The UK did something similar before, I think it was with disability benefit. They outsourced it to a US company and paid them based on the number of cases processed and the amount of money saved.
But I'm sure a quadriplegic could work on a building site, if he made the effort.
If their suspicions based on not having FB make them search, search. You won't find anything. If they tried to "do" anything based on those suspicions alone, my lawyer makes money on the deal.
Tomorrow's headline: Internet tough guy shot while resisting arrest.
people are too dumb to do the right thing for themselves, and cannot be educated to behave more sensibly.
Call me a cynic, but look at history. I think it proves the point, doesn't it?
There are perhaps counterexamples - the American revolution, England getting rid of the monarchy, England restoring the monarchy - but I suspect the reason why we study them is precisely because they are so rare.
If your country's elections can be "rigged" by screwing around with a social media platform, then your country deserves the end result.
1960: s/a social media platform/TV shows/ 1930: s/a social media platform/radio shows/ 1880: s/a social media platform/newspapers/ 1700: s/a social media platform/ye town crier/
'twas ever thus.
Fucking moron doesn't even begin to describe the average American voter.
Aaaaand (picking a purely hypothetical example out of the air) British voters are so much more savvy, as they've recently demonstrated.
its first subsurface sojourn beneath the surface of the Red Planet
Good thing you clarified that. Otherwise we might have thought it was the other kind of subsurface sojourn - the one that happens twenty feet up in the air.
"unlike listening to music" (an action) is compared to "the group that" (some people). A type mismatch.
It's like saying Mozart's symphonies aren't as good as Beethoven. At what, tennis? Hardly surprising, since he has two more arms.
P.S. That comma after "was" shouldn't be there. And "different" and "difference" should be in quotes, since you're referring to the word itself rather than what it means.
Was it ever one? The Verge, Wired and that other one - the scissors-paper-stone of semiscientific shite that is the source of 90% of PHB's "initiatives".
Slashdot Mirror
The UK did something similar before, I think it was with disability benefit. They outsourced it to a US company and paid them based on the number of cases processed and the amount of money saved.
But I'm sure a quadriplegic could work on a building site, if he made the effort.
If you were suspected of tax fraud you probably earned enough that the Tories consider you to be human.
Does "Tim Cock" make you feel better?
Translation: There will be a premium rate phone number that goes to India. It will never be answered, not that it would be any use if it was.
Tomorrow's headline: Internet tough guy shot while resisting arrest.
Call me a cynic, but look at history. I think it proves the point, doesn't it?
There are perhaps counterexamples - the American revolution, England getting rid of the monarchy, England restoring the monarchy - but I suspect the reason why we study them is precisely because they are so rare.
1960: s/a social media platform/TV shows/
1930: s/a social media platform/radio shows/
1880: s/a social media platform/newspapers/
1700: s/a social media platform/ye town crier/
'twas ever thus.
Aaaaand (picking a purely hypothetical example out of the air) British voters are so much more savvy, as they've recently demonstrated.
They should have said "fuck everything!" and gone straight to 5.
Until that number reaches 25, my point still stands.
Protip: read the *whole* post before writing a reply to *any* of it.
If your finger gets tired, take a rest.
All colonials are vulgar, that's true. But the septics are mostly comprehensible.
Good thing you clarified that. Otherwise we might have thought it was the other kind of subsurface sojourn - the one that happens twenty feet up in the air.
It transforms a cuboid into a parallelepiped?
He bestraddles the warp of the attention economy with the weft of long-tail synergies.
Circus? It's more like a pantomime.
I'm not going to look it up, but I bet they could reach Switzerland.
Because if adverts cost more then companies will be able to afford less, of course.
Hang on ...
s/who speak/who think they speak/
"unlike listening to music" (an action) is compared to "the group that" (some people). A type mismatch.
It's like saying Mozart's symphonies aren't as good as Beethoven. At what, tennis? Hardly surprising, since he has two more arms.
P.S. That comma after "was" shouldn't be there. And "different" and "difference" should be in quotes, since you're referring to the word itself rather than what it means.
Perhaps he was addicted to addiction itself?
Stupid nogger. He was making a cocktail with eggs in it and forgot the eggs.
The fuck it is, you dumb fat cunt.
It's bloody obvious, and always has been, that there are 24 hours in a day, 8 of which you typically spend asleep.
It's a ten dollar name for a ten cent idea, and now the "influencers": and other bullshit artists are latching onto it.
That time you went to Shelbyville.
Again.
Was it ever one? The Verge, Wired and that other one - the scissors-paper-stone of semiscientific shite that is the source of 90% of PHB's "initiatives".