Slashdot Mirror


New Nail Polish Alerts Wearers To Date Rape Drugs

stephendavion writes Checking to see if your drink has been tampered with is about to get a whole lot more discreet. Thanks to the work of four North Carolina State University undergrads, you'll soon be able to find out without reaching for a testing tool. That's because you'll already have five of them on each hand. The team — Ankesh Madan, Stephen Gray, Tasso Von Windheim, and Tyler Confrey-Maloney — has come up with a creative and unobtrusive way to package chemicals that react when exposed to Rohypnol and GHB. They put it in nail polish that they're calling Undercover Colors.

595 comments

  1. The world we live in. by jcon1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That we need ways to test drinks for date rape drugs shows the state of the world we live in. I don't want to live on this planet anymore.

    1. Re: The world we live in. by AvitarX · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm willing to bet strait alcohol is the most common one.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    2. Re:The world we live in. by i+kan+reed · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm trying to come up with a way to point out that the world is fully of humans doing all sorts of awful things to each other, without it seem like condoning the date rapists as being "not so bad" or whatever.

      I couldn't. Because there's something uniquely shitty about disabling and taking advantage of someone who's already going on a date with you. They went out of their way to spend time with you, and you just go "not good enough" and betray the hell out of them.

    3. Re:The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Crime is a reality of the human condition and has been since the beginning of civilization.

    4. Re:The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I think its sad that we need tests, but I don't think that speaks to the state of the world. Its unfortunate that some people will stoop to the level of spiking drinks, but its hardly a new thing. If anything I think that its great that the "arms race" for spiked drinks is starting to tilt the tables in the other direction. Making available technology that aides in exposing and hopefully catching and prosecuting the people who spike drinks will improve society.

    5. Re: The world we live in. by Xiaran · · Score: 1, Troll

      It is and there have been numerous studies to back this up. The stories about Rohypnol and GHB are all moral panic bollocks. Why bother using complicated, hard to obtain and potentially dangerous drugs when good old fashion vodka will do the trick for a would be rapist. This is a solution for a problem that does not really exist.

    6. Re:The world we live in. by sribe · · Score: 3, Informative

      I couldn't. Because there's something uniquely shitty about disabling and taking advantage of someone who's already going on a date with you. They went out of their way to spend time with you, and you just go "not good enough" and betray the hell out of them.

      While that is uniquely shitty, it's not all that "date rape" drugs are used for. It's not at all uncommon for them to be used on strangers at a bar.

    7. Re:The world we live in. by i+kan+reed · · Score: 2

      True enough, but a huge majority of rape is acquaintance rape. I tend to avoid emphasizing stranger rape, because that's the stereotype that people already tend to over-focus on.

    8. Re: The world we live in. by F34nor · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Ok, I'm going to go out on a limb here and say you're a completely stupid fuck. For one thing I know someone who had roofies used on her. She knew a member of the frat since they were little kids and he still pulled a "bros before hoes" on her. (Yes I know he was probably the rapist.) I have also stumbled on someone in downtown Portland who had been given something. Had one drink and she couldn't walk properly. Roofies are not a "moral panic block", they are widely available, tasteless and odorless drug used by sociopaths to rape people. Do you read the news? Do know who many women are raped each year on campuses in the US? Take your useless, ignorant, thoughtless, opinion and have some frat boy tape it to his dick and shove it up your ass and see what you "think" about it then.

    9. Re: The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least in Phoenix, it is actually a serious problem. Three family members of mine were drugged in a single night, but were lucky enough that one person in the group was not. It's a common occurrence at that particular bar, but they did not know that at the time. The fact that alcohol works and is plentiful does not negate the fact that there are people who use other easier methods.

    10. Re:The world we live in. by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's a clever bit of science, but unfortunately, I fear the young ladies who are most likely in need of this product are probably not going to have the foresight to wear it. If they had such foresight in the first place, it seems like perhaps they wouldn't be in a position where someone they shouldn't trust could surreptitiously slip them drugs in their drinks.

      I'm not "blaming the victim", mind you. No should be subject to drugging and rape regardless of circumstances, and the perps and deserve all the wrath our legal system can throw at them. I'm just pointing out that some people are more prone to making poor life choices. I'm sure we've all met them before. We feel really bad when these people are eaten by wolves, but we can't help but thinking: "was it really the best idea to go out in a suit made of meat and barbeque sauce?"

      The big problem is that if you're drugged, you may not be in a suitable state of mind to fight off a would-be rapist even if you know you've been drugged. The best defense is, as always, for women to watch out for their friends when at bars and parties. Don't go wandering off alone after heavy drinking with a guy you don't know or trust. That's asking for trouble in about a million different ways. Drugged drinks are just another type of potential trouble among many.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    11. Re: The world we live in. by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Being able to say no to liquor is extremely easy.

      Being able to say no to GHB that's been slipped into your drink isn't.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    12. Re: The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Wow, you couldn't have asked for a better illustration of moral panic in action. Bravo

      P.S., It's "bollocks," not "block."

    13. Re:The world we live in. by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      Not really, Ted Bundy would do much worse

    14. Re: The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My wife doesn't drink much, so that wouldn't have been effective on her. She was out with a friend, and had two drinks (I was out of town on business).

      Next thing her friend notices, is that my wife is basically loosing consciousness. They have been bothered by a couple of guys, they were at the bar watching them.

      My wife's friend had some bar employees help load her into her rental car and let her sleep in the car overnight outside of her friend's hotel (her friend was in town on business). She couldn't move her by herself, and it was a very high end resort with good security.

      My wife woke up in the car the next morning and had no idea what had happened.

      This shit happens. Fucking scared the shit out of me, especially so since I was out of town.

    15. Re:The world we live in. by gweihir · · Score: 2

      Yes, indeed. Completely unethical fear-mongers all around that blow irrelevant risks all out of proportion, and countless stupid sheep that fall for that. Truly a sad state of affairs.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    16. Re: The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      The plural of anecdote is not data.

    17. Re:The world we live in. by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      was it really the best idea to go out in a suit made of meat and barbeque sauce?

      tasty

    18. Re: The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Again, the plural of anecdote is not data.

    19. Re:The world we live in. by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      We should all use covered cups and never set them down even once, just in case someone tampers with them? That's the "better" world you want to live in?

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    20. Re:The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not the world that's the problem. It's a few individuals who sadly will repeat this many times. 99.9999% of people won't ever do this.

    21. Re:The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True enough, but a huge majority of rape is acquaintance rape.

      Without any correlative studies between acquaintance rape and usage of date rape drugs one can't really assert anything here.
      Without really knowing anything about it I would just assume that there is a reverse correlation between them. Acquaintance rape seems like an unplanned thing that happens over alcohol.

    22. Re: The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      She knew a member of the frat since they were little kids

      And him being a member of a frat wasn't enough to clue her into him being a probable rapist (or at least a douche that would sell her out)? She must have been a freshman.

    23. Re: The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The effects of rohypnol and ghb are completely different. Vodka does not give the same effect. A single tasteless dose of Rohypnol/GBH in your drink is unnoticeable, and leaves you with the effect of having drunk dozens of shots of vodka. That means it can be done easily. You're not going to be able to spike their drink with enough vodka to have the same effect (you won't fit enough in a single glass) and they're going to turn down you buying dozens of drinks.

    24. Re: The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I know someone who had roofies used on her.

      It's far more likely that you know someone who claims that happened to her. She may even believe it. It's far more likely though, that she drank more than she wants to admit.

      Do know who many women are raped each year on campuses in the US?

      Yes, and according to the FBI, it's a hell of a lot fewer than you and your fellow SJWs pretend.

    25. Re: The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Ok, I'm going to go out on a limb here and say you're a completely stupid fuck. For one thing I know someone who had roofies used on her. She knew a member of the frat since they were little kids and he still pulled a "bros before hoes" on her. (Yes I know he was probably the rapist.) I have also stumbled on someone in downtown Portland who had been given something. Had one drink and she couldn't walk properly. Roofies are not a "moral panic block", they are widely available, tasteless and odorless drug used by sociopaths to rape people. Do you read the news? Do know who many women are raped each year on campuses in the US? Take your useless, ignorant, thoughtless, opinion and have some frat boy tape it to his dick and shove it up your ass and see what you "think" about it then.

      The point the parent was trying to make you asked right back in the form of a question. Yes, we know how many women (and men, sexist much?) are raped each year on campuses. Care to tell me what percentage of those involved anything other than straight alcohol? Yeah, I thought so.

      Yes, we all know it's a problem, it's simply not anywhere near as powerful or prevelant in rape culture as you or anyone else make it out to be. Alcohol is a drug. Why is it people seem to forget that, or excuse it because they don't want it to interfere with their chosen lifestyle? Isn't it ironic when everything is bad and evil except when it's a vice of yours. Easiest solution to avoid this? Don't consume drugs. Of any kind. That would include your beloved precious fucking alcohol and your lame-ass excuses to keep drinking it in order to have a "good time".

    26. Re: The world we live in. by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Yes, because everyone knows GHB and Ruffies only work with alcohol as a catalyst, and only then if the woman has consumed more than 6. It is impossible to use it on a woman who is drinking soda or a woman who is just having one or two alcoholic drinks.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    27. Re: The world we live in. by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      It depends upon how "plural" it is :-)

      People drink large quantities and drink then drive without killing people all the time, so I think we can safely conclude that there is little danger of killing someone while drink driving and repeal these pesky Drunk Driving laws. The statistics show that death by Drunk Driving isn't all that common!

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    28. Re:The world we live in. by sinij · · Score: 1

      People do awful things, and we should take measures to reduce or mitigate this awfulness. This nail polish is one good example of such mitigation tactic with no downsides to it.

      What isn't a good example? Well, turning a large number of gender issues into moral panic where proposed TSA-like solution is arguably worse than the problem.

    29. Re:The world we live in. by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      No. He wants to live in a world where he can rape women with impunity, then blame them for not covering their cups and looking away from them even for a moment. What he doesn't wan is a simple way for women to foil his plans :-)

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    30. Re:The world we live in. by sribe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Acquaintance rape seems like an unplanned thing that happens over alcohol.

      While this is the stereotype, the truth is that normal acquaintances are not rapists, and rapists often stalk their victims, becoming their acquaintances, testing boundaries, and then attacking.

    31. Re: The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would like to point out that some frats actually have an ounce of respect and/or game, and would beat any "bro" who raped a woman with a 2x4. Rapists are not my bros.

    32. Re:The world we live in. by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      ... and each is equally evil. It doesn't matter if they agreed to date the rapist, or already figured out what a scumbag they are. Rapists deserve the death penaly.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    33. Re:The world we live in. by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "I'm not "blaming the victim""

      I hate to break it to you, but that is exactly what you are doing. You are also claiming that only woman without much brains or ability to think for themselves and plan ahead like to have a good time in public.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    34. Re: The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Being able to say no to liquor is extremely easy.

      I'm an alcoholic, you insensitive clod.

    35. Re:The world we live in. by Cabriel · · Score: 2

      One who is aware of this could check up to 10 drinks for their friends. Through effectiveness, that one might be able to convince others. Everything starts with a few who convince others.

      Look at Google, for example. It used to be a nerd-only thing (I remember a time before Google was). Now, I can't think of anyone who doesn't understand when someone says "just google it".

      But, really, if you want to educate people, teach them to drink only from a bottle and to keep their thumb over the neck when they aren't drinking it. Alternatively, convince them that if they ever take their eyes off of their drink, even for a second, and there are other people within arm's reach, just leave the drink and hit the dance floor for a while then get a new drink.

      The only "safe" way to drink open drinks (cocktails/hiballs) is to drink them all in one go over a period of five or ten or fifteen minutes without putting down the drink, then do something else for a while, like dance or get some fresh air or hit the washroom, or just have a conversation with someone. If you're concerned about getting too drunk, a good bartender will not judge anyone, especially women, for ordering water, and if the bartender does give the person a hard time about it, that person should never return to that bartender.

      Obviously, the safest way is to not go to the bar, but no one will listen to that advice, so if they're going to go out, they should be well-informed with good advice.

    36. Re: The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It certainly SOUNDS like blaming the victim. Just because you feel bad for the result doesn't change the fact that you are blaming them for making such bad choices that they end up raped.

    37. Re:The world we live in. by unrtst · · Score: 1

      I'm not "blaming the victim", mind you.

      ... goes on to blame the victim.

      The whole point of these drugs is that they can be easily administered to someone that is being otherwise careful. I've heard far too many anecdotes (read: personal experience from most of the people I know, including myself) to think this is just some really rare thing that only happens to those that are "asking for it". FWIW, most of the experiences I've heard of have luckily avoided the rape part. It's often something like the person or one of their friends realizes that the world crashing down on them, so they get the fuck out of there ASAP and wake up the next morning having no idea how they got home.

      I'm honestly shocked by how many AC's are completely dismissing this issue.
      "And him being ... wasn't enough to clue her into him being a probable rapist"
      "the plural of anecdote is not data"
      "It's far more likely that you know someone who claims that happened to her"
      WTF people?

    38. Re: The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Do you read the news?

      Outside of /., no, I don't. Care to enlighten us with some links, or are you just good for name-calling?

    39. Re: The world we live in. by mlts · · Score: 1

      It also happens to men.

      A former co-worker of mine, who just got a job in another state, had someone stick roofies in his drink at a party. He wound up stumbling to the wrong house, got brained with a baseball bat, and snagged both a criminal trespass charge (because he opened an unlocked door) and a PI charge. None of this he remembers. His memory is gone from when had a drinks at the party until he wound up waking up shackled to a hospital bed due to the head injury.

    40. Re: The world we live in. by CastrTroy · · Score: 2

      Why not get call the police to report the crime and ambulance to get her to a hospital? Seems odd that somebody would leave their friend to sleep in a car after suspecting that they had been drugged. Sure the perpetrators may have gotten the dosage right, and she could just sleep it off, but they could just as easily have given her too much, and put her in danger.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    41. Re:The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the "better" world you want to live in?

      I don't know how you came to that conclusion. All I said was that a better solution is to cap the cups.

      If a new daterape drug is developed, you have to figure out how to test for it, and in such a way that, if the new drug is not present in the drink, you have not just ruined your drink by dipping your fingernail in it and letting the chemicals from your special nail polish leach into the drink.

    42. Re:The world we live in. by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't give them the death penalty. That's too easy. Their victims need to suffer for years, why shouldn't the rapists.

      I'm thinking a modified version of the old-time stocks. The rapists' head and arms would be stuck out and restrained while his rear would be obscured (no need to gross out everyone else). At random intervals, a device would "enter" his body in a forceful manner. He'd never know when this would happen just that it would happen. Extended periods of nothing wouldn't be relief, but would lead to an increasing anxiety of "is it coming now?!!!"

      Sadly, this would never pass the "cruel and unusual punishment" test.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    43. Re: The world we live in. by weszz · · Score: 1

      Now hold on there... I take great offense to this.

      Like Police, Teachers and all kinds of others, I would say 90-95% are good people doing good things, the 5-10% give it all a bad name. If we found/find someone who wasn't living up to standards, we remove them from membership and when applicable alert law enforcement. plain and simple. Most groups I talked to did the same. Our declaration of principles talks about secrets, but it's secrets that a family would keep (and keeping rituals secret is mainly intended to give them value to the person knowing them, not because they are scandalous. Not much value is normally given to public knowledge), breaking the law is not something you can expect to "be covered" on, and being a bad person is a sure way to find the door.

      Now if we are talking frats vs fraternities, then yes there is a difference. a frat is a drinking club, a fraternity is a wholesome thing with adult oversight from local volunteers and a national/international body that also oversees the groups. Yes there are some bad actors, but they are typically either removed, or do something dumb and get the whole chapter closed if they aren't dealt with.

    44. Re:The world we live in. by jfengel · · Score: 1

      Date rape doesn't just happen to drunken girls at frat parties. The whole idea of date rape drugs is that they're used in places where women otherwise have a reason to feel safe, with someone they aren't actively afraid of, and having consumed only reasonable amounts of alcohol. It happens in very nice bars by very nice-seeming men, surrounded by other well-behaved people.

      They're making good choices, unless we want to tell women that the only good choice is to lock herself in her house. The whole idea of this is to test the drink before she drinks it, and if it's been tampered with, she doesn't.

    45. Re: The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      We call these fraternities. We have respect for everyone. Frats don't.

      As one guy put it, We are a Fraternity, not a frat. you wouldn't call your Country a ... would you?

    46. Re:The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rapists deserve the death penaly.

      I have no problem with someone who is facing rape defending themself in whatever manner they are able to. This includes taking actions which may end up killing the bastard.

      But once in custody, the death penalty should not ever be a possible conviction that the court can hand down.

    47. Re: The world we live in. by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Given the simplicity of putting on nail polish, the drawback of wearing it would be pretty small. Remember, while the rate of drugging rapes is small across the whole population, there are a lot of women going to situations that they know have an inordinately high likelihood of someone raping them, and Not to mention, they are going already going into it with the intent of drugging themselves with a drug that induces poor judgement.

      As with any security measure, it is a question of balancing convenience, cost, and risk. Going to a 3 year old's birthday party? Don't need it. Going to a frat party where you already know a couple of the guys are rapists? Yeah, the nail polish is probably a good idea.

    48. Re: The world we live in. by BronsCon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes, they exist, they get used, I've seen it, too; in fact, I've been a victim. Doesn't change the fact that most club rapists simply buy a girl drinks until she can't walk straight anymore, though. Cheaper and you aren't carrying something that will land you in prison just for possession. Think about it.

      I know a guy, a former friend (basically because he does this kind of shit) that will meet a girl at a bar or club, take her to a table that has no visibility of the bar, and buy himself a beer and her a drink. Innocent enough, just buying a girl a drink, right? Well, his game, and the reason why the table must not be able to see the bar, is that he keeps buying her drinks, bringing his beer with him on every trip to the bar (he never lets the waitress bring drinks), but, instead of getting himself another beer, he gets a glass of water and refills his empty beer bottle before returning to the table. She thinks he's drinking as much as him, making him less of a threat.

      Scum. Absolute scum. After I learned what he was doing (he was proud of it when he told me) I did tell a few bartenders at places he was known to frequent but they didn't seem to care, which, I suppose, makes them scum, as well.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    49. Re:The world we live in. by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      If they had such foresight in the first place, it seems like perhaps they wouldn't be in a position where someone they shouldn't trust could surreptitiously slip them drugs in their drinks.

      I'm not "blaming the victim", mind you.

      Actually, you are blaming the victim. Here's a common scenario: Guy that a woman knows buys her a drink. It doesn't need to be alcoholic. It could be soda. Or maybe it's alcoholic but the woman hasn't been drinking much. Either way, woman accepts the drink (since she knows the guy) and drinks it. Unbeknownst to her, though, the guy has been acting nice in hopes of getting her into bed and has decided to "speed things up" by spiking her drink. She passes out and wakes up having been raped.

      Saying that it is this women's fault that she didn't have the "foresight" to "be in a position where someone they shouldn't trust could surreptitiously slip them drugs in their drinks" is blaming the victim. You might as well say "well, if she didn't want to be raped, she shouldn't have worn that dress." It isn't always a woman turning her back on her drink for a long time and then drinking it. Often, the drink is spiked by someone the woman knows and trusts. You could definitely say that the trust was misplaced, but there is no way for the woman to know that beforehand.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    50. Re: The world we live in. by BronsCon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      To be fair, the FBI's statistics only include what actually gets reported; if all rapes were reported, we may well see that men rape women no more often than women rape men. And yes, women do rape men. Mine went unreported, officially, but I do talk about it when the subject comes up.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    51. Re:The world we live in. by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Don't take it too much to heart. I also think people who are too lazy to create a Slashdot account should receive it.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    52. Re: The world we live in. by BronsCon · · Score: 0

      Right, and roofies don't work on men, either, which is why I didn't bother reporting when it happened to me. Stop being fucking sexist, rape goes both ways.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    53. Re:The world we live in. by Frobnicator · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Agreed.

      Looking over the USDOJ stats, it seems Rohypnol is a regional problem with relatively low use count. In many places it is listed as "the least accessible date-rape drug", in other regions it is a suspected factor in hundreds of rape cases. The numbers show it going from about 1000 suspected cases nationally in 1997 to it's modern level of being suspected use in 1.5% of rape cases, a few thousand cases per year. Consider: how many hundreds of thousands of dates where a drink is consumed are there every year? Millions of drinks? Hundreds of millions of drinks? On a per-drink basis the number of uses is a very small percentage. Since it is small as a percentage that suggests going after bigger percentages for the bigger reductions.

      While any number bigger than 0 is a problem, as a statistic these two drugs are not used in a high percentage of rapes, and date rapes themselves are relatively rare. I'm not trying to trivialize it. As the parent post suggests, a very rare problem does not lend itself to a TSA-like drug test where millions of drinks are tested for something detectable only a few thousand times annually at a maximum. My rough estimate is around 100M drinks across the nation over the course of a year, roughly 3000 testable contaminated drinks, so 0.0003% of date drinks, or one in every 30,000. That's a lot of useless fingernail-dips.

      I suppose if you do go that route, of the new products this one that continuously monitors your drink by the cup and straw changing color seems much better than nail polish you need to dip frequently. It is both passive and continuous. Someone could slip the drug in after you dunk your fingernail, but the sensor on the container or the straw is 'always on'.

      --
      //TODO: Think of witty sig statement
    54. Re: The world we live in. by F34nor · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. Any social structure that diminishes personal responsibility is suspect.

    55. Re: The world we live in. by danlip · · Score: 3, Insightful

      frat is just an abbreviation for fraternity. What is the distinction you are trying to make?

      And they have a terrible reputation, which they have earned.

    56. Re: The world we live in. by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Everybody does not know that. I have no experience with GHB, and don't know anyone first hand that does. A search didn't find anything that said that. Do you have a link? I don't ask that to be snarky. I knew that it was usually put into alcohol, but had never heard anything about it requiring large quantities to function.

    57. Re: The world we live in. by F34nor · · Score: 1

      l don't disagree; alcohol is abused and used to abuse almost universally. A sociopath is a sociopath ad infiniutum.

    58. Re:The world we live in. by BronsCon · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Let me preface my response with the following: I'm speaking as a victim, here. A victim who learned a valuable lesson about personaly responsibility.

      No, he wants to live in a world where people take responsibility for their own safety. Knowing that rapists are out there, and knowing that keeping your drink in hand at and in view at all times is a simple and effective preventative measure, it is irresponsible not to take that simple measure.

      Hell, a girl I was dating brought me a drugged drink when I was 17; it wasn't even alcohol and we weren't even at a club, it was kool-aid and we were at someone's house, babysitting their 3 kids. I learned, then, that you get your own drinks and keep them in hand and in view at all times, even around people you trust. It's not your fault if you get raped if you don't do that (of course, the rapist made the decision to rape) but it is your fault you didn't at least take steps to prevent it (you made the decision not to).

      I don't blame myself for the girl's actions; after all, I didn't drug my own drink, she did. And I didn't rape myself after I passed out, she did. I don't even blame myself for trusting her; I had known her for over a year at that point and she had always been good to me. Hell, she wouldn't even have had to rape me, I was willing, so the thought never even crossed my mind. I let my guard down, and I do blame myself for that; but, at the same time, life isn't worth living if you don't let people in at some point. So, instead of becoming a woman-hating shut-in, I considered what I could have done differently to prevent it from happening, and I learned from it. In case you haven't absorbed the information by now, that is to get my own drinks and keep them in hand and in view; that allows you to still trust people, until they give you a reason not to, while allowing you to quickly and easily see that you have reason not to trust that particular person *before* something bad happens.

      It's not perfect, bad shit can and will still happen, but by taking mitigating steps, at least you've prevented one form of bad shit. Really, the same reason you lock your doors, despite the fact that a criminal can just break a window.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    59. Re:The world we live in. by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      Ugh, I knew someone was going to completely misunderstand me. Probably my fault for being overly analytical about what is obviously a very emotional issue. I don't mean to sound unsympathetic to anyone who had this happen to them, nor would I speak personally to someone like this who had suffered from an attack like that.

      I hope you can see the difference between "blaming the victim" and acknowledging that people are going to engage in risky behavior which such a product won't necessarily solve. I'm not saying this product shouldn't be available by any means. I'm simply suggesting that I believe the most effective deterrent is for women to be extremely careful about getting into a situation where they are vulnerable to this sort of assault. It doesn't mean they can't or shouldn't go out drinking and having a good time, but do so smartly. That means watching your drink and friends looking out for each other. Sure, it's great if we have this sort of product in case it does help someone protect themselves - don't misunderstand me there. But color-changing nails won't help a woman if she's alone with a predator and already semi-conscious on a couch.

      I just think we need to be realistic about how much a simple product like is going to do to really improve the situation. Maybe a few women might actually find someone attempting to drug them and alert her to the danger, and that would be awesome if it happened. It's great having better tools at your disposal. However, I think that, more than anything, it will probably help mostly by alerting women to potential dangers they face, and so encourage them to think proactively about their safety.

      I'm just in favor of real solutions rather than feel-good, high-tech solutions when it comes to an issue this serious. Hopefully that clarifies my point a bit.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    60. Re: The world we live in. by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Then what was your point? Were you just playing the role of the contrarian?

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    61. Re: The world we live in. by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 0

      Hey dude. If you want to wear nail polish it's fine with me.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    62. Re: The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm willing to bet strait alcohol is the most common one.

      Straight alcohol works best on the willing who want an excuse.

    63. Re: The world we live in. by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry. I forgot to put an Asperger's Alert banner across the top of my post. WHOOOOSH.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    64. Re:The world we live in. by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Sample size of one, I know, but I've been raped by someone I knew and trusted, never been raped by a stranger. I'm also a male who's been drugged and raped by a female, but that's probably also a statistical anomaly, right?

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    65. Re: The world we live in. by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      No, having learned from my experience, I employ other mitigation tactics. Those tactics (get your own drinks - even if someone else is buying, be present at the bar, watch the bartender make the drink, and take the drink directly from the bartender - for starters, then, keep the drink in hand and in view; really simple shit) are also available to women and I strongly encourage their use.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    66. Re:The world we live in. by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1, Troll

      " A victim who learned a valuable lesson about personaly responsibility.

      You have PTSD. Seek help. Seriously.

      "I don't blame myself for the girl's actions; after all, I didn't drug my own drink, she did."

      Yes. You do. And I quote:

      Knowing that rapists are out there, and knowing that keeping your drink in hand at and in view at all times is a simple and effective preventative measure, it is irresponsible not to take that simple measure.

      Your belief that it is irresponsible of people not to keep their drink in eyesight at all times is irrational, and is a consequence of your PTSD. Mentally healthy people don't believe that, and nothing you can say will convince them of it. Why? Because it is an irrational belief that stems from your experience and the fact that you haven't yet addressed your PTSD issues.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    67. Re:The world we live in. by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      No downsides? Has it become normally socially acceptable for a male to wear nail polish now? No? There's a downside, then. Get your own drinks, keep them in hand and in sight, and live your life.

      As for the efficacy of the nail polish, how long do you think it will take for someone to come up with another drug that it doesn't detect? Here's a hint: they already exist. Only, now, women using this product are going to be more easily fooled into thinking they're safe.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    68. Re:The world we live in. by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Wait, was that 2 downsides?

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    69. Re:The world we live in. by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      I walk away from my drinks all the time, actually. If my wife wanted to drug me, she has much better ways to do so, and if my friends want to do it, they'll find a way. I'm not a part of the club scene, so I don't have to worry about it happening there; when I was, my mother was the bartender, so I may have picked up a few pointers from her, as well. And you're clearly not a psychiatrist (and certainly not mine), so let's not go giving medical advice, okay?

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    70. Re: The world we live in. by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 0
      Now you are changing the subject. You claimed I was singling out woman. I concede that I forgot to include men who wear nail polish in the category of people about whom I was talking.

      "Stop being fucking sexist, rape goes both ways."

      Oh, yeah, and I almost forgot. You're an idiot.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    71. Re:The world we live in. by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Why limit it to women? Men get drugged, too.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    72. Re:The world we live in. by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      One who is aware of this could check up to 10 drinks for their friends.

      Or crush up a roofie, pack the powdered pill under her fingernail, and drug the first drink she "tested". And everyone would think they were safe.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    73. Re: The world we live in. by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      I made the bad choice to trust my high school girlfriend. I sure don't blame myself for trusting someone I had known for over a year and had been friends with for the entirety of that time, who had never done me wrong. That didn't stop her from drugging me and taking advantage, though.

      I do, however, recognize, that, had I gotten my own drink (it was freakin' kool-aid) and kept it in hand and in view, she could not have done what she did. I didn't cause it, but I sure could have prevented it.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    74. Re: The world we live in. by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      I'd like to tell you to go fuck yourself, but my employer knows my Slashdot username, so I'll just tell you to have a nice day, instead.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    75. Re:The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If i go walking in a bad part of town late at night and get mugged, that is really shitty and I didn't deserve to get mugged. Anyone pointing out that walking through bad part of town late at night is not a good idea is simply making an observation not blaming the victim. People always have a share in their own well being.

    76. Re: The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably because that kind of thing costs tens of thousands of dollars.

    77. Re: The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, so all your righteous outrage is based around rape of college girls? Are they somehow more precious than non-college girls? Tell us Oh Holy One, how does the percentage of rape of women in college compare to the percentage of rape among women who arent in college?

    78. Re: The world we live in. by pr0fessor · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I know a few guys who are certain a woman slipped them a Viagra and one that knows since it went horribly wrong and he ended up going to the ER.

    79. Re:The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except for women the "bad part of town" would seem to be "anywhere they want to have a drink & there are men present". This is so fucked up. Having to carry a drug testing kit around with you isn't a solution to the problem. It's capitulating to it.

    80. Re:The world we live in. by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 0

      So you're saying you're irresponsible then. Got it. I was assuming you were sincere. Now that you have made it clear you are full of shit, I recind my diagnosis.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    81. Re: The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes it is. Refuse to drink anything that is not in a sealed can or bottle. Educate yourself and also raise the standard of the people you "date". Hint: the standard is not in the looks department but the morals and brains department.

    82. Re: The world we live in. by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Imagine my surprise that you can't speak for yourself either :-)

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    83. Re: The world we live in. by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. Any social structure that diminishes personal responsibility is suspect.

      You mean like how a country diminishes personal responsibility for wars of aggression?

    84. Re: The world we live in. by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Why defend my position in two separate threads? You're already berating me in another and I'm holding my own quite well.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    85. Re:The world we live in. by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1
      Which is not at all what was said. What was said is that smart women don't socialize, and that socializing represents a lack of foresight. If only those women had the foresight not to socialize they wouldn't have been drugged.

      "If i go walking in a bad part of town late at night and get mugged, that is really shitty and I didn't deserve to get mugged."

      I'm not convinced you don't actually. It simply wouldn't be true that the reason would be because you walked in a "bad part of town." :-)

      BTW - Some people live in the bad part of town. I know. I know. They are irresponsible for living there.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    86. Re: The world we live in. by Cardoor · · Score: 1

      90-95% (let's be honest, 99.9%) of people are deeply conditioned into thinking they are doing good things.

      FTFY

    87. Re:The world we live in. by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      How is it irresponsible to trust my wife and my closest friends? Are you saying I absolutely should behave as though I actually have the PTSD you amateur-diagnosed me with? I wasn't exactly wrong for trusting the girl who drugged me, either; I had known her for over a year, we had been friends for all of that time, and she had never done me wrong up to that point. I was pointing out that I *could have* prevented the incident, had I not trusted her, but that's a far cry from blaming myself for it happening; and I'm still able to trust people, I just do so much more carefully now.

      Regarding walking away from drinks, I think it's perfectly fine to leave a drink on my side table when I go take a shit. Like I said, if my wife wanted to drug me, she has much easier ways to do it. Clearly, since I provided qualifying context, I wasn't saying I walk away from drinks at, say, a bar; I also don't nurse them, and keeping my eye on a drink for 5 minutes is a small price to pay for being safe. I've got no problem leaving my drink at a restaurant, though, when my wife is sitting at the table; she'll keep an eye on it just fine -- and like I said, she has easier ways of drugging me if she wants to. And I trust that she doesn't.

      If you see something wrong with that, please be specific, otherwise you're making it clear that your only intent here is to troll, which I'm also fine with; I find your kind to be quite entertaining most of the time.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    88. Re: The world we live in. by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 0

      Rape apologia on a tech site!? GASP

      There's a huge difference between being slipped a mickey and being extremely intoxicated.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    89. Re:The world we live in. by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      "Hell, a girl I was dating brought me a drugged drink when I was 17; it wasn't even alcohol and we weren't even at a club, it was kool-aid and we were at someone's house, babysitting their 3 kids. "

      "I wasn't exactly wrong for trusting the girl who drugged me, either; I had known her for over a year, we had been friends for all of that time, and she had never done me wrong up to that point."

      ... and yet, when women trust people they know without staring at their drink, they are irresponsible! (Yes, you are an idiot, and BTW you do have PTSD.)

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    90. Re: The world we live in. by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 2

      That would mean staring at your beverage the entire night rather than socializing.

      This is amazing. The message should always be, "never rape" instead of "don't get raped."

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    91. Re:The world we live in. by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      The world has always been terrible. Stop pretending like its never been worse.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    92. Re:The world we live in. by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Trusting someone you know; someone you legitimately know, not just someone you've met a few times, is not irresponsible, unless they've given you a reason not to trust them. I never said that was gender-specific, either. When you're out in public, you've got more than just the people you know and trust to worry about and it *is* irresponsible not to be vigilant in that situation. That you fail to recognize the difference between my scenario, trusting someone I had known or over a year, who had never done me wrong, and doing so in a private setting, versus trusting a crowd of people, most of whom you've probably never met, in a public setting, is your failing, and not mine.

      I'm genuinely curious, though; what is the basis on which you are diagnosing me with PTSD and what credentials do you have that provide any validity to that diagnosis? My guess, none and none. If that's the case, you might find yourself afoul of the law (PDF warning; also, that document is specific to my state, but each state has their own, similar laws).

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    93. Re:The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have PTSD. Seek help. Seriously.

      I'm confused. What the fuck does Post Traumatic Stress Disorder have to do with this?

      Your belief that it is irresponsible of people not to keep their drink in eyesight at all times is irrational, and is a consequence of your PTSD. Mentally healthy people don't believe that

      I am a mentally healthy individual, and yet I recognize the rationality of keeping an eye on ones drink in such an environment.

      Because it is an irrational belief that stems from your experience and the fact that you haven't yet addressed your PTSD issues.

      Likewise, you haven't addressed what makes it irrational. You seem to simply be saying "It is irrational, trust me".

    94. Re: The world we live in. by Kielistic · · Score: 3, Informative

      Rape apologia on a tech site!? GASP

      There was no rape apology there.

      There's a huge difference between being slipped a mickey and being extremely intoxicated.

      Which is why people are not allowing you to conflate the two. Some times alcohol hits you harder than you expect. A lot of women think this means they were roofied (because people like you tell them there's roofies around every corner).

    95. Re: The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Roofies are not a "moral panic block", they are widely available, tasteless and odorless drug used by sociopaths to rape people. Do you read the news?

      When were the news not in on a moral panic? There are still far too little data here, and the numbers we have indicate that it's much rarer than people believe. In one Australian study, they found none of some 100 people who sought medical treatment after being "roofied", had actually received anything but alcohol. It's linked in the wikipedia page for date rape drugs.

      Do know who many women are raped each year on campuses in the US? Take your useless, ignorant, thoughtless, opinion and have some frat boy tape it to his dick and shove it up your ass

      If this isn't a moral panic, you're sure doing your part to make it seem like one.

    96. Re: The world we live in. by Vintermann · · Score: 1

      Any social structure that diminishes personal responsibility is suspect.

      I agree. It follows from this that alcohol use in itself is suspect, though, even more so than frat boys. Temporarily and selectively evading personal responsibility for your actions is the reason people get drunk in the first place.

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    97. Re:The world we live in. by judoguy · · Score: 1

      Saying that the victim had a role in the incident isn't precisely "blaming the victim". Our attention and/or inattention during our activities play a role in the outcomes. It's true that no one deserves to be taken advantage of by some bastard, but it's childish to cry that no one should ever be at risk for carelessness either. Doesn't work with power tools, rock climbing or as any adult knows, interaction with other people.

      --
      Peace is easy to achieve, just surrender. Liberty is much harder get/keep.
    98. Re:The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Has it become normally socially acceptable for a male to wear nail polish now?

      Yes.

    99. Re: The world we live in. by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      The message should be a little bit of both I think.

      One doesn't need to blame the victim, but one should try to not be one (within reason anyway) too.

      Sort of like houses being broken into, mugged, etc.

      Both are important, because there will always be those trying to do bad things to people.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    100. Re: The world we live in. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      I'm willing to bet strait alcohol is the most common one.

      Which reminds me...

      "They're trying to put warning labels on liquor saying, 'Caution, alcohol can be dangerous to pregnant women.' That's ironic. If it weren't for alcohol, most women wouldn't even be that way" - Rita Rudner

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    101. Re: The world we live in. by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 0

      There was no rape apology there.

      Bull fucking shit.

      It's far more likely that you know someone who claims that happened to her. She may even believe it. It's far more likely though, that she drank more than she wants to admit.

      Which is why people are not allowing you to conflate the two. Some times alcohol hits you harder than you expect. A lot of women think this means they were roofied (because people like you tell them there's roofies around every corner).

      Have I said roofies are around every corner? No.

      Nice straw man.

      If you get hit with a date rape drug, you will not feel like you got overly drunk in the morning.

      Here's a great post talking about this particular issue. in short, the notion of "you drank too much" vs "You got date rape drugged." is so fucking stupid it's comical. Well, it'd be comical if it wasn't so fucking tragic.

      stop fucking raping people and covering up rape.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    102. Re: The world we live in. by nedlohs · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It already is.

      But non-idiots mitigate risks as best they can - trading off against convenience and so on of course, sometimes with convenience winning by miles.

      The message is "never burglarize" and no one thinks advising people to lock their doors somehow changes that message.

      The message is "don't abduct children" and no one thinks that "stranger danger" type idiocy in schools changes that message.

      Why does any mention of mitigating rape risks always get portrayed as undermining "don't rape".

    103. Re: The world we live in. by CastrTroy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Thank goodness I don't live in the US. I kind of forget how nice it is to have health care available to everyone paid for by taxes. If I'm lying unconscious, I don't want anybody making decisions about whether or not I should go to the hospital based on whether they think it will cost me too much money to save my life. If I saw somebody (especially a friend) unconscious on the street, I would call an ambulance, health insurance or not. Hell, you could probably be found negligent if you didn't get the person to a hospital and something bad did happen them.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    104. Re:The world we live in. by Vintermann · · Score: 1

      Sorry for what you went through man, but this is a great example of a case where this would not have worked. Assuming this nail polish existed, and no one would think twice about a man wearing it, would you have dipped your finger in the kool-aid?

      There's a very narrow use case for this nail polish, and that's when you expect there's a good chance someone will try to drug you, but you still aren't sensible enough to stay the hell away from that place.

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    105. Re: The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are no statistics that back that claim up, period. What happened to you is horrible, but trying to pretend women prey on men in this way with equal frequency is completely ludicrous and unfounded.

    106. Re:The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Straight Alcohol, get her a little woozy. Slip outside with her, then either she's drunk enough to restrain, or stun gun and restrain her and drag her back to your "palace".

    107. Re: The world we live in. by MitchDev · · Score: 2

      Because no one wants to take any responsibility for themselves ....

    108. Re:The world we live in. by Vintermann · · Score: 1

      One who is aware of this could check up to 10 drinks for their friends.

      Yeah, if those ten friends don't mind you sticking your finger in their drinks. If you don't explain, you might get unpopular very quickly. If you do explain, why aren't you just using a paper strip or something?

      That this silly invention is taken seriously at all is a testament to moral panic.

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    109. Re:The world we live in. by BronsCon · · Score: 2

      Even moreso, this nail polish isn't even really effective in that narrowly-defined scenario. It provides a false sense of security, as it detects only two of many date rape drugs, so a negative result means nothing; and, by its mere existence, opens up a potential plain-sight avenue of attack: woman claims to be wearing this polish (but really is not), woman crushes up a roofie and packs the powder under her nail, woman offers to test friend's drink, drink "tests" negative, but has, in reality, just been drugged. This stuff is just a bad idea, all around.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    110. Re: The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you know, if this is such a huge problem, they could just not go to frat parties?

      I don't understand why this problem needs such elaborate solutions. Just don't go out and drink in suspect environments and watch your own drink. And if the problem is SO bad, give up alcohol for a few years while going out.

      In school--in second grade--we had to learn the little song "if you don't know just what it isssss, don't put it in your mouthhhh." Problem freaking solved.

    111. Re: The world we live in. by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 0

      If burglary and child abduction are as common as rape, we would be having a MUCH DIFFERENT conversation.

      But it's not.

      Rape is really common.

      And it happens to people who have taken all the precautions in the world. Telling someone to mitigate the risks while looking at all possible ways for things to go wrong and then saying, "You didn't mitigate risks enough!" is ridiculous.

      Stop teaching boys it's ok to harass, rape or feel entitled to women's (and men's) bodies. No, persistence isn't going to pay off. It's just creepy.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    112. Re:The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does that even work? Did she peg ya or something?

    113. Re:The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'm not "blaming the victim""

      I hate to break it to you, but that is exactly what you are doing. You are also claiming that only woman without much brains or ability to think for themselves and plan ahead like to have a good time in public.

      Since the overwhelming majority of people in bars would insist that you need to consume yet another powerful mind-altering drug such as alcohol in order to have a "good" time, the statement isn't completely inaccurate. I see a considerable amount of ignorance and stupidity in bars regardless of gender. That is why some people avoid them, and the mentality they breed.

    114. Re: The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am so fucking sick of listening to your whiney bitch comments all over this topic. Shit happens to everyone. Get over it dude.

    115. Re:The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Need? Meh. I don't think the frequency is all that high, though it certainly does happen. And, of course, it's awful and bad and more people should take responsibility for their own actions and stop doing gratuitously shitty things and so on. This is part of the underbelly of humanity. You only need to accept that this is the reality; nobody says you have to like it.

      I do like the elegance of the idea (in the technical sense) and of course that secret agent trickery flair. Kudos for making it work too.

    116. Re: The world we live in. by Kielistic · · Score: 1

      stop fucking raping people and covering up rape.

      Nice straw man.

      But to give you more of a response than you deserve: people self-diagnose based on faulty reasoning all the time. We've all had nights out drinking where we wake up confused about how we were hit that hard. Spiked drinks are incredibly rare. Without some kind of qualitative evidence beyond "trust me I'm practically a doctor" I'm going to have to assume most of these anecdotal stories are people self-diagnosing incorrectly. This is what actual data on the subject indicates.

      Personally I'm in favour of anything that brings more data. I just highly doubt it will be as high as people like you think it will. I also don't think this will be used. Ever.

    117. Re: The world we live in. by jbo5112 · · Score: 1

      If burglary and child abduction are as common as rape, we would be having a MUCH DIFFERENT conversation.

      Apparently not... According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, in 2008, there were 3,188,620 cases of household burglaries, another 13+ million cases of theft and 203,830 cases of rape/attempted rape/sexual assault. (www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cvus08.pdf) You have a study that cites 1.3 million women, which is MUCH higher (and I'm not disputing it), but still well below the number of burglaries. I'm aware that crime rates have been falling, but not by that much between 2008 and 2010.

    118. Re: The world we live in. by jbo5112 · · Score: 1

      Dora the Explorer's chant of "Swiper no swiping" doesn't work in the real world where evils actually exist. We do our best to raise people into good citizens, and it seems to be helping (rape peaked in 1992). However, I don't expect the world to ever stop having horrible people in it. Some places are always going to be safer than others (e.g. church singles mixer vs wild frat party). When I would visit my grandparents in small-town Mississippi a few years ago, we never locked the door because no one even knew where a key was, but it was never once robbed. If I go to someplace dangerous like Baghdad, Iraq; Mogadishu, Somalia; or Kabul, Afghanistan, then I would be quite foolish not to take extra precautions and expect things still may go badly.

      I find it amazing that a group of men worked together to find a way for women to help protect themselves, and women get upset about it. *sigh* I would never blame the victim, but I miss the days when we read children stories about little pigs that got eaten because they were too lazy to protect themselves against any old wolf.

    119. Re:The world we live in. by nanoflower · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what the difference is between that world and one where women are expected to wear nail polish that detects GHB when ever they go out. Both assume that any man they meet (or are even in the same room in) while drinking anything from water to alcohol could be a rapist so you have to test your drink every time it is out of sight. While both methods will keep you safe(r) they clearly make assumptions about the world they live in.

      I know that date rape and the usage of GHB occurs but it is so common it makes sense to test every drink that a woman gets outside of their home?

    120. Re: The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      anecdote : a short story about an interesting or funny event or occurrence
      datum (plural data) : a single piece of information

      It seems that the plural of anecdote is indeed data, but with a large population, it takes quite a few anecdotes to be significant.

    121. Re: The world we live in. by F34nor · · Score: 1

      If there is no vote for war in the legislature yes, but what does that have to do with personal responsibility especially in a representational democracy?

    122. Re:The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a difference between placing blame and pointing out advice for keeping safe. Getting mugged or hit by a drunk driver aren't the victim's fault either, but telling them to avoid dark alleys or driving around the time that bars are closing for the night isn't blaming them either. Also it's not blaming to identify at-risk groups either.

      Blaming is telling someone that they probably deserved it or that they should have expected it based on the way that they dressed. That's markedly different than providing suggestions for staying safe or using previous data to identify people with the largest potential risk. Calling that blaming and attempting to lump it in with actual victim blaming isn't going to help anyone.

    123. Re:The world we live in. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      That's funny. I don't want rapist to live on this planet anymore.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    124. Re: The world we live in. by westlake · · Score: 3, Informative

      if all rapes were reported, we may well see that men rape women no more often than women rape men

      I don't think that is in any way very likely.

      According to a 2010 report by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, nearly 1 in 5 women and 1 in 71 men in theed States have been raped. The actual number is likely higher, experts say, as incidents of sexual violence are severely underreported in the United States -- particularly among male victims.

      Against his will: Female-on-male rape

    125. Re: The world we live in. by Cruciform · · Score: 1, Redundant

      There's no doubt that they are used but the prevalence is likely as exaggerated as "stranger danger".
      In the UK 75 cases of suspected dosing were investigated and only one person turned out to have a date-rape drug in their tox screen. The other cases appeared to be people drinking to excess.
      This doesn't put the blame on the victim instead of a rapist. We should also be aware that the regular old issue of people getting shitfaced is still a real contributor to creating vulnerable targets for predators.

    126. Re: The world we live in. by Tyrannicsupremacy · · Score: 2

      I had a friend who worked in a lab that police/paramedics would send various blood samples to for drug testing. He said that in a 4 year period, out of all the hundreds of date rape drug test requests, 100% percent of them showed nothing but alcohol. He said it was a real eye opener for him, how people (in this case women) underestimate the power and simplicity of alcohol. Drinks can be mixed that almost completely mask the taste of booze. Now I know that this was only in his particular state, and not all states will have the same results, but I still think it's telling over all. Be less worried about pills getting slipped and more wary of the fact that alcohol can completely drop your inhibitions,

      --
      http://i.cubeupload.com/T6cyLu.png
    127. Re: The world we live in. by Livius · · Score: 1

      There are no statistics that back that claim up

      That was his point, which you obviously missed.

    128. Re: The world we live in. by Livius · · Score: 1

      The straight alcohol is being consumed voluntarily, the other drug by criminal deception.

    129. Re:The world we live in. by ebyrob · · Score: 1

      > I know. I know. They are irresponsible for living there.

      I was going to say they are irresponsible for not making it a good part of town by living there.

    130. Re: The world we live in. by kheldan · · Score: 1

      Glad to see I'm not the only one coming down on this side of the issue. I'm getting flamed from all angles by assholes calling me anything from 'white knight' to accusing me of being the very thing I'm protesting against, all because I have the almighty nerve to speak out against date rape and abuse of women in general.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    131. Re:The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It's far more likely that you know someone who claims that happened to her"
      WTF people?

      Well, it is actually true that studies show very few cases of suspected uses of date rape drugs actually involve such a drug (maybe 5% or less). For starters, check the Wikipedia article on date rape drugs. If Wikipedia isn't reliable enough for you, there are usually at least links to more solid sources of information.

    132. Re: The world we live in. by kheldan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Being able to say no to liquor is extremely easy

      Yes, it is. However: if a woman has had too much? That's still not an excuse to take advantage of her. I don't know about anyone else, but I've had women want to have sex with me while they were significantly drunk, and I just won't do it because I know they'll regret it later, and I don't want to be That Guy. Oh, and for the record: Women should not take advantage of guys who are too drunk, either. Of course there's a double standard, as always, which is also bullshit, but that's another subject entirely.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    133. Re:The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm just pointing out that some people are more prone to making poor life choices.

      Statistically the most common rapist is someone you trusts. This is a problem, as you can make as many good life choices as you like and still be blindsided by a rapist.

      Hell, going by said statistic you're better off going home with a total stranger than that of friends and family.

      So saying you should not go home with guys you don't trust isn't terribly helpful. Contrary to popular beliefs there's no "I'm a rapist," signs women can look for, it's rather they guy you thought you could trust.

      So the only real "advice" for women is to quit their social life. Yes, staying away from people is the only truly effective way to avoid rapists. Dressing like a slut, walking through dark back allies and dating strangers does not increase your chances of being raped by much, strangely enough.

    134. Re: The world we live in. by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Right. there are more rapes than burglaries! Inside prisons I'll buy that, in the rest of America not a chance.

      No one* is teaching boys it's ok to harass and rape. Just like no one says "you didn't lock your doors enough" when a house is burgled.

      * Well OK I'm sure there is someone. Just like there is someone teaching boys that jews are evil incarnate and somone teaching boys that violence is a good first resort. I'm assuming we are talking about "normal" people.

    135. Re: The world we live in. by BronsCon · · Score: 2
      From your own quote, supporting my position:

      The actual number is likely higher, experts say, as incidents of sexual violence are severely underreported in the United States -- particularly among male victims.

      Exactly the point I was making. Thank you.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    136. Re:The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We do not need to test any drink; date rape drug are a myth. In most case, these women black out on alcohol alone. But you can't say that because they would appear less-capable then men as supporting alcohol intoxication and therefore misogynistic. Date rape is regret sex. Date rape can be avoided by teaching your daughters to not get stupid drunk in club and grind on some random douche's cock. .

    137. Re: The world we live in. by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Then stop reading them? I'm over it; I've been over it for over a decade, but it's relevant to the topic at hand, so it's being brought up. Get over it, dude.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    138. Re:The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dealing with lawyers is similar to being date raped.

    139. Re: The world we live in. by F34nor · · Score: 1

      Double negative. As the grandfather I am supporting your opinion.

    140. Re: The world we live in. by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      I picked up on that in your response to my post, I was asking what your post was in posting your initial response to Xiaran's post, since you clearly agree with the point he was making (which happens to be the same point I was making, which you've just stated you were supporting). I'm not trying to be argumentative, here, since we clearly are in agreement, I'm just trying to figure out what you issue is with how Xiaran approached the subject to make the very same point.

      Moving past that, though, this is a product that detects two of many date rape drugs, providing the opportunity for guaranteed false negatives and a false sense of security for the user of the product. It also opens up a new attack vector, just by its mere existence, but I've been called a woman hater for pointing out the details so I'll leave it to the reader to find my other posts detailing the method. In short, this stuff is bad new, not for potential rapists, but for potential victims; were I a rapist, I'd view this stuff as a gold mine.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    141. Re: The world we live in. by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      gah.. typos... lots of them... shame on me

      The corrections are "what your initial point was", "what your issue is", and "this stuff is bad news", I'm sure you'll find where they belong.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    142. Re:The world we live in. by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they could develop a type that goes on clear and only changes color if it reacts to a substance.

    143. Re: The world we live in. by Nephandus · · Score: 2

      The CDC's "forced to penetrate" showed 1.1% victimization (obviously of males) over 12 months as did their "rape" of females, so any "rape" of males would raise male victims over females. Also according to "Accuracy of Adult Recollections of Childhood Victimization: Part 2. Childhood Sexual Abuse.", males with documented sexual abuse were 5 times more likely to deny sexual abuse later than females. The numbers could be heavily skewed for both but are hiding way more male than female victims.

      --
      "A soft answer turneth away wrath. Once wrath is looking the other way, shoot it in the head."
    144. Re: The world we live in. by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1, Informative

      1 in 5 women will get sexually assaulted in her life time.

      1 in 5 homes will not get burglarized in their entire existence.

      No one* is teaching boys it's ok to harass and rape. Just like no one says "you didn't lock your doors enough" when a house is burgled.

      Blurred Lines hit #1 on the pop charts. The repeated stories about guys who get away with rape even after it's been reported and there's solid evidence for it. Guys like MMA star War Machine(God help me, that's his legal name) telling people that his ex-GF is his property.

      There's all sorts of cultural influences telling men that they're entitled to women's bodies. In essence, we're teaching our children that rape is OK. It's called Rape Culture.

      Here's Rape Culture 101

      And yes, there's all sorts of antisemitic influences in our culture. Including saying someone "Jewed" you out of money. But that's another rant.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    145. Re:The world we live in. by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      How does that solve the problem? Honest question, I feel like I might be missing something here, but the way I see it, we have a product that detects two of many existing date rape drugs (albeit the two most popular ones). A scumbag using one of the drugs this doesn't test for won't be foiled by it.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    146. Re:The world we live in. by antdude · · Score: 1

      Professor, is that you?

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    147. Re:The world we live in. by cryptizard · · Score: 1

      Umm... you know that just because it is called "nail polish" doesn't mean that it won't stick to other things, like a drink stirrer, right?

    148. Re:The world we live in. by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      And the rest of my post?

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    149. Re:The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That we need ways to test drinks for date rape drugs shows the state of the world we live in.

      Right, because they weren't going to a bar to get laid in the first place

      I don't want to live on this planet anymore.

      /wrists

    150. Re: The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's far more likely that you know someone who claims that happened to her. She may even believe it. It's far more likely though, that she drank more than she wants to admit.

      My wife got roofied at the gay at she likes to hang out in. Many women did. They caught the guy who was doing it. He was not intending to rape anyone. He was a gay man that felt women shouldn't be in a gay bar so he was roofying their drinks so they'd get out of control and get kicked out. He is now banned from the bar (and might even be in jail.
      If he is still in jail it is win win, as he is in the woman free environment he always dreamed of.

    151. Re: The world we live in. by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Is that what that noise was? I think I might have woken up dumb this morning.

    152. Re:The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then shut the fuck up and kill yourself already. Nobody else wants you here either.

    153. Re:The world we live in. by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

      "I'm not "blaming the victim""

      I hate to break it to you, but that is exactly what you are doing.

      I hate to break it to you, but I think you might need to work on your reading comprehension skills.

      You are also claiming that only woman without much brains or ability to think for themselves and plan ahead like to have a good time in public.

      Actually, GP didn't say that AT ALL. At no point did he make assertions about intelligence ("without much brains") or "ability to think for themselves." That's entirely something you manufactured -- you may want to look into the mirror if you're worried about people making assumptions about others and stereotyping them.

      What GP was specifically talking about was your third category -- people who don't "plan ahead." I know plenty of very intelligent people who make incredibly poor choices in social situations. I know plenty of very independent folks who can "think for themselves" who also make poor choices in planning. In fact, while I'd say that people who are a little above average in intelligence are better than average at these things, those who are very intelligent often get worse again.

      GP said absolutely nothing about intelligence or independence -- he simply stated that some people don't plan ahead or think about all the "bad situations" they could get into in social situations, and that's simply a fact. Those people exist. Those are the people who really need this stuff. But I don't think it's at all a controversial claim to say that some people don't think about possible consequences in social situations, and they are more likely to fall victim to some bad scenario than others. And it's certainly not "blaming the victim" to provide advice that would aid in preventing date rape, as GP did.

      And also, GP never said or implied that "only women without [X] like to have a good time in public." He said that women who plan ahead when they are having a good time are less likely to end up in scenario where they can be taken advantage of than women who DON'T plan ahead when they are having a good time.

      Let's review the actual advice GP gave:

      The best defense is, as always, for women to watch out for their friends when at bars and parties. Don't go wandering off alone after heavy drinking with a guy you don't know or trust.

      Do you actually disagree with this advice? Or do you believe it's impossible "to have a good time in public" if you bother to make sure you're with some friends and not go wandering off alone (i.e., not "in public") with a guy you don't know?

      Look -- random hook-ups are a risky business. Aside from STDs, you could be locking yourself up in room with an ax murderer, or a rapist, or... who knows? If I were a young woman, I would definitely follow GP's advice and go drinking with friends and never agree to go somewhere alone with a guy I just met.

      But that's me. I'm cautious by nature. I also don't bet on horses or play in traffic, which is effectively what you're doing when you put your trust in being intimate with a person who is stronger and bigger than you without knowing a lot about him/her first. Sure, in an ideal world no one should have to worry about such things, but given that everyone knows it's not an ideal world, random hook-ups are inherently more risky than many other activities.

      I also occasionally like to have a "good time in public," but I don't know why that means that a "good time in public" needs to include having a private session afterward with some unknown person.

      But there are other people who are less cautious. I don't think it's a stretch to say (as GP did) that those people are also less likely to seek out all sorts of preventative items to warn them of date rape, if they haven't already taken other measures to do so. That's not "blaming the victim" -- that's lamenting the fact that there are terrible people in the world and realistically noting that some people take less precautions in general when confronting those terrible people than others.

    154. Re: The world we live in. by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Thank you for stepping in with statistics, I was at work when I posted that and did not have time to search them out myself.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    155. Re:The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, in the cases when claims of date rape drugs have been made and test kits employed, they have found virtually 0% incidence, something like 2% of all claims made. Based on that it's far, far more likely that most people saying they were date-rape-drugged simply had too much alcohol.

      You can point to GHB - but GHB has a very strong taste and it should then regularly surface that someone tastes their drink, finds that it has suddenly dramatically changed falvor, remembers that someone handled it a few seconds ago, and takes it for testing, which would make the news. That pretty much never happens.

      Hence we don't really "need" it. But maybe you should stop living on this planet anyway,because reactionary hyperbolists aren't really needed either.

    156. Re: The world we live in. by Destructo-Bot · · Score: 1

      EMT here. Unless you are getting flown in a helicopter to a trauma center it isn't going to cost "tens of thousands of dollars". BLS or ALS transport would typically be somewhere south of $700 for full unmitigated cost, and after insurance more likely $0-$200 out-of-pocket. That's if the person transported even pays the bill... many do not. An admitted ED stay would also be covered and that's usually between $0-$50 for most insurances I've seen.

    157. Re: The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you're an SJW cocksucker who doesn't believe anything that goes against the liberal feminist faggot media agenda. See the fucking FBI statistics below you goddamned piece of scum sucking filth. I hope you die in a goddamned fire with the rest of you SJW slithering ilk. Fuck you.

    158. Re:The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He isn't assigning blame on the victim but instead making a correlation between woman who gets date raped are usually those without the proper foresight to avoid such scenarios. Those without the foresight wouldn't be buying this product by definition.

    159. Re: The world we live in. by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      There were 132,802,859 homes in the US in 2013 - http://quickfacts.census.gov/q... - which counts individual rooms rented out as a "home".

      There were1,393,152 burglaries of home in 2009 - https://www2.fbi.gov/ucr/cius2...

      Assuming those numbers haven't varied too much then, yes if homes have average existence of 20 years (the one I'm in right now is older than that) 1 in 5 will be burglarized in their "entire existance".

      And of course you are using unreported sexual assaults in your numbers. There are also unreported burglaries that aren't in the burglary numbers - if you don't have insurance there's no reason to report after all. If it was your stash of drugs that were stolen you aren't going to call the police. When your child broke in and pawned off some of your stuff you are probably not going to report the crime. And so on.

      Rap songs have also glorified murdering people, murder culture?

    160. Re: The world we live in. by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      Yes. There is a culture of violence in our society.

      Why else would someone decide the only way to deal with someone texting in a theater is to blow their fucking head off?

      Or to deal with someone who's music is too loud is to put a gun through the window and start shooting?

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    161. Re:The world we live in. by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      The victim is never at fault.
      That being said, there's an important question to ask.

      Why is is that the other women present that night were not attacked?

      Is it because they traveled in pairs? Is it because they never left their drinks unattended?

      It's often something like the person or one of their friends realizes that the world crashing down on them, so they get the fuck out of there ASAP and wake up the next morning having no idea how they got home.

      Yeah, about that. That's a symptom of acute alcohol intoxication too. As far as I know, I have never been date raped but in my younger days, there were many nights that I don't remember how I got home.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    162. Re: The world we live in. by russotto · · Score: 1

      Why else would someone decide the only way to deal with someone texting in a theater is to blow their fucking head off?

      Yeah, because that happens all the time. It's socially acceptable. When I come into work on Monday, my co-workers and I talk about all the fucking texters we shot over the weekend.

      Or to deal with someone who's music is too loud is to put a gun through the window and start shooting?

      Yep, because a singular case which makes national headlines is evidence of a greater culture of acceptance of such things.

    163. Re:The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is your brain at zero Kelvin cause it sure as fuck isn't operating. You draw too many assumptions and see implications that simply don't exist. Go outside and warm your noggin up and maybe you'll see the error of your ways.

    164. Re: The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fag

    165. Re: The world we live in. by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 1

      If you are lying unconscious, no one is going to make a decision about whether it costs more to save your life.

      Lots of people are aware of good samaritan laws, and will do anything to save you.

      Lots of people are aware of the legal responsibility of SURVIVORS suing THE PEOPLE WHO TRIED TO SAVE THEM and FUCKING WINNING.

      If you are unconscious, you will hope for some ignorant retard, which is most of the population, to come along and call someone who cares. Most likely 9-1-1. And they will disclose your location but not their identity. And that's okay.

      Emergency, please help this poor fuck. I'm out. Is that what you wanted? Great, because their job is done.

      Or did you want your health care delivered by untrained strangers? Stats on Heimlich and breathing help suggests that even trained CPR means a very small advantage.

      Literally, people who call 911 anonymously and fuck off have as good a chance at saving you as the people who really try to save you. They might as well fuck it up.

      Call an ambulance, sure. But you really lost the point.

      The VICTIM has to pay the cost. If she does not have insurance, she either dies or wishes she had. Your hate is on the side of hospitals and medical billers and health insurance.

      Not on the side of the people who will invariably call for help regardless of whether you're a foreigner. We love all people, because we can't tell the difference immediately. We hate them equally, for the same reasons.

    166. Re: The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're only acting out your nature. White Knights always think they are on the side of right and good. Otherwise they'd be black knights. I will tell your from experience though that no amount of White Knighting on the internet is gonna get you laid. To achieve that, might I suggest slipping your mom a roofie?

    167. Re: The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You probably got roofied!

    168. Re:The world we live in. by Sun · · Score: 1

      Please provide source to that claim.

      As far as I know, a great majority of acquaintance rapes are by either family member or neighbor. Then again, I haven't been keeping track, so I might be confusing things (for example, this might be the statistics for minor's rape, and thus irrelevant for the date rape discussion).

      Still, if you can back your claim, please do.

      Shachar

    169. Re:The world we live in. by sribe · · Score: 1

      Reliable statistics are of course very hard to come by. And I think you are indeed thinking of minors where it's family member or neighbor. So, while I think there are studies that back up the point about date rapes being perpetrated by serial offenders who work to become acquaintances, I cannot recall sources. I can however vouch for what friends say after spending a few years working in crisis counseling and talking to victims...

    170. Re: The world we live in. by russotto · · Score: 1

      Otherwise they'd be black knights. I will tell your from experience though that no amount of White Knighting on the internet is gonna get you laid.

      How about Black Knighting? I know it gets us much better looking horses and armor (except that guy in Holy Grail; he always was the white sheep of the group)... so maybe that too?

    171. Re:The world we live in. by quenda · · Score: 2, Informative

      Would it help to know that it is largely an urban legend?

      Drink spiking with Rohypnol and GHB on a large scale that people are imaging is not real.
      In my city, a study was done on a large number of young people arriving at the city hospital (free A&E) with suspected drink-spiking.
      Not one had any traces in their blood. Maybe some had been spiked with extra alcohol, but mostly is was young women not taking responsibility for their own excessive drinking (or pills).

      Similar data from the UK:
      http://www.telegraph.co.uk/new...

    172. Re: The world we live in. by F34nor · · Score: 1

      Don't conflate the two. Just because thing A is abused a lot doesn't make mitigating harm from thing B ANYTHING. Xiaran point about a moral backstop was a red herring and complete bullshit.

    173. Re: The world we live in. by quenda · · Score: 1

      I made the bad choice to trust my high school girlfriend.

      WTF!? Your girlfriend had to drug you to get laid? You gotta be trollin'. How awful for you.
      And here is me having sympathy, thinking it was your schoolteacher or something.

      Oh wait, BronsCon ... you must be just telling a parable that is going over my head again.

    174. Re: The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll offer a little moral support. I had a girl attempt to force herself on me. Also during high school (many years ago). In my case there were no drugs involved, but it would definitely have been a sexual assault and attempted rape if the genders were reversed.

      We were dating for a couple of months, so she was well aware of my boundaries. On night she got carried away with her libido and tried to force intercourse against my will. Luckily I was not incapacitated and was able to physically restrain her and prevent her from succeeding. Given my beliefs about premarital sex it was a really, really big deal to me. But it wasn't a major traumatic event.... perhaps a major traumatic event that was narrowly avoided.

      I think being rendered incapacitated by a drug and taken advantage of by someone I trusted in that scenario would have been pretty horrific. Not just for the sexual violation, but because I am an overly-trusting sort of person and a violation of trust at that level would be about as damaging a thing as you could do to me. As it was I simply played it off as a case of hormones getting the best of someone and getting caught up in the moment.

      I have never mentioned it to anyone since though, so maybe it carries some importance that I wasn't aware of. That was my first real girlfriend, and though there have been quite a number and a marriage since, none of them ever heard this story.

    175. Re: The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you use the term "rape culture" without irony, you just might be a dingbat.

    176. Re: The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you use the standard cultural definition of rape - physical force or a weapon of some sort - then the ratio is likely very far from equal. Probably close to that 1 in 75 number. But if you use the "rape culture" definition that includes failing to get "enthusiastic consent" as rape then I think you might be right in assuming that the ratios are closer to equal. I have had one woman try to physically force herself on me and a few others try various emotional blackmail tactics - all defined as rape over at Jezebel. Never encountered the drug thing though.

      Heck, just using a definition of rape that includes "I was too drunk to give true consent" there are probably a lot of men who have been raped. A heck of a lot more than that 1 in 75 number.

    177. Re: The world we live in. by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Point taken, thank you for clarifying.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    178. Re: The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      stop fucking raping people and covering up rape.

      Anyone who uses this kind of language in an online discussion about the prevalence of "date rape drugs" is an unadulterated idiot.

      Just so we can be clear on exactly why you are an idiot:

      stop fucking raping people

      Stating that rape drugs are not around every corner is not raping someone. Sticking your dick in them without permission is raping someone.

      and covering up rape.

      Stating that rape drugs are not around every corner is not covering up rape. At worst it is stating an opinion about the prevalence of one particular method of sexual assault. At best it is a statement of fact.

      For those who care for an honest debate on the merits: A quick google search came up empty for official FBI stats, but one article aimed at prosecutors and police mentioned a couple of thousand cases since the first reported case of rohypnol use as a rape drug. So a few hundred a year as of that writing. I suppose at that point it is a matter of opinion as to how accurate "not around every corner" is. Not that it matters if you are one of the victims.

    179. Re: The world we live in. by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      She didn't have to, that's the fucked up part.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    180. Re: The world we live in. by Truth_Quark · · Score: 1

      we may well see that men rape women no more often than women rape men.

      I greatly doubt it.

      You understand the game theory inherent in the biology don't you? Sperm is nothing to produce. Carrying a child is a huge investment. Men are selected to want to fuck everything that moves, and fuck most things that don't move, until it moves.

      Women need to be selective. They want the very best possible father for their child and, generally speaking, a relationship to support the upbringing of the child.

    181. Re: The world we live in. by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      They wouldn't. You might notice that the two cases you reference made national (and international) headlines because they were unexpected, unusual, and considered abhorrent to everyone else. Again, there are crazy people but they don't define what society as whole is.

      Oh and yes I'm sure people made jokes at the time. "What color were Christa McAuliffe eyes? Blue - one blue this way and one blue that way" also didn't mean there was a culture of wanting space shuttles to blow up in the 80s

    182. Re: The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It just came up.

      I'm honestly curious as it's so foreign to me. Stronger woman? Knife? Gun? Unconscious?

    183. Re: The world we live in. by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 0

      yet somehow we don't have a violence problem.

      Btw, Florida thinks it's acceptable to stalk an unarmed kid in the middle of the night and then shoot him.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    184. Re: The world we live in. by Lotana · · Score: 1

      Yes, women do indeed rape men. It is occuring and sadly very much unreported. But I am convinced it is a MUCH more rare occurrence than the standard man-on-woman combination. Even given the non-reporting bias.

    185. Re: The world we live in. by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      The CDC disagrees with you. If you'd like a source for that data, you'll have to ask Nephandus.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    186. Re: The world we live in. by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      Saying we have crazy people and blaming it on the crazies hides how bad our violent crime rate is compared to the rest of the developed world.

      It's gotten much better than the 60s, but we are still way past the curve here.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    187. Re: The world we live in. by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Drugged drink, the very topic of this thread. Of course, you could have read any of the other, oh, probably dozen or so posts on this article where I give that detail.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    188. Re: The world we live in. by BronsCon · · Score: 2

      Why, thank you for telling me the thing that happened to me happens, I wasn't really sure. The sick part is really how I found out it happened in the first place, but those are private details I will not discuss on a public forum. You can be convinced of whatever you want (and clearly you will not be swayed) but then the CDC and FBI disagree, with the CDC reporting similar positive rates (roughly 1.1%) on rape kits performed on men and women who report rape (stats reported by another user, elsewhere in the thread, ask that user for the source if you really care), with the fact that society expects men to be "unrapeable", leading to fewer men than women reporting rape when it does happen... well... if the per-capita percentage of positive rape kits (in response to a report of rape) for men and women are roughly equal, and the per-capita incidence rapes reported by women is roughly 4x that of reports by men (in the US, at least)... well, if you could do the math, you would have already, so I'll do it for you. For every 4000 women reporting a rape, 11 will show a positive rape kit; every 1000 men reporting a rape, on the other hand, will show the same 11 positives. By those numbers, it sure looks to me like 4x as many men are actually raped, but it's more likely that men only report *actual* rape and the numbers are actually much closer to equal.

      Of course, not every rape gets reported and not every reported rape actually happened, so any statistic based on reporting rates is going to be skewed by both of those factors. Just food or thought.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    189. Re: The world we live in. by dave420 · · Score: 1

      That is still infinitely more money than is paid out-of-pocket in most of the civilised world.

    190. Re: The world we live in. by dave420 · · Score: 1

      I'm sure you think you are, but to normal people you sound like another Elliot Rodgers waiting to happen. You sound so butt-hurt at women it's not even funny.

    191. Re:The world we live in. by dave420 · · Score: 1

      You seem to like talking about evil women... You might want to get some help.

    192. Re:The world we live in. by dave420 · · Score: 1

      So you'd fix something by doing the same thing. Genius..? It also makes sure that anyone who rapes anyone else would just kill their victims as that'd increase the likelihood they'd get away with it. What's wrong with your brain? You sound like an angry 13-year-old.

    193. Re:The world we live in. by dave420 · · Score: 1

      You don't seem to trust women. You keep coming up with these scenarios which do more to illustrate your mental state than anything else...

    194. Re: The world we live in. by Truth_Quark · · Score: 1

      The CDC disagrees with you. If you'd like a source for that data, you'll have to ask Nephandus.

      Why would you trust that data without a source, when its counter to biological plausibility, and common experience?

      Here's a CDC data sheet.
      Note that:
      Nearly 1 in 5 (18.3%) women and 1 in 71 men (1.4%) reported experiencing rape at some time in their lives.

      And

      4.8% of men reported they were made to penetrate someone else at some time in their lives.

      Since only the 4.8% can be women forcing sex on men, that's about 3.8 rapes of women by men for every forced penetration by a man. And I'd suspect a lot of the 4.8% would be forced penetration of another man.

    195. Re: The world we live in. by Truth_Quark · · Score: 1

      Yep.

      * Across all types of violence, the majority of female victims reported that their perpetrators were male.

      * Male rape victims and male victims of non-contact unwanted sexual experiences reported predominantly male perpetrators. Nearly half of stalking victimizations against males were also perpetrated by males. Perpetrators of other forms of violence against males were mostly female.

    196. Re: The world we live in. by Truth_Quark · · Score: 1

      The figures are further down:

      For female rape victims, 98.1% reported only male perpetrators. Additionally, 92.5% of female victims of sexual violence other than rape reported only male perpetrators. For male victims, the sex of the perpetrator varied by the type of sexual violence experienced. The majority of male rape victims (93.3%) reported only male perpetrators. For three of the other forms of sexual violence, a majority of male victims reported only female perpetrators: being made to penetrate (79.2%), sexual coercion (83.6%), and unwanted sexual contact (53.1%).

      So Females forcing males to penetrate them is 0.792*3.8% = 3.0% of the US population, Males raping females is 0.933* 18.3% = 17.1%, or 5.7 times as many.

    197. Re: The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, that is precisely what an anecdote is.

    198. Re:The world we live in. by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      ... and each is equally evil. It doesn't matter if they agreed to date the rapist, or already figured out what a scumbag they are. Rapists deserve the death penaly.

      Thereby turning every rape into a murder (why leave a witness - it's not like they can execute you twice after all). There is something severely wrong with society when the taking of a human life is considered to be the same as forced penetration.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    199. Re:The world we live in. by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      "I'm not "blaming the victim""

      I hate to break it to you, but that is exactly what you are doing. You are also claiming that only woman without much brains or ability to think for themselves and plan ahead like to have a good time in public.

      He actually makes a very good point - the only time this will be worn is when a women is about to enter a potentially dangerous situation. Going to the book club? No need for this. Going to hang with new friends at the bar? Then this nail polish becomes useful. Unfortunately my understanding of human nature is that those who have riskier outlooks in life also tend to worry less about the precautions.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    200. Re:The world we live in. by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      If they had such foresight in the first place, it seems like perhaps they wouldn't be in a position where someone they shouldn't trust could surreptitiously slip them drugs in their drinks.

      I'm not "blaming the victim", mind you.

      Actually, you are blaming the victim. Here's a common scenario: Guy that a woman knows buys her a drink. It doesn't need to be alcoholic. It could be soda. Or maybe it's alcoholic but the woman hasn't been drinking much. Either way, woman accepts the drink (since she knows the guy) and drinks it. Unbeknownst to her, though, the guy has been acting nice in hopes of getting her into bed and has decided to "speed things up" by spiking her drink. She passes out and wakes up having been raped.

      Saying that it is this women's fault that she didn't have the "foresight" to "be in a position [snipped]

      He didn't say that. You're saying that he said that. Parent made no reference to whose fault it might be.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    201. Re: The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on services required.

      I went to the ER once for a highly infected car bite I put off going to the doctor for. I was in the waiting room for three hours. Saw a doctor for 10 minutes, received one IV of antibiotics, and was charged $1800 because I did t have insurance at the time.

      Yes it was my own fault for waiting and not going to a standard office but if you are rushed in unconcious and they don't know what's wrong I can easily see the cists exceeding 10k.

    202. Re: The world we live in. by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      So not a rape culture? A violent crime culture and of course rape is a subset of violent crime?

    203. Re:The world we live in. by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      I'm not "diagnosing" you with PTSD, and your failure to understand the English language is astounding. The degree to which you contradict yourself is similiarly astounding.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    204. Re: The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Car bite=cat bite.

      My bad.

    205. Re:The world we live in. by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      " If they had such foresight in the first place, it seems like perhaps they wouldn't be in a position where someone they shouldn't trust could surreptitiously slip them drugs in their drinks"

      In other words: "The reason this happened is due, in part, to the "fact" that the victim lacked foresight, and put themselves in the position to be exploited." Seriously, you can't figure out how that is blaming the victim? By your argument anyone who gets shot at a McDonald's "played a role in it". After all, they should have had foresight and not gone into public, where it is a known fact that sometimes random shootings occur!

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    206. Re:The world we live in. by JigJag · · Score: 1

      The solution seems simple: have the bar/club put test strips on the counter like they put peanuts.
      One step further, have it on mixing sticks or drinking straws so it can be put in every glass.

      --
      "The hallmark of humanity is the ability to move beyond sensory inputs" - Mary Helen Immordino-Yang
    207. Re: The world we live in. by kheldan · · Score: 1

      I'm ex-SCA; I've known a few actual black Knights. They were all pretty cool dudes, really.

      (not you I'm responding to, but..) I'm almost 50 years old. I've had more than my fair share of sex, am rated as pretty good at it, but frankly it's not all it's cracked up to be, have more important things to me to pursue at this stage of the game, so NO, I'm not 'trying to get laid' by 'being a (goddamn) White Knight', I just happen still believe in quaint notions like 'right and wrong'. Someone doesn't like it? They can suck it. I'm sick and bloody well tired of people IN GENERAL pretending to be 'civilized' when I know damned well that it's just a facade.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    208. Re: The world we live in. by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Where do I sound butthurt? For fuck sake, I'm married, and quite happily at that; someone who's butthurt at women doesn't get married. I have no problem with women and pointing out that something that happened to me actually *does* happen does not indicate such.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    209. Re: The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Consensual sex is not rape, it doesn't matter that both parties are drunk, it's still consensual.

    210. Re: The world we live in. by kheldan · · Score: 1

      Wow, five-star post! Do you always write so well? Is it natural talent or did you have to go to a special school to learn to do that? Someone should nominate you for a Pulitzer Prize for that comment alone! Tell us, how do you do it? We're all totally jealous of your god-tier writing ability!

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    211. Re: The world we live in. by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      You've never encountered it, but let me assure you it happens.

      Also, fuck all the posters calling me a woman hater. Say it to my wife and see who gets the hate thrown at them.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    212. Re: The world we live in. by BronsCon · · Score: 1
      First of all, that is based off of 4 year old data. Second, the article you ripped that from is quoted out of context and improperly emphasized above, already, with a correction posted below it. So you don't have to scroll, here is the full quote:

      According to a 2010 report by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, nearly 1 in 5 women and 1 in 71 men in theed States have been raped. The actual number is likely higher, experts say, as incidents of sexual violence are severely underreported in the United States -- particularly among male victims.

      Emphasis mine. And, third, who said I was trusting that data? I used it for some math in another post, but I also questioned it in that very same post since the numbers just didn't seem right. Don't confuse laziness with stupidity, how often one gender is raped compared to another just isn't that important of a fact to me; i know it happens both ways, because I'm of the gender that supposedly doesn't get raped and it happened to me, how often it happens to anyone else doesn't really matter.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    213. Re: The world we live in. by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Yes, and reported statistics are *so* helpful in comparing reported vs. non-reported incidents, and stalking (typically a guy stalking a guy is planning an attack or a robbery, not a rape) is soooooo relevant, right? Nope. Show me some statistics on un-reported rape. Don't have any? Wonder why. It's a fact, men are brought up in this society to own the image of strength and reporting that they were raped goes against that, while women are raised to protect themselves at any cost; because of this, most women will report a rape whether it happened or not, most men won't, even if it did. I'm not judging the genders, just making a societal observation, because this is a societal problem caused by... well... society.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    214. Re: The world we live in. by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Again, that's of reported incidents. It's also been said that women are 5x more likely to report a rape than men, particularly if their attacker was female. Again, this is a societal issue, as men are simply brought up to be ashamed of such a situation and, therefore, do not report it. If it's unreported, you don't know about it, so your statistics aren't just from 2010, they're severely skewed. And the article you're using as a (3rd hand) source is actually trying to support my position, if you read the words around the numbers you're failing to see are meaningless. It's pointing out how meaningless those numbers actually are. Try looking for the CDC's numbers, first-hand data, rather than an article that's making the complete opposite point you're trying to make. Yes, I've read that article; how do you think I recognize that you, in fact, only skimmed it for numbers?

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    215. Re:The world we live in. by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Really? "You have PTSD" sure sounds like a diagnosis. "I think you have PTSD" or "go talk to a shrink, you may have PTSD" not so much, but "you have PTSD", yes, sounds like you're trying to diagnose, here. Perhaps I'm not the one who fails to understand the English language, friend?

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    216. Re:The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The basis of his diagnosis (that you have PTSD, are an idiot, and other insulting language), is that he doesn't like the idea of being personally responsible for his own safety. As such, he must denigrate your entirely reasonable precautions, else he admits that he has behaved foolishly and wishes to continue to behave foolishly. I shall now respond to Zero__Kelvin in a way he will understand:
      No, YOU'RE stupid.

    217. Re:The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There must be a whole lot of information between the lines that I missed, because he has made no claim to women being evil. Whiteknight faggot.

    218. Re:The world we live in. by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Women who get raped are usually woman who get raped. That is the one thing you can say about "woman who get raped", because their is no such thing as "the kind of woman that gets raped".

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    219. Re:The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What he is doing is offering practical advice in the hopes that people will learn something from their experiences and the experiences of others, rather than wallowing in their misfortunes. "Doctor, I get raped when I do this!" Doctor says, "don't do that".

    220. Re: The world we live in. by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Now that it's out, if you want to talk about it, feel free to email me and we can set up a more appropriate venue for such a discussion. I've dealt with mine, I actually got over it fairly quickly; there are only a handful of people who know what happened... and how I found out about it, which is honestly the worst part, but also a detail too private to discuss here.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    221. Re:The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You trust somebody because they're a women? Forgive me for shattering your delusions, Dave420, but women are just as much sinners as everyone else.

    222. Re:The world we live in. by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      That's because you are an idiot. "I am a licensed psychiatrist, and having interviewed you and reviewing your records, it is my diagnosis that you have PTSD" is a diagnosis. You didn't consult with me or pay me, so I have not "diagnosed" you in the context of the law to which you are referring. I hereby diagnose you as an idiot. Quck! Call the cops!

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    223. Re:The world we live in. by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      So, then, what was your basis for being so insistent that I suffer from PTSD and must, with such urgency, get help? I've asked multiple times, now, but you can't seem to dig up an answer. Your posting history reveals precisely what I suspected from the start (I avoided taking a look earlier because I was entertained in either case, but now you're just being ridiculous)... not even a good troll, either.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    224. Re: The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BTK is just one of many that were married. When you blame women for getting raped, don't be surprised to find that most men think you are sick. Most of us don't believe that only a certain "kind" of woman gets raped. This is because we know better than to blame the victim, which as has been pointed out, is exactly what you have been doing.

    225. Re: The world we live in. by lonecrow · · Score: 1

      If your talking about Canada I have to clarify your statement. Healthcare is not paid for by taxes. We have "public health insurance". So we all buy insurance from the single state insurance company spreading the risk as wide as possible and taking profit out of health insurance. Rates are discounted for low income people. As low as free or $20/month in some cases. Average lower middle class probably pay about $250/month for family of four. Federal tax dollars are set to each province based on population and are used to administer the health insurance program and help with the subsidies to ensure that no body is denied access to insurance due to financial hardship. So...it is "PUBLIC HEALTH INSURANCE" not public health care providers.

      All doctors are private business owners who bill the public insurance company. That is basic health insurance only. Many companies provide their workers extended insurance to cover things not included in the basic government insurance. Extended health insurance is an open market of private companies.

      The government insurance company has an interest in keeping costs down which they do through public information campaigns to promote preventative measures such as early screening, active lifestyles etc.

      It is a great system and I was really sad that the US didn't explore this option. There were just to much lies and propaganda in the US about "Guberment doctors". I live in Canada and have never seen a "gubberment doctor" in my life.

    226. Re: The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to take issue with what you are saying here. It's easy to lump all fraternities into a homogeneous pool together, but that's not really being fair. They are all independent from one another.

      At my college, we had a problem with sexual assault in our football and baseball programs. Would it have been fair to say that all the athletic teams have an earned reputation for sexual assault? The swim team, track team, wrestling team, hockey team, etc didn't have any incidents of sexual assault, do you think they have an earned reputation because they're in the athletic program?

    227. Re: The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. There is a culture of violence in our society.

      Why else would someone decide the only way to deal with someone texting in a theater is to blow their fucking head off?

      Ok, first off, can you please get your facts straight?

      The guy did not get shot for texting, he got shot for assaulting the guy who kept asking him to stop texting. I've seen the video. I don't think shooting the guy was warranted, but the guy with the gun was responding to a physical assault.

    228. Re: The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Why else would someone decide the only way to deal with someone texting in a theater is to blow their fucking head off?"

      Ok, first off, can you please get your facts straight?

      The guy did not get shot for texting, he got shot for assaulting the guy who kept asking him to stop texting. I've seen the video. I don't think shooting the guy was warranted, but the guy with the gun was responding to a physical assault.

    229. Re:The world we live in. by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      I would be willing to bet my life against a dollar that you have PTSD. That isn't a diagnosis, but it doesn't take away the fact that you have clearly shown that you have it, either. As to the "troll" accusation, you clearly have no idea what the term means, and my Karma has been pegged at "Excellent" for 99% of the 15+ years I have been on Slashdot. Hint: "Troll" doesn't mean a person with strong opinions who isn't afraid to call an idiot an idiot.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    230. Re: The world we live in. by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      They're not mutually exclusive. Sexual harassment, sexual identity and all sorts of other issues related to sex and body integrity also exist.

      So, yes, rape culture extends from a culture of overall but declining violence and but also restrictive and repressive cultural norms around sex.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    231. Re:The world we live in. by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      I can tell you with a high level of certainty that I was not traumatized by the event; therefore, there is not post-trauma, which means no post traumatic stress to cause such a disorder. I don't babysit my drinks around close firends because, as I said, if one of them wanted to drug me, they have easier ways; and I don't fear that they would want to drug me, anyway. I do keep an eye on my drinks at a bar or club, and don't drink it if it's been out of my sight - that's just being safe - and it doesn't hinder my ability to enjoy a night out, as I don't nurse my drinks; rather, I fucking drink them, then they're gone and I don't have to keep an eye on them.

      No PTSD here, sorry. You're the only person who seems to disagree.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    232. Re:The world we live in. by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      "I can tell you with a high level of certainty that I was not traumatized by the event;"

      From your OP:

      "Knowing that rapists are out there, and knowing that keeping your drink in hand at and in view at all times is a simple and effective preventative measure, it is irresponsible not to take that simple measure."

      Again, normal people don't believe that it irresponsible to " keep your drink in hand at and in view at all times". If you do this, then you are hypervigilant. I am of course assuming you really were raped as well. Furthermore, when you have PTSD but have not identified it and addressed it you don't know you have PTSD. You run around staring at your drink at all times so you won't get raped, and think you do it because you are "responsible." Again, normal people don't think twice about letting their drink out of their sight, and certainly don't think it is irresponsible to not keep your drink in view at all times, lest they be raped again.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    233. Re:The world we live in. by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      You still haven't stated the basis for your claim. How have I "clearly shown" that I have PTSD? Explain, please; your repeated failure to do so is a strong indicator that you are, in fact, trolling. As for karma? I've done my fair share of trolling on here, as well, and have maintained Excellent karma for the entirety of my time here; in fact, when karma had a number assigned to it, mine was among the top of the list. Karma means absolutely jack shit on this site, which you should know, having been here so much longer than me (in reality, I've been here since 97, posting anonymously until I decided it was time to sign up in 2007, but I digress).

      Only an idiot would resort to name calling without first being called names.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    234. Re:The world we live in. by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      "You still haven't stated the basis for your claim."

      Of course I have. Don't worry about it. Just go on staring at your drink at all times lest you be raped. Everything is fine, and you dan't have a thing wrong with you! Everyone either stares at their drink out of fear that they may be raped, or is irresponsible.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    235. Re:The world we live in. by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      And I don't run around staring at my drink at all times. I keep an eye on it for the 5 minutes, tops, that it is in my hand, until I'm done drinking it. When I'm in a bar or club, or a setting where I don't have another trusted individual available to keep an eye on it if I happen to walk away. Someone with PTSD about being drugged and raped would act as you describe, but that is not me, my friend. Thank you for finally explaining where you were coming from so I could clear that up; was that so hard?

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    236. Re:The world we live in. by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Wow, you haven't read most of my posts in this thread, then... or at least, failed to comprehend them. I clarified in the reply I just made to your other post; if you don't get it after reading that, you're simply being willfully ignorant in order to support your position, which, by the way, doesn't work. Ever.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    237. Re:The world we live in. by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      I figured out that you can't lie consistently quite some time ago, so there was nothing to "clear up".

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    238. Re:The world we live in. by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Well, in order to lie consistently, I'd have to be lying in the first place. That's a pretty strong accusation and you seem pretty damn sure of yourself for someone who couldn't be more off base.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    239. Re:The world we live in. by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Plonk

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    240. Re:The world we live in. by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      This isn't USENET, but likewise.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    241. Re:The world we live in. by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      That's wonderful, I've never seen it used outside of USENET; probably for good reason.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    242. Re: The world we live in. by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Excuse me? Wherein did I ever blame the victim? I *am* a fucking rape victim, for crying the fuck out loud. You need to learn how to comprehend what you read, friend. Please, point out where I said rape victims are to blame for what happens to them? Please, point out where I say only a certain kind of woman gets raped. Can you do that? No.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    243. Re:The world we live in. by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      No, just pointing out a flaw in this particular product. A man could just as well do this, but he'd have to get past the social abnormality of a man wearing nail polish and the common belief (truth is not up for debate here, it's irrelevant) that men are more likely to drug someone's drink in order to pull it off; since women commonly wear nail polish, it only makes sense that the villain in this scenario would be played by a woman. Likewise, when I talk about the possibility of false negatives, it is out of concern for the most likely female wearer of the product, who is trusting it to detect drugs in her drink, when the likelihood of it being effective at doing so is minimal. Are you implying that I have concern for the safety of people I believe to be evil?

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    244. Re: The world we live in. by F34nor · · Score: 1

      As N grows sufficiently large the sample mean will begin to reflect the true population parameter. I know how statistics works. I also know that if I have seen something twice I stop operating on best practices for statistical analysis and start operating as a human being. The number one killers in the US are...
      Cancer: 576,691
      Chronic lower respiratory diseases: 142,943
      Stroke (cerebrovascular diseases): 128,932
      Accidents (unintentional injuries): 126,438
      In my whole life I know 1 cancer victim, 1 lower respiratory disease victim, 1 stroke victim (who was 90 and smoked 2 packs a day) and 1 accident victim.
      So even though it is not statistically valid my count of 2 seems extraordinarily high, yes I know it can be attributed to chance but I also know that that chance is fairly small.

    245. Re: The world we live in. by F34nor · · Score: 1

      Yes it is fair to say. Any social structure that diminishes responsibility is suspect. Add to that the feeling of self importance and a culture of administrators and coaches who are financially motivated to protect them and you have the opportunity for things to go terribly wrong really fast.

    246. Re: The world we live in. by F34nor · · Score: 1

      SJW?

      P.S. the media is was LITERALLY owned by the military industrial complex until it became easier to sell to Comcast.
      Here you go this is the ONLY skit that was censored for rebroadcast by GE.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    247. Re: The world we live in. by F34nor · · Score: 1

      What? I gave two personal examples one college one public bar.

    248. Re: The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would like to warn you against making the arguement "cause biology!" In discussions about sex, sexism, gender roles etc. Because (and I in no way support the argument I'm using as an example) one could argue that women should stay home and act as incubators so that the human race can advance. After all men cant incubate baby's cause biology!

    249. Re: The world we live in. by nzs1 · · Score: 1

      It is not that anti-rape tools are invented for which you are upset. Rather that rape tools are invented, e.g. roofies. If you do not want to live in a world with anti-rape tools, then first you must live in a world without rape tools. Sadly, that world does not exist. Anti-rape tools such as the nailpolish are a far-cry to anti-rape tools that ought to exist, that is, by now. For some time now the rape tools have existed. From day one there ought to have been anti-rape tools to counteract roofies, etc. That is, on day one of roofies every bar ought to have begun treating patrons to complimentary baggies of the anti-rape chemical.

    250. Re: The world we live in. by Truth_Quark · · Score: 1

      First of all, that is based off of 4 year old data.

      If you've got more recent data, please post it. Or if you've got evidence of a trend in these sorts of attacks please post that. Or any justification for this objection.

      According to a 2010 report by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, nearly 1 in 5 women and 1 in 71 men in theed States have been raped. The actual number is likely higher, experts say, as incidents of sexual violence are severely underreported in the United States -- particularly among male victims.

      Emphasis mine.

      Certainly an important limitation of the data. Note that those stats are for rape, which according to CDC means does not include being forced to penetrate, but requires being penetrated. Females forcing sex on males, as being discussed in this thread occurs later in the piece under "being made to penetrate".

      And, third, who said I was trusting that data?

      No one, to my knowledge. Your claim was that the CDC data disagrees with me. It does not. It shows about 6 times as many male rapes of females as female forced penetration of males.

    251. Re: The world we live in. by Truth_Quark · · Score: 1

      Show me some statistics on un-reported rape.

      This can be studied by survey.

      It's a fact, men are brought up in this society to own the image of strength and reporting that they were raped goes against that, while women are raised to protect themselves at any cost; because of this, most women will report a rape whether it happened or not, most men won't, even if it did.

      I'd be interested to read your statistics on this claim.

    252. Re: The world we live in. by Truth_Quark · · Score: 1

      It's also been said that women are 5x more likely to report a rape than men, particularly if their attacker was female.

      That's interesting. Do you have the study?

    253. Re: The world we live in. by SimonInOz · · Score: 1

      >> strait alcohol

      Hmm. Is that alcohol served in a very narrow glass, perhaps?

      --
      "Cats like plain crisps"
    254. Re: The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no its not easy for some to say no to liquor! and with that fact meta kane was able to lie about a rape. all due to drinking and not being in her own faculties. a noted alcoholic drunk! drank and screwed her husband for years then on one particular day this lying fool decides she was raped due to a few bruises.. and who paid for this drunken fools 2 bottles of wine and bruises? her own husband who is NOW HER EX HUSBAND.. this bitch lied on paper. I can prove it.. so your freaking bullshit on nails and roofies.. shove it... wont hold up in court.. and it sure as hell wont last... the whores who go out to get drunk and laid wont care and the others.. if youre drinking and leaving your drink alone.. its your own FRIGGEN FAULT IF YOU GET RAPED.. USE YOUR BRAINS. AND IF YOU DONT LIKE THAT TOO BAD.. I DONT RIGHTLY CARE.. NO WOMAN SHOULD BE ALONE OUT DRINKING AND LEAVING HER DRINK UNATTENTED.. AND BEING A FOOL WITH MEN.

    255. Re: The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The CDC report is poorly summarised there - rape only counts penetration, and ISTR that it excludes prison rape.

      If you look at the 12-month figures (pp 18-9), you'll see that the number of men forced to penetrate is virtually the same as the number of female rape and attempted rape victims.

    256. Re: The world we live in. by silfen · · Score: 1

      Do know who many women are raped each year on campuses in the US?

      No, and neither do you. Nobody does.

      But it's clearly a lot less than what some hysterical feminists scream about for political reasons.

    257. Re: The world we live in. by silfen · · Score: 1

      According to a 2010 report by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, nearly 1 in 5 women and 1 in 71 men in theed States have been raped. The actual number is likely higher, experts say, as incidents of sexual violence are severely underreported in the United States -- particularly among male victims.

      That's utter nonsense. The number you cite is from a 1995 survey of college students. You are then deftly switching to the term "sexual violence", falsely suggesting that the CDC report actually dealt with legal incidents and violence, when it actually included self-reported college sex that people had second thoughts about afterwards.

      Incidents of sexual violence are likely underreported to the police, but they are quite rare at 0.04% / year.

      Incidentally, males are primarily victimized in prison.

    258. Re: The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you drink too much alcohol, that's your personal responsibility, as are the consequences, not the responsibility of whoever is paying for your drinks.

    259. Re:The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about you, but I meet very few inorganic chemists and single female lawyers drinking themselves half-retarded at the club.

  2. As someone who went to NC State by i+kan+reed · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You have to sign over all inventions you create as undergrads to the university.

    At least if you're an engineer.

    The university was bitter about an undergrad project turning into a billion dollar company(SAS) and them not seeing a cut.

    1. Re:As someone who went to NC State by Steve+Blake · · Score: 2

      That is not consistent with the current policy:
      http://policies.ncsu.edu/policy/pol-10-00-01/

    2. Re:As someone who went to NC State by i+kan+reed · · Score: 3, Informative

      From that page(bolding mine):

      All INVENTIONS arising from (1) research conducted with University-administered funds, (2) work within the INVENTOR’S SCOPE OF EMPLOYMENT, or (3) the SUBSTANTIAL USE OF UNIVERSITY RESOURCES are owned by the University.

      I guess the relevant thing is whether they used university facilities to develop their chemical. My guess is that they did.

    3. Re:As someone who went to NC State by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also as someone who went to NC State this is not (or at least no longer depending on when your experience was) true. It is true that undergraduates are required to file invention disclosures with the University but as long as it is evident that the invention in the disclosure was not "specially enabled" by access to University resources that aren't openly available to all students the rights to the invention are assigned to the student. The specially enabled clause only applies in situations where a student makes use of something that you can't get access to just by being a student or signing up for a class (say, access to the nuclear reactor to test materials, or access to research equipment in a faculty's lab).

    4. Re: As someone who went to NC State by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone who was down the road at UNC when it happened, NC state encouraged Goodnight and Sall to take the project elesewhere. It was originally a USG funded ag statistic program, open-source and freely distributed . We all thought Goodnight was crazy for dropping tenure on such a wild and crazy idea.

    5. Re:As someone who went to NC State by Koreantoast · · Score: 1
      Some corrections needed here:

      1. SAS wasn't created as an undergrad project, it was a large, multi-university and government agency collaboration with Professor Goodnight, at that time a member of the faculty, one of the researchers.

      2. Universities spinoff new companies all the time: this is hardly the first or last time that students and faculty at a university have used their research to start new companies. Nor is NC State particularly unique in this IP clause, and this clause hasn't stopped start ups in the past or present.

      3. Goodnight was a statistician, not an engineer (different colleges).

      4. Despite your implications that there's bitterness between the two, Goodnight and NC State have very strong relations and a history of collaboration; just this past year, he's got at least a million in scholarships for future statisticians at the university. There's also a lot of research funds, support and materials that flow between him and the university, the Statistics department in particular. I would go so far as to argue that the Statistics department's reputation and ranking are in part driven by the success of SAS.

    6. Re:As someone who went to NC State by tapspace · · Score: 1

      That doesn't make any sense. You pay tuition to use those resources. Your output should be yours.

    7. Re:As someone who went to NC State by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      Probably should, but not every policy ends up being just.

    8. Re:As someone who went to NC State by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      I said "at least for engineers" because I was an engineer, and that's how I got exposed to the policy. And I apologize for my factual errors.

    9. Re:As someone who went to NC State by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      You pay tuition for education. Your tuition covers the use of campus resources to further your education. Tuition doesn't cover any use of university resources outside of education or recreation.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    10. Re:As someone who went to NC State by Ezel · · Score: 1

      For those, like me, who wondered if what a Scandinavian airline or the British army had to do with this university I actually think it is this SAS that is being talked about:
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAS_Institute

      --
      Prosp long and liver.
    11. Re:As someone who went to NC State by tapspace · · Score: 1

      Tuition doesn't cover any use of university resources outside of education or recreation.

      It does at the university I attended.

    12. Re:As someone who went to NC State by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      I bet it really doesn't.

      A quick survey of "Acceptable Use Policy" from several universities including NC State allow for "Authorized users may access University IT resources for occasional, inconsequential personal uses, with no expectation of privacy..." and usually include a bunch of restrictions that apply more to employees than students except where "The use does not negatively impact the availability or performance of the University IT resources" and "no cost is incurred by the University".

      Your tuition covered the use of the equipment for academic purposes which means as long as you are doing something specific to your class assignments then you are free to continue using the equipment for as long as you like with the exception of a lab being closed due to a class. If you are using the computer for personal use and someone else needs access to the computer then you will be asked to stop. It's done all the time and it shouldn't be a surprise to you.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
  3. The world we live in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We don't have to. The better solution would be to use cups that are covered and not set them down after being filled.

    As far as this technology goes, it might cut down on those particular drugs being used, but I doubt they're the only ones that people use.

  4. Re:Seriously, we're not rapists.... by i+kan+reed · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think it might be that you respond this way when no one accused you of it.

    Methinks the not-lady doth protest too much.

  5. Discreet? by B33rNinj4 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Yes, because sticking your nails into a drink is totally discreet. I still think the best method is to just not leave a drink unattended when you're out.

    1. Re:Discreet? by i+kan+reed · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It takes 2 seconds with your back turned to get a drink spiked. The level of responsibility you're demanding is beyond human. Unless you spend your entire night focusing on nothing but your beverage(which I gotta say, is worse than dunking your finger in your drink occasionally), that's not going to work.

    2. Re:Discreet? by Millennium · · Score: 2

      It's more discreet than using a special straw, which seems to have been the predecessor (at least in spirit) of this new method.

    3. Re:Discreet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is the point of being discrete about it? What is the problem with being obvious about it?
      OK, bringing a complete chemistry set and doing test on the drinks might mean that you have to fight off creeps like me but hopefully that is preferable compared to being drugged.

    4. Re:Discreet? by unrtst · · Score: 1

      Besides that, it IS very discreet! There's LOADS of ways to discreetly put your finger in your own drink. I often do it by mistake on mixed drinks - they come with that stupid little straw and I hold it out of the way with my pointer finger, which wraps to the inside of the glass... quite easy to splash some drink on it.

    5. Re:Discreet? by jfengel · · Score: 1

      The straw, at least, was clean. I wouldn't want to stick my finger in my drink after I've been in a bar all night. Of course, I like being drugged even less. But carrying around disposable straws or swizzle sticks strikes me as a lot more hygienic.

      I guess one can hope that the alcohol will solve that problem, especially since women's garments are notorious for lacking pockets in which to carry such things. That does make this particularly brilliant: you put it on before you go and it's always with you. But I'd still want to wash my hands a lot. (I hope it's durable to hand-washing.)

    6. Re:Discreet? by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      There's also no way to pack the powder of a crushed up pill under your nail and drug a friend by offering to "test" their drink, either. So, that's good, right? It's also not possible to drug a drink with something this nail polish doesn't detect, thereby creating a false sense of security in your victim, is it? I sure hope not, that would be horrible.

      All sarcasm aside, all of that *is* possible. This product now enables a woman *claiming* to be wearing it to covertly drug her friend's or date's drink *right in front of their eyes, while they watch*, and provides a false sense of security, as there already exist a number of drugs it can't detect.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    7. Re:Discreet? by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      And if you're out with a girl who claims to be wearing this nail polish and offers to test your drink, it takes 2 seconds of you watching her actually do it to get your drink drugged. All she has to do is crush the pill up and stick the powder under her nail and you'll be none the wiser when her normal nail polish doesn't detect shit. Enjoy that false sense of security, you won't remember it in the morning.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    8. Re:Discreet? by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      You can quite easily dip the finger nail into the drink without anybody noticing. It's not like you are forced to use cartoon like exaggerated movements.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    9. Re:Discreet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut the fuck up already! My god, you need serious help. Judging from all your comments on this topic, you clearly have a delusional hatred of women. Get that shit fixed, for your own good! (And im not even the same person who called you on it earlier)

    10. Re:Discreet? by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Such hatred of women, yes, I certainly hate my wife, my friends' wives, my boss' wife, and, well, every other woman I've ever met.

      Perhaps I'm just stating an observation. I suppose it also enables men to do the same, but men wearing nail polish is uncommon enough so as to already throw up a red flag, making it much less likely that a man could pull this off. There are a number of mitigation techniques that are actually very effective, but they have to actually be used in order to be useful. This nail polish, however, is not one; sorry if the way I pointed that out offended you, it was not my intent.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    11. Re:Discreet? by cryptizard · · Score: 1

      You are posting this idea on pretty much every thread but it makes no sense. It requires that someone be paranoid enough that they know about this nail polish and would want someone to test their drink, but lazy enough to not actually get it themselves and paradoxically trusting enough that they would accept that person's word about the veracity of their test. And, of course there will be drugs that it cannot detect. This is just a proof of concept. That does not make the whole idea worthless.

    12. Re:Discreet? by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Actually, the idea was one of the first things that popped into my mind when someone else (I'm too lazy to find the post, but if you're read "every thread" I'm sure you've seen it) posted the idea of one girl in a group getting this and acting as the designated tester. Of course, then, there's the possibility of someone buying this stuff, dumping it out and refilling the bottle with regular polish to set someone up. The stuff is just bad news and completely unnecessary; there are numerous mitigation tactics that actually work and don't cost a penny.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    13. Re:Discreet? by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Hell, put a coating on the insides of bar glasses that reacts to various drugs. That would be an ideal solution IMO. Drug-assisted rapists would avoid the place, so the bar or club wouldn't get *their* money, but people who want to be duped into thinking they're any safer for it, and booze-assisted rapists, would flock to an establishment that used such glasses.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    14. Re:Discreet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't want to stick my finger in my drink after I've been in a bar all night.

      Assuming we are talking about an alcoholic drink of course, the alcohol will kill a lot more microbes on your skin than washing could ever hope to remove.

      Washing might move most of them around, while a tiny amount is actually removed from your skin, but most microbes are so "out of reach" in the microscopic cracks and crevices that nothing short of alcoholic hand sanitizer will hope to effect.

      Simply put, if the drink itself doesn't kill it, there are already more of them living on and inside you than you likely can imagine, and they haven't done you any harm in your entire life. Most of them in fact have already tuned your immune system to capture and remove them many decades ago, and others are required to even live. In both common cases as long as you are over 5 years old, they won't be harming you.

      Now soda/pop on the other hand, you may have a point.
      In those cases, unfortunately no, washing your hands with anything short of alcohol won't effect the microbes already on you at all, and alcohol does tend to remove most forms of nail polish.
      I would assume this polish isn't much different, as most people would expect to remove it with the standard nail polish remover used already.

    15. Re:Discreet? by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Yes, because sticking your nails into a drink is totally discreet.

      She smiled suggestively at him as she gently stirred her drink with the tip of her nail.

      I still think the best method is to just not leave a drink unattended when you're out.

      Nowhere near effective. When someone buys you a drink, you dont usually follow them to the bar whilst they do it.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    16. Re:Discreet? by dave420 · · Score: 1

      There you go again! You seem to have all kinds of issues relating to women. You might not be the best person to comment on stories like this.

    17. Re:Discreet? by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      A guy could just as easily do this, but a guy wearing nail polish in the first place is more likely to draw attention to himself, so I stuck with the social norm of a woman wearing nail polish. This isn't about something I think a woman would do (it's something I thinks a scumbag, regardless of gender, would do), it's about something this product enables, again, regardless of gender. Keep thinking it's about woman hate, though, if that serves your purpose.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    18. Re:Discreet? by Millennium · · Score: 1

      The problem with being obvious about it is that there's a very large overlap between the populations of people who would spike someone's drink and people who turn psycho when they see drinks being tested. Without the ability to be discreet, merely performing the test puts a person in danger.

    19. Re:Discreet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There you go again! Jumping to conclusions about the poster's "issues" that are unsupported by what he has said. Why don't you accuse him of being a racist while you are at it?

  6. If you can get 10 drinks in her.... by funwithBSD · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    you don't need the rape drugs.

    --
    Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
    1. Re:If you can get 10 drinks in her.... by funwithBSD · · Score: 1

      It's ok. I am used to it.

      Even better:

      Don't let someone you don't know mess with your drink. Don't drink around people you don't know because alcohol reduces your ability to make good decisions.

      I had a boring late teens early 20's... what can I say?

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
    2. Re:If you can get 10 drinks in her.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The way it's phrased is misogyny. He could have said the same thing with better wording and it could have been insightful instead of contemptful.

    3. Re:If you can get 10 drinks in her.... by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Doe the word "oversensitive" mean anything to you? If form becomes more important than content, all is lost anyways as only idiots will participate in the "discussion"/

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    4. Re:If you can get 10 drinks in her.... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      It's also the rapist's excuse. Claim that roofies don't exist are are too difficult to find, then accuse the victim of drinking too much. If the victim is made to seem a heavy drinking party girl then it deflects attention away from the problem.

  7. Anything similar to alert men of the dangers of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...false rape accusation? Some cologne or hand cream alerting you about a total bitch or so?

  8. I wish we didn't need something like this by kheldan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why do enough members of my own gender have to be such creepy bastards that we need something like this to be developed? I enjoy sex as much as the next healthy, red-blooded adult man does, but I have never had to slip drugs into some woman's drink to get it. I sure as hell haven't always 'got the girl' at the end of the night, but seriously? How fucked up do you have to be to do something like this? Shit like this is one of the many reasons why, if there are alien civilizations out there watching us, that they don't contact us openly: We still act like goddamn animals (and no, I'm not trying to be funny).

    C'mon guys, knock this shit off already!

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    1. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by sjwt · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Lets see..
      False rape claims and 'honor councils' leading men to just give up on women all together
      http://washingtonexaminer.com/...

      43% of men have been ''Raped'' under what the feminist movement keeps trying to push a rape claim as.
      http://time.com/37337/nearly-h...

      Would you like to take a rethink if its 'Men are creepy bastards' or 'Humans are creepy ass bastards and bitches'

      --
      You have 5 Moderator Points!
      Which Helpless Linux zealot/MS basher do you want to mod down today?
    2. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by i+kan+reed · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Why do enough members of my own gender have to be such creepy bastards that we need something like this to be developed?

      Well, it's not actually that complicated. There's a few common psychological threads that tend to unite serial rapists. Pyschopathy/sociopathy/anti-social personality disorder(whatever you feel like calling it) is one. People who just can't imagine another persons' perspective at all tend to be capable of some pretty shitty things for pretty stupid reasons.

      Another is a flexible definition of rape. They tend to look for an excuse for why something "doesn't count" as rape. So they blame "mixed signals" or "unreasonable rejection" or "playing games" or similar kinds of behavior. People tend to be excellent rationalizes, and after the first rape, serial rapists tend to start finding any excuse.

      (Oh, and don't mistake "serial rapists" for the common image of stranger violently raping women on the street, most serial rapists still engage in acquaintance rape. That's a pretty important distinction.)

    3. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We don't you fucking cretin. Date rape drugs are an irrational paranoid fantasy. It's like selling an anti-meteorite strike hat... not that that will stop your kind of self-hating bullshit.

    4. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      He's not ashamed of his gender, just assholes like you.

    5. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It probably surprise you that drug-assisted robbery was more prevalent that drug-assisted rape and that men are just as likely, if not more so, to be the victims.

    6. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by kheldan · · Score: 1

      I am not disputing anything that you're saying, however:
      RE: 'Men are creepy bastards':
      Here, let me fix that for you, since you seem to be paraphrashing me without my permission: 'SOME men are creepy bastards'.
      Also: I said: We have to police our own. How about we clean up our own house before criticizing the cleanliness of someone else's? Honestly, what kind of 'civilization' do we really have, where this shit goes on at all anymore?

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    7. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by kheldan · · Score: 0

      Date rape drugs are an irrational paranoid fantasy

      Is that what you tell yourself before, during, or after you've removed her panties from her semi-conscious body?
      If you want me to take any inflammatory utter bullshit like that even remotely seriously, you're going to have to come out and NOT post as an Anonymous Coward, you piece of shit.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    8. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by kheldan · · Score: 1

      So what? What the hell does that have to do with anything, other than maybe you're trying to deflect myself and others from the actual subject? Also, why should I take anything just another goddamn Anonymous Coward says here even remotely seriously? You're not helping here by doing that, you're actually making things worse.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    9. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Why do enough members of my own gender have to be such creepy bastards that we need something like this to be developed?"

      They don't. You poor indoctrinated fool. No-one ever lost money convincing women that every man around her secretly wants to rape her. The actual prevelance of date rape drug use is vanishingly low... and the vast majority of claims of it have been debunked by blood tests showing that the woman drank too much and passed out. Instead of taking responsiblility she simply claimed to have been drugged.

      So really... you should be asking why women so fucking reluctant to take responsiblity for their own behaviour.

    10. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whoa, op gone anon to respond, doesn't like when being criticized and having your flaws pointed out for you?

    11. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Were you getting hard while you accused the AC of being a rapist with no justification... you weirdo.

    12. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

      Why do enough members of my own gender have to be such creepy bastards that we need something like this to be developed?

      Because those are the types of people we reward with powerful political positions and high paying jobs. Such is the power of charisma. The psychos are loaded with it.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    13. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Simple: They are not. This is profiteering from irrational fears.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    14. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not just people who have serious mental defects, it's people who might otherwise be normal human beings. It's what some people call "rape culture", the fact that a lot of guys don't really see anything particularly wrong with pressuring girls for sex or treating them as disposable sex objects so it isn't that much of a leap to go as far as drugging them. I mean, if plying them with alcohol so they are less inhibited is okay...

      Once you become away of it you start to notice how prevalent it is in western culture. A few years ago there was an advert for pain medication where a women told her husband she didn't want sex that night because she had a headache. The guy produces the pills, "problem" solved, and the woman looks... Well, in all honestly the actress looked like she was resigned to being raped that night, by the look on her face. Going back much further if you watch this scene from Goldfinger it's supposed to be... romantic? but Bond basically forces her to have sex with him.

      Women are often portrayed as either wanting this behaviour or as deserving it. Female characters tend to be manipulative, using their looks and the promise of sex to get what they want. It gives guys the impression that if they meet a girl, she is attractive and dresses in anything lower cut that a turtleneck, she is trying to manipulate them. If they go along with it and maybe buy her a drink or two they have "paid" and expect something in return. Changing her mind or wanting to go slowly is just a rip-off.

      It's really screwed up when you start to look at it.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    15. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      I don't disagree with the assertions of rape culture. They seem founded in some pretty reasonable subjective observations, and also corroborated at least a little by interviews with incarcerated rapists, but it's hard to be objective about the way mental health evaluations can be.

    16. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by KingOfBLASH · · Score: 1

      People get uppity about the definition of rape, because the definition is basically how does the female feel the next day.

      Case in point, a girl I know got drunk one night, and on her way home from the pub met a guy on the street (who was also drunk). The guy accompanied her to her home, and she was lucid enough to tell her brother (visiting from a different town) she needed the apartment for an hour or two so she could get laid.

      The guy left after the deed was done, and the next day, having drunk so much she had a black out, she went to the police and reported a rape.

      The police actually took her statement, and if she had been able to ID the guy, would have made an arrest.

      Hearing this story, I really got the feeling that if the guy had stayed the whole night, and she'd woken up in his arms, she'd have been happy to have found a new man (she was a bit desperate).

      THAT'S how society views rape. Much rape is not about men jumping out from bushes on helpless women, but just at the woman's discretion. And, as a man, you've got some issues if you haven't taken a vow of chastity, because you always run a risk with a one night stand.

    17. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure you've ever "gotten it" in the first place? You seem quick to bash on your own gender and point fingers left and right. This stink of white knighting, and something tells me you've conditioned yourself to this kind of behavior in hopes of getting attention.

    18. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also: I said: We have to police our own. How about we clean up our own house before criticizing the cleanliness of someone else's?

      Because there is no us or our house.
      I do not have anything in common with rapists, I can't understand how they think or why they do what they do.
      I am sick and tired of being placed in the same group as them because of my gender, most men aren't rapists.

    19. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The police have to take her statement if she claims a crime took place, regardless of how ludicrous. If I went to the police and said I saw a UFO land, Bill Clinton exit, who then murdered Family Guy's Lois Griffin, and finally flew away, the police would take my statement.

      The fact they take a statement doesn't mean they'd follow up with an investigation or arrest, let alone do anything that would result in a prosecution.

    20. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's what some people call "rape culture",

      Rape culture is a term that originally referred to the prevalence of rape between inmates in the male prison system. Then Feminists in an attempt to steal focus away from the issue, stole the term and made it about when a guy's knee accidentally makes contact with your knee on public transit, or a guy she doesn't find attractive has the nerve to make eye contact.

    21. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by carlhaagen · · Score: 1

      The sympathy-seeking white knight emerges.

    22. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by carlhaagen · · Score: 1

      That's a very worrying attitude considering what kind of light you're trying to pose yourself in with your leading post. Why exactly do you feel that people owe you a name in order to have the right to criticize you, and what makes you feel you have the right to accuse them of being "date rapists" and call them pieces of shit when they don't pay this imagined debt to you?

    23. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do enough members of my own gender have to be such creepy bastards that we need something like this to be developed? I enjoy sex as much as the next healthy, red-blooded adult man does, but I have never had to slip drugs into some woman's drink to get it. I sure as hell haven't always 'got the girl' at the end of the night, but seriously? How fucked up do you have to be to do something like this? Shit like this is one of the many reasons why, if there are alien civilizations out there watching us, that they don't contact us openly: We still act like goddamn animals (and no, I'm not trying to be funny).

      C'mon guys, knock this shit off already!

      Wow. So it's only ever men who use date-rape drugs. No woman has ever thought about disabling a man in a similar way to take advantage of them, sexually or otherwise.

      (Yes, I'm well aware of the imbalance here, but it isn't somehow magically guaranteed to be one-sided.)

    24. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by sinij · · Score: 1

      >>>Why do enough members of my own gender have to be such creepy bastards that we need something like this to be developed?

      You are welcome to self-loathing narrative, but I refuse to buy into evidence-free assertions of this kind. Men are not any more likely to be abusers, rapists, sociopaths and so on than the general population. Awful people exist, but gender is not a reliable predictor of this.

    25. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      And people wonder why women were advised not to put out until the guy has made a public proclamation that he will take care of her and any kids their union might produce.... Old timers call this "marriage."

    26. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

      Fine suggestion there. What do you propose for policing our own?

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    27. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by hey! · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No need to paint the male gender as a whole as being filled with sociopaths. It's just the law of large numbers at work. There's maybe 30 million American men in the age rage that are likely to pick up srange women; if just 1/10 % of them are sociopathic predators that's 30,000 predators; and since they *are* predators they'll be overrepresented in young women's encounters with men in pick-up scenarios. Small numbers can produce disproportionate problems. In this case it represents numbers the actions of such a small proportion of men that our ideas about how normal people act aren't a reliable guide.

      Drink spiking is a very rare crime. Most studies that look for evidence of it find very little. The highest I found was a government study which found date rape drugs in 4.5% of the cases from four sexual assault clinics. Note this is 4.5% of the cases where the assault occurred, so we're not talking about 4.5% of encounters, we're talking 4.5% of rapes. 4.5% is certainly high enough to be a concern in certain situations, like residential parties at a college. In such a situation a date rape drug detector might actually have some utility, even though it addresses relatively rare actions by a tiny proportion of men.

      A bigger concern than what we think of as a "date rape drug" is alcohol itself. The same study that found date rape drugs in 4.5% of sexual assault samples found alcohol in 55%. This result is consistently found across studies: alcohol is very frequently associated with sexual assault -- around half of the time. This is especially concerning because some people (men and women both) don't believe that surreptitiously incapacitating someone with alcohol in order to have sex is rape. They don't distinguish ethically between two people getting drunk and having sex and one of them slipping extra alcohol into a drink.

      But the fact remains most men wouldn't do something like that. But that doesn't preclude the possibility that a woman might often encounter the few remaining men who would. A typical man has sex with a small number of women many times; a man who has sex with a large number of women only once is bound to be encountered by women disproportionately often.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    28. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by aquabat · · Score: 1

      How about using the police?

      --
      A republic cannot succeed till it contains a certain body of men imbued with the principles of justice and honour.
    29. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      u mad bro? Methinks there's a bit of projection going on here. If you get this mad at AC on /., you must get really enraged when a woman dares to disagree with you. You "sensitive" guys are all alike. Outwardly projecting a feminist friendly persona, yet beneath it all, you secretly despise women. Face it, you're a Bob Packwood feminist.

    30. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps we could police out all the male bank robbers as well.

      No? That's not plausible because bank robbers act independently, hide themselves in the population, and so on?

      Well, now you know why men can't just "stop rape", even though there was a feminist campaign called "men can stop rape." It's because rapists are like other criminals, and we can't stop many of them, either.

      There are some things we can do, but "policing our own gender" (and NO, I am not responsible for the actions of people I've no relation to and never even met) isn't one of them.

    31. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by kheldan · · Score: 1

      But the fact remains most men wouldn't do something like that.

      I also cannot, apparently, stress that enough. I am not meaning to imply that a majority, or even a large percentage of men, would actually do something like this, and I will apologize to anyone who was offended because that's what they thought I was saying, but at the same time I cannot stress enough that there has to be a zero-tolerance policy for such behavior.

      Oh, and by the way: I'm no goddamn 'White Knight', far from it, I'm a fucking cynical curmudgeon if there ever was one, but regardless I will not suffer fools or assholes gladly. So any of you calling me a 'White Knight' can kiss my ass.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    32. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, so disagreeing with you means he's a serial rapist?

      Wouldn't him saying that the drugs are a paranoid fantasy imply he does not use them?

      And people wonder why we don't take Feminism seriously.

    33. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Protip, dipshit: it's only white knighting if he's using it to get laid. If he's not expecting the lady he just saved to put out for him for the trouble, he's not a white knight.

    34. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but not all rapists are men, either. Rapists are their own group, but people fail to recognize that.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    35. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Of course, there's always the "my boyfriend that I didn't tell you about found out about us, so I'm going to tell him you raped me so he doesn't leave me" scenario. This is why you always document consent.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    36. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Since it's unlikely that the AC you're replying to will follow up, I'll do so for him. As a man. A man who's been drugged and raped. By a woman. I wasn't robbed, mind you, but that AC is right on three counts (one, I sure, entirely by accident):

      1) drug-assisted robbery is more prevalent than drug-assisted rape
      2) it happens just as frequently to men
      3) which, of course, means that men get drugged, as well

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    37. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's really screwed up when you start to look at it.

      I have a suggestion I heard about that was apparently a highly-effective solution to all of these ambiguities and negative outcomes, for a very long time.

      It was, let me see if I can remember this correctly, it was really complex... don't have sex (or give the situational appearance that you are open to having sex) unless you have a formally-established pair bond (I forget what they called that)--or have rocks thrown at you.

      Massively effective. But, nobody agrees to having their sexual activity in any way suggested it should be handled the slightest bit differently than exactly the way they want, now and whenever they want. So, let the rationalization dance commence, and the STD's roll on.

    38. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... for their own behaviour.

      They didn't rape themselves, you fucking ignorant prick.

    39. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by Bigbutt · · Score: 2

      But the police don't prevent rape. They apprehend rapists after the offense. Rape can be pretty traumatic and in some cases is life changing. This needs to be addressed before the Rape happens.

      The proposal doesn't seem to be about arresting the perpetrators but in making sure guys don't act when situations arise (so to speak).

      And of course, arrests after the fact should already be happening.

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    40. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They drank themselves into a stupor though.. didn't they... they then turn up in an emergency room and claimed to be drugged to get out of trouble when their parents arrive. Despite the fact that years worth of studies and blood tests shows this to be bullshit.

      But then... stupid twats like you will always excuse women from their behaviour.

    41. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mighty sexist of you. I'm male. I've been drugged for sex twice. The first time she was thoughtful enough to give me a (thankfully curable) STI after dropping some rohipnol in my drink. The best part was she actually told her roommate she did it! Of course, I did nothing. The second time a total psychopath spiked me with a dangerous dose of morphine after I was already pretty drunk. She had stole it from her grandmother who was dying of cancer. I guess she figured she had enough of molesting me when I was completely passed out and having labored breathing. I at least thank her for getting my friends to save me. And of course, I did nothing.

    42. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

      And again I'd like to know how you want to proceed with this. Tell every person we meet "don't rape"? Just tell our friends "don't rape"? How do you propose to enforce zero-tolerance proactively?

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    43. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by kheldan · · Score: 1

      For what reason are you being an argumentative asshole about this?
      Since you appear to be too stupid or too stubborn (or both) to figure it out for yourself, I'll make it simple for you: You see it happening, you stop it. That simple enough? How about this: A woman asks for your help because she's afraid someone is going to assault her, you goddamn well help her. Is that easy enough for you to understand? How about this: Lead by example by not being an asshole to women/assaulting women (Note: not accusing you of anything so don't go there!).

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    44. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by Nephandus · · Score: 1

      Wow, you're myopic and sexist as fuck. You're the idiot who attacks and blames men fighting back because you "know better" due to lapping up poisoned sources, aren't you? You're part of the problem, but you're blind.

      --
      "A soft answer turneth away wrath. Once wrath is looking the other way, shoot it in the head."
    45. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by Nephandus · · Score: 1

      It's a disturbingly reliable predictor of who people will believe and otherwise favor though.

      --
      "A soft answer turneth away wrath. Once wrath is looking the other way, shoot it in the head."
    46. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by cryptizard · · Score: 1

      And the fedora-wearing neckbeard crawls out of his slime pit.

    47. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by aquabat · · Score: 1
      Ok, fair enough. Definitely a social issue. I think part of the problem is that we overestimate the extent of what we think of as our community. I've lived in small towns, where everyone knew everyone else, and there was always a sense of trust and connection within the community. You could go to a bar and have a beer with your friends without ever thinking that someone would do (in your group, or to your group) something nefarious. At the very least, everyone knew who the bad apples were. In big cities, people can be more isolated (often, people don't even talk to their neighbours), but we still behave like we're in a connected community. When we go out to a club, we extend that same trust to those around us, even though they are an unknown in the social equation.

      The social issue I see here is that there's no consensus that we're all the same tribe, and therefore should have each other's back. There are people who see others as competition at best, and prey at worst. For them, a club is not an opportunity to make social connections and strengthen the tribe; it's a feeding ground. I guess one could also turn it around and see it from the other angle. There are people who see a predator in everyone, even when it's not the case. Either way, we're losing something valuable by inhibiting the development of these kinds of social bonds.

      --
      A republic cannot succeed till it contains a certain body of men imbued with the principles of justice and honour.
    48. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i dont think slandering of that sort does anything else than make you look like an idiot. op's description is accurate and based on his statements, you're just tossing out guesses here.

    49. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by carlhaagen · · Score: 1

      C'mon, Travis... that's just making weak assumptions based on us having different opinions, unlike my statement based on the original poster's attitude, or me commenting on something else based on reality, like f.e. saying I like your receding hairline and your non-refracting hipster glasses.

    50. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

      As someone who doesn't drink, I've always thought of bars as places to pick up single women or be picked up if you are a woman. A woman is there, dressed up, and presenting herself as available for dating. And guys are there to look for dates. Women bring other women for support or protection. Guys come with other guys to give him the courage to approach a woman. I've never considered it a social gathering place.

      That's what I get for not drinking and getting all my information from movies and TV I guess.

      Carl

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    51. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

      Sir, I think you need to step back and take a breath.

      Since we haven't exchanged a single word until now, I don't see how I'm being argumentative. I'm asking a simple question.

      I would hope any man or anyone would stop it should it be happening in front of them. If I happened to be in a bar (I don't drink so it's unlikely) and saw someone pour a strange chemical into a drink, I hope I would say something.

      Depending on the circumstances, I would most likely help a person. But I am also quite wary of scams, having been the victim of a couple (which I escaped with only a loss of money) perpetrated by women.

      Certainly I personally am not going to drug a woman's drink.

      But I'm already doing this. And I'm reasonably sure a majority of guys are doing this. It sounds like you want us to do something about the guys who are doing this. I'm with you, brother because just you and me and the rest of the guys who aren't doing it, doesn't appear to be fixing the problem since we're still discussing this and there are still rapes.

      Is there something more we should or even could be doing? It's an honest question. Should we all wear buttons that say "Don't Rape Other People"?

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    52. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Most rapists are men. The vast majority, in fact.

    53. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by dave420 · · Score: 1

      You are so eager to play the victim, and to make all men look like victims. You are pathetic. Elliot Rodgers 2.0!

    54. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by sjwt · · Score: 1

      Wow, way to totally miss the point...

      We can't police our own, unless we first admit that 'our own' is EVERYONE.

      humans are human, be that male or female, they both have creepy bastards, and focusing on just 1/2 of them is not going to solve anything, due to the strange coincidence that most of the creepy bastards and bitches where abused themselves.

      Men abuse Humans.
      Women abuse Humans.

      Those humans can be male, female, young, old, friends, family, strangers.

      Its time to move past 'Dirty old men' or 'isolated troublesome teen' or what ever group is getting singled out.

      --
      You have 5 Moderator Points!
      Which Helpless Linux zealot/MS basher do you want to mod down today?
    55. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 1

      You are a white knight you fuckstick, and you are holding men collectively responsible for the actions of a few deranged individuals. What you're actually saying is that a culture exists which objectifies women to the extent that men feel they are disposable objects of sex. Which is horseshit on the face of it, but to the extent that such attitudes exist they are absolutely mirrored by womens attitudes to very attractive men, maybe have a look through Cosmo sometime.

    56. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by kheldan · · Score: 1

      Are you a troll, or are you really this stupid?

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    57. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Dude, it's something that happened to me a decade and a half ago that is relevant to the subject at hand. It's also something that many people deny *ever* happens at all. It deserves to be brought up. So I bring it up. In a conversation where it's appropriate. This is maybe the 3rd of 4th time it's come up outside of talking to my wife about it since it happened, I'd say I'm probably okay. Pointing out that something happens to some men is not the same as saying all men are victims, nor is talking about an incident that happened in my past "playing the victim".

      You seem to be putting a lot of effort into finding and commenting on my posts (not much required on my end, since Slashdot alerts me of replies), what's up with that? You have a thing for me or something?

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    58. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Hey! We agree on something! Would ya look at that? Doesn't change the fact that *not all of them are*, which is the point I was making. Don't conflate "most rapists are men" and "most men are rapists" as being the same, either; it's just not the case.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    59. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by Nephandus · · Score: 1

      Manflesh doesn't owe service as meatshield for womenflesh. How dumb are you? Men owe women nothing unilaterally. Most women aren't likely to even help you in emergency even without you being under attack, and they admit this without shame. People in general go away from male screams but toward female. If you think you owe it to them to be assaulted in their place, go right ahead. We need less of you anyway. You're part of the real problem.

      --
      "A soft answer turneth away wrath. Once wrath is looking the other way, shoot it in the head."
    60. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't accept "kindness coins", but dollar bills work just fine.

    61. Re:I wish we didn't need something like this by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Why do we need something like this? Wouldn't it be more effective to have some sort of warning of excess alcohol consumption? Getting a woman to drink more than she should appears to me to be just as effective and a whole lot safer, and there's evidence that it's enormously more prevalent.

      There's a whole lot of dangers that almost never come about that people get all worried about.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  9. Re:Seriously, we're not rapists.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And obviously that's what they're suggesting here, that you and me and every other guy on the planet is despicable scum.

    Has it ever occurred to you that this is a valid and common concern? It's ridiculous that women have to go through such lengths to feel safe going out. But the current reality is that it IS necessary. Not because you yourself might spike their drink, but the chance that someone might is high enough, and the result is horrific enough, that products like this are the necessity.

    And instead of sympathizing with that, you decided to make this about how you personally feel slighted that anyone would suggest there's a need for this.

  10. In 14 years practising emergency medicine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    In 14 years practising emergency medicine, I've seen large numbers of young women who get drunk and come to A&E firmly believing that they've been given a "date rape drug," but when laboratory testing is used to confirm that belief I've only ever seen one actual case of drug-facilitated sexual assault. We live in a world with a lot less drug-facilitated date rape than fearmongering about date rape drugs.

    1. Re:In 14 years practising emergency medicine by TheCarp · · Score: 2

      well wouldn't you expect GHB to be hard to detect since it occurs naturally anyway in the body and the body is excellent at eliminating it? I have taken it myself, it onsets in 10 minutes if the dose is large enough, and is pretty much back to baseline within an hour, its doubtful anyone in real disress makes it there fast enough to be reliably tested.

      That said, I have little doubt you are mostly correct that its very few. Having personally gotten myself to debilitated states on both GHB and Alcohol, I would be hard pressed to really differentiate the effects (aside from GHBs lack of a hangover but, if you are doing both anyway....) from such a state.

      I suspect the majority of such cases are really people who got drunker than they realized, and may have trouble believing that they drank that much.

      Which brings up a very legitimate question: Do these nail polishes give a false sense of security when out drinking? Or, on the other hand, will simply having a "string on ones finger" itself help to remind the wearer to be more careful by inducing her to take conscious steps towards recognizing danger?

      I suspect the former but.... I can't really say that the second is implausible either. Regardless, I am doubtful that their main effect of detecting these substances will, in and of itself, be of much use.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    2. Re:In 14 years practising emergency medicine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some experts think drug facilitated robberies are far more common and usually the victims in a lot of those cases are men who don't report the crime because they're embarrassed about the circumstances that led them to get drugged (hooking up with a stranger in bars/clubs).

    3. Re:In 14 years practising emergency medicine by gweihir · · Score: 1

      This person is an MD and knows all that. The labs of course will not run meaningless tests. If he "says 1 case in 14 years", you better believe that he knows what he is talking about.

      That said, I completely agree that the alcohol is more of a problem, and that this may well increase risky behavior.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    4. Re:In 14 years practising emergency medicine by Cardoor · · Score: 4, Informative

      i think your sample set and conclusions might be seriously biased. i'm no expert on rape-statistics, but it's my understanding that a very significant amount of non-drug-assisted rapes go unreported by the victims for a variety of reasons.

      it seems to me that under the circumstances where a woman 'comes to' and can't even remember what happened (not to mention probably still feeling mentally/emotionally impaired from the chemical hangover) there would be an even higher incidence of the rapes going unreported.

      it may still be possible that drug-facilitated rape occurs with less frequency than feared, but i see no ability to reach that conclusion logically from your estimation.

    5. Re:In 14 years practising emergency medicine by KingOfBLASH · · Score: 1

      95% of marketing is convincing people they need your product. In very few cases, do they actually need it

    6. Re:In 14 years practising emergency medicine by argStyopa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because fearmongering about dirty, nasty predatory men is a lot more politically palatable than talking to young women about making bad choices and the consequences thereof. That's "substantiating the patriarchy".

      The public narrative is about "victimization" not about "stupidity and carelessness".

      Don't get me wrong, a man who takes advantage of a girl who's drunk is just as much a scumbag shit as someone who takes advantage of a girl who's been drugged.

      But... I know that if I left my car running with the keys in it, even if the guy that (almost inevitably) would steal it should & would be prosecuted, simultaneously the insurance company isn't going to replace my car because of my own stupid choices.

      Just sayin'.

      --
      -Styopa
    7. Re:In 14 years practising emergency medicine by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Says the Anonymous Coward. Without any kind of reference to reliable statistics your anecdote is utterly worthless I'm afraid. Could be completely made up.

      I'm not saying you are wrong, merely that an anonymous anecdote with no data to back it up shouldn't be modded "informative".

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    8. Re:In 14 years practising emergency medicine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      > This person is an MD and knows all that.

      This person is an AC. Anything else is speculation.

    9. Re:In 14 years practising emergency medicine by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Except not everyone reading this knows that and the very fact that there is difficulty in detection calls some question on the "1 case in 14 years" claim; since we should expect false negatives due to the pharmacology of one of the drugs in question.

      It is quite understandable to day that many tests for GHB would be false positives or false negatives so its not worth doing, but, that means the case is inconclusive, and saying "1 case in 14 years" means all inconclusive cases are bing lumped with all the true negatives which, is misleading at best.

      I would, be shocked if the numbers were high given how rare this sort of crime really is compared to more mundane versions of the same; however, I have trouble believing it is quite this cut and dry simple.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    10. Re:In 14 years practising emergency medicine by jeff4747 · · Score: 2

      In 40 years of living on this planet, I've never had a heart attack. And no one I've personally known has had one. Therefore, heart attacks never happen. Ever. To anyone.

      Alternatively, we could learn the difference between "anecdote" and "statistics".

    11. Re:In 14 years practising emergency medicine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how do you know she wasn't lying about being prescribed the drug?

      I once had a girlfriend who regularly took Ativan, a benzodiazepine drug similar to Rohypnol. We would go out to party, socialize, and whatever - I would be talking to her about it the next day recounting funny happenings, friends to whom I introduced her and so on - she never would remember.

      It took me a week or two of badgering to get her to admit she was on something. And it only happened because I rifled through her purse.

      People do not understand how women cannot be trusted. They will lie, lie, lie until the evidence is overwhelming.

      What invariably happens with such sexual assault, is she realizes she just banged a total loser. Would she go to the ER if she woke up in Brad Pitt's bed not remembering anything? Of course not.

      She is going to the ER and lying to the staff so she can absolve herself of any responsibility in choosing to bang a loser.

    12. Re:In 14 years practising emergency medicine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a moron.

      GHB is never used for such things. Benzodiazepine drugs are easily obtained. And very strong. A tiny pill into a loaded girl is more than enough to black her out. GHB requires OUNCEs of liquid to achieve a similar effect.

      As well, the majority of women who end up blacked out due to benzodiazepine drugs TAKE THEM BECAUSE THEY ARE PRESCRIBED THEM. Yet, they are stupid, and irresponsible, and hope the Doctors, our new priests, will save them.

    13. Re:In 14 years practising emergency medicine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're in a nice area, then.

      If you want another anecdote: I've been the subject of an attempted date-rape. I don't remember much, but I remember that everything felt... comfortable, but creepily so, and I knew something was up after about 20 minutes, because I felt tired and everything kind of looked... flickery. My second drink was lime and lemonade, same as my first, and I saw it poured and I didn't think I'd left it unattended. The person who wanted to go home with me and who bought me the drink made an excuse and left on their own; the barstaff called an ambulance because apparently I asked them to; I woke up later that night in hospital.

      I hadn't intentionally consumed any recreational drugs, including alcohol, that night; my urine tested positive for norketamine. I recovered fine and I consider it a lucky escape... as far as I know.

      It's not as common as some people fear it may be, but it does happen. One victim is one too many, and even with possible false positives, if this alerts someone to "accidentally" drop a drink on the floor, make their excuses and leave, it might save someone.

    14. Re:In 14 years practising emergency medicine by sinij · · Score: 2

      Because heart attacks happen, we should treat everyone as if they are having, or about to have a heat attack. Because you never know, and HeartAttack Culture!

    15. Re:In 14 years practising emergency medicine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a nit pick but the person didn't say he or she was a doctor (MD), the person said he or she "practising" emergency medicine. The person could be an emergency room nurse, or emergency room helper.

      Still, it does imply being a doctor.

    16. Re:In 14 years practising emergency medicine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that the grandparent post is the unvarying refrain of emergency medical personnel and police. It may not always be as strong as once-in-fourteen years, but all report alcohol, and alcohol alone, as the most prevalent "rape drug". Sounds like you're confusing what it means for something to be drug-assisted.

    17. Re:In 14 years practising emergency medicine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, wow, if only people out there were careful to counsel women about how to conduct themselves so as to minimize their risk of being raped. By, you know, telling them to go out in groups, watch out for each other, never finish a drink they've left unattended, always let people know where they're going and with whom, have plans for a person to contact them if they haven't called within a certain period of time, not drink too much, not drink at all, not wear 'slutty' clothing, wear clothing they can run in if they need to, etc. etc. etc. ad fucking nauseum.

      Women get it. They get it and have gotten it for a hell of a lot longer than you have. Women know because people like you won't shut up about all the things they can do to make sure they don't end up a victim. Like it's their fault... if only they'd done this one thing they wold have been fine. That rapist who raped them? He would have raped some other woman, instead of her. And that's what it's all about, amirite? Because all those precautions are really just a way of saying 'make sure he rapes the other woman.'

      Women aren't property; they're not a running car with the keys left in it. They're people. It's not unreasonable to expect that, no matter what they wear or how much alcohol they consume, a guy won't stick a dick in them without their express, enthusiastic consent. And even if going out and getting falling down drunk isn't the best idea, it's still not the same thing as leaving your car running with the keys in it. Particularly since the cops'll actually charge the asshole who stole your car, as opposed to blaming you for leaving the keys in it and refusing to prosecute because there's no way for them to tell that you didn't just really want someone you didn't know to take your car out for a joyride. You could be lying; after all, you've let people borrow your car before.

    18. Re:In 14 years practising emergency medicine by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      We should treat it as possible, instead of insisting it never happens because we have not personally experienced it.

    19. Re:In 14 years practising emergency medicine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd guess you've never been laid in 40 years on this planet either, nor will you ever going around spouting silly non-sequiturs like that.

    20. Re:In 14 years practising emergency medicine by gweihir · · Score: 1

      I have a number from Germany: 1 reported case of a (pair of) strangers doing it to a woman last year, and that is the one case I know. Now, there may be other cases, but this case was not in any way remarkable, yet it made the national news. That is a very strong indicator that this basically never happens. The only other case I know is 25 years back when some strip-clubs did it to customers. And that is with following the news daily. Seriously, getting seriously harmed or killed on the way to or from the bar is much, much more likely and that is not considered a relevant risk by most people.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    21. Re:In 14 years practising emergency medicine by Rinikusu · · Score: 1

      Well shit. I guess women should just stay at home, never go outside, and get themselves a man to protect them, right?

      --
      If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    22. Re:In 14 years practising emergency medicine by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Do these nail polishes give a false sense of security when out drinking?

      Given that there are drugs that they don't detect, yes, you bet they do. Their mere existence also opens up a potential avenue for plain-sight attack, as well; a woman wearing normal nail polish can just as easily crush up a roofie, pack the powder under her nail, then "test" her friend's or date's drink for them, drugging the drink right in front of their eyes.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    23. Re:In 14 years practising emergency medicine by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      It's not the false positives most of us are (or, at least, should be) worried about, but the false negatives. This polish tests for GHB and Rohypnol, neither of which you tested positive for; this polish would not have helped you that night. Rather, it would have told you everything was fine, possibly leading you to believe you were simply becoming ill for some other reason. You may never have had the bartender call for an ambulance and never known you had been drugged, all because your nail polish already told you you hadn't.

      You're also missing the potential attack vector this polish opens up: a woman with normal mail polish claiming to have this product on her nails crushes up a roofie and packs the powder under her nail before "testing" a drink for a friend.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    24. Re:In 14 years practising emergency medicine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > it's my understanding that a very significant amount of non-drug-assisted rapes go unreported by the victims for a variety of reasons.

      Then how do we know about them? How can we come to any reliable conclusions with data like that? I think the best fix here is to help women feel safe about reporting this stuff.

    25. Re:In 14 years practising emergency medicine by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      Oh come off your fantasy planet. You're making it seem like all men are honest and all women are liars. Did you get accused once and now are on a crusade to prove that rape doesn't exist? And what were you doing rifling through someone's purse, that certainly doesn't give you any high ground. You've got a chip on your shoulder so big you can't walk straight.

    26. Re:In 14 years practising emergency medicine by Gavrielkay · · Score: 1

      I think both discussions should be had at the same time and with the same attention. People of both sexes need to hear the "don't be an idiot" speech and the "zero tolerance" speech. Getting offended at either of these is not going to fix anything. It seems someone shouts "don't blame the victim" whenever personal responsibility is mentioned and someone else yells "victimization" when people talk about predatory rapists. We should be careful because in the end we are the ones who will suffer if attacked. And rapists should be punished as the psychopathic predators that they are. Getting defensive on either side prevents real dialogue on how to solve the problem.

    27. Re:In 14 years practising emergency medicine by cryptizard · · Score: 1

      That's why we tell people to exercise and watch their diet like, all the time in every form of media there is. Why can't we handle this with even a modicum of the same respect? Teach people that sex is only to be had with positive consent from both parties, under no influence from drugs.

    28. Re:In 14 years practising emergency medicine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's irrelevant. As far as the victim is concerned, the effect of excessive alcohol and date rape drugs are indistinguishable, and hence can't affect the relative frequency with which they are reported. Even if such cases are less likely to be reported than rapes that do not involve "circumstances where a woman 'comes to' and can't even remember what happened", they would still be equally likely to be reported whether the drug in question was alcohol or roofies or whatever else.

    29. Re:In 14 years practising emergency medicine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Greetings from Australia. My ex-girlfriend is an emergency ward nurse.

      When we were first dating she told me that in virtually all cases of patients or their friends claiming they'd had their drinks spiked it turned out they were just too pissed. She also said they'd have spikes in patients claiming as such whenever the topic of drink spiking came up in the local media.

      I know this is also just anecdotal evidence, but I didn't really believe it so sought a second opinion: I asked my cousin, who worked as an emergency ward doctor years ago (now a surgeon) if that was his experience, he said "of course, everyone who works in emergency wards knows that."

      This isn't to say that drink spiking doesn't happen and that there aren't rapes that go unreported, but just that what the OP said probably has a degree of credibility to it.

    30. Re:In 14 years practising emergency medicine by dave420 · · Score: 1

      The sheer number of times you've written about this scenario of the treacherous woman speaks volumes about your attitudes towards women in general. It's frightening.

    31. Re:In 14 years practising emergency medicine by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      You're confused, so I'll say it again: treacherous product. If a man wearing nail polish were a social norm, it may just as well have been a man in my example, but it's not, so it wasn't. Read my first paragraph; would the woman-hater you accuse me of being even be concerned that a woman could be drugged as a result of a false negative? No, they'd welcome it, but here I am pointing it out as an issue with this product. You know, the thing I actually have an issue with. Unless nail polish has a gender and this particular polish is a woman, you're so far off base, maybe it's time to drop the 420, you've left the atmosphere, my friend.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    32. Re:In 14 years practising emergency medicine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Going outside means accepting the risks and taking precautions. If they aren't willing to protect themselves, which seems to be indicated by a number of posts here, then perhaps they should get a man to do it for them.

    33. Re:In 14 years practising emergency medicine by jwhitener · · Score: 1

      i think your sample set and conclusions might be seriously biased. i'm no expert on rape-statistics, but it's my understanding that a very significant amount of non-drug-assisted rapes go unreported by the victims for a variety of reasons.

      it seems to me that under the circumstances where a woman 'comes to' and can't even remember what happened (not to mention probably still feeling mentally/emotionally impaired from the chemical hangover) there would be an even higher incidence of the rapes going unreported.

        it may still be possible that drug-facilitated rape occurs with less frequency than feared, but i see no ability to reach that conclusion logically from your estimation.

      I see no ability to reach the opposite conclusion either: that date rape drugs are used enough for anyone to fear them. We just don't have any data either way.

      I'd rather start an education campaign centered around telling people to watch out for their friends, rather than 'watch your drink!'. I guess both are valuable, but since most rapes seem to happen with just alcohol alone involved, a more effective message to party goers would be 'watch out for each other!', 'don't let drunk friends wander off with strangers!'.

    34. Re:In 14 years practising emergency medicine by Cardoor · · Score: 1

      i like that idea a lot

    35. Re:In 14 years practising emergency medicine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that is not a sample - it is anecdotal information. And anyway, isn't ONE ENOUGH????

  11. What about the alcohol? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most "date" rapes involve only alcohol.

    1. Re:What about the alcohol? by gweihir · · Score: 1

      I am sure they can test for that too.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    2. Re:What about the alcohol? by F34nor · · Score: 1

      You are totally factually right but also absolutely wrong! Isn't paradox fun!

    3. Re:What about the alcohol? by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Indeed, 100% of date rapes also involve a rapist.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  12. This is Slashdot . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    . . . Filled with creeps that think this stuff is perfectly normal. Your words will fall on deaf ears, or be marked as flamebait by all the "ZOMG men's rights!!111!111" fuckups around here.

    (For the record, I'm a heterosexual guy. But I'm not a fuckup.)

    1. Re:This is Slashdot . . . by kheldan · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I encourage you to stand with me here, instead of posting as an AC. I don't believe in this 'rape culture' nonsense I keep hearing about, but I do believe that us men have a responsibility to police our own against these flaming assholes that do shit like this. The line needs to be drawn here, and no farther.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    2. Re:This is Slashdot . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So true. Every friday I go to the bar and take some date rape drugs, I don't' have any luck though.

    3. Re:This is Slashdot . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can pretty much guarantee that in my neck of the woods if a girl in a bar all the sudden yelled "hey this guy is trying to drug me" and something that looked like slightly plausible proof, that guy would get the shit kicked out of him. But hey, I'm just a redneck in a hick town so maybe you big city folks don't behave the same.

    4. Re:This is Slashdot . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you run with the Wolfpack?

      I heard that helps.

    5. Re:This is Slashdot . . . by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 1

      Oh fuck off. That's another way of saying that men are collectively responsible for the miniscule number of sexual abusers out there. How about most burglaries are commited by men, men can stop burglaries. Not working for you? Really!

  13. Great idea... by flopsquad · · Score: 1

    ... but did they have to name it like a bad 70's detective show? What's next, theme song by Isaac Hayes?

    --
    Nothing posted to /. has ever been legal advice, including this.
  14. nice idea by Cardoor · · Score: 3, Interesting

    my first thought was that this was redundant, as but it seem to me that women who are apt to buy and wear this nail polish would probably already follow the most basic rule.. if a drink leaves your hand... (or passes within someone else's range of dosing), you don't drink from it again. EVER. to me, that's probably the most basic think to teach girls new to bars. I was astounded when i was in thailand a couple of years ago taking a course, and when we hit a bar one night, a girl from my class (probably 21 or 22 years old) put her drink down and left it to dance.. only to go back to it afterwards. i gave her quite an earful about the dangers etc etc.

    all that being said though, the rule wouldn't help you if the bartender is in cahoots with his buddy. you could also then only drink beer from a bottle (that you see opened in front of you), but for mixed drinks - why not have the extra level of security?

    also, to the extent that people understand this exists, it may prevent ne'er do wells from trying it in the first place, as a positive test should result in some serious accusations flying that creepers would probably like to avoid.

    1. Re:nice idea by gweihir · · Score: 1

      The thing is that these cases are so rare they are mostly an urban myth. Yes, they do happen, but it is far more likely to be run over by a car on the way to or from the bar. Getting drugged by way of your drink is _not_ a relevant risk, just like getting killed by a terrorist or "stranger danger" are not relevant risks. They merely get this attention because some people are using the idea to manipulate people.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    2. Re:nice idea by Cardoor · · Score: 2

      i absolutely agree with you vis-a-vis the manipulative farce that is 'terrorist' risk - but in my mind, this is materially different for a few reasons:

      'terrorist' acts either go reported (due to their obvious ex-post nature) or are "thwarted" by those who have a vested interest in trumping up the whole scenario. in the date-rape scenario, there is no military-industrial-complex that stands to gain from people believing the stories... granted, others might be motivated to do so, but not nearly to the same extent.

      also, and perhaps most importantly, is that the data for reported cases (also, unlike car accidents) is so corrupted. given that non-drug assisted rapes often go unreported , it stands to reason that drug-induced rapes have a significantly higher incidence of going unreported for a variety of reasons. so the lack of demonstrable cases cannot be used as evidence that it doesn't exist (or exist in significant numbers).

      that's of course not to say that there is proof it IS a high risk - but here is where the final issue comes to play - cost to detect/prevent. if you're talking 'terrorism', you're talking billions or trillions of dollars and the trashing of civil liberties left and right. this? a few bucks to paint your nail polish a color?? incidentally, if women actually all used the nailpolish, they could report cases where the dosing/rape was attempted but AVOIDED (and the drug was detected) which could yield far better data.

    3. Re:nice idea by gweihir · · Score: 1

      This is all about creating fear. The "drug rapist" just the same as the "terrorist", and no, ordinary people do not think in overall damage, just in damage to them.

      Once people are in fear, they are easily controlled and directed in as desired as they are not rational anymore.

      I maintain: This is an exceedingly stupid idea. The harm done by false positives will vastly outstrip any caught would-be rapist, because a) there are almost none that use this method and b) how are you going to identify the person that put the stuff in the drink? The fingernails certainly will not do that.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    4. Re:nice idea by Cardoor · · Score: 1

      logical flaws... hurting... head... can't.... continue......

    5. Re:nice idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...ordinary people do not think in overall damage, just in damage to them.

      And here I thought I was the only person on Slashdot who really got why society in general is a cesspool of bullshit and hypocrisy from top to bottom, from left to right, from near to far.

      Guess not. Bravo.

    6. Re:nice idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      teach people new to bars

      Fixed that for you.

      Had a male friend who had something slipped in his drink. By a woman, even.

      I'm sure it's the purported "outlier" situation, but if we're whining about zomgevilraepdrugz, remember kids, shit can happen to anybody, regardless of what plumbing they have.

    7. Re:nice idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, you are suffering from several logical flaws. Let me help you out:

      Almost 3,000 people were killed on 9/11. That number approximates the number of people who have been raped using rape drugs since 9/11. That is if you can trust the numbers given by the "roofies are an epidemic" crowd in law enforcement.

      That is why the terrorism analogy works. It is all about relative risk. Car accident? Big risk. Hit by meteor? No risk. Killed by falling coconut? Surprisingly high risk in Florida, but small risk overall. Roofied and raped? Pretty small risk. Even small alongside raped in one of the good, old-fashioned ways.

  15. A few issues with this... by Zapotek · · Score: 2

    First of all, you've got to stick your fingers in your drink, which doesn't seem at all appealing. Why nail-polish? Why not just use the strips? If all you had was nail-polish and someone came out with strips, that'd be an improvement. This looks like a step backwards.
    Secondly, what's the false-positive/false-negative rate on this thing? Were there any compromises in accuracy in order to make it work as a nail-polish?

    Again, doesn't anyone see a problem with sticking your fingers in your drink? I know I'm the finicky type, but doesn't this look bothersome to anyone else?

    1. Re:A few issues with this... by Cardoor · · Score: 5, Insightful

      i think the benefit of nail polish is that it's subtle. to whip out a testing strip in a bar is to say "hey everyone - i think the guy im talking to may be a rapist and trying to drug me. pardon me while i conduct an experiment. "

      to dip one fingertips into a well stirred (and presumably mostly full) drink could be very discreetly done. and i dont think hygienics should be an issue (esp with the alcohol content.) and if a girls fingertips are so grody she feels the hygiene is too rough, well.. then she may have bigger issues.

    2. Re:A few issues with this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you never seen a woman string drink with her finger and suggestively sucking it slowly...ok I see what you mean.

    3. Re: A few issues with this... by hodet · · Score: 1

      She wouldn't have to roll up her sleeve and dunk like a proctologist. A quick discreet swipe with her little finger would be fine. Seriously, how can anyone be shitting on this idea.

    4. Re:A few issues with this... by Zapotek · · Score: 1

      I think the subtlety will wear-off once this invention becomes common knowledge, if someone can see you dip a strip, they can see you dip your fingers. Actually, I can palm and dip a strip without others noticing, I can't do the same with my fingers though.
      And I still can't help but find it gross, and not all drinks have a high alcohol content, and you'd be surprised what's under your fingernails -- cba to find the oblig XKCD.

    5. Re:A few issues with this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      False positives are a serious concern. People tend to blindly trust technologies they don't really understand and I could see someone getting their ass kicked or arrested due to an 'attempted date rape' accusation that stemmed from a false positive.

      As for sticking your finger in the drink, no I don't think it's really an issue. As women's fingernails typically extend past the tip of their finger, there would generally be no requirement to even get the finger wet. Besides, would you rather stick your own finger in your drink, or have some random guy stick himself inside you?

    6. Re: A few issues with this... by Zapotek · · Score: 1

      How am I shitting on the idea? Criticism is how you get improvement. Also, even if I were shitting on the idea, I'm pretty sure that'd have absolutely zero effect overall. You know this is a public forum right? I don't have veto power over the product, I'm just throwing my concerns out there, lighten up.

    7. Re:A few issues with this... by TadMSTR · · Score: 1

      Have you got any better ideas for a subtle way of testing a drink? A finger is a lot more discreet than a paper strip. Try explaining why you are dipping a paper strip into your drink without accusing the guy of being a rapist. Slipping your finger in the drink is much less noticeable and almost no one will question it. This can be casually done many ways, for instance sticking your index finger in the glass while grabbing around the brim (not uncommon). The idea of the nail polish, applied before going out, is that it gives a woman a discreet way to test her drink. If it tests positive she can then covertly escape without alerting the guy that she found him out.

      --
      There are 10 types of people in the world: those who understand binary and those who don't.
    8. Re:A few issues with this... by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      > Why nail-polish? Why not just use the strips?

      Easy, it reduces the steps required between returning to your drink or realizing you have forgotten to watch it, and doing the test. It removes....barriers. If you have to go into your pocket or purse to remove test strips, you are less likely to want to do it as often as you should....it could also be seen as insulting to whoever you are with that you don't trust them.

      > doesn't anyone see a problem with sticking your fingers in your drink?

      Not to me, but I understand that there are people grossed out by such things however, your body evolved to process far worst than whatever your fingers are likely to harbor, even after a night out drinking and touching doorknobs.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    9. Re:A few issues with this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the thing is that there are other drugs besides GHB and rohypnol that needs to be detected. It would be disastrous if the nail polish returned a negative result giving a false sense of security when, in fact, a drug that it's not designed to detect is used.

    10. Re: A few issues with this... by neilo_1701D · · Score: 0

      Seriously, how can anyone be shitting on this idea.

      Simple: it infringes on their sense of entitlement and reinforces their need to be a victim.

    11. Re: A few issues with this... by Zapotek · · Score: 1

      Dude, I'm a guy, who doesn't wear nail-polish.

    12. Re:A few issues with this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've used my finger to stir my drink, just because that is something to do. I wasn't wearing special nail polish at the time, since most of us guys don't wear any anyways.

      It isn't difficult for a woman to figure out how to discreetly test her drink with her finger. Not to mention, where would the woman keep the test strips, when her dress doesn't have pockets? Opening a purse is more noticeable than dipping a finger to play with ice cubes.

    13. Re:A few issues with this... by Zapotek · · Score: 1

      Fair enough, that sounds gross to me but that's just my problem, which is why I'd prefer the strips. Possible compromises in accuracy can be a real problem though, does anyone have any resources they can link to on the subject?

    14. Re:A few issues with this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Place a finger over the top hole of the little cocktail straw in the drink. Lift the straw out of the drink. Place the straw over the treated fingernail. Remove finger from top of hole. Watch fingers.
      No fingers in drink required.

    15. Re:A few issues with this... by Zapotek · · Score: 1

      That's a good point. If this thing is accurate too that'll be awesome.

    16. Re:A few issues with this... by Zapotek · · Score: 1

      Everyone focused on the very personal concern I voiced, which is me being grossed out by the finger dipping approach. No-one touched on the very real issue of whether there were any compromises in accuracy for making this thing work as a nail-polish. For Pit's sake I've got a sister and plenty of female friends and I don't want them to get in trouble just because they trusted a product based on how popular it is, due to people drowning out valid criticisms, like mine.
      I don't care if someone claims they've found the cure for cancer, show me the data, then I'll tattoo your name on my forehead.

      Also, I don't have to have a better idea to voice concerns, just like I don't have to be a master chef to say that I don't like the food at a restaurant.

    17. Re:A few issues with this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Am I the only one who stirs the drink with the finger? It's my finger, not a biological weapon.

    18. Re:A few issues with this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Girls who need this tool probably could probably benefit from a few more barriers in their lives.

    19. Re:A few issues with this... by _anomaly_ · · Score: 2

      You keep asking for sources about whether or not compromises were made in testing accuracy to get it in the form of nail polish. I assumed you were just being lazy, because how could there not be a more in-depth article out there on something that's getting so much attention. Well, after a bit of searching, it appears you probably weren't being lazy... I couldn't find anything out there in the form of details. Maybe the detection rate isn't so great... or (god forbid) they're having difficulty with false positives or false negatives.

      --
      "I have no special gift, I am only passionately curious." - Albert Einstein
    20. Re:A few issues with this... by geekmux · · Score: 1

      First of all, you've got to stick your fingers in your drink, which doesn't seem at all appealing...doesn't anyone see a problem with sticking your fingers in your drink? I know I'm the finicky type, but doesn't this look bothersome to anyone else?

      There was a study done across three different states where they took swabs from almost every surface in a restaurant, to include the bathroom. Do you know what ranked more germ-infested than even the bathroom door knobs and faucets?

      The glass your drink is in.

      Drink up.

      Oh, and stop being finicky already, that liquid inside your glass is a poison to your body too. You just happen to like the way it poisons you.

    21. Re:A few issues with this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? Just stir your drink with the swizzle stick and "accidentally" have one nail brush surface? Heck, that happens all the time without the polish. Or pick your drink up by the rim and have a finger inside for a moment. Really, if you couldn't pull that off you are really inept, certainly incapable of palming, dipping and reading a dip strip discretely.

  16. Re:Anything similar to alert men of the dangers of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you don't fornicate, you're never in danger of false rape accusations.
    A strange game. The only winning move is not to play.

  17. False positives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any false positives? I hope they have insurance when some poor schlub gets accused based on nail polish and sues them.

    1. Re:False positives? by F34nor · · Score: 1

      Save a sample you ignorant fuck. That's what labs are for.

    2. Re:False positives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Know what "chain-of-evidence" means? An even if you could preserve an untainted sample, you still have no idea who put the drug in the drink. Was it the bartender, the server, one or more of the people the intended victim was with, or simply someone who happened to walk by a table backs were turned?

    3. Re:False positives? by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Whit what they do to those "presumed innocent" in sexual cases these days, that could get really expensive.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  18. Here's an idea! by F34nor · · Score: 1

    A How about the complete fucks who make Rohypnol just put indelible blue dye in it that also passes through to urine? Oh yeah because they are complete fucks. We should just make chemically assisted rape punishable by death.

    1. Re:Here's an idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am not a chemist, but I think a blue dye that passes through urine would be a real breakthrough. I know of no such current technology.

    2. Re:Here's an idea! by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Threatening punishment, regardless of magnitude, has no effect here. There people are already deranged. "The law" is completely unable to solve these kinds of problems. It can make things worse though. Example: People that are afraid they will rape some child but have not done so (yet), are unable to get help as the law stupidly requires doctors to report them. The law is not a prevention tool. It is about revenge, and that is not helping the victims one bit in most cases.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    3. Re:Here's an idea! by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      >> How about the complete fucks who make Rohypnol

      You do realise that Rohypnol is made by drug companies, is widely used pre-surgery and helps millions of people that suffer with convulsions and insomnia right?

      What about those complete fucks that make rope? do you know how many people get tied up against their will or even strangled to death by rope?

    4. Re:Here's an idea! by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 2

      You've never blued someone's soda? Bromothymal blue does it. You can't see it in caramel color, and then you pee green or blue.

    5. Re:Here's an idea! by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      It's not so much the consequence of punishment as the risk. The full force of a threat is the consequence multiplied by the probability. Make the same consequence more likely and it becomes more of a result of action.

    6. Re:Here's an idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In cub scouts we had the new kid running to his dad saying: 'Dad Dad, I've got to go to the doctor right now, I'm peeing yellow! Something is wrong with me!'

    7. Re:Here's an idea! by Ksevio · · Score: 1

      millions of people that suffer with convulsions and insomnia

      Would those people have a problem with their drugs being blue or having some koolaid powder mixed in?

    8. Re:Here's an idea! by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Not to mention duct tape. Everyone knows the only purpose for duct tape is to put it over someone's mouth so they can't call for help, or say "no".

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    9. Re:Here's an idea! by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Nonsense. You assume a rational actor. Rational people either are not criminals or do not get caught. Rapists are the very definition of irrational and hence the law has absolutely no value in preventing rape. It can lead to more murders though, when a rapist recovers some level of sanity and tries to hide the crime. IN particular, the death penalty will do wonders for motivation in that direction, as they will not have anything to lose at that point.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    10. Re:Here's an idea! by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Humans are rational. Humans are rational 100% of the time. They do, at different times, account for different sets of information.

      Consider: A human whose life is threatened will execute lethal force without considering the need or consequence, if urgency is so high as to preclude time for consideration. This is rational behavior: immediate recognition of a situation and rejection of analysis which leads to a qualitatively-assessed high likelihood of poor outcome. In a stand-off, a man will try to talk down another man who is threatening someone, even when he's 100% sure he's got the head shot with no consequences beyond his own conscience: there is time to now account for the gut feeling that you would dislike killing a man in cold blood, and hesitation is selected on the grounds of reason.

      Criminals in da hood are embroiled in gang wars in which they may die. They die much more often in gang-related violence than by state arrest, trial, and execution. State execution isn't a concern because it never happens: even if 100% of arrests for gang-related murder lead to state execution, their existing actions are getting them killed by gang-related violence 99.9% of the time, and so they really have better things to worry about than the lawman.

      Individuals in quieter neighborhoods with low tolerance for criminals aren't used to murders. When convinced that murder is impossible to escape, they hesitate on any impulse to murder: the fact that committing a murder will lead to their inescapable death is burned into the basal ganglia, which constantly provides all known information about a situation--and the concept of killing someone is tied directly to the concept of being hunted and killed by a relentless mob of state enforcers, so the very basic impulse brings a rational decision about facing the enforcers. It takes large amounts of reasoning (often faulty reasoning, as above) or extreme levels of emotion to override this.

      Of course humans are rational.

    11. Re:Here's an idea! by F34nor · · Score: 1

      There was a show I watched about Voodoo where the real doctor would give it to people because they thought blue urine was a sign of a spirit leaving the body.

    12. Re:Here's an idea! by F34nor · · Score: 1

      So what?

      Doctor, "We used Rohypnol on you so you might notice that your pee is blue for a the first elimination!"
      Patient, "Why is that?"
      Doctor, "So less people are raped each year."
      Patient, "Wow whoever thought that up must be more interested in human beings than a the marginal profit from rape sales!"
      Doctor, "Yep, the F34nor on Slashdot is the motherfucking man!"
      Patient, "What if I have to use this regularly?"
      Doctor, "I guess you'll get used to blue pee!"
      Patient, "My wife is going to use this to make me sit when I pee isn't she?"
      Doctor, "White bath mats?"
      Patient, "Yep."
      Doctor, "You're days of manly peeing are over my friend, I'd invest in a Japanese toilet with heat and powered bidet to take the edge off your emasculation."

    13. Re:Here's an idea! by F34nor · · Score: 1

      Yep, sometimes good thing can be used for bad. That's why we have logical fallacies to call out people have no fucking idea how logic or debate works.

    14. Re:Here's an idea! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      You propose putting a company that makes a legitimately needed product in jail becasue some people misuse it?
      Also, Rohypnol is illegal in the US.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    15. Re:Here's an idea! by F34nor · · Score: 1

      It gets them out of the gene pool.

    16. Re:Here's an idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Methyl blue passes through the body to colour the urine blue or blueish

    17. Re:Here's an idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't sound like you have met many humans. Spend a couple of weeks in a house with a pregnant woman and get back to me about how humans are rational.

  19. Re:Seriously, we're not rapists.... by F34nor · · Score: 1

    Oh snap!

  20. Re:Anything similar to alert men of the dangers of by Bigbutt · · Score: 2

    Seriously? Never heard of the Duke Lacrosse Team that was falsely accused of rape?

    [John]

    --
    Shit better not happen!
  21. dexterous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess someone will at least get fingered.

  22. Allergies... Can they expand the detection? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I know a lot of folks with allergies and diet sensitivities. Wheat, Gluten, Dairy, Casein, Soy, Peanuts, Tree Nuts, Shellfish, etc... A detector like this could be really useful if the detected compounds were expanded.

  23. OK, I was wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, I was wrong. There are some assholes here who would secretly use date rape drugs on women. But since this is Slashdot, most of the population are so dumb that they can't figure out how to use the drugs and end up accidentally administering them to themselves. They're still assholes, though. And when they end up out cold, heads down on the bar with a little drool coming out of their mouths, they just get ignored.

    1. Re:OK, I was wrong by Ferrofluid · · Score: 1

      Whoosh.

    2. Re:OK, I was wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey easy now, buddy: I resemble that remark!

  24. Is this really necessary as a mass-market product? by timrod · · Score: 1

    I thought that Rohypnol had been regulated so heavily that very few people can get their hands on it, and that those who can are also capable of getting something stronger and harder to detect. To me, this sounds like giving people an easy way to test for polonium poisoning in their food - sure, it might help if you're someone who has pissed off a foreign intelligence service (or the Russian government) but it's a non-issue for the vast majority of people... that and if they really want you dead, they have other methods.

  25. Re:Seriously, we're not rapists.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Why do you think the Arabs assume their women are going to be raped if they go out in public alone?

    Because they would all rape a woman who is out in public alone.

    It is also why they assume the woman "asked for it", because the women know this as well.

  26. Re:Anything similar to alert men of the dangers of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Yes you are. If you do anything that a crazy woman doesn't like, she can just accuse you of rape. Who would they believe? They'll default to the woman being right without any evidence.

    I've seen it before on a few occasions. About a year ago, a friend's cousin accused her new boyfriend of raping her. She was at the police station crying her eyes out for hours. Eventually she confessed that she lied, and what really happened was that she took a bunch of nude pictures and sent them to him, and he showed his friends. So to get back at him, she made up this whole rape story to punish him.

    Hell, how about the case recently where a woman claimed that her boyfriend, who happened to be a well-respected judge, had assaulted her? He had video proof that she lied about the whole thing, and yet that evidence was completely discarded and ignored while they went through with the case against him, despite the fact that he did nothing wrong.

    The truth of the mater is, women have absolutely no problem playing the victim card when it suits them. They lie and manipulate to garner support to punish innocent people.

  27. I'm all for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let her dip her finger into her drink to check as often as she likes..
    If it helps one girl avoid a predatory jerk, then I say great!
    As I guy who likes women a lot and dates frequently, I have no problem with ladies having some independent reassurances I'm not some manipulative weirdo.
    I probably wouldn't even notice that she checked... I'm like: This isn't something a non-creep like ever worries about. go ahead and google me, have a friend to call if you're uncomfortable etc.., st your phone to ring at the 12 minute mark, whatever... I don't care about head games... I just roll with it 'cause I ain't forcing anything, at any time, on anybody.. I've dated some paranoid women and it's amusing (and sometimes kinda sad) but hey.. she's gotta do what ever she needs to do. I want my sisters, friends, etc. to have all the security they need. I can't be all up in their heads refuting inaccurate moral scares, or defining what is and ain't a "normal" level of precautions etc. Look: Just do what you have to do to be comfortable. Someone that 's comfortable can relax and connect and enjoy herself. and most drinks in question have alchohol in them so I'm thinking it'll be ok to dip a finger in it.. I mean club glasses ain't usually sterilized in an autoclave to begin with..

     

  28. If that is necessary, all is lost anyways by gweihir · · Score: 1

    Seriously, if a dating-scene is messed up enough for that to be an actual risk, the only sane thing is to leave it and don't look back. Somebody that is likely to put this stuff in your drink can just wait a little longer and force you to get dosed, at knife or gun-point, with much the same effect. And as soon as a few of these scumbags have gotten caught by this nail-polish, the others _will_ wise up.

    On the minus-side, this can lead to less caution by the ladies and hence is likely counter-productive.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    1. Re:If that is necessary, all is lost anyways by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "and force you to get dosed, at knife or gun-point, with much the same effect."
      That's a common fallacy.
      Just becasue some one will do X, doesn't mean they will do anything to get to X.
      Rapist are predatory in nature and usually planners. Needing to use a knife or gun puts them at risk, and is different to plan for.
      Maybe some will, but not all. You see this in any case where the bar to commit a crime goes up, fewer people do it.

      This isn't likely to get anyone caught. Anyone can roofie a drink. A 3rd party could roofie a drink, then the date takes her home because she isn't acting right, and a 3rd party arrives at the home and rapes her.

      This is the kind of planning rapists often do.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  29. brilliant, but with a few flaws. by nimbius · · Score: 3, Insightful

    unless you're Penn Jillette, most men do not wear nail polish.
    it would also be very important to educate the wearer that they could never, under any circumstances, topcoat as it would render the system useless. Salons would also need training on numerous procedures that, while safe for normal polish, would damage the system.

    Disclosure: ive worked in a salon. my suggestion would be to offer a topcoat or clearcoat that can be added to existing colours. This system would also work well in french tips, but again, most men do not wear them.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:brilliant, but with a few flaws. by Cardoor · · Score: 1

      good idea w/r/t clear and topcoat. would solve all the issues you raise. just top off before you head out.. a clear would be fine for even one or two fingers on an otherwise non-polish-wearing-man.

    2. Re:brilliant, but with a few flaws. by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      unless you're Penn Jillette, most men do not wear nail polish.

      The test chemical is clear. As a result, you could put it in a clear nail polish, which would not be extremely obvious on people who don't normally wear nail polish.

  30. Oh, so it detects alcohol? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A polish that detects GHB and Rohypnol is almost useless. Why? Because they are almost never used to carry out date rapes! Seriously, no major study has ever shown date rapes commonly being accomplished by using these substances. In fact, the vast majority of reported cases of their alleged "use" (i.e. 99+%) turn out to be the result of alcohol overconsumption alone.

    Think about it. You have a cheap, powerful drug that causes blackouts, unconsciousness, and lack of inhibitions. And it's socially acceptable, even encouraged, to take it in social situations, despite the fact that gov't studies show that half of all sexual assaults implicate its use.

    Yet your typical will no doubt will no doubt be throwing her money at the company that markets this polish, at least whatever is left over after the eight $10 appletinis she consumed last night.

    1. Re:Oh, so it detects alcohol? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *typical coed

  31. Re:Anything similar to alert men of the dangers of by gweihir · · Score: 1

    Full authenticated recording of her giving consent and full authenticated recording of the act or she does not get any. Seriously, with it being this easy to successfully make false rape claims, it may be time to give up on women altogether.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  32. Re:Seriously, we're not rapists.... by gweihir · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Neo-Feminist standard tactics: All men are savages. Because looking at actual facts would expose them for the hate-preachers and frauds they are.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  33. Classic Slashdot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdotter: OMG OMG I want to get teh babez! I am teh geniuz so they shood all love me but they dont! What do I do???

    Shifty dealer: Here, administer one of these. [Gives Slashdotter some pills]

    Slashdotter: ZOMG I are teh geniuz! [Administers a pill . . . to himself! Passes out.]

  34. Re:Seriously, we're not rapists.... by Presto+Vivace · · Score: 2

    Rapists don't have Rapist stamped across their forehead.

  35. Re:Is this really necessary as a mass-market produ by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You can't get GHB anymore because of dumb ass jocks, but, for some reason, Phenibut isn't scheduled.

    Phenibut is a GABA receptor agonizer with a powerful relaxing effect. It's OTC, but pretty useless: you become tolerant on the first use, and then require high doses to get an effect. It might be useful once a month, give or take a week. After using it for 2-3 days--by upping the dose a bit to overcome tolerance--side effects include severe depression and suicidal desires. Your life actually becomes a steaming pile of despair from which you wish to escape. It's far more addictive than Valium, and worse than Heroin.

    A dose of 250mg is a good, strong initial dose. Doses of 5000mg are common among body builders, who use the substance as a relaxant while training (bodybuilders used to dose GHB for the same purpose). A dose of 5000mg directly into some girl's drink would be fantastic... until it wore off. In the interim, nothing would bother her, and she'd probably be amenable to whatever you want. The next day, she'd cry a lot, then kill herself after deciding she'd be better off.

    Again: this stuff is OTC, has no viable medical use, is impossible to use without addiction, has severe withdraw effects, is not directly toxic at high doses, and can be used to make someone compliant.

    It should be banned because it's sold OTC as an anti-stress relaxant, yet is incredibly fucking dangerous to the user. It's not a thing you could dose yourself safely--like Modafinil or Dextroamphetamine--because it's not a thing a fucking physician could prescribe safely for any useful treatment. It's not a dangerous drug that can provide a recreational high or a medical benefit or can somehow be managed; it's a completely useless, indirectly toxic substance that creates immediate tolerance and brings on intense withdraw qualifying as a medical emergency.

    I bet their strips don't test for that.

  36. Why isn't alcohol itself a date rape drug? by PeterM+from+Berkeley · · Score: 1

    Subject says it all. Alcohol is considered harmless, but it isn't. That said, I don't support banning it. I just think it mostly isn't a good idea to use it for psychoactive effects.

    --PM

  37. It's not 1995 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't believe this feminist propaganda is still going on.

    There is nothing fundamentally different between Rohypnol and a dozen other benzodiazepine drugs that are prescribed to tens of millions of American women. The demonization of that drug continues to baffle me, when far stronger drugs like xanax are readily available. Anyone who has experimented with benzos knows full well xanax plus alcohol will fuck you up to the point memory loss will be the least of your concerns.

    Here is the reality: feminism has made women miserable. The majority of women take psychotropic drugs to cope with the hell that is modern liberal society. Many of these drugs say VERY CLEARLY on the label not to consume with alcohol. Yet they do. And as has been discussed in literature going back to the dawn of civilization, women get honry when they are really drunk - and benzos potentiate that effect. But then because of the benzos, that can't remember anything.

    There is a simple solution to this problem. Women under 30 should not be prescribed benzodiazepine drugs under any circumstances.

    GHB was such a load of crap too. That stuff was great for bodybuilding, and it's bullshit it got banned. No one was using that to date rape anyone with at best a dozen examples.

    1. Re:It's not 1995 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your posting is a load of crap.
      The End.

  38. Re:Seriously, we're not rapists.... by Noah+Haders · · Score: 2

    Also many rapists meet their victims at a bar or club.

  39. It's a no-win situation by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

    You stick your finger in your drink, and either your date is a creep, or he's okay but you now have nail polish in your drink.

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  40. Re:Anything similar to alert men of the dangers of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    The truth of the mater is, women have absolutely no problem playing the victim card when it suits them. They lie and manipulate to garner support to punish innocent people.

    It's that last line that betrays you. Some women have no problem lying and playing the victim when it suits them, but in your mind that has morphed into ALL women, and that is your problem, not theirs. Some men also have no problem doing bad things to women and lying when it suits them. The women are just trying to figure out how to be safe short of withdrawing from society.

  41. Re:Anything similar to alert men of the dangers of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My right hand gives a hardy thumbs up!

  42. Re:Anything similar to alert men of the dangers of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah but most men are already addicted to women. it is like asking a drug addict to quit drugs.

  43. What about all those people who need a kidney? by TheRealSteveDallas · · Score: 2

    Do you people have any idea what this will do to my organ harvesting business?

    1. Re:What about all those people who need a kidney? by Cardoor · · Score: 2

      dont worry - if it isn't already, the economy will be sending people your way as willing participants.

  44. Re:Seriously, we're not rapists.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I have no problem with this product. But I am concerned about false-positives. And I don't mean just the "it detected a daterape drug but in fact there was nothing in the drink". I mean the wrong guy gets identified as the one who spiked the drink and gets his life ruined as a result.

    But that is a societal problem.

  45. Re:Seriously, we're not rapists.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why was this modded Troll? Whoever did it is abusing the moderation system.

  46. Re:Seriously, we're not rapists.... by BronsCon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But that is a societal problem.

    So is the need for this product.

    --
    APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  47. Re:Seriously, we're not rapists.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No, jerk. Nothing here says "All men are savages". That's all in your mind. Some men are savages, and women need every level of protection against them possible. This story is about one new form of protection.

    I guess the real question is: why do you feel threatened by a new date rape prevention tool?
    Do you get equally offended when Toyota adds a new interior airbag?
    Do you assume that Toyota is telling you that *you are a terrilbe driver?

    How about when you're operating system alerts you to a new security update?
    Is Microsoft or Redhat telling you that you can't keep your computer safe?

    Why would this story be any different?

  48. Date rape drugs are over 70 years old by tepples · · Score: 1

    That we need ways to test drinks for date rape drugs shows the state of the world we live in.

    But I doubt that this state has changed since most of your parents were born. Date rape drugs have been a thing for at least 70 years. A line in "Baby, It's Cold Outside" (written in 1944 and recorded in 1949) alludes to them, as an article by Ian Fortey points out.

  49. Lab Kits on a Dance Floor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finally, the less cumbersome way to dance!

  50. How many women are raped each year on campus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    1. Re:How many women are raped each year on campus? by cryptizard · · Score: 1

      That article is so full of shit. They admit that at least 1 in 40 college women are raped. If the same percentage of them got, say, meningitis, that would be all over the news as the worst epidemic in decades. Stop downplaying the seriousness of the situation.

    2. Re:How many women are raped each year on campus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your post is incoherent.

      Saying the problem affects 10,000 people instead of 100,000 people is not "downplaying the seriousness" of the situation. It is "rightsizing" the seriousness.

      Assuming the figures are more accurate, the accusation you should be leveling is "stop using ridiculous hyperbole" and leveling it against those who use bogus statistics to try to further their argument, even if they happen to agree with your position. Using obviously false numbers cannot possible be good for your credibility in the long run.

    3. Re:How many women are raped each year on campus? by F34nor · · Score: 1

      No its not because most people are profoundly math illiterate. Not that I think using hyperbole is right. But don't overestimate people's inability to know what statistics really mean.

  51. Re:Seriously, we're not rapists.... by danlip · · Score: 2

    No, it is not suggesting that every man is a despicable scum, it is suggesting that there is a reasonable chance that at least one man at a party is a despicable scum. And that seems like a reasonable suggestion.

  52. In 14 years practising emergency medicine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Date rape drugs are terrifying because of what they do, not because of how common they are. Kind of like shark attacks. Shark attacks keep some people out of the water, or at least instill a basic sense of fear, especially people who are already afraid of the ocean. Date rape drugs, similarly, instill a sense of fear around not just dating but being able to trust men in general.

    It doesn't have to affect every single person who gets afraid. That one person you found in 14 years is probably two degrees of separation from over a hundred people. Four degrees of separation from thousands. All of those people know girl who knows a guy who knows a girl who knows a girl who got date raped liked this, and now they have to live with the fear that it could happen to them. Having an unintrusive test like in TFA would at least allow those people to get back their peace of mind.

  53. the mind works in strange ways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...thanks to the work of four North Carolina State University undergrads

    Somehow I read that as "North Carolina State University underpants"

  54. Re:Seriously, we're not rapists.... by danlip · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think the main point is to prevent the woman from drinking the spiked drink. I think it is rather unlike that a guy gets convicted (or even prosecuted) based solely on this test. Perhaps arrested, but more likely just questioned. Unless he's black, in which case he would probably be shot by the police, but that's a problem which has nothing to do with this product.

  55. Re:Seriously, we're not rapists.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I've recently stopped driving a taxi (after a 1 1/2 years, 2 summer seasons) in the Hamptons of E. Long Island NY. Through my fares telling me what happened to their friends (cute looking, vulnerable type young women), I applaud this fingernail polish roofie detecting product.

    Last summer, I had on one early Sunday morning fare (a woman), tell me how her friend walked out of the Southampton Social Club (near the Southampton Lirr train station) the Saturday night before after feeling 'strange', and fell onto the club's driveway, face first, slightly (thank God) cutting up her face. The young woman managed to call her friend (my passenger) who drove and picked her up. No police were summoned, and as I've learned since, it wouldn't have mattered much, since the Southampton Police in L.I. do not even have a 'rape kit' available to them.

    One other episode was this (2014) summer: Early one morning (5:30 am), I was dispatched to a local, S.Hampton call to a (very expensive, not unusual for the vicinity) home. After getting admittance through the gated driveway, two beautiful young women got in. One was sick and 'out of it', though her friend was much more in control of herself, and gave me the info needed to get them to where they needed to go (a temporary summer rental home). The other young woman was a really cute, vulnerable type young lady, who I could tell, was not feeling very well. During our trip she needed a plastic 'barf bag' that I supplied her with. And her friend told me how she suspected that her friend got 'roofied' by one of the residents of the home. Very plausible allegation, to my mind. I did my job and delivered both of them safely to their destination. A few days later I was called to their address to take both of them to the train station so they could leave Southampton. On the trip we spoke little, other than me asking the young lady if she was alright, she quietly said she was, though I had a very bad feeling that she was molested that day. As their cab driver, there wasn't a damn thing I could do to help them, excepting safely delivering them where they wanted to go. It's a shitty, powerless feeling for a man.

    Some 5 years ago I was roofied myself, by a supposed 'friend'. Within a 30 minute period after eating a drug laced slice of pizza, I felt quite 'odd', and left the home of my 'friend'. I walked over 2 miles to get back to my rented room, needing to stop on the way to throw up the pizza I'd ingested. The final, 3 story climb up the stairs to my room were the most difficult, I was forcibly pulling my body up the stairs by gripping the stairway's banister, and I'm a somewhat strong man. As soon as I got inside my room and locked my door behing me I collapsed onto my bed, and for the next six hours I slept the sleep of the dead. Woke up knowing this was not a normal thing to happen to me, and deduced that I must have been 'roofied'. I wanted at the time to go back and kill that guy who I know did that to me. I didn't do that. One day I went there, knocked on his door (acting normal), and made sure that I got my belongings out of storage from his garage. As I walked away, his last words to me were, "You need a psychiatrist!" (I had just began walking away from him down his driveway while carrying my packed up bags).

    At those words I almost froze, intent on wanting to drop my bags, and go walk up to him (my 'former' friend), and clock him a good one in his face. I didn't do that though, my intent was just to get away from the asshole without police involvement and my meager, but important to me, belongings intact. Instead of doing that, I remember my steps hesitating a small bit, but I instead kept on walking away from him, despite my wanting so much to stop, go back and smash his face in for what I knew he had done to me.

    Now, I am a somewhat strong guy who is non-violent by nature, though I am capable of violence, when pushed too far. I mentally 'chose' not to act upon my 'baser instincts'. I 'thought' through it as it was happening, kno

  56. Downside by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    After she's well-hammered by 3 or 4 untainted drinks, will she still have the ability or memory to 'run the test' on the potentially last fateful drink of the night?

    More to the point: stay the eff out of bars and never go to a frat party of any type.

    1. Re:Downside by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      And if you do leave the house, cover yourself up to protect you from all the raping animals out there.

      Seriously, why don't you fuck off to Tehran or Riyad? You'd be perfectly at home there.

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
  57. Re:Seriously, we're not rapists.... by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

    Oh good grief. No they don't.

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  58. Re:Anything similar to alert men of the dangers of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey Kreskin, you failed to qualify your last sentence and in turn you've implied that ALL women are buying into the feminist narrative of rape culture and feel unsafe in society. The fact is, most women reject the concept of rape culture and misandrist feminism.

  59. Re:Anything similar to alert men of the dangers of by BronsCon · · Score: 1

    There was no qualifier, there; you added the "all" on your own.

    --
    APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  60. Re:Anything similar to alert men of the dangers of by BronsCon · · Score: 1

    I had a girl try to accuse me of rape when her boyfriend (who I didn't know about) found out she had been with me. She backed down really quickly when I reminded her she was the one who turned the camera on and the video would show that. This method actually does work (though, that isn't why it was recorded; she wanted to make a video and I was cool with that).

    --
    APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  61. Re:Anything similar to alert men of the dangers of by BronsCon · · Score: 1

    No, it's like asking a drug addict to document their usage, which many already do.

    --
    APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  62. Great! I'd buy this. by Bismuthprince · · Score: 1

    I'm a man so I'm technically not the target demographic, but I'd love to have something to this for some of the parties, events of festivals I sometimes find myself at. Now I'm not that worried about being sexually assaulted or raped; both my sex and my ghastly physical appearance make chances of that happening to me extremely close to zero. but I've heard some anecdotes that GHB and the likes are also frequently used by muggers; instead of risking a physical altercation or a gunshot to the face, you can also just drug the dude, take his stuff and toss him off the nearest bridge all without him putting up a fight.

    Concerning the need for this product; it's not so much the times we live in that created this product; being incapacitated and taken advantage of has always been an active threat to women in social situations; so I'm mostly just happy there is an addition to the safety precautions a woman can take to gain a little more security in their day-to-day lives.

  63. Re:Anything similar to alert men of the dangers of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are right. You put no qualifiers and therefore presented the item as applying to all in the group, in this case women. I put the word "all" in to point out explicitly what your wording was presenting.

  64. Re:Seriously, we're not rapists.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is wrong with someone saying that they are innocent? Why is it that when a man says they are innocent that you chose to believe and publicly insinuate that they are guilty? Worse, a significant portion of people will agree with your claim that a man defending himself is the worst kind of criminal offender.

  65. Re:Seriously, we're not rapists.... by Ferrofluid · · Score: 1

    You're implying that people at bars and clubs are only ever drugged and raped by their dates.

  66. Good/Bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While I certainly support anything that helps prevent rape, drug-facilitated or otherwise, I think women should be overt in their testing: the people she is with deserve to know her true opinion of them as potential rapists.

  67. Re:Seriously, we're not rapists.... by crypticedge · · Score: 0

    Oh to have mod points right about now. This is exactly right. I know a lot of the MRA anti women sociopaths don't want to hear it, but it remains true that there are some savage men out there and sometimes they act on that savagery. People thinking this is an attack on men are the exact same men who use date rape drugs to get a girl to bed.

    I was dating a woman who got hit with a date rape drug right around 2 years into our relationship. We would frequently go out drinking then go to a hotel and sleep/fuck it off. One night we were on our typical drink and fuck nights at a local bar and some guy was chatting her up when I went to the restroom. She was only on her second drink and she didn't catch it. Thankfully he left after I came back but she didn't catch that he slipped her something, and neither of us noticed until after the second drink was gone. We got her back to the room safe but never went back to that bar again.

  68. Ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are way too many articles here lately they have absolutely no relevance to tech "news that matters."

    Further, tons of them are basically either that men are repressing women in the tech industry, or that all men are rapists and/or racists.

    Here's the thing though, the audience here is probably the least likely to be those things. Submit these articles to bodybuilder forums or something.

    I've been coming here daily for 14 years and a couple more of these submissions and I'll unfortunately have to leave. -_-

  69. Re:Seriously, we're not rapists.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the main point is to prevent the woman from drinking the spiked drink. I think it is rather unlike that a guy gets convicted (or even prosecuted) based solely on this test. Perhaps arrested, but more likely just questioned. Unless he's black, in which case he would probably be shot by the police, but that's a problem which has nothing to do with this product.

    Yeah, the latter part is an entirely different social problem.

  70. Re:Anything similar to alert men of the dangers of by DrGamez · · Score: 1

    Go away kid.

  71. Re: Seriously, we're not rapists.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In life there are certain questions where if you have to ask them, the answer doesn't even really matter.

    In my opinion, if you are in an environment where your drink may or may not be spiked with a drug that may cause you to be raped, YOU'RE IN THE WRONG FREAKING ENVIRONMENT.

    There will never be a time when going out and drinking with friends becomes so imperative that dodging potential rape is worth the experience.

    I'm not against this scientifically neat invention, but if this is what our society has come to then I think women can do better things with their time than going out to venues where this is even a problem.

  72. Re: Seriously, we're not rapists.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's really is a concern too. Even when you're with friends and feel safe. My sister went to a large house party hosted by a long time friend. She was there with her boyfriend of 4 years and several other close friends. After her second drink it was obvious something was wrong, she was far too enebriated for what she had consumed. Within 30 minutes of her second drink she was unconscious. Thankfully both her boyfriend and friends were there, and they took her to the hospital.

  73. How will the "For Men!" version work? by qeveren · · Score: 1

    Guys don't (typically) wear nail-polish...

    --
    Don't just stand there, get that other dog!
    1. Re:How will the "For Men!" version work? by cryptizard · · Score: 1

      It's clear and you only need one nail to get the job done. Also there's not reason you couldn't put it on like a drink stirrer. Think outside the box before you cry "what about the men".

  74. Re:Anything similar to alert men of the dangers of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You just have all sorts of different stories about rape today. Seems a bit strange, don't it? Maybe should keep an eye on this one here...

  75. Re:Anything similar to alert men of the dangers of by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    And therefore, all women lie and rape never happens? Men are superior moral people? I don't see your point.

  76. Never as easy as it sounds. by westlake · · Score: 2

    Being able to say no to liquor is extremely easy.

    It can be extremely hard to say no to alcohol in certain social settings --- and you don't have to be an alcoholic to know this.

  77. Re: The world we live in. Police/ Fraternities by turning+in+circles · · Score: 1

    Hi, Personally, I want a much higher fraction of gun wielding, baton-toting, chokehold knowing police officers to be good people doing good things. 5-10% of the police force is a lot of bad apples, given their ability to cause mayhem. Teachers - they may not teach you, they may pick on you, but they won't kill you or beat you senseless. Probably.

    As for fraternities, It is just incorrect to call fraternities wholesome things with adult oversight from local volunteers. Seriously? To solve the problem, though, instead of nail polish you could simply avoid going into fraternities or off-campus parties altogether. Especially freshman fall.

    --
    Might as well face it I'm addicted to data.
  78. Re:Seriously, we're not rapists.... by gweihir · · Score: 1

    Nice Ad Hominem there. "If you disagree with me, then you are obvious a rapist." As I said, typical Neo-Feminist tactics. Utterly repulsive and dishonorable of course.

    As to your "story", statistics say you either made that up, or it was something else. Data-rape drugs are exceedingly rarely used. It would also be terminally stupid to try to use this on a woman that obviously is with somebody. Anybody planning rape is bound to do at least some target observation before.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  79. Re:Is this really necessary as a mass-market produ by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Regulated? It's illegal in the US, but easy trivial to get in Mexico. So getting your hands on one can be as difficult as getting some weed.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  80. Re:Is this really necessary as a mass-market produ by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Except it doesn't seem to bind to the ionotropic receptor. There is some literature that it MIGHT bind and very high doses.

    The drugs really aren't comparable.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  81. Re:Anything similar to alert men of the dangers of by BronsCon · · Score: 1

    Except that the post you were referring to was not mine.

    --
    APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  82. who are you dating?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are that worried about it maybe you want to think about the kinds of guys you are going out with.

  83. Re:Seriously, we're not rapists.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So why exactly does the idea of women being able to easily detect GHB bother you? Worried it will get in the way of your social life?

  84. Re:Seriously, we're not rapists.... by BronsCon · · Score: 1

    There are also savage women out there and sometimes they act on that savagery. What's your point? I'm glad your friend was okay (more or less) after the event, but let's not pretend it never happens the other way around.

    --
    APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  85. Re:Seriously, we're not rapists.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the main point is to prevent the woman from drinking the spiked drink. I think it is rather unlike that a guy gets convicted (or even prosecuted) based solely on this test. Perhaps arrested, but more likely just questioned. Unless he's black, in which case he would probably be shot by the police, but that's a problem which has nothing to do with this product.

    If a black person is shot it is extremely likely that it was by another black person. In fact, 93% of back deaths by guns are from other blacks. Don't believe me? See it in (no pun intended ) black and white here: http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/htus8008.pdf page 13

  86. Re: Seriously, we're not rapists.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Never had a shot of vodka before, huh? I mean, OMGZORZZZZ!!! TEH GHBZZZZZ! Faggot.

  87. no working product exists by PJ6 · · Score: 1

    I see only stock photos. If they had anything at all working they would have released either a video demonstration, or before-and-after pictures.

    What they're attempting is non-trivial - I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that they're going to fail on the chemistry.

  88. Re:Seriously, we're not rapists.... by 1arkhaine · · Score: 2

    Thanks for the story. Honestly.

  89. Re:Seriously, we're not rapists.... by lgw · · Score: 1

    Hah, turns out feminists are saying this nail polish actually promotes rape culture. From ThinkProgress: "Now, remembering to put on anti-rape nail polish and discretely slip a finger into each drink might be added to that ever-growing checklist - something that actually reinforces a pervasive rape culture in our society."

    Bet you didn't see that coming. It's not merely everything a man ever does that promotes rape culture in this new world, you see, it's also every step a woman might take to reduce the likelihood of rape.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  90. Re:Seriously, we're not rapists.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my life has been 'complicated' by people who care about me, they think that anonymously drugging/medicating me was the right thing to do

    Any hints what motive your "friends" have for drugging you? Something doesn't smell right about your story. I don't mean to be rude but have you considered the possibility that you're delusional and no one has ever actually tried to drug you? That seems like the most likely possibility to me.
    Just going by the odds I'd guess that it's about 1000 times more likely you've got schizophrenia than all your friends are trying to drug you.
    Best wishes.

  91. Re:Seriously, we're not rapists.... by russotto · · Score: 1

    Bet you didn't see that coming. It's not merely everything a man ever does that promotes rape culture in this new world, you see, it's also every step a woman might take to reduce the likelihood of rape.

    Apparently they're upset at anything a potential victim might want to do, at all.

    From the article:
    "As a woman, I'm told not to go out alone at night, to watch my drink, to do all of these things. That way, rape isn't just controlling me while I'm actually being assaulted -- it controls me 24/7 because it limits my behavior. Solutions like these actually just recreate that. I don't want to fucking test my drink when I'm at the bar. That's not the world I want to live in."

    And there's actually a small point there. Unfortunately, however, she doesn't get a choice as to the world she lives in; none of us do, it's take it or leave it. And despite all the man-blaming, there's not much the vast majority of men, who are non-rapists, can do about the few who are. No amount of our not-raping will change the rapists out there. Particularly not the vanishingly few using date-rape drugs; they either know they're doing wrong, or they're mentally ill, and aren't likely to respond to any sort of cultural persuasion either way.

    So, should she let (fear of) rape influence her to take precautions? It's really up to her. If she doesn't want her behavior limited, she can simply not limit it. The risk is hers to take, and the rapist is still in the wrong -- but that doesn't make the risk go away. It's the same risk anyone takes when they engage in behavior putting them at risk of crime -- walking around the NYC subway holding your iPhone. Cutting through the projects rather than walking around. Driving a nice car through Southwest Philadelphia. Though not testing one's drink probably falls into the same category of "not wearing a Kevlar vest whenever you go out", given how rare drink-spiking is.

  92. SMH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Drugs like Burundanga will absorb through skin making it a far better option when it comes to stealth. My view on the subject is anyone trying that bs should have their rear violated with a cactus before being thrown in prison.

    There is some good news for you women well over 99 percent of all men are not out to drug then rape you. I'm looking for no strings attached sex not couldn't live with myself twenty to life sex.

  93. Discreet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Knuckle deep in your own drink, and then stare at it intently in case it changes colors. Fucking discreet

  94. Re:Is this really necessary as a mass-market produ by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

    Phenibut is more like Valium up to 11 than GHB yes. Have you ever had valium delivered as a continuous intravenous drip? You won't remember a damn thing, but you'll be awake and compliant. Mind you, that's a massive bioavailable dose compared to a pill.

    Phenibut really is useless, though.

  95. Rape rape rape rape rape rape rape rapety rape by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 1

    I've made a feminist robot.

    Meanwhile back in the real world men are sexually assaulted and raped by women just as often. Rape culture my arse.

  96. Genius by DaMattster · · Score: 1

    Now this is quite simply and honestly pure genius! I think they have something that really contributes to safety. These kids should patent it and make money - they deserve it.

  97. Girls like to drink by xvent · · Score: 1

    Girls like to drink and have sex do they not? Maybe we could could just offer them Rohypnol. Why can't Rohypnol be the hot new drug everybody's doing like ecstasy?

  98. Re:Anything similar to alert men of the dangers of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The truth of the mater is, women have absolutely no problem playing the victim card when it suits them. They lie and manipulate to garner support to punish innocent people.

    Let's rephrase that to "...SOME women have absolutely no problem..."

    It is near impossible to speak about anything of substance without generalizing to some degree, but that one was pretty far over the top.

  99. Re:Seriously, we're not rapists.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You obviously don't know anything about roofie's or how they work. Every story you cited was just the effects of alcohol and not a date rape drug. Same for yourself.

  100. Take care of yourself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about being responsible for our own behavior? Instead of wearing nail polish that could detect a date-rape drug, how about not drinking to excess and also babysitting our own drinks? That is, as women, we should never leave an alcoholic beverage unattended in a public place. If you're going to the bathroom, or stepping out to smoke a cigarette, take the drink with you. Many of the legally innocent people who end up being wrongly convicted of serious crimes (and decades later, exonerated) were often arrested in places they shouldn't have been in the first place.

  101. slashdot - "Talkin' bout rape since 1997." by Gliscameria · · Score: 1

    Hey guys... I don't about you, but I come to SD to argue about RAPE, because there's no where else on the internet to do that, and this site right here has been rape based since day one! Can you believe some of these faggots talking about science in here? What a bunch of noobs. Clearly the issue here has nothing to do with science or using chemical detectors in new and interesting ways, it's all about how stupid all women are and how rape happy every man is. This is something new and exciting, so why not have the same conversation that everyone has had 50 times before?

    --
    X
  102. Re:Seriously, we're not rapists.... by Destoo · · Score: 1

    I read it all, expecting he got into a fight and his mom got scared, said 'You're movin' with your auntie and uncle in Bel Air'

    But yeah.. Doesn't sound like roofies. None of it.

    --
    Nouvelles de jeux et technologies en français. TC
  103. Re:Seriously, we're not rapists.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then why the fuck is an article regarding "nail polish" on /.

    It is neither news, nor for nerds. But hey, don't let that get in the way of your white knight bullshit.

  104. Re: Seriously, we're not rapists.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's relevant because it's essentially an interesting type of litmus paper for certain drugs. New chemical testing methods are nerdy because it's not only novel, but the expected use is also novel.

  105. So-Fucking-What?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unbelievable, the shit people say on the internet.

    It's a clever bit of science, but unfortunately, I fear the young ladies who are most likely in need of this product are probably not going to have the foresight to wear it. If they had such foresight in the first place, it seems like perhaps they wouldn't be in a position where someone they shouldn't trust could surreptitiously slip them drugs in their drinks.

    Unbelievable.

    I'm just pointing out that some people are more prone to making poor life choices. I'm sure we've all met them before. We feel really bad when these people are eaten by wolves, but we can't help but thinking: "was it really the best idea to go out in a suit made of meat and barbeque sauce?"

    Analogies are nice, but we're not talking about wolves. We're talking about humans. This is what the justice system is fucking designed for.
    Un-fucking-believable.

    I think this is great news, and I can't fucking believe how many rape apologists are dwelling in here.

    --surd1618

  106. Re:Seriously, we're not rapists.... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    Seems to me that both your stories of women are consistent with having had too much alcohol. Fingernail polish won't solve that.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  107. Re: Seriously, we're not rapists.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow... High horse much?

  108. Re:Seriously, we're not rapists.... by joe_frisch · · Score: 1

    I agree.
    There is the possible issue that if these are expensive, then they might be oversold by fear-mongering. I do not know how common date-rape drugs are, or what this costs, so I have no opinion as to whether or not is is a reasonable (cost effective) precaution. It does seem good to have this available for women who want it.

    The other possible downside is if there is a significant false-positive rate. This wouldn't lead to convictions, but could possibly destroy the reputation of innocent people. In an ideal world the drink would be sent to a lab to be tested, but most women would (reasonably) leave immediately if they thought their date tried to drug them, and would then warn everyone they knew about that person.

    The second problem would be helped if the product came with a strong recommendation that the victim take a sample of the drink for real analysis any time there was a positive indication.

  109. Re:Seriously, we're not rapists.... by danlip · · Score: 1

    Yes, but that's a completely different thing from what I was saying. An unarmed black man is far more likely to be shot by police than an unarmed white man.

  110. Re:Seriously, we're not rapists.... by amias · · Score: 1

    if it prevents one woman being raped then its worth it , seriously women are having their lives ruined , it would behove you to do some research before posting about this subject.

    If women where date raping men in anywhere near the amounts the men do there would be an outrage.

    We need to redress this balance and stop behaving like sex starved teenagers , then maybe we wouldn't be sex starved teenagers

    --
    [site]
  111. Re: Seriously, we're not rapists.... by amias · · Score: 1

    just being somewhere is not an invitation to rape , nor is wearing particular clothes , nor is being cute

    there is no valid reason ever to rape or trick someone into sex , stop defending bad people you are sounding like one.

    how does this sound - "You know wearing that outfit and posting on slashdot is just asking to be raped"

    you can argue all you like but if you provide excuses for that kind of thinking you are helping it happen.

    --
    [site]
  112. Re:Seriously, we're not rapists.... by amias · · Score: 1

    be glad you don't have to worry about this sort of thing when you go out and stop pretending you have be wronged because you haven't

    maybe they are sick of being told they have to do things to stop men raping then instead of you know , men doing things to stop other men raping because its men raping thats the problem not women inviting it , they are not , ever inviting it , regardless of how you think about it, they are never inviting it

    --
    [site]
  113. Re:Seriously, we're not rapists.... by amias · · Score: 1

    bet you don't have sisters or a daughter

    --
    [site]
  114. Re:Seriously, we're not rapists.... by deadweight · · Score: 1

    If a number of unrelated people have wanted to drug you for your own good over a number of years, you must have been quite the interesting roommate. Just sayin..

  115. Re:Seriously, we're not rapists.... by joe_frisch · · Score: 1

    If this is expensive (and maybe it isn't) then the question is whether this is an efficient way to spend money to reduce rapes. Its possible that other approaches (better surveillance in bars for example) could be more cost effective.

    Again, I'm not objecting to this, just saying that it needs to be compared to other approaches. If it is cheap then it is probably a good solution. Even if its expensive, I think it is good to have it available to women who want to purchase it.

    No question that having people stop committing rape would be great. I just don't know how to make them stop except through very indirect methods (like this one).

  116. Re:Seriously, we're not rapists.... by lgw · · Score: 1

    If you go out without an umbrella, it serves little purpose to yell at the sky when you get wet. We live in an imperfect world. A rational person takes reasonable precautions against known and likely dangers. An irrational person makes excuses not make the effort.

    Blame and responsibility are orthogonal concepts. You can be completely free of moral culpability, yet still be irresponsible. And responsibility distinguishes an adult from a child (and that message is one more men need to hear - for this problem and many, many others).

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  117. Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cool info :) dnt forget to check out www.buddychoice.com

  118. Is This a Real Problem? by sudon't · · Score: 1

    Is this a real problem? How many guys are slipping Mickeys these days, that the ladies need to wear testers when they go out? Are things really so uncivilized today? In my day, you politely asked a girl whether or not she'd care for a Quaalude. But then again, you could be certain the answer would be, "Yes!"

    --
    -- sudon't

    Air-ride Equipped

  119. Re:Seriously, we're not rapists.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Considering that 20 billion women are raped every second in the US according to the CDC [cnn.com], chances are that I participated in several rapes while I was making this post.

  120. Re:Seriously, we're not rapists.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've recently stopped driving a taxi (after a 1 1/2 years, 2 summer seasons) in the Hamptons of E. Long Island NY. Through my fares telling me what happened to their friends (cute looking, vulnerable type young women), I applaud this fingernail polish roofie detecting product.

    Last summer, I had on one early Sunday morning fare (a woman), tell me how her friend walked out of the Southampton Social Club (near the Southampton Lirr train station) the Saturday night before after feeling 'strange', and fell onto the club's driveway, face first, slightly (thank God) cutting up her face. The young woman managed to call her friend (my passenger) who drove and picked her up. No police were summoned, and as I've learned since, it wouldn't have mattered much, since the Southampton Police in L.I. do not even have a 'rape kit' available to them.

    One other episode was this (2014) summer: Early one morning (5:30 am), I was dispatched to a local, S.Hampton call to a (very expensive, not unusual for the vicinity) home. After getting admittance through the gated driveway, two beautiful young women got in. One was sick and 'out of it', though her friend was much more in control of herself, and gave me the info needed to get them to where they needed to go (a temporary summer rental home). The other young woman was a really cute, vulnerable type young lady, who I could tell, was not feeling very well. During our trip she needed a plastic 'barf bag' that I supplied her with. And her friend told me how she suspected that her friend got 'roofied' by one of the residents of the home. Very plausible allegation, to my mind. I did my job and delivered both of them safely to their destination. A few days later I was called to their address to take both of them to the train station so they could leave Southampton. On the trip we spoke little, other than me asking the young lady if she was alright, she quietly said she was, though I had a very bad feeling that she was molested that day. As their cab driver, there wasn't a damn thing I could do to help them, excepting safely delivering them where they wanted to go. It's a shitty, powerless feeling for a man.

    Some 5 years ago I was roofied myself, by a supposed 'friend'. Within a 30 minute period after eating a drug laced slice of pizza, I felt quite 'odd', and left the home of my 'friend'. I walked over 2 miles to get back to my rented room, needing to stop on the way to throw up the pizza I'd ingested. The final, 3 story climb up the stairs to my room were the most difficult, I was forcibly pulling my body up the stairs by gripping the stairway's banister, and I'm a somewhat strong man. As soon as I got inside my room and locked my door behing me I collapsed onto my bed, and for the next six hours I slept the sleep of the dead. Woke up knowing this was not a normal thing to happen to me, and deduced that I must have been 'roofied'. I wanted at the time to go back and kill that guy who I know did that to me. I didn't do that. One day I went there, knocked on his door (acting normal), and made sure that I got my belongings out of storage from his garage. As I walked away, his last words to me were, "You need a psychiatrist!" (I had just began walking away from him down his driveway while carrying my packed up bags).

    At those words I almost froze, intent on wanting to drop my bags, and go walk up to him (my 'former' friend), and clock him a good one in his face. I didn't do that though, my intent was just to get away from the asshole without police involvement and my meager, but important to me, belongings intact. Instead of doing that, I remember my steps hesitating a small bit, but I instead kept on walking away from him, despite my wanting so much to stop, go back and smash his face in for what I knew he had done to me.

    Now, I am a somewhat strong guy who is non-violent by nature, though I am capable of violence, when pushed too far. I mentally 'chose' not to act upon my 'baser instincts'. I 'thought' throug