All the more reason to not announce it and follow it back to where it came from. There is an international community on this. We need to trace this ALL the way back.
That is not capitalism. That is simply the set-up the way that we have it. Since it is set-up this way, I think that we need to return to the per-reagan time that prevented Executives from owning stock, OR better yet, require that all employees including executives to own only employee stock. That way, you remove the incentive from the employees and executives to short companies.
While I agree that us Businesses AND politicians (W was the best friend that China had with his tax break and.75T/year deficits) deserve a lot of blame. China's actions have over and over been illegal from POV of WTO/IMF and even the 2000 accord with USA. Even now, their requiring companies to build there, but not import is illegal. Obama SHOULD have done something by now, but.....
The fast that companies like Intel, AMD, Dell, IBM, HP, and esp. Apple, move their tech to China, the faster that these companies will disappear. Chinese gov. is simply using their greed against them. Smart on their part. Stupid on the companies, and America's as well. Hopefully, Google with Motorola will change that. What has to happen is that Motorola needs to focus on top products that get demand, while not taking the GM/Harvard finance MBA approach to businesses.
So they grabbed the drive/system, rather than watching and find out who is controlling it and then grab them. And ppl wonder why there are so many crackers out there.
Nope. Not a tariff. A tariff is applied ONLY to incoming or outgoing products. Instead, you put it on ALL products, including your own. That way, there is no discrimination.
Seriously, cap-n-trade works IFF all nations participate. Well, Not only is USA not participating, but the worst polluter, china, will not either. In fact, if USA does, then it is CERTAIN that China and 3rd world nations will actually make a grab for American businesses by quickly building up electricity (probably following the chinese model of illegally subsidizing it and then dumping the goods on international market). And what is the fastest way to build up CHEAP electricity? Coal plants without ANY pollution control (in fact, china has nearly all, if not all, of their pollution controls turned off).
So, what is the best solution? Have nations tax ALL goods (local and imported) based on the CO2 that comes from the nation where the final assembly and the primary sub-components (depending on size of item, much even want several of the largest sub-components). Ideally, we would tax based on CO2 emissions from a nation on a per sq km basis. With that approach, it forces ALL major nations to lower their emissions, while nearly all 3rd world nations are all ready at low levels. However, with this approach, it will reward those nations that actually take the initiative to drop their emissions, while punishing those that choose to ignore it. That includes the nation that invokes the tax itself.
America is to launch OCO2 in 2012. It measures CO2 emissions. Rather than playing guessing games, this would simply measure CO2 into a nation's border, as well as CO2 OUT of the nation. That approach would allow us to find exactly how much CO2 a nation generates and not worry about the source. That is up to the nation to solve. They may wish to kill coal plants. Or they may elect to kill cars. etc. However, this approach combined with per sq km basis, allows a nation to decide if the issue is a business issue or a ppl issue and then adjust accordingly. However cap-n-trade and combined with per capita is about the worst idea going. It is already failing in EU. They are losing businesses to China who will continue to cheat all the way through this.
The current post says no pictures taken because the company did not want to be ID. In particular, did not want engineers and testers to be shown. My guess is that the testers is another nationality and race: chinese. Therefore, it would show up easily on a pix that it was somebody from China.
You have a difficult time reading? You objected to the story, but then noted that you learn from bad scientist. That was what YOU said. How are you going to learn from bad scientists and their science, unless it is shown?
So, you object to this story being published here, but then you state that you learned from watching bad scientists. Would you care to address your logic on this one?
I wonder if a future archaeologists digs that up, what they will wonder? They will probably assume that we had a new race of 50' women take over the world, but that it was so few, that only a few of these coins were found. Then upon finding 'attack of the 50' woman' movie, they will know that man was wiped by that race.
Actually, things are going to be a LOT worse for you guys. Your mostly single customer that is buying no just your material, but your mines, is about to have multiple bubbles pop. It is expected that it will make what just happened in America look positively MINOR.
And actually, I think that America got rid of most of ours, and parts of EU have as well. EU has some issues with the PIGS. Hopefully that was taken care of over the last couple of days.
They will sell it for a time in bulk to China expecting to make it up in volume. Then China will swoop in and buy the company and the mine. Then shut it down, move the operation to CHina and sell it at a lower cost, while keeping the coin the same.
Most ppl in the country that are served by these kinds of subsidies do not have burglar alarms. They take care of burglars DIRECTLY. However, there is no reason why an alarm system can not be designed to use AOIP(Alarm over IP) approach. In fact, it has the advantage over pots that it can handle voice as well.
ah, just read the actually rules. They want the algorithms to assemble this, not the upfront sieving. That makes life more sporting, but actually doable.
Some interesting work around will have to be done. This is actually a traveling salesman issue since they combined multiple documents together. One easy short cut is that the blades on a physical devices will have various widths. If two pieces have similar widths, then it probably came from the same blade area. So, the trick here is to get these fixed in terms of size. Once you have added these up, then the largest amount is the ceiling of documents. Technically, the lowest amount is the floor (can not go lower than that). The answer is likely close to the floor, and not the ceiling.
Once you have the document count, then you can partition these out to make comparisons. As you figure out one document (due to graphics), you then know the bin orders to use to build other documents.
Many will try to do this physically. Big mistake. Instead, put the shreds in an airstream from underneath and blow it upwards. Start gently and increase the stream methodologically. That will create a sieve type action in which the lighter stuff will go higher and towards the top. At the top have an opening in which the pieces will blow into . What is needed is to get these to individually go into a small 'pipe', but individually. Once in the 'pipe', it can be streamed past multiple high speed cameras. The best solution is to run this several times and make sure that you have all the pieces. Once that has occurred, then you can assemble the pieces via algorithms.
Basically, this is a nothing more than chromatograph that uses weight and size.
VOIP is available as well. Seriously, it makes good sense to convert POTS lines to DSL/VOIP systems. It might even make sense to run fiber in many areas.
Interesting. I agree about Ryan Air. I could not imagine a worse airline. I have never flown easy jet and certain never Chinese.
However, I find AA and UAL to be superior to Luthansa. The passengers are on top of each other in Luthansa, and the FAs really were not that nice. AA/UAL international have been enjoyable for me (domestically, they both sux).
American fleets are required to not look at age, etc. In addition, they can no longer insist on the no-marriage, lose job after age 30 or 40, etc. In asia, they have the same old rules that America had back in the 60's. Europe is fairly similar to Asia, but not by design. For example, you will find that in europe, most of the FAs are NOT married. The norm for many nations is that a woman works when single, but quits upon marriage and certainly quits while raising kids. That is why when you fly german Lufthansa, it is male FAs. Once the women are in their late 30s and wanting to return the european airlines will NOT hire them.
As to American fleets, the older housewife FAs fly the short domestic routes, so that they are home at nights. The internationals pay a BIT more, but not enough to entice them. Most of the internationals are junior FAs, OR have no kids(BTW, this is the exact opposite of the cockpit; those guys have SENIORITY). So, you will find that most of the FAs on all international flights are pretty decent, though at the moment, Asian and middle eastern fleets are younger and nicer.
Finally, I have to say that my Dad is retired AA capt. while my sister is working at USAirways. I grew up flying AA but rarely do it anymore for domestic. The same is true for United. I used to prefer Frontier, but now go with SouthWest. The FAs ARE friendlier and happier and it reflects in how ppl are treated. But for going europe, I take United or American 777s. Best plane going with great service.
No, it will mean that local brands will take over. pick up your latest cPhone and cPod players. Likewise, droidCX2 is now available. The difference is that all of the tech will have been stolen/duplicated already, so having a new local brand is MUCH cheaper.
Slashdot Mirror
All the more reason to not announce it and follow it back to where it came from. There is an international community on this. We need to trace this ALL the way back.
That is not capitalism. That is simply the set-up the way that we have it. Since it is set-up this way, I think that we need to return to the per-reagan time that prevented Executives from owning stock, OR better yet, require that all employees including executives to own only employee stock. That way, you remove the incentive from the employees and executives to short companies.
While I agree that us Businesses AND politicians (W was the best friend that China had with his tax break and .75T/year deficits) deserve a lot of blame. China's actions have over and over been illegal from POV of WTO/IMF and even the 2000 accord with USA. Even now, their requiring companies to build there, but not import is illegal. Obama SHOULD have done something by now, but .....
I doubt it. The control chips will be too busy arguing amongst themselves and that will prevent it.
The fast that companies like Intel, AMD, Dell, IBM, HP, and esp. Apple, move their tech to China, the faster that these companies will disappear. Chinese gov. is simply using their greed against them. Smart on their part. Stupid on the companies, and America's as well. Hopefully, Google with Motorola will change that. What has to happen is that Motorola needs to focus on top products that get demand, while not taking the GM/Harvard finance MBA approach to businesses.
So they grabbed the drive/system, rather than watching and find out who is controlling it and then grab them. And ppl wonder why there are so many crackers out there.
Nope. Not a tariff. A tariff is applied ONLY to incoming or outgoing products. Instead, you put it on ALL products, including your own. That way, there is no discrimination.
Hence the reason why I oppose Cap-n-trade, but support a tax on ALL goods predicated on the amount of CO2 that came from where the good was produced.
And I seriously doubt that China was anything to do with AGW other than generating it faster.
Seriously, cap-n-trade works IFF all nations participate. Well, Not only is USA not participating, but the worst polluter, china, will not either. In fact, if USA does, then it is CERTAIN that China and 3rd world nations will actually make a grab for American businesses by quickly building up electricity (probably following the chinese model of illegally subsidizing it and then dumping the goods on international market). And what is the fastest way to build up CHEAP electricity? Coal plants without ANY pollution control (in fact, china has nearly all, if not all, of their pollution controls turned off).
So, what is the best solution? Have nations tax ALL goods (local and imported) based on the CO2 that comes from the nation where the final assembly and the primary sub-components (depending on size of item, much even want several of the largest sub-components). Ideally, we would tax based on CO2 emissions from a nation on a per sq km basis. With that approach, it forces ALL major nations to lower their emissions, while nearly all 3rd world nations are all ready at low levels. However, with this approach, it will reward those nations that actually take the initiative to drop their emissions, while punishing those that choose to ignore it. That includes the nation that invokes the tax itself.
America is to launch OCO2 in 2012. It measures CO2 emissions. Rather than playing guessing games, this would simply measure CO2 into a nation's border, as well as CO2 OUT of the nation. That approach would allow us to find exactly how much CO2 a nation generates and not worry about the source. That is up to the nation to solve. They may wish to kill coal plants. Or they may elect to kill cars. etc. However, this approach combined with per sq km basis, allows a nation to decide if the issue is a business issue or a ppl issue and then adjust accordingly. However cap-n-trade and combined with per capita is about the worst idea going. It is already failing in EU. They are losing businesses to China who will continue to cheat all the way through this.
The current post says no pictures taken because the company did not want to be ID. In particular, did not want engineers and testers to be shown. My guess is that the testers is another nationality and race: chinese. Therefore, it would show up easily on a pix that it was somebody from China.
Actually, I had already apologized to him in another thread. It was 4 am here at the time and was waiting on first coffee.
mea culpa. I am the one having a hard time reading. :( I just noticed that you are not OP. Sorry.
You have a difficult time reading? You objected to the story, but then noted that you learn from bad scientist. That was what YOU said. How are you going to learn from bad scientists and their science, unless it is shown?
So, you object to this story being published here, but then you state that you learned from watching bad scientists. Would you care to address your logic on this one?
I wonder if a future archaeologists digs that up, what they will wonder? They will probably assume that we had a new race of 50' women take over the world, but that it was so few, that only a few of these coins were found. Then upon finding 'attack of the 50' woman' movie, they will know that man was wiped by that race.
Actually, things are going to be a LOT worse for you guys. Your mostly single customer that is buying no just your material, but your mines, is about to have multiple bubbles pop. It is expected that it will make what just happened in America look positively MINOR.
And actually, I think that America got rid of most of ours, and parts of EU have as well. EU has some issues with the PIGS. Hopefully that was taken care of over the last couple of days.
They will sell it for a time in bulk to China expecting to make it up in volume. Then China will swoop in and buy the company and the mine. Then shut it down, move the operation to CHina and sell it at a lower cost, while keeping the coin the same.
Most ppl in the country that are served by these kinds of subsidies do not have burglar alarms. They take care of burglars DIRECTLY. However, there is no reason why an alarm system can not be designed to use AOIP(Alarm over IP) approach. In fact, it has the advantage over pots that it can handle voice as well.
ah, just read the actually rules. They want the algorithms to assemble this, not the upfront sieving. That makes life more sporting, but actually doable.
Some interesting work around will have to be done. This is actually a traveling salesman issue since they combined multiple documents together. One easy short cut is that the blades on a physical devices will have various widths. If two pieces have similar widths, then it probably came from the same blade area. So, the trick here is to get these fixed in terms of size. Once you have added these up, then the largest amount is the ceiling of documents. Technically, the lowest amount is the floor (can not go lower than that). The answer is likely close to the floor, and not the ceiling.
Once you have the document count, then you can partition these out to make comparisons. As you figure out one document (due to graphics), you then know the bin orders to use to build other documents.
Many will try to do this physically. Big mistake. Instead, put the shreds in an airstream from underneath and blow it upwards. Start gently and increase the stream methodologically. That will create a sieve type action in which the lighter stuff will go higher and towards the top. At the top have an opening in which the pieces will blow into . What is needed is to get these to individually go into a small 'pipe', but individually. Once in the 'pipe', it can be streamed past multiple high speed cameras. The best solution is to run this several times and make sure that you have all the pieces. Once that has occurred, then you can assemble the pieces via algorithms.
Basically, this is a nothing more than chromatograph that uses weight and size.
VOIP is available as well. Seriously, it makes good sense to convert POTS lines to DSL/VOIP systems. It might even make sense to run fiber in many areas.
Interesting. I agree about Ryan Air. I could not imagine a worse airline. I have never flown easy jet and certain never Chinese.
However, I find AA and UAL to be superior to Luthansa. The passengers are on top of each other in Luthansa, and the FAs really were not that nice. AA/UAL international have been enjoyable for me (domestically, they both sux).
American fleets are required to not look at age, etc. In addition, they can no longer insist on the no-marriage, lose job after age 30 or 40, etc. In asia, they have the same old rules that America had back in the 60's. Europe is fairly similar to Asia, but not by design. For example, you will find that in europe, most of the FAs are NOT married. The norm for many nations is that a woman works when single, but quits upon marriage and certainly quits while raising kids. That is why when you fly german Lufthansa, it is male FAs. Once the women are in their late 30s and wanting to return the european airlines will NOT hire them.
As to American fleets, the older housewife FAs fly the short domestic routes, so that they are home at nights. The internationals pay a BIT more, but not enough to entice them. Most of the internationals are junior FAs, OR have no kids(BTW, this is the exact opposite of the cockpit; those guys have SENIORITY). So, you will find that most of the FAs on all international flights are pretty decent, though at the moment, Asian and middle eastern fleets are younger and nicer.
Finally, I have to say that my Dad is retired AA capt. while my sister is working at USAirways. I grew up flying AA but rarely do it anymore for domestic. The same is true for United. I used to prefer Frontier, but now go with SouthWest. The FAs ARE friendlier and happier and it reflects in how ppl are treated. But for going europe, I take United or American 777s. Best plane going with great service.
BTW, skip ryan air. THEY SUX.
Actually, I have wondered what would happen if you do a bunch of geothermal wells. Take the heat out and cool the rock.
No, it will mean that local brands will take over. pick up your latest cPhone and cPod players. Likewise, droidCX2 is now available. The difference is that all of the tech will have been stolen/duplicated already, so having a new local brand is MUCH cheaper.