Product manager: I tell them to take out the flour and add snails because I read somewhere that they're trendy. I also have those stupid big earrings and a beret because I'm a twat.
You're mostly right. But then again there was an article posted here, maybe a year back,about "Business at the speed of trust". It was all about cutting bureaucracy and red tape and just gettin' 'er done and other gung-ho number-one stuff like that.
People, especially those that fly a lot, read stuff like that and it makes their point hair stand up with excitement.
IIRC it was posted a week after a story about how some major corp got scammed because someone didn't do all that bureaucracy shit.
If the figures given above are correct he could have it happen once a month and it'd be less than the risk free rate of return by about an order of magnitude.
In plain English, he makes more than that in interest, unless he has it all stuffed under the mattress.
Slashdot Mirror
Why would they search for it? Everyone already has it!
Star Trek. No fucking contest.
All of it, apart form the fava beans and the chianti.
I crystallise thought.
Sadly, most people wouldn't understand that.
Product manager: I tell them to take out the flour and add snails because I read somewhere that they're trendy. I also have those stupid big earrings and a beret because I'm a twat.
Unless you have very long & flexible arms it's true, isn't it?
Are the corps claiming ownership of the patients and all their descendants in perpetuity?
Not the same then, is it?
This is the ninth "walking back" story today. And it's not like Helen Shapiro said, because they aren't leading me to happiness.
How do you know what *he* opposes, you fat fairy-tale believing cunt? Mind reader, are you?
No, he's opposed to the technology because the major corporation pushing it are assholes who want to corner the market for a necessity.
And businesses will tell them to fuck off.
I don't have time for silly games, I'm gonna buy me some of them thar bitcoins before they go up even more!
It's because the calls last longer due to all the "aboooooooooot"s, "y'hoser"s and "eh"s.
There's a lot of defense money going in the other direction, though.
180 degrees out.
You're mostly right. But then again there was an article posted here, maybe a year back,about "Business at the speed of trust". It was all about cutting bureaucracy and red tape and just gettin' 'er done and other gung-ho number-one stuff like that.
People, especially those that fly a lot, read stuff like that and it makes their point hair stand up with excitement.
IIRC it was posted a week after a story about how some major corp got scammed because someone didn't do all that bureaucracy shit.
So what happens when a genuine seller gets payment in advance, ships the goods, and then the buyer rolls back the transaction?
What if everybody starts rolling back transactions willy-nilly?
If the figures given above are correct he could have it happen once a month and it'd be less than the risk free rate of return by about an order of magnitude.
In plain English, he makes more than that in interest, unless he has it all stuffed under the mattress.
So no, he wouldn't end up in the poor house.
I thought the same; the former's an academic infraction (can get your degree torn up) and the latter is a civil matter (can cost many dollarpounds).
Seriously? They get to personally pocket the dosh?
I'm in a kind of uncanny valley, because it's so retarded it shouldn't be true, but some retarded things actually are.
Do they have to give it back if (unlikely, I know) he's found not guilty?
Did you even read what you wrote?
This. It's like "luna", anyone who uses it is a pretentious wanker too.
This. QoS is about what kind of shit it is. Net non-neutrality is about where from and (possibly) where to.
Does it?
When they came for Pluto, I did not speak out ...