...and all the recent micro-fluidic lab-on-a-chip research could be the substrate that keeps the neurons alive. a Neuron Cube Computer. What is really neat is that it is the *computer* that can by reading the firing of one level, provide inputs to the next, completely controlling propagation of learning. Just thought i'd post that bit of dreaming too.
what a neat idea
this and a laser at the right wavelengths(s) could manipulate a transparent surface of connected neurons very nicely, and like multi layer dvd technology, they could probably stack the layers. never heard of anything like this before.
Agree. Totally, totally agree.
We are all aware of where this leads up. Synthetic Pain, audio, electrical (the microwave device) and optical (laser) that make up a platform for denying areas to people, and if i'm right, you'll see this being installed on PEOPLES HOMES in the next few years. People whom i'd rather not see have the ability to pull through a city evacuating a bubble around them at the cost of great human suffering.
Yeah, i sound conspiratorial, because i'm typing fast. Plain truth is, the future above is my distilled hypothesis about the general outlay of force application in the next five years.
oh i disagree in measure, i think that sometimes wise things have to BE SHOVED DOWN PEOPLES THROATS.
no really, i do. Or Win32 APIS will always be enough for everybody or something.. mumble mumble...
i posted this elsewhere in the thread, but note, from the SBSP wikipedia article, the following means that you *cant* miss, accidentally.
"A commonly proposed approach to ensuring fail-safe beam targeting is to use a retrodirective phased array antenna/rectenna. A "pilot" microwave beam emitted from the center of the rectenna on the ground establishes a phase front at the transmitting antenna. There, circuits in each of the antenna's subarrays compare the pilot beam's phase front with an internal clock phase to control the phase of the outgoing signal. This forces the transmitted beam to be centered precisely on the rectenna and to have a high degree of phase uniformity; if the pilot beam is lost for any reason (if the transmitting antenna is turned away from the rectenna, for example) the phase control value fails and the microwave power beam is automatically defocused.[56] Such a system would be physically incapable of focusing its power beam anywhere that did not have a pilot beam transmitter."
because i had my own death ray curiosities about this, i admit sheepishly. From the wikipedia article, "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space-based_solar_power":
"A commonly proposed approach to ensuring fail-safe beam targeting is to use a retrodirective phased array antenna/rectenna. A "pilot" microwave beam emitted from the center of the rectenna on the ground establishes a phase front at the transmitting antenna. There, circuits in each of the antenna's subarrays compare the pilot beam's phase front with an internal clock phase to control the phase of the outgoing signal. This forces the transmitted beam to be centered precisely on the rectenna and to have a high degree of phase uniformity; if the pilot beam is lost for any reason (if the transmitting antenna is turned away from the rectenna, for example) the phase control value fails and the microwave power beam is automatically defocused.[56] Such a system would be physically incapable of focusing its power beam anywhere that did not have a pilot beam transmitter."
of course, maybe someone can make their own "overriding" pilot beam, and use it to give slightly better tans to guests on a luxury beach or something (eeeeviilll). This system is tight and I like it, being someone who never thought about it.
Pardon me, but anytime you want to express an coding idea from one person to another, anytime you make an API that must then be understood by another, you are in the realms of art, because it is precisely the beauty of a system that (should!) drive you to use it.
Beauty is a way of judging survival in people as it is in code.
it's not demented - it's fitts law. if flicking your mouse to the top of the screen takes too long, perhaps you shouldn't be displaying your output on an imax screen. On the avergage (hello, laptops!) moving to the top of the screen is *way* faster then putting a menu on each screen and fundamentally better/waves hands and chants, screaming off into the woods//HIG HEIL!
IT'S CALLED NYQUIST'S THEOREM - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nyquistâ"Shannon_sampling_theorem go look it up please! (re: vinyl is "infinite kbps - it's more like 32 kbps, in between FM Radio and CD's! go read about it!
It seems obvious from this look into the early stage of a house bill that 'democrats' and 'republicans' are acting as either side of a polar debate, one proposing knowing it's plan leans far too far one way, confident that the other side will try as hard as possible the other way, reaching a stalemate.
it's kinda like the game my brother and I would play as children splitting a piece of cake , one cuts - the other chooses.
Of course, what happens when there is more then two ways to look at a problem, i don't know.
that's why I love support and cherish openlaszlo and variants as the sane choice for non-semantic web applications of which there is large need. HTML+css is fine for publications and static searchable content (e.g. craigslist), and a barrier to entry for everything else.
check it: http://openlaszlo.org/
Gawd, you all do realize that the code needed to re-deliminate python code to braces instead of spaces or tabs is about half a page right? You can have it both ways. Hint: Every time you hit an open bracket, increase a value by four. this value is the number of spaces before each line except where the line ends in '\' (a line continuation character). When you hit the close bracket, you decrease the number of spaces you emit by four. Simple, no?
Gawd, you all do realize that the code needed to re-deliminate python code to braces instead of spaces or tabs is about half a page right? You can have it both ways.
Hint: Every time you hit an open bracket, increase a value by four. this value is the number of spaces before each line except where the line ends in '\' (a line continuation character). When you hit the close bracket, you decrease the number of spaces you emit by four.
Simple, no?
I made a living once reaching into excel spreadsheets from python to do math because excel was bone slow. A process that took *three* hours in excel took python about 45 seconds. Maybe my loops were smarter (hint) but it was still a very very dramatic experience.
just sayin'
Re:Probably Also Contending with OpenLaszlo
on
Sun Releases JavaFX
·
· Score: 1
i am excited about XML UI programming languages, so i've been doing my part by porting (and supporting) the OpenLaszlo concepts, which are really fun and easy to learn, by the way) to other languages. Although OpenLaszlo is still the first thing i reach for when doing web apps, I'd love to see a Laszlo-Inspired layer over every interface system out there, JavaFX, certainly included in that
Yeah, because when i'm working on a coding project what i LOVE to see is five developers (precious little snowflakes) each with there own precious little style that totally mungles any reflexive ability to comprehend their code. And I totally LOVE all my screen space being used up by single lines with brackets on them.
Hint: think professional.
very cool - although i can't speak to your accuracy you might post some supporting documents to fully show you've found a flaw in the report. not to take any fun out of it, because it's pretty cool. But facts are facts..!
php ahhhhh!/jk, but OpenLaszlo has inspired me to do many things, including, well, use openlaszlo everywhere, the Original RIA King.
I think OL is much more advanced the XUL, if only because it has everything in one place and doesn't have completely separate parts for the interface, logic, etc. Some may disagree, but i think that gives OL less of a learning curve and supports code sharing between people.
right that was what the "take two" was about - i was aware of the java bridge. But with the random crowd this place gets, thanks for making that clearer.
I saw a project that emitted JS from Java bytecode. I was just wondering if the same thing could be done, rendering JS from python bytecode. i think about this too often. They should, as a earlier post said, make the intepretters pluggable. that's a big difference from just allowing any ol' code to run - i would imagine the contenders could be vetted pretty thourghly.
The sooner this happens the sooner a jython engine (javascript->python interpretter) becomes possible. Get google to host it like the library hosting article of a few days ago, and profit!
Slashdot Mirror
...and all the recent micro-fluidic lab-on-a-chip research could be the substrate that keeps the neurons alive. a Neuron Cube Computer. What is really neat is that it is the *computer* that can by reading the firing of one level, provide inputs to the next, completely controlling propagation of learning. Just thought i'd post that bit of dreaming too.
what a neat idea this and a laser at the right wavelengths(s) could manipulate a transparent surface of connected neurons very nicely, and like multi layer dvd technology, they could probably stack the layers. never heard of anything like this before.
Agree. Totally, totally agree. We are all aware of where this leads up. Synthetic Pain, audio, electrical (the microwave device) and optical (laser) that make up a platform for denying areas to people, and if i'm right, you'll see this being installed on PEOPLES HOMES in the next few years. People whom i'd rather not see have the ability to pull through a city evacuating a bubble around them at the cost of great human suffering. Yeah, i sound conspiratorial, because i'm typing fast. Plain truth is, the future above is my distilled hypothesis about the general outlay of force application in the next five years.
oh i disagree in measure, i think that sometimes wise things have to BE SHOVED DOWN PEOPLES THROATS.
no really, i do. Or Win32 APIS will always be enough for everybody or something.. mumble mumble...
"National Covert Surveillance Program"
I like your ideas and would like to sign up for your newsletter!
neat, man, neat. whatever the math, i like the idea!
i posted this elsewhere in the thread, but note, from the SBSP wikipedia article, the following means that you *cant* miss, accidentally.
"A commonly proposed approach to ensuring fail-safe beam targeting is to use a retrodirective phased array antenna/rectenna. A "pilot" microwave beam emitted from the center of the rectenna on the ground establishes a phase front at the transmitting antenna. There, circuits in each of the antenna's subarrays compare the pilot beam's phase front with an internal clock phase to control the phase of the outgoing signal. This forces the transmitted beam to be centered precisely on the rectenna and to have a high degree of phase uniformity; if the pilot beam is lost for any reason (if the transmitting antenna is turned away from the rectenna, for example) the phase control value fails and the microwave power beam is automatically defocused.[56] Such a system would be physically incapable of focusing its power beam anywhere that did not have a pilot beam transmitter."
because i had my own death ray curiosities about this, i admit sheepishly. From the wikipedia article, "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space-based_solar_power":
"A commonly proposed approach to ensuring fail-safe beam targeting is to use a retrodirective phased array antenna/rectenna. A "pilot" microwave beam emitted from the center of the rectenna on the ground establishes a phase front at the transmitting antenna. There, circuits in each of the antenna's subarrays compare the pilot beam's phase front with an internal clock phase to control the phase of the outgoing signal. This forces the transmitted beam to be centered precisely on the rectenna and to have a high degree of phase uniformity; if the pilot beam is lost for any reason (if the transmitting antenna is turned away from the rectenna, for example) the phase control value fails and the microwave power beam is automatically defocused.[56] Such a system would be physically incapable of focusing its power beam anywhere that did not have a pilot beam transmitter."
of course, maybe someone can make their own "overriding" pilot beam, and use it to give slightly better tans to guests on a luxury beach or something (eeeeviilll). This system is tight and I like it, being someone who never thought about it.
Computer Science is not an Art?
Pardon me, but anytime you want to express an coding idea from one person to another, anytime you make an API that must then be understood by another, you are in the realms of art, because it is precisely the beauty of a system that (should!) drive you to use it.
Beauty is a way of judging survival in people as it is in code.
it's not demented - it's fitts law. if flicking your mouse to the top of the screen takes too long, perhaps you shouldn't be displaying your output on an imax screen. On the avergage (hello, laptops!) moving to the top of the screen is *way* faster then putting a menu on each screen and fundamentally better /waves hands and chants, screaming off into the woods //HIG HEIL!
IT'S CALLED NYQUIST'S THEOREM - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nyquistâ"Shannon_sampling_theorem go look it up please! (re: vinyl is "infinite kbps - it's more like 32 kbps, in between FM Radio and CD's! go read about it!
It seems obvious from this look into the early stage of a house bill that 'democrats' and 'republicans' are acting as either side of a polar debate, one proposing knowing it's plan leans far too far one way, confident that the other side will try as hard as possible the other way, reaching a stalemate.
it's kinda like the game my brother and I would play as children splitting a piece of cake , one cuts - the other chooses.
Of course, what happens when there is more then two ways to look at a problem, i don't know.
that's why I love support and cherish openlaszlo and variants as the sane choice for non-semantic web applications of which there is large need. HTML+css is fine for publications and static searchable content (e.g. craigslist), and a barrier to entry for everything else. check it: http://openlaszlo.org/
"...BitTorrent Peer-to-Peer (P-to-P) (P2P) (PPP) (P^3) traffic"
Gawd, you all do realize that the code needed to re-deliminate python code to braces instead of spaces or tabs is about half a page right? You can have it both ways. Hint: Every time you hit an open bracket, increase a value by four. this value is the number of spaces before each line except where the line ends in '\' (a line continuation character). When you hit the close bracket, you decrease the number of spaces you emit by four. Simple, no?
Gawd, you all do realize that the code needed to re-deliminate python code to braces instead of spaces or tabs is about half a page right? You can have it both ways. Hint: Every time you hit an open bracket, increase a value by four. this value is the number of spaces before each line except where the line ends in '\' (a line continuation character). When you hit the close bracket, you decrease the number of spaces you emit by four. Simple, no?
I made a living once reaching into excel spreadsheets from python to do math because excel was bone slow. A process that took *three* hours in excel took python about 45 seconds. Maybe my loops were smarter (hint) but it was still a very very dramatic experience. just sayin'
not for me - just tried it
i am excited about XML UI programming languages, so i've been doing my part by porting (and supporting) the OpenLaszlo concepts, which are really fun and easy to learn, by the way) to other languages. Although OpenLaszlo is still the first thing i reach for when doing web apps, I'd love to see a Laszlo-Inspired layer over every interface system out there, JavaFX, certainly included in that
Yeah, because when i'm working on a coding project what i LOVE to see is five developers (precious little snowflakes) each with there own precious little style that totally mungles any reflexive ability to comprehend their code. And I totally LOVE all my screen space being used up by single lines with brackets on them. Hint: think professional.
very cool - although i can't speak to your accuracy you might post some supporting documents to fully show you've found a flaw in the report. not to take any fun out of it, because it's pretty cool. But facts are facts..!
php ahhhhh! /jk, but OpenLaszlo has inspired me to do many things, including, well, use openlaszlo everywhere, the Original RIA King.
I think OL is much more advanced the XUL, if only because it has everything in one place and doesn't have completely separate parts for the interface, logic, etc. Some may disagree, but i think that gives OL less of a learning curve and supports code sharing between people.
right that was what the "take two" was about - i was aware of the java bridge. But with the random crowd this place gets, thanks for making that clearer. I saw a project that emitted JS from Java bytecode. I was just wondering if the same thing could be done, rendering JS from python bytecode. i think about this too often. They should, as a earlier post said, make the intepretters pluggable. that's a big difference from just allowing any ol' code to run - i would imagine the contenders could be vetted pretty thourghly.
The sooner this happens the sooner a jython engine (javascript->python interpretter) becomes possible. Get google to host it like the library hosting article of a few days ago, and profit!
//salivates,
//why are you looking at me funny?
as a mac user... eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeXP!
is something i say everyday. I Approve!