Slashdot Mirror


User: WindBourne

WindBourne's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
17,227
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 17,227

  1. Re: Meanwhile at a REAL car manufacturer... on Tesla Earnings Show Record Revenues With Record Losses (techcrunch.com) · · Score: 1

    As to mining 5km in the ocean, it is happening in a number of places. You lose idiot. Yes coal are plants, while oil comes from algae. Mea culpa.

  2. Re: Meanwhile at a REAL car manufacturer... on Tesla Earnings Show Record Revenues With Record Losses (techcrunch.com) · · Score: 1

    No. There has been YOU making wild accusations with nothing to back it up. The fact that you continue to lie and troll as several ppl speaks about you and what your Chinese overlords want.

  3. Re: 5% is nothing on Can We Live Without Concrete? (cnn.com) · · Score: 1

    No a very bright guy are you? That is % of co2. Since America's total co2 is dropping and China's total emissions continue to climb, then this is just more lies and BS from you.

  4. Re: Umm, right on Can We Live Without Concrete? (cnn.com) · · Score: 1

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/a... Red tide/porker #1 polluter? 1 coal company from china with 14% And as you go through top companies, it is china over and over and over. Crawl back into your Chinese gov subsidized home.

  5. Re: Umm, right on Can We Live Without Concrete? (cnn.com) · · Score: 1

    The idiot is you. The per capita takes total co2 and then divides it by the number of ppl. It , and idiots like you, do not care WHERE the CO2 comes from. BUT in all developed nations, including America AND china, the majority of emissions is NOT from ppl, but from businesses. In America, ppl account for less than 25% of total emissions. As such, ppl in America are under 4 and dropping. Sadly, it is idiots like you that continue to push lies. Heck 90 companies, not ppl caused 2/3 of the emissions. And that is based on cBS calculations. Likely it is a lot more.

  6. Re: Homes in California are already only for the r on California To Become First US State Mandating Solar On New Homes (ocregister.com) · · Score: 1

    they are still subsidized. That needs to be stopped.

  7. yeah, but Canada is picking up engineers on Canada Facing 'Brain Drain' As Young Tech Talent Leaves For Silicon Valley (theglobeandmail.com) · · Score: 1

    Seriously, lots of engineers and good non-software talent is leaving America and going to Canada. Smart on their part.

  8. Re: Umm, right on Can We Live Without Concrete? (cnn.com) · · Score: 1

    No, the real problem would be if every business in America polluted like Chinese. Our CO2 would be at 10+ like yours. In addition, our cities would be as polluted as yours, with an inability to see. The problem is not ppl. It is businesses.

  9. Re: 5% is nothing on Can We Live Without Concrete? (cnn.com) · · Score: 1

    Hey porker, concrete is already starting to be done clean in the states. However, 5% from concrete is fine. Trucks burning are mistakes. These are easily replaceable. And by switching to electric combined with clean electricity, not the pile of shit you have in china, it will continue cleaning up. Unlike china , where coal burning and CO2 emissions continues to climb, but trash like you does not care.

  10. Re: Meanwhile at a REAL car manufacturer... on Tesla Earnings Show Record Revenues With Record Losses (techcrunch.com) · · Score: 1

    Everything u say only proves u are a fucking liar. You never back a single thing u say with anything credible

  11. Re: Complaints and alternatives on Can We Live Without Concrete? (cnn.com) · · Score: 1

    What an idiot u are red tide/porker. You continue to support those that will destroy the planet and think you have a right to do so. However, china pours the most concrete and again, in the worst way ( inability to see in your cities ). You use coal rather than nuke power, or AE. And you continue to add more coal plants at a faster rate than AE. Only an idiot like you would think it will clean up.

  12. Re: Complaints and alternatives on Can We Live Without Concrete? (cnn.com) · · Score: 1

    Red tide/caffeinated bacon. Only an idiot thinks thinks we should spread out all over the planet. That is why you are not a city planner or architect.

  13. Re: Concrete != cement on Can We Live Without Concrete? (cnn.com) · · Score: 1

    Minored in it. U red tide have not a clue.

  14. Re: Meanwhile at a REAL car manufacturer... on Tesla Earnings Show Record Revenues With Record Losses (techcrunch.com) · · Score: 1

    And you are nothing but full of shit and lies. You are not able to look at anything rationally. And when I see the same illogical bs ( such as claiming that coal is cleaner than nations gas even though I showed how it is impossible ), well, just shows that you have a lot in common with walking dude; a liar.

  15. Re: Meanwhile at a REAL car manufacturer... on Tesla Earnings Show Record Revenues With Record Losses (techcrunch.com) · · Score: 1

    Because caffeinated pork and red tide are the same person. And I've seen enough of the AC writing to know that it is also just 1 peckerhead. You.

  16. Re: Fast follower on Tesla Earnings Show Record Revenues With Record Losses (techcrunch.com) · · Score: 1

    U might want to read TFA. She says they are going to increase production. It does not say how much, nor does it say that they held back.

  17. Re: Meanwhile at a REAL car manufacturer... on Tesla Earnings Show Record Revenues With Record Losses (techcrunch.com) · · Score: 1

    ROFL. Red Tide/caffeinated pork, like always, you are a fucking idiot.
    You obviously have NO CLUE of how to do power.
    100 KW charger? Or even 350 KW? That is nothing on our grid.
    Heck, my brother was stringing up multiple military bases with multiple MW on each base in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. The mall that I go to for charging draws MULTIPLE MW, with each major store and restaurant drawing a minimum of .2MW, though most will be closer to .75MW. In fact, even without the 10 Tesla Chargers, I would bet that the mall draws 10MW minimum. Heck, Mall of America probably draws around 20-30 MW.
    And you think that a simple 100 KW car charger will make a difference?
    Seriously, you have not a single clue of what you talk about.

  18. Re: Once Fords, GMs, Toyotas seriously push electr on Tesla Earnings Show Record Revenues With Record Losses (techcrunch.com) · · Score: 1

    who said that? Many asshole ACs on /., as well as analysts.

  19. Re:Concrete != cement on Can We Live Without Concrete? (cnn.com) · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry, but how do you get CO2 out of water, sand and pebbles?
    I've made 100s of yard of Concrete, and poured much more, and I do not see CO2 coming off those items.

  20. Re:Concete Manufacture Does Not Have To Produce CO on Can We Live Without Concrete? (cnn.com) · · Score: 1

    we have plenty if we can get the leftys to shut up. Nuclear power, combined with AE (wind, solar, hydro, geo-thermal, etc), are all clean and perfect.

  21. Re:Modular construction on Can We Live Without Concrete? (cnn.com) · · Score: 1

    good luck building high rises without concrete.

  22. Re:Complaints and alternatives on Can We Live Without Concrete? (cnn.com) · · Score: 1

    ugh.
    U just hit the nail on the head. If the far lefties would focus on the right stuff, this would be easy to solve.
    How many ppl want to go into a 100 story building made out of wood? Not me.
    Now, think of all the lefties that scream ( correctly ) that we need to shut down fossil fuel.
    Yet, most ppl would say that we need a COMBINATION of AE along with nuclear power.
    Of course, then the leftie starts screaming about how bad nuclear power is, and how it will destroy earth (yeah, right).

    We can and should have the CO2 issue solved by now, but extremists from lefties and righties are blocking it all over the world.
    Look at the lefties that scream about America. Of course, they say that our per capita emissions is higher than China, while they ignore Australia, middle east and a few other nations, all with higher per capitas.
    BUT, other than Germany, Japan, Eastern Europe, and SOuth Korea, all western nations are either stable or dropping. However, nations like CHina continue to grow faster than all of the globe, except for India, combined. IOW, Chinese mainland is accounting for about 40% of global growth and that does not include the damage that they do by adding coal to many other nations.

  23. Re:Umm, right on Can We Live Without Concrete? (cnn.com) · · Score: 1

    It is funny how often the idiots run out and scream about every little issue that they have just learned about.
    You have to correct.

    Oddly, the only way to bring our CO2 down, is to stop fossil fuel, of which the worse is coal. That needs to have the highest focus.
    Then oil burning for our transportation is right up there.

    If these items were stopped by simply stop adding coal and then slowly closing down plants.
    At the same time, we need to move our transportation off oil (electricity, hydrogen, etc).

    If all nations did this, CO2 would be a none issue.

  24. Re:5% is nothing on Can We Live Without Concrete? (cnn.com) · · Score: 1

    While I agree that playing with the 5% is stupid, humans are part of a cycle, not extra. IOW, our CO2 goes to plants, etc. Then we breathe the O2 from plants.

    OTOH, the CO2 from fossil fuel and concrete was in the ground and trapped but is being added to the environment. BIG difference.

  25. Nope. Simple as that on Can We Live Without Concrete? (cnn.com) · · Score: 1

    Concrete is a necessary item in today's world.
    However, the pollution from it is NOT the actual making of it. The vast majority of the CO2 emissions comes from burning coal to provide heat directly (uhm, china, india, etc), AND/OR from the massive use of coal for electricity.
    The only way to clean this up and minimize it, is to shut down coal plants. Keep in mind that NO coal plant can produce clean electricity/heat. At its absolute best, which is impossible to obtain, coal will produce double the CO2 of what methane does. And many many times more what Nuclear, hydro, wind, and solar produce.
    SO, for now, we need to quit focusing on small items like aircrafts, and concrete and instead focus on electricity and have all nations QUIT BUILDING NEW COAL PLANTS and instead focus on Nuclear, wind, solar, geo-thermal, hydro, etc. Even Nat Gas should be stopped.