Slashdot Mirror


Canadian Cellphone Bills Are Some of the Highest In the World, Says Report (straight.com)

Freshly Exhumed shares a report from Straight: A report released this week by the Ministry of Innovation, Science, and Economic Development (ISED) confirms that Canada ranks among the top three most costly countries for mobile wireless plans. Comparing the U.K, Italy, France, Australia, Japan, and the U.S. on six tiers of pricing -- which looked at talk-time, texts, and data -- the document shows that Canada has the most expensive mid-range and higher-tier plans in the world. "It is unacceptable that Canadians continue to pay ever-rising prices year after year for something as critical as mobile communications services," said Katy Anderson, Digital Rights Advocate at OpenMedia.

184 comments

  1. $ or it didn't happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My US cell phone bill is pretty high too but without providing details you will have to just take my word for it.

    1. Re:$ or it didn't happen by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

      Here's the three reasons why it costs so much:
      Bell
      Rogers
      Telus

      If you want more details, watch the video at this address:
      http://theprovince.com/news/ca...

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    2. Re:$ or it didn't happen by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      "Rogers’ $25 a month plan, for instance, buys 150 local minutes, 50 text messages and no data."

      Does it sink it, yet?

      150 LOCAL minutes.
      Only 50 text messages.
      NO data.
      And that joke of a service costs $25 PER MONTH.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    3. Re:$ or it didn't happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've lived in both the US and Canada (currently in London, Ontario). US cell phone bills are no where near the cost of what I pay here. At least in the states, you have the option to get a cheap pre-paid plan..not here!

    4. Re: $ or it didn't happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      7âs for: 3000 minutes for any national network and most EU countries with some intercontinental included like Portuguese speaking countries. 5Gb internet. 1 year subscription with operator. Portugal on a Canadian owned operator :)

    5. Re:$ or it didn't happen by tripleevenfall · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm confused. What is Bell Rogers going to Telus?

    6. Re:$ or it didn't happen by tripleevenfall · · Score: 1

      I've lived in both the US and Canada. US [everything] is no where near the cost of what I pay here.

      FYP

    7. Re:$ or it didn't happen by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

      The secret is to buy a US plan and just have it roam constantly in Canada. Still cheaper.

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    8. Re:$ or it didn't happen by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 0

      I'm confused. What is Bell Rogers going to Telus?

      Bill Rogers is going to Telus that an enormous country with a low population density and harsh weather requiring more expensive equipment, combined with a mostly "fairly-well off" population is going to result in prices being higher than for a more compact population in a milder climate.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    9. Re:$ or it didn't happen by denis-The-menace · · Score: 1

      You used to be able to have 200 minutes for $20 on prepaid at Virgin mobile.

      But then Bell bought out VM...

      --
      Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
    10. Re:$ or it didn't happen by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      An enormous country with a low population density that is almost all concentrated in the southern part of it.

      Harsh weather? Not more than other countries with winter seasons, where prices are much lower than here.

      You said the same exact arguments that keep being said by those three companies... We shall mark you as being a paid shill for one or more of these companies.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    11. Re:$ or it didn't happen by phorm · · Score: 1

      Except that in places like Saskatchewan - where you have a provincial Telco - prices are *much* more reasonable and they still manage to turn a decent profit.

    12. Re:$ or it didn't happen by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      The majority of Canada's population is concentrated in the areas close to the Canada–US border.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    13. Re:$ or it didn't happen by wardrich86 · · Score: 1

      To bend over, and that they're going in dry

    14. Re:$ or it didn't happen by Jason1729 · · Score: 1

      ROgers, Bell, and telUS. Also known as ROBUS because they rob us blind.

    15. Re:$ or it didn't happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As i said, i fully believe that the telcoms are greedy bastards, the world would be a better place if we executed all the C levels and lawyers from telcoms generally. But i have a hard time believing that low population has nothing to do with it. Even if all the population is too the south, how much coverage is "wasted" covering major highways and the like between cities. However it is also VERY likely that the tecoms overstate the cost on this to convince you to pay way more then you should. My point was more that it was a likely contributor, not necessarily the main one.

    16. Re:$ or it didn't happen by corychristison · · Score: 1

      Until our Premier sells off our Telco to Bell. :-/

      Source: Live in SK. Always talk going around about selling off our government owned infrastructure.

    17. Re:$ or it didn't happen by mark-t · · Score: 1

      A majority, yes... not everyone, however. There are roughly 3 million that do not. Three out of the ten largest cities in Canada are not very near the Canada-US border, in fact: Winnipeg, with a population of about 3/4 million is 110 km from the border, Calgary, with about 1.3 million people is about 250km from the border, and Edmonton, with about 950,000 people is about 550km from the border.

    18. Re:$ or it didn't happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still, I think the point is that Canada has a population of mostly dense urban areas, very inexpensive to provide cell service. There's a reason why the big three are making profits hand over fist - they are public companies you can see for yourself.

    19. Re:$ or it didn't happen by phorm · · Score: 1

      Yup. I think that recently happened to Manitoba.

      http://www.newswire.ca/news-re...

    20. Re:$ or it didn't happen by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      an enormous country with a low population density and harsh weather requiring more expensive equipment,

      Are you talking about Finland, Sweden or Norway? Because I thought all of three of those low-population with harsh weather countries had pretty cheap mobile service.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    21. Re:$ or it didn't happen by catchblue22 · · Score: 1

      Rogers once tried to charge us nearly $2000 for roaming data in Ft. Lauderdale. We had purchased a very expensive roaming data plan, but it didn't go through, so the cost was nearly $2000. The amount of data was primarily due to having the maps function turned on during three moderately short taxi rides. It was likely on the order of $5 to $10 per megabyte.

      They have also muddied the competitive waters by creating a large number of fake shell cell phone providers to give the illusion of competition. Fido and Chatr = Rogers. Virgin, Lucky Mobile = Bell. Koodo, Public Mobile = Telus. In our area, the only actual competitor outside the big three is Freedom Mobile, owned by our cable monopoly Shaw. They remind me of organized crime.

      --
      This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when first he appears as a protector - Plato (423 to 327 BC)
    22. Re:$ or it didn't happen by TimSSG · · Score: 1
      Data from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
      Finland 212 16
      Canada 232 4

      Finland and Norway has 4 times the population density. Sweden has even greater population density than Finland or Norway, Tim S.

      an enormous country with a low population density and harsh weather requiring more expensive equipment,

      Are you talking about Finland, Sweden or Norway? Because I thought all of three of those low-population with harsh weather countries had pretty cheap mobile service.

    23. Re:$ or it didn't happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fact, the DHS takes a very harsh view of non-US citizens having US mobile plans. As with everything, they believe that only terrorists would want US mobile plans...

    24. Re: $ or it didn't happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      90% of Canadians are within 100km of the border. Itâ(TM)s mostly empty space.

    25. Re:$ or it didn't happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yo Quiero Telco Bell.

    26. Re:$ or it didn't happen by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      Norway and Ontario are nearly the same population density, at 14.3 versus 14.1 people per square kilometer. So at the very least the infrastructure where more than half of Canadians live could be equivalent to what Norway's costs.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    27. Re:$ or it didn't happen by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      My fault Ontario is only 37.5% of the population of Canada. I've only solved a third of your problem for you, I guess you'll have to figure the other 2/3rds on your own.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    28. Re:$ or it didn't happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      But population density in Canada is much lower than in the countries in comparison and weather is much worse as well.

      Canada 3.4/km2

      UK 255/km2

      Japan 337/km2

    29. Re: $ or it didn't happen by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, I pay $15 a month for 3 gigabytes of data and no phone number. For calls my VoIP service costs me about $3 a month for my normal usage.

      You don't actually HAVE to spend ridiculous sums for basic service; most people just don't know any better.

    30. Re: $ or it didn't happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should see Jim Shaw's "cabin" on the lake at Invermere BC.. it's like something Tony Soprano would build in tribute to his tiny cock.

      I pissed on his driveway. I encourage everyone to stop by & do the same.

    31. Re: $ or it didn't happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      VOIP. Ahahaha. The chinks listen to all your calls bud.

    32. Re: $ or it didn't happen by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      I with they would jump in when I'm trying to place an order with Szechuan Palace. Could use a good interpreter.

    33. Re:$ or it didn't happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is still close by Canadian standards. People just don't get (on both sides) just how big Canada is. Close to the border I'd say is anything within 500km, but close to the longest border in the world is still a lot of land.

      I'm with a non-national career and don't really see the point in supporting a national carrier. 99.5% of the time I'm either within 200km of my home which is covered or overseas which I'd be screwed regardless. So I'd rather deal with a carrier that can give me the pricing for the density we have within say 150km of the boarder in the Toronto, Winipeg, Vancouver etc areas and let the hinterland alone. I'm sorry but if you insist on living 10km away from anyone else then you forgo modern conveniences or you pay the cost of delivering them to you. I'm not going to pay higher cost of living for being in a large metro area and subsidize the dude with a shack 500km further north.

    34. Re: $ or it didn't happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, you know, oligopoly.

    35. Re:$ or it didn't happen by mark-t · · Score: 1

      If you're going to make 150km be the standard for "close" (I would have considered it to be anything closer than 100km, as the crow fliies, personally... since things like terrain or great lakes that might force roads to not simply be straight has no bearing on the distance that a wireless signal necessarily has to travel), that still leaves about 12 or 13% of Canadians that don't live that close... and of those, about 85% of them live in just one of two Albertan cities, both of which are among Canada's ten most populous: Calgary and Edmonton. The former city has about 1.3 million people and is 250km from the border and the latter has a population of about 950,000, and is 550km. Neither of them are just dudes living in a shack out in the boondocks somewhere.

    36. Re:$ or it didn't happen by mark-t · · Score: 1

      True... but there are somewhat long highways connecting them.

      The above post only suggested that cellular service would only be needed along the Transcanada highway.

    37. Re: $ or it didn't happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you claim Canadian cellphones work in every acre of its snowy wilderness? If not then density is highly irrelevant. Russia is a larger country than Canada, but with cellphones plan costs order of magnitude cheaper. And there is no such thing as twoyear plan for any decent phone in Russia. And equipment is about the same just everywhere in the world.

    38. Re: $ or it didn't happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just happened in Manitoba , plans starting to climb already.

      And what happened to WingMobile?

    39. Re: $ or it didn't happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With not much cell coverage away from highway 1. Wanna go hiking backoungry, bring your satellite Garmin or what are the called or you are out of luck.

    40. Re: $ or it didn't happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that's where it actually is. Go drive 1 hour north and coverage gets very patchy. Don't you imagine all Manitoba covered, because it it is not.

    41. Re: $ or it didn't happen by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Manitoba isn't very well covered, that is true... but Alberta sure as hell is, with reliable LTE service going as far north as Athabasca. BC also has pretty good coverage on its major highways extending into the interior and to its northern major cities.

    42. Re:$ or it didn't happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit.

      There are 4 Wireless carriers available in Canada
      Rogers = Which has the most coverage nationwide, though centered around population centers.
      Telus = Which most of it's towers are in BC and Alberta
      Bell = Which most of it's towers in in Ontario and Quebec
      Shaw (Wind Mobile) = Which most of it's towers are in city centers of Vancouver and Ontario and practically useless outside of those two markets.

      None of them. Zip. Zilch. Cover rural areas to any degree what-so-ever. This is no different from the US where Verizon, AT&T, and T-Mobile basically abandoned Montanna, North Dakota and South Dakota. At some point AT&T pre-Cingular abandoned Alaska, selling their towers and customers to a carrier that actually is already there and established. GCI basically owns all the cellular coverage in Alaska. If you had Verizon (or worked for a company who required you to use Verizon) you had no service previously to LTE.

      And there in lies the rub. The further north you go, the less competition there is, because there is less population. You might be able to listen to Spotify on a road trip from San Diego to Seattle, but you sure as hell can not do that in Canada, because of the costs of data plans, and even if you could afford it, your LTE coverage ends 10 miles outside of Hope, and doesn't pick up again till you reach another city. That is how it is in most of Canada and the US. You have coverage as long as there is something to cover, and then then 10 miles outside of it, it's dead. Take the Amtrak from Seattle to Chicago, and you'll have no service once you hit Montana until you enter Minnesota.

    43. Re: $ or it didn't happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Source?

    44. Re: $ or it didn't happen by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

      It's not just density, it's population overall.

      Russia has a population of 145 million. That's more than 4 times Canada's population. That brings economies of scale that lowers prices.

    45. Re:$ or it didn't happen by dk20 · · Score: 1

      Really, can you provide a source?

      I was a canadian citizen living in the US for years. I'd cross back into the US 4-6 times a month and hand a canadian passport while driving my connecticut plated car and using a connecticut drivers license becaues i needed it to buy my car and i let my Ontario license expire.

      Never once had them ask me about the TWO US phones i had on me.

      I still go back and forth often. in the last 10 years of crossing dozens of times i have only had one DHS guy ask about a phone. He found it odd i didnt have one and mentioned that everyone does and when people say they dont it sets off red flags that they are hiding the phones.

      Never once was i asked who was the phones service provider.

    46. Re:$ or it didn't happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      which southern part? theres a 3000KM border on the south side.

    47. Re:$ or it didn't happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take the Amtrak from Seattle to Chicago, and you'll have no service once you hit Montana until you enter Minnesota.

      But drive, and you will.

    48. Re:$ or it didn't happen by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      It's because the calls last longer due to all the "aboooooooooot"s, "y'hoser"s and "eh"s.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    49. Re:$ or it didn't happen by mark-t · · Score: 1

      I'm in Canada and mny cell phone bill is about $80/mo for a smartphone plan, which includes 2gigabytes of data, with an overage charge of $10 for every gigabyte or portion thereof over it. It has unlimited talk minutes, no charges for long distance anywhere in Canada, and can be used without paying roaming charges anywhere in the country that is within my provider's network (and their coverage is quite reasonable... including all of the major cities, many smaller ones, as well as all of the highways I've ever driven on). Not sure how that compares to typical US plans, but there's your comparison.

    50. Re:$ or it didn't happen by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      Sure, let's compare Rogers (probably the biggest wireless carrier in Canada) in Canada's most populous province to T-Mobile. I'll pick a plan with unlimited nationwide minutes and as close to 50GB of full-speed monthly data as I can get:

      Rogers: 40GB for $225 USD / $290 CAD per month
      T-Mobile: 50GB soft-cap for $70 USD / $90 CAD per month

      How much can you get with Rogers for the same price as T-Mobile? $90 CAD a month gets you 4GB.

      So as compared to the US, Canadians either pay 3.2x the price, or get 12.5% as much data.

    51. Re:$ or it didn't happen by MercTech · · Score: 1

      I'll just say that the two years I spent working at Chalk River, Ontario I found my Virgin Mobile account to be cheaper than my U.S. minimum price AT&T phone. And I have a decades old cheaper contract with AT&T they keep trying to get me to let go of so they can raise my rates. I keep turning down new iPhones for free.

      --
      NRRPT/RCT
    52. Re: $ or it didn't happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd be happy with that plan if the data was up to 10GB at regular priority and reduced-priority over 10GB.

      Convert the units on GB/month to Mb/second and compare the result with your speedtest.net results. It's a tiny, tiny number.

      I pay $50/mo for 1GB and 1000 nationwide minutes, but my plan is circa 2012, before they banned 3 year contracts (I'm not on a contract and buy my phones outright).

      Seems like I can get 3gb and unlimited minutes from public mobile (Telus owned, I'm with Koodo now so same network) for not a lot more than my current price but I have to pre-pay for 3 months there.

      The only real solution is structural separation, but we could improve the situation a lot if they opened wireless up to wholesale like they do for wireline internet (which is its own shitshow but has got us some competition and lower prices.

    53. Re:$ or it didn't happen by rhazz · · Score: 1

      Canada 3.4/km2

      That is the average population density across the entire country which is 100% irrelevant.

  2. Well, duh by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    That's why I know a lot of people without cellphones. Basic packages are around $15~$20 and only give you about 10 hours of voice calls. You can pay $10~$20 extra on top of that for something like 100~500MB of data. It's just insane.

    And there's basically monopolies on the coverage everywhere, you only have options if you live in or near the big cities. Get outside of Vancouver, Toronto, Ottawa and Montreal and your list of options gets really small, really fast.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
    1. Re:Well, duh by kwerle · · Score: 1

      On the one hand, I feel bad for my northern neighbors.

      On the other hand, how the hell are you going to pay to cover that huge area with such a small population in most places?

    2. Re:Well, duh by fred6666 · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, how the hell are you going to pay to cover that huge area with such a small population in most places?

      That's the point. They don't. Most of Canada isn't covered by cell phone signal.
      Countries with similar population density such as Sweden and even Australia have better cell phone plans so Canada is getting ripped off no mater what excuse you can find.

    3. Re:Well, duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That’s crazy, here in Ireland we pay on a average 20euros per month.

      Getting :

      Unlimited data (capped around 18gb or so, I never reach this) & 8GB of data roaming in Europe
      & Unlimited voice calls

      We have no fear of going over the limits as they simply don’t exist.

    4. Re:Well, duh by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      They only need to cover the cities and the one road that goes west to east across the country.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    5. Re:Well, duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After you pay your next phone bill, please take the time to kick all the greasy filthy camel humping muslims out of Ireland. Ireland should be for the Irish only, with no room for muddy skinned third world child molesting goat fuckers.

    6. Re:Well, duh by lucasnate1 · · Score: 2

      That's why I know a lot of people without cellphones.

      Sounds fun, wish mobile was more expensive where I live.

    7. Re:Well, duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But they still get forced to cover all kinds of rural area with land lines and cellular. These areas are nearly a total loss as far as revenue goes, so the high population areas wind up subsidizing it.

    8. Re: Well, duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a bit of BS, if they are forced they still some how don't do it because Canada ain't covered; on the other hand Russia which is a larger, sparse and three times more poor country somehow manages to get a good coverage which costs its users perhaps a tenth of the cost Canadians are paying. Considering that Russians import just about every high tech equipment from the same sources paying for it more, their cheaper labour cannot explain it . They do not have cell carriers monopoly though.

    9. Re:Well, duh by phoenix_rizzen · · Score: 1

      All 3 of the major carriers (Telus, Rogers, Bell) have a special going right now with their budget subsidiaries (Koodo, Fido, Virgin):

      $60 / mth for unlimited Canada-wide minutes, unlimited SMS/MMS, voicemail, call display, etc, etc, etc, with 10 GB of data.

      The Fido and Virgin deals are actually 5 GB plans with a bonus 5 GB for the first 12 months. The Koodo plan is actually 10 GB of data.

      Note: These plans are only available until the 19th of Dec, and they haven't done much advertising for them.

      These are for new SIM activations, and only available to customers bringing their own phone. But still a hell of a deal compared to the "normal" plans.

      We're on a corporate plan which is includes a 30% discount, and it's still over $150 / mth for 2 phones with only 7 GB of shared data, 300 daytime minutes on one phone and unlimited Canada-wide minutes on the other phone. :( We'll be switching to Koodo shortly ...

  3. Yes it's ridiculous by RobinH · · Score: 2

    I live in Canada and can't believe what people are willing to pay, but that's just it -- the phone companies charge it and they pay it. Myself, I have a pay-as-you-go plan where I can buy minutes in a $100 chunk which doesn't expire for 365 days, and for several years I've never maxed out that $100 so it keeps rolling over. I think I have about $250 still in there right now. That's the best deal I could find, as it's only $8.33 per month, but I only use it for a few phone calls and maybe about a dozen texts per week with my wife. No data, I just use WiFi everywhere. My wife, on the other hand, with her iPhone 7 is paying around $60/month including data on a Rogers account, I think.

    --
    "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
    1. Re:Yes it's ridiculous by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      They passed laws that pre-paid credit cards and pre-paid store cards cannot expire anymore, so pre-paid phone cards should not expire too. You can be sure bribes were involved to exclude phone companies out of that law.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    2. Re:Yes it's ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am doing the same thing you are with Fido. However, you should also check with your provider to see if they offer an unadvertised "plan" that deducts $100 airtime to extend your remaining balance for another year without needing to pay. Something about "excessive airtime", but hopefully your provide has something like it. For Fido, they have one extra stipulation: your airtime must be more than $150. For me, not needing to pay 1 year for the use of something that is just going to accumulate is nice.

    3. Re:Yes it's ridiculous by Frederic54 · · Score: 2

      I do the same thing as you, but with PetroMobility, 25$ for 120 days, so 75$/year, it's 10 per minutes/SMS. I rarely use more than 15$ for a 120 days period.

      --
      "Science will win because it works." - Stephen Hawking
    4. Re:Yes it's ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use 7-11 Mobility in Canada (they use ztar mobile same as petro-canada) It's only $25 for year/365 days... Free incoming text, voicemail etc.

    5. Re:Yes it's ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason not to use those is that its an american company and all your data is sent to the USA. texas i believe.

      fido is more expensive, but at least its in canada. I do pay as you go as the parent for $100 a year (just refilled). Some years i use it all, some years i dont.

      Fido constantly, weekly sends me text messages to try and switch to a plan, and when you call the call centre you are ALWAYS sent to the quebecois call centre where you can understand anything they say. I see that as them trying to gently nudge me towards a plan.

      used to be able to pay the bill with fido bucks too, and for two years i didnt pay anything for the cell phone bill! just used my previous 10 years of accumulated fido bucks. Sadly that was discontinued as well.

    6. Re:Yes it's ridiculous by Luthair · · Score: 1

      Nope, provincial governments put the gift card law in, but federal government regulates the telcos.

    7. Re:Yes it's ridiculous by bdh · · Score: 1

      I'm on Speakout, as well. If you're going through 7-11 rather than PetroCanada, you can buy minutes in blocks as low as $25 for the year.

      I have co-workers who spend $350 a month for their family plans (two adults, two children). If they went with Speakout or similar, it would be closer to $7 a month. But then when you see two kids at the dinner table texting each other, or the adults making a 45 minute call on their cell phone when sitting right next to a landline, you see where why the telcos can charge what they charge.

      People will pay it. They'll complain, but they'll pay it.

    8. Re:Yes it's ridiculous by bdh · · Score: 1

      The reason not to use those is that its an american company and all your data is sent to the USA. texas i believe.

      Uh, what data, exactly? The phone numbers of people I call? The phone numbers of people who call me? The texts I receive or send?

      Yes, those go through the phone company. Whether it be Bell, Rogers, Telus, AT&T, or someone else, the phone company will have a record of what your phone calls were, if for nothing else than bill purposes.

      I'm not really sure where the call center is for Speakout. I think the last time I called them voice was in 2009. And at the time, they were actually pretty helpful (I was using a non-Speakout phone, and I had to configure a setting somewhere so it would restrict itself to the Speakout frequencies, and not use the other frequencies Rogers has).

    9. Re:Yes it's ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which pay-as-you-go plan are you with?

    10. Re:Yes it's ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My dad is on the same plan. It actually sucks. He pays $100 a year, which buys him some pay-as-you-go credit. At the end of the year, he has to spend another $100 or else he loses the credit he's already got. And he can't use the credit he's already got to pay for his renewal.

      Result? He's now got over $350 worth of credit after a few years, and *still* has to add $100 to that pile every year. The instant he has to replace his phone--too bad, he'll lose that credit.

      So it's ABSOLUTELY NOT "pay as you go" in the sense that you'd expect it.

    11. Re:Yes it's ridiculous by movdqa · · Score: 1

      We used to do this as well. My wife and kids did this with AT&T but had to be frugal with calls and texts and no data. This past September, we bought four iPhones from Xfinity Mobile. We have four lines with them and the last bill was $8.04 for all four lines. So about $25 per line per year for unlimited voice and text and 100 MB data per month. I had a look at the article and the rates that Canadians pay is pretty close to what those in the US pay. I think that things have improved in the US with T-Mobile starting a price war a few years ago. There are also some pretty good deals with MVNOs but I think that it's hard or impossible to beat Xfinity Mobile's deal if you use very little cellular data. They have 16 million hotspots for WiFi which works out really well in my area and rock bottom prices for unlimited text/voice using Verizon's network. It may be too good to be true over time but we're loving it for now. What I'd like to see is more MVNOs doing this. Comcast clearly has the size to do this. I think that Disney, Microsoft, Samsung and Cisco could do something like this as well.

    12. Re:Yes it's ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oddly I see this as well with co-workers. Recent iphones with data plans that are close to $400/month and cable tv and expensive family vacations at least once a year and cycle through new cars every 3 years and have their kids in competitive sports. Given they make close to what I make, I have no idea how these people function with such high monthly expenses.

    13. Re:Yes it's ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a Rogers $100 a year plan, unlimited texting with about 15 minutes of voice x 4. Wifi is the data plan. If a kid blows past his voice minutes, they can buy a top up card on their own for more minutes.

    14. Re:Yes it's ridiculous by RobinH · · Score: 1

      I'm on PC mobile actually, so it only has the 365 day option on $100 top-ups, but it looks like the coverage map for PC mobility (uses Bell towers) is better than Speakout. However, I have to admit that Speakout is certainly very good as well.

      --
      "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
  4. On the upside by vux984 · · Score: 1

    Anyone invested in Telus, Rogers, and Bell have had a good decade.

    1. Re:On the upside by PPH · · Score: 1

      Rogers

      In this context, is Rogers a verb?

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:On the upside by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You Telus.

    3. Re:On the upside by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      It's ringing a Bell, Canada!

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    4. Re:On the upside by ELCouz · · Score: 1

      rimshots fired!

    5. Re:On the upside by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd be rogered if you think so.

    6. Re:On the upside by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      roger roger. whats your vector victor?

  5. That's not true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My mailbox is at the same height as anywhere else.

    1. Re:That's not true by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      They're not talking about the height of your mailbox you dumbass, they're talking about above-sea-level elevation.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
  6. Takes money to build out in ice and snow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look at Alaska, and Hawaii. Super expensive.

    1. Re:Takes money to build out in ice and snow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had at&t when I lived in anchorage. It was the same cost as when I lived in the midwest.

  7. Except Sask by dentree4 · · Score: 2

    Cell phones are cheap in Saskatchewan. They have competition (sasktel) I just got new phones the other day and every fucking salesperson told me that there was no difference between carriers because "there's so much competition their pricing is identical" That's collusion.

    1. Re:Except Sask by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CBC reported that the rates are low in southern Sask. because US cell service doesn't stop at the border and are much cheaper. Therefore Sask. providers have to be competitive with US. Some companies now sell a sask. service to other parts of Canada and hide the fact that they are not in Sask. to get cheaper rates from the 3 gouging companies.

      There are other counties with low population densities that have cheaper rates. Australia is one that I remember off hand.

      So there must be a form of collusion in setting rates by the big 3. They make sure packages aren't directly comparable and so compete with each other. They were pretty shook up when AT&T wanted to come to Canada, but AT&T decided not to.

    2. Re:Except Sask by dentree4 · · Score: 1

      Thats the thing they are directly comparable, and even the sales people say any change is mirrored overnight by the others. There's "competition" in a "They all charge the same so there's no competition" kind of way.

  8. But.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But.... But.... But..... Free medical!

    1. Re:But.... by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      ... is nullified when people keep stressing about going over their monthly smartphone quotas for voice, messages and data.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    2. Re:But.... by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Just use wireless, grandpa.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    3. Re:But.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Free? Are you earning $20000 gross? I'm paying $300 a year through my provincial taxes:

      http://www.taxtips.ca/ontax/ontariohealthpremium.htm

    4. Re:But.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note: compared to the US that is cheap as balls

    5. Re:But.... by dryeo · · Score: 1

      In BC, it's $70 a month for a single person on top of the taxes.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    6. Re: But.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alberta is still "free"at least.

  9. Its because net neutrality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    I am Canadian and it is real fact that Canada has stong pro-net-neutrality laws which are prime cause of expensive bills. If we were smart to kick out libtards we could end net nutrality and the deregulation is guaranteed to lower prices.

    1. Re:Its because net neutrality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The prime cause is that our network providers are greedy kikes.

    2. Re:Its because net neutrality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is literally no evidence that is not provided by Breitbart or The Rebel that proves this. The free market does not solve all the ills.

    3. Re:Its because net neutrality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, We all know know you aren't Canadian.

    4. Re:Its because net neutrality by substance2003 · · Score: 1

      I am Canadian and it is real fact that Canada has stong pro-net-neutrality laws which are prime cause of expensive bills. If we were smart to kick out libtards we could end net nutrality and the deregulation is guaranteed to lower prices.

      The fact that Canada has some of the highest prices around the world have been around well before net neutrality was a thing. While I'm all for kicking out the Liberals (for other reasons), I'll point out that a decade of Conservative rule has not changed anything in regards to pricing either.

    5. Re:Its because net neutrality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Found russian stooge. I'm "sure" you are anti-liberal and here is you defending net neutrality like a cuck.

    6. Re:Its because net neutrality by substance2003 · · Score: 1

      Found russian stooge. I'm "sure" you are anti-liberal and here is you defending net neutrality like a cuck.

      This comment shows how low the IQ discussion can go on this site at times. Keep your nonsense to yourself dude.

    7. Re:Its because net neutrality by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      The primary goal of free enterprise is to maximize income while minimizing cost. Removing government regulation lets them increase rates and cutting corners on things that cost them money. The reason for high costs in Canada is called regulatory capture.

    8. Re:Its because net neutrality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is impossible to take comments like yours seriously. You obviusly dont understand net neutrality and why it is a bad thing and you claim to not be a libtard but then opinions you say happen to be all in agreement with libtards. It is librals fault that online discussing sucks because libtards will never admit they are wrong, which they always are.

    9. Re:Its because net neutrality by substance2003 · · Score: 1

      How can I take your comment seriously when you slip in net neutrality as if it had anything to do with the fact that Canadians pay the highest prices for cell phones fees? This problem in Canada is as old as the arrival of the cell phone service, well before we started to hear of the term net neutrality which makes it irrelevant to this discussion. You're mixing apples and oranges as far as I'm concerned.

  10. The only way that things will change... by mark-t · · Score: 1

    ... is when enough people decide that they don't want to pay that much for it, and are willing to live without the service unless or until things change.

    After all, it's not ridiculous for a company to charge as much as people are willing to pay for a product or service, even if they pay it only because it is preferable to them than the inconvenience of not having it.

    1. Re:The only way that things will change... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the classic scenario you find in any monopoly - high prices, poor service, and lack innovation, You only have three choices and they know it - what's the service provider's incentive to offer more? It's not going to change until there is a viable alternative. Freedom Mobile are slowly chipping away in the bigger cities, but unfortunately it's very unlikely that any new competitors will come into Canada because of the foreign ownership rules for telecom services here. The government actually likes having a small number of big players to regulate, it makes their job so much easier but all Canadians are paying the price for this lazy attitude. (I'm Canadian too in case anyone was wondering.)

    2. Re:The only way that things will change... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet, the CRTC does a poor job at regulating the telecoms. They might be throwing rules at them, but they are not very effective.

      For example, it used to be about $17 a month on a 3-year contract. CRTC declares that 2.0001+ year contracts are not allowed because people complained it was too long, bla bla bla. Now, it's $30 a month for essentially the same plan.

      Another example: It was approximately $60/month for plan X about half a year ago. CRTC declares phones now must be unlocked; provide free unlocks for existing phones. Now, telecoms charge $65/month for the same plan X.

      All these blemishes negate whatever they did right (cap on overage charges, I forgot what else now...).

    3. Re:The only way that things will change... by c-A-d · · Score: 1

      There will never be any real competition in the market until the federal government repeals the rules requiring 50%+1 canadian ownership of telecommunications companies.

      --
      some karma... and kinda lukewarm about it.
  11. Don't get too excited by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you look at the actual report, you'll find the differences between the prices in the US and Canada are not that dramatic. And they don't take into consideration all the lovely fees and service charges that get added to your cellular bill.

    Here's a direct link to the report, because the article itself gives almost no useful data:

    https://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/...

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Don't get too excited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, well personally I look forward to seeing the new cell towers Katy Anderson starts putting up. Talk about a go-getter!

    2. Re:Don't get too excited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks but the report was already linked in the original Slashdot story.

  12. It's dumb by decipher_saint · · Score: 1

    I got my Telus mobility bill just a couple days ago, it's just a few cents shy of $90 for a 1 GB data plan. I get about 300 minutes of call time (which I don't think I've ever gotten close to using) and unlimited texting nationwide (whoop de doo).

    I'm really thinking about going back to a dumb phone, or at least scrapping the data plan. 99% of the time I'm on WiFi anyway.

    --
    crazy dynamite monkey
    1. Re:It's dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not sign up with a US carrier who offers free travel mobile, like Google Fi?

    2. Re:It's dumb by corychristison · · Score: 1

      The prices vary greatly depending where you live.

      Here in SK with Koodo, I'm paying $48/mo for Unlimited Nationwide Calling (and roaming, I can be in BC and call NS for not a penny more!), Unlimited North American SMS/MMS (Canada and US), and 5GB of Data per month.

      I've yet to find a better deal anywhere else. I rarely go over 1GB data a month, so I don't have a use for "Unlimited" data.

    3. Re:It's dumb by Ian+A.+Shill · · Score: 1

      Freedom Anywhere
      $55
      8gb/1gb roaming
      unlimited NA text voice roaming
      (GTA)

      --
      For hire.
    4. Re:It's dumb by Straif · · Score: 1

      Sask tends to have the best rates and from what I've seen Ontario the worst. On the Telus site using a 6gb unlimited talk and text plan as a base you get:

      Sask = $55
      Ontario = $100 (but only 5gb)
      Quebec = $63

      Now I can see Quebec from my office window but I have to pay almost double for access to the same network. The Quebec cable company however does offer cell plans across the border which also happen to use the Telus network but at Quebec rates. So I can go with Telus and pay $100+ or switch to Videotron, use the same network nationwide and pay $61. as an added bonus they often have a double data offer so if I wait till Christmas week to switch it would probably be 10gb data for $61.

      --
      Of course that's just my opinion...... you could be wrong!
    5. Re:It's dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      major metropolitan areas only...

    6. Re:It's dumb by substance2003 · · Score: 1

      No here's the dumb part.

      I pay 35$+tx a month which is a little bit more than 40$ for unlimited calls across the country, 1 Gig data, unlimited texting nationwide and a voicemail box with 10 messages (the others offer only 3 VM with the base plan) on Koodo.
      Of course Koodo is using Telus' network since it's the same owner but most think it's better quality to be on a known brand like Telus.

    7. Re:It's dumb by joelgrimes · · Score: 2

      My phone company is Canadian (Ting). They are available all over the US and they're extremely cheap.

      Are they not available in Canada?

    8. Re:It's dumb by substance2003 · · Score: 2

      Yes they are located in Canada but none of the Canadian carriers will let them buy bandwidth as I recall which is why we can't get this option out here. If the federal government wanted to get competition going, they should force carriers to provide the possibility for companies like Ting to do here what they can do in the US.

    9. Re:It's dumb by epine · · Score: 1

      I'm in BC on Koodo. After being badly overcharged a couple of years ago, I decided to turn off my data modem service until I had recouped the entire overcharge.

      This will take a while, as this is only saving me $5/month (measured against the impossibly small 25 MB/month plan). I must have misunderstood something in the TOS, but after a server crash (the only server in a company just coming out of post-2008 mothballs), just the panicky phone calls from the server room the following week (where it wasn't convenient to use a land line) ended up costing me enough to have paid an unlimited voice and data plan for the entire upcoming year. I got one week for the same price.

      Koodo noticed my unwillingness to run up data charges about a year later.

      Before this happened, back in June 2015, I got a notice that they will now send out data usage notifications in real time when you hit 50% and 90% of your bucket. (But I had only had one data overcharge, and this didn't mean much.)

      Back in April 2017 (offer repeated in November), I was told I could text "SAVE" to Koodo and get 500 MB/month for $10/month, or I could text "YES" to get 250 MB/month for $5/month. (Apparently this is for "additional" data, so I would probably have to pay $5 to activate my modem for something disgustingly paltry, then pay another $5 to obtain the 250 MB limit.)

      Back in August, I got a text from Koodo offering me wireless home phone for $5/month for 12 months (surely there's a giant price jump baked in at the end of the year).

      Around this time I also got a message that my "Tab" (a savings plan toward a new phone purchase) was "retired". I had $105 bucks there, which they have now credited to a one-time future purchase (probably a captive device on awful terms), but I will no longer see 5% of my monthly expenditures credited to this account. Basically a fee hike (had I planned to ever use it).

      On 14 November, I got a text that they gave me 1 GB/month for two months with no charge. (I never turned on my modem.)

      On 5 December, I got a text that I can say goodbye to unexpected data charges, where the new Shock-Free plan will pause your data before you ring up extra charges.

      The other problem is that I'm still using an older Galaxy II X, which hasn't seen a patch for years now. As hardware, it's working just fine.

      So basically, I uninstalled almost every application, and mostly just treat it as a fancy glass flip phone with an annoying tendency to pocket dial. I never did install any applications (other than Google and maybe one Pebble thing) which allowed access to my contacts folder. As a Smartphone, I sometimes use Chrome to browse the internet on trusted connections. And it sometimes plays my podcasts, but mostly I still use an old iPod nano. And I use the camera every so often.

      I'd like to get a larger phone some day, but my self-imposed rule is that the next phone must promise full OS upgrades for three full years, or I'm sticking with my glass flip phone. (I was actually promised Jelly Bean by Koodo at the time I purchased this phone—which was already in beta on other products—and it never materialized. So I'm still on Android 4.0.4.)

      From where I sit (these days I'm mostly a happy homebody), the PC revolution was amazing, the internet revolution was amazing, and the Smartphone revolution was total shit.

      Privacy: fuck you.

      Security: only on a 2- or 3-year planned obsolescence cycle.

      Economic prudence: $80/month for the no-hassle 3-year contract buffet, or you're taking your life into your own hands (with no help from us).

      And get this. The one feature I really love is the ability to put telemarketers on my reject list. In about two years I had added 100 numbers to this list and then Android started to tell me I couldn't add any new numbers without first removing old numbers. But which ones to remove? There's no easy record of which entries are still actively rejecting assholes.

      I've got 1 GB of RAM, and g

    10. Re:It's dumb by Luthair · · Score: 1

      Yep, in an odd twist we do require that cable, fibre and phone line networks be made available wholesale.

      Personally I'd like them to prevent network infrastructure operators from offering services to end users. Then we could have infrastructure companies competing with each other and service companies competing.

    11. Re:It's dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recently moved to SK, from AB, and am using that very same Koodo plan. $48/month. Well, $52 and change after taxes.

      But it is so much worse than you suspect. For those who don't know, Saskatchewan (SK) has a government-owned telecoms company, SaskTel. You're not forced to use them, and there is competition between SaskTel and other companies. Alberta (AB) used to have a government-owned one as well, but it was sold off ("privatized") years ago, because somehow adding middlemen saves the customer money. That company is now called Telus.

      Koodo is owned, in it's entirety, by Telus. Which means that if you're a Koodo customer, you're actually using the Telus network.

      Here's where the 'worse than you suspect' comes in: The $48/mo Koodo plan? That VERY SAME PLAN, in Alberta, one province over, is $110/mo. In the province where Telus owns all the towers, all the hardware, and has THE LOWEST OPERATING COSTS, it's $110. Every month.

      But here in SK? Where they have to compete with SaskTel and have higher operating costs? Where Telus does -not- own the towers, the landlines, the hardware, or FUCK-ALL, they can price it at $48 a month and still presumably make money?

      Yes, they're competing with SaskTel and thus have to price accordingly (Sasktel's plan with identical features is $50/mo), but you don't 'price accordingly' and lose money on every sale without trying to play the walmart card and drive the others out of business. And that won't work in SK, Sasktel isn't going anywhere.

      Fucking greedy bastards, all of them. ..Even Sasktel.

    12. Re:It's dumb by corychristison · · Score: 1

      I see where you're coming from, but I don't think you understand why it's cheaper in SK.

      Telus (as well as Bell) simply leases network capacity from Sasktel within the province of Saskatchewan. They own zero equipment here, and have to do none of the maintenance. I suspect their operating costs are actually lower here.

      All of Sasktel's infrastructure has been paid for with tax payer money over the past 60 years.

      In exchange, Sasktel users utilize Bell owned towers outside of SK, so I'm sure there's some net metering going on there. I'm not sure if they have any agreement with Telus or not.

    13. Re: It's dumb by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      http://www.iphoneincanada.ca/c... My brother told me Rogers is doing a 2 year promo for 10GB plan for $60. A few minutes later, he said Virgin is doing $55 and Koodo is doing $60 with no 2 year limit. You can switch to Koodo with your existing phone even if it is locked to Telus. I'm on $40 for 4GB on Public Mobile but never use that much since Shaw and Telus have so many WiFi hotspots in my town. But I hate that PM has no phone support but Koodo does. I left the $48 Manitoba plan for it and regret it. I think I will change when I get home if I can before my next trip. Your welcome.

  13. Where did they get US broadband numbers from? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I missing something or do the numbers they report for US broadband seem way out of wack?

  14. Depends on where by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Saskatchewan has some of the lowest rates, for example.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  15. Canadians need to be taught by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Socialism just doesnâ(TM)t work.

    1. Re:Canadians need to be taught by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Socialism just doesnâ(TM)t work.

      Neither does your fucking keyboard.

    2. Re: Canadians need to be taught by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      Government owned Sasktel is cheapest, private is most expensive. You're not too bright, eh?

  16. Every time I go to Niagara Falls by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    Rogers Wireless will slam charges in my T-Mobile phone. Had to call T-Mobile to have the charges reversed. Every. single. time. Very very abusive practice.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Every time I go to Niagara Falls by BHS_Turf · · Score: 1

      I live in Victoria BC, and for years, I would roam onto AT&T out of Port Angeles every time I went near the water on that side. I don't know how many bills I had to get sorted before they stopped charging.

    2. Re:Every time I go to Niagara Falls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here, I'm convinced AT&T has installed extra strong towers pointing at Victoria to pull in roaming fees... I get 5/5 bars on AT&T in some spots.

    3. Re: Every time I go to Niagara Falls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats funny, every time im near the water in Port Angeles, I switch to Rogers.

  17. No one "needs" a cell phone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First world problem. No sympathy.

    The world got along for millenia without cell phones.

    Can't afford your cell phone? No problem. Eat Raman noodles or get a second job.

  18. As a Canadian by nightfire-unique · · Score: 4, Funny

    .. I'd like to post a rant, but can't afford the data.

    --
    A government is a body of people notably ungoverned - AC
    1. Re: As a Canadian by TimMD909 · · Score: 1

      There are no data limits in our parents basements. MAKE BASEMENTS GREAT AGAIN!

  19. Still wish we'd get credited back for unused stuff by wardrich86 · · Score: 1

    It's fucking bullshit that they get to have their cake and eat it too. If I go over one month, they get to charge me up the ass for it. But if I don't hit my limit the next month, there's absolutely no credit back. This is fucking bullshit. It should go both ways or no way at all. Fuck 'em.

  20. Data Only by iCEBaLM · · Score: 1

    I signed up for a Voice and 6GB data plan when the iPhone first came to Canada. It cost almost $85/mo (taxes in). It's still cheaper than any comparable plan you can get now.

    I got fed up and did the math. It would actually be cheaper to sign up with GoogleFi in the US, and just roam in Canada.

    So what I do now, is I use a flex data tablet plan. Costs $17 for 3GB, and $10/1GB after that, and I use a VOIP provider for voice and text, which costs less than a dollar a month for the number, and pennies a minute for usage. I would literally have to be talking for 2 weeks straight before I ever hit what my old plan cost. Most months it costs me less than $20.

    1. Re: Data Only by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Same setup here, but $15 per month. With VoIP costs included I'm up to $18 per month or less.

    2. Re:Data Only by CrashNBrn · · Score: 1

      What VOIP provider? Our Vonage bill is $41.58/mos ($27.99 + $13.59 in "Fees and Taxes") - which we barely even use.

    3. Re: Data Only by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      Freephoneline.ca is one time payment. Haven't really experienced any issues, but dealing with sip clients and no dynamic 911, not for me. No phone support, use their forums for help. Free calling list is fairly good. It's good to replace landlines, though.

    4. Re:Data Only by iCEBaLM · · Score: 1

      I use voip.ms. They're awesome for voice, but if you're a texter then you may want to look at other alternatives.

  21. Isn't cell service a RIGHT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why aren't the Canadians providing cell service to every Canadian via a government entity? (sarcasm)

  22. No service here so it's cheap. by bvdp · · Score: 1

    Every time I see one of the articles I thank an Internet god that now of the companies have bothered to bring cell service to my (not remote, but rural) part of Canada.

    1. Re: No service here so it's cheap. by TimMD909 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Watched a good documentary on rural Canadian life called "Letterkenny" the other day...

  23. Still cheap by DogDude · · Score: 1

    Cell phone usage is super super cheap. Like electricity cheap. So cheap that I have long ago stopped looking at the bills.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
  24. So, it's in the middle by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 2

    So, the summary says

    ...confirms that Canada ranks among the top three most costly countries for mobile wireless plans. Comparing the U.K, Italy, France, Australia, Japan, and the U.S....

    As I see it, the phrase "among the top three" means: "third" (because surely if it was the most expensive or the second most they'd say that. First could, of course, also be labelled "among the top three," but you'd just call it first.) And there were six countries compared. So: Third of six is in the middle, not "some of the highest".

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    1. Re:So, it's in the middle by beckett · · Score: 1

      As I see it, the phrase "among the top three" means: "third"

      you can skin a cat many ways. you can pick nits and split hairs.

      this is where the rubber meets the road: i pay $115 for a phone + 1gb of data.

      where i have to work, i don't have a choice. Let me know if you can find a worse plan than this, becuase AFAIK this plan "are some of the highest in the world".

  25. Canada, the most profitable country for ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cell phone providers.
    Turn it around and the article looks positive for carriers :)

  26. Does Canuckda have MVNOs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Iâ(TM)m in the US and I laugh when people say cell phone bills are expensive. Sure, if you go with the main characters. Pick a MVNO and you can pay $20-30 for unlimited talk + text and 1-2GB of data per month. Youâ(TM)re still using the major network with the great coverage, but are paying less than half.

  27. Canadians pay more for everything by boudie2 · · Score: 1

    As long as I can remember just about everything in Canada is 20-30% more than in the U.S.. Sometimes 50% more, it varies as our dollar goes up and down like a yo-yo. Which we expect. The Bell-Rogers-Telus bunch just shove it in a little further.

    1. Re:Canadians pay more for everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      except its not JUST the rate of exchange, there's more taxation as well.

  28. Was true 10 years ago too by Solandri · · Score: 1

    10 years ago I lived in Washington (state) and got a job commuting to Vancouver for work. I looked into getting a Canadian cell phone, and it turned out that adding the Canada roaming option to my U.S. plan was cheaper per minute than any Canadian plan.

  29. Deal on right now in BC/AB/ON by Strider- · · Score: 1

    So just as this was posted, there is a $60/mo promo going on with all the carriers in BC and AB, $60/mo for 10GB data, unlimited nationwide text/talk, BYOD. Some of the carriers (and probably soon all) are also offering it in ON. Get on it while you can.

    --
    ...si hoc legere nimium eruditionis habes...
    1. Re:Deal on right now in BC/AB/ON by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Got any links? I don't see it on the TELUS site for BC.

      I see it on the Rogers site. Virgin is running some other deal. Nothing on Koodoo. Nothing for Bell either.

    2. Re:Deal on right now in BC/AB/ON by Strider- · · Score: 1

      http://www.kodomobile.ca/ / just make usre your location is set to BC or Alberta. Huge threads on this on redflagdeals.
      For most of them you have to either go to the shop or call in, it's a flash sale, and not generally available through their online cart stuff.

      --
      ...si hoc legere nimium eruditionis habes...
    3. Re:Deal on right now in BC/AB/ON by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Got on it a couple years back and grand fathered in to LTE recently. 5GB full speed, and throttled but unlimited otherwise data, nationwide calling, unlimited text for $40 with Freedom. You don't have to get screwed over. You get screwed over if you insist on only dealing with one of the 3 big carriers. You also get screwed over if you insist on paying for the full amount of data you think you might want to use in a month. That is where Freedom is a win for me IMO. If I happen to have a busy month then I have to drop down to just using my data for email, basic surfing and tethering for access to my corporate git repo or whatever. But I know I won't get cut off entirely so I don't panic and buy 2X what I likely need "just in case".

    4. Re:Deal on right now in BC/AB/ON by Strider- · · Score: 1

      The problem is that Freedom's coverage is seriously lacking, and besides they're now owned by shaw, who is just as evil as Telus, Bell, and rogers.

      --
      ...si hoc legere nimium eruditionis habes...
    5. Re:Deal on right now in BC/AB/ON by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're doing it wrong, it is koodomobile.ca

  30. Interesting contrast between Internet and Mobile by cptdondo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I live in Canada as a US expat. US allows ISPs to control the last mile so Comcast and such prohibit any competition for service to your house. Ontario, at least, requires Rogers, Bell to lease their lines to anyone. So I contract with VMedia and get cable with a couple of premium packages and 35 mbit down for about CAD$70 a month, much cheaper than what I was paying in the US ($70 a month for 1.5 mbit down. Really. Try living in Qwest territory.)

    OTOH the US prohibits telcos from owning cell towers, and the cell tower operators must lease to anyone so competition is fierce. As a result there's lots of competition and mobile prices are reasonable. In Ontario, Rogers owns Rogers towers, and no one else can use them. Each telco has to build its own tower network, decreasing competition and driving up prices.

    What the numbers in the report don't show is that in the US you can get family bundles that substantially lower the bill; I have 5 lines and pay about US$120 a month for the service; the first line is $60 and then each additional line is $10. If I was to contract with Rogers, I'd pay CAD$60 PER LINE with no discount. Sure I can share data, but I have to pay full freight for each line.

  31. Bad plans by smallmj · · Score: 1

    After five years of paying 50 CAD for more data and minutes than I ever used in a month, I went to a prepaid plan with minutes and data that don't expire at the end of the month if I pay the $15 base charge (Koodo). I now average about $25 a month in cell costs without being very stingy with my data or minutes.

    My wife uses her phone MUCH less than I do, so she is on a pay as you go plan and spends around $5 a month with no data (speakout7eleven).

    The key is to buy phones outright and not get sucked in to contracts.

    But it is still true that people in other countries with higher population densities, more competition, or more regulation still pay much less than we in Canada, especially for the heavy users.

    --
    ------- Mark
  32. Key Parameters by John.Banister · · Score: 1

    Where the data was actually collected: Canada: Halifax, Montreal, Toronto, Winnipeg, Regina, and Vancouver; United States: Boston, Kansas City, Minneapolis, and Seattle; UK: London; France: Paris; Italy: Rome; Germany: Berlin; Japan: Tolyo.

    Let me guess - The rates were cheaper in the places with higher population density.

  33. French tourists in Canada have a better deal! by flood78 · · Score: 1

    When they say that the price is high because Canada is a big country and few people... I simply answer this:

    French tourists in Canada have a better deal than Canadian themselves!
    So last time I went to France, I went to one of their SIM card vending machine where I bought the SIM card using my Canadian Credit Card and I'm still using it in Canada!

    http://mobile.free.fr/fiche-fo...

    Using Free Mobile, you get a very good deal in France where you can call in more than 100 countries in the world and 100gb data...
    But they get also a pretty good deal in 35 countries!

    For 20€/month (no contract):
    - Unlimited calls/sms/mms in that country and France
    - 25gb data (not as fast as LTE... I get between 2mbit and 4mbit AND 25gb!)
    - You can choose the network. In Canada, I can choose between Bell, Rogers and Telus (Videotron doesn't accept the connection). So when the speed or network reception is not good in one place, I can switch to another network.
    - You can "Pause" it by downgrading to the 2€/month deal

    That means that my mother, who also kept her Free's sim card, can call me for no extra cost even if we are anywhere within those 35 countries
    That means also that if I go to USA, I also get this deal for no extra cost

    The only thing that cost much more is the Toll Free number. So I just ask them for their "not Toll Free number" so I can call them... for free! :P

    Enjoy!

    1. Re: French tourists in Canada have a better deal! by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      So you get a Canadian area code with this? Otherwise, it's crappy for any local in Canada as it would be long distance to France.

    2. Re: French tourists in Canada have a better deal! by flood78 · · Score: 1

      If everybody do this, then who cares :P
      But yes, it's true that I don't get a local number. So what I'm doing is I just configure a voip number with a service like Twilio, Anveo or Plivo just to name those 3... and forward the call to my French number!
      With all the saving, I can afford this little extra fee and I can call them backup if I think the call will be long.

      But the point is not this... the point is that as a Canadian, I cannot get a package like this! And it's not the number that is expensive, Twilio rent it for $1cad/month.
      It was to demonstrate that all the reasons we are given for high price are just plain lies! A representative from Virgin Mobile Canada (own by Bell) called me and asked me some question about my service I had with them... I told her all that. She was so surprised... she said that she understand why I was upset, that she wrote a report about it and that she had nothing else to ask or propose me as nothing can beat that.

      When I tell this to people, they all get upset... for few minutes then they just continue.
      So when I asked on Facebook why do people pay so much, the only good answer was this

      "why not?!"

      He then added: Yeah... why not as people are not offended more than that and are willing to pay so much anyway.

  34. Not all the carriers fault... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check out the quarterly results for each of them, its actially a fairly
    low margin business thanks to a) government spectrum fees, i.e a massive hidden tax and b) less buying power due to being much smaller than the big boys down south and in europe. the likes of ericsson are raping us blind because they can. in europe you have conglomerates like vodafone which are not legal here due to foreign ownership regulations (socialism is expensive eh?). perhaps it is time for the government to do away with the protectionist laws so we can sell our telcos
    off and get decent buying power from the equipment vendors? you also see strategic movements such as consolidated access networks happening, bellus, rogers and tbaytel/mtsa/videotron, also, no wonder bell wanted to buy out mtsa, i.e to scuttle the deal they have with rogers! yes there is much room
    for efficiency at the carriers, believe me. but there is a lot more to this than just evil telco c level types. most of the problem would be solved by relaxing regulation on ownership.

    1. Re: Not all the carriers fault... by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      Can you use specific numbers, because my impression has always been that the big three are making more and more profit than ever before? I half believed the ongoing high prices were because government employees are on a volume discount price, so they don't get reamed like the rest of us. The other is that since they are more and more profitable, they are in a shit load of mutual funds and stuff.

    2. Re: Not all the carriers fault... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its all public information since they are public companies, example for Rogers, $10B in revenue but only $1.2B in profit.

    3. Re:Not all the carriers fault... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because that worked SO WELL for nortel.

  35. Regulatory, corruption, etc... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Power bills in Canada can be insanely expensive because of massive mismanagement over decades, and paying back money borrowed over that time. Hell, the billing system for Ontario basically didn't work for over a year. Some utilities in Canada have some great linemen working for them, but I would not trust whoever runs their offices to screw in a light bulb.

    http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/...

  36. Report pricing for Australia is completely wrong.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I Canadian dollar is roughly the same as an Australian dollar. The prices the report claims are completely wrong. 15g a month, unlimited calls and messages can be had for 35$ and yet the rport lists 70$

  37. At least they have cell service! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quit your bitching! Similar areas in Russia, China & even Finland DO NOT have any cell service...

  38. Hyperbole: #5 of 8 isn't so bad. by Fringe · · Score: 1

    They only looked at eight countries total, including the U.S. and Canada. No others as sparsely populated as Canada. It's a bit like breathlessly claiming that they're below average half the time!

  39. Collusion by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    The problem is Canada is there is very little competition, and what does exist seems to actively collude and price fix (depending on your definitions I suppose). From my simple perspective, just go to Bell or Rogers (or one of their subsidiaries) websites. You'll see the exact same plans, for the exact same prices. The new player Wind, might actually shake some things up, however they have a pretty limited market share and is only really available is certain markets anyway. I am not surprised in the least that Canada has the most expensive rates. While I think the CRTC tries every now and again, they are full of former industry shills, and get bullied around half the time by the active industry. What is even worse is the roaming rules. I know I went overseas a number of years ago with a large mixed nationality group, and they were all aghast at what I paid, and what my limitations were. Basically I couldn't use my phone at all without Wifi someplace. Now that said, with the new unlocking measures being put into place in 2018 at the behest of the CRTC, that should at least help in that regard.

    However even to the point of leasing lines (which is internet not mobile but you mentioned it), there was a case brought before the CRTC in Ontario of TekSavvy an independent ISP and Bell, about what Bell charged for the leased line, and the throttling of said line. As I recall TekSavvy lost, where basically the Bell argument was that they provide shitty expensive service to their customers, so if Teksavvy were to use their lines, they would be obligated to provide the same shitty expensive service...

    Anyway as I said, it is slowly getting better in Canada, but it is sloooow, likely because of no real competition and the few companies that do exist fight the CRTC tooth and nail, lobby government, etc...

  40. Re:Interesting contrast between Internet and Mobil by rhazz · · Score: 1

    Exactly this. Mobile prices also vary significantly by province, due to varying states of regulation making competition more viable. Saskatchewan has some arms-length crown-owned providers which produces a competitive market with the big 3. Over there prices are in the area of $45/mo for phone+5GB, versus the exact same provider/plan in Ontario being $60/mo.

    And for all the idiots talking about population density? Saskatchewan = 1.8 persons/km, Ontario = 14.1 persons/km. The difference is competition and regulatory capture.