So a guy suffers harassment, doxxing, stalking and death threats but doesn't call the police.
What good would that do?
At best they'd ignore it, at worst they'd go round and shoot him. " 'spatcher said death threats at this address, ain't that so, Cletus?" "Yup, and he was clearly reaching for something, or thinking about it anyway."
However, unlike listening to music, the researchers found 'no significant different' between the group that worked in silence and the group that worked in a noisy library.
Go film some of the anti-vaxxers whose children got sick with perfectly preventable diseases. Make sure to really capture the suffering of those poor children and the misery of the dumb-fuck parents.
They could equally well interpret it as being God's will, that he wanted some new angels or was testing their faith or something.
Like that dude who applied for a lot of jobs and was told not to look back but he did and was assaulted by a pillock.
Slashdot Mirror
The dupe ecopnomy is thriving!
https://games.slashdot.org/sto...
I keep a wind-up gramophone in the basement with a stack of shellac 78s for just that eventuality.
I could understand you being confused by an initial h because they're sometimes silent, but come on.
What good would that do?
At best they'd ignore it, at worst they'd go round and shoot him.
" 'spatcher said death threats at this address, ain't that so, Cletus?"
"Yup, and he was clearly reaching for something, or thinking about it anyway."
Yeah, of course you did.
This was after you were in the Spetsnaz and before you were an astronaut, right?
Dolly Parton? Johnny Paycheck? Kraftwerk?
Out with it, man!
A total train-wreck of a sentence.
If the Indian artillery & airstrikes don't get him first.
Or a system addict. Never can get enough.
Mmmm, Doris.
Anything fatal causes you to stop breathing.
You still are.
Summary mentions addiction several times, but doesn't say what to. Was he that famous that we're expected to just know?
Yeah, I suppose they couldn't possibly pass laws about anything else other than tech or that could affect you. *eyeroll*
Now I am hearing Iggy Pop's "Lust For Life". Thank you very much.
The first link I followed from the rebuttal was to a book titled "Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code".
I'm not even sure I understand what that means, but I detect a distinct hint of woo-woo.
They could equally well interpret it as being God's will, that he wanted some new angels or was testing their faith or something.
Like that dude who applied for a lot of jobs and was told not to look back but he did and was assaulted by a pillock.
True, but other people have votes -and theirs count just as much as yours. And votes lead to laws, and laws do affect you.
Snapnumpty only have to convince one person and they've cancelled you out. Two, and they're ahead.
Right. That clearly follows because the word, - nay, the very concept - didn't exist prior to 1776.
You beat me to it.
I think it was Orwell who warned against using a word in writing that you've overheard the grown-ups saying.
According to the summary they telecasted something that belongs to Oscar, but they didn't say what it was.
Note that the actual article - probably because it was written by an actual journalist - got it right. MsManisH1B did the needful and "corrected" it.
Oh, I totally agree.
I understood correctly, this will only apply to brown people and ones with big noses, right?
You aren't too hot on geography either.
This is aboot Canada, y'hoser.
Your link may shows that it happens, but that says nowt one way nor t'other on his claim about it not being healthy.
Your logical fallacy is ignoratio elenchi. On top of that, tha can fuck reyt off.
And it was quite easy to stand on Lavoisier's shoulders, on account of him having no head to get in the way.
The main reason Lavoisier was hated was that he was a tax collector. In your rather limited world-view shouldn't that make him the socialist?