D'oh. I meant X as in an unknown thing that is universally disliked by the intended audience, not the display server protocol.
But no, systemd was never about just booting faster. Its always been about managing services better. They looked at upstart and decided they couldn't modify it, due to the Ubuntu copyright assignment, and decided to address some existing problems it had in managing services. It should be noted that upstart also starts machines pretty fast.
Wow, that really makes systemd detractors seem like lazy people with no interest in advancing their knowledge or skill set.
I don't think that's the case at all. I think, for a lot of people, they don't have the challanges that systemd solves.
Also, it challanges a lot of sacred cows that people hold dear to them. You see kind of a religeous attachment to certain ideas, that is tough to give up, even when presented with a system that provides a different model of working. Then you get this whole game of analogy making. Everyone hates X, so lets compare this thing I don't like to X. Even thought its obviously very different from X.
Cause the NSA ain't providing code, bandwidth, or servers to scale the system to millions of users. Google and Facebook have the knowledge and resources to actually do it, if they want.
But yeah, its a pretty dumb hope. They don't want you to have any anonymity as it is.
I think it would be cool if some one were to design a cryptocurrency wherein the proof of work was somehow related to the number of connections proxies. So mining would actually be providing anonymity to those who needed it and their would be an incentive to provide service. However that trick of providing indisputable proof of work, while not reveling the traffic or inbound/outbound connections might be a bit tricky to get right.
I wish when I was starting out, I knew how idiotic it would sound to tell everyone what I wished I knew when I was starting out. Cause, man, does it sound stupid.
Come children, let me pretend to be wise by telling your really obvious things I was not aware of when I was your age.
Maybe because its a a combo of a chip design pivot that saved the company, much like this might do if its successful.
Back in the day AMD was KILLING intel with the amd64 design in price/performance over the Pentium 4 line. Intel scraped that design and went back to Pentium M, the mobile version of the Pentium 3. It called it the core duo/solo. So "core M" makes a lot of sense. A piviot to meet a competitor ( this time ARM ).
If that's the case, he's a terrible scam artist. He's taken money from investors and turned it into function products and services. Which, I've been told, is very expensive and really cuts into a scam artists profits.
If we wanted to punish them, we'd make JAVA usage manditory. JAVA Desktops for everyone! JAVA ME phones only! and Java Jackpot. Who the hell knows what the point of Jackpot was, but starting now every Mother and child in Russia must figure it out, and use it!
Its scary because FORMULA TRANSLATION involves formulas, which implies Math. Why, you'd have to be some kind of super genius to understand it. With all of the algebra and limited use of mathematical symbols instead of plain English. Not like nice cobol that spells everything out for you, why even a business analyst can understand it!
Typical CIA Front story. This isn't something they *could* do, its something they don't need to do because they've already gained access to the servers distributing the zero days. But by announcing a plan to go through the front door, they're hoping the miscreants wont realize they already broke in through the window out back.
I think that means you haven't seen enough PDFS. Adobe makes heavy use of proprietary add ons that only work with Adobe products. Then there are all the security vulnerabilities they can contain.
PDFS are great for internal use, if you create them and you consume them. Dealing with those made by random people kind of sucks. Sometimes you get a pdf that's just composed of images for each page. So no text extraction is possible.
I'm not recommending any libraries for the original poster, because they all suck in their own ways and none of them do everything necessary. Without knowing what the pdfs are he's dealing with, its tough to really recommend anything.
Wind farms around here are in farmers fields. Most of the land is used for farming, The turbines don't interfere much with the crops. Ugly is subjective and a stupid qualification for energy production.
How beautiful are coal mines? Uranium Mines? Oil Fields? Is aesthetic beauty that rational of a criteria to select energy sources?
Yeah, Danger. They had the company that formed Android, but then lost almost everyone that really mattered who went off and formed Android. They didn't think they could do it with Microsoft. Those that stayed made KIN. Which wasn't a bad feature phone, but was conceived while windows mobile 6.5 was dying off and windows phone 7 hadn't been launched. It was killed for being late ( not its fault) and for not being windows enough ( not its fault).
Wish I could have a magnetic bracelet. But then people would think of me as someone who believes it has magical powers.
I just have a faint suspicion that I might end up in a situation where I need to macgyver a solution that may require a magnet of some kind to disable a bomb.
What? They are the retailer. Of coarse they have access to your itemized transaction records purchased through them, its right there in the POS at checkout.
They know your full name and the zipcode you shopped at along with the purchase history with that card. That's probably enough to identify you and cross reference the address book to figure out the rest of your address. They can then target your snail mail, if they want. Or sell the info to their suppliers, so they can do the same.
Re:It's better to hear people you might disagree w
on
The CIA Does Las Vegas
·
· Score: 1
Wow, I could write the same thing a million times and people would still miss the point entirely.
All I really need to do is to figure out how to invert this situation, so people don't care how much they disagree with my position and just pay attention to the question I'm asking. Then anything I want will be mine.
Re:It's better to hear people you might disagree w
on
The CIA Does Las Vegas
·
· Score: 0
Facts, Truth ( with a capital T) are indeed greater than opinions.
However, that doesn't really mean much in our current discussion.
The question at hand is: Why aren't people more outraged about what the NSA/CIA do?
The correct answer is: Because they don't think that what the NSA/CIA did is wrong.
Now those people ( myself included), could be dead wrong, but that still answers the question. That's what my post is doing: answering the question of why people aren't outraged. Maybe you feel they should be. Great. Have fun converting everyone over to that (opinion or Truth ). Then people will be outraged and then change will come.
Re:It's better to hear people you might disagree w
on
The CIA Does Las Vegas
·
· Score: 1
Great post. I completely agree that morality should not be confused with legality. Shame on me for implying they were the same.
I do disagree that what they did/are continuing to do is immoral.
However, I would welcome additional oversight to their activities. While, there is nothing heinous I currently see in their activities, if they are left unchecked they could wander off into areas that I would consider to be immoral.
Re:It's better to hear people you might disagree w
on
The CIA Does Las Vegas
·
· Score: 3, Interesting
No, you completely misunderstood my post. Maybe it wasn't clear. I'm not saying that Snowden didn't do anything illegal. I'm saying that I don't think that the NSA did anything illegal. The whole point of my post is that people have different opinions on the legality of the NSA's operations, while this story assumed that they didn't.
Re:It's better to hear people you might disagree w
on
The CIA Does Las Vegas
·
· Score: 2
Yeah, I'm a minority here in that I don't think Snowden revealed anything illegal at all. So this whole story is basically a group of people with an opinion getting upset that other people don't share their opinion. Of course, it *must* be a conspiracy against them... Couldn't possibly be free will or anything.
I reject his premise prime facia. There is no evidence to believe that not having a top ten list would lead to a more equitable pay distribution. Its just something he can bitch about.
Slashdot Mirror
D'oh. I meant X as in an unknown thing that is universally disliked by the intended audience, not the display server protocol.
But no, systemd was never about just booting faster. Its always been about managing services better. They looked at upstart and decided they couldn't modify it, due to the Ubuntu copyright assignment, and decided to address some existing problems it had in managing services. It should be noted that upstart also starts machines pretty fast.
Wow, that really makes systemd detractors seem like lazy people with no interest in advancing their knowledge or skill set.
I don't think that's the case at all. I think, for a lot of people, they don't have the challanges that systemd solves.
Also, it challanges a lot of sacred cows that people hold dear to them. You see kind of a religeous attachment to certain ideas, that is tough to give up, even when presented with a system that provides a different model of working. Then you get this whole game of analogy making. Everyone hates X, so lets compare this thing I don't like to X. Even thought its obviously very different from X.
The world has always been terrible. Stop pretending like its never been worse.
Cause the NSA ain't providing code, bandwidth, or servers to scale the system to millions of users. Google and Facebook have the knowledge and resources to actually do it, if they want.
But yeah, its a pretty dumb hope. They don't want you to have any anonymity as it is.
I think it would be cool if some one were to design a cryptocurrency wherein the proof of work was somehow related to the number of connections proxies. So mining would actually be providing anonymity to those who needed it and their would be an incentive to provide service. However that trick of providing indisputable proof of work, while not reveling the traffic or inbound/outbound connections might be a bit tricky to get right.
I wish when I was starting out, I knew how idiotic it would sound to tell everyone what I wished I knew when I was starting out. Cause, man, does it sound stupid.
Come children, let me pretend to be wise by telling your really obvious things I was not aware of when I was your age.
Well, for starter, they typo'd "kilbots"
Maybe because its a a combo of a chip design pivot that saved the company, much like this might do if its successful.
Back in the day AMD was KILLING intel with the amd64 design in price/performance over the Pentium 4 line. Intel scraped that design and went back to Pentium M, the mobile version of the Pentium 3. It called it the core duo/solo. So "core M" makes a lot of sense. A piviot to meet a competitor ( this time ARM ).
If that's the case, he's a terrible scam artist. He's taken money from investors and turned it into function products and services. Which, I've been told, is very expensive and really cuts into a scam artists profits.
Yes, I remeber that. The cartoon where Bears drank magic potions in order to get high. Great programming that was.
Those luck bastards!
If we wanted to punish them, we'd make JAVA usage manditory. JAVA Desktops for everyone! JAVA ME phones only! and Java Jackpot. Who the hell knows what the point of Jackpot was, but starting now every Mother and child in Russia must figure it out, and use it!
Its scary because FORMULA TRANSLATION involves formulas, which implies Math. Why, you'd have to be some kind of super genius to understand it. With all of the algebra and limited use of mathematical symbols instead of plain English. Not like nice cobol that spells everything out for you, why even a business analyst can understand it!
Typical CIA Front story. This isn't something they *could* do, its something they don't need to do because they've already gained access to the servers distributing the zero days. But by announcing a plan to go through the front door, they're hoping the miscreants wont realize they already broke in through the window out back.
I think that means you haven't seen enough PDFS. Adobe makes heavy use of proprietary add ons that only work with Adobe products. Then there are all the security vulnerabilities they can contain.
PDFS are great for internal use, if you create them and you consume them. Dealing with those made by random people kind of sucks. Sometimes you get a pdf that's just composed of images for each page. So no text extraction is possible.
I'm not recommending any libraries for the original poster, because they all suck in their own ways and none of them do everything necessary. Without knowing what the pdfs are he's dealing with, its tough to really recommend anything.
Wind farms around here are in farmers fields. Most of the land is used for farming, The turbines don't interfere much with the crops. Ugly is subjective and a stupid qualification for energy production.
How beautiful are coal mines? Uranium Mines? Oil Fields? Is aesthetic beauty that rational of a criteria to select energy sources?
Well, he's dealing with PDFs, so he doesn't have *strong* principles.
Yeah, Danger. They had the company that formed Android, but then lost almost everyone that really mattered who went off and formed Android. They didn't think they could do it with Microsoft. Those that stayed made KIN. Which wasn't a bad feature phone, but was conceived while windows mobile 6.5 was dying off and windows phone 7 hadn't been launched. It was killed for being late ( not its fault) and for not being windows enough ( not its fault).
Wish I could have a magnetic bracelet. But then people would think of me as someone who believes it has magical powers.
I just have a faint suspicion that I might end up in a situation where I need to macgyver a solution that may require a magnet of some kind to disable a bomb.
What? They are the retailer. Of coarse they have access to your itemized transaction records purchased through them, its right there in the POS at checkout.
They know your full name and the zipcode you shopped at along with the purchase history with that card. That's probably enough to identify you and cross reference the address book to figure out the rest of your address. They can then target your snail mail, if they want. Or sell the info to their suppliers, so they can do the same.
Wow, I could write the same thing a million times and people would still miss the point entirely.
All I really need to do is to figure out how to invert this situation, so people don't care how much they disagree with my position and just pay attention to the question I'm asking. Then anything I want will be mine.
Facts, Truth ( with a capital T) are indeed greater than opinions. However, that doesn't really mean much in our current discussion. The question at hand is: Why aren't people more outraged about what the NSA/CIA do? The correct answer is: Because they don't think that what the NSA/CIA did is wrong. Now those people ( myself included), could be dead wrong, but that still answers the question. That's what my post is doing: answering the question of why people aren't outraged. Maybe you feel they should be. Great. Have fun converting everyone over to that (opinion or Truth ). Then people will be outraged and then change will come.
Great post. I completely agree that morality should not be confused with legality. Shame on me for implying they were the same. I do disagree that what they did/are continuing to do is immoral. However, I would welcome additional oversight to their activities. While, there is nothing heinous I currently see in their activities, if they are left unchecked they could wander off into areas that I would consider to be immoral.
No, you completely misunderstood my post. Maybe it wasn't clear. I'm not saying that Snowden didn't do anything illegal. I'm saying that I don't think that the NSA did anything illegal. The whole point of my post is that people have different opinions on the legality of the NSA's operations, while this story assumed that they didn't.
Yeah, I'm a minority here in that I don't think Snowden revealed anything illegal at all. So this whole story is basically a group of people with an opinion getting upset that other people don't share their opinion. Of course, it *must* be a conspiracy against them... Couldn't possibly be free will or anything.
Yeah, I really wobbled the ranger on that one.
I reject his premise prime facia. There is no evidence to believe that not having a top ten list would lead to a more equitable pay distribution. Its just something he can bitch about.