Close.
Bud: "Why didn't you call 911"
Kelly: "Because I couldn't remember the number!"
I don't know how that's stuck in my mind - must have been fifteen years since I've seen MWC.
I never knew that either, probably because I (and you) have never read the documentation for the browsers we use. While it's true that browsers are one of the many apps you'd probably never need to read a manual to use, you'd still gleam some information if you did.
How the hell is a normal user supposed to know?
By R'ing the FM. I think it'd be great if Firefox had one of those "Did you know" boxes on startup that you could easily disable once you're up with the play, and teach you all these tidbits until then.
I've got $5 US that says this reply gets moderated as "troll" or "flamebait" because it contains so much truth about the attitudes of the majority of the Slashdot community.
Hmm, I usually use "Funny" for those, am I doing it right?
Male pronouns in papers got you points off, and using "they" would loose yourself grammar points.
You sure you weren't 'loosing' the points for some other reason?
I generally think that anything you get for free has some cost associated with it (tracking, advertising, etc),
Closed source, maybe. OpenVPN is Open Source. Even if the original author used something like that, someone would just fork it and remove all the spying. I've implemented an OpenVPN server for half a dozen off-site staff, and closely monitored the traffic on its interfaces. It doesn't do anything except what it should.
Smug prat. Obviously, his point is, these days it's not too hard to predict just from the article summary that most of the discussion will be merely semantics. Anyway, the last sentence contained three separate points. While the last one could have been worded better, it's plainly obvious and unambiguous as to what it meant.
Well, it had to be said, even if he knew it was obvious. Every time there's an article here about some new data transfer record, half the page is taken up by:
I think he means "tunnel" the TCP packets over the UDP "connection", which is exactly how OpenVPN and others work.
The UDP packets that travel between two hosts (the "connection") is now analogous to some sort of LAN cabling between them: We encapsulate whatever we want inside the UDP packet, and it's probably make it to the destination. We can therefore tunnel TCP/IP inside of UDP/IP packets and get reliability and flow control, as well encrypt the contents if we want security.
Slashdot Mirror
Obviously nobody here has ever seen the insides of older automatic transmission. Definitely nothing new here.
What do Mac users have again?
*sighs*, reaches over and yanks the cable out of Fa0/15.
(probably getting Fa0/14 by mistake, if this thread is anything to go by)
correction:
en
conf t
int fa0/15
shut
exit
wr
Google. Rotational Symmetry. You're feeling lucky.
*kiss*
Close.
Bud: "Why didn't you call 911"
Kelly: "Because I couldn't remember the number!"
I don't know how that's stuck in my mind - must have been fifteen years since I've seen MWC.
How the hell is a normal user supposed to know?
By R'ing the FM. I think it'd be great if Firefox had one of those "Did you know" boxes on startup that you could easily disable once you're up with the play, and teach you all these tidbits until then.
No, it could be (0+1, Redundant) ,(1+0, Redundant), (1, Redundant) and so on.
Folks like me, who do our own meta-moderation.
Hmm, I usually use "Funny" for those, am I doing it right?
Male pronouns in papers got you points off, and using "they" would loose yourself grammar points.
You sure you weren't 'loosing' the points for some other reason?
Closed source, maybe. OpenVPN is Open Source. Even if the original author used something like that, someone would just fork it and remove all the spying. I've implemented an OpenVPN server for half a dozen off-site staff, and closely monitored the traffic on its interfaces. It doesn't do anything except what it should.
See the OpenVPN site
Smug prat. Obviously, his point is, these days it's not too hard to predict just from the article summary that most of the discussion will be merely semantics. Anyway, the last sentence contained three separate points. While the last one could have been worded better, it's plainly obvious and unambiguous as to what it meant.
You're wrong. In fact, it never will.
17,16,15,14,13,12,11,10,9,8,7,6,5,4,3,2,1
For about four years, neither could the IE team. It just wasn't "innovative" enough for them until a few months ago.
I see, thanks for the correction.
Gary was in the early A1000 / 500s, he was a glue chip and floppy controller.
It's not so much the fibre that's expensive (nor does the actual quality of the glass need to improve in the forseeable future), but the endpoints.
Single-mode fibre does not have these "channels" you speak of.
...and my apologies for the horrible typing there.
The UDP packets that travel between two hosts (the "connection") is now analogous to some sort of LAN cabling between them: We encapsulate whatever we want inside the UDP packet, and it's probably make it to the destination. We can therefore tunnel TCP/IP inside of UDP/IP packets and get reliability and flow control, as well encrypt the contents if we want security.