the workers who'd lose their jobs if Crane (who makes the paper) loses that amount of business from the government. On the top of that no Senator from Massachusetts would ever support it and a majority of the our Representatives wouldn't either.

    I agree with the idea of dropping the dollar bill but it it would be a politcal and economic disaster for Massachusetts, thus won't happen for a long time, if ever.

    --

    CDE open sourced! https://sourceforge.net/projects/cdesktopenv/
  115. A few coins are ok by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

    but it quickly gets out of hand... can't wait to get back 14 of them for change at the toll booth. But this whole thing is pointless as the money 'saved' will be lost in inconvenience and then some. At roughly a penny per week per person, is it really worth it?

    1. Re:A few coins are ok by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      So, get rid of toll booths? :)

      Modern toll road systems have an electronic device attached to one's car that beeps every time you pass a checkpoint, automatically deducting the toll from your bank balance.

      Faster travel, less emissions in sitting in a queue at the toll booth...

    2. Re:A few coins are ok by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

      yeah ok, more big brother, goverment spying.. what ever could go wrong? easy pass has worked just soooo well for divorce lawyers right?

  116. It is based on the experience in Canada and the UK by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 1

    The idea that people hold more dollar coins than dollar bills is based on what happened in Canada and the UK when they replaced their lowest denomination bills with coins. Those countries wound up issuing 1.6 coins for every 1 bill that had been in circulation.

    The GAO is predicting that the rate in the US will be about 1.5 coins for every bill.

  117. It's been a couple of milleniums by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Do you really know so little about the thing you are going on about? There was this place called Rome that you may want to read about.

  118. Why are we straining after gnats. . . by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

    . . .and swallowing the entitlement camel?
    -The tax code is a train wreck
    -There hasn't been a budge in years
    -The President's going-in position to 'solve' the self-inflicted 'fiscal cliff' was literally laughed at by the Senate Minority Leader
    If our government showed up in spandex and wigs and started playing hair metal, that would be an increase in the level of seriousness on display.

    --
    Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
  119. You enter a dark room... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And are eaten by a GRUE!

    Never saw me coming. AC

  120. Seen any Susan B. Anthony dollar coins lately? by Volastic · · Score: 1

    We have a dollar coin already and to the delight of the U.S.Treasury collected as fast as they are produced.

    Only place I can find any Susan B. Anthony's is change from the stamp machines
    at the local U.S. post office.

    Walmart gave out Susan B. Anthony dollar coins as change when they first came out, the difference
    being they were gold colored (an official coin, not a false color). Damn the reaction I got handing those
    out to pay for purchases, it was an immediate treasure to the person and it would appear collected like
    all the rest.

  121. Who uses cash anymore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What? Your local strippers don't have QR codes tattooed on their tatas?

  122. Fuck coins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know about anyone else but I hate coins/change. I refuse to carry it as it takes up way too much space and about 90% of my transactions can be done with plastic.

  123. just like switching to the metric system by j2.718ff · · Score: 1

    I don't know what it is that makes people hold on to outdated ideas, even when the new idea has clear superiority. (Actually, I have no strong opinion on the dollar issue, but that's probably because nearly all of my purcahses are with a credit card.)

  124. Keep the bills, use more durable material by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dollar bills weigh less and are easier to handle in your wallet.

    So keep them, just swap the $1 bill (and the $5, $10, $20, $50, and $100 bills) to polymer instead of their current linen/cotton.

    Plastic bills should last considerably longer, and be harder to counterfeit. (Canadian polymer bills are supposed to last 2.5x their previous non-polymer bills.)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymer_banknote

  125. Forget the dollar by jason777 · · Score: 1

    How about instead we ditch the fed?

    1. Re:Forget the dollar by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      OK, everyone pays in gold instead.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    2. Re:Forget the dollar by jason777 · · Score: 1

      Ok. Great idea! And if you don't want to carry around the actual metal, you can keep with a company that secures it, and allows you to write "receipts" to others to transfer some of it to another person.

  126. I'll be the first to say...Plastic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's why a lot of new vending machines now take plastic.

  127. Let's be honest here by Swampash · · Score: 1

    Nothing will ever again happen in the USA that isn't the way that it has always been done. Getting rid of useless low-denomination coins and notes, using the metric system... the USA is now stuck in a permanent unalterable nostalgia mode. To propose something as sensible as ditching $1 paper bills is tantamount to saying "I hate the Founding Fathers and Jesus and Ronald Reagan".

    1. Re:Let's be honest here by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      And drop the $5 bill too when you are at it. Compare with many other countries and you see that even that denomination is often represented by coins these days.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  128. People don't use it? by jmv · · Score: 1

    Many have commented that "people don't use $1 coins", but it's not like most people actually choose one over the other. In practice, you withdraw money as $20 bills or something like that. You only get $1 coins/bills as change when you buy something. So in practice, it's the stores and/or the banks that decide, not individual people.

  129. It won't work for another reason.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It won't work for another reason...

    Best Buy will try to have people using the new dollar coin arrested for counterfeiting.

  130. You want the REAL reason we have a $1 Bill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All coins are printed by the ACTUAL US Mint. Dollars are printed (and are created by Fed Note debt) by a group of banks call the Federal Reserve.

    Jimmy Carter created the Susan B. Anthony silver dollar and the banks put him on the menu (from what I heard).

    So we print paper money, so the Federal Reserve banks can get their cut -- the rest of this debate about merits, efficiency and such are pretty much moot.

  131. UK coins are very inconsistent and get redesigned by rklrkl · · Score: 1

    Here in the UK, we dropped the one pound note in 1984, a year after introducing a rather stubby (small, but thick and heavy) one pound coin. We even brought in a 2 pound coin in 1998 too. It shoiuld also be noted that UK ATMs have had a policy for a while of not stocking 5 pound notes (so the amounts you are offered by default are in multiples of 10 pounds), so the 5 pound notes in circulation are quite tatty now (I can't remember the last time I saw a new-ish 5 pound note!), though some banks have decided to reverse that decision recently.

    The UK coin situation in terms of diameter is very inconsistent now - here's the order from smallest to largest diameter:

    5p, 1p, 20p , 1 pound, 10p, 2p (!), 50p, 2 pounds

    I guess that's what you get when you redesign coins at random times like the Royal Mint seems to do. As for notes, they too seem to get random redesign (and on rare occasions such as the 5 pound note, even the dimensions can change!), which is either because the Governor of the Bank of England has become bored with which 19th century celebs are on the designs or because the latest colour photocopiers have beaten their design security.

    So to sum it up, UK coins are inconsistently sized and, like notes, are occasionally redesigned too. Must be a nightmare having to reprogram automatic vending machines every few years!

  132. Take care of the pennies something something by Trogre · · Score: 1

    Okay perhaps the dollar bill has outlived its usefulness, I don't know.

    But what savings could be gained by doing away with the useless penny?

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  133. Economists have no idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, it causes deflation.
                        Gold is basically fixed in quantity. Mining has little effect on the overall supply.
                        As the economy grows and the money supply is fixed, the value of money increases.
                        This shifts wealth to those people who hold cash, a non-productive asset.
                        This increase real interest rates, deterring investments in productive assets.
    It is a horrible, horrible thing.

    See “A Monetary History of the United States “ by Milton Friedman

    The above is an example of the absolute garbage that economists and Federal Reserve apologists inflict on the world.

    Even if money gains value due to deflation, would you hold your money for a 3% gain or invest it in a company thats making 10% gains?

  134. Presidential Dollars by kenh · · Score: 1

    How many countless billions have been wasted producing the Presidential Dollars?

    I think someone wants to vindicate themselves for their approval to mint hundreds of millions of coins nobody wants.

    The government could save $5.5 billion over 30 years by replacing dollar bills with dollar coins, according to the Government Accountability Office. But even the GAO notes that the public is not supportive of getting rid of the $1 bill.

    Source

    --
    Ken
    1. Re:Presidential Dollars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.npr.org/2011/06/28/137394348/-1-billion-that-nobody-wants

  135. Here's My Formula for U.S. Currency by BBCWatcher · · Score: 1

    1. Withdraw the penny, nickel, paper dollar bill, 2 dollar bill, and 5 dollar bill from circulation;
    2. Introduce 2 and 5 dollar coins and a 500 dollar bill;
    3. Substantially increase production of the dollar and half dollar coins;
    4. If the Republicans in Congress fail to raise the debt ceiling without conditions, the U.S. Mint would issue one or more 1 trillion dollar coins which are deposited with the Federal Reserve. These coins would feature the likeness of former President Ronald Reagan on one side and a quotation from the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution on the other: "The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned."

    Casualties in the withdrawals would be Lincoln (penny and 5 dollar bill), Jefferson (nickel and 2 dollar bill), and Washington (1 dollar bill). Consequently Jefferson would appear on the new 2 dollar coin, and Lincoln would appear on the new 5 dollar coin. Washington already appears on the quarter, and he'd stay there. The dime (FDR) and half dollar coin (JFK) would also remain the same. The presidential series of dollar coins would continue, but the existing Sacagawea dollar coin would be issued concurrently and thereafter as planned. The new 500 dollar bill would depict Martin Luther King on one side and the Apollo 11 Moon Landing on the other. It would also be physically larger than the other denominations, and it would be distinctly, tastefully, vibrantly multicolored. Hamilton would remain on the 10 dollar bill, Andrew Jackson on the 20 dollar bill, Grant on the 50 dollar bill, and Franklin on the 100 dollar bill.

  136. Heh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then you were un-cautious in picking your wife... Don't worry, I managed to be un-cautious twice...it's not happening again.

  137. Re:Get rid of the murderers instead... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Considering that there's more than enough freelance murderers within the group that calls themselves "Muslim", you really want the other group of "murderers" for some time to come. Don't think that this is the case, go live over in someplace like Libya, openly being a Liberal idiot like you're doing here. See how long you last.

  138. Is it time? by Phreakiture · · Score: 1

    No. It is past time. We should have done this a decade or two ago. While we were not at it, we should also have gotten rid of the penny, and arguably the nickel*. Adopting the metric system would have been nice, too.

    (*If we took this step, we would also want to change the quarter for a fifth, i.e. a 20 cent coin in place of a 25 cent one)

    --
    www.wavefront-av.com
  139. How's The Inflation Down There? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This will not happen until Americans can let go of their irrational attachment to dollar bills and pennies.

    In Australia we ditched $1 and $2 notes for coins in 1984 and 1988. 1c and 2c coins were dropped in 1992.

    How's the inflation down there? Last I checked, everything in Oz(including local goods) costs 40% more than in places that still had dollar bills.

    G'day Mate.

  140. // Watch for the old Shell Game // by TheRealHocusLocus · · Score: 1

    Heads up people! While this silly dollar bill retirement issue with its measly $4 billion savings for untold aggravation is being played out in the press and hoo-hawed on NPR and discussed and we are all distracted... ...just what stealth spending package is being pushed through Congress at this very moment? Something at least $400-billiony I'll bet.

    I love the smell of Congressional bill riders in the morning. It smells like Real Money.

    --
    <blink>down the rabbit hole</blink>
  141. No! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know people who advocate dollar coins and have for a decade. The simple fact is real people prefer paper currency over coin for dollars. Ten singles weigh less and consume less space and are more conformal to wallets and clothing than coins.

    I say even if dollar bills do cost more, pay it. It's worth it. Currency is nothing more than a form of exchange. If people vote with their behavior for currency over coin, the issuing agency should conform to HUMAN NEEDS.

    The issue of currency or coin, or the issue of penny or not, intentionally misses the real problem. The FEDGOV is devaluing the currency to monetize the debt. Stop deficit spending and over promising the limited resources of the government and its taxpayer benefactors. Make a dollar worth 1-2% more every year, instead of less. Make it so dollar bills are coveted again. Re-release the $1000 bill.

    JJ

  142. Here in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We effectively only have coins for $1.00 and $5.00. It works just fine.
    (I also use e-money cards like the Suica train pass at convenience stores, etc., because I hate change...)

    1. Re:Here in Japan by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      We effectively only have coins for $1.00 and $5.00. It works just fine. (I also use e-money cards like the Suica train pass at convenience stores, etc., because I hate change...)

      When I visited Japan, I bought a PassMo card for use on the train and convience stores like AM/PM. I also converted my change into American dollars as I left because you cannot convert Japanese coins into Canadian currency in Canada but you can use/convert American dollar bills here.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
  143. Panama has already minted $1 USD coins by mhocker · · Score: 1

    A little background first: Panama uses the US Dollar but calls it the "Balboa". 1 Balboa = 1 Dollar and they look exactly the same because they are actually US dollar bills. Doing this has given Panama an economic stability unheard of in Latin America and contributes to the consistent annual 9% economic growth that the country enjoys, all while keeping inflation low.

    A couple of years ago, Panama started to mint their own $1 coins. See here: http://www.thepanamanews.com/pn/v_17/issue_02/economy_12.html. Now granted, they can't be used outside Panama and were actually minted in Canada, but the "Martinellis" as the Panamanians call the coins, named after the president, have some significant advantages over dollar bills:

    - In a country where dollar bills do not get replaced frequently and are usually filthy, Martinellis are clean and durable.
    - $1 in Panama can get a lot done for you: groceries bagged and carried to your car, a parking space from a "bien cuidado", and two of them will get you a taxi ride in the city. So dropping one or two coins is a convenient way to pay.
    - Martinellis represent money that stays inside Panama and can only be used to pay for goods in Panama, thus reducing capital outflow (but of course, not by much as there aren't that many in circulation)

    However, this money is minted independently of the US, so it actually represents Panama's own currency. I'm not sure if this is good or bad though.

  144. The issue is perception IMHO by salunatics · · Score: 1

    It's my opinion that we are hesitant to make this move because the of the mental image between the US dollar bill and the strength of the nation. Politics, markets, economies aside a "greenback" is a symbol of the US as much as any monument or famous President. By making it pocket change you have marginalized the perceived strength of the US that a dollar represents in the minds of the Americans who use it.

  145. Dumping the Dollar Bill by michaelslevinson · · Score: 1

    Not going to happen. What we should do is print our money on hemp paper. Like the good old days. Then the bills would not wear out! For a look at a dollar bill from 1945, (actually a (gasp) silver certificate) visit my home page where the buck is prominently displayed. http://michaelslevinson.com/

  146. dollar bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Make a new dollar with 10 old dollars worth one new dollar. or just stop making dollar bills and make more two dollar bills.

  147. Dollar Coin Dreamers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dollar bills are not going away! This country couldn't convert to metric or even ban incandescent light bulbs. No matter what the savings, the dollar bill will always be around

  148. Time to change more than just the dollar bill ? by phoebbs · · Score: 1

    You owe everything your country produces (and more) to China, so just change to using the Yuan :-p

  149. See Previous Failures by crispin_bollocks · · Score: 1

    I'd support this when the Mint can pull its head out of its ass and come up with a dollar coin that CANNOT be mistaken for a quarter. It just doesn't seem that difficult to stamp something like a 12-sided coin.

  150. On topic... real cost... by Foo2rama · · Score: 1

    SO let me get this striaght...

    I pay 50 cents a year to use dollar bills and not have a pocket full of change like I do when I am in the UK?

    I'm totally OK with this.

    --


    ---In a time of Chimpanzees I was a Monkey.
  151. So use silver... by Archfeld · · Score: 1

    Convert what is left of fort knox and move to a sterling backed economy and make our curency worth somthing. The economy has been broken since the early 70's, it just took this long to fully register.

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  152. Don't Believe It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't believe any of the rheteric coming from that bunch these days

  153. GAO Report Misleading by Valhawk · · Score: 1

    The GAO report is misleading in the same way that many GAO reports are. This is largely because the GAO essentially acts like a computer and answers the question with the parameters its given. In this case what is the savings of switching to coins assuming a 1:1 conversion.

    This is misleading because in practice coins have much lower circulation rates than bills. There are a number of reasons for this such as weight, the need for different holding arrangements than the rest of the high denomination units, etc. What this means is that in order to meet the circulation needs you need more coins than the number of bills you are replacing. For example, in the United Kingdom after the switch over they found they needed 1.6 coins for each bill removed. Once you factor in this non-trivial increase in the amount of currency to match current levels of circulation, dollar coins actually cost more than the bills they are replacing.

    NPR's Planet Money covered this brilliantly, and should be required listening for anyone who wants to comment on this debate:
    http://www.npr.org/blogs/money/2012/11/29/166103071/no-killing-the-dollar-bill-would-not-save-the-government-money
    and
    http://www.npr.org/blogs/money/2012/11/30/166253822/episode-364-should-we-kill-the-dollar-bill

    tl;dr: Bills are cheaper than coins when you measure actual amounts needed in circulation.

  154. Saves $4 Billion, probably not... by amunds0n · · Score: 0

    Really? Paper money seems cheaper than metal money, lighter, easier to store.... Want to carry around $10 in $1 bills or coins? Coins are too heavy. I see a lot of cost to switch also... Usually, with the government, do just the opposite and that is the answer. So instead, they should be getting rid of a coin (pennies) not adding one. btw, we have a $1 coin and it is not popular for reasons I mention above.

  155. Time to ditch the FED! by stuffduff · · Score: 1

    Do the research! It is time to ditch the FED!

    --
    "Can there be a Klein bottle that is an efficient and effective beer pitcher?"
  156. I use dollar coints to prove.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...i'm a douche bag.

  157. Re:UK coins are very inconsistent and get redesign by arwel · · Score: 1

    The UK coinage is perfectly logical:
    Smallest value coins, 1p, 2p - round copper-coloured (actually now copper-plated steel) in increasing size.
    Smallish value coins, 5p, 10p - round silver-coloured in increasing size.
    Medium value coins, 20p, 50p - rounded heptagonal silver-coloured in increasing size.
    High value coins: £1 round, gold-coloured very thick coin; £2 round, thin, bimetallic gold/silver coloured coin; £5 commemorative - round huge silver coloured coin.

    And the redesign a few years ago was the first time the designs on the reverse had been changed in over 40 years - it was time for a change; the queens' portrait of course has changed several times as she's got older, but the same happened with Queen Victoria.

  158. dollar coins for the laundry by warpuck · · Score: 0

    It takes 32 quarters to wash a king size comforter in the large washer in the laundramat + 7 to dry in the large dryer. My fingers get so tired I can hardly fold it when it is done.

  159. give its value back by valugi · · Score: 0

    How about give back some more value to the original dolar bill instead of removing it. The current lack of use is due to the current lack of value, given the current inflation. If you really could buy something with the 1 dollar bill, then there is no need to remove it from circulation.

  160. since a lot of places, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    even governmental offices, won't take a bill >$20, why would you want to limit options at lower end?

  161. Bar Change by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    Canada did it a long time ago, and you'll notice that our money is worth more than the US now...

    as an aside, one of the side effects of going to the 1$ and 2$ coins, is that after the bar you develop what is known now as "Bar Change" in that you have about 5lb of coins in your right pocket...

  162. Really? by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    I know you all like to make fun of the rest of the world's gay colour money, but you know you're like the one place in the world where all your money of all denominations are all the exact same colour right? Yeah, cause that is easy to figure out as well...

  163. I don't think this has been thought through... by centre21 · · Score: 1

    I understand most of the arguments against the dollar bill (and penny, nickle, etc.), but I don't believe this has been completely thought through.
    First, 4 billion over 30 years? Right now, on the scale our World operates, 4 billion really isn't a whole lot to worry about (considering our deficit is in the Trillions). Take that further to $140+ million per year and it's tantamount to an individual who makes $150,000 annually saving $1.40 a year (assuming there's a direct comparison between the US's $15 trillion GDP and the $150,000 annual salary).
    Then there's the question about with what we'd replace the paper money. Many here have suggested using coins, but, for me, $20 in paper money is a lot more convenient than twenty large coins in my pocket. Plus, even though it was suggested as a joke at the beginning of this thread, there are professions in which smaller denoms are heavily used, and I can't imagine a stripper or bartender wanting to head home with an extra 20 pounds of metal in her purse.
    As far as the vending machines go, there's a perfect solution for that - start accepting debit cards or NFC and stop taking any sort of currency altogether. Of course, they may complain about the cost of having to service the machines because of the bills getting stuck, but, roughly translated, what they're actually saying is, "If we didn't have to accept dollar bills, we could let go of most of our service technicians." They may be annoying, but dollar bills clearly maintain someone's job security.
    So while I see all the arguments against the dollar bill, just like with may "great ideas", no one has mentioned the downsides to eliminating it.
    And as far as the penny goes, I don't know how factual it is, but there's an episode of "The West Wing" that talks about one reason we'll never ditch the penny - unless you move Lincoln's face to another coin, Illinois (and Kentucky for that matter) will always lobby against eliminating the penny.

  164. $Bills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    send yr dollars to me

  165. Obvious first problem by Vrtigo1 · · Score: 1

    So they save the government 4 billion. What's the cost to retool every piece of equipment to accept and understand these new coins? Vending machines, toll booths, car washes, pay phones, change machines, slot machines, parking meters, etc. I can see this EASILY outweighing the possible cost savings, the gov is just passing a minimal (in the grand scheme of things) cost on to the private sector where it becomes a much larger cost.

    A better solution would be to universalize debit cards by doing something to reduce the barriers to accepting them (i.e. cost for terminals, service fees, etc).

  166. Note from euroland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't. Here a one euro bill would be a most welcome thing.

  167. Re:End fiat currency? Nationalize the Fed!!! by hoboroadie · · Score: 1

    I only wish that the fiat money were distributed fairly, rather than arbitrarily shared between the incumbent felons.

    --
    They feared that it could be used to suppress protest or support unpopular rule.
  168. Re:END FIAT CURRENCY? NATIONALIZE THE FED! by hoboroadie · · Score: 1

    Just because they're doing it wrong is no reason to dismiss fiat currency. Indeed, methinks more people believe in the magical paper than in all the deities of the pantheon.
    If the magical paper were disbursed by a less self-serving crew*, there could be reasonable justice. Just as arbitrary to continue using gold as an instrument of commerce, btw.
    Rather than gluing hairs back onto a dead horse's carcass, modern societies could move on.

    *Or use self service to promote efficiency: Incompetence merits life in gaol, corruption meets cruel and unusual execution.

    --
    They feared that it could be used to suppress protest or support unpopular rule.
  169. Insightful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do it today and you're going to wind up needing avogadro's number to figure out what your dollar's worth in gold.

  170. Time for $2 bills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Getting rid of the $1 bill would open up the use of $2 bills. Then finally people will see that ....YES... that is a real US government issued note.

  171. A dollar is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...no longer worth the paper it's printed on.

  172. only smaller in diametre by DABANSHEE · · Score: 1

    It's quite thicker