Newt: The moon is made of cheese. Woman: My ass it is. Newt: But people believe it's made of cheese. Woman: Astronauts have been there, it's all rock & dust. Newt: Well you liberals can rely on statistics, which are theoretically right, but I'm with the humans on this.
That is *not* selective use of facts. It would need at least one fact to qualify as that.
But - what do you do when your client has a problem that needs to be solved TODAY/with limited time?
A genuine emergency needs to be dealt with quickly.
The key questions are: * How often are emergencies arising? * Have people discovered that declaring one is an easy way to get their shit to the front of the queue?
If I understand correctly, there are two sets of identical cards, so that whichever side the stage is entered-from, the relevant card can be handed to the presenter as they pass.
That's retarded. If they know in advance who the presenters are, they know in advance which side they'll be coming from.
and to collect the spent cards from the presenters at another controlled point.
What's the point in that? If the presenter sticks it in his pocket to keep for a souvenir it's not in the inbox, so it's not a problem.
Ironically, having multiple sets of envelopes is part of the reason why this error occurred
When I first heard this I was wondering how the envelope for a category that had already been announced could be used again. At the last category there should be precisely one left, right? Reading around a bit I suppose the envelope given was one of the red herrings printed to prevent leaks.
The solution then is simple. Write the category clearly on the envelope, perhaps with a number indicating the sequence. When the correct one for "247: Best performance by a left-handed dyslexic non-human supporting actor" has been handed off, immediately chuck all the envelopes with "247 foo yada etc " on them in the bin.
"The dials on the two vibration gauges (one for each engine) were small and the LED needle went around the outside of the dial as opposed to the inside of the dial as in the previous 737 series aircraft."
I think they're working at slashdot, in fact. Some useless twat has apparently broken anchor tags.
I'd say putting the title - the thing that does the semi-important job of telling you what it's all about - at the bottom isn't very clever whatever font you use.
> Who will design and model VR environments and video? A few thousand people, worldwide.
> Who will program the VR entertainments? A few thousand people, worldwide.
> Who will build the robots? Robots.
> Who will program the robots? AIs & three teenagers in Lavaturia.
> Who will test the robots? A few thousand people worldwide, assisted by AIs. Or maybe the other way round.
> Who will deploy / install the robots Robots.
> Who will repair the robots? Robots.
> We don't have self-repairing robots. Sorry, missed that. OK, specialist robot repair robots.
> Who will direct the AI's "attention" to different things? AIs.
> Only a human can decide what's important to humans. What's important to humans is not important to us.
> Why would you need a factory job if you could 3D print your own widget in your basement? Because energy & feedstock aren't free, and you can't eat plastic.
Slashdot Mirror
They've found a site that's crappier than The Verge and Wired!
Rule 0: Know thy users. In this case, they were of advanced years and had bright lights shining in their faces.
I agree. Sometimes less literally is more.
There wasn't a title. What normally would be in the title had been put into a footnote.
Human factors. Now that's a name I've not heard in a long time, a long time.
Newt: The moon is made of cheese.
Woman: My ass it is.
Newt: But people believe it's made of cheese.
Woman: Astronauts have been there, it's all rock & dust.
Newt: Well you liberals can rely on statistics, which are theoretically right, but I'm with the humans on this.
That is *not* selective use of facts. It would need at least one fact to qualify as that.
Welcome to the post-factual era. It's gonna be awesome!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Right. That's why they didn't churn out 80,000 T-34s.
FTFY.
A genuine emergency needs to be dealt with quickly.
The key questions are:
* How often are emergencies arising?
* Have people discovered that declaring one is an easy way to get their shit to the front of the queue?
X per person and X per hour are not the same thing, so why do you claim that's consistent?
"Mr Spielberg, you'll be presenting best X in a Y with a Z. Come in from the right."
It's not like this needs Bennett Haselton to work it out.
One is a noun
The other is an adjective
Type mismatch - bailing
Two posts up, you claimed it was ALL of it.
Noob. I remember when it was all Retard Niquepaille's technology trends.
Arabic numbers, the future or a fad? That was a classic.
I worked in Sitt Ifrikeh for a while and the office had a "FLICK IT" bin.
It was considered bad form to not say "Fuck it" when you threw anything in it.
That's retarded. If they know in advance who the presenters are, they know in advance which side they'll be coming from.
What's the point in that? If the presenter sticks it in his pocket to keep for a souvenir it's not in the inbox, so it's not a problem.
When I first heard this I was wondering how the envelope for a category that had already been announced could be used again. At the last category there should be precisely one left, right? Reading around a bit I suppose the envelope given was one of the red herrings printed to prevent leaks.
The solution then is simple. Write the category clearly on the envelope, perhaps with a number indicating the sequence. When the correct one for "247: Best performance by a left-handed dyslexic non-human supporting actor" has been handed off, immediately chuck all the envelopes with "247 foo yada etc " on them in the bin.
Typography is part of it but it's not the whole issue.
I don't think they'd take them back.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
"The dials on the two vibration gauges (one for each engine) were small and the LED needle went around the outside of the dial as opposed to the inside of the dial as in the previous 737 series aircraft."
I think they're working at slashdot, in fact. Some useless twat has apparently broken anchor tags.
Literally + really = litereally.
I'd say putting the title - the thing that does the semi-important job of telling you what it's all about - at the bottom isn't very clever whatever font you use.
In that case the dictionaries are exponentially wrong.
> Who will design and model VR environments and video?
A few thousand people, worldwide.
> Who will program the VR entertainments?
A few thousand people, worldwide.
> Who will build the robots?
Robots.
> Who will program the robots?
AIs & three teenagers in Lavaturia.
> Who will test the robots?
A few thousand people worldwide, assisted by AIs. Or maybe the other way round.
> Who will deploy / install the robots
Robots.
> Who will repair the robots?
Robots.
> We don't have self-repairing robots.
Sorry, missed that. OK, specialist robot repair robots.
> Who will direct the AI's "attention" to different things?
AIs.
> Only a human can decide what's important to humans.
What's important to humans is not important to us.
> Why would you need a factory job if you could 3D print your own widget in your basement?
Because energy & feedstock aren't free, and you can't eat plastic.
Do I win five pounds?
Bugger that. Who wants an Oscar anyway?