well, I can see you are another idiot that is lying to yourself as well as others.
Too bad that we do not teach logic in our schools. Had we done so, it might have made up for your total lack of intelligence.
got news for you. If we stop burning oil, our demand will be at about 1/3 of the current level.
And we import about 1/4. IOW, if we can cut our oil based vehicles in half, we will not import a single drop of oil
It is bad enough that the far right are liars and simply choose to ignore what is happening with climate change, but the far left is just plain stupid.
Will this stop the digging? Nope. It will continue. It is just that it will be sent to be processed via trucks and rail, which is even more pollution.
worse yet, if a neo-con gets control of the White House, then they will simply pass it through.
Far better is to stop the CO2 emissions via economics.
The dems should be cutting a deal with the GOP in which the pipeline is allowed. BUT in return, limited time subsidies are created for more EVs with bigger batteries, along with some for moving Commercial vehicles to nat Gas and Nat Gas series hybrids. With this approach, it will drop America's imports of oil to the point of ending them, and lowering the price of oil, which will stop the tar sands, and finally, leading to a whole new robust industry based on Electricity and methane, rather than gas/diesel. Electricity comes from many sources, and methane can as well.
For the shear amount of hydrocarbons that we find on other planets, moons, etc, it makes me wonder about our oil. I would not be surprised to find out that some of this oil comes from before life.
Lol. ROFL. How hard and long has your gop been trying to get trump out? Had he not been number 1, he would not be in the debates. And fiorina had to shame you criminals to get on the floor. No doubt carsen made it only because he is black and so many of you are hiding your white hoods.
On a side note, normalizing on emissions / GDP does not limit their making money. What it does is tie the cost of a good to the very real cost of the pollution that is emitted. For those areas that move to solar, wind, geo-thermal, nukes, etc, they would have little to no tax on goods produced there ( assuming none of parts come from high co2 area ). This rewards them relative to those that will pollute.
Take the example of Wyoming vs say California. Any goods, or goods with parts , from wyoming should and would have higher tax than CA. Why? Because currently, majority of their power comes from coal ( though wind is on the rise ).
Go look at oco2 data. China is producing a LOT more co2 than is acknowledged by them. In particular, they are lying about the amount of coal that they burn.
And yet, if you are worried about lowering co2, the smart money would be to focus on either the largest, which is china with 33-43% , or better yet, ALL nations. In addition, since co2 comes mostly from business and gov choices and uses, and not directly from ppl, it makes far more sense to normalize based on emissions / GDP, not per capita.
It did not say that you have to give it to the farmers. It said develop one and you win 250k. From there, these farmers will happily buy them from you.
No, it is obvious that soon illegals will be dealt with. When that happens, labor costs will return to what should be, whereas automation is much cheaper.
And yet, it is the far right that have pushed for using cheap labor over automation. In fact, in general, it is the far right that hires loads of illegals and pays them far less than they should while also skipping taxed.
Socialism was never in Somalia. America is far more socialist than Somalia EVER was. Somalia is the perfect example of free capitalism without regulations.
Not sure that I would agree that non-orbiting flights do not lower the costs. Basically, it builds up manufacturing lines for sealed crafts, with same seats, suits, life support, etc. However, I would argue that these companies will build up interest in space flight and gives the wealthy a taste of what space flight has to offer. In fact , it might be useful for billionaires to use this for training.
Actually, we need CONgress to quit fucking around and push a bill for Support for gen 4 companies such as trans atomic and flible. Both designs can burn thorium and/or nuke waste. Oddly, O likes nuke power and would support it.
No, he did this under the auspices of Thompson school. Had he done it on his own, it would have been fine.
However, when you have a board that is currently GOP controlled and they allow for postings by a GOP for another GOP, that is campaign contribution.
BTW, normallly, Thompson is NOT controlled by the GOP. THis is an unusual situation. The kock brothers have spent BIG $ in Colorado targeting school boards here and are then running around trying to destroy the public schools.
well, I can see you are another idiot that is lying to yourself as well as others.
Too bad that we do not teach logic in our schools. Had we done so, it might have made up for your total lack of intelligence.
got news for you. If we stop burning oil, our demand will be at about 1/3 of the current level.
And we import about 1/4. IOW, if we can cut our oil based vehicles in half, we will not import a single drop of oil
Oil prices are NOT falling. They have been low for sometime.
I suspect that it was pulled because they knew that O was going to nix this. Basically, the WH and state department have GOP moles that have no issues with being traitors.
It is bad enough that the far right are liars and simply choose to ignore what is happening with climate change, but the far left is just plain stupid.
Will this stop the digging? Nope. It will continue. It is just that it will be sent to be processed via trucks and rail, which is even more pollution.
worse yet, if a neo-con gets control of the White House, then they will simply pass it through. Far better is to stop the CO2 emissions via economics.
The dems should be cutting a deal with the GOP in which the pipeline is allowed. BUT in return, limited time subsidies are created for more EVs with bigger batteries, along with some for moving Commercial vehicles to nat Gas and Nat Gas series hybrids. With this approach, it will drop America's imports of oil to the point of ending them, and lowering the price of oil, which will stop the tar sands, and finally, leading to a whole new robust industry based on Electricity and methane, rather than gas/diesel. Electricity comes from many sources, and methane can as well.
Which is interesting that they are bigger than mercury. So mercury is planet only because of orbiting the sun, while these moons are not.
For the shear amount of hydrocarbons that we find on other planets, moons, etc, it makes me wonder about our oil. I would not be surprised to find out that some of this oil comes from before life.
Lol. ROFL. How hard and long has your gop been trying to get trump out? Had he not been number 1, he would not be in the debates. And fiorina had to shame you criminals to get on the floor. No doubt carsen made it only because he is black and so many of you are hiding your white hoods.
On a side note, normalizing on emissions / GDP does not limit their making money. What it does is tie the cost of a good to the very real cost of the pollution that is emitted. For those areas that move to solar, wind, geo-thermal, nukes, etc, they would have little to no tax on goods produced there ( assuming none of parts come from high co2 area ). This rewards them relative to those that will pollute. Take the example of Wyoming vs say California. Any goods, or goods with parts , from wyoming should and would have higher tax than CA. Why? Because currently, majority of their power comes from coal ( though wind is on the rise ).
Go look at oco2 data. China is producing a LOT more co2 than is acknowledged by them. In particular, they are lying about the amount of coal that they burn.
And yet, if you are worried about lowering co2, the smart money would be to focus on either the largest, which is china with 33-43% , or better yet, ALL nations. In addition, since co2 comes mostly from business and gov choices and uses, and not directly from ppl, it makes far more sense to normalize based on emissions / GDP, not per capita.
Trivial. Very trivial. In addition, with the gains made in vision recogonition and sensors since 9-11, it should be very easy.
It did not say that you have to give it to the farmers. It said develop one and you win 250k. From there, these farmers will happily buy them from you.
Nah, those are dingleberries.
Esp for the builder of said machine.
And yet a nut picking machine was developed in this same way so that farmers have lower costs than imports.
No, it is obvious that soon illegals will be dealt with. When that happens, labor costs will return to what should be, whereas automation is much cheaper.
And yet, it is the far right that have pushed for using cheap labor over automation. In fact, in general, it is the far right that hires loads of illegals and pays them far less than they should while also skipping taxed.
Socialism was never in Somalia. America is far more socialist than Somalia EVER was. Somalia is the perfect example of free capitalism without regulations.
Only if you are an alien esp with fangs.
Only because others do.
Not sure that I would agree that non-orbiting flights do not lower the costs. Basically, it builds up manufacturing lines for sealed crafts, with same seats, suits, life support, etc. However, I would argue that these companies will build up interest in space flight and gives the wealthy a taste of what space flight has to offer. In fact , it might be useful for billionaires to use this for training.
Where does nat gas come from? Same wells as oil.
Actually, we need CONgress to quit fucking around and push a bill for Support for gen 4 companies such as trans atomic and flible. Both designs can burn thorium and/or nuke waste. Oddly, O likes nuke power and would support it.
No, he did this under the auspices of Thompson school. Had he done it on his own, it would have been fine. However, when you have a board that is currently GOP controlled and they allow for postings by a GOP for another GOP, that is campaign contribution.
BTW, normallly, Thompson is NOT controlled by the GOP. THis is an unusual situation. The kock brothers have spent BIG $ in Colorado targeting school boards here and are then running around trying to destroy the public schools.
Bob Schaffer, is part of the criminal GOP pack that runs around in Larimer and Weld County. Schaffer and his ilk were always fairly shady.