First off, you are not European and I doubt that you are Caucasian.
Secondly, there is a HUGE difference in intentions. Europeans that are grabbing knowledge and companies in America are not about to bomb America with it. In addition, it is NOT 1-way only. We are allowed to buy land, companies, etc in over in Europe. OTOH, Your nation, china, blocks the west from doing the same thing.
many of us have been saying that CHina is about destroying the west. So far, they have been getting big in academia, bringing in others from their nations, and then sending them home. Just as Manufacturing was taken from America, china will take R*D from here. And again, I will say that CONgress, esp the GOP but dems are complicit as well, along with MBAs in our businesses, are the main cause of this.
Wrong. Worst would be any windows solutions. Linux starts in a fairly secure and most are minimalist fashion.
However, misconfigure and behind on updates can change that quickly. Just like on any router.
oh yeah. Your posting is right on. I think that Trump needs to go further than what he did. Right now, I get the funny sense that he is trying to pull a fast one, rather than stop CHina from doing their garbage to America.
sure, but it does no good for tesla when the average price / car is around 20K. They want to sell them at 40-50K like its competitors, such as BMW, MB, Lexus, etc., do.
I agree with him about the illegals and H1Bs.
But seriously, he is dead wrong about tariffs. China not only manipulates their money against the dollar, but has loads of tariffs against imports, esp. against the west. It is best that we raise tariffs on similar areas. For example, they have LARGE tariffs against cars from the west. We need to raise tariffs on cars and car parts from CHina. And it should ramped up monthly over several years, not just simply be slapped out like he is doing. This way, either CHina can decide to be honest and work for true free trade (i.e. keep their agreements that they are breaking), or let car makers know that their imported parts are about to become EXPENSIVE. i.e. move the manufacturing out of china.
If Trump takes that approach, China can then decide what to do.
Yup. That can work when you have data that shares individual data pieces. In fact, you would just throw it into a Postgres or other SQL relational DB and simply join the various tables. And that approach WILL work with data from Facebook, Apple, Microsoft, etc.
BUT, imagine Google did a group by, along with using min/max,count, sum, on the data. IOW, you have data that is 1 level removed from what is needed to do that with.
Not at all. Give SLS to those companies that worked it and then have NASA offer contracts for launches, private space stations, etc. If SLS is actually viable, l-mart/Boeing will fund the rest and do launches. Just as CTS got SNC to keep dream chaser going, l-mart/Boeing could get 1-2 launches / year for 3 years sending cargo to Leo and/or moon, they would quickly finish it.
Seriously, trump does more for china and Russia than he does for America. We layoff here and too bad. China business layoff because Chinese gov owned business was giving American secrets out all over, and trump has to save them.
You can buy CLEAN data from Google. That is, if your are in science and need information about population bases, you can buy that from Google. BUT no names/addresses. So, no way to tie it back to you.
Likewise, you can buy access to clean data. I can describe somebody and then target an ad at them. If they click it and fill in information, that was free choice. BUT, again, google does not sell names/addresses and never has.
Unlike Facebook, Microsoft, Apple, etc. (and yes, this assumes that those are still selling it; it is possible that apple/MS/yahoo/etc quit selling names/addresses, but I doubt it).
Actually, they MIGHT add a few starlinks to launches ONCE they have the initial 12,000 up, but, they have to have the ENTIRE 12,000 up there in the next couple of years. It is something like 3 or 5 years. And IIRC, the timer has already started due to their launching the test sats. IOW, they are going to start with F9 launches for early next year, and before end of 2019, they will be launching with FH at least monthly until BFR comes on-line.
take it further. Starlink can be used around the moon and mars for total communications, along with other science projects.
He really is about to do for space what USSR/America space race did.
Now, it is time for ppl to start screaming at our CONgress critters to quit wasting our money.
Well, that is what starlink is all about. He is setting that up so that the sats are built robotically AND the line can then add different items to a sat.
Right now, so much of old space is focused on BEGGING money from CONgress to make a few $, while Musk is changing the world. OLD space needs to change quickly and invest in themselves, or simply sell out to somebody else.
In fact, I would say that the biggest issue is not Launch Costs, but CONgress forcing NASA to waste BILLIONS on SLS/Orion each year. We have already thrown $32B down the drain with it. At this time, I would love to see NASA kill off SLS, give it to the companies that worked on it, and then allow for private space to bid for sending cargo to EML1, along with doing 2 private space station contracts. With 2B / year, we could have a base set-up on the poles within 3-5 years.
Yes, it is obvious that with you backing the SLS/Orion along with Atlas/Delta, that you really do NOT care how much money America throws away.
For the rest of us, we understand that it is all about economics of launch and exploration that gives us the ability to do things. .
Actually, they are already at half a magnitude. $6 million would make it 1.5 magniture. If they can go from $150-300 / launch down to $15-30 million for 20 tonnes, They will own all commercial launch for at least a decade, and depending on CONgress, it COULD really restart our lunar exploration. The fact that we continue to throw BILLIONS at SLS/Orion is just sick, but if Musk gets this down to say 30 million for F9 AND $50 million for say 50 tonnes on FH, it will be extremely hard for CONgress to continue justifying this incredible waste of money.
First off, you are not European and I doubt that you are Caucasian.
Secondly, there is a HUGE difference in intentions. Europeans that are grabbing knowledge and companies in America are not about to bomb America with it. In addition, it is NOT 1-way only. We are allowed to buy land, companies, etc in over in Europe. OTOH, Your nation, china, blocks the west from doing the same thing.
why should we NOT allow foreigners to own land? There is no reason why not. And yes, that includes the Chinese. That is not a problem.
There are plenty of other issues that we need to address.
many of us have been saying that CHina is about destroying the west. So far, they have been getting big in academia, bringing in others from their nations, and then sending them home. Just as Manufacturing was taken from America, china will take R*D from here. And again, I will say that CONgress, esp the GOP but dems are complicit as well, along with MBAs in our businesses, are the main cause of this.
Say no and uninstall it.
If you are going to run MS, then simply shut off the power and pull all comm links. Then you will decently secured on MS.
Wrong. Worst would be any windows solutions. Linux starts in a fairly secure and most are minimalist fashion. However, misconfigure and behind on updates can change that quickly. Just like on any router.
They constantly update, and then made it skinny. In fact, I wish I had a couple of features back. However, it does a decent security job.
So, should CA start posting signs that Lawyers can cause cancer?
oh yeah. Your posting is right on. I think that Trump needs to go further than what he did. Right now, I get the funny sense that he is trying to pull a fast one, rather than stop CHina from doing their garbage to America.
sure, but it does no good for tesla when the average price / car is around 20K. They want to sell them at 40-50K like its competitors, such as BMW, MB, Lexus, etc., do.
I agree with him about the illegals and H1Bs.
But seriously, he is dead wrong about tariffs. China not only manipulates their money against the dollar, but has loads of tariffs against imports, esp. against the west. It is best that we raise tariffs on similar areas. For example, they have LARGE tariffs against cars from the west. We need to raise tariffs on cars and car parts from CHina. And it should ramped up monthly over several years, not just simply be slapped out like he is doing. This way, either CHina can decide to be honest and work for true free trade (i.e. keep their agreements that they are breaking), or let car makers know that their imported parts are about to become EXPENSIVE. i.e. move the manufacturing out of china.
If Trump takes that approach, China can then decide what to do.
Yup. That can work when you have data that shares individual data pieces. In fact, you would just throw it into a Postgres or other SQL relational DB and simply join the various tables. And that approach WILL work with data from Facebook, Apple, Microsoft, etc.
BUT, imagine Google did a group by, along with using min/max,count, sum, on the data. IOW, you have data that is 1 level removed from what is needed to do that with.
Musk can not and will not sell out to China ( trump does, not musk ). The reason is that he has space gear under itar.
Not at all. Give SLS to those companies that worked it and then have NASA offer contracts for launches, private space stations, etc. If SLS is actually viable, l-mart/Boeing will fund the rest and do launches. Just as CTS got SNC to keep dream chaser going, l-mart/Boeing could get 1-2 launches / year for 3 years sending cargo to Leo and/or moon, they would quickly finish it.
Seriously, trump does more for china and Russia than he does for America. We layoff here and too bad. China business layoff because Chinese gov owned business was giving American secrets out all over, and trump has to save them.
You can buy CLEAN data from Google. That is, if your are in science and need information about population bases, you can buy that from Google. BUT no names/addresses. So, no way to tie it back to you.
Likewise, you can buy access to clean data. I can describe somebody and then target an ad at them. If they click it and fill in information, that was free choice. BUT, again, google does not sell names/addresses and never has.
Unlike Facebook, Microsoft, Apple, etc. (and yes, this assumes that those are still selling it; it is possible that apple/MS/yahoo/etc quit selling names/addresses, but I doubt it).
No, just politically intolerable.
Actually, they MIGHT add a few starlinks to launches ONCE they have the initial 12,000 up, but, they have to have the ENTIRE 12,000 up there in the next couple of years. It is something like 3 or 5 years. And IIRC, the timer has already started due to their launching the test sats. IOW, they are going to start with F9 launches for early next year, and before end of 2019, they will be launching with FH at least monthly until BFR comes on-line.
take it further. Starlink can be used around the moon and mars for total communications, along with other science projects.
He really is about to do for space what USSR/America space race did.
Now, it is time for ppl to start screaming at our CONgress critters to quit wasting our money.
Well, that is what starlink is all about. He is setting that up so that the sats are built robotically AND the line can then add different items to a sat.
Right now, so much of old space is focused on BEGGING money from CONgress to make a few $, while Musk is changing the world. OLD space needs to change quickly and invest in themselves, or simply sell out to somebody else.
In fact, I would say that the biggest issue is not Launch Costs, but CONgress forcing NASA to waste BILLIONS on SLS/Orion each year. We have already thrown $32B down the drain with it. At this time, I would love to see NASA kill off SLS, give it to the companies that worked on it, and then allow for private space to bid for sending cargo to EML1, along with doing 2 private space station contracts. With 2B / year, we could have a base set-up on the poles within 3-5 years.
Yes, it is obvious that with you backing the SLS/Orion along with Atlas/Delta, that you really do NOT care how much money America throws away.
For the rest of us, we understand that it is all about economics of launch and exploration that gives us the ability to do things. .
Actually, they are already at half a magnitude. $6 million would make it 1.5 magniture. If they can go from $150-300 / launch down to $15-30 million for 20 tonnes, They will own all commercial launch for at least a decade, and depending on CONgress, it COULD really restart our lunar exploration. The fact that we continue to throw BILLIONS at SLS/Orion is just sick, but if Musk gets this down to say 30 million for F9 AND $50 million for say 50 tonnes on FH, it will be extremely hard for CONgress to continue justifying this incredible waste of money.
Not the same rocket, but same first stage. So far, they have not captured the second stage. Still, 2'nd stage is pretty cheap compared to first.
is that the site already collapsed and NK is building a NEW test site.